HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.a. Biscayne Pointe Preliminary Plat and Rezoning CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 2, 1996
AGENDA ITEM: Biscayne Pointe Preliminary Plat and AGENDA SECTION:
Rezoning New Business
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, Assistant Planner AGENDA NO.IT # 4
ATTACHMENTS: Preliminary Plat, Location map, PC ex. APPROVED BY:
Summary and minutes (6-11-96), Comp
Guide Plan excerpt
Mr. Jim Remder, Mr. John Prinz and Mr. Dick Putnam have an interest in developing
approximately 62 acres of land east of Biscayne Avenue and north of the Dakota County
Garage for single family residential use. The property is beyond the Metropolitan Urban
Service Area (MUSA) and a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will be required to
accelerate the expansion of the MUSA to for this property.
The proposal is variance free and is described in detail in the attached Planning Commission
review. On June 11, 1996, the Planning Commission discussed the proposal at length and
adopted motions to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and rezoning to R-1. The
dissenting commissioner expressed concern about the proximity of the railroad tracks and
questioned the creativity of the design. The commissioner suggested that clustering techniques
be used in a manner similar to the CMC proposal to create buffer space near the tracks.
The U.S. Army National Guard was represented by Terry Palmer who expressed concerns about
future utilization of the O.M.S. facility across Biscayne Avenue. The O.M.S. Facility was
constructed with a significantly increased setback and landscaping concentrated along the
Biscayne Avenue frontage because of the urban residential land use designation.
Approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment is necessary for rezoning from
Agriculture (AG) to R-1, Single Family Residential. However, it is inappropriate to approve a
conditional rezoning. Therefore, action on the rezoning should be undefinitely tabled pending
the outcome of the Guide Plan Amendment process. The Preliminary Plat was prepared in lieu
of a concept, in support of the Guide Plan Amendment. Therefore, it is premature to approve
the preliminary plat. However, the City Council should provide the Developer an indication of
the relative acceptance of the plat. The Developer will be asked to accept the tabeling in
writing in order to process the amendments.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to indefinitely table action regarding the preliminary
plat and rezoning for the Biscayne Pointe residential proposal
pending the implementation of a Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment to include the property in the MUSA as approved
by the Metropolitan Council and completion of the preliminary
plat requirements.
COUNCIL ACTION:
. .
, i II ti-----1 T•1
ii
!Ifil 1 4.
L! i
1 4 ' 1
li,.... :.
i -
I I I i t t ii
• 1 :SII:
1.1;:i i •! ! a
, I.
" 4 i i riiit a -, - ! 1
11
i II
,..) > 1....-1........; 1 'i
illi 1
. 41,i .; - i 1 i
1 g II 1 I 1M: • r ! r r ! 1.01 ..
1::! i "
111 j Its I I gr-IF:i 1 .11111111; i1 1.
\ \ LIM 0.101,111illoci Mil
WIC 1- ggs:i \
, .
\ . OM We Ai pow.1111.N.tr.
.IA 11 1
2-22_41.20 2 4.m.asmemoln r maws./au.an sows
1 13
III EWA \
ifilii.IL .!
, t
IN ,,
..:.
‘\ A \
'°.f.t XI, % LI•1
1.111 If DWI \ifAltA\ 1-4
g ,
\
i .1\
-, •„o 00 - --). U.,1 !
E i
tit 4, •-, , ,
.
6:14)
s \
, \Q
4,.
I / ;V \;: a \ \ • - sr,
1.L1 1
. .. .
,.. . . lull 1 , (7', 1:;'/
1 / !I E ail -
. , \ \
, illy i
' i / , ' !el./ /: ' \ \
i / 1,, /
is:g ' \
1 ' ....,..•
„ ,;i0 , . ,,, s\t .,:!.,, ,,
LL1 ! , E i 44 . :.
. , -„,„ \
,„ , ,
,ir .„--,:', \ V.:
lir \ `.
' 1 3 I In ""
\
cord
II ISM
......0 v.,, ,
i .
„. .
