HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.a. Dakota HRA Final Planned Unit Development and Platw
City of Rosemount
Executive Summary for Action
Citv Council Meeting Date: _____September 3. 1996
Agenda Item: Dakota HRA Final Planned Unit
Agenda Section:
Development and Plat
New Business
Prepared By: Andrew Mack
Agenda
'�
Senior Planner
ftM 6 A
Attachments: Resolution, 8/27/96 Planning Commission
Approved By:
Summary, Draft 8/27/96 P.C. Minutes
It is with great pleasure that I present for consideration before the City Council the Final PUD
Development Plan and Plat for the Dakota County HRA Senior Housing development proposed
for Cameo Avenue and Lower 147th Street. Please refer to the attached planning report for
further details and a summary of the proposed project.
Staff finds that the proposed design of this much needed senior housing development for the City
is of exemplary design and reflects a substantial enhancement to the neighborhood; which the
community as a whole can be very proud of for many generations to come.
The Dakota County HRA has really gone the extra mile to work with the community and has
done an excellent job through their architect & site planner to respond to issues identified by the
immediate neighborhood, in addition to those stipulations required in the Council resolution
approving the Concept PUD last fall.
Upon approval by the City Council on Tuesday night, the HRA will plan to proceed with bidding
out for construction of the project in mid September with a proposed construction start date
anticipated for this fall, dependent upon the bids received.
Staff recommends approval of the project subject to the conditions identified in the attached draft
resolution for the City Council's approval of this request.
Recommended Action: MOTION to adopt a resolution approving the Final Planned Unit
Development Plan and Plat for Rosemount Senior Housing.
City Council Action:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1996-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PLAT
FOR ROSEMOUNT SENIOR HOUSING
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount approved the Rosemount Senior Housing
Concept Planned Unit Development and Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment on August 15,
1995; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount approved the rezoning for the Rosemount
Senior Housing property on August 25, 1995; and
WHEREAS, a plat for Rosemount Senior Housing was submitted and action was subsequently
tabled by the City Council of the City of Rosemount on August 15, 1995; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has received an application for approval of the Rosemount
Senior Housing Final Planned Unit Development and plat; and
WHEREAS, the Final Planned Unit Development and plat is in conformance with the approved
Concept Planned Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, on August 27, 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Final Planned Unit Development and plat and has recommended approval of the Rosemount Senior
Housing Final Planned Unit Development and plat subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, a letter of waiver has been received by the City of Rosemount from the applicant
extending the 120 -day reviewal requirement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the Final Planned Unit Development Plan and Plat for Rosemount Senior Housing subject
to:
1. Relocation of the resident garden plot;
2. Incorporation of recommendations relative to grading and onsite utilities from the
Public Works Department;
3. Conformance with all applicable building and fire codes; and
4. Execution of a Planned Unit Development and Plat Agreement.
RESOLUTION 1996 -
.ADOPTED this 3rd day of September, 1996.
Cathy Busho, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
Planning Commission Meeting Date: August 27, 1996
AGENDA ITEM: Dakota County HRA - Senior Housing
AGENDA SECTION:
Final Plan Unit Development and Plat
Public Hearing
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, Assistant Planner
AGENDA NO. 7B.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolutions 1995-54 and 55
Site Plan and Building Reductions
APPROVED BY:
Vd--
Blue Prints
This Public Hearing is scheduled for the review of the Dakota County HRA Senior Housing
project. The project is a residential planned unit development primarily because it involves the
assembly of a number of parcels by platting.
On August 15, 1995, the City Council adopted resolutions approving the Comprehensive Guide
Plan Amendment, and concept approval of the PUD. Subsequently, on August 25, 1995, the
property was rezoned to R-4 Multiple -Family Residential.
The PUD concept approval had five conditions:
1. A review of the underground parking driveway access design and a redesign of the
parking/circulation setback which eliminates the setback variance and provides a detailed
plan for screening the driveway and parking lot from property to the west.
* The driveway access and parking/circulation have been redesigned and the
previously identified variance has been eliminated.
2. Submission and approval of a detailed landscaping plan for the entire project with the
final development plan.
The landscape plan is attached which achieves all objectives and exceeds all
applicable requirements.
3. Submission and approval of a revised final building design which architecturally softens
the three-story design features of the entire building.
* The revised building design achieves the objective in the opinion of Staff.
4. Full compliance with all requirements of the Rosemount Zoning and Subdivision
Ordinances, except as may be approved through the PUD.
The only variance identified at this time is for building height. The top of the gable
is 39 feet high - four feet higher than the standard of 35 feet.
5. Submission and approval of a detailed lighting plan.
* Sheet A-1 indicate fixtures and illumination intensity and is acceptable to Staff
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and
final development plan for the Dakota County HRA Senior
housing project subject to: 1) incorporation of
recommendations relative to grading and onsite utilities from
the Public Works Department; and, 2) conformance with all
applicable buildinq and fire codes.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
ROSEMOU NT
Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!!
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Pearson, Assistant Planner
DATE: August 22, 1996
CITY HALL
2875 — 145th Street West
P.O. Box 510
Rosemount, MN
55068-0510
Phone: 612-423-4411
Fax: 612-423-5203
RE: Site Plan Review For the Dakota County HRA Senior Housing Project
PROPOSAL
This site plan review is the final development plan for the Dakota County HRA Senior Project
consisting of 44 multiple dwelling units in a single building of three stories to be located on 2.45
acres on the north west corner of Cameo Avenue and 147th Street West. The PUD process has
been utilized because of the assembly of a number of parcels by platting. The PUD process
offered the County the ability to proceed with the lengthy funding process based upon an
approved concept without incurring the cost of preparing construction documents.
