HomeMy WebLinkAbout3. Accept Comprehensive Plan �
Os ev►�.ouvi�
��� O MAYOR
posemount,Minnesota Edward B.McMenomY
2g75.145th Street West, COUNCfLMfiMBERS
PHONE (612)423�441� Maiting Address: Sheila Kiassen
p,p,gox 510,Rosemount.Min�esota 55068-0510 �am��Red)Staats
FAX (612)4235203 Harry Wilicox
Dennis W�PPe�ann
ADMtNISTRATOR
���
Niayor E.B. McMenomy willcox, Wippe�ann gtephan Jiik
City Council Members Klassen, Staats,
' a �'eese, Director of Planning pC "�i'1�4�-
FROM: L�
DATE: October 19, 1993
SUgJ' Comp�hensive Plan Revisions
revisions to the Comprehensive Guide Plan as
Included in your packet are the proposed .�e T�le of Contents indicates the
a roved by the City Council in Niarch of this y�• fo� ou to
Pp re made. Please note that not all sectionn�we�vised '�e
sections in whieh changes we acket so it will be
not included in t1�s P
sections were nat revise� �rovided to you in M�'ch.
reference the Plan that was p
h�n es are notated separa.tely from the sections. Text that is
our convenience, a11 of the c g Text that is being i�Sen� is referenced by
For y S� R,�briefly averview
being deleted is crossed out in the atta.ched sectie ening Planning � ou have
age number and insert number. �oT�or�me in advance of the mee��t ons on Thursday
p es. I would encourage Y
these chang es because of the tune � ht, it is
questions regarding some of these proposed �h�g ro osed changeS on Thursday �
ts the Plan with the p P a,ith the Planning
night. If the City Council acceP�� to set a joint public hearing Commission
recommended that the Council p m �S evening is a Planning
Commission for November 8, igg3 at 7:00 p•
Meeting night. will be published in the
along with the details regarding the hea�g� e$ �e
Z'he Land Use Plan Map, T�ibune, and T�.e Rosemount T C ea of the hearing
DQk,ota County
City's official newspaper, � M�ch will be used agai�• p
h�g no�ice format used for the hearingT��s�y �ght.
notice will be distributed at your meeting
efull , we'll be able to wrap the Plan up on Thursday•
Hop Y
Thanks for your continued padence and cooperation.
i , �� �osemountll
�v��hing s ��mtn9
.^_.,e.�.��,-a�P. -
__ __ _ _ � . . _
}
z� o osevvcoun�
�
2875-145th Street West,fiosemount,Minnesota MAYOR
PHONE (612)4234411 Edward 8.McMenomy
FAX (612)4235203 MaiNng Addresx
P.O.Box 510,Rosemount,Minnesota 5506&0510 COUNCILMEMBERS
Sheila Klassen
James(Red)Staats
Harry Willcox
T�o �ilyOl' Fi.B. MCM8T10IllY Dennis Wippertnann
Clt Council Members Klassen, ►�tAdtS� Willcox, Wippermann ADMINISTRATOR
y Stephan Jilk
FROM: Lisa Freese, Director of Planning ��i1,�►f�,d,�,
DATE: October 19, 1993
SUBJ: Comprehensive Plan Revisions
Included in your packet are the proposed revisions to the Comprehensive Guide Plan as
approved by the City Council in March of this year. The Table of Contents indicates the
sections in which changes were made. Please note that not all sections were revised. The
sections were not revised are not included in this packet so it will be necessary for you to
reference the Plan that was provided to you in March.
For your convenience, all of the changes are notated separaxely from the sections. Text that is
being deleted is crossed out in the attached sections. Text that is being inserted is referenced by
page number and insert number. On Thursday evening Plarining staff will briefly overview
these changes. I would encourage you to call me in advance of the meeting if you have
questions regarding some of these proposed changes because of tbe time limitations on Thursday
night. If the City Council accepts the Plan with the proposed changes on Thursday night, it is
recommendetl that the Council proceed to set a joint public hea.ring with the Planning
Commission for November 8, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. This evening is a Planning Commission
Meeting night.
The Land Use Plan Map, along with the details regarding the hearing, will be published in the
City's official newspaper, Dakota Counry Tribune, and The Rosemount Town Pages. The
hearing notice format used for the hearing in March will be used again. Copies of the hearing
notice will be distributed at your meeting Tuesday night.
Hopefully, we'll be able to wrap the Plan up on Thursday.
Thanks for your continued patience and cooperation.
�ver�things �oming `U(.�i C�J�.osPmount��
�
. .. ��o�� o
i
Public Hearing Notice }
City of Rosemount
Rosemount City Hall Council Chambers
To: Citizens and Property Owners in the City of Rosemount HE�.�iG LoCATTONr 2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN
FROM: Rosemount City Council and Planning Commission TrntE OF HE�utuvG: T�esday, November 8, 1993 at 7:00 p.m.
Svs,�c'r: The City's Comprehensive Guide Plan Update 2000 is a To P�[t�['[c�A�: 1. At�tendre�resent tg e to testify; or assign a
blueprint for the anticipated growth of the City and how it � p p
2. Send a letter with comments or concerns to
can be focused to achieve the objectives and goais of the the Planning Department, 2875 145th Street
City. This Plan includes revisions required by the West, Rosemount, MN 55068.
Metropolitan Council, including a reduction in the proposed
Urban Service Area (MUSA). Copies of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Update
,i� GuIDE Pr��1v 2000 document are available for review at City
The City Council, Planning Commission, and other advisory Hall and can be purchased for $10.04, plus tax,
commissions have developed a °vision° for the City of
Rosemount in the year 2000. The "vision" l�as been
translated into Update 2000, which is the third Contact the City at 423-441 t regarding the
Comprehensive Guide Plan process that the City has initiated � ��5,�,�oNs? Comprehensive Guide Plan Update 2000.
since 1970. .
City of Rosemount
Comprehensive Guide Plan
Update 2000
Table of Contents
I. IntroduCtion (CHANGED)
II. Planning Context (No C.�vvcE)
Regional Setting
Rosemount Profile
III. Community Goals (1Vo CHANGE)
N. Growth Projections (Cx�vvGED)
Development Trends
Existing Land Use and Available Land �
Future Land Needs
V. Comprehensive Plan
A. Land Use Element (No C�vGE)
Agriculture
. Conservancy
Housing and Neighborhoals
Public and Institutional
Commercial
Industrial
Waste Management
Planned Development Areas
B. Transportation Element (No CI�1vGE)
Existing Transportatian System
Street and fiighway Plan
Transit Plan
C. Public Facilities and Services Element (C�u1vcED)
Public Utilities
Public Services
Schools
D. Environmental Protection Element (No C1�vGE)
E. Economic Development Element (No C�1vGE)
VI. Implementation Plan (C�vcED)
VII. Plan Maps (CHANGES TO 4 MAPS --- 1 MAP ELIMINATED)
VIII. Appendix A: Of�cial Proceedings and Correspondence
IX. Appendil� B: Land Demand Background (ADD�D SECT1oN)
ii
.. �
Introduction
Pa e�I-2
Update 2000, The Formal Review
1. Delete the last sentence in the paragra�h.
2. The followin�paragraphs should be added:
The Metropolitan Council staff notified the City on Apri127 that it would nat
be possible to approve the City's plan without substantial reduetion to the
proposed Metropolitan Service Area expansion. The City understood that
additional time was necessary to evaluate success of interim facility
improvements at the Rosemount wastewater treatment plant constructed by the
Metropalitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) in Iate 1992. Basecl on the '
understanding that this information couid result in a more favorable
consideration of the City's plan, the City requested a three month extension to
the statutory ninety day review period. During this three month time period,
the MWCC completed its review and determined that the treatment plant's
capacity had been enhanced, but it was still below the capacity required to
serve the City's year 2000 needs.
Qn September 16, 1993 the Metropolitan Council unanimously passed a
resolution approving the Rosemount Comprehensive Plan-Update 2000 subject
to a plan modification. The Metropolitan Council required that before Update
2000 could be placed into effect the City must modify its plan
1. by removing the area within the proposed year 2Q00 MUSA
(including the area identified as removed from the MUSA until
after 1996) until such time as the Council has approved the
Commission's Implementation Plan for expanding the capacity
af the Rosemount waster treatment plant;
2. to reflect the Rosemount wastewater treatment plant capacity of
0.9 million gallons per day; and
3. to specify that all on-site systems be inspected at least biennially
by an inspector li�ensed by the city or County and certified by
the MPCA.
Revisions 10/93 - Introduction
Page 1
, w
In addition the Couneil recommended that the City revise its plan to
1. respond to the changes in the region's roadway classificatio
system adopted by the TAB in 1992 and 1993; and
2. specify how the city will incorporate recommendations of t
Highway 52 Study.
Based on these requirements and recommendations the City revised Updat
20�0. On October 21 the Council and Planning Commission accepted the
revised document and set a joint public hearing for November 8, 1993. e
public hearing was held and after considering public testimony, the Pl ' g ',
Commission recommended approval of the Plan. The City Council adopt a
resolution approving Update ZOQO as revised on November 8, 1993. On
December �, 1993, the Metropolitan Council approved Update 2000 and
authorized the City to proceed with implementation.
Revisions 10/93-Introduction
Page 2
y y
I�VTRO�UCTIDN
THE PLAN ANZj ITS .[ URPOSE
The Ciry of Rosemount has active�y designed and implemented comprehensive plans since 1973.
Update 2000 is the tlurd plan developed by tlie C`iry un.d the first comprehensive revision to the 198Q
Guide Plan. The plan is a blueprint of the Ciry's vision for the year 2000 und beyond, providing
guidance for the communiry's growth and development.
The Ciry of Rosemouxzt, like all other communiries in the Twin G�aes Metropolitan Area, iS required
by the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act to prepare a Comprehensive Guide Plan which prouides
for orderly and staged development of the Ciry. The P.lan must be consistent with the Metropolitan
Council's Metro�oditan Development Investment Framework.
The Plan acknowledges areas and issues beyond the Ciry's jurisdiction or immediate control. The
City recognizes thar it is part of a regional unit. The Ciry's decisians will have an impact on the
region. The P1an anempts to address these impacts. The Plan also takes into account regional
decisions rnade by public and private concerns that have substantial impact on the loeal community's
vision ared growth patterns. An expressed concern of this plan is that regional decisions would be
made in concert with the stated communiry vision. .
To remain viable the plan must be,ftexible and dyreamic• It will have to respond to change as well
as guide ir. The Plare will need to be periodically amended ro keep it current. Each change
however must be evaluated on its merits and on whether it supports or detracts from the City's
vision.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF UPDATE 2000
The City of Rosemount views planning as a V'LSiOII
continual process and its has periodically re-
evaluated the existing 1980 Comprehensive Ptan. The formulation of a community vision was the
The City acknowledges its dynamic position in the basic foundation in the development of this plan. In
Metropolitan area and the impact of changes both develaping this vision, the City Council undertook
internally and extemally that have accurred since an extensive and ambitious community involvement
1980. Therefore, the City decided that a new major process beginning in 1988. A vaziery of tools and
planning effort to help guide the community into the techniques were utilized including town meetings, a
next century was necessary. This effort began in citizen advisory committee, an citizen attitude
1988 and four years of dedication and critical survey and a design charrette. The visioning process
community analysis is integrated in this plan culminateri in the development of gaals to achieve
document. The process consisted of three important this community vision.
components: a vision, a policy framework, and a
physical plan. These components are merged
together in the creation of this comprehensive plan
doeument.
CrrY aF RosErzourrr SEcrtoN I - 1 Jp,rTuaRY 1993
,
. .
Policy Framewark
After dew�eloping the community vision as its ► In 1988, the City studied the City's Fire Station
faundation, the City Council and the Planning needs and identified the number and location of
Commission began to construct the policy or future facilities for acceptable service levels
development framework. This framework expresses within both the projected 2010 urban service area
the policies of the City with respect to quantity, and remaining rural service areas.
character, location and rate of arowth. 1fie
Hoisina on Koegler Group was retained by the City . In 1989, the City developed a master draina�e
Council to assist the Cit�� with the formulation of plan for the western drainage area. This plan
these policies. A number of special workshops were provides the City with a stormwater mana�ement
held by the Planning Commission and City Council plan that will provide 100 year flaod protection
co frame these policies during 1991 and 1992. for properties, vegetation and other
During these workshops community input was impravements within the projected 2010 service
openly sought and all of the City's advisory area.
Committees were encouraged to participate in
developing a tand use concept and supporting . In 1990, the City analyzed projected staffing
policies. neetts and facility requirements through 2(?O5.
PhySic.al Pla.ii ► In 1991, the City completed a comprehensive
park plan and development guide. This plan
The physical planning component exarnines the guides park development for the Ciry well into
infrastructure and services (i.e,, roads, sewers, �e next century.
water service, fire protection, etc.) necessary to
support the desired land use patterns and , In 1991, the Ciry updated its sanitary sewer plan
development. The City has evaluated existing plans determining design and sizing requirements far ,
and assessed whether or not those plans those sewer service districu within the projected '
corresponded with de��elopment projections and land 2010 urban service area.
. use patterns. From this evaluation the Plannin�
Commission and City Council developed a work , Additionally in 1992, the City has developed
program to update these plans. The following is a {��dinQ mechanisms {Stormwater Utilit}j) and
summary of those studies and/or supplemental plans adopted consistent policies {Assessment/
completed. They are incorporated by reference into Improvement Polic}�) to implement physical
this comprehensive plan. improvements warranted by growth and
► In 1988, the City prepared a comprehensive development.
water system plan. This plan addresses future
supply, storaQe, and trunk distribution mains for
a projected service area in 2010.
V PDA�'E 2�OO, THE �ORMAL REVIEW
The final plan docurnent was completed in January 1993 and presented to tlie Planning Co»imission
aazd Ciry Council for acceptance. On February 9, 1993, the Planning Cor�zniission accepted the
document and recornmended tluzt a public hearing be held jointly wirh the City Council. 77ze Ciry
Council accepted tlze docurnent on February 16, 1993 and set an o,ff�icial pubtic hea�zng. The
public hearing was held on March 10, 1993. After reviewing the public testimony, tlie Planning
Comniission recomrnended approval on March 10, 1993. Tfie Ciry Council adopted a resolurion
approving Update 2000 on Marcli 16, 1993 arid it was forwarded to the Metropolitarz Council for
approval on Marclz 19, 1993 as required by rlie Metropalitan Land Planr�ing Act of 1973. $r�-
�.% �J
CITY OF ROSEn"[OUNT SECTIO!� I - 2 JANUARY 1993
� y
IV. GROWTH PROJECTIQNS
EXIS771�G LAND USE--URBAN SERVICE AREA
At the end of 1992, 2,284 acres or 10 percent of the Table IV-4.
City's total land area was in the Metropolitan yA�,T I.��,a
Service area. Seventy-five percent of the Urhan Ygg2 EX�S27NG MUSA3
Service Area is developed: residential land uses �gAS,�D ox LaEvn UsE Pra,v DrsicNarroxs)
comprise 34 percent, industrial comprises 13
percent, commercial only 3 percent and public uses Empire Rosemount Total
eight percent {8�). Please refer to Map 1, EXlStll2g Residential 236' 1ss� a2a
Land Use 1992. Gommerciul 10 24 34
Table N-3. Business/Industrial Park 161 9 1�0'
EXISTING LAND USE ACRES Public/Utilides 23 10 33
(12/92) TOTAL 430 231 661
Uttsntv RutUv.
SERvIc� S�v�C� To7,.�, llncludes 141 platted lots: 41 Final; 97
AxEn AitEn ActtEs Prelimiruiry.
2Al[Lantl Planed- 255 lots: 171 F�l;84
RESmENT1AL 817 1,367 2,184 Preliminary.
PUBLIC/INSTITU170ri1AL! 3Does not include 166 acres of existing MUSA to be
OPEN SPACE/ROADWAYS 518' 4,4b0 4,978 removed in Phase L
C0111MERCIAL 77 0 77
IrIDus'CRtnL 289 1,400 1,689
Ac[ucui,'iv[t�/Vncnn^�' S83 t2,989 13,�no With the Empire diversion and accompanying
MUSA expansion, the City has deliberately
ToTnL AcRFs 2,2aa 2o,2i6 22,soo attempted to reorient the residential market to
'Of the 518 acres, 184 acres is Public/InstiwtionallOpen section 31. For the past three years the Rosemount
Space. The remainder is public roadways and streets. RIRT'I'� SgN1C0 1Tt;3 �135 IIICT?.aSP.CI lri�le SllaTe Of
housing starts, so this effort appears to run counter
to the mazket forces. Housing construction trends by
Of the remaining twenty eight percent of sewer service district are summarized in Table IV-5.
undeveloped land (583 acres total), approximately The City hopes that opening up the Empire Service
149 acres is platted for residential development and area will increase residential de�elopment
awaits construction. (An inventory of the City's competition in the City and lower residential land
major residentia] development and their status is demands in the Rosemount WWTP service. But
included on pages IV-13 and IV-14 of this section.) realistically the City must have additional Urban
DJhen develaped it is anticipated that this land will Service azea in the Rosemount WWTP service area
yield about 660 homes. There is very little vacant to continued balanced growth, both in terms of
land planned for residential, remaining in the variety of housing constructed and land uses.
