The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6. Wayne Transport Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Concept Planned Unit Development, Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat . ` � City of Rosemount Executive Summary for Action City Couacil Meetiag Date: July 5, 1995 Ageada Item: Wayne Transport Minor Agenda Seetioa: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Concept PUD and PUBLIC HEARING Preliminary Plat Prepared By: Andrew Mack Agend��}� � � Senior Planner �y� Attachments: Council Memo Dated 6/29/95; Approved By: Revised Concept Site Plan & Prelim. Plat; Resolutions; Letters to & from Dakota County dated 6/16/95 & 6/26/95; Planning Report Dated 6/9/95; P.C. Minutes - SFsE ATTACHED MEbiO - Recommended Action: I. A MOTION to approve of a Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment adding approximately 15 acres to the City' s MUSA, subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council . II. A MOTION to table rezoning for approximately 14 .92 acres from Agricultural to General Industrial until final plat . III. A MOTION to approve a PUD Concept Plan for Koch Refining Co. for 55 . 68 acres of land located near the Northwest intersection of C.R. 42 and S.T.H. 52 subject to the following conditions : 1. Provisions for additional access to lot 1; 2 . Provide for parking and circulation lane set backs along the westerly edge of the paved surface for lot 1, except as may be required for rail access; 3 . Provide for a high quality planting & screening plan along the East side of lot 1; 4 . Provide for a landscaped planting area around all perimeters of the outdoor truck/trailer storage area for lot 1; 5 . A redesign of the street and lot layout to support the efficient and orderly development of the PUD; 6 . Approval of the frontage road alignment with C.R. 42, temporary driveway access to C.R. 42 or the provision of an approved alternative temporary/permanent access to the property, and review of needs for traffic safety improvements at the S.T.H. 52 & C.R. 42 interchange by Dakota County. IV. A MOTION to approve the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Re-design of the frontage road alignment; 2 . Provision of the minimum 300 feet lot frontage for lot 1; 3 . Submission of required engineering information; 4 . Approval of the frontage road alignment with C.R. 42, temporary driveway access to C.R. 42 or the provision of an approved alternative temporary/permanent access to the property, review of needs for traffic safety improvements at the S.T.H. 52 & C.R. 42 interchange and needs for additional right-of-way along C.R. 42 as may be required by Dakota County. City Council Action: �ox�uM To: Mayor and City Council From: Andrew Mack, Senior Planner Date: June 29, 1995 Subjeet: Wayne Transport Truck Terminal & Of�ce Development Proposal - July 5, 1995 Public Hearing The attached Planning Report provides a description and analysis of the Koch Refinery/Wayne Transport Development proposal. This summary is intended to provide Council with an upda.te of the project activity that has occurred since it's review by the Planning Commission. On June 13, 1995 members of the Planning Commission reviewed the development proposal and approved motions recommending approval to the Council for a11 applications connected with this project. Two key elements in their approval conditions are as follows: 1. Alignment of the proposed West S.T.H. 52 frontage road and its point of future connection with County Road 42. 2. Authorization to obtain a temporary driveway access permit to County Road 42 until such time as the frontage road is developed. These key conditions are dependant upon approval from Dakota County based upon their relationship to County Road 42. A copy of the Planning Commission meeting minutes for this item have been atta.ched for your review. On June 16, 1995 a letter was sent to Dakota County requesting review of the preliminary plat and asking that these issues be considered. A copy of this letter has been attached for review. On 7une 26, 1995 the Dakota County Plat Commission met to review the project. They reviewed a revised PUD plan drawing prepared by the applicant which now shows the proposed frontage road located appro�cimately 1100 feet west of the 42/52 interchange. This location met with very favorable review by the Plat Commission. The proposed temporary driveway access where Koch property has frontage on 42, however, did not meet with their approval and resulted in their decision not to recommend approval of the plat. A copy of their letter dated 7une 26, 1995 summarizes this decision. Wayne Transport Proposal City Council July 5, 1995 Hearing Page 2 Koch and Wayne Transport representaxives have been reviewing their options as a result of the determination from Dakota. Counry concerning the temporary access. At this tune a series of alternatives e�sts in proceeding with the development project. They appear to be as follows: 1. Acquire additional right-of-way off-site and improve all or a portion of the fronta.ge road to provide access to 42. 2. Improve a portion of the frontage road and provide access to former County Road 38 to the north. 3. Process an appeal from the decision of the County Plat Commission to the County's Physical Development Board Commission for the temporary driveway access as proposed. 4. A combination of one of the above altematives. The applicant is considering these options and will be working with City Staff to consider the most appropriate direction to take with respect to this issue. Therefore, the recommended condition for this issue has been modified to reflect this position. Resolution to this issue is viewed as critical to the continued progression of this project beyond it's preliminary stage. Recommended Action: I. A MOTION to approve of a Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment adding appro�mately 15 acres to the City's MUSA, subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council. II. A MOTTON to table rezoning for appro�mately 14.92 acres from Agricultural to General Industrial until fmal plat. Wayne Transport Proposal City Council July 5, 1995 Hearing Page 3 III. A MOTION to approve a PUD Concept'Plan for Koch Refining Co. for 55.68 acres of land located neax the Northwest intersection of C.R. 42 and S.T.H. 52 subject to the following conditions: l. Provisions for additional access to lot 1; 2. Provide for parking and circulation lane set backs along the westerly edge of the paved surface for lot 1, except as may be required for rail access; 3. Provide for a high quality planting & screening plan along the Fast side of lot 1; 4. Provide for a landscaped planting axea around all perimeters of the outdoor truck/trailer stora.ge area. for lot 1; S. A redesign of the street and lot layout to support the efficient and orderly development of the PUD; 6. Approval of the frontage road alignment with C.R. 42, temporary driveway access to C.R. 42 or the provision of an approved alternative temporary/permanent access to the property, and review of needs for traffic safety improvements at the S.T.H. 52 & C.R. 42 interchange by Dakota County. IV. A MOTION to approve the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Re-design of the frontage road alignment; 2. Provision of the minimum 300 feet lot frontage for lot 1; 3. Submission of required engineering information; 4. Approval of the frontage road alignment with C.R. 42, temporary driveway access to C.R. 42 or the provision of an approved alternative temporary/permanent access to the property, review of needs for traffic safety improvements at the S.T.H. 52 & C.R. 42 interchange and needs for additional right-of-way along C.R. 42 as may be required by Dakota Counry. �.�i �CLlI� � . ��. � /�!,l<� 1 �f�\ � � 1 1��= �--r-s— �._ —♦ �.�• �n— / i— ~ �..�._�� -�--^--�%_� 1• t.)��-��r==%l - �� _��--' -- %��.��if �� _ _ .�.r.:.:_..�-...a�r'v=rs'-:.�_w�_-�s-'�'-�-±+.=:�Tf--a�/�-�s=� � y„r�„i- '__ ^ ^�.. `f\ / .._�� — — _� � _ , � � i '�J��'r�i� —�r ""—� 'f'� 1/' ^.J�- .-J�> >_/�>�,��,i' � i` -�' �.�-` � __...� `��-�' \_.�_J t� _} . t �. � � �. '� ._ i -. _� �- --`----�`-__ „�'_S�$T'� 3�Id.�-'==��=�1�\�' --� Bi�--�-� �' -!._.� -F��_r '=y�¢! �=-�-- . J _. "` .�` \ .� ^�n`ti-� T�"�'4�_�s��r -� � . I � `�'�/I � ^� �� I �\ ��\� � 1 ��=_�� \l `--�j�/_ II'yj�,ii`\�\�\ t ��I � � \�� ' , \��'- -- \� \~ � "`_'=- --'-� ��_�\�\ .,� �`'� r�� ? . .W � � ' � ' --' -'�.�__ i.- � ' � '\r'"'�� ' �.� ^�, •s� � , '� ti� � � � 0`l.l�T L 0_T_ B I` _,�_,,� ---�� `..� � /=,�'; ��-...�.... "i r + �, < �'-,.-- � � � �� ..,�i . ¢ 1�� •msear.�:ssa .1`� �1 I _i J I �,�_J_ �_�—_"i_�y�_� ` �� ' ( I� . /' ( � � , <� ; � I , _-�---� � �- _ � �iJ� � ' � - � � /—�— ` �`-.�. ...._I.--.—`"�`"�"�r —��'~/ I .-��_ //�/ �\ J /// . . . ,� ��w..r�.��. ��a�` ��=�1— ��'�YS„!!Gf / \1/�/ \ �'. � �(l) •�1 � �� %�� T I RDAD EA9F]1FNT �.1021Si1 � +.�... / . '` ` �� _��/ \••�'� , �� '�\\_� . � r__�_.__� I � /� i �\ �`�l��_ � � � � � � �.�.,. / �` I�1�\�\_ f � � � I l � 1�� I I �� r f--,� ,� . ' � .��, � � �, ' ��, � � -J�\\ ��/ r V /� /� � / �� e � i +�_�� . � �` . . � �OUTL 'f A ' �� ' '�" $ � •� �, � Q ��`J 3 B dC , 1 � � � � , , .� � � ) � � ; . j �.. i � � � 't� � � / �� w `\.- ( �•+`'�� , ^'" . . I �-� �-�J � � ` / ��•-�� -��1��ru � � � � (f. / 11 III��, �(�� ; � � ` � ��.�V� �l �� -i\��`-- f 1 �I1�1�''�i ��fl — (--1 �,� � _ ,� j 1 �� I �'°`�� ` r R �iji ( %�� ` � 1 1111 �--�..c�� ,� —t— � ` i / / 1 � �\ , \ % •j / �� --Ho� E 1 a,\__� '„ / �i� �`— _ \� � _ I � 1 �—� � � 1 ) ..( ( � .� i� �� _�±r�� \\ ' l�y t\ \� 1 \�\��_\1l .,, l ''%�.�., � \` � }'� � �^ \�.�4�� ;"'"III i "� '� ; � �\�t��\ �� 1�1 1 �. • ` , �l)�, 1` �.", � - � I11 �l� I�� I � �l � ��t��il� � 1 � ��/ �'�'i�i�i'LS@` ,t �//// /// • � ,�� Iii i ,�� ,�, '► , .v,�... � ��« � — �\�—_ � � � �� __�\\�^1_<>,( .r , : � ��\\�� 1 � i , . � _ -.,/ 1 a�I� _ �\ ^ 1�+, � � y �' � � `1�^� ` 1�'I, , ✓ � ,� o PRELIMINARY PLAT —'_;, •� � ,;;�� t � "" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ��=;'� —;��% %' �''�' �= � � ..�, .,-, . '�� KOCH INDUSTRIESIVUAYNE TRAN3PORT, INC. '—;,'�y�;'�r�� ,, `�,� � g '%,�::''�i� i� �1�, � AAAYIJUI�1Y0a "��%/J; /• � � ��° _' � /�i�ii�% � ( 111v // �'�n / ` `y�/ `� ' � �r� ��^��'^^�'�'% � _,i,'- d. Y "" � �.� FISJ fNE 1-3-4Qe1 . . ��i . �r /..-:�i Y10 fC100.Q7 . . . . . � iwa�www.� � GARY H.STEVENSON,R.LS. � DAKOTA CC�UNT Y �AN�c�6°2 s9 ogRE�TOR SURVEY &LAND INFORMATION DEPARTMElVT FAX(612)89t-7031 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE APPLE VA�LEY,MINNESOTA 55124-8579 �.