HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. 145th St Street Improvements, Chili Avenue to Cameo Avenue, City Project #245 � � CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 2, 1994
AGENDA ITEM: 145th Street Improvements, Chili Avenue AGENDA SECTION:
to Cameo Avenue, City Project #245 Public Hearing
PREPARED BY: Bud Osmundson AGENDA �Q��� �
City Engineer/Assistant Public Works Director � �
ATTACHMENTS: Duff & Fischer Letters, Memo from Joan APP �VE� B :
Anderson, Funding Overview, Resolutions , �" : ��
�� ,, �
This item is on the agenda for the public hearing for City Project #245,the recons uction of 145th '
Street between Chili Avenue and Cameo Avenue.
On Wednesday, February 23, 1994, an informational meeting was held at City Hall for residents in the
project area. Twelve residents attended along with Council Member Joan Anderson, City Staff,
Engineering Consultant, N.S.P, and Vista representatives. The discussion centered on the proposed 44'
width, parking, snow removal, sidewalk width and location and boulevard width. The results were that
parking should be retained on both sides, but that the public wishes to have a boulevard area separating
the sidewalk from the street for safety considerations. Specifically, this results in retaining a 44' wide
street with parking on both sides, afong with a 3'-4' boulevard on each side and a 5' sidewalk on both
sides. A good discussion was held regarding the reconfiguration/burial of overhead lines with the
consensus that this would improve the area.
If this proposal of a 44' wide street with a 3'-4' boulevard and 5' sidewalk on each side is approved,
then the attached funding overview would change slightly. The column entitled "Other Funds" will have
515,200 deleted from it due to the reduction in the size of the sidewalk from 6' to 5'. (MSA will cover
the cost of a 5' sidewalk and the City was responsible for anything over that width.) With the approval
of this project and the amount of funds required from MSA it should be pointed out to Council that this
will reduce the number of MSA projects that can be done in the next 2-3 years. Other funding
considerations are that the proposed 38 decorative lights will cost approximately 5110,000. The
overhead reconfiguration and/or burial is estimated by NSP to be somewhere between 545,000-560,000
and Vista at 55,000-58,OOOfor a total of 568,000. For this project to continue on a 1994 summer
construction schedule, this project will require that NSP and Vista be notified as soon as possible so that
they can proceed with the burial or reconversion of their lines. Therefore, we are recommending that if
Council orders the project and orders the preparation of plans and specifications, that they also pass a
second motion which would reallocate C.I.P. funds which were designated for the reconstruction of
Cameo Avenue and 143rd Street, which would then be used for this overhead reconfiguration and/or
burial. Please note that we are excluding the decorative lights from these motions. When/if the funding
for this is more concrete, then we will ask that it be added to the project. Staff will provide an updated
funding overview on Wednesday night which will itemize the changes discussed above.
Brian Bourassa, P.E. from OSM Engineering, the project manager for the project, Dan Schultz of NSP and
Staff will provide a brief overview of the project and then answer any questions the public or Council
may have. Staff recommends approval of the motions as listed.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION FOR THE APPROVAL OF
145TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM CHILI AVENUE TO CAMEO AND APPROVAL OF THE
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITY PROJECT #245.
MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF CERTAIN 1994
BUDGET ITEMS.
COUNCIL ACTION:
1
1
A RESOLUTION FOR THE APPROVAL OF
145TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM CHILI /CHIPPENDALE AVENUES
TO CAMEO AVENUE AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CITY PROJECT #245
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount by a unanimous vote ordered a
feasibility report for 145th Street Improvements from Chili /Chippendale Avenues to
Cameo Avenue, City Project #245; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and accepted the feasibility report on February
1, 1994 for City Project #245; and
WHEREAS, the City Council ordered and held a public hearing on March 2, 1994 to
receive input on the project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount
hereby orders the improvements of 145th Street Improvements from Chili /Chippendale
Avenues to Cameo Avenue, City Project #245, excluding the installation of decorative
lighting and orders the preparation of plans and specifications for the improvements of
the 145th Street Improvements from Chili /Chippendale Avenues to Cameo Avenue, City
Project #245.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of March, 1994.
ATTEST:
Susan M. Wa City Clerk
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1994 16
E. B. McMenomy, Mayor
Motion by: W i p p e r m a n n Seconded b Staats
y: y:
Voted in favor: W i ppermann, McMenomy, Staats, Busho
None.
