The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2.b. MIRTSCITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR DISCUSSION COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DATE: NOVEMBER 4,1996 AGENDA MM: MIRTS AGENDA NO. 2.B. Intermodal Terminal Operating Plan 1--17 PREPARED BY: -atoj/111 Thomas D. Burt, City Administi ATTACHMENTS: MIRTS Advisory Group, Business Plan Intermodal Rail Terminal Study Staff will update you at the meeting. RECOMNENTED ACTION NOTES: Presentation to ..W- MIRTS Advisory Group Intermodal Terminal Operating Plan and Business Plan 28 October 1996 000 YEARS S Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Study Objective Analysis of Multi -User Intermodal Facility • Operation • Design • Cost • Development 2 "000 Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step One - Operating Parameters Determined in Collaboration with Railroads Projected Annual Lifts Year 1 306�000 Year 8 4559000 Year 15 6925000 7000 Feet Working and Storage Tracks 3:1 Storage Track to Working Track Ratio too YEAM S 0 Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step Two - Operating Plan (continued) Operating Scenarios 1. Condominium 2. Joint Use 3. Hybrid 4. Modified Joint Use 800 YEARS Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step Two - Operating Plan (continued) * Condominium Scenario �j Individual Control Over Terminal Operations and Services — High Initial Cost $114.5M — Slightly Higher Operating Cost 7 mow - Al VE"s I Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step Two - Operating Plan (continued) e Joint Use Scenario — In -Terminal Operations and Maintenance Activities by Third Party — Lower Initial Cost $75.2M — Lower Operating Cost gonna. goo YEMB Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step Two - Operating Plan (continued) * Hybrid Scenario Individual Control Over Working and Storage Tracks — Shared Use of Support Facilities/Common Insufficient Cost Differentiation From Condominium Scenario Not Analyzed in Business Plan too 9 YEARS Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step Two - Operating Plan (continued) Mocatied Joint Use Scenario — Selective Modifications to Operating Parameters — Terminal Operations and Maintenance Activities by Third Party — Lowest Initial Cost $63.9 M MENEM. BOO 10 YEARS Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step Two - Operating Plan (continued) '004" ounie Comvonent Condominium t Use 0 int Use Working Tracks 4 3 3 Storage Tracks 12 9 6 Gantry Cranes 6 5 5 Side Loaders 3 1 1 Switch Engines 3 1 1 Parking Spaces 29300 29300 29300 i0o VEARB 0 Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step Three - Business Plan ssumi2tions a Lift Volume Projections • Capital Cost Estimates • Operating and Maintenance Cost Estimates • Inflation Projections Debt Interest Rate: 1.5% Above Market Maturity: 20 Years for First Stage and Shorter Thereafter * Return on Equity: Mid -Range of 25% 12 1100 VEARS Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step Three - Business Plan (continued) Projected Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Annual Lift 1998 Demand By Railroad A 197MOO 2849000 4239000. Railroad B 509000 909000 1481000 Railroad C 5%Q00 8 1 �000 1219000 Total: 3069000 4559000 6929000 1900 13 YFM.9 Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step Three - Business Plan (continued) Estimated "Within - the -Fence" Capital Costs (in 1996 dollars) Condominium Joint Use Modified Joint Use Phase 11 $114.5 M $24.0 M $75.2 M $28.0 M $63.9 M $24.0 M 14 Phase III 2012 $60.0 M $33.0 M $27.0 M YEWS 0 Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step Three - Business Plan (continued) Projected Lift Modified Charges, Year 1 to Condominium Joint Use Joint Use Year 5 100% Debt $94 $69 $62 Financing 30% Equity & 70% $102 $75 $66 Debt Financing 100% Equity $183 $130 $112 Financing too 15 YEOMS Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Step Three - Business Plan (continued) Conclusion