The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About8.b. Shannon Pond South-Hampton Development Corporation Revised Concept Residential PUD . ' CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ► EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION Ci Council Meetin Date: June 17, 1997 __ tY g AGENDA ITEM: Shannon Pond South- Hampton Development AGENDA SECTION: Corporation Revised Concept Residential PUD New Business PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness, CommunityDevelopment Dir. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS: Concept Drawing, Draft Resolution, PC APPROVED BY: minutes (6-10-96), correspondence„ proposed ��,�--� twin home desi s v Applicant and Property Owner: Jim Allen, Hampton Development Area and Acres, Location: 26.73 acres at the northwest corner of Shannon Pkwy and 160th St. W. Number of Lots: 37; 17 single family detached units, 20 twin units Overall Density: 1.38 dwelling units per acre; 1.76 Du/ac net Comp. Plan Land Use Designation: Urban Residential Current Zoning: Agriculture Requested Zoning: R-1 and R-2, Single Family attached and detached Residential Planning Commission action: Unanimous recommendation of approval SUMMARY Jim Allen originally requested approval of a concept residential PUD that combined 10 Single Family detached, 14 twin homes and 3 quad buildings for fifty overall dwelling units. On April 22, 1997, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and adopted a motion for a recommendation of denial after receiving extensive public comment and concluding that the proposal was inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood pattern and that a proposed"flag lot"was unacceptable. Mr. Allen then chose to revise the concept instead of risking Council denial. The revised plan consists of 37 overall units combining 17 single and 10 twin units. In addition to the 26% reduction in density and elimination of quad units, the"flag lot" was eliminated and the street design was modified. Dakota Drive has been reoriented north to intersect with 158th Street West with single family units on either side. The effect of the street design change is to insulate the existing neighborhood from the twin units by the combined width of a double loaded street with two lot depths and the back yards of the twin units. In other words, generally, the twin homes rear yard/common space will be across from rear yards of new houses. The Planning Commission conducted another public hearing on June 10, 1997 for the revised concept. Residents of the existing neighborhood expressed many concerns ranging from erosion of pro�erty values to children safety and traffic impacts. The Planning Commission discussed the new concept and expressed their opinions that the revision adequately addressed the previously identified concerns and that the proposal was consistent with the policies stated in the Comprehensive Guide Plan for density transfers and cluster housing at the edge of a neighborhood adjacent to an arterial street. The Commission then unanimously adopted a motion to recommend approval of the concept. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the revised Concept Residential Planned Unit Develo ment for Shannon Pond South. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: �` , HAMr'1'ulv .U� v �L�rl�i �lv 1 � C/0 JIM ALIEN / /� `;�\ 12433 PRINCEiON AVE. � SAVAGE MN 55378 s � \ ' /,.�TtiRo No %` �� Nor��'�-t �` ,°�. � / / ` q �T�o��._�"--_--__--._ _�, t'��iG� . � . � ��`� � �-��' -1--- -�'� �'� S,F, t� - � � ' � � . . l � S qN � �I� ,\ lt� lw�w� 20 � �`--_� Np,� p � � / 0 , t'C S � � /� \ u� / . � � � ToT�` 37 � � � �� l l / �`'�'i-s\ ; ��' �,� / �.l A� �� '--'� i \�� , f� �� / / ,'i �� / � �� ! �� , / � � /� � i �,s \,'� � I �^ ',—— � ��' r,y� I �a� ,,,� � w' � I I WE T RID E I `�� p,, � � �� s`�'��L� �,�`\ � I� z( � �EC ND A DITIOIV '4ti`F � \ ♦� / O�9 O��. _ I i �� w� � --L---�--- - -1---- � /�, al--_ -�- 157TH_STREET WEST _- �` ,, �\ ��` �\ /��i�.iOO )�,, �� , �� I I� w� --- � / ' ' a , ---T---�- --�---I--1-- _, �#' �\ `�\ / /� -; �� ;� i � � � . ,' z' ' � I I I I ( I �'�iM'{ \� � _ / I a i'� � � d � f .� �. � � � — I \ 1 I A��------- - --- ------------ H0� �^�� \ � ( � � ( I �� W � � I I I I I � � �y ��. z; ; �� I FAILY FAiiY � _ �// POND J � I I ' _� �/ Fs4 `�♦ � � %/ � ��. �-----J----J----1---J---�-- " _�.- '�� ' i � 158TH STREET WEST —"'� ` � � � � � � ----------- ---r—' -- M?�,�,C."�� - � -- - - - - - '. I �� -� -1 -� -� - --�-- � �-- ��\'� ��, ,.... � W , � ,�� , , Q� � � 1 I I i I �� ' � �� , ,\ � ��. ,- �� , , � , � , � �. � � J_WE�T RID�GE _1_ , �� - , �--- �IRST �ADDIT�ION �� -- - - -- -%- oaa. ' ' � � z I � � ' I I I �Y � , � �� - ; � � ��,,- --' z � �--�-----�----L--- - '/ � y , � .�__U DAKOTA DRIVE ___�' ' �g I � � �� I----------- � ,. � � . . ________ __ _ __ � �> � I I I I I � � �� ,� 4�/ I I i (� 1 �� a I I I ❑ � �� , , ; �� , �, I � I_� ► � ; I I I � -----�-------�- � 180TH STREET WEST `�--'----"—�—"� �• TVE SqI�TN L►E OF T/E SWl/{OF SEC.]I.TWP. I13.RGE. 19 . . . r,- �n r�� ,��r� �i ir�'•'r.