HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.a. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment - MUSA Expansion V
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL iVIEETING DATE: February 4, 1997 �
AGENDA ITEM: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment --- MLJSA AGENDA 5ECTION:
Expansion New
PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness, Community Development Director AGEN���:� �� ,
� I �
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution and Background Information APPROVED BY: �'
Applicant: City of Rosemount
Location: Within the corporate limits of Rosemount
Owner: Various Owners
Guide Plan: Phase 1, 2 and 3 MLTSA in the Land Use Plan Section
Amendment: Add Phase 2 MUSA to Phase 1 as the new 2005 (Current) MCJSA, and change the existing
Phase 3 to the new Phase 2 MLTSA
PC Hearing: Janaury 28, 1997
PC Vote: Unanimous Recommendation of Approval (5-0)
SUMMARY
The latest Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment was approved by the Rosemount City Council on 11/09/93
(Res. No. 1993-116). The Met Council subsequently approved it on 12/02/93. Because of limitations to the
Rosemount wastewater treatment plant, the Met Council restricted the city's initial 2000 MLTSA request by
shifting it to 2000+. The Met Council's plans for the Rosemount treatment plant have now been completed,
which include the phase-out of this facility by 2000 with a replacement of a lift station. In addition, the latest
2040 Regional Growth Strategy information from the Met Council contains population/household projections.
Based upon this new information, staff is now ready to submit an amendment to the planning commission, city
council and metropolitan council for review and approval.
The amendment request is actually quite simple in concept ... add the Phase 2 (2000-2005)MITSA area to the
Current Phase 1 MCTSA(2000), which will become the new Current MUSA. The e�sting Phase 3 (2005-2013)
MLJSA will then become the new Phase 2 (2005-2010)MUSA. By doing so, the city will be able to approve
development projects and provide necessary public services now rather than wait unti12000.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: MOTION to Adopt A Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Land
Use Plan of the Roesmount Comprehensive Guide Plan Update 2000.
COUNCIL ACTION:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1997-
A RESULUTION APPROVING AN AMI+,NDMENT TO LAND USE PLAN OF THE
ROSEMOUNT COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN UPDATE 2000
VVHFR�AS, the Rosemount City Council approved Resolution No. 1993-116 on November 9,
1993 that adopted Update 2000 as the Comprehensive Guide Plan for the city; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council approved Rosemount's Guide Plan Update 2000 on
December 2, 1993 with stipulations related to wastewater treatment capacity and on-site septic
system inspections; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount adopted a biennial septic system inspection ordinance on
May 7, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has projected the useful life of the Rosemount
Wastewater Treatment Facility prior to its planned phase-out by 2001, as identified in Exhibit
A (to be replaced by a lift station); and
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount is proposing to amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan's I',
Land Use Plan as identified in Exhibits B, C and D; and I,,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Rosemount Planning Commission on January '
28, 1997 to consider and recommend the proposed amendment with a unanimous vote in ,
support of it; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rosemount
hereby authorizes staff to submit an application to the Metropolitan Council to amend the
city's Comprehensive Guide Plan Update 2000 by adding the Phase 1 (2000) and Phase 2
(2000-2005) MUSA's into a new current Phase 1 (2005) MUSA, and changing the Phase 3
(2005-2013) MUSA to a new Phase 2 (2005-2010) MUSA.
ADOPTED this 4th of February, 1997.
Cathy Busho, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Wa1sh, City Clerk
Motion by: Seconded by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
EXHIBIT�__
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
C'i1N1ULATIVE IMPACT
on WASTEWASTE FLOWS-MGD
u ing THREE GROWTH SCENAR (�
Rosemount WWTP Empire
Annual MGD Z90
Household MGD Ind./ MGD MGD
--- Year Growth Households Comm. Balance Househoids
1997 200 (.025) (.015) .250 (.025)
250 (.038) (.015) .237 (.025)
300 (.050) (.015) .225 (.025)
1998 200 (.050) (.030) .210 (.050)
250 (.076) (.030) .184 (.050)
300 (.100) (.030) .160 (.050)
1999 200 (.075) (.045) .170 (.075)
250 (.114) (.045) .131 (.075)
300 (.150) (.045) .095 (.075)
Z000 Zoo �.loo� (.060) .130 (100)
250 (.152) (.060) .078 (.100)
300 (.200) (.060) .030 (.100)
2001 200 (.125) (.075) .065 (.125)
250 (.190) (.075) .025 (.125)
300 (.250) (.075) (.035) (.125)
NOTE: • Assume 100 units to Empire per year; balance to Rosemount
• Assume 1 household=250 gpd
• Assume 10 acres/year for indJcomm. (1500gpolacre)
� Balance=remaining capacity at Rosemount WWTP of.29 MGD
minus household and ind./comm. units based on .96 MGD
capacity and .67 MGD flow on 12/31/96.
