Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.i. Wensmann 6th Addition Rezoning , , City of Rosemount Executive Summary for Action City Council Meeting Date: April 19, 1994 Agenda Item: Wensmann Sixth Addition Ageada Section: Rezoning OLD BUSINESS Prepared By: Rick Pearson Ageada No: Assistant City Planner � L, Attachments: Ordinance B-41; Planning Approved By: Commission Meeting Reviews. Mr. Herb Wensma.nn is requesting a rezoning for his 27-acre residential development located south of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 42 and west of Shannon Parkway. The 19 single family lots will be rezoned to R-1 Single Family Residential (detached) and the 87 townhouses will be rezoned to R-2 Single Family Attached Residential . The land is currently in the Agriculture District. The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the request on February 8, 1994 along with the preliminary plat and planned unit development. The public hearing was conducted by the City Council on March 2, 1994 with action tabled until the final plat can be acted upon. ' Recommended Action: MOTION to adopt ORDINANCE B-41 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B - CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE which provides for the rezoning of the Wensmann Sixth Addition from Agriculture to R-1 Single Family Residential (detached) and R-2 Single Family Attached. City Council Action: 419-94.008 . City of Rosemount Ordinance No. B-41 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B CITY OF RO5EMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE Wensmann Sixth Addition THE CITY COUNCII. OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled °City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance," is hereby amended to rezone from AG Agriculture to R-1 Single Family Residential (detached) the following described property located within the City of Rosemaunt, Minnesota to-wit: LoZ'S 1 - 15, BLOCK 1�WENSMANN SIXTH E�DDITION AND LoTs 1 -4, BLOCK 2,WENSMANN SIXTH ADDITION Section 2. Further, Ordinance No. B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled "City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance," is hereby amended to rezone from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Attached the following described property located within the City of Rosemount, Minnesota to-wit: ALL OF BLUGK 3,WENSMANN SIXTH ADDITION AND ALL OF BLOCK 4,WENSMANN SIXTH ADDITION Section 3. The Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount, referred to and described in said Ordinance No. B as that certain map entitled "ZONING MAP OF THE CiTY OF ROSEMOUNT°, shall not be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the said zoning map on file in the Clerk's off'ice for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this Ordinance and all of the notation references and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. ENAc'rEn ar� ORn�r�n into an Ordinance this 19th day of April, 1994: CITY OF ROSEMOUNT E.B. McMenomy, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk Published in the Rosemount Town Pages this day of , 1994. � : CITY OF ROSEMOUNT z875-C145thSAteetWest P.O.Box 510 Ever thin s Comin U ROSemOU11fi!! Rosemount,MN y g� g p 55068•0510 Phone:612-423-4411 Faxr 612-423-5203 ' TO: Planning Commission FROM: Richard Pearson, Assistant Planner DATE: February 4, 1994 SUBJ: February 8, 1994 Regular Meeting Reviews Agenda Item 8b. ATTACHMENTS: Correspondence, Preliminary Plat & PUD reductions, Previous Planning Commission Review, and Applications 8b. Wensmann Homes, Inc. Residential Planned Unit Development including: �nal Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning Recommendation to the City Council PROPOSAL AND PROCESS Mr. Herb Wensmann of Wensmann Homes, Inc. is requesting approval of a Residential Planned Unit Development that contains single family housing and two types of townhouses. The Planning Commission reviewed the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept on January 11, 1994. The proposal has been refined as a result of issues identified by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission is asked to review the refined development plans and forward a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council will conduct a public hearing to hear testimony relative to the development proposal, preliminary plat and rezoning. After the public hearing is closed, the Council will be able to take action on the PUD and preliminary plat. With approval of the preliminary plat, a fmal plat will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The Council will take action on the final plat and the rezoning with the benefit of the resulting recommendation by the Planning Commission. PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED ISSUES 1. That the Park and Recreation Commission review and comment on the requested park improvements as proposed by the Developer. 