HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.a. Discussion of Fluegel Block Improvement Project �
CITY OF ROSLdiOIINT
EXECIITIVE SUb�lARY FOR ACTION
PORT AUTHORITY MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 18, 1994
AGENDA ITEbI: DISCUSSION OF FLUEGEL BLOCK AGENDA SECTION:
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NEW BUSINESS
PREPARED BY: JOHN MILLER, AGENDA NO.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR 7. A.
ATTAC�lENTS: SITE RENOVATION PLAN, COST APPROVED BY:
ESTIMATES PROPOSAL TO PORT AUTHORITY DATED
9-14-94, DRAFT AGREEMENT DATED 9-21-94, MEMO
Please see attached memo.
RECObmlENDED ACTION: None. Discussion item.
PORT AUTHORITY ACTION:
MEMO
TO: Cha.ir Carroll
Commissioners Anderson, Busho, Edwards, McMenomy, Miller, Wippermann
FROM: John Miller, Economic Development Coordinator
DA'TE: October 13, 1994
RE: Fluegel Block Improvement Project
Sometime ago Arlyn Cope purchased the old Fisher building located on the south side of the
downtown area and on Trunk Highway 3. As the attached "site renovation plan" shows it is
located between the new Quik Trip location and the Novak-Schwanz building. Mr. Cope had
to resolve several issues in relocating his Repairs Inc. business to the new property. Over
the last several months he has initiated a rezoning, addressed parking issues, abandoned the
U-Haul rental business, and painted the building's exterior. The city also approved a site
plan for the redevelopment of the Strese Oil site.
In doing this work there was a considerable amount of activity in re-esta.blishing lot lines,
drainage, and parking. As a result several land owners began working together to address
not only these issues but also the question of aesthetics. The attached documents are a
product of those activities.
What the plans show and what has been discussed are as follows:
• Fluegel, Novak, and Cope will renovate their building facades and remove and
replace present business signs.
• Drainage issues will be addressed in a manner acceptable to the city engineer.
• Space for a new business will be made available in the building shown as "Fluegel
Commercial Rental Property."
• The areas away from the highway will be paved at the owner's expense once storm
drainage issues have been resolved by the city, i.e. there's a new, bigger storm
sewer.
• Landscaping will be similar to that approved for the Quik Trip property.
To leverage this work the landowners are asking far $30,500 in assistance from excess taY
increment funds to pay for curb, landscaping, and sidewalks adjacent to Trunk Highway 3.
�,� Th'qCks
F �\ '", ,
�U
. � ST fC,E �;Y,
� B� ORA � ��,, �,�,�,x
uet D,G G f �
��, ,x 4
�'` \ �+'
''��
�f ��,
4W'� ` I 1 I.� � �
��
��i
i , �. � �� ���
I ' ` �� � ,y iY
� tiy i
I '`� Iy
� �I-i ♦�y,�
*�Y
�xx
j. �x
�. ,,�
F( '� ��
I W sT�FCE � "'�Yx x•�
i a 8�D GqGf �; � �'`.-, '"'.x,�y�X „x,,�Yy��
_
w i;q �' "� '''„*y_ �„''�
� , .
� �
3 ------ � � � i � i � � ( � ( � � ` x''*.�
' � -- — ; �
U u PARKING �{ I �� I I I � I I I I � i I � \�� '�,,
� Q - --- ' � E%ISTING VOOD m� �
A � -------- DOCK TO RENAiN t / . � .
J 3' VIDE CURBED i � �
g —__ _ P�ANTING AREA �
i � � NEV S' CONC -+�f -�I i � I ! ! I . � I � I ,
? SIDEVALK ��_�-. . i i i � I i I � i � .. -
, J _"..._ ----- ---
� � _ ,
-- �___ � r W
__'_"_ --- � V —
s i�'� -- FLUEGE� NOVAK, ---- ' > ~W �–
-�` — se�snNn� COMMERCIAL SCHWANZ __ -' // C�PE BUILDING � �Z I o.
FLUEGEL _. ARE�^Y RENTAL - -- ` Y>� I
` RETAIL PR❑PERTY ___ B L D'G > �Z o
: BLD'G � Y o N
— ,
, '� ,� � o.
� ��` �FENCE V[TH GATE � � � - ---�-- � � I
(� EX1ST'G PLANTER EN�VITH GAT ONE VAY DRIVEWAY � �-
� ` \ /
�O•_
� t,�i O FIAGPOIE � � � - \� �•.� . 0000 '
�� ' EXIST'G � � E%IST'G ' � � � ' A �iiiiii
-PYL�N • � --- - -- - -- �
6N � SOD
S CONCRETE NEV 30' CURBED DRNEVAY S�DDED NEV 24' CURHED DRNEVAY SO➢DE➢ NEV 24' CURHED DRIVEWAY NEV PYION�SIGN NEV 22' CURBED DRIVE4AY
SIDEVAI.K AP?ROACH PER THE REO. BERM APPROACH PER THE REQ. BERM APPROACH PER TFIE REG. APPROACH PER THE REQ. . .
� OF TF�.CITY 5' CONCRETE OF TFE CITY 0� THE CITY OF THE CfiY
S[DEVALK . � � .
. . . -'..-- --..._ . ------ ---- --- � .------- -
NEV 8' LONL RENOVE TNE EXtSTING � � � �
� � � SIDE4AlK PLANTER AND A PORTION . �
OF THE EXiSTING ENTRY
S`"B MINNES�TA STATE HIGHWAY N0,3
SITE RENOVATION PLAN
SCALE 1' = 40'-0'
� Phone: (612)432-7132
Fax: (612)432-7530
��S�Tq'�' Proposal of
�� q�
� :` MINNESOTA STATE CURB-GUTTER DIVISION, AVR, INC.
� i� , 6801 West 150th Street � Appie Valley, Minnesota 55124
. Q
��� ��
�VT��
Page: 1 of 1
PROPOSAL SUBMITfED TO Pp�P�s� IQ3810 �A� 09/14/94
STREET J081�'P�SEKOUNT SAUARE
� .
CITY.STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB IOCATION J�
l
ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS `, JOB�HONE
� v
WE HEREBY SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS ANO ESTIMATES FOR:
APPROXIAnTELY: 800 LF OF B6i2 CURB AHD GUTTER
R HES �� �
1000 SF OF 8 CONCRETE APPROAC �
230 SY OF 3" MAT �
1600 SF SWEEP TACK AND 2" OVERLAY
900 LF OF SAW CUT ASPHALT �
1 EA PATCHING OF ASPHALT FOR NEW CURBS
23, 500. 00
SOD/L.AHDSCAPIKG AND RESTORATIOH 7, 500. 00
31, 000. 00
ALTERNATE BID:
990 SY OF PATCH RLAY
4700 SY OF GRADE" , INSTA L BASE AS HEEDED W/3" MAT
� 30, 500. 00
���V� v
�� ,�� ,
� � .
We Propose hereby to fumish material and labor-complete in accordance with above specifications for sum of: Payment To Be Made Upon Completion
dollars(S 1
All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. MINNESOTA STATE CURB-GUTfER assumes no responsibility for
problems caused by fauity sub-base. Any alteration or deviation fram above specification invoiving exVa costs wiil be executed onty upon wirtten orders,and wiil become an exVa charge over and
above the estimate. AII agreements contingent upon strikes,accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire,tomado and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by
Workmen's Compensation.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATUAE
X
Acceptance of Proposal-The above prices,specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as speafied. Payment wili be made as outlined
above. We further agree to give MINNESOTA STATE CURB-�UTTER at least seven(7)days notice prior to commenang work.
SIGNATUiiE OATE OF ACCEPTANCE
X
,�,
� � September 14, 1994 .
Page 2
I recommend,based on the above,that the Port Authority grant the request for$31,000 to
complete the improvements as shown on the print
Thank you fo ur consi on
Yours v y,
� �uge E.Pedersen
� Repairs, Inc.
