HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.i. Wensmann 6th Addition Rezoning ,
, City of Rosemount
Executive Summary for Action
City Council Meeting Date: April 19, 1994
Agenda Item: Wensmann Sixth Addition Ageada Section:
Rezoning OLD BUSINESS
Prepared By: Rick Pearson Ageada No:
Assistant City Planner � L,
Attachments: Ordinance B-41; Planning Approved By:
Commission Meeting Reviews.
Mr. Herb Wensma.nn is requesting a rezoning for his 27-acre
residential development located south of County State Aid Highway
(CSAH) 42 and west of Shannon Parkway. The 19 single family lots
will be rezoned to R-1 Single Family Residential (detached) and the
87 townhouses will be rezoned to R-2 Single Family Attached
Residential . The land is currently in the Agriculture District.
The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the
request on February 8, 1994 along with the preliminary plat and
planned unit development. The public hearing was conducted by the
City Council on March 2, 1994 with action tabled until the final
plat can be acted upon. '
Recommended Action: MOTION to adopt ORDINANCE B-41 AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING ORDINANCE B - CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE which
provides for the rezoning of the Wensmann Sixth Addition from
Agriculture to R-1 Single Family Residential (detached) and R-2
Single Family Attached.
City Council Action:
419-94.008
.
City of Rosemount
Ordinance No. B-41
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B
CITY OF RO5EMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE
Wensmann Sixth Addition
THE CITY COUNCII. OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ordinance No. B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled °City of Rosemount Zoning
Ordinance," is hereby amended to rezone from AG Agriculture to R-1 Single Family Residential
(detached) the following described property located within the City of Rosemaunt, Minnesota to-wit:
LoZ'S 1 - 15, BLOCK 1�WENSMANN SIXTH E�DDITION
AND
LoTs 1 -4, BLOCK 2,WENSMANN SIXTH ADDITION
Section 2. Further, Ordinance No. B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled "City of
Rosemount Zoning Ordinance," is hereby amended to rezone from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single
Family Attached the following described property located within the City of Rosemount, Minnesota
to-wit:
ALL OF BLUGK 3,WENSMANN SIXTH ADDITION
AND
ALL OF BLOCK 4,WENSMANN SIXTH ADDITION
Section 3. The Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount, referred to and described in said
Ordinance No. B as that certain map entitled "ZONING MAP OF THE CiTY OF ROSEMOUNT°, shall not
be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the said zoning
map on file in the Clerk's off'ice for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for
in this Ordinance and all of the notation references and other information shown thereon are hereby
incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication
according to law.
ENAc'rEn ar� ORn�r�n into an Ordinance this 19th day of April, 1994:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
E.B. McMenomy, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk
Published in the Rosemount Town Pages this day of , 1994.
� :
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT z875-C145thSAteetWest
P.O.Box 510
Ever thin s Comin U ROSemOU11fi!! Rosemount,MN
y g� g p 55068•0510
Phone:612-423-4411
Faxr 612-423-5203 '
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Richard Pearson, Assistant Planner
DATE: February 4, 1994
SUBJ: February 8, 1994 Regular Meeting Reviews Agenda Item 8b.
ATTACHMENTS: Correspondence, Preliminary Plat & PUD reductions, Previous
Planning Commission Review, and Applications
8b. Wensmann Homes, Inc. Residential Planned Unit Development including:
�nal Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning Recommendation to the
City Council
PROPOSAL AND PROCESS
Mr. Herb Wensmann of Wensmann Homes, Inc. is requesting approval of a Residential
Planned Unit Development that contains single family housing and two types of townhouses.
The Planning Commission reviewed the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept on
January 11, 1994. The proposal has been refined as a result of issues identified by the
Planning Commission. The Planning Commission is asked to review the refined
development plans and forward a recommendation to the City Council.
The City Council will conduct a public hearing to hear testimony relative to the development
proposal, preliminary plat and rezoning. After the public hearing is closed, the Council will
be able to take action on the PUD and preliminary plat. With approval of the preliminary
plat, a fmal plat will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The Council will take action
on the final plat and the rezoning with the benefit of the resulting recommendation by the
Planning Commission.
PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED ISSUES
1. That the Park and Recreation Commission review and comment on the requested park
improvements as proposed by the Developer.
2. That the Developer conduct a neighborhood meeting for the PUD including the proposed
park for neighborhood comment.