Rosemount WWTP (98 acres). This area of
Rosemount has been the most popular area for
residential development over the past 10 yeazs and
continues to be the most desirable area of the City.
It is also the most appropriate location for
commercial and industrial expansion in the near
term.
�eKo�,�s Ghan cs �ddfif�o�c
�
CrrY oF RossMourrr SEcrtorr IV - 6 Ja,�vuAxY 1993
Table N-S.
1990 - 1992 RESIDErrriai. Bvu..nnvG P'E�Ts
(BY SEWER SERVICE AREA)
199U 1991 1992
ROSEMOUNT WWTP SERVICE AREA ��_��
Carrollton ' 18' 13 32 '
Cimanon Village -- -- 36
Country Hills SO 75 87
Shannon Hills 11 15 55
SER�'ICE AREA TOTAL C 74 1Q3 .��10
PExCENr OF OVExALL TOTAI, 43°!0 51.5% 78%
ENIPLRE WWTP SERVICE>AREA �-.T��
O'Leary's Hills 18 5 3
Valley Oak_Addition Replat 14 16 8
Wensmann 45 34 19
VJest Ridge 15 2� 24
SERVICE AREA TQTAL 92 82 53
PEItCENT QF OVERALL TOTAL SO% 41% 20�
RURAL SERVICE AREA �T ��
��
Amberwood 0 1 �
Chelsea Woods 2 2 �
Rosemount Hills 1 4 2
Shannon Oaks 2 3 1
Stonebridge � 1 �
White Lake Acres 3 3 �
Other 5 1 3
UNSEWERED TOTAL �3 is 6
RESIDENTIAL TOTAL 184 200 270
In addition to the City's concern for balance growth, deferred or are pending based on this presumed
MUSA restrictions in the Rosemount VJWTP could available land bank. In another instance, a portion
have serious legal and fiscal implications far the of this land banked MUSA is in the downtown tax
City. A large share of land in the Rosemount increment district and the City may not be able to
VJWTP was in the MUSA prior to its removal and take advantage of TIF revenues if a pending
placement in the undesignated MUSA. At the time it development cannot be approved.
was removed property owners were assured that if
they choose to develop, MUSA would be available.
In some cases, assessments where voluntarily
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SECTION IV - 7 JANUARY 15�3
GROWTH PROJECTIONS
In 1992 the Metropolitan Council revised its local projecting a household growth of 245 units per year
population, household and employment forecasts. �d a total population of 15,897.Because of the
These forecast acknowledges Rosemount increasing Planned housing type mix in Update 2000, the City
development activity, projecting that households will anticipates a slower household size decline than
increase by about 220 units per year from 1990 to projected by the Metropolitan Council.
2000 and by 3(?0 units per year from 2000 xo 2010.
Employment growth is also expected to significantly
The Metropolitan Council's growth projections increase from 1990 to 2000 and level off in the
correlate with the City's own growth projections. following decade. The City has not completed its
The City's household and population projections, own employment forecasts but questions the decline
however, are slightly higher between 1990 and 2000 in employment growth after the year 2000. These
growth projections are summarized in TableIV-6.
Table N-6.
ROSEMOUNT GROWTH FORECASTS
1990-2010
:.`.``;'>'��:::.;:::::`>.::.::::`:::::::::.;
:::::::':��
. � :»';;<:`::,i>.;;<>��:���::::>��::':'t`��::'���'::>���`�;{�>�::»:��::;::;::>::>�::`:>::<�;<::<`::::::»`<:>::»os`<::::;,�;s:s;:;>;:>;;::><�s:;```<``«<;:::>'i;::;s:':>::::;�>`� <�:��:':>:::';>`:`::>::�<:::::::;::':'�::::::<:;:�>```:�:::::::>:<:::::<`::';;:':'>:'>:':<``<�:;:;�;» .
� ����...:�5:t!�i�l��::;:;[<:;� ::.r:.>:�>:::::::.::>:.>:::.::::-:.::..: .�.........:...:...: . y�. ; .
. + '. :..�■'�' .,.[�l:�ii .
:::::::::;::;;:::::;::;:;r;:::>�.::`'>:...:x:::;i:::::`;":::::::::::;::{::,::.>':.:i'^i:2::i?:::<:::i.';'.:::::>•::::::[:[[::iYit%.[i`;:';'':':'':[:'.[:�.:i:=:::;i i:i::�::.. �:...iLs . .':;[i:iiiii' . . V'....
!� �] ���:::::.:.::s::':�}-�}�� ::::. ::.��::��r..::.::.Y._.�.,..,..,.,._,..,.�.�...._.u:.;_;'?:'.�.:::.:::. �
�.::.:.:::.:.:.::.:.::::;;."o : :''`�'::i:::%:::i:i;::::::i:`::::::::::r::.. : . .:::<.;:.;::.::.;;'
�:::::.:.::<.:i�S7���2i:;::::: i::.:;.;:.;:.:�:.»:.;>:::;:;::.:;.:t::::.:.:::.>:.::.::s:.;.i:Si::i::<::::.>:c.:::<.::.::.:> .
�....::.:.:.:.�.�::....���r::::::::::::::::...::.:::�,w,7,._,_/,.,�:.:.::...:..::.:���::;:::..::::::................... .................. . .
Households 2,779 5,000 8,000 2,221 3,OOQ
Population 8,622 14,800 22,300 6,178 7,500
Employment 4,114 5,868 7,766 1,754 1,300
_ _........ .... ... ......._..:::::::::..�::.:._.::::. .::::::::::::::;::.;;:>: ;:;;;;;;;;::;;:.;:.;;;>;:.;;:;:>;:;:::.-�;-:.;,.;—»::>::»;»::>:::::>;
;>;::;:
>::;:::>,>�(��'�IT:<>::>>::::<``:;:::>:<:<:��<:':;<:';;`:�>>:<:>:<;:'�<:�>:::;<>:::::::>::<:': :`'<;::>:::;`:;>::::::>::::>;::::< ;<::�<::::::>:::�>:::::::::>:�;;<:::;:::;<::>::;:::>`::::�;;<`<>><:::::>::::::>::::>::::::>;::`«`»
.::::::.
::_:�::>:Rc�.�t.;:;:;::.;;:.::.;:.::<.:>:<.;::;:.:;.;:<.>:.>:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;::.;..::.;:.::;;:::;:.::::..:::.::.::::::..:....::....:.:::. :.:.::.�::::::::::....,.:::.......::..::.:::.:::::::::...:.:.::.:::;
::::<:>:`�><:»``::::>:::::: :.:::�:::::>::»::>`:>:;;::>::>:::::`><:>�>:�»::::'>::>:::�>;:;>::::::>:<:�;><:`::::;::>:::::::::«<::<>::><::::>;::>:<:::::::::>::;:��::<::::>::; ;::::::::::;::::�::::::><>`:;:>::<::::>::>:<:::>::::::>;:_<:;;:<<:::::::::::::<:>:::>:«<:>::>:::::
;,;;;;;;;;;;;:.::.;:��:: ::::::::,.:�:::::...::::::::.::..;;:;.;>::�.;;:;.;:.;;::::.:;:.:::::::::::::,..:::::::.;:.;;;;>;;:.;:.;>. :.::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::..:..::::....................._......
::.::.::::.:::::�:::::,:::.�::::. .:,::.:::.:::.::.:::.............. ..................................
Househoids 2,779 5,229 8,229 2,450 3,004
Population 8,622 15,897 23,864 7,575 7,967
'i'he City utilized these household and employment Based on the City's land demand forecast method,
projections, historical land development trends, 1,890 acres of land will be required to meet the
utility service requirements and plan policies to growth projections through the year 2000 and
generate land absorption projections for 20 years. provide for a five year overage of land supply for
The City's projected land needs are shown in Table each type of land use. The Metropolitan Council's
N-7. The Metropolitan Council has developed land land demand forecast method demonstrates a much
demand forecasts by two different methodologies. smaller land demand need of 1,026 acres. While
Details of these methodologies are discussed in the MUSA phasing plan has been modified in this
Appendix B, Land Demand Calculations. The revised version of the Plan to be consistent with the
Metropolitan Council land demand projections that Metropolitan Council's land demand forecasts, the
were used as a basis in evaluating the City's MUSA City is cancerned that the forecasts are too
expansion request in this plan are also summazized conservative.
in Table N-7.
New 5���`ioh
CiTY OF ROSEMOUNT SEcrtoN IV - 8 J�vuAxY 1993
Table IV-7.
PROJECTED LAND NEEDS
(1�DDITIDNAL f1CRES�
CITY PROJECTIONS MET COUNCIL
PROJECTIONS
Year 5-Year Year 5-Yeac' 1992-2000
2000 Overage 2410 Overage
Rura!Residential 50 150 50 150 N/A
UrbanResidential 600 1,137 1,075 1,612 811
Commercia! 35 65 60 90 20
Business Park 120 240 240 360 80
GeneralIndustrial 60 120 120 180 N/A
P�blic/InstitutionaUOpen Space 105 180 150 225 172
MUSA Addition 970 1,892 1,695 2,617 1,026
�RBAN SERVICE AREA 1992-2010 intentions beyond the year 2000. See Map 2, Urban
Service Area 1992-2013 and Map 3, Land Use Plan.
The Metropolitan Council is currently involved in
updating the Metropolitan Develapment Investment �e rationale for developing a 20 year land use plan
Framework and has adopteci an "interim policy" for �'e three-fold.
reviewing local comprehensive plan amendments
requesting expansion to the Metropolitan Urban ► With a 20 ear lan in place, the City will have
Service Area. The Council's interim policy states a grounds or implementing land use controls
that urban service expansion can occur provided the �e may affect properties beyond the year 2000
following conditions are met: MUSA boundary in the rural service azea.
► The local government's rural are densities are ' The � ' az' land use plan is required to
consistent with the Councii policy; adequately s�ze the Rasemount Wastewater
► Local timing and staging corresponds to allocated Treatment Plant.
usage rather than design capacity; ► The City encourages the Metropolitan Council
to utilize the 20 e plan in evaluating potential
► The local government has an up-to-date a
comprehensive sewer plan, including on-site airport sites that may be consider in or near
sewer management; and Rosemount as part of the Airport Planning Dual
► The local government has assessment practices Track Process.
that limit creation of vested rights.
As a method to move away from the land banking
The Council has also indicated to the City that it system and move toward designated MUSA, the
will not approve land use plans reaching beyond the City is establishing an,.P..h,as�I MUSA. The Pt'�a.c� ��I
year 2000 until the Framework in updated. MUSA will be in effect unt�1 additional land needs
can be demonstrated to the Metropolitan Council or
Update 2000 is a 20 year land use plan and when the Metropolitan Council allows communities
associated facilities plans. The plan has been divided to plan beyond the year 2000.
into three phases based on land needs projections:
The hase SA adds 1 Q84 acres to the existing
Phase I, 1993-2000; Phase II, 1998-2005; and Phase •�•�•�••
III, 2005-2013. Phases II and III aze included in Urban Service Area. Approxunately 496 acres af
Update 2000 in order to solidify the City's planning �e land added to the MLTSA is already developed
CrrY oF RosEtvtoUiv�r SEcrioN IV - 9 JAt•tuauY 1993
Table N-7.
PRO.TECTED �.AND NEEDS
(AdDlTIONAL ACRES)
CITX PROJECTIONS MET COUNCIL
PROJECTIONS
Year 5-Yeai' Year S-Year 1992-2000
2000 Overage 2010 Overage
Rural Residential 50 150 50 150 N!A
UrbanResidential 600 1,137 1,075 1,612 811
Commercial 35 65 60 90 2�
Business Patk 12A 240 240 360 80
Generallndustriat b0 120 120 180 N/A
Public/InstiwtionaUOpen Space 105 180 I50 225 172
MUSA Addition 970 1,892 I,695 2,617 1,026
URBAN SERVICE AREA 1992-���0 intentions beyond the year 2000. See Map 2, Urban
Service Area 1992-2013 and Map 3, Lrznd Use Plan.
The Metropolitan Council is currently involved in
The ratianale for developing a 20 year land use plan
updating the Metropolitan Development Invesmtent ,......w
Framework and has adopted an "interirn policy° for �'e three-fold.
reviewing local comprehensive plan amendments
► With a 20 year plan in place, the City will have
requesting expansion to the Metropolitan Urban ...
Service Area. The Council's interim policy states a grounds for implementing land use controls
that urban service expansion can occur provided the the may affect properties beyond the yeaz 2000
following conditions are met: MUSA boundary in the rural service area.
, ► The 20 ear land use plan is required to
► The local government s rural are densities are
consistent with the Council policy; adequate y size the Rosemount Wastewater
► Local timing and staging corresponds to allocated Treatment Plant.
usage rather than design capacity; ► The City encourages the Metropolitan Council
► The local government has an up-to-date to utilize the�an in evaluating potential
comprehensive sewer plan, including on-site airport sites at may be consider in or near
sewer management; and Rosemount as part of the Airport Planning Dual
► The local government has assessment practices Track Process.
that limit creation of vested rights.
As a method to move away from the land banking
The Council has also indicated to the City that it system and move toward designated MUSA, the
will not approve land use plans reaching beyond the City is establishing an Phase I MUSA that will be in
year 2000 until the Framework in updated. effect until December 1996 or until treatment
capacity can be enhanced, whichever occurs first.
Update 2000 is a 20 year land use plan and 'I'he Phase I MiJSA that will be in effect until land
associated facilities plans. The plan has been divided demands can be demonstrated to the Metropolitan
into three phases based on land needs projections: Council or when the Metropolitan Council allows
Phase I, 1993-2000; Phase II, 1998-2005; and Phase communities to plan beyond the year 2000.
III, 2005-2013. Phases II and III aze includetl in
Update 2000 in order to solidify the City's planning
CrrY oF RosEMourrr SEcrtorr IV - 9 JArrvaxY 1993
and is being served by urban services (including When land demands evarrant or the City is able to
sewer). This developed area included in the Phase I seek approval of plans beyond the year 2000, the
MUSA boundary extension is to the north of�the� City will submit Phases II and III to the
downtown area and includes the school and city Metropolitan Council for consideration. The Phase I
park complex, the Wintz Trucking Facility and the MUSA boundary is based on the Metropolitan
Brockway Golf Course. The undeveloped Iand adds Council's projected land needs from 1992-2000 plus
approximately 445 acres planned for residential a five year overage as provided for each
uses, eleven (11) acres planned far commercial and metropolitan community in the Development
105 acres planned for Business Park. The P ase I Investment Framework. Table IV-8 summarizes the
MUSA remoyes approximately 166 acres of the land available for development.
existing MUSA that was plann �or ustrial pazk
and redesignates 10 acres of industrial park to urban
residential.
Table IV-8.
VACANT LAND INVEM'ORY
(ACx�S)
IN1E[cn�t MUSA 1OC10 MUSA
--�- ------- ---- --� ------- -----
Em ' e Rosemount To'raL Em Rosemount To'rat.
Residentisl 173 • 498 811 173 1,090 1,263
Gommercial 0 . 23 23 0 45 45
Business Park 147 140 287 147 219 366
GeneralIndustry 0 0 0 0 448 448
Public/Utilities 23 50 73 23 82 l05
Other/Undesignated 48 40 48 48 1� 65
ToTwl. 391 8Q1 1,152 391 1,891 2,293
CITY OF RbSEMOUNT SEC'fION IV - 10 7ANUARY 19�3
The Phase I MUSA adds 1,084 aeres to the existing When land demands warrant or t�tte City is able ta
Urban erv�ce Area. Approximately 496 acres of seek approvat of plans beyond the year 2000, the
the land added to the MUSA is already developed City will submit Phases II and III to the
and is being served by urban services (including Metropc�litan Council for consideration. The Phase I
sewer). This developed area included in the Phase I MUSA boundary is based on the Metropo(itan
MUSA boundary extension is ta the north of the Council's projected land ne�ds from 1992-2000 plus
downtown area and includes the school and city a five year overage as provided for each
park complex, the Wintz Trucking Facility and the metropolitan community in the Development
Brockway Golf Course. The undeveloped land adds Investment Framework. Table IV-8 summarizes the '
approximately 445 acres planned for residential land available for development.
uses, eleven (11) acres planned for commercial and
105 acres planned for Business Park. The Interim
MUSA removes approximately 166 acres of the
existing MUSA that was planned for industrial park
and redesignates 10 acres of industrial pazk to urban
residential.
Ta�ile N-8.
