HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.f. Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Process �r � �' City of Rosemount
Executive Summary for Action
City Council Meeting Date: March 2, 1993
Agenda Item: Comprehensive Plan Public Ageada Section:
Hearing Process OLD BUSINESS
Prepared By: Lisa Freese Agenda��q+� � �
` Director of Planning � C 5
Attachmentss Memo APPr ed By:�
' �!.v� /j
�,, In order to be prepared for the Comprehensive Guide Plan Public
Hearing process, City staff and the City Attorney would like to
discuss the legal requirements and recommend procedures for adoption
of the Plan. The requirements and procedures are discussed in the
attached memo. Additionally, I would like to bring to your attention
the Metropolitan Council' s review process and some potential issues
that the City may face.
Recommended Action: A MOTION to set a Speciai City Council
Meeting on for the purpose of holding a Joint
Planning Commission/City Council Workshop on the Comprehensive
Plan.
City Council Action:
03/02/93.001
�,. . � , . � . .
i� o osemoun�
�
PHONE (612)423-4411 2875-145th Street West,Rosemount,Minnesota MAYOR
Edward B.McMenomy
FAX (612)42&5203 Maifing Address:
P.O.Box 510,flosemount,Minnesota 55068-0510 COUNCILMEMBERS
Sheila Klassen
TO: Mayor E.B. McMenomy �a'"�{p��s`ga'S
Harry Wilicox
City Council Members Klassen, Staats, Willcox, and Wippermann oe��;s w�R��,a��
ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: Lisa Freese, Director of Planning stepna��nk :_
DATE: February 26, 1993
SUBJ: Comprehensive Plan Hearing and Review Process
ATTACHMENTS: 1Vlinnesata Statute 462.356
Metropolitan Council Flow Chart
Metro Digest Excerpts
On Tuesday I would like to have a brief discussion with you in order to ensure that everyone is
prepared for the public hearing on the Comprehensive guide Plan scheduled for Wednesday, March
10, 1993. This memo highlights the legal requirements and offers some suggestions regarding the
process that should be followed during and after the hearing.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS - _
T'he Minnesota State Statutes require that a public 1}earing be held prior to the adoption of a.__
comprehensive plan. Spec�ca�ly, the statute rec�ui�s-�at�e "Planning Agency" or P�azining
Commission hold a public hearing regat'ding the plan. This public hearing is required to occur
before the Planning Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council regarding the
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan.
In order to fulfill this legal requirement, the public hearing is being conducted jointly by the
Planning Commission and the City Council. As you will recall, Planriing staff recommended this
procedure in light bf the extensive public review process undertaken by the Planning Commission
and City Council in the development of the comprehensive plan.
Prior to adoption by the City Council, the Planning Commission must make a recommendation �
, regarding the adoption. If the Council wishes to proceed with adoption after the pubiic'hearing, '
� the Planning Commission must make a recommendation to you first. The Planning Commission
. must have a quorum in order to take this vote, but a favorable recommendation does not require a
° two-thirds vote. In order for the City�Council to adopt the comprehensive plan, a two-thirds vote
is required by the City �ounciL
PUBLIC HEARING
As you are well aware, the purpose of the public hearing is to allow public input prior to the
adoption of the plan. Although we all hope that the community will be �upportive of the plan,
there may be issues that are brought forward at the hearing that warrant consideration by the
Planning Commission and City Council. Therefore, I would strongly encourage you to have an
alternate process laid out in case further work is necessary prior to adoption of the plan. Keep in
s , (� �
C'�ver���ings �oming �UC� �osemoun���
�
. . . Li'N.vC����d;R� � . � .
Comprehensive Plan Hearing & Review Process `` �
February 26, 1993
Page Two
mind that once the plan is submitted to the Metropolitan Council and, hopefully, approved a guide
plan amendment will be required to change the plan. Therefore, any significant changes that you
wish to consider should occur prior to your adoption.
The alternative process that I would suggest, if additional revisions are considered warranted, is to
hold a joint work session between the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider those
changes and to provide staff direction. Then after staff has time to make the desired revisions then
the Planning Commission and City Council can accept and adopt the revised plan. I would suggest
that the Council set a work session tonight in case this alternative process is necessary.
1VIETROPOLTTAN COUNCiL REVIEW
Once the plan is adopted by the City and before it becomes effective, it must be approved by the
Metropolitan Council. This is considered a major guide plan amendment. City staff has already
submitted the Comprehensive guide Plan Update 2000 draft document to the Metropolitan Council
staff for an informal review and hopes that they will complete their review by the time of the
public hearing. Hopefully, this informal review will identify any additional information that they
will require of the City so that the formal review process will go smoother.
The flow chart for the major guide plan review is attached to this memo. As you will note, the
Metropolitan Council has ten days to determine whether or not the submittal is complete. I have
consulted with other communities that have submitted plans to the Metropolitan Council within the
past year and i�all instances additional information was requested of the cities. It seems to be a
pretty safe assumption that we will also be required to submit further information. This is the
main variable in the time that the review will take.
Once the City's submittal is considered complete, the Metropolitan Council has ninety (90) da.ys to
finish their review and take action. Their action will consist of requirements necessa.ry for us to
unplement the plan and also recommendations. If requirements are spec�ed the City will have to
demonstrate canformance to those requirements prior to placing the plan into effect.
I have done research on some of the more recent plan submittals to the Metropolitan Council and
have attached summaries of those actions. A sampling of the requirements made of other
communities include: 1) Removal of a portion or all of the requested MUSA expansion; 2)
adoption of a routine septic system inspection ordinance; 3) study and development of
improvement plans for roadway facilities outside a city's jurisdiction; and 4) adoption of the
Metropolitan Council Model Stormwater Ordinance. In order to implement our plan it is probable
that some of these requirements will be made.
Recent actions by the Metropolitan Council have become much rnore restrictive. MUSA
expansions have been virtually halted in communities such as Blaine, Andover, and Lake Elmo.
Prior to the Metro council initiating its efforts to revise the Metropolitan Development Investment
Framework (MDIF) MUSA expansions were granted more liberally.
This recent posture of the Metropolitan Council suggests that the City will need to work hard to
develop support for this plan. I would recommend that we begin our education efforts immediately
with the appointed Cauncil Members starting first with the City's representative, Craig Morris.
cc: Planning Commission
Stephan Jilk, City Administrator
>•
9400 � 9401
t- HOUSINC,REDEVELOP!�tErT,PI,ANtiING,ZONING i62.35.f
lses for the entire � „
�cific types of land Subd. 15. Official controls" or "controls" means ordinances and regulations
which control the physical development of a city, county or town or any part thereof
�uses or any com- � including air space and subsurface areas necessary for mined underground space devel-
�- opment pursuant to sections 469.135 to 469.141, or any detail thereof and implement
statements,goals, � the general objectives of the comprehensive plan. Official controis may include ordi-
�ent of the various z nances establishing zoning, subdivision controls, site plan regulations, sanitarv codes,
jing air space and = building codes and official maps.
zt pursuant to sec- Subd. 16."Preliminary approval"means official action taken by a municipality on
zsit, railroads, air �
� . an application to create a subdivision which establishes the righu and obligations set
�.ajor thoroughfare forth in section 462.3�8 and the applicable subdivision regulation. In accordance with
� section 462.358, and unless otherwise specified in the applicable subdivision regula-
policy statements, = tion, preliminary approval may be granted only following the review and approval of
�velopment of the " a preliminary plat or other map or drawing establishing without(imitation the number,
1,educational and � layout,and location of lots,tracu,hlocks,and parcels to be created,location of streets,
� roads,utilities and facilities,park and drainage facilities,and lands to be dedicated for
i program settin g � public use.
g__�_ .. Subd. 17.Pro .. � ,,• _
�vements by fisca! � perty rights.The words area," �nterest in real property,""ground,"
�surface areas nec- � "land," "lot," "parcel," " -
� property," "real estate," "real property," "site," "territory,"> -
ns 469.135 to 469. � and"tract,"and other terms describing rea! propeny shall include within their mean-.
'�r*' -��ement, the � ing, but not be limited to, air space and subsurface areas�ecessary for mined under-
�, �ense of the �- ground space development pursuant to sections 469.13� to 469.141.
s as may be perti- ; Histo'rys 196.i c 670 s 2:1973 c 12j art�s 7,• 1974 c jl l s 3;1980 c.i09 s 1�3: 1980
� c 566 s 19-23; 1982 c�07 s 11; 1982 c 520 s 3;1985 c 194 s 17-?�; 1489 c 209 art 2 s 1
with section 462. �
:d highways of the � 462.353 AUTHORIT'Y TO PLAl�T.
streets, roads, and � Subdivision 1. General authority. A municipality may carry on comprehensive
_space and subsur- � municipal planning activities for guiding the future development and improvement of
;rsuant to sections ` the municipality and may prepare,adopt and amend a comprehensive municipal plan
;ys and state trunk - and implement such plan by ordinance and ot�ie� official actions in aceordance with
�n of existing and � the provisions of sections 462.351 to 4b2.364.
s in the metropoli- ; Subd. 2. Studies and reports. In exercising its powers under subdivision 1, a
of up to five years � municipality may collect and analyze data,prepare maps,charts,tables,and other illus-
yation,water sup- trations and displays,and conduct necessary studies.A municipality may publicize its
-emoval including '� purposes, suggestions, and findings on planning matters, may distribute repoRs
�y buildings,other _. � thereon, and may advise the public on the planning matters within the scope of its
=' duties and objectives.