�iir�i:� �r�r� CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTI�,MINNESU`TA RESOLUTION 1997- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REVISED CONCEPT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR SHANNON POND SOUTH WHEREAS,the Planning Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Hampton Development Corporation for approval of a revised concept residential planned unit development on property located at the northwest corner of Shannon Parkway and 160th St. West; and WHEREAS,on June 10, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the revised Concept Residential Planned Unit Development of Hampton Development Corporation and adopted a motion to recommend approval to the City Council, subject to three conditions; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission directed City Staffto prepare Findings in support of the PUD, which Findings are attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the revised Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for Hampton Development. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the concept for the Shannon Pond South Residential Planned Unit Development subject to: 1. Incorporation of recommendations relative to grading, streets, utilities, and easements identified by the Public Warks Department. 2. Incorporation of recommendations relative to the right of way and intersection spacing on future County Road 46 by the Dakota County Plat Commission. 3. Developer must make payment to the City at final plat for: a. 1997 Storm Water Trunk Area Charges for a combination of multiple family and single family which is estimated to be$32,505. b. 1997 GIS fees of$50 per lot/unit which is estimated at the time as SO lots x $50 per lot/unit = $2,500. c. Prelirninary payment for future improvements to 160th Street, including street and trail of$76,156. 4. Conformance with applicable engineering, subdivision and zoning requirements for PUD final development plan review and platting. 5. Sufficient screening provided along 160th Street West/County Road 46 to mitigate the effects of traffic generated by a minor arterial highway. 6. Developer committed to the City a value for the twin home units of no less than $130,000 per side, in addition to full basements and other architectural features. Resolution 1997- ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1997 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. Cathy Busho, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: , Voted in favor: ' Voted against: I Member absent: FINDINGS For The Hampton Development Corp. ConceptPlanned Unit Development known as "Shannon Pond South". In approving the Concept Plan, the Planning Commission must find as follows and forward its findings to the City Council. 1. The Plan provides sufficient open space and evidences a substantial preservation of natural features to warrent the granting of variances through Planned Unit Development. 11.3 acres of contiguous open space is preserved as part of the current City storm water ponding system including S.7 acres being contributed by the proposed PUD. The density o,f'the PUD excluding the exisimg ponding easement is 1.76 dwelling units per acre, consistent with and below City urban residentiad land use policy. 2. The Plan complies with the intent of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The proposed land use is consistent with the Urban Residential land use policies as specifred in the Comprehensive Guide Plan Update 2000. 3. The proposed development will not be detrimental to surrounding properties. No evidence has been provided that would indicate detrimentad ef,f'ect to surrounding properties. The proposed single family detached residential units will be consistent with existing adjacent land use patterns and will provide separation o,f'dissimilar units. The common open space associated with the twin homes will have extraordinary landscaping and be maintained by a homeowner's association. 4. The Plan is more creative and will provide a better living, working or shopping environment than is possible under strict ordinance requirements. The density transfer preserves a significant amount of open space along with comparitively low density occuring in the housing cluster area (2.39 dwelling units per acre). The relationship of attached housing with open space enhances the diversity of housing available in the City with common open space maintained by a homeowner's association. EXHIBIT "A" C�RAFT CITY OF ROSEMOUNT Z8�5_"TMt"AeetWeSt Rosemount,MN Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!! 