�RY OF ROSEMOUNT
McTROPOLffAN URBAN SERVICE AREA LAND INVENTORY 1
Curcent • In[enm•1996 20Uo
Land Use Acreaae2 Parcets Acres Parceis Acres Parceis
DEVcL P D LAND A
i Residential 708.05 2347 1b22 8 7a.35 22
! Apartments 23 7 9 0.67 1 0
� Mobile Homes 392 1 a 0 0
: Commercial 76.51 89 11.57 5 0
! IndusViai 68:99 12 31.04 2 45.2a 6
aste ManagemeM 219.6 3 0 0 0
Utiliiies 6.32 2 a 0 0
riwttural Presewes 0 0 0 0 0 0
L3kes 13.06 1 a 35.31 37 1.68 2
P3rk5 46.73 18 236.9 10 A.8C 7
PubliC 117 67 113.98 14 7.77 3
Roads 382.67 18 51.02 7 3 �20.96 21
otal DeveloPetl 1701.13 2590 I a95.77 90 � 250.8a SS
�an�d vaca�c 201.17 137 A 0 5.75 3
Residentlal 1 a8.89 0 575
Mutti Fam Residential 17.71 0 0
Commercial 1579 0 0
Business Park t a.61 0 0
Public/Fark a.17 0 0
Agricuttural/Undeveloped 379.88 22 Sd7.57 76 � 5200.nc --
UrGan Resitlential i68.8 10<.3B 6 � <2<.33
PUD Resitlentiat 0 3C5.2� a �3a.25
Commercial 7.96 11.a 26.84
Business Park t0i.53 13203 S 160.�
Geneialintlustrial a5.85 0 398.6
Undesionatetl a8.7a o 0
PublicJPark 0 34.°5 56.53
Remna�t Parcels 2i 3 17 A:OS �
Total Undeveiooetl 563J8 176� 567.97 76 I 1206.79 59
O A�Acreage � 228c.3� 2766 � t0E3.6& ti06 � �457.03 t1c
1 Based on the Rosemourn GtS database ub'iizing ihe Dakota
Couniy Parcel file. Lantl uses are based on 12192 irneMory:
The aaeages may dit(er hom ihe figures reported in UPDATc
2000 because they were basetl on manual2abulations.
2 Does not inGutle approximatery 2a6 acres from existing
MUSA tlesignatetl as intlusVial.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SECTION IV - 1� JANUARY 19g�
� � �
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELF.tVIENT
Pa�(C�-2
1. Change figure the last sentence of last paragraph on page from .665 to .609
Note: This is a correction. This number corresponds to what was
approved in the sewer diversion amendment.
Pa�e VEC23
1. Table VEC -�ange Empire WWTP Flow fi rQu es for 201Q to:
Additional: .134 mgd instead of .190 mgd �
Cumulative: .609 mgd instead of .665 mgd
Note: This is a correction. This number conespands to what was
approved in the sewer diversion amendment.
2. Third Parag_raph, add the sentence at the end:
In July 1993, the City completed construction of the lift statian and force main
required to complete the diversion of this area from the Rosemount WWTP
service area to the Empire WWTP service area.
3. Fourth Para�ra�h, delete the second and third sentence and replace with the
following:
The MWCC completed an analysis of the eapacity of the treatment plant after
winter operations with the improvements. This study determined'that the
plant's capacity has been expanded to .90 mgd. Based on the first two months
of post diversion flow to the Rosemount WWTP, it appears that the current
flow at the plant is .59 mgd. The post diversion capacity at the Rosemount
WWTP provides for approximately 1,130 residential equivalents in this sewer
service area until a more permanent solution is implemented. Based on the
city's residential growth projections, capacity again will be rea.ched in either
1997 or 1998. Until the enhanced capacity is planned and part of the MWCC
implementation plan, the City will need to work within the .90 mgd limitation
in considering development proposals within the Rosernaunt WWTP.
4. Fifth Para�raph add the followin� to the last sentence and add another
sentence:
for the Rosemount WR�TP service area. In 7une 1993, the MWCC staff
estimated that the first phase of the study would be completed and the
associated Implementa.tion Plan amendment would be approved by the end of
1993.
Revisions 10i93 -Public Facilities
Page 1
. __ *• � !
Pa�e V(C�4
1. First Paragraph, first sentence, second line the word "interim° should be
replaced with the word "phased".
2. Table V(C)-3 should be revised as follows:
Served by the Empire WWTP
Subdist Avg Flow Added Cum. Avg Flow
1Q2 .286 .487
104 .201 .241
106 .122 .609
Note: This is a correetian. This number conesponds to what was
approved in the sewer diversion amendment.
Pa�e V(C)-6
PRIVATE WASTE TREAT`MENT SYSTEMS POLICIES
l. Insert after policy 3 the following new �olicy 4:
require biennial inspections af all on-site septic systems by an inspector
licensed by the city (or county), and certified by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency.
2. Renumber the existin�policy 4 to policy S and edit ta read as follows:
support the development of a county-wide biennial inspection program for on-
site septic systems.
3. Renumber policies 5 throug:h 10 as,6 through 11.
Page V�CL
PUBLIC SERVICES ELElVIENT-F�re
L repiace last sentence of fifth paragraph with the following;
On May 4, 1993 the cammunity defeated a referendum to consider the
construction of a new fire sta.tion at 145th Street and Shannon Pazkway. The
referendum also included the acquisition of an aerial truck. A the present time
the City is reviewing alternatives to the project and it is anticipated that in
1994, the City will chart a refocused course towards capital needs.
Revisions 10/93 -Public Facilities
Page 2
�'�� I'UBLI�' .,�ACILITIES ELEMENT
I� WA
, TER
� The western three (3) miles of Rosemount has a The City's water system is shown on Map 7,
II potable water system cornprehensive plan which was Exzsting Water Service and Map 8, Future Water
, updated in 198$. The municipal water system Main Plan. For further information regarding the
�', guided by this ptan currently has four (4) active existing water system and future expansion
, wells, 1.5 million gallons of storage capacity, and requirements refer to the 1988 Comprehensive Water
�', 43.5 miles of distribution lines. System Plan.
�, Since the completion of the water plan in 1988, the Table V(C)-1.
City has added a one (1) million gallon storage tank �y�{�g �junicipal Wells
'�,, and one (1) well (depth with an estimated capaciry
I� of 1,200 gpm). All of the Ciry's western urban weu n�m
I service area is encompassed by this plan and �-- ��;o„ A4�;fer ��c� Capaciry(GPIvt�
�!, subsequent feasibility studies.
�, 1 Old City Hall Drift 190 Abandaned
I!, In 1992, the City assumed ownership of a rural 2 o�a c��y xeii Joragn ai2 Abandoned
!, «�ater system. This system was installed by the sanas�one
�I University of Minnesota due to contamination of 3 Brazil Avcnue Jardan 471 500
� many private wells near the University's property s8na�cone
I 3�On� County State Aid HighwBy 4� (CSAH 42). 4 Ghippendale Park Jordan 520 Abandoned
', The system has two (2) wells, a pump house, and is sanascone
I a hydrostatic system. It has approximately eight (8) s Chippendale Par{; Jordan 490 Abandoned
' miles of PVC w�ater main and services twenty-nine sgnas;one
�I ��9� hOTI1BS, two businesses, 3I1d Lt2E tECIlI11C3I 6 Daliare Parl- Jordan 482 550
�'� CO��C�B. Sandstone
, 7 Chippendale 3ordan 444 1,000
�'I �le Clty IS CUrrelltly SiUdylAb �1B feaSlbllily Of Avenue Sandstone
!, providin� 3 ITIUAiC1p3I S8N1Ce IEV@� W2t8i SySteTCI t0 g Shannon Perkw•ay Jordan 498 1,2Q0
!� the eastern Rosernount area. This study is examinina sandsconz
I the possible utilization of some components of the �o ia5�,s«�et�St �ora8� aoo soo
�, rural water system in an upgraded system. sanasto�,e
I 11 145th Street Fsst Iordan 400 S00
�I Sandstone
II' STORM SEWER AND
�STORM WATE� �TILI�'Y
Ii, A 1989 report entit(ed Drainage Plan, West flood protection within the 19 subdistricts. Virtuatiy
'I Drainage Area provides the basic framework for all of these basins are landlacked. A summary of the
I development of the ponding system throughout the City's storm water draina?e system is depicted on
'�, western drainage area. This drainage area Map 9, Existing Storm Sewer Service Districts and
'', incarporates the urban density development within Map 10, Future Stornz Se�ver Service Districts.
�i the City. This plan is designed to give 1Q0-year
I� CITY OF ROSEMOUNT �V -
SEGTIO, V C 1 J�vvax�� 1993
� O
To improve water quality in the storm sewer ,S'ANITARY SEWER SYSTENI
ponding system the City has implemented several
policies and ordinances. More than any other eiement of the plan, sanitary
► As part of the City's development review process sewer service functions as the primary means of
for site plans and subdivisions, the City zoning guidinD growth in the community. Because of the
and subdivision ordinances require that grading expense involved with providing sanitary sewer
ptans address stormwater runoff and direct flows services, expansion of the service must be
into the City's system in an acceptable manner. concurrent with growth. However, growth must be
b ided to occur in only those azeas that can be
► T'he City has adopted Appendix Chapter 70 �onomicaliy served by sewers. To this end, the ,
(Excavating and Grading) of the Uniform Ciry has delineated sewer districts and sub-distriets
Building Code which requires erosion control for to guide growth based on service feasibility.
all construction projects requiring gradina or
excavation. The City has developetl plates Rosemount, like every other City in the
specifying the erosion contral standards that must Metropolitan Area, is required to prepare and adopt
be met by the contractors. The erosion control a local comprehensive sewer plan and to secure the
types vary by situation but can include filter Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's (MWCC)
fence, sediment basins, rock construction approval prior to undertaking any sewer
entrances, diversion ditches, and hay bales construction, alteration or improvements. In
around catch basins. addition, the MWCC is also responsible for
► In May 1992, the City created a stormwater construction and operatian of all waste water
utility for the purpose of funding a more treatment plants. It is therefore the responsibility of
aagressive preventative maintenance pro�ram for �e MWCC and the Metrapolitan Council to expand
� � sewer services as necessity warrants.
the City's storniwater draina�e and ponding
system. Some componenu of the maintenance
program include: 1) an aggressive street TREATII�IEIVT PLANT
sweepin� pro�ram; 2) pond maintenance; 3)
systematic cleanin� program for seclimentation The City of Rosemount currently uses both the
ponds; 4) enhancin� the system by adding erosion Rosemount and Empire Waste VJater Treatment �
blankets and rip rap in problems areas; and 5) Plants (WWTP) for treatment of waste water.
adding additional sedimentation basin in areas Empire V�'«'TP currently serves the Southwest
where need has been identified. corner of the City (767 acres) and Rasemount
► The City cooperated with the Vermillion Water WWTP serves the rest of the city's Municipal
Urban Services Area.
Mana�ement Oraanization (WMO) in the
development of a watershed plan. Empire WWTP's current desi;n capacity is 9 mgd.
► All development agreements executed for new In 1991, the average flow was 6.3 mgd or
subdivisions and multi-family housing approximately 2.7 mgd remaining capacity. In 1991
development includes requirements for erosion the estimated flows to this plant from Rosemount
control and soddina. was estimated at .026 mgd. In October, i992, a
major amendment to the City's sewer plan was
The Ciry is currentiy workin� to revise its approved. As a result of this amendrnent, waste
ordinances to include the National Urban Runoff water flows far approximately 540 existing homes
Program design criteria for new stormwater ponds, (approximately .14$ mgd) were diverted from the .
the Minnesota Poilution Control Agency's (PCA) Rosemount WWTP to tt�e Empire VJWTP. The
urban "best management practices", and the facilities required for the diversion will be
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) revised completed by July 1993. The Ciry projects an
shoreland management standards. estimated flow of .475 m'd by 2000 and .¢FSS at
ultimate development to the Empire WWTP.�
•b05
CITI' OF ROSE1�10U;�T SEGTION V(C} - 2 JANUARY 1993
Table V(C)-2.
;. ; P.�i,�ected Sew�er�ows �'or>the�it�of,Rase�ou�zt . ..; : :
ROSEntOUNT V4�'VTP EnTPIRE VVVV"TP TOTAL
Additiona! Cr�mulative Additio�ial Cumulative Additiona! Cumutativc
YEnR FLo�t� (MGD) FLo�ti� (MGD) FLow� (MGD) FLow (MGD) FLow (A�GD) FLot�' (MGD)
1992 0.107 0.565 0.009 0.183 0,116 �J47
1993 0.078 0.6A3 0.026 0.209 0.104 0.852
1994 0.050 0.693 0.030 -0.238 0.080 0.931
199� 0.051 0.744 0.032 0.270 O,Q83 1 A14
1996 0.032 0.776 0.041 031Y 0.073 1.087
1947-2000 0.192 0.968 0.164 0.475 0.356 1.443
201'0 0.829 1.797 .13y 9�r�98 ,(yDQ � 0.963 2.406
The capacity of the Rosemount WWTP is designed housing units to Empire until the expansion of the
for an average annual flow of .71 MGD, maximum WWTP was completed (Spring, 1992). Originally,
monthly flow of .87 MGD and peak hourly flow of the City had intended to arnend its sewer plan as a
2.19 MGD. This plant was constructed in 1988 and part of Update 2000, but in an effort to assist with
replaced a physical/chemical treatment facility which the capacity at the Rosemount WWTP, the City
dated from early 1973. The current facility is a praceeded with a major guide plan amendment in
three (3) cell aerated lagoon, with air provided to all 1992. This amendment was approved by the
three (3) cells A quiescent zone for settlina of Metropolitan Council in October, 1992. �
solids is located at the end of cell number 3. Treated
waste water is chlorinated and discharged into the Also in 1992, the MVJCC installed interim
Spring Lake area of the Mississippi. Sprin� Lake is impro��ements to the existin� Rosemount WWTP to
a backwater lake formed by the Mississippi River. improve the plant's capacity. tiW-�'-� `���al
?he Plant is currently subject to secondary treatment ' a
effluent limits. , ' � e
1.
The facilit}� was constructed to have a design life of ,
20 years usin� the 1976 Metropolitan Council b ' b t
forecasts. The City has been growing by a much � 's
faster rate than projected by those forecasts. To -i��et�e�-
accelerate this capacin� issue, in 1992 the h4WCC
indicated that the plant was functioning at less than In 1992, the MWCC initiated 'a facility planning and
its design capacity. Its actual capacity was probably design study to explore alternatives for the
closer to .60 mgd during the winter months.The expansion of the Rosemount WWTP capacity or the
1991 average flow was .605 m�d. Therefore it was conveyance of waste water to another facility: The
imperative to the City and the MWCC that first phase of the study will determine need and the
necessary steps be taken to alleviate the situation. method in which the need is met by the MWCC.
The second phase will be the actual design and
To this end the City proposerl to divert existing construction of the necessary facilities. While the
waste water flows in Seetion 31 (Southeastern exact date for the completion has not been
corner of the City) to Empire VJWTP. This change determined, the Cit}� was told by the MWCC that
in sewer service areas had been in the planning the earliest such a facility could be brought on line
staaes for several years. In 1986, the Ciry would be late 1996. The stud}� will determine u�aste
eompleted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet water treatment needs over a 50 year planning
for this proposal. The City was ailowed to send 300 horizon� Q
CITY OF ROSEt�40UNT $ECTIflN V(C� - 3 IANUARY 1993
Ph�►s�
Consistent wi this framework, the City is Table V(C}-3.
proposing a�-�� Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA) Boundary and has developed annual SANITARY S�WER F'LOWS - 2000 UILI3AN
sewer connection and flow projections by treatment S�vtcF AxEn
p}ant service area from 1992-1996, and a more s����d bv R�se�ounr«<���rr
�eneralized fiaure for 1997-2000 and 2010. These
projections are summarized in Table V(C)-2. s��n- �.eo ,+��g. Flow G�m.Avg. Pea�Design
District (.lcres) Added(mgdj Flow(mgdj Flow(mgd)
101 332 0.498 0.498 1.69A
t03 59 0.089 0.084 0.354
�ONVEYANCE F'ACILIT7ES �os 26 0.026 a.o26 o.�oa
. 12 291 0.291 0.29I 1.077
The design of sanitary sewer conveyance facilities 13 2$a o.2sa osbs �.s��
serving local development are the responsibility of
the City. Constructing such extensions must be la Zas o.2os o.?os a�90
based on careful analysis of projected land uses and �6 ir� o.i» �.s�o a.s�9
flow estimates from those land uses. If a pipe, lift 1� lls a.i62 o.i62 o.ss2
station or force main are undersized, the
replacement or duplication of that facility can be 18 $� o.oss �.s63 as3s
costl��. Therefore it is important to determine i9 s3 o.obi o.obi o.2aa
necessary sewer service districts based on ultimate 20 26� o.zb� 2.a9s b.�as
development of the land. Consideration must be 2� s�6 o.s�b s.sss �s,o7�
�iven to waste water flows that may someday be
generated from areas currently outside the proposed 3 ss2 o.3�s o.s2s 3.bo
Urban Service area. To correspond with the �enea b�•£�p;re«=���rr
praposed land uses in Update 2000, the 1980
SaIIlt1� SBWGi dBSIQ❑ CT1L8I'13 W3S llp(�3CP,d 211C� Sub- Area A�g. Flow Grm.Atig. Peak Drsig�r
pisrricr (Acres) Added(mgd) Fto�v(ntgd) Flow(mgd)
expanded in a study conducted by SEH Consultin�
En�ineers for the City in 1991. The design criteria io2 Zbi .2�(,� .yg� o.ss2 i�70
for each subdistrict is summarized in Tabie V(C)-3. �oa �s9 .�o� e�o .Zpt o�20 0.2�0
The City's sanitary sewer facilities are shown on �ob ��� `1z2 �.�a, . o.bbs i.sa9
Map II, Existing Sanitary Sewer Service and Map
I2, Future Sanitary Sewer Service Districts.