Voted against:
1
1
1
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF
CERTAIN 1994 BUDGET ITEMS
WHEREAS, the City Council ordered certain improvements for 145th Street, City Project
No. 245, and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the need to reallocate funds to pay for certain
improvements associated with City Project No. 245, and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the need to amend certain items from the 1994
General Fund Operating Budget, for this reallocation as follows:
Capital Improvements (C.I.P.) expenditures, the total which reflects a change as
follows:
Fund No. 202 49002 -01 -531 ($43,000) and 202 49002 -01 -532 ($29,000) which
were designated for the use of the reconstruction of Cameo Avenue (north of 145th
Street) and 143rd Street from Cameo Avenue to Trunk Highway 3 will be reallocated
to City Project No. 245 for the expressed use of the reconfiguration and burial of
certain overhead utility lines, which reflect a total change of $72,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the amendment of the above listed budget items for the 1994 Capital
Improvements Budget.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of March, 1994.
ATTEST:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1994 17
E. B. McMenomy, Mayor
Susan M. Wa City Clerk
Motion by: McMenomy Seconded by: W i ppermann
Voted in favor: McMenomy, Staats, Busho, W i ppermann
Voted against: None.
ESTIMATED GENERAL FUNDING OVERVIEW February 9, 1994 H(:O
CITY PROJECT NO. 245 •-
145TH STREET RECONSTRUCTION I�ROM CHIPPENDALE/CHILI AVENUE TO CAMEO AVENUE
REVENUES
ITEM ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT STORM WATERMaIN SANITARY MSA FUND OTNER FUNDS TOTAL
COST SEW�R CORE �UND SEWER CORE REVENUES
COR� RUND FUND
Sanitary 76,800.00 -0- -0- -0- 76,800.00 -0- -0- 76,800.00
Sewer
Sanitary 36,800.00 -0- -0- -0- 36,800.00 -0- -0- 36,800.00
Sewer
Services
Watermain 107,800.00 -0- -0- 107,800.00 -0- -0- -0- 107,800.00
Water 55,200.00 -0- -0- 55,200.00 -0- -0- -0- 55,200.00
Service
Storm Drain 24,100.00 -0- -0- -0- • -0- 24,100.00 -0- 24,1 Q0.00
Street 689,100.00 55,500.00 -0- -0- -0- 633,600.00 -0- 633,600.00
Street! 10,000.00 -0- -0- -0- -0- 10,000.00 120,000.00 130,000.00
Lighting
Sidewaiks/ 92,200.00 -0- -0- -0- -0- 77,000.00 15,200.00 92,200.00
Trails
Overhead 85,000.00 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 85,000.00 85,000.00
Utilities
TOTALS 1,177,000.00 55,500.00 -0- 163,000.00 113,600.00 844,900.00 220,200.00 1,241,500.00
��� � � � � �
� �C I TY O F RO S E�M�O U�N T z8�5-`;�t"�eet�West
— P.O.Box 510
� .
Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!! Rosemo�m,Mrv
55068-0510
Phone:612-423-4411
Fax:612-423-5203
TO: Mayor E.B. McMenomy
Councilmembers: Busho, Staats, Wippermann
FROM: Joan Anderson, Councilmember
DATE: February 25, 1994
RE: 145th Street Public Hearing, Mar. 2, 1994
Since I was at Wednesday' s "145th Street Informational Meeting°
and won' t be at the March 2nd Public Hearing for 145th Street, -
I' l1 fill you in on the highlights of the citizens reactions.
There were 12 people in attendance in addition to staff. They
expressed concern about the final project resulting in "too much
concrete" . They felt that a sidewalk adjoining the street would
create a safety hazard for children in the neighborhood. They
questioned where snow would be piled. Since they see 145th
Street as a major use for school children, the question was
raised as to whether the city would maintain snow removal .
A general consensus was reached that they would prefer at least a
3 foot grass boulevard with decorative lights on it and a 4 or 5
foot sidewalk beyond that. It is my understanding that staff
will research this alternative and present it to you as an
option.
Good luck!
. . � � Rinted on recK'led paper �
contaminq 30°.G
post<onsumer maixials.
February 22, 1991� �C vQ. �Z- — Z�-�� �.
