The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About8.c. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment - Dakota County HRA and M & H, Inc � CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ` EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION City Council Meeting Date: January 19, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment- AGENDA SECTION: Dakota County HRA and M &H Inc. Old Business PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness, Community Development Dir. AGENDA�� ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution, Current and Proposed Land APPROVED BY: Use Map and Housing policies text excerpt. Applicant: Mark Ulfers of the Dakota County HRA Location: West of Biscayne Ave., '/z mile north of 145th Street West Property Owner(s): E. B. McMenomy Area in Acres: 7.5 acres(including west %z of Biscayne Ave.) Overall Density(potential): 12 dwelling units per acre Comp. Guide Plan Desig: Public/Institutional (P/I) Requested Land Use Desig: High Density Residential (HR) Current Zoning: Agriculture Requested Zoning: R-3, Medium Density Residential and R-2,Moderate Density Residential Planning Commission Action: Recommendation of Approval (unanimous). SUMMARY This amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan is connected to a revised housing proposal by the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The housing concept involves 46 rental townhomes located on the southerly half of the site at a density of 6.13 dwelling units per acre, slightly higher than the maximum 6 du/ac. typical of R-2, Moderate Density standards. The idea is to treat the development as a lower density apartment project in contrast to a higher density townhouse project with variances. The townhouses would conform with multiple family(R-3) standards, but would not conform with typical attached housing (R-2) standards. Therefore, the southerly half of the site would be guided for High Density Residential (HR) use, and the northerly half would be Urban Residential (UR), allowing up to six dwelling units per acre. Previously, the Comprehensive Guide Plan designated the property for Public/Institutional use in anticipation of the development of a cemetery for the Islamic Community of Minnesota. Staff is providing two options for consideration: A. Amend the Comp Guide Plan to include UR- Urban Residential and HR- High Density Residntial; or B. Amend the Comp Guide Plan to include UR only. Since the current plan has the property guided for public and institutional uses, the"work in progress"plan for 2020 proposes urban residential use for the property. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution to amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan changing the land use designation for the 16 acre parcel west of Biscayne Avenue, north of the National Guard OMS property (1) to HR- High Density Residential and UR-Urban Residential. -or- (2) to UR-Urban Residential. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: w DP"tro� A ' CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 1999- A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDNiENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN WHEREAS,the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an � application from Dakota County Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and M&H, Inc. for approval of an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan changing the land use designation for a 16 acre parcel located west of Biscayne Avenue, '/z mile north of 145`'' Street West, north of the National Guard OMS site in Rosemount, Minnesota from Public/Institutional use to a combination of High Density and Urban Residential; and WHEREAS, on December 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the land use designations and adopted a motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to the City Council. WHEREAS, on January 19, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the application by Dakota County HRA and M&H, Inc. for an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan changing the land use designation for the 16 acre parcel located west of Biscayne Avenue, '/2 mile north of 14�`'' Street West, north of the National Guard OMS site in Rosemount, Minnesota, from Public/Institutional to a combination of High Density for the south half(450 feet) and Urban Residential for the remainder of the property, all subject to formal approval by the Metropolitan Council. ADOPTED this 19`'' day of January, 