INFLOW/INFILT�A770N
�ED UC770N (I/I�
Inflow/infiltration(I/I) is stormwater and The MWCC in a recently completed study
groundwater that finds its way into the sanitary characterized Rosemount's sanitary sewer system as
sewer pipe. Inflow occurs when surface or ground having potentially excessive groundwater
water is directed into the pipe by such means as a inflow/infiltration. The MWCC cansultant defines
rainleader or sump pump connected to a sanitary I/I as excessive if it can be removed cost effectively.
sewer. Inflow also occurs in a more indirect way Most of the sewered areas of the Ciry are in what is
such as a low-lying manhole structure. Storm run- classified as a dry soil. The granular nature of this
off washes into the sanitary system azound the soil should altow any groundwater to "slide" by the
seams of the manhole cover and through any pipe preventing groundwater from easily enterin�
openina in the co��er. Infiltration is groundwater the pipe. Heavier wet soils tend to hold the water
enterinb the system through cracks in the pipe or near the pipe thus increasing the opportunity for
leaky joints. entrance into the system. 'I'he NIWCC's findinas
regardinL Rosemount run counter to the dry soil
CITY OF ROSEh40UNT SECTION V(C) -4 .JANVARY i993
concept. Although the problem is not as severe in Table V(C)-4.
Rosemount as in other communities, the City has
studied the problem to identify where xhose sources
where limited I/I may be originating. Descripcion Specification Joint Types
Approximately 50% of the City's 32 miles of sewer Reinforced ASTI�1 G76 ASTM C361
is 10 year old or newer. These newer lines were con��ece prPe
design to the present I/I standard of 100 Pvc P�pe as�rnl Dso3a ��es�omeri�
Gasket
gallons/day/inch diameter/mile. The system is air
Cast Iron Soil ASTRi E-8 ASTM C564
teStP,Cl LO CT1SUi8 COIT1p�tallCE;. 1'ilE SpeC1flCltlOIIS fOr pipe AST'A4 A-43$ Rubber Gasket
pipes, joints and manholes are summarized in Table ns�rn� A-�26
V�C�-4. Manhole ASTM C-478 Gasket
The remainina 50% of the sewer system is located PRIVATE T�ASTE TREA�1t1E1V:I'
in the older parts of town and is in the +10 to 50
year range in age. The City has undertaken the task �'YS`��Vjs'
of televising this older pipe to determine sources of
excessive i/I. Approximately 75% of the system is All non-agricultural uses within ihe Urban Service
televised. The information pravided by the videos Area must utilizepublic sewer facilities. Therefore,
has located several areas where there are potential private waste treatment systerns can anly be used
problems. The City has also identified other when public sewer systems are not available. Each
sources such as commercial rainleaders connecteti to system must conform to published standards for the
sanitary services and residential sump pumps design, location, instalIation, use and maintenance
draining to interior floor drains in the basements, of the City's Subdivision CJrdinance; the County
rea lations published in ordinance 113; the state
Dealing with groundwater infiltration is important plumbing code, Chapter 4715 and the state's
because it depletes sanitary treatment capaciry and Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Standards,
increases cost of treatment because of the added Chapter 7080.
�rolume. It is imperative that the City take the
necessary steps to minimize inflow/infiltration into At present, two industrial firms operate their own
the sanitar}� system. The City has elected to waste treatment plants, Koch Refinery and
mitigate this potential problem throuQh the capital Continental Nitrogen. Both of these firms operate
improvement process (CIP) and other proactive under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
measures. System and State Disposal Systems permit
programs.
Through the CIP, older streets scheduled for
reconstruction will also include upgrade or repair of
defective sewer installation. Several o€the problem
areas identified by televising are in streets included PUBLIC FACILI7�ES PLAN
in the five year street reconstructian CIP.
Also the current program to upgrade water meters in �b�eCt1V�S
older residential areas is loaked on as an opportunity
to inspect sump pumps for connection to the sanitary It is the objective of the City to:
sewer. The City is working with commercial 1. pr4vide pubIic utility services within the Urban
businesses to disconnect rainleaders from the Services Area to maintain the health, welfare and
sanitary service. safety of the public;
2. ensure that additional waste treatment capacity is
provided in a timely fashion so that development
within the Urban Services Area is not restricted
as a result of insufficient capacit��;
3, provide limited services such as police and fire ta
the Rural Service Area;
C[TY OF ROSEh40UNT SECTIOtv V(C) - S .TAIVUARY 1993
4. explore service sharing with surrounding 2. provide adequate facilities for storage and
communities and develop alternative methods of transpoRation of runoff to protect against
providing public services which will maintain flooding;
levels without substantial cost increases; 3. require that the release of stormwater from a
5. minimize service failures by monitoring and devetoped site complies with the City's
maintaining the public infrastructure; stormwater management plans or be retained to
6. extend public utility systems in a logical, the extent that its release rate is no grearer than
sequential fashion concurrent with development, the pre-development ten year peak dischazge;
not in advance; 4. require the termination of the pumping of storm
7. define and protect potential pubIic utiliry rights- water from basernent sump pumps directly into
of-way which may eventually be needed to extend the sanitary sewer system; and
service to rural residential areas; S. construct storm sewer facilities with the best
8. recognize the value of water as a natural resource technology available to improve water quality.
and adopt policy that encaurages water
conservation wherever possible, both by the
private sector and the public; and Sallitary SeWer PO11CieS
9. provide safeauards to insure against the
disruption of essential public services. It is the policy of the City to:
� 1. cooperate with the MVJCC in providing su�cient
waste treatment capaciry to meet Rosemount's
WSteI' POliCieS projected sanitary sewer needs, including the
expansian of the Rosernount Waste PJater
It is the policy of the Ciry to: Treatment Facilit};
1. provide and maintain facilities for the 2. provide public sewer service to east Rosemount
transportation, storage and distribution of water to service reaional-scale industrial and waste
within the Uxban Senrices Area; management/processing land uses; and
2. provide adequate distribution and storage facilities 3. continue the upgrading of the sanitary systern to
to cover peak consumptive demands, fire reduce inflow and infiltration, thereby increasing
fighting, and other events where additiona] water waste water treatment plant capacity.
is needed in excess of what is directly supplied
by the available wells;
3. pro��ide for any increases in the amount of water Private Waste Treatment Systems
demanded by new developments and industrial pO11C1eS
uses within the Urban Services Area;
4. research potential benefits which may accrue to It is the policy of the Ciry to:
interconnecting public water supply systems in 1. prohibit the development and use of new grivate
conjunction with appropriate conservation waste water treatment plants in the City and the
measures to insure a minimum level of service in expansion of existing systems;
case of service disruption; 2. require that all industrial dischargers satisfy the
5. evaluate the need and feasibility of providing U.S. Environmental Protection Agency standarcis
pubiic water service to rural residential areas only for industrial wastes discharged into surface
if the public health is at risk; and water;
6. evaluate the service need in east Rasemount and 3. require soil testing for all new on-site septic
upgrade the rural water system in accordance treatment systems and prior to repair of any
with those needs. existing drainfieid; �'i,�
�" 1�: ta
Storm Sewer Policies ' - �te
�;�►��e`spn�mr, �2
It is the policy of the City to: �.6� require replacement of non-conforming on-site
1. reduce the negative impacts of increased runoff septic systems;
and sediments from expanding development; '7 � revise the City ordinance to meet County
CtTY OF ROSEA40UNT $ECTION V(C� -S 7AIvUARY 19�3
Ordinance 113; Minnesota Individual Sewage (p� prohibit the installation of septic systems inside
Treatment Systems Standards, Chapter 7080 and the Urban Services Area and require all
the Clean Water Act; residences and businesses to use public sewer
Q � require that the on-site septic system be designed facilities as they become available as mandated by
to receive all sewage from the dwelling, buildinb, the State Building Code; and
or other estabiishment served; ((kfj� require in the subdivision platting process a study
a� �. prohibit the use of a septic system or a private � to determine the site's compatibility with septic
waste treatment plant for the disposal of all system canstruetion and operation.
products containing hazardous materials;
PU�BLIC SERVICES E�EM�NT
Public services can be categorized as all of those services provided to the comni�cn.iry by its local
govenzment tl�raugh the financial resources afforded the governnient and include, but are not linzited
to, police,fire, recreatior�, general govern�nental operations, and educarion.
Providing these services ��equires personnel, equipnzent, and faciliries at a level suffccient to'su�porr
tlle cornniuniry's needs and desired level of tlzose services.
POIiCe The Fire Department receives its funding through
the general tax levy of the City for all equipment,
The City Council has indicated that the increase of trainin„ and operational costs.
the visibility and service level of police operations
in the community is a high priority. The The department maintains mutual response
maintenance of one patrol officer to 1,000 a�reements with neighborinb cities to more
population ratio should be maintained. The City has efFectively utilize all available equipment and
also hired a school liaison o�cer to work in the manpower.
schools and also maintain a D.A.R.E. program for
drug awareness education in the schools. The current fire station is located near City Hall on
Brazil Avenue. In 1988, the City conducted a study
In order to provide equipment and o�ce areas to determine the best location for a new station to
sufficient to support these functions, the Ciry improve on the response time for fire calls and to
continues to provide fundin� capital for updating ��re efficiently utilize the equipment maintained by
vehicles, computer equipment, and training for the department.
police personnel.
This study indicates that a new station be built in a
Also, in lookin� to the expandina o�ce needs of the location more central to the residences of the
police function, the City included in its 1990 Space volunteers. , , a �
Needs Study, an expansion of the eurrent Police d
n
Department element of City Hall. ����
Fire General Government
The City maintains a Volunteer Fire Department Rosemount is a statutory "Plan B" city with an
with a chief and officers elected by the Fire elected mayor and four council members. All
Department membership in a process which requires members are elected at targe on odd year elections.
approval by the City Council. The current Fire The Council appoints an administrator to manage
Department membership is set at 39. city operations.
CITY OF ROSEA90UNT SECTION V(C� - 7 JANUARY 1993
.
The City Council appoints citizens to four standing SChOOIS
committees which provide recommendations on
planning, parks & recreation, port authority Rosemount is currently served by three independent
(economic development and redevelopment), and school districts and one technical college:
utilitieslcable. The City Council has established an Independent School District 196-Rosemount;
annual goal setting and Town Hall meeting process Independent-School District 199-Inver Grove
to help increase the opportunities for public and Heights; Independent Schoot District 200-Hastings;
committee input into the decision makina process. and Independent School District 917-Dakota Counry
Technical College.
In 1987, the City opened a new City Hall,
relocating it from a rural area of the community to The largest share of Rosemount students are served
the dawntown area of the City to make it more by Independent School District �96. Independent
accessible to the general public. It is also located in School District 196 has greatly expanded since its
close proximiry to the Public Works Maintenance creation in 1952, and now includes portions of
facility in an attempt to centralize major Burnsville, Eagan, Apple Valley, Inver Grove
governmental services in one location. Heights, Coates, Lakeville, Empire and Vermillion.
Independent Schoo] District 196 the largest and
Based on a Facilizy Needs Study completed in i990, fastest growing school district in the state. The
the City plans to create a "campus" of local district serves 22,500 students at three high schools,
governmentat operations at this location. five middle schools and seventeen elementary
schools. Four of these schools, Rosemount
Elementary, Middle and High Schools and Shannon
�arl�S Park Elementary, are located within the City of
Rosemount.
The Ciry owns and operates nineteen (19) different
parks within the City along with miles of walking In Novernber, 1991, voters in the District authori2ed
and biking trails. the issuance of�36,500,0�0 for the acquisition and
betterment af school facilities. In late December,
The City utilizes park dedication fees, tax dollars, 1991, the District issued �18,500,000 of�eneral
revenues from fees, and contributions to develop obligation school buiiding bonds (Phase 1) to build a
and operate the system. new middle school, elementary school, additional
classroom space in Rosemount High Schoot and
In 1992, the Ciry compleced its first Comprehensi�e RosemounC Middle School. The additions to the
Par� Plan and Development Guide. This long ranae Rosemount Middle School are currently under
plan calls for the development of the City's park construction and are scheduled for completion in
system. The plan is staged to correspand with the early 1993.
City's anticipated �rowth and financial resources
based on the community recreation needs and Independent School District 917, Da.kota County
desires. Technical College, has three (3) programs serving
the residents of Dakota County and the City of
The Ciry beaan constrnction of a community center, Rosemount: 1) a vocational technical coIlege; 2) a
in cooperation with the Minnesota National Guard. high school vocatiana! program; and 3) a special
The cammunity center, located near downtown, will education program. In 1992, the three programs
house an ice arena, theatre, banquet hall, served approximately 3,800 students fram all over
gymnasium, and central offices for the Parks and the metropolitan area.
Recreation staff. When completed in 1994, the
community center will provide social and
recreational opportunities for a broad spectrum of
the community.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SECTION V(C} - $ JANUARY 1993
. , .
PUBLIC SERVICES PLAN
Objective
It is the ob}ective of the City to locate public facilities and provide public services in a manner that assures
the continued health, welfare, and safety of the public at a (evel desired by the community.
Police Policies
It is the policy of the City to: insurance ratings; and
l. provide police and rescue services for the City of 6. continue to explore cooperative cost-sharina
Rosemount; arrangements with mutual aid fire departmenu to
2. continue to uparade emergency equipment to increase e�ciency and improve fire service and
maintain present ievels of service and improve training.
insuran�e ratings;
3. continue to promote cooperative arrangements City Government Polieies
between the Da�:ota County Sheriff s Department
and all other law enforcement agencies to It is the policy of the Ciry to:
improve services and optimize costs; 1. maintain all public administration functians in a
4. serve warrants and subpoenas as assigned; single centrally located City Administration
S. investigate nuisance-type complaints and issue Center which meets accepted work space
citations as the situation demands; standards;
6. transport prisoners as may be required; 2. continue to examine space and equipment needs
7. dir::ct traffic to relieve congestion problems as as the City arows in order to maximize the
needed; and delivery of public services;
8. promote a cooperative program in City schoots 3. annually e��aluate staffing needs to ensure
�vhich promotes education of and involvement in appropriate level needed to accomplish scheduled
programs such as D.A.R.E. and community projects, tasks, development review, and
service. maintain desired service levels; and
4. evaluate/explore service sharing opportunities
F1I'e S@I'V1C� POI1C1eS with other jurisdictions and service organizations
ranging from cost-sharing to consolidation.
It is the policy of the City to:
1. provide fire and rescue services to all areas of School Polie3'
the Western Urban Service Area w�ithin a six to
seven minute response time; It is the palicy of the City to:
2. sixe fire stations in locations that offer the best 1. cooperate with the staff of the schaol districts Fn
potential accessibilit}� by volunteer fire fighters order to provide for the educational needs of the
and especially to recruit daytime volunteers communit��;
within a two minute turnout time from stations; 2, encourage the school district to develop future
3. eontinue to cooperate with Koch Refining facilities in conformance with Ciry land use plan
Company and the University of Minnesota to policies; and
improve fire protection services to the more 3. cantinue to establish opportunities where the
remote areas of the City; schaol district and the City can work together in
4. consider the need and feasibility of providing utilizin� school district and City facilities and
public water service to northwest Rosemount staff in providin� educational and recreational
only if the public health is at risk; opportunities.
5. continue to upgrade fire fiQhtinQ and emergency
rescue equipment and water service as needed to
maintain present le��els of service and improve
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT $ECTION V(C) - 9 IANUARY 19J3
� ,
IlVIPLEMENTATION PLAN
Pa�e VI-1 & 2
1. Highwav 52 Corridor BtudY, delete last sentence and replace with the
following:
The study will be completed in November and incorporated into Update 2000
as an enhancement to the framework set up in the transportation element.
2. East End Utilit�udv, delete the last sentence and re,�lace with the
followin�:
The study was completed in July 1993. The study is currently pending public
review. Upon adoption the study will be forwarded to the Metropolitan
Council and Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for review.
3. Downtown Develonment Plan. delete the last sentence and re�lace with the
followinQ:
• The work of the Scoping Cammittee was completed and the docurnent was
referred to the City's other advisory commissions and comrnittees for review
and comment.
4. Business Park Plan, delete the last sentence and re�lace with the fallowing;
The concept plan was accepted by the Port Authority and a detailed feasibility
study was completed for Phase 1. Based on the findings of that study the Port
Authority made a purchase offer on a 80 acre tract on the northern portion of
the study area. Bonds were sold to finance the acquisition and the purchase is
final pending performances on contingencies by the seller. The Port Authority
has begun a preliminary plat of the property.
Revisions 10i93-Implementation
Page 1
t �
Page VI-3 II. Ordinance Revisions
Renlace Item 11 with the following sentence and definition of tasks:
11. Adopt a revised stormwater plan and revise development ordinances in
compliance with the Metropolitan Councils Interim Strategy for Non-point
Source pollution. Stormwater design standards for all new ponds will be in
compliance with National Urban Runoff Program standards and state
regulations.
Proj ected
Comptetion Task
Within 90 Adopt Interim 5tormwater Management Ordinance based
days of Plan the Metropolitan Council Model Ordinance .
Acceptance
Within 18 Complete Stormwater Management Plan and update 1989
months after Drainage Plan in conformance with Metropolitan Council
Plan Acceptance Interim Strategy and new state and federal regulations
December 1994 Revise DNR Shoreland Regulations consistent with the
1989 rule changes. Rosemount is a priority 3 City and
the DNR anticipates working with those communities in
1994.
April 1995 Adopt Stormwater Management Ordinance consistent
with City's Stormwater Management Plan and revised
Drainage Plan
Pa�VI-4
L Add the followin� new headin� and text after Subdivision Ordinance
On-site Septie System Inspection Program
Because the City's rural development is inconsistent with the Metropolitan
Council, the City is required to implement an on-site inspection program. To
this end the City has been supporting Dakota County's efforts to develop such
a program on a county-wide basis. This program has not been adopted by the
County and in the event that the adoption is not timely, the City is taking steps
to implement a local biennial inspection program in conformance with the
Council's requirements. The City plans to adopt an ordinance by the end of
the first quarter of 1994.
Revisions 14/93-Implementation
Page 2
��.
. , �.
Pag�e VI-6
1. Delete second bullet under "Current CIP Projects°
Page VI-9 Transuortation/Official Mapping
l. Add the following; new subheadin�and text at the be�ning of this section:
Transportation
The City will need to reevaluate its transportation element when the Regional
Transportation Plan is adopted and standards are established for the regional
raadway system. A number of changes to the regional system are pending that
will effect the City. Specif'ically, CASH 42 and TH 52 will be designateti as
non-interstate principal arterials. In addition, CSAH 71 and TH 3 will be
reclassified as "augmenter arterials". These changes are significant and could
require some rethinking of land uses along these comdors. It is unportant to
reevaluate after roadway access standards are been fmalized by the
Metxopolitan Council.
2. Add the followin h� eading� befare the existin text:
Official Mapping/Financing
Revisions 10/93-Implementation
� Page 3
, ,
IM�'LEMENTATION P.I�,AN
The Comprehensive Guide Plan establishes the City's growth objectives for the 1992 to 2Q00
planning period and beyond. The Impletnentation Plan, on the other hand, describes the programs
and procedures the City`will need to successfully achieve its vision. Without a plan of action, the
Comprehensive Plan will be of reactive value only. The Implementation Plan's rea.l value is as a
proactive body of public poliey which establishes priarities and balances public needs.
This Implementarion Plan includes the following elements:
I. Additional Studies
II. Ordinances: Zoning and Subdivision
III. Capital Improvements Pragram
IV. Housing
V. Inflow and Infiltration Reduction
VI. Transportation/Official Mapping
VII. Parks and Trails
V�. Tree Preservation and Replacement
IX. Public Services
X. Economic Development
XI. Plan Amendments
I. ADDITIONAL ►J TUDIES
During the course of the development of Update 2000, several areas have been identified warranting
further study. In several cases these studies are currently under way and the initial findings have
been included in this guide plan update. In arder to complete these studies, however, the City must
solidify the proposed Land Use Plan and Urban Service Boundary.
Transportation Study (west side):
In June, the City commissioned OSM, consulting engineers, to conduct a Transportation Study on
the western one-third of the City. Their task was to investigate existing conditions, model present
and future traffic, and investigate and make recommendations on the timing of roadway
improvements. Initial work was completed and was incorporated in the guide plan update. Upon
approval of the Plan by the Metropolitan Council in 1993, further analysis will be necessary to
refine the tirning of necessary roadway for incorporation into the City's ongoing Capital
Improvement programming.
Highway 52 Corridor Study: .
In coordination with the City of Inver Grove Heights, Dakota County, and MnDC1T, the City of
Rosemount has agreed to participate in a study of Trunl: Highway 52. The intent of tliis study goes
beyond the frontage road concept developed as a gart of Update 2000. The scope of the study will
identify the future funetional classification and develop design concepts for Trunk Highway 52.
CITY OF ROSEMOUIVT SECTION VI - 1 1ANUARY 19g3
V�-ken the functional classification is agreed upon, the study will develop alternatives for the Tntnk
Highway 52 corridor capable of accommodating the projected traffic flows and street extensions.
e comp .� -�s���-is-3une�` r
East End Utili�y Study
In Novernber 1992, the City of Rosemount initiated an EasF End Iltiliry Study. The study being
conducted by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. will develop a sewer and water plan
for an urban service area in the Pine Bend/Eastern Rosemount area. VJhi1e this area is not included
in the City's Interim MUSA, an area for urban industrial development is inco raterl in the City's
Year 2000 MUSA. • �
Downtown Development Plan
Early in �1992, the City Council appointed a Downtawn Scoping Committee. The committee is
examining commercial development, focusing on the Central Business District area, and providing
recommendations for a deta.iled land use plan in the downtown. This plan wili supplement the braad
direction provided in Update 2000. � a
�,1�.�...�n�1 nf.,�le Se�o rl rn�*t�P,*-. �
l,_�
Business Park Concept Plan: Sectivn 32
In November 1992, the City Port Authority initiated a Business Park Plan for Section 32, south of
County Road 42 and east of Trunk Highway 3. The concept plan being developed by SEH
Consulting Engineers, will provide: (1) an overall concept plan showing road, utility, and business
lot locations; (2) a proposed phasing of the praject covering the 400 to 500-acre area; and (3)
estimated costs for infrastructure.
� ' �..'./
11 . C�RDINANCE 1lEVISIONS
Tlie p�z�7iary i��ipleriientatio�i tools of the Co»tpreliensive Guide Plan a��e tlze Zo�iing and Subdivisiori
Ordinances. 77iese o�diiiances are the official controls tJtat will enable the City to pro-acrively
utilize the Guide Pla�i and aclaieve tlze Ciry of Rosenzount's visio�a fa- zlie year 2000.
Zoning Ordinance
The Zonzng Ordinance was adopted in 1989. Amendments to the ordinance are necessary to
unplement the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The following amendments will be considered by the
City Council:
I. Establisl¢ a Pla�zned Residenrial and Mixed-Use Deuelopnient District to preserve sensitive land
use transition areas and una�ue topographic features. The R-L Low Density Single Family
Residential District should be replaced by PD-R - Residentiai.
2. Establislt Interini Use Pennir (IUP) and/or eonditional Use Permit (CUP) provisions to
legitimize some existing non-conforming uses with performance criteria and to enhance official
CITY OF ROSETIOUNT SFC'TiO� t�T - 2 T"••'-""`' ����'
controls as needed. These mechanisms will promote greater flexibility within existing zoning
districts.
3. Expand loeational criteria for R-3 Multiple-Family Residence District to go beyond the
Rosemount Central Business District (CBD). Expand locational criteria in the Purpose artd
Intent paragraph in accorda.nce with High Density Residential plarr elements that are not
dependent on the CBD.
4. Establish perfonnance standards for Multi-Family Districts beyond the basic development
standards that specify density bonus requirements. Maxunum overall densities will be lower per
ordinance if the density bonus is not requested. Examples of performance standards include, but
are not limited to: (1) enhanced architectural or aesthetic treatments; (2) private recreational
amenities; (3) enhanced landscaping, parking, open space, and/or building setbacks.
5. Reduce the nuzximum densiry allowed in R-3 Mulriple-Family Distrzcts to twelve (12) units per
acre from the cunent density permitted, eighteen (18) dwelling units per acre. Up to eighteen
(1$) dwelling units per acre would be allowed with conformance to performance standards.
6. Modify the Purpose and Intent paragraph of the R-2 Single-Family Artached Districr to
discourage development of additional manufactured horne parks. Existing manufactured home
parks should not be rendered non-conforming.
7. Consider expanding tlie list of permitted uses under R-I Attached Single Farnily by PUD to
accommodate density bonuses allowed for adherence to adopted performance sta.ndards.
8. Analyze the results of the Downtown Scoping Committee to consider refm�ments as appropriate
to the Commercial Districts.
9. Rezone as necessary and antend zoning map:
1) Broback Industrial Park: Industrial Park to Residential;
2) University Addition: Industrial Park to Residential;
3) CMC 104-acre Site: Industrial Park to ResidentiaUCommercial;
- 4) Kelley Trust Property: Agriculture and R-1 Single Farnily Residential to PD-R;
5) 15-acre Islamic Community Cemetery Site: Agriculture to PB (Public or Quasi-Public);
6) East of Shannon Parkway, West of Chippendale, South of CSAH 42, and North of 152nd
Street West: Agriculture to Mixed Use PUD;
7) Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 3, South Rose Park Addition Replat: R-3 to Business Park;
8) South Half of Section 32, Range 19, East of Chippendale, and West of STH 3: Agriculture
to Business Park.
10. Identify Non-confornii�zg Uses, and clarify and strengthen non-conforming use provisions.
11. �4�t-t�i�-riro 'b
b �
�s...m��ciated-� .
12. Establish a Tree Preservarion Policy and Ordinance.
�3. Establish a Sidewalk/Pedestrian Comdor Standard for neighborhoods to connect the City trail
system.
14. Establish Site Plan Review Requirements for parking lots of more than fifteen (15) spaces and
development of slopes that are in excess of twelve percent (12%) gradients.
15. Establish a Conditional or Interirn Use Perniit requirement for any tower or structure to be built
200 feet or higher.
16. Creare a Conservmicy Zoning District consistent with the Conservancy Land Use Designation.
17. Review the R-1 Single Family District and determine if the district needs to be revised or
additional districts are necessary to increase the diversity of the City's housing stock.
C[TY OF ROSEAiOUNT SECT10\ V T - � T,�TT�,o v t oo'z
18. Repeal the Industlzal Park (IP) Disnzct and create a flexible use Business Park (BPj District
with appropriate standards regarding outdoor storage, setbacks from residential uses, loading
facilities, landscaping, etc.
i 9. Differentiate sewered and unsewe��ed general indccstrial areas in the east end of the City by
creating a Rural-Limited Industrial District intended primarily for existing industrial uses outside
the proposed eastern MUSA.
Subdivision Ordinance
The Subdivision Ordinance was originally adopted in 1972. Adoption of the Guide Flan will
necessitate major changes to this ordinance. Among the needed changes identified are: (I)
increasing setbacks to major thoroughfares and ra.ilroads; (2) converting all references "Village" to
"City"; and (3) clarification of the lot split/administrative plat process. The overhaul will
streamline the ordinance by removing repealed sections and consolidating defuutions and
exemptions.
� �
► Rdd o�, -s;�� Se��-<< Sps{��. �,�p��.-��, o� \Yo��a.�
CITY OF ROSEt��OUhT SECTIOn VT - 4 J a�.T r�vv �on�
Table VI-1.
Summary of Rosemount Zoning Districts
ZONING DISTRICT MINrMUM MaxIMUM
LOT AREA .UENSITY
..... ..;�:.:::.::::::..
:>:z;:;;;s::it::;::::::::;::;:<i:s::i:?:i:i;;::::::fi:;:r};>i;:::;>::i;:i;i;;;;:::i::;:i;:;i::;:?i:::::ri:i::;i:;i::::;::i:;?a.'::::;:,;;:;:;::>;?;:;:;:;::?:;i .
':r''%'+ •:.:+::s:+;s::.y�::;
..............:..............:..: .
:::::::::.>::::.:::::»:�>t�::.:::.;:..::.;:.;�::•:
:::::::::::':'•i'i i!:::—:::'::.'::::�::i`^.:.:o-<i"`:::...:::::'�>+:::x:::.r:.::::o.
.:: t' ' n:::::>:: ��>:;::::::::..:.::..:.:t>.;:...:t+::•.:o::•::::.:...:"[t:::..::.:•
[+'�}; :.+: ; ..���+�.....: �:::.....:v.>......:..::;::.:;.y::......:t::.:.,..y..:::::y:::::.::.....:.;•.>•r:::.j
�>. , . .... .::•::::o-::::r::c::,-..,:a�:..:•r:::r>:...:.::::..:.::o-::;.:>�.:r:,:.::.:+;::::.:::a:,.
:So-:::::::r:::::% :::ii;'�:::::::::;::::;::::
. . :..:' �:'::2::::•`.::;i::{% � i:::,::::::::::::::::::::>•:
:�{.T.�i���..............................:.::<:;:»;:.:::::::::.:>;:c::.ri::.o-::::.::a:;::r::::::::;i::::<:.::::r,':.:;:;.:::.::::::ox,,:;:;:...::... . , �..,. ...•:<.»:;:::.x.::. . ..:....:.::;::::::::..:;%;':
�:::.:::.::.:;;:.:;:;::::�;::;;.::.::.;:.:�;::::.::.:.:::•.:•:::.>:::.;-::....:::::::...:..::...:.....:...:...::.::.::..:�:.:..:.:... ::.. . .... .. .
AG Agricultural 2.5 acres 1 unit per i0 acres
AG-P Agricultural Preserves 2.5 acres 1 unit per 40 acres`
CONS Conservation N/A Densiry at time of
enactment
_.................... ....
`<:�:::::::>::::>::>:«:;<>::::::::::<:><::>::>:::<:>::::::>::::<;>:;::>:::;>�:'<:>;:<::`:::>.:.:�::�::::>.;::::;::>:;::>:?:::.::<:;:::':::;::«:::�:<:::>:.�:<:>>:::::>:::::;:>>::«::>:::,;:::::::>:;;<:
;:::;:;:_::::;::;;;>;;;;;;;;;;;:.;:.;::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:�:::::::.:>::::.�:
................:.::..:....:.:::;::::.::::::::.•,�::.:_::•:::::::::::::::•::::�.;.:..:::: . y
?S:r:ri:':�.•':�?-:;i::�:i;:•3.-:`;3::+'•.i�::i%:;;:�;'::;�:•'::::::::::
�>::•'i.�;ii�:'t�::::::f:;:�:i:::;:Y:;:;'t:::<Sr:S<::::::`4:i?:::j:'t�:::;::;::::;�>:;;::::x•;::i::�::;:=:<;r::�:i:
.............
>
. -:::t::•:.:::+n::•:r;•::;.:::+'.•w:>:��:+:r::r�`•::::::::��:;;::n::::,.,.:r:::•>•�::�:� .
. . . •o•.. :•::: � .. . . � '���Y^������
: .:;;': '� >`:+.: � ': '�iX33L.':::i:i:::'':'':[<::i:�3.`•:i{:ti;;iy:;i•:::::.:t•:::..�:::•::::::n�>:a.y:.;•::..:.
��,�+•:�,c._�',,,�.........................:?�:::::::::.�:::... .:::..:::::.r.:::.•:: ....
. ::.::.::.:;:::::::::::i::i;::ii:::.>:.::.>:.>:.>:.;r::.:::::.::::.::.>:.:>::.;:.::.:r.::.>:.:::::::::::::.:.:::..:::.:::::::::::::::::.::,:::::................................
RR Rural Residential 2.5 acres (platted) 1 unit per 5 acres
5 acres (unplatted)
:::;:>>:;>:::::`::;::::�:�:A�::>�>::;<:::::>:�::;:>:::<::::�:>::::<>:::;�::
`:`:�<';:::::<:>::::;:::>;::::::><:`�:<€;:>�:;:::<:>;::;;::�`::::;::>.:.::::::::::.:..:..
.,.,.......,..
..<:.:;>;>::.;�;:.;;:.>;;:;.;;:::::»>:;::.;::>;::::
<:«�::.>: � :�':�';�;��<:�:';<>:<:::<:':<�<>`:::`'<€�:>::�:><�::<:<::;�:�.:::<:::::;;:;�<;::`:�':��::<�'::;::�<»::�:::.;:::;>:::<:>:<>:�::r.::::::::::.:.:...:,:::;:.::.:.;>;::.:>..
.;.;>::;::::: ;_.:;::>::;:::
�:�8...... ��'il��".. :.;�:.::....:.:::::..�::::::::::::::.::::..,..::::::::::...
:.>;::.;::<.;;:;::.;;>:;�:;;.:<;:.:.;;:.;:.:;:::.:.::::::.:::::::.:::.::::.�::::::::::::::::::::... ....