ACCESS, CIRCULATION AND PARKING
The site has two driveway entrances, one each on Cameo Avenue and 147th Street West. The
driveways are connected by a gradual "s" shaped interior drive with a pick-up/drop off lane at the
front entrance and 10 visitor parking spaces. A ramped driveway provides access to underground
parking for 39 cars. The required parking for senior housing is 22 cars based upon the number of
dwelling units.
BUILDING CHARACTERISTICS
The building consists of two residential wings arranged at right angles to the main entrance area
that contains the community dining area, kitchen, laundry, offices and group areas. A large porch
dominates the lower story and main entrance and includes a gazebo on the south east corner of
the building and a screened in area. The two wings containing living quarters are three stories
tall, but the vertical effect is softened by the 11/2 to 2 story community/dining area (with loft
ceilings).
The building mass is further broken up by a variety of gabled roofs, vertical window elements and
bold use of building materials. The largest three story wall surfaces are to be faced with brick,
and no maintenance lap siding is intended for the remaining wall surfaces. The elevator shaft area
provides a decorative accent which adds additional interest to the building.
The gable heights of the two living wings are four feet higher than the standard building height in
toPrinfcd on recycled Paper
containing 307
post<an.0 —Wia&
August 27, 1996 Dakota County HRA PUD Final Development Plan Review
Page 2.
the R-4 District. However, it must be said that a flat roof would be functional, allow possibly
four stories and meet the height standard with a much more institutional look. The roof eves are
at approximately 25 feet heights, so that the half way point of the roof is at 32 feet. Staff is of the
opinion that all of the findings required of PUDs are met even though the concept is already
approved.
GREEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPING
The combined building and paved areas combine to about 27% lot coverage which is significantly
lower than the 75% lot coverage maximum. The landscaping plan indicates twice as many trees
as required and almost four times as many shrubs as required by ordinance standards. Boulevard
trees are spaced at forty and fifty foot centers along both frontages, and extensive evergreen tree
plantings separate the western driveway from the adjacent single family residences to the west.
PLATTING ISSUES
Platting has been required to combine the assembled parcels into one lot. The plat conforms to
subdivision ordinance standards and the necessary drainage and utility easements have been
provided.
RECOMMENDATION
Motion to recommend approval of the plat combining all of the parcels to the City Council with
no conditions; and,
Motion to recommend approval of the final development (site plan) to the City Council subject to:
1) incorporation of recommendations relative to grading and onsite utilities from the Public
Works Department; and,
2) conformance with all applicable building and fire codes.
DATE: 8-23-96
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REVIEW FOR:
PROJECT NAME: Rosemount Senior Housing CITY PROJECT NO.
Proposed By: Dakota County Housing & Redevelopment Authority Phone No. 423-4800
(N & A) 2496 145th Street West Fax No. 423-8180
Rosemount, MN 55068
Type of Request: Site Review
The Following Conditions Must Be Met for Approval:
Incorporation of recommendations relative to grading, utilities and easements identified by
the Public Works Department.
2. Developer must make payment to the City for:
a. 1996 Metro SAC charge of $900 per SAC unit as determined by the MCES when
making the Building Permit application.
b. 1996 City SAC charge of $950 per SAC unit as determined by the MCES when
making the Building Permit application.
C. 1996 City WAC charge of $950 per SAC unit as determined by the MCES when
making the Building Permit application.
d. 1996 Storm Sewer Connection Charge of $430 per unit or a total of $18,920 (44
units) when making the Building Permit application.
e. 1996 Storm Water Trunk Area Charges of $2,530 per acre which is estimated at
this time as 2.45 acres x $2,530 = $6,198 at the time of platting.
1996 GIS fees of $100 per acre estimated at this time to be $245 at the time of
platting.
The following is a review by the Public Works/Engineering Department of the "Grading, Utility,
and Erosion Control Plan" for the Rosemount Senior Housing site at the corner of Cameo Avenue
and Lower 147th Street West. The plan was received by the Public Works/Engineering
Department on August 22, 1996.
Grading//Drainage facillities
Please limit all access to the site to the rock construction entrance shown at the drive on Lower
147th Street West.
1 of 2
If site grading is completed near the recommended sodding deadline of November 1, sod the
drainage swale to the 12" flared end intake and around the beehive catch basin. Stake this sod
if necessary.
Sanitary Sewer
Watermain
Streets
Walks & Trails
Easements & Right -of -Ways
Fees & Assessments
Developer must make payment to the City for:
a. 1996 Metro SAC charge of $900 per SAC unit as determined by the MCES when
making the Building Permit application.
b. 1996 City SAC charge of $950 per SAC unit as determined by the MCES when
making the Building Permit application.
C. 1996 City WAC charge of $950 per SAC unit as determined by the MCES when
making the Building Permit application.
d. 1996 Storm Sewer Connection Charge of $430 per unit or a total of $18,920 (44
units) when making the Building Permit application.
e. 1996 Storm Water Trunk Area Charges of $2,530 per acre which is estimated at
this time as 2.45 acres x $2,530 = $6,198 at the time of platting.
f. 1996 GIS fees of $100 per acre estimated at this time to be $245 at the time of
platting.