�
�uncil by whatever �� Subd. 3. Appropriadon and contracts. A municipality may appropriate moneys
� from any fund not dedicated to other purposes in order to finance its planning activi-
el,or tract of land � ties.A municipality may receive anc�expend grants and gifts for pianning purposes and
ng-term leasehold � may enter into contracu with the federal and state governments or with other public
creation of streeu, 4_ or private agencies in furtherance of the planning activities authorized by sections 462.
r any combination � 351 to 462.364.
� Subd. 4. Fees. A municipality may prescribe fees sufficient to defray the costs
�20 acres or larger j incurred by it in reviewing, investigating, and administering an application for an
� amendment to an official control established pursuant to sections 462.351 to�i62.364
:er in size for com- � or an application for a permit or other approval required under an official controi estab-
lished pursuant to those sections. Fees as prescribed shall be by ordinance.
- 4e relocation History: 1965 c 670 s.�: 1482 c 41S s 1
462.354 ORG:��iIZ.�TION FOR PL�INNING,
�repared for filing y Subdivision 1.Plannin
: requirements set � g agency.A municipality may by charter or ordinance create
'_.3�8 and chapter ; a planning agency. A planning agency created by ordinance may be abolishcd bv two-
thirds vote of all the members of the governing body.The pfanning agenc}•shall be advi-
sory, except as other powers and duties are imposed on it �y sections 46_'.3j I to -�6�.
^d pursuant to sec- 361. bv sta±ute h�� �
C'��31'?Pr. n�h�'r�r�i�in�nr�rnnciciuv ' i- o .,.,
. 't' . �.......i .1...�..,� T:.
'� -,
462.354 HOUS1tiG,REDE�'ELOP!�4E'.�T,PLANti1�G.ZO\I�G 940Z j 9403
(l) It may consist of a planning commission, which may or may not include the planning age
municipal officials among its members. The planning commission may be provided - place and purpo
with staff which may be a division of the administrative structure of the municipal gov- _ �the municipalit}
emment. The commission shall be advisory directly to the governing body. - Subd. 3. Ac
(2) It may consist of a planning department with a planning commission advisory amendment to it
to it and shall function as a deoartment advisory to the goveming body and the munici- the recommenda-
pal administration.The planning department may be provided v�!ith an executive direc- an amendment F
tor and other staff as in the case of other municipal departments. agency for its rec
Subd. 2.Board of adjustments and appesis.The governing body of any municipal- body may by res�
ity adopting or having in effect a zoning ordinance or an of�'icial map shall provide by � the comprehensi•
ordinance for a board of appeals and adjustments.The board shall have the powers set � notice and hearir
forth in section 462.357,subdivision 6 and section 462.359,subdivision 4. Except as 3 Subd. 4. Intf
otherwise provided by charter,the governing body may provide alternatively that there � rized a study to t
be a separate board of appeals and adjustments or that the goveming body or the plan- - of considering ad
ning commission or a committee of the planning commission serve as the board of defined in section
appeals and adjustments,and it may provide an appropriate name for the board.The trols have not bef
board may be given such other duties as the governing body may direct. municipality ma}•
In any municipality where the council does not serve as the board, the goveming � for the purpose o:
body may, except as otherwise provided by chaner, provide that the decisions of the � of its citizens. Ti�e
board on matters within its jurisdiction are final subject to judicial re»evv�or are final � opment, or subc'.�
subject to appeal to the council and the right of later judicial review or are advisory to exceed one yea*
the council.Hearings by the board of appeals and adjustments shall be held within such � periods as the r_
time and upon such notice to interested parties as is provided in the ordinance estab- .$ period of 18 mc
lishing the board.The board shall within a reasonable time make its order deciding the * which has been �:
matter and shall serve a copy of such order upon the appellant or petitioner by mail. � ordinance.
Any party may appear at the hearing in person or by agent or attomey.Subject to such � History�:-}96�
�
- limitations as may be imposed by the goveming body, the board may adopt rules for � 216 art l s b7,• 1`"'
� the conduct of proceedings before it. Such rules may include provisions for the giving
ofoaths to witnesses and the filing of written briefsby the parties.The'board shall pra 462.356 PROCvi. -
vide for a record of its proceedings which shall include the minutes of its meetings,its Subdivision i.
findings,and the action taken on each matter heard by it,including the final order.In , the planning agen,:; -
any municipality in which the planning agency does not act as the board of adjustments ning agency shall s�
and appeals,the baard shall mal:e no decision on an appeal or pecition until the plan- means for putting t
ning agency, if there is one, or a representative authorized by it has had reasonable � of the foilowing sec:
opportunity, not to exceed 60 days, to review and report to the board of�adjustments � regulations for the �
and appeals upon the appeaI or petition. � the normal public i;
History: 1965 c 670 s 4; 1967 c 493 s 1 � a capital improvem
� Subd. 2. Comp
462.355 PREPARATION,ADOP'TIOI�,AND AMEI\TDMENT OF COMPREHEN- � thereof has been rec
SI�`E MUTIICIPAL PL�,N. ing body, no public:
Subdivision 1.Preparation and review�.The planning agency shall prepare the com- � acquired or disposec
prehensive municipal plan. In discharging this duty the planning agency shall consult ipality or special di
with and coordinate the planning activities of other degartments and agencies of the � jurisdiction within �
municipality to insure coaformity with and to assist in the development of the compre- proposed acquisitio; -
hensive municipal plan. In its planning activities the planning agency shall take due governing body or c
cognizance of the planning activities of adjacent units of government and other affected its findings as to com
public agencies.The planning agency shall periodically review the plan and recommend the comprehensive n
amendments whenever necessary.
posal within 45 days
Subd. 2. Procedure for ptan adoption and amendmeat.The planning agency may, by the governing boc
unless otherwise provided by charter or ordinance consistent with the municipal char- vision. The governir
ter,recommend to the goveming body the adoption and amendment from time to tirne with the requiremen
of a comprehensive municipal plan.The plan may be preparedand adopted in sections, posed acquisition or
each of which relates to a major subject of the plan or to a major geographical section ship to the comprehf
of the municipality. The goveming body may propose the comprehensive municipal History: 1965 c!
plan and amendments to it by resolution submitted to the plannitig agency. Before
adopting the comprehensive municipal plan or any section or amendment of the plan,
�- T . � � . .. . . .
i �
�
3. .
�
Y.
9�2 � 9403 HOUSING,REDEVELOPME�fI'.PL�NNiNG,ZONING�4G2356
�
.ay not include � the planning agency shall hold at least one public hearing thereon.A notice of the time,
:ay be provided y place and purpose of the hearing shall be published once in the official newspaper of
:municipal gov- ± 'the municipality at least ten'days before the day of the hearing.
body. � Subd. 3. Adoption by gorerning body. A proposed eomprehensivo plan or an
zission advisory _ amendment to it may not be acted upon by the goveming body until it has received
and the munici- • the recommendation of the planning agency or until 60 days have elapsed from the date
executive direo- ;, an amendment proposed by the governing body has been subtnitted to the pianning
agency for iu recommendation. Unless otherwise provided by charter, the govcrning
`any municipal- _ body may by resolution by a two-tlxirds vote of all of iu members adopt and amend
shall provide by the comprehensive plan or portion thereof as the official municipal plan upon such
-e the powers set � notice and hearing as may be prescribed by ordinaace.
ion 4. Except as { Subd. 4. Interim ordinance.If a municipality is conducting studies or has autho-
itively that there = rized a study to be conducted or has held or has scheduled a hearing for the purpose
�ody_,or the plan= _ _ s of considering adoption or amendment of a comprehensive plan or official controls as
as the board of = defined in_section 462.352,subdivision 15, or if new territory for which plans or con- ~-
r the board.The = trols have not been adopted is annexed to a municipality, t�e governing body of the
-ect; municipality may adopt an interim ordinance applicable to all or part of its jurisdiction .
-d,the goveming � for the purpose of protecting the pianning process and the health, safety and welfaze
decisions of the of its citizens.The interim ordinance may regulate,restrict or prohibit any use,devel-
°�•� •or are final = opment,or subdivision within the jurisdiction or a portion thereof for a period not to
t advisory to � exceed one year from the date it is effective,and may be extended for such additional
held within such � periods as the municipality may deem appropriate, not exceeding a total additional
ordinance estab- , period of 18 months. No interim ordinance may halt, delay, or impede a subdivision
rder deciding the s which has been given preliminary approval prior to the effective date of the interim
�utioner by mail. � ordinance.
:.Subject to such � History: 1965 c 670 s 5; 1976 c 127 s 21; 1977 c 347 s 68; 1980 e 566 s 24; 1983 c __.
