Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.c. 2020 Comprehensive Plan CITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR DISCUSSION COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DATE: October 13, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: 2020 Comprehensive Plan PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner � . � � �. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes The public hearing process for the modification to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan has been completed. As the Council may be aware, the Planning Commission failed to adopt a motion for a recommendation. In essence, some Commissioners felt that some additional land should be guided for rural residential use,particularly in the more environmentally sensitive areas. The Commissioners in support of the recommendation for urban reserve seemed to accept the idea that the future implementation strategies could take a form similar to the Kelley Trust PUD process. Given the lack of a Planning Commission recommendation, staff will present several plan alternatives as a discussion aid for the Council. Ultimately, staff hopes to use Council direction to assemble a draft land use strategy for Council review on November 2 possibly for adoption. The land use strategies include: 1. The original staff recommendation of 900 acres in Urban Reserve with land use designation and zoning remaining Agriculture. 2. A modified land use plan that includes a combination of Rural Residential and Agriculture/Urban Reserve land use designations. 3. A land use plan combining Urban Residential and Rural Residential land use designations. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Provide staff with a Council directed strategy for resolving the 2020 Comprehensive Plan process. COUNCIL ACTION: Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes S eptemb er 14, 1999 Page 2 Di ssion continued. Mr.Pearson explained that if a building is abando or over six month a prior non-conforming use cannot be restored. Commissioner e-Corrigan repeated her interpretat� at the ordinance pertains to car and equipment sales and not exclude the retail of automotive parts. While she supported the desire of the Downtown ing Co � ee, she felt the ordinance should be changed if it does not conform. MOTION by Tentinger t vertum the staff retation of the zoning ordinance prohibition of . retail automobile p sales in the C-2,Community ercial Center. Seconded by Shoe- Comgan. Ay . hoe-Corrigan and Tentinger. Nays:"'ei sel and Droste. Motion failed. C � erson Droste recessed the meeting unti17:00. Public Hearing: 2020 Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment Chairperson Droste opened the public hearin�on the 2020 Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. The recording secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Posting of a Public Hearing Notice on file�vith the City. Mr.Pearson summarized the Met Council's preliminary review of Rosemount's draft 2020 Comprehensive Plan. At issue is the Rural Residential desi�ation for the area between STH 3, Akron Avenue and north of 135th St.W., excluding Stonebridge,White Lake Acres, and other platted areas. Mr. Peazson provided background information on the 2020 plan, explaining population proj ections,Rosemount's role in regional plans, and restrictions imposed by the University of Minnesota and the Koch buffer zone. He explained the proposal to place approximately 900 acres into Urban Reserve,wherein the area would remain zoned for Agricultural use and brought into the MUSA and rezoned in the future. Discussion continued. Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing. Laxman Sundae, 2055 128th St. W.,commented on the connection of sewer&water services to existing properties�.vhich have working septic systems and the cost for such services,resulting in a financial hardship to some residents. Mr. Sundae also noted his concem for the preservation of natural features and wildlife, stating an increase in population would put stress on the wildlife. Mr. Sundae presented a copy of the Met Council recommendations,which was entered into the Clerk's record. . Joanne Varey, 12920 Biscayne Ave.,asked how the implementation of city services would Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 14, 1999 Page 3 impact properties on Biscayne Avenue. Mr.Pearson explained the application process for sewer &water. Connie Fadden, 12231 Biscayne Ave., asked how development further north would affect property owners located south of the development. Mr. Pearson explained that"leap frog" development is not allowed and that development would occur from the south to the north. 