City of Rosemount
City Hall
2875 - 145th Street West
Rosemount, Minnesota 55068
Attn: Bud Osmundson, City Engineer
�Re: City Pro ject No. 24�5
Dear Sir;
This is in response to your notice of an informational meeting on
March 2nd. We are in Mesa, AZ for the winter months and will not be
able to take paxt in any discussion regarding this improvement.
There was so much controversy over the last proposed improvement to
14$th St, so I know you have heard them all. But in going over the
improvements proposed, I take exception to some of them. I don't
see why there should be a 6 ft. wide sidewalk for us to maintain. Of
course, I may be in the minority but I liked having a bike trail past
our home and being maintained by the city. Most of us are unable to
clean sidewalks during the long winters and heavy accummulation of
snow. I hope you will be able to furnish us with names of people who
will do this sort of work.
Then your proposal that only property with driveways facing on 145th
St. would be assessed. Now, isn't that just dandy - how many homes
facing 145th St: have driveways cominJ off a side street? They will
benefit from a31 'l�he improvements but will not have to pay for any of
them. All the sewer and water lines come off 14�5th St. so why should
they be exempt? '
Also, why should only 14�5th St. owners pay to have overhead electrical,
phone and cable lines buried? If you want that kind of a project, why
only the property owners along 145th St. be assessed? Is that to
improve the looks of the city of Rosemount? We ha,ve long known tha.t
busnesses have left Rosemount being unsatisfied with the cooperation
they received from the city administration. I can remember when the
town of Apple Valley was first buil�. We la.ughed and. called it a
bedroom community. But we laughed too soon - look at how the town
ha.s prospered dragging most of the Rosemaunt people there to shop in
their stores and other businesses.
I am sorry tha.t I will not be able to participate in this discussion,
but I ha.ve expressed my views in this matter.
Sincerely,
<_ � � � � ��
�
22 9 E. Balsam Circle
Mesa, AZ 85204
,
. , .
Mesa, AZ, 8520?
Feb. 18, 1994
Bud Osmundson, City Engineer
City of Rosemount ',
Posenount� IvII�T 55068
Dear Sir:
l�,�thceived your letter on the subject of city project i#245
St. reconstruction. Since it arrived here only yesterday�
� we are short of time to re spond to your inv�tation to this
"�nformal information meeting on Wednesday Feb. 23°
As a resident of 145th St. for a period of about 70 years T_
feel we have a good understanding of this thoroughfare. We
� take this opportunity to respond to your letters
# j�ie expe�t to continae to have parking on BOTH sides of the
street when this work is completed.
# �f you put a 6 foot sidewalk in, w�o is going to keep it shov-
e?ed tio that extent �n the �+inter? ' Vlhere will you pile the
snovathat builds up when the city snowplows shove it into the
s�dew�alk? '
# �ecor2tiv� an� in�roved, intersection lighting is a broad sub-
jeat. We do not feel we need to con�inue any decorative light-
ing,'or. to our residential neighborhood ONLY GOOD BRIGHT street
lights for safE vision at night. �
# On your item of buryi.ng and or realignment of overhead elect-
rical, phone and cable . . . This could become a very burdensome
prob?em financially and physically for homeowners. Tt means dig-
ging up their lawns, changing electrical and phone entrances to
their homes, and so on.
ZJe havs an establlshed metihod of entrance at present and have no
problem with it. There are many ot�er stree�s i.n Rosemount in this
area which have the same overhead �ntrance. Do you propose to
change the whole town, or are you just selecting us because we
happen to live on a street that the current city off icials seem
to want to renovate to become a super highway into old downtown
Ro semount?
Also note: This estimated charge af $1,�00 per lot owner is not the
whole �$�. Your proposed chaf�es have ' hidden costs to each property
owner. Is the city going to redd our yards, or pay for the instail-
ation of �00 amp servece to the many homes here to be upgraded for
underground electric �f you change the location of power lines going
into the homes, etc. etc. ,??
As to the proposal to 11'OT charge homeowners who don't have driveways
onto 14�th Street, we are no� in agreement. If a home faces 145�h
the residents are serviced by the water and sewer and other utilities
that traverse that street. ^hereby they are as reeponsible for this
project as anyone e��e. These "improvements" pass their door, just
as it will ours. Their benefit (a ltho questionable to us all) is
the same.
Ve� truly yours
,
� ��.. ,� � y
D=C�a , �l'�� l��tr ;t. i�J. ,�''' � i�� ,,