HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.d. Geronomie Pond Prelimiary Plat � ' CITY OF`ROSEiViOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUi�i1�1�RY FOR�CTiON
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: Januarv 21, 199
AGENDA tTE1�i: Geronime Pond Preliminary P1at, Final PLrD AGEND� SECTION:
and Rezonin� New Business
...
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, Assistant Planner ,�GEND�► : . i.
ATT�CHi1�IENTS: Draft Resolution, Preliminary Plat, Engineering :�PPROVED BY:
memo, PC Reviews, McMenomy
Cones ondance, Conce x a roval resolution I
Appiicant: Tom Bisch of Heritage Development
Location: 36 acres on the northwest corner of Chippendale Avenue and 160th Street West '
Property owner: Robert Geronime
Number of lots: 48 Single Family, 56 Twin Home - 101 total units I
Density: 2.77 units per acre �
Comp Guide Plan: Urban Residential �,
Current Zoning: Agriculture
Requested Zoning: R-1 Single Family Detached Residential & R-2 Single Family Attached Residential I
SUMMARY
On November 9, 1996, the City Council conditionally approved the concept for Geronime Pond, a residential
developmen# for single family homes mixed with twin homes (please see attached resolution). On December 10,
19�6, Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for review of the preliminary plat, final FUD and
rezoning.
The primary issue was an apparent density bonus requested by the developer to heip absorb the cost of
acquisition and development. The concept approval gave the developer a choice between lowering the density to
91 units or enhance the landscaping to qualify for the bonus. The developer is entitled to 2.5 dwellin� units per
acre. The density of the preliminary plat is 2.77 dwelling units per acre excluding the remnant parcel isolated the
anticipated relocation of Chippendale Avenue. The recommendation passed 3-2, which iilustrated two of the
Gommissioner's dissatisfaction with the landscape enhancements. The landscaping consists of an additional
boulevard tree for each single family lot and increased evergreen screening along 1bOth Street West. The latter
was a Staff recommendation after review of the initial landscape plan submission. The revised landscape plan
responds to the concerns identified by Staff.
Additional questions were xaised regarding the timing of the Chippendale Avenue xelocation and the ultimate
construction of the County Road 46 project. Concerns were expressed abaut delays of the Chippendale Avenue
relocation and the effect an the outlot property and the adjacerit McMenomy owned property if the project does
not coincide with the first phase of Geronime Pond. The lack of design and grading information relative to 160th
Street West caused concern that the proposed berms along 160th Street West might be inadequate for screeninD
purposes. In reviewing the grading plan, the City Engineer will approve 3:1 slopes instead of the standard 4'1 in
order to achieve the highest possible berms. The steeper slopes will be the responsibility of a homeowner's
association.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Geronime Pond prelirrunary
plat and final PUD development plan; and,
Motion to table action regarding the rezoning from Agriculture to R 1
and R-2, Single Family Attached and Detached Residential until final plat
a roval.
� '
�A�
�
CITY OE ROSEiViOUNT
U�KOT� COUNTY, N�INNESOT,�
RESULUTION t997- i
A RESOtUTION COPIDITION�LLY �PPROVING '�
THE PRELINIIN�RY PL�T�ND FUD FINAL-DEVELOPMENT PL�►V '
FOR GERONIME POND
VVHEREAS, the Planning Department of the City of Rosemount received applications for ,
preliminary plat and planned unit development final plan frorn Heritage Development, and,
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1996, the City Council conditionally approved the concept for
Geronime Pond, and, '
WHEREAS, on December Y0, I996, the Planning Commission ofthe City af Rosemount ',
conducted a public hearing for review of the preliminary plat as specified by the Subdivision '
Ordinance, and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend approval of the
preliminary plat and PLTD final development plan for Geronime Pond, and,
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the preliminary plat, and PUD final development plan
with the benefit of the Planning Commission recommendation and discussion. '
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rosernount
hereby approves of the preliminary plat and planned unit development final plan for'Geronime
Pond subject to:
1. Enhancement of landscaping as appropriate to suppoR the density bonus.
2. Dedication of 0.71 acres of land for park development with the balance ofrequired
dedication in the form of cash contribution at the rate established by the fee resolution at
the time of final plat.
3. Incorporation of recommendations relative to sidewalks and trails as approved in the
concept plan.
4. Incorporation of recommendations relative to grading,utilities, easements, ponding,
streets and public infrastructure requirements as recommended by the Public Works
Department.
5. Developer must make payment to the City at the time of final plat for{the following items I
modify items 5a-e ofResolution 1996-99): j
a. 1997 Storm Water Trunk Area Charges of$2,000 per acre which is estimated at '',
this time as 32.5 acres x $2,000 = $65,000.; I
b. Preliminary payment for street irnprovements to Chippendale Avenue using 1996 �
rates for a 38' wide residential street which is estimated at this time as $53.20 per
foot x 1,168.38' _ $62,158.;
c. Preliminary payment for street improvements to 160th Street West using 1996
rates for a 38' wide residential street which is estimated atthis tirne as $53.20 per ,
i
��
foot x 996.65'' _ $5�,022.;
d. Escrow for 8'bituminous trail on Chippendale and 160th Street West (wtuch will
be constructed with b & c above) using a 1995 rate which is estimated at this time
as $10 per foot x 2,165' _ $21,650.;
e: 1997 GIS fees of$50 per loUunit which is estimated at this time as I O l lots/units x '
$50 per lot/unit= $S,OSQ
6. That the twin home lots must be governed and maintained by a homeowner's association
with responsibilities including maintenance and replacement of Iandscaping and buildin�
exteriors.
ADOPTED this 21 st day of January , 1997 by the City Councit of the City of Rosemount.