1999, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. Cathy Busho, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: + OP�[1�t•� � � CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 1999- A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Dakota County Housing & Redevelopment Authority(HRA) and M&H, Inc. for approval of an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan changing the land use designation for a 16 acre parcel located west of Biscayne Avenue, 'h mile north of 145"' Street West, north of the National Guard OMS site in Rosemount, Minnesota from Public/Institutional use to a combination of High Density and Urban Residential; and WHEREAS, on December 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the land use designations and adopted a motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to the City Council. WHEREAS, on January 19, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the application by Dakota County HRA and M&H, Inc. for an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan and further requested a possible change to all Urban Residential. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan changing the land use designation for the 16 acre parcel located west of Biscayne Avenue, %2 mile north of 145`� Street West, north of the National Guard OMS site in Rosemount, Minnesota, from Public/Institutional to Urban Residential, subject to formal approval by the Metropolitan Council. ADOPTED this 19`h day of January, 1999,by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. Cathy Busho, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: � � :� . � ��. ��,� ' �� 'f,,�:. . • - �r � •�'�-�:■ � �r�.�rr � 1 ... , � T . �= ^ ,�is.� .f,� = A, � 1 I.� � . -s� �c� :►�:. : �� ,� - . , , �� , _ ■ � � � a �► � , n � � � � . ■ �� /.!� �. � � � `�� , "' != �`p1� � :�� _ ,� . ., \ . .�., •`.. �' • � � �� ' � �i�i I�t -.\_ �� . 1 � � � � _�r:��■.� _ � �! � ■ ►l_ ��_• � .�,:�.•�• � , -��.r.� L. . __. _ !� � --� ` - ,� ♦ 7��,,, :�r/1�� , _ :� L � , � ; ..�un� ,.... . � ��- �uln1�� ?�� ---� i� � .�_ - . �,�� . . - � .�.... ...�_ =� ,._ � �, ... ' /7 �� c� �� E 1 � � \�� ' ' � t � , - �l�Pg� �J • , ,� � ff. � � ,� _ � � , � _�.� J.� � � r o -� r.`' �/,� ._� � � , � , ` +p�� .i . � � �� = ; ,-s ' . `_- � ,%t • ' , _�y.��.p�..��--�` �� •�� r ' � _��, `' ,� ' ' •�!. � ' ' ' � . � • �� •', � � �. � 1. �{�' �� , _ ,i � + �i// � � �� I � �� • •�� (� ' � ��•-� . � � ��' , / _� � � � nrn ��l�11 I'um�u�i� �/ �� '� � a ' a,�� —_ __ fq� � ��I�l�f��ua �nn�na■ - �/ �--c�, � ♦ //�+�s amtuu� �t � = ��' w� � �//�1� ...� � • - �n, =' .,...•��..".::: s. .-': �f�� %- ii� �M �1 u��i'i�, lillli/llllllU ��lt= a �(/►��/� � r' '� � tlt��a��: ■ I��a�/�lfl! 11�!(I�Is ::••�.�•uC • �� ='a/��r��r I "•�i�tn� tlf�1111Uillqt111�: <:f1: =� � s - ��: �. � � �/�-�� =-� - � ■ �1 �= ' �n . . � .� � • ' � � ' • � � �a � -��/1/��1�1!/ � � "�ll�= VI�/��1�U � • ��-Iiuu��i/11� ��asa��ni !�'•��.= ��_ . ::��l�f/��/�l// � nu.�■,■■■c _- - == =� � '� = unitU�i1� na�n�nu �:..%=�� - i � � � �� qU��f�1l� � ■u��i��: � �� ' �� " � � �•`--'•'7:./��is.�� =/ / �� '�� 1%� �� ' ,. �� =� �� '�� !, � • �/ ��t�� 1�� ''� ��1� � � ��11� �� 1111��I�f/1111/\� � ,�/�//1�1�� Z Z _ _ -- ,r- — — ;� ■I , ''•� � _ • • � �� . ___J '"'.,.' ; .;: .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ��i i 1 __ .....,....., _ �--.,� � �.,: � � � �r �. �r. � � ' .. ri�'Irr 1 l ,.;�'':.�.., , „ a . . � �1�,�. L - .f,� : A, ► � I� ! -s t� :1►;. :��' , � ��. - � i �!� _ ■ ii � � . . � �. / �. �► � � . 1 � ■ �� .l� j. ��■ _ '� �■ !: ��p1 � :..� � — i � �. : �.�'• t ��_;� � -� . . � �! :� � , � <<.:,�.,, ' � � � - . .t .�..� � ��:� � ■ ►l_ ��_. \, .�:,.•,• � _ _. _ , -�.l...n � _ _ . _ ,'.''� � -� � �L7a■� :�Irl�� 1 . :1► � ,�, , � `11/�� 7�!=='-• ; � � � .�. _ � --- - _ . 1� • - . .`- ---y--- - -- � -- ;R�'', ,, , ._ . /Y - c s� ��` � ! � �J , ��. ' ' ' t � , �� • � ,` � /�/ ` � ,, �`__ � � � ' • , r� � � z � �� T� `� l/� �_ ' '= �� ► I - �) �,��i � � � . . . � � � � � � _J r � . � . , • ' • __y..._.o--v--,es•+�1 /: s '��•!1i� . . y , -- \ � • � ..� _ �' _�.��'� ��' '`.� � � , � • /,,� � • -/ - _ � � /d' �, ` �� r � I� � � �i%� s ' � /� � l • ,.. / . . �� I � � // � '��i . � /i , / i� �� • , =�lt��/Iltu`�... _ _ '� �l ' �� 1 � = // � � �p� � rn�11��ua a�anan� �, �� . ��-' � � � /fM�� nuop � �� /�, , �i1� �� 1� /�� / • -i t)�' _ ■ �� Qt/11sf��ii/atYuras �� •-i i'� �.'I I,. /�• �1�I un, .� uu,a►��a �mmmnm �■a�= Y, 1��-�/ � M'�� a�►�s�na; =.7� usaas�tui� t�il�ut. ::_�.uc _ �; I��a��n�• ;��a'=��1t/1 tftttittuttlll� _=J�'=If = . �� : � � d�� :U/na�tllu.