Construction
g:\eng\project\hracameo\hracaml.wpd
2 of 2
DAKOTA COUNTY
August 7, 1996
Mr. Richard Pearson
City Planner
City of Rosemount
2875 -145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068-4997
Dear Rick:
Housing & Redevelopment Authority 612-423-4800
2496 -145th St. W. - Rosemount, MN 55068 - T.D.D. 612-42.3-8182 - FAX 612-423-81
The Dakota County HRA is pleased to submit for your review the Application for Planned Unit
Development (PUD) for the senior housing project to be constructed along Cameo Avenue in
Rosemount. The revised application requests approval of a 44 unit building which can replace
the application submitted last July 1995. In addition, enclosed is a check for $200.00 to cover
the required concept approval fee. The HRA submitted the $500.00 PUD fee and $1,000.00
escrow fee last summer.
The Rosemount senior housing development consists of a 44 unit building with underground
parking. The development is designed with one, two, and three story elements. It is equipped
with an elevator with elevator service to all floors. There is community dining, parlor, lounges,
laundry and library spaces.
For this application, the survey and plat were submitted today by our surveyor under a separate
cover letter. Attached please find a detailed site plan, grading plan, landscape plan, and building
plans prepared by our consulting architectural firm, BRW Ellness Architects.
The Rosemount senior housing development is one of ten senior housing buildings to be
constructed under the Dakota County Capital Improvement Plan. The County plan was approved
to provide attractive affordable housing for seniors in ten different communities throughout
Dakota County. Currently, the HRA has completed and is managing seven of these senior
housing facilities, two are under construction, and the Rosemount building will be the tenth to
be constructed. Upon City approval, we hope to begin construction by mid-October with the
completion anticipated for August of 1997.
We look forward to working with you and the City of Rosemount on this project. Please feel
free to call me at 423-8112 if you have any questions or need any more information regarding
this application.
Since ,
Diane Nordquist
Project Manager "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER"
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
• RESOLUTION 1995 - 54
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL FOR
A MINOR COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
BY CHANGING THE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION FOR
APPRoxImATELY 2.5 ACRES OF LAND
FROM UR -URBAN RESIDENTIAL TO HR -HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
FOR A DAKOTA COUNTY HRA SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT
LOCATED ALONG CAMEO AVENUE BETWEEN
146TH STREET WEST AND LOWER 147TH STREET WEST
WHEREAS, Dakota County HRA owns land and is continuing to acquire the balance of all
remaining properties necessary to complete the assembling of all parcels for a Senior Housing
project on approximately 2.5 acres of land located along Cameo Avenue, between 146th and
Lower 147th Streets West, and being more fully described as follows:
Lot 55, Block 2, and the North Half (N'/2) of Lot 56, Block 2, Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; and
South Half (S'h) of Lot 56, Block 2 and all of Lot 57, Block 2, Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; and
Lot 1, Block 3, and the North 16 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; and
Lot 2, Block 3, EXCEPT the North 16 feet thereof and Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 3, Rose
Park Addition to Rosemount; and
Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 3, Rose Park Addition to Rosemount; and
All of Lots 10, 11 and 12, and Lots 36, 37 and 38, Block 3, Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; and
All of Lots 13 and 14, Block 3, and the East eight (8) feet of Lot 15, Block 3, ; and
All of Lots 39 and 40, Block 3, and Lot 41 EXCEPT the East eight (8) feet, Block 3,
Rose Park Addition to Rosemount; and
All of Lots 29 and 30, Block 2, Rose Park Addition to Rosemount; and
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 2, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, and vacated Birch
Street between Lot 2, Block 2, and Lot 1, Block 3, all in Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; all as shown by the records of the County Recorder and County Treasurer of
said County.
WHEREAS, the Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan has guided this property for UR -Urban
Residential and the proposed use of the property for High Density Residential for a Senior Housing
Development Project is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Community and
Comprehensive Guide Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed land use is adjacent to the Rosemount Downtown Commercial District
and is within the Central Community Commercial Study Area; and
WHEREAS, an application has been submitted to rezone the project area from R.1 -a Single Family
to R-4 Multiple Family Residential; and
RESOLUTION 1995-54
WHEREAS, existing and planned water and sewer utility services are capable of meeting the
needs of the development; and
41
WHEREAS, existing and planned storm water facilities are capable of meeting the needs of the
development; and
WHEREAS, transportation facilities in the immediate area provide sufficient capacity to
accommodate the needs of proposed development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has reviewed the proposed redevelopment project and
anticipates a very minor net increase in the additional sewer demand resulting from the proposed
development, which is not scheduled for construction before 1997; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the Minor
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment during a Public Hearing conducted on July 25, 1995; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing has been conducted by the City Council to hear testimony regarding
the high density residential concept planned unit development in accordance with the policies as set
forth in the Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed guide plan amendment and project will provide the opportunity to fulfill
a demonstrated need for additional senior housing in Rosemount.
'rREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the application by the Dakota County HRA for an
amendment of approximately 2.5 acres of land located along Cameo Avenue, between 146th and
Lower 147th Streets West to the City of Rosemount Land Use Plan re -guiding the property from
UR Urban Residential to HR High Density Residential be approved, subject to review and approval
by the Metropolitan Council, and that the City Staff be directed to prepare a Minor Comprehensive
Guide Plan Amendment request for submission to the Metropolitan Council.
ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 1995.
ATTEST:
Susan M. W , City Clerk
Motion by: Wippermann Seconded by:
Staats
As
Voted in favor: Anderson, TTipperma.nn, fictRenomy;:Staa.ts, Busho.
Voted against: Yone .