Cathy Busho, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk
Motion by: Seconded by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
c
wu�cr oac aoortwrr �
' '� �1
; �, ; ; ,; < , �i
� ,- ���. �, � _�_ - ; � ; � �
� ' �� y`-- �" '� �'r i
,. �„-' •
;. . i',., --�rr�,R,e�...ni�' `.`. : � . . � � � � � � . � ti�
� � � ���' i � � ' � . �y i PApC . . I I � � . . . � . : ��� .
'. �: � i ,� � � ' . . . . . . � .
�
. � . / I / { � . 1 I/ . . . . . I � . � . . . � . ��� .
_____ � �� � ' ..
[_" 7'_' ._ . . . .
`� � i � �J � I�I ��1 10 1.�1 d 1 • �I 7� 1 •�i 1 6� 1 ~� i s� i- 3--ji 1,_! � l .� . . . . � . � � � �� '
',, ; ���'� �" [��_;�[.�_�[� �(�_}�[��(���.�_��[.� �� �,��u,��j �� � �� � �i
--.-� � � ', _' , -- � --- , -- , - �� - , ----- ,I..',(_::__.,��.1; = I �� �.�.�
� i � � � . �.x.����r��_i�—����.t.x��.�` � �
>--t � � a.
j �� ��J _____— �"�'—_� "` +.. . �. ' . . . . �
_�. .t---- � .� 4� � . � . . . . . �. : .'_y�'�.., .�_.i� ��) . i
I . � 1 1 N � f� -a.—r.r r�r A T'Y-f Zi`I'i��'1 -1/—IZ+ ���y .. _ .I� � . . . . . . . . `
� � �,.•__� � f - � ----- � ---_ � ----- � ----- � - -- � ----- � ---- � --- � '�.—. ! i 1
�� � I i � o o � ai� �� oi � i .,�ti ,�ai si -.___ s''�. .�"A �-- � � �` �+ ` )
'� ---� � �----- �'�,�,r t� � f ����a�1��s��[f�)�[�a}�[J�i����J�n�f/'�o�i�I'ia�i[l�is�[iw.....j', ,/�.( �i '�) ��
�i i . i. N"'�e_� � i� r_u_L_sr_1_sr_a_x_L._�a..l-se_J_sc�._a �. �n_J�F� �+1!�t,�u I. � � . . . . . . . � .
�, ---� I �-----•` W� � x�?*Ti,�j r a� � �!t_�l:4� i i � � ���
1 _ - �
/ u___ � 3
. ..`e .
� � 1 1 1 � �,��l�i/ A� J�t � � � � � 11 O�N 1� I �i ' . . . . . � .. . . . � . . .
� � 1 � l ��, ,/"' : , � . . . �E _?!_- j�'�w�iu. � . .. . . . . . . . . �(f !
--' I_ �---- ."I/ �r�»I S POND �y � f 1"-l_.,�� � i ^^^^^� O��
. _ . w�..w - -� -- __- � .J � . .
� � -
��i. .» i'� _ - -T � . wr��w C'�u. 1 "��. . . ..
. . . . •. . / ✓.. . . . . .
'li'
. - . /.�� �wne �� I �� 1" � . � . . . . �
I __ - .ww � . Q� 3 � j r'�1 .
-- �C T . k � �. U
I : , fr
� -_f_-_'I �� . i"� '. � ♦ ""' t ♦ n��en.�vtira �gL+ . . �
� M /+ 70;' )i �7 .. . . {- - � • 7uwo l-_....J . . . . . '�Z�,`
i i •� � /+ � $ : �j�} ..�...f,��l ae �. \ �� rry�- � 11�_�.':_ I � �`� �
� � {«� Y ��, ,; ---'jl wn..�••, , ,y,�1�..N�-� - -;, � � n ' �r�'
` I,,� �1I W��
i _J___ �/ ,cr�� �c/ ;...w:`�Y.� s�".',� ,��`�a��061i -_r� � � C�Z
� ----�'--r _ ./jC .«,.. , :'a,,,�'��7 �. .�. � . ,���•'ba\9 ''V i�(.�nw...� � � � . � �� . . . . . . . . . . Q.�
, __.w_'l w:3v '� '�i:-. _N i ti ;r�.ti � Q �
/� , //�� �.='j;y �6 ■
� . a�" �ru. � �� i jN w�j J�" �i y/. �;�wn«. � � � ('t����e�>: V ��"�j. •;b�! p�ci� / _� . � � � �ECRIP'f10N. -- �--.— �—��— —�— . . ��W� .
) � � I i
. W i ""'' �� f 1 37,.�7 DD� l� � �� /� `y, �� � i`I .��� . r�� � 16)�i � I. . . .. . . . . . . . .
1 If� � ! 'z'• Mr � � _ ���� Ce�KN1 MIY�rMW iA�s
1 ,,•.� „ .�I . � \ \\`'n O ...Ctro,ur....n.e.cwo
��� _t_ � 1�� ( au.�jt :i f � r'.`� a : � � s� u j.� `'�- �\�\u•.�; ��� � � I �
r- � '�"-�� �\� ���..A.' / /�c!:���. 4�' �:5,�8;•,`�'/��+ ``�i��"`.-' ' � I � ---
"" � ' "
i � \\� `� `.w > J�y �/ �L�� Y :>`� .+;'� � ��ie:' � _ r__-��'/�J sunarica--- ---—— —_ — - —-- �
� .. 11� wa�w �� , \O� ~.�/. . P7i/ i3, +i ,�4 s��;�.f • .;...� 't�iq;� .� ''�/ i� � // // . . .