-_ -..i �� F . :� �`�. June 26, 1995 City of Rosemount 2875 - 145th St. W. Rosemount, MN 55068 ATT: Bud Osmundson, City Enginear RE: PUD for Koch Industries/Wayne Transport Dear Mr. Osmundson: The Dakota County Plat Commission met on June 26, 1995, to ��, consider the preliminary plat of the PUD for Koch ' Industries/Wayne Transport. Said plat is adjacent to CSAH NO. 42 and is, therafore, subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. The Plat Commission recommended, on a 3 to 2 vote, not to recommend approval of the plat as the County's spacing guidelines do not allow private driveways on roads with � projected ADT of over 15, 000. The Plat Commission is in favor of the location of the future street alignment as it meets the spacing guideline of ' ;th mile west of the T.H. Na. 52 ramps. County Board Resolution Number 82-151 states the followinq: If a plat is submitted to a city and the access spacing is NOT consistent with the Access Spacing Guidelines, then the city may proceed in one of the following two wayst A. If the City approves of the access spacing as shown in the preliminary plat, then the city staff should submit written comments to the County Plat Commission outlining their reasons for recommending approval of the plat. The Plat Commission may then consider whether a variance is in the best interest of the County. B. If the City does NOT approve of the access spacing as shown in a preliminary plat, then city staff should work with the developer in attempting to meet the County's guidelines, Also, city staff should submit a written memo to the County Plat Commission outlining their objections to the preliminary plat. Any conflicts must be resolved before the County Plat Commission considers final approval. a,,.. �,,,, ,,n�.s ��f UlG SO[utuJ/�.� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Printed on Recycled Paper � ��.�� The city may appeal the Plat Commission recommendation to the County Board of Commissioners. Please let me know if the city wishes to appeal this recommendation and I will prepare the agenda item. The appeal would be placed on the agenda for the next Physical Development Board Commission meeting. No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Highway Department and no permit will be issued until the plat has been filed. Sincarely, :G � '�Gar H'. Stevenson Y Dakota County Surveyor & Land Information Director Secretary, Plat Commission GHS/vf cc: Harry S. Johnson Company Andrew Mack, Senior Planner Phil Kairis, Koch Project Engineer I � CITY HALL � C i TY O F RO S E M O U N T Z8�5-,45th StT�t WeSt � � P.O.Box 510 _.��a Rosemount,MN � � Everything's Coming Up Rosernount!! SSo6s-os�o � `� °�°� � Phone:612-423-4411 i��U�u�3� �� Fax:612-423-5203 June 16, 1995 Mr. Gary Stevenson Land Information Director & Secretary, Plat Commission Dakota Counry 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, Mn 55124 Re: Koch Refining Co. PUD Concept Plan & Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Stevenson: Enclosed for your review please find a copy of the proposal received by the City of Rosemount for the Koch Refining Co. proposed development of property located at the northwest corner of S.T.H. 52 & C.S.A.H. 42. For your information, I have also enclosed a copy of the Staff Planning Report which accompanied this request before the Rosemount Planning Commission on June 13, 1995. On June 13, 1995, the Planning Commission approved this proposal with a number of conditions. One of the conditions added by the Planning Commission required "decisions and fact fmding" by Dakota County. Specifically what the City is looking to Dakota. County for response in this regard is as follows: l. Alignment of a proposed west frontage road to S.T.H. 52 where it intersects with C.S.A.H. 42. & needs for associated 42 roadway unprovements. 2. A temporary or interim driveway access from C.S.A.I3. to the proposed Wayne Transport Facility. 3. Needs for traffic safety improvements at the S.T.H. 52 & C.S.A.H. 42 Interchange. 4. Needs for additional right-of-way where the pla.t is contiguous to C.S.A.H. 42. The City of Rosemount has identified this project as an unportant economic development opporlunity for the community. The City of Rosemount would appreciate the cooperation of the County Plat Commission in reviewing this project and assisting in fmding cooperative solutions to meet the immediate needs of Koch Refining Co.; while at the same time identifying long-range design objectives which satisfy Dakota County Highway design standards. . . � � Prinfed on recYc7ed PaPrr conrainin.q 30°6 poNi'onsumrr nr�tr�i;.i•. Gary Stevenson Boch PUD & Preliminary Plat Page 2 It is my understanding that Harry 7ohnson and representatives of Koch Refining Co. are scheduled to meet with Dave Zech of the County Highway Department on June 20, 1995. I felt this background information would be of use in advance af this meeting. The City of Rosemount appreciates your assistance in reviewing this project and is prepared to work with Dakota. County in order to facilitate the approval of this development. Please feel free to contact me at 322-2050 if you have any questions or if I may be of any a.ssistance to you in this regard. Sincerely, /�v�G�.u^,J 1 � \ Andrew Mack Senior Planner Enclosure cc: Dave Zech Harry Johnson Phil Kairis Mark Siemers � City of Rosemount Fxecutive Summary for Action Planning Commicsion Meeting Date: Tune 13. 1995 Agenda Item: Wayne Transport Minor Comprehensive Agenda Section: Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Concept Public Hearing PUD and Preliminary Plat Prepared By: Andrew Mack Agenda No: Senior Planner 5 III Attachments: Planning Report Dated June 9, 1995; Approved By: Concept Site Plan & Preliminary Plat; Applications; Mailing List & fIearing �,� Notice; �iwy 52 Corridor Study EYcerpt. -PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PLANNING REPORT- Recommended Action: I. A MOTION to recommend to the City Council approval of a Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment adding approximately 15 acres to the City's MUSA, subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council. II. A MOTION to recommend to the City Council approval of rezoning for appro�cimately 14.92 acres from Agricultural to General Industrial. III. A MOTION to recommend to the City Council approval of a PUD Concept Plan for Koch Refining Co. for 55.68 acres of land located near the Northwest intersection of C.R. 42 and S.T.H. 52 subject to the following conditions: l. Provisions for additional access to lot l; 2. Provide for parking and circulation lane set backs along the westerly edge of the paved surface for lot 1, except as may be required for rail access; 3. Provide for a high quality planting & screening plan along the East side of lot 1; 4. Provide for a landscaped planting area. around all perimeters of the outdoor truck/trailer storage area for lot 1; 5. A redesign of the street and lot layout to support the efFicient and orderly development of the PUD. IV. A MOTION to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat subject to 1) a re-design of the frontage road alignment and 2) provision of the mini�mum 300 feet lot fronta.ge for lot 1; and submission of required engineering information. Planning Commission Action: Approved all four recommended motions and stipulated an additional condition to the motions as follows: Motion I - The Guide Plan Amendment be processed as an addition to the MUSA area. and not as a land trade. Motions III & IV - Decisions and fact fmding of Dakota County. PLAlvl�TIl�TG REPORT To: Planning Commission From: Andrew Mack, Senior Planner Date: June 9, 1995 Subject: Wayne Transport Truck Terminal & Of�ce Development Proposal - June 13, 1995 Regular Meeting Agenda Item 5-III BACKGROUND Koch Refining Company has requested approvai of a Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Rezoning; PUD Concept Plan and Preliminary Pla.t for property located near the northwest intersection of C.R. 42 and S.T.H. 52. The applications support the intent of Koch to acquire the property and buildings owned by Wayne Transport located in Inver Grove Heights at 117th Street. Koch would then be providing Wayne Transport with a new facility and land on approxunately 15 of the 55 acres recently acquired by Koch on the former Dunn fann property. The entire 55 acres is included in the Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat requests, however the plan amendment and rezoning would include only that area of land where Wayne Transport would be located, including the area:afforded temporary access to C.R. 42. MINOR COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN A1VI�NDIV�NT The area in question is guided for General Industrial land use and therefore the amendment does not require any changes in the land use designation. The change involved includes the addition of appro�cimately 15 acres of land to the Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) in order to provide for urban sewer services to the property. Although sewage trea.tment for many of the rural industrial users in eastern Rosemount is provided by on-site septic systems, Wayne Transport has identified a need for urban sewer services. This is based upon the number of employees working regular shifts on the property (37 office and 22 mechanics), food gra.de and chemical washing facilities and the approximate 80 drivers that will be coming and going during the course of the work day. The Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services (MCWS) has estimated that the sewage flows, based upon information supplied by Wayne Transport, shouid be an equivalent of 40 SAC units. Although the Rosemount Wastewater Treatment Plant has present design limitations, the amount of anticipated waste Wayne Transport Planning Report Page 2 flows projected from new construction going to this plant appears to be somewhat lower over the past two years than estimated by earlier projections. Therefore, it is not anticipated that proposed increases in flows will impact current plant operaxions beyond it's present treatment capacity. The MCWS will be taking a closer look at current flow rates relative to its rated capacity and providing additional feedback through their review process. Infrastructure Availabilitv In terms of sewer availability, the interceptor runs easterly a distance of appro�nately 600 feet from the north end of the property. A trunk line would be extended as planned for in the Eastern Rosemount Utility Study. The developer would have responsibility for improvements related to the area being serviced. The City would be responsible for additional capaciry above that required to service the development. Further analysis will be required as to the cost and method for funding these trunk line improvements. No additional impacts on the regional transportation system are anticipated as a result of this project. Although a slight increase may result in the number of truck trips to and from the