The Projected Lift Charges Would Support the Terminal to Cover O&M Costs, Repay the Debt, and Make a Reasonable Return on Equity Investment. The Proposed Intermodal Facility Is a Financeable Project on a Purely Private Funding Basis. BOO 16 V"RS Minnesota Intermodal Rail Terminal Study 28 October 1996 Summary Initial Lift Charge In Initial Caipital Cost Five Years .M Condominium $114.5 M $94 to $183 Joint Use $75.2 M $69 to $130 Modified Joint $63.9 M $62 to $112 Use 800 17 Y"Rs CITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING DATE: November 4, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Assessment Policy AGENDA SECTION: PREPARED BY: Bud Osmundson a AGENDA NO. City Engineer/Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Existing Policy, Assessment Estimates APPROVED BY: land various other Assessment Information Tonight we are having a discussion regarding assessments, every City Councils favorite subject. The City has a written Assessment/improvement Policy which was adopted by the City Council on March 17, 1992 (attached). The main area where questions are being raised are on assessments for reconstruction projects where existing developed properties have streets and utilities which provide service to that property reconstructed. Other assessments in new subdivisions or on new streets where the property has not yet been developed have not come under the scrutiny or the pressure on the Council that is received where streets and utilities are reconstructed. The current policy for reconstruction projects includes the requirement which is in the State Chapter 429 Statutes stating that the City must prove a "benefit" to the property in the amount of the assessment. In 1993 when we assessed the first 145th Street project we had three different appraisal firms pursue the benefit issue which would be attained by a reconstruction of streets and utilities. All three stated that the benefit for replacing existing utility lines was zero and to my knowledge this has been proven out in a court case in the State. However, some cities do assess for utilities and the residents go along with it Oe: Northfield). The present system which we use is to assess $2,000 per lot on regular streets and $1,500 per lot on "Collector" streets. In the 1996 project I also recommended that we charge for other improvements such as concrete curb & gutter that currently did not exist on the City street. I also included a small amount due to inflation to arrive at $2,500 per lot for the street only assessments. Other cities are all over the map in the amount they assess. At Mondays meeting we can discuss the Assessment Policies of the City and other cities and get some direction from Council. Personally I think we are right in the ballpark for our assessment policies, but we do need to revise and write them as a policy of the Council so there is less ambiguity between Council and Staff on the Assessment Policy. I RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion only. I COUNCIL ACTION: APPRAISAL SUMMARY Single Fanay esitle-Ain XTIRW ONLY ADDRESS APPRAISED BENEFITS STREET ASSESSMENT BENEFITS 3400 143rd Stmet West $2,000 F340MS -POLICY $3,228 3405 144* fteet VWtst $2,000 $3,228 144W Sweet Weet *2�000 $3,229 UNh fteet West *3,22& Commercial & Multiple Family STREET STR STREET E ONLY SE AIE h ASSESSMENT S ADDRESS C_ 3-0- _P -1 APPRAMW P0 POLICY BENEFITS R 14537 Dodd Wvd Tom Thumb Center $10,000 $6,679 3710 145th Street Rosemount Court Apartments $8,000 $ $13,3598 3810.145th Street Rosemount Green Apartments $8,000 .$13,358 WENSMANN 7TH ADOMON 3/30/96 Calculation of A3se33ments HCO A. Diamond Path ROW Length: 885.10' + % (103.17') - 60' 876.69' B. Street Assessment for Diamond th 876.69' x $46.36 per fo t = $dO �_V,643 $46.36 = One half of a t3 eet XResidential Equivalent C. Watermain Assessment for Diamond Path Trunk. A 12" trunk will be installed but a 6" Residential Equivalent is proposed to be assessed. 