HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.b. CMC Concept PUD - The Villages at EastviewI" _ _ _
� � ' � � CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COLJNCIL MEETING DATE: November 4, 1997
AGENDA ITEM: CMC Concept PUD -"The Villages At AGENDA SECTION:
Eastview" New Business
PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness, Community Development Dir. AGEND �
ATTACHMENTS: Dahlgren, Shardlow,Uban booklet with fold- APPROVED BY:
out maps,PC minutes and reviews(10-14-97),
Public Works memo
Applicant&Property Owner: Tosh Neminsky of CMC Heartland Partners I
Location: North of 145th Street West& CSAH 42; East of Biscayne Avenue
Area in Acres: 226 acres
Number of Lots: 286 (estimated single family detached), 226 attached housing units
Overall Density: 2.24 dwelling units per acre.
Current Zoning: Agriculture-AG
Requested Zoning: A combination of R-1, Single Family detached Residential and R-2, Single
Family attached residential
Comp. Guide Plan: Urban Residential
Planning Commission Action: Recommendation of approval(unanimous)
SUNIMARY
Mr. Tosh Neminsky on behalf of CMC Heartland Partners I is requesting concept approval of their latest
proposal concerning the 226 acres east of the Dakota County Maintenance Facility and North of CSAH 42/
145th Street West. The concept includes four distinct neighborhoods with different housing types. The overall
housing mix is approximately 56%detachea single family(conventional and"executive"lots) and 44%
attached housing distributed between townhouses,twin homes and"mansion homes". A fifth"neighborhood"
located in the south east corner of the property indicating 79 "patio homes"will be redesigned as conventional
single family. The resulting 45+conventional single family lots will be added to the 1831ots,thus expanding
"neighborhood 4".
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on October 14, 1997 as required, and received comments
from two adjoining property owners. Written comments were subsequently received from an adjoining
property owner who attended the public hearing but did not speak at that time(please see attached). The first
neighbar expressed concern about the proposed twinhomes near his property(a relatively large single family I
detached lot). The other participant who owns agricultural property east of the development was concerned ���
about drainage from the development affecting his property. '
The primary issues discussed by the Planning Commission included the impact and proximity of the railroad '�
tracks,the incompatibility of the County Garage, awkward lots and the"eyebrow"east of the ponding area, '
elimination of the patio homes and the integration of the development with the pipeline and utility easements.
The Commissioners also stated a desire for a trail connection between Biscayne Point and"The Villages".
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt A Resolution approving the Concept Residential
Planned Unit Development for CMC Heartland Partners I.
COUNCIL ACTION:
, � � I�,
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT '�,
DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA �
RESOLUTION i997- Ilii
A RESOLUTION APPROVING ���
TAE CONCEPT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED U1vIT DEVELOPMENT
FOR CMC HEARTLAND PARTNERS I
WHEREAS,the Planning Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from '
CMC Heartland Partners I for approval of a concept residential planned unit development on
property located north of 145th Street West and CSAH 42 and east of Biscayne Avenue in '
Rosemount,Minnesota; and
WHEREAS,on October 14, 1997,the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed
the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development of CMC Heartland Partners I and adopted a
motion to recommend approval, subject to conditions,to the City Council.
WHEREAS,on November 4, 1997, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for CMC Heartland Partners I.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for CMC Heartland Partners I,
subject to:
1. Execution of a subdivision agreement to secure public infrastructure and including
recommendations relative to driveways, grading,utilities, easements,rights-of-way,
ponding, streets and public infrastructure requirements as identified by the Public Works
Department.
2. Incorporation of recommendations of the Park and Recreation Committee relative to park
dedication, sidewalks and trails including the requirement for all parkland to be above the
100 year flood elevation.
3. Modification of the lot and street design to eliminate conflicts with the sewer interceptor,
elimination of the"eye brow"from the larger cul-de-sac east of the pond.
4. Shifting the north-south collector street approximately 4U0 feet west along the railroad
right-of-way or as recommended by the City Engineer.
5. Adjusting the housing mix to be consistent with the housing policies of the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
6. Requiring appropriate screening and buffering for the Dakota County Maintenance
Facility from the northwestern portion of the townhornes, as well as the railroad tracks
and CSAH 42.
7. Changing the patio home area to traditional single family detached homes.
8. Developer must make payment to the City at the time of final plat for the following
items:
a. Preliminary payment for future improvements to 145th Street West, including street
and trail that has a 1997 rate of$63.20 per lineal foot of frontage;
b. Preliminary payment for future trunk watermain improvements on 145th Street West
and throughout the development;
t r .
ResoluNon 1997-
c. Storm Sewer Trunk Area Charges that has 1997 rates of $2,530 per acre for multiple
family housing and$2,OOU per acre for single family; and
d. Geographic Information System(GIS) fee that has a 1997 rate of$50 per lodunit.
9. Approval of the Dakota.County Plat Cominission, as necessary.
ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1997 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
Cathy Busho,Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk
Motion by: Seconded by: '
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
I _ ___ _
_ _ 'I
• i
� _ ' Planning Commission '�
Regular Meeting Minutes �
' October 14, 1997 I
� Page 4 II
Pubtic Hearin : CNIC �Ieartland Conce t Ptan I
Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing for the CMC Heartland Concept Residential Planned '
Unit Development. The recording secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of ,
Mailing and Posting of a Public Hearing Notice on file with the City. ,
Mr. Pearson presented a summary of the concept plan submitted by CMC Heartland for property '
located east of Biscayne Avenue, north of 145th St.W. and south of the railroad tracks. The plan
consists of five distinct neighborhoods with collector streets between CSAH 42 and Bacardi Avenue
and to 145th St. W. Generally, the concept plan follows previous direction provided by the City
Council and Planning Commission. Staff has identified the following issues: 1) Park land must be
above the 100 year flood elevation; 2) the sewer interceptor poses a conflict with lot designs; 3) the
detached townhome concept has not been supported in the past due to separation benveen the units;
4) the proportion of 70% single family homes is lower than the Comp. Guide Plan housing policy of
80%; 5) location of the north-south collector street should be ali�ned with the pipeline across the
tracks.
Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the Applicant. Tosh Neminsky,Director of Development
for CMC, and John Uban, Planner for CMC,were present. Mr. Uban provided further details in the
changes made to the plan, includinQ a more traditional layout, integration of collector streets with
the neighboring system, and park land separating higher density areas. Mr.Uban feels Dakota
County should share in the bufferin� responsibility around the maintenance facility.
Discussions continued concerning elimination of the triangular lot in the northeast portion,
elimination of the"eyebrow" in the large cul-de-sac located east of the pond, elimination of the
patio homes,pipeline and utility easements.
Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the public.
Lawrence Kane, 2387 145th St. W., expressed his concem about multiple family dwellings backing
up to his neighborhood which has larger lot sizes. Mr. Kane is concerned the twin homes will
eventually become rental property. Mr. Uban explained the t�vinhomes are approximately 50' from
the lot lines and over 150' feet from the existing homes. Mr. Kane is also concerned about
assessments for upgrades to 145th Street.
John Widerhold, 3370 145th St. W., owns property to the east of the ponding area located in the
southeast portion of the development and is concerned about drainage onto his property. Mr.
Litterer explained this is a storm water ponding system,providing drainage from Mr. Widerhold's
property.
MOTION by Droste to close the public hearing. Seconded by Shoe-Corri�an. Ayes:
DeBettignies, Tentinger, Droste, Shoe-Comgan, and Weisensel. Nays: 0. Motion carried.
I�i,, .
_
� ,Planning Commission ` Y '
Regular Nleeting Minutes
= October 14, 1997
' Page 5
NIOTION by DeBettignies to recommend that the City Council approve the concept for CviC '
Heartland Partners I "The Villages"dated September 3 and 22, 1997 subject to: 1) Incorporation ,
ofrecommendations of the Park and Recreation Committee relative to park dedication, sidewalks I
and trails including the requirement for all parkland to be above the 100 year flood elevation; 2)
Modification of the lot and street design to eliminate conflicts with the sewer interceptor,
elimination of the"eye brow" from the lar�er cul-de-sac east of the pond; 3) Shifting the north- ''
south collector street approximately 400 feet west along the railroad right-of-way or as
recommended by the City Engineer; 4) Adjusting the housing miY to be consistent with the
housing policies of the Comprehensive Guide Plan; 5) Incorporation of recommendations relative ',
to drainage, easements, grading,pondina, right-of-way, streets and utilities by the Public �Vorks ,
Department; 6)Requiring appropriate screening and buffering for the Dakota County Niaintenance
Facility from the northwestern portion of the townhomes; and 7) Chan�ing the patio home area to '
traditional single family detached homes. Seconded by Droste. Ayes: Tentin�er, Droste, Shoe-
Corrigan, Weisensel and DeBetti�nies. Nays: 0. Motion camed. '
Public Hearing: Schmidt Variance Petition
C irperson Droste recessed the Planning Commission meeting and opened the Bo d of Appeals ,
and djustments and the public hearin; for the Schmidt Variance Petition. The cording secretary '
has pla ed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Mailing and PostinQ a Public Hearing
Notice o file with the City. '
Mr. Pearson p ented the request by Todd and Patricia Schmidt a variance to sideyard setback, ',
in addition to lot ntage requirements. The existing house, ich is approximately 20 feet from '
the lot line, will be de olished. The foundation will be re ed for construction of a new hame. �
Reuse of the foundation uld benefit the applicants f ncially, however, no conclusive evidence
has been presented to show the house cannot et the 30' setback requirement. Access to the ',
property is via a twenty foot eas ent to McAn ews Road. A variance is warranted for access. ',
While the neighbors support the va ' nce, th have been complaints concerning the use of the '
property for a landscaping business. T ' �ssue is separate from the variance requested. '
Commissioners inquired as to the ain of th roperty and the existin� septic system. '
Chairperson Droste opened e floor to the Applicant . Todd and Patricia Schmidt were present. I�,,
a'n el '�
' unclear where the dr i fi d
Mr. Schmidt indicated tests �vere done three months o and it is
P ,
addition to '
is located. They inte to put in a new septic system. Mr. Sc idt fi►rther indicated the �
the south side of t house will not require removal of the existing ees. !
Chairperso roste opened the floor to the public. There was no comment. hairperson Droste
further p sented a letter signed by several neighbors in support of the improve t to this property
but ob� cting to its present use as a landscape business.
OTION by Droste to ciose the public hearing. Seconded by Tentinger. Ayes: Drostc, Shoe-
orrigan, Weisensel, DeBcttignies and Tentinger. Nays: 0. Niotion camed.
i
,
;
' ` � � CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTiVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
Planning Commission Meeting Date: October 14, 1997
AGENDA ITEM: CMC Heartland Partners I AGENDA SECTION:
Concept Residential Planned Unit Public Hearing
Development
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner AGENDA NO.
� � �
ATTACHMENTS: Public Works Comments, Narrative, Plan APPROVED
reductions
Applicant & Property Owner: CMC Heartland Partners I
Location: East of Biscayne Avenue, North of 145th Street West, South of
Railroad tracks.
Area in Acres: 226
Number of Lots: 320 Single Family lots, 226 townhouse dwelling units.