.. .
. I
in sal I nit 31110' 10- \
_a 1 ‘ , •
ulnas
1.111 gOiXilill MO --..0,,\ \ IIIII1
I \ \
1 a ii, tag 1 .
; ' ..i . • \ .0
r• -
4,1 j661...0 1
0\ I 2" l'i •••
1 \ • It ' . It?.
A\
'E i a\1 .. * '•K' ' i ' 7741 1611
1 g n ' '' 31 ,ti '' . 4 a •
9 . " , . ., 4• ,
. ..
_ 5 '/
0.4 tf
;//'
f '
/ t i 1110 . \\ . . ‘ ,\
- \ \
-1 .H• __-.4'1
I g ,,, I I- h al ii. 1 \\ ! i
A g - a i •,,.), - \-,,_ Z a
" ' I .\ \
, '.° g■
•MEW:
1
WI .- 1 ,,. • ' °4 " ,
"
rt , ,... . . \ \ 1 9 il
. „ . , ....... b Ili! fri
110 .._.
t 1 -
tg
1 -
• Ns?. ,
' " " ---;----
WiI. i 1
ll
i 1104/ \ i in 1 ' ' ■ 1 - 0
' 6
\9-•\.
,1.•' . ii $
s• .
ii .: A'gi no 1i
,, , ii •,... 4,- mi 1 1 ' \c..)\
\ ,, z;••
. - I ' 2 i
- i
0 . -
• 1 i - I I i - ,
ifi..ifiii-J- i3gifir----—-—"----------*-- 1\ \7•*— w z
et$■• 0 ,
__.......T121 ._ ' \
—1 Eau ma Dm ta.....i--, • N-..-
ala ,
••■•■AMIM •
1
• •
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
City of Rosemount •
Planning Commission ,
•
• TO: Property Owners Within 350 feet : • •
APPLICANT: • Render-Putnam-Prins Partnership • •
PURPOSE: To hear public comment relative to the proposed Preliminary Plat of 155
single-family homes on 62 acres.
LOCATION OF. East of Biscayne Avenue, North of the railroad tracks
PROPERTY: Legally described as All that part of the NW I/4 of Section 28,Township 115,
Range 19 lying northerly of the right of way of the Chicago Rock Island and
. Pacific.Railway Company as located across said premises,all according to.the
Government Survey thereof.
•
MEETING: 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, June 11, 1996
PLACE OF City.Council Chambers
HEARING: 2875 - 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
HOW TO 1. You may attend hearing and comment.
PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to the Planning Commission,
P.O.Box 510, Rosemount,MN 55068.
ANY QUESTIONS: Please call the Planning Department at(612)322-2051.
1O
�= 3-ew le
C14 1 ' 1
-.. — .4,0.
\ ,,...-xEri,, r-_,,t, I !
, ,, ,.....mr.p,
___-,----__ ,,,,,,,,,,r , N...., 1
.---,,,,,A....,160:;,f
4
. . , , .
,..____!...„,,......„, ,, ---.47, ..:.„..,..r.„:„.„.„.„..:
r%< _ , . ___-_________ •
.,, nT =/ 4• is..:...:.
.17:
f=it
li 4
,• �•/ ,�� ti�N •Z
it r.0 "I". / / n
. B I M •147M it 1 f 1
CITY OF ROSEMOU1
• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
r,;ng Commission Meeting Date: June 11 , 1996
AGENDA ITEM: Biscayne Point - Preliminary Plat,
AGENDA SECTION:
Rezoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Public Hearing
Amendment
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, Assistant Planner
AGENDA NO.
flc .
ATTACHMENTS: Preliminary Plat
APPROVED BY: ,("
PROPOSAL
Mr. Jim Remder, John Prinz and Dick Putnam are proposing to develop the approximately 62
acres of land east of Biscayne Ave. And north of the Dakota County Maintenance Facility
currently owned by the Corrigan Family for 155 single
e Metropolitan Urban Service The
cel Areas
currently zoned for Agricultural use and is beyo nd
(MUSA). The land is in an area that is designated for urban residential land use in the next
phase of MUSA expansion. The proposal is intended to be free of variances and therefore a
conventional single family detached preliminary plat proposal. Overall density is 2.5 dwelling
units per acre.
