HomeMy WebLinkAbout11.b. Livable Communities Act Resolution t
City °f R�Sem���
e . e gumY'j'asY f�'� A���n �
��otl� S�t,ioxl� ��S
. Age1'�` 1�1e�F'vs
.
e
. .M�tin �at � u��es Act �
Cl Covnc�l Ll�able C°roro �'� ����N�� ��
Ite�� ... 1 ��
Agen�` i���
��ea Ma�ei ApprovedBY�
�epared$y; geniot Yla� 1��10195 pl��g
9126195 &' rna�`J
Resolut��n� � uri�e SUm b the Cl� �f
e� es
c�e'��' Co m�ssion ation y. ti�
as� sv�g cen mission
� o�s p c i p �o0 1" Cova
A Cou�c i l s°p p d t h e Z-°���d p l a�g
�onside�`�°C mmu��eS Ac to he C°u�c�
olu�on f oo� Ll�able us1Y Supp�� item• arid,wirh
�ies tan reuio of t�is resolution �e�ter�
,�e a�,a,cb t�the Metro�o�a�°n CP��side��on �tlus �erns
,:�, . ,�e� �On of ti�s
onsldoval• �mp�ica�ons
em�un ,� n but
Ro$ e a�,cb ound foi �issi�n�
�o�,ad��o��back� g C°�' cil f o�a�=' ture� �scusSlo ,
�videS �bers of the enl�n t,o C��d Q°ssibl�t�o�m.f��to n�this��g�d
p ber 14, 1995 mor�ble s�o��S legisla�'io the approp� e�views� due to �°n�`' the
�n pcto �ade a fa ��for S aas not to m�e�? at that, wit�
ation� e ove� ��ly C� �essaty tion f-o� e wox�g t�e a�t
ieSeN ound rh p,d� felr it n tre�SOlu d��tO�'h sistent alt,h O�t
p�c,ari19 o the�x Pay Com�issioneYs ch�ges in 1 �o�'ie,�; �at�e�on �t ls iYnp
�� plan�g e wording �ot be ent�e�er� r�ade ssion• Ag�'any�'g it st
p ber of ed sO�' , could weie�h°w g Co�mmi ou�t�to d tbe fir
a n°�n o Yecoriv'1'ena ��cil s� . etits p1a��', osem on
�ey �S Njet C° ot ad�ustm ie�1 by �'he the C�� °f�,,: �lpa�on beY
maae with t o�tivs a�t' �cen�s ide�oes not lo��on�ue it s,SP� g„
le�slat��n f ad�ess the S resolu�� obligatecj „�luster�n
�d Se�e to Iov�°�t e�°re ls�°� �coTP°ra`te e�o�s foY
note t�at app �d,f`��' ation�to Goope��ve u���b�o�
to ot a�to ,M�agess�g�ng�with �e Met C° and
cann o�the piog�'' b tre D�°�a swgle e'���K'R.P'' T°,'�lettei fr°�th e�i-e�°�°n'�
eaY eff � °nty fo�n�l 'Th
y �ont�uiug �ti f i t e C h the D�ko�`C uati°n. P'e is fort��O�ing•
The�h go�S a�o a�°n pl��,nlp��'1On��to�� g��S lsSu �e imP�O�e�'
tion on P ti ,, t,;i�-, �d�tiu
��leme�� tibe a�� l�lier Cp°
„� ,..
����O g�ation�fo�t1�s p°sition• �h of�e��'��Council•
M�agess ��r suPp° �ued�° Solutlonb�,;4::•.�.
aoYd��'O re clu�g��n val of�e� ��, :x�: °� a�on
P�c o six��
of rea,sons,� ends a�i° .'. >� ��' oitang 1�
a vasietY 5��°� �p�1,��k� �e Z,ocal
oY pL � " and
to 16�h S��t� �ve a� U�ties:p'ct •-
, a Comm „,,
�'pT1�oli Livable
�ended A'���the MetioP t:`
o �},,.
R� Rose�v�u� o
CitY °f p,ccou�t�
IncentC u���A�,iov�
�i;�ct 1::
C.1�
J
� .I,ty UF gOSEM��SpTA.