2. That the Developer conduct a neighborhood meeting for the PUD including the proposed park for neighborhood comment. �n«������ � . � � .. �.cartainioX30% . . poshmnsumer matenals. � + Wensmann 5i�rth Addition Final PUD Review February 8, 1994 Page 2 Other issues that had been identified and presented to the Planning Commission on 7anuary 11, 1994: 1. That the proposed density for the townhouse clusters be maintained in retum for increased site amenities as requested by the Pazks and Recreation Director; 2. That the City Engineer approve the concept utility and gra.ding plans to verify that e�sting infra.structure is capable of serving the PUD; 3. That implementation of the abovementioned recommendations as well as attention to issues identified by the Planning Commission will allow the residential PUD to be developed with variance to lot width standards as specified in the Zoning Ordinance; and 4. The site will be platted in conformance with the City of Rosemount Subdivision Ordinance as well as all construction conforming with applicable building and fire codes. PUD REr�nvEMErrrs The Developer has made a commitment to the Pazk and Recreation Commission to dedicate additional land for park use in the anticipated future phase contiguous with the half acre parcel in the current phase. The Planning Department understa.nds the proposed pa.rk dedication combination of cash and land to be acceptable to the Park and Recreation Commission. The Developer conducted a neighborhood meeting to discuss the development proposal. Six people from the neighborhood were in attendance as well as Councilmember Busha Kelly Murray representing the Developer summarized the issues: "Major topics o€concem were Danville Avenue not becoming a cul de sac, when Dodd/Diamond Path would be extended, what we plan for the other property, and the prices of the townhomes. No real objections were raised." As previously mentioned, a public hearing will be conducted by the City Council for the PUD, preliminary plat and rezoning. The lots along the western project boundary have been adjusted to address the lot-width deficiency issue. The proposed 151 st Street West has been shifted 5.8 feet north. As a result, the three interior lots are consistent in lot-width with the lots to the west. The corner lot is now 90 feet wide which should be sufficient to accommodate the required street-side yard setback without placing undue limitations or impose a need for variances on the lot. There is no change to the street design. Danville Avenue must connect to 151st Street West for efficient traffic flow and dispersal through the area. Traffic as projected by the City Engineer would not significantly increase along the effected section of Danville Avenue. This is because it does not align with through-streets to the south. Rather, the net impact will be to disperse traffic both north and south from Danville. Future street connections that I will be built in connection with the Shannon Pond residential PUD to the south will further ' diffuse traffic flows in the area, thus relieving some pressure on 153rd Street West. ' The City has asked the County to include the Diamond Path improvements in their Capital I Improvement Plan. The participation of Apple Valley is necessary for this project to I! _ _ __ _— � Wensmann Sixth Addition Final PUD Review February 8, 1994 Page 3 proceed. Apple Valley currently is not in support of the project which results in uncertainry for timing of the project. LANDSCAPING A landscaping plan has been developed for both trees and foundation plantings. The proposed landscaping includes 368 deciduous, evergreen and ornamental trees. The proposed landscaping is more than four times the minimum ordinance required amount when compared to the combined with the proposed shrub beds and foundation plantings. GRADING AND U'I�iTIES Mr. Osmundson, City Engineer, is recommending modifications to the grading plan. It is the opinion of the Planning Department that minor revisions to the grading and utility plans that do not impact the overall design of the project can be resolved prior ta the public hearing with the City Council. If the recommended changes have a significant impact that results in changes to the design of the PUD, then the revised PUD should come back to the Planning Commission for further review. CONCLUSION Planning Staff believes that the Developer has responded to all of the identified issues with appropriate revisions to the PUD with the only exception being grading and utilities as mentioned above. Absent any significant changes to the design of the PUD, Planning Staff recommends that the PUD be forwarded to the City Council for public hearing and consideration by Council. A development agreement will be prepared to secure developer installed improvements and other issues including park dedication. RECO�NDATION MOTION to recommend approval of the Wensmann Sixth Addition residential Planned Unit Development to the City Council subject to the preparation and execution of a development agreement securing the Developer installed improvements, park dedication, grading and utility issues and compliance with all other applicable code requirements; - and - MOTION to recommend that the City Council schedule a public hearing to hear testimony regarding the proposed Wensmann Sixth Addition Residential Planned Unit Development.