The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2.b. Gergen Farm Development ✓ � CITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIiTE SUMMARY FOR llISCUSSION CUNIMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DATE: July 21, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Hampton Development - Gergen Farm AGENDA NO. Development Issues PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner ATTACHMENTS: Single Family Lot Layout, Draft Resolution of Findings for Denial Jim Allen of Hampton Development has been very interested in seeing the findings for denial of the Hampton Development concept for the Gergen Farm area. City Attorney Charlie LeFevere has been working with Staff on the findings and the latest draft is attached. In the mean time, Mr. Allen has been working on a development layout exclusively for single family detached lots. Mr. Allen indicates that he has been able to achieve a surprising number of lots, although Sta.ff has not had an opportunity to review the layout to date. A number of vaxiances are anticipated including the"flag lot" which had been included in the original version that never made it to the Council. Several lots are also included that front Shannon Parkway are also anticipated at this time. A brief discussion regarding the layout may give Mr. Allen the direction he needs to proceed. RECONIlVIENDED ACTION NOTES: � � CONCEPT PLAN f� /� HAMPTON��DEVELOPMENT / /�,,\, �►v�ce ►�ir+ss3ia�ve. , �,,'�ti�qtiHp ��, �� ,q p `�.�� "----____- /� /T��ti� '�_' ---r-- � '�- . � � � ,,\ ` ` , � � � �T- -_ 7 -_ , �`, � f �1�q�No� 1 �il� \ �`-L 7 p � � � � ¢ -�.�, � ��o // / . � � ��, � /�!/ ;' ��'�,�s, / � � � � i �` ,• �. ..T�.' / � � �, � :i / �`CA\\ / `\ � �"� � H // ' � � � \ '^ _ —1' \\ 1`1`�(f( �' �\� / ��'S'\ �� 1 �� - �.�'� 1^ ��'�� \ "�, \\\ � \�`\ � >�,/ _ . , �� , .�_:_, �� ,,, � ! ��\ j �� . I � �r� � ` �-� � � /��i%�i� %�� ,`��,:-.��\ j s�tiq ' � � ` W I I WE T R1D E I �4 � i ' � ��`\ i z I� ( . SEC ND DITIOIU �� `�t�► (�( / `� I �`� �� 't'O�'L� I W�' ' --�--�- - -�-- ��\ � �� " \\�� -9�QO,L�� , ' d� 157TH STREETr�E�=~i�r.a r �...� } \ � �� ' ��•, �\ / ��!� ,�\� I W� _ .,,,,,�_ '"""'-,�� 'C""" � ��r \� �+'\ ♦ ��`t •��\ O� __'� � >) � -�--�----1- —r--r--1- ` � � �.• �\\ �\��\\� \`'�\\ � `� I I z� � � � � � � ( ` �,y �� \��y\\� \\\` `__ �_` �,,; �I ' � \ � '�� \ - � � { A{-�-------- --- --- --- --- "�"� r�. � \S \ ��` �`\ I � I � � � � �° F ` � �.. _' . I ,� '""t '� \\�\��o.,�\ -�..�lz {, ; � I I i I I � Y �� ' ;�� - � I �a,r � �-', �'� ` \ .x, .l � POND 1 A �I�� , � - , �. , r��- ��'� 1� � I -1---1- --1-----1---1..�- �- �� 158TH STREET WEST- �� '"� ` � ( ( `� �'� � "y �„ � ---- --='�-st''� ��-''�\\�`� � ��- �~ �— W�� ` t n �� .L �.—��\\ ��\1 '�� —1--1--�--� � � �w� � � � � F�,..r � ., � � � l `( r 11�►1�1 /1/ Wi� � ` , ( I I � .I� iA►LT FAILY I��Y' .� �� I�• � ��n \\\J� //`I p� � i '�'�'( � . � ,' __J_WE�T RIC,�GE 1_ ` � / .�' � �� ( r �� \ " �', � f / �� a , � f�IRST jADDI�ION � �� , � � ` � '�,, 4 �.�y�r � a , , � \ / �� "°'�� / z Ii I F,�� Y �u�i,�c rivar w�. �I I 1 > ` _ Yi� > ,� �--�--�- � � � �;' .t ' \ � �\ � --r----. ��G��` x �_� � ` r' � d �DAKOT�A �DRIVEL�� ,,,,, _ _�',G-�--F-f--==� � ` ' / .� �, 'w..,'.--- -- --r- � � �� , � ,, � � Y � I I � � 1 114E lJ�E lN4f 914E � � . �� +s �0 � FA�M.Y il1t�.Y FAIL7 � FAIRY FN�.�� FAI�.Y fA1<1f . � �) + � � .''' '`\ � I � I I i .� � / . � � � 1 I � I �i��t�•� ��'�� , ; � � � - -- �- �- -�--�._ �-�- - - - - -- ---�----�---�-- - --- S —g— � � '"i�,'.� lr�s'f � —_:��.a-�.��' s�, . ne�ue v ne svs ee a�.n►.na,�oe u ' BOF�.EN L.A.�ND.,S�..t1R.