. .� -;L� t .!. •wj ij �� �d �.EY �r �� � � '.�. .� � �. . C / � �w.K .ra.m . . � � �wrw� � � d� �:
.�1..A,.. �±�. ���/�3 Ta'�w fwYxTst�r(�'���fig,j�.)`J /��4�a•'��✓ � �� �I J � �NAWIRMY . . . � . � YY1Y � O.�
, ;,.: ; : �`)� �•:-:�., ;��;���.����j(44��`�t�wl�1� � 1 �.N; �� � � � r.ev.�wra �r�
A� 4C 101/ ; ��� � YM1'N I �N, j�tui}�'M �C;; . � �,ir'�\ e)•� ��� , J�11 � .I ► . . . . . . n..�,.�v.�u+n:.�o . . � . .�.` � . � ���� � .
Yw� S ` I I (. . CII�M��ifti0lN . .. �� �.
t -- - ,,�,�j 6 '�
`�'_"� � . � f..•j.� . �� L.Y_1-:_1�s!1-�L'�"--V' /C�,i b`P'�: '�/ � nr�w�a�. . � urr�r � }��� � .
Y y/
. ;Y i t .'��I' . ..�i �,�.yr.�'"—�.�. � . --�-���•t��v�\ !6'� v ., . . . . � . ���»•�xiN ww:l�i . �toirwew i� . � �aw+. � <�.�
� '
i f �, ��'�r„-�,*-� ' r„-• r-�n"..'( ti °w'� � I I v.
� ��� �.�. �; ., . rs--w a- `. M� � .� � � ( � . .a� _ ., . �»..�...�� � C
� �,. � r�;�� -j� --1- � -1---,� -�---�S � �� i � � � ,.a �..a�....ow,.....��., ..�... m
,� t� (# q i �i �i '�t � � : . .; � .�...�.. "" ..�.,,,. _
. � � �//" ' � f7! n�!u. il.�ir����u. ;���r. � �w,r ��`, .� -) I I . . . . . . . �: . �. � � . . . .
/9I '"� 97 rfa�_.J.�J 1_���.1_�1 j_esl�la.-a---"--•�� '
i I�� 1 1 � i � � . . NoulE 6Eie�cK r+aRLtION
___ J : . '�. .. . . � I . CXCEPiION f� i ' . .w�M M _—_ ._. _ ___ . � Q
--� -- � ^ -- ------ ---- ----� � --- -J� L_ �a�...�,. : � Z
/-• .. � � .ort rour.na im��..��•rnaw.w�or � � O
___________ __ ___-_______ _ _ _�-�r_ _________ ,�M��N��-.�.-�a�.M � �.
.—�— f M ���lN �
— . � YO1H�TlrlT YN(CQNfT 11O.W N/� lxUt MO LN � :� .� .. . � .NEW RDM DAiA _�_._.�...�..__ _. ._ �..� �
� � iutww[�e � � w�no w+n�r.o.wr �s�!u ^! �.�rw���.
. . . . . 1.. . . . . . .�.� . . �W MMq� . � O ��...
�..� /+'� M�wuIIC�D� NIYt . M��
� � . . . .. . . .. ❑ �� � 1 �l. . . � � G!l�O.r1��{ M y 1MOr M IiP�W�� �
. . . . . � . .. .. .. J . . . � . . IM1t• �rMl�. . . . Il�f'y� � . � �.
• w
U
l—J
.
,,....«.o.�.��t�, ; , _,m�, !� ��
, � `!
�.' . . , r--�'�+�.+.r� /// ;P�' . ' . _'�, . ..1' ' . � .. � . � . �. . . . �' .
�� �`� . . �•�+e,.--��' . . � . . �i� � .
/ .A,� '�- I,• � � " :�!
„
-„ _
`i�� ""' PARK ..,-.. I " . . . . . . .
I��,!' • " ,.�; � � �,.-•"_� ��`. ' '� _" .. . .. . ,�f
��� � . - _- : . ,r . ,. � i -- � �
��L,^ �-µ' � .q."I .• � _lY _k._. -� �� �� �::'• � ',r' h ,'� ' � . .� � . . . � � .. . . . � . ... f' � . .
� ,'�. �a''1 �'� f � � ♦ � � M�'� M� �. � 1 . ,C . �� . . � .
,1 . _ _ r� � r � •���� r ,„ � �' _� r . . « �/J t' ' `, b' .�,•�I'�,�,l��'� . . . . . '�` .
t�+l� 1 l 4 I _ (t�,� �k, G �.� . � � . � . Ifd►l Ls�t' . -
� ' � �pr ~ ;.k.�'a'-J.' _i r-i-- t_a�.J.� � � 4.�b:, ,� . . � . � . . . . . .
�.,-;.� - - - -`-''� . , -,'. _.. , •..�-�:_..,.-:T'' �� �
, , , �
� ,I �, + I -�-——r �.r�•`-i--.�• , t,+—� . — _]_._"�.--.. k ...... _ _. `
+ p�,( t ( �. �' � � . � p � . � � �I�y LEGEND �� �I 'I
\I f f �_ �' f � i�� r A r•• w n � 1`""'y�.�'�'� 'eea' � �, �'� .`r ! ��� ioi� - -- uw�w cona.r
��i �e�i�;�I f- - ► t�;,r nl:.r��i. �; io is� � '�` � n � � 'I ,1 ---�ou- �a�ow
,�, �► ��� 1 �� �� " '" �. .�.,.�.�.....,�,,. F.. Z��
i � - f, I� � .. .. K (, -�� _.1..t� � � '� xi.. �.wuwro�u��.oar I, . � V.
'1 1 �l �-`h^�-�6'�.� � �
,i; � �;.k q -_ � 1 a � k �i r w w�w►.o w..r w.o� p �
� �• � '� ,.�'. � . �` ��'' � ��. 4. � : . . . f wn � .�a��.��� . . . O�
_,��_ _ - �� � ,' , ' _ _"�� r �, �� � ;� .:.. �� '��
-- -- -t� o' ;-' •-=^'A.` . . P�� � (• i�� ;i �I �-� ' � o. --a' dw..v.......1n.w�r:. j.�. . �L'
. / w ♦ '1 6 ♦ . . ,1 1 ��_� . . . Q rii�
'" �� �`,� n� �t'_� �r 13i ., ,,� �iW.. � �Q� 6 �� ,,� r �I I CJ W� .
