HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.c. 2020 Comprehensive Plan CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR DISCUSSION
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
DATE: October 13, 1999
AGENDA ITEM: 2020 Comprehensive Plan
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner �
. � � �.
ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
The public hearing process for the modification to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan has been
completed. As the Council may be aware, the Planning Commission failed to adopt a motion for
a recommendation. In essence, some Commissioners felt that some additional land should be
guided for rural residential use,particularly in the more environmentally sensitive areas. The
Commissioners in support of the recommendation for urban reserve seemed to accept the idea
that the future implementation strategies could take a form similar to the Kelley Trust PUD
process.
Given the lack of a Planning Commission recommendation, staff will present several plan
alternatives as a discussion aid for the Council. Ultimately, staff hopes to use Council direction
to assemble a draft land use strategy for Council review on November 2 possibly for adoption.
The land use strategies include:
1. The original staff recommendation of 900 acres in Urban Reserve with land use
designation and zoning remaining Agriculture.
2. A modified land use plan that includes a combination of Rural Residential and
Agriculture/Urban Reserve land use designations.
3. A land use plan combining Urban Residential and Rural Residential land use
designations.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Provide staff with a Council directed strategy for resolving the 2020 Comprehensive Plan process.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
S eptemb er 14, 1999
Page 2
Di ssion continued. Mr.Pearson explained that if a building is abando or over six
month a prior non-conforming use cannot be restored.
Commissioner e-Corrigan repeated her interpretat� at the ordinance pertains to car and
equipment sales and not exclude the retail of automotive parts. While she supported
the desire of the Downtown ing Co � ee, she felt the ordinance should be changed if it
does not conform.
MOTION by Tentinger t vertum the staff retation of the zoning ordinance prohibition of .
retail automobile p sales in the C-2,Community ercial Center. Seconded by Shoe-
Comgan. Ay . hoe-Corrigan and Tentinger. Nays:"'ei sel and Droste. Motion failed.
C � erson Droste recessed the meeting unti17:00.
Public Hearing: 2020 Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment
Chairperson Droste opened the public hearin�on the 2020 Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment. The recording secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of
Posting of a Public Hearing Notice on file�vith the City.
Mr.Pearson summarized the Met Council's preliminary review of Rosemount's draft 2020
Comprehensive Plan. At issue is the Rural Residential desi�ation for the area between STH 3,
Akron Avenue and north of 135th St.W., excluding Stonebridge,White Lake Acres, and other
platted areas. Mr. Peazson provided background information on the 2020 plan, explaining
population proj ections,Rosemount's role in regional plans, and restrictions imposed by the
University of Minnesota and the Koch buffer zone. He explained the proposal to place
approximately 900 acres into Urban Reserve,wherein the area would remain zoned for
Agricultural use and brought into the MUSA and rezoned in the future.
Discussion continued. Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing.
Laxman Sundae, 2055 128th St. W.,commented on the connection of sewer&water services to
existing properties�.vhich have working septic systems and the cost for such services,resulting in
a financial hardship to some residents. Mr. Sundae also noted his concem for the preservation of
natural features and wildlife, stating an increase in population would put stress on the wildlife.
Mr. Sundae presented a copy of the Met Council recommendations,which was entered into the
Clerk's record. .
Joanne Varey, 12920 Biscayne Ave.,asked how the implementation of city services would
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 14, 1999
Page 3
impact properties on Biscayne Avenue. Mr.Pearson explained the application process for sewer
&water.
Connie Fadden, 12231 Biscayne Ave., asked how development further north would affect
property owners located south of the development. Mr. Pearson explained that"leap frog"
development is not allowed and that development would occur from the south to the north.
7oan Anderson,2295 Bonaire Path, expressed her concerns for the protection of wildlife and the
wet an s, an she noted the city is forced to listen to the U of M wishes. She is concemed that
transitional zoning would have higher density development next to it and that development
would affect the lakes. Mr.Litterer explained the city monitors the lake levels and that
stormwater management is in place. Commissioner Shoe-Comgan stressed the importance of
citizen participation in the protection of wetlands and noted organizations available to citizens to
preserve greenways.
Marilyn Radtke, 12550 Danbury Way, feels the University of Minnesota and the Met Council are
o mg t e crtizens as hostages.
Karin Penrod, 1065 121 st St.W., asked how this proposed rezoning would benefit the
an owners. Mr.Pearson explained this is a regional issue and that urbanization is vital to the
downtown.