L
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1995 - 5 5
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL OF
A CONCEPT PLAN FOR A HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON APPRoximATELY 2.5
ACRES OF LAND FOR THE DAKOTA COUNTY HRA SENIOR
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, Dakota County HRA owns land and is continuing to acquire the balance of all
remaining properties necessary to complete the assembling of all parcels for a Senior Housing
project on approximately 2.5 acres of land located along Cameo Avenue, between 146th and
Lower 147th Streets West, and being more fully described as follows:
Lot 55, Block 2, and the North Half (NI/2) of Lot 56, Block 2, Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; and
South Half (Slh) of Lot 56, Block 2 and all of Lot 57, Block 2, Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; and
Lot 1, Block 3, and the North 16 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; and
Lot 2, Block 3, EXCEPT the North 16 feet thereof and Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 3,
Rose Park Addition to Rosemount; and
Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 3, Rose Park Addition to Rosemount; and
All of Lots 10, 11 and 12, and Lots 36, 37 and 38, Block 3, Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; and
All of Lots 13 and 14, Block 3, and the East eight (8) feet of Lot 15, Block 3, and
All of Lots 39 and 40, Block 3, and Lot 41 EXCEPT the East eight (8) feet, Block 3,
Rose Park Addition to Rosemount; and
All of Lots 29 and 30, Block 2, Rose Park Addition to Rosemount; and
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 2, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, and vacated Birch
Street between Lot 2, Block 2, and Lot 1, Block 3, all in Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; all as shown by the records of the County Recorder and County Treasurer of
said County.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount has reviewed the high density
residential concept planned unit development at a public hearing conducted on July 25, 1995 and
has passed a motion to recommend approval of the request with conditions; and
AS, a Public Hearing has been conducted by the City Council to hear testimony
regarding the high density residential concept planned unit development in accordance with
Section 12.2 of the City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance.
RESOLUTION 1995-55
t
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the high density residential planned unit development concept plan for the Dakota
County HRA for approximately 2.5 acres of land located along Cameo Avenue, between 146th
and Lower 147th Streets West, subject to the following conditions:
1. A review of the underground parking driveway access design and a redesign of the
parking/circulation setback which eliminates the set back variance and provides a detailed
plan for screening the driveway and parking lot from property to the west.
2. Submission and approval of a detailed landscaping plan for the entire project with the final
development plan.
3. Submission and approval of a revised final building design which architecturally softens
the three-story design features of the entire building.
4. Full compliance with all requirements of the Rosemount Zoning and Subdivision
Ordinances, except as may be approved through the PUD.
5. Submission and approval of a detailed lighting plan.
ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 1995.
ATTEST:
SM. W h, City Clerk
Motion by:
Wippermann
E.B. McMenomy, Nfayor
Seconded by: S t a. a t s
Voted in favor: Anderson, Tlippermann, McMenomy, Staats, Ausho.
Voted against: None.
City of Rosemount
t Ordinance No. B-54
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B
CTTY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE
Dakota County HRA Senior Housing Project
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Ste. Ordinance No. B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled City of Rosemount Zoning
Ordinance is hereby amended to rezone from R-1 Single Family Residential to R-4 Multiple Family
Residential the following described property located within the City of Rosemount, Minnesota to -wit:
Lot 55, Block 2, and the North Half (N1h) of Lot 56, Block 2, Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; and
South Half (SI/2) of Lot 56, Block 2 and all of Lot 57, Block 2, Rose Park Addition to
Rosemount; and
Lot 1, Block 3, and the North 16 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, Rose Park Addition to Rosemount; and
Lot 2, Block 3, EXCEPT the North 16 feet thereof and Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 3, Rose Park
Addition to Rosemount; and
Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 3, Rose Park Addition to Rosemount; and
All of Lots 10, 11 and 12, and Lots 36, 37 and 38, Block 3, Rose Park Addition to Rosemount;
and
All of Lots 13 and 14, Block 3, and the East eight (8) feet of Lot 15, Block 3; and
All of Lots 39 and 40, Block 3, and Lot 41 EXCEPT the East eight (8) feet, Block 3, Rose Park
Addition to Rosemount; and
All of Lots 29 and 30, Block 2, Rose Park Addition to Rosemount; and
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 2, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, and vacated Birch Street
between Lot 2, Block 2, and Lot 1, Block 3, all in Rose Park Addition to Rosemount; all as
shown by the records of the County Recorder and County Treasurer of said County.
Section 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount, referred to and described in said
Ordinance No. B as that certain map entitled Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount shall not be
republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the said zoning map
on file in the Clerk's office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this
Ordinance and all of the notation references and other information shown thereon are hereby
incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication
according to law.
ENACTED AND ORDAINED into an Ordinance this 15th day of August, 1995.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
;r'
E.B. McMenomy, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sq,4n M. W , City Clerk
Published in the Rosemount Town Pages this aday of , 1995.
ROSEMOUNT
SENIOR
HOUSING
FOR:
Duma couNm sm
GwY.Y
n ELEVATION
2 attic. uv.r.o :�
BRW H L N B S S
ARCHITRCTS INC
Mhosawry-rrr
r.r arr. •w w. a:..w a.
• w. aver-w�
rna
ir a
•}•..7 ..72..i �'�'��
a.w.a aw.