C Ty
�
DA��TA C��
� �SOLU�pN 1995- , IN TI�E
T�pp,gTICIPA C A�TH�
�50LUTION ELEC E C��UNITIENT R�G�M
A LI�� 5 AccoU
1�IjETR�p�I'ITAN 1996
�C��jpU5ING YN��Y Ag Cha ter 255)
L CALE p and other
1995��es�o a aress housing
unities Act( �tended tes section 4�3.121;and
olitan I-ivable C�� �,hich is
�AS,the Metrop Livable unities F�d �esota Statu
Comm defined by� e�ta�yation
w� lvietropolit�' etropolitanarea T�BaseR
establishes a facing the m comp�sing the �Centives
development issues u�ties Fund, the Loca�xousing
Livable Co� nt and metropo�it�area
olitan emonstration Accou
�,g,the Metrop and other assistance to
wgEgE unities D �nding
Account,
the Livable CO�ae�e�a�n .
�ccount,is intended to p �nts or loans under the �nding
municip�ities;and nt will be eligible to receive gr n olluted sites cleanup ocal
� rt� p atticipating�n the L
AS,the City of Rosemou or eligible to receive � �nt bY p
unities Fund �Devela�,.� 473.254;and
Vy�RE conomi
o�lta�I,ivable Co� Trade and E tatutes sectlon
lvietrop De artment of �esota S Counc�t�
from the NU�esota p under N� etropolitan
ccount prog�am �t requ��s'��1e M oa�s for the City
Housing��entives A u�ties A �E��.�e.�ycle housin$g
Livable C�� , .. rto olitan Coun��as identified u'
A,S,the Metropolita� �Stablish affordable�
ount to
��� ' the City of Rosem romote the po�icies of the NMet
negotiate with �h serve to p �j Couricil the
with and w� ide;and to the Metropolitan
�keeping olitan Development Cru�
etroP ount must id"exiti�fy
the M of Rosem ���;�and
June 3p, 1996 the CitY established housing g
w��As�by lans to take to meet the olution after a public hea,ring,�icipating
actions the City p res o f.Ro�emount and each p
ro olitan Council must oa�p f b he City
° �A,S,t h e M e t d�e_��le h o u s m g g Liva b l e
w� ordable an �` , � `` olitan
neg o t i a t e d aff 1 5� 1 9 96;an� e a r of the Metrop b
u���pa�l�by lanuary ate in the firs t y ccoun t P r o g�
am
m o u n t i s to part'lcip �I o u s�g�Centives A
of Ros e m �icipate in t he L o c a 1 , : , T;�- ,
w��p,g,if the CitY elect to p '
it must ;� t �``' ate under
Commu�ties A�� can particip
ber 15, 1995;�d uni�1P�1��Y
Novem metropolitan axea m _ ,s:,:., d the
199b, a unities A�t an
r �A,g,for calendar y4 3 2$4 only�� ivable Co�
w�' tes section Metropo�ltani- 1995; � cle
��esota 5tatu a�,{cipate i the�by November 1S,` . d l'�fe- y
elects to p �� ��" ` ordable an
the mu�cip�i�' ccount p � �l riegotiate aff
a ousingincentives A uniciPality successfu y',s�. 4.�..
� � Local H the m otiated affordable
etropolitan Coun��and
the M he municipa�itY�and ts by resolution the neg
oals for t olita�Council adop i, ;:
�) housing g 6 the Metrop ��tpality;and ", ,
15, 199
��� by lanuary oals for each mu
and life-�ycle housing g
.�a
.A::.`1 i
v'
WgE�A
theLivable Co n September26 '�;��l;r,:� ~ -.
�nunities A��a Wos the P1
�, rk session ng Co'r�Ssion fQr the
with the 11�1etropoj�t Cl�'°f RoSemount re '
�d� ��ese�n ��ober 10 � Council sta;� �ewed
Nation , I995 the Pl , and
Rosemount's partici ' recornmended to the Cng C��Ssion for,ti�e Ci
pation in the fu-st �'�ouncii ado �'ofRosemount re •
W Yeas'of the ro�.�� an�tlon of this resolution su �ewed
to «�5��S, the City oflZosemo Pporting
Council, alonhejr a " unt supports the �
PProach to co11e ' '.'•
g with meeting identified �ive effor_�s,ofD
t�Ough the involve a clusterin �� Housin akota Coun
Authority. ment arid g approach to pre g GO�S as set forth b �3'Muni�ipalities
Participation of the P�e�a�ion P1an for y the Metropo��
Dakota meetin
e�W' T�REFO,� Countyr�Q�sing and Redevelo gm�s
olves to 'BE jT'1�S�L�D P ent
Incentives pr�lcipate in the � the Ci
��.� duri� Metropolit tY Counc�I�'` �`
g�a.lendar �Livable CornmU�hes�f��e Ci�of Rose
`��P1'ED ye�' 1996. A�and the Loc mount hereby
t�s �Housing
day of
, 1995,
� `;.
