HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.j. Wensmann Tenth Addition Planned Unity Development AgreementCITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 19,1996
AGENDA ITEM: Wensmann Tenth Addition PUD
Agreement
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, Assistant Planner
AGENDA #6 IJ
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Agreement
APPROVED BY:
�-j
On October 15, 1996, the City Council approved the preliminary plat and planned unit
development plan for the Wensmann Tenth Addition. The attached draft agreement reflects the
conditions of approval. Staff expects that the final plat will be on the Council agenda on
December 3, 1996. It is hoped that the title for the outlot in Rosewood Manor will then be
conveyed to the City in return for Outlot A, Wensmann Ninth Addition.
IRECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to authorize the execution of the PUD agreement for
Wensmann Tenth Addition. I
WENSMANN TENTH ADDMON
AGREEMENT TO CONDMONS OF APPROVAL
FOR THE RESIDENTL&L PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT dated this _day of , 1996, by and between the City of
Rosemount, a Minnesota municipal corporation, C'City"), and HERBERT H. WENSMANN
DBA Wensmann Realty, a sole proprietorship, (the "Developer").
1. Request for Planned Unit Development. The Developer has asked the City to approve
a planned unit development (PUD) for residential uses on land intended for public use.
The property is legally described as follows:
Outlot A, Wensmann Ninth Addition
2. P.U.D. Approval. The City has approved the residential PUD on October 15, 1996
subject to:
1) Conveyance of approximately 1.23 acres of land in Rosewood Manor to the City
for public park purposes;
2) Rezoning Outlot A to R-2, Single Family Attached Residential;
3) Incorporation of recommendations relative to easements, grading and utilities
made by the Public Works Department (see exhibit "B") ;
4) approval of final plat as required by the Subdivision Ordinance including execution
of a development agreement to secure public infrastructure;
5) Execution of this PUD agreement;
6) Enhancement of the landscaping to incorporate revisions suggested by staff,
7 Conformance with all applicable building and fire codes.)
3. Effect of Planned Unit Development Approval. No changes to the PLID will be
allowed unless agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Notwithstanding
anything in this contract to the contrary, the full extent permitted by state law the City may
require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan, official
controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. The
Developer shall conform to all conditions of PUD approval.
4. Development Plans. Improvements related to the PUD shall be in accordance with the
attached site plan and grading plan as approved by the City Engineering Department.
5. License. The Operator and Property Owner hereby grant the City, its agents, employees,
officers and contractors a license to enter the property to perform all work and inspections
deemed appropriate by the City. The license shall expire after the site has been
redeveloped for permitted General Industrial use.
6. Responsibility for Costs.
A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Operator shall pay all costs incurred by it
or the City in conjunction with the development of the site including, but not
limited to, Sod and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning,
engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval of the
multiple industrial use PUD, the preparation of this contract, and all costs and
expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development and
operation of the CleanSoils facility and the enforcement of this contract.
B. The Operator and Property Owner shall hold the City and its officers and
employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages
sustained or costs incurred resulting from project approval, development and
operation. The Operator and Property Owner shall indemnify the City and its
officers and employees for all costs, damages or expenses which the City may pay
or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees.
7. MisceHaneous.
A. The Operator represents to the City that the PUD complies with all city, county,
metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations including, but not limited to:
zoning ordinances and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the
PLID does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or
the operation of CleanSoils until the Operator does comply.
B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this contract.
C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of this
contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portion of this Contract.
A The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to
the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in
writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City
Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract
shall not be a waiver or release.
E. The Operator represents to the City to the best of its knowledge that the plat is not
of "metropolitan significance" and that an environmental impact statement is not
required. If the City or another governmental agency determines that such a
review is needed, however, the Operator shall prepare it in compliance with legal
requirements so issued from the agency. The Operator shall reimburse the City for
all expenses, including staff time and attorney's fees, that the City incurs in
assisting in the preparation of the review.
F. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the
property. After the Operator has completed work required of it under this
Contract, at the Operator's request, the City will execute and deliver to the
Operator a release.
G. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in
addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or
hereafter arising, available to the City, at law or in equity, or under any other
agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or
otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such
order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the
right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy.
H. The operator may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the
City Council.
L The city assumes no responsibility for design, construction, maintenance, or
longevity of Operator installed improvements.
11. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand
delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by
registered mail at the following address: 3 3 12 15 1 st Street West, Rosemount, MN 5 5068.
Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City
Administrator, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Administrator at
the following address: Rosemount City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, Rosemount, N4N
55068. Attention: City Administrator.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and
year first above written.
Herbert H. Wensmann
DBA Wensmann Realty
BY:
Its
City of Rosemount
BY:
Cathy Busho, Mayor
BY:
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 19,1996
"REVISED"
AGENDA ITEM: Receive Bids/Award Contract, Wensmann
AGENDA SECTION:
10th Addition Utility Improvements, City Project #278
Consent
PREPARED BY: Bud Osmundson
AGENDA NO.
City Engineer/Public Works Director
6G
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Bid Tab
APPROVED BY:
The City received bids on November 18, 1996 for the referenced project and a total of
four bids were received. The apparent low bidder was Ryan Contracting at a bid of
$31,429.42. We have received the upfront funding for the project from the developer,
Wensmann Builders. Staff recommends that the contract be awarded to Ryan
Contracting as stated in the resolution.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECEIVING BIDS AND
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR WENSMANN 10TH ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS, CITY
PROJECT #278.
COUNCIL ACTION:
2
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1996 -
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT
FOR WENSMANN 10TH ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT #278
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota, as follows:
1 All bids on construction of Wensmann 10th Addition Utility Improvements, City
Project #278 hereby received and tabulated.
2. The bid of Ryan Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $31,429.42 for the
construction of said improvements in accordance with the plans and
specifications and advertisement for bids is the lowest responsible bid and shall
be and hereby is accepted.
3. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a
contract with said bidder for the construction of said improvements for and on
behalf of the City of Rosemount.
4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of all
successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a
contract has been executed.
ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1996.
Cathy Busho, Mayor
ATTEST -
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk
Motion by: Seconded by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Y
C 'a 00ift6wit I
WSR Preigo4yo. 10.1100.
Bids Opened: 10:00 (LnL WSB & Associates, Inc.
November 18, 1996 Project Na. 1051.00
Contractor
Sid,Vecuri&
Total Bid
Ryan Contracting
$31,429-42
Richard Knutson, Inc.
$36,838.42
Ford Construction
P.c)-So Contracting
$38,950.00
$59,855.00
S
Engineer's Estimate
$2 7,02& 50
City Engineer
I hereby certj& that this is a true and
correct tabulation of the bids as received
on November 18, 1996.
Mic e Van Gilder, P.E.
*Denotes carrectedfig
20"Id
VIVIAP, Willy
dEE:EO ge-IRT-ACf,