" l�` f�. 1 � �� »..r�..v....uf • ' �- .r _ .. . .. � .. . � � � � � Z��
1 J�1� .V''•� ""'� i 69, �t �7� .' '�'• . . . � . . � Q V.I� .
_� � ,
, � � .
.
.. . �! � I . . . . Z
, � . .. 3 . i � . .. . �u�
, � . � . . ____'__'______' _ '...... ._ ""
'• �� � . 'K � . -. � .
� . ` ' " —�
� .
�
, � � � � ,£'��i � `�!. ! , ,.� ' ` '> `. � ,j� � —
'� ,�•. ..I NOTEB Q, !
r4 � ;. ' �'.-
, . . , ' �,', • .
Y , , ¢ � as � .!�• ,r .,. � . �s ,' . , �_ n-a
,� /y � / �. ./� �
. � �' i�{� � '1 �� 3j �. �� . ' 41 A� ' /q/i. �`. � \ ...I I � . . . .. � . . . . . � . .
� � } �} �.' IF, , )�M.' � ? / �, •%�,�` � (' t�
91 ati v a � •R � -'�, �e� � �, �1 ' `-- �o
'�•/ y �� y -- '_�� �, .�` , � �� � �y ' ��t
tit < ��
-::�s,: , � ," j ''f s •�.--�,7 ' '/' . �- � ,i i ��,� �
' 'M1;'° �%" P ','�" . � .�� �,d r'� � ��. . . ';I � . . . �. . � � � � ... � . � �..� .
�'• IL,� �, `��11. � i �)>'��MyT.RIWLNi.' . . . �. . . . � � � � + .
/ . , s : \� � � . . . . � � .�
� � � :� �Y �� '+ t�t
',�M- - I ,;`;'`\�.F; - _-r.--,.--� ;, � � , � � i �
� ', ,/',,, I � - i 'I Y - � ' � ,,:/' _
` L� = =►�l ���`I :�; �
� �.. . � ` �•'i ExGEPt�EA ��_�� I . � ,/ i� � . . . � � Z .
�,_ �I_�_—__'___ H. _ _ _ . . a__. __ ���I .. . : � �. . � � O
��.
f �-��— - _ -_- w ._...r•:---J� L -- � � a.
T. �— .�--- . _ .. . �.. � �� . _ . . ..
_ -" �_ � . �— � �^� �_ _ . ���-
�
, — — — - • — _ — 1�OlM�TIEEI Il�it(Go1NiT wDAD N) — — — !%I�t MY LN 1�I. � f /, . � � � � � .. . . 44 � ..
' � �NRN RAY L�! . � . �. � � t 1 . � � . . . . �� . ��. �...
� � �
�•.��� � /
❑ � � ' ; o
. . _ Q % ' w
U
� C1
I
��
: I
�?"�C..L.+F ~`���r� � :"�`-� + �`
.�
..._.-_.-- - '_ - .
.. . . . . . �� . . .. 1 � � \\ . � � � . . . . . � � �
(�j� C�� C,�� (nr �� ���s C� ��� �m"' \
-- -- -- -- ��� \ ,
-1 ��p� ., � �`
� ,,s� I � I � �H
� � t�" �,# k cm' � cn� �<� � � Q. ,� �►+
� ( � i ,
ch� � � �' i � � . . '�,(�7w
� � � 1 � � � c�'i c� � . �,
� 1 i � ��_ ' �� / 7q� � 7 �
i _� _ !. —. / i qg . ti (�)� \
(
� ./ q � (�7
� // ^ �,\`
� / �'� N
� ��7 �
/ `�
� ��(� `� • `�--
. � �� � �
\/
� �,� �/ ��
� � �r r�
\i / ��
\ �
� '
�
�
��
�� U(!�
� �2�
� �' \ ` � \l�
i , �� ��
i ,�,� '\ ��� � M�''�
�
�� �� j� / � � � � . �
1(.=) / � /�—,. �. _.,_ .r — --' �� � �
� �
' / �l') /� � � (� � `� � ��bq7 ' E6� �
� �/ � i I I j � � �a>
• , � � � � . . �
� ' W� cc��� 6W c�� ,� � � � aa �t�> �
A cZ) � (� tt�' ��� � G� oC�1 ! *� �� uD '� ��
Ntn►) � ' 'r- 11�� ;
�
FG) M(3�w ACz) ���� c(,i •'r �A(�) A(!)n(� Q). � ',, FC,'--- 1 � – M C5, ( `
� a C� � M C) C(i) M G�) GO q�,� H!� ( I
____ :-� ..._.. ..�., .�.._, --
— — A(1) —
�/--, '/
_� `T_J`�^- .�--'.�r-''J` ��,,yy^~- ,�'"'.r.Y'
G..I" 6' "�..:=A�
--... .-- ._.. _ . --.• -- -__. ----•__-__ --� --,
CODE CON1i�tON NANIE SIZE ROOT Qli�1NITlr'
EVERGREEi�i TREES
A BL�CK HILLS SPRUGE 6' BB 20
B BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 8' BB 20 '
C COLOR�DO SPRUCE 6' BB lfl
D COLORADO SPRUCE 8' BB 10
E WHITE CEDAR 6' BB 15
F WHITE PINE 6' BB 1�
DECIDUOUS TREES
G MARSHALLS ASH 2" BB 10
H LINDEN 2" BB 10
I MARSHALLS ASH 2 1/2" BB 10
J SUGAR MAPLE Z 1/2" BB 10
K RED MAPLE 2 l/2,� Bg lp
L NORWAY MAPLE 2 1/2" BB 10
ORNAMENTAL TREES
M FLOWERING CRAB 2" BB 2Q '
DECIDU4US SHRUBS
N AMUR MAFLE 3'-4' CONT.