��/EYNG. MC � � uraac w tsm , ls�t>ws-Nat� , � ti DAK(�T�A OUNTY MIN ESOTA �� . � � RESOLUTION 1997- A RESOLUTION FOR DENIAL OF A CONCEPT FOR A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ' REQUESTED BY HAMPTON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ' BASED UPON FINDINGS OF FACT WHEREAS,the Planning Department received an application for a concept planned unit ', development for residential development involving mixed housing types from Hampton ' Development Corporation on April 2, 1997; and, � WHEREAS,the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing as required by the zoning , ordinance on April 22, 1997; and, j WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend denial of the concept to '�, the City Council after receiving testimony from adjacent property owners in attendance; and, '�, WHEREAS,the Developer modified the concept in an effort to address the concerns of the I', Planning Commission and property owners; and, !� WHEREAS,the Planning Commission conducted another public hearing for a revised concept on �'�� June 10, 1997 and adopted a motion to recommend approval of the revised concept to the City I Council against the objections of the adjoining property owners; and, �i WHEREAS,the City Council reviewed the revised concept on June 17, 1997 and adopted a motion to deny the concept residential planned unit development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby denies the concept for a residential planned unit development requested by Hampton Development Corporation based upon findings of fact: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that its proposal is consistent with the intent of either the provisions of the zoning ordinance or the Comprehensive Guide Plan. 2. The subject property is surrounded by existing, established single family detached residential housing on all sides in the City of Rosemount. Generally, it is in the best interest of the public to maintain homogeneous housing types in a neighborhood unless there are factors which justify mixing housing types, which factors, as detailed in these findings, do not exist in the case of this proposal. Y , . �� . . .. � t � 3. There is no need for the establishment of multip(e family housing(referred to as single . family attached housing in ths zoning code) to provide a buffer between e�sting single family detached residential uses and more intense uses such as commercial uses or major roadways. 4. The proposed multi-family housing types in the development are located between single family detached residential uses and ponding areas. Thus, the multi-family housing uses do not represent a logical transition from a higher to a lower intensity of use, but rather a higher intensity of land use between two lower intensity land uses. 5. The proposal is essentially a mixed-use planned unit development which provides single family detached residential housing along with multi-family housing. Such mixed uses through the planned unit development process may be justified by, for example, more creative design, the protection of larger expanses of useable open space and unique natural features, or high design standards. In this case, the proposed design is essentially a string of multi-family structures along the edge of a single family residential detached neighborhood, or a strip of R-2 zoning surrounded by R-1 development. Although a substantial area is reserved for ponds, this area is not incorporated into the design of the planned unit development in such a way as to make it useable and thus justify the mixing of housing types. The design does not provide through creativity or overall planning design for a more desireable environment than would be possible under strict ordinance requirements for R-1 zoning. 6. The development involves the use of existing local single family residential streets for access to the multiple housing portion of the development. 7. Little or no buffering is provided between the single family and the multi-family housing types. 8. The multi-family housing does not represent a logical extension of multi-family housing but rather a strip of multi-family housing in an area which would be a logical area for e�ension of existing, established single family detached residential development. ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 1997 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. Cathy Busho, Mayor ` ATTEST: Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent;