The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6. Rosemount Village Square Commercial Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat e ' "'� CITY HALL CITY F R EMOU � 1 2875-145th Street West O OS P.O.Box 510 EVC'C thin s Comin U ROSei'YIOU►lt�l Rosemounr,MN y g� g p 55068-0510 Phone:612-423-4411 Affidavit of Posted and Mailed Hearing Notice�6,Z-4z3-5z°3 ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PI�D) PRELIMINARY PLAT (South side of County Road 42 between Chippendale Avenue and Canada Avenue) STATE OF P/IINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) SS CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ) Susan 1VI. Walsh, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: I am a United Sta.tes citizen and the duly qualified Clerk of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota. On 1Vlarch 4, 1994, acting on behaif of the said City, I posted at the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota, and deposited in the United States Post Office, Rosemount, Minnesota, a eopy of the attached notice of a Public Hearing for consideration ' of the Rosemount Village Square Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Preliminary Plat on property located within the City of Rosemount as described in the Public Notice, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the attached listings at the addresses listed with their names. There is delivery service by United States Mail between the place of mailing and the places ' ', so addressed. ', Dated this 4th day of Maxch, 1994. . .ar��c-�-�'. S M. Wals City Clerk City of Rosemount Dakota. County, Minnesota Subscribed and sworn to before me this �� day o , 1994. a , , O"`�) P�U�flRrjhhfiJV1/viAAI�� s ��tl�l11�.Q��NTUS �iOTr�R'�°PUBLIC-MINNESO'TA '' �;AK�'iA GOUNTY '��.��'.r.,33i:S!'i�.Y}'.iT09�UOi 7,1�9 � . . . ..._ :..,y a>.y,..,-�;..,�s,•••P,�JlhI4/1N{MIHN4y� R�ntedonrecyckdpaper . eontaining 30% positariwmer materials. C 1 TY �F RO S E M O U N T �a�5 ��n1HA eet��est P.O.Box 510 EVet" t�llll � Comin U Rosemount!! Rosemou�c,MN Y 9� 9 P 5�osa-os�o . Phone:512-423-4411 �T T� �TO�� Fax:oi2-423-5ZQ3 Ll Ir ROSEMOLTNT VILLAGE SQUARE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PUD) � PRELIMINARY PLAT (Soutlz side of Couaaty Road 42 between Chippendale Avenue atza' Canada Avettue) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, the City Council of the City of Rosemount will hold a publie hearing on Tuesday, March 15, 1994 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, beginning at 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of this hearing is to receive public input and comments on the proposed Rosemount Village Square Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat. The proposed commercial development subdivision pertains to property located on the south side of County Road 42 between Chippendale Avenue and Canada Avenue and legally described as follows: Lot l, Block l, SOUTH ROSE PARK ADDITION REPLAT, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. Except the West 225.00 feet thereof, as measured at right an�les to and parallel with the west line of said Lot 1, and lying north of a line beginning at a poinc on the west line of said L,ot l, distant 208.33 feet south of the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence easterly at right angles to said west line a distance of 225 feet and there terminating. -AND - Lot 3, Block i, SOUTH ROSE PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. -AND - All that part of Lot 4, Biock l, SOUTH ROSE PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying South of the North 230.00 feet thereof, as measured at right angles to and parallel with the north line thereof. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the RoSE1�ou1v'r VII,LAGE SQU� commercial I planned unit development and preliminary plat. The 9.094-acre tract of land is designated Commercial (C) in tfie City of Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan: Update 2000. The ' developer is proposing to develop an approximate 64,600 square foot retail center, associated ' site improvements and two outlots at the northwest side of the site. Persons wishing to comment on the Rosemount Village Square PUD and preliminary plat are invited to attend this meeting on Tuesday, March 15. 1994 at 8:00 p.m. Dated this 2nd day of March, 1994. �` ' � .6- " ��r/1. ./ / .- '/ !�_,.� �Susan . Walsh�ity Clerk City of Rosemeunt Dakota County, Minnesota . . � �n m c aauer . HARVEY L & DENISE K ENERSON WAYNE L & RHONDA S WEIGAND TODD M & BARBARA A URBAN' 15206 DANBURY AVE 15186 DANBURY AVE 4112 151ST ST W ' ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 JAMES R & DIANE M HAMILTON MARK D & CAROLYN L MAIERS KEVIN M & KRISTY l BRIST 4102 151ST ST W 4088 151ST ST W 4066 151ST ST W ' ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ' RANDOLPH L KOEB RICHARD & LINDA RASCHKE BRADLEY J & ANGELA M LEDEL 4056 151ST ST W 4042 151ST ST W 4026 151ST ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 RICHARD L & COLETTE BtESMAN OUDONE & CHANTNANOM RICHARD A & LAURIE A GIORDANO 4025 151 ST ST W SOUMPHONPHAKDY 4055 151 ST ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 4041 151 ST ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 DONALD JR & VICTORIA NfLSON JOHN J & JANICE L OLESICK DANIEL R & JULIE A BROWN 4065 151ST ST W 4085 151ST ST W 4101 151ST ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT M'N 55068 ROSEMDUNT MN' 55068 TODD A & MECHELLE R JOSEPH G & PAULETTE GENSKE BRIAN K TAFT & DEBORAH K STEPHENSON 4125 151 ST ST W SCHWARTZ-TAFT 4111 151ST ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 4137 151ST ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 TIMOTHY L & KIM C ERICKSON PATRICK J & VICKI L RUIZ WILLIS W & KAY D DEKRUIF 15145 DANVILLE AVE 15163 DANVILLE AVE 15183 DANVILLE AVE ' ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 RAYMOND & BETTY JEAN HOLTZ THOMAS T & VICTORIA KLOOZ ADELINE J WAPLES 15199 DANVILLE AVE 15215 OANVILLE AVE 15223 DANVILLE AVE ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 MICHAEL & SHERRI BURBACK FREDERICK JOHN DYCK JAMES L ACKER & MARGARET M 4119 152ND CT 4105 152ND CT CAPRA ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 5506$ 4091 152ND CT ' ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 WAYNE D & ROBIN L LAMOREAUX DAVID & DEBORAH KANGAS DUANE J JURGENS & NICOLE 4075 152ND CT 4065 152ND CT NELSON JURGENS ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 4051 152ND CT ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 CHARLES M & TERRY L CARTER WAYNE E & BARBARA A CHARLES DAVID R & C1NDA C PANKRATZ 4041 152ND CT 15315 DEWBERRY CT 15325 DEWBERRY CT � ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROS€MOUNT MN 55068 THOMAS A & LOUISE M PAGET STEPHEN E & VICTORIA SMITH LAWRENCE J & bIANE J BURKE 15320 DEWBERRY CT 15310 DEWBERRY CT 4390 152ND ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 GERON P & JILL R HELLING C J GRANT & BRENDA MATTISON GREGORY J & MELISSA OGEL 4370 152ND ST W 4350 152ND ST W 4465 152ND ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 KURT A & CAROLYN T JENSEN MATTHEW J & DEBRA K CHURCH RAMSAHAI & SANDRA I KOWLESSAR 4445 152ND ST W 4435 152ND ST W 4415 152ND ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 DAVID J & JENNIFER J PRESTON RALPH W & NANCY E GODBEY RORY S & LONA L RICHAROS 4405 152ND ST W 4375 152ND ST W 4365 152ND ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 TIMOTHY R JOHNSON JOHN E & VICKI P GEHRMAN THOMAS t HALLAWAY & SHARON R 15235 DARJEELING CT 15315 DARJEELING CT HALLAWAY , ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 15305 DARJEELING CT ' ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ' MARK R & DEANNA K DAUS BRIAN M & CHERYL L OLSON TERRY 1 & KATHLEEN L WALCZAK 15310 DARJEELING CT 15320 DARJEEtING CT 15330 DARJEELING CT ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 EDWARD A & DIANE M FITZGERALD CHRISTOPHER OSTERTAG LUTHERAN CHURCH OF OUR SAVtOR 15340 DARJEELING CT 14888 DODD BLVD 14980 DIAMQND PATH ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT KEVIN J & M K ERUASTI WESLEY & DIANE ROLFING 2875 145TH ST W 14950 DODD BLVD 14930 DODD BLVD R05EMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 MERLIN AND JOANN TEAL FlOYD C HARLOW ARNOLD L & ELIZABETN TEAL 167i BROOKSHIRE AVE 14958 DODD BLVD 14962 DODD BLVD ' TUSTIN CA 92680-6640 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068' DAUID A JOHNSON & D1ANA FLOYD E & TERESA TEAL LEIGH C & MICHELE L ANDfRSON' LOUISE URBAN 6406 LOUGHBOROUGH 14940 DELFT AUE W 14956 DODD BLUD ST LOUIS MO 63109-3642 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 DAKOTA COUNTY HRA JAMES L CLARK TIMOTHY & ERIN' M ZEMANOVIC 2496 145TH ST W J4949 DELFT AVE W 14915 DANVILLE AVE W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 CHRISTOPHER G OSTERTAG bENNIS M & SUSAN E tIEN WtLLIAM P MURPHY 14888 DODO BLUD 4215 UPPER 150TH ST W 4195 150TH ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 LEROY A & KATHLEEN D OLSON DONALD M & JOY LUDESCHER STEVfN B & KAREN E DAVIS 4175 UPPER 150TH ST 4155 150TH ST W 4280 150TH ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 RUSEMDUNT MN 55068 ROBERT E & JANET B DOLAN JOSEPH J & PAMELA FOREMAN JOHN R & SANDRA J WALLACE ' 4260 150TH ST W 4240 UPPER 150TH ST W 4220'UPPER 150TH ST ROSEMUUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 MICHAEL R & MARY B INCE CAROL JEAN MOTZ SCOTT G & AMY B ADAMS 4200 150TN ST W 4180 UPPER 150TH ST W 4160 150TH ST W - ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 RICHARD J & KRISTIN SCHNEIDER MICHAEL A &PENNY J EFFERTZ CAROL J BROADBENT 4100 150TH ST W 14955 DAMASK AVE W 14950 DAMASK AVE W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ARTHUR C BROBACK- EUGENE T & LONNIE L BAKA RAYMOND f & PHYLLIS PIKE 10341 204TN ST 4060 150TH ST W 4120 150TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 KENNETH J & KAREN K LOOMIS MARC J & BARBARA M RETTERATH SCOTT M & MARIANNE NELSUN 4140 150TH ST W 14955 DALLARA AVE W 14975 DALLARA AVE W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 GERALD M & SHARON PETERSON THOMAS R BAYER TODD M & JOAN A JAGERSON 14950 DALLARA AVE W 14970 DALLARA AVE W 1499Q DALLARA AVE W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 WALTER M & ROSALIA M BAUER RONALD W & CYNTHIA IMESTLUND RICHARD W & LEE A KROENER 14990 DALLARA AVE W 4030 150TH ST W 4040 150TH ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 BILLIE L LANE JOHN & DELORES TENTINGER LE0 & SHARON TUTEWQHL 4050 150TH ST W 15072 DODD BLVD 16942 PILOT KNOB RD ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 RAYMONO & LUCILLE TOUSIGNANT RAYMOND & LUCILLE TOUSIGNANT MARK R NACHREINER & SHE{LA 4550 150TH ST W 5440 150TH ST W A BAKALYAR' APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 15109 DUNBAR CT � APPtE VALLEY MN 55124 ROGER & DEBRA SEDLER JUSTIN & DIANNE MORITZ UIRGINIA L BERG 15i07 DUNBAR CT 15105 DUNBAR CT 15103 DUNBAR CT APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPI:E VALLEY MN 55124 RICHARD E & JEANNE E HAUS GLEN & CAROL RAUTfO JEFFREY"T`OSNES 15101 DUNBAR CT 15104 DUNBAR CT 15106 DUNBAR CT APPLE UALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE 11ALLEY MN 55124 DAVID H IVERSON DAVID L & MARIAN A STANKOSKI ,IOHN R & PATRICIA A CHAMPON i5108 DUNBAR CT 15110 DUNBAR CT 15112 DUNBAR CT APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 FREDERICK L ROYBAL & LESLIE A BRENT L & PATRICIA DUNN PETER W & DONNA J PUTNAM CONDON ROYBOL 4556 152ND ST W 15497 DRESDEN TRAIL 15114 DUNBAR CT APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 JEFFREY & JOAN RAMBAUM SCOTT HILGERT GUY & CANDY ALBERTUS 4565 152ND ST W 4553 152ND ST 4541 152ND ST APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 JOSEPH & JEAN HASSENFRITZ TADE 0 & THERESA A OSITA THOMAS M & LORI A KEPNER 4529 152ND ST ]5502 DRESDEN TRAIL 15500 DRESDEN TRAIL APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 STEPHEN J & MARSHA I CRAMER RICHARD & KATHLEEN NELSON ALBERT W & PNYLLIS WEFEL 15260 DRESDEN WAY 15240 DRESDEN WAY 4528 149TH CT APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 JOHN T il & LAJEAN PETERSON CLIFFORD C & MARY E NELSEN PAUi J & GLORIA J STIER 4520 149TH CT 4512 149TH CT 4504 i49TH CT APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY DANtEI R & SHEILA M BETHKE GARY R & KIM M OHLEMACHER ,41200 CEDAR AVE S 3910 UPPER 149TH ST 3938 UPPER 149TH ST W APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 RUSEMOUNT MN 55068 HENRY IRIZARRY & GENEVIEVf MARK W & MICNELE R TOFFEFSON WILLIAM E & HARRIET DAY RODRIGUEZ 3972 llPPER i49TH ST 14955 CRESTUIEW AVE 2174 CROTONA APT 4C ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 BRONX NY 10457-2719 GREGORY A TRUSO & JACQUELINE A GARY A & VICTORIA S WHITE MARVIN & JOARINf TEAL HOLLATZ 14945 CRESNIEW AVE 20476 HAMBURG AVE S 14931 CRESTVIEW AVE ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 LAKEVILLE MN 55044 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 STEVEN J TEAL TROY A TEAL 14966 DODD BLVD t49B4 bODD BLVD ARNOLD TEAL ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROS€MOUNT MN 55088 14962 DODD BLUD ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 I Rosemount Town Pages city of xo�emwtnt " AFFIDAVIT aF PUBLICA�ION �� > rr.,�av�o�,.�c�, Diane Berge, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is an authorized �'"'` �s�,d.��a an�.a c�.� agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper, known as The a�.a.ac�� Rosemount Town Pages, and has full lrnowledge of the facts which are .l,p��.�Y�,,�;; stated below: A The news a er has com hed with all of the r u�rements constitutin "O��'�'�`��1�� ( ) P P P� �1 � g atY ot Ro.emoo�.rm bot�t.ra�ue�na oo'tha� qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota:Statues °�M��''�°'°me°°'°°�'`�'�"°"b°a�r'�w'' 331A.02, za�s�asws�aww.�cgs:aon.m.a...� 331A.07 and other applicable laws,as amended. ,u�..r�'�. �)The printed ` . ��r�nv�LR�o�� '� 1, 1,�,�C� ��'1�-'� aammeau ao tLe prapw�d °i� plsnned Utrit Deveiopmeat and ProHmimry PW.TLe �eomm��I¢v�mlcpmeM pbdividan pasuin w babd o0 8�s wMh dde ot tbooty Raad 42 � benveen(�ppeed�ia Av�u�aed�Areoae aod` which is attaehed, was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was ��ur� ' printed and published once each week for�,��s'�l successive La<<�B��k 1.S°uTf'xass ra�ax nnDrrcox x$pi.nr..««�s w�ua�«aee�u�n�«. weeks; it was first published on Thursday, the _��-__ day of c�,.�:��" �+ 19 %C and was thereafter rinted and ublisl�ed on �"a�"'°�t1oi�d�'n`'"'mm�� `-�=� + —� P P �.aac«,..oatytoa�m oc.��e�s every Thursday, to and including Thursday, the _,____day of ��M«��°°�'�'!L°"��`�'��°°"°°�'°� uw��or.aa i.a�c a��r u� , 19 --- ; and printed below is a copy of the ,�ww,aa�«��.�� lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclpsive, which is hereby '"�°°�°� acknawledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition �.«3,B�i,��p"��D ADD�O"' and publicadon of the notice: �`°`�'�`d p�`�� nn m��c�ri.«a a��.�t�ern�ex� .bcdergmjl��op�.tuvw�cyi nnntfFox..00mdit��o me moordedrLt tLaeo�1� op v c C000y.l�meau.lytn6 Sou�h oP the Natd�230A�lPoet (�,' d�eoG m m�sond at d�t m�bs�md P�callel�rU6�e By: �1��_ `� uaW tira�eot Ttde:Typesetter �P,tp�or mu he.ri.a�.w comiaa�uK �, RO�kOtTNP VHLAC�S�lAIiB oommadai p� Subscribed an sworn to before me on this ��`�`�`�� m°�°� c� �day a«a�a d a�ae�a c�t� of � xo,e�.c�r�,�a�c�r�,v�r�a�oo. ' 19 ' G4,600�e foo�t�at1�t�assacta� II • improvempys aod taro oulbb it�e notUnr�at dde a[the /�, dee. , I ,/ Awsoa wiaWns m oommen�on We Ro�emo�V'ilfe�e �pup�pR�y pist aro iavired a Weod thL Notary Public �� I� AFFIDAVIT u,�amuxoe�.r�rr,r�.i9s.. s��.v�,.�r� �qrotno.amo.nc ' `D�utaC�SY.A� � �"..+�.aw-r.'s�+'N+is -� . . . . . . ��..' . . . . �. � . ��cANNE K ELBERT . " �acary PUUIic Mmnasota � �^�; ,T UakUta Cuunty t�r �;omm Exc 5•15-96 ' . � 4 � . . � . . . . .. . . . . 7 � . . .�. TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Carlson Motion at City Council Meeting Before too much time passes, please review this motion to see if it is correct with what happened at the meeting. Thanks Ron. MOTION by McMenomy to approve preliminary plat and revised final development plan (PUD) with entry access off of CR 42 both directions, subject to City Engineer' s approval of grading and utility plan and execution of a development agreement. Full access will be currently provided at Chippendale with the option to review as necessary in the future. Second by Staats. Ayes: Anderson, McMenomy, Staats. Nays: None. Present: Busho. �', t. ' �._., _. .. . ' :'. ...:� � . , : . ., .._ . - � ....._ � . : ��-:. . . . _ .. ... . . - _'. ._.' . . ' ...� . . . .. . . . . : . . _ �. . .._.._ : .- . . .. .. . .. :, �'. E . ... __"-. .. . .._ . . . . � .-�� .. . . . . _ . . ..._ . . � � � - ....�. . . _... .. . .. . . . � � . . - . .. . � . . � _ . . . .. .., . .. _ � . .. __ � . .. . ... . � . . , _.. . ,_ ... �� . . �. . �. . ., _ . . _... .�... . . : ._ ._. . # � . _ � � � . . � . .. _ . � . � � - . . _ : . ,Draft Pra osai � -� - -- �- � �. : . _.._ . � . . :_ _ _ - .. _ � _., . . :- : _ . . . . :.: . . :- Pro'�ct Plan�- Bud � et , _ _ 1 J ! - t�o _ - . __ _ sem�unt V�IIa e Square ; g ; . � Rosemount, Minnesota l - 1 � _ _ Submitted to � � Port Autharity City of Rosemount . � ; � � . . � � . � Dated June 8, 1993 � : for June 15, 1943 � Port Authority Meefiing � � : � _ � - : :, . . _ _ � _ - � _ ; � � Table of Contents � A. Request Page 2 � B. Project Background Page 2 C. Proposed Project Page 2 � D. Project Development Team Assembled Pages 2-3 � E. Legal Description and Boundary Survey Pages 3-4 1. Legal Description 2. Boundary Survey � F. Proposed Development Pages 5-9 1. Conceptual Site Plan i 2. Conceptual Rendering of Shopping Center �� 3. Elevations Shopping Center 4. Statistical Summary & Green Area Variance Request 5. Center Signage � Exterior Tenant Signage Criteria G. Project Identification & Review Page 10 � 1 . Location 2. Ownership - 3. Developer ' H. Site Analysis Pages 10-13 1 . Topography/Slopes/Surface Drainage � 2. Surrounding Land Use/Zoning 3. Comprehensive Guide Plan Designation 4. Existing & Future Transportation Systems � 5. Programmed Pedestrian Trails & Sidewalks 6. Existing & Programmed Utilities I . Approval Process and Tentative Schedule Page 13 � 1 . Necessary Approvals for Project to Proceed 2. Tentative Schedule � J. Project Impact Pages 13-14 1 . Job Creation � 2. Estimate of Real Estate Taxes Generated by Project 'I 3. Psychic Benefits to the Community K. Summary Page 14 I, � I�' � : � � � A. Request Carlson Properties of Rosemount is requesting approval of a Commercial � Planned Unit Development on approximately 8.6 acres of land. B. Project Background � The 8.6 acre site is a part of the South Rose Park Addition Replat and its second addition. The site has been commercially zoned for ten years or more. Rosemount's comprehensive guide plan designates the area as a major commercial area within the city. � C. Pro osed Pro 'ect P J � The current concept is for a 67,000 square foot, two phase. project plus two areas designated for freestanding retail buildings out in front of the shopping center adjacent to CSAH 42. � The initial phase will consist of a 25,500 square foot grocery store anchor tenant, a 10.000 square foot secondary anchor tenant and approximately 16.400 square feet for small shops to house smaller retail � businesses and personal service businesses. The outlots near CSAH 42 are programmed to be sold in the First Phase. � The second phase will accommodate a 15,000 square foot expansion of the grocery store as the market demands. � D. Project Development Team Assembled 1 . Carlson Properties of Rosemount - Developer. Sponsor & Owner P.O. Box 69 - � Rosemount, MN 55068 Phone: (612) 423-2222 FAX �� (612) 423-4551 Partners Cliff Carlson, Ron Carlson and Rich Carlsan � 2. Land'Sake - Project Coordinator, Real Estate Broker, Leasing Agent P.O. Box 24127 Apple Valley, MN 55124 Phone: (612) 431-7500 Company Representative: Tom Heiberg � 3. Architect: The Runyan-Voge1 Group. Inc. Suite 6200 � 1300 Godward St. N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55413 Mr. Gary Vogel , Company Representative � Mr. John Kohler, Company Representative (612) 379-4100 (612) 379-4847 FAX � � � -2- � i � . . . � . � � � . , � 4. Civil Engineer: Rehder & Associates. Inc. Suite 240 3440 Federal Drive �� Eagan. MN 55122 Mr. John Krausert (612) 452-5051 ' � (612) 452-9797 FAX 5, Surveyor: Sigma Surveying Services 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway Eagan. MN 55122 �. Mr. Wayne D. Cordes, Company Representative (612) 452-3077 � 6. Contractor: ECI Building Contractors 1771 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, MN 55121 Mr. Mike Gresser, Chairman of the Board � Mr. Larry Gre11 , President and Company Representative (612) 452-0555 (612) 452-0057 FAX � E. Legal Description and Boundary Survey l . Legal Description � r r Divi ion Oescri tion Proposed P ope ty s p -- p/o Block l, SOUTH ROSE PARK ADDITION REPLAT-- � -Farcel C- �ot 1, Block 1, SOUTH ROSE PARK ADDITION REPLAT, according to the - � recorded plat thereof, Dakota County. Minnesota . Except the West 225.00 feet thereof, as measured at right angles to and parallel with the west line of said Lot 1 . � Together with a 30 foot wide non-exclusive driveway easement being 15.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 1 , distant � 208.33 feet Southerly of the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence Easterly at right angles to said west line, a distance of 225.00 feet and there terminating. � and Lot 3, Block 1 , SOUTH ROSE PARK 2ND ADDITIQN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota . � and (Common Driveway) � The North 60.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, SOUTH ROSE PARK 2ND ADDITION, as measured at right angle to and parallel with the north line of said Lot 4. I � -Parcel C- Land Area = 375,236 Sq. Ft. � (8.612 acres) � -3- � � � E. Legal Description and Boundary Survey 2. Boundary Survey � � COtlNTY STATE_ , A/D H1C'sHWAY NO. 42 N87��SSYE � .�_._. IJ31 'R: �. . . . . � . � � . . . � . ..�f � .•S��7. -MBB°S�3•'"E +°7 SO' __ _ �tnoe '•,. �t�� ' � �_ I � `•' � , � � � ` ,� � � �' � ti� `�`. • ' � ' _( P��So : ('v w � � r`'� � Q •t° •� tlYi� � � �! .. � � u, I � �'� ..__ � �: � ',;`°, � � ' � �i' =s:a.ve- � f`O .� Qj I . . ��o'•ro�wt.w---uurlrr.l=s-, .W ,�' fyv,, ♦`�_V- O� �� Oj 1 �� " �' I . � , �tb � t ! �.�/1 ��,�� _ � � aP` ,'� l I `, � � � �e6 •�, , : .I •}�` �F' G � ,pt . - u:. -NaE°�5.7.E =25 C ^ ��y``o ., . e�v J� �O� �� G�'6�a �' ' g com,w� o-:.�� «) . , p�?,� .�� _ � $ � � fP =��m— •�`� J� -•-t �,--See�:ss��W �JO196 �;: � � � •`' � •p. � �_._ _ , . .. � o _ � � • �.,� . ..a , ,_ �b�;•�3 •.�.. "-eyE ��t5 0 _ ' �j � rF ' o ,�4�.:o ' �' � •b i — �--—e 1S �-- � .�`_ 1 Sj, , ' := �` L> _ i . � � � . `.; � � �•*� , � �, �` �;, , � o ' •6� � � ; � : , \ � •,• �i�`` ! � I � �� ,�� r �*:�, Ag�,>�S . S � '' � �,\ RE`�•?; s�� `-t•_ I � y� l , �� ,� �-- _- _:�_� , /QpJQ / � �. � . �Q�3 � � ` "--- � C.`/ V� / I � � � , s�ae� i"= io�' � � � -4- � ' � � F. Proposed Development 4. Statistical Summary & Green Area Variance Request I ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE SITE AND BUILDING DATA '�I � OVERALL HARD HARD BUIIDWG PARKING PARKING SITE SURFACE SURFACE AREA REQUIRED PROVIDED AREA AREA (�) (S.F.) AT 5/1000 (S.F.) (S.F.) ' 'I LOT 1 302,036 242,859 80.4 66.900 334 342 RETAiL � ) ' i LOT 2* (AUTO 13,257 9,020 68.0 1,550 8 8 � SERVICE) ' LOT 3* ` F000) 41,018 31,055 75.7 3,600 �ESTIMATE) 55 ` TOTAL 356.311 282.934 79.4 72.050 382 405 (AvERAGE) '� AREAS AND PARKING SHOWN FOR IOTS 2 ANO 3 ARE BASED ON ASSUMED LAYOUTS _ AS SHOWN WITHOUT CONFIRMATION FROM ACTUAL USERS OR BUYERS OF THESE LOTS. Since the proposed green area percentage is just over 20%, which is a , departure from the standard 25%. A variance is requested with the following offsetting features: . Treat the pond areas with rock lined bottoms with more � landscaping around them. Fnhance the appearance when water is 1ow. • Enhanced building aesthetics . Improved Center appearance. • Screen the loading area of the grocery store from 151st Street � with more trees, walls, shrubs , etc. Perhaps extend a concrete block wing wall off the building corner to partially cover the trucks if it does not impair maneuvering site lines. � • Irrigate the parking lot islands and the remaining landscaping - foster the growth of the landscaping. • Show planters to be located along the front of the center, under � the overhang, soften the massiveness of the Center. r 5. Center Signage � A. Center pylon with center identification, major and minor anchor signage, and a changeable reader board B. Free standing pylon sign for each lot adjacent to CSAH 42 C . Tenant Signage - See Exterior Tenant Signage Criteria (Page 9) . � ' $' � i � ' ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE Exterior Tenant Signage Criteria � A. Tenant signage at the exterior shall consist of store identification only. Copy is � restricted to the tenant's proper name and major product or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems, shields and similar identifying devices are permitted, provided they are confined within the signage panel and approved by landlord. ' B. The designated signage area provided on the building facade is 3'-6" high x 18' long for each typical 20' tenant bay. Tenants may locate their specific area by referring to the architect's elevation plan. Horizontal recessed channels or � raceways are provided for anchora�e of the signage. C. All exterior tenant signs must be individual channel letters meeting the following � criteria: 1. 13MM white neon tube illumination with 60 milliamp transformers. � 2. 1/8" thick "plexiglass" face, color as selected by tenant with approval of landlord. 3. The returns and back to be .032 aluminum shop painted to match the � building's signage paneL 4. 5 h thick letters exactly, face to back. � 5. Single letters, capitals or logos, no higher than 36". A single row name of equal height letters may be 30" hi�h. Lower case letters shall not exceed 20". 6. Where possibie signs shall be centered on horizontal center line of the signage - � area, otherwise if upper and lower case letters are used, the bottom edge of the sign will be constant with other like signs. 7. Signs shall be confined to desi�nated areas shown on drawings. � 8. Sign installer to provide and instal; wire to accessible J-box provided by others near back of sign. 9. All exterior signage voltage shall b� verified with existing power. � 10. All signage shall be constructed per above, i�owever, each tenant will be allowed their own letter style and color of plexiglass sign face. ' 11. Signage contractors must include ;n their pricing the cost to review the criteria with each tenant, design the actual copy, create the shop drawing of each for fabrication, and include the cost of an acquisition of the signage permit or � permits for each and/or all signs. 12. Tenants sf�all submit to owner and to the city of Rosemount for approval all proposeci signage to be mounted on the exterior face of the building prior to � the signage fabrication. D. Auxiliary signage, such as that use� for grand openings and sales, shall be subject to approval by the landiord. ' E. Anchor tenant si na e shall be as a�reed u on between anchor tenant and landlord. g g .. P Location of signage area is restricted to the designated area on the signage band � provided. ' -g- � � ' G. Project Identification 1 . Location , The project is located South of CSAH 42 and North of 151st Street, West of Canada Avenue and East of Chippendale Avenue. , 2. Land Qwnership The land is owned by Carlson Properties of Rosemount, which is a , Minnesota Partnership. 3. Project Developer , Carlson Properties of Rosemount intends to develop, build, own and operate the shopping center. � H. Site Analysis 1 . Topography/Slopes/Surface Drainage. , The site rolls gently with minor slopes. The ground cover is field grasses . The area drains to CSAH 42, Chippendale and 151st Street which all use the in place storm water system to drain into the , Wachter Pond South of the site. 2. Surrounding Land Use/Zoning � The present zoning on the site is Commercial . The parcels to the North across CSAH 42 are Residential . The parcels to the East, - � West and South are Commercial . 3. Comprehensive Guide Plan Designation � The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area as Commercial . 4. Existing & Future Transportation Systems ' The following critical intersections affect the existing traffic conditions near the proposed center. ' a . CSAH 42 at Chippendale Avenue b. Chippendale Avenue at the existing Service Road tbetween CSAH 42 and 151st Street) � c. Chippendale Avenue at 151st Street d. CSAH 42 at Canada Avenue ii e. Canada Avenue at the existing Service Road (between � CSAH 42 and 151st Street) , f. Canada Avenue at 151st Street g. CSAH 42 at the proposed site entrance ' � -10- � ' � 1 . Existing Transportation Conditions CSAH 42 is a major east/west Dakota County highway extending ' through the City of Rosemount. This roadway, in the area of the proposed development, is a four lane divided facility with left-turn lanes provided at major intersections. Traffic ' signals in the area of this site are located on CSAH 42 at Chippendale Avenue and TH 3. The intersection of Canada Avenue is currently stop sign controlled, stopping Canada Avenue. The posted speed limit is 50 mph. This roadway is proposed as a , ' Principal Arterial by the Metropolitan Council . Chippendale Avenue is a two lane north/south city street I ' traversing from 145th Street south to 160th Street. Turn lanes are provided at CSAH 42. northbound at the Eastbound service road, and southbound at 151st Street. No parking is allowed on either side of this roadway between CSAH 42 and 151st Street. , The intersections of the service road and 151st are currently stop sign controlled stopping the side streets. A speed limit of 45 mph is posted in this area of Chippendale. � Canada Avenue is a north/south two lane city street running from CSAH 42 to TH 3. Parking is allowed only on the east side , of the roadway. The intersections with the service road and 151st Street are stop sign controlled, T intersections, stopping the side streets . A 30 mph speed limit is allowed on this roadway. � 151st Street is a two lane east/west city street with a speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Parking is allowed on both sides - ' of this roadway which runs from Chippendale Avenue to Canada Avenue. The Service Road is currently not a through street. From � Chippendale Avenue this roadway extends to the proposed site then turns south to 151st Street. This portion of the service road is not controlled by the City. From Canada Avenue this ' roadway extends to the proposed site. Both sections of the roadway are two lane parking allowed on both sides. , 2. Requested Future Transportation Systems The project as proposed will have four points of customer access. They are as follows: , * East Bound CSAH 42 Right Turn LaneJWest Bound CSAH 42 Left Turn in Lane � * Private access off of Canada Avenue from the East I * Private access off of Chippendale Avenue from the West * Maintain the private access off of 151st at the West end of ' the proposed center Two service accesses are proposed along 151st. ' -11 � ' ' A. Public Roadways: (criticaT Intersections and Proposed Improvements directly related to proposed center) , l . CSAH 42 at Chippendale -- Adequate during initial phase. 2. Stripe Chippendale Avenue Southbound to improve ' left turn to the Eastbound Service Road. 3. Chippendale Avenue at 151st Street -- when land ' uses to the West occur and when volumes develop. this intersection should have stop signs installed. ' 4. Construct right turn lane Northbound Canada Avenue to go Eastbound CSAH 42. Continue to allow left turn from Canada Avenue to CSAH 42 ', , Westbound. Continue to allow left turn from CSAH 42 Westbound onto Canada Avenue Southbound. 5. Canada Avenue at the existiag Service Road -- no � changes requested. 6. Canada Avenue at 151st Street -- no changes , requested. 7 . CSAH 42 at the proposed site entrance. ' a. Right turn in Eastbound from CSAH 42 to the site. - ' b. Left turn in Westbound from CSAH 42 to the site. B. Public Transportation: , We would invite Minnesota Valley Transit Authority to ! add the Rosemount Village Square to its published , route to pick up and drop off passengers . 5. Programmed Pedestrian Trails & Sidewalks ' There exists a trail on the South side of County Road 42 on the North edge of the property. A sidewalk pedestrian system on the North and East side of the shopping center is proposed. , 6. Existing & Programmed Utilities ' a . Sanitary Sewer -- A line is in place just North of the proposed building running East/West through the site. The Commercial lots adjacent to CSAH 42 will be served from this main line. Sanitary sewer is also available on 151st Street. , ' -12- � ' . ' b. Water -- A line is in place just North of the proposed building running East/West through the site. The Commercial lots adjacent to CSAH 42 will be served from this main line. Water is also � available on 151st Street. c. Storm Sewer -- Most of the storm water will be drained to one of two proposed on site ponding areas then on into the storm sewer line in 151st Street. From here the storm water goes to the , Wachter Pond to the South. I . Approval Process & Tentative Schedule ' 1 . Approvals for the project to proceed ' a. Preliminary Plat Approval b. Final Plat c. PUD Approval d. Site Plan Approval Shopping Center ' 2. Tentative Schedule ' a . Submittal Deadline - December 7, 1993 b. Planning Commission Review: Project Concept Review - January 11, 1994 ' c. Planning Commission: Recommendation - January 25, 1994 d. City Council Public Hearing - February 15. 1994 e. Planning Commission: Review Final Plat and PUD Agreement: February 22, 1994 , f. City Council : Approve Final Plat and PUD Agreement: March 1, 1994 ' J . Project Impact 1 . Job Creation Full -time Part-time sZQt� sZQ.b� I4�1 � Grocery (1994) 30 45 75 Shops 20 30 50 ' Secondary Anchor 7 18 25 Freestanding Retail Sites � �Q � ' Tota1 62 143 205 Z. Estimate of Real Estate Taxes Generated ' Phase I Shopping Center $150.000 Annual Real Estate 1994 Tax Dollars Freestanding Retail Sites (2) ' A. Approx. 41 ,550 sq. ft. 18,000 Annual Rea1 Estate 1994 Tax Dollars B. Approx. 12,160 sq. ft. 7.000 Annual Real Estate 1994 Tax Dollars Total First Phase $175.000 Annual Real Estate 1994 Tax Dollars , Phase II Shopping Center $ 45,000 Annual Real Estate 1994 Tax Dollars Total at Full Completion $220,000 Annual Real Estate 1994 Tax Dollars I ' -13- � � '' I I �' 1 '� ' 3. Psychic Benefit to the Community � A significant part of a community's identity is its shopping area. , � Currently our principle shopping area has served the needs of the , community well over the years. However, now as the community I grows, our population increases and our traffic patterns change, � we need the area for more stores and related parking to serve the j ' shopping needs of our larger population. We are fortunate to have ', the space to expand the downtown area down Highway 3 to include I the County Road 42 corridor. I ' , Today's customers are looking for one-stop shopping with ', convenient parking and the Rosemount Village Square, as proposed. I ' will begin to address this one-stop shopping need. It should help I keep residents ' shopping activity in Rosemount and their dollars �� spent in town which should help make all business residents and ' the municipal administration within Rosemount stronger and give us �, , a new sense of pride and identity for our community. I K. Summary , '', ' Carlson Properties of Rosemount is anxious to give the residents of ' Rosemount an expanded list of shopping choices. We are pleased to be able to offer a quality Jubilee Grocery Store as the center principle I II�, anchor. We are excited about the personal service businesses that can i ' , accom an the anchor. I p Y With the community's approval we are anxious to begin construction early ', ' this spring with a programmed opening of the Center in late summer or , early fall 1994. - , , We look forward to the process of making this Center a reality for the �, residents of Rosemount and the resulting expanded commercial service , area for the community. , , ' ' ' , � ' ' -14- ' T ° . ' . . . . . . . BENSH04F & ASSUCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE,SUITE 500/EDINA, MN 55439/(612)832-9858/FAX(612)832-9564 March 15, 1994 REFERroFi�E: 93-58 PRESENTATION TQ ROSEMOUNT CITY CO�JNCIL REGARDING TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR R4SEMOUNT VILIAGE SaUARE . Process to Complete Traffic Anaiysis . Proposed �ayout for Right and Left Turn Entrance to Rosemount Village Square on CSAH 42 . Proposed Pian far CSAH 42/Canada Avenue Intersection . Proposed 1995 Plan for CSAH �2/Chippendale Avenue intersection . Reasons for Service Road South of Noliday Station to Accommodate Trips to and from Rosemount Village Square PROCESS TO COMPLETE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE , . Identified potential fu�ture development in the area bounded by Shannon Parkway, County Highway 42, Highway 3, and 160th Street . Developed p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts for 1995 and 2015 that accounted for expected development in the area plus growth in through traffic on County Highway 42. These projections are consistent with the County's traffic forecasts for Caunty Highway 42. . Analyzed the ability of the roadway system to accommodate the projected volumes. . Developed a preliminary recommended traffic plan that addressed access arrangements and needed improvemen#s to effectively accommodate future traffic volumes. . Met with City and County staff to review preliminary recommended traffic plan. . Revised preliminary plan to respond to comments raised. 620'TO CENTERLINE OF CHIPPENDALE AVENUE �-- ----►720'TO CENTERLINE�F CANADA AVENUE ' CSAH 42 � — -- — — — -- — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — -- — _ � �'- � _ � _ _ ._ _. ._ _._. — — — — — -- — — � � 1 �� RECOMMENDED CHANGES FROM EXISTING � �,SITUATION ARE AS FOLLQWS: °'fe' �� -CONSTRUe'TION OF RIGHT AND LEFT TURN �� ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY TO ROSEMOUNT �� VILLAGE SQUARE �. -CfJNSTRUCTiON OF EASTBOUND RIGHT TURN � tANE 4N CSAH 42 —,► —► -CONSTRUGTION OF WESTBOUND LEF?TURN LANE ON CSAH 42 k -----__ sTOP l � N � ROSEM�UNT VILLAGE � SQUARE 0 100, ' CARLSON PROPERTIES FIGURE 1 OF ROSEMOUNT CARLSON PROPERTIES PROPflSED LAYOUT FOR TRAFFIC STUDY RIGHT AND LEFI"TURN BENSHOOF&ASSOCIATES, wC. ENTRANCE TO ROSEMOUNT - TRANSPORTATIONENGINEER3ANDPlANNERS VILLA�E SQUARE ON CSAH 4Z CSAH 42 � ,- - - — - - - - - - — - - -- - - �«-- � _., — ._, - - - - -- -- - - - - — - -- - - - _. _. � -� 1 � � , RECOMMENDED CHANGES FROM EXISTING SITUATION ARE AS FOLLOWS: -CONSTRUCTION OF EASTBOUNQ RIGHT TURN LANE ON CSAH 42 -CONSTRUCTI4N OF NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE ON CANADA AVE. W -PROHIBITION OF PARKING ON CANADA AVE. FRC?M SERVICE RD. � TO CSAH 42 � ' - INSTAW4TION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL AT CANADA AVE( CSAH 421NTERSECTION WHEN VOLUMES MEET STANDARD Qy' WARRANTS. � � 2 U / / N / � f � o ,00� / CARLSON PROPERTIES OF R�SEMflUNT CARLSON PROPERTIES PROP�SED PLAN FOR - TRAFFiC STUDY CSAH 42/CANADA AVENUE gENSHooF&Assoc�ar�s, wc. INTERSECTION TRANSPORTATION ENGI NEEfl3 AND PLANNERS � �� I CSAH 42 _ � � � — ,,, _ ` � � � � � � � �l RECOMMENDED CHANGES FROM I EXISTING SITUATION ARE AS FOLLOWS: -CONSTRUCTION OF EASTBOUND AND ' WESTBOUND RIGHT TURN I.ANES ON CSAH 42 � TQIFROM '♦- ROSEMOVNT II � VILLAGE SQUARE '� SERVICE RQ wI Q � I 0 Z �W a a = l �. U 1 151 ST STREET N SGALE �� 0 100' CARLSON PROPERTIES PROPOSED 1995 PLAN FOR OF ROSEMOUNT �ARLSON PROPERTIES CSAH 42/CHIPPENDALE TRAFFIC STUDY �NTERSECTION AND CHIPPENDALE AVENUE �BEtdSH00F d�ASSOCIATES,INC. TC} NQRTH AND SOUTH �RANSPORTATIONENC,INEERSANDPIANNERS REASONS F�R SERVICE RDAD SOUTH OF HOLIDAY STATICIN TO ACC�MMODATE TRIPS TO �11VD FRQM ROSEMO�JNT VILLAGE SQUARE a) Enterin mov m e ents do no n t eed to be rohibited in ord r 9 p e to provide adequate operation at Chippendale Ave./service road intersection. Of the total projected 2015 p.m. peak hour traffic entering the intersection of Chippendale Ave. and service road t 1612 vehiclesl, only 84 vehicles {five percent) would use the service road to enter the Rosemount Village Square development. b) Safety difficulties would occur if traffic exiting the shopping center is allowed to use the service road, but not entering traffic. This result would occur because some motorists turning off Chippendale Ave. would be surprised to see the one-way condition and would travel in the wrong direction ta reach the shopping center. c) Establishment of one-way westbound flow on the service road between the shopping center praperty line and the eastern driveway for the Holiday Store would conflict with a basic transportation planning principal, which is to encourage movements among commercial properties without having to use major public roadways. If the service road is one-way westbound just west of the shopping center, trips from the Holiday Station to the shopping center probably would use Co. Hwy. 42. . .DAKQTA � UNT Y �AN�r��M�U��°�E",.�� C� � , ,; �;.:. a9,.�oa� } SURVEY dc I.ANA.iNFORMATION DEPARTMENT +ax(ui2t�3!?�.�u;n 3 • e.!'��»C;ni.4X�G AVFNIiG '�"':(' :h.:.i 4'v M�iNNY;$C)T.1 fi'S��'s fi4l,+ � � March 14 � 1994 city o� Rosemount 11�67 � 145�h St. E. - Rosemount, MN 55068 . AT'r: John Mx].].�r, Econamic �evel.vpment coordinator RE: ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE Dear Mr. Miller: : The �Dakotia countx Pla� Commission mat on March 14� 1994r ta �econsider the ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQ[TARE. Said piat is adjacent to C.S.A.H. No. 4Z and is, Cheretore, subject to the Dakata county contiguous k1.at vrdinance. , The Piat Commissi.on tabied t2�1s p2a�. However, in the review of WENSMANN S�XTH ADb�'i�zON, the riqht of way requirements far developments along C.S.A.H. N�. 42 were discussed. Bec�use o= the incsease �n trafPic, this plat � . should be re-evaluated to pe7�mit a 6-l.ane rQadway on the plat, � The requirements call for �.00 �eet of half righ� of way along C.S.A.x. No. 42. s�,ncerely, . � � .f . . ► ��'- �Y-' ry H. 3t�vensa bakota coun�y Surveyor & Land rnformat�on Director 5+�cretary, Piat Comfiission . CHS � Vt � �f �� . ,�o � 6� cc: Bud �smundson, City Engineer p� �. � ,tN Carlson Pro perties c� /1 � . � � � � t �� `�� *" a . � � . � a � �. *•� � �� . ", � ��"t � � � ([��`''`� P�ine.e on R•erasa rapw � ��„`��k��/\ � � AN EQUAL Ot'PORTUNITY EMi'I.OYC'R , � vJ . L�Ah;) ' SAKE TEL No .6124317500 Mar 15 ,94 15 � 13 No .002 P .01 c�o.aax�a�2� ' AF'PLE VAIL[Y,MN 55124-0127 1 LLCPI•iONE:81�tl431*750G _ � �,�.� �,�. . � GCIMMFt�c:lAL!INDUSTRit1�/REAf,FSTATE/ ` i7PMEN7 ANU Pf90f�ERTY MI�NRG[MEN1 SE.4�VICES _ _ _ FaCSlMI�.� TRANSMtTTAL CQVER LETT�R - TIM�.• �' : �,� DATE: �I (51�� .. -- �-r�—�— T�:�.�.� '� - �'ROM: � - � ♦`� ~ � FAX# r��'�,3 FAX# 431-7512 C�MMENTS: 1�-�.Z� � `�.9 r�t`��t� `�G�.�G.-Q. ^ ��- �-�, l S t,.�., t�c.�— C,�...-R t.a:.• • �V, �� .. . `� ��t � � �. ��. -�-� �- �,,,,,"�, ,� C�S� � ��G BGt `=j ,. if you did not rec�ive �-p�ges, incluciing this page, please cat! 672-431-`75QQ. SENT BY: r��_._ / � . � � � ■ � ' 1 � l � / � rT l� � I .` \ � � A t r ��p��. � ��1 � +��' ,�� 1 \ I � �� + ` � �� \� � � � � � , j � ��. . , , �� , ��1 `�►�w�ar.�__ �.�-. � � �1 . . E�` � �►� : ' 1�� l �� T ,\�� , �_ �� f��! �'�l�l�� .�._��►.�.:�•��:� „�'� :,..�..;-. � •�c:��w�+�.iuh!�nMrt��rrN�u��A�E�A,�_� �\'`, �e �� . ��t.,� <<,��<i` �^�.- � . �, ��`��'i�\.�`�s�,�,�4�!��\\�;:t�.''4r\��'.� i��`��1 - �� ,.._>.. .,__ �.�. _. . .�.*.�,��v��.w�.,��w.�t�� a'�::`�.�R� ��i�3.�s;:: �►�`��.�,+��.�a��+��+� �- � " .^ / f� ' .• �,��, �,^ �, �� O '�� t .\ �1 � , � ��. �.,� o � . . . ,. �.'�� • 1 ;. , � • ' ' :; �/ . - e � ,�•� � I ~ �'�.'� � � � � � � a��.:�";��.��,`�� ►��;=.-..�.-�.-�'�~�' �=�- ��`�' ».�_._ _. _ - - -- �1��1„��.•.,.�.MI.��•�-�,',� �� f�r�� r�+a."�..'`�..�.�i�.^''-��;►A:.=�:+�.e:.�.�-.-.�,'�S'`�-. .4-R..�.,.4 - +�""r"..a��.�'.. . ' �_e..t,.\ •tiy-,�w�ri`1►..7:.1i►1.._,�r+..1:.;..�i1�..��.,�'�::a,� `1♦ � • ��ti..�►ti�:.1=��L��1'� �,j� `r -� ` � .� � `;• ! �j �� 1 •� � c,i � � . . . . � � � � . . . � � . . . �wf .. � � � � � . � � . � - �� ..r- ��..^�.... � � ....... . � . . . . � � � . � �. . . . � . . � . . . + � � E . . � . . . . . . .. . . [ 7 � � ( � . . . .. . . 1 . � . . . � � . . � . . � � � � � � � � . �I. � � � � � . � . . � . ( . , .. . . � � � . . .. ��1�� y �� r' � � � � � � - 'I , � ; 5 � ..._."_" ; ' � � 3 ; � t f��... � � ; � � � 3 � � , , �� . ; � � . _ : ' � � i ._._ ` i . � - - t . �, Ca.ty of Rosemount � Executive Summary for Action ,� City Couacil Meeting Date: March 15. 1994 Ageada Itea�: Rosemount Village Square Agenda Seetioa; Commercial Planned Unit PUBLIC HEARING Development (PUD} and Preliminary Plat Prep�red By: Richard Pearson Ageada No: Assistant Planner �TEM � � Attachments: Resolution; Application; PUD; Appr ved . � Natice; Mailing List. ' Mr. Ron Carlson of Carlson Prt�perties, Inc. is requesting approval of a Commercial Planned Unit Development on their property on the south side of CSAH 42 between the Pizza Hut and the Holiday station. The Planning Commission reviewed the concept proposal on January 11, 1994 and the revised final development plan on February 22, 1994. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the final I, development plan and the preliminary plat on Februar�r 22, 1994. _ On Friday, March llth the Developers presented sketehes indicating significant modifieations to the western half of the shopping mall design. The 10, 000 sq. ft. drug anchor has been replaced by a ��free standing" bank with a drive-thru. The preliminary plat will also have an additional lot intended for the ban}�. The developer wishes to proceed with the review process. It is the opinion of Staff that the ma.gnitude of the changes require further Staff and Planning Commission review prior to approval by the City Council. The attached reso2ution reflects the proposal prior to the revisions. Developm�t =ssues: Prior to the revisions, the issues wi�hin t�.e shopping center site had been resolved in terms of building aesthetics, landscaping and parking` design and circuiation. Access issues reiative to Chippendale Avenue and CSAH 42 remain unresolved'. The City Engineer has outlined his concerns and recommendation in the attached memo. At this time the Planning staff cannot recommend approval of the Rosemount Village Square Flanned Unit Development and preliminary plat without additiona-1 review by Planning Commission and City staf f. , Recommeaded Actioa: A MOTION to t��^�..�--a��on on the Rosemount Village Square CQmmercial Planned Unit Development and preliminary plat and refer it back to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation_ City Couacil Actions 1 U-�h-Qe, �.x-i�. � ��-0 a 2- + , � �� 3-15-94.OU4 r � "' E. Legal Description and Boundary Survey � 2. Boundary Survey COUNTY STQTE_ , A10 HtGNWAY NO. 42 Mar�fS'sY( � � . �. o.y � . � . . - . . � '��.�..�.. �_�n rSl�lf t r.cs��. ... -•r!!' S f.,.. �¢�gp.� ' - � - � � . . .�,»� � �•; °'"�°° �. . . � . � , Pizz�� 1 � ' . : ' , , � � HuT , � � •�� QGv~�' . � .y� � . . . , .. L `� : .. � .� . .. � ,� r � .,,. : . � . ' i' M . � �'�/ ' Q?.��" � } .:t`� � " :�y ' q f •• � : � i ��. l �oLt(�p.'-C� , � � : a ': . 1 � � �Y`" '_ -__ • ,�, ... �h� :�t` n ! _� -.x,r � Z :•t+!•!t: �.. ��.."�""'�.•� r' � "'' V V _` �V • � :' � Q 1 ��.,....�...._.c.x«..�s:�_ ;, , r` .,`,� a�r�� , r �, � ., t� t 0 � I M�tc.17 SuQwaY ; ::• ♦ �� ; �.:.�,` -,� `� , .� . . :� �I��LE . � � :p ��t. G � �i� `66 ,.., p . . i/ i ft �!. --rl.S'�53T't �-23 f - S��P' '� • • _� Q� Qi �,��`' �% , �---- � - � . �j . �/��•�`•� �. • Jv� . . . `►`�O�� . ��.,�7=s ' . � . . . ; �; G.w.., 0�=....'.�:--. '��;i�� ` � ! � •,\ . � •�ttsr�.t�•��. . � � . . � . . � �� '�� f�-Stf:SSl`w' ��8��l6 � . � . • � . . � � � � �� -� � � j ' �a I . �' • _r � - p�,�{Z-w � . ,., < : . � � :� , � ., . Qc,i�_t•t G£,�; . � . ; . . , � � I ..�..��..'.�..�• . �.a.,�re9�.� � . . . . . . ,�.�'�.� - � �:r �+'�,: � s . � ., . • : . i . . �� .�Q� � � . . � y�;, ,_ +, �.——_._.._.,,_. � 1 � - . � `"" ---.� Sl S7- � ; � ^ . ' � �` � .,�?. , � � �,� � . . - • ` � , � 1 �� , • •P! , � \ �, � � �G�o.,. ' � I , ,..f ¢ ., . ` ~t `� , s . `� Q ' , \ j'QE�r�,�•a':.< <-- � ' � . � -�,.� . , � V "�:�,"`. _ • y�v � �. �~-"�..'�='�.�� , �oS� � � �` : - /�434 � �'` - ---_..._.�. . c l' �� 1 . � � ` : , I scae t t"=to,' i . ; � -4- 1 1 1 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 1994 -31 A RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL TO THE ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AND PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SETTING OUT THE CONDITIONS FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount has received a Commercial Planned Unit Development (PUD) and preliminary plat for property legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, SOUTH ROSE PARK ADDITION REPLAT, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, except the west 225.00 feet thereof, as measured at right angles to and parallel with the west line of said Lot 1. Together with a 30 -foot wide non exclusive driveway easement being 15.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 1, distant 208.33 feet southerly of the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence easterly at right angles to said west line a distance of 225.00 feet and there terminating; and Lot 3, Block 1, SOUTH ROSE PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota; and the north 60.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, SOUTH ROSE PARK 2ND ADDITION, as measured at right angles to and parallel with the north line of said Lot 4; and WHEREAS, on February 22, 1994 the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed a Commercial PUD and preliminary plat and submitted its recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the proposed commercial development is consistent with the current C -4 General Commercial zoning of the property; and WHEREAS, the proposed commercial development is consistent with the City of Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan: Update 2000 land use designation for subject property; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 1994 the City Council of the City of Rosemount held the required public hearing for a revised Rosemount Village Square Planned Unit Development and preliminary plat. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount approves the Rosemount Village Square Commercial Planned Unit Development and preliminary plat subject to the following: 1. engineering recommendations; 2. site access resolution to be reviewed and approved by the city engineer; 3. detailed plans and specifications in conformance with all applicable building and fire codes and the Rosemount zoning ordinance; 4. park dedication recommendations; RsmtVilg.PUD /PRE March 15, 1994 Page 1 of 2 1 1 5. trail location recommendations; and 6. execution of a Planned Unit Development /Subdivision Development Contract. ADOPTED this 15th day of March, 1994. ATTEST: Sus.: n M. W. sh, City Clerk Voted against: Voted present: None. Busho E.B. McMenomy, Mayor RESOLUTION 1994 -31 Motion by: McMenomy Seconded by: Staats Voted in favor: Anderson, McMenomy, Staats RsmtVilg.PUD /PRE March 15, 1994 Page 2 of 2 � i �' cinr Hau . C I TY U F RO S E M�U f�l T Z8�5-,45th�treet�est — :��`� � �� P.O.Box 510 �� ' � �� =' � � � � � � � � Rosemount,MN � � Everything s Coming Up Rosemount!! s5obs-osio ' Phone:612-423-4411 fax:612-4Z3-5203 To: Mayor E. B. McMenomy � Councii Members: Anderson ' Busho , Statts Wipperman From: Bud Osmundson, P.E., City Engineer, Assist PWD ' Date: March 11, 1994 RE: Rosemount Village Square Development ', This memo is an overview of the traffic analysis of the site. This review includes a !, site access and impacts of the development on the surrounding city and county streets. Access to the site is available from the fiour fallowing locations which wilf be , discussed in more detail in the following materiaL 1. County State Aid Highway 42 (CSAH 42) 2. Canada Avenue 3. 15'1 st Street ; 4. Chippendale Avenue , The City, with approval from the developer, hired OSM Engineering to complete a traffic anaiysis for the Rosemount Village Square. However, after their analysis was ' comptete the developer contracted an engineer, Benshoof&Associates,to analyze the � traffic on their behalf. I, 1. County State Aid Highwav 42 '� Access from CSAH 42 is proposed to be a direct right in and a teft in to the site. The I Dakota Count Pla in m ' y tt g Co mission had received a prelirninary plat in July of 1993 and recommended that a right in be atlowed to the site, but not a right out due to the probabifity of possible traffic conftiets (U-turns) at Canada Avenue. The plafi commission furthermore recommend that a left in woufd be allowed onfy if the Canada Avenue median would be closed, {Exhibit A) However, recent discussions with the county staff have determined that they may support a left in off of west bound CSAH 42 with City support. This is addressed later on in the agenda this evening. Staff supports the right in and left in off of CSAH 42 as long as the Canada Avenue median is not closed. . .. . ..� RiMed m reeyelyd paper . cauaiMng 30°0 �posKonwme marerials. � y The current average daily traffic count {ADT) on CSAH 42 between Chippendale and Canada is 7580 east bound and 7950 we$t bound, far a totai of 15,530 trips per day. tOSM took actual caunts in July, 1993.) The Dakota County Highway Department predicts that within 20 years the segment of CSAH 42 east of Chippendale will have an ADT of 2&,000 to 30,000, while west of Chippendate the ADT is predicted to be 33,000 to 35,000. 2. Canada Avenue The proposed shopping center is accessibie to Canada Avenue off an easement between McDonaids and Dairy Queen to the east. The recommendations from both OSM and Benshoff due to the proposed traffic increase on Canada include a widening of Canada at CSAH 42 to allow for both teft and right turn lanes. It also includes the removing of parking on the east side of Canada Avenue tit is already prohibited on the west side) which will allow safer traffic flow on Canada Avenue. In addition, tfiere would be a right turn and thru lane at 151 st Street for south bound Canada traffic. Canada Avenue currently has an ADT of 4350, with a projected ADT of 6165 in 1995 (after the shopping center is completed), and 7?10 in 2015. 3. 151 st S�reet West The orientation of the shopping center is such that it backs up to 151 st Street. Retait traffic firom 151 st Street eould utifize an ent�ance at the west end of the shopping center site adjacent to the existing Subway store. There are other accesses to the rear of the buiEding for employee parking and deliveriss. This has been agreed upon by staff and the developer, and has Planning Commission approvaL 15'1 st Strest currently has an ADT of 1480, with a projected ADT of 1930 in 1995, and 2895 in 2015. Both OSM and Benshoof predict very light peak hour traffic on 151 s# Street. {Exhibit B) This is due in part to the orientation of the shopping center on the site. Regardless, there seems ta be an under-utiiizatian of 151 st Street 6oth now and in the future. � 4. Chi�pendale Avenue The Chippendale Avenue access has been the most discusssd and is the most important within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. I have itemized the information on Chippendale into many sub-categariss as follows. The "service road" or driveway into Holiday and the Chippendale Center (Subway, Mr. Movies, Mac`s1'is located 210 f�et south of the south curb af CSAH 42. The 151 st Street opening is approximately 424 feet south ofi CSAH 42. Staff's position is that the 210 foot separation is inadequate for smooth and safe traffic flow. a. History y t � � �. � . � I � As the attached Rosemount Ci Co n il min es exhibi he raffic im ty u c ut t, t t paet onto Chippendale Avenue has been discussed at a number of ineetings since 1979 when the South Rose Park Replat was initially proposed. The initial conclusions of Short Elliot Hendrickson, who completed a feasibility report and traffic analysis at the time, was that a median should be built from CSAM 42 to 151 st Street on Chippendale Avenue which would aHow safe and smoath traffic f{ow in this area. In 1985 at the time the Holiday Station was proposed, the City Council thoughfi' that the median sho�ld be constructed prior to development. Quoting the February 19, 1985 minutes, tparagraph 2 on page 203 Exhibit C). "The Gouncil generatly agreed that premature construction of the median served no benefit but expressed great concern of the political diffieulties of constructing a median after the area is developed. The Council agreed to allow a temporary futl access to proposed parcels A & B (the Holiday Station and Chippendale Strip Center) provided the Carlsons enter inta a development contract with the City." "The contract would be recorded and indicated that the City would construct a median on Chippendals, limiting access to Lot 1, Block 1, (Holiday site�, when, in the opinion of the City, the median is needed. The contract would also specify no ather access points would be permitted to parcels A & B from either Chippendale Avenue or 151 st - Street, and a utility and driveway easemen� be established on Lot 1, Black 1 to serve parcel A from 151 st Street." A month later at the March 19, 1985 meeting further discussion was held on the subject and the Council directed staff to redraft the agreement and allow a median cut for full access at the service road entrance. The initial development contract with Carlson Properties reflects these statements. However, the Holiday Statian and South Rose Park Replat development contracts may nat necessarily reflect the verbiage irr these minutes. However, the Rosemount National Bank was only allowed a right in, right out directly across from the service road in 1986. �Exhibit C) b. Accident History Since 1987, the Rosemount Police Department has recorded 14 accidents that have occurred between CSAH 42 and 151 st Street. However 10 of the accidents have been in the parking lots of either the Holiday Station or ths Chippendale Strip Center. The four accidents that were actually on Chippendale Avenue have either been rear-enders or 90 degree angle accidents #or south bound traffic on Chippendale Avenue trying to turn into the Holiday and Chippendale Center site. c. Traffie Volume Both OSM and Benshoff have predicted approximately the same eak hour P volumes on Chippendale Avenue, the service road, and 151 st Street. This ADT f S _ was 561'4 between CSAH 42 and 151 st Street. OSM further predicted that the ADT'wouid be 8060 in 1995 (after the shopping center is constructedl and 10,075 in 2015 when the area is fully developed. The 10,000 car per day prediction 20 years after the proposed shopping center is buitt is the same prediction which was made in 1979 by Short, Etliot, Hendrickson when this site was first proposed for development. At that time, they determined and recommended that a median be constructed between CSAH 42 and 151 st Street on CMippendale Avenue. d. OSM Engineering Recommendation The traffic engineering department from QSM, after studying and analyzing the traffic impacts of the site, presented both short term and Jong terrn recommendations. The short term or phase 1 recommendations relate to when the shopping eenter is initially constructed and the long term or phase 2 recommendations relate to after the grocery store is expanded and is generally for the year 201_.5 when fulf development occurs of the entire area. The OSM short term recommendations can essentially be summarized in that they recommend a median be constructed on Chippendale Avenue fram CSAH 42 to 151 st Street, which eliminates a left turn onto the service road from south bound ehippendale Avenue and a left turn from the service road to south bound Chippendale Avenue. The Iong term recommendations from OSM are that the City should provide a dual left turn lane for north bound Chippendale Avenue to west bound CSAH 42. e. Pedestrian traffic OSM has recommended that a sidewalk be constructed on 151 st Street. Pedestrians can utitize the trails an CSAH 42 and Chippendale to access the site, along with the proposed 151 st Street sidewalk. In addition, a median on Chippendale would pravide a safe haven for pedestrian crossing of Chippendale Avenue.: Pedestrian traffic wilf increase as the area west of Chippendale develops. f. Conclusions The pro�osed Rosemount Village Square is considered a neighborhaod retail center. In simple terms, this means that the majority of the peopte using the site wil{ be local people and will be familiar with the area. Staff"has worked wifih the developer and has presented many afternatives to the recommended design. W� have concluded that 2 alternative (or hybrids) which are shown an the attached Figures 1 and 2 should be considered. The developers have adaman#ly requested #hat full access be provided at the service road entrance , Y to Chippendale Avenue. One of the atternatives provided egress from the proposed shopping center which woufd pass by both the Holiday Station and the Chippendale Strip Center. However, none of the alternatives have been accepted by the developer. They want to have full access between the Holiday and Rosemount Vil{age Square and fuli access to Chippendale at the service road. The City's major responsibility when constructing or analyzing city streets should be towards safety. The staff, plus two reputable engineering firms have I recommended a median be constructed between CSAH 42 and 151 st Street. In addition, the traffic engineer for the County has concerns about traffie I, backing 'up on south bound Chippendale which could affect the operation of i CSAH 42. (Letter is attached, Exhibit D) In addition, it saves the residents ; future tax dollars in having the developer, which impaets the site the most, pay ' for improvements at the time of that development. Otherwise, if the median ' is not completed at this time, the taxpayers of Rosemount will be the ultimate responsible party to construct Chippendale Avenue into a safe street in the future. We have not discussed the fiability issues with this specific item. If the City has been advised to construct a median in this area many times, and reluetant to because the developer is more concerned about traffic access, not safety, then does it open itself up to future lawsuits resulting from accidents at this intersection? But at this time does the Gity have any liabilities for restricting the acce'ss b orderin the construction of the median? This is a very complex Y 9 and tough decision for the policy makers. If the Holiday and Chippendale Center buildings were not in place, and the area was proposed for development today, Staff would recommend that the median be constructed and a right in, right out be allowed. If the accident history is any indication of what may happen when the traffic is almost doubled from 5,000 to 10,000, we ean expect tw'rce as many accidents. This is a major concern. The City's responsibilities include saving its residents #rom property damage and personal injuries it can prevent by constructing a median. g. Recommendations My first recommendation is to construct a full median on Chippendale between CSAH 42 and 151 st Street with left turn lanes at CSAH 42 and at 151 st Street. tF'rgure No. 1) Furthermore, two way access east on the service road would be allowed, but it would only be a right in, right out onto Chippendale. This would include a four-way stop at Chippendale and 151 st Street. . 6 � . . . . . � . . . - My second ehoice is the alternative which inciudes a partial median, but allows a left into the service road, a right out only from the service road, and onty egress or west bound movement from the shopping center site. (Figure No. Z) I don't betieve the City can leave it "as is" (full access) and wait to see what happens with the traffic. Do we wait untii a real bad accident occurs prior to any action? i would recommend against it. �..----� � . � �` , GARY H.STEYENSON,R.�..S. �,� �Q � �(J(M//� y LANDCINFORMAT ON DIRECTOR v (612)891-7087 , SURVEY& LAND iNFORMATION QEPARTMENT FAX(612)891-703t � � • 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 55124-8579 . _ �T,, . _.- �,` ..__ ,, s � July 13, 1993 City of Rosemount 1167 - 145th St. E. Rosemount,, MN 55068 ATT: Stephan Jilk, Administrator ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE Dear Mr. Jilk: The Dakota County Plat Commission met on July 12, 1993, to reconsider the revised preliminary plat of ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE. Said plat is adjacent to C,S.A.H. NO. 42 and are, therefore,: subject to the Dakota County Contiguous P1at Ordinance. ,� The Plat Commission on a 3 to 1 vote recommends the following: ,Q 1. ) A right in only at the proposed access location is the only allowed intersection with the existing conditians � at Canada Avenue. This , is a variance from our � guidelines since it is not a public street. However, < — with the internal road network of the development it = serves the same purpase. Right turns onto C.S.A.A. NO, � 42 from this property need to be prevented at this time W to minimize U-turns on C.S.A.H. N0. 42 at Canada Avenue. 2. ) If the median at Canada Avenue is closed now, a right out and a left in would be possible. Future guidelines, however, may not allow this type of intersection this close ta Chippendale Avenue. ' 3. ) In conjunction with this development, staff` recommends that the County and City work together to improve ' traffic in this area by installing right turn lanes at Chippendale, Canada, and TH #3. , The City ' should respond to these concepts before the , development moves to the final plat stage. ' No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the Caunty Highway Department. ' .�� • Printed on Recveled Paoer ' �_g Ro��{1j7o cn�1/1'r7m� AN EQUAL QPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER � . Sin erely, �Gary H. Stevenson Dakota County Surveyor & Land Information Director Seeretary,' Plat Commission GxS Jvf cc: Carlson Properties Q ` Bud Osmundson, city Engineer Tom Heilberg Dave Everds, County Engineer �- Louis Breimriurst, Physical Development Director — Brandt' Richardson, County Administrator � � Steven Loedin Count Commissioner 5. Y = � W � � � . � . � � . f � � � �� . . � . . . �" COUNTY ROAD 42 .�� .--mrneu,oe, K�.�sor,s� .-...�es�eorn�se ,� j--rer„ti,3� �asareaeer2ss�3si� f �.�u�22enso � ;i�'ueu� �� ,_ �' �1� �� . • 'S .._... � ... . � �4A _ ... . ..... . ._ ... .. ... .. . ... .... . . ..... .. . ........ ._... .. . . .. �� ..... .. ... .. .. _. _ .._. ... . .. . . . � �� . . . . . . . . .. . . . ~m . . . A� � . .. . � . rN.� � .. . �� ;�� aao--. f—omro � � 'l�('� PROPOSED SfTE ,� b �� q � � ��. a� W �� ' a��'�.°"`� �l > �� ' 4 '�r � �� mns� �orors • q �� ¢ "�� rSrSrsT , c, o �� RFFr z w a . u. _ �� EXISTING �1 �� V � �---2015 ��'a�� XX1XXlXX � eg ` A� ��r� �� GARLSON PROPERTIES � ' � : CARLSON PROPERTIES EXISTlNG AND FUTURE P.M.PEAK TRAFFIC STt1DY HOUR TURN MOVEMEAlTS FOR N �BENSM04F&ASSOCIATES,INC. . RIGHT TURN AND LEFT TURN IN SCENARfO NOTTO�SGALE � � � � TNANt►ORTAt10NENOiNBlRSANO►UNNLh6 . � . EXHIBIT B � t� � • . N � . . . . - . � � �� . . . . � . �O � . � � . .. � n io .�1�. COUNTY RC :==�o,nsanoa, n� � i 31/139f2fl0 536J642/885�' N.A.f126/t3Q i 88J265t3s7--'�'�i �� WQ� �� ' �� m �� N . . '�C�iO � � . . . � ��. � A� � � . . � . � . ,. � ��V. . . . �., ' � N� �. . �. . . � � � i 6 �� B81203l2Q5 . II oloro� � aao - � .� --z. ,r- �«►� : PROP4��.I `l�t' �-- ' ro,�co — Lj,� ��m m m�� N � . . . �,t' � � . � . . � � . . m r � . 'e ' � � . � .. . Q �� L�"'! o� �� 717/13� '�—0/O15 . 8l8H 06�' '� �`�'`\,\ W 1T� rs,�r J cv�., �� Q ��=� R o -��' � z � � w ^ � EXlSTING Q- �---�'� 1995 U � r--�--- 201 a ' XX/XX/XX 1 �j �' � < /J �j F.� .��..E OF C S�t-t- L�-Z�- CARLSON PRC3P: N B�r�sHo�F a�n.� NOTTO SCALE TRANBPGflTA710N@NQ� ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS � '�Q ' Regular Council Meeting ' July 17, 1979 MOTION by Jensen to adjourn. Second by Walsh. There being no further ' business to come before this Council and upon unanimous decision this meeting was adjouzned at 9:23 p.m. . Respectfully submitted, � r � • Maury�f tus ' Council Secretary �A'.�S2: �,!--�, / . on . Darling Clerk/Treasurer Printed this � day of �j�� , 1979. Dakota County Tribune. ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS - Special Council Meeting � ' July 23, I979 Pursuant to due call. and notice thereof the Special Meeting of the City �""' ; Council of the City of Rosemount was duly held July 23, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. � in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. �„ The meeting was called to orde= by Mayor Knutson with Councilman Ratzlaff = , absent. � ' ' W ' The Mayor led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance. �'l E ll p rpose af the Special Meeting was to hold Public Hearings on South Rose Park Reglat Preliminary P1at Hearing, Carlson's request to rezone a small parcel in South Rose Park, and Broback's request to rezone various lots in the Broback Addition and the Broback 6th Addition. Mayor Knutson opened the Public Hearing on the Propased Replat of South Rose Park. The Clerk has nat received the A£fidavit of Publicati�on, but noted that is has been published in the Dakata County Tribune for two weeks. Wayne Cordes, pf Harry S. Johnson Campany, represented the Carlsons and discussed with the Council the South Rose Park Replat. MOTI�N by Jensen to close the Hearing, Second by Stauffer. Ayes Walsh, Stauffer, Knutsan, Jensen. Nays 0. Mayor Knutson opened the Public Hearing on the Rezoning for a small tract within the South Rose Park Addition. The Clerk had in his presence the Affidavit of Mailing of the Hearing notice. ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDIIvGS s . Special Council Meeting . July 23, 1979 ��{ .� . The Affidavit of Puhlication has not been received as yet, but � the' Clerk noted that it has been published in the Dakota County Tribune for two weeks. � Discussion followed with no opposition to the rezoning. . MOTION by Jensen to recommend approval to rezone the Carlson � property"�as spelled out in Agenda item 3 B to rezone part of Lot 'i 2, $lock 3 of South Rose Park Addition that was replatted as � part of Lot 4, Block 3, South Rose Park Additi4n Replat with ', the understanding that the actual rezoning wi1.1 take place after ', the offical deliniation is received on the Yarcel to be rezoned. Second by Knutson. Ayes Stauffer, Knutson, Jensen, Walsh. Nays 0. ' MOTION by Knutson to close the Public Hearing. Secomd by Stauffex. Ayes Knutson, Jensen, Walsh, Stauffer. Nays 0. i Mayor Knutson opened the Public Hearing on the Broback request to rezone Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, Broback 6th Addition and Lots 6 and' 7, Block 4, Broback Addition. . The Clerk had •in his presence the Affidavit of Mailing of the Hearing notice. . The Affidavit of Publication has not been' rec= eived as yet, but the Clerk noted that it has been published in the Dakota County Tribune for two weeks. : No one was present to represent Broback's request to rezone. � The Clerk and Planner explained to the Council that they had � requested the Broback's to accomplish this rezoning to allow � them to build single family homes on these parcels as a way of �„ eleaning up those vacanC lots. _ MOTION by Knutson to close the Hearing on the rezoning of .Lots . � 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, Broback 6th Addition, and Lots 6 and ?, . W Block 4, Broback Addition. Second by Jensen. Ayes Jensen, Walsh, Stauffer, Knutson. Nays 0. Mayor I�nutson opened the Public Hearing on the Rezoning of Outlot "A", Broback 6th Addit�.on. The Clerk had in his presence the Affidavit of Mailing of the � Hearing notice. The Affidavit of Publication has not been xe- ceived as yet, but the Clerk noted that it has been published in the Dakota County Tribune for two weeks. The' Clerk and Planner again explained that they had requested the Broback's to accomplish this rezoning to allow them to build single family hanes : on these parcels as a way of cleaning up , those vacant lots. i MOTION by Stauffer to close the Hearing on Agenda item 3 A, � Broback's request to rezone from C-3 to R-1, Outlot A, Broback 6th Addition. Second by Jensen. Ayes Wa1sh, Stauffer, Knutson, Jensen. Nays 0. R05LMOUNT CITY YROCEEDINGS Special Council Meeting + ' �^� July 23, 1979 Council action requixed for Agenda item 3 A was discussed. MOTION by Knutsan to recommend preliminary approval of the South Rose Park Addition Replat with the following: 1. The restricted access on CSAH 42 and Chippendale Avenue be determined by the Dakota County Engineer and City Engineer before firtal plat. 2. When constructing new utilities, placement of utiiity stubs to the property should be at intervals consistent with the potential lot divisions shown on the Utility Plan. 3. A development contract be drawn up for the'benefit of the City and the developer, and would inelude, among other things, provisions for future lot divisions and restricted aceesses,- and that also the development contraet should consider the park dedication and open space requirements of our zoning and subdivision ordinance re2ating ta multiple dwellings. Second by Stauffer. Discussion followed. MOTION by Knutson to amend the Motion to include the fact that the Planning Comraission has not seen the additional division of Lot B - l, lock 2, and that before the final plat is approved, the Planning Commission be iven a n o o t , g pp r unity to review the additional fort feet. Seeond b J ensen. Y y Ayes Stauffer, Knutson, Jensen, Walsh. Nays 0. � t Vote on the Original Motion. Ayes Knutson, Jensen, Walsh, Stauffer. Nays 0. ; Council action required for Agenda item 3 C was discussed, � � MOTION by Knutson to adopt Ordinance XVII.29. (AN -ORDINANCE AMENDING THE � ZONING ORDINANCE N0. XVII.3�. Second by Stauffer. . Ayes Jensen, Walsh, � _ Stauffer, Knutson. h'ays 0. � Council action required far Agenda item 3 D was discussed. � MQTION by Stauffer to adopt Ordinance XVII.30 {AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2C7NING ORDINANCE N0. XVII.3). Second by Walsh. Ayes Wa1sh, Stauffer, Rnutson, Jensen. Nays 0. MOTION by Knutson to adjourn. Second by Jensen. There being no further business to cocrn before this Council and upon unanimous decision this � meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respect€ully submitted, '� � ' + � ' Maurya ftus Council Secretary ATTEST: % � -� �; , ��-� � . on F. Da ing j C1erkJTreasurer ,� Printed tnis ' �1 day of,��L_, I979. Dakota Count Tribune. � Y DEVELOPMENT GONTRACT n the Y F R M UNT a ��I AGREEMENT dated April 2, 1985, by and betwee CIT 0 OSE 0 , Minnesota municipal corporation, ("City"), and Clifford W. Carlson, Ronald C. II Carlson and Richard J. Carlson, ("the Developer"). I�I 1. Request for Subdivision Approval. The Developer has asked the City to Ili approve a metes and bounds subdivisian of Lot 1, Block 1, South Rose Park Addition � Replat ("the subject property") into two separate parcels, general cribed as: � � Parcel A: The north 208.33 feet of the west-�88�� e t of�x ' i!/�� G c • I Lot 1, Block 1. � 'Parcel B: The wes�� 200 feet, except the north 208.33 feet of Lot 1, Block 1. - 2. The City hereby approves the concept of the foregoing metes and bounds � subdivision subject to the terms of this agreement and formal survey. � 3. Comp 1 i ance w i th Laws and Regu 1 ations. The DeveToper represents to the — City that the subdivision complies with' all city, county, metropolitan, state and � federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, � zoning ordinances and environmental regulations. � W 4. Access on Chippendale Avenue, - A. Request for Access. The Developer has asked the City for unrestricted driveway access to the subjeet property to be located on the westerly lot line, approxim ately 208 feet south of the nartherly lot line, ta permit left and right turns in and out of the site. 6. Chippendale Avenue Street and Utility improvements. The City has approved plans for improvements to �hippendale Avenue, which include a raised median between 151st Street and County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 42. The median is designed to f ac i 1 i tate turn 1 anes at CSAH 42 and 151 st Street. The Ci ty agrees to perm i t unrestricted access to the driveway described in paragraph 4.a: ►�hen the median is constructed. The Developer agrees that no other access points, restricted or unrestricted, will be permitted to lot 1, Block 1, South Rose Park Addition Replat from Ghippendale Avenue. " � 5. Utility Easements. The Developer agrees to provide minimum 30 feet wide utility easements, in recordable form, across the common lot line of the two proposed lots described in paragraph 1, at the time the City executes this Agreement. The Developer further agrees to provide 20 feet wide utility easements, in recordable form, from the northerly right-af-way iine of 151st Street to the proposed Parcel A. 6. Miscellaneous. A. The Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the preparation and enforcement of this Agreement, including, but not limited to,' legal planning and engineering expenses. B. The Developer shall hold the city and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustajned or costs incurred resulting from access restrictions, subdivision approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, (� damages or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees. � C. This Agreement shall be binding upon the par�ies, their heirs, � successors or assigns, as the case may be. _ � D. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be W grounds for denial of building permits. E. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of this'Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the va7idity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. F. The actian or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment.to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shal ] be in writing, signed by both parties and approved by written resvlution of the City Council. The Gity's failure to promptTy take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. G. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota. � -2- CITY OF ROSEMQUNT ' BY: .� z Le S. Knu on or . BY. on . Darling, C erk/Administra or r� _ � �; ' iff W. Carlson I ' ""� � -7, _��/_.3r'" C/c_,a.�—..Q y c '' Ronald C. Carlsorr �� :��-...�--' C -�—� - I . ichar J Car son STATE OF MINMESOTA) � COUNTY OF DRKOTA )$$ � � � The for going instrument was acknawledged before me this o� day of '""` , 1985, by Le l and S. Knutson, Mayor, and Don F. Dar l i ng, � Clerk/Ad inistrator of the City af Rosemount, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on w behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority gra�ted by the City Council. � Notar�Publi � . � AA,�'.,Z.S.:. . �..: .,NAA��h4� . ' . � �,. 4lNCY� c�RNi;StN a STATE OF 1�lINNESOTA �-»�..:.„` n��7aa.v �� r. w:Nar;�-n (SS � �,.�t� �.�i;u�.a cc,uNT � COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) �nvrrvrn►vrv�d y�•ro:Yd�aw�i'wY+��c The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �� day of r{�(1AQc�.. , 1985, by Clifford W. Carlson, Ronald C. Carlson and Richard J. Carlson, of Clifford W. Carlson, et al, a Minnesota partnership, on behalf of the partnership. � �..�..�.•ti.•s..�•.�...r..r•�.y.�..�,.. . � . � . � . .;�-::�;:,. ARLO V:i(G�ERT + ��'"�„# ' NOTARY PUBUC-MINNES�TA t � t�' Q r ' '��1.; DAKGTA C;,UNTY t {� � ,�`•..�-� My Commiasion fx3ires lune 8,39E6 � �NQt a1••y I'Ub�� ..�. ..�... .� �...�.........v.•�+..«..n.� . . . . . -3- ��'t., ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS , , REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 1985 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a Regular Meeting of the City , Counc i 1 of the Ci ty of Rosemount was du 1y he 1 d on Tuesday, February 19, 1985 at ' 7:30 p.m., in the Counci 1 Chambers of the City Hal l. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Knutson with all members present. Mayor Knutson led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance. Robert Turek Assistant Fire Chief and Scott Aker, Secretary were sworn in by Mayor Knutson for their respective offices on the Rosemount Volunteer Fire Department, Items added to the Agenda: Item 6e, Authorize attendance at Planning Com mission Workshop; Item 6f, CDBG Resolution; 7e, Rosemount Woods Public Hearing; 7f, authorize attendance of Police Chief at Governors National Disaster Conference. Minor corrections were made to the February 5, 1985 Council Meeting Minutes. � MOTION by Tucker to approve the consent calendar as corrected. Second by WaTsh, Ayes: Knutson, Tucker, Willard, Walsh, Stauffer. Nays: 0. MOTION by Walsh to approve the Gustafson Estate Development Contract �"� and authorize the necessary signatures. Second by Stauffer. Ayes: � Tucker, Wi 11 ard, Wal sh, Stauffer, Knutson. Nays: 0. See Clerk's Fi le „_, 1985-5. � � MOTIUN by Stauffer to adopt Ordinance XVII.72 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING = ORDINANCE XVII.3 ZONING ORDINANCE. Second by Knutson. Ayes: � Willard, Walsh, Stauffer, Knutson, Tucker. Nays: 0. � �', There was no additional information available on Gounty Road 3$ far ' discussion at this meeting. , _ !, The Commerical Rehabilitation Loan Program regulations were explained by Dean Johnson, City Planner. MOTION by Walsh to approve the Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program regulations and applicatians forms as outlined. Second by Tucker. Ayes: Walsh, Stauff er, Knutson, Tucker, Willard. Nays: 0. See Clerk's File 1985-5. A resolution authorizing participation in the Metropolitan Area Management Association .Comparable Worth Group Study was reviewed. MOTION by W�llard to adopt Resolution 1985-8 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZIN6 PARTICIPATION IN THE CQNTROL DATA BUSINESS ADVISORS, iNC. 30INT COMPARABLf WOfiTH STtlDY. Seeand by Tucker. Ayes: Stauffer, Knutson, Tucker, WilTard, Walsh. Nays: 0. Cliff and :Ron Carlson, South Rose Park developers, requested clarification on the status of the Chippendale Avenue median, between CSAH 42 and 151st Street. Steve Campbell, SEN, informed the Council that the original plans for Chippendale Avenue included a raised concrete median, based upon traffic projections and the need to define turn lanes. � ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDING�Q� ' ' REGULAR MEETING . � FEBRUARY I9, 19$5 Cliff Carlson indicated the construction of a median would hinder the " ; use of the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, South Rose Park � Addition Replat, particularly if the corner is developed prior to the , proposed shopping center. Mr. Carison did not dispute the traffic projections presented by the city engineer, but argued it would be many years before those figures are realized. The Council generally agreed that premature canstruction of the median served no benefit 'but expressed great concern about the political difficulties in constructing a median after the area is developed. The Council agreed to aTlow a temporary full access to praposed parcels A and B, provided the Carlsons enter into a development contract with the City. ?he contract would be recorded and indicated that the City will construct a median in Chippendale, limiting access to Lot 1, Block 1, when, in the opinion of the City, the median is needed. The contract would also specify no other access points would be per mitted to parcels A & B from either Chippendale Avenue ar 151st Street, and a utility and driveway easement be established on Lot 1, Block l to serve parcel A from 151st Street. - M OTION by Willard authorizing staff to prepare a development contract between the developers of South Rose Park and the City of Rosemount, - outlininq the provisions discussed, to be recorded with the county . recorder's office. Second by Knutsan. Ayes: Knutson, Tueker, Willard, Walsh, Stauffer. Nays: 0. See Clerk's File 1985-5. � � Johnson gave a brief update on the Refuse Derived Fue1 Facility Siting report from Dakota County. �' M OTION by Knutson that the Councii recieve and accept the Refuse m Derived Fuel Facility Siting report from Dakota County Planning with = ' no 'comment at this time. Second by Willard. Ayes: Tucker, Willard, � Walsh, Stauffer, Knutson. Nays; 0. See Clerk's File 1985-5. W A letter from the seeretary of the Rosemount Volunteer Fire Department regarding the tQrmination of Mr. Dennis Neinzen and Mr. Neinzen's letter of appeal were discussed at length. Mention was made that Mr. I, Heinzen was usually available for day time firefighting. �I MOTION by Willard to accept and acknowledge the letter from the Fire ��, Department dated January 28, 1985 and Mr. Dennis Heinzen's letter of I appeal dated February 18, 1985, and that Mr. Heinzen be notified by ' letter that he is suspended from the Rosemount Volunteer Fire Department pend�ng further investigation. Second by Knutson, Ayes: Willard, Walsh, Knutson, Tucker. Nays: Stauffer. See Clerk's File 1985-5. M OTION by Stauffer that Mayor Knutson be designated to meet with the = Grievance/Membership Committee of the Fire Department and Mr. Hein2en : to discuss the termination of inembership in the Fire Department of Mr. � Heinzen. Second by Tucker. Ayes: Walsh, Stauffer, Tucker, Willard. Abstain: Knutson. An amendment to the Bylaws of the Rosemount Firemen's Relief Association raising the retirement amount to $1,000.00 for each year served was reviewed. ��d � ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS - REGULAR MEETING MARCH Z9, 1985 . Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rosemaunt was duly held on Tuesday, March 19, , 1985 at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Knutsan with all members present. ' Mayor Knutson led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance, Items added to the Agenda: Item 4e, Alexander Construction App for Payment #9: Ite m 5d, Fire Department Termination: Ite m 6h, Set Public Hearing for Alsip Rezoning Request: Item 7c, AM M Board of Directors Nominations: Item 7d, Dakota County Solid Waste Processing Meeting: Item 7e, pakota Caunty Staff reorganization: Item 7f, Koch Refining Office Tour Offering. Discussion was held on the Consent Calendar noting that items are to be prepared and presented by department heads. Administrator is to advise department heads of this requirement. MOTION by Stauffer to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. Second by Wa7 sh. Ayes: Wal sh, Stauffer, Knutson, Tucker, Wi 1 i ard. Nays: 0. See Clerk's File 1985-7. � Discussion was held with Cliff Carlson on the Median Agreement proposed at the February 19, 1985 meeting. The Carlson group infarmed �-- the Council that they could not agree to the terms of the agreement as — proposed and would request that the Cauncil approve a median cut for � full access at the curb opening already inplace between 151st Street z and County Road 42 � Council directed that the proposed agreement be redrafted to reflect � the agreement reached at this meeting and return it to the Council when the agreement has been prepared and signed by the Carlson's. Mayor Knutson interrupted the Regular Agenda discussion at 8:00 p.m. to allow the Council to hald the Public Hearing on the Rosemount Woods PUD Amendment' scMeduled for that time. Mayor Knutson opened the Public Hearing on the Proposed Amendment to the Rosemount Woods PUD. The Clerk had in his presence the Affidavit of Published Notice. See Clerk's Fi le 1985-7: Mr. James Evenson was present to represent Rosemount Woods request. The amendment proposed was a division of land making three distinct parcels within the plat instead of a single description. The reason for the reque'st is to allow the owners to place a mortgage an a mare specific area instead of encumbering the entire parcel. Planning Com mission recom mendations were to deny the request. Park & Recreation has reviewed this request with the idea that the City may at sometime become the owner af the marginal land in the development with the Park & Recreation Committee commenting that they did not see a use for the property in question. M OTION by Walsh to clase the public hearing. Second by Stauffer. Ayes: 5. Nays: Q. . . . . _ . .: :. _ . . ' � •• =.�'�'� , ROSEMOtI{�iT CITIf PttOCEERIN6S � RE6ULAR MEETIN6 MARCH 29, 19$5 . . _ � MOTION by 'fucker to -authorize the Rdministratar/Clerk to purchase the Smead Fi�Ting System;per the quote from Fair Book as requested. Secand by Knutson. �Ayes: Knutson, Tucker, Willard," Wa1sh,��Stauffer.��:Nays: 0. _ . _ _- � � MOTION by Tucker to adjourn. Second by Knutson. A�res: 5. ' Nays: 0. . espec f s mit e , r . - .a i . 1 n D 9 AdministratorJClerk . Published this��day , 1985 in the Dakota County Tribune. � . ROSEMQUHT CITY PROCEEDIN6S RE6t1LAR M�ETIN6 - APRIL 2, 1985 � Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a Regular Meeting of the City - Council of the City of Rosemount was duly held on Tuesday,� April 2, 1985 at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Na17. The meeting was called to order by Mayar Knutson with all members � present. ' Items _added to_the Agenda: Item 8b, Councilman Tucker's Report on the �""' � ..,,,, � rt on th Waste�Dispos.al Meet�ng: Item 8c, Gouncilman Walsh s Repa e � � Annual Dakota County Officers Meeting. .,.,, - Ron Wasmund, Building Official was introduced to the City Council r Members and welcomed as part of the City Staff. � � MOTIQN by Walsh to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Second by Stauffer. Ayes: Walsh, Stauffer, Knutsan, Tucker, Wil�ard. Nays: 0. See Clerk's File 1985-8. The Clerk informed the Council that the South Rose Park Median Agreement has been signed and returned by the Carlson's and is now ready for City signatures. I MOTION by Knutson to accept the So:uth Rose Park Median Agreement as prepared and autharize the necessary signatures. Second by Walsh. Ayes: Stauffer, Knutson, Tucker, Willard, Walsh. Nays; 0. See � C1erk's Fi1e 1985-8. Mayor Knutson advised the Cauncil that Fireman Heinaen was terminated by the Fire Oepartment at a Regular Meeting of the Fire Department on March 26, I985. No Council action was needed. The Administrator in updating the Council on the liquor Store requested . they cartsider setting the annuaT fees for On-Sale Liquor License should the aperation go private and further to consider a moritorium on issuing additianal On-Sale and flff-Sale License after the city has removed itself from the liquor business. Further infarmation is needed before consideration can be given to this request. �j.� . ROSEMOUNT CITY PR�CEEDINGS • REGULRR MEETING MARCH 19, 1985 . Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a Regular Meeting of the City Cauncil of the City of Rosemount was duly held on Tuesday, March 19, 1985 at 7:3fl p.m., in the Counci 1 Chambers of the City Hal l. The meeting was calied to order by Mayor Knutson with all members present. Mayor Knutson led the group in the Pledge of A1legiance. Items added to the Agenda: Item 4e, Alexander Construction App for Payment �9: Ite m 5d, Fire Department Termination: Ite m 6h, Set - Public Hearing for Aisip Rezaning Request: Item 7c, AM M Board of Directors Nominations: Item 7d, Dakota County Solid Waste Processin 9 Meeting: Item 7e, Dakota County Staff reorganization: Item 7f, Koch Refining Office Tour Offering. Discussion was held on the Cansent Calendar noting that items are to be prepared and presented by department heads. Administrator is to advise department heads of this requirement. MOTION by Stauffer to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. Second by Wa1sh. Ayes_; Walsh, Stauffer, Knutson, Tucker, Willard. Nays: 0. � See Clerk's Fi]e 1985-7. Discussion was held with Cliff Carlson on the Median Agreement proposed at the February 19, 1985 meeting. The Carlson group informed the Council that they could not agree to the terms of the agreement as proposed and would request that the Council approve a median cut for (� full access at the curb opening already inplace between 151st Street and County Road 42, � � Counci l directed that the proposed agreement be redrafted to reflect � the agreement reached at this meeting and return it to the Council -- when the agreement has been prepared and signed by the Carlson's. � � Mayor Knutson interrupted the Regular Agenda discussion at 8:00 p.m. -(� to allow the Council to hold the Public Hearing on the Rosemount Woods PUD Amendment scheduled for that time. Mayor Knutson opened the PubTic Hearing on the Praposed Amendment to the Rosemount Woods PUD, The Clerk had in his presence the Affidavit of Published Notice. See Clerk's Fi l e 1985-7: - Mr. James Evenson was present to represent Rosemount Woods request. The amendment proposed was a division of land making three distinct parcels within the plat instead of a single description. The reason for the request is to allow the owners to place a mortgage on a roore specific area' instead of encum'bering the entire parcel. Planning Com mission recom mendations were to deny the request. Park & Recreation has reviewed this request with the idea that the City may at sometime become the owner of the marginal land in the development with the Park & Recreation Com mittee commenting that they did not see a use for the property in question. M OTION by Walsh to close the public hearing. Second by Stauffer. Ayes: 5. Nays: 0. , + nMKY`. i (�1�1 Q �E�7 ..:�,+�y c? f :�:!� . . � � `� � . . „•.cr �r . : I ,.,,, ��;� /�^� ___NO:...' n•;rvr�F„O'A S5C76& ' -i,f ' ( � �ose}z�oufz� E,� _ �� 4a, , . �, �`�.�� May 21, ' 1986 Mr. W. C. Mawe, President Rosemount Nationai Bank 15055 Chippendale Avenue South Rosemaunt, MN 55068 Dear Mr. Mawe: , The City Council at their May 6, 1986 regular meeting discussed and took actian on the curb cut request from � Rosemaunt National Bank in order to a1Tow direct access onto Chippendale Avenue. The Council approved the access onto Chipper�dale Avenue with the condition that the access be �"" restricted to right-irt/right-out access only. The Cauncil ' unanimously agreed the restriction af a right-inlright-out � _ access would eliminate potentia] traffic congestion and = accidents. � This is your authorization to request the curb cut permit � from the Public Works and 6uilding Departments. Sincerely, . . Don . Darling Administrator/G}erk srr� cc: Public Works Department Building Department • � _ � �'REL. IMINARY _ PLAT F4R : � , , , - �:- R �F� LAT � � ♦ tJF �� "N ROS � . :� . .. .�� :- . . �w� . . � ��` . _ a �� ; � . c.S� � -- -- - , �..-_ . _ _. - ----� -�---�- - — .p�� —',s,• t_._~�--COUN�'Y � STATE —.,_- '- �- p / r�sz�• ;, _ �7 ..��'4y' �'1"w � .�.tBB'65'S�"E 3�ib.5o':=;u.:;..,..�..-.—.�- � S 2�a.o2 ---- �=ih4.�� ; R=��61'7to 's'' . � ' ' ' ------ = I°10'�OLL------- ----------- --r��y �' ---------- � � �----- -'r- _ � _--- 9ao--- ' ' ;:- � � ---' � �! ( �� f,- . � , -' ---- ; ` � � ' { • i . . . ` f ►c 1 �... /. Y 7.ti � . . � . � � � � � . � ' ...i ' ' � � • 1 + � � � .� .9 � ��•�• �' � ` � �� I 1¢ ' , �" _� . � � ` � ' — � �-- �� ..�� . - � � sl3 . � ��-� r � _ "" � I 0` �fj..�y: � V ; 9 tn i � � - � ! o i � ` «.: 1 � `j � � � ... � W ..: � W �.f � { � I I�r.S �� 1 = � y=�` =f � ( i ,��;. %'s S L 5 � � � � I ��; � ; .,._ ..\� _ � `�^� _.``� .- ._ . . - . � � , . 1 � � � --!*^—�-1'�'-- _ � ` � .�� '` �I g°I°`�t°�U i�v�".' � �s r s� '�' ' �` � ' `�' � � i• � � , i51 ' � n^' 1rL.l• ;�'a,,�rG,(Q;�,, r .` y� :ti.o'1 � 4'' �• i i• T � ;�—ti.= ��:�_�.. � '��q,� �'s �.R° �j i �' , Jw. V Z' f M IOI.� ..,�'ev.a �p �� -••�`55/, ��' �53 � ' �0 � � - '-: � l t ' tJ$9°4 '4i g =�'�,. . '..Q c•�.,y '� � . �e � 24_W� _� \ 14 � / �2q� p?oe'� ,, � . �.. Q; . r-a �� —Pjs,_`,.w \ •2 �Q� ``/ •2 .o�;`� � � t �,�� ' i 2 : .��, � „ „� i .U� : � tr !' -T a•E� 9° � ' �� ,v . �� k Q� - � � .. : � � � , �o. /2�3 � .� r -� M � r �� O� � � � I � ��J �,. g.. " ,� _ �� ,• �� y R � � .\ �.:• � � i�r 5 4 + i ,� , +�,/ � , , � i�� i � � ,\ . ,��. Y � it �� 1,,, •m � Sl � `��,`� . oN � �• Z i `' � I • '* �'��Y � � _� I i l'r' � ♦ � � } l •O�2`•\ � � � '� I ��•. ` V^ 1 `+Caj��`r.,`�.C� I "t• I. � � � - F� � „1 8•!03 ' ��- I Z� .�. .:.._....'..'� . ..�... ... ' = 3' �9 " Qrn` �'4��.Bq "' I � � 1 , ;• . . � �`! � � " .,;, r O �a. i . - \ ��:.�1� �� •I . . . \ � /�L � `�� I ' �� , _ _,/'�\ .N• \\ � d / �\ `~�� {\ 1 � �. .t .j: � : Y � \ � i 1 � . , I�I U Y i i L.. � � � / � .11 � . \I �•� / / �f�3 . I � � i � \ J � 1� ♦ � � '�d � ' � .. ..��.. . .,;»..:�.2. .�:... • -I�• � �p � ..i, �,.�� , i . Y'� t (�. � � J - � �� i � �.. � •�.. � / . . I '�{!� �' � n' �� ^� O I '�+...., � �� L��' .?I :.� ~ � — .;?_ ' � �/� � ♦\ 1 �� cr� I •�u(' . �'�•_ ` �� .P ,� i i�•• ' •� / �I� `,J t ! . I W °f o� ::�— -- — ---� --- --- — N u � � ::, i � �� " Z ,`,� �"t.�-- - � --- -- y�P•-3�{-------- � � �T,l�- �� i r - � r --� � ' ' I > �' �� ` J . � T 957 = i � i J `, � " __� ; . � Q I' � � f / - M y.�.� i � � � ; ~ `� J u�• � 9�G � '� � � 7i - .... �,._ � �„ W � _ � _ N � rl � �� 1� F i + �; o' � � ,li S` i/ , ,• r� ��,' � t � `� '.I � � (. � . � \J" ��; , i�'� . %' ! ,,,•C 4 �• . . .... . .... . . .. . . .. .......... ................. ... . .. . .. . .........�... ......... ...... ......................... ...�N.�. � ....,....�... . ..................... . , .... ........ .. . .. � .�............... ......... � . . � � . �. ... ...t.............................. ........................................................................�..................... � .............. ................................. ................................ ..................,.......... ..........,.................... ......... ��. . . , ...�..�........... ...... . ......................... .......................... .. �...................................... .................................. .............. , ................................... ................................. ........... ..... ......... ................ ............... ............ ...... ...... . ..i.. 20 • 22 24 �. 26 � _ : , _�, . . . ; _ .. ;, . . , . , _ _ � � f __.�1 Nv-! � � i,� '_'"' "".�► i l� f I ., . . `rl ,/1\ � . � . � �. . . . . . . . . . . . . � �-- d l c� . ! � � i c� , . � � .�. .. � . .. . � , , � . . � . C` l�. ;�p �-�:.C� . i � 0 n _ � . � ' � � � . I ' PROPOSED 68� ROADWAY (� � �ss� i ; : � r F-� � ( � �-� C-- � ; _ ; , � � u� , � �k ,�\ . ; ; � . . � . , _ . :. ...... . .. . .... ,.. . ...... . :... .. . .... . . ..... . . . ........ . ... .::...:.:'... ..._... ..................... ............................... ..,....................... . ..... . ... . ... .. ...... . .. .. .. . . ... . .. . _ . . . ... ...: ... . ,. . . . .. .. : . .. .................................................................: ............ .......:...... .... .._._........ .. .. . .......... . . . ..... ...... ... .. ......... . ................... ...................... ........ .............. .......... ... . ...... ... .. .. ..... ... ... . .. ... . ....... . ...... .... . ..................... .............................._.... ..... . . .. .. : . ....._ _ ..... , _... .... ........ .......... .......:... ..... .. .... . ............. ................................. ....................... ..... . . ... ... . . . . ... . ..._ ... . ......... .. , , • .. ...... ...... ... ..... . .... . ... _..... . . ...... . ..._......... ... ...... .... ......,... . ......... ................... .... ... ... . . ... . .:. . .. . ...... . ...... ...............�.................. ............................. . . . .. .. . .. . . ... .. .. . ............................. . .. . .. ... .. . _ .. .. . . .. . . ... . ...... . ... ...... ... .: . ....... . .. . . ..... ......... . . ............................: .......... ..... ........ ... ............................ ................................ . 9 ' .. . ....... . . ... . ....... ..... . . .. . .... . , .... . , . . .... .. . ...... . . . . ....... . . . ... �....�...... : . .... .. ....,.. ........ ................ ..... ... ........................... ............... .......... ............................... ..........................�...... .. ........ � 1 � DA KOTA C N T Y DACOUNTY EtvG N�ER E C�U �si 2�as�-�,oa HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Fax(6t2)89t-703� ' � � � 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE,3RD FLOOR APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 55124-8579 ,.,�.,�,: : , :;� �.,..'�t_� =-�� l: t�;��',�:.r� :_; February 22, 1994 Mr. Bud Osmundson, P.E. , City Engineer/Assistant Public Works Director 2875 145th Street W. P.O. Box 510 Rosemount, 1�IIJ 55068-0510 Dear Bud: As you requested, I reviewed the preliminary traffic analysis for Rosemount Village Square prepared by Benshaof & Associates and the Traffic Impact Study performed by OSM last fall along with the Western Rosemount Transportation Study performed by OSM last summer. The background traffic forecast used in all three reports results in assumed traffic volume increase on CSAH 42 at approximately 1� growth per year. This roadway has actually experienced 5$ annual traffic growth since 1980. In light of continued development activity thraughout Dakota County, _a more realistic traffic growth must be assumed. ' My recommendation is that 20 year background traffic forecasts should assume 3� annual traffic growth for CSAH 42 through Rosemount. Any forecast less than 3� will result in unreasonable low traffic volumes and should not be used in traffic analysis. With regard to the present intersection on Chippendale Ave. between 151st Street and CSAH 42, there certainly is the potential of this intersection interfering with the operation of the signal at CSAH 42 as traffic volumes increase. The Benshoof report analyzes queue lengths from the signal at CSAH 42 and expects the queue to extend through the service raad intersection using the year 2015 traffic forecast. Using traffic growth on CSAH 42 at 3� per year, I expect the northbound signal queue to extend across the service drive before year 2000 - even ' considering the roadway and signal improvements referred to in the Be�nshoof repart. , Rinted on Recycled Paper , AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER , Bud Osmundson, P.E. Fehruary 22, 1994 Page Two In order to maximize the roadway capacity and ensure safety I would recommend that the city proceed with the plan to construct a center median prohibiting left turns and crossing t=affic between 151st St. and CSAH 42. � Please feel free to contact me further if yau have questions or eancerns regarding this: Sincerely, - �� ter L. orenson Traf f ic En ineer g PLS/ckj � cc: Ron Wasmund ['�'- Chuck Rickart -" Jim Benshoof � _ � � n:Osmund-1 � _ _ � � � i i PRDPOSED ROSEMOUNi 1L/ , i i ViLLAGE SOUARE � � i � _r.-i_... � i y i � � _..........._ , , r � � ti � , , � � � i � � q ,' � � ,� , � �.b,�<� � r ti� ( � � .... . i i _ _ . i , ___.____. _ __)' � � _ ' ' __..-- �- --- _._.__�-----_- � i � .-- _ . i i � -_� �_�,, � N � � � � MOL I DAY �.