Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.b. Selection of Developer for the Repairs, Inc. Site CITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECIITIVE SII1�iARY FOR ACTION PORT AUTHORITY MEETING DATE: MAY 17, 1994 AGENDA ITEbi: SELECTION OF DEVELOPER FOR THE AGENDA SECTION: REPAIRS INC. SITE OLD BUSINESS PREPARED BY: JOHN MILLER, AGENDA NO. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR 4 . B. ATTACI�IENTS: MEMORANDUM FROM JOHN MILLER APPROVED BY: In the attached memorandum you will find an analysis of the proposals from the two businesses interested in redeveloping the Repairs, Inc. site. From the analysis you will see that the proposal from White Funeral Home offers the port authority a substantial financial benefit. If the port authority selects the White Funeral Home proposal, it should negotiate through its staff a development agreement that ensures certain conditions important to the port authority are met. �'hese would include such items as 1) construction schedules, 2) cross-parking easements, 3) building exterior, and 4) building value. , W Q�K..T�if/i'" RECOb�IENDED ACTION: Motion to sele t ��I�'� as the developer for the Repairs, Inc. site�,contingent upon a submittal of a $5, 000 refundable deposit to cover consultant costs, and submittal of plans for an all brick veneer building, and successful compl tion of a development agree:nent with the port authority within 45 days. PORT AtJTHORITY ACTION: MEMO TO: Chair Carroll Commissioners Anderson, Busho, Edwards, McMenomy, Wippermann FROM: John Miller, Economic Development Coordinator DATE: May 6, 1994 RE: Financial Analysis of Repairs, Inc. Redevelopment Proposals The members of the Rosemount Port Authority have received two proposals for the redevelopment of the Repairs, Inc. site. Both proposals are permitted land uses according to the city's zoning ordinance and both represent aesthetically pleasing buildings that would be attraetive additions to the downtown. In tlus regard the members should be pleased with the progress the board has made in attracting new development to the downtown. Of great importance to the port authority though is the fmancial aspect of the redevelopment. • Both proposers are requesting port authority assistance in completing their projects and because of this commissioners need to know the costs and benefits of both projects. That is the purpose of this memo. Here is a project summary: White Funeral Home Rosemount Professional Buildin� Size 5280 square feet 9568 square feet ma�mum 4000 square feet minimum Building Ext. Brick veneer and lap Brick veneer siding - possible all brick veneer Construction Date 1994 1994 Value of Constr. $450,000 $478,400 maximum $311,000 minimum Assistance Requested Land for $1.00 Land for $1.00 TIF through 2000 Rosemount Professional Building Large Option City Assistance (land) $168,000 TIF Assistance 119,600 Tota1 City Assistance $287,600 As is the case of White Funeral Home, the redevelopment of the Repairs, Inc. parcel for the Rosemount Professional Building could be accomplished without a direct property tax. This would include purchase of the property, relocation, sewer extension, and demolition. The cost, however, would range from $245,750 to $287,600. As a final measure let's compare the fmal project values to the assistance requested. White �uneral Home Rosemount Professional Building Large Option Small Option Land $ 54,780 $ 54,780 $ 54,780 Building 450.000 478,400 ' 311,000 Total $504,780 $533,180 $365,780 Assistance 55,000 287,600 245,750 Assistance of % . ' of Tota1 11% 54% 67% I have recently rea.d my April 1, 1994, memo to you on the review of the preliminary proposals which included some analysis of requested assistance. In that memo I included some explanation of how the estimates were derived. It read very much like my tenth grade geometry book, dull. I eliminated that from this analysis but I would be available to discuss how the numbers were derived, for anyone interested. dw 3 . MEMO TO: Chair Carroll Commissioners Anderson, Busho, Edwards, McMenomy, Wippermann FROM: John Miller, Economic Development Coordinator DATE: May 18, 1994 RE: "Additional" Financial Analysis of Repairs, Inc. Redevelopment Proposals In the agenda packet for the May 18 meeting was a memorandum providing some basic fmancial review of two proposals the board has received for the redevelopment of the Repairs, Inc. site. Copies of the memo have been made available to the proposers and personal conta.ct has been made with both. In addition some of the commissioners have raised questions about the costs and benefits of the project to the public. The following is an attempt to address some of the more recent questions. 1. Q: What are the actual out-of-pocket costs for both proposals? A: At this point in time they are identical. The money spent to date is: Purchase $130,000 No-repurchase agreement 20,000 Demolition 11,300 Watermain extension 6,500 Tota1 $168,300 2. Q: Does either proposal offer the port authority the possibility of recapturing some of that money? A: Yes, the White Funeral Home proposal would provide the port authority with appro�mately $112,000 ± of tax increment fmance revenue through the year 2000. 