876.69' x !i-611�per foot = $149115 $16.10 One half of a " aterni idential Equivalent IZ,4-9 -= le A)" qf / 41 x 77 ASSESSMENT POLICIES FOR SEALCOATING & STRUCTURAL OVERLAYS AS OF 6-20-95 SEALCOATING STRUCTURAL OVERLAYS C11 Rosemount No Assessments 75% of Cost (1995 Cost Estimate $335 for Single Family Residential) Apple Valley No Assessments None to Date Investigating Possibility Eagan No Assessments 50% of Cost (Have only done in GI District) Burnsville No Assessments 40% Assessed Lakeville $ 90.83 /Residential Lot (Cost of Sealcoating) $90-83/Residential Lot Inver Grove Heights No Assessments No Assessments Farmington $53/1-ot (Flat Rate-Adj Winflation) 35% of Cost Hastings No Assessments (Likely to Change) No Assessments (Likely to Change) i 0� -16 - � E 2B e SAINT PAUL SUBURBAN EDITOR: Les Suzukamo PHONE: 228-5475 FAX: (612)228-5500 SUBORBS COTTAGE GROVE V Tax could Pave the for smoother streAl*c! W, yay VLO JIM BROEDE STAFF WRITER Cottage Grove Is going through bumpy times. The streets In some of (lie older neighborhoods have gone without Inajor repairs since being built In the into 105os and early 196913. But. smoother rides may be shead. City officials have proposed re- building about half of the commu- nity's 140 miles of streets at a cost of $19 million over the next seven years. "We would use state road aids ROSiMOUNT V Ch 'uric' h 'will A appeal ELO-V discipline ruling TOM MAJESKI STAFF WRITER Ot. . -Vohn's L utheran Church of Rosemount announced Thursday that it intends to appeal a Jan. 16 disciplinary committee decision to suspend the congregation from the Evangelical Lutheran Church in to pay for some of the Im ve- pr: ments," C!ty Administrator K vin Frazell said. "But that still leaves a little over $12 million for the property owners to pick up." A citizens' task force has rec- ominended using a general city- w1do tax to pay So percent of those costs, and assessing 40 per- cent directly to benefited property owners. For the owner of a $90,000 home, that amounts to an assess- ment of $1,656, plus an annual tax increase that ranges from $15 to $53 during the seven-year period. ".Some people In neighb4hoods with deteriorating streets think street repairs should be entirely the city's obligation," Frazell said, "and that they ought not be as- sessed anything." But others have a different opin- loll. I "In the newer neighborhoods," Frazell said, " ou'll find people opposed to paying taxes for new streets all over the city when their neighborhood streets probably won't wear out for another 15 to 20 years." The city will schedule public in. formational meetings this spring to discuss the proposed street im- P!ovements and financing alterna- tives. The city's engineering staff f 'a' vors starting ilia rebuilding In the Thompson Estates subdivision, south of Both Street between East Point Douglas Road and Jamaica Avenue. "Those are the worst streets in town," Frazell said, "We might proceed with a small demonstra- tion project there on I Yz miles of streets in the area just south of Hillside School." ROSEMOUNT Paintball fffm face, possible shutdown, BILL GARDNER STAFF WRITER The Adventure Zone paintball operation in Rosemount will be given another two weeks to prove to the city it will Improve Its dirt parking lot. If no agreement Is reached, the City Council will shut down the business. . 1. The Adventure Zone, one of two EaIntball areas In Rosemount, has een in business eight years under nnil tiormil To i- (in Minne� has not met the conditions. "They've had nine months to come into compliance," said City Administrator Tom Burt. The two major problems are an 80 -foot trailer placed on the pro,- erty and the dirt parking lot, which does not prevent erosion. The Adventure Zone operators agreed at Tuesday's City Council meeting to remove the trailer, which violates city building codes. The city wants the business to place crushed limestone in the V1.10(ino lot hilt f1w colinvil 1prved decided to ban sliding on the hill at Connemara Park. "The kids are sliding right down into the parking lot," Burt said. "We've had kids run Into the fence around the parking lot." Burt said the city will remove the split -rail fence around the lot to help prevent Injuries In case anyone Ignores the sliding ban. pr( 09FORR VOUBUY.