AT�ST. '`'''�,.
E.B. Mcl�enomY,°�ayor
;f
Susan 1�1: Walsh, Ci�,Clerk
� � . � . � _f: . �
.. . . . ` ',, . .
> � . - ..t�t.:i: . .
y`���fF'
E_
. . . � �����' .
� � ��t.�3r},:.�1�i',. . . . � .
� .� . � �,. ' . �
� . . ��j' . . .
Motion by. .
,��.:;
Voted in favor: Second by;
'�oted against:
; <>: ,
.�i-?::
• � r City of Rosemount •�<_��. �
Executive Summary for Action '�'"��'`"'
Planning Commission Meefing-Date: October 10. 1995 - -
Agenda Item: Livable Communities Act Agenda Section:
NEW BUSINESS
Prepared By: Andrew Mack Agenda No.:
Senior Planner I�No. 6B.
Attachments: Resolution Approved By:
./�
� ����:,1> �
Attached for considera.tion and recommendation to the City Council is a resolution supporting
participation by the Ciry of Rosemount in the 1 st year of the Livable Communities Act. Prior to
this date, City Staff in conjuncrion with the Metropolitan Council;b�s supplied a tremendous
amount of information which describes this program. City Staff'�lias also communicated it's
perceived view of 'critical importance' with respect to Rosemounti's:future growth and
participation in this voluntary legislaxion. In light of these fmdings; Planning Staff strongly urges
the Planning Commission to support a recommendation in favor o�:the attached resolution to the
City Council. Over the next two months City 5taff will continue to work with the Met Council
Staff to address questions raised duri.ng the work session prior to adoption of the Housing Goals
Agreement which, if Rosemount is to participate, must be approved�by the City on December
15th. City Staff is also continuing to work with the Dakota.Manager's Organization and the
Dakota County HRA to explore opportunities for "Clustering." An update from a meeting
scheduled on Friday October 6th with these organizations to discuss the "Clustering" issue will be
provided for the Planning Commission on Tuesday night.
. 5
. � r4'�i' � � � .
'..I.l�7 F�:r.-. .
. . '� I���= c� � . .
it �:}j;
, i;34y
,.'*' ._
� i
. .. �-1�:;+�.�..flAi� . .
, # ., !.`..s_`... . .�
. � . .,i�. � � �
.. � � . .,�.�„� ..
Recommended Action: A MOTION to approve a recommendation�o the City Council in favor of
the resolution supporting participation in the Livable Communities"`Act by the City of Rosemount.
Planning Commission Action: A MOTION to approve a recommendation to the City Council in
favor of the RESOLUTION, as revised, supporting, with reservation, participation in the
Metropolitan Livable Communities Act by the City of Rosemount for the calendar year of
1996.
10-10-95.004
- �,
.
City of Rosemount
Executive Summary for Action
Planning Commission iVleeting Date: Se�tember 26, 1995
Agenda Item: Livable Communities Act Agenda Section:
Work Sessioa
Prepared By: Andrew Mack Agenda No: A
Senior Planner
Attachments: Multiple Approved By:
For Tuesda.y night's work session, Representa.tives from the Metropolitan Council will be in
attendance to present information and an overview of the Livable Communities Act for the City
of Rosemount. Enclosed with your packet are materials covering the overall act implementation
and describes the specifics of this voluntary program. Also atta.ched for your review is a copy
of the proposed housing goals for Rosemount. These goals, as established by the Meuopolitan
Council, will have to be agreed to by the City by December 15, 1995 in order for us to
participate in the progrun in 1996. Prior to entering into an agreement for the housing goals,
the City will be required to adopt a resolution similaz to that enclosed with the packet, by the
November 7, 1995 City Council Meeting. It is anticipated that a formal recommendation on
this resolution by the Planning Commission will be considered at it's October 10, 1995 meeting.