�
EXHIBIT B I
SUMMARY OF A PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT I�',
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA �I
Janua 1997 'I
rY
A. Request:
Amend the Land Use Plan of the Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan Update
2000, as revised, dated October 1993, to identify the Phase 2 MUSA
(Metropolitan Urban Service Area) as part of a revised Phase 1 MUSA to the �
year 2005, and to designate a new 2005-2010 MUSA. I
B. Current MUSA Categories
Phase I 2000 MUSA
Phase II 2000-2005 MUSA
Phase III 2005-2013 MUSA
C. Proposed MUSA Categories:
Phase I 2005 MUSA (identical to current Phase I and II MUSA)
Phase II 2005-2010 MUSA (identical to current Phase III MUSA)
D. Future MUSA Categories:
(to be determined during the required 1998 update)
Phase III 2010-2015 MUSA
Phase IV 2015-2020 MUSA
E. Rationale: �'I
The Metropolitan Council approved a major amendment to Rosemount's II
Comprehensive Guide Plan on September 16, 1993 (Res. #93-57). At that time, j
the Council stated that, "Once the Commission's Implementation Plan [for the '',
Rosemount WINTPJ is approved by the Council, the city may resubmit its year ',
2000 MUSA request." This amendment will allow the City to provide additional '
areas of development opportunities three years ahead of the existing plan ,
designation since: (a) the Rosemount Wastewater Treatment Plant has capacity
prior to the planned phase-out; (b) nearly 65% of the residential land within
MUSA is controlled by two owners without current development activity; and (c)
the expansion will allow for cost effective extension of municipal services.
EXHIBIT C
SUMMARY OF M.U.S.A. AMENDMENT
ROSEMOUNT COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN ---January 1997
Land Su�piv:
• 705 acres are currently available for residential development within the (current)
Phase 1 MUSA.
• Approximately 65% of the total acreage within the current MUSA is owned by
CMC Heartland Partners (165 acres) or Kelley Trust (290 acres).
• 670 acres for residential and 700 acres for commercial/industrial are shown
within the Phase 2 MUSA (2000-2005).
Housing Su�plv: ',
• Nearly 1,735 housing units can be constructed within the (current) Phase 1 ',
MUSA at an overall gross density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. I
• The number of housing units that can be constructed within the current MUSA I
should ailow a 5.5 to 8.5-year supply from 1997 (200-300 units/year range).
Sewer Capacity:
• Approximately 30% of the housing units to be constructed within the current
MUSA will be treated by the Empire WWTP. The remaining 1,200 units will be
treated at the Rosemount WWTP, including all Phase 2 MUSA property.
• The Rosemount WWTP will be phased out by the year 2002 and replaced with a
new lift station with significant capacity improvements.
• Based on three different growth options (200, 250 or 300 housing units/year),
the existing Rosemount WWTP should easily have capacity through 2Q01.
An�sis
• At a high projection of 315 new housing units per year, 2,520 units will be
constructed from 1997-2005 (8 years).
• However, Phase 1 plus Phase 2 MUSA together will provide space for nearly
3,410 housing units at an assumed gross density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre.
• Therefore, an estimated 890 housing units (or 355 acres) is an "overage°
amount shown within the Phase 2 (2000-2005) MUSA. However, the city is
requesting all Phase 2 MUSA to be added to Phase 1 MUSA (2005) in order to
allow efficient and controlled utility/street phasing.
�c,E+tF lT D .
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT � , yZ M;. � �p 3 �
, ..
- ,�r � ,� �� i• ; . , � i. � i i c.i � �� ; � c-i '.�.
� � � � � �
;
'" � -�¢-wos • '• , �-'� L.��i� � ;�' z rn L�
� _ e.��.�� ;� RRI � 'I�' • r--;�� � 1 '
� . , .��, ,
, � • � _
�� � ' ��'�� 'PIOSs� p I � I � �I —�
�' • AG � ! ; � CONS � ) � �i�'', i � � 0 S
�� � '�---� � �' ��Gd � _�� ��,� G•I �r- , N
� � �� ��i � � :� � � � - � ✓--.� � ' '�°� �_�./ `� � !e���� �� �
� �
� � � , � i � � � ,
PD•R • .:�. ;: .;' . • ;: � Im_. . .... . .. . ,... GI ^--y- PIOS
. •' • r10 _
. _ �� � —T —
. • � �.
P� � i i � a. -
o �o t�R...:... .. Q y _ �.
. t .:. : . . ' ---
.... :• . ..:.,::: : . - s� i `'�
, ��
M
s I #
L
>:�;::.:: .;: .:::...:
1 � :::::: . 1 1 �- . � J = ` � WM I . AG
t�1k �
pD•R k f ( � � ' �� —i . -- : ;( � I �
� � I
:::::: . _
<>:: • ,�
.. . :
.
: �s � � ;
8 E` , Ue � : q, ;,, ,.�€ AG � r > ; PII Sr - -- __-i
, �` i . � _ �� f Y i , , i SS I
<•: ' ` �
: : • t: I �pG TiJ "PIOS
UR PIOS PII ,�:�:` : n �t.. �� ! ' -_ � � -
,
�
• �S = �8 i rro`SE �F �s a. ! � - i 1��°
_ � ��- ��
-PII ' �� t; ` � �: � i -cs.rta�. az 1 .. ------ r,. -_ -- �S-------
•;_ , 4 �
' Me n * PI03 ' � PII I CONS �'� -
. _ PIOS �n � . � —',. , ., �
• �� i
.. . : � �;•--�-�
� F _.... . � . AG
_ � ; V � F � -.___ j
. , ..:_ UR � � . 1 -" ---------
;. 1 _-,.:�--- - -------
' ac'.