- The board reasoned: the land was zoned agricultural; surrounding lan values could be afiected;4M.W-- compromised if the tower fell; n could affect futur develop 4 them would be e n environment.Treir rei an State Couniy, Fmance and Co_mmerce ing Facts d P valunden L-mdks The the an violath tions or contemporaneous fi in support of the reasons givenftrial court found in favor of the c y and ro ordered the board to rezon roverr DecWon and analysis The court of appeals the rule that, when a municip kes a zoning decision WithOUE CO )orane- ous findings it is presumed e arbitrary and capricious, and there fn, -9 i d. The rule does aw th 'e ip 3diEy to produce evide2ce in cot: how that the reasons given for the z g1dectision were not arbitrary. The co d provide evidence and the f appeals reviewed each reason give r e denial. First, the county denied d oning because the land was zont I rural. The court said that the t oning is immaterial because all tdffihi I in the county was zoned agricul hich the court decided wmm really ing, and bemuse all the land su the property had already bee d agricultural. Also, becauss . tiles which existed on the Ian property was unusable for agricul rposes. Second, the county de i e rezoning because the the surrounding properrdiems be damaged. The county e no evidence on this point, b it ed the board could use its k io area to support this reasc said that although some gav 11'rIg of municipalities may use their knowl- edge to support such a finding, because the county was so Large, this exception could not apply and therefore this reason was arbitrary. Third, the county argued there could be a problem if the tower fell. The court found that the county had entered no credible evidence on this subject. Fourth, the counry argued therewould be adverse environmental effects. The court decided this reason was also arbitrary because the testimony given at trial pertained only to the possible adverse effects of other uses of the land, not the tower. Put together the court found that the county put forth no rational basis and therefore ordered the board to rezone the property. (CP1, Inc. v. Facts A property owner brought suit against the city challenging a special assessmenL The city introduced evidence using the *paired sales analysis" approach which indicated the benefit to the property exceeded the assessment. The owner tried to introduce expert testimony on the *development cost approach* of valuation. The trial court ruled this evidence inadmissible, and found that the assessment was less than the benefit to the property. Decision and analysis The Supreme Court of Minnesota upheld the trial court's decision finding that the assessmentwas less than the benefit to the property. The court also decided the "development cost approach" could only be used if- the land is ripe for development; the owner reasonably expects to receive the necessary zonmig and permits required for the develop- ment; and the development must nor take place at too remote a time. (Buzink v. City ofBlaine, Finance and Commerce AppeUaEe Courts Edition,August 27, 1993, p. 14). of the dant a ment The manner, which is significai leaves oF commu to be cc particul Also it c express pass i'l I pild I If : was charged with aship's ordinance tivity focused on a single ng without the consent occupanL" The defen- the ordinance is under the First Amend- ed States Constitution. ld ana4sis a of appeals decided that the a a content -neutral, valid time, e restriction on speech wly tailored to serve a vernmental interest and amomple alternative channels of ition. It found the ordinance =-neutral because no y pe of speech was regulated. restricts the place one may ivs. The township has