site, they will only shift to a point further south along Hwy. 52 where a grade separated interchange will provide for increased safety on the system. Dakota County Highway Department had expressed some concerns over the uutial access point for the proposed service road at it's intersection with C.R. 42. A temporary access driveway has now been proposed for the property frontage along C.R. 42 with the ultimate service road connection proposed to occur further west off-site. Additional right-of-way would need to be acquired to provide for this connection. Water services may be supplied from the rural 6" water main for domestic level flows to the development. Further evaluation will be required as to the demands for fire suppression and tank washing operations relative to available flows. It is possible that additional on-site facilities may be needed to support water use demands of the business operations. The City Engineer and East End Utility Study have identified the long-term need for an elevated storage tower in this vicinity. This project alone is not anticipated to trigger this need, but will serve to justify an intensifying need for implementing identified water needs in this area. Increases in surface water runoff are anticipated to be accommodated through the use of on- site detention ponds. No identified wetlands exist upon the site. Procedurally, the City would consider approval for the comp plan amendment conditioned upon approval by the Metropolitan Council. Wayne Transport Planning Report Page 3 REZONING Within the past few years the City rezoned 10 acres (known as the L.H. Sowles property) from Agriculture to General Industrial, along with a subdivision and site plan approval for a building that was never constructed. The balance of the 45 acres contained in the property representing the PUD concept area is presently zoned Agriculture. Appro�mately 2.47 acres of the proposed Wayne Transport site as shown is within the General Industrial Zoning. This would leave a balance of roughly 12.45 acres to be rezoned for the lot and an estimated .85 acres for the temporary access drive to C.R. 42 for a total of 14.92 acres to be rezoned from Agricultural to General Industrial. Land to the west is zoned Agricultural with single family homes along 42. Land to the North along C.R. 38 is zoned Agricultural with General Industrial zoning further to the North. Land to the Fast at the northeast intersection of C.R. 42 and S.T.H. 52 (Soleberg 10 ac.) was recently rezoned to General Industrial. The balance is zoned Agriculture and Public. Land to the South is zoned Agricultural with a few single family homes along the North and South side of C.R. 42. The subject property is all guided for General Industrial in the Future Land Use Element of the City's Current Comprehensive Guide Plan. As such, the proposed rezoning is found to be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and is recommended for approval. PUD CONCEPT PLAN In many respects, the site plan which is presented has good design characteristics associated with the overall la.yout. The buildinas are oriented toward the front of the site which helps to break up views of the paved rear surface area containing staging opera.tions. The location for Wayne Transport also affords direct access to the rail spur identified as an asset for receiving bulk shipments for the business. A PUD is required where multiple buildings are proposed on a single parcel and to provide for the orderly planning of a phased development. A review of various conceptual site development issues are as follows. Wayne Transport Planning Report Page 4 Access A single access point is the only driveway proposed for the site. Whereas this may seem logical given the temporary access driveway planned, a second driveway access is deemed necessary for providing for the orderly flow of tra.ff'ic to and from the site. Further consideraxion should also be given to affording an opportunity to separate the heavy truck trafFic from the main circulation of employee and visitor vehicles. Setbacks , The principal and accessory building locations shown meet required setbacks. The parking azeas, however, would involve variances as follows: Location Proposed Required Variance West P.L. 0 Ft. 25 Ft. 25 Ft. East P.L. 2Q Ft. 25 Ft. 5 Ft. Some deviation to required parking and circulation set backs may be appropriate where access along the west is required to facilitate rail shipments. The complete absence of any set back along this principal access point to the site is not deemed acceptable and should be modified to provide for set back and opportunity for planting strip along this end of the ProPertY• Variances to parking setbacks along the east property line may be warranted provided a high quality landscaped planting/screening area plan can be devised. . Site Covera�e A significant portion of the site is dedicated to the improvement of buildings, paved surfaces, and aggregate outdoor storage areas for the parking of semi tra.ctors and trailers. The maximum lot coverage requirements of the General Industrial District is 50%. The approximate break down of site coverage is as follows: Im�rovements Acrea�e Lot Coverage Building & Pavement 4.56 ac 31% Green Space 2.51 ac 17% Aggregate 7.85 ac 52% Wayne Transport Planning Report Page 5 The question this design raises is whether or not an aggregate base should apply toward the lot coverage maximum percentage limitation. The defuution of Lot Covera.ge according to the Zoning Ordinance is as follows: "The percent of the lot covered with structure, paved and other impervious surfaces." One can make a case for the fact that crushed aggregate does have pervious characteristics and may provide for limited absorption of water. On the other hand, water will run off gravel at a much different rate than a landscaped or natural vegeta.tive area. If the lot covera.ge requirement is applied to the site, then an additional estimated 10 acres of green space would need to be added to the site bringing the total land area for Wayne Transport up to 25 acres. This will not be viewed favorably by the applicant. The PUD procedure does, however, afford us the ability to accommodate some flexibility in the ordinance interpretaxion, provided there is a sound effort made toward enhancing the overall appearance of the development and ensuring that adequate provisions for on-site drainage are designed. An engineering analysis of drainage conditions is not typically conducted at the Concept stage of review, but will receive thorough review at the Final Development Plan stage. One substantial measure to enhance the appearance of the outdoor storage area would be to provide for a landscaped set back area along the north and west perimeter of the storage area. Pa.�'kin� A total of 150 parking spaces, or nearly twice the required 77 spaces are proposed for the site. The additional pazking spaces are intended to accommodate the approximate 80 drivers that will create additional parking demand in addition to the 59 workers estimated to be employed on-site. Limited opportunities for additional parking on-sitp exists should a need develop. Slight modifications to the parking areas may be necessary to accommodate an additional access point to the site. FINDINGS In approving the concept plan, the Planning Commission must fmd as follows and forward its fmdings to the City Council: 1. The Plan provides sufficient usable open space and evidences a substantial preservati�n of natural features to warrant the granting of variances through the Planned Unit Development. The plan has the potential tc provide for substantial usable open space. The degree will,, however, be dependant upon the future development of the outlot areas and ultimate Wayne Transport Planning Report Page 6 configurations for the service road and possible future improvements to the 42/52 interchange. There are no substantial natural features that warrant preservation and thereby minimizes potential conflicts with the natural environment. 2. The plan complies with the intent of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The Comprehensive Guide Plan land use designation is General Industrial which supports the intended land use and associated rezoning to General Industrial. The proposed development will also provide an opporlunity to provide for orderly growth by expanding the MUSA area where services are readily available to service regional-scale industriaUcommercial development. The PUD will also provide opportunities for the attraction of new business and the retention and expansion of an existing business in this area of the region to expand employment opportunities and increase/diversify the City's taY base. 3. The proposed development will not be detrimental to surrounding properties. The applicant has attempted to minunize impacts of the development with surrounding non- compatible land uses by positioning the initial phase of development toward the middle of the site pernutting open space to serve as a transitional buffer until future redevelopment of land occurs. The PUD concept also provides for temporary access to C.R. 42 and further minimizes the immediate impacts of a proposed service road through the property until provisions can be made for acquiring additional right-of-way off-site. 4. The Plan is more creative and will provide a better living, working or shopping environment than is possible under strict ordinance requirements. The long-term plan of the PUD is to accommodate a west fronta.ge road to 5.T.H. 52 which will ultimately provide for a better and safer working environment for the area with respect to commercial traffic. Over the long term it will also serve to implement the recommendations of the Highway 52 Corridor Study by removing local trips from the highway for commercial circulation and improved safery by encouraging the removal of at- grade intersections to Highway 52. PRELIlVIINARY PLAT Platting of the property is required due to subdivision and resubdivision of land that will occur in conjunction with the PUD. The plat includes the entire 55 acre parcel owned by Koch. A lot area of approximately 15 acres is proposed for Wayne Transport, an estimated 5 acres for the proposed frontage road right-of-way and the balance of approximately 35 acres that would be designated as Outlot for future industriaUcommercial development. Wayne Transport Planning Report Page 7 Lot & Street Desi�n Lot 1 and Outlots A&B meet the minimum 5 acre lot size for General Industrial lots as required by the Zoning Ordinance. There are, however, a series of isolated & truncated lot remnants that occur to the South and Ea.st of the proposed fronta.ge road location. This is a function of the conceptual street design which was initially suggested by City Staff. This was based upon the possible alignments as recommended by the Highway 52 Corridor Study (a copy study design has been attached). 