ELEVATIONS
- — - — -
+'a EXTERIOR
Tg
rl ELEVATION
1 aa.u.D. W.rw •ur
A7
■■ \ a0 am
a
�00 —
([N[NAl YNi((t
1. (IYrr N,wIY/, YW/� Y//�NIiYY W
I.W /ilwwMM'1/w/MN �w��wYw�
L NN Y///Yr w e IIYN w
OONO ASR el[ GYt w N/-a/N
M wMw w. r 1-/00-i(i�11N M
/M IN NSI Ya//w w Iww N wIM/
A Wabk M4�IMIpw�� A
r/N N w ilN w .IlwNia/ Ny.
(/wNnlb /INII,wYw M Illlo//w w
//I wY1M7 M MYNI. e/II/. W
YY/IwN MIbN MN N Y/N MND (r
M YYw. tlwW � W MNYY
Y M � M/MIW, MM M Yql
/. NNI/w 1/11 11/,//NY Mwr A r
Mllein M M Nil/ /MW/ Yw,YbL
/. /Nl— w IA' — M MN/NRe MN
lie' w AwNw,l/ IwlwnwLL
(. [/Mee N w -M wrNM Ye/MwY w
NMNMI/tM M (� IYrMw w ,
Iws,i Yew. Itl, N SWI,
M NN,IgbN r wMYy M/,/M/w
ROSEMOUNT
I. CwM/.swr.IRrr/e.r
SENIOR
Mw Mr Y MMM 7 WI I M SMV
,wr,r/�/riy w w or Irll 7 Wt
HOUSING
Mwwu Ir wl+i� M M
N(O(1 MIII(T �/
4 ew�w ww 1/i�/w (w4
eN.Ir.r
W IrwNiN•
Iw�1 MSM Ill
�wNr� Yr
Nw YM /�W
MN NK Ilw � ryM4-rw NA
H 1/wwM rwMMri �i,wNN r✓t
'N�r
~� ��
MM M�irMw lr rN M rM N�
Ilr NA/w/'1 Y MM / wAN M
MNw= Y� wW Y� Mw Mn�
MG,MM/ MMi I wry M 1 MI,.
N1 W�Mw wwM4
w�iM/N r wii, MrN�- r�
Y wN ,n/Y,lll M e/IAIY III, rIW
MMU W W/ w,MNawa Mr ti
w/ MIN Maw1M
BRW BLNBSS
�%
ARCHITECTS INC
Irr. �/ • MI/'/il/ ewM w
If. hnnr,l /r/n, (NM N¢ MFMq r
M ,N/ M M 1MYs1Y, I /N
� w/ MMY NN Ywl M w
1Mw:
/ly.N-w�i.. � i'u•N.
WN1w1Y�
MY/ IwwrM MwN
IelOel !R
NOW
— 'MI. 11 W.
S31all. mt el/
Mx COUNi(l 1
."L— (r r.w
�/� rOOI s¢Iw .iJA.
Law— —
1y weANMrf.
Y.001 W4 1i11�C
//NI/N--100 cw YO (I t
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES
AND DETAILS ON SHEET C2
MfAND EROSIONu m
CONTROL PLAN
J"
ROSEMOUNT
SENIOR
HOUSING
amm UK. 9".
102,
DUNA COUN" WA
tKtfxl
QINIAI R
V1
PLANT136HEDULE'
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
0 20 40 GO
. ..... .....
- .0 -
�.�. 0 w .111
at Nt OAL 00190.1
1. [Mr M�.n. rryeMlM K � .M
Wwlq .Yrw"Mnr
0 w low fOrl y
x tM wM�4y�" WIIr—w
dio11 Mw M un=�G w
OOM1U ANt 0K CML M C01-0107 w
'w rM ar. � 1-Ni•7N-IIN 1V
11w M On11 ww.V M N Oa1w1
IMM.O -v OA
x IylraYi111 0.5— + +w04
Ml�w>� �
Gaits +a�1a+w1 R rlrClwl "
O7 r11wi1 P 1Y101y rW N
. Wlnwr Or.111O OM w YM 11�
MrrNa4 a111rw � N MrYr
r�wr 7n1II11aL a11r rn1r. w
w1."Iwr IwM+ 1.11711.1 aw w re11
wlp anifail.
O. M 4111r1 r+ Y1wwi1 +111 MI Y
1111x11 " w11 ai11 M1a+r YOrYL
0. Cft r" 111"inaw—iMrr.M �w aw
1. 1b11/O YM wM-M +YIY\ lwaiia� a
1as11r vlsW ; NN rhMr M ,
a1•amM ramrM 1sI, w .Me11
I7 b11nIQ11n1 M rMY1, MrN�11
M1•rnw,+Vlr+.r
ROSEMOUNT
,.
SENIOR
0111 rM Y .1M 11111 " w Iian1
r1I111 w ION wwO wV
HOUSING
7r1w rel w 1�.w.ww.� r
0 rwm XR.
lkuon coum =u
� OI ML M11ilF .M1/1 A lwwlw
w t1.r.a•
1. Mar 0rM111+0w NO.I.Y Iw.
w rl
O�r� OXY
r 111 w wIw /arm
11ea�ii M xr M 1Yr � M M
IOI��
�'x �
"'FiL�.T..
rw aw w . w11.11-wr M
M w rr147 wti�M i aw+.„ wM
1..11rMaw aw wl w.
w wr + Y1r -Y
rMal Mw aw " r
w wg11w ► wrY1 ■ rW w
rawrwwwrwr111.aw
r w�i�+inaww w wr�ii '.Ie .w111
aaM1 M rr 1111 1a+11n11n 11 -MM w
rw w11rY1w
to, -W* 411— + w rwrwor.
BRW B L N B S$
11112=. r 7PUn1+ awl.