a governmental interest in the sanctity of the home. � alternate channels of ation because people could )ugh whole neighborhoods, formation door-to-door or Dmmercial areas. (Castellano v. f 11%ite Bear, Finance Com- iellate Courts Edition, October 32). Handbook f Minnesota Cities Unw ition by Joel I Jarnnik Legislative Counsel :�'—�gue of Minnesota Cities has available the sixth edition of the Handbook for Minnesota Cities. The Handbook is a valuable reference tool, containing authoritative informa- tion on statutory and home rule charter city governments. Legal notes at the end of each chapter refer readers to applicable state statutes, League publications, court decisions, and attorney gen- erol's opinions. The Handbook is approximately 630 pages, published in a hard- cover, loose leaf format. Cost is $213.00 for member cities and $266.25 for nonmembers. These prices include tax. The book includes seven main parts: • Form and structure of the hAinnesota city • Elections, elected officials, and council meetings • Personnel management • Regulatory and development functions a cities • Liability and insurance Finance, budgeting, and debt • Financial reports and records management To order contact the League of Minnesota Cities 3490 Lexington Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55126 (612) 490-5600. June 1993 Park Bugle 15 Assessments set for street improvements in Falcon Heights By Daren Harmn front foot. street overlay at $1,200 per lot, concrete curb After reviewing objections to and gutter at $6.40 per front individual assessments, the Fal foot, storm sewer at $0.063 per con Heights City Council unani- square foot and sidewalk at $8 mously adopted assessments per front foot. for the 1993 street improvement projects in the University Grove and Falcon Woods neighbor- hoods. Approximately 15 people attended the May 12 public hearing, where homeowners had a chance to voice their con- cerns about their assessments. Most complaints involved prop- erties that are irregular in shape or bordered by two or more streets, such as those on Burton and Coffman Streets. Such prop- erties are not specifically addressed in the city*s assess- ment policy. 'It's a good thing we weren't too creative in planning this city," said Mayor Tom Baldwin. The street improvement pro- ject represents year two of the city's five year Capital Improve- ment Project. The majority of the $935,000 estimated for this year's project will be spent in the Grove area. Assessment rates remained unchanged since the previous public hearing. with street \.reconstruction costing $24 per Residents will have ten years to pay assessments at a 6.5 per- cent interest rate, though pre- payment without interest is available for 30 days. In the Falcon Woods area, Autumn Street will be complete- ly reconstructed from Roselawn Avenue to Prior Avenue. Pave- ment overlay, curb and gutter will be added to Summer Street from Moore to Howell and on Prior Avenue from Roselawn Avenue to Summer Street. In the Grove neighborhood, Folwell Avenue will be recon- structed from Fulham Street to Coffman. Vincent, Northrop, Burton and Coffman will be reconstructed from Hoyt to Fol- well, and Folwell will get new overlay east of Coffman to Hoyt. Sidewalks will be reconstructed throughout the Grove area. Some sewer lines and storm sewer drainage will be added to both. areas of the city, and Northern States Power Co. will be replacing gas lines, city engi- neer Terry Maurer said. Other complaints raisedat the public hearing involved home- owners who had replaced at least a portion of their side- walks last year on a recommen- dation from the city. The coun- cil agreed to reduce assess- ments for those who had com- pletely replaced their side- walks. "Maybe the most misunder- stood thing throughout this project has been the issue of sidewalks," Maurer said. Approximately 85 percent of all sidewalks in the city will be replaced this summer, he said. Another misunderstood issue was how