The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2.b. 2020 Comprehensive Plan Modifications CITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR DISCUSSION COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DATE: November 10, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: 2020 Comprehensive Plan Modifications AGENDA NO. PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner �. . ATTACHMENTS: Expanded housing text, Map revision The Mayor and staff have met with Met Council member John Conzemius and Met Council staff regarding the status of the Cities Comprehensive Plan. As well, a subsequent meeting was held to discuss the substance of the revised Comprehensive Plan. There are three primary areas of the plan that are being revised: 1. The Urban Residential area north of 135"' Street will include 300 acres as Rural Residential between the Stonebridge additions and STH 3, north of White Lake Acres. The remaining 640 acres east of Bacardi Avenue would be guided as Urban Residential with development occumng as a future phase, most likely post 2020. The land between Keegan Lake and Bacardi Avenue will be Transition Residential. Met Council staff will accommodate the Rural Residential use if ghost platting for future redevelopment is included with the subdivision process. 2. Availability of land for attached and multi-family housing will be further quantified in the text and indications of otp ential housing areas (primarily in the Business Park)will be shown on the map as asterisks. 3. Undeveloped land guided for Industrial use in the Koch buffer area and Mississippi River Critical Corridor will be reguided for Agricultural use. Following the original Council direction, staff has worked with the Met Counci� staff to produce a modified 2020 Comprehensive Plan that will be mutually acceptable. With Council concurrence, staff will then prepare the modifications in final form for Council review on November 16, 1999. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Provide staff with Council discussion and direction as needed regarding the proposed 2020 Comprehensive Plan modifications. COUNCIL ACTION: 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update 3.3 Housing Plan 3.3.1 Background The 1990 Census showed that Rosemount had a total of 2,779 households; the 1995 estimate is 3,783. The estimated housing mix in 1995 was 82% single family and 18% multi-family. By the end of 1998, the City estimated a housing mix of 77°/o single-family and 23% multi-family units. Of all housing units in 1990, nearly 20% were renter occupied. The City has experienced moderate housing growth as follows: 1970-79 = 50 units per year average 1980-89 = 125 units per year average 1990-98 = 200 units per year average Due to Rosemount's location, the pace of development is expected to increase for the following 10-year period with a modest increase in the last 10-year period. The average rate of 270 housing units per year from 2000-2020 is shown as follows: 2000-09 = 250 units per year average 2010-19 = 285 units per year average 3.3.2 The Future The City desires to keep single-family detached housing as the dominant housing type with all housing at an overall (net) density near 3.0 dwelling units per acre. This will be done by establishing a target level of 72 percent of all new housing units as single family detached compared to 28 percent as multi-family housing (twinhomes, townhomes, condominiums, apartments, and mobile homes). RosemounYs prominent rural residential areas in the northwest portion of the City will retain that status without municipal sewer and water services. The City is designating 300 acres contiguous with two existing areas that total 55 lots west of Akron Avenue and north of County Road 38 for rural residential areas. Some smaller rural lots east of Highway 3 and west of Bacardi Avenue may require municipal service within the planning time period 1995-2020. Multi-family housing includes two dominant types: "urban attached" for townhomes less than 6 dwelling units per acre and "high density" for condominiums and apartments near 10 dwelling units per acre. Urban attached housing may be placed at locations that make good transitions between detached housing and other more intensive land uses. High-density housing is targeted to three locations: in the commercial downtown area, within a future redevelopment site formerly known as Brockway Glass, and south of County 45 City of Rosemount Road 42 either adjacent to or on the technical college property (student housing only). Multi-family housing will be a higher percentage of all housing units in the first half of the planning period due to their close proximity to the core commercial area of Rosemount. This type of housing will decrease after 2010 due to land proximity closer to the rural edge of Rosemount as shown below, which identifies the mix of all new housing units from 1995 to 2019. � The City has committed to establishing housing mix goals in accordance with the � Livable Communities Act. Figure 3.3-A illustrates the distribution of Single and � Multi-family