�....� ------ �r AG - - �
— T— �
' I ��— I . ...
t, < C BP PII , � , __._ _ . -
.. .:'� �POMN� _�;. � � . � P , . :�. .._ � ._ i
. II
. . _�
I 1� UR k �-�'S� � � �� - PI� � ___ - �� - �-- -- -�� . . _._ ---e�e� - - ;
� � ,__..���,�
.. � �v �
� � � COATES �� '�
� , , �: , �
_ �� p - � .. � 1 --- _ �
R � - _� gP`' .. ��_� j' i = I � _ -_ � -- ,' ---
� = wos - �.� .-�`r. i i — -
.LEGEND w - - �,,�E ;---�.�-_�--��oRTH
A�,��,� LAND UsE PLAN
A6 Agriculmre PO�MU Pianned Oevelopment Mixed Use
j x�se i October 1993
� � �7noo Musa CONS Cunservancy C Commercial
RR Rural Readem�al BP Business Park � Comprehensive Guide Plan
�— � x�se 11 UR Urban Hesidential 6�1 General Industnal "" U�te 2��
� � IZ000�1005 MUSN � � �
PO fl Planned Oevelopment Nesidential WM Waste Manaqement `
. HH High OensitY Aes�dential PIOS Exlstmg Parks or Open Space
� x�sE IU p�l Pu61ic 1 Institutional �1. fuwre Park lacations
. l7005-IDl7 MUSA! � � m (es ineiceted u+the Comprehensive .
Park Plrn and Developmenr Guidel
p� � C��
p+� tt C2no5-zo�o,
CURRENT M.U.S.A. --- ROSEMOUNT, MN
ACRES TO DEVELOP WITHIN CURRENT PHASES
PHASE f = 705 acres residential
375 acres commercial/industriai
50 acres other
1,100 acres total
PHASE II = 670 acres residential
700 acres commercial/industrial
1,370 acres total
PHASE III = 520 acres total (all residential)
ALL PHASES . . . . 2,990 acres to develop
9
i
EXHIBIT '�
VACANT LAND SUMMARY --- ROSEMOUNT, MN
Using 2.5 Dweiling Units per Acre Density
1/01/97
MUSA Designation Acres Housing Units
Phase I, final platted lots/units 60 155
Phase I, prelim. platted lots 210 595
Phase I, concept approval 0 �
Phase I, vacant with no plans 435 985
705 1735
Phase II, vacant with no plans 670 1675
Phase III, vacant with no plans 485 1210
TOTAL 1860 4620
Note:
1. Phase I MUSA = year 2000 designation
2. Phase II MUSA = year 2000-2005 designation
3. Phase III MUSA = year 2005-2013 designation
4. Platted IoUunit count based on actual inventory;
assumed 2.5 units/acre for non-planned property.
-------------------------------------------------
1995-2010: Therefore, based on a projected increase of 4,715 housing
units in Rosemount from 1995-2010 (or 315 units/year), the current
Comprehensive Guide Plan MUSA designation will be adequate
through 2010.
1995-2020: However, using the 2020 growth estimates, Rosemount
will need another 1 ,400 acres in MUSA between 1995-2020 for housing
in order to accomodate the expected increase of 8,715 units during that
25-year period ... (8715-4620-600) = 3500/2.5 = 1400
i
i
EXHIBIT !
VACANT LAND SUMMARY --- ROSEM4UNT, MN
Using 10.0 Employees per Acre Density
1/01/97 _
MUSA Designation Acres Empioyment
------------------------------------------- -------- ------------------
Phasel 120 1200
Phase II 700 7000
Phase III 0 0
TOTAL 820 8200
Note:
1. Phase I MUSA = year 2000 designation
2. Phase II MUSA = year 2000-2005 designation
3. Phase III MUSA = year 2005-2013 designation
-------------------------------------------------
1995-2010: Therefore, based on a projected increase of 3,955
empioyees in Rosemount from 1995-2010 (or 265 emp./year), the
current Comprehensive Guide Plan MUSA designation will be adequate
through 2010 (an overage of 425 acres).
1995-2020: Using the 2020 estimate that shows an increase of 4,555
employees between 1995-2020, Rosemount still has enough projected
MUSA area to accomodate that increase (an overage of 365 acres).
� � E�zoVNT
F Ro s
CITY O .
_ _ _. ,`M , - _ � ��.;,�=', ` ' ��
. . ,- �:,,�„ , ; � �
�
, �
/- 1 �
' � � � • -JL' T � ' i � — j ;
� RR ``�-��-��as i } � �1 - - • �' �
�_' • '.��� � � /-'� RR y �� � �-�'� � �
� � � . �t. � :..� Lti t � � ' ,�� , " .
�,'� ,-� ;�. �..,� .
� _o-, ,.;�'�,� `� �� �
l�' � �_._-.,,_._, _ `�G • PIOS� ;� -�
�� � I � � _ ' �-�,,; . ,
���G-- �- !�`-�.-� =-�r- —. � • AG � �
, +—. _ ,� �
�r- , v , -;�--��,- f,� ��T.� � � �--�
-==��./ • -=,r`' -�.- ; , I . I
. !g� _ RR�;��-.t--�I, �'- " " � ' ;
;� � �� �� � �
PU-R ' • �i �' `!_.: Plo ,P�os I,
e • ` ' . . ` �
e ' � ��
� � i �
PI •.;_:•::•:::.:.:.:.::::::::.: ! ' j i n
° .�., .�o `�:' gp. . ! m_,.
`,
:�-
�
�:>w:.: I
:;Y-� I
>..;;�;::
�>;:-;
� I
--�.,.r.s .,,.::;>`
;;:r��:�
r:>;N:<.,
5 :=::;�`:><:..
.. .
:�: .�. .
, .
... . ....�
.
�
- .>:::.>:-
- - �:._.-..::..:...:.:.:•....:.
.
't i
- — �::�:�>.�Y».<:;V
- �,p !:<::�:
��`-' :�>.v:`:">;;'.
_ a <>.;::»>::>,:� :s;:»:.:<
�
VJ1 .�Y:� :}i,+.::.:s;x.;�4:
,::Y:Y:v::::::,:.�vi:. �
�:'.`�
_ ..r:::::,:
•:;ii:
.... .....