.v adopt rules for .; 216 art 1 s 67,• 1985 c 62 s 1,2
�ns for the giving �
=boazd shall pra - 46?.356 PROCEDURE FOR PL�,1 EFFECTLJATION; GE:�tER�►LLY.
f its meetings,iu = Subdivision 1.Recommendadons for pian execution.Upon the recommendation by
:he final order.In ;� the planning agency ofthe comprehensive municipal plan or sections thereof,the plan-
-d of adjustments � ning agency shall study and propose to the governing body reasonable and practicable
�n until the plan- � means for putting the plan or section of the ptan into effect.S�bject to the limitations
s had reasonable � of the following sections,such means include,but are not limited to,zoning regnlations,
-d of adjustments � regulations for the subdivision o£land,an official map,a program for coordination of
the normal public improvements and services of the municipality,urban renea�vat and
a capital improvements program.
Subd. 2. Compliance with plan.After a comprehensive municipal plan or.section
COMPREHEN- thereof has been recommended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the govem-
ing body, no publicly owned interest in real property within the municipality shall be
prepare the com- acquired or disposed of,nor shall any capital improvement be authorized by the munic-
=acy shall consult ipality or special district or agency thereof or any other political subdivision having ,
:d agencies of the jurisdiction within the municipality until after the planning agency has reviewed the
=at of the compre- proposed acquisition, disposal,or capital improvement and reported in writing to the �,
:cy shall take due governing body or other special district or agency or political subdivision concemed, i
and other affected ics findings as to compiiance of the proposed acquisition,disposal or improvement�vith
a and recommend � the comprehensive municipal plan.Failure of the pianning agency to report on the pra
� posal within 45 days after such a reference,or such other period as may be designated
, agency may, by the goveming body shall be deemed to have satisfied the requirements of this subdi-
�inunicipal chaz- �ision. The governing body may, by resolution adopted by twathirds vote dispense
from time to time �+ich the requirements of this subdivision when in its judgment it finds that the pro-
:opted in sections, posed acquisition or disposal of real property or capital improvement has no relation-
�graphical section ship to the comprehensive municipal plan.
-:ensive municipal � History: 196.i c 6�D s 6
� �o>nr•• R�Fnra -
{
I
METROPOLITAN C(�UN I �
C L pLAN REVIEW PRC�CESS �
,
�
. ,
,
,
MINQR Pian : Amendment MAJOR Plan Amendment
1a-DAY Initia! Review 1a-DAY Initial f�eview
-----► Re t ur n for
No Issues;Waive Inadequate
Further Review Inforrnation
, .
Issues but No Finding of
Metropoiitan fvietropoiltan
System lmpact System Impact
60-DAY Review 94-DAY Review
MCDC � MCDC
MC ,�,,,� Comments to �oca1 MC
Units of Government �
�,
�
.r-
METRO DIGEST
� �
...,�
A monthly digest of the activiHes of the Metropolitan Councii�Metropolitan Alrports Commission,
Metrapolitan Parks and C3pen Spacx CommLssion, Metropoittan Sports Facillties Commission,
Metropolitan Transit Commisston, Metropolitan Waste Coatrol Commission,and Regional Transit Board.
For oommission inquiries�call the commisslon voncerned.
Jan. 15, 1993 M�
Co�o�cil
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth S�,S�Paul, MN. •
55101. For more information about Council items,ca11291-6359. '
Metropolttan Council
Governor Appoints Eight Members to Awal�ary and the East Metro women•s �
' MetroRolitan CounCil--On December 30. ��ation.
Governor Arne Carison announced the Roger Schrrer.57,Plymouth,will represent Disttict
appointrnent of eight members to the Council,atl 9. President of Scherer Lumber Company in
to serve four-year terms. Minneapolis,he served on The Council from 1981
Polly Puerson Bowlcs, 33, of Edina, continues to to 1985 and served in the state tegislature from
represent District 11. She is an associate attorney 1966 to 1972. He is past chairman of the
with Faegre & Bensen and a recipient of the Minneapolis Chamber of Commeroe and nrn�r
� Minneapolis Distinguished Service Award. �I'ra on the Plymouth Planning Commission.
Manha M.Head,47,of Minneapolis,witl represent Mary H. Smith, 49, Orono, wili represent District
District 5. She is president of the Calhoun Square 13. She serves on the Minnesota Medicai
shopping mall in Minneapolis, vlce president of ��ation Awdliary, the HenneQin Techntcat
Nationwide Housing Corporation, and a member �llege Board and the Metropolitan State
of the Minneapolis Institute of Arts and the University Alumni Board. She resigned her schooi
American Association of University Women, board seat on District 284 to be on the CounciL
Kevin Howe, 58, Mendota Heights, will represent Stephen B. Wcllington, 43, St. Paul, wiH represent
District 15. A vice president of IDS Financial District 1. He runs a construction firm and served
Services,he was an assistant attorney general from � a representative to the legislature_for St. Pau!
1967 to 1970. under former Mayor.rGeorge Latlmer. He is a
member of the Citizens L.eague,the NPighborhood
Patrick C.Lcung,41,New Brighton,will represent � �O�mic Dtvelop:�ent Alliance and the H�nsing •
Alte�natives Develop�ent Corporation: �"�-
District 3. An attorney in immigration law, he r
came here from Hong Kong in 1973. He oo- �e .Council took the following actions in
founded and direcu the scate cha_pter of the December• ' l�r:.tr �
National Asian-Pacific American Bar Association • � ,��
and serves on the Metropolitan Transit � '
Commission's Minority Community Advisory LOCaI Planning--Thc Council agreed:;,that
Committee. before the proposed amendment for the Blaine
Comprehensive p[an can take effect the city rnust:
Esther Newcome, 62, White Bear Lake, continues remove the proposed expansioo of�.;.the`
to represent District 7. An employee of Ocean Air Metropolitan Urban Servicc��re�:(MUSA);rcvise �
:1.:.
, Travel,she serves on the Health East Foundation wastewater flow projections;and remove teferences
�' Grants Review Committee-St. Joseph's Hospital to a Light Rail Transii corridor.
,.�'
y`
x,., . . � . . � .
� I�/IE
TR� DIGEST �
• A monthly digest of the activities of the Metro olitan Council, Metro o(itan Air orts Commission
P P P �
Metropolitan Parks and Open Spaee Commission, Metropolitan Sports Facilitles Commission,
Metropolitan Transit Commission, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and Regional Transit Board.
For commission inquiries, call the commission concerned.
hi�y 1� 1992 Meaopotiron
Council
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN,
55101. For more information about Councii items, call 291-6359.
Recent MetropoGtan Council Actions
airport search area, and said a variance to the
The Council took the following actions in Empire Township comprehensive plan in the
ApriL• airport search area is inconsistent with the
township's comprehensive plan and cannot be put
Local Plan Reviews--The Council decided not to into effect.
expand the area designated for urban services into
Lake Eimo. 1fie city had requested a 440-acre In a related locai planning matter, the Council
expansion to allow construction of an o�ce park. decided to enter an amicus currae brief to the
The proposed area, bordered by Oakdale Court of Appeals in support of Woodbury's two-
on the west and Interstate Hwy. 94 on the south, year development moratorium for planning
• lies just outside the region's "urban servicc area," purposes.Washington County District Court ruled
which is provided with regional facilities such as last year that the moratorium constituted a taking
roads and sewers. of property.
The Councit said there is not a regional
need for urban land in Lake Elmo, which is Alrports--The Council decided to enter into a
designated as a rural-area community. In addition, contract with the Metropolitan Airports
sewer capacity is not sufCcient to handle the Commission to conduct community and regionat
projected demand from the proposed expansion. impact studies and economic analysis for the
The Council said a large sector of the East potential new airport site. It also decided ro hold
Metro area,which includes Lake Elmo,already has a public hearing this summer on what should be
� an oversuppiy of land designated for urban services contained in the dual-ttack decision report,which
and does not need more. About 2,700 acres will will be prepared after the airport planning is
be needed for new urban development in that area completed.
by the year 2000. This is far less than the current
supp(y of land available for urban services in the Solid Waste--The Council approved a permit
area,which exceeds 10,000 acres. reissuance for the Burnsville Sanitary Landfill and�
a resource recovery permit for Bellaire Sanitation,
The Council approved an amendment to Falcvn Inc. .
Heights comprehensive plan, but urged the city to
continue to work with the State Fairgrounds and Transportation--The Council approved the projects
the University of Minnesota, both located in the recommended for federal funding and amended the
city, to resolve questions about sewer flows from 1992-1994 Transportation Improvement Program.
the institutions in the Falcon Heights' locai sewer The Council also approved criteria that will be
system. used to define a new system of"A"minor arterials,
approved an interagency agreement with the I-494
. The Council approved changes in Dakota County's Corridor Commission and issued comments on an
shoreline and floodplain zoning ordinances in the environmental assessment worksheet for the
1
, _ _ _ . . __ .__.. _. _ ._ ._..__�..,_-s,-o-.�-.�._�...�.�..�.�,-�--A-�—.__
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ' •
' , '` ':�
; E
� A monthly digest of the activities of the Metropolitan Councit Metro olitan Ai orts Commisston ' �
r P �P ,
- Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission,Metropolitan Sports Facllities ComrnTssion, � • �.
