HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.m. Receive Petition /Order Feasibility Report, Biscayne Pointe Street & Utility Improvements, City Project #285CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 19, 1997
AGENDA ITEM: Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report
AGENDA SECTION:
Biscayne Pointe, City Project #285
Consent
PREPARED BY: Bud Osmundson
Works Directorial
AGEND M�A sm
City Engineer/Public
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Petition and Map
APPROVED BY:
The City has received a petition for street and utility improvements for the Biscayne
Pointe Addition. This addition is located just north of the railroad tracks on the east side
of Biscayne Avenue approximately '/4 mile north of 145th Street. Sanitary sewer service
for this property requires the installation of the Brockway Draw Trunk Sanitary Sewer.
The Feasibility Report for this Trunk Sewer is currently being worked on by Short, Elliott,
Hendrickson, Inc. We believe the Biscayne Pointe and Trunk Sewer projects could have
the utility work completed this fall, but we will have a hard time getting the streets in by
freeze-up.
Since the petition is a 100% property owner petition, we will not have to have a public
hearing for the improvements. Therefore the schedule is tentatively set as follows:
Order Feasibility Report
Receive Feasibility Report
Order Plans & Spec's
Receive Plans & Spec's/Order Ad for Bid
Receive Bids
Award Contract
Begin Construction
Complete Utility Construction
Install Bituminous
Assessment Hearing
August 19, 1997
September 16, 1997
September 16, 1997
September 16, 1997
October 14, 1997
October 21, 1997
October 30, 1997
December, 1997
June, 1998
September, 1998
Staff recommends that the City Council pass the resolution as stated below
RECOMMENDED ACTION: MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE PETITION
AND ORDERING A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE BISCAYNE POINTE ADDITION STREET
AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT #285.
COUNCIL ACTION:
7
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1997 -
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR
BISCAYNE POINTE ADDITION STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT #285
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount has received a petition from the
developer and property owners of the proposed Biscayne Pointe Addition Street and Utility
Improvements, City Project #285.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount as
follows:
(1) the aforesaid petition represents 100% of the owners of the affected property;
(2) the property owner requests in the petition that the improvements be
constructed and that the entire cost for their share less the City's share of the cost
of the improvement be assessed against the property;
(3) the aforesaid petition is approved and placed on file.
(4) the City's Consulting Engineer is directed to prepare the necessary Feasibility
Report for the Biscayne Pointe Addition Street and Utility Improvements, City Project
#285.
ADOPTED this 19th day of August, 1997.
Cathy Busho, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk
Motion by: Seconded by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
08/01/97 15:47 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT,INC. + 1 612 423 5203
6128813632 ++
G£ ► tl i� > 14:11 HER t TACE DEQEWF(I�NT. I1•4C .
CITY OF 0059lOUNT
PETTTZON FAR LOCAL, jNPRQVCmRNTS
i l00% retltion)
7a the City CQUncll
, 09 Ageeiaauntj Minnesota:
Yw, the undorwigned, being the OVners of all
j Lwpaliy deearibod ee gallows
r
`! � hsrtb ti
NO.909 P002i002
the real property
y As tion th* city aaunCll to und*rtmk* v.lthaut O public
hrearinq under Minntwdaa stout*w. Section 429.031, the ioilarttc
improves►*nes tng
o such praperty end Our*a to pay tar all Costa .tar
th• preparation 6f the 39i2ibi,lity report tar theme improvom*" to
in thoeve t the 1mPravr7aent8 Or* not ord#raed tris
ah4tary Sewer
—:/atermainStreets
:i/z0StQrm Seven --b4 Curb i Gutter
6tr'>tttlights Other 6J
And to pay the Ontire OOsessible costa therrpi ptin>IRt, our
property •ncoenpawilt►p ar abuttl"Q said improvement• based an
benefits recei,v*o vlthout areverd to cash v#luotlon.
1.
2.
U1
_q
3.
4.
we also agree to suaranty psywwnt tar tho Priparyit'Lon of plana
tad wtheitleatt,
that thane tar the "A" petltl0ft0d tmprov*m Pnte in ardor
e plan*and eepeeiticitiQnN MAY bo proptred *4multan*ou0ly
with th• 9089tbility report.
For City 11QQ only
onto Roc'di_ my& To Gpunail=
+ Praporty owned it joint tenancy whauld ba •iQnvd py *rch evnar.
30/88
P. V a ell i
1 154 IN"—
amm Lual
_! _ ■ uato PAU
u y,_. uuamo uxv, r
13 2
luau I" w
P r N
u S.
_ uu -- w mml �o /uww aqua
L • /. - – iffiw /l,_._ _. 'Y'1 , {!1 w ,S+L `b ■ LI v`'+ r w ,
°� a ;c ,■ ■ its•-� ■ ■ + "" (YYLY r r GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
10
„ ° ,nui,n • r �n■!w N r r u r E umui' ■ �.. _
"b • " 1.13 w lau w a)m w P "1 f w u u.0 w J %ICH TY YAP
I,>mw
If; ,umw LL31w m� "o /LLL1N __... - __ ... �.. \ !► 1■ Y 4 S.
- - Y Yyl �� °• r r r N 1W1!!7 M 61m� / P � I � y � `_� � . .I
M ,
li■lY1 QY1Y, LLYIw Yffi YI I»� � �� % , '
„ Y.�u 1D �u r,'pLL!liK'1 / •r `�
. o
4
■ r 4
uam 1
U r l Y j 1°19
u v
to
j I
UAW w 11.w wi
is
aYam a_ f1Cj ` 1° 42
` ■ STE DATA
■ °� �� ,« r 1 t.w1� i�.1 (,�� • 4w ,u�aM �IMr, It,{i
'— •' w ��.., •u T��h �.+ 1 M.uw ) .r'rr►•h•tMw=•1
d � 'tea® a� a,� • �/ � .w..,w.w ~ I aM e.:, Pw.� ....: � w�... wr�..n
}} I ' /
1
if a
� � �•,. •, nw,• lu„ma.,ruaruur �
°D"w �
ROBE QjrjrVt=
ENGINEERING
COMPANY, INC.
1. inn wt lua ■-7. ■w k w % Y3a eN v■
uw r wr 1 r . us
■,m
rte.
NEAITAGE DEVElAP11ENT
ono eAsr calNn ROAD o
UT. PAUL, UN ■A117
I�
-
BIWA, (ti■POWN
PRELIMINARY PLAT
•