� ;::•;';•;•;::_..
' ::.�.....�.
...... .'.'•'•'•'.••.
...{{`::�.k:i •i,!�'�".•.
� PD-R `S:G: :?:�'S4�::'�:;:a�i
/
'•i:::c:•�ap^'�+�.
�`-s'r.'+' .
L:• �
_ . � �%:%:°�r:w.
:..;r.
.f
p �'�_:`:
o�;:•:�•.':.....;...�.y:.
e
�
..w....,Srv:{:f;:,:.
.,.r;.
:...;:.�...
-�;x,�;�^;;;+ ``•'.v:i:::`�`:;�r?..
�..• ...r,•:a:::� ::.c:::. • (
UR ..�y��:�� •n.�.�.�:..;;::;:.:,.::. >:>;::<�:::<;=�:
�l ...,.�.>:::::... ?>::<:::•:<;,; ;.... ._..
. �o..o� � �. � .�.�.�:::. �:{:w;:�t,<::':`>:;.;��`�`+�' .
';ti).::..:.y.r.�. �� • �
:$t4':::2•'`•:ti w•��.�i�i:C2 :
.:.�� • ,:{i,:s:�x'�<..:�''::Q:..
/ ':•. ::;:::;�.. nSi�:`...:,;:� � �
U R P I O S .�:��� ::`::::� � : ::�::::�:�>:...:.,
P Il -prOS ..�: �:::�-.:�.:.. :����4::1. � �;�:>��:::;: I I
�:.�:.::. >�:,>:::>;.:::r
::::,:sw,.:��t:z;<r:is�`�s:
� a PI >:.�:>�;:.::$:xt»;�::<...,...:.:: I
', . •--::• �:;.�:::;:::r:::;.
� . - `� �::£>�;.;�h.sti,.` .;<. A
.—E :���•: w:,>:::::<r . �;: I
p�� ,a, E���:�=, ::;:�.>:::::.a.::�<:.::<::.:.��.:::�:: ,—
..�
_ ,
- -� - i1A . � PIOS � p�� I i
�, � PI�S ( �
�
��� �� % � I
, -
- �. � UR o \t!I � I
� b ��„'-=�� C%•:' C �..,.� , i �� t
� � !
� :::::::.:;�..:. � � � BP P�� � i �
� .Pn Mui�- �= li P11 �
' � E� UR '� y ; �i �
� � � �
� �
�
; io � - P , � i
r � q � :..: �
R = a � '. BP �' � �,'
� �%� ..j.�.. � I I� I
. ,
' Pios — :I i
G-1 � ,
_.....,.
. s �,y,'�.f�.�
LEGEND lr�7 o a�rt �rw�, r ��d, ,
IVIUSA PswSrnG �� ��
AG Agriculture Ptl•MU Pianned Deveiopment • Mixed Use
�� PHASE I C Commercial
� � �2�oa Musa1 CONS Conservancy
RR Rural Residential BP Business Park
� � PHnsE It G-I Generai lndustrial
:::::::;:::: UR Urhan Residential
�:::::::::::.:`.>: (ZOQO 1005 MUS:71
PD�R Planned Development � Residentiaf WM Waste Managemen
HR High Oensity Res�dential PtOS Existing Parks or Open Space
'-"—� Future Park Locations ,
';' PHASE�111 .^ I p;� Puolic insntutional � as indicated in the Comprehensive ',
r2ee� a ., �us.v
va.F P1an and Deve/aament Guidel
- ---- ----- -- ---I�
i
YH '''
E�
I
UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY WITHIN �''�
ROSEMOUNT'S CURRENT M.U.S.A. '�,
DEVELOPMENT UNITS ACRES DENSITY STATUS WWTP ,
CMC-1(single farnily) 192 80 2.4 P R '
CMC-1(townhouse) 70 14 5.0 P R '
Hawkins Pond-1 16 16 1.0 P R
Hawkins Pond-2 SQ 22 2.3 P R
Geronime Pond 100 38 2.6 P E
CMG2 175 70 2.5 N R
Shannon Meadows 29 13 2.2 F R '
Shannon Pond East 77 39 2.0 P-F E ',
HRA Senior 44 3 17.5 F R '
McNamara 132 22 6.0 P 65-R/67-E
Englert 150 25 6.0 N E
Gergen 45 45 1.0 N E
Broback Ind. 8 11 .7 F R
Kelly Trust 580 290 2.0 N R
O'Leary's 25 10 2.5 F E
Canollton Sth 8 4 2.2 F R
McMenomy 36 5 6 N E
TOTALS- 1737 707 2.5
�TATUE CODE: C= Concept Plan Approval
P=Preliminary Plat Approval
F=Final Plat Approval
N=No Status
R=Rasemount WWTP
E= Empire WWTP
Updated: l2/31/96
���_
` .
EXHIBIT (continued)
DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNITS
WITHIN ROSEMOUNT'S CURRENT M.U.S.A.