housing mix through 2020. Ending at 2009, the distribution of the 1 projected housing mix averages 59% Single-Family and 41% Multi-family, which exceeds the adopted Livable Communities Goals of 65% and 35%, respectively. The projected overall mix of 72% and 28% through the year 2019 reflects the ��t`-'"� current values of the community. Changing demographics and market influences � may cause the long-term mix proportion to align more closely with the ongoing � trends. � Currently, development is occurring on land that is more conducive for higher � densities, primarily because of proximity to established transportation corndors ; and commercial districts. The period beginning in 2010 anticipates land ; developing in remote areas which are comparatively isolated from transportation � corridors and have a higher degree of environmental and land use transitional ; sensitivity. t � ;-- Begin-End : Single Multi- Famil '. Fami[ 1995-1999 55% 45% 2000-2004 54% 46% 2005-2009 68% 32% 2010-2014 81% 19% 2015-2019 94% 6% 1995-2019 72% 28% Figure 3.3-A 3.3.3 Land Use Categories The residential land uses are divided into four general categories, including Rural Residential (RR), High Density Residential (HR), Urban Residential (UR), and Transition Residential (TR). Each category is intended to offer different housing opportunities to satisfy a diverse market need within the regional population. These four residential categories are defined as follows: Rural Res'tdential (RR) This category is intended to have a distinct rural character with single family detached housing, located outside of the MUSA. Corresponding land features include the distinct northwest portion 46 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update of the City with rolling topography, upland hardwood trees and moraine wetlands that match the development standards for a rural estate lifestyle. The Rural Residential areas maintain a minimum gross density of 1.0 dwelling unit per 5 acres and a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. Due to agricultural preservation needs in other parts of the City, this density standard will continue to apply in Rosemount despite its difference with the Metropolitan Council's density objective of 1.0 dwelling unit per 10 acres. Urban Residential (UR) This category is intended to be located entirely within the MUSA and serviced by public sewer and water. This designation correlates to the developed and developing residential neighborhoods west of Highway 3 as well as the planned areas east of Highway 3. A range of single family detached and attached housing will be accommodated within this category at average net densities of 2.4 for detached and 5.8 dwelling units per acre for attached housing (twinhomes and townhomes). Attached housing within the Urban Residential areas will be located in logical transition areas from higher to lower intensity land uses, at the edge of a defined neighborhood, and/or planned to sufficiently integrate within a large planned development area. High DetlSity ReSiderttlal (HR) This category is intended to provide housing types (condominiums and apartments) that meet the needs of renters, smaller households, and senior citizens. An average net density of 10 dwelling units per acre is expected for this type of housing. A fairly small number of High-Density housing is planned between 1995-2020 at 10-15 units per year, or 315 total units. This represents a modest 5.0 percent of all new housing units constructed within that planning time period. The City intends to discourage large concentrations of high density housing over 100 total units in any one location. Three separate locations are designated for High Density Residential: in the commercial downtown area, within a future redevelopment area formerly known as the Brockway Glass site, and south of County Road 42 either adjacent to or on the technical college property (student housing only). Transition Residential (TR) This category is a new one for the comprehensive plan, although it closely resembles the former Planned Development Residential (PD-R) category. It is intended to provide unique housing opportunities in areas that are environmentally sensitive and are adjacent to the City's established Rural Residential areas. Two major areas include the 500+ acre Kelley Trust property and a smaller area north of 135th Street and east of Highway 3. Another smaller area includes rural residential lots of 0.5 to 5 acres in Birchview Terrace and Le Foret Additions. The City will allow the clustering of housing units in areas in order to avoid impacts to natural features, allowing smaller lots within the clustered areas at a maximum net density of 2.4 dwelling units per 47 ~ City of Rosemount acre for single-family detached and 5.8 for single-family attached housing, while maintaining an average net density of 2.0 dwelling units per acre. Some of these areas will also get city sewer only if warranted based on need and cost factors. (See the Transition Residential District section 3.3.10 at the end of this chapter.) Business Park (BP) This category is primarily intended to provide land for office and clean "high tech" or light industrial use. However, Multiple Family residential use of up to 10 dwelling units per acre is allowed by Planned Unit Development. Business Park land available for residential use is either adjacent to existing or guided residential uses, or contains natural amenities or features that may provide opportunities for multiple family or attached housing with high standards of architectural and site design, which effectively mitigates potential land use �� incompatibility. As of 1999, 121 attached housing units are approved with another 36 imminently anticipated on Business Park land. Redevelopment of the Brockway plant for residential use in addition to � other suitable Business Park land could yield several hundred additional � attached or multi-family housing units. � Agriculture — Research (AR) Multiple family housing is anticipated in the vicinity of the Dakota County Technical College. While this project � has not been planned, the City acknowledges the most appropriate � location for this housing to be south of the campus on the University of � Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station. Housing in this area may ; serve the University as well as the Technical College. Therefore, the j anticipated form of the development would consist of apartments rather ; than dormitories. � �---- 3.3.4 Housing Assumptions The City's housing estimates are based on the following assumptions. These assumptions are based on current housing demand, the amount of land available for residential development, and the City's core values and goals. • Housing Mix. The mix of housing units from 1995-2020 will be 72% single family detached and 28% multi-family (compared to 62%/38% targeted by the Metropolitan Council). • Residential Portion. Future residential development from 1995-2020 as a percentage of all land uses will be 60% (compared to 52% by the Metropolitan Council). • Housing Density. Future net density for all housing types combined from 1995-2020 will be 2.9 dwelling units per acre, or 2.9 du/ac (compared to 3.0 by the Metropolitan Council). 48 1 - --------- \ =M =1" --. .. um4 ............... "Am i_imm••••••••••••••• _ . \i --4-4-1t,„„ wilmur-mimm y aw upD sil 1priam_ 1111111tmeri ••••._A. ,7 -..so% -k tp, 'MI I i b •- ::;tD ' lib ‘11% , ..! . 1,1 ,...1 IRENE& •Biaroi gli? tg RiLl _ ..". ml I rr47 ' V .. ILI , -et utioiAvti‘ ii, • k__ Imm...”. 4./kli 4--; . ' deriii ....ell, I ir-- -sr" IIIIEWORMIZIoNtle j.-4. 0 at&Wig won IMME=II. M. 1 rig.ratiOirgiliglitriling II:" \ "I ''4741- -:11 M. k I 1111PAIIIIIMILONOtillihnI 114110191Mill% 111/11-M 1 UDI ilMrk. RS i- imill ;,--a,,:4;,-44cAl.'...: r-,77,:--1 ITIOra— -------0,4 , IL 12 nal. 111111011...p I. ftrM.tit. 4 I i 1 / ,...p'''' ''"---=-L-%":--=',=•-•.,.. ' '•i';i:''''7!.'W''''', e,-- if- V"'. .itniIl . i --- N \ k *ffill a -,----''''-- \ 1 -- - 1 , MA Witt":.Afte4'' " m i ii, .a..„, Oil:O.,..•,.7'.-1-s-,- ' # W \ _ :le:10//awl Of- II i t liv,,7,a/44-• $01,74147;,:,,,,,,..f.- - , N ,,,,,,, --- .w_„1--tig 41,10,7-v4sir tk-i't 7..,,ititiim.e),_,-'1,-..s. I _ / !!0'-Ne---4,17 ' miiii"Ittkriiii ...1: !,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, W, /,,--4, m•Erwgt c , f4- 41.4 tal..„ ,,-_-4tAkt. 11;:Lifillka grigigumil nu! ,..// Ar LT-Irii...10 ! •Ilium,,7:17..5- 1 re ivewrit.proNsw .., - 4.711111 iirmini N111_111111 I" Or il t.-..1' —,,, -- -- --,w42,41, To:,,,, y , ..:;,,;- "-:,,,-;',%,,,,W. C.S.A.H.NO.42 1 ';'-'4.‘ai*-:'t• ..,-- -!j-4:0'4, err iri ,-(11d,inkiik II' ,.....esei 14 dr. il,,,,,,,,,,......,, ' A°-:'-'4;-!1 -4firetNia 'r:•'.. -4*,:t14'.‘1.1-',' 1 i 11.1M:' * 71 _ ./..47 , ,--4-Wit,•:•::-Wc., 411›.,:..1.1 -1'i3„. ,....E-Z. :: 2 M•n•,,,,,PI E. t ., LI_ 1 -....„ •• .:,..7 JUR Of 1,-.---....:„..4:-, 1 ;7., I .....:a , -i---170.rn 4s NA: 7".*''''.- I 1 v441:4-047-ra 1 rat...t. 4::::13; mio_y Mk PiNtWai' M 1 ra I ' ,/ I •!.w.t.4w..,,,,ii , 4‘...-zterei!"''""'IVIVIfilf ,. / / 1 iei . .... .voi:::!::1.;...1 :i_sit ) 1 1 1 Effit*P::::ii7F I 1 1 v•s,4e.fire. t'::,.0,4-4F —, - ....41...TvIglq I aliPVV 1 CO.RD.NO.46 1,4 f _ 1 - PLANNING DESIGNATIONS: ACRES: PCT.: PLANNING DESIGNATIONS (CONT): ACRES: PCT.: A/ Railroad I I RR-Rural Residential TR-Transition Residential 2363.62 1046% II AG-Agriculture 5875.97 26.00% 2020 MUSA Line 2020 Land Use Plan Map 749.61 3.32% A/ UR-Urban Residential 2221.54 AR-Agriculture-Research 3085.87 13.65% 2010 MUSA Line DRAFT ALTERNATIVE (A) 9.83% II HR-High Density Residential 38.49 0.17% . PI-Public/Institutional 400.11 1.77% A/ Post 2020 MUSA Line _ 0 Planned/Potential 180(Estimated) . PO-Existing Parks/Open Space 712.92 3.16% A/ Sewer Needs Attached/Multiple Housing NII _BP-Business Park 454.54 2.01% . WM-Waste Management 234.70 1.04% 2020 Comprehensiye Plan Update UC-Commercial 138.96 0.61% Right-of-Way 1541.91 6.82% A ii4 1 .__ . ,. , . _ City of Rosemount III GI-General Industrial 2859.39 12.65% Water 1011.54 4.48% 0.5 0 0.5 1 Miles :1,.. IM-Industrial/Mixed Use 911.85 4.03% TOTAL: 22601.02 100.00% 1 3 d:\98info\compupdatetanduseplanmap map date:11/18/98 Figure .1-C