7oan Anderson,2295 Bonaire Path, expressed her concerns for the protection of wildlife and the wet an s, an she noted the city is forced to listen to the U of M wishes. She is concemed that transitional zoning would have higher density development next to it and that development would affect the lakes. Mr.Litterer explained the city monitors the lake levels and that stormwater management is in place. Commissioner Shoe-Comgan stressed the importance of citizen participation in the protection of wetlands and noted organizations available to citizens to preserve greenways. Marilyn Radtke, 12550 Danbury Way, feels the University of Minnesota and the Met Council are o mg t e crtizens as hostages. Karin Penrod, 1065 121 st St.W., asked how this proposed rezoning would benefit the an owners. Mr.Pearson explained this is a regional issue and that urbanization is vital to the downtown. Mike Mortenson,2026 128th St.W., suggested that the burden of assessments for improvements e p ace on t e property rather than the owner. This would allow repayment on a long-term basis. Aina Wiklund, 12110 Bacardi Ave., asked if there is a timetable for the rezoning. She is also conc—erneTa�out land preservation and requested information on citizen involvement. Brad Wallace, 12171 Biscayne Ave.W., also inquired about a tuneframe for development. He as ce t e city to look at other areas in Rosemount for urban development, such as the area west of Hwy. 3,north of CR 38. Mr.Pearson explained the difficulties in developing other areas. Rich Lamotte,2318 Bonaire Path, commented there are three pipelines through his property and at sewer water lines could not run across the pipelines. Mr. Litterer responded. Kevin Mueller, suggested the U of M lease land from Koch. Planning Commission � Regular Meeting Minutes September 14, 1999 Page 4 � Cindy Beamish, 12164 Biscayne Ave., suggested the city go back to the Met Council and say t e�r requests cannot be done because of the Koch and U of M restrictions. Mr.Pearson explained this has akeady been done. Jeff Fadden, 12231 Biscayne Ave., stated he moved here to avoid urban sprawl, feels he is getting mixed information on when city services would be brought into the area and on assessments, and asked what the Met Council is holding over us to have such power. Reid Hansen, 122490 Canada Court, appeazed on behalf of a client who wishes to develop property or residential use but is unable to because the city council reguided the property for public use. Mr.Hansen requested the Comp Plan be revised to designate his client's property urban residential,which will respond to the Met Council request. Mr.Hansen presented a letter explaining his proposal,which was entered in the Clerk's record. Arlen Evenson, 2693 132nd Ct. W., inquired about a survey that was to be done of residents as to w et er t�y would support sewer and water services. Mr. Litterer will follow up with this inquiry to see if a survey was ever done. Ray Barton, 2175 128th St.W., has concerns that the Met Council or City Council would come up wit�lan to condemn all on-site septic systems which would require residents to hook up to city sewer&water. He also expressed concems that the transfer of density concept would result in high density or affordable housinj on buildable land. Deborah Klecatsky, 1375 121st St. W.,wondered where they would go to find recreational open space a er eve opment of the area,particularly for horses. Jack Gillespie,2322 Bonaire Path, stated the city controls its own destiny and should push for the m o city t e residents want. . MOTION by Droste to continue the public hearing to September 28, 1999. Seconded by Tentinger. Ayes: Weisensel,Tentinger,Droste, and Shoe Corrigan. Nays: 0. Motion carried. The meeting was recessed and reconvened at 9:45 p.m. Public Hearing: RHB, Inc. Lot Split Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing on the RI�,Inc. Lot Split. The recording secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Mailing and Posting of a Public Hearing Notice on file with the City. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 28, 1999 ursuant to due call and notice thereof,the Regular Meeting of the Planni g Commission was du eld on Tuesday, September 28, 1999. Chairperson Bill Droste ed the meeting to order at 6:35 p. .with members Jay Tentinger, Jeffery Weisensel an Shoe-Corrigan present. Also in atten ce were City Planner Rick Pearson and Ci ' ngineer poug Litterer. There were no addition r corrections to the ag a. MOTION by Weisensel to appro th eptember 14, 1999 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Seconded by T r. Ayes: Tentinger,Droste, Shoe-Corrigan and Weisensel. Nays: 0. Motion 'ed. Department A ouncements Commissio rs noted the actions taken by the City Council on Septe er 21, 1999. M ION by Droste to recess the meeting unti17:00 p.m. Motion carried un ' ously. Public Hearing: Rosemount 2020 Comurehensive Plan Amendment Contd. Mr. Pearson summarized the Comprehensive Guide Plan update process and the purpose of the plan. He further explained the role of the Metropolitan Council. There is currently approximately 1300 acres of undeveloped land in Rosemount,which will be developed in the next 13-15 years. This land must be developed prior to expansion of MLTSA. Mr.Pearson described the existing interceptor layout and options for future expansion of city services: . : Mr. Litterer indicated a survey seeking information on the condition of existing septic systems and resident interest in city sewer and water will be sent out in November, 1999. The results of the survey will be reviewed at an open house in December or January. Discussions continued concerning the expansion of development from Eagan into northem Rosemount and city policy on connection to city services. Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing. Planning Commission , Regular Meeting Minutes September 28, 1999 Page 2 Tim McDonnell, 1150 124th Ct.W., feels that urban development will take away from the quality of life in Rosemount and does not see any benefits it would bring to the residents. Rural residential zoning is consistent with surrounding development. Aina Wiklund, 12110 Bacardi Ave., stressed the importance of preserving the land for future generations. Ms. Wiklund presented a letter to the Planning Commission and a newspaper article addressing the issue of public housing in the suburbs,which was entered into the Clerk's record as Attachment#3. Tracv Dou herty, 12370 Blanca Ave.,read her letter addressed to the Planning Commission, which was entered into the Clerk's record as Attachment#4. Ms. Dougherty expressed her concern that planned development achieve the goal of the city to maintain a small town atmosphere. John Remkus, 13040 Akron Avenue,indicated the Met Council is an advisory body and has no legal standing. The estimated 20 years before urban development would occur is a short period of time which will go by quickly. Just say"no"to the Met Council. Lois Muellner, 2320 Bonaire Path, indicated she moved from the downtown area to get away from vandalism. She is concerned that urban development will bring an increase in taxes and the crime rate. Jerrv Anderson, 2295 Bonaire Path, suggested the city look at urban development on the Koch buffer property to the immediate east and on property on the eastern border near Nininger Township. Deb Williams, 1225 Biscayne Avenue,indicated children are taught to take care of the environment and wildlife. They feel safe in the area and want the open space. Denise Travers, 12467 Biscayne Avenue, expressed concems about preserving the protected wetlands, open land, and wildlife for our children. Residents have a large investment in their homes and she feels the city is taking this too lightly. Ms. Travers presented a DNR map and an article on sewage treatment systems, entered into the Clerk's record as Attachment#5. Discussions continued concerning development in the northern portion of Rosemount from Eagan and the hearing process this would involve. Cvndi Beamish, 12164 Biscayne Avenue,requested the city say"no"to the Met Council. Pete Peterson, 12781 Bacardi Avenue,presented a Petition rejecting the Met Council's request, which was entered in the Clerk's record as Attachment#6. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 28, 1999 � Page 3 Sharon Taylor, 1350 121st St.W., indicated she was crowded out at prior addresses. The,area supports wildlife and ponds. If development occurs, it should be in larger parcels;there is no value in over developing. Dan Helwi�,2145 126th St.W., opposes the Met Council request, as it will lower the quality of life. He urged the city to represent the residents and not the Met Council. Diane Schnoor, 12246 Biscayne Ave.,urged the city to save the land for tomorrow. Rich Carlson, 1330 121st St.W.,referenced the issue with tree preservation in development of Stonebridge Addition. He expressed concern with the number of trees that would be cut down as a result of urban development. He believes the market currently demands 5 acre lots, and that 20 years is a long time to wait for someone who wants to sell their property. Richard Cliff, 12523 Akron Ave.,owns property south of Stonebridge Addition and planned to se115-acre lots. The proposed zoning change will not allow him to se115-acre sites. This will create a hardship for him. Jeff Fadden, 12231 Biscayne Ave.,had questions concerning development of 120th Street and the tax base. Bob Hawkins, 1110 124th Ct.,previously lived in the southeast corner of Eagan and was forced out because of taxes and assessments as a result of development. Discussions continued concerning the hearing process on the Comprehensive Plan amendment and that public comment would not be allowed at the city council meeting. Chairperson Droste explained the public hearing process at the Planning Commission level. Additionally,public involvement in the ongoing process of the Comprehensive Guide Plan update was reviewed. Jim Uttlev of the Metropolitan Council was present at the meeting. Mr.Uttley explained the role of the Met Council in reviewirig city plans and commenting on them. If a plan is found to be inconsistent with regional policies,then the Met Council does have the authority to tell the cities to revise the plans to bring them into conformance with the policies. The regional policies are intended to support highways, airports,parks, and sewer treatment. If a plan creates an ixnpact on systems,the Met Council is required to direct the city to change its plan. Mike Beamish, 12164 Biscayne Ave.,wondered what consequences the city would face if it doesn't go along with the Met Council. Hank Nieland,2067 135th St.W.,noted the importance of the quality of life in this area. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 28, 1999 Page 4 Connie Fadden, 12231 Biscayne Ave., indicated the city is not ready to make a decision at this time. She does not feel there is full representation by the city council. Brad Wisherd, 12890 Biscayne Ave.,had questions concerning the water treatment plan. Mr. Pearson described the existing infrastructure and options for expansion. Steven Kreitz, 1785 W. 120th St.,indicated the Met Council needs to realize that most residents grew up in Rosemount and continued to raise families here. This is a unique area where residents have established roots. Denise Travers, indicated she spoke with John Consemius of the Met Council,who said the Met Council couldn't require the city to comply, only to make recommendations. Ms. Travers shared pictures of the area,which were entered into the Clerk's record. Deb Williams, suggested a compromise, allowing expansion in 5-10 acre parcels. Bob Na�el, 2400 126th St., objected to the process that does not allow public comment to the city council. Dan McNultv, 15670 Cicerone Path, asked which cities do not participate with Met Council policy and whether they have had funds withheld. Mr. McNulty suggested the city say"no" and see how the Met Council responds. Aina Wiklund, feels it is wrong to squeeze development into this area because of the amount of land controlled by Koch and the University of Minnesota. MOTION by Droste to close the public hearing. Second by Tentinger. Ayes: Droste, Shoe- Corrigan,Weisensel, and Tentinger. Nays: 0. Motion carried. Chairperson Droste recessed the meeting at 9:25 for 5 minutes. Commissioners discussed options for development for those residents who want to se115-acre pazcels. The suggestion that development occur in eastern Rosemount was discussed and the constraints of Koch and the industrial corridor were pointed out. The Commission responded to residents' concerns about protection of the environment with an explanation of the wetlands and tree preservation ordinances. Commissioner Shoe-Corrigan indicated her support for Met Council projections and the city's responsibility to regional goals. Residents have an opportunity to participate in the planning process to preserve open spaces. She suggested resubmitting the plan with a Rural Residential Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September 28, 1999 Page 5 designation and updating the plan later after reviewing the issues. While she supports urban development of this area, she feels it necessary for the market to drive it,not the Met CounciL Commissioner Weisensel noted the city has been proactive in the planning process and has the wetland ordinance and tree preservation ordinance as tools to preserve the environment. The city is part of a region and it is important to work within that framework. Resident involvement is critical. Chairperson Droste refened to the city's rich history and that the existing wetland and tree preservation ordinances will preserve the pristine areas.This Comp.Plan amendment would not change zoning at this time,but guide it for 20 years in the future. Commissioner Shoe-Comgan commended the city on its plans for the Kelley Trust development, including transitional zoning,buffering, clustering,wildlife comdors and innovative urbanization,which shows the city can accomplish its goals by maintaining open space. She felt the residents would better understand how development could work if given the opportunity to observe the Kelley Trust development. Commissioner Shoe-Comgan supports the amendment to the Comp.Plan but wants it delayed for approximately two years. MOTION by Tentinger to recommend that the City Council revise the draft Rosemount 2020 Comprehensive Plan concerning land between STH 3,Akron Ave., 135th& 120th Street West: 1)Placing approximately 900 acres of land into Urban Reserve;2)Designating approximately 140 acres for Transitional Residential use; and 3)The Stonebridge Addition and White Lake Acres would remain Rural Residential. Seconded by Droste. Ayes: Tentinger and Droste;Nays: Shoe-Corrigan and Weisensel. Motion failed. P lic Hearin : Flue el Elevator Site Plan Review Chairp n Droste opened the public hearing on the Site Pl eview for Fluegel Elevator. The recording se tary has placed the Affidavit of Public ' ,Affidavit of Mailing, and Affidavit of Posting of a P 'c Hearing Notice on file wit e City. Mr. Pearson presented the si an fo roposed 4,458 sq.ft. addition to the retaiUstorage facility of Fluegel Elevator. Buil levations were reviewed. Mr. Pearson indicated the proposed metal siding is not rmitted on side facing the public right-of-way and is allowed up to 50%of the remai � g surfaces. The apph must substitute the metal siding with another material. Some or zation is necessary for parking. .Pearson explained landscaping options. Ch ' erson Droste opened the floor to the Applicant. Greg Fluegel was pr t and addressed ' ues related to parking and landscaping.