TYPE # %
Single Family 1,230 71%
Twin Homes 50 3%
Townhomes 413 24%
Apartments 44 2%
TOTAL 1,737 100%
i
�
�
Population, Household & Employment Forecasts
by the Metropolitan Council
Rosemount, Minnesota __ ',
A. POPULATION:
increase Increase
1995 2000 2010 2020 1995-2010 1995-2020
11,720 14,500 23,700 34,000 11,900 22,290
102% 190%
B. HOUSEHOLDS:
Increase Increase
1995 2000 2010 2020 1995-2010 1995-2020
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- -------------
3,785 5,000 8,500 12,500 4,715 8,715
125% 230%
C. EMPLOYMENT:
Increase increase
1995 2000 2010 2020 1995-2010 1995-2020
5,345 6,330 8,300 9,900 2,955 4,555
55% 85%
EYHIBIT
ROSENIOUNT, MINNESOTA
C'[IMULATIVE IMPACT
on WASTEWASTE FLOWS-MGD
� in�THREE GROWTH SCENARIOS
Rosemount WWTP Empire
Annual MGD .290
Household MGD Ind./ MGD MGD
Year Growth Households �omm. Balance Households
1997 200 (.025) (.015) .250 (.025)
250 (.038) (.015) .237 (.025)
300 (.050) (.015) .225 (.025)
1998 200 (.050) (.030) .210 (.050)
250 (.076) (.030) .184 (.050)
300 (.100) (.030) .160 (.050)
1999 200 (.075) (.045) .170 (.0�5)
250 (.114) (.045) .131 (.075)
300 (.150) (.045) .095 (.075)
Z000 aoo (.loo� (.060) .130 (.100)
250 (.152) (.060) .078 (.100)
300 (.200) (.060) .030 (.100)
2001 200 (.125) (.075) .065 (.125)
Zso (.190) (.075) .025 (.IZs�
300 (.250) (.075) (.035) (.125)
NOTE: • Assume 100 units to Empire per year; balance to Rosemount
• Assume 1 household= 250 gpd
• Assume 10 acres/year for ind./comm. (1504gpd/acre)
• Balance= remaining capacity at Rosemount WWTP of.29 MGD
minus household and ind./comm. units based on .96 MGD
capacity and .67 MGD flow on 12/31/96.
' _ _ ._ '
;,pro Title:Rosemounf WWTP Phaseflut ' � Project #9208
�escriDtI01t:
'�P�B�Pmvida for the phaseout of the Rr�semount WWTP w the Metro Plant via a ncw lift station and
em in Imra Grove �Ia . 'Ihe e�dsting aerated pond system.
forceatain connecting to the iaterceptor syst wit� the CeatralizationJDecentralization
projected to reach capacitY bY 2000, w�l be eiiminated in agreemeat
Study aad facility plannin8 results
h Sis( � • . I .: ' � �MYWiM�r��p�O x�
� O�M '^C+J �" " /
• J�IyH F , `+M'• �.
wtv�••�+°,.;�r.i . .. ^ � ..�v,;;::a:%: 'A::wYawr..:,.:•::�..::.... . ..
:::,;,....;�•:..:i::..6.?'a .. .......�� -� � _.:.::.. .:�'�'��''��.�::.�
nzatron�
k. .:::>:. ... _ .-...:�yj•:..... ..:.::n:i-;nc
Prior Autharization �Z,000,000 ssep I-Pla�s �"Pp`°"°� 0 �°�°°�d
��
1996 Author�iraxion e $1,000,000 s�II�ai�a 0'�`°"°d 0 � OF"�
�}�� ���>""' /�` � ���{A.}���}��}< step III camstcvcsioa Q'''pp`91Od Q � Q Faoa�
' �� }..�YLai..�+J�+�+v"�_a�'"�Y��'. �
Q Fssoae
Future Authorizations a 10,116,6zz oma �"�`°"°d � � .
- Total Project SI1,I16,622
.. ......... - 4 .•:....:n.::::::
..::..:.::.:t m:tin��v.:.x:w;{J.4�� .
... . . . � :.�...... vrxw::::.vq•' , F.
<0.5'.9M��'�i:i'?• � . ••:::..:v:?9Y::i..•.::\v:.ev..;;.; .ty.:. . —`
�:n.:.........v.:.x:r::.:�i•::: �. .v
- .. ..:�{� � t. :.......�:::ny::�.}..:......: y d...Y.�*�:;xx.,$.:.�Yr:v;i::k:i:4::.�{:._v:i'v}.... •� �'y .
:�:na,•::.. ... :...�......-:v ��::'::v:�•::., ...... nv.:�':rv'm:r:. 'i .
:.:
w�+ :•:.v .5 :::. '. LLL— ..' ..l.r . . .vnv:•.v�•y:A:::..'m•.•;::�......... ViIM•�'
{ ..�.
h ^ . ...�.,.. .......... .,. .... ... .. . ,.:..... ,:.:.::..�.�;: ..>..;.:.:::;.:.:::..;::;.;.:.:.flb :<::>;::t>.<;:::«.:.;;:.::,>z;:;:..,;
�.::�,. :;k,. k;:<:.�:..�:. �<:. n�,, 1.
: ...............::...,......:. ....�....,:::::.,.. .
}b„�F:w ..:w:...r......... . �:.v:m;... -.��u�. �A.i
........:.::. ...;
•.v .: •:.:x:................ . ': ..u. ..... .:::•:•�:�:.
::�:•
. •. ::%
xl.. ..i :W:: `:�:' v,rTi.t.�}.A.`S.. .vh:` ::\v�.
.{v �.
�v .vx ...ri.n.i.vn::hl�i:::<•::� ��. ....v .� ::::..4.n.ti.
v ..fi. .................... .. .. �� .. ::.::n......ihJ v.v:'.....�v::;:.::;�.y'}.'p,`
P .:::.. :..
.. An . ................ .r . n...:•nw•.v i.........,A;
.r.... i4�:. :::..:.. ....YH�:.•:,•
...M. ynh`-J:::•... .... ..... �v::..