ACCESS AND STREET DESIGN generally across from the
The plat has two primary street connections to Biscayne Avenue, g Y
National Guard OMS Facility. The streets intertwine in a modified grid design that is oriented
east and west generally parallel with the rail road ROW. Proposed future local street
connections are one north and one east. Temporary cul-de-sacs will be required until future
development occurs on adjacent property.
LOT DESIGN
The initial preliminary plat included 23 lot dimension variances. The Developer has responded
with a plan revision that is intended to eliminate all variances. The revisions arrived Friday
morning (June 7) and a cursory review has (so far) found the revision to have achieved the
goal. •
PARKS SIDEWALKS/TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE
will
No park land is included with the current proposal. The Parks ae a Committee
The initial itial
meet on June 10, 1996 to discuss the development and provide
Staff discussion identified a neighborhood park on the northern edge of the development that small first phase g
may result in a modification affecting one or several lots as oad ROWes a neighborhood b'ar er.
the relative isolation of the development assuming the
A below grade crossing of the rail road tracks is an idea that Staff would like to explore with
the developers on both sides of the RR ROW. Such a trail connection might relieve this
proposal of park land dedication if a direct link is available to a proposed neighborhood park
south of the tracks. be
A bike trail will likely be required along Biscayne Avenue Ave. into least one
interior'of the neighborhood required to facilitate pedestrian access from Biscay ne
will a link to parks and the RR underpass if it is created.
Two ponding areas are indicated as easements. One is located in the interior of block 5 in the
west center of the development and the other is against the wide portion of the RR ROW.
/AMENDED ACTION: MOTION to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for
Biscayne Point to the City Council subject to: 1) incorporation
of recommendations relative to grading, utilities and
easements identified by the Public Works Department; 2)
incorporation of recommendations relative to the Parks and
Recreation Committee for park dedication , sidewalks and
trail linkages; 3) adoption of a Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment to place the 62 acre preliminary plat area in the
Metropolitan Urban Service Area; 4) Rezoning of the
preliminary plat area to R-1 Single Family Residential
(Detached); and 5) conformance with the subdivision
ordinance requirements for final plat approval including
execution of a development agreement to secure the public
improvements, landscaping and potential future phasing
considerations; and,
MOTION to recommend that the City Council rezone the
property to R-1 Single Family Residential Detached " "
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
•
• Regular Planning Commission Meeting Proceedings
June 11,1996
Page 4
Th ommissioners and Staff discussed the following: (1) possible MUSA expansion and the effect
on fu development; (2) surrounding land uses; (3)bike trails and walk p connecting to the
downto area; (4) safety concerns with circular streets and intersections; (5) setbacks.
Member DeBe ;:r. 'es stated that he likes this proposal but is"not sold%'"that people will buy these
small lots. He felt ' : more information and discussion was needed b' fore a decision could be made.
Mr. DeBettignies also -.uested the name and location of a similar development so that he could
either visit the site or talk t. e Homeowner's Association. Other Commissioners stated that they
too would like this information.
Member Tentinger stated that he has , problem wi the road system as he believes it is not practical;
however, overall he likes the-concept.
Member Shoe-Corrigan stated that she was'm :vor of the clustering of the homes, life-cycle
housing, smaller lots and the open space aareas. Sh- would like to visit a similar development and see
more pictures and examples of a"ne ditional" de . opment. Ms. Shoe-Corrigan also requested
that the a pp licant address Staff's/concerns and Mr. Leon ach's concerns cerns which he stated in his
letter to the Planning Commis ion.
Chairman Droste stated at he would like to see examples of a fla area of land, similar to the
proposed site,that w- a developed as"neotraditional."Even throu• e basically likes the design, he
stated that he is 11.4 ggling with some concerns such as the neighboring .' oad and the footprints for
neighborhood • d 3.