55oba-a99� Plannin Commission Phone:612-423-4411 g Hearing Impaired 423•6219 Regular Meeting Minutes June 10, 1997 Fax:612•4Z3-5203 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was duly held on Tuesday, June 10, 1997 at 6:30 p.m. Chairperson William Droste called the meeting to order with members Mark DeBettignies, Jay Tentinger, Kim Shoe-Corrigan and 7effery Weisensel present. Also in attendance were Community Development Director Dan Rogness, City Planner Rick Pearson, and Civil Engineer poug Litterer. ,I There were no additions or corrections to the agenda. � MOTION b Droste to a rove the Ma 27, 1997 Re lar Plannin Commission Meetin Minutes. ' Y PP Y � g � Seconded by Shoe-Corrigan. Ayes: Droste, Shoe-Corrigan and Weisensel. Present: DeBettignies, ' Tentinger. Nays: 0. Motion carried. ' Department Announcements: Summarv of Cit_y Council Actions Commissioners noted the actians taken by the City Council and June 3, 1997. . . . Public Hearin�: Hampton Development Revised Concept Plan Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing for the Hampton Development Revised Concept Residential Planned Unit Development. The recording secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Mailing and Posting of a Public Hearing Notice on file with the City. Mr. Pearson presented the concept plan proposed by Hampton Development, which was revised in accordance with previous recommendations of the Planning Commission. The revised plan, consisting of 17 single family dwellings and 10 twin homes, results in a 26% reduction in density (1.76 du/ac net) and elimination of the quad units. In addition, the proposed plan eliminates the"flag lot" and routes Dakota Drive north to intersect with 158th St. W., which connects to 160th St. W. A bituminous walkway is planned along the ponding area. The proposal meets the zoning criteria and is consistent with other existing developments in Rosemount. Mr. Pearson explained that, prior to being approved by the City Council, the plan must meet all zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan regulations. If the revised concept plan is approved by the City Council, the matter will come back to the Planning Commission for another public hearing where details relating to lot dimensions, grading, utilities, style, and other enhancements to the twinhomes will be reviewed. Commissioners discussed regulation of the style of the twin homes through a PUD and the drainage easement on the 157th St. cul-de-sac. Additionally, it was determined there would be no building in the southeast corner of Shannon Pkwy. & 160th St. due to driveway issues and separation from other units. Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the applicant. Jim Allen appeared on behalf of Hampton Development. Mr. Allen had no comments but was available to answer questions. Ptanning Commission � Regular Meeting Minutes , June 10, 1997 Page 2 Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the public. Leo Hill, 4221 W. 157th St., inquired as to the status of the"flag lot." NIr. Allen indicated this lot has been removed and is now part of the existing home. Mr. Hill expressed his concerns about construction vehicles traveling through the neighborhood and construction taking place in the spring when children are out of school. Additionally, Mr. Hill felt the 158th St. and Danville Ave. intersections at 160th Street are too close. There was discussion concerning association covenants and enforcement. Mr. Hill stated he would rather see single family homes in this development and is against the twin home concept. Carl Osterhaus, 4165 158th St., is opposed to the twin home concept, stating they axe not necessary and do not present a sense of com�nunity. The twin homes will bring property values down. Mr. Osterhaus presented an article which stated the value of single family homes is reduced by 7.7% when bordered by twin homes. He felt the loss to the neighborhood in property values would be greater than the loss experienced by Hampton Development in reduced profits. Mr. Osterhaus presented additional information indicating that reports of crirne are higher in multi-family developments. Safety is another issue at the intersection at 160th Street. Mr. Osterhaus referred to an article which suggested that traffic safety is better accomplished through better urban planning rather than through programs to educate in traffic safety. Mr. Osterhaus suggested that, rather than 158th Street being a thru street, the twin homes should be on a cul-de-sac with direct access to 160th Street. Chairperson Droste informed the residents of an Open House on June 18 in Apple Valley and on June 19 in Coates to review the plans for 160th Street. The residents were encouraged to attend. Jim Burkhardt, 4160 158th St. West, is opposed to the twin homes and the revised concept plan. ' NIr. Burkhardt has concerns about the traffic and safety and would prefer to see a cul-de-sac off !, 160th Street. Commissioner Shoe-Comgan asked Mr. Burkhardt to elaborate on the safety concerns �� and the basis for his belief that the twin homes will generate a greater amount of traffic. Mr. Burkhardt did not have information to support his concerns but stated he would just prefer single family dwellings. In response to other concerns brought up by Mr. Burkhardt, it was pointed out that the developer is required by ordinance to maintain a tree inventory and that sidewalks will match the adjoining properties. Larr,y Chackan, 4218 158th St. W., expressed his concern that the value of the homes built by Hampton Development will be less than the existing homes. Donna Schomaker, 15717 Crystal Path, indicated she would prefer the twin homes to be separated from the remainder of the development and suggested the cul-de-sac or an I-let off 160th Street. Ms. Schomaker referred back to promises made by another developer as to the type and value of the homes that would be built in this area. Ms. Schomaker wanted assurance that the developer would carry through with his promises as to value. There were further discussions concerning the benefits of association covenants vs. zoning. . Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes June 10, 1997 Page 3 Mark Schosta�, 4188 I58th Street, reiterated the safety concerns. There are over 60 children who wait to catch buses and there are no sidewalks. There will be more traf�ic with the twin homes. Mr. Schostag would prefer to see a cul-de-sac off 160th Street. Mr. Schostag also addressed concerns over value. Dale Ouamme, 4166 Dakota Drive, expressed his concerns about safety and children catching school buses. Traffic on 158th Street will probably triple. The City should horseshoe 158th St. &Dakota Drive and put in a cul-de-sac off 160th Street for the twin homes. Doug Litterer explained that a cul-de-sac off 160th Street would create a safety issue as fire, ambulance and police would not have convenient access to the area and this could affect response times. Mr. Pearson further explained that City policy limits cul-de-sacs. In response to Chairperson Droste, Jim Allen went on the record to state the minimum value of the , twin homes would be $130,000 per side, that the developer will obligate itself to the approved design, and the twin homes will have full basements. The minirnum square footage is estimated at 1300+. Jennifer Peloquin. 4226 157th Street, is concerned about traffic safety issues created by the access onto 160th Street and feels there is more crime with twin homes. Ms. Peloquin stated they were promised by another developer there would be single family homes in this area. Discussions continued regarding safety at the school bus stops. Mr. Pearson informed the Commission that the school district is aware of the Comprehensive Guid Plan and has been kept informed by Staff. If approved, a copy of the preliminary plat will be provided to the school district. Bus routing and additional bus stops is decided totally by the school district. In response to promises which residents claim were made by a prior developer, Mr. Pearson presented a plan prepared by Broback which showed anticipated development in the area. Mr. Pearson explained the plan has no bearing on how this property is now developed. The Brobacks do not own the land. The plan also depicted the anticipated road expansions. i Larry Swanson, 4209 158th St. W., is against directing more traffic through the neighborhood. He �I was led to believe there would be all single family homes in the devetopment. The development '� should be consistent with the existing neighborhood. ' Bruce Anthonv, 4195 158th St. W., is opposed to the multi-family plan, feels it is not compatible and is inconsistent with the neighborhood. Commissioner Shoe-Corrigan pointed out to Mr. Burkhardt, as representative of the neighborhood, that the City could not regulate the value and design of the homes if all single family dwellings. The higher standards requested by the neighborhood could not be forced upon a single family dwelling. This may have more of an effect on property values. Planning Commission � _ Regular Meeting Minutes June 10, 1997 Page 4 Terr,y Burkhardt, 4160 158th St. W., reiterated the concerns regarding property values, traffic and safety. Ms. Burkhardt is opposed to picking up additional traffic from 160th Street. MOTION, by Tentinger to close the public hearing. Seconded by Droste. Ayes: Tentinger, Droste, Shoe-Corrigan, Weisensel, and DeBettignies. Nays: 0. Motion carried. In response to public comments, Commissioner DeBettignies estimated the value of the twin homes at $130-150,000 with association fees and that empty-nesters and retirees would most likely be the potential purchasers. There is no indication that the twin homes will create more traffic than single family homes. A cul-de-sac off 160th Street into the twin home section would landlock that area of the development. Issues brought up by the public should be addressed, however, could see no reason to deny the plan. Commissioner Weisensel noted mail he received from citizens concerning this project and recited the issues raised, including consistency, density, spot zoning, traffic, safety, property values, the"flag lot", noise, and construction. In response to a neighborhood newsletter, Commissioner Weisensel objected to the claim that he did not take the public's concern into consideration when he approved the initial concept plan. The Land Use Plan was published in 1993. In accordance with the Land Use Plan, this is an urban residential area. The developer's plan is consistent with that plan. Chairperson Droste indicated the proposed plan by Hampton Development is consistent with the zoning. He visited townhouse developments in the area for value comparisons. Mr. Allen assured the