. .:....:::::..<::::::.:.:...:::::.J.:.�:::::.:::.::�...:;:.;::.-...�.�><:::.:::.::..:...::.::::.::..:.:.:...... ......,..;.::..
,r.�,wcr.<J:r;�;z:a`.",,•.:•.::.::•.:........ ........... . ,.,............. .fi..... ,�.+:..::�3.::»'<,a�.�an.:'2?.....
::. .:.. h T: .. . ....�_: .. .:!. .:y,
'+L vtn\:?�:Sl:...�� ��:::i4:�i2:.::.i::- - �. •::..: ri v.. .. ... ~
L�aC�$%?`;+�'..hvn 'i:4:i•iiii:.iri4' .:. ... _ ... .. .
.:::...::::.::... n .
�.:.
Project Type: Irnerccptor 1996 Objectives. Coati�ue desiga and the
tatus Bud et right-of-way acquisition
Step 1 - In pmgress 5251,000 1997- Complete desiga
Sttp 2- In pro� 5749,000 1998- Not applicable
Step 3 - Nat authorized N/A 1999- Not applicable
Total Capitai Budget: $1,OOQ000 . .... 2Q00- Not appticable . . .. ,
.......iii:oiii:.::i.�::::.:.i>r;•i:itJ:i:}:•xii:.:qyS:i-..::v:-. ...�:.v
.._............................... ... ....:::. .....
.._ _...._... _.::::• :....:.::.,.:..::�:::�:::::::>:+::.::::.:. ...:................:::.:.::::• .....x:.:•v :2t�;+::;'.,•.:;':::^y::?.
... ...... .
..w......::..•,,;•,
.wc:r•>::::::�... .:.am
..............._.....:.::..::......._:...............:.,....... .:::::::::.......... :.�..........,;..... .... u!;:.::;,:.'
�x.�::.�..::::..... . ........:
.........__.............. .............. ..............................:... ..�:::::.x�:•:o::::::•. ..�:,...:.:n::::x;.::::.:::.::•:..:.:...... ....M{.
.._._.. .... _..... ...... ............................................,. ...............................,. -::�:.:�..•.-..:.... r:,.•:•-::::
........ .:.�.........:........ .......... .................... ................... •
. ............... .. .......... ........... ...................... ....X .:....�:...;..: . -.;:..:..;:,.;.::.;•...:';">�»;::;� ..iU..:...::�-::.;.,;-...:.::::::.;y,,.;
.......:. .:..........................................._........,..._.... .....:.:::. ::.:>::...;......
nn.....i.......................................................... ...:::.•:::n..... ..{v.nv:�:.::................;.:............ v.•�.i:::\{},;.�Y:� .:nw. v...; ...�. ..�..
.............. ................n................... .. l.r t.................. ...... .,v,..... �
..........., n ...::::::::....�.:::�... v+t v..+.:�:.ii:iv:?v..........:v:� v,.;:{:vT:ti:+`' :tL�vT:ti�iT'�
...v.�:::::.::::.........:::::......:�::::::::�-:::::L•n..v..:�:::•::::..{�i{........ :�:m:�vii...:-:::x:n.......:......:..!y:.C:��:::i: :.
.......:..�...v.......
.....����::n�.
n :,- .::'.
....
....:..-:nv:vn�:'::• ...:.•..... .:v:�::�::v.•::x� ....,.,-..,.t:n: ::: ......y.... �..................:....... {..}
: t......v.......si.....<..... . .............. �. . ':.�:--........................i.�-.�. :•`::::•.:::.r...tv::.:v.}..,.5
i: ..
�{{H.t.:i::`:.�
.S.\1N............T.:..::::::::::::. .. ,. ..::>::+ai'4i'::vn?Y,-,,:,.;:'.... .::,,..::•::w:<•:.:.•:::::`::.. .:.. ,.,. .,: . O . '.;< �._..._.� �e�-.�.'�:�:;;;:;,�:
�:. .: .......... p ......:.:.....
�}�� ..........:...:.:::.::..::::...,..:> .:::.:,.....:::::,...,,..0 eCI...::........�Y:::::....
...x..r.vni.....::::::.:::v:::::::. .. ':. ........... ............�i �v}�N.... ' '...��.
.. .... ... .................... . ..........r .... .....Y....: :::'::::y�:'•i:{.•i:
...
.�{'u,`:=' ..[
,..... .....<...................... ..... ....:........., . .
,.v.-`.C�':'•:
... _ ��:::..::::::::::::�.............,:�:.,. .....:::...... ....::... :::.:........:...::::,.•:.... .^. t�^�'io-�,:"_,::�,+h�;
.....u+... .................. . Tw46Y+ ................... ......... � ....:�::::::-:::.�.:�
. ..r.. . .... . � ...............::. ....v.;.Rp:<.x�:.:::::v:::::::::�. �:�:...y,.;:i�.:4::i{�:::............
,... ,.. v.............. diliire..S .
... .. en .................... ............... ....::..... .
......... .:..
::��- ..,>;��>;:::<
...,. ....,>.......... ...... ....... >.......... ........::>:::::.:::..... ,.,:::.:::..:,..
.. .. ....................... _.........__............_..... ......... ...,...:. ..::,:..;;;��.:..... -� ...:.,..;::.......N..,.:...W;.:Y:..:�
:..:. . ::.:...:........ :�::.:. ...:.... ...........::::::,:::................
:....:.,..._....::.:.... .. .v.��::...:.:....... .. ..,
,... .............::........ .:,... ...
......::
... . ...... .::. ;:.... ..,.,:....... ... ......