" '100f 71""'
711a71a11n 71ae.u1 p11.r" oa.ti
r1w13
ARCHITICTS INC
/Y..1r 11.71 Iw�1r1...r .
1f.wwnal lalr n.++a 11111ow1r
w rr Ir w w11YOe11n " w
.,u,I."ri �.1v :..�
0W1+�Im w 1aYy ar a1+...
Oar1a1.
1rn1a. 1..x.111 rw
Il' 11OOf R
/IIIr
_ I.s• root fQ.
Ia[ mrot(N
'•'L r
1' IIWt VM 7111
` J
(N cwrw..wrw.r �r
� I7t 7n ur �_
x1101 fIR. 73,1316
�r
of a 711
I�7s�N- .ao CW Ma n x
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES
AND DETAILS ON SHEET C4
0.111YI t101
OW
AND MSC
CONTROL PLAN
a.af•O. ca N t. al N0)ts
Nom. Ip'ri r'""i.pp
wN MN w {ow"wiw—1 P", �M1.�•
Ir I•SM N w b•nrY w MN
4k'�w arneael. Ww .a wrkw h w Ise•k p • N«♦ Na. 4 Mwe. en1•rr• w r•pk N YNx f Y.M.
♦•r. W •xr•1 •MN f N wIwY O.p SM 1•«♦ r♦O••1W Osx. •M N J MN •eua♦ w N•sw
rpN«•, µr, r paNr• I- N U-Mlw kNgM1�eM•. f- « U -MSM MM hM• Wr Mfb M Np MN 1.0 O
•M�.^wa• r wG0<MWra r« sN« JIU I.w7J.• u•.MN N eM<M�Y• La Nrw.•Wis< Neo wYrr
«w•e N IN�O••r} ♦}nlnels, ar«1w. W n."N^••••NrH• eraaw M WrvN •M•N •rritw a0w w NI♦ •e•
e•re•Nw aM aNarM.w
1 Mre hNe.4 <wIM1N•, r•NN • MNrM•M .Op CMItIMY'IMM I.1.pki N wY NMI .Yr•♦ NMNer M w
M w • J •eM 4r•a « WeN u x 1•R1p1 rO } repN ewNN♦ M<♦ IM
aw +mow• n • Nyw N 1wN f brew Nr� «•M w M•• .Wn r w NI t•IW w MrW N Neel r
rp w <MprMM IW UN • Sw1M•M 1•w •MM. N• OSa•{N•'M rM• N N.•M MaNwn N ••Y 'MI•
Iw •«• 1••« SeN. .
' �a�'NM w N«M NS<t«�•�slwr ra+enNN wN«y Sway N.e xrNw (O S'�aN�rwel. eMM w�NN N<Y. Pk<�
awM• researirY SNN• MSO•Nr< N MN ♦'••• rsW W r♦kr♦an NN. N« arwr w
p•«r1r b w w r w f1eeY Saw Mm w r•e• b •Nrea w emN «I• N MNM w ro<Y. ban hiy
.wnN w 01e•S• M•r• N<Y MhN Ir w n.M N w IN M w SHIN IM 1 I. 1 htS rkmMw rNY
N w001 G-1, G -J. r G•1 Ce•m yq•peN. NxN IN rMw< N !• mpr N pM. N •rrn• a 0••rIN
+esM N I{•
MINI N xe••rl♦. MM W rrlipr. W McMe NM M •we wa«r1N « W. N«R M• rn•1I•. w ♦Ua reNk
ww• •x••♦•ran•n1 W Os�M{ M SN MOMMn.M ♦0••p1n. Ym MN a«nW1N S•OOws Nx• •asllr h awN M
Ww t IM N: w awNf eM• NN h • wrY wmtr• .M Nxe, x pW• NM Iw♦ Mm Npwro M Nee
NN 1 ] M M •n•er hN. N. • nnn..ynw N^N• N JO N«• ON• SwN MON.
r MN M Na«M♦ b♦rYre « N w •ww•N W♦ O.••n•r^I «Ne • fNr rW
u•«•nNNi w MMw M w raa�vrlu, iwn r.•.• .•.rea• •r .+«.«y « .wM�t wMr«'awt N NwN
•^Y M« 1•anM• e•♦ Men rsn•erN N Ww'ro p •N•aro
• arny♦.r♦) p •rNw^14 pNM1♦ N MYrrr wrM eNl..M rw f+M.pNN. w M N.NN w♦« h MI<.
aNw r w •w.y <.. r...w «!pw eMr.w •t•hx « rw 1• .an, .h•. M •r+•nt
.. r•rY uh ...cw w :♦�re�.y. «Me..Y rwr NNIn), w/a �eraro w Nwro h �N.Y.♦«. «•.•
u« .r•y re•NpN. N wNa !ae• x• a«. M r eN.s
♦ cro• r I—Is •..e• Me..M na r arpr ..n • wwMun N r• IN•e• NMarN.y M« ap •Y•vr• rw.N•Iw.
!.•r w nrr<n. r w w pN• vow N«♦ .awn Jt lou+ •.p reTrpw a r a falro .wY (w.w• b«Ntlhfl
u« 1•e.e• Yw w«1• w .gw«w.I• r rWm Mn Ir Isere• r••e. nsNNr 1♦ <rx•N « ..a•• wn u. wM.