Commission that the value of the twin homes will not be less than $130,000. Chairperson Droste indicated he is concerned about the safety and value issues and stated the Commission will follow through with this development to ensure that those issues are dealt with. Commissioner Shoe-Corrigan echoed the Commissioners' comments. She indicated she researched ', the twin homes issue with local real estate agents and learned that the value will depend in part on � style, association requirements, and the marketed buyer. The City has control over the type and '� value of the twin homes. The City has no control over the value of a single family home. The development can be regulated by the City and will have increased standards. Commissioner Shoe- Corrigan sympathized with the residents over promises made by previous developers in the area but this is something the City has no control over. She does not agree with the public perception that Mr. Allen is simply out for the money. The proposed plan is consistent with density requirements. In fact, it is much lower than the existing neighborhood. Commissioner Tentinger pointed out the three issues raised by the public. One, misrepresentation by prior developers. The City has no control over the marketing strategies of developers. Two, safety. The Commission has not overlooked this issue. Safety must also be considered when planning the , new development and the cul-de-sac recommendation by the public would affect access by fire, police and ambulance into the area. Three, value. There is no indication that the proposed development will reduce property values in the area. The lower density will have a positive effect on safety. Additional landscaping will be done in the twin homes area. The City will retain control over the development. Commissioner Tentinger could see no negative impact on the sunounding neighborhoods by the proposed plan. . Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes June 10, 1997 Page S MOTION by Droste to recommend that the City Council approve the revised concept for the Hampton Development Residential Planned Unit Development subject to: 1) Conformance with applicable engineering, subdivision and zoning requirements for PUD final development plan review and platting; 2) Sufficient screening provided along 160th Street West/County Road 46 to mitigate the effects of traffic generated by a minor arterial highway; 3) Conformance with County requirements for right-of-way and access spacing. Seconded by Weisensel. Ayes: Droste, Shoe- Comgan, Weisensel, DeBettignies and Tentinger. Nays: 0. Motion carried. Public Hearing: Heritage Develo�ment 'rperson Droste opened the public hearing for the Hampton Development Revised Concept Res ntial Planned Unit Development. The recording secretary has placed the�davit of Public 'on and Affidavit of Mailing and Posting of a Public Hearing Notice on file with the City. Mr. Pearso resented the application by Heritage Development of Minnesota, Inc. for approval of a PUD for 193 t nhouse units upon the Englert and McMenomy property located east of � Chippendale Ave e. The townhouse units would be ananged in clusters around garage courts, including common n space between the units. Heritage is also requesting the property be rezoned to BP-4, Busi Park. This development will have access from 156th Street West and from Geronime Pond. Chairperson Droste opened the or to the applicant. Tom Bisch appeared on behalf of Heritage Development. Mr. Bisch presente ' erature and sample drawings from the axchtect. Mr. Bisch indicated that changes to the design w Id be made to meet area needs, including the change to two- car garages. The price for each unit is ap oximately $100,000. It is intend that childless couples and retirees will be targeted for these townh ses. I C mmi i ir ilr n h t side of the ro e . Mr. Bisch '� o ss oner Droste inqu ed about the ra oad ated o t e eas p p rty , indicated that berming would be done on that side. fronts of the units will not face the track. , Additionally, the structures wi116e moved further west t what is shown on the maps. ' Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the public. ' E.B. McMenomv, 15872 Chippendale Avenue, is owner of a portio f the property and was also ' appearing on behalf of the Englerts who own the remaining property. . McMenomy believes this development will be a good fit with Geronime Pond and would provide a ' ure in the style of homes. Dan McNultv, 15670 Cicerone Path, compared values of the proposed townhouses 'th the values of townhomes and single family homes located in Geronime Pond. He pointed out pr ems with multi-family units on 145th Street. Mr. McNulty believes the train will present a proble It presently travels through town approximatley 8-10 times per day. This amount may incre �f the sale of the railroad goes through. Also, Mr. McNulty feels the park services are inadequate to support this additional housing. DATE: 4-18-97 PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REVIEW FOR: PROJECT NAME: Shannon Pond South Addition CITY PROJECT NO. 283 Proposed By: HamRton Develoqment Phone No. 894-1888 (N & A) 12433 Princeton Avenue Fax No. 894-4543 Savage. MN 55378 Type of Request: Concent Plan The Foliowing Conditions Must be Met for Approval of Final Piat 1 . Incorporation of recommendations relative to grading, streets, utilities, and easements identified by the Public Works Department. 