_ Metropolitan Transit Commission,Metropolifan Waste Controi Commission,and Regfonai Transit Board.
• • • � For commissiort InquiMes,catt the commtsston concerned. � .
' : . . - - °;,.:
. �. . . . . . . � • . . • . . �
� . September 1992 ` - _ ' . . � .
. , . - , - �
. �. Metropolitan Council � _
. The Council took the following actions in annual average savings will 'be 5400,000 in debt • *
August: � service ovei the remaining 17 years of the bonds. -
. � � � The interest tate on the 1979 bo�ds was 7.48 ,�
Priorities for 1993 Proposed--Revising the, percent; the new race is 5.91 percent. The savings � . �
Council's keystone plan for fostering orderly � �ll be used for capitai improvements at the Dome, �
�rowth in the 'I1�vin Cities Area--the Metropolitan � including building more women's bathrooms, ,
DevelopmentandlnvestmentFramework(MDIF7--is ` improving concession areas, adding seats and .�
. � one of seven priorities the Council has proposed �dening concourses. �
' for its 1993 work program. The Council proposes � ' -
iq spend $161 mitlion in 1993, 7.7 percent less �C81 Planning--The Council approved a
than the 517.5 million budgeted for 1992. In comprehensive plan amendment, with
� adciition to revising the MDIF, the Gouneil set modifications, from the City of Lake Elmo that �
. priorities in the-areas of water quality and supply; exp2nds the met�opolitan urban service area '�
, airport planning; updating the CounciPs . - (MUSA)by 100 acres. The modifications relate to
- " transportation plan and developing strategies to land use in the general rural use area,sewage flow
achieve the CounciPs vision and goals for the , restrictions and stormwater rt�noff controls.
region in 2015. ; _ . ` � -
_ . � �The Council approved a comprehensive plan .
Metro Z015 ViS1011 and GOa1S--1fie amendment updatir►g the entire plan for May
Council held meetings with more than 60 civic � 'Township,but suggested several revisions relating
groups, organizations and loca( governments in jo development density,on=site sewage treatment,
August to discuss its vision and goals for the soils, and wetland runoff. •
region in 2015. It also conducted eight focus -
group meetings with eduptors, locai planners, The Counci!defermined that a comprehensive plan •.
people of color, young people and others to hear amendment to change zoning for the Hidden . .
feedback on the vision and goals. In early Valley residential development in Oakdale was
September,a town meeting was held,cabiecast live �nsistent with regional policies.
on regional channel 6, to hear�public comments. �
' � The Council will now take into account the public The Council approved a minor comprehensive plan
• feedback in formulating its final vision and goals amendment from Andover adding 26 acres to the
� � document in October. ° MUSA.
The Council determined that Sunfish Lake,
Metrodome Bond Savings--The Council because of its zoning and planning policies, which
appro�ed reissuance of bonds for the Hubert H. conscientiouslyexclude most commercial-industrial
Humphrey Metrodome in Minneapolis. The$42.8 development �for reasons other than preserving
� miliion in bonds will be refinanced at a lower agricultural use; should be excluded from
interest rate, which is expected ro save more than participation in the .fiscal disparities tax-base
$6 million in gross debt service payments. The � .
la . . . . •
�*
�
l��IETR� DIGEST �
�"J A monthly digest of the activities of the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission,
Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission,
Metropolitan Transit Commission, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission,and Regional Transit Board.
For commission inquiries, call the commission concerned.
hlay 31, 1991 Mcaopotuan
Councrl
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre,230 E. Fifth St.,St. Paul,
Minn., 55101. For more information about Council items, call 291-6359.
Recent Metropolitan Council Actions
The Council took the following actions in May; November 1991, the Council said.
Transit Plan--lfie Cauncil voted to require the Aging--The Council announced the availability of
Regional Transit Board (RTB) to reevaluate $10,359 in 1991 Title III-G funds for programs to
regional priorities for light rail transit (LR'I) in improve elder abuse awareness for adults, their
- light of new ridership and cost estimates. The families, professionals and the public.
RTB should either confirm the existing top-priority
;_ corridor, which runs between downtown St. Paul Airports--The Council authorized a contract, not :
-- and downtown Minneapolis,or propose a new one to exceed $30,000, with UDA Arclutects-for the
to the Council by Nov. 1, 1991. first phase of a study of the potential reuse of the
- ' -- As part of the reevaluation, the Council Iviinnea�Paul Internatipnal Airport site. �
said, the RTB should consider ways to reduce the • �
✓ cost of the proposed LRT lines. Local Planning--The Council approved a Champlin
The CounciYs comments were part of its comprehensive pIan amendment to extend the .�
. review of the RTB's transit plan for 1991-1995. metropolitan urban service area (MUSA) by 54.2
The Council also found that the transit aeres to acr.ommodate 138 new single-family
plan does not adequately justify the continued homes.
large increases it proposes in funding for Metro
Mobility, a specialized transportation system for The Council approved a Chanhassen
people with disabilities. comprehensive plan amendment to extend the '�
This part of the plan should be revised, MUSA by 2,780 gross acres, of which 1,571 are
the Council said, to: developable.
' Justify the increased spending;
' Assess the potential for cosi con- Parks--The Council authorized a $88,925 grant ro
tainment; Bloomington to acquire land for the Hyland-Bush-
* Consider how increased spending for Anderson Lakes Park Reserve.
Metro Mobility could affect other transit services;
* Explain how the variety of transit The Council authorized a $536,739 grant to xhe
programs available in the Metro Area can Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District for
complement each other to meet the needs of reimbursement of Lake Minnetonka Regional Park
senior citizens and people with disabilities. acquisition eacpenses.
Finally, the Council said, the finance
section of the plan needs revision in several areas, Solid Waste--The Council rescinded the
including additional discussion of the fiscal impact development limitation for a portion of Anoka
�of the plan's proposed bonding program; a County candidate site P to allow the installation of
description of transit service fare changes,and the a groundwater pumping and treatment system.
projected impact of those fare increases on transit
��' users. ridership and system revenues; and the Transportation--The Council reviewed the Ramsey
ciming ��f futuce f�ce ch3ng��s c��un�� Regu�n�1 R��itc��a�� .�u�h���i��'t t���tthr.t:t
�lhc �cvisions must bc comp►ctc�f by cuuidur Lkl'aiignmcut study.
�.� l.�;r.�r/'" �,
�
l��IETRO DIGEST �
�
`°""'� A monthly digest of the activities of the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission,
Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission,
Metropolitan Transit Commission, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and Regionat Transit Board.
For commission inquiries, call the commission concerned.
May 3, 1991 Maropotitan
Councrl
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul,
Minn., 55101. For more information about Council items, call 291-6359.
Recent Metropolitan Council Actions
New Council Members Sworn In--In early April 18 alignment south of the bypass throagh the rural
nine new Council members were sworn into o�ce area in Shakopee.
following their appointments by Gov. Arne Neither the interchange nor a realigned Hwy. 18
Cartson. The new members are Dede Wolfson, south of the bypass is shown on the comprehensive
District 2, representing the south half of St. Paul; land use plans of Scott County and Shakopee.
Carol A. Kummer, District 4, representing The Council found that allowing the interchange
downtown and part of south Minneapolis; Donald would cause premature development in the rurat
-- -n-B. Riley, District 6, representing north _._ area. This development wo�d��e a b_urden_on
-_ _ -
Minneapolis; Esther Newcome, District 7, the sewage treatment plants in the area.
representing Lino Lakes,Centerville,and northem The Council agreed that in two yea__rs it_will
Washington and Ramsey Counties; Susan review the comprehensive plans of Shakopee,Prior
Anderson, District 8, representing Coon Rapids, Lake and Savage to determine their consistency
� Blaine, Lexington, Circle Pines, Spring Lake Park, with Council policies, and reeva(uate the
Hilltop, Columbia Heights and Fridley; �im appropriateness of direct access between Hwy. 18
Krantkremer, District 10, representing Osseo, north and south of the bypass.
Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Crystal and New
Hope; Sondra R. Simonson, District 12, Aging--The Council approved the Advisory
representing Bloomington and Richfield; Bonnie Committee on Aging's guidelines for distribution
D. Featherstone, District 14, representing of additional Title III funds.
Burnsville, Lakeville, and Scott and Carver
Counties; and E. Craig Morris, District 16, Parks--The Council approved criteria for the 1991
representing southern Washington and Dakota natural resource development grants for regional
Counties. Council Chair Mary E. Anderson aiso recreation open space. '
named new Council committee chairs. They are: --�
Metropolitan Systems Committee, Dirk deVries; Local Pianning--The Council approved an Eden
Metropolitan and Community Development Prairie comprehensive plan' amendment that � ,�
Committee, Susan Anderson; Environmental enlarges the boundaries of its 2000 metropolitan
Resources Committee, Sondra Simonson; and urban service area (MUSA) by 317 acres. ;
Management Committee, E. Craig Morris. �
The Council approved an Excelsior comprehensive
The Council took the following actions in April: plan amendment that states a "master park plan"
will be prepared in 199L
Cty. Hwy. 18 Upgrade--In a move to prevent
premature development of rural land in the The Council approved a Plymouth comprehensive
southwestern 'I�vin Cities Area, the Council ptan amendment that reclassifies 15 acres of land
approved' the upgrading of Cty. Hwy. 18 in from high medium density residential to planned
�- Hennepin and Scott Counties but did not approve industrial.