Overall Density: 2.42 dwelling units per acre
Comp. Pfan Land Use Desig: Urban Residential
Current Zoning: Agriculture
Requested Zoning: R-1 , Single Family detached Residential and R-2, Single Family
attached Residential
SUMMARY
CMC Heartland Partners is requesting approval of a new concept PUD for the 226 acre site east
of the Dakota County Maintenance garage. The Planning Commission will recall the previous
public hearings concerning the property in June and August of 1996. Ultimately, the City
Council adopted a resolution of denial based upon findings of fact on November 5, 1996. Much
discussion occurred during and after the review process resulting with the current application.
CONCEPT OVERVIEW
The new concept has some recurrent themes including five distinct neighborhood clusters and a
transportation design which must "blend" with the existing and planned system. The
neighborhood clusters are detailed in the Dahlgren Shardlow and Uban narrative. The north-
south collector street between CSAH 42 and the Bacardi Avenue alignment is intact. Also
included is an east-west collector street which is designed as a slightly below standard collector
street.
Two signifieant ondin areas are included in the north central and southeast corner of the site
P 9
which are fairly dominant existing topographical features. Several smaller ponds are located
near the "sub collector" street connection with 145th Street West and the open space
associated with the "Mansion Homes"cluster. The proposed park backs up to the railroad
tracks and is situated between tfiree of the "neighborhoods". A strip of park land traces the
western edge of the largest pond for potential trail connections.
_ _ _
� ,
' � Generally, the concept follows previous direction provided to the developer by the City Council,* ' '
staff and the Planning Commission. Four issues have been identified by staff and relayed to the
developer.
1 . All park land must be above the 100 year flood elevation.
2. Several lots conflict with the sewer interce tor location with resultin building pad size
P 9
reductions.
3. Recent City Council and Planning Commission actions and discussions indicate a lack of
enthusiasm for "detached townhomes". Staff suggests that neighborhood 3 intended for
"patio homes" be indicated as an outlot, or converted into traditional single family use
(neighborhood 4).
4. The City Council is very concerned about housing mixes that differ from the
Comprehensive Guide Plan housing policy proportion of 80% Single Family and 20%
Multiple Family.
Further discussions with the developer occurred regarding the rail crossing location of the north-
south collector street which should be shifted west, closer to the area of larger railroad right-of-
way. The north-south collector is the only railroad crossing between Biscayne and Akron
Avenues, which are 1 .5 miles apart. South of 145th Street, the collectors are spaced at %2 mile
intervals. This means that the collector system is spread apart with a need to "center" the
streets as much as possible to ensure balanced traffic flow and volumes.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to recommend that the City Council approve the concept for CMC Heartland Partners I
"The Villages" dated September 3 and 22, 1997 subject to:
1 . Incorporation of recommendations of the Park and Recreation Committee relative to
park dedication, sidewalks and trails including the requirement for all parkland to be
above the 100 year flood elevation.
2. Modification of the lot and street design to eliminate conflicts with the sewer
interceptor, elimination of the "eye brow" from the larger cul-de-sac east of the pond,
3. Shifting the north-south collector street approximately 400 feet west along the railroad
right-of-way.
4. Adjusting the housing mix to be consistent with the housing policies of the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
5. Incorporation of recommendations retative to drainage, easements, grading, ponding,
right-of-way, streets and utilities by the Public Works Department. ,
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
DATE: 10-10-97
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REVIEW FOR:
PROJECT NAME: CMC Heartland Partners"B" Site CITY PROJECT NO.
Proposed By: CMC Heartland Partners i Phone No. 131212940440
__�47 West Jackson Boulevard Fax No. (3121663-93 7
Chicaao. IL 60680-6205
Type of Request: Concept PUD Review
The following is a review by the Public Works/Engineering Department for the Concept PUD of a concept plan dated
September 22, 1997 and received by the Public Works/Engineering Department on September 29, 1997. The utilities and
streets,if the streets are to be public, must be done as a public improvement. The Developer can also petitio�for the site
grading to be do�e as a public improvement.
At the time of final platting, a subdivision agreement will need executing to secure public infrastructure and including
recommendations relative to grading, utilities, easements, right-of-ways, ponding, streets and public infrastructure
requirements as recommended by the Public Works Department.
Grading/Drainage FacilitieslWater Resources
The Storm Water Management Ptan does have trunk ponding requirements on this property.
The recently completed wetland i�ventory does show wetfands on this property.
Sanitary wer
Possible sanitary sewer connections are in the vicinity of this site. A Metropolitan Council trunk sewer is roughly located
in the eastern third of this property. City sanitary sewer is located in the southwesterly part of this property. A City trunk
sanitary sewer,the Brockway Draw Trunk sanitary sewer,is proposed to run northwesterly from the Met Council trunk sewer
to serve this site and properties to the north.
Any septic systems on this property should be abandoned per code prior to any grading on the site.
Watermain
Trunk watermain extensions will be necessary to serve this property. The trunk watermain improvement on 145th Street
West is proposed to be constructed with the 145th Street West improvements scheduled for 1998. Additional 16" and 24"
trunk watermain will be constructed with improvements in the development.
Any wells on this property should be identified and sealed per code. If already sealed, paperwork should be submitted
showing proof of closure.
Streets
Staff still believes that the North/South collector street (Bacardi Avenue) should align 500-600 feet west of its present
location at the railroad tracks.
This project as proposed introduces a "round-a-bout" along with center medians just north of 145th Street on the collector
street"A". These traffic calming devices need to be engineered in detaif to achieve future traffic and maintenance goals.
Staff is concerned about the 17 lots frorrting the cotlector street"A"and recommends that the design be changed to eliminate
these lots.
An 80' right-of-way is recommended for the collector street"A". This will allow room for trails and on-street parking in the
street"A" right-of-way. Continue to use a 100' right-of-way on the north/south cotlector Bacardi Avenue.