MOTIO► •y DeBettignies to table action regarding the Concept Plan until the I;veloper provides
additi. al information to support the second and fourth findings required of Section .2 D of
Or•s ance B of the City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance. Seconded by Shoe-Corrigan. Ayes: Shoe-
►orrigan,DeBettignies, Tentinger and Droste.Nays: 0. Motion passes 4-0.
Public Hearing: Render-Putnam-Prins Partnership - Preliminary Plat/Rezoning
Chairman Droste opened the public hearing scheduled at this time to hear public testimony regarding
the Render-Putnam-Prins Partnership Preliminary Plat/Rezoning application. The recording secretary
has placed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Mailing and Posting of Public Hearing Notice
on file with the City.
Assistant Planner Pearson stated that the City has received a proposal from the Render-Putnam-Prins
Partnership to develop approximately 62 acres of land east of Biscayne Avenue, north of the Dakota
County Maintenance Facility and north of the railroad tracks for 155 single-family lots. Mr. Pearson
briefly reviewed the Preliminary Plat and noted that there are no variances requested. He also stated
that no park land is included with this proposal and the Park and Recreation Committee will meet to
provide a recommendation in this regards. Mr. Pearson mentioned that a Planned Unit Development
is not required because this Preliminary Plat is consistent with all City standards.
Staff and Commissioners discussed the MUSA timeline availability.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Proceedings
June 11,1996
Page 5
Dick Putnam stated that he is 1 of 3 partners requesting approval of the rezoning and Preliminary
Plat. He mentioned that this proposal meets all standards and is very straight-forward. Mr. Putnam
stated that he understood the MUSA issue; however, was still hoping to begin development this year.
Terry Palmer, a representative of the National Guard, stated that they were concerned with the
proposed zoning change. He stated that the OMS Facility and adjacent undeveloped land is west of
this proposed development and they foresee this undeveloped land to eventually be used for parking
their equipment. Mr. Palmer was concerned that the National Guard's uses be consistent with that of
neighboring property owners.
A discussion occurred regarding the OMS Facility.
As there were no further comments from the audience, MOTION by DeBettignies to close the
public hearing. Seconded by Tentinger. Ayes: DeBettignies, Tentinger, Droste and Shoe-Corrigan.
Nays: 0. Motion passes 4-0.
Member Shoe-Corrigan commented that this was a good proposal; however, she was very concerned
about some of the lots abutting the railroad tracks. She felt this was a serious safety issue. Assistant
Planner Pearson mentioned that the lots abutting the railroad tracks do conform to the additional
setback requirements for railroads.
Member Shoe-Corrigan also expressed her concern that this development will not be integrated with
the rest of the City. She stated that she would like to see a more creative design approach used for
this piece of land. Mr. Putnam addressed Member Shoe-Corrigan's concerns.
The Commissioners discussed fences, sidewalks and park issues.
MOTION by DeBettignies to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Biscayne Point to the
City Council subject to: 1) incorporation of recommendations relative to grading, utilities and
easements identified by the Public Works Department; 2) incorporation of recommendations relative
to the Parks and Recreation Committee for park dedication, sidewalks and trail linkages;.3) adoption
of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to place the 62 acre preliminary plat area in the
Metropolitan Urban Service Area; 4) _ :oning of the preliminary plat area to R-1 Single Family
Residential(Detached); and 5) conform,.nce with the subdivision ordinance requirements for final
plat approval including execution of a development agreement to secure the public improvements,
landscaping and potential future phasing considerations. Seconded by Tentinger. Ayes: Tentinger,
Droste and DeBettignies. Nays: Shoe-Corrigan. Motion passes 3-1.
MOTION by DeBettignies to recommend that the City Council rezone the property to R-1 Single
Family Residential Detached. Seconded by Tentinger. Ayes: Droste, Shoe-Corrigan, DeBettignies
and Tentinger. Nays: 0. Motion passes 4-0.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
.
--■•■•••■.m.....