♦ N+•p NYa.N MN. w ♦•••ar•1Nr Mlw Ip N•W ••rrnY/ m rran aen 1! Wap• am ., fN «rens N
•S�x1 �N•• � M f••�1«nS•111l�u1w SNI•n.w tl ea. wp�'�wn.� 1 Is e••r«p♦wn�ren•�w «NNCS«MM
•p N «.« N r ...sr. eN;•...N .:.a. M «rkNM• M. aN. r. ♦xMYw• N Num wwpr MN. x>r r.
anp .orM.l• . a•w..• r«.xw r a -x.-}• is «-e••) Nw w ..Y .1 .• w♦YrN �M. a }ao e. w «N
�aNM� M rr♦ero tNNYN 1«I N «twrNr♦ Nn N•q} AWm Soer�}s».). w a M1
+ •r♦u r)1%! MW�sMM«:w 1 �Mw w�M W/« 1 ♦er« Nw Ir M x�.rNamN�Ny Mn w
N♦anr ♦'•wr r. r • mre r NVwNp 11.r rM. N Snar<M: :1 Nr w•w I e<wa.�iw�
rpwer w„wN rMtw •"'MNNI:.� N Mi i :Iwwtr•a<wnj « «iN w i MM •«•.Sia ini Ii awI w
M w wW N♦ MM ••♦• NN h Ww N re•NN •e�pelXW N w w«
•• •+ «ee♦rM •A 1e r ♦rr♦r•. O•eY .Yppl AwN Sw ,Ief} IM 1 •nary we.«N M wNac• M aW
r .••< NIMw }• b•Yn arlw ••NW n «rr .an wpm AenMr• Sore J!}SS S•e•.rlelrly MN e1•<rNM.
WN•M wrMr• .«Ma N♦ w rd b r•++.ro =4. MMI h s a•«rn M•«^•'snkr N IM r w e••MM
'1 Lim tl r F 1••c•OY<• tr•aNny Nr• Ib♦n 10 — pN• N w1••M .1M a MenMeer nNwfe.Nn M r M 1M
}�<.N rw.• w w r w w 1♦ . •.♦s.a :IYw �rYNnN. •••r••ro 1« . Mrw N.•M,r
_ �. r NrrYw. e.•NNn. < � . « c.N.a ma.• b«n w a«•eN. •r r•e<W .M
r.w w W.. ouW ••w•. e♦... r«M.xINn M p M a«•NprN. w♦Ip <wrr�M� m NN
M�«e.w N o.uep Nana .N a•e. aM ra«1 r e..« Ye•4 .N aN. .« •MMM .r• a
• N Iw.n.w�..M.� W ..NerN rwr .aMw « rr. M• w rw� � ««�NrM•
MM w.•.p «Mp w ..••n.o rwNr «..« w . •.N rr«N
«w.%ba. rwM mNen w •••«•nl <«1•r r..N.. « «.M r M � MMM Ie «iwnew. le . r.NY a
-w. WwN r w wNm N w ww.n w we.n«a <M.a Mar« No1.1r ••M«• Mr«NMN. MwwN.
• ......• N «..N .w••1 raer•.• •• «erect.♦ NM w nrin.M MYnr N rx NroxnM r«Ixp w.reM'.
ti•♦wlry aaw Mwr ^urn a•a.' OeNW r M eNneWs ONNr. CM•M
• erNVN N r.♦e•.• .k..NO.♦ .an ase.♦ w mr.ey • 1 1• Y.neMa N I wN.a/
Se0•Y St.[. ..It S'.
_ «n«... NerNN. N.. k •erN« a.l r.-eM ..N«<.r •w.e1. w«1rN e•n «.« M<r..n.
. •�•. �.. x+e v <NIW .N . .... ,. «see... r. t} ••n r• J.
< ... .-1}J) apW .+• Ips •C •Nr aaw r aee•e.rr .w. «• to Js
< v...♦n ..txp-[1 •.w... Np.{ « ..r...s NM..n ce t•
w aN4^w YM N«« «... Nn ♦ nr++nrnn N 1N eaneM r •M aw..«• w INN.
r: �•.w +i � 1< ea. wNNn w M.npw<m ro. anm w Mw♦. NNN 1wN rw. « r•« w
m « w N row N•w vw }• h w«N«
M N aw.•♦4 •e• M eph{• 1YN <Mp« Ir W ••rS•neia• M w ANKH sreMMbr M .anrw•N
< CWM♦ S♦.p MN. •SN OwaelNn Cn h•qn C ♦MWNn �. M Yae�w w ebw al µq w«MN. ur•n
vNN M+ra•<N r .awn . �«Mw ro•-.W NN•w
p�wa �N eure«ae ��Nr�NM. Nn N+r•raa awe.+Mey •a. • wp0i. Aw«r 6r
S•. st.t. .NO ••rt. .pits.
• w•+..r« w w .w« IMw •n. •• •p••r ,♦r �•+ !•+1 w« N rM •rww.
• L♦«MM• hN�i<4«•r�r w 4W M ! �M • M C.e � b• MNNnp r M«Wnh rMwrw
rr♦•ee. )S r••1 N an.• •Sen 1•♦ N «N N. 1«�• • ••nn.+• w.Nr NO♦•NM N If Yirr.• p M M♦•wn
w wwn.n rwww)♦. e•.ri•e • w�N w.••MV ....r«• N 10 •M M.•••• N M••ww w N.«eNn.
r
22-1/t •r1♦w rea••1✓✓. M p: •Hw<. <�•iti4•a.«1w<. m<<r N•1• N n)r••h wMkr M N MINI• MINn N
«••rlla.♦ .an cA♦ nrYewM♦.