5ubsequent review of the proposed frontage road connection point to C.R. 42 by the Dakota County Highway Department, however, has pushed the location off-site further west of the railroad right-of-way. Another issue is the fact that the Wayne Transport lot is deta.ched from the street frontage, which is prohibited by the City's Subdivision Ordinance. This presents a significant concern with respect to access and proper design of the subdivision layout. It is recommended that the street alignment be moved so as to provide direct access from the lot to the street. A concept as to how this might be accomplished has been attached for review. This revised layout would not only provide for direct access, but would also resolve the isolated parcel concerns and allow for a third outlot that would meet the minimum 5 acre lot size requirement. En_in�eerin� There is a substantial amount of engineering da.ta that will need to be provided xelative to the plat and associated improvements. This level of detail is typically not supplied at the PUD concept stage of approval. The City Engineer has, however, reviewed the proposal and is in general support of the proposal to develop this area for General Industrial land use. It is recommended that action on the preliminary plat be ta.bled until a revised plan is brought forth and preliminary engineering information to support the plat can be developed. OTHER ISSUES Koch Refining has identified the need for a short time frame in making their decision to either acquire the cunent Wayne Transport property and construct them a new building, or pursue other land options to support their fire station needs. City Staff has assured Koch representatives that we will do everything possible to expedite the required reviews for the project. Early reviews of the Concept Plan with Planning Commission and Council will provide the applicant with necessary feedback as to the feasibility and general acceptance of the project. If supported, this would enable the City to proceed with the Comp Plan Wayne Transport Planning Report Page 8 Amendment with Met Council which may take up to 2 months or so for review and approval. Further refinements and detailed engineering information may be developed to support this project and required local approvals during this time period. SUNIlVIARY The proposed project meets the intent of the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan, serves to further economic development objectives of the City and esta.blishes a framework for improving traffic safety in relation to the regional transportation system. If the Concept Plan receives favorable considera.tion by the Planning Commission and City Council, then the necessary measures to proceed with MUSA expansion can be initiated along with further project deta.ils necessary to support required development approvals. RECONIlVIENDATIONS I A MOTION to recommend to the City Council approval of a Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment adding approximately 15 acres to the City's MUSA, subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council. II A MOTION to recommend to the City Council approval of rezonin'g for appro�mately 14.92 acres from Agricultural to General Industrial. III A MOTTON to recommend to the City Council approval of a PUD Concept Plan for Koch Refining Co. for 55.68 acres of land located near the Northwest intersection of C.R. 42 and S.T.I3. 52 subject to the following conditions: l. Provisions for additional access to lvt 1; 2. Provide for parking and circula.tion lane set backs along the westerly edge of the paved surface for lot 1, except as may be required for rail access; 3. Provide for a high quality planting & screening plan along the East side of lot 1; 4. Provide for a landscaped planting area around all perimeters of the outdoor truckJtrailer storage area for lot 1; 5. A redesign of the street and lot layout to support the efficient and orderly development of the PLTD. N A MOTION to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat subject to: 1. A re-design of the frontage road alignment; 2. Provision of the minimum 300 feet lot frontage; and 3. Submission of required engineering information. ,.� _ ��.�-♦ \��' I P�' / �' � � � / / (C�. 1{ �l \\ � + l 1��_%%=-i=�� , ��-'. --�-^� � �lf ��i / " \�''^/ 1Q�� `—ti -..._ '_-^=__=� _-� ` _: J•= � .� __��` _� , - _. � �� __ � L��.��.��e_� .o-�c Tj.�_' _��_�..,.`.-�_�..�.�y�.:�_'�i_-�!_-s`�-�� -= �`- � ..� �^r?�-�_\j +� �-�--� ='ib.'�/-- /�' �'./�v� / � `� ./. �, �^ _"��('\ � / /T' '\ ✓ � ' /� / J i .__' — �_. ` .�. ,✓ � .� �./�-- `� _.=J �> �_��>o .� -M_� � _ Y-p�;-5� 6�.,�- _-,_J _ ----- _�--�-==.1�� ---' N `- _ > � ~ ` � ' ' 1` _ V , . �� - -..-._',��. - - ` _ � --►--�- --��_--..,,:--=-=r��_=�=:� , ,-, _�_ � - -- .-� �_ -� � ' � ^s -5"o•i'S'S2"W� 3�g:e+��---�» ;��' � _�=_-_ - ��---=- i�� •i�-�*_� � ` �_ -r,--..—---'��1 1 � � � � �.�w+.�wKoa _ � _ .�{ "e*�r'=�:-�--�-- _,` ""�;�-"`\��: �� 1 _ �� __-`. ��,� \ l�`�-//�I! �I �.oj�,�t1 \ \ \ — `-- -- � i - ! w�ur�ww��r� � _.- j�) �� . �. � �. �.� �� _ � _ _ J '-... - .. ``_ `c�i (-\�t -,� . � . � � ` . \ � •1 � - '_.- �-i '� ��, � � � / � �•C 7 ' � .. \ \� `\�'• . _\- '_ `\�,�\ - �� -.� - ''� � ',i va�'�1� 7 � �� ``w�.i�`� "^"� . � � / .// S ..-� ` in.:w.oirt. . '��J �- �`--\ ( ( ��`\{ ��%J � � ��w��".r� �„ /� �naar�wr1M�rw �1 1 I �' � � `-�_ _ ---_.--� � _- '�� _ �\� ��1� � 'I�I� �� •a:M.�a'.��sa:i.uro / ..- � t, J � / t � f/� 1\ � p � v„__. -- -- ��_ --.�,- _-� � ��, . �r ( � �� _.� Q 0 U T L 0,_C_ -S»-� - �i __, ,� � �� -... �� '��- y I I )7 t� `� J. I 'waao mun dion � /, J�� J e ~/ . ' � 1,-� . . � / �� ~ ��'�_� � \ � �^ 9' ��/i . : � �� _� ' � � � ' ► � �;i� „ � �� 1��/ii� a C -� � �� 1 \i� �� I _ _ � � � - - .�.e. � � � ROAD EASEMENT DOC.N0.1o21511 � FFt TTTTTT r117Ti� .m,,,.. �; "� ��1 t��l� ��'- � � � 1 � ��Al��-\`� � ` � — — — ,– — — — ,� ; ��, � .�„� � � � �'� � ��,,,�,�,�,- �j �"�' i � , `� �`'`�� Z I � � It � 1 ( � �/ � J � Tr ' �1 , �` �°� �\-r'^ �1� � \• � �� `�,� � �� / .!`�- I I�r� �\ i, ,r t _,�, ,- t-OT � 1 �, o � �� ,- � - - ►;.� ( �� ,' � � � B 6�C< '1 � ,' '� � � : - �� OUTLQ'T A ._ � � .� ,� ,^ ,»�. �� -��_- 't p r- �� 1 \ t t� � � ��a � ��«� �� ` ` 1�)� 15 7 ' • � � � �( � ��..�« «1 � ...a. / e�-' _��J vi' �+/'� ��! !�. � �- � (_.-' t � � �\ ✓� w� � r ��'_�'� I 111��1� � � � � � � 1 f. ��;�\ ,� ' ,� �II�IiI � �' I � / �� /�! �/ +'- � � � '��r ! /j14� i��;�� 1\� � � I� �t`�`I\�� ir W Z -- _ ��--� �-- f < < `� i � � �� ` f / / � � � � -T` \ � � � ��`��Ilt �l � i � --NO'15 �E t53 .91�_._- ��. � /�l �_-_�� \ ltM "� .� �� _i� �� 1 1 ,.f ( % J � i� r .>) > ..�.�.\��.\\ �"" g � � y�; PRELIMINARY PLAT a z �� PLANPIED UNIT DEVELOPMENT � ' �-��+ � Q o „ o ,� I�OCH INDUSTRIESNVAYNE TRANSPORT, INC. � z � � MFltT MAYMA�E ti�6 � a � HSJ FN.E t-3-49Ei � ,�---,r � ��' I lu'� � ,�� ^.-- �' _" "� � l( ^/ _� �- :-�-� :-J-'� _,•��' --�' � �, �,.— �- , � (�,/ � I ( ` \ � � ` � �%%��✓• �� !\ ✓ .-,i 1 � ^.� . � ` _ � —�=.�—� � 4 ) � _�-`t r �;-= —=' 1 ' — r.r►j,�-1"'�.�.-r s'-��r i �r��.i l��._�+�'� r, �.� � /�,�,. \ �..-' � �. !"` � �V � . % ` ��,_�^ �--�� K.._ =_ �� `__ � ` / 1 l �, d'"� "T-_ J i�T�,�..�- ��GI ` „� � / , � �_�-_. _ i ' % t�- I �- -•� i� / ~ ' ^ ✓ ~ ~��/�-�G � y / '''� � i- _ � � � / .�. �M►- '� j`--'�"_ / � ' 0 � � i � �r J �> >_/v>� ,1 %�r g ��— ` / � "'� �- J � �..- " —— M► �1-/' � — � % � ti.. � _' — ^ � _ ^--J �;.-i ` — ,� ._•�—�:-- -� ` ` /�"' � � =��,�,.L� s�-` � �� \ \\ ._� "� '�- �<w ~ �' V`..�►�.�. ,_`_�� \��\�^'� '�`.' , _'"Yl. 9 � ^d' � T ��'i"' _ _/ � �� J� �� .�"` _"`- '� ` � <� _ l� /`�=-.. - Y► ^-��- � — _� /)� 'I l0�'1,�, \_�� G_ __ _( � , ;�'• �� - ✓ 1 _ / �`�;��^'�=�` —\ � �� `��`� �,�� ''...r. �� .. �� "+r.,,�_ `-�„ � _ i� / `. �• � `' 0\��o '�� 7�/. � � % f *M � � \��. ._, '�' 1i+� ' �— — —= � " --�=j� � 1 � �►'�� \�.� � �l � ` ' ^ �� / i �� . �- ' �� M �`� ` -+`�, + � 1 �\ � • �y�� . "` -� � l � -� I � �� S ,r..��,.�, _,�,,��. `.q� �, .`�l I . > > i a• �. � �!� / � � � � �— �.` _. — —�-- ��_� _ _ ! -�; _ _� J� \I ��;� rr � I f��l� / / - \ � �_ o , , ��, � � 0 U T L 0 T —�. -'� ��'" _ ` � �� ,, r J � (/ � I f ^ uwm u�aan �/ / '� i� ./�y , � �, J � / ~/ <� � \ \ � //� /� �� -•�— � � � �� ` ti,.- -�� \\ , �. � • �'" �t�%/�� , . ^ i � / � i t 1 > > 1 I � /I -- � ,� � � �� / ( ) ��t� t �— � \ \ i �� J� }—�1t r�lU�,.`�� ► � ....... _.,... � .� � / � � �, �U l �(y`�l(I.�..- �OC.N0.1021511 .� \ '�' "�`" � � / � \ � , '�jy ( ��,��1`\1\_ • _—' ""' _ �,r.ur» j I � re�w�a�s Mu �TI ` ` `� n � � �� ,o wu. � � � \ � � � ` •� �aawra �� u�[�an '�'\�.X \ ` Ma► ( �f � �/ 1 � � �� // � i" �R nVt `� +� � �„�� (�� \� �" S 1 , , '' OT � ' � ' � � ��` % ' ---- '� ��' .,'��,- '�� ti �� B 1�� f. �� , �-�-_��1 1' � � �� - _ �fi A � _ � � � � .�� -� ,� �- ,�� , ; t � r,,1 � ....�,./ � cG,� _ /�t J � u ' t i,�� / I� � � / �� . �,+`�(I't/ -� � � � \ � �y�;��-'�`' ' 11 il� �, �� 1- , � � � � , c > ��`�' ' .� � �� %;��y�j�. � , � � ��«+i �/ � ��l �� J .�► \ �\ �� i`i.\� \�y ` � � � � --� � `I �ik�� ; � � ��i � � � _, _�� i �"ii _ _ � � ��. i ,� )t - � �. .` �.��.�� t� n� — -N 0'15 �E 153 .91 � �,. _ ) �S ( `� / i /• •- � )> > «• �"' � � � � PR�LIMINARY Pt.A►1' Pl..A�JhIED UNIT DEVE�.(JPhA�NT .,.....,�►. � �� •-�-�w�-c+n�r�►�� -�r�r��1�Pf1RT� Il�r. m ' � `�` r � _ ys ,; ' �„ * =� �+ .."'� . . ��i � , x � ?` � � - . � ��sc�,4 �.� r� :� � .� ',�r ,,�' ,�tr : � � �:�t t . � �i'.p'3�� '.F,.j� . .a�� '� `�� i'�y�6l�� ; �� ' �� , .. _ .l � �" �.- �_; pz2+L�'„ ��.''"� ,;;".. } . �. �o. �. ,w �Tw t"s� ��:1Lr 1`�,".�-�� ,.i.;. ' �,�� 3 ,�. x "� '�': �1' 'S.i. . . r ,.n y : �y�y��'�P'� z �,.� n � f�. �- � ¢,�.. �,� .. :.1: A� '�� 1: ir� � �i�� ,,�, ��'� ,� x. 'Y" e9.r.. . d ,; �r,y, . �,,�,{, {c.i :, • ''��ie� : R% . ,r � `S�,. � � � ,df' t.v t f,.�F` F^ -: '' '6'1'i'S •.��'�!:E� x�s. `c''".� s#�..�'r '�. . �.1�•'�a�� " • � yt'4 �w•,. y,-...- y �J1,t �r , � �"��"$�3"i # .�.. ��.f:: s ,q � . � �. : , . : ,y� fi�-`- ¢.�i �� ..�. �N3"'��(!'�'y(Nu.Y.T�y"'Y.:� u.K"!:M� - _ ��rtT�' . .._._�, � tr- ...��._„T"�J^s��4 � , rY r18II � � `'�'Aa'f %� k� � f:� � _�. �� s.. 5 t � �+�,� �.� _ r-�- .� • ,. F . t�. �•�� - �.`� � -�s i Yt�+�+c3_y�`.. ��,,�;�� f. j �-� �M � .. ,r M..r�.;c ....-:.� -_ . ' �t ., #f � -:� . � .`�,� �� i. �� -�� .�. � �� g ; . � F t . '�c ,.�. '�r�s � ��-' _ ` ,�� ' � �' ��. �� . ,.,� � �. � � T -,#� ;:yz��„ �I s � x :;. �* 'z`�X' y {�� .:� ,� '� a ' f",� '� � �. .�". .; ; o.e�S.� �� .� j f � � xS.3� i T �"'� . _ �� .�� ,'�E. �; ��' $'�,t� . t . ..i:.v'��.� q":��'a '. �t�3"sy�Y. . � ..�-�� {f. `! �I�� 'P ^ . " �+ .� + �i.,. ��i�� ..�, �''re-, t �J �� .; k ,,�;. . . 1 Y �w �*�`S'' qz� �'�� l � ,�- "°"°'3'" "° �'�z,. ��'�� " �� "� i� - -'�tl � e � � �� t� r [.