2. Incorporation of recommendations relative to the right-of-way and intersection spacing on future County Road 46 by the Dakota County Plat Commission. 3. Developer must make payment to the City at final plat for: a. 1997 Storm Water Trunk Area Charges for a combination of multiple family and single family which is estimated to be 532,505. b. 1997 GIS fees of S50 per lot/unit which is estimated at this time as 50 lots x S 50 per lot/unit = S 2,500. c. Preliminary payment for future improvements to 160th Street, including street and trail of $76,156. The following is a review by the Public Works/Engineering Department of the Concept Plan received by the Public Works/Engineering Department on April 8, 1997. The street & utilities and possibly the grading will be done as a public improvement. Gradin� A Grading Plan for this Plat has not yet been submitted. Sanitary Sewer , The proposed Plat may be serviced from existing extensions of sewer on Dakota Drive, I 158th Street West, 157th Street West and on Danville Avenue. Some of it may also be 'I serviced by extending a pipe from the Lift Station No. 3 located at the northwest corner of I Shannon Parkway and 160th Street West (future CR 46). There was a previous home farm site located on the property and the septic system on that property should be abandoned per code prior to any grading on the site. Review for Shannon Pond South Addition City Project #283 Watermain The site can be serviced from extensions of watermain on Dakota Drive, 158th Street West, 157th Street West. The developer will also be required to extend a water line on the yet unnamed north/south street that intersects with 160th Street West for a future loop connection to the east. That future loop connection wiil be completed with the construction '', of County Road 46 on 160th Street alignment in 1999. ', At the former farm home site, any wells should be identified and sealed per code. If already ' sealed, paperwork should be submitted showing proof of cfosure. Streets The street alignment is adequate from an Engineering Department perspective, but must meet the spacing guideiines proposed by the Dakota County Plat Commission. The unnamed north/south street may be a right in/right out only on the future County Road 46. V_1lalks and Trails Staff has identified that a 8' wide bituminous trail will be constructed with County Road 46 on the 160th Street alignment from Shannon Parkway to Danville Avenue. This developer is responsible for a portion of that trail from Shannon Parkway to the western edge of his property. �torm Drainage The site will be easily serviced by a combination of existing and proposed drainage facilities which will drain intv the adjacent Shannon Pond. The high water elevation of this pond is planned to be 924.7' and the developer will be required to dedicate a ponding easement below that elevation on the eastern edge. The Shannon Pond water elevation will be controlled by a future lift station which will pump the water from this area into Lakeville to the west. The need for this lift station will be monitored by the Public Works Department and constructed when required. �ees and Assessments The develope� must make payment to the City at final plat for the following: 1. 1997 Storm Water Trunk Area Charges for 8.5 acres of rnultiple family at the rate of 52,530 per acre, plus 5.5 acres of the single family at the rate of $2,000 per acre for a total of 532,505. 2. 1997 GIS fees of S50 per/unit times 50 units for a total of 52,500. 3. Payment for future improvements to 160th Street (future CR 46) in the amount of 2 Review for Shannon Pond South Additio� City Project #283 S 76,156. This amount is based on the muiti-family rate of haif a street at S 53.20 per foot for 1,205 lineal feet. It aiso includes S 10 per lineal foot for futu�e trail construction on County Road 46. Private Utiiities This area will be provided electrical power by Dakota Electric Association, phone service by Frontier Communications, gas service by Peoples Natural Gas, and cable television by Marcus Cable. Street lights will be provided by the developer as determined by the City and Dakota Electric Association. 