Mike Mortenson,2026 128th St.W., suggested that the burden of assessments for improvements
e p ace on t e property rather than the owner. This would allow repayment on a long-term
basis.
Aina Wiklund, 12110 Bacardi Ave., asked if there is a timetable for the rezoning. She is also
conc—erneTa�out land preservation and requested information on citizen involvement.
Brad Wallace, 12171 Biscayne Ave.W., also inquired about a tuneframe for development. He
as ce t e city to look at other areas in Rosemount for urban development, such as the area west
of Hwy. 3,north of CR 38. Mr.Pearson explained the difficulties in developing other areas.
Rich Lamotte,2318 Bonaire Path, commented there are three pipelines through his property and
at sewer water lines could not run across the pipelines. Mr. Litterer responded.
Kevin Mueller, suggested the U of M lease land from Koch.
Planning Commission �
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 14, 1999
Page 4 �
Cindy Beamish, 12164 Biscayne Ave., suggested the city go back to the Met Council and say
t e�r requests cannot be done because of the Koch and U of M restrictions. Mr.Pearson
explained this has akeady been done.
Jeff Fadden, 12231 Biscayne Ave., stated he moved here to avoid urban sprawl, feels he is
getting mixed information on when city services would be brought into the area and on
assessments, and asked what the Met Council is holding over us to have such power.
Reid Hansen, 122490 Canada Court, appeazed on behalf of a client who wishes to develop
property or residential use but is unable to because the city council reguided the property for
public use. Mr.Hansen requested the Comp Plan be revised to designate his client's property
urban residential,which will respond to the Met Council request. Mr.Hansen presented a letter
explaining his proposal,which was entered in the Clerk's record.
Arlen Evenson, 2693 132nd Ct. W., inquired about a survey that was to be done of residents as to
w et er t�y would support sewer and water services. Mr. Litterer will follow up with this
inquiry to see if a survey was ever done.
Ray Barton, 2175 128th St.W., has concerns that the Met Council or City Council would come
up wit�lan to condemn all on-site septic systems which would require residents to hook up to
city sewer&water. He also expressed concems that the transfer of density concept would result
in high density or affordable housinj on buildable land.
Deborah Klecatsky, 1375 121st St. W.,wondered where they would go to find recreational open
space a er eve opment of the area,particularly for horses.
Jack Gillespie,2322 Bonaire Path, stated the city controls its own destiny and should push for the
m o city t e residents want. .
MOTION by Droste to continue the public hearing to September 28, 1999. Seconded by
Tentinger. Ayes: Weisensel,Tentinger,Droste, and Shoe Corrigan. Nays: 0. Motion carried.
The meeting was recessed and reconvened at 9:45 p.m.
Public Hearing: RHB, Inc. Lot Split
Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing on the RI�,Inc. Lot Split. The recording
secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Mailing and Posting of a Public
Hearing Notice on file with the City.
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes September 28, 1999
ursuant to due call and notice thereof,the Regular Meeting of the Planni g Commission was
du eld on Tuesday, September 28, 1999. Chairperson Bill Droste ed the meeting to order
at 6:35 p. .with members Jay Tentinger, Jeffery Weisensel an Shoe-Corrigan present.
Also in atten ce were City Planner Rick Pearson and Ci ' ngineer poug Litterer.
There were no addition r corrections to the ag a.
MOTION by Weisensel to appro th eptember 14, 1999 Regular Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes. Seconded by T r. Ayes: Tentinger,Droste, Shoe-Corrigan and
Weisensel. Nays: 0. Motion 'ed.
Department A ouncements
Commissio rs noted the actions taken by the City Council on Septe er 21, 1999.
M ION by Droste to recess the meeting unti17:00 p.m. Motion carried un ' ously.
Public Hearing: Rosemount 2020 Comurehensive Plan Amendment
Contd.
Mr. Pearson summarized the Comprehensive Guide Plan update process and the purpose of the
plan. He further explained the role of the Metropolitan Council. There is currently
approximately 1300 acres of undeveloped land in Rosemount,which will be developed in the
next 13-15 years. This land must be developed prior to expansion of MLTSA. Mr.Pearson
described the existing interceptor layout and options for future expansion of city services: . :
Mr. Litterer indicated a survey seeking information on the condition of existing septic systems
and resident interest in city sewer and water will be sent out in November, 1999. The results of
the survey will be reviewed at an open house in December or January.