SERVICE BERRY 3'-4` CONT.
VIBURNUM 3`-4' CONT.
-ARROW WOOD
-WAYFERRING
-WENTWORTH
DOGWOOD 3'-4' CONT. MIX OF lOQ
-REDTWIG SHRUBS LISTED
-GRAY '
_ -- �
DATE: 1-t 7-97
PUBLIC VUQRKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REVIEW FOR;
PROJECT NAME: Geronime Pond C1TY PROJECT NO.
Proposed By: Heritage Development Phane No. 481-0017
(N & A) 450 E. County Road D Fax No. 481-1518
St. Paui. MN 55117
Type of Request: Preliminary Plat Review
The Following Conditions Must Be Met for Appro�al:
1. Incorporation of recommendations relative to grading, streets, utilities and easements
identified by the Public Works Department.
2. Developer must rnake payment to the City at final plat for;
a. 1997 Storm Water TrunK Area Charges of $2,000 per acre which is estirnated at
this time as 32.5 acres x $2,000 = $65,000;
b. Preliminary payment for street improvements to Chippendate Avenue using 1996
rates for a 38' wide residentiaf street which is estimated at this time as $53.20 per
foot x 1,168.38' _ $62,1'S8;
c. Preliminary payment for street improvements to 160th Street West using 4996 rates
for a 38' wide residential street which is estimated at this time as $53.20 per foot x
996.65' _ $53,022;
d. Escrow for 8'bituminous trail on Chippendale and 160th Street West (which wifl be .
cons#ructed wi#h b & c above) using a 1995 rate which is estimated at this time as
$10 per foot x 2,165' _ $21,650;
e. 1997 GIS fees of$50 perlot/unit which is estimated at this time as 101 lots x $50
per lot/unit = $5,050.
These fees cover the outlot created bythe change in alignment of Chippendale Avenue.
The following is a review by the Public Works/Engineering Department of the Preliminary Plat ,
submittal#or Geronime Pond. The submittal was received on November 21, 1996 and incfudes ,
a plat, grading plan, and utility plan. ''
Grading/Drainage Facifities
Some of the six proposed outfalls into the pond may be eliminated. The many outfalls into the
pond increase long term maintenance, exacerbate the less than desirable pond shape, and look
unsightly. An overland or piped emergency overflow is required for the pond. '
1 of 4
One trunk storm sewer is proposed to be constructed from the proposed pond to the southerly
pond on the Shannon Pond East Addition.
Two tn.rnk storm sewers are praposed to drain into the proposed pond. One pipe is proposed to
be constructed from Winds Park Pond and another from the east which wilJ drain the McMenomy
property and-State Highway 3 right-of-way.
Grading of the northeast corner of the site, including the park area, wilf be required of this
development. 1t should be graded to an elevation of 942' with berming provided aiong
Chippendale Avenue.
Emergency overflows are required for low points on a street. Label the emergency overflow route
and show a spot elevation at its high point. Drainage easement widths may need increasing for
overland flow. Additional catch basins rnay be required to prevent run off from flowing through
intersections.
Retaining walls are not allowed in easements or right-of-ways.
Areas disturbed by the grading shall be sodded or seeded. Silt fences, temporary rock
construction entrances and additional erosion control measures will be needed before grading
can begin.
Sanitary Sewer -
I# wiil be necessary to construct a 12'' trunk sanitary sewer between the Shannon Pond East
Addition and Chippendale Avenue. The cost for the increase in diameter of the sanitary sewer
from an 8"to a 12"will be paid for through the Sanitary Sewer Core Fund. The difference in cost
in depth befinreen a sanitary sewer trunk line and a sanitary sewer needed to serve this proposed
subdivision will be paid for through the Sanitary Sewer Core Fund.
Show existing and/or abandoned drain fields, alternate drain fields and wells on the pian. Show
the existing drain fields for the homes at 3785 and 3567 160th Street West. It is proposed to
provide water and sanitary sewer service to the easement line for 3785 and 3567 160fih Stcee#
West with the construction of this subdivision. The homes at 3785 and 3567 160th Street West
will have to be connected to City sewer and water within two years of the availability of City sewer
and water.
Watermain
A 12"trunk watermain will need to be constructed between the Shannon Pond East Addition and
Chippendale Avenue. The cost for the increase in diameter of the waterrnain from an-8" to a 12"
will be paid for through the Water Core Fund;
2of4
treets
Chippendale Avenue is proposed to be relocated at its intersection with 160th Street West
(Proposed County Road 46), Chippendale Avenue is proposed to be graded and paued during
the 1997 eonstruction season.
Walks � Trails
An 8' bituminous trail will need to be constructed along the west side of Chippendale Avenue from
the drive at Winds Park south to a future traii along 160th Street West. An 8' bituminous trail wiN
need ta be constructed along the north side of 160th Street West from the Shannon Pond East
Addition to a future trail along the west side of Chippendale Avenue.
A 5' concrete walk is proposed from the south side of Cardinal Drive in Shannon Pond East
Addition to Chippendale Avenue. A 5' concrete walk is also proposed to run southeriy from
Gardinal Drive to a proposed 8' bituminaus trail in the southwes#erly part of the p1at. The traii in
the southwesterly pa�t of the plat will provide a link with the future traik along 160th Street West.
Easements 8� Right-of-Ways
Fifty (50')feet of half right-of-way needs to be dedicated for future improvements to Chippendale
Avenue. Seventy-five (75') feet of half right-of-way needs to be dedicated for future
improvements to 160th Street West (Proposed County Road 46).