The reconstruction of 145th Street West from Brazil Avenue to County 42 is scheduled to begin in 1998.
Final plat approval could be dependent on the developer incorporating recommendations by the Dakota County Plat
Commission relative to County State Aid Highway 42
CMC Heartland Partners"B"Site
g:\....\cmcbrl.wpd . Pa e 1 of 2
9
, . .
Walks &Trails
Staff noted,in recer�t reviews in adjacent developments,traii improvements along 145th Street and Biscayne Avenue. The
trail along 145th Street is an 8' wide bituminous trail that will be constructed with the 145th Street construction work
scheduled for next year. The trail along Biscayne Avenue is an 8' wide bituminous trail that will be constructed along the
east side of Biscayne Avenue with other improvements in proposed developments along Biscayne Avenue.
Other trail and sidewalk improvements in this development will be located as the plans progress for this development.
Easements &Right-of-Wavs
The developer will need to incorporate recommendations made by the Dakota County Plat Commission that are relative to
County State Aid Highway 42
Fifry(50')feet of half right-of-way needs to be dedicated for Biscayne Avenue and the proposed trail to be constcucted along
the east side of this street. Fifty (50') feet of half right-of-way needs to be dedicated for 145th Street.
An 80'right-of-way is recommended for the collector street"A". This will allow room for trails and on-street parking in the
street"A" right-of-way. Continue to use a 100' right-of-way on the north/south collector Bacardi Avenue.
Right-of-Ways and Drainage &Utility easements will need finalizing prior to finalized utility plans.
Private Utilities
This area will be provided electrical power by Northern States Power, phone service by Frontier Commu�ications, gas service
by Peoples Natural Gas, and cable television by Marcus Cable.
Street lights will be provided by the developer as determined by the City and Northern States Power. Shoe box style street
light will be requested at some intersections besides the normal street light installations.
Construction
The City has adopted a policy for the public construction of all future publicly owned facilities. The Developer has the choice
of City financing or private financing of these improvements per the adopted policy. A petition can be obtained from the
Public Works Department.
Fees &Assessments
At final platting the Developer will need to make payment for items such as the following:
a. Preliminary payment for future improvements to 145th Street West, including street and trail that has a
1997 rate of 563.20 per lineal foot of frontage;
b. Preliminary payment for future trunk watermain improvements on 145th Street West and throughout the
development;
c. Storm Sewer Trunk Area Charges that has 1997 rates of 52,530 per acre for multiple family housing and
52,000 per acre for single family;and
d. Geographic Information System (GIS) fee that has a 1997 rate of S50 per lot/unit.
The preliminary payment for future improvements to 145th Street West is based on the 1997 multi-family residential rate
of half a street at 553.20 per foot of frontage. It also includes S10 per lineal foot for future trail construction on 145th
Street West.
The acreage for Storm Sewer Trunk Area Charges will be based on gross acres of developable property minus City trunk pond
acreage (at high water level) and wetlands at delineation line.
CMC Heartland Partners"B"Site
g:1....lcmcbrt.wpd Page 2 of 2
I �
� ` ; �� � ��� �
. sr �
. �,. � ,
� ,�,>.�� . . . ._. . . � � �
�...,. . . , , . -
September 24, 1997 ;;,� . , , .,
._ _._ _ :, ,
Mr.Dan Rogness
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street W.
Rosemount,MN 55068-4997
Dear Mr.Rogness:
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this application is to provide the Rosemount Planning Commission, City Council,
and staffwith details of our revised Planned Unit Development. The 226 acres of land is
bordered by 145th Street West and C.S.AH. 42 on the south,Biscayne Avenue and the Dakota
County maintenance facility on the west; agriculturat land on the east; and the Chicago Rock
Island and Pacific Railroad on the north.
This P.U.D. is a resubmission and is the result of numerous meetings and presentations before
staff,Planning Commission, and City Council amving at a plan we feel satisfies the City's intent
of the PUD and provides unique and special housing market niches within a predominately single
family development.
LAND USE
The concept of providing opportunities for the full life-cycle housing is only possible in a master
planned community such as this one proposed by CMC Heartland. The five distinct villages
provide for traditional single family to move up to larger home sites and empty nesters to move to
low maintenance homes for changi.ng lifestyles, all within the same community.
Single Family Lots � 320(59%) 158 ac. (70%)
Multiple Family Units 226(41%)47 aa (30%)
1
���
._ . _ _ _
� _ _ _ __ _ __ _.. ._. . .._ . _
i .
�' ' '
NEIGHBORHOOD 1
The westernmost neighborhood cluster includes 150 units of townhomes and twinhomes on 27
° entire site and results in a densi of 5.6 units/acre. This nei borhood I
acres 12/o of the 8h
� ) tY
accesses off Biscayne Avenue and provides both a buffer to the maintenance facility and the '�
railroad tracks. '
NEIGHBORHOOD 2 '
This neighborhood cluster is located in the center of the parcel and consists of mansion homes '
with primary access off Street"A" -the east-west subcollector that bisects the site. This
neighborhood provides for higher end multiple housing on site and is separated by the other
multiple neighborhood by a 21 acre neighborhood pazk with trail and pond amenity. This 76 unit
development of 4 unit homes has side loading garage doors, creating a warm and inviting street
presentation. V'iews from interior and pedestrian spaces focus on two central ponds and
landscaped grounds. The four unit buildings are designed to look like large single family
residences providing each home with an attached garage and a private entry porch avoiding the
row house appearance. This 20 acre village comprises 9%of the site with a density of 3.89 '
units/acre. '�
NEIGHBORH�OD 3
The easternmost neighborhood village includes 79 patio home lots occupying 34 acres(15% of '
the site)with a density of 2.3 units/acre. The minimum lot width on these lots is 50'with 110' '
minimum depth yet average lot size is+/- 16,540 sq. ft. Primary access is offthe north-south '��,
collector with a storm pond providing an amenity to this village. !,
NEIGHBORHOOD 4 '�,
The largest neighborhood occupying 90 acres or 40% of the site is the traditional single familq II
cluster. The 1831ots are typically 80'wide with minimum lot depths of 125'providing an average I
lot size of 17,614 squaze feet. This neighborhood provides for the typical single family home on a �I
10,000 square foot minimum suburban lot. Gross density in this neighborhood is 2 unitslacre. ,
NEIGHBORHOOD 5 ',
Located in the northeastern part of the site, this village provides for higher end single family I�
housing. The executive single family village is 34 acres or 15%of the site with 581ots providing �
1.7 units/acre. The 90' minimum lot widths and 140'minimum lot depths result in an average lot '�
size of 19,525 square feet. This neighborhood is intended to provide for a more expensive home
on a large lot, another component of the life cycle housing.