Discussions continued concerning the expansion of development from Eagan into northem
Rosemount and city policy on connection to city services.
Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing.
Planning Commission
, Regular Meeting Minutes
September 28, 1999
Page 2
Tim McDonnell, 1150 124th Ct.W., feels that urban development will take away from the
quality of life in Rosemount and does not see any benefits it would bring to the residents. Rural
residential zoning is consistent with surrounding development.
Aina Wiklund, 12110 Bacardi Ave., stressed the importance of preserving the land for future
generations. Ms. Wiklund presented a letter to the Planning Commission and a newspaper article
addressing the issue of public housing in the suburbs,which was entered into the Clerk's record
as Attachment#3.
Tracv Dou herty, 12370 Blanca Ave.,read her letter addressed to the Planning Commission,
which was entered into the Clerk's record as Attachment#4. Ms. Dougherty expressed her
concern that planned development achieve the goal of the city to maintain a small town
atmosphere.
John Remkus, 13040 Akron Avenue,indicated the Met Council is an advisory body and has no
legal standing. The estimated 20 years before urban development would occur is a short period
of time which will go by quickly. Just say"no"to the Met Council.
Lois Muellner, 2320 Bonaire Path, indicated she moved from the downtown area to get away
from vandalism. She is concerned that urban development will bring an increase in taxes and the
crime rate.
Jerrv Anderson, 2295 Bonaire Path, suggested the city look at urban development on the Koch
buffer property to the immediate east and on property on the eastern border near Nininger
Township.
Deb Williams, 1225 Biscayne Avenue,indicated children are taught to take care of the
environment and wildlife. They feel safe in the area and want the open space.
Denise Travers, 12467 Biscayne Avenue, expressed concems about preserving the protected
wetlands, open land, and wildlife for our children. Residents have a large investment in their
homes and she feels the city is taking this too lightly. Ms. Travers presented a DNR map and an
article on sewage treatment systems, entered into the Clerk's record as Attachment#5.
Discussions continued concerning development in the northern portion of Rosemount from
Eagan and the hearing process this would involve.
Cvndi Beamish, 12164 Biscayne Avenue,requested the city say"no"to the Met Council.
Pete Peterson, 12781 Bacardi Avenue,presented a Petition rejecting the Met Council's request,
which was entered in the Clerk's record as Attachment#6.
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 28, 1999 �
Page 3
Sharon Taylor, 1350 121st St.W., indicated she was crowded out at prior addresses. The,area
supports wildlife and ponds. If development occurs, it should be in larger parcels;there is no
value in over developing.
Dan Helwi�,2145 126th St.W., opposes the Met Council request, as it will lower the quality of
life. He urged the city to represent the residents and not the Met Council.
Diane Schnoor, 12246 Biscayne Ave.,urged the city to save the land for tomorrow.
Rich Carlson, 1330 121st St.W.,referenced the issue with tree preservation in development of
Stonebridge Addition. He expressed concern with the number of trees that would be cut down as
a result of urban development. He believes the market currently demands 5 acre lots, and that 20
years is a long time to wait for someone who wants to sell their property.
Richard Cliff, 12523 Akron Ave.,owns property south of Stonebridge Addition and planned to
se115-acre lots. The proposed zoning change will not allow him to se115-acre sites. This will
create a hardship for him.
Jeff Fadden, 12231 Biscayne Ave.,had questions concerning development of 120th Street and
the tax base.
Bob Hawkins, 1110 124th Ct.,previously lived in the southeast corner of Eagan and was forced
out because of taxes and assessments as a result of development.
Discussions continued concerning the hearing process on the Comprehensive Plan amendment
and that public comment would not be allowed at the city council meeting. Chairperson Droste
explained the public hearing process at the Planning Commission level. Additionally,public
involvement in the ongoing process of the Comprehensive Guide Plan update was reviewed.
Jim Uttlev of the Metropolitan Council was present at the meeting. Mr.Uttley explained the role
of the Met Council in reviewirig city plans and commenting on them. If a plan is found to be
inconsistent with regional policies,then the Met Council does have the authority to tell the cities
to revise the plans to bring them into conformance with the policies. The regional policies are
intended to support highways, airports,parks, and sewer treatment. If a plan creates an ixnpact
on systems,the Met Council is required to direct the city to change its plan.
Mike Beamish, 12164 Biscayne Ave.,wondered what consequences the city would face if it
doesn't go along with the Met Council.
Hank Nieland,2067 135th St.W.,noted the importance of the quality of life in this area.