Minimum utility easement widths are 20' or twice the depth to the invert of the pipe, whichever is
greater. Existing easement widths may have to be increased or decreased in size. Additional
easements may be needed for storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain connections between
this development and neighboring developments.
Private Utilities
A shoe box style street light wili be requested at the street intersection with Chippendale Avenue
besides the normal street light installations.
Construction
The City recently adopted a policy for the public construction of all future publicly owned facilities.
The Developer has the choice of Gity financing or private financing of these improvements per
the adopted poFicy. A petition can be obfiained from the Public Works Department.
3 of 4
Fees 8� Assessments
Developer must make payment to the City at finai plat for;
a. 1997 Storm Water Trunk Area Charges of $2,000 per acre which is estimated at
this time as 32.5 acres x $2,Q00 = $65,000;
b. Preliminary payment for street improvements to Chippendale Avenue using '1996
rates for a 38' wide residential street which is estimated at this tirne as $53.20:per
foot x 1,168.38' _ $62,158;
c. Preliminary payment for streef improvements to 160th Street West using 1996 rates
for a 38' wide residential street which is estimated at this tirne as $53.20 per foot x
� _
996.65 - $53 022.
, ,
t
d. Escrow for 8 bituminous trail on Chi endale and 160th Street West which witt be
rr (
constructed with b & c above) using a 1995 rate which is estimated at this time as
$10 per foot x 2,165' = $21,650;
e. 1997 GIS fees of$50 per lot/unit which is estimated at this fime as 101 Iots x $50
per lo#/unit= $5,050.
These fees cover the outfot created by the change in alignment of Chippendale Avenue.
�i
g:lenglprojectlgeronime\qerrev2.wpd
4of4
��
�nr HAu
CITY OF ROSEM�U NT � 28�5_,45�hsu�W�t
� P:O.8ox 510
Rosemount,MN
Everything's Coming CJp Rosemount!1 ssoba-0s�a
Phane:612-4Z3•441 l
Fax:512�i23=5203
Ptanning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes December 10,1996
Pu suant to due call and notice thereof the Regular Meeting of the Plannin� Cornmission was duly
held Tuesday, December 10,1996 at 6;30 p.m. Chairperson Droste called the meeting to
order ' h members Mark DeBettignies,Patrick McDermott, and Kim Shoe-Comgan pr sent.
Also in at dance were Assistant City'Planner Rick Pearson, and Civil En�ineer pou itterer.
There were no a itions or correctians to the agenda.
�� Commissioner McDe ott indicated he took his chair at 6:38 p.m. ver s 7:38 p.m. as indicated
in the draft minutes.
MOTION by McDerrnott to a rove the November 26, 19 Regular Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes as amended. Se nd by Droste. Aye � eBettignies,Droste, Shoe-Comgan, :
McDermott. Nays: 0,
Assistant City Planner Pearson indicated t t has not received any feedback from the DNR in
regards to the tree preservation ordinance
w Busi e - D ce r 2 996 R Meetin
MOTION by DeBettignies cancel the Regular Pla ' Commission Meeting scheduled for
December 24, 1996. Se nd by Droste. Ayes: Droste, Sho -Corrigan, McDermott,
DeBettignies.
Chairperson oste recessed the Regular Planning Commission Meet at 6:35 p.m. until 7:00
p.m. for t public hearings scheduled at that time.
Ch ' erson Droste reconvened the Regular Planning Commission 1Vleeting at 7: p.m. with a11
mbers present. Droste opened the six public hearings scheduled at this time.
Public Hearing: Geronime Pond Preliminarv Plat and Rezoning
Assis�ant Planner Pearson presented a brief overviewfor the Geronime Pond preliminary plat.
The preliminary plat consists of l0l dwellina units, (45 single family units and 28 twin homes [56 ,
units]):
.. � . � . . � � � .� � . .. . . PnM.donrt�evt4�As�N+� ��,
. . � . . . . . � . . . � � � . . . . � . ` �.. �.
OHIdII1M,(J�
. . lIMf.COI1fUI1MY TJfWL1It.
. . � � . . . . . �I.
.. . . .. � .. . . . . . � . . . .. . ..... � . . _.— � � . �I
t y�PL.�►;YNING CONIIVIiSSION �'
REGULA,R�VIEETING ��
��,
DECEMBER i0, 1996
Mr. Bisch,xepresentin�Heritage Development, was present in the audience to answer qaestians.
Commissioner Tentinger questioned the finat elevations when the resurfacing of 160th Street
occurs.
A representative from Paramount Engineerin� indicated that the elevation at 160th Streer for the
proposed development would be similar to what it is now.
Chairperson Droste opened the floor far public comments.
E.B. McMenomy, 15872 Chippendale Avenue West, distributed a letter he had composed relative
to the proposed development. Mr. McMenomy would like to proceed with developin� his
property which is located in the southeastern corner of the proposed development. He would like
the realignment of Chippendale to be part of the development process, preferably in the first
phase.
Mr. Bisch indicated that all grading would be done at one time;but the installation of the streets
were dependent on variables.
MOTION by Tentinger to close the public hearing. Second by Droste. Ayes: Shoe-Corrigan,
McDerrnott, DeBettignies, Tentinger, Droste. Nays: 0.
Commission's concerns included the realignment of Chippendale Avenue, the timing of this
realigriment, �he elevations for tne resurfacing of 160th Street, the landscaping for the
development, and the enhancements provided for the increased density.
Mr. Bisch indicated Heritage Development would try to accommodate the walkway aceess area
to be 30' in width by a realignment of lots; enhancements provided for an increase in density
would include 2 trees per lot; 85 e�ergreens, plus deciduous plantings, a total of 165 trees;
uniform mailboxes; and higher quality street lighting.
: NIr. Peaxson stated that the realignment of Chippendale Avenue is a City/County issue and not a
developer issue.