Therefore, Tuesday night will be your opportunity to ask any questions you may have regazding
this program and it's importance to the future growth and development of Rosemount.
On the topic of future growth and development, I would also like to inform Planning
Commissioners that a regional forum for the Southeast Metro Area, being sponsored by the
Metropolitan Council, will be held here in Rosemount at the Community Center on October 9,
1995. Although the strategies for growth management in the region are not directly linked to
the Livable Communities Act, there are direct ties to the broader issue in terms of dealing with
where jobs and households should locate in the region over the next 20 years. The overall
success of the Livable Communities Act may play an unportant role in guidi.ng these broader
land use policy considerations in our region. More specific to Rosemount as a fringe growth
community, it will have a direct correlation to the abiliry for the City to grow east of Highway
3. For your review I have also enclosed a copy of the most recent Metropolitan Council
Directions publication which in.cludes a brief summary on both of these topics.
Members of the City Council have been invited to Tuesday night's work session as indicated in
the attached memo. This memo also describes additional cansiderations for Rosemount,
includi.ng information about the Dakota. County �iRA's possible involvement in this program
� with respect to possible "clusteri.ng" of communities within Dakota County. A follow up
meeting with the Metropolitan Council Representatives and the Dakota Counry Managers will be
� held on September 28th and should provide additional information on the Metropolitan
Council's determination on the fundamental qaestion of defining "clustering" as it specifically
relates to individual community goals agreements. Further details on the outcome of this
meeting will be provided for the Planning Commission at the October 10, 1995 meeting.
Recommended Action: -NONE REQLTIItED-
Planning Commission Action:
Cit of Rosemount
y
2875 - 145th Street West
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 510, Rosemount, MN 55068-0510
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M 4 R A N D U M
To: Mayor McMenomy, City Council, Planning Commission & Tom Burt,
City Administrator
From: Andrew Mack, Senior Planner
Date: September 14, 1995
Subject: Livable Communities Act
In the past few weeks I have supplied a great deal of information provided to me at various
workshops & forums from the Metropolitan Council. Although this program is being conveyed
as essentially a local option for participation, there are a number of strong incentives associated
with the program that make voluntary participation by our community very important. Priority
review points for future ISTEA funding projects such as 160th Street improvements is one very
important financial consideration. Future growth of the community to the East of Highway
precipitating the need for MUSA expansion approvals by Met Council is also an important
consideraxion. Although MITSA expansions are not linked to the new legislation, Met Council
representatives have hinted that participation in the Livable Communities Act Program will be a
consideration in making regional investment decisions, including MUSA expansions.
The good news is that the City of Rosemount is actually in pretty good shape overall with
respect to affordable housing. Furthermore, the Dakota County HRA is one of the foremost
entities in the region in terms of providing a coordinated housing program for all cities in the
County. At this time there is also discussions occurring through the Dakota County Managers
Association concerning the concept of "clustering" or joining in on a County or Sub-County
wide basis with all or a portion of the cities in Dakota County. The Dakota County HRA
would be the possible vehicle for making this type of effort work. At this time, however, the
Met Council Staff is addressing some fundamental questions regarding how a "Cluster" is
defined. I will keep you up to date on the outcome of these discussions and what the possible
implications may be for Rosemount.
On September 26, 1995 at 5:30 p.m. a work session will be conducted at the Planning
Commission Meeting to review the details of how the City of Rosemount must proceed should
we decide to participate in this program. Representatives of the Metropolitan Council will plan
to be in attendance to review the oveiall details of this program with the City. I would at this
time like to extend an invitation to all City Councii Members to attend this work session and
participate in the discussion and questions regarding the Act and its
proposed 'unplementation at the local level. Please give me a call if you
FR°"�fi D6`o�... lan to attend so we ma ost a notice of the omt work session should
Andrew M ack P y P �
Senior Planner three or more City Council members decide xo attend. Thank you.
CtTv oe RosEuourrr
2875 145TH STttEET WEsr
� Rosentouxr,MN 55068
(6l2)322-2�0
Fax(612)423-5203