` �I d„ i � G�S . � � �� 5T4TIOM . . . . � _ SUBM�Y . — . . . = 1 f �� . � � i �� . . . � 1.. j ►H. . . i 1 ►qVIES� � � � . U � � , , �---- � � � 4 1 � M��'S � . . . . . .. . � ��1. � BOTTLE --� � . . .. . � � 5� � � �.. . . . � . � � � f�� _ lt� - :� ----------------�-------- :._ ---�. ..--- - ._---_..____,_ _._ ___ _� _._ __� .------ ---- ____ .__.,� ---�_ --- ----- ------------- --- ---- ;_- _--. A.�seo —�"`'}j�� GHIPPENDALE AVENUE . . ►EDIAN � � � . j {��i , , , , , , , , , , , , , , � , � , , , , , , , , , ; , , , , , � , � . . � ,� RROPOSED ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE ��usr��n 6 ALTERNATIVE LANE CONFIGURATION ""°`'°'".'"`. Co{foa�p�ArebltfA��Pisaesn -Surrerm� . o0o r.rt n.e.e.ein�.»ri fa)tW B�ulnu� (RIGHT IN / RtGMT OUT1 Ybu�plh.YM66��•Itil��1T6M53713 FIGURE 1 I . . . 1 1 ' • h. _ . . ; ; PROPOSED ROSEMOUN7 W i i VIIIAGf SOUARE �Cf � � i � �„�, �.r--� � t � � � _� � i i � � i � � � ^ . � � � t � r„ - � � n n , , , , , , �.. _ _ , _ . � _ _ . � � ! , , - � , � ; ; Ha�o�r lI � � GAS . �. � STATIWI � . . � i � SUBMAY . � � � . d � i � N � i MO�v1E5 U � � � ; � — — ""c•s _ ,� � � I eott�E . � � s� e r ti � . . . . . � � . . RAISED . i � � � . � � . �. � � . �o�� .--.. � .._. 1 i ��_ _ �. .----------- - - ------- � _ --�"' sior - . _ __ _ _ .. - -- -- - _._ — �. . t�....�. _ -��- -------- -- �,► - - -- � � .�seo F f 1' CHIPPENDALE AVENUE DMN �� . � � 1 � . . . . . . . . � . � . 1 . � . . . . . .. 1 1 . . � � 1 � � � � . . � � . . � . . . . � . . � . , � ' � . � f . �. I . . . . . . . . � �� 1� . . � . . � � . � � 1 . _ , . . . . � � � 1 . � " 1{` 11' tI" �' tY Ii•. :1�• . . . 1 . i . . . . . � . iv�, � � .� � .�I . � 58 S8� . SB �MIN NB �� N8 � ..-N8� . . . .. . . � � . . � . . TMRU � lMWU IiFT L6F• TNRU• RICNT . , 1 � ' 7YPICAL SEC710N , .� ' . PROPOSED ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQU�4RE ��s�he,e,, lfsyeron 6 ALTERNATiVE LANE COfVFIGURATION ""°``.`°','"°. Co�inerrt.1re91lecta�Pboaer��9uneyon . . . . . � . . � � ]00►uY fi�e�Cr�1�r�a�»r.�u�.�au1n�N� � . � . . . Ylu�s�NU.YM Oi�N•ffLt�Qf�lM�Sli� � � � (STATE AID STANDARD) �� I�URE 2 � t + � � . . . � . � . . . �� . Pianning Corninission REGULAR MEETIlVG T�IINLTI'ES - FEBRUA.RY 22, 1994 Former Planning Commissioners Cathy Busho and Jay Baago were in attendance for a brief ceremony to receive formal recognition for their years of service on the Plannina Cammission. Interim Admiriistrator Ron Vdasmund presented each with a plaque and thanked them for their time and contribution as Planning Commissioners for the Cit�� of Rosemount. Several Ciry staff members u�ere also in attendance to extend their appreciation. P�rsuant to due call 'and notice thereof the Re�ulaz Meeting of the Planning Commission was duly held on Tuesday, February 8, 1994 at 5:30 p.m. Chairperson McDermott cailed the meeting to order with members DeBettignies, Tentinger, inaram, and Droste present. Also in attendance were Interim Administrator Ron Wasmund and Assistant Planner Rick Pearson. Commissioner Tentinger requested.the addition of Item 5(a) Flannin� Commission Meetin� Times Discussion to the February 22, 1994 Re�ular Flanning Commissian A�enda. nZOTION by DeBetti�nies to apprave the February 8, 1994 Re�ular Plannin� Commission AZeeting Minutes as presented. Second by Tentin�er. Ayes: DeBettignies, Tentinger, MeDermott, In�ram, Droste. I�Tays: 0. Assistant Planner Rick Pearson discussed the Rosemount Village Square Ptanned Unit Develapment � e ro osed develo er of th f Rosemount P P (PUD) and preliminary plat. The Carlson Prop erties o , P i e Rosemount Villaae S uare Shopping MaII, has responded to Plannina staff commercial PUD for th a q and Plannin� Commission concerns in revisions to the mall's service entry area that eliminates traffic flaw conflicu, structure enhancement of ti�e rear of the mall building, and intensification of hitect discussed the details I landsca ina and screening of the dumpster area. Gary Vogel, project arc , P � of the modifications. After further discussion regarding easements on the northeast portion of the site, Mr. Voget stated the developer's willinaness to modify the northeasterly carner of the buildin� to ensure future building expans�on w�ll not encroach into the utilities easement. Considerable discussion ensued regarding access to the site from CSAH 42. Tom Heiberg, project manaQer stated that it is not the develo er's intent to jeopardize the current Canada Avenue access � , P to County Road 42. Nor is it their objective to create a neaative impact to property owners whase access is off Chippendale Avenue. Mr. Heiberg also expressed the developer's willingness to work with City staff/consultant for resolution of access issues that will be in the best interest for all concerned. Assistant Planner Pearson advisect that Planning staff is of the opinion that the review process can proceed to a public hearing with the City Council for final approval of the Rosemount Viilage Square PUD and preliminary plat. Resolution of any outstanding off-site access issues can be addressed along with public irnprovements and other issues, including park dedication, in the Planned Unit Development Agreement. The C-4 zaning of the property is appropriate fvr the proposed use and the proposed land use is consistern with the City of Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan: Update 2000. -- '�- . : � w' r , �� :� � . MaTION by Ingram to recommend to Ciry Council approval of the Rosemount Villa e S uare Commercial Planned Unit Deveiaprnent and preliminary plat subject to: 1) exeeution of a Planned Unit Devetopment Agreement; 2} approva! of a final plat for Rasemount Village Square, in conformance v�,ith the Ciry of Rosemount Subdivision Ordinance; 3) conformance with applicable building and fire codes; and 4) site access be resolved to the satisfaction of the city en;ineer. Second by Droste. Ayes: Tentinger, McDermott, Ingram, Droste, DeBettignies. Nays: 0. MOTION by DeBettignies to recommend that City Council schedule a public hearin to hear testimony relative to the Rosemount Villaae Square Cammercial Planned Unit Devet pment �dublic preliminary p1at. Second by Ingrarri. Ayes: McDermott, Ingram, Droste, DeBettignies, Tentin er. Nays: 0. g Assistant Planner Rick Pearson presented the application from Ground Development Co . developer, for the fina] plat for the Shannon Hills Sixth Addition. The 30 sinale family ots represents the final phase of the residential Planned Unit Development and will be developed on the north and south of Cobbler Avenue and connect with Shannon Parkway narth of Cranberry Way, The R-1 Single Far�ily Residential zaning is appropriate for the residential use and the final lat is consistent with the preliminary piat and PUD agproved in 19$9. Staff recommends approval of the Shannon Hills Sixth Addition final plat. ` MOTION by Ingram to recommend to City Council the approval of the Shannon Hills Sixth Addition final plat subject to: 1) agproval of the Qradin� Park Dedication eombination of Outlot B and a cash eontr buti nlof � 5,�761b60�as re u red�r� 2� Par'1cs and Recreation Director; 3) execution of a development agreement to secure the construc�e 'I of public infrastructur�; 4) construction of a tem or tion and 5 P ary cul-de-sac at the terminus of Clover Lane; ' I ) provision of sidewalks along the north side of Cobbler Avenue and the east side of Clover Lane. Second by Tentinger. Ayes: Ingram, Droste, DeBettignies, Tentinger, McDermott. Na • ys. 0. Mr. Tim Braback, Rosemount Development Co., has requested final plat approval for the }ast g5 single family lots in the West Ridge Pianne,d tTnit Development. T'he site is cunently zoned AG Agriculture and a public hearing is required for the rezoning to R-1 Single Famil Residential occur. The residential land use is consistent with the comp p]an's land use aesiD ation of Urban Residential. Assistant Planner Rick Pe�rson advised that utiIrties installation for the West Rid e Fifth Addition will be a City project and wi�l be combined with the Shannon Pond Third g improvement project. Addition MOTION by Droste to r ec omme . . nd t . o Ci Addition from AG Agriculture to R-1 Single F�amily Detached Resident al s b�tto the�dge Fifth recording of the finaI plat. Second by Ingram. Ayes: Droste, DeBettignies, Tentinger, MCDerm tt� Ingram. Nays: 0. MOTIpiv by Droste to recommend to City Council that a public hearing be scheduled testimany relative to the rezoning of the West Rid�e Fifth Addition from AG Agricultu e� o R-1 Sin�le Family Residential. Second by DeBettignies. Ayes: DeBettignies, Tentinaer, McDermott Ingram, Droste. Nays: 0. , MOTION by Tentinger to recommend to Ciry CounciI approvai of the West Ridoe Ad ' ' b dit�on final . � City of Rosemaunt ' Execukve Summary for Action i'Ianning Commission Meeting Date: Februar�2, 1994 r Agenda Item: Rosernount Village Square: Planned Unit Agenda Section: Development (PUD) & Preliminary Plat OLI7 BUSII�FSS Prepared By: Rick Pearson Agenda No.: Assistant Planner ITEM NO. 4a. Attachments: 1/I1/94 P.C. Reviews/Minutes; PUD Approved By: Revisions; Traffic-rela:ted Correspondence/ Documentation; (Onginal PUU Booklets for New Commissioners). The proposed camrnercial Planned Unit Developrnent (PUD) for the Rosemount Village Square Shopping Mall has been revised in response to the previous Planning Commission Review of January 11, 1994. The revisions satisfy on-site concerns. FIowever, access issues remain unresolved relative xo the connections to C.S.A.�-I. 42 and especially Chippendale Avenue. Recommended Action: A MOTION to recommend to City Council approval of the Rosemount Village Square Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat subject to: (1) execution of a Planned Unit Developrnent Agreement; (2) approval of a final plat far Rosemount Village Square in conformance with the City of Rosemount Subclivision Ordinance; (3) conformance with all applieable building and fire codes; and (4) Site access be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer., -AND - A MOTION to recommend that the City Council schedule a gublic hearing to hear testimony relative to the Rosemount Village Square Commercial Planned Unit Development and , Preliminary Flat. ' Planning Gommission Action: - e �� . � � CITY OF RC�SEMOU NT zB�S-`,TMths`�West P.O.Box 510 `-� Everything's Coming Cip Rosemount!� Rosemo�nt,nnN 55068-0510 � �:�.-" ." Phane:612•423-4411 � fax:612-423-52d3 ', TO: Planning Commission �I, I FROM: Richard Pearson � , Assistant Planner DATE• Febru ' . ary 17, 1994 , SUBJ: Februa 22 1994 ReQular ' a a I rY , Meetin R v' b b e ie��s A„enda Item , ATTACAI��NTS; Janua 11 1994 Meetin Revi w I�' rY � e s and Minut g es; Plan Revisions; li Traffio-related Correspondence and Documentation; Booklets for New '� Commissioners. I 4A. ROSEMOUIVT VII,LAGE SOUARE (CARLSON PROPERTIES) li (1) Commercial Pl�zrzned Unit Development � '� (2) Final Developrnent Plan review ', PROPOSAL II' Mr. Cliff Carlson and Mr. Ron Carlson of Carlson Pmperties, Inc. are proposing to develop a 72 ,OSp sq. ft. shopping center between Chippendale avenue, Canada Avenue, CSAH 42 and 151st Street West.: The proposal includes the shopping center with a i0,000 sq. ft. drug store "anchor" on the west side near the Subway restaurant; 16,000 sq. ft. far retail uses and a 25,000 sq. ft, grocery "anchar" that could be expanded with an additional 15, OQO sq. ft. on the east side near the Dairy Queen. In addition, two free standing peripheral uses adjacent to _CSAH 42 and the Holiday Sta:tion are propos�d cansisting of a "fast food" restaurant and an automobile service structure. � On 7anuary 11, i 994, the Plannin Commissian v' g re iewed the conc t for the commercial see attached ep . PUD ( Jan. 11 PC review). Plannu�g Staff provided six recommendations for Planning Commission discussion and considera.tion. The Planning Commission ident�ed additional issues that have caused the Developer to make revisions to the plans. Identified issues include: 1. That the pmposed building expansion be mod�ed to eliminate the encroachment into the existing utility easement; 2. That the service area of the primary huilding fronting alang I51 st Street be further screened with landscape intensification and fencing with materials consistent with the building; 3. The building elevations adjacent to the ponding areas receive further enhancement with landscaping or building aesthetics; 4. That the proposed center pylon sign be mod�ed to conform with sign ordinance standards, or that a significant aesthetic device such as a clock tower be added to the site design to provide a facal point for the "village square" as well as the CSAH 42 general commercial district of which the sign will be a part; . .. �� . � � �. � � . �. � ni�Jo�an,rkewa• . tan:am.i�3p:- �'KO^t�'!T'Ti.•M."i. Rosemount Village Square PUD Final PIanlPrelim. Ptat . . � February 22, 1994 Page 2 , 5. That implementation of the aboue mentioned recommendations, as well as attention to issues identified by the Planning Commission will allow the comrnercial PUD to be developed with variance to 1ot coverage standards as specified in the Zoning Ordinance; and 6. That the site will be platted in conformance with the City of Rasemount Subdivision Ordinance, as well as all construction conforming with applicable building and fire codes. Mr. Gary Vogel, the Architect for the Developer, presented a concept for the pylon sign that u�cl�u;,�. a large clock. The Plannu�g C01212221SS;OIi L"i�l�a[� a�3�t�ti•al of t�;� co;�ceYt a3;d a refined colored rendering is attached to this memo. The Planning Commission identified the access and circulation related to the service and delivery area along 151 st Street West as having the potential for conflicts and requested additional refinernents. The Architect proposed several alternatives which resulted in the "Revised Rear Service Area" 2-8-94 refinement that is included. The revision separates the semi- truck traffic from ather vetucles, screens the trash compactor and durnpster and enhances the landscaping along 151st Street. The trade-off was the addition of a one-way exit only driveway for the trucks. The City Engineer found the solution to be accepta.ble given the anticipated low volume of truck traffic. The building elevations have been modified in response to the Planning Commission as wel1. The east and south elevations of the grocery anchor are now proposed to maroon colored textured concrete block with horizantal accent bands along the lower half of the elevations. the west and south elevations of the drug store anchor have been similarly treated. The elevations facing the interior of the rear service area remain unchanged. Planning Staff has concluded that the pmposal has been refined to appropriately resolve idantified issues vf building aesthetics, interior site circulation and landscaping. Access to and from the site rernains to be an issue that is still being negodated by the Developer and the City. ACCESS ISSUES 1. Primary access from CSAIi 42. The "right-in° from CSAH 42 providing access for east bound traffi� has been faund acceptable by the City, the County and the Developer. The Developer would also like to have a "left-in" from CSAH 42 for west bound traffic access. The City would be in supgort of the left-in only if it does not trigger the closing of the median crossing at Canada Avenue. The County has indicated that additional access movements directly into the shopping center would be allawed at the expense of the � Canada Avenue intersection. 2. Secondarv access from Chippendale Avenue. The Developer is requesting left-in, right- in and right-out at the west entrance between Mac's Bottle Shop and the Holiday Stare. Closing the left-out movement appears to be aeceptable to the developer. The cunent discussions concern the City's traffic consultant's recommendatiQn to constnict a median in Chippendale Avenue between CSAH 42 and 151st Street. The result would be right-in, right-out only at Chippendale. The Developer and the Holida Station owner refer the Y P maintenance of the left-in m v o ement from south bound Chi endale Avenue. P P Rosemount Village Square PUD Final PIanlPretim. Ptat ' • February 22, 1994 ' Fage 3 The current traffic consultant's recommendation is echoed by a study that was camgleted by Glen Van Wormer in 1979. Projected traffic volummes from commercial and residential development in the area and concern for anticipated traffic congestion resulted in a recommendation for a raised median on Chippendale Avenue to channel traffic flow and keep the intersection of'CSAH 42 a.nd Chippendale from being "unduly restricted". 4n May 20, 1980, the City Counc�l removed the median fram street unprovement project at the request of the developer. The Developer has hired his own traffic consultant ta estimate traffic volummes and flow, and to mal:e recommendations for street improvements to serve the project. A review of this consultant's report shows higher volumes than the City's report. City Staff is anticipating the T'�VI�L'v� af the Uevelo�ser's pro�sed alte�,�a�ives ai i�8 titii� Of Li�2S �%iiiiilb. eorrcLus�oN The commercial PUD propasal has been modified with the benefit of the Planning Commission's previous direction. Planning Staff is of the opinion that the review process can proceed to the public hearing with the City Councii for final approval and resolution of any outstanding off-site access 'issues at that time. Staff will prepare a Planned Unit Development Agreernent that will secure the access, public improvements and other issues including park dedication. RECOh�MEIv'DATIOh' �IOTIOl� to recommend to the City Council approval of the Rosemount Village Square Commercial Planned Unit Development and preliminary plat subject to: l. Execution of a Planned Unit Development Agreement; 2. Approval of a final plat for Rosemount Village Square in conformance with the City of Rosemount Subdivision Ordinance; 3. Conformance with applicable building and fire eodes; and 4. Site access be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. -AND - MOTION to recommend that the City Council schedule a public hearing to hear testimony relative to the Rosemount Village Square Commercial Planned Unit Development and preliminary plat, R ` ' City of Rosemount Executive Summary for Action , Planning Commission Meeting Date: _ Tanuar�l, 1994 Agenda Item: Rosemount Village Square: Agenda Sectian: Concept Plannect Unit Development (PUD) NEW BUSINESS Prepared By: Rick Pearson, Assistant Planner Agenda 1�To.: ITIIvi NO. 6a. Attachments: Memo; Rosemount Village Square Concept Appr ved B ; Plan Booklet. - SEE ATTACHED MEMO - Recommended Action: A MOTION to approve the concept review for the Rosemount Village Square commercial Planned Unit Development subject to the following considerations by the Planning Commission: 1) that the propased building expansion be modified to eliminate the encroachment into the existing utility easement; 2} that the service area c.q ttie primary buildi.ng fmnting along 151st Street be further screened with landscape intensification and fencing with materials eonsistent with the building; 3) the building elevations adjacent to the ponding areas receive further enhancement with landscaping or building aesthetics; 4) that the proposed center pylon sign be mod�ed to conform with sign ordinance standards, or that a significant aesthetic device such�as a clock tower be added to the site design to provide a focal point far the "village square" as well as the CSAH 42 general commercial district of which the sign may be a part; S� that implementation of the above mentioned recommendations, as well as attention to issues identified by the Planning Commisssion will allow the commercial PUD to be developed with variance to lot covera.ge standards as sP�if ed in the Zoning Ordinance; and 6) that the site will be platted in conformance with the City of Rosemount Subdivision Ordinance, as well as all construetion conforming with applicable building and fire codes. Planning Comrnission Action: 1-1 4. a il • , ... . . � . . . . T0: Planning Commission � FROM: Richard Pearson, Assistant Planner II�I DATE: January 4, 1994 SUBJ: Janua 11 , z'y , 1994 Regular Meeting Reviews Agenda Item 6a ATTACHI�ivTg; Traffic Analysis and Recommendations by 0. S. M. , PUD Narrative, Applicati�n, Survey, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan 6a. Carlson Properties, Inc. - Commercial Pl.anned Unit Development Concept Review PROPOSAI, Mr. Cliff Carlson of Carlson Properties, Inc. is proposing to develop a shopping center between Chippendale Avenue, Shannan Parkway and 'south of C.S.A.H. 42 . The proposed shopping center would total ,72, 050 sq. ft. at "maximum build-out" which would include a future expansion and two commercial uses located in peripheral buildings. The property is zoned General Commercial (C-4) . The 'shopping center will be called ��Rosemount Village Square" . PROCESS Planned Unit Development (PUD} review of the proposal is required because it involves multiple uses, multiple structures and ultimately, multiple lots or parcels. Any one of the above would trigger the Planned Unit Development process. The process is broken down into three major areas: 1. Concept review with the Planning Commission; 2 . Final Development (of the concept) review with the Planning Commission; and, 3 . Finai Development approval by the City Council after a public hearing is conducted. The PUD process allows for variances to ordinance standards to pravide flexibility. The existing or proposed zoning (in this case C-4 General Commercial) is used as a base line for standards. The PUD process can be misused, however. So:netimes the PUD process is thought of as a means to eliminate standards. The flexibility for the project should result from a willingness to make reasonable tradeoffs if some ordinance consistency is truly a hardship, Other expectations should be increased proportionately in return for such variance consideration. � Rosemount Village Square PUD Concept Review ` Janua-y 11, 1994 � Page 2 . MIXED COM_►�?