�n«������
� . � � .. �.cartainioX30% . .
poshmnsumer matenals.
� + Wensmann 5i�rth Addition Final PUD Review
February 8, 1994
Page 2
Other issues that had been identified and presented to the Planning Commission on 7anuary
11, 1994:
1. That the proposed density for the townhouse clusters be maintained in retum for increased
site amenities as requested by the Pazks and Recreation Director;
2. That the City Engineer approve the concept utility and gra.ding plans to verify that
e�sting infra.structure is capable of serving the PUD;
3. That implementation of the abovementioned recommendations as well as attention to
issues identified by the Planning Commission will allow the residential PUD to be
developed with variance to lot width standards as specified in the Zoning Ordinance; and
4. The site will be platted in conformance with the City of Rosemount Subdivision
Ordinance as well as all construction conforming with applicable building and fire codes.
PUD REr�nvEMErrrs
The Developer has made a commitment to the Pazk and Recreation Commission to dedicate
additional land for park use in the anticipated future phase contiguous with the half acre
parcel in the current phase. The Planning Department understa.nds the proposed pa.rk
dedication combination of cash and land to be acceptable to the Park and Recreation
Commission.
The Developer conducted a neighborhood meeting to discuss the development proposal. Six
people from the neighborhood were in attendance as well as Councilmember Busha Kelly
Murray representing the Developer summarized the issues:
"Major topics o€concem were Danville Avenue not becoming a cul de sac, when
Dodd/Diamond Path would be extended, what we plan for the other property, and the
prices of the townhomes. No real objections were raised."
As previously mentioned, a public hearing will be conducted by the City Council for the
PUD, preliminary plat and rezoning.
The lots along the western project boundary have been adjusted to address the lot-width
deficiency issue. The proposed 151 st Street West has been shifted 5.8 feet north. As a
result, the three interior lots are consistent in lot-width with the lots to the west. The corner
lot is now 90 feet wide which should be sufficient to accommodate the required street-side
yard setback without placing undue limitations or impose a need for variances on the lot.
There is no change to the street design. Danville Avenue must connect to 151st Street West
for efficient traffic flow and dispersal through the area. Traffic as projected by the City
Engineer would not significantly increase along the effected section of Danville Avenue.
This is because it does not align with through-streets to the south. Rather, the net impact
will be to disperse traffic both north and south from Danville. Future street connections that I
will be built in connection with the Shannon Pond residential PUD to the south will further '
diffuse traffic flows in the area, thus relieving some pressure on 153rd Street West. '
The City has asked the County to include the Diamond Path improvements in their Capital I
Improvement Plan. The participation of Apple Valley is necessary for this project to I!
_ _ __
_—
� Wensmann Sixth Addition Final PUD Review
February 8, 1994
Page 3
proceed. Apple Valley currently is not in support of the project which results in uncertainry
for timing of the project.
LANDSCAPING
A landscaping plan has been developed for both trees and foundation plantings. The
proposed landscaping includes 368 deciduous, evergreen and ornamental trees. The proposed
landscaping is more than four times the minimum ordinance required amount when compared
to the combined with the proposed shrub beds and foundation plantings.
GRADING AND U'I�iTIES
Mr. Osmundson, City Engineer, is recommending modifications to the grading plan. It is
the opinion of the Planning Department that minor revisions to the grading and utility plans
that do not impact the overall design of the project can be resolved prior ta the public
hearing with the City Council. If the recommended changes have a significant impact that
results in changes to the design of the PUD, then the revised PUD should come back to the
Planning Commission for further review.
CONCLUSION
Planning Staff believes that the Developer has responded to all of the identified issues with
appropriate revisions to the PUD with the only exception being grading and utilities as
mentioned above. Absent any significant changes to the design of the PUD, Planning Staff
recommends that the PUD be forwarded to the City Council for public hearing and
consideration by Council. A development agreement will be prepared to secure developer
installed improvements and other issues including park dedication.
RECO�NDATION
MOTION to recommend approval of the Wensmann Sixth Addition residential Planned
Unit Development to the City Council subject to the preparation and execution of a
development agreement securing the Developer installed improvements, park dedication,
grading and utility issues and compliance with all other applicable code requirements;
- and -
MOTION to recommend that the City Council schedule a public hearing to hear testimony
regarding the proposed Wensmann Sixth Addition Residential Planned Unit Development.