'.4.�:.vi:::�v.:::... :w::•v::..:... ..
.....u.� :.ri{+n;.); ^�+C �
:::..:'. :: ' •ti' f�Y :i.0 :i-... ... .��..
. .'.Y'.{. .... � . -.�::i:. ' :n . .... . ... . .... . ..
....... .:..•
.... -......::.'............ ... �. . .:..... .... .
. _quth_ _ Future Category: Expansion
'Thru 12131/94 5198,989 a� �
1995 5200,800 SO � Risk of Deiay: 5
� W.... �... � eratin Effici 0
.,��:;:::,::::.:;:.::k.,:<:..:,..,.�;;:,�:;>,.,....:�.:.:�;: �0 � g ��'
. .,, Q�,��9G � .<
:;:�;:: � #��<:
�:. 2
I.. h r.....�.
�ff➢/ N ? T� vH{rix�;"A.y:'a. •
., ::2a�(�tr��9C �.��fl� , eratin Effectivmess'
so � g
`:�,'��:: '� � 4 ;(�� sp Governmernal Coord'ination: Q
.>:<::,�:�::,,.,� s (�/�
:r.+N`:��riJr������ s�t a���25/V��1i/��: . .
:..•
.
+i::i�1N� • . •
�:"�, ti�4.Otr. r99� �.,..<:�:�.:'�,� � Subto
„�;;.;', :::..�.::..: �:��,.Y:�:.�;:::i�:.. w�: .�
�;, � � ao
a,�:,�����6��ta� '��IOs#�
i/b�a/�b�C ��bY+: OA . .
.�"`.�"'`.�'"'":. . ...."�°"...�"'.."",.'�".,""" Priori Poiat Total: 7
1997 SZO1,011 5398,989
I 19
98 • SO 55,000,000 �—�-�
. 000.
1999 �0 54,000,000 $�o�p��ec'ry pco�`cred w b`ree�ched by tb,e Year 2
prtated p�d plaat is not mmeaabk to iataim�
2000+ SO 5717,633
Contingency �0 �0 Fttecti.�cnas:Pbaseout im�roves floa�n7it}+ro mxc lmeataia fi�a+e ,
������guintosy requi�ts aad avoids fuua+e odo�
II'�, Totals 51,000,000 510,116,622 p�blcros.
:TotaTPro ect Cosr. ':511,1:16,622"<
+�AP�naix w.l l
� � � e � • ' � -
� � - .
� �• � �in.i�� ��`�- � •
..
��■�_ III{L*�Z • .�.
� � t�
�,�_ �""�`T ; j'�� - .
' ti1111t1 1�• � \l:i
las� .�i7/ 111��
� - r���C�, i• �fn� .
�
t�� 1��f�-'� '� ; .0 ,�•_
�..�.�� ��• tta
1' �:�, ��- �:-:�. :' t��»
� �`G �.--�- .� ��t- i.
- _-.�� �{������ t �: `
�1\�
,
� ,� , � ..�
�, ��, _ . �
� - ._-.
� > ` !r: ` •.-.
~� 'I � �• �.�i
; � � !
..,� �'l� - ..
r•� 1.�
�- �. _
��-
, }
e� �t .--. .
� ���,
� � � ... .,�
' r�A�l�� `�:-� r�. ,
� ;. ~, �
`. ��`� -�
_ , , � ���..
i o
� �,.-
�'" I� . . � .
,_��— �,�;�
��i�
� �• � � � IV. � 1 111 r�
,
�------ --�---� -- �- - ..___..__.._____�_.._._. .___..�._..__.._._ . '
---...... _..._ .Y.__-� -----__. .. . _ - 1
METROPOLITAN C � UNCIL
�� Mears Park Centre, 250 E. Sth Strees, S� Paul, Mianesota 55101
� 612-291-6359
RESOLUTION NO. 93-57
R�SOLUTION REQUIRING MODIFICATION OF
A PROPOSED AMENDNIENT TO T�IE '
CITY OF R�SEMOUNT CONYPREHENSIVE PLAN i
WHEREAS, the city of Rosemount, by letter submitted March 22, 1993, transmitted a proposed
amendment to its adopted comprehensive plan regazding revision of the entire plan, in
accordance with the NietroQolitan Land Plannin;Act and the Council Guidelines for
Re�riewing Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and
�,�'nLP.EAS, at its meeting on September 16, 1993, the Metropolitan Cauncil reviewed the
Rosemount plan amendment and adopted a plan review report, in accordance with the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the Council Guidelines for Reviewing L.acal
Comprehensive Plan Amendments; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment has been re•�iewed for impacts on metropolitan systems,
apparent consistency with other adopted Metropolitan Development Guide chapten and
compatibility with plans of ad;acent iccal ur.its of govemment; and
WHEREAS, the Council has conctuded that the amendment as proposed constitutes a substantial
�� impact on or substantial departure From the Council's Wastewater Treatment and
__ Handiin� Poiicv Ptan, and that a plan modification is required prior to Councii apprvvaL
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that: ..
1. The Metropolitan Council fnds that:
a. The forecasts contained the Rosemount comprehensive pIan, Update 2400
are consistent with the Council's forecasts.
b. The city's policies for rural area development are consistent with the
Council's rural policy, except for the existing developed areas shown on its
zoning map as Rural ResidentiaL
c. The hietropolitan Waste Controi Commission has completed interim
improvements to the Rosemount Wastewater Treatment Plant that has
increased its design capacity to approximately 0.9 mgd. The city's plan and
flow projections must be consistent wich the plant's capacity.