front footage was determined. To help insure fair- ness, Maurer said, front footage was measured at the 'building setback line," which is 30 feet from the property line. Bids were received in April for the street projects, though no contractor has yet been select- ed. Construction is scheduled to begin in June and end in September, Maurer said. Anyone who wishes to object to an assessment may do so in writing to the city clerk within 30 days of the council's adop- tion of the assessment, Baldwin said. Garden Tour and Detour featured on July 4 weekend The history and beauty of St. Anthony Park will be the focus of several events this 4th of July weekend. On SaL, July 3, from noon -4 p_m-, the St. Anthony Park Garden Tour will showcase summer gardens, new to the tour, with features such as prairie plantings, roses, garden sculptures and a water- fall. Discount reservations are available at Flowers by Jane, at Como and Carter, and from the Park Association's table at the June 5 Festival. On July 3, tick- ets will be sold at the library: e- - ty of Minnesota. While traveling through the Park and the cam- pus, you will learn about the dis- tinguished personalities who worked on the campus and lived in the Park, and how they influ- enced our neighborhood, state and nation. Campus buildings and streets named for Park resi- dents will be highlighted on the tour. Air-conditioned buses will depart from St. Anthony Park Elementary School, Como at Knapp Streets, at I and 2:30 p.m.. rickets may be purchased at the Park Association table at the I_, C V- -*.-1 �... -,Il*.-- mat featuring the Rockin' Holly - woods as the entertainment highlight. The Park Association will again give out ribbons to all children in costume or riding decorated kid vehicles, and will give prizes for the best histori- cal and all-American costumes in three categories: preschool- ers, K-3 and 3 -6th grades. There will also be awards for the most creative teen and adult. entries. - Volunteers are needed for all these events. To volunteer for the Garden Tour. call Diane Emerson at 645-4278; for Clean - F Rainlead. Ucensed -Ban Ourton I � � no Como C 1884 C FREE (_- We speciali: discomfort FREI AU1 A ne house? T with a Fe It Ch you may surance Cher HOLL Inst - (61" Di Your nt St. Pau I. seeks 'new ways'. to payfor stred-repayi.ng Property owners could . be assessed 100 percent of street repair cost by Jane McClure The MacAlester-Groveland neighborhood of St. Paul may have the most streets In need of new pavement In the city: --28.3 miles of them, tobe exact. But residents living there may balk at the thought of having their road- ways repaved If the city approves a recent proposal that would have them fork out 1W percent of the construction costs. "One hundred percent assessment?" asked Ward 5 City Council member Janice Reitman. 'There'll be lightning bolts around here." The proposed assessment represents a major shift from current city policy under which the city pays 75 percent of the bill and property owneq pick up the rest. But the as- sessment could become. a reality as the city tries to cope with an Increasing demand for capital Improvement projects And a decreas- Ing supply of revenue. - Discussion of new street assessment poli- cies began on May 24 when Chuck Mi:Guire of the city's planning staff presented the 1996-2003 Program for Capital Improve- monts (PCI) to the City Council's Finance Comniiif tee. The 180 -page document outlines the city's anticipated capital needs and esti- mates the amount of city, regional, state and federal funds that will be available to pay for city projects in that eight-year period. According to the PCI, alternative, funding sources need to be found for the city's resi- dential street paving program so tha ' t scarc6 capital funds can be used to pay for other needs. McGuire said the recommendation to. assess the entire cost of street paving to ben- efiting property owners was made solely In response to concerns about the difference between the capital needs of the city and the available money. "We have almost twice as many projects proposed as there are dollars available," he said. According to him, if the city met every funding request in the PCI (there are more than 500 of them), it would face a shortfall of $7.04 million this year, $10.79 million In 1997 and $11.54 million in 1998. CL a- W W 0 CL go SICAV iry n 54 0 F 95XK13 I q a �,. R .0 tv :,. , 5 > go 01 V. Q.UV & ;4 :4 00 fA I o — 00 0 g 0 0 WG E? & o 6 0 g M 04 tv a -0 , Cr 00 :70&5qW M (V V =Vrl V 0 0 =14 0 At M ME 1.