2
DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY SU1��IMARY
Neighborhood 1 150 twinhomeltownhouse units 27 acres 5.6 un./ac.
Neighborhood 2 76 mansion home units 20 acres 3.8 un./ac.
Neighborhood 3 79 patio homes 34 acres 2.3 un.Jac.
Neighborhood 4 183 single family lots 90 acres 2 un./ac.
Neighborhood 5 58 single family lots 34 acres 1.7 un./ac.
Park Open space and recreation 21 acres
Site Total 546 units 226 acres 2.4 un./ac.
P.U.D. ACREAGE SI:1�rIlvIARY
Total Acreage 226 acres
Pazk Acreage 21 acres
Right-of-Way 34 acres
Net Acreage 171 acres
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
The Comprehensive Park Plan and Development Guide adopted by the City indicates a 10 acre
neighborhood park intended to serve the needs af this development as well as the adjacent land
west of Akron Avenue.
The proposed pazk consists of 21 acres of land, 13 acres upland, with active and passive
recreational amenities including a trail link to the east-west sub collector street along the pond.
Earlier discussions with park staff arrived at a program for the pazk and CMC Heartland agrees
with that progam.
TRANSPORTATION
The development's site access will be via the easternmost entrance along County Road 42.
Additional site access will occur from Biscayne Avenue and the proposed north-south collector
road. The street rights-of-way are 60'wide with pavement widths of 32', a11 city standards. ,
An east-west subcollector street was suggested by staff and incorporated into the design with I�,
minimal lot frontage. In all, 171ots front on"Street A"with special design considerations applied
3
---- -- ___ ._
g
� .
i . , „
to those lots to allow for residents to maneuver their car on site instead of backing out onto the
subcollector(see inset on Concept Plan).
The north-south collector street location was arrived at through numerous discussions with the
City. Access was kept to a minimum with intersection spacing kept to a 500'minimum distance.
The collector provides for a north-south connection from County Road 42 to Bacardi Avenue
north of the railroad tracks.
CONCLUSION
We believe this project is an excellent example of the many benefits that a PUD offers the City of
Rosemount,resulting in wonderful neighborhoods for the enjoyment of future oitizens. The PUD
provides a variety of housing, creating better choices for citizens and their changing lifestyles and
the changing demographics in the metropolitan area. The overall design benefits greatly from the
flexibility offered in the PUD and provides for a much improved living environment through the
preservation of open space and the many shared amenities that would not be available in a normal
plat.
The plan specifically creates economic and cultural advantages in the development of the common
space for social interaction and the shared enjoyment of the trail system. We believe this creative
approach makes the most efficient use of the land while preserving the desired characteristics of
the site. Through the flexibility allowed in the PUD and the creativity shown in this neighborhood
design, harmony is achieved between the environment and the land use density allowed in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Sincerely,
DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW AND UBAN,INC.
� � Jo��
c. 7ohn uban
Principal
4
/
•'� �
. I ��� O �-� _y_ ! '-•� � �
. � 1 1.,', • _ .�\ � / 9�Ti#
� �, �— � �- � e��-
'- - %_-:.�� '� _ ~_-� -- - �Y�r
� _ _ _ _ �.����� ' �, � �;a
t ; _. .. �;,?-,, .• _ ;,�
. �
r � � h.. ' '�� UTfi'c SINGLE FAMILY ^ � �I
/�' ' '
�� ' � 1 � �.,#�..� � ' !{4 RES 11{�'Sr1 �V�
i � t. � � t81 TS, i�l
<�' / �%: �f.7 N./AC. � 1!� �
�\,` '� ,A�N�S ON!H MES ��f 1 I , �. � �y 1
u
\' \ • I�{ tl ACRES(Y9o) y � � � ��i i
'� )
\ = PAR � AuNITS - U:
�i� r� � 21 AC S(996 1 UN./AC. �:� \ _� � •�• �' �:
��^,�! _ / � �_._ _ 1�+d=> _. _ .,_ — - -- _ _ --1-... _ _....+.. �' f
. �i�-.. > . � ' � � ,ii ,/� .``� .�- ,• �, ��•` . �$ .
—,_.?iJ'��— RA ITIONAL TOWNHOMES/ � � � � � �� �'" J
� �'I � NHOMES w � ' —.rt � �� '� .i, s. t�. 3
, ,
\ , � � ;,9
! � � I < =
1 �y 5 7 ACRES(1296) � � I �I� ,� ` .� \ .�
,i.r"'' ... I�I � . �SO UN1TS . TRA�ITtONAI S NGI.0►'nM{1.5 }J� `.' ; 'sf�, .` \� C i
'' > <
� It,I 1 �.6 UN./AC. � i 90 ACRFS(40�7r1 I�I 4 �\� F <
-' � ` I ! . ���18.1 LOTS � � �� ���` r.�
=�- � N� UN.iAC r ,�� � � � F ��
�--`.^ t
�� ;� L �4, , , � �, ��' j, , ;,: �.