-� an interchange sought by the counties.
The interchange would connect the reconstructed The Councit approved a Carver County
Hwy. 18 to the north of the bypass and a new Hwy. comprehensive plan amendment that clarifies and
� , �
R DI�E
ST �
�
l�/IET O
80-acre McKenna farm. The community and the the land-use designation of a 10-acre site on the `
McKennas are completing a purchase agreement south side of Cliff Rd.between Trunk Hwy.77 and
and setting a closing date. Suspending the review Interstate Hwy. 35E to commercial pianned
preserves the rights of all parties should the sale development.
not be completed. If the sale isn't completed, the
review could then resume without any loss of The Council approved a comprehensive plan
preparation time to the parties. The Council had amendment for Andover. The amendment expands
� begun the review at the request of the City of the metropolitan urban service area(MUSA)by 84
Prior Lake to assess the local impact of the acres to allow constructian of 183 single-family �
McKenna's proposed mining operation. homes. The Council asked the city to evaluate the
potential impact of runoff from development on
Agrlculturai Preserves - The Council decided to Round Lake and take measures to mitigate the �
include in its 1992 legislative package a impact prior to approving development plans. ,_..1
recommendation that a minimum tax credit of S3
per acre be established for land enrolled in the Parks-The Council approved a S1.4 miltion grant
Agricultural Preserves Pragram. It also recom- allocation for Burlington Northern Regional Trail.
mended that the minimum parcel size eligible to However, if Ramsey County does not acquire the
participate in the program be lowered from 40 to railroad right-of-way, the funds would go for
20 acres. Exceptions recommmended would permit further development of Como Regional Park.
parceis as small as 10 acres, and remove the res-
triction on soil type for parcels less than 40 acres. Solid_Waste - 'The Council established several
oonditions on the operation of Reuter, Inc.'s,
Other Council action in October included the resource recovery facility in Eden Prairie.'They
_-- -
follawing: __, include: quarterly reports to ihe Council on waste
_�__w
_ _______ intake and materiais sent out such as'refuse- �
� - — Airport Ptanning - The Council held two`public derived-fuel, recycled materials, material for land
hearings in October on a recommendation from disposal, and ash and stored materials; quarterly
the New-Airport Search Area Advisory Task Force. reports on progress in establishing a residual
The re�ommettdation would designate a 115- compost facility, with operations commencing by
square-mile area in east-central Dakota County as mid-1993; and that Reuter should direct materials
the location for a possible new major airport for that would otherwise be landfilled to another
the-Metro Area. The Council must recommend a resource recovery facility in the Metro Area.
;' search area to the Minnesota Legislature by the
�� -� end of the year. The Council released an environmental assessment-����-
j worksheet (EAV� on the proposed Scott County
- j i _ Local Planning - The Council approved a municipal solid waste compost project and set a
_( comprehensive plan amendment for Spring Park in public meeting on the EAW for Nov, 18. (See
;� Hennepin Counry. The amendment updates the "Public Meetings and Hearings," below.)
? sections of the plan concerning inventory,land use,
reatural envirot►ment, transportation and '�'he Cauncil authorized an agreement with Data
community facilities. Listing Services, Inc., doing business as The
Connectionm, to expand and enhance the Metro
The Council found a proposed S� Paul Recycling Hot Line. The agreement provides
comprehensive sewer plan amendment for the 525,000 in reimbursement to be paid from Nov. 14,
Highwood area of the city to be inconsistent with 1991, through Dec. 31, 1992,with matching funds
Council policies for the region's fully developed of$30,777.
area. The Council strongly encouraged the�city to
vigorously enforce its program for managing on- The Council approved the Metropolitan Landfill
site septic systems and to include a requirement in Abatement Account Fiscal Year (FI') 1991
its sewer ordinance that two drainfield sites be Ezpenditures and Activities Report to the
' provided for each 1ot. I.egislative Commission on Waste Management. i
' The Council spent nearly $3.6 miilion for waste
; The Council approved a comprehensive plan reduetion, tecycling and composting grants,
� amendment for Eagan. The amendment changes research, public education and administration im
�
�
n.�.
� l��IET E T �
RO DIG S
�
E
the current airport,can be convened to wardinate year after operations begin regarding the feasibility
work programs. The work would be related to of on-site separation of recyclable and reusabte
"dual-track" planning for a possible new airport components that may be disposed of at the facility.
and possible expansion af MSP; and
. Until atl parties affected by the dual-track Transportation--lfie Council found that the
planning process are convened in order to Minnesota Department of Transportation's
determine the possible allocation of planning Comprehensive State Bicycle Plan is consistent �
assistance loans and the impact on various with and complementary to regional transportation
communities as a result of that process. and recreation policies.
The Council found the proposed Oakview The Council found that proposed improvements to
Meadows, Second Addition, subdivision in Ham State Hwy. 9 in northern Anoka County are
Lake to be inconsistent with Council policies for consistent with regional policies.
the rural area. The Council recommended that the
housing units not be designated eligible for federal The Council gave preliminary approval for a right-
mortgage insurance. of-way acquisition loan to Richfield to purchase
� property within the right-of•way of 77ih St. that
The Council approved a 470-acre expansion of the will serve as future frontage road to Interstate
Metropolitan Urban Service Area in Minnetrista. Hwy. 494.
� The Council also required the ciry to modify its
cornprehensive plan to institute controls for on-site The Council approved a report on the I-494 bridge
j septic systems in its rurat service area. The ' over the Mississippi River as information for the
j controls ca1T for biennial post-installation next amendment to the Transportation Policy Plan.
� � inspeccion and maintenance.
�� The Council approved a Right-of-Way Acquisition
bietroliousingandRedevelopmentAuthority--The Loan Fund loan amendment of $192,800 so that �
Council approved seeking a change in state law to Brooklyn Park and Maple Grove may complete
make it consistent with federal law regarding the design and environmental studies for Trunk Hwy.
Metro HRA's authority to administer the federal 610.
Section 8 rent assistance program statewtde.
_
Water Resources--The Council found that the new
Parks--The Council authorized a grant of$111,300 sanitary sewer element of Scott County's
to Ramsey County to reimburse the cost of comprehensive plan is consistent with metropolitan
acquiring land within Bald Eag(e-Otter Lake system plans and other regional policies.
Regional Park.
The Council found an environmental assessment
The Council adopted a draft revised capital worksheet on the expansion of the St. Francis
improvement program for the regional recreation Wastewater Tteatment Piant inadequate in several
open space system. The draft,approved for pub[ic respects. 1fie Council also said that the city,
hearing, covers fiscal years 1992-93, 94-95, 96-97 before imptementing an}� proposed improvements
and 98-99. Spending of$30 million to acquire and to the facility,must amend its comprehensive plan
develop regional parks is proposed for the 1992-93 to reflect the proposed,design and a pian for
biennium. A public hearing is set for Wednesday, growth in the city.
Dec. 18. (See "Public Meetings and Hearings,"
below.) • Other--The Council adopted a revised citizen
participation plan. An additional goal in the plan
Solid Waste--The Council approved a permit for is to increase interaction and diaiogue with local
the Minnesota Industrial Containment Facility. governments,and to obtain their input early in the
The faciliry,a privately owned landfill proposed to planning process.
be built in Rosemount, would take in only
nonhazardous industrial waste. The Council The Council approved a contract for analysis of �
recommended several conditions be placed on the design options for a region-wide 800 megahertz
permit. One is that USPCI, Inc., the permittee, trunked radio system.
must submit a report to the Council within one
�
..., -�--
- METRO DIGEST
�
�
The Council agreed that before the proposed final approvaL
amendment to the Andover oomprehensive plan
can take ef�ect the city must: withdraw all MUSA The Council saspended approval of the Fiying
expanslon requests accept 100 acres untti afeer an Cfoud Airport L.ang-Term Comprehensive Ptan
� analysLs of the potentlal impact on Trunk Highway nntit: information on funding and feasibility fs
lo-. and revise its ordinance to specity that all on- provided; a storm water management plan is
site systems be�checked at least bienn�aliy by an included;the risk of groundwater contam�nation is
inspectoi certified: by the Minnesota Pollution evaluated; airport facilities are linked to the
Control Agency (MPCA). metropolitan disposal system; Eden Prairie
provldes docnmentation to fite for an extension of
Solid WBSte--The Councit suthorized an the MUSA; and the Councii 000rdinates a
agreement for S80,000 with Gersham,Brickner & compatibIlity plan for the sirport aros.