MOTION by Tentinger to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Geronime Pond to the '
�
City Council subject to: 1) enhancement of iandscaping as appropriate to support the density '`
bonus; 2)Dedication of.71 acres of land for park development with the balance of required
dedication in the form of cash contribution at the rate established by the fee resolution at the time
of final plat; 3) Incorporation of recommendations relati�e to sidewalks and trails as approved in
the concept plan; (4) Incorporation of recommendations relative to grading; utilities, easements,
� ._
PL,AivNIIYG COMMISSION �
�
REGUL�R MEETING �,�
DECE:VIBER 10, 1996
�
ponding, streets and public infrastructure requirements as recommended by the Pub(ic Works
Department and including items 5 a-e of Resolution 1996-99; and, 5)That the twin home lots
must be governed and rnaintained by a homeowner's association with responsibilities including
maintenance of landscapin� and building exteriors. Second by DeBettignies. Ayes: McDermott,
DeBettignies, Tentinger, I�roste. Nays: Shoe-Corrigan. '
MOTION by Tentinger to recommend that the City Council rezone the property from AG
A 'culture to R-1 Sin e Famil Detached Residential for the single family detached lots and R-2"
� � Y
Single Farnily Attached Residential for the twin home lots. Second by DeBettignies. Ayes:
DeBettignies, Tentinger, Droste, Shoe-Corrigan, McDermott. Nays� 0.
Pu li Hearin : USP I nterim e Permit
Mr. Pe son reviewed a letter received from USPCI requesting a continuation of th public
hearing u �1 January 14, 1997.
MOTION by ermott to continue the public hearing to January 14, 19 . Second by
DeBettignies. Aye . Tentinger, Droste, Shoe-Corrigan, McDermott, ettignies. Nays: 0:
F li He rin • Z ni ext Amend t-N n- ar u Waste
�;'ontainment Facilitx
MOTION by McDermott to continu the public ring to 7anuary 14, 1997. Second by
Tentinger. Ayes:Droste, Shoe-Corrig c" rrnott, DeBettignies, Tentinger. Nays: 0_
lic arin • r 'v i 1 m ment- Pr ee si
ta.
Planner Pearson apprised the ommission of an interest fr Leon Endres in purchasing a 70+
acre parcel of land north 'ghway 55 currently zoned Gene IndustriaL
The petitioner requ ted this land to remain industrial to enable him relocate his business on
this parcel and t amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan from Agricultu to Industrial. '
Chairper n Droste opened the floor for public comments.
J n Rechtzi�el, Clayton Avenue, indicated that this business emitted no fowl odors. The odors
emitted into the air were similar in nature to that of a bakery.
, CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
Planning Commission Meeting Date: December 10, 1996
AGENDA ITEM: Geronomie Pond Preliminary Plat and AGENDA SECTION:
Rezoning - Heritage Devetopment Public H�aring
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, Assistant Planner AGENDA NO. 7A.
ATTACHMENTS: Concept Resolution, Location map, APPROUED BY:
Prefiminar Plat
On November 5, 1996; the City Council approved the Heritage Deve{opment concept far single
family and twin homes in the property on the northwest cvrner of 160th Street-west and
Chippendale Avenue. The attached resolution contains the conditions of concept approval.
The Developer has assembled a preliminary ptat submission for the final development plan stage
of the planned unit devekopment (PUD). This public hearing is needed for recornmendations
regarding the preliminary plat and the rezor�ings; R-1 for the single famiiy and R-2 for the twin
homes (attached single'family).
The preliminary plat consists of an estimated 36.36 acres of property including the anticipated
right-of-way acquisition, park and ponding areas; but excluding the property isolated by the
expected relocation of Chippendale Avenue and the existing house shown as an exception at �
the southeast corner of the plat.
The preliminary plat design is consistent with the approved concept. tt indicates a total of 101 �,
dwelling units resulting from 45 single family lots combined with 2$ twirr homes {56 units) '
which yields an overall density of 2.77 units per acre. The City Council must approve a density
bonus based upon enhanced landscaping performance. Otherwise, the overall density would
have to be reduced to 2.5 dweNing units per acre which would mean the loss of ten units. No
variances are requested for the pfat.
The landscape plan indicates two boulevard trees (four for corner lots) for each of the 45 singie
family (detached) lots, which is a 100% enhancement. The twin homes are consistent with the
minimum requirement of one firee per unit. In addition, berms and landscape screening is
proposed for the lot sides adjacent to Chippendale Avenue and 160th Street West. "Planting
strips" are required in these areas, but no performance criteria is specified in the ordinance.
The planting design indica#es large shrub hedges with alternating boutevard and ornamental
trees spaced every 100 feet. A cluster of White Pines are located on the corners. Staff has
encouraged the Developer to augment the proposed screening planting with additional
evergreens, boulevard trees and reductions of the spacing between the shrubs.
The preliminary plat indicates a 15 foot wide strip of land intended for access and utilities to
the DeBates property, west of the south west corner of the pFat between units 1OO and 101 .
Staff suggests that this "pan handle" be increased in width to accommodate a trail in addition
to a driveway and utilities. Therefore, it shoutd be 30 feet wide and platted as an outlot.. fn
addition, a 20 foot wide easement for trail development should be dedicated along the rear
(west) property line of lots 98, 99 and 100.
The 1 .4 acre parcel isolated by the relocated Chippendale Avenue will be discussed at a future
date with regard to appropriate-land use and development opportunities.