... � ...
,
, , . �.� , ,
. , . -
. � _ � __ _
�--. —��-, � " > i i / ` ; 1� ,:�� ,..--�.� � : -
. . S � . .. �I� I � .. . .. .�� • _ �`---' ., _ _
� . . I
�� � . ............ ....y..... .N �.y.. . .��--s._���._ _ �� 4�
_�TS �. -- _ _-�.__ �__.�_ . � . �• ..
• _ _
�'__ ' � l -a� ��-+. ..!+r...�-��a+-'.� -{„} :
�.f —' . . . . ."' _�_ '—. __�.� 'S�__��._ .�.C'-� _ �
'1 .] �I`l� �ti .• , � '� �-_— ..'� � \ ��� . f� .�I� . . f. _.-_� - +'�� .
, .' . .T� �. _
����. � � ._.i
. \" � ~-� a�
� '' a�i ' � l � . ������ .�� '� /- (�
�— - �' i; �i i � . � ; ,,.� � ��� � /
i , l'���� �\�,\ �I i r'��i • ' .. �I � ���j`A/ �� . � j. .�s�� . / i//'1 � _ �EP 1`1 L��.. i�
�i _ ���^c .t' i «—� � '.li I Y , .. . . . \ . .
�,� 1 L. r �, Li j �.. �I•` ; � �� 'j , � fl � ,v �r
—� ` ','� ; i '�' , ,/, dL-1 �
� �
� . .�I `���..�~ I Q— i'� � • i t ir j,/I . � . � •22 SEPT.�l7 � .
� � :I l . � ' d �
� . ' ,��"g'e . . .
> ". f � • ` � � ���v �p����:�y -
.��')i . ; , . ,, '�� . _ �J`'" �i�'��i(� �
. i
. i
t
,
. ,
. . � : ... , /y - - \ ,
/
. . . . �1 -� � -/_\ � .
, ` . �•, • ' . � / \ N .
- - , T/ \ �
;\
i r r -�`� — - — - - --� ' - �/�,'�r- \�� --- —1 �.
' ' ,"�� �_ _ � � --�—�.�� ;. � �
� `�``�// '` �' �-1 � . �: -' � .�� i
r� � ; ��' ,`�� � ..�„W•� � .\�1� -• - �J" �
i \�, /� `,' l �� '' � r '�` `' �'
I �, i , r% ��i� . l I l_ ������'� , I`,'� ,�� �� r _ t HXlt'UTI�'E '
_�i_ ' , �s; / . —' .-�' —, ��=
�( '•y-'<�.- • / s�nc�e F.a�iiu• �c I
. ����.� `` � ��I ' POND ' `y � _ _ �
' . ` �` �` I �'y;�:� _aa�xtuy »��:s/ � � '-1 ,` ' ' ���,�j'� +��
� � � � - y � T, �
- -�' ^` 4 �` �_-�-�--��`��,; `�-,�( "� !,r . - i �., -- .^ � �•�. `� !'1�
�� � ' F � � �\ , „ /- � :�r
\ �, /- l
� � .( -f�- � �
� ' L' � T -
�
✓� l
� � � `� , ' -
' �.-�--�-�`� '� � ��'""�-�; �� ;��' �' ���x `�� _ �'"�r-- _ '<�i� ,�� y '�,,.r- 4,�
, �
<, � , ;' ' "� ,��
,-. , . . � _ _. .
. , � �\ \ ��,,K� � ,1 `� _ _j ', r. , �;�t�- f �� . ` � ;�,�
` a `� ` � ` i' !(� \ � �" �' y . _ i���
� �,�--�' � ,�_ � i ,\' ! -�'/�� 1''�: ,\ � �„ • ���
' . . 1_ l, •. \ `- � i �, ,\ 1/ �_ f����.���Y �'� r , ',-, • . ��}, l V
, .,�_ . . � , ��. , � � � \ � �` ��► �` \`�_�' ��,, ,� , ' ,:� .
. ^ +.f _.. -_ \ � IR\IlllllY:4 lf\�VIHI\It1 \ '�c, ' . •. ' � r . �. � �
_ _r. � �
t �.. �_ �� i
I� �-� � �`_ —_�l ``r-. �� - 1- r — ^r •1-• .
� I J'�._ ;�� �,�1. ��I� Y " - —F' STRE�� c�_ � � �•X �T • r,�r � �- '— �-
il ". � I � :\� , � � ^� 1' ��d - -� - � �';.�1- . . �--L' _ _,
; . �j' � „\\ � , ' ' � r-�- Y ' _ . '� ^
L_L �.. ' r
y � �,r , ����. � \\ ,. � y, , } �_�_ , ,�``� , � . F • ' �- � :,,
� �//• / /' ^��� . . �, ��� -���� ; � � �/ . �'.1 � r�..�.``�'. c._• PATII) �.
-.. ' i ����''.� ` ' . ~�" I �� � . `
' i >, / <i� \ .y�'l \�) ,� , 1 a�.0 .��-� , ��� . ���.�' Hl)htEti �
� /��� 1`1t. 1 Y /. .,� '� � /� Y � t . .