Novak and Schwanz
� Fluegel Grain
�
� DEVELOPMEI�TT AGREIIVIII�iT
THIS AGREEMENT, dated this day of , 1994 by and
between the Rosemount Port Authority (the "Authority"), a public body corporate
and politic, and Repairs, Inc. ("Repairs"), (" "), and Fluegel
Grain ("Fluegel") (collectively, the "Developer" or "Developers"):
RECITALS
WHER.EAS, the Developers own certain property (the "Property") within the
City of Rosemount (the "City"), a description of which is attached as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the Authority desires to cause the Property to be developed in a
manner consistent with the City's downtown business community; and
WHEREAS, the Developers have submitted a proposal and specifications for
construction of certain site improvements adjacent to County Trunk Highway 3 (the
"Frontage Site Improvements") to be constructed on the Property, a description of
which is attached as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the Developers have also submitted a proposal to undertake certa.in
improvements to buildings on the Property and construct certain related parking
improvements (collectively, the "Other Site Improvements"), a description of which
is attached as Exhibit C; and
WHEREA5, the Property is within the Rosemount Redevelopment Project (the
"Project") and the Rosemount Redevelopment Project Tax Increment Financing
District (the "TIF District"), which TIF District was created by the City in May,
1979 and is now administered by the Authority; and
WHEREAS, the Authority is authorized to undertake certain activities to
facilitate development of redevelopment of property within the Project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual
covenants and obligations set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Construction of Fronta#;e Site Improvements. (a) Before commencement
of construction of the Frontage Site Improvements, the Developers shall submit to
the Authority detailed site and construction plans for both the Frontage Site
Improvements and the Other Site Improvements (collectively referred to as the
"Construction Plans"). The Authority will approve the Construction Plans if sueh
plans (i) conform to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and (ii) are
reviewed and approved by the Rosemount Planning Commission. The Construction
Plans will be deemed approved unless rejected in whole or in part by the Authority
within _ days after the date of their receipt by the Authority. Any such rejection
shall be made in writing and shall set forth in detail the reasons therefor. If the
Authority rejects any Construction Plans in whole or in part, the Developers shall
submit new or correeted Construction Plans within 30 days after written notification
to the Developers of the rejection. If the Developers make any material change in
the Construction Plans after their approval by the Authority, the Developers shall
submit the proposed ehange to the Authority for approval in aecordance with the
terms required for initial plans.
s��63a�
xszso-i 1
` Requests for payment hereunder shall be filed no more often than monthly and the
aggregate of amounts requested shall not exceed $31,000. The Authority shall have
no obligation to the Developers or to any third party with respect to any defects in
the construction of improvements financed or reimbursed by the Authority as
Frontage Site Improvements.
4. Construction Letter of Credit. Before the first payment under Section
3 hereof, and as security for the Developer's obligation to construct the Other Site
Improvements in accordance with this Agreement, the Developers shall deliver to the
Authority one of the following:
(a) an irrevocable bank letter of credit (the "Letter of Credit") in a form
satisfactory to the Authority. The Letter of Credit shall be in the amount of$31,000
and shall endure for at least one year and shall be renewed or replaced if necessary
in order to remain in effect until (i) the paving areas referenced in items 1, 2 and
3 in Exhibit C have been graded and aggregate is in place and readied for application
of bituminous surfacing; and (ii) the facade improvements referenced in Item 4 of
Exhibit C are completed. Upon satisfaction of the aforementioned conditions as
reasonably determined by the City's Building Official, the Authority shall return the
Letter of Credit to the Developers. At least 30 days before the Letter of Credit will
expire, the Developer must provide written notice evidencing the issuers commitment
to renew the Letter of Credit or issue a new one. If the Developer fails to provide
such timely notice, the Authority may draw the full amount of the Letter of Credit.
The provisions of tYxis section shall not be construed to prejudice or limit any
additional right of the Authority under Section 6 of this Agreement; or
(b) a Letter of Credit in the amount of $15,500, subject to the same terms and
conditions as described in paragraph (a), together with copies of executed contracts
between the Developers (or any individual Developer) and contractors, which
contracts indicate to the satisfaction of the Authority a commitment to construet all
the Other Site Improvements.
5. Events of Default Defined. The following shall be "Events of Default"
under this Agreement and the term "Event of Default" shall mean, whenever it is
used in this Agreement (unless the context otherwise provides), any failure by any
party to observe or perform any other covenant, condition, obligation or agreement
on its part to be observed or performed hereunder.
6. Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default referred to in
Section 5 of this Agreement occurs, the non-defaulting party may exercise its rights
under this Section 6 after providing thirty days written notice to the defaulting
party of the Event of Default, but only if the Event of Default has not been cured
witYun said thirty days or, if the Event of Default is by its nature incurable within
thirty days, the defaulting party does not provide assurances reasonably
satisfactory to the non-defaulting party that the Event of Default will be cured and
will be cured as soon as reasonably possible:
(a) Suspend its performance under the Agreement until it receives
assurances that the defaulting party will cure its default and continue its
performance under the Agreement.
(b) Cancel and rescind or terminate the Agreement.
SJB76347
xszao-i 3
' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority has caused this Agreement to be duly
executed in its na.me and behalf and the Developers have caused this Agreement to
be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.
ROSEMOUNT PORT AUTHORITY
By;
President
By:
Executive Director
DEVELOPER.S:
REPAIRS, INC.
By:
• Its
By:
Its
By:
Its
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Holmes & Graven, Chartered
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 337-9300
3JH76347
RS230-1 5
' EXHIBIT B
DESCRIPTION OF FRONTAGE SITE IMP80V�TTS
ars�eaa�
. asaao-i 7