� . �''q Yi„� p� I : �! ..�;+.+y��F�� SM�h�l� �.^�5:� , . .. a .,,,!1 �J- � �.'�i� F � { ��. P�At �3f-' � ' L � r�S ."�J l w. s r� . . . /. . :� A .n�� h.'' ,� ,� � . �,. �:X r i� � �� } .. "y'�. ' . ' � f,� ,PN'��1'� ��..',k 1 ' FCabY 1 S ` ... r ..: �. M 1 _ ) .f,'�,. ri. _ �^., . ._ ' • i g�,e ' ti ty. �.•b.irA'"��>h4v 4 t! '��;�r"'�5�.;:+.s e ,..�� .s.i � � � �. � . <r 7.� �. �C'A;r � �,�.:�. {'��-'��. 'e ��?x.. � , ;:1 u. :i>��?e'4�'a..��•,�i S: '�';'a.wk� �,a� :��'�•: ��.�.an tir�i •} . . , . - .. �T�Y' .1 .n. :�a.p:i f� � -;.�� ' .{..' : - � �._ .• . . " .s �iii. � ��; ��°{Y._ji�,�p�+ .}:i r'��'.u. ,,�a,.,�. q��.v.��A�,r. f�+ ��:i a > t�.�� . _ . � syrx .�.., te ��- ':+t`h �_`�r. . :_ .��. r . �, .�.C55 �j�r.X 's�..r'r +� 'n 5• - . � ,•r �' *.��L� ,� Y:�,l ,? y= ;�:::�:. p y . . .. C�t�_ b! i�� e .J '��! �'�w -n � �{S"r` :�-.�" ,t; t . . � . a'� ; r�t ��:y"f�# .� c :-r��,r Fr� �,d. �..�1i�j-, }��a�F: .. F� _ .. .e t .• -:ttr. �' .1 .i% � - t .:,�;a� iti ♦ i . d!4� `l�S�'. �w .�.. � �' ,. .y �i:. '�,'. _ `+4" {-.,p '� q, � �4��.�YN� ' � . ..a{ �.�L a 'S:a �f,nk . ' . . . !�jf 7� ��. r� ..�. � .'.,.� . ' ; .F� � ;,g:'S,1�_.b , . . ' � .. . . T :•+�� .i.- .,f� ��'�.i :R �C�ti.�.�r`• . \i I � Y "➢ .i'� Ab � fr �,�r��t' :Y �`c. ,,: � '�, d`+-.P � . " tt'?.�(� � �' ' �-�: . �� , ' ' w a ny L';.f 2 �=L�`n.•�� # ..i! Y�*�+i �•o-a t4 . ' �. � . Y�. c p ; �,�y -�� # i'�Y �'�, .. 3� ✓� -�.�- �'� �..r.n. M� �� 3l+xi . � t �: �:.�S S,�'° r o... n �sa �r/. � . ., � �4 ; _` M„ , � z� .. �.. . :�a. r"�� 'c��.�:�•.� -, ... : ��s '.tZ�� .i:-`i � �r �``� p, .z� #'«.��:.-" T..N-; /:^./ t��, . . . . : ��.�1� � -,.;w, i�� 3:.�.T..� �:,�. ..� . .' M�Y ,�"yT c;� .. . E� a+,'a�ri�-rfw��z�'�--,��✓� F��r•��.+� `�:l.. . d�°, ,� `��T � ,4-`.°•��IC� �i.S',��:�'7,y ' Y � LY iI(M ...rl.i+4:"'�.?�F- n .�r �.,N�T�� 'CN`t . � w.�. � .. :.. L.. �7c� � . .. ..• �� ^.. � . , .. "�7�' �. � :. ,�,� ' �,„,� �J' . ?w� .. ' �+r�c.a�i bw�Fr ...�. - - .Y= ��, ��;.. ._..,. �+�''.-'v :. .1,: . �'*w!�"`�'S� :... �'+�w�r `r�. �t'�+-�u�. . �. �." .t "f� ,.-„�'�.,�K �+.w,y. �� ,r � . ``��t �`'�' �...�r ST"i:`;,7.ST)�� - , *• �'uf T179.; 5 K..�W' CIOYt. CI13l� . . ...�C ' i ''-� Yul*� rt.��vh�� ,.�i�,wes�e'."�'*�' ._ ... � . _. . . . � ay a': s , - ,m , .. ise r � ..xi�'�� ♦ t ,. . ;f�� _ S ,r � ,� � �yy � ��f � �` 1� h.;. e . L �r e �. �. -; i��a s�.-�.: , .. ; . y- o �� .} ,�•t'� '�''- `!� : ..,� ,�#ad..-. .:. i ., ..�y44'i,'�•...j� .; ' ' MR'. .' `-'i,ktT ,F ,� '"t� _ ��r��61�iwa�.�t.�.�j�� ,f'vi.. _x-sMT' �. v3.:a i ,�t1 '• 'Yf.J��. . �. �.. �a �:h��'.`�"��a� i � �'{`7. 4E'� r - i: y�. a'�K ,�a"�.,��F`�,, �.�. w ".� � I ��._ F s:G�. �"+�+`�'�'' }'.`.�� Nie _.J:RY. f� �d`,:�lE� 1�A � _ � �3-y\ ::� _ i ..,p� � y . . � +.`: ��E 3 �� .r SiF; �q 9 i�:,..�'+�',�" ;t 4.�� .{o� �� S }p �;,.� :� a1,. a �.> ��:r �:.rr 4. � - t �;-�.�E_� }S.�. �' ;�; a. Y� ��:.-_4.7:r -1_ � �r-- - y �� . '�.�-�. -¢'^. '� �?�4i'" i�"�Zt� -. ,�`+. �X.r�.,�� r.�ifl. �K t .�.. ;yt.t ..� ..* � . �� ? .�''_ ..�� t r n9i. " b, �'�:'j � f. . a. _ n A �t�.s�t Y�� i ,� �i �' ,�. 'y�,6 `�{ {�"'� •:�9.�1` P � ,f i� �.'�.,ri �FvF��:r�; r��€ i.x �� k�s };.'S� �^; ,,4y�..sY / , �i�"'' ; . � .✓�.,�� '"� p, yy.', .t .�i.�.:.r�.:�^. g:- �.�{r'st,� YY �y..y: ti,: �,y:, �,�� -y;� r�-;t+X'y �e -� ,� , . �: ,° t ,�,,, ,��A �.:'�k.y 1. . 1'. �r �:�f;' '��j 'CCi:.'ypix.t��C .�''.'�4�4� ...�° eYf� �� -t."t+��r � I:.Nt {'Ti�•"��.e. .. � .. . -�1 ,� hrt '4'_ ':;A.' � F .�'� ��' � s s �, ys,i'. � �rt.� f � ��[ f♦ ,�y' •� � � ..1 •�� i.,,.�e � . . � ��',��t,fc u� r7� . . "" �s �,� 1x�� . �' :.�ff �F �. t� . s�� 'x.��Z.,.� _�.:T �.� 'p ��''�� y ��}x t�t- �s t .�1 . . ., � � .l�- �� 1-�'�`��y��,un'�1 > ' . y� �3�r.�"M�� w1K -' � �, � ��+'�.w ,.l �, �. 1.� .:g y�5 :� v, h!:i YR+'�:;°I"'� ...�� {�,��,��+xu.:ia ��t s. .+? # t'�.`i � r cFi a`' � r�}�'k}t�� .. . � ��.t. u n'n-:� �,J'i- `� ':{` � `'k"`�F r�`` .�n�'� .f 1N�& ...� .y i�'�r o- y+:� �� ,.:�£�:, .y `��, 'S 3b �a.�;' � �s�Tci��7.��^�� s,��'��„�,,�M.� '�i�� :��;� ;'. �,� �4-. � '�� ':.4c1`'r;'fn 3z�'+u i�� ,,r'�� d �,•v�F� �yc.d��,Lle'� a' . 'y�'7•. +��'�� . '�� j � r. .1�,..,:�. r�`',� .. �t�v #��a: `+•' a... $ � . �j-'�'' .�.X. .. fr .�` ..c.i.a.� r�r�i�9g,� � 8�'`•i-c ,�., ..= t � : itr:' .. � ,/ ,a, _ {'� �+'.�'� aSK• �` ` �'� �}`��;��,,t�� ,�' `��`' !'��+r7...i ' �,.S.�� ,i4j�Yr .r i f'3!�;4�� " �„ �t�` �} �tr g�Lg� , �„y , y ��. ��'�3Y � i'Y.�. �.��..:�� 9�,T..r.• s kK2,y��_'^,'�Vl. .;>Ni��.,r)r-.y ..G� y.Y,$.SY �.i�� dj"�'e` RJ�- ..3.�: � . . - � '��''�%� ��s t*r �q ��1�L'. ra �� +�. f '��. i,� .a � r" a s. :�-_. f �� f�� s_;?..ar';, r, y � ��'.;, y ...� . a -,t'� �i ""4� � .. t •� �. 7v"^'i k�`*�� o-�.^ �� r �{" .t-}`'f..j.&�J'� s .�_:y � i1T'.'X�.�+F+• �.:F �,.�.., S '� f,q .n^,,.�i' ?�t �'a ,.;e�� 4 '. �. . . . , � ° .A�y�'� 4 ��t '�� q. s>�*'k' ,�*_�-�" '�§j.. .� J �y Y�:: r �t:. 5r?l��s . �-,tis+��''s�t r�;"-. .� ':ai :.3#+��, 7�-�+�� '�`;�::M- .�M +�'s ,!. r �:!' ��x� '-"a #`�u . � ,�,ws�, �.�i�,.,�"t�r:kw � �� '�. .s..i.'i ��°''y i �`� . . � ��_"i;} .� f� �.�. � V . � +}1 � "�a ,a�'�' ��.. L,. ,� �� . j�-, +v� v+.s,4�i� � '�f�_� �S� .�' ' � �ti t� 4,�t„,.. . . ;.'4 ..r.tq 9�' �e � r.Y.. `^'� • � , p F „� ��'� r n. .t y...�. ! .L ��i��JFSf�i . � , , .:� � � � � '. �. � L I . . 1 +: �rte �i, i fi-�r�r:..�� .. ,,�y, • y � � �' ��,. i��. ��f�:�, : �� ;��7'�,�i",�,,,Jy�'�„LN��p,�. R��S d � 'iy�.t..M�, ��, 1�;3,.2. p.. � ��r,:. >�,r� �rAK1.�.rwy2" .� Y.B,(•, �1=+ xy - . ..i.� �;j'YL'f�� :drn 6g�� .�f ��`-''"'rC.... Yhc ..�� ,-�t , : , _.� . • ' , " .! : -� : � '�Y � +F+ r ,-,. 5 ';*a r z ' 3 ��.�j ��x,?�„'� + s,� �:- � �' r�d� r��,��y�r+i �tl"�Y`p1 �Yw... �4 . . � ' dri.K r �� x 7rv �r r'x,��` ] T t;�.'.f.j ��: . A �.y^ �� € `Y¢.- ��.�e.`��'�- ..t'ti;% .�' � � . .. ts - �: ^r� .t � ! � � .f�„ ...`[., r�� r.��r:. �i. �` i�� .r � �ii�yy. �5.s_�..L r�s.4 ,L6� F .S«.�k.�l �1+.4+r s'k.�r �! 1-x: •tF!: Y� � � �� } ,� y� `l r ;;:r.'. .� �� ::n :t .�;` f� • - c :x.. �i fi':z -+ '.g^i�;r'9 � '+r.y. °�:rr, ti :�-�+ .. - s :a.� �Y'• Y °l ?;.' �'5 C �. ? �. ...�� a�u ;.� •, � `.. :�� . 'it �} ., �,j, � v. `„�.. � � I 1 ` . •r� �c�, �i a a r. s '� � �'�;�T ,ee,+�t u y �i i �7. � f f c� �ts.�; i �.�`t,.t -z.°�. a : "F: ,� .� ti y� r � .t y'. � .,r a k i . . � ..] f�dx .'r� �f r�hY1'wf��. � "ft` ..� . 2 � :� �r•� s . y��:j �� ,�<w:4 �� -.,+q�`�' y��Nr�,..i�s��- �t 3' �. . e i .i �� . : � _ ..k-.�'�+ a« .�+c+.;a. .c. �'�� j {i� •:+d:..�' 'g 3�` "j: sEa .Y: .��y ( i,$: � .�: ��.` 1 '.tp . . �'��;�-"�W. � ;'''�r�"�l ..r�Y;�t, . # �. � �,��,,�'�.'''��,3N `�r 1 �j / � - s ;"! a' ,t �.. .., � � . .��' � ��1 t .l �i � S i F�l� r 4�"':5S�US�2 ��i�� ...: � a. ...aC._.t��ti�'. ..... _ , . .......,d'�tfbfi#�r M...v,9i n f�� , ;_ .. , <,�:."� � �,�_.. L, ,.._�. _ �.�. �,.__r ta*xss . _,_.v:.....,_..s....,...,..,....._ ... , ...xr..n,.:,�.i_:.�-<..L�.�.. c._.___. _.. . ., ..... . .. . � • �Gii-�� MAY 2 6 )995 C�ty of Rosemount 1��0� rtuStMQUNT �t�!�I�P�E9i�NSiV� GUIDE P�LAiV A�VIENDME�IT AP�LICATlON Date: SZG•9'S r } Koch Ref ining Company Ph011@' <f 3�'��'¢1 Ap�,.�iCan�. • Acdr�ss: PO Box 64596, Saint Paul, MN 55164 STATuS OF AAPLICANT: � Owner Buyer Lessee OTHER: \ LOCATIO�i: l.ot , Block , Addition c-� rt�b �—c�.�� s�� 0�.1 � SLreet Address: Metes & Bounds Description Attached: �x Survey or P;ot Qlan Attached: �x Presently Designated: Proposed Designation: R�ASt�N ��R R�QJfST: 1, The proposed land use is for the relocation on Wavne Transport Inc. Wavne Transport's current facility is in the City of Inver Grove Heights, just north of the Koch refinerv. Wavne Transport is a truckin� comvanv svecializi�� in the transportation of liquid and dry bulk commodities. Site layout would include 2, two buildings and outdoor storage for approximatelv 200 trucks. The office building would be approximately 10,000 sq.ft. and would be used by 37 office employees. The maintenance shop would be approximately 20,000 sa.ft. and 22 mechanics would use this building for truck maintenance and cleaning. Both 3, buildings would be built to current Rosemount codes. Electric and �as would be provided by local utility companies. Water and sewer would be provided by the City of Rosemount. ��2^��`�� Signature of Applicant _ _-- ��,u.�� E. l��z�s FOR OFFICE USE ONLY A,�plic��ion recezved by: Date: �e�: $ �j�J<?_Oc? How Paid: Date: Plannin� Co�nmission Action: Date Received: ' Ci o Rosemount ��E� � �' f P.o. soX sio �AY 2 6 �95 2875 145'rt�S'rx�E'1'W EST RosElvto�m�r, MN 55068-0510 ��(�F }�VSt�OU� (612) 423-4411 :... : : _ : ,.. _ . ' ��'; �� .. , .::::.:.:.>.:;::. �1PPL��A�O�f FfJR ��'�� I�t�I'� �E _ _ _ � � ; j, Koch Refining Company 438-134� Natne of Applicant (to be used on legal documents) Telephone No. 2_ P0 Box _64596, Saint Paul, MN 55164 L}37-OSD¢ Address of Applicant Fax No. 3, Harry S Johnson Companies, Inc. 612/884-5341 ___ 1�'ame of Consultant Teleplzo�ze 1Va. 4. ll0 West 79th Street, Bloomington, 2�1 55420 b12/884-5344 Address of Consultant Fax No. 5, Koch Refining Company Name of Properry Owner 6 PO Box 64596, Saint Paul, MN 55164 �3�-(34� Address of Properry Owner Telephone No. 7. C�n•re�tr Zaiing Proposed Zoning (if applicable) 8. P�-esenr Use Proposed I�se (zf applicable) 9. � lSOO CoMB�NEa f��oNrac�� Pub PIID Fee ($�00.00) Escrow ($1,000.00) Received By 10. Street Address of Property(ies) Im�olved: �S�-t..% �t� ��r�+�t-- I��T_� Cunent Description(s) and Survey Attached? Revised Description(s) and Survey Attached? 6. Project Description: The proposed land use is for the relocation on"Wayne Transport Inc. Wayne Transport's current facility is in the City of Inver Grove Heights, �ust north of the Koch refinery. Wavne Transport is a trucking company specializing in the trans�ortation of li�uid ar_d dry bulk commodities. Site layout would include two buildinQs and outdoor storage for ap roximately 200 trucks. The office building would be approximately 10,000 sq.ft. and would be used by 37 office employees. The maintenance shop would be approximately 20,000 sq.ft. and 22 mechanics would use this building for truck maintenance and cleaning. Both buildings would be built to current Rosemount codes. Electric and gas would be provided by local utility companies. Water and sewer would be provided by the City of Rosemount. PUD/APP.93- 1 No: Date: S•Z�•9s" City of Rosemount �� '�� REZONiNG PETiTiON �Y 2 s � G�OF�pSEMQUi�t' Appii�nt: Koch Refining Company Phone: 438'/34( Address: PO Box 64596, Saint Paul, MN 55164 STATUS OF APPLICANT: � Owner Buyer Lessee OTHER: LOCATION: Lot Biock , Addition ` SEE �� L�C-��- ��G�tFrto^' ) , Streei Address Metes & Bounds Description Attached: Survey or Plot Plan Attached: Afrected Section(s): Present Zoning: Proposed Zoning: REASON rOR REQUES7: 1. The proposed land use is for the relocation on Wayne Transport Inc. Wayne Transport's current facility is in the City of Inver Grove Heights, just north of the Koch refinery. Wayne Transport is a trucking comp any specializing in the transvortation of liquid and drv bulk commodities. Site layout would include two buildings and outdoor storage for approximately 200 trucks. The 2. �f;ce building would be approximately 10,000 s4.ft. and would be used by 37 office employees. The maintenance shop would be approximately 20,OOQ sq.ft. and 22 mechanics would use this building for truck maintenance and cleaning. Both buildings would be built to current Rosemount codes. Electric and gas � would be provided by local utility companies. Water and sewer would be 3, provided by the City of Rosemount. Signature of Appiicznt: �-` �<i�L L p E. �4i2�r �� Application received by: Dare: Fee: S �vv• � How Paid: Dare: P/arrning Commission Acfion: Daie� Date Received: ' Cily o�' Rosemount RE�'��E� P.o. soX sio �AY 2 6 i995 2s7s 14s�s�rx�r wFsr RosFlvtotnvT, MN 55068-0510 �`m�F}jV�tMOUNT (612) 423-4411 7r �?.