Bratton, for an anatysis and technology review of
aonswctjon debris� demolition waste and 7'he Covncil adopted the Minneapolis-St Paut
nonhazardous industrial wastes. Intemational Airport (MSP) Reuse Study to
- submit to the state legislature.
The Council found that the Carver County Solid
Waste Master Ptan is complete based on the Solid The Council approved the 1993-1995
Waste Manag�ment Development Guide/Policy Plan, 'rransportation Improvement Plan to transmit to
but requested�ome addltional information prior to MnDOT and thc MPCA.
oompleting the master plan review. _ _ __ _ _
_ _.._ ____... _ _ �._ _ __�..____'Ihe Council "concuned with the TAB on a
,-_----- The Conncil agree� to=suppon legislat��---to rxommanded urbaniud area-_-plus 20-year
streamijne the seven solid waste reports that boundary to submit to MnDOT.
--- �_ oounties must now submit to the Council. -- _
The Council appointed Jim Newland of Fddley to
' 'Il�e CouncIl agreed in ooncept to propose the TAB for District E
', legislatlon regarding the disposal of cardboard,film
, wrap and food waste. Water Quallty and Supply--Tt,e coancii
. , • withhetd aPProval of a St. FrancLs comprehensIve
- , -- Tl'BnSpoi't$t101f==The Council submitted to ihe plan amendment untit the city: adopts ordinanas
- - �', Minnesota Department of Transportation for a density standard of one unit p�r ten acres;
'', {MnDO't') its review of the supplemental draft adopts ordinanoes requiring use of centraliud
' . environmental impact statement (EIS) for-xhe _. sanitary sewers,inspcction and maintenance of on-
', proposed Trunk Highway 610. site septic systems, and regulation of private
�, wastewater treatment plants; adopts policies to
, The Council fonvarded the Transportation pr�ent and reduce inflow and infiitration in the
', Advisory Board's (TAB) recommendations for locai sewer system; and calculates usage of on-site
i arterial roadway systems to MnDOT. septic systems and the sanitary sewer system.
!, The Council adopted the I990 Clean Arr Act '1'!u Councii agreed to support its 1992 water
j Amendment Transportution Planning Procedur,es, supply bili passed by the state Senate last year with
I, forwarded it to the Governor and notified the $dded funding requests to:develop a mathematical
� MPCA of its action. model for diagnosing groundwater resouras;
, anatyze water supply alternatives for the region;
The Council approved an tnver Grove Heights and study the feasibility oE shared water semces.
wmprehensive plan amendment for a highway
; system change and interchange,CSAH 75 at Trunk In other actions, the Council.•
' Highway 52/55, provided that: the TAB designate
, CSAH 75 as a minor arterial route; the •Approved filing a friend-of-the-conrt brief in ihe
interchange address criteria in the policies of the state Supreme Conrt appeal of the Woodbury
' Rural Service Area; and the city adopt waste Place Panners v. City of Woodbury decision
, control ordinances before submitting plans for concerning devetopment moratoriums land sites.
' The Council believes that the moratoriums are
, y
CITY OF ROSEMOIINT
DAROTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1993-
A RESOLIITION AMENDING THEs COMPREFiENSIVE GIIIDE PLAN
OF THE CITY OF ROSEMODNT TO REDESIGNATFs A 9 .98-ACRE SITE
ON THE NORTB SIDE OF 160T8 STREET FROM AGRICULTUR.AL TO
GENER.AL INDIISTRIAL FOR THE PDRPOSE OF DTVELOPING A FACILITY
FOR THE METROPOLITAN MOSQIIITO CONTROL CONIl+2ISSION
WHEREAS, the property owner, RCD Real Estate Partnership, has
entered into a purchase agreement with the Metropolitan Mosquito
Control District to purchase a 9 . 767-acre site on the north side
of 160th Street West adjacent to Knutson Services, Inc. ; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District desires to
construct a multiple building facility on this property and
intends to relocate the Dakota Division Headquarters from the
University of Minnesota Rosemount Campus to the new facility; and
WSEREAS, the Comprehensive Guide Plan currently in force
designates this site for Agriculture; and
v�HEREAS, the City is nearing completion of a major update to the
1980 Comprehensive Guide Plan; and
WHEREAS, the updated Comprehensive Guide Plan proposes to
designate the surrounding area for business park development; and
tn1HEREAS, at the current time this site can be serviced by City
water services, but sewer extensions would be infeasible at this
time; and
WHEREAS, the proposed facility can be served adequately by on-
site septic system treatment of wastewater until sanitary
extension is more practical; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District and RCD Real
Estate Partnership requested that the City submit a separate
amendment for this pro�ect in order to facilitate the
construction of this facility in fiscal year 1993; and :
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount
considered the proposed redesignation of the site from
Agricultural to General Industrial on February 9, 1993 and
February 23, 1993 and recommended approval of the amenciment to
the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Cit� Couneil scheduled a public hearing, according
to law, to eonsider the plan amendment and the hearing was held
on the 2nd of March, 1993 .
r r
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of
Rosemount forwards Comprehensive Guide Plan No. 24 to the
Metropolitan Council for their review of this amendment to the
1980 Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan; and
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount
approves the Comprehensive Guide P1an Amendment No. 24 as an
amendment to the Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan contingent
upon Metropolitan Council action.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of March, 1993 .
E.B> McMenomy, Mayor
ATTEST;
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk �
,
Motion by: Seconded by:
Voted for•
Voted against •
2
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068-OS10
(612) 423-4411
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment No. 24
ME'T'ROPOLITAN MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
DAKOTA DIVISION HEADQUARTERS
The Metropolitan Mosquito �ontrol District proposes to relocate their existing Dakota Caunty
facility from the Universiry of Minnesota (Rosemount campus) to a new location in Rosemount.
The proposed site is on the north side of 160th Street West (proposed County State Aid
Fiighway 46) between State Trunk Highway 3 (STH 3) and Biscayne Avenue, to the immediate
west of Knutson Services, Inc. The facility will have multiple buildings that will include a�ce,
equipment, and material storage functions. Although the proposed use is public in nature, the
City has determined that its functions are sunilar to a general industrial use.
The proposed site is zoned Agricultur�l (AG) and the majority of the site is designated as
Agriculture (AG) in the 1980 Comprehensive Guide Plan. The site is a total of 9.767 acres
with appmximately 329 feet of frontage along 160th Street and a depth of appro}cimately 1,325
feet. The land is being subdivided from a 40-acre tract. The very southwestern corner of the
site is within the Empire Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) service area and was
designated for General Industrial with the approval of the Sewer Diversion Amendment (No.
22) in 1992. This limited portion of the proposed parcel is also within the Metropolitan Urban
Service Area (MUSA).
The site is in Section 31. In the City's proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Update 2000, this
section is planned for a business park development. Presently, the land in this section is used
predominantly for agricultural purposes with a few commercial uses along STH 3 and general
industrial uses along the north side of 160th Street to the west of the proposed site. Empire
Township is on the south side of 160th Street and this land is used for agricultural purposes.
The area on the north side of 160th Street to the immediate west of this site is designated as
General Industrial to STH 3 in the existing comprehensive plan. Gas Supply, AAA Auto
Salvage, and Knutson Services, Inc. have facilities in this location. These businesses have City
water available, but sanitary sewer service has not been extended to this location.• These
businesses were developed under the City's and Metropolitan Council's rural service policy
before the urban service area was extended in 1992.
Waste Water Treatment
Initially, the Metropolita.n Mosquito Control District intends to serve this facility with an on-site
septic treatment system. Although a portion of the site is wittvn the MUSA, sanitary sewers
have not been extended into this area. In order to extend sewers into this area, lines would
need to be placed through an area that is currently undeveloped in Section 31 and across STH 3.
The City anticipates that this area in Section 31 will develop within the next five to ten years
which makes placement of those facilities premature at this time. The City does not allow
unsewered development to occur within the urban service area; however, it is considered
warranted in this instance.
The Metropolitan Mosquito Control District has agreed to eonnect as soon as those services are
extended to this area. The City has just completed a feasibility study for a business park in this
section and the preliminary fmdings indicate that this area can be served through either the
Empire or the Rosemount interceptor.
Transportation
The Mosquito Control District projects that between 30 and 60 trips will be generated`from this
site daily. These trips will not add any further burden to the transportation system because they
are currently occurring in another site in Rosemount.
Water Resources
-- - There are no DNR or US Army Cc�rp, designated wetlands on the site or in the anticipated
drainage area. The Dakota County Soil and Water Gonservation district has identified two
locations on the site where Type 2 wetlands may be presento Prior to approval of any final
development plans a wetland delineation will be required and the City will take all necessary
steps to comply with the required wetland regulations.
2
INFORMATION SUI3MISSION FOR
MINOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
This summary warksheet must be filled out and submitted to the Metropolitan Council with a
copy of each proposed minor comprehensive pIan amendment. Minor amendments include, but
are not limited to:
1. Changes to the future land use plan where the affected area is small or where the
proposed future tand use will result in minor changes in metropolitan service demand.