3 1��52 JUN 11, 1997 ID� THE TORO ��MPaNY TE� N0� 3ao-a�33 #86b97 PAGE� 2�� Phone:612-322-4057 To: Mayor Cathy Busho From: Car1 J.Ostefiaus F� 612-423-5203 Date: ,1une 11, 1997 Phone: 612�23-4�11 Pages: 1 Including this page. Ra: Hampton Developmerrt Meeting CC: X Urgent X For Revisw Q Please Comment Q Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle •Comments: Dear Mayor, I aftended Tuesday evenings planning commissian meeting, and the planning commission has once again put fhe "needs" of the devefoper above everybody else. Every single speaker at the meeting, except Mr. Pearson, spake aut against this developmerrt. We provided statistical data, campiled from the US govemmerrt,the Minnesota Department of fransportation, and several magazine articles. This info�mation was dismissed wifh out even the slightest cansideration. The main angumenf that commissioner's Weisensel and Shoe-Comgan had in favor of the townhomes is that they can regulate the townhome construction. Mr. Weisensel made a point of saying that "if we I demand single family homes,that is exactly what we will get, but the aty has no way to dictate the type ' and the size of these hauses. The builder could build $80,0�0.00 houses, and that would hurt our ', property values�, so they are doing us a favar by regulating the townhomes. On the surface that looks ' tike a goad ar�umerrt, unless you realize that the plan that they appraved still has 17 singl�family ', homes,which they admit they can't regulate. So that means that we can still get 17$80A00.04 houses , plus the townhames. I feel that the ar�umerrt that Mr. Weisensel and Ms. Shoe-Corrigan presented i was not a realistic argumertf, but just a way to try and justify a bad decision. � I was also e�ct��rnely disturbed when the planning comrnissioners�blicly canmented thaf I was out of une tor senaing a ietter stating tnat tne opirnons ot tne neignnomooa ao not maKe any aitterence. i nen in the same breath they proved that public opinion ance again doesn't matter. I don't know what other agenda the planning commission has, but 1 believe that it is not to seive the public, in the publics best irrterest. Also afterthe meeting,Mr. Pearsan announced to the entire group that this developmerrt plan would be preserrted to the city council during rtext weeks cauncil meeting for quick approval. Thase were his exact worcis.So apparently Mr. Pearson has the authority to speak forthe city council. I am very disappointed in the entire process, we are repeatedly told that our opinion matters, but the actions of the planning commission constarrtly proves otherwise. Our neighborhood will be attending the City Council meeting, we are aware that it is a waste of our time, but wewe gone this far,so we would like to witness the complete process disregard our concems. Sincerely Cari J Ostert�aus ■ ■ ,,.�.::. --- , , ::: � - �:. G.;....:: _ _ _�.... �.... �:_,� z � o . _. , : ...'� R�i: e 4 . :' ��:�::-. ;. ...�.�nfi' • ' � � � ��j i �� .-. �y� ,�.. ' - � .... :..: ;. -..:�. � n�� `.� . 11 _ __._ , �A , _ ��.,., . .......: ':.�.a �:�::�� ' �'[�::':;�. , ;�:,: . - ,.,.,.. .. ,:.._. ...�:_. �.�:. �.... w.. _... ...... •.r .:.�. �,ri �� • . � �r�� u��. . � �o 0 no �� uc�uu : . . _- .._.. ........._............_..............._...... ::.:.,.�::,:.:�;.:.:��:.:,,-...� .:........ ...r;=;'r: :::,:::..:r::se,:...f,::?ar=•r�:�:?i's�c:{;;;,a;:::,......r;rr:::i: ....,�......,..�...:.. .�. , .....:. .._._................,.. .............. �.. "'...:::::::a::::e:::'�:..s.-:::::.r.�:•r•e:::r.h.3....._n....,-.;.....:r.._r.�,�^s»a�::::ai::: '}iti�i'::c?iis:'r::::m:'.......�........:. - ..._..,.......::..........._..:..................... ....�,..�.... .._....... _ ...»......_._........::c....,�................... �_..:.....,.�....:�.............�...�.................... ....�..� .._....... ,.�..........� ..i......,...«.. ......�»..,s...............r.......�..,...�...r�re:..p,:::�.,�,............,..�... �.,.._..�....j. :af.._.ra�:.::,:^::;::it:ii^• - :::.ar.?uf:i�i:rir!r;i:�fei"e'v'.`;�r;c.:r:!'''i:;:":':;�'• ;',::::.��:::::a •: _.......... .,.. �.........:....................:r-�a.�:,,:a.:....,::r:., ..,.........::r:a:::::r.:c:::::r:r: ,...s.....,a.:,::.r.ar��.r:1�.:a.:�'`.' .c:a,a,....,...... .�:e:;::^a::rtis::�aritititT::�:::::�a�s,,�.sr;:.�...},{i^:m•a�:r.r.;r.�,�rr.�;,«:., _.a. :�.s��ci;::?�ri:i;_r.:;:•: ..... ..t . r.e.::c-.. . .,, "'cvrl:c -...aa�.t.a;:..s.::::Zi:::�.ii�iiii9ic'i.� ^:ii::�::.;.;t::..,c::;;ac.::::.::::.........c,;�.ce:.:::C'r...i,,..., ..,, .... i::'rc: ii:iir:;:aivF.s:Ti;c"t'x'rti:�ci:z;.EiifiiF:'rri;.,f,r.}:7':'" .ti; � ' .I ' �;�� ` ` '' { �'L �' r.; . . ."'' �J �.,� ,� r + , _�� S ...j� �A7�' ! �� ' �� r f� G ��'. � � I I �� '�� L -�� -L�� - - _ �.�� _ a v�'� '� - � _. �:ty,. F ��.: tv��a+ern��cvv_��.��.v�� I _ O:I� — — — L��; � � �� C � m �= 0 �� o o �� 11 10�`.a.� `.i.�� • �� : . .� ,- � r�� _ ,. .� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ o _ ,. � =� .� �� _� �� I — _ I� � ��- � . .� . . �a_ , . _ _ � , F . . . .. -��.. . �. _'q _�� A.��., y . .t � � : ��. Y �. � � - . . hr N ._ ... . _. -• .. _'.. . ... i� . .� ' � _.. .__.. . .. .._._.._._ _. ._, ' " .,r .K;�: . _ - �. ..� . _ .. . ., �, .r �, ,. . .y.�•m..�.n ....� . � . � .. . . ..i ♦. . . _ .. _. . .;. .. ... ��x A • ...� '. ' � s� . � 4 �11 .�w � ++��+w.•s:. ._"_'r'T�. . " .��, j�p..�- t_ „ .,, ___ __ — . �. �� .. .:--•-' .- � . 'r�'n ♦ :��V;' , . , . . � . � � � I { .�.. ...:.��i.....,n..nn�� n,�• oo... .��. :��1':: n�i. �ju��n��..i=��...��,o� ::r: �:i r:::i::?i'�:s�:;t j:Fi}ti�i,}�,;f}�,i�� Fr'�:{�i:f:rr�;#};'f::i}::::s:irr�i}I:::s"::.;:,::;:�':::s },: �;ti:::a��tis�;,�,titi;,, .,ti. ..��.. �. �' � ..:::� } •�r�} ��,sl. :.,. ,:s:.r,s:::n�,�:.r, :4•,.:::�;t:, r ' t: � { � l s...;.i?.. ,i:ti�r�a:;.., rr,::";:i'f,�ceeL�i2rY��'�i}�.