..............................
PD-R Residential PUD* N/A 2.5 units per acre
R-L Low Density Single Family Residential�"� 20,000 sq. ft. N/A
R-1 Single Family Residential 10,000 sq. ft. 2.5 units per acre/
4.0 units per acre
R-lA Single Family Residential 10,000 sq. ft. N/A
R-2 Single Family Attached Residential c�-f8m>>y� 12,000 sq. ft. 6 units per acre
R-2 Single Family Attached Residential t3+ t'am;►y) 18,000 sq. ft. 6 units per acre
R-3 Multiple Family Residential (Attached) 22,500 sq. ft. 12 units per acre/
18 units per acre
R-4 Multiple Family Residential 22,500 sq. ft. 40 units per acre
��'�I;F:«<:>'�:�<;:::::'�>:;:;::>;>:;:`::><��>:::<:«�:;::;�:<::'<::>::>;�::>�'<`�`{`:<::<::�'<:>;:<�'::`;;;;'�t�::;;<::s;::�:;>;':�;�:"::::<::'>';::»:<>��::>:;:::;'«;»<_<€'>:;;;;;:{:<<:;:::;`:;::;�:;;:::�<;'<::::��':'�:';::;::>:<:�;::;::>:�><�::::��'<:<:<:;::�`:
.,
�����.:.....::::::........... : �.>;:;:;>::.
:::,::;::;;:,::,,,.::::,.,::::,,.:,::,::.:,,,.::.:,.,.:,�:,:.::..::.:.<.;::.;:<;;..:,::::::,::.:::::.:.:::::::........._........... ... ..
PD-MU Mixed Use PUD N/A N/A
G1 Com�enience Commercial 15,000 sq. ft. N/A
C-2 Community Commercial N/A N/A
C-3 Highway Service commercial 0.5 acres N/A
G4 General Commercial 20,OQ0 sq. ft. N/A
:;:::�;;:.:;:�:�:::�::«;>:�:::::;:;>;:�`:::<:>::::::>::>:;:::::>�:;::`<::;:::<:><::>�h;«�:::;>::�::�:'
,
�':<<_:>.<»><<:<.;;:::..:>::;;`>:::;:»>:>���:���<::�>::«:>:�>;'":::::�::::::<»::;�:�:�>::��>:::::�>:::�:>:::;::::::<�<;>`�>:'::::<:<;<':::;>:�:`;;:;<<:`;>;'�:;:::>::::::�;:::;::>:::<:;::<:::>;<�`:::::;::.:::.,..>.<::.::::<:::..;�::�.;�::.;.::::>.:.:.::::.;�.:::.:�::.;::::::�:�:.;;.:
i� _...�.......................... ...................::::..::::::.:::.::.::.::: ::>:<:>;>:.>:-:::>:::>::;>:>.<:;::».:<::;:;:>::><::>::<::;::>�<:::>:::>:::::;:<::�<::::::;�:<.:
:.�...:,��..`�.I.......................................................:�::..:.................................:.:::;::...:::::.:...
:�.:::.::.::.::.::.>,,.;;�.;::<:;:::::.;:.:.;;;:.;,;;,:,;:.:;,,.;�::;::.;,.;�.;,.:«:.:.:�..,;�..:::..,..:::.:.�.::..::.:...::...::::.:.... ..... .. ..........
BP Business Park*** N1A N/A
IP Industrial Park**** 0.5 acres N/A
IG General Industrial 5 acres ��A
Li Limited Industrial Rural 5 acres N/A
WM Waste Mana�ement ;5 acres N/A
<:><��<::::;:::>;<:>::<::::::;:::{:<::>?�<:_::;::::>=:�>::>:'::�:<:>:::»> . . �
�+.�s .•::a.:.:........ .
: ':::;::::::::.>•:>:;
"::ia3.3i:���::;ii;:;?i?:;��:2�r;::;�i;?:?��'it;:;i;:'%;:':i;i;;;:::2ii;:;�::t�::`�;:;;i;%��i;':'::i:;;;`::;::%2i:`;i;:t.r:;:i:i.:i:;:i:':i::;:?';r.#;;`;i`:3?`:'•i::'2?;�;:::S:ii>�'�:"�%��`;;:;'.;':�:.y�.:::;:i:;:::::::.::i i•
:SP�;�::::��.:::.::::::::::.......... ...:.:...:.....:... ....;:::..�.::�;:.. ::::;:::<�::.::
::.;::;;:<.:::;:.:::::::::.:�:::::.::,:::::.::::,.::::::::::::::.:::.::::::.::::,.::.::::.::::,.:::::::::...s.............................. .
PB Public or Quasi-Public N/A N/A
FP Flood Plain N/A N/A
'"''"` Re laces IP
~'� W 11 be de ted in favor of PD-R """* W il be deleted in favor of BP
IIl . CAPITAL 1 MPROVEMENTS 1- ROGRAM
The City recognizes that it must invest in a strong infrastructure of streets, utilities, parks, and
public facilities to promote a healthy growth pattern and maintain existing agri-business and older
residential neighborhoads. In order to ensure investments are made wisely, the City is in the
process of completing its first Comprehensive Five Year Capital Improvements Program (CIP).
This comprehensive approach to recognizing, prioritizing, and funding all capital expenditures will
support the continued development and replacement of the City's infrastructure. The CIP will be
annually reviewed to prioritize projects for funding based on community needs. Capital
improvements required to implement Update 2000 are identified on Map I8, Capital Improver�aent
Prograan 1994 - 2000.
The CIP consolidates all funding mechanisms utilized for capital expenditures. The funding
mechanisms established by the City include, but are not limited to, park dedication fees; connection
charges for all utilities; and stormwater, sewer and water utilities. These funds along with
Minnesota State Aid funding and assessments for certa.in projects will be used to fund the onboing
program. The City continues to explore additional funding mechanisms and resources.
T'he City has completed planning studies for this program including:
► a comprehensive Master Parks Plan
► a city facility analysis which projects needs for all city facilities for the next 20 years.
► a utilities study projecting water and sanitary sewer trunk line needs
► a five-year street reconstruction plan. (5ee Table VI-I).
The transportation studies and utility study currently underway will supplement present plans and
support the CIP programming process.
Current CIP Projects:
• The City is working with the State of Minnesota to complete a major ArmorylCommunity
Center which will open irr February 1994. This 150,000 square foot building which will have
offices and trainin� areas for the National Guard, as well as an arena, gymnasium, banquet
hall, and theater operated by the Ciry.
► � . --�� b d
r � �, t e exis ing •
► The City is planning the second phase reconstruction of 145th Street through downtown
Rosemount in 1993/1994.
► The City is completing a major park facility l:nown as Jaycee Park and beginning the first
phase of a Erickson Town Square Community Park which will act as a key link between the
downtown retail area and the Arn�ory/Community Center.
r..,... ,..- n�,- .,,.. . _ __ - -
Table VI-2.
City of Rosemount
Street Five-Year CIP
IMPROVEMENT 7URISDICTION FROM - TO SCHEDULE
145th Street Rosemount Cameo to Shannon Parkway 1994
Chili-Chippendale Rosemount 14bth to end 1994
C�� Rosemount 143rd to 145th 1994
143rd Street Rosemount TH 3 to School 1994
CR 46 Dakota Co. Apple Valley to Highway 52 1994
Lower 147th Rosemount TH 3 to Canada 1994 .
��� Rosemount 145th to Lower i47th 1995
Cambrian Ave. Rosemount Lower 147th to TH 3 1995
Cameo Rosemount Cambrian to End 1995
CR 73 Dakota Co. Inver Grove Heights to CR 42 1995
Chippendale Rosemount 151st to 160th 1996
145th Rosemount Brazil to CR 42 1996
Biscayne Rosemount CR 42 to Railroad Tracks I996
Connemara 'Traii Rosemaunt Shannon Parkway.to Highway 3 1997
Dodd Bivd Rosemount Chippendale to Delft 19�g
Sources: Ciry of Rosemount CIP, Dakota Counry CIP
C[TY OF ROSEMOUi�T SEC'fION VI - 7 7ANUARY 19g3
I V. 1�i OUSING IMP�EMENTA�'70N
The City has a large supply of affordable first-tune home buyer housing. The average value of
homes in Rosemount is approximately $98,000. As the City's residential base expands the City
would li.l:e to ensure that it continues to provide a variety of housing types and a broad range of
values.
The City has targeted two housing types it needs to encourage to balance the City's housing stock:
(1) move-up housinb; and (2) senior housing.
MOYE-UP �iOUSING:
The City recognizes that some of the City's most prime residential land could begin to develop duxing
this planning period. Essential to ensuring that this land is sensitively developed adopting zoning
ordinance provisions that protect and capitalize on this area's natural resources.
SEh'IOR HOUSING:
The Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has targeted downtown Rosemount
for a senior housing project in 1995. In order to ensure that the HRA proceeds with this project it
will be necessary for the City's Port Authority to assist with acquisition and ciearance of the selected
site.
�. INFLOW AND INFILTRATION RED i�CT10N
The City of Rosemount continues to monitor its sewer system for inflow and infiltration problems.
The MWCC in its recently completed Inflow a�id Infcltrariora Study characterizes Rosemount's sewer
system as having potentially excessive �round water infiltration.
The City has undertaken televised monitoring of approximately fifty percent (50%) of its older sewer
facilities which are between 10 and 50 years of age.
As part of the ongoing process to mitigate infiltration problems, the City intends to:
► Increase its effort in televised monitoring of older sewers.
• Identify potential contributors to infiltration.
► Investi�ate sources of the infiltration and establish aggressive enforcement practices to ensure
the integrity af the City's sewer service and mitigate any environmental impacts.
► Up�rade sewer services in those areas of the City where existing roads are scherluled for
reconstruction.
► Work with commercial business to eliminate ra.inleader connectians to sanitary service.
CITY OF ROSER40UIv'T SECTIQN �1 - t�i .�P.NUARY 1993
V�. TRANSPORTA�70N/OFFICIAL MAPPING
\( � ��1 y� .Q��! .
A old T�r a v►b po v�-Ira�i e�." �u�•b ti.e.,�Li r.5 oir OC.�.c�►0 M apr� ��i
One of the major problems facin� every community is the finarr�ing of noi�-local str�et improvements
and public transit. The City supports legislation that would allow local jurisdictions the ability to
establish funding mechanisms such as a transportation utility or development impact fees.
All local and collector streets should be the responsibility of the developer except in those instances
where a county road is included and qualifies for County funding. Generally, all local and collector
street rights-of-way should be dedicated by the developer and all construction costs should be assessed
to or otherwise paid for by the developer as required by ordinance. Where development is imminent,
rights-of-way should be dedicated by the developer as part of the platting process.
In order to protect rights-of-way for arterial streets, the City should be prepared to utilize the official
mapping process as per Minnesota Statute Section 462.359. This procedure allows the City to legally
map rights-of-way to prohibit development that would add appreciably to the cost of acquisition and
development. It requires no compensation for structures placed without a permit or in violation of
permit conditions. -0n the other hand, the law may compel the City to acquire the land if it wants to
continue to protect right-of-way in the face of a building permit request.
If a buildin� pernlit is denied by the City within an officially mapped right-of-way, the proponent
may file an appeal with the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. If the Board authorizes issuance of a
permit, the City has six (6) months from the date of the Board's decision to institute proceedings to
acquire the land or issue the permit.
VII. PAxKs ANv TxArLs
All trails and parks should be dedicated by the developer at the time of platting. Trails construction
should be the responsibility of the developer and should be done in accordance with City
specifications. Neighborhood and community par�s design and development are the responsibility of
the City and will be done in accordance with the Comprehensive Park Plan and Development Guide.
In the case of park land dedication, the size requirements for a whole park will not iikely be satisfied
by dedication. In such cases, parcels should be accepted that are adjacent to another ownership where
the remaining land needed can also be acquired at a later date by dedication. If this is impractical,
the City should require that the whole park be set aside so that the remainder can be acquired by the
City. In any event, the City should not accept small parcels that do not meet the minimum standards
for a park and have no potential for enlargement. Likewise, the City should not accept lands as part
of the dedication requirement that are unsuitable or undevelopable for park purposes and/or not in
conforn�ance with the Parks Plan policies.
CITY OF ROSEA40UNT SECfI01� VI - 9 JAI�UARY 1g�3
VI�t . TREE PRESERVATION' c�i 1�EPLACEMENT
The tree preservation�replacement program is intended to be applied to the entire City. In order to
implement this tree preservation/replacement policy, an amendment to Ordinance B, Section 8.3.E.
Woodland Preservation, should be adopted which includes the following:
E. Woodland Preservation and Renlacement
► Purpose and Intent
► Definitions (caliper inches, drip line, significant tree, etc.)
► Permit/Application/Procedures/Requirements
• Exemptions
► Tree Replacement Policies
• Calculation of tree replacement
• Location of replacement
• Sizes and types of trees
• Sources of trees
• Guarantees/Letter of Credit/Bond
1�... 1— UBLIC ,JERVICES
As the City continues to grow and develop it will be necessary to expand police, fire and general
govemment services. The City has established an annual community goal setting process to assist
with work program development. Through this process the City Council has ident�ed
communication and customer service as focus areas for improvement.
11.. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The City desires to retain its existing commercial and industrial businesses and encourage the addition
of new businesses to the comrnunity. The Port Authority is the City agency charged with this task.
Major program tasks for 1993 and 1994 include:
lj site acquisition for a senior housing project ;
2) assist with development of hospitality businesses to enhance armory facility;
3) complete a downtown redevelopment plan;
4) the construction/development of Phase I af the Rosemount business park; and
5) completion of business relocation and site redevelopment activities cunently underway.
CITY OF ROSEMaUNT SECTION VI - 1� 1ANUARI' 1993
��. .[ LAN AMENDM�NTS
The Comprehensive Plan is a body of policy which serves as the basis for zoning and public
improvement decisions. As such, any departure from tt�e plan requires an amendment that must also
be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council to determine whether or not it is of local or regional
significance. While the plan can be interpreted broadly, it is essential that its principles not be
violated or abused.
Plan amendments may be initiated periodically either by citizen petitions or by the City Planning
Commission. In either case, proposed amendments will be studied carefully to ensure that the
proposed amendment will not have an adverse effect on surrounding neighborhoods or establish an
undesirable precedent. Where a petitioner applies for a plan amendment, the burden of proof to
evaluate City-wide impacts and document compatibility with plans, the neighborhood, etc. is the
petitioner's responsibility. Planning Commission irutiated amendments will require a similar level of
consideration by the City.
Plan amendments should not be discouraged because tunes and conditions do change. It is important
to document changes that have occuned since the adoption of the original plan to deternune if an
amendment is warranted.
For any plan amendment which is specific to a parcel of land, public notice should be published and
mailed in accordance with the requirements for rezonin�. For a general City-wide plan amendment,
notice should be publisherl in the official City newspaper ten (10) days prior to the he,arin� date.
Discretion must be exercised where an amendment affects several parcels but may be construed as
City-wide in nature. The best option will be to provide mailed notice in such instances.
Any plan amendment requested by petition should be aceompanied by documentation supporting the
amendment and its effects on the City, the neighborhood, and the Plan. It should also document
changes that ha��e occurred since adoption of the Plan that warrant an amendment.
CIT1' OF ROSEI�40U\T SECT'iOti VT - 1 1 T�n�r��nv t�o;
VII. Pr,AN M�s
1. Ex�s�rtG LArm USE 1992
2. Ur�A.lv SExvICE AxEa (1992 - 2010) . . . . . . . . . . . (Cr�vG�n)
3. L� UsE PI.,�v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , (Cx�v��)
4. E�s�NG Zo�vuvG M�
S. RF�SIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPT�LENT . . . . . . . . . . . (CHANGEDJ
6. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
7. EXISTING WATER SERVICE
8. FU�rvxE WA�t Manv PLarv
9. EXISTING STORM SEWER SERVICE
10. FUTURE STORM SEWER SERVICE DISTRICTS
11. EXISTING SAIVITARY SEWER SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . (CHANGEDJ
12. FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE DISTTtICT5 . . . . �CHANGED�
13. P�Er_nvEs arTn Gas S�xvicE A�as
14. SOIL LIlVIITATIONS
1 s. wE�ri.aNvs
16. IMPLEMENTATION: POTENTIAL ZONING CHANGES
17. CAPITAL IMPROVII��NT PROGRAM 1994 - ZOOO
NOTE:
2000.vvD 2010 La1vD LIsE Pr.,vvS xAv�BEEN Cox1sINEv ON M,�3
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT .TANUARY l9
� �
IV. GRQWTH PROJECTit)NS
EXIS�NG �AND USE--URBAN SERVICE AREA
�� �j�' �
At the end of 1992, 2,284 acres or 10 percent of the Table IV-4. `G�' "! �( .