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 28, 1999
Page 4
Connie Fadden, 12231 Biscayne Ave., indicated the city is not ready to make a decision at this
time. She does not feel there is full representation by the city council.
Brad Wisherd, 12890 Biscayne Ave.,had questions concerning the water treatment plan. Mr.
Pearson described the existing infrastructure and options for expansion.
Steven Kreitz, 1785 W. 120th St.,indicated the Met Council needs to realize that most residents
grew up in Rosemount and continued to raise families here. This is a unique area where
residents have established roots.
Denise Travers, indicated she spoke with John Consemius of the Met Council,who said the Met
Council couldn't require the city to comply, only to make recommendations. Ms. Travers shared
pictures of the area,which were entered into the Clerk's record.
Deb Williams, suggested a compromise, allowing expansion in 5-10 acre parcels.
Bob Na�el, 2400 126th St., objected to the process that does not allow public comment to the
city council.
Dan McNultv, 15670 Cicerone Path, asked which cities do not participate with Met Council
policy and whether they have had funds withheld. Mr. McNulty suggested the city say"no" and
see how the Met Council responds.
Aina Wiklund, feels it is wrong to squeeze development into this area because of the amount of
land controlled by Koch and the University of Minnesota.
MOTION by Droste to close the public hearing. Second by Tentinger. Ayes: Droste, Shoe-
Corrigan,Weisensel, and Tentinger. Nays: 0. Motion carried.
Chairperson Droste recessed the meeting at 9:25 for 5 minutes.
Commissioners discussed options for development for those residents who want to se115-acre
pazcels. The suggestion that development occur in eastern Rosemount was discussed and the
constraints of Koch and the industrial corridor were pointed out. The Commission responded to
residents' concerns about protection of the environment with an explanation of the wetlands and
tree preservation ordinances.
Commissioner Shoe-Corrigan indicated her support for Met Council projections and the city's
responsibility to regional goals. Residents have an opportunity to participate in the planning
process to preserve open spaces. She suggested resubmitting the plan with a Rural Residential
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 28, 1999
Page 5
designation and updating the plan later after reviewing the issues. While she supports urban
development of this area, she feels it necessary for the market to drive it,not the Met CounciL
Commissioner Weisensel noted the city has been proactive in the planning process and has the
wetland ordinance and tree preservation ordinance as tools to preserve the environment. The city
is part of a region and it is important to work within that framework. Resident involvement is
critical.
Chairperson Droste refened to the city's rich history and that the existing wetland and tree
preservation ordinances will preserve the pristine areas.This Comp.Plan amendment would not
change zoning at this time,but guide it for 20 years in the future.
Commissioner Shoe-Comgan commended the city on its plans for the Kelley Trust development,
including transitional zoning,buffering, clustering,wildlife comdors and innovative
urbanization,which shows the city can accomplish its goals by maintaining open space. She felt
the residents would better understand how development could work if given the opportunity to
observe the Kelley Trust development. Commissioner Shoe-Comgan supports the amendment
to the Comp.Plan but wants it delayed for approximately two years.
MOTION by Tentinger to recommend that the City Council revise the draft Rosemount 2020
Comprehensive Plan concerning land between STH 3,Akron Ave., 135th& 120th Street West:
1)Placing approximately 900 acres of land into Urban Reserve;2)Designating approximately
140 acres for Transitional Residential use; and 3)The Stonebridge Addition and White Lake
Acres would remain Rural Residential. Seconded by Droste. Ayes: Tentinger and Droste;Nays:
Shoe-Corrigan and Weisensel. Motion failed.
P lic Hearin : Flue el Elevator Site Plan Review
Chairp n Droste opened the public hearing on the Site Pl eview for Fluegel Elevator. The
recording se tary has placed the Affidavit of Public ' ,Affidavit of Mailing, and Affidavit
of Posting of a P 'c Hearing Notice on file wit e City.
Mr. Pearson presented the si an fo roposed 4,458 sq.ft. addition to the retaiUstorage
facility of Fluegel Elevator. Buil levations were reviewed. Mr. Pearson indicated the
proposed metal siding is not rmitted on side facing the public right-of-way and is allowed
up to 50%of the remai � g surfaces. The apph must substitute the metal siding with another
material. Some or zation is necessary for parking. .Pearson explained landscaping
options.
Ch ' erson Droste opened the floor to the Applicant. Greg Fluegel was pr t and addressed
' ues related to parking and landscaping.