�RCIAL USES The primary ,buil�ing totalling 66 , 500 sq. ft. wi11 provide generally three types of commercial uses: 1 . A grocery store of 25, 500 sq. ft. with a future expansion of 15, 000 'sq. ft . totalling 40, 500 sq, ft. ; 2 , A drug store of 10, 000 sq. ft. ; and, 3 . ketail shops in a central wing that connects the two "anchors" previously mentioned. Two geripheral uses in individual buildings would also be located on the site containing: 1. A xestaurant - probably "fast food" of 3600 sq. ft. ; and, 2 • An auto service use of �550 sq. ft. ACCESS TO KOSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE � The proposal indicates four general access points : 1 . Right-in �rom eastbound CSAH a2; 2 - ri1�� aGC�S� �Y'Olil C!11.DD�?1C��-u�.? A.V?IlU� V1G ��1� TJ�.'�Vd�@ C.�1.VETtiGy 1��L�'0`'�7? i�_^.� :30�id�.y Station and Mac'S 30��`.ZA S�'lOD � SllbW�y; � . :L�� GCC�SS '=0It1 CuT1GC1a Avenue Via t�12 `pr1.Vc'��2 C1Z'1.V@VJc'iy b�tween P�zza Hut / NcDonald' s and Dairy Queen; �nd, g • "a1 l a:.C�SS _=0?11 �j�S:. S�r�et w�th tnree separatA @11tz'driC@S (two a�e pr�.ma=��y service and �mployee access? . o -. In addition, t�+e Develober would like a ��right-out" and "lef`-in° at CSAH 42 �ither right now or if Canada Avenue is closed at CSAH 42 . Tne Coun`y Highway Dex�artment reviewed th� proposal �n3 ir�dicated that thesA additional movQments maybe undesirable with respect to existin5 tra�fic flows, existing intersection consideratians �nd spacing criteria. ' Much discussion has occurred regarding access issues with the Developer, City 5taff and the County Highway Department. As a result, a traffic study with recommendations was prepared by a consulting traffic engineer, Charles Rickart Traffic Operations �ngineer with Orr Schelen Mayeron & Assaciates, Inc. {see attachQd? . ^'he recomm�nnations inelude off-sitA improvernents `o the Chippendale and Canada intersections as well as various street improvements to provide for efficient and safe traffic flow. � . Rosemount Village Square Concept PUD Review January 12 , 1994 ' Page 3 . � Same of the recon�mendations impact the four general access points listed a�ove, specifically, the w�st access from Chippendale Avenue between Holiday and Subway should not be full movement. The traffic study anticipated full development scenarias for adjacent vacant l�nd including the G.T. I. movie theater project . PARKING The parking area is between the primary builaing and C.S.A.H. 42 and is organized into four areas separated by traffic lanes serving the various uses . The grocery store would have 226 parking stalls, the Drug store/ retail area would have 87 stalls, the ��fast food° would have 55 stalls and the auto service would have 8 stalls. The south elevation of the primary building that fronts 151st Street contains additional parking as wQll as loading docks so that the total combined provided �arking equals 402 stalls. The ordinance standard for the combined uses equals 382 . Estimated required parking - 382* Ir_dicated parking provided - 402 * `I'111.S i:.t3UY'^-` COP_�c^L1.11S an estimatA i0Y' t�1� "L3St L�OC�° give*� �i1�i. r na r�S��u-i►f 3?7� ?7:S '_10t y�t been C�S.'.Q?7.�Q �11: �'..:7� S�G?1Ca,.�_G� 1.5 "JaS�C� L_L'`O^ `'?:� �:'i1Q::.:?� of seatir.g �I1 L�1� =�S VZU=-u�.7I:. ��T COVE�AG� TO ^�c�EA' SPAC: "_':c M�Y_�.i'il:::: !J�. .^...i✓��Gv- G�!047�?C =: �!"!� ��.-.�'?2��;1 ��',OITt1?1�:C�a.'_ *�: -.� ��a�1'1::� (�-L) }.� ']j o W.'7�C�1 li1C!11Q�S �11 }?:.11�Q1ri� °=00t iJz'7.T14S n and paved surfaces. � Tot�l lot coverac� combining buiidings - 77.30 (22 . 7o gre�n s�ace; �rio� to ��, 000 sq. ft. groeery store Axpansion. Tc;.Gi io� coverage post expansion - 81.5� (18 .5o green space) . In the opinion of S�aff, the proposal is inconsistent with standards for lot coverage by a significant margin gresuming the expansion of the grocAry store. i,AATDS CAPING The required landscaping in the C-4 District for Rosemount V_llage Sauaze w�uld amount to: 119 deciduous tre�s or boulevard type traes based upon 1 trAQ er 3400 r - P ass s' . 3 q ft. of land area• and , . �90 foundation p2antings prior to e�cpansion and 209 foundation �lar_tings �ostexpansion basQd upan on� planting per t�:� linear �cet of building �erim�ter. Rosemount Village Square Concept PUD Review 4 . January 11, 1994 • Page 4 . . . The lan3scape plan indicates the following: 70 deczduous trees and 25 evergreen trees; 57 ornamental trees (three varieties of flowering crabs) ; and 188 foundation plantings . Planning S�aff suggests the following formula for comparing the ' proposed landscaping with the standard commercial requirements: The ornamentals are divided between the required trees and foundatian plantings at a pro-rated value of deciduous trees equalling evergreens, one tree equalling two ornamentals, and one ornamental equalling twa faundation plantings (one tree egualling four shrubs) . 1 tree (deciduous or evergreen) = 2 ornamentals = � shrubs. The resulting value of the prop�sed landscaping is basicalTy ' consistent with General Commercial District standards. �i 3UILDING MATERIALS I The no�tn elevatien iacing CSP_H �2 wi11 bb �Z,TT�she� with a corr�inGtion O� �dC2 1��1C}C, "Dryvit" and glass fo� t�l? StOrn _r0'_'li.S . T:':=' l �t,�»r 'r,µl r rJ= �`.�'?� _...�?..^.� V:?11 .^.::S�S� .^.' '��^� �'"" _:1�='_'=i:Di.�C1 W:.._r? }70�_.ZO+'_t�u� GCc�n- bar_ds o�ysmoa;.�! ^OT1Cr'A'� --V,v, _.,��'Y1 `-�==Ti'i*..=�' `-=i.�.:�:.�5 Vdl^i t�...vaCC�Tli.?Q� W7.Lt1 L3CE t�Z'1.C.K, GiQ .»_;L.;_S: i11_�.;? ��i_�,'�` yIOY'}� iO�it'._.ly arcn�s . U�'iU�r W�i.L Sll?"aC?$ ��'JG�G�:..?Q �.3'?! �T?;'"V �CC�11�.5 W?1_ CO?1S1St`. O� ,"��1Qo nDryV=i° V:Y11 -c G �,c�F�t.�,�- .^cL�Q`S�'.:�CO �Gi1A� . "�"�'?1S 4�':i.�� ^�?� `?1� ZOCa�10I1 Ot C:1 �__c W'._� S' : . East, west and south elavations will cons�st of beiQe =ock faca3 �Ji7CZ'��c �''..00!�' 4.1.��.. ?�v.,,., y n , y r_ - -_ O tG_ ,^-„C c:"::. �„rGnCS O•_` SiTt^�`!� COi1C�"=�..= b_ock, SezvicQ doc_s �iona the seu�nern elevation facing l5lst S�r�et �.re tu��ois� . �� lcading coc1; areQ s�r�;zng t:ne grocery store has a depressed Yamp that brings semi trailer box�s down to ground floar level . A metal pipe rail painted turcxuoise encloses the ramp. In Staf�' s opinion, the loading dock area should be eompletely screened �rom view, with a wall constructed of materials consis�e:�t wit:� the building. Th� proximity to 151st Street and �hc gc+�,>i Cc on��y �C�OSS from Ca?"Ol1S�l k'ay places i 11c SG'�T2C�' GiGf�',. 1ri .v1�in�� rom .l�ls� Street. Landscape enhance*nents c:?"�� =-c�rrLL-n�r_ded D�� the pla�ning Com*nission should discuss the m�rits of building aesthetic enhancements in this area as well . Rosemount Village Square Cancept PUD Review �I January 11, 1994 ', - Page 5 . ' � OTHER CONSIDERATIONS . I Much of the available green space will be used for ponding between the southeast and southwest corners o� the building and t�:� 151s� Street right-of-way. rsecause of this, opportuniLiRs to ' intensify landscaping are somewhat limited. This situation m�y cause the Planning Commission to discuss alternative buildir.g an3/or site enhancements as tradeof�s for variGnces . Tne proposed center pylon sign is larger than the sign ordinance allows . Commercial developments south of C.S .A,H. 42 may have `ree standing pylon or ground signs of up to 140 sq. ft . in area. The proposed sign has 120 sq. ft . of area excluding support structures and architectural emi�ellishrnents. In addition, the sign is seven feet higher than the 20 foot height maximum imposed by ordinance. Given the significant setback chosen by the developer of the primary bu'ilding from CSAH 42, zurther develo�ment of the sign and architecturai detailing could be considered. A kiosk or clock tower might give th? site a focal noint appropriate for a ' '�village square° concept. Struetures such as these should utilize forms, detailing �nd materials found in the buildings to emDhasize WY1�t�VA�" ��chitectural th�Il?� ?S inter_dec tD b� ' �rcg�tl�oC� kJy tl'1? Q�'Vcl Ot7ITtc?'?t. �-'��'= '�`�' �G.�C� ��=�.�'-.._ �_ ....n= _ ��.�.C�u -..^i.".�-y 5...�.�_ �1��G�.�''�. _.�h..� ',. _...="C)?..,-'?cc =_^_�� _^_� ,.' � `z� r �^ _ ' '�-- - . =�S�:T:=11� �._c'zV�_S:.i._y^ ..:!� S=..c =�C �' �' c:j= �: v:c � �' _ . S� :` . ' ��iCl.�._.:S_v�. . � � � �''., Y.. -_ ....� ._: _:: ._y..= ' -_ .._y..- -...•'_�ti �.:'.;. _:��'"' �.:� _:.t' �C; �=•.•�`.`C -'r:�c'` �� _ ^v `�c`:�iTi.::==C_GiM�U;� W.i.iI1�Y'2COITlICic?'1�G�.10T?S � ' =0 Z'@f1?7�, IriOG�.?�V Oi" `^A�F� S� D�Z:7.c �nr +,;hc rc�r� �it��rc �.c •.hc , ,-�J?`'v: y,`OC=S� . i��:.^._ ^ �:. G=C1:.I"��G^^ " n .. �I - - �-V=:� •�..c ��:7i:==�it1� i.S+ ,.�i... I ��V?�Q�?�r �,,i 1 l GSSC:T�.+.�1C' G �=Tlc.�� .1pV�lo�ment iJ��-u:1 �O� i.�1��1� d?:C -c i.l:?"?'! i.O i.�'?� ��'_7'!'11:?C L"O^L'?l1 S S= ^ i , T11 n • O i0� ��V_.�k . �i�:':^1''?C _��.=: S�..^v_, N'--- -=ZT-=t'� ---_ -- - = C1.==•.+'c'o�m�r_' ^.:.ci?"., �ii�ii= G^G -�=WG�Q a �"cGGI?1.*T:�31C7��+.0'" �O^ i . _ I� r.ne City Counc_l . Tne City Caunc?! k•�11 conduct a buDlic h�ari�g and take action accordir_gl�. �.4COI�ENDP_TION I =`��'�'=Ot�T �O c�1�}�rove tne concept revi�w �or the Rosemount Villag� �^.:.:;� CO:T'1?1=�"�:.G! D_Grncµ T�jn�� 't�=v�lOD�Tt�rit SL:17]=^` t� `�- -.^.!�OVIiP.^. �vi':S�G�'_"G�.'�O:'?S bt� `j,'Ic D , _.... __ � :. l�nning Cc:n��ss_on: _ • '-"- � ��8 N=^v��.==C `,.J'ii11^u1:1� �:f:L�G::S1OI1 �� IilQQ1�12Q LO �liminate t'r.� encroacYun�nt into the exist=:�g utility =aSa?1:_"�` ; 2 • Tnat the seY-vice area of the primary building fror_ting along i�ls�' StreEt be �ur�ner screer_ea witn landsca�e -=' ==1�1"_Cd�1.C^ caI1� ��r_c=ng Y:?�i1 IT't�ut�"� �-u!S C0=?S1S�c^�. V,'' �tl V � �n� ��1^ing• , J . . Rosemount Village Square Concept PUD Review ' January 11, 1994 ' Page 6, , 3 . The building elevations adjacent to the ponding areas I , receive furth er enha neem ent with landscaping or building aes�hetics; � . That the proposed center pylon sign be modified to conform '�, with sign ordinarlce standards, or that a significant ! aesthetie device such as a clock tower be added to the site I design to provide a focal point for the ��village square" as ' well as the CSAH 42 general commercial district of which th� ' si5n may be �art of; '�, 5. That iinglementation of the above mentioned recomm � endations as well as attention to issues identified by the Planning III Commission will allow the commercial PUD to be developed � with zrariance to lot coverage standards as specified in the Zoning Ordinance; and, 6 . That the site will be latted in of p conforrnance with the City Rosemount Subdivision Ordinanee, as well as a?l construction conform�.ng with applicable builr3ing and fire codes . 0 . - < < �� Planning Cornmission . REGvt,�t M��t r[vG Muvt��s -Jarrt,rr�tY Il, 1994 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was duly held on Tuesday, January 11; 1994 at 5:00 p.m. Chair Busho called the meting to order with members Droste, Busho, Baa�o, and In�ram present. Commissioner DeBetti�nies took his chair at 5.23 p.m. Staff present inciuded Assistant Ptanner Rick Pearson and City Attorney Mike Nliles. There were no additions or corrections to the a?enda. MOTION by Busho to approve items 3.a., 3.b., and 3.d., Planning Commission minutes. Second by Droste, Ayes: Droste, Busho, Baago, Ingram. Nays: Q. Assistant Planner Pearson briefly reviewed council action items. Peazson advised that even thou�h the City Council concurred that evidcnce of property hardship existed on the James Atwood variance petition, they tahled action for additionaI site inspection opportunities ar�d aareed to take formaI action at the January 18, 1994 merting. Pearson also advised that city council had appraved a - resolution in support of a grant agplication by IvIVTA for a "hiah speed bus" project. Also diseussed was the idea of chanaing the Planning Commission meeting time from S:OQ to a more convenient time for city residents to attend planning meetings. Plannin� Commissioners agreed it would be proper to aIlow new pIanning commission members to eomment on a modified planning commission meeting tirne. Assistant Planner Pearson reviewed staff conespondence re�arding the Dave Lawson rezonin; petition for Dave's Auto Body at 1478� South Robert Trail. The primary reason for the request is to change Dave's Auto Body to a conformin� status so that Mr. Lawson can obtain building permiu to irnprove his propeny. Dtscussion ensued reaarding zoning ordinance enforcement issues. MOTION by Inaram to recommend approval to the City Council for the rezoning from C-2 Communiry Commercial to C-4 General Commercial property located at 1478� South Rabert Trail and legally described as Lot l, Block 1, Evenson Addition. Second by Droste. Ct�mmissioner D�,Bettignies took his chair at 5:23 p.m. Gommissioners debated whether autarelated businesses belonD in the downtown area. Chair Busho called for a poll of ttte motion. Ayes: Busho, Ingram, Droste. Nays: BaagQ. Present: DeBettignies. Assistant Planner,Pearson provided an overview of the Carlson Properties, Inc., Commercial Planned Unit Development Concegt. Pearson explained that the Carlson's proposed "Rosemaunt Village Square" shopping center will require a planned unit development (PUD) review because it involves multiple uses, multiple structures and multiple parcels. Pearson further explained that the shopping center wiIl be anchored by two major tenants on either end of the structure connected by small shops in the center. Discussion r�gazding tra�c patterns, minimum parking space requirements, landscaping, and liafiting ensued. Ron Cazlson was allowed to speak and introduced Gary Va�el, the azchitect for the project. Carlson ar�d Voael grovided more details of the project and answered Commissioners' questions. IMr. Vo?el also provided a drawing of a proposed clock tower that could be implemented into the project. MOTION by Baago to approve the concept review for the Rosemount Village Squaze commercial Planned Unit Development subject to the followina considerations by the Planning Commission: 1) that the proposed building expansion be modified to eliminate the encroachment into the existing Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes , . January 11, 1994 T Pa;e Two utiliry easement; 2) that the service area of the primary buildinb fronting along I51st Street be ` further screened v,jith landscape intensification and fencing with materiats consistent with the building; 3) the building elevations adjacent to the ponding areas receive further enhancement with IandscapinJ or buildin� aesthetics; 4) that the proposed center pyl'on si�n be modified to conform with sion ordinance standards, or that a significant aesrhetic device such as a ciock tower be added to the site desi'n to provide a focal point for the "village square" as well as the CSA.H 42 �eneral commercial disuict of which the sign may be a part; �) that implementation of the above mentioned recommendations, as well as attention to issues identified by the Plannin� Commission wilt allow the commercial PUD to be developed with variance to lot coverage standards as specified in the Zoning Ordinance; and 6) that the site will be platted in conformance with the City of Rosemount � Subdivision Ordinance, as well as all construction conformin� with applicable buildin, and fire codes. Seeond by Ingram. Ayes: Baago, Ingram, Droste, DeBetti�nies, Busho. Nays: 0. Assistant Planner Pearson reviewed staff conespondence re?ardina Wensmann Homes, Inc.'s proposed 27.3 acre residential development called Wensmann Sixth Addition. The development will include three different housin� rypes, developed on multiple parcels and therefore will require a Planned Unit Development review. Pearson explained that the proposed density meeu the guidelines of the Comprehensive Guide Plan and works out to less than six dwellings per acre. Pearson further explained that the proposed street system provides for e�cient dispersal of traffic with little or no impact on the existin� sueet system to the south. Discussion regardin� the location, size, and maintenance of the mini-park, proposed by the Parks and Recreation Committee, ensued. Commissioners concurred that there was concern about the location and size of the park. Representatives from Wensmann Homes were in attendance and provided answers to Commissioner questionino. Commissioners directed staff to request that the Parks and Recreation Committee review the concept of the proposed mini-park at their next meetin� and provide a recommendation to the Plannin� Commission, acquire the development's association documents to review, and prove that the residential lou on Danville Avenue work without variances. MOTTON by Ingram to approve the Concept FLTD for the Wensmann Sixth Addition for a Residential Planned Unit Developmern subject to the follawin� consideration by the Planning Commission: 1) that the proposed densiry far the townhouse clusters be maintained in return for increased site amenities as requested by the Pazks and Recreation Committee and director; 2) that the City Engineer approve the concept utility and grading plans indicating that existing infrastructure is capable of servina the PUD; 3) that implementation of the abvvementioned recommendations, as well as attentian to issues identified by the Planning Commission, will allow the residential PUD to be developed with variance to lot width standards as specified in the Zoning Ordinance; 4) the site will be platted in conforniance with the City of Rosemount Subdivision Ordinance, as well as all construction conforming with applicable building and fire codes; 5) review and recommendation by the Park Board and Director of the proposed mini-park; and 6) an opponunity for the area residenu to review and make commenu on the proposaL Second by Busho. ' Ayes: Ingram, DeBettignies, Droste, Busho, Baago. Nays: 0. I120TION by Busho to adjourn. Second by Baa�o. Meetina adjourned at 8:15 g.m. Respeetfully submitted, Deborah Widstrom Recordin� Secretary , . , r , . , !\. .• '�.: . . ':`: .. . .. . �� • ' PROPOSED BUILDIN� R�ra►� 16,405 S.F. � 0 GROCERY STORE \SAq�F.s _ � 8 25,500 5.�. .s, � . 8S� 8612 CURB & � "� GUTTER (TYP.) �- � � a � � �`�`— . �4• �' sp 9• '� � o , � S4• --r-��,�4''� � �d F'�+�^!!"�r rvfJ r =--.�.______- � �� . � ' o�ve.V�l- �� -- . —�-- �xrar a �-— ------ � �� `� _ . �� .__. � � ——�-.;..� __.. -�..�-� �. �_ _.. . . ,� - -_,��j . . . %�,/ r I .��-\ . /�Nl�t K�L 1"w° , �� S � .` .. ' �� , � . :�, _ ',�' Yf�i++y' 1 r��' `.�� . 3o p'''�p/,•. __ __....___ __..._: ..-- --- ---...:._. . . � '•• 3.. R ��2» R *� � _/� . � . , - 2a,pARk/,'�G � 1 ' • `� � . �.. . . .. . . .• 3 , . . � ��, � '' - �] :.. .• � `�'�t�.' �� Y � � , . ,� , .. . •� .•. �• . . ,� • �,� . .��..� .�.�.� ... . '•� '. 13 1/2" , . . . . . .. . .. . .�•�. , � . . . . . . ,. . , .. . .• ' , , . ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE SITE AND BUILDING DATA OVERAL� HAftD HARO BUILOING PARKING PARKING StTE SUR�ACE SURFACE AREA REQUIREL` nQ��Fn AREA AREA (%) (S.F.) AT 5/1000 (S.F.) �S.F.) LOT 1 3�2.Q3o 242,015 80.1 66,900 334 341 (RETAIL} LOT 2* (AU70 13,257 9.020 E8.4 1.550 8 8 SERVICE) * �OT 3 (FAST 41.018 31,055 75.7 3,600 40 55 FOOD) (ESTIMATE) TOTAL 356,311 282,090 79.2 72,050 3$2 404 (AUERAGE) �AREAS ANO PARKING SHOWN FOR LOTS Z AND 3 ARE BASED ON ASSUMED LAYOUTS AS SHQWN WITHOUT CONFIRMATIQN FROM AGTUAL USERS OR BUYERS �F THESE LOTS. ��.� -�'^,,-�?'� !�,??�7� 7',7'�L-� � 9`f'_. r. /'/, . ' . ' �, „ � � / . � PROPOSED BUI LDING � , � RETAIL ' i6.400 S.F. ' ;:�' 1-SMb� `�..�� ' GROCERY SFORE .a 3-SNC � ?5.S00 S.F. ' + i . • 1-5MA 5•G�� ' • , ' 2- �N C ' � � . 12'AOF� -G fs 5 _'� I-SMP� � . � . -CGS _ � \ �-�� ' 3-CGS -�.DM - _ o�- . �� -�— (v-GG�S 3_G[xs ' , , / 2-SMA ,� • t, ' . ` � (1� . -ADM V ::� . 4-NoR . • � 5•�tic �L NAME-----------SIZE ROOT ��G� �I� �TANOIDES 'DEHRA' 2. 5" H&H �� .,r'f' /�„ 'G�' Kr ?�� ` , �IVN. �SUMMIT' 2. 5 u B&B G � �IA. 'IM{'LRI7�1L ' 2. 5" Bbt3 ��C�7� .. JRD. 'GREFNSPIRE' 2. 5" BbH , • PiNKSP2Ri,' 2 . 5" B&B .\t . . . I A ` � � V.Y�� `��I�'1G�i�"�_.�f�GsOC�1' , ' 1 . � � . � . � . � � `�`,` � .� .. { ! � � � s �� - �s : T PLANT SCHEDULE KEY QN CObiMON�NAME BOTANICr�L IVAME SI ZE ROOT NOR 21 NORWAY MAPLE ACER PL.�TANOIUES 'DE:BRA' 2 . 5" B&B SMA 18 SUhth1IT ASH FRAX . P�.:NN. 'SUhiI�tI'I'' 2 . 5" B&B ihtL 1'J IblPEF2IA!. L�JCUST GLEU. '1':i lA. ' IMNEf2IA.L. ' 2. 5" BbL3 LIN 12 GREENSPI`RE LINDEN TILIA Ct)�D. 'GRI.E:NSPIaE' 2. 5" I3bH PIC 25 PINKSPIRE CRAH 1�IJ�LUS ' 'ICIKSPIRI:' 2. 5" Bbi3 � ItSC 14 RCD SE'LEt4U0F2 Ct2A:3 , h�J�LUS ':Zi�U SPL.L•'Nll0F2 ' 2. 0" E�&H SNC 3� SNO�JURIFZ' CR/�8 M71LUS 'S:VUWDRIF't' ' 2 . G BbB CCS 30 CUL. GREEN SPFtUCE PICEA PUiVGGNS 6 ' BbB k�liS 7 HLACK f-IILLS St'RUC�: PICEA GLUACA llENSA'?'A 6 ' 8&II 5GJ 42 SF:A GR�L•'N JUNIPLR JUNIPERUS CHIN. 'S�:A GR. ' 18" POT ;r r HJ 6 4 HUGHES JUNI PCR JUNI PERUS t�OHI Z. 'NUGFIES � 18" POT ADM 65 AMUR DWARF h1�1E'LC ACER GINNALA 'C(�Mf'ACT' 36" POT CEC 34 CUM. �.UR. CRANBERRY VIBURNUM OPULUS 'CONiP. ' 3b" POT �� AWS 56 ANTHONY WA'r. SPIitGA SPIl2ACA X DUMALI�A 'A.W. ' 18" YO`P vrr.w ,,,Q,�,„,, •�,-, NOTESt 1 ) ALL DISTURHED l�REAS TO Bt: SODDED. 2) R.LL SNRUB BEDS TO RCCCIVI. 3" L11YL12 `1'RAP ROC:K r�,a� �.•n��k, ( 2. 5" DIA, ) OVLR LANUSCAk'L: 1'ABK1C � USI: IiLACK ,rnrr�r,• �N��.�„ VINYL EDGE:R Wt-iLItL ADJAC�N'P 'I'0 CRI�SS �ERS. 3 ) ALL Ll�ND5CAI'EU AREA5 TO BE TRRIGATF:I). 4) PONll F3U`l`TOMS '1'0 I2LCLIVL•' :i" LAYL•"R I3TNUCR ROCK. �J !�� 2��`�' 1��''�`�� `��'�� ' �'3,. 1�. � `r 4°.:. � �; ,�,�. _�.�k� ,.. �_ � �� .., � � _� .. �r � R tie.-:'''�.�,!■ . .. w�i ��r e�.r��•4.� - � ;,�� !_.�� .� ��_� ��,;� - �-, . � �: � _ -_ �:�� _ � - �-�;�� ;.. �,.:3 - -� �;��, � �;� � `�;� �� " � -:4 ' s + , � A � � • s -`Y ��- Q:i 2ixcrtl=. ._ =- 1ub11�� . _ - . � � �--_ _ � _ , - - — =� � - � — �� . �.�. . . _; . --}:'__� _ • . � , e . . . . . . � . ��; ROSC1vi0UNT VILLAGE SQUARE �y �n � . . � . r�o r.7 F:(tc1A�U�Nt. ��I.VNf.�cSTn y ��: , oo�T] °ii ' .n v c�. "''' ' � OG . �C � (lKl.)f)\ I`I:UI'i I:IY��lf G�»lAU)U\i.LN\'t IISYCR � ��`�7006GD'i Oth.^=�dC� hl[ til!\l:\NI\'�1�:11 G1:(}lp', :\RCIIII(C�IS . --- f�'-�+..I�hµ� MG�A II • Ga��... �t�i i -TY�- ' _-.., -.y % % ` � D ❑ , ❑00� , . � � � ❑ --- —"-'�N�CJJhI 'N'�'Jri �.�•'JViJpthlb � � '��. � � • � . • � ��i�-= �• . . . . . . ,. . . ❑ � � ❑ . . �. ❑ • • ❑ . .i`— _ _ _._.--�ll.t.�Mn1A'T�fl �{.R:t= �� ° oao❑ ° ' ❑ o � ROSEMOUNT —«M,NA-�ti ��. VILLAGE � - �� SQUARE Jubtilee � . � ANCHOR t -_ �.�`�_�,Mh4T� -r-��- � . / ,� , � READER ` , — -P�ii�� tG�.'- �Ntx.`�:`= BOAR D �� . __a-�rN�ae�o +yatioNCY P�E�,- 9E� Pt,raN ------'`� � . . _ _-._.._ ��C.l. R.ht-tT� ...� . � �i2.ONT � �►LK �I..��IA-71(�t�� z �li�� .L-��/�.-C'14f�1� � t-�a-9�- . . l�'•a" _ ._.._ _.— .Y . .. � � . . � 2'D" 8" 8��" �� , 2,�, -- _-,-, - _ / - ' •T} �- ;t � " _. �-_ - N ❑ � � OD�O O � . � ❑ • • p . o n o . � _- D • • C� a- � Z��O' ❑ � � � M ooao � o 0 —-- ---�- i ROSEMQUNT VILLAGE � � �.8. S QUARE_ _ a� � - �' M -f-- N Jubilee ° �+ _ �. ANC,HOR . � � ° � . � �. READER `� . BOARD � , . � . . "-'_' �n��q. .M . yl,i.Y ^_ �� /��.(�y.� . 'r � . � . . . . . .. V U {/ ..... . 13,,�. _ _ p _N 4�— � _ _.�l20.�iT -� �:-K ��A�Ti o+.i �G�"c �1�JA�."'C"ic�t t � ,� -: � z- '• �•O � K Y _ . -2_:_Y .`I�a �" �- 1-►b�i4- . . , < -EUS COLOR 3 .__METAL GRiILE..-, ' --EIFS WLOR 2 ;,.EIFS COLOR ] ' � . �EIf3 COLOR 7 � � � . . . F.IPS COLON 2--.� . . .�� . ` � . `� . EIFS COIOR i � � -EIFS COIOB t� �'/ -EIFS COtOR t 'METALGItIiLE � ;' EIfS COL��R 2 � ,METAL GRILIE FACE BR�CK �FACE RRiCK l EIF Ol<)R 1 . , EtFS CULOR 1 ._.....a. , , -„ . S G - --_ ---- ----- - --- . ..._ _ _ � ..... �..�_ � ' . ...T. _._. ,. . ._, , ..___. ._,.___ _.._.Z---------- � H �-�— DAUO 6TORE - . � � � � FIOWER3 FORMAL WEAH YIpEO FASHION OES'' ..0 - NORTH EIEVATION � '�--_.=BRICK PIERS, TYP. _ . ' --AI.UMINUM WUR5 h FRAMES-� �._-flRIf.K PIERS, TYP. � EIFS COIOR i t r , y; -. -'KCENT BANDS ' � , �' c..a , . . _.. ., ._._. M .__�..__...__f ._._..._..--_-_..._ --`— �. --._.. . . ---- �-^� �EIPS f�1.OR 3 '^. � �� •` EIFS COIUR 1- ._.�.C� -- --- .. _��i RETE RLOCK, TE%TURE � NCHE fE RLOGK RANDS 5 OOTH . .. '��. � � . . ' � � . �r.��EIFS COIUR 1 . �� , � EifS COIUR'7 � -, . �- . � � � � FACE 6RICK � fhST EtEVAT10N IGROCERY STORf1 �r��k+u�:W WEST ELEVAf10N IDRUG SfOREI ' -C�NCRETE BLOCK,J TEXTURED- -- -------._ --, _ __ , " r' CONCNE7E OIOCK�UANDS. SMOOTH . ; , ____�_.. .' .:. .._. --.___._ .. _. . . . _. . _ � ..... . .._..�......... ._.._�...__ . ..__�.__._.,. ._�...._ . .. � . ' I ' . .� � �� ! � ..... ' . . .,_.... .. ... ...�.i� . � . f.... . . .. . � . r ... SOUTN EIEVATION . . . . .. - � TRtKK DOCK AREA . . . . .� � . .-. �--EIfS COIOR_}.. � . . � . . . . . � � . . ' .s' ,__.__.METAL GRlIIE_.__� `.. -fAGE ORICK- . � � E�FS COLOR.2-.• � .i'' � ��EIFS COIUkt i--. ._.EiPS.f.OLOR 2 � . � .� .EIfS CCUUN J � . � . EIfS COIOR 1-_.. ' t:;_._T ' . . .. _ � J. ., . EIFS COLOR 1 � I •. EIFS COLOR 2 �. -- ,_ _.. _._ . -_-_:- �+ EIiS C.Oi OR i ; �, � r_ --- _---- --�--- �- ' --�---�-; � � • • - - - ._ ,,� m_ - .;_- � -- -- _._ v��o 1 �, "' ii. .�'jk i. - i •,i_ DETMLED NORTH EIEVATION FACE BRtCK �LUMINUnn UOURS d fRAMES __.-uRICK PIERS, TYP.-_-- �hnno A:L ROSEMOUNT VILLAGE SQUARE �n . � n� . . . � .. ROSC�.Ip11N1, nIWNC$l)IA � � � � � � � qn . G�RLg�1N i'RVL'tRiEti nf�:��tii'nl<�UNI.IICV[LOPER � .�� . n .�n — •nnp��p�� nO.��m . . � i11E RIM�'.\N�VU(;CL C;4tUtp', AR�I'tlllkl'K � � . . Date Ftecei��ecE:��:1 � � S�i�_ . `rt'7`.,..__ - �'�� P.O. [iox 510 * 2S7$ 145TN STREET��"cST RosE��ounr, 1�iN SSOGS-0510 (G12)�23-4411 �� <' APP7:3�ATI4�' :F��. �L�'\':lED. U��'`IT:�E�'Ei.4I�IE�"+TT (�'�7I3} �: '; ; �f _ _ _ _ _.. : ,: _ .`�i l. Carlson Proqerties of Rosemn�nt (612) 423-2222 .��ame of.?�pljcarxi (ro Ue used oti leaal �lacirtrierrts) Tele�hone ?�Io. �. P.O. Box 69 Roser�ount, MN 55068 (612) 423-4551 Address of APPlicant F�.i 1��0. 3, The Runyan/Vogel Group, Inc. (612) 379-4140 ��'ante of Co:rsulr�ut �elepi�one �i�a 4. 1300 Godward St. , St�. 6�QO Minnea�olis, Mnt 55413 (612) 379-4847 Aadress of Cv�zs�clranr F�� i.v. �, Carlson Properties of Rosemount Nanre nf Prope;7y U��ier b. P.O. Box 69 Rosemount, f•1N 55068 (612) 423-2222 �a'tlress of Froaern� 01r•ner Tele�Itc�iri :��o. j 7. C-4 C-4 (PUD) II Cc�rre�rt Zonin, Propvicea' Z�rtin, ;if ap�l:cable) ' Und v e elo ed b. p Retai 1 Prese��r �'.ce Pro�osecl Use (if applicah.le) 9. S 1�500.00 �� PUD Fee (��OO.DOj Escro�v (�I,D00.00) Receivetl By�� %;3 lU. Street Address of Property(ies) Involved: County High�ra� 42 between Chippendale and Canada Ct�rrent Description(s) and Survey Attacl�ed? Current Survey Revised Desct7ption(s) and Survey Attach�d? Canc�pt P1 an 6. Project Description: The current undevel oped 8.2 acre parcel ��oul d be deuel oned to include a 64.600 s4uare�f ot retail center (at maxir�um buildout) , associated site 1CinrnvPmPntc� and two outlots at the northwest side of the site P'vD.'AFP.9's- , Date Received:L/C�c.,� I`7', �`^7 9-3 � , l.,,ll� O�f .+�0►S��'tZOld�2� P.O. Box 510 � 2875 145TH STxEs'r W�sT ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068-0510 (612)423-4411 ::»>::>::>:>::;::>::> : ;: �: >::::;::;::>:,>::»:: :. ,. ::;:<::.»>:::;�:. . �.�t�T�IN'�R� �A�' �l;P.�LIGt�.�TIC)�3' 1. Carlson Properties of Rosemaunt (612} 423-2222 ATame of Applicant (to be used on legal documenrs) Telephone No. 2 P.O. Box 69 Rosemount, MN 55068 (612) 423-4551 Address of Applicant Fax No. 3 The RunyanjVogel Group, Inc. (612) 379-4100 Nanae of Consultant Teleplio�ze ATo. 4. 1300 Godward St. . Ste 62Q0 Minn annli� P1N 5�i41� (612) 379-4847 Address of Consultant Fax 1�'v. 5 Carlson Properties of Rosemount Narne of Properry Owner 6. P.O. Box 69 . Rosemount, MN 55068 (612) 423-2222 A�l�lress of Property Owner Telepho�ie 14'0. 7. �-4 C-4 (PUD) Current Zoning Proposed Zo�ting (if applicable) g, Undeveloped Retail P�•ese�it Use Proposed Zlse {i�f ar�plicable) 9. � 1,206.00 ��/.f.�-�-�—L---- �✓ ' Ptat Fee $200.00+$3/lot plus �1,000.00 Escrow Received By 10. Location Map of Property(ies) Involved Attached? �oncept P1 an Current Description(s) and Survey Attached? Current Survey Revised Description(s) and Survey Attached? Concept P1 an 6. Project Description: The- current undevelaped 8.2 acre parcel would be developed to include a b4,600 square foot retail center (at maximum buildout) , associated s�ite improvements. anr: two outlots at the northw ct side of the tite PREPLTAP.93- I I! ., . . CITY OF RC�SEMCJu NT z��5-`;TMt"Aee,�-es� — � P.O.Box 510 Rosemount.M� Everythrng's Coming Up Rosemount!t ;;o58-osio Phor.a:51'-4?3•441 i �UBLIC I'��TI�E Fax:��_.��->>�3 ROSEMOIP.VT VILLAGE SQUARE PLA14'NED Uh'IT DEVF_LOPMENT(PUD) , PRELIMINARY PLAT ' (Soutli side of Couraty Road 42 bet►l�een Chippendale Avercue a�ut Ca�iada Ave�zue) I TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERI�: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEr', the City Council of the City of Rosemount will hold a public � hearing on Tuesday, March 15, 1994 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 2875 145th . Street West, beginning at 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. The puzpose of this hearing is to receive public input and comments on the proposed Rosemount Village Square Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat. The proposed commercial development subdivision pertains to property lacated on the south side of County Road 42 between Chippendale Avenue and Canada Avenue and le�ally described as follows: Lot I, Block l, SOtJTH ROSE PARK ADDiTION REPLAT, aceordina to the recorded plat thereof, Dal:ota County, Minnesota. Except the West 225.00 feet thereof, as measured at riaht an�les to and parallel with the west line of said Lot 1, and lyina north of a line beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 1, distant 208.33 feet south of the northv��est corner of said Lot 1; thence easterly at ri�ht angles to said west line a distance of 225 feet and there terminating. -AND - Lot 3, Block l, SOLITH ROSE PARK ZND ADDIT'I�N, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota Caunty, Minnesota. -AIJD - All that part of Lot 4, Bloek 1, Sotrrx RosE PAItx 2ND ADDtTroh, according to the recorded plat thereaf, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying South of the North 230.00 feet thereof, as measured at right angles to and parallel with the north line thereof. Tlye purpose of this hearing is to consider the RoSEn�ourrr VII,t,AGE SQu� commercial planned unit development and preliminary plat. The 9.094-acre tract af land is designated Commercial (C) in the City of Rosemount Gomprehensive Guide Plan: Up�late 2�00. The developer i� prvposing to develop an approximate 64,600 square foot retail center, associated site improvements and two outlots at the northwest side of the site. Persons wishing to comment on the Rosernount Village Square PUD and preliminary plat are invited to attend this meeting on Tuesdav. March 25. 1994 at 8:04 p.m. Dated this 2nd day of March, 1994. ' � � i f'/✓� / /,/ �I�/ _ ti 'i�G. . Susan Yvi. Walsh��ity Clerk J City of Rosemc�i.int Dakota County, Minnesota � _, r��- 4 M1 � HARVEY L & DENISE K ENERSON WAYNE L & RHONDA S WEIGAND TODD M & BARBARA A URBAN ' 15206 DANBURY AVf 15186 DANBURY AVE 4112 15iST ST W ' I�� • ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 RQSEMQUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 JAMES R & DIANE M HAMILTQN MARK D & CAROLYN t MAtERS KEVIN M & KRISTY L BRIST 4102 151 ST ST W 4088 151 ST Sl' W 4066 151 ST ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 RANDOLPH L KOEB RICHARD & LINDA RASCHKE BRADLEY J & ANGELA M IEDEL 4056 151ST ST W 4042 151ST ST W 4Q26 151ST ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 RQSEMOUNT MN 55068 ' RICHARD L & COLETTE BIESMAN OUDONE & CNANTHANOM RICHARD A & LAURIE A GIORDAND 4025 151ST ST W SOUMPHONPHAKDY 4055 151ST ST W I ROSEMOUNT MN 35068 4041 151ST ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 . ROSEMOUNT MW 55068 ' DONALD JR & VICTORIA NELSON JOHN J & JANICE L OLESICK DANIEL R & JULIE A BROWN 4065 151ST ST W 4085 151ST ST W 4101 151ST ST W '� ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 II TODD A & MECHELLE R JOSEPH G & PAULETTE 6ENSKE BRIAN K TAFT & DEBORAH K �I� STEPHENSON 4125 i51ST ST W ' SGHWARTZ-7AF T , 4111 151ST ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 4137 151ST ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 TIMOTHY L & KtM C EaiCKSON PATRICK J & VICKI L RUIZ WILLIS W & KAY D QEKRUIF 15145 DANVILLE AVE 15163 DANVfLLE AVE 15183 DANVfLLE AVE ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55Q68 ROSEMQUNT MM 55068 RAYMOND & BETTY JEAN HOLTZ THOMAS T & VICTORIA KLOOZ ADELINE J WAPLES 15199 DANVILLE AVE 15215 DANVILLE AVE 15223 DANVILLE AVE ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55�68 ROSEMOUNT MN 550B8 MICHAEL & SHERRI BURBRCK FREDERICK JOHN DYCK JAMES L ACKER & MARGARET M 4119 152ND CT 4105 152ND CT CAPRA ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 4091 152ND CT RaSEMOUNT MN 55068 WAYNE D & ROBiAI L LAMOREAUX DAVt� & DEBORAH KANGAS DUANE J JURGENS & NICOLE 4075 152ND CT 4065 152ND CT NELSON JURGENS ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 4Q51 152ND CT ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 , , � CHARLES M & TERRY L CARTER WAYNf E & BARBARA A CHaRLES DAVID R & CINDA C PANKRATZ 4041 152ND CT 15315 DEWBERRY CT i5325 DEWBERRY CT . ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 RQSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 THOMAS R & LOUISE M PAGET STEPHEN E & VICTORIA SMITH LAWRENCE J & DIANE J BURKE 15320 DEWBERRY CT 15310 DEWBERRY CT 4390 152ND ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 GERON P & JILL R HELLING C J GRANT & BRENDA MATTISON GREGORY J & MELISSA OCEL 4370 152ND ST W 4350 152ND ST W _ 4465 152ND ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 KURT A & CAROLYN T JENSEN MATTHEW J & DEBRA K CHURCH RAMSAHA! & SANDRA i KOWLESSAR 4445 152ND ST W 4435 152ND ST W 4415 152ND ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUPIT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 DAVID J & JENNIFER J PRESTON RALPH W & NANCY E GODBEY RORY S & LONA L RiCHARDS 4405 152ND ST W 4375 152ND ST W 4365 152ND ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 550fi8 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 TtMOTHY R JOHNSON JOHN E & VICKI P GEHRMAN TWOMAS L HALLAWAY & SHARON R 15235 DARJEELING CT 15315 DARJEELtNG CT HQLLAWAY ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 15305 DARJEELING CT ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 MARK R & DEANNA K DAUS BRIAN M & CHERYL L OLSON TERRY L & KATHLEEN L WAtCZRK 153t0 DARJEELING CT 15320 DARJEELING CT 15330 DARJEEUNG CT ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 , EDWARD A & DIANE M FITZGERALD CHRISTOPHER OSTERTAG LUTHERAN CNURCH OF OUR SAVIOR 15340 DARJEELING CT 14888 DODD BLVD 14980 DIAMOND PATH ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 CITY OF R OSEMOUNT KEVIN J & M K ERUASTI WfSIEY & DIANE ROLfiNG 2875 145TH ST W 14950 DODD BLVD 14930 DODD BLVU RQSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 MERLIN AND JOANN TEAL FLOYD C HARLOW ARNOLD L & EtIZABETH TEAL 1671 BROOKSHIRE AVE 14958 DODD BLUD 14962 DODD BLVD � TUSTiN CA 92680-6640 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 I � DAViD A JOHNSON & DIANA FLOYD E & TERESA TfAI LEIGN C & MICHfLE L ANQERSON f LOUISf URBAN 64Q6 LOUGHBOROUGH 14940 DELFT AVE W I 14956 DODD BLVD ST LOUIS MQ 63109-364Z ROSEMOUNI' MN 55068 '�, ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ' DAKOTA COUNTY HRA JAMES L CLARK TfMOTHY & ERIN M ZEMANOVIC '� 2496 145TH ST W 14949 DELFT AVE W 14915 DANVILLE AVE W �I ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 �, CHRlSTOPHER G OSTERTAG DEMNIS M & SUSAN E LIEN WILLIAM P MURPHY ' I 14888 DODD BLVO 4215 UPPER 150TH ST W 4195 150TH ST W � ' ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 LEROY A & KATHLEEN D OLSON DONALD M & JOY iUDESCHER STEVEN B & KAREN E DAVIS 4175 UPPER 150TH ST 4155 150TH ST W 4280 150TH ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROBERT E & JANET B DOLAN JOSEPH J & PAMEIA FOREMAN JOHN R & SANDRA J WALLACE 4260 150TH ST W 4240 UPPER 150TN ST W 4220 UPPER 150TN ST ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 MICHAEL R & MARY B iNCE CAROL JEAN MOTZ SCOTT G & AMY B ADAMS 4200 150TH ST W 4180 UPPER 150TN ST W 4160 150TH ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 RtCHARD J & KRISTIN S�HNEIDER MICHAEL A & PENNY J EFFERSZ CAROL J BROAOBENT 4100 150TH ST W 14955 DAMASK AVE W 14950 DAMASK AVE W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55Q6$ ARTHUR C BROBACK EUGENE T & iONNIE L BAKA RAYMOND F & PNYLUS PIKE 10341 2Q4TH ST 4060 150TH ST W 412Q 150TM ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOU(dT MN 55068 KENNETH J & KAREN K LOOMIS MARC J & BARBARA M RETTERATH SCOTT M & MAR{ANNE NEISON 4140 150TH ST W 14955 DALI.ARA AVE W 14975 DALLARA AVE W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 GERALD M & SHARON PETERSON THOMAS R BAYER ?ODD M & JOAN A JAGERSON 14950 DALLARA AVE W 1497� DALLARA AVE W 1499fl DALLARA AVE W ' ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 F WALTER M & ROSALIA M BAUER RUNALD W & CYNTHIA WESTLUND RICHARD W & LEE A KRQENER 14990 DALLARA AVE W 4030 150TH ST W 4040 150TH ST W � ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 BiLUE L LANE JOHN & DELORES TENTINGER LEO & SNARON TUTEWOHL 4050 150TH ST W 15072 DODD BLVD 16942 PILOT KNOB RD ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 RAYMOND & LUCILLE TOUSIGNANT RAYMOND & LUCILLE TOUSIGNANT MARK R NACHREINER & SHEILA 4550 150TH ST W ' S4�.0 150TH ST W A BAKALYAR APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 15109 DUNBAR CT APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 ROGER & DEBRA SEDLER JUSTIN & DIANNE MORITZ VIRGINIA L BERG 15107 DUNBAR CT 15105 DUNBAR CT 15tU3 DUNBAR CT APPLE iIALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 RICHARD E & JEANNE E HAUS GLEN & CAROL RAUTIO JEFFREY T OSNES 15101 DUNBAR CT 15104 DUNBAR CT 15106 DUNBAR CT APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 DAVID H IVERSON DAVID L & MARIAN A STANKOSKI JOHN R & PATRICIA A CHAMPON 15108 OUNBAR GT 15110 DUNBAR CT 15112 DUNBAR CT APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 FREDERICK l ROYBAL & LESLIE A BRENT L & PATRICIA DUNN PETER W & DONNA J PUTNAM CONDON ROYBOL 4556 152NQ ST W 45497 DRESDEN TRAlL 15114 DUNBAR CT APPLE UALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 JEFFRfY & JOAN RAMBAUM SCOTT HILGERT GUY & CANDY ALBERTUS 4565 152ND ST W 4553 152ND ST 4541 152ND ST APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 RPPLE VALLEY MN 55124 JOSEPH & JEAN HASSENFRITZ TAQE 0 & THERESA A OSITA THUMAS M & LORI A KEPNER 4529 152ND ST 15502 DRESDEN TRAIL 15500 DRESDEN TRAII APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 '� STEPHEN J & MARSHA I CRAMER RICHARD & KATHLEEN NfLSON ALBERT W & PHYLLtS WEFEL 15260 DRESOEN WAY 15240 DRESDEN WAY 4528 149TN CT � APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY Mtd 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 ' � JOHN T II & LAJEAId PE7ERSON CLIFFORD C & MARY E NELSEN PAUL J & GLORIA J ST1ER 4520 149TH CT 4512 149TH CT 4504 149TH CT ~ APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE UALLEY MN 55124 APPLE UALLEY MN 55124 ClTY OF APPLE VALLEY DANlEL R & SHEtLA M BETHKE GARY R & KIM M OHLEMACHER 41204 CEDAR AVE S 3910 UPPER 149TH ST 3938 UPPER 1497N 5T W APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 ROSEMOUNT MN b5068 ROSEMOUN7 MN 55068 HENRY IRIZARRY & GENEVIEVE M ' , ARK W & MfCHELE R TOFFEFSON WItIIAM E & HARR(ET DAY RODRIGUEZ 3972 UPPER 149T S 1 955 GRESTVIEW AVE ' H T 4 2174 CROTONA APT 4C ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ' BRONX NY 10457-2719 GREGORY A TRUSO & JACQU€UNE A GARY A & VICTORIA S WHITE MARVIN & JOANNE TEAL ' HOLLATZ 14945 CRESTVIEW AVE 20476 NAMBURG AVE S '� 14931 CRESNIEW AVE ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 LAKEVIILE MN 55044 I ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 STEVEN J TEAL TROY A TEAL 14966 DODD BLVD 14964 DODD BLVD ARNOLD TEAL ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 14962 DODD BIVD ROSEMDUNT MN 55068