City's total land area was in the Metropolitan yACA1vT LAND
Service area. Seventy-five percent of the Urban 1992 ExISTTNG MUSA3
Service Area is developed: residential land uses �gASEn orv Laxn UsE Pc�uv D�srcxArroNs)
comprise 34 percent, industrial comprises 13
percent, commercial only 3 percent and public uses Empire Rosemount 7'ocat
eight percent (8%). Please refer to Map l, Existing Res�t�►�r�1 236' 1ss� a2a
Land Use 1992. ��ercial 10 24 34
TaBle N-3.
Business/Industrial Park 161 _ 9 170
EXISTTNG LAND USE ACRES PublicNriliries 23 10 33
(12/92)
TOTAL 430 231 661
U[�e�tv Ruftnt,
�y�� ��� T��y �Includes 141 platted lots: 41 Final; 97
A[�n AxEa AcxEs Preliminary.
ZAII Larui Platted-ZSS lots: 171 Final;84
ItFsmENT�nL 817 1,367 2,184 Preli�ninary.
PUBLIC/INSTTRll70NAL/ 'Does not include 166 acres of existing 16fUSA m he
OPEN SPACElROnDwAYs 518' 4,460 4,978 removed in Phase L
Con�xcut, 77 0 77
IrIDUs'PRiAL 289 1,400 1,689
AGRICUI,7v[tElVACMT 583 iz,989 13,n.o With the Empire diversion and accompanying
MUSA expansian, the City has deliberately
Tar.u,ncxEs 2,2sa 2o,2i6 22,soo attempted to reorient the residential market to
`Of the 518 acres, �sa a�res,s�bi«i�►�c�a,c�o�uopen section 31. For the past three years the Rosemount
spa�e. �rne�e,Y,a;naer�S Puni;��aWays ana�c��. p�wTP service area has increased in the shaze of
housing starts, so this effort appears to run counter
to the market forces. Housing construction trends by
Of the remaining twenty eight percent of sewer service district aze summarized in Table IV-5.
undeveloped land (583 acres total), approximately The Ciry hopes that opening up the Empire Service
149 acres is platted for residential development and area wili increase residential development
awaits construction. (An inventory of the City's competition in the City and lower residential land
major residential development and their status is demands in the Rosemount WWTP service. But
included on pages IV-13 and IV-14 of this section.) realistically the City must have additional Urban
When developed it is anticipated that this land will Service area in the Rosemount WWTP service area
yield about 660 homes. There is very little vacant to continued balanced growth, both in terms of
land planned for residential, remaining in the variety of housing eonstructed and land uses.
Rosemount WWTP (98 acres). T'his area of
Rosemount has been tlie most popular area for
residential development over the past 10 years and
continues to be the most desirable area of the City.
It is atso the most appropriate location for
commercial and industrial expansian in the near
term.
�Q Ko��� GH�tn �� �4dd�ifio�
.� s
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SECTION IV - C JANUARY 1993
. ;
Table IV-S.
1990 - 1992 REsmE�,�, BuII,vnvG PEx�ntTs
(BY SEWER SERVICE AREA�
1990 1991 1992
ROSEMOUNT WWTP SERVICE AREA ���-r�
Canollton 18' 13 32 ,'
Cimarron Village -- -- 36
Country Hills SO 75 87
Shannon Hills ll 15 55
Sr�xxv�cE Ax�a To�rai. 79 1Q3 21U
PERCENT' OF OvERAI.L TOTAL �43% 51.5% 78%
Et��R'WTP S�tviC�:A�A �— ��
O'Leary's Hiils 18 5 3
Valley Oak Addition Replat 14 16 8
Wensmann 45 34 19
West Ridge 15 27 24
SERVICE AItEA TOTAI, 92 82 53
PEItCENT OF OvERA,LL TOTAL 50% 41% 20%
RURAL SERVICE.AREA ' �
Amberwood 0 1 0
Chelsea Woods 2 2 0
Rosemount Hills 1 4 2
Shannon Oaks 2 3 1
Stonebridge 0 1 0
VJhite Lake Acres 3 3 0
Other 5 1 3
UNSEWERED TOTAL �r— 13 15 6
RESIDENTIAL To7'AL 184 200 270
In addition to the City's concern for balance growth, deferred or are pending based on this presumed
MUSA restrictions in the Rosemount WWTP could available land banic. In another instance, a portion
have serious legal and fiscal implications for the of this land banked MUSA is in the downtown tax
City. A large share of land in the Rosemount increment district and the City may not be able to
WWTP was in the MUSA prior to its rernoval and take advantage of TIF revenues if a pending
placement in the undesignated MUSA. At the time it development cannot be approved.
was removed property owners were assured that if
they choose to develop, MUSA would be available.
In some cases, assessments where voluntarily
CTI'Y OF ROSEMOUNT SECTION IV - 7 JANUARY 1593
. �
GROWTH PROJEC?70NS
In 1992 the Metropolitan Council revised its local projecting a household growth of 245 units per year
population, household and employment forecasts. and a total population of 15,897. Because of the
These forecast acknowledges Rosemount increasing Planned housing type mix in Update 2000, the City
development activity, projecting that households will anticipates a slower household size decline than
increase by about 220 units per year from 1990 to projected by the Metropolitan Council.
2000 and by 300 units per year from 2000 to 2010.
Employment growth is also expected to significantly
The Metropolitan Council's growth projections increase from 1990 to 2000 and level off in the
correlate with the City's own growth projections. following decade. The City has not cQmpleted its
The City's household and population projections, own employment forecasts but questions the decline
however, are slightly higher between 1990 and 2000 in employment growth after the yeaz 2000. T'hese
growth projections are summarized in TableIV-6.
Table N-6.
ROSEMOUNT GROWTH FORECASTS
.z99a2o�o
:�:::��:�::::::::�:::::..:�:::::::::..:.:::.:�:::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::
................ .......... ...... .::::::::::::
�.
..............:::::: .:::.�::::::::::::::::::..::::.::::.:::::.::::::.::::::.::.::.:::::.::.:::::::::::.:::.:::::,::::.:::.::::.::::_.:::.::: ::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::�:::::::::::: .:...�:::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::: ::::::::::::::::_::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::
.::.::.::..::.:.::.::::::.::::::.::::.::.::::.::::.::.::.:::..::.::.:.:::::.::::.:::: :::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::.:............. .........................
:���:::�
.:��:
.::::::::::.::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::: :;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::.. :: .::::.::.:..::.::::.:..::.:::.::.:: .,::.:::.:.::::.,::::::.::..:.:::..:...:
:�:::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::;:::;:::::.::::::;:::::::::::�:::::::::::::::;.:.:�:::::::::::::;:::::;::::::::;::::::;::::::::::�:: :::::::.::
::":::"::::�:.:::::::::.::�:::::::::::�:
:�:�: .�::�::�:::::::::
:.::::::::::: :..::::::.:::.�:::.::.. :::::::::::.... .: �� ��:: :::.��::��. �:.:::
:::::;:::::::::: : ����::::.::::::::::::::::::::.:�::::::: . : . .:::::::::.:: : .:::: :::::::::::::: ::::::::.::::.:::::::::::..... .:..� ::::
. ... .......... ....��::::::::::��:::::::::: :;:::����:.::.::.: ::.::.:.::.:.::.:::.::::.: .:.:.:.::.:.::::.:.:::.:.:.:::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::
Households 2,779 5,000 8,000 2,221 3,000
Population 8,622 14,800 22,300 6,178 7,500
Empioyment 4,114 5,86$ 7,766 1,754 1,300
:::»:<''::R :.;<:::>;>:;:;:::::':::;<::::;':<```'::�'':>»::: _;':::>::::::>::::>::::>:�:::::::::::::<:::::::::::::;::>�:>;:::::::::<"<:::<:>: ::::'��:::`>'::<:::::::>':>::::>::::» :::::<:::::�::::::>::�::<:`::;<::{::>:>:»::�:::::>::::::::::::::::::::::::<:::><:>:::�:::>'>;;::;:>:<:::::::
���� ;:.;;;;:::..:;:�.;:.;:.::::.:::.>::.;:.;::;.;: :..;:.:.; <.;:.::.:::.::.:.:;
�:>>:<:::::::<::::>::''>'::"`�:<:;::;::::;:»:::::::<:::>:::::::;::::;�;::>;:<::::>::>:':::<:::;:<'::»:::»><::>;<>:::;:<:::<`::;:;:::>:::::::<�>:>>::::�':::::::::::> :<�:>>::;<>':>:;>::>:::::::��:::::>�'>:»::::>::;::::::::<�:<:>::::::;:::::>:::<>::.<::::::::::>::>
.:�.��:: ::.:.:::::::::::: ::::::::::::::.:::..::::::::::::._:._:::::::::::::.:::::::::.::.::.:..:::.�. .�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::.:::::::::::
:::.::::,. .::,::::�:.;:;.;::.:::::::.::::::::.:::::.:;.::.;:.:.::: .:�.�::.:.:.:::::::::::.::::::::.�::.:.:::::.::.;;:.; .:.;:::.::::::::._:::::::.�:.:�::::.::::::::::::::::::::.;:.:.;:«::::::::
Households 2,779 5,229 $,229 2,450 3,000 �
Population 8,622 15,897 23,$64 7,575 7,967
The City utilized these household and employment Based on the City's land demand forecast method,
projections, historical land development trends, 1,890 acres of land will be required to meet the
utility service requirements and plan policies to growth projections through the year 2000 and
generate land absorption projections for 20 years. provide for a five yeaz overage of land supply for
The City's projected land needs are shown in Table each type of land use. The Metropolitan Council's
IV-7. The Metropolitan Council has developed land land demand forecast method demonstrates a much
demand forecasts by two different methodologies. smaller land demand need of 1,026 acres. While
Details of these methodologies are discussed in the MUSA phasing plan has been modified in this
Appendix B, Land Demand Calculations. The revised version of the Plan to be consistent with the
Metropolitan Council land demand projections that Metropolitan Council's land demand forecasts, the
were used as a basis in evaluating the City's MUSA City is concerned that the forecasts aze too
expansion request in this plan are also summarized conservative.
in Table IV-7. '
Ntw S�`1'ioh
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SECTION IV - g 7ANUARY 1993
• 6
Table IV-7.
PROJECTED LAND NEEDS
(ADDITIONAL ACRES}
CITY PROJECTIONS MET COUNCIL
PROJECTIONS
Year 5-year Year 5-year 1942-2000
2000 Overage 2010 4verage
Rural Residential 50 I50 50 150 N/A
Urban Residential 600 1,137 1,075 1,612 81I
Commercial 35 65 60 90 20
Business Park 120 240 240 360 80
GeneralIndustrial 60 120 120 180 N!A
Public/InstitutionaliOpen Space 105 I80 150 225 172
MUSA Addition 970 1,892 1,695 2,617 1,026
Z�RBAN SERVICE AREA 1992-2O10 intentions beyond the year 2000. See Map 2, Urban
Service Area 1992-2013 and Map 3, Land Use Plan.
The Metropolitan Council is currently involved in
updating the Metropoditan Development Investment The ratianale for developing a 20 year land use plan
Framework and has adopted an "interim policy" for �e three-fold.
reviewing local comprehensive plan amendments
requesting expansion to the Metropolitan Urban ► With a 20 ve�lan in place, the City will have
a rounds or��m lementin 1
Service Area. The Council's interim policy states g P g and use controls
that urban service expansion can occur provided the �e may affect properties beyond the year 2400
following conditions are met: MUSA boundary in the rura] service area.
► The local government's rural are densities are ' The 20�1and use plan is required to
consistent with the Council policy; adequately size the Rosemount Wastewater
► Local timing and staging corresponds to allocated Treatment Plant.
usage rather than design capacity; ► The City encourages the Metropolitan Council
► The local government has an up-to-date to utilize the 20��e plan in evaluating potential
comprehensive sewer plan, including on-site airport sites that may be consider in or near
sewer management; and Rosemount as part of the Airport Planning Dual
► The local government has assessment practices Track Process.
that limit creation of vested rights.
As a method to move away from the land banking
The Council has also indicated to the City that it system and move toward designated MUSA, the
will not approve land use plans reaching beyond the City is establishing an,P,.h.as��I MUSA. The Ph�ase�._�T
- year 2000 until the Framework in updated. MUSA will be in effect untl additional land needs
can be demonstrated to the Metropolitan Council or
Update 2000 is a 20 year land use plan and when the Metropolitan Council allows communities
associated facilities plans. The plan has been divided to plan beyond the year 2000.
into three phases based on land needs projections:
Phase I, 1993-2000; Phase II, 1998-2005; and Phase The hase USA dd� s�1,Q8�4�aeres to the existing
III, 2005-2013. Phases II and III are included in Urban Service Area. Approximately 496 acres of
Update 2000 in order to salidify the City's planning �e land added to the MUSA is already developed
CrrY oF RosEMourrr SECTiorr IV - 9 J.e.rruatzY 1993
Table IV-7.
PROJECTED I,AND NEEDS
(ADDITI4NAL ACRES�
CITY PROJECTIONS MET COUNCIL
PROJECTIONS
Year g-y�' yeai. g_}'ea�.
2000 Overage 2010 Overage 1��-��
Rural Residential 50 150 50 IS€? N/A
UrbanResidential 600 1,137 1,075 1,612 811
Commercial 35 65 60 90 20
Business Park I20 240 240 360 80
GeneralIndustrial 60 120 120 180 N/A
Public/tnstitutional/Open Space 105 180 150 225 172
MUSA Addition 974 1,892 1,695 2,617 1,026
URBAN SERVICE AREA I,99Z-ZOI D intentions beyond the year 2000. See Map 2, Urban
Service Area 1992-2013 and Map 3, I.and Ilse Plan.
The Metropolitan Council is currently involved in
updating the Metropolitan Development Investment �e rationale far developing a 20 year land use plan
Framework and has adopted an "interim policy" for �e three-fold. '�'�'�"
reviewing local comprehensive plan amendments
requesting expansion to the Metropolitan Urban ► With a 20 year plan in place, the City wilI have
Service Area. The Council's interim policy states a grounds for implementing land use controls
that urban service expansion can occur provided the the may affect properties beyond the yeaz 2000
following conditions are met: MUSA boundary in the rural service area.
► The local government's rural are densities aze ► The 20 ear land use plan is required to
consistent with the Council policy; adequate y size the Rosemount VJastewater
► Local timing and staging corresponds to allocated Treatment Plant.
usage rather than design capacity; ► The City encourages the Metropolitan Council
► The local government has an up-to-date to utilize the 0 r lan in evaluating potential
comprehensive sewer plan, including on-site airport sites at may be consider in or near
sewer management; and Rosemount as part of the Airport Planning Dual
► The 1oca1 government has assessment practices Track Process.
that limit creation of vested rights.
As a method to move away from the land banking
The Council has also indicated to the City that it system and move toward designated MUSA, the
will not approve land use plans reaching beyond the City is establishing an Phase I MUSA that will be in
year 2000 until the Framework in updated. effect until December 1996 or until treatment
capacity can be enhanced, whichever occurs first.
Update 2000 is a 20 yeaz land use plan and The Phase I MUSA that will be in effect until land
associated facilities ptans. 'The plan has been divided demands can be demonstrated xo the Metropolitan
into three phases based on land needs projections: Council or when the Metropolitan Council allows
Phase I, 1993-2000; Phase II, 1998-2005; and Phase ��unities to plan beyond the year 2000.
III, 2005-2013. Phases II and III are included in
Update 2000 in order to solidify the City's planning
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SECTION IV - 9 JANUARY 1993
and is being served by urban services {including When land demands warrant or the City is ab(e to
sewer}. T'his developed area included in the P�h�I seek approval of plans beyond the year 2000, the
MUSA boundary extension is to the north of the
downtawn area and includes the school and ci C�h' will submit Phases II and III to the
park complex, the Wintz Trucking Facility and the MUSA bo dary ns bas�ed onsthe Metropol�hase I
Brockway Golf Course. The undeveloped land adds Council's pro�ected land needs from 1992-2000 p}us
approximately 445 acres planned for residential
uses, eleven (1l) acres planned for commerciai �d a �ve year overage as provided for each
105 acres planned for Business Park. The P ase I metropolitan community in the Development
Investment Framework. Table IV-$ summarizes the
MUSA removes agproximately 166 acres of the
existing MUSA that was lann o land available for development.
and redesignates 10 acres of industr�k to urban
residential. p
Table N-8.