2. Changes (land trades or additions� in the urban service area involving less than 40 acres.
3. Minor changes to plan goaLs and policies that do not change the overall thrust of the
comprehensive plan.
Please be as speci�ic as possible; attach additional explanatory materials if necessary. If a staEf
report was prepared for the Planning Commission or City Council, please attach it as welL
Communities submitting regular plan amendments may wish to enter this form or a reasonable
facsimite into their word processing menu for ease in preparation of the form.
Send plan amendments to: Lynda Voge, Referrals Coordinator -
Metropolitan Council, Mears Park Centre
230 E. Fifth St. , St. Paul, NII�i 55101-3634 .>
I. . GENERAL INFfJRM�TION
A. Sponsoring governmental unit CITY OF ROSEPiOUNT
Name of local contact person contact personLlSA FREESE, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
Addrest 28�5 145TH 5T W, ROSEMOUNT, PiN 55068
Telephone (612)__322_:�050___
Name of Preparer (if different from contact person)
Date of PreparatiorL k'EBRUARY 5 1993
B, Name of Amendment COPiPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN �624, METROPOLITAN MOSQUITO CONTR(
DescriptionlSummary To redesiQnate a �. 8-acre site fr, o�n,__,�!_� DISTRI(
Agricultural to General Industrial to allow the construction of a
multiple buildin� facility (office, warehouse & vehicle storaQe)
for Dakota Division Headquarters of the Metropolitan Piosquito
Control District.
C. Please attach the following:
1. Five copies of the proposed amendment.
2. A city-wide map showing the location of the proposed change.
3. The current plan map(s), indicating area(s) affected bv amendment.
4. The proposed pIan map(s), indicating area(s) affected by amendment.
i
D. What is the of�icial local status of :he proposed amendment? (Check one or more
as appropriate.)
X Acted upon by planning commission (if applicable) on
FEBRUARY 23, 1993
.� Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review,
r�aRcx_2� 1993
_ Considered, but not approved by governing body on
Other
E. Indicate what adjacent Iocal governmental units and other jurisdictions (school
districts,watershed districts, etc.) affected by the change have been sent copies of
the plan amendment, if any, and the date(s) copies were sent to them.
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP: INDEPEND N H00 DT4TRTC'T 196; DAKOTA ('OiTNTY
IL L.�iND USE
A. Describe the following, as appropriate:
1. Size of affected area in acres 9.98 acres
2. Existing land use{sl__ AGRIGULTURAL
3. Froposed Iand use(s) Ii�DUST�lAL - OrFICE & WAn�HOUSE
4. Number and type of residential dwelling unics involved
— -__
-----_._�_.._--------
NOT APPLICABLE
S. Proposed density
6. Proposed square footage of commercial, industrial or public buildings
21,520 - 26,800 square feet
III. METROPOLITAN DEVELOPOMENT GUIDE
A Population, Household and EmpIoyment Farecasts
Will the proposed amendment affect the city's population, household or
employment forecasts for 2040, or any additionaI local staging contained in the
original plan?
No/Not Applicable
x Yes. Descnbe effec�
The existing 1980 Comprehensive Guide Plan desi�nates this area as
A�riculture. The proposed Update 2000 proposes that this entire
section be developed as industrial park. This proposal is consistent
with the land uses progosed in Update 2000.
11
B. Changes to Urban Service Area Boundary
Will the proposed amendment require a change to the boundary of the
comrnunity's urban setvice area?
� No/Not aPPlicable.
_ Yes. Under I. C., a map should be attached to show the proposed change.
C. Changes to Timing and Staging of Urban Service Area -
Will the proposed amendment require a change to the timing and staging of
development within the urban service area?
�No/Not Applicable.
_ Yes. Undcr i. C., a map should be attached to show the proposed change.
D. Wastewater Treatment
1. Will the proposed amendment result in a change in the projected sewer
flows for the community? :
X No/Not Appticable. Initially this development will be served by an
_Yes. IndiCate the e ec°�edsChan s�stem until sewer is extend�d into this
xP � area fxom the west. When connected
the projected flow is approximateiy
Total Year 2000rL010 flow far communiry 3,000 gal/day,
based on existing plan milIion gallons/day
Tota12000I2010 flow for community
based on plan amendment million gallons/day
2. If your community dischar�es to more than one metropolitan interceptor, -
indicate which interceptor will be affected by the arnendment.
EPIPIRE WWTP INTERCEPTOR
3. Will flows be diverted from one interceptor service area to another?
, _
x No/Not applicable.
_ Yes. Indicate the change and volumes (mgd.) invoIved.
lil
E. Transportation �
1. Will the proposed amendment result in an increase in trip generation for
the affected area?
No/Not applicable.
X Yes. Describe effect.
The nroiected triDs will rang� between 30 and 70 daily d�,Fgnding
on the season.'
2. Does the proposed amendment contain any changes to the functional
classification of roadways?
� No.
_Yes. Describe which roadways
F. Aviation
i,
Will the proposed amendment affect the function of a metropolitan airport or the
compatibility.of land uses with aircraft noise?
�, No/Not applicable.
�
,_Yes. Describe effec�
f
G. Recreation Open Space =
Will the proposed amendment have an impact on existing or future federal, state
or regional recreationa! facilities?
� No/Not Applicable.
_Yes. Descn�be effect.
H. Housing
__ _
Will the proposed amendment affect the communiry's ability or intent to achieve
� the long-term goaLs for low- and moderate-income and modest-cost housing
opportunities cc�ntained in the existing plan?
' x No/i�tot Applicable.
Yes. Descrioe effect.
iv
. I: Water Resources
L Does the plan amendment affect a Minnesota Department oE Natural
Resources or U.S. Arrny Corps of Engineers protected wetland? If yes,
describe type of wetland affected and:show location on a map.
Yes.
X No. TYPE 2 WETLAND, DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION
DISTRICT.
2. Will the wetland be protected? NOT APPLICABLE
Yes. Describe how.
_ Na Descnbe why not.
3. Will the plan arsendment result in runoff which affects the quality of any
surface water body? If yes, identify which ones.
Yes.
�, No. :
4. Will the water body be protected? NOT APPLICABLE
Yes. Descnbe how.
_ No. Explain why not.
IV. IMPLEMEIv'TATION PROGR4M
__ _
A. Official Controls
L Will the proposed amendment require a chan�e to zoning, subdivision, on-
site sewer ordinances or other official controls?
; _ _ — No/Not Applicable. -----
x Yes. Describe effect.
PROPERTY WTLL NEED TO BE REZONED FROA1 A RT LTTR (A ) TO GENERAL
,
INDUSTRIAL AND THE PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE SUBDIVIDED.
v
CITY 4F ROSEMO�JNT MAP ,
,
- - _ - , _ --
�'��'�� ��� ` � I' r � - --_— - — — -- '� ' �� r `�"
_ ,.
. , _ . —
. . . ,� -
.
-- „ - -- '� � � � ��
o �, �.. �. :; �_ � - �, ; � � �
, �. � � �i. ,� � -�-&#, _
„ �� [' f '• ��_—� ��=$ --� i —
1 — . — -- -- r .:y
,c L--} —�� — — � • � o o � . '� j �� �I�.�� ��
�..,F� �-- _ r�— � �. I
`-�. � 1 ��_.• ' � _ � - �� ' - - --
e.l � �- _ D '�' , ___ — -- — � . �. -`� \
� • � 1_L _ ._ / � � —
• � �{ l d � � ' _ �g ,� � � `� i,
�v' -,., -�� --�C�� '' —� � .a �__ �w,. � ' --- — 4-- ' ---�9 __ , ,---� - �
. 4 �. � ,tl C�' • � � � �4!
. .,, ' " �. �-�_ Y �s�°` � . � . � . MV
j � 1 .. . . ' . .•• � . . _ .:. . . .
, � �,. __ _ � -- _ __ - ; �
, � � _ __ I� �� ---- � � --�- � � S
; � �- _�-�� �1._ L � �
i-- ,�,:� — — ss — —
� �.� � ! � � .. � �
,,. . � _
;
:o �Y.,,�, , • ---, —
"��II_. �� {: ' � }' ���..�F( a� L �� -- 1 , f • � o� I I
� m
, � �� _� � � ;
. ? .di. .._��,,,..� � :. - F r CSA f2 .: � :�,.....
�, . . . .. 1:
.. . � -- _�8--
I '1 ' ' �
� , ., � ,� � ... �B .� - -- - _ --- �
�
� f '� `�1��� � 'y 7 . .�...;.:.- _'' ___._ � . � ____' . _ '. � . � '___ .
' — � ' _
� �� � . i � � � . .
� i __ �__
� � .:.t� ;,fq. __'—_ _
��.�.�.� ... . . .
' ___
:. _: ; _. f..-- -- �— ' � �_ �. _
. . � —_t_ —
. .�.. � .��- r2 r �, � ' � � . COATES `. � .