��'t�y��i�'<'.`�:<:>>::::»::<:':;..'•.;:>`<?:::`.:'•.:»?:��<::::�z<>;>::::>;>::::`<�;;::::::;�`::��:;<;:``�.:....:::':<��<�;� ':;;:i:::::;�ii::;i:i:::'i:i:;:::;�i::�:i:::;;::;i�>��::;:ii;i:;i;;i';;ii:`�i::i:5ii;:ii;:::_:i;::i�i;;;;:ii:i:::::::;ii:i::;'`�i:i?;:;::i:':i;i:i;i:::;;:::ii::ii:ii;;:i`:;:::::;:i::;;:i::::i::::;<:<i:;:::',•':::;i;:i:?c;:::;:;;i:;;:;:;::::;:::;;;:: ::::::::•:::.:�:;:f::::'r:::::;:9.1::i::i::;Y::;;::i::::i;:::;::;::i::::::::;:::::::::i;:;:i::::S:::i:;::. ..:::::::::::.:::'::r ::.>�:.:..:;:.�.r;•.::.:::. .::.,:;::."'^�::::+y::.::::::.:..:.;.:::::.::::: . :::.:�:::.>::n>::.»::>:.:::::::::::::::>:::riCi::i::;::Si�::::::::ii:'t::}>s2Ei:::i:r:i?:i::iiii: .. '::�Y•:,•i .� `[. ? ': ': +iii;: .>: c:ii C¢:::it:��J:�i�k:i.CZ;�:1c�� ...................... ::..............:::.::::::..:.......:..:.............::::::::.:............:.:::::: : . :.��..��:...............................::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.............:...::::.�::::.�::>:::.>:.:a::::::::::::::::.�:::::.::»:t.:. ..::::•:::..:::...............:::::::::.:::::::::::...................... �t'�1L.�.....:....... 1. Koch Refining Company �38'l3q-� Name of Applicant (to 8e used on legal documents) Telephone No. 2, PO Box 64596, Saint Paul MN 55164 437-OSa4 Address of Applicant Fax No. 3 Harry S. Johnson Companies, Inc. 612/884-5341 Name of Consultant Telephone No. 4 170 West 79th Street, Bloomington, irlN 55420 612/884-5344 Address of Consultant Fax No. 5 Koch Refining Company Name of Property Owner 6 PO Box 64596, Saint Paul, MN 55164 , Address of Properry Owner Telephone No. 7. Current Zoning Proposed Zoning (if applicable) 8. Present Use Proposed tlse (if applicable) 9. $ 209,oa Plat Fee $200.Q0+$3/lot plus $1,000.00 Escrow Received By 10. Location Map of Properry(ies) Involved Attached? � Current Description(s) and Survey Attached? Revised Description(s) and Survey Attached? b. Project Description: The proposed land use is for the relocation on Wayne Transport Inc. Wayne Transport's current facility is in the City of Inver Grove Hei�hts, just north of the Koch refinery Wayne Transport is a trucking company specializing in _the transportation of liquid and dry bulk commodities. Site layout would include two buildin�s and outdoor storase for aRproximat�� 00 truc a The office building would be approximately 10,000 sq.ft. and would be used by 37 office employees. The maintenance shop would be avnroximatelv 20 000 �a �* �^� �2 mechanics would use this building for truck maintenance and cleaning. Both buildings would be built to current Rosemount codes Electric and gas would be provided by_local utility companies. W�.ter and sewer would be provzded by the City of Rosemount. PREPLTAP.93-1 12. Planning Commission Action: Date: 13. Ciry Council Action: Date: 14. Conditions or Requirements: This application must be ac�ompanied by a list of narnes and addresses of property owners within a 350 foot radius of the subject property. Also to be included are two sets of address labels of the property owners. These must accompany the application u1� the time of submittal. All applica�tions must include a copy of the property owner's Duplicate Ceriificate of Title i,f the property is recorded under the Torrens system. NOTE: APPLICATIONS ARE NOT CONIPLETE UNTII. ALL REQUIItED SUBMISSIONS HAVE BEE�'�1 RECEIVED. ACICiVOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURE: THE UNDERSIGNED APPLICANT HEREBY REPRESENTS UPON ALL OF THE PENALTIES OF THE LAW, THE PURPOSE OF INDUCING THE CITY OF ROSE�I�IOUNT TO TABE ACTION HEREIN REQUESTED, THAT ALL STATE�YIENTS HEREIN ARE TRIIE .4iVD THAT ALL WORK HEREIN ME�VTIONED WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WTlH THE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, AND TIiE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AND THAT THE UNDERSIGNED A.PPLICANT WILL PAP ALL FEES AND CHARGES INCIIRRED BY THE CITY FOR THE EXAMINATION .4ND REVIEW OF THIS PET'ITION. � �' �,.�.� f.�,��=-c' .C'�PG�E ,��5 � Signature of Applicant ��p E./��+-r,e.�s Signa re of Property Owner .5�2 �s— S2b•9s� Date Date PREPLTAP.93-2 2 DESCRIPTION Parcel 1 The North 871.00 feet of the West 534.00 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northeast I/4 of Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Dakota County,Minnesota. Abstract Property. Parcel2 That part of the E 1/2 of the NE 114 of Section 25, Townsiup 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota lying Easterly of the Easterly right of way line of Railroad and except the following described tracts: a. That part of said E 1/2 of the�TE 1/4 taken for State Highway purposes. b. That part of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said E 1/2 of the NE 1/4; thence South 89 degrees 46 minutes 39 seconds West along the South line thereof a distance of 549.10 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing South 89 degrees 46 minutes 39 seconds West along said South line a distance of 336.95 feet; thence North 00 degrees 13 ininutes 21 seconds West a distance of 112.60 feet; thence North 57 degrees 18 minutes East a distance of 409.82 feet; thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 97.43 feet; thence Southwesterly to the point of beginning. c. That part of the E 1/2 of the i�1E 1/4 described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said E 1/2 of the NE 1/4; thence North 89 degrees 14 minutes 41 seconds West along the centerline of County Road 42 - State Highway 52 a distance of 195.70 feet; thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds East a distance of 940.55 feet to the angle point in the Westerly right of way line of said State Highway and the point of beginning;thence continuing North 00 degre�s 15 minutes 52 seconds East along said Westerly right of way a distance of 166.45 feet; thence North 89 degrees 44 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of I00.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds West a distance of 285.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 44 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 29.32 feet, more or less, to a point of 33.0 feet, as measured at right angles to the Westerly right of way line of said Highway; thence South 17 degrees 14 minutes 04 seconds West, parallel with and 33.00 feet Westerly of, as measured at right angles to the Westerly line of said State Highway, a distance of 804.41 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the Highway right of way line; thence South 89 degrees 14 minutes 41 seconds East along said right of way line a distance of 34.41 feet to the angle point in said State Highway; thence North 17 degrees 14 minutes 04 seconds East along said Westerly right of way line to the point of beginning. d. The North 871.00 feet of the West 534.00 feet of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Dakota County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. . � � � Regular Planning Commission Meeting June 13, 1995 Page Two __ Representatives for the development have indicated they aze unable to secure an agreement at this time due to delay in a legal process. Therefore, they are formally requesting an amendment to this condition that would permit phases 1 and 2 to proceed with final platting and rezoning prior to procuring an agreement for the railroad spur relocation. Mr. Reid Hanson, local legal counsel, and Mr. Glenn Sexton, Director of Construction CMC Heartland Partners, were in attendance and provided a brief history of the project and explained that a federal court process has delayed progress in securing resolution to the railroad spur issue. There were no further comments from the audience. Vice-Chair DeBettignies cicsed the public hearing at 7:00 p.m. City staff maintains that the spur has a substantial impact on the overall design of the planned unit development and, without assurance of its relocation, the design of the development as a whole would be in jeopardy. Staff has determined that no significant changes have occurred in the factors surrounding this approval condition that would warrant its modification or removal and, therefore, recommends the applicant's request for a PUD amendment request be denied. The Commissioners discussed the request at length with Commissioners Droste, DeBettignies, and Tentinger concurring that, with no verbal or written communication from the CP Rail indicating their support of and assurance as to the relocation of the railroad spur issue, they were unwilling to risk the chances that this situation may not be resolved in a timely manner. Commissioner Ingram sta.ted her position that this development is a positive step that will provide economic support to the City of Rosemount. MOTION by DeBettignies to recommend denial of the request to amend the Eastbridge Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) condition requiring execution of an agreement with the CP Rail providing for the relocation of the railroad spur. Second by Tentinger. Ayes: Droste, DeBettignies, Tentinger. Nays: Ingram. Motion passes. � PUBLIC HEARING: KOCH REFIrTING/WAYNE TRANSPORT MINOR COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN A1V1ElYD1VIENT,REZOMNG� CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)� AND PRELIMINARY PLAT Vice-Chair DeBettignies opened the public hearing to hear testimony regarding a development proposal from Koch Refining Company for their property situated near the northwest intersection of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 42 and State Trunk Highway (STH) 52. The recording secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavits for Mailing & Posting of Public Hearing Notice on file with the City. Senior Planner Andrew Mack reviewed the development proposal from Koch Refining Company to provide Wayne Transport trucking