. d. The long term faciIity plan for the Rosemount plant wiIl not be approved
until 1994_
e. The city's program for inEiltratio�nflow is acceptable, and the provisions
for private wastewater treatment plants comply with Council requirements.
c�
� The city needs to modify its on-site sysiem regulations to require biennia!
inspection of on-site systems by certiFed and licensed inspector�. �
g. The ciry's surface water management policies comply with the Council's ',
Interim Nonpoint Management Strategy. ,
h. The plan's funciional ciassiFcation system complies with the current I'
Transportation Poliry Plan, but not the ciassification revisions adopted by
the TAB in 1992 and 1993.
i. The ciry does not specify when che results of the TH 55 Corridor Study will
be available, nor how it will be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan.
" j. The plan amendment indicates the city is studying the provision of
municipal services to the eastern portion oF the ci_ry, but ^o: a�d:ess t,e
volumes and types of traffc expected to be generated by expansion of the
proposed industrial uses and densities. .
k The transit section of the plan is realistic in scope given the level oE service
available. The city is committed to work with develogers to remove
barriers and encourage transit use in the desi;n of development projects in
transit corridors.
1. A decision to relocate the Minneapolis/St. Paul airport to the Rosemount
search area woutd require a major revision to the transportation element oF
the ciry's Comprehensive Ptan. �
m. Approximately 2�0 acres of Spring Lake Regional Park is located on the '
eastern end of Roseinount. Adjacent development appears to be �
consistent with regional parks.
n. There are no other regional recreation facilities within the city. Proposed
development in Rosemount, adjacent to Lebanon Hills Regional Park �
located in Eagan and Apple Valley, is compatble and cansistent with
metropolitan plans for regional recreation open space.
o. The plan provides compiete inEormation on its housing goals and policies,
as weil as implementation measures necessary to achieve them.
2. The Metropolitan Council conciudes that it will:
a. Adopt the above findings and the staff report as part of these
recommendations.
b. Inform the city of Rosemount thar pursuant to the Metropolitan Land
Planning Act (Minnesota Statutes Sec. 473.175, Subd. 1), before it can put
the plan amendment into eEfeci it must:
�}
........� ._...,`........".�.___. _.�. _. _._._.. _-----_.... _.....---.. _..... _..
. ._ .. . ._ . ._. --------- - — _ I
t
� L madify its pian by removing the area wichin che proposed year 2000
� MUSA (including the area identified as removed from the MUSA
until after 1996) until such time as the Council has approved the
� Commission's Implementation Plan for expanding the capacity of
the Rosemount wastewater treatment ptant.
2. modify its Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Rosemount
wastewater �ieatment pIant capacity oE 0.9 million gallons per day.
3. modiFy its plan to specify that all on-site systems are to be inspected •
at least biennially by an inspector licensed by the city or County, -
and certiFied by the NiPCA. •
c. Recvmmend that the city revise its plan to respond to the changes to the
region's roadway classiFcatior_ s;nte^: adoptc� by t:e Tr"� in i992 and
1993.
d. Recommend that the city revise its plan to specify how the ciry will
incorporate the recommendations oF the TH 52/55 Study.
e. Commend the ciry for its support of strategies to work with deveiopers to
remove barriers and encourage design that promotes transit usage in
specified corridors.
�� Adopted this 16th day of September, 1993.
.
- ti�. � � -- �
Kevin owe, Vice Chair andra L. Lindstrom, ecre '
i� ,
,�
��'
CRAIG J. MINEA
611 QUINCE CIRCLE - BOULDER, CO. 80304-1030
TELEPHONE (303)440-9497 - FAX (303) 442-3491
Faxed - (612) 423-5203
January 24, 1997
Mr. Dan Rogness
Community Development Director
City of Rosemount
P. O. Box 510
Rosemount, MN. 55068-0510
Dear Dan:
I received the proposed January 1997 Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan
that will be presented to the Rosemount Planning Commission and City
CounciL
My only criticism of the plan is that it treats all MUSA sewered acreage as
fungible, i.e. all R-1 land is equal in quality. In my opinion, several hundred
acres of the expanded Phase I MUSA area, designated for single family
residential, are unsuitable for Class "A" residential development. Much of
this ground lies immediately east of the north-south Canadian Pacific
Railroad. This land is too close to the Wintz Warehouse (formerly Brockway '
Glass), Griggs Bros, the Dakota County Highway Department, the National
Guard maintenance garage, and Knutson Rubbish. These adjacent industrial
uses are totally incompatible with better quality residential development.
The 230 acre Kelly Trust parcel is the only current and expanded Phase I
acreage suitable for medium to high-end housing. If the Kelly Trust
representatives continue to demand $30,t�00-$40,000 per acre, the larger
residential developers, such as Centex and U.S. Homes, will build elsewhere.
Rosemount will be unable to achieve their development projections of 315
homes per year. I recommend that you invite several large residential
developers to review and comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan
revisions before adopting the plan as currently drawn. Inquire whether any
of the expanded Phase 1 MUSA acreage would meet their development
criteria.
I have 155 acres within the revised MUSA Phase II area. I am asking you to
recommend the inclusion of this 155 acre parcel in the revised 1997 Phase I
MUSA service area. This gently rolling property is the only remaining parcel
of sufficient size for better quality, single family residential development, east
.
of State Highway #3. This parcel is the only serious competition to the Kelly
Trust property. As the future sewer interceptor will be located on the
property's west boundary, the inclusion of this property in the Phase I MUSA
will not require any additional infrastructure investment.
�
i rely,
g a
cc: Ms. Cathy Busho, Mayor