� �r i/ � ,�� c`�= =" tnu� �c = �� . � - . ��ii/� �r�a�uua� � t�m � • � v�uauiu� _ �a� •��i4l1f1If[11/ � �n� - .i �� w�— �� T�liOl[Uff// � ��ttt�tti��s ... � �=� / -� • 'w'�� [!/llltl�il� i a��s��'�r'= "_� - � � �� f��1lfU1)�! /-��:!: ///ii.�� N-� / � � � �� ! �•'� � s i`O=� M�- �� .- �� : ;�Lit111t : • �� .� f�f�� .. � � �IJq�1�1� � � Qlp �� ✓ Il\��i�Ip�tlfl/�f � ,��lf/i��/► �� -/i� Z Z _ '=- - �- -- —� �v �: �1 , � � ��r- � , . ,, ..� - . . � �� ',- ,: ,��,��. �� ♦ / � -= ■..■n.■s.n■. - ` �� . ��i / a�l � � ` � a �'��If . �: 1� HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS � zone� land. An additional ten (10) acres could be OBJECTIVES rezoned for multi-family development by the year It is the objective of the City to: 2000 based on current housing projections. By the 1. provide housing in appropriate proportions for y�ZO10, the City projects that an additional $S people of all incomes, age and life styles; acres could be absorbed by multi-family 2. create and maintain quality living environments development. (See Tables V(A)-2 and V(A)3) that are compatible with the natural environment and the rural character of Rosemount; Areas for these units aze not desianated on the land 3. upgrade and maintain the existina housina stock; use plan. Their location will be based on the degree �d to which individual projects meet adopted locational 4. strengthen neiahborhoods and protect them from criteria. It is the City's intent to discourage lar;e adverse influences (excessive traffic,junk cars, multi-family concentrations and to encouraae nuisances). projecu that are unique, properly located, fill market niches, entail a higher level of amenity and/or satisfy a need for affordable housing. P�`-'4N�L"EME1V�l�' Multi-family housina exceedina a density of six The plan establishes three categories of residential units per acre will be considered with a density not land use termed High Density Residential (HR), to exceed 12 units per gross acre only if it meets all Urban Residential (UR), and Rural Residential of the following locational criteria: (RR). Each is intended to offer a distinctly different 1. Located within MUSA; lifestyle to satisfy the needs and desires of a diverse 2. Does not require the use of existina local population. Each is intended to be planned to create residential streeu for access; � neiahborhood cohesiveness and identity, to promote 3. Is compatible with adjoining uses; and neighborhood conservation and long term residency, 4. Represents a logical transition from higher to and to protect the natural environment and lower intensity land uses or provides sufficient incorporate it as an element of human habitation. on-site open space to effectively buffer dissimilar uses or is adjacent to a permanent High Density Residential (SR) open space that buffers dissimilar uses or is � High Density Residential development is intended to adjacent to the CBD or represents a logical be permitted only within MUSA. It has a maximum eztension of existing multi-fam.ily zonina. density of twelve (12) units per acre (eacept within the CBD) and will include the full ran;e of attached Density bonuses for up to eighteen (18) units per multi-family rental and owner occupie�housing gross acre aze intended to be considered for projects rangina from townhouses to apartmenu. While the outside of the CBD if there is a provision for more City has a rather substantial amount of land already ��ive landscaping, outdoor group open space, used and/or zoned for multi-family housing, some of �door and outdoor recreational amenities, high which is designated on the land use plan, it is the Quality design standards, energy conservation and/or City's intent to be circumspect about where and it satisfies unique and special market niches and under what circumstances it will approve additional needs for affordable housing. Within the CBD � hiaher density housing. densities up to forty (40) units per acre may be considered for seniors housing providing such It is the City's intent to lim.it high density housing �enities. (six units per acre or higher)to twenty percent (20�) of its future housing stock. The City Urban Residential (IJR) cunently has eleven percent (11°b) or 392 units of Urban Residential land use areas are located entirely its housing stock in multi-family housing. There is within MUSA and are serviced by public sewer and - twenty_ni.ne (29) acres of vacant R-3 (multi-family) water utilities. This designation correlates with the /'rrv.�,r Dr,cr��nrrwrr SECiioN V(Al-� Ck7I'OAFR 1��