� �'�� . � G/ - -- ��I - - ,�. i-�.� , ; �_ ��� , , � _
_ i . �� /'� ' 11; _,.; -( -� _. ��I � � `� , ; � .
i� /ti• '/ -�; ._. � • �� � �_
' --�--�- � / /;� /' � '--< y � , • _
` -" i ,�'`—�_ �_�i�.,'�\� `� jy` f1� ' . ��� � '�..�`.- � /� '� �y�;� " � `j�k� _ � � � 1 f-
t ��'-+ 1 i �` �, ��.'.�� PQ�D �
- ; �i��� �- '� �+� ��� , :.� , - � � � - �,- ' y � -,��� -� . •_ l.� . `� ..
� ,� � ��, _" %' ��" T -,.� � -`T` � ` f1- l � ',�—` �-�--- i i , �' 7
_ _r��i�u��.�F, w� ,� � r�� • "`
' - -
r
-�� , «. s. � � �,I 1 � ;I lt�t)fllqN�1.YI\/d f f�\I�I.}�,, \ �`� �` . ' � . " . _
i '
� . . .L .... n .. . � l_ _ _ .__' . � _—.�-- j L 1' I y
� � �-1_I 1 1 ! � h 1. � 4_�' 1 \ .��f _ % _L . . . �' �
� _ J __. _ — '� -�------ __ - - - -'�-- - -�- --- ' - --
. . _
, .
... _ - - - �_�s - -_-- . :. ._y .. _ _-':-a...�-�_ -
�
.: - �-._,.�.-. _ _ -
- - - -�- - -- -- - -'
S� B r. ._ . . _ . �._ �-s� y = --_ . _ -� -=. __ _— _ - - - " _ -- - � _,
_ . - r . , 1 ` �,�. � ''' ' !�I'OT\L :\(. ?6 �('. '� ,V ' �"` "' •
_ .`� _
,.�`., � �""' � � t. ,. _ '/ � ; / _-.� .. ��tth zi :�c.ii� :�c. rrt..��vn� - ` I ,
� � ,: - , . , : i � f�`_. ;'' �' ht.o.���. 'i� .,c. _ ^�
� � �I i� � � , � � � • r ,' � i +. _- �.
' 1 - „ ., .. . � � . , f- " unrrs ;.�r� =Cn`iCEPT' PLAN`
� r.'_� • ,,, �
��`` � —`i � •-. . , ,/! , . , _ - � EXECU'fIVE titVG1.F FA�tILY 18J LO'fti . � , . `�»j� ��.
/ t� �-, ;
�. � � .�. � � � . �� ' �,�' . . 'PR,\DIT(qN.\I.ti1NGLi Fqh11LY �Sq L!)TS c:_ -- -..f � �
� \�'/ �.\'-� _ _-� •/ '/ � :y .� � . � ��� � � � PATfQ HOpiF.ti 7�[OTS - .. .
' � �` � . �.:._�� / ' � . •dtit.Pf..47
../ .. � --- _ . � . r .,
F. .�. i ' . , . � ' .' .'. .- ; �i.' ' �,,.,��„���„w..—�... . TWINlIO�tES �
,�f /� �t�.. _ � � - - � � . � .IO tNlTti � . .
� ' ' � 9. � � ' ' • � � ' MANtiIUN ilh�it:ti 76 I.NI'fti r .
. � � � . TRAUfTION.�I.TOWNIIQM1IF.ti 1211 UNITti . ' . �•
DA KQ TA CQ UN T Y °A��N EN GDEER E
(6t2)891-7100
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Fax(6i2}89�-7t 27
� � 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE.3RD FLOOR APPLE VALIEY:MINNESOTA 5512�i-8579
: _
—'�.� .:'_'�;
"�'r"�` .
� � October 13, 1997
Cathy Busho, Mayor
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Dear Mayor Busho:
It has come to our attention that on October 14,1997, the Rosemount City Council wiii
review a concept plan#or property adjacent to the Dakota County Highway Shop on
Biscayne Ave. On behalf of the County, I want to alert you to several concerns.
As I am sure you are aware, the Rosemount Highway Shop is the County's central
maintenance facility. It is a very busy site that incfudes all vehicle and road
maintenance functions, sign and signal ope�ations, and snow removal equipment and
personnel for the north/central part of the county. Activities begin at 7:00 A.M. during
most of the year and as early as 2:00 A.M. during snow and ice events. The County
expects to continue operations at this site indefinitely.
With this in mind, the County wants to be a good neighbor to the future residents of the
proposed housing development. We believe that the noise and appearance of the shop
is not entirely compatible with private homes and request that you consider requiring the
developer to provide a visual barrier and possible sound mitigation (such as vegetation,
berms, or walls). In addition, the general drainage from the shop property is to the
southeast on the site and this must not be blocked. Early attention to this matter will be
in the long term interest of both the County and future residents.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the plan.
Sincerety,
�.;c-� e���r�— I�I
David L. Everds, P.E. I
Dakota County Engineer I
DLE/mjl I'
i
cc: Brandt Richardson !
Louis J. Breimhurst ' '
Reid Hansen, Attomey for the Developer '
N:mayor-r ,
Pnnted on recycle0 paDer.20%Oost-consumer �y AN EQUAL pPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
��
. - .
CRAIG J. MINEA
b11 QUINCE CIRCLE - BOULDER, CO. 80304-1030
TELEPHONE (303)440-9497 - FAX (3Q3)442-3491
e-mail - qc611craig@aol.com
October 3, 1997
Mr. Bud Osmundson, P.E.
City Engineer and Public Works Director
City of Rosemount
P. O.Box 510
Rosemount, MN. 55068-0510
Dear Bud:
Thank you for sending me information on the Brockway Draw sewer plan to
serve the Biscayne Pointe and CMC/Heartland developments. The package
included a CMC "Concept Plan" dated September 3, 1997.