with a new facility on approximately 15 acres of a 55-acre tract currently owned by Koch (former Dunn farm). Koch Refining Company has advised they are interested in acquiring the existing Wayne Transport buildings and property located in Inver Grove Heights to accommodate their immediate fire station needs. Approval of this proposal will require the following: 1) Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to add approximately 15 acres of land into the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA); 2) a rezoning from AG Agriculture to IG General Industrial a major portion of the proposed site; 3) the planned unit development (PUD) procedure is required for the multiple buildings proposed for the single parcel and a phased development; and 4) approval of a preliminary and final plat for subdivisian and re-subdivision of the land. Regular Planning Commission Meeting ' June 13, 1995 Page Three Hany Johnson, consultant, and Phillip E. Kairis, project engineer, for Koch Refming Company were present in the audience and presented a brief overview of the project and discussed general site plan issues. They responded to several comments from the audience as well as the Commissioners. Myron Napper, 3381 145th 5treet East, and Elroy Sell, 2975 145th Street East, were both in the audience and both expressed their concerns regarding the temporary access to County State Aid Highway 42 indicating their objection for the proposed temporary, as well as future frontage road, access point to CSAH 42. Specifically, they discussed whether or not safety issues had been considered regarding the proposed intersection in relationship to the existing STH 52/CSAH 42 intersection to the east. Dennis Ozment, 3275 145th Street East, advised that the proposed alignment of the service road would impact buildings on his property. However, in his capacity as State Representative, Mr. Ozment advised he had some involvement in the STH 52/55 corridor improvement process and expressed his belief that the long term plan of this PUD appears to accommodate alignment of a planned frontage road along State Trunk Hi?hway 52 which will ultimately provide for an improved and safer working environment and vehicular movement for the area. Details for temporary and final access issues can be addressed as development proceeds based on requirements and comment from both the counry and state highway departments. There were no further comments from the audience. Vice-Chair DeBettignies closed the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. Senior Planner Mack advised that the proposed project is consistent with the intent of the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan for industriai development of this property, therefore, rezoning to IG General Industrial is appropriate. The PUD also provides opportunities for the attraction of new business and the retention and e;cpansion of an existing business in this area of the region which will expand employment opportunities and increase and diversify the City's tax base. Commission members discussed the proposed development at length. The major issue identified was a safety issue for proposed temporary access in the close proximity to the major CSAH 42/STH 52 intersection. The Commissioners were in support of the project, but concurred that further review and additional study regarding the safety issues of temporary access, temporary frontage road location, and interchange be conducted by the County Highway Department. MOTION by DeBettignies to recommend to the City Council approval of a Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendrnent adding ( no MUSA land trade) approximately 15 acres to the City's existing Metropolitan Urban Service Area, subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council. Second by Ingram. Ayes: Droste, DeBettignies, Tentinger, Ingram. Nays: 0. MOTION by DeBettignies to recommend to the City Council approval of a rezoning for approximately 14.92 acres from AG Agriculture to IG General Industrial. Second by Tentinger. Ayes: DeBettignies, Tentinger, Ingram, Droste. Nays: 0. , • � Regular Planning Commission Meeting June 13, 1995 Page Four MOTION by DeBettignies to recommend to City Council approval of a Concept Planned Unit Development for Koch Refining Company for 55.68 acres of land located near the northwest intersection of County State Aid 42 and State Trunk Highway 52 subject to the following conditions: 1) provisions for additional access to Lot l; 2) provide for parking and circulation lane setbacks along the westerly edge of the paved surface for Lot l, except as may be required for rail access; 3) provide for a landscaped planting area around all perimeters of the outdoor truck/trailer storage area for Lot 1; 5) a redesign of the street and lot layout to support the efficient and orderly development of the PUD; and 6) approval of the frontage road alignment with County Road 42, temporary driveway access to County Road 42, and review of needs for traffic safety improvements at the STH 52 and County Road 42 interchange. Second by Tentinger. Ayes: Tentinger, Ingram, Droste, DeBettignies. Nays: O. MOTION by DeBettignies to recommend to City Council approval of the preliminary plat as requested by Koch Refining Company subject to: 1) a re-design of the frontage road alignment; 2) provision of a minimum 300 feet lot frontaae; 3) submission of required engineering information; and 4) approval of the frontage road alignment with County Road 42, temporary driveway access to Counry Road 42, review of needs for traffic safety improvements at the STH 52 and County Road 42 interchange and needs for additional right-of-way along County Road 42 as may be required by Dakota County. Second by Tentinger. Ayes: Ingram, Droste, DeBettignies, Tentinger. Nays: 0. MOTION by DeBettignies to adjourn. Second by Droste. There being no further business to come before this Commission and upon unanimous decision this meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Donna Quintus Recordina Secretary CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 1995 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL FOR A NIINOR COMPREHfTNSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMF.I�TDMENT BY ADDING APPROXIMATELY 15 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY KOCH REFINING COMPANY NEAR THE NORTHWE5T INTERSECTION OF C.S.A.H 42 & S.T.I3. 52, TO THE MUNICIPAL URBAN SERVICE AREA WHEREAS, Koch Refining Company owns a 55 acre tract of land near the northwest corner of C.S.A.H 42 & S.T.H. 52 and has proposed to pla.t and develop an appro�cimate 15 acre site for Wayne Transport Company, including offices, a truck terminal and outdoor truck storage area and has made application for a Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to add Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) for the 15 acre site described as follows: That part of the East 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County situated 650 feet south of 140th Street, 66Q feet north of C.S.A.H 42, and 530 feet west of S.T.H. 52 and located adjacent to the railroad right-of-way line containing 14.92 acres of land as shown on the attached diagram; and WHEREAS, the Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan has guided this property for General Industrial use and the intended use of the property is consistent with the Future Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS, an application has been submitted to rezone the appro�mate remaining 12.45 acres of the site from Agricultural to General Industrial; and W�IEREAS, water and sewer utility services are within close proximity to the site; and WIiER�AS, transportation facilities in the immediate area provide sufficient capacity to accommodate the needs of proposed development with proper connections; and WHEREAS, the Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan anticipates the need to provide urban level services in the proximity of C.S.A.H. 42 and S.T.H. 52 and this site is contained within this area as identified in the plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has reviewed and compared its anticipated vs. actual sewer demand for the Rosemount Wastewater Treaxrnent Plant and has concluded that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate projected flows from the proposed development; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment during a public meeting conducted on 7une 13, 1995; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing has been conducted by the City Council to hear testimony regarding the concept planned unit development in accordance with the policies as set forth in the Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan; and VVHER�AS, the proposed project will provide the opportunity for sound economic development activities by retaining and expanding employment availabiliry in this azea of the region and by expanding and diversifying the local tax base of the community. 'THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the application by Koch Refining Company for the expansion of approxirnately 15 acres into the MUSA be approved, subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council, and that the City Staff be directed to prepare a Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment request for submission to the Metropolitan Council. ADOPTED this Sth day of July, 1995. ATTEST: E.B. McMenomy, Mayor Susan M. Wa1sh, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted Against: . ",{ �'`'l1QJl�= � ' �_=__...__,;.�..� � r_--/c�!<� I� �1 1\ � � \ ��=�`�"-'- �•. ..._ �.r- �-♦ \��' I U��' / �"= . � . .j � �rw'.�...�o fv i-.-.��.rr�� ,3'�.. I��"'��_ - '��'�� i( �/�i .^ ^ \r\ / �^�/.:..� �-_�_� � � / -'��•*.yr��-,�.a r -- � �i ^,I-'� � _��-' �_i••>Q '�"'-' � � t�i . �'_" '� -- -� --� � . " � -- .� -w►�- \___..� � '� _� �- --�__-_.�-r=_> .�*_33'{d'Bl`Nt 2�M.E4+�='�"r�'��1��-'� •"� =ij�---"'' ` -�._._ _=-��,_�� ;_'��` �__._= . � � '�� ( - \� `�� _ � ^%^�� '^-- -`�I/ �.�� \ . . ^� � � � �� .� � . l. � 1�\ � �� ,\�� . \\` \\\�'` .,�1 ___� --_ "��'q-=`;�` ..�ti�/=.�� I(�,��`�. w . i � � '_ _ \` � i � _ � �, - , �: j�- '� f�' � �� 0`l.!�T L 0 T B I \ �"'� / r.-!�'T _---, ,� p �'"'r`��'� ,%s.'� ��'�:�„`*�,�'a. , .� . I �- �� \ � ; ...,---'��_�__ � �;� � r\\�. r 11 1 � •'AiL3t7i:!!i3/ � I \ � � r+ I1 1 � � �.._`_Y __� "�'� ` � a`' ' I� �� , -r- � , , . ,, a — —— '—�———'��°'+�_—�— �= --J-- '~/ /, -`�---//�J, \ � J � � ' � ...�v....e.� ��- — —1_.. �/ � I � �: .�� ""'_�s � ��r.s«.— — —=-�j / � i� \ � /i\t) ��1 � �' i��i` �ono�r�ooc.no.iat�sn � , � / . ..-�, �i `��, ROAD ___T____ � �� '� � I�t��.` � � �r � / `��( l�� i ��\\ � � ; / \J' ,�� / 7 `'"�� \1� � �� -' _ i �'� , I �i `` ;QUTtq'T A ,� - �w , � � �� • �� ;- ; ; , - `,- � `��, 4 � - I �_• i ��`_; , , , . ( i, ` lr-'r �s\\�` '=n.