RECOMMENDED ACTlON: Motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for
Geronomie Pond to the City Council subject to: 1►
enhancement of landscaping as appropriate to suppo�t the
density bonus; 2? Dedication of .71 acres of land for park
development with the baiance of required dedication in the
form of cash contribution at the rate established by the fee
resolution at the time of final plat; 3) Incorporation of
recommendations relative sidewaiks and trails as approved in
the concept pian; {4) lncorporation of reeommendations
relative to grading, utilities, easements, ponding, streets and'
public infrastructure requirements as recommended by the
Pubiic Works Department and including items 5 a-e of"
Resolution 1996-99; and, 5) That the twin home lots must be
governed and maintained by a homeowner's association with
responsibilities including maintenance of landscaping and
building exteriors.
- and;-
Motion to recommend that the City Counci( rezone the
property from AG Agriculture to R-1 SingJe Family Detached
Residential for the single famity detached lots and R-2 Single
Family AttacMed Residential for the twin home 1ots.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
,
TY F RO E:1�IOUNT �,
CI O S
DAKOT� COUNTY, iVIINNESOT�
I
RESOLUTION i996- 99
A RESOLUTION OF CONDITIONAL APPROV�L
FOR THE GERONONIIE PQND
CONCEPT PLA�'YNED UNTT DEVELOPMENT
FQR RESIDENTIAL USE
WHERE�S, the City of Rosemount received a request from Heritage Development for concept
approval of a residential planned unit development on June 25, 1996; and,
W�REAS, the Plannin� Commission of the City of Rosemount conducted public hearings as"
required by Section 12 of Ordinance B, the City of Rosemaunt Zoning Ordinance on Juiy 9, 1996;
July 23, 1996 and October 8, 1996; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend to the City Council
approval of the concept with conditions; and,
WHEREAS,the City Council reviewed the concept plan with the benefit of the Planning
_. Commission recommendation as well as the minutes of the public hearing.
NOW, THEREF4RE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of Rosemount
hereby approves the Geronornie Pond concept planned unit development for residential use
proposed by Heritage Development subjeet to;
1. Approval of a density bonus in exchange for enhanced landscaping performance for
screening purposes along Chippendale Avenue and 1bOth Street West;
2. Adoption of findings provided in the 10-8-96 PC review in support of Planned Unit
Development;
3. Park dedication and sidewalk improvements as recommended by the Parks Committee;
4. Incorporation of recommendations relative to grading, utilities, easements and public
infrastructure as recommended by the Pu6lic Works Department;
5. Developer must make payments to the City at the time of final plats for:
a. 1996 storm water trunk area charges of$2,000 per acre which is estimated ta be
$60,500 (30.25 acres x $2,000);
b. Preliminary payment for strest improvements to Chippendale Avenue estimated to
be $55,920 at this time;
c: Preliminary payment for street improvements to 160th Street West estimated to be
$48,000 at this time;
- d. Escrow for 8 ft. Wide bituminous bike:trail on Chippendale Avenue a.nd 160th
Street West(which will be contracted with b. and c. above)estimated to be
$21,b50 at this time;
e. 1996 G.I.S. fees of$50 per single family lot paid at the time of final plat estimated
at this time to be $5,300;
, �
,
_ RESOGUTIOIY t996 -99
6. Conforrnance with Section 12.2 of Ordinance B, the Zoning Ordinance for PUD final
deveiopment plan requirements as well as applicable subdivision ordinance requirements
for platting; and,
?. Density of the development shall be limited to 2.5 dwelling units per acre with the
exclusion of the isolated"triangle" area or demonstrate enhancements which justify the
increased density in accordance with policies of the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
ADOPTED this Sth day of November, 1996 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount
Cathy Busho, ayor
I� •
ATTEST.
. us M. Wals City Clerk
Motion by: W i p p e r m a n n Seconded by: E d w a r d s
Voted in favor: Edwards , Anderson, W i ppermann , Busho. Carro l I .
Voted against: N o n e.
Member Absent: N o n e. '�
2
"''�
December 10, 1996
City of Rosemount
P.O. Box 510
28?5 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
RE: Geronime Pond Preliminary Plat & Rezoning
Dear Mayor, City Council, Planning Commission Members & Staff:
On November 5, 1996, I attended the City Council meeting and
spoke in favor of the Geronime Pond concept plan. My support was
contingent upon Heritage Development agreeing to sell me the
1.48 acre piece of property isolated by the relocation of
Chigpendale Avenue. I'm gleased 'to say that Heritage and I have
.agreed on the terms of the proposed sale.
I write in support of the Geronime Pond Preliminary Plat that is
before you tonight, However, I have a concern about the timing
of the relocation and reconstruction of Chippendale Avenue.
On October 16, 1996, I submitted a concept plan for the
redevelopment of my property which is directly across
Chippendale Avenue to the east of the proposed Geronime Pond
development.
After the city staff reviewed my plan, I was called to a meetinq
by staff to discuss my concept plan. It was' their opinion that
my plan would need a temporary variance until Chippendale Avenue
was relocated. Staff and I both agreed that it was probably best
to put my concept plan application on hold until the Geronime
Pond development plan was approved.
The staff and I also a eed it made sense that I talk to
�'
Hsritage Development about buying the isolated garcel that would
be created by the relocation of Chippendale Avenue. It was
clear that a better plan could be developed by combining my
property, the isolated parcel and vacated Chippendal.e Avenue
. right of way.
` �
It was then that I began negotiating with He=itage
Development and as I stated earlier we were able to ayree on
terms for the purchase of the isolated parcel. �
I would like to be able to proceed with my concept plan to _
develop my property as soon as possible. In order for me to
develop in the appropriate manne=, it is necessary that
Chippendale Avenue be relocated with the construction of the
' st addition of Geronime Pond. " ,
Therefore, I respectfully request that Chippenda2e Avenue be
relocated and reconstructed as a part of the first addition of
Geronime Pond from the new intersection at 160th St=eet to the
north property line of Geronime Pond and my property.
Sincerely,
�' ,r3• �`?/LC_
��
E.B. McMenomy
�
�
;
i
i
f
�
_�
i
�
i
t
;
i
i