�, �', �r�; �, 1 ;� �!t{ ; �t,:�;,,�{;r�:r�i;��;;ti:�::z�:� +:i::•s:�s:,;i:�:::i ; �� • r `SSV� �5: .�ti.� Y:SS�.,.�.,., :.,::1�:�:�.:�.: Y� �,�5 � ��1 . �{tiV1� ,titYt�'r.l:.�„ti::. �...,��. t:i;�r'r:'r�:;�r;,s:.� ,. �1 ;�s, ,, �,;�jf � �} '} '}Yi'r�:��, ::;rr �; �ir,��;:;,:� ::•�:��:::;: r �►. �,�,,� { � 5,•,,:;.r,�! ��kk':.., f�::+��'��:itf;�f:��:;::;:�,_.;: 1 .1:'.t��}�1 ' t!t�}, ! ^� Y '�� ti �,J�.�.:: 1 t' .... 1 �Q;S 1 �J1 1L?l1�.h:� YY:;S� 1'�S::�S"^�'..'.:.:l:..:.: ••iSl:::.. 'ti'r: .,��r:� �;t�'rr�';r.�; ;;tiv{;�:;ir �i;' -•.;l.1'sti .�} ;�:i.��:r,;�:s},t.:�;'r,s:;.r, E:.,', j i., :...,j;. s;.:,t 'i�}�'} ..s�,r::rc:,�f:�if tt�s�1r7}. .��t t�: ��i �.�' �l,r�s.��:::�[ :��t}rI:�;s}r�:f:}s;{rf:si}�i;i rr:: ,,:i :'1'ii :`ii5 5�u!•+1 .:i�.i:�i" �{ u1.:' ui71�Y!.�:::ti:.1�5•..iiin`:5ii:1:1'�u.'.::i�:::i:'�u: ' ':3 r �:;s''r�'i' ;!•' ;�;ti �� '}, '!fi' ' r�:r'lEt:ia:�r:l', ..,•r�", :iY:: �.� 'r;; -- �1� i� � 4'� �... ..f .ti,. ..,k•:�r:es�'rre'r=:-r:a ::s;�f'i';��, ,.i?r.,rs:I:s:�.� � � .;;L ,i�r ��;r: :::.:::.....n . ��:a �,►..:.,i.... ': ,.i.:.�,. .� ,,,,�.:��::�r� r.::,;, �,tiy•�....��::...�.:...�;.�'i: ::r:: ,. ..,�a��` !ti ,,,: •;i'�;:::r�,rf;e":,t:.i,,,.;�� -"�"—:,.;� � ��f��r��.��4��;k��s r��,:ti,:,,::}�,.:::��:�,�,�:�,�,::::: , — I, � � ,#;au.i.�u�ic.,��,.w i iic.:.i i .�iiu � i I � �r�� 1�'1, -- —— — � �, .�:,.. �.�� . � � � ; , � �� i 1 � , k� ; �.il��i� � �� _ ; � � �� , � I� ��' .� I 3 �� a �:.. � , . II �...... � � .._ :._ _�� ,,�� -��=-�� 5 0 a ��: � � C►�� , , _ � _ ==�='�=�_�: - I r�� —' '� � � .�� _��______.�� . ___ . . . , . . , m �m m o� .o; �� _ � . �� - .; , = _ �, � . : : � . � � „ „ �� ; � ; �� , �_ _ _�_ �i _ . , � '- ► `. . j _ _ , � " -��_i � �� o .- . ... :� � _�-,,� _ , �� _. ,,��— .�- __ 4.� . ��:,r �;, ��,_: - P.ri ��:i!� �_-.�. i _� �::.. . � �_ __._��}_ ___ _---=�� , _ ,� , �r� � -- _ �r � ��, �,..; , t�y �'�''��'� � ;. a �� s :��_ �� .. �' ;- �G �J �_ � �� i �', ��-_ _ -_ _ � - - �:-- � _ - ______�__ � _._--.--��, ! �.n a�'t`.�'i``"; r��-�' ��>_ ��-: _ ,, : ;.-,� -.. ; ,�, - � �� . i �.-' ..� � - �- � � s ,� �,- � ;�"` � � � � ?� �: �� # } , � , �', �4�� _��3 � � " 3 �.- ,.S "�a � _a�� .£'' ��_ �' t�' � 3'I �' .P�- �.- `� �- . p ,,�r�,. '' ,. '£ . i� - .� �� , -� . ^. �r- � � .y, � ' . "'- _ y � �._ � � ,. � �� `�� " i : _ � � �'� " - -�. ,� �� 1 Y.� _ �4� � - _.._.w+..� / . . .�' F �- �"{ , ��1" . .. �.. ' � ... .. q . � � ^ : _� .� '' Ililll��'""�t � _ _ - _ _ �� . _ _ p `„� _ �"�--_ -- - � ',-~, . ` . ., r'_.. �� . : _ .. y .. _ . -_ . _ �. ._ . - �, .... _ _ . ...: __ ...: - . __:. _u - - � �-_ .�,..:...� ,�-, , . . ,_ , ,�, ,. , . �. , --t., .. _. <: � � �� .,��:��y ,,. �.-„�-� -r � . �. ... _ �4 �: � L &"' - � .. �._ . ,:.rv • �. .. ._ .� :'% .. ;: .: "... . - . i9 t.: ,.:��✓...... � � 't i��i�� 1 g � *''' �•�-- � � : �. — .- _. y • � �f/. " . _ J"�� .: �-.r-„ r��' ` ..* J � y,.0 "t�� i r F'i' . . a ri h iC ^*x r v,�r� a,.*`,ei"n �xk y��'�'�,,,��,.�k�:�i�.A"L`?"+, ' �• x i �.r� e ,n� _. ' . :��i � + �� t } i � ... ii.P`� .7'hK'�,,,te, " �;f t... a - .. �. ' t�MJf+6I� fyr. `� . . . . . � .,.a }�',j f./�1._. ,. -: 3f77d"` . � . i .` �.i..v..A�� .. .. - r'.,�,�,"b'6+:tiw�^c a.'��'!�.��"fi�• �{.a��'ly�,�y, + � y � '` e � � ) :�' �� '� i�,�J +� y; .. � � ' � � � ,- .,�.�, ,�11111)� �� t �r �� . _ �, �� b ; .: �," �.� n i� '^�a: -5?'. "#�, r,;(,y�{.t � :$ ,��,: Nij r 1�ry�i �4 t^ F� ^�� f, r$I yYq �� 1 ' w�' �'$ � �,: F . � � -��' �.i ,}...� . �� ,. �� . :s �`' 'i�,�, �t �x� . , .4-•�ar a � � ��'"»` � �" � �� -'� '- . �� '�� < �`� �' ; i(llE_l' ��` -- �.° �'r =� '�� - � t�l.i 1.�=: .� � �`1L1�� ,-- ��'��` �� ._ �� 1 � ��ili� �_�.� � r ' ' �; l, � �, � . . ., � ,_ '�� r . . � ,.� � ` � � � ` �� ; �, � � ��# p � � —�-,—,— 1 � � ��,��, � �a � '��I��I��' .. � �; � �,; 4� ' �I,2� \\ �.^ � � � : W��., � � . �.�y' � '� � �� r�„ ;� �'� � � : � ;� ��'. �� , '� -. 1 ,�� : � , � , �'� '� � �� ' i t , � , � �Y � , z , , `, � ��., � ' � ..,��ii�lllll��ll� � . ; � - . � � � � w�, � � .� _��_. ,�� _ _ , � ��fi .��;�, � � � �' �� ; � �,: � � � t, r h;� S' 'Y yJ A �tu '�` . r T� S 1�-' Y t � _� { •� ' �' '__'...I,.i-..'i. � 1 r�`,. d � i , � , � . � .,. ��'`�" � �:: ,;,,,;� : 3�'�%r `�*� -'�-'r �..�1> ,�. �'"'�i�� r.. . ~ � ,�� i �� µ`��• �\ 4•`�� _ _ � �~ � > _ �'�'�, �'h _ ' e�� `� , -- - - _, _''�� :L � ---- i��':��1=��` l � � `��r- .; '� __ , �.� --- ��-,�.,_.._--.-,��_._..'�_ ��,`lql-' � �. � ; '�� ,, � '._-` . . . 4, _r` ! 4 �r�,...�. . � ' • �'a'a�'.:�..:- ' ' ' � � . ... .�\�� ' . .. v � " " ' /� ::- / � . . ..." ! ' � . � _ 'l��`�._—__——f .......J � ��.. �_ ��'��LC�i==��-�� .g�.....:. _ � j`. �1: ��.. '� .'.ir� f A� . . +-.��:,ti��s r�. .�.��"-m�,.sx� . � . _.._, 1 ' �:� � .. s �. � _ , . � _., . .�Jr.w".i..+�:+^!'�.. -�. � ..... e-. _.�. . . . ., A .. ti ��I�.� t f �- �{ ( i ! ' �\.. $ h � � L i{� � ��*�."'!ar L � � � �� T 4 S ..'�� . . ,S s. •7v w �'�1' ii k,. _ � _ .a � � _ �/.l�/T +_ �i _ _ ;��... �. _:._ _ - � '" '� '� . - L..^- � , ,. __ _ __. _�. -_ r ' ------ '+._.T !_'�"_ _ _ _��:�'...:----• . _ _i---� � � - 5 � ..:.. . . -.:�.. , .,. - 1 '3; :