�...r. i��(��,,,G;e. � �-,r � � i i�� %;�� ^ � � ! `��i ii�� '� � � �� , � � .i F / �� --N E i Y1\..._ •-� �� \� � _ � . � �—� � � \ ) ,.( f j l �/� �,)) 7 ��+�. �\ \\ ' l� l�`\ � \ ^\ ��'� �� y�% \ \ �\ �w+�/ ��`� ,1 .,1 \ — aw � 1 � �f _� �. �—� // \ `�\ \ w^ y � `\ � ��\��\ ��I t � Area of Proposed MUSA Expansion ��;� �� -;�+;� �! �, , ,,,�,, �, � , �� ` , ��i � ��i.'�'�.'ii` �i�i /ii, : . `��y � � r � / ii t�� T��J '�°► � � � � r�wi i:: � �� \.,,">i'� ( ,!i / � �^ / \`\��,/ t � ' ' � _ —.,/ 1 a\�1 � ��- .. ��1� �' < � �� ~\`�� }"� � ��_�_,�� PRELIMINARY PtAT ``-�'- ,,�� `�;l�� , PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT f,._�;-�--,�: � �� = � � K4CH INDUSTRIESiWAYNE TRANSPORT INC. � , ��✓�,�� +�, � � �' , �;��i��;�,,r i. �+t , p MAYMJIi tii6 � ''��'�r�.iJ / �` ►j � �� W %�i�ii'�% � � 11�" � � . . //��/ / \• ,y�/ `\ _.� n.� � i + � �\\ /� I` .! . � �r �^�\ l^' 1 \ ,.,�% . �"� �.� HSJ FIIE 1-3-4Y01 . . � y� � .. � . �v /.r%�i �WO 96100.01 � . . . . .a Mww r.� CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, n�IINNESOTA RESOLUTION 1995 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL OF A PRELIlVIINARY PLAT FOR APPROXIMATELY 55 ACRES OF LAND OWNED BY KOCH REFINING COMPAI�TY NEAR THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF C.S.A.H 42 & S.T.H. 52 WHEREAS, Koch Refining Company owns land near the northwest corner of C.S.A.H 42 & S.T.H. 52 and has requested concept approval of a preluninary plat to support the development of Wayne Transport Company, including off'ices, a truck terminal and outdoor truck storage area, and Outlots for future industrial development for the 55.68 acre site legally described as follows: See Exlubit A; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount has reviewed the preliminary plat at a public meeting conducted on June 13, 1995 and has passed a motion to recommend approval of the request with conditions; and WHEREAS, a Publie Hearing has been conducted by the City Council to hear testi.mony regarding the preliminary plat in accordance with Section 3.2 of the City of Rosemount Subdivision Ordinance. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the preliminary plax requested by Koch Refining Company subject to: 1. Re-design of the frontage road alignment; 2. Provision of the minimum 300 feet lot frontage for lot 1; �. Submission of required engineering information; 4. Approval of the frontage road alignment with C.R. 42, temporary driveway access to C.R. 42 or the provision of an approved alternative temporary/permanent access to the property, review of needs for traffic safety improvements at the S.T.H. 52 & C.R. 42 interchange and needs for additional right-of-way along C.R. 42 as may be required by Dakota. County. ADOPTED this Sth da.y of 7uly, 1995. ATTEST: E.B. McMenomy, Ma.yor Susan M. Wa1sh, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted Against: . ExHiaiT a DESCRIPTION Parcel 1 Th�North 871.00 feet of the West 534.00 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Dakota County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Parcel2 Thax part of the E 1i2 of the NE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota lying Easterly of the Easterly right of way line of Railroad and except the following described tracts: a. That part of said E 1/2 of the 1TE 1/4 taken for State Highway purposes: b. That part of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast cornez of said E l/2 of the NE 1/4; thence South 89 degrees 46 minutes 39 se�onds West along the South line thereof a distance of 549.10 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing South 89 degrees 46 minutes 39 seconds West along said South line a distance of 336.95 feet; thence North 00 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds West a distance of 112.60 feet; thence North 57 degrees 18 minutes East a distance of 409.82 feet; thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 97.43 feet; thence Southwesterly to the point of beginning. c. That part of the E 1/2 of the 1�tE 1/4 described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said E 1/2 of the NE 1/4; thence North 89 degrees 14 minutes 41 seconds West along the centerline of County Road 42 - State Highway 52 a distance of 195.70 feet; thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds East a distance of 940.55 feet to the angle point in the Westerly right of way line of said State Highway and the point of beginning; thence continuing North 00 degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds East along said Westerly right of way a distance of 166.45 feet; thence North 89 degrees 44 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 100.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds West a distance of 285.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 44 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 29.32 feet, more or less, to a point of 33.0 feet, as measured at right angles to � the Westerly right of way line of said Highway; thence South 17 degrees 14 minutes 04 seconds West, parallel with and 33.00 feet Westerly of, as measured at right anglesto the ' Westerly line of said State Highway,a distance of 804.41 feet, more or less, to its r intersection with the I-i'ighway right of way line;thence South 89 degrees 14 minutes 41 �� seconds East along said right of way line a distance of 34.41 feet to the angle point in said State Highway; thence North 17 degrees 14 minutes 04 seconds East along said � Westerly right of way line ta the point of beginning. d. The North 871.00 feet of the West 534.00 feet of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Dakota County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 1995 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT FOR AN INDUSTRIAL PLANNED ITNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 55 ACRES OF LAND OWNED BY KOCH REFINING COMPANY NEAR THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF C.S.A.H 42 & S.T.H. 52 WHEREAS, Koch Refining Company owns land near the northwest corner of C.S.A.H 42 & S.T.H. 52 and has requested concept approval of an Industrial Planned Unit Development for Wayne Transport Company, including offices, a truck terminal and outdoor truck storage area, and for future industrial development for the 55.68 acre site legally described as follows: See E�ibit A; and VVH�REAS, the Planning Commissian of the City of Rosemount has reviewed the concept planned unit development at a public meeting conducted on June 13, 1995 and has passed a motion to recommend approval of the request with conditions; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing has been conducted by the City Council to hear testimony regarding the concept planned unit development in accordance with Section 12.2 of the City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the Ciry of Rosemount hereby approves the concept for the commercial planned unit development requested by Koch Refining Company subject to: 1. Provisions for additional access to lot 1; 2. Provide for parking and circulation lane set backs along the westerly edge of the paved surface for lot 1, except as may be required for rail access; 3. Provide for a high quality planting & screening plan along the Ea.st side of lot 1; 4. Provide for a landscaped planting area. around all perimeters of the outdoor truck/trailer storage area for lot 1; 5. A redesign of the street and lot layout to support the efficient and orderly development of the PUD; 6. Approval of the frontage road alignment with C.R. 42, temporary driveway access to C.R. 42 or the provision of an approved alternative temporary/permanent access to the property, and review of needs for traffic safety impmvements at the S.T.I3. 52 & C.R. 42 interchange by Dakota County. ADOPTED this Sth da.y of July, 1995. ATTEST: E.B. McMenomy, Mayor Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted Against: • EXHIBIT R DESCRIPTION Parcel 1 The North 871.00 feet of the West 534.00 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Dakota County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Parcel2 That part of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, M'innesota lying Easterly of the Easterly right of way line of Railroad and except the following described tracts: a. That part of said E 1/2 of the 1�tE 1/4 taken for State Highway purposes. b. That part of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 described as follows: Commencing at the $outheast corner of said E 1/2 of the NE 1/4; thence South 89 degrees 46 minutes 39 seconds West along the South line thereof a distance of 549.10 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing South 89 degre�s 46 minutes 39 seconds West along said South line a distance of 336.95 feet; thence North 00 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds West a distance of 112.60 feet; thence North 57 degrees 18 minutes East a distance of 409.82 feet; thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 97.43 feet; thence Southwesterly to the point of beginning. c. That part of the E 1/2 of the ivE 1/4 described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said E 1/2 of the�TE 1/4; thence North 89 degrees 14 minutes 41 seconds West along the centerline of County Road 42 - State Highway 52 a distance of 195.70 feet; thence North 00 degrees 1� minutes 52 seconds East a distance of 940.55 feet to the angle point in the Westerly right of way line of said State Highway and the point of beginning; thence continuing North 00 degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds East along said Westerly right of way a distance of 166.45 feet; thence North 89 degrees 44 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 100.00 feet; thence South QO degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds West a distance of 285.00 feet; thence South 89 de�ees 44 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 29.32 feet, more or less, to a point of 33.� feet, as measured at right angles to '• the Westerly right of way line of said Highway; thence South 17 degrees 14 minutes 04 a seconds West, parallel with and 33.00 feet Westerly of, as measured at right angles to the } Westerly line of said State Highway, a distance of 804.41 feet, more or less,to its � intersection with the Highway right of way line;thence South 89 degrees 14 minutes 41 � seconds East along said right of way line a distance of 34.41 feet to the angle point in said State Highway;thence North 17 degrees 14 minutes 04 seconds East along said Westerly right of way line to the point of beginning. d. The North 871.00 feet of the West 534.00 feet of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Dakota County, IVI'innesota. Abstract Property.