.. •-
4 0 • •-•."---,..rcliii , — el
Aril i a 7 , . ,z,__. ,.__.,_„,„f
„,-, __,__. it , ,, ,,,,, , , e. .... . .. •
.., , . ,
i gig,. - R_R _ ,-PIOS •
•,.... it* r 1 . • SI
,,,, 4 0..1 ,,, _ • wir y $A
It, • ‘.149 • 1
i 1 7 erielg.
1 ' L R --1----:----16 1 &PAW■ - ,:....111i111!%, i ,,,,, . . loir.,, ,
I ITV '5'
I I-19
MalMr. ::,.T.L wisopiciim.:16.11 lasog_ ., .pios,
IN 0 0 al
it
t.
,'
I1 , . viel ' " ' Illr■ IOW /at 4/1
; ‘, !‘ , . — 7
oat DrailL2.
'AR' i smi - t 1111111M-4 41'
1.1.
----......-- ---.....■- --— a.•-.-=-SIIN....le• I ' — --,-..-------\\ —
I SPA/Milled We\ 4e,:
PD•R ; • 9.;Y; 1;...matmag. P.10a 1 PIOS
, 1 MI 111L6 -.,..1... g I
a.. _ — -
...r 0 s 4 .'71.41;..III:;;;.- ' .-...-.---:-...--7-.................... ,e), -1,. Aqi. • 1
M
A i....e. •III ....................::::::::::::::::::::i ilie ' '') ',
r 0_ :::::1:::::rex.R.:-:.:-:-:-:.:.4. 1p n tiii% .',■N......„, I ,
a, r r r.....,,,,,,, .......,.... ..^...,.cii)..,.!ma.; \ , hihth, ,t, co.no.as 22L •
„.-......_ -I: .1.v!, ..----- ....: -::..:.-::::,. .5,... 540 -' . ‘k /17.,a...:•••-- 7*i::::.0 ..:;•:•::::::::*;:z::::,•::::,:•::::Air„,,,,,,,,•: -
1.."----■triiiTti it•2-".i.ar r 1::::::::[:::::::::•:::::::::•:•:::•::/ . - Alky.:::'•:••::::::-.•:•••••• ";:i4::', ..,....,••4M91- •.40:•;:;:!:;• ----
..---,----
MAAAA 1 :,' ••••;„..c?":111.1:4 t•.•:•:-.••:•:-:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:, ; I:••••••••• :.::•:•:.: •;:i..4.-:,,:.•11WROjegNaiO.ReME _ - -'• --• --- ... ..
•la! 6_. .444:42 1
[::::::: :::::.■ ,-. • • •-• IA'::::;:::•••••••••••'::::::: ill.-i'ialgig*::03,..,k:i:I.::•.'Iaiiiii:::Iii:E -.---:-.•'•
I *IpCor-le(1"- PD-R •••••••••••••••••••••••••• + I 1/4.:.:-:-:. +:-:::: :gi.s.:::::•:.i.::::::::::::Ar.::::::::::::60s: mig::::::::::::::::: ,---.--.::::::::::::::
iffil*.:„.rdolue.A.:S':= a 1::-..,-.'-—--It n '■'91.: •
'5 r*7 ,..- —------i 7l ii
,gra is // ,•:.:-:.••...-.•.•.-.•:-:::::.::::;:,::x;:?,::::::ox,:::;*::::::;:;:::::::p.------
••••••• •• ,..,:41.,:':.:.-,4:4::5:,;:*.4;;:;:x:•,,,/-
co..1E1.ARA J !11 Ls.. A.::::::::::::::.. :::: ■:?:■1tiiiiMaZ,:: ::ail. .::::Ii:::::'::.:Mi,K:
i...<ARAVO Siral 1111t -" - ;46
,.1:::::::::V:i :90..