3. Q: What about building costs? In an earlier memo John Miller suggested that one estimate might be a little high and the second estimate low. Since both buildings are proposed to be brick veneer, what happens to the projected cost/benefit if different dollar values of per square foot are used? Page 2 A: Dr. Walter-Hansen, the suspected low estimate, has supplied the board with revised cost estimates of $85 per square foot for the small building (now 5,000 square feet) and $65 per square foot for the larger 9,000 square foot building. This does three things. First, it increases the actual amount of'l� that Walter-Hansen would receive. Second, it shortens the "breakeven point" in terms of years before the city would recover its investment. Third, it reduces the city assistance as a percentage of total project cost number with the large building option. Here are the new numbers: ROSEMOUNT PROFESSIONAL BUII.DING Small O�tion Large O�tion 5,000 Square Feet 9,553 Square Feet 85 Cost Per Sc�uare Foot 65 Cost Per Sauare Foot $425,000 Building Value $621,000 Building Value .OS Approx. TaY .OS Au�rox. T� $ 21,250 Available for TTF $31,000 Available for TIF 5 Years in District 5 Years in District $106,000 Total TIF $155,000 Total TTF Total project value and city assistance as a percentage of total cost: Small Option Large Option Land $ 54,780 $ 54,780 Building +425,000 +621,000 Total Project $480,000 $676,000 Assistance Land $168,000 $168,000 TIF +106,000 +155.000 Tota1 $274,000 $323,000 Assistance as a % of total project 57% 48% Page 3 As you will recall, the numbers given in the May 6 John Miller memorandum had this assistance as a percentage of total project results. Project Assistance as a Percenta�Ye of Tota1 Cost White 11 Hansen 5mall Option 54 Hansen Large Option 67 4. Q: What about the breakeven point for Dr. Walter-Hansen's proposal? A: Let's assume the following: ROSEMOUNT PROFESSIONAL BUILDING Small Option Lar�O�tion Total Assistance Land $168,000 $168,000 TIF +106,000 +155.000 Total $274,000 $323,000 Annual Property Tax $ 21,250 $ 31,000 City Share .30 .30 Annual City Share $ 6,400 $ 9,300 Total Assistance = Years to breakeven Annual City Share Years to Breakeven 43 35 5. Q: Costs of construction keep changing for the proposals. Are there any real numbers? A: Yes. In the past the city and the port authority have both worked with Vanney and Associates, a St. Paul architectural fum. Interestingly enough Mr. Vanney designed and supervised construction of both a funeral home and an Page 4 animal clinic. The funeral home is located in West St. Paul and is wood frame with brick veneer described by Vanney as "showy," the funeral home has a basement, precast floors, but no decorating allowance. The building footprint was 5,613 square feet. Tota1 cost per square foot was $115.80. The animal hospital Mr. Vanney designed is in Inver Grove Heights. This was a 2,500 square foot building with a full basement. The building had amenities including a gabled roof and a quany tile floor. Total cost was about $144 per square foot. 6. Q: What about intangibles? There has been no effort to quantify issues such as impact on other downtown businesses, job creation, or leveraging of other redevelopment activity. Too many assumptions would be required, the results would be highly debatable. 7. Q: Is there "anybody coming over the hill?" A: No. dw MEMO TO: Chair Carroll Commissioners Anderson, Busho, Edwards, McMenomy, Wippermann FROM: John Miller, Economic Development Coordinator DATE: May 18, 1994 RE: Purchase of Land in the Rosemount Business Park by Lemna Corporation Recently Mr. Burt and I, as well as other city staff, have been working with Lemna Corporation to facilitate a move of the fum from Mendota Heights to Rosemount. As some of you are aware from a weekly progress report distributed by Mr. Burt, Lemna is a water purification and treatment firm with worldwide sales. Its staff is mostly professional and includes persons holding the doctor of philosophy degree. Lemna is interested in purchasing approxirnately 5.5 buildable acres of land on the pond side of Business Parkway. It is contemplating construction of 25,000 square feet of space with additional space for lease purposes to later be used for Lemna expansion. As Lemna is hoping for a July 1 groundbreaking, the port authority must complete several steps to make the site buildable. The land must be subdivided and platted and it must be rezoned. In addition terms of the sale and financial assistance must be resolved. In this regard Mr. Burt and I are requesting the commissioners approve the following: 1. Motion for Mr. Burt and Mr. Miller to negotiate with Lemna Corporation for the sale of land and any needed port authority assistance, contingent upon port authority approval. 2. Motion for the consulting engineer to prepare a final plat for subdivision of the land necessary for Lemna Corporation development. � � 3. Motion for r. Miller to initiate on behalf of the Rosemount Port Authority rezoning of the subdivided land from Agriculture to Business Park II. � To date port authority and city staff persons have visited with representatives of Lemna Corporation as well as Caliber Development Corporation, its architect and builder, and G.Q. Associates, the firm that will aid Lemna in leasing excess space. dw