VACANT j.AND INyENl'ORY
(AcRESJ
It�tERat MtJSA 2000 MUSA
— ------- ----
Empire Rosemoimt ToTni, F,mpire Ros�ount TOTq[,
Residential 173 498 811 :
173 1,090 1,263
Commercial p 23 23
0 45 45
Business Park 147 140 287
147 219 366
Genera!Industry � 0 p
� 448 4q8
Public/Utilities 23 5� �3
� 82 lOS
Other/Undesignated 48 44 48
4$ 17 65
T�T�� 391 801 1>152 C 391 1>89i 2,293
�
CTTY OF ROSEMOUNT
S�crtorr IV - 10 JalvuaRY 1993
The Phase I MUSA adds 1,084 acres to the existing Whenland demands warrant or the City is able to
Urb�e qrea. Approximately 496 acres of seek approval of plans beyond the year 2000, the
the land added to the MUSA is already developed City u+ill submit Phases II and III to the
and is being served by urban services (including Metropolitan Council for consideration. The Phase I
sewer). This developed area included in the Phase I MUSA boundary is based on the Metropolitan
MUSA boundary extension is to the north of the Council's projected land needs from 1992-2000 plus
downtown area and includes the school and city a five year overage as provided for each
park complex, the Wintz Trucking Facility and the metropolitan communiry in the Development
Brockway Golf Course. The undeveloped land adds Investment Framework. Table IV-8 summarizes the
approximately 445 acres planned for residential land available for development.
uses, eleven (11) acres planned for commercial and
105 acres plannecl for Business Park. The Interim
MUSA remoues approximately 166 acres of the
existing MUSA that was planned for industrial park
and redesignates 10 acres of industrial park to urban
residential.
Table I�8.
/ Gf1l'OF ROSEMOUNT
M�qOPOUTAN URBAN SERVICE AREA LqND INVENTORY t
urrent � Intenmq996 20U0
Land Use Acreaoe2 Parceis Acres Parcels Acres Parcels
DcVcLOPEDLAN A �q
! Residential 708:05
i Apartments 2347 15.22 B 7a.35 �
Mobile Homes 23 19 0.� � �
392 1 0 0 p
' Commerdal 76.51 89 11.57
Indusiriai 68.99 5 �
Waste Mana ement 12 31.04 2 45.24 g
9 2t9.6 3 � � �
Utilities 6.32 p �
aricuftural Preserves � 0
0 p � p p. 0
Lakes 13.06 14 35.31
Parks 4673 37 1.68 p
PubliC r 8 236.9 10 0.8a �
17 7 67 713.98 7 4 7.77
Roads 38267 18 3
ota!pevelooetl 51.02 73 t20.96 2i
1�01.13 259D I 495.71 90 f 250.8a
Ptattetl Vacant 2D1 �� 55
Residential ta8.89 737 0 0 5J5 3
Mutd Fam Residential � 5.75
17.71
Gommeraal 1 S 79 � 0
Susiness Park � 0
Publi 14.61
c/'rark 4.17 � �
0 p
Aoricultural/Untlevelopetl 3i9.88
UrcanResitlentiai � o87•S� t6 �200.�9 ��
PUD Residential �66'8 10c.38 6 a24.33
0 3Q5.21 4 134.25
Comme�cial 7.90
5usiness Park ��4 25.84
7 07.53 132.03 5 150.44
Geneiallntlustrial a6.85
Untlesianated � 898.6
� 48J4 0 0 � � .. .
Pubiic/Park
� �•°$ 56.53
Remnant Parcels 2�3 ��
Total Untlevelooed 583.7 8 0.05 �
T07AL Acreage �76 � 58�.97 i 6 I i 206.79 9g
� 2284.31 2766 � 1083.66 106� 145 i.63 7 7 q
t Based on the Rosemount GIS tlatabase utiGvng the Dakota
Courtty Parcel fl1e. Land uses are basetl on 12/92 irrvemory.
The acreages may differ from the figures reporteC in UPDATc
2000 because they were based on manual tabutations;
2 Does not inGude approximately 2a6 acres trom ewsting
MUSA designatetl as intlustrial.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SECTION IV - lO
Jatvu.vtY 1993
� ,
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
�PUBLIC NOTICE `
' '..-.;DAKOCTAYCOUN�MMkINE50TA `
G NOTICE OP HEARING ON ASSESSAIENTS �
FOR 145TN STREET RECON$��w STAT E O F M I N N E SOTA
�-WESTENDIMPROV � SS
GTY PRO)EC7 NO.206
TOWHOMiTbIAYCONCEAN• 4 County of Dakota )
Notice is hereby given t6at t!�City Ccwmcl!
of ffie City of Rasemount,Minnespta;�wi1�
ane�in the City Hall ia t6e City of Rose-
'�oonc,as�s i�scn s�r wes�,xo�mwne,_:
'Mimfesota,on the zlst day of Octobei,1993 aE:
8:00 p.m.,or as soon thereafter as po�s�ble,;
'to c�sider objectioas to t6e proposed
assessmeats for street,watermain,sanitary
sewei'.'storm sewer, curb and gutter and. NANCY J. GUSTAf50N,being duly swom,on oath says thot she is on uufhorized agent and
"kail co�hvcti�.f'or�t45th Sh'eet Recau= ;
st�+reti�; wesl,"End'Imiuovemmts;'[RtY en+P�opee of the pubiisf►er of the eewspaper known as DokoM Coumy Tribune,and h�full knowledge
al��il 2os,leaetofa�e ordered,by'the
of the facts which are stated below:
� T�ProP�as4essment°roll !s on.6k,
vnth the Gity G7�and opeo to public insper
U�. .',� ..,,. .._
.; The se'ea proptised to be assessed crons�
.,��,eYy�Pi��.������. (A)The newspoper has compGed with all of the requirements constituting qualificotion as e legal
�:b� esid`improvements, whic6 has bem
�pylered made sodis a�f��c�p�t�- newspaper,as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02,331 A.07 and otheroppiicable laws,as amended.
:Se�a1IY'.,described as'Lot`1 -Blocit 1. �
` Acres..Lot 1.Btock 1,'Brobacit
md 'Hon; LM 2,Bloct 2,.Broback tnd
�`ild�tion;a�tha�e properhes in Sb�ti��p� (g)'�he pri�ed
��Topmdip115 Nartli.�ianSe 19 Westwit6PID'
s�6tis:34-0.4010�O�ii;01430 010-44;`010�`
�+lSR 0],$38'O1WO,Ud4+10•'010-.�-010�1�814�'
A �13�37j,O�D•3s``01455'`I)akotH CqmtY+'�
1[�ta;as�fle aud ol't+eca�d in th8 of-
���aecCthe Camty Recorda�Dakota Couot7.
�ota. � � �:� �,,._,s, �
�1be�,totai amauaf p�roposed to be asse�ed
�� �:=,�� �:.� �
iN�titten ar oral ob ', "a:
�a����'�ODB � �COp'� which is attached wes cut hom the columns of soid newspaper,a�was printed und published once
r, .
�u.�sa a�oc�cy�o ne"�a'�,;y
1�rbe as�smeoc w the disa�cc cairt or
`"'Countyr.:pursuant to H4Innesota'
�`Sf+tti�s�SecGon'429.061 by serving notice of �r � 't was
�yp�1 nPun the`Maya�oe Qerk"�'the .
�C�Y within 30 days atter the adoptim`bE H�e
rauapnetit and filing such noUce with the ��_ �����"
<"�ict�wt within ta►days after"service first published on Thursday,the �J rZ doy of
,;upnntheMayorocClerk ,
`.:: No appeal may be taken as to the amount n
otaay assessmeat adopted by t6e City Coun. �
�al unkss a`n'tte°°b�cq�Signed b7� 19 � ond was thereafter printed and puWished on every Thursday to and including
°affected property,rnvner is Gled with tbe '
('�rk'W'tor to the,asse�menf hea=ing�
`P�'��d to thepresiding�cerat the hear-
in&A1!`objectiona to the asscssmenfs iat ThursdaY,the doy of ,19
reoeived at the assessment}�earing ia tlie .
Sectmn 4�re�wa v��unl�s��a��� and inted below is o c
pr opy of the lower ease alphobet from A to Z,both inclusive,which is f�erebr
to ebject.at the assessm�t t,earing is due w
�araronablecause.. < ecknowledged es being the size and kind of t��pe used in the eomposition and pubiieation of the notice:
a >Uoder-=the provisiops`of�Minnesofr
2 SYadttl8,SeC4on.49S5.19S to�35.195;theQk� :�h�•di�fR�i�.iklmnn�Hp:�n��•u�xcz .
-:map,at its d�scredtoiy&defertfie PeYme�of'
a�nenis�fa"' 6on4estea..PCOp�3'
�'�bY��P�neS3'ears4faSga'ol�fer .
k'�1hom'it would&a`hatdsfip io m��Ce�e
t PaY�ts.Howeve�;°�LeC',ty haskeleetednok BY:
W�aWisli•any�def�ment .
suaeEtottiaseSechons: ��-'���:� TITLE:Seeretary to isher
Ik�Q�d fhis 2nd day of October�'1g93"�
� $YORDEROFTHECITYCOUNCIC.�
�u'san�C'W��`�'�� �r�
� : �h'�� ��i ''s ` Subscribed and swom to befae e on this—'�do of 19
.. (9 o[Rosemamt:�''�����` � ` `, Y �
i� . c�y a� � ��.g�� �
���'�� � ��'��-��� !
-:���.,.,, n�«_r.r��., .�� .. � . �
NoMry Public
�,,..,� CApOt.J.HAVERIAND
;.;�_u NO�i1ti1Y P�JBLiC•M�A
t=� DAKOTA COUN�'Y
'' `•• IAyCanrnWionE�N��t99'
�>
C.2
'
2�2� O OSe1NGOuvt�
PHONE (612)4234411 2875-145th Street West,Rosemount,Minnesota MAYOR
FAX (612)423-5203 Mailing Address: Edward B.MCMenomy
P.O.9ox 510,Rosemou�t,Minnesota 55068-0510 COUNCILMEMBERS
Sheila Klassen
James(Re�Sfaats
Harry Willcox
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILED AND POSTED HEARING NOTICE oe���s w�p�m,a��
145TH STREET RECONSTRUCTION, WEST END ADMINISTRATOR
Stephan Jilk
ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT 206
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )ss.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT )
Susan M. Walsh, being first duly sworn, deposes and says
I arn a United States Citizen and the duly qualified Clerk of the City of Rosemount,
Minnesota.
On October 6, 1993, acting on beha)f of the said City, t posted at the City Hall, 2875
145th Street West, and deposited in the United States Post Office of Rosemount,
Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of public hearing regarding assessment roll
for 145th Street Reconstruction, West End, Project #206, enclosed in sealed
envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the
attached listings at the addresses listed with their names.
There is delivery service by United States Mail between the place of mailing and the
places so addressed.
san M. W sh '
City Clerk
City of Rosemount
� � ' � � Dakota County, Minnesota
Subscribed and sworn to before me this l� � day of October, 1993.
, �
Notary ublic
�ver���ivegs �oming `U�1i �osemoun���
�
. ..��.,.,,�a�a.
z�� o osemoun�
PHONE (612)4234411 2875•145th Street West,Fosemaunt,Minnesota MAYOR
FAX (612)42&5203 Mailing Address: Edward B.McMenamy
P.O.Box 57Q flosemount,Minnesota 55068-0510 COUNCILMEMBERS
Sheila Klassen
James(Red)Staats
Harry Wilicox
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT oe���s w����,�
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATOA
Stephan Jilk
NOTICf OF HEARING ON ASSESSMENTS
FOR 145TH STREET RECONSTRUCTION, WEST END
IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 206
TO:
TIME AND PLACE Notice is hereby given that the City
GENERAL NATURE OF Council of the City of Rosemount,
IMPROVEMENTS: Minnesota, will meet in the City Hall in the City of
Rosemount, 2875 145th Street West, Rosemount,
Minnesota, on the 21 st day�of October, 1993 at 8:00
p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, to consider
objections to the proposed assessments for street,
watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, curb and
gutter and trail construction for 145th Street
Reconstruction, West End Improvements, City Project
No. 206, heretofore ordered by the City Council.
ASSESSMENT ROLL The proposed assessment roll is on file
OPEN TO INSPECTION: with the City Clerk and open to public inspection.
AREA PROPOSED The area proposed to be assessed consists
TO BE ASSESSED: of every lot, piece or parcel of land benefi*sd by said
improvements, which has been ordered made and is as .
— follows: all that area generally described as Lot 1, Block
1 Evergreen Acres; Lot 1, Block 1, Broback 2nd
Addition; Lot 2, Block 2, Sroback 2nd.Addition; and
those properties in Section 30, Township 115 North,
Range 19 West with PID numbers : 34-03010-020-44;
010-30; 010-43; 010-45; 010-36; 010-40; 020-40;
010-39; 010-41; 014-37; 413-37; 020-35; 010-35,
Dakota County, Minnesota, as on file and of record in
, (� � �(
�ver�t�ing s �oming `Ul�i CcJ l osemounl��
�..*:_ ,
r _
A .
the office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota.
TOTAL AMOUNT The total amount proposed to be assessed
OF PROPOSED: is 596,503.
WRITTEN OR ORAL Written or oral objections will be \ --
OBJECTIONS: considered at the hearing.
RIGHT OF APPEAL: An owner of property to be assessed may appeal the
assessment to the district court of Dakota County °
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of
the City within 30 days after the adoption of the
assessment and filing such notice with the district court
within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk.
LIMITATION ON No appeal may be taken as to the amount of
APPEAL: any assessment adopted by the City Council unless a
written objection signed by the affected property owner
is filed with the Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Ali
objections to the assessments not received at the
assessment hearing in the manner prescribed by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061 are waived,
unless the failure to object at the assessment hearing is '
due to a reasonable cause.
DEFERMENT OF Under the provisions of Minnesota �
ASSESSMENTS: Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the City may,
at its discretion, defer the payment of"assessments for
� any homestead property owned by a person 65 years
of age or older for whom it woutd be a hardship to
make the payments. Mowever, the City has elected not
to establish any deferment procedure pursuanfito thase
Sections.
SPECtFIC AMOUNT TO The amount to be specificaUy assessed
BE ASSESSED: -- against your particular lot, piece of
parcel of land is shown on the attached
Exhibit A.
PREPAYMENT: You may prepay the entire assessment to the Treasurer
. of the City until the assessment roll is certified to the
County Auditor; after certification to the County
2
Auditor, prepayments of the entire amount rernaining
due may be made to the County Auditor at any time
' prior to November 15 in the year this assessment is
adopted.
NO PARTIAL: The City Council has not authorized the partial
prepayment of assessments prior to certification of the
assessment or the first installment thereof to the
County Auditor.
PREPAYMENT WITHOUT No interest shall be charged if the entire
lNTEREST, OR WITH assessment is paid within 30 days from
INTEREST TO END OF the adoption of the assessment roll. At
YEAR: any time prior to November 15 of any year following
the year the assessment is certified, the owner may
prepay to the City Treasurer the whole assessment
remaining due with interest accrued to December 31 af
the year in which the prepayment is made.
iNTEREST RATE: !f the assessment is not prepaid within 30 days from
the adoption of the assessment roll, interest will accrue
on the assessment at the rate of 6.8934%. Interest
_ � accrues from the date to be specified in the resolution
levying the assessment, but not earlier than the date of
such resolution. Assessments shall be payable in equal
annual installments extending over a period of up to 10
years, the first of the installments to be payable with
general taxes for the year 1993, collectible with such
taxes during the year 1994.
Dated this 2nd day of October, 1993.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
S san M. V�alsh. �
City Clerk
— City of Rosemount
Dakota County, MN
3
,
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXHIBfT "/1"
ASSESSMENT ROLLfMA1LING LIST �
PROJECT NAME : 145th Street Reconstruction, West End improvements
PROJECT NO. : 206
ASSESSMENT HEARING DATE : October 21, 1993 �
ASSESSMENT DUE BEFORE : November 20, 1993 �
ASSESSMENT TERM (YEAR) : Ten (10)
PARCEL NO MAIUNG TOTAL
CC PLAT NO LOT BLOCK LAST NAME FIRST NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP ASSESSMfNTS
34 03010 010 36 Goettsch Gregory K& 4255 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 56,700
Terese A
34 03010 010 30 1 st Baptiet Church 14400 Diamond Path Rosemount MN 55068 $17,729
34 03010 010 39 Hawkins John&Joan 4173 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55Q68 S6,775
34 03010 010 40 Allen Gene& Rebecca 4249 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 53,350
34 03010 010 41 -Hawkins John&Joan 4173 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 S4,025
34 03010 010 43 Berg Floyd 4335 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 56,700
34 03010 010 45 Bezenek David & Judith 427& 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 53,350
34 03010 0'13 37 Strese Waiter& Olga 4063 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 S3,395
34 03010 074 37 Wagner Robert& 4075 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 $6,050
Florence
� 34 03010 010 35 Knick Hulda G 4055 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 S3,350
I
i 34 03010 020 35 Strese Waltar& Olga 4063 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 S3,350
� 34 03010 020 40 Thoen Steven R & 4211 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 53,350
Anite R
I
! 34 03010 020 44 "/o Norma Marsh 1590 Hwy 55 Hastings MN 55033 S21,079
' 34 24900 010 01 Mullikin LeRoy& 4060 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 S4,300
Rosamary
34 15201 010 Ot Chamberlin Steve R &Tracia 4185 Upper 145th St Rosemount MN 55068 51,500
L W
34 15201 020 02 Erickson Edward & 4098 145th Street W Rosemount MN 55068 S1,500
Therese