S e•N•1♦NN♦ N•Mww• Y •NMN r N e«w hw sw.
� O�NN"'i .iM'NNy�w awr p�NM ): �r«e�nai,r a «N. 1�yw. wp w «NM.•r• r w tkr MaN rn•
• ON•rrn M r•«r♦ NNW N Nw• w• aW r Nr••••r• w ♦N• wr w rM•«w Wp w ♦eOriNN•n N
< •w•...•1p•r r w eM eerr ««.• 0..«1-«+ w rw.«•« NN «1Yr w u1r N N,x t• .wv. rw .< «.
.TRAP CATCHBASIN
w a1M
rwN..
BLOCK AND GRAVEL DROP INLET SEDIMENT FILTER
GT.t�
ROSEMOUNT
SENIOR
HOUSING
•re NWJa eKwn m
t e•MrI.
I�NrNa �«aa.a��M• ar.
r�•knJ 7 '=Fi��•.
•e1Oae La1ppO"am •ou N°p1 I�c"'N�i .1:i °L`as""ialf'.�'wIn`
IN �. TYPICAL INSTALLATION FOR SILT FENCE
BRW ELNESS
ARCHITECTS INC
-1:'N.
cMaN.a..
Jfu}e•
i•�-'C� �Gi:
n ..am—
'so i•larw
fjA/N--e00 Cso
t... Tae
DETAILS
ROSEMOUNT
SENIOR
HOUSING
BRW ELNESS
ARCHITECTS INC
SECOND FLOOR PLAII
f'REUMINARY
A4
ZNVMHOS *H UVW13(3
1.0"ll wt ZW"
-no IT- ftmocv- q%VF. a; W-1 ao*s pw WTI
3-.2" IT* A-TUT"Pe pw A 91 VMS OD*01 "TOG
F-20
-P� O-ww" ms .0alb-P w qzxm
so hnx-q P� m am AD aovTm zMa.
aL oDmom SIM NKN *t -Pete So 4m 4 a"
'w— -did -an v�; —=am 0
.oTft=qW w—Tm SM 2wq� ew�M
a— eW u -T q-" tj AR q=T I UM W* -WG 0
7
ONisnOH -
&zjW
ow 00.
C)
'*-,
-'s
SIM
13t
Us
vw
N011V
�J 0 1 N:3 S iNnOA3SOd
9
010
v
SO
Vo'sl
k �,' 3 IV
Tr
;z
'0 1
v;
_j
3 >
<
S.Vo.or..99 N
IM,
�J 0 1 N:3 S iNnOA3SOd
9
P*4
Public Hearing: Dakota ComnJ3� HRA - Final Planned Unit Development Pr
Chairman Droste opened the public hearing to hear public testimony regarding the Final Planned tinit
Development application of the Dakota County HRA. The recording secretary has placed the
Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Mailing and Posting of Public Hearing Notice on file with
the City.
Assistant Planner Pearson reviewed the site plan and building elevations for the senior housing
building. He stated that the Concept PUD was approved with conditions of which this proposed Final
PUD complies with. Mr. Pearson mentioned that 75% lot coverage is allowed and this proposal has
only 27% lot coverage. The applicant is also proposing twice as many trees as required.
Kari Gill, a representative of the applicant, stated that this budding is part of the Senior Housing
Development Program of which 10 such facilities will be located in Dakota County. This building is
the 10th facility. She mentioned that there is an extensive waiting Est for all of these facilities.
Jay Nelson, architect for the applicant, reviewed the circulation on the site and the roof design. He
mentioned that he spoke with one of the neighbors while waiting for the public hearing and the
applicant has agreed to move the gardens in the northwest comer of the site further away from the
neighbor's property line.
Steve Heimer, Lower 147th Street, thanked the applicant for cooperation on the increased buffer
zone to his property. He felt that this development would be an asset to his property.
Mr. Stoffel, 146th Street, had hoped that the applicant would buy his property also. He is happy now
that the gardens will be moved farther from his property line.
As there were no further comments from the audience, MOTION by DeBettignies to close the
public hearing. Seconded by Tentinger. Ayes: Shoe -Corrigan, McDermott, DeBettignies, Tentinger
and Droste. Nays: 0. Motion passes 5-0.
Member DeBettignies congratulated everyone involved in this project.
Member McDermott commented that it appeared that all issues raised at the beginning of this process
had been resolved and felt this building would be an asset to the community.
A short discussion occurred regarding parking availability on the site. Member Tentinger requested
that additional parking spaces be added to the above -ground parking to which Mr. Nelson replied
that a few additional spaces could be added.
Member Shoe -Corrigan commented that this was a beautiful building and will be an asset to the
community.
Chairman Droste agreed with previous comments and mentioned that he too was concerned with the
availability of parking. Assistant Planner Pearson mentioned that the applicant is already providing
double the required amount of parking. Senior Planner Mack also commented that the residents in
the area widely agreed that the current wide streets be retained for on -street parking for all.
Civil Engineer Litterer requested that since the garden is going to be moved, that the grading plan be
reviewed to compensate for this move.
MOTION by McDermott to recommend approval of the administrative plat and final development
plan for the Dakota County HRA Senior Housing project subject to: 1) incorporation of
recommendations relative to grading and onsite utilities from the Public Works Department; and 2)
conformance with all applicable building and fire codes. Seconded by Shoe -Corrigan. Ayes:
McDermott, DeBettignies, Tentinger, Droste and Shoe -Corrigan. Nays: 0. Motion passes.
"/?4 4APt