Map 6 of the 1993 City of Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan shows the ;
extension of Bacardi Avenue from its current southerly terminus at 135th '
Street continuing south to Dakota County Road #42 through the property I I
hold and the CMC/Heartland property. I
I met with Dan Rogness and Andrew Mack August 13, 1996 and gave them
copies of the survey of the Northern Natural Gas Line that traverses the
property I hold in the SE 1/4 of Section 21 {enclosed). At that meeting, we
agreed that it made the most sense to locate the Bacardi extension parallel to
this gas line and to align the CMC/Heartland portion of Bacardi Avenue with
the portion that traverses my property. At that meeting we discussed
running the Bacardi extension both south and north of the gas line. In order
to have a perpendicular intersection at 135th and Bacardi, it probably makes
the most sense to locate the Bacardi Avenue extension south of the gas line.
Bud, I would appreciate your thoughts on this proposed alignment.
Before approving the CMC/Heartland's preliminary plat, I would ask city staff
to carefully review the location of CMC's portion of Bacardi Avenue to assure
that it is correctly positioned and correctly angled with that portion that
trave ses my property.
ic
' ea
cc: Dan ogness, Community Development Director
____ _ _ _ , _ _ -- -
. a •. .�.a �, . . . � . . � .
4 ��8 � (Dak. Co.� Monwnent) ` .
6� ,.✓' . • �_ ,
w 2655.70 ' EAST � i
....
/ � -.::-.:.� .
�� � , N34 8 North line SEl/4 •. � .
�2 .: .�3�_ ,
t �\ �`�a .. A�'� . _.
� �p�+►, `: �Y .
� .. p -
:� . �.� .
�. � . • .
` ,..f '
��� East line oF
�� . SEl/4 3
. , . o
\ ,� ��
�� �� . �
1 `�\ ab �i o
� : : - �
� o
i:.�> .; vs.
W . �.. t`/ • �
O �` � , �' �
Q
\ �\ . N
o Gertterline � �3S
� Pipe3ine �o Centerline
� _ � \ Pipeline . �
� �. �
�_�� y �
. � � � .
o� , - � \ 2�, '
�-.. ��k . �4p� .:
�
♦ t :
r, _ . . \ \
�: �� . � � .
��,� :: �\
. . . . . . � N . . � . .
��.;,� , � � '1
_ \� o�'t�Op.
�\� 56"� 5�g'
Weat line of. SE];f 4 '` ,,.-/���
. North right-of- -,/
� � way o� R.R.
�' Centerline
� , road
, . Sou�h line of SEl/4 . ��1
� {�a�c. Co. I�onument}
2&75,8G N88�44`33"E _
'"' (Dak. Co. Monument)
`y,�
o� I
, I hereby certify that this. is a true and aorrect. representation I
of. a aurvey af the location of the centerline .o� :a pipeTine I
=lcscated ir� the Southeast Quarter of �ecticin 21, Townshig 115, ,
Rarige 19, Dal�ota Caunt�, Minnesota, lying north of railroad. I
' batedz October 22, 1980
_ . qV�;���,,,,''� '
_ Delmar H. Schwanz
Minnesota Reg. No. 8625
�CALE: 3 ineh � 400 Peet
. : .
17 October, 1997
Greetings,
I was at your public informatian meeting this last Tuesday and wanted to express my dismay at some of the
things I found out. '
I have been teaching in Rosemount far twenty years and have lived on 145`h Street for six years. I was
disturbed by the amount of lower quality housin� that CMC was proposing for their site north of my property. I ;
recognize that CMC needs to have some kind of buffer next to the Dakota Maintenance buildings, but was
shocked at the number and density of the twin homes that they propose. In fact, when we received the public
hearing notice, it appeared on the map that it might be a green space area(no roads were shown). This was
obviously wrong. Of course, it is a costly and time consuming process to go back to the drawin�board.
However, it seems that some of the green space they are proposing should be shifted to protect a well-
established (forty year old) neighborhood instead of putting our homes on the fast track for gentrification. �
I was also disappointed to heaz about the current plans for upgrading 145`h Street. When we taiked to City '
Engineers during the recent upgrading on Biscayne, we were led to believe the current plan was to cut off i
access to County 42 whenever 145`h was up�raded. Given the current flurry of attention to County 42 access, I
our whole neighborhood assumed this was a"done deal" and that the new CMC neighborhood was connect to �',
us and further down on County 42. ��,
Keeping the County 42 connection makes no sense. We have become the"short cut" for the whole southeast '�I
metro area when going to Cedar Avenue or Minneapolis. It creates a hazard for our kids and adds way too �,
much wear and tear to a locally funded road. The argument that this helps support the downtown merchants is
silliness—these are not people who shop downtown Rosemount. Just set up a chair at the stop light and watch
traffic someday—it will become painfully obvious that folks travelling through from Hastings or Cannon Falls
do not shop in Rosemount.
I often walk 145`h Street on the way to wark and have had plenty of time to observe the traffic patterns and
speculate on what it will be like as we develop both north and south of the street and both east and west of
Biscayne. I predict a very unpleasant increase of traffic in a residential neighborhood that has no benefit (but
plenty of cost) to the city. And certainly of great cost to our immediate neighborhood.
While I have your attention, I would like to bring up a final point that you will certainly be hearing more about
as you develop these local neighborhoods. There has been a tremendous increase in noise (the blaring of
horns) from the trains over the last year. Ask any of the neighbors here and they will tell tales of the house
shaking at 2:00 in the morning. Is there some type of city noise pollution ordinance or a method for the city to
mediate with the railroad?
Thanks for your time and attention. Feel free to call or write anytime.
Sincerely, '
Mark S anson
2419 145`h Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068 �
322-2972 (h) I
423-7577 (w)
683-8566 ext. 2067 (voice mail)
swansome@rms.isd 196.k 12.mn.us