} '� -- — -- - .�. . � .
. . . r. __ � . _ - - ��
. � �• . � ' �. . . SCALE � M � .�NOHTN � � ..� . � �.
� SUBJECT PARCEL
METROPOLITAN MOSQUITl3 CONTROL DISTRICT
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE P�AN AME�IDMENT
;
REDESIGNATE FROM AGRICULTURAL TO 1NDUSTRIAL
�
CITY OF R EM T MAP 2
O S OLTN
_-_.� � �_.�._�{�--M.� .____. __ .�.� __._ __ __ __ : - - -�____ ___._._.r.. _.
- •F z J � ���a��F j '� 1 1 AG -+n-� : .� � � : � �. '" : - '; �s:.
M�'S :i__{ 1 ' ��.. .. � � _:./� V�_ . . ... r t, f� Ia .y_..�.
. �
•�'3,s AG „� ' ' ,.��n � �r ,?/ *� ;,""' �: � ��: � .l ;/ w :
f? �•� ... ^' w, / �"3'�,_ r_� r. -� , ._ . �.;.._____._�� _ . ��� �' ��. - � . _ .
pg '�� � ,n(}� _-�� �, � ' � � AQP , 'r`i�,.� � ' �
� � Y��� :) i �j d �'� � '�' �y'�� d�'��._ : j .._ k�� '.- -c� �AGP �
���r-�., ,r �, �:�-�-�. .�,;-._� ,� �;�: � � � Y�.iG_..._. �_ ' '1 _.. _'-
i , +� �.h � �.
F .� - � \4 .r �.3. �':a '� ,�{�R �r �W _ 1�'�' ! _� . ��" :+' `43 �
; ;1.. �.: �„ � , f_ � �.� _ �, " '-'f � �;;� _. .
.
� ��,` .RR c �� Z«'�. . �.= �^` h�� �t � t�."'Y .,M ---�•----A-C�-- •
✓ ��•' : //l� �;� '�- = 1��1� �r�- ��� �A _____'�•--• + � � ' AG
f � 1'-'t. 7xl -^'
t �.
� T�r '�� --�-� ��1, ar� �.�1�. . ji - t' ,u.i � � � k.� i.._ ...� � t -..---
' m ' �'':rry�le, , " � x'--' -r a � ; �+ . ;(-. ,_+r-kv�'_ .-r�-�a ' r`?,: i Y:
i -_/��k�-� }.. - _- ,�.�- .7��.— �..�.i..�_.�
' . •,! l� . „ _�E��,� r�� '�' :�:;� � :} - �
AG `J" � �g,� ✓Y� �rj _ it_� � ; ��.
,a � "J . ��; �. T- � '„'�� � �;
• - '""`� r '� �
/ � -i 6 v� .=�: � ._� �_ -- -- '.�. �
�y n.r� � � '�� � � �, c-.,r, �; i
�, . ;� • �-- ���i ', ,
�7�;. ��j.�_ �,-�� ° ,�•:�i^• k i� i ��., .��- �i Se.-r_"�,._ '_,c,s _ � �; ;: ' . •..
�-'�' .�� �"�r� ...--'^---- - �'.a t- ���j� -�•, ,X_ ,`r--�-...�...iG,,A�� � _� __ �a--s+�-..
.' 1 .� —(�� - ��.� � / '/! !` . ^3 . I
RR a '-=� i. �, " _ �L � '
�� a c �y}i�' 1 R-1 , , �_1 �� AG ` AGP i
'. i �,�_�! f��e. r a�...----- -' p.2 � � f ,
. . �Y'J..--r.° �r� yj.=i-.r;'c�+ 'r�". Y��J� �t�J M . � � .
�� 4 �7..�-�.� ...�::`.�. - '_.�.��.'_.�'__'._ ... .'�___..
1
F �-=�_�y�-1 � .. . �' � �� - .���.� . . i
.'���'�l���r t"^' _"'� { J . �: �i . . 'tt
i
, �
t /\ "L:� `
-- `� ; .
;.
:
,}.n���n,''�.,,,�� y._. +) : � ' : �p � ;(_
.,-�' -- __...._.__.. �i
_ � ;: . .
� � 'AC . �:.Y pg _
-- �i i.. ,� •-^,
� � �:� �� ��s ��.�'' _. . .e�� •'' . . C�
,\ .. '�1-'i==i :R-fA- W,,,,�- - - - w
- - •-- -- - - - ' - ___�__�_- �-" - -
". � . _ . M. �.'_�� � . �'r ' � �. �'._- . '
t��i�A 't=� A�3 �.�. —_ - /� '� ,
1P a.'._� � w ;- t �, �r,.i PB
� - S f '� - . � _ — � � � .
� •-.ia�. � �-fM,w � _ w G', ---.._ .- u �1:_.
.
� �1� ' �_._ "z"z-^�.�� � �
;: n , i
.. ._ . . w �. . �.� ,t� �r � ii.ti '-;�+ . _ fP + � - ------
�
. .. _-- . � . '- .... , ' .
..._1 a ,e� 1 u r' A.'Lir t, { ;
, .
. . -�r . .. . ; .
. . . ---=-. ��_-- aa •. ,. �..
. ..� .._ . i . �e.. �.. .- .�.
— �'_-.� .-�-�-.' �_____�_.- ....�+..-'-' ".�_...r.__--'-' � '
� " '--__"' "." '•'-'." ._..._.v. "..-"...'_"--.'-"'."".'.'
„ �-__--- . -_� � _. .
�- '-' "-
'-'-'_
"
a ;
A4 '+ o� � ^� � • � -
� .
�' --`1"Q � • � AQ �
� ri� _�i# �� . . .:/� �� /i;r. • � .
� � � ...._..._._ .. . .
. � ..ait��1 �� N . ,i :_..��..� /� ��� �w �_ `
� f
}�_1F`'�`.,,� r_r���` y^ e w , � AG e -- _ �::.._:_ _
L
� r
:l�--'-:..z: t--'=� - , ' ' ,�� "; y - '.s�._ ..tlj- �--- ' .-. _._..
/�r - � +. �i� :✓ -� ' i;� '_"'. ,L ._. . `,�`r
t _: :�.�-7. " %/
j `__ -y � . .. ` y.,
.
_ . .
� �"�t�. `_'i � t� � --�i. . � // ; - �
. i Jt ;
:
"_ .. .,:i.'.^'- .�,-- .� , 4= ._. ,�,::. w L ' . . x ,�. _ -. . .
`_� .. .."'; . '_'......... � "._ _ . -.___ �
� . ;� � 1 G� "`' '' " f.l .1
�� i � . � : ! ,'�. �. - � .- �
t �.
_,�k4.. �1 pG , � % ._. --�� � ;�;
- i -:�w-vs• i,J' �.�•� � . .� . .
LEGEIvn ZONING MAP
R-1� SINGLE FAbtILT RESt0ENT1Al ' C•1 CONYENIENCE COMMEffC1Al AG AGRICULNRE
R-1A S�Nc� F�n,r Res�oexnu G2 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AGP A6AICULNRE PRESERVE
R•Z SINGIE FAMILY A7TACHED C-3 HI6HWAT SERVICE COMMERCIAL FW FLOO�WAY
R-3 MUITIPLE FAMILT RESI�ENTIAL C-4 GENERAL COMMERCIAL WM WASTE MANA6EMENT
R-4 MULTIPLE FAMlLT RESIOENTIAL PB PUBLlC I QUASI-PUBUC �� MISSlSSIPPI RIYER CRITICAL AREA
%
RR RURAL RESIDEN71Al 16 GENERAL INOUSTAIAL
RL RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSIPf 1P INDUSTRIAL PARK , SUBJECT PARCEL
METROPOUTAN MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
.,
PROPOSED DAKOTA DIVISION HEADQUARTERS
� � • � . �
���� _ �'�J���II'I� , '•�I—1,. _ �����' - -- i �-��i�' i � �/��s �
r� �
p ' �=1.7 �I�� ' �'I • �� 1 � L ��"��� �
�I �i c ��.,�1�r '-�1 I ��t'�'1���■I■� -e IL� C A ;�\,�,� L I C�J��� .,���.�' ��a . . .
=C���..�:y�� ��i �I�p�`� J �`�� `,� � �v ` t' �
, �t� \�. ■� q�7� I ' �,���, � s� ' �
. ,�� ���ic����T i��i. �.��y/I� , \ f i
� �� ��� - ��rlla•-�r; �� .,�'`*���.� , , — r t� � i��'::
�'��►�� '��I������w�..� , �������'� �1 � �. �� � i
t tit��\�;
fi�'Il���������i��l,l ��r;:�i.,a .��� ---� ���� ri��� ����� �� .
� - - �t�.�.� �,,,� „ .�
� 7�n�':1dr1i�,�,��.�! `i� �'�, --�- � �
� /��'�i,i:'a::���ir''��i � '� � ��C"� t i
=� ', `'+i:� ._��.y ,
.�� ��p �,� .�`� � ,,
".�r �''�it'.n;�'' '° � � ` `'`�`��!