%Vo a " z , n 0 0 0 "o R !!' 0 :r 9 0 EF 0 0-0 C: 4* Mv o I M 0 W tv �t Er q n 0 U, U04 5 o n r- A, o -Z 5 a 0 0 q 0 CL 0 F'o tA a ".0 M — 0 15F " W 'A 0 =.e 0 CA :3 rA 0 :7 CA 0. Etr 0 n :1 2. 0- CA a a M 0 cr N cr 9 M [is R C: 0 Er rV OQ (W R 0- rV P :r 4. 'n � I 0 .4 0 —M 0 0 0 n 1A M < — = 00' M ep :7 11:3 0 0 -0 10A* rr'< 16 1.0- Q tv o =L:7 0. � = 0 f- o 0 0 a" sp 0 cta —0 " -1 -1 , R :: 0 :3 ;; " R0 0 o' M g 6 d 2 9 a 0 = o. E; a Z = 1 4, = 9 cr 00 =10 a a :3 — (V () a 0. :_ P — Err 10A 0 a , F 0 0 sq Cr V . = ;r F, 0 to M9 M a I T. a 0 � . 0 8 'A �:c .1 C: a logs ff - 51 _ Nalo 4 Z-a"P110- ROW402R.90-90 — - 0�3 R:-:� : Z cr a = 0 r� 0 t3- :1 Er" W a UQ 0 3 W 53 tb Cr 0 :3 0 'A rnn 0 o 0" M te o a Is P. K o 'a r 0 r 0 0 &j r o UQ M RE r- d 0 The city's 115 -year residential street paving program, which Is slated to begin In 1996, Is expected to cost $8 million per year, about two-thirds of the annual CIB fund. The city could Issue more bonds In order to increase its pool of CIB dollars, but tho� means going further into debt to repay them. . According to Ward 4 City Council rkember Bobol)Aegard, the city already Is Issuing more librids thin It Is repaying. LAst year, St. Paul ls.su . ed $12.5 million in CIB bonds but ,only repaid $8.5 millign (if its CID bond debt. The street paving piolect Is ai followr'up to the cit 's 10 -year sewer separatipn pro raw, N I . .9 now In Its final year. The city w4s forced to separate storm and septic sewer lines in re- sponse to legal action taken'by the state of 0 M a .M C (D Q) M "0 0 :t 04 (D (cont'd an pqUe 4) 4- t - LA aa a a IS 5� as SEES&& 1 .0 or i 52111: ;V It r4 iiii i� EWt I M� ;I,, 2H ti -71 Z; I a W,2 C) ji 0 rn r Fo*lc 06 - rn t 12 r 6-1: McIz" P. Z� ZE M 1> L 7 w w A � 11 � F 0 to It 10 a — — — — — — — — — — — — — lor -or 0) 0 UP (A Coco —MW WW 040 moftwom WWWWO 0 at "&;W,4" N2,01 -az 1 to IMP1,10DO PAP I eggs 8 P;; -au 9D Popp; pp; Beg "'S 88 as 8 . B. 3999 . v F* -90 4*t2 83838a Aessems "its 008; �w .0 41, 4W401 ; - Be 140*0888888 Ste 411 T T IT 2 t 12 t t, z 1. 1. T T — — — — — — — — — 9'9'§ It t It R R I §,v 0 9 § § V1 SHO It Egg 98 88888 888 10 t, T4*41. "0 184 am zz zzzzzzzz zz QP6 P1 A J26.p. J26 P6.p. ja, jL_&A MECICCCC MCI = , " z! H 11111111 1 1 d -4 -w -4 -4 -4 -4 �d 4w 41-0 41� 4V W� I I I ; 4.. 40 4W 400,41,41,41- 4W 41� 4-14-1 ; �W 41, 4� 4'. 4"4* oil ;!"rP P !r 40 zzzzz zzzz F F. F. j: X X =ZZZZZ=ZZ zz ZZZZ==ZZZZZZZZ --------------------------- qw�wa 22222-282-8 FpMFF;fFp- twit !if F F F zz zz zzzz z Z= zzzzz 0 M CZ r - r am all R 0 8 s 48 40. t is v 10 -R -EC ONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AXAWUqM OF AREA CrrY9S POLICIES SINGLE FAMILY RESIUDENTUL Eagan South St. kos*villd Shakopee Prior Lake St. Louis Paul Park Street $2000/lot $31/Fr. Ft. 25V cost 25V cost is 60V cost is $161F. Ft. $1500/lot - 50* cost 1993 - assessed assessed includes C & W/o C & a (incl. CB's) $15/F.Ft. Sidewalk incl. SD G Replacement 50/50 modification Collector SW $45/F. Ft. Policy - 75* Policy Policy Paid by City in 1993 of cost Actual Actual cost/F. Ft. cost/F. Ft. X 25V Sanitary other funds Other funds Other funds Main - other Other funds Other funds Sewer funds Service look assessed Watermain other funds Other funds Other funds Main - other Other funds Other funds funds Service loot assessed Storm Drain Storm Water Other funds Storm Water Storm Water Other funds Other funds Ut 1�ty Utilitz - Utility M -1