UR NOS( . .re / ',..i.i-a::.s:' :.-..----- ,....,..e..---- t.:-...•.::::::::::,:i: 30nAggisig:::
4:4.-0:0-•,,,eu•
f.0.;•=2"rt,r0;442.0.-4, Is , a v yos i !5:1::, ,( ,--,,,-.,-.......1
;,„..-...usumvaddlenna ,. . / ,, ,---•%"••:•:•:•:•::::i
I i I I LA•A.1=1411111111011 .-- - 1/ ,'' "'--.-,•-•4••• Rr'rs- :•:•:. 11/04 ::::::•:: :Mi.: .;:i:;:iii:::;:::::;:iic::::::::ii;
i ntore____,_....... ..........s. ,.1.:E.:),, ii: .,,,:i-.---;;'.-_....-.1.1.1::-....:M....P......::•:.::'C •:-::::::::::: .:M::::::::::::agliow:::
1 4 "--•:1-1.■•;1117.1■_20.=:::=.—.--EI f I--,-.1,
fill
ihr
,-,I'''' .......:2■111"-IY2 Laummaguimmonac r:-„,•,:iirek.%11.'i•';','* 1, "•••::::•:•:::::::::.
.41ffienii i,:■r FaVAgnmairowsmac... ... ,.mmarsumrtuttaah... ,,,,,r,_•71;,.4,_ A,.....r.: •:.
al"... .1"...=_ffA_2.21•1 k T..., lir,N--;i'WE=-= : .-iis -011.111111.,111r,E F, • •••••• ••,:0).::-:•:,,,,,,%:::-.: ••: •.•:,
:-:•:•:•:•:•::::::::,,:••::;::*;*::::*;:iMi.S47,:ft:
..,.........•••• :::::'?4;::•;:::::;:45::-.*-;•.:-.:•;-;*;•;::::::::::
• •'" ---'''''-'•'-'-' •II-.
9 LI--=ra"g=.-.3-5 .... p,--,,:zi.s.......... ._.......4L...-ixt.,,,,,ths. of n c.-...T-2:0-. i* PIOS
---,...-_r-2=-.-.,= m. i ....r_ ---it---- /,,,u . ..r,-....-. r-lapa ......,,,.
...=*.:,;;=,,-= 1.,.. diE=MI=,='amen 1 I i r, Ace lir 1 1
1,_____111.111111_1_
_2:..........E.,....-_-_:.-----
i
:-...;641164.7 "I...m.7LO Lannmsoilleathaumfia rams.m.c _____,= -.....010r7.
..",---..-....m...----
1 6
: : ::::......e.1,E,N mon r izeP Bp
,,,,, •-1.,•‘ PD-MU 1-4- J=IIMIVi/..; 1
P11
.
4_,Z.1r.2= •ro..••••MIAm
Pit
. ..........
al'fOrff., :-?-'----=--- t, - . ,‘ .'.. .... :: : s- 0 Ir
,. g 4.1:;:"....pz....., 1■;.:
IL: on p
;1.7s:? n - •g.'••-•V0-40 5 nu :-:••••••••-1-'-'-'-:.:.-.I.
‘.1 r. ......sa`..... A
---1— — .1 ','•:{-:s::::::::. 4■11W
PIOS ! "1,‘„,iii ,.-•..1.
. .____I ,
, 1G
, , , t,
._. , •■•••■•••111.11
L—....- .1
s, /7
,e,.. I
.... 4-,
LEGEND
..„. •.. -
MUSA PHASING
.,4. .%
I 0 PHASE
AG Agriculture PD-MU Planned Development - Mixed Use
..,,, ..
1 i
12000 MUSA) CONS Conservancy C Commercial
: . RR Rural Residential BP Business Park
ti.,....,•-.--,
, -
PHASE II 2005 MUSA) UR Urban Residential G-I General Industrial
PD-R Planned Development - Residential WM Waste Management
. ,
HR High Density Residential PIOS Existing Parks or Open Space
,.....,..„...,.....„:„
'• ..:::::::::::*:::::*:,:::
PHASE III -
PII Public I Institutional . Future Park Locations
• ''''''''''''''''''''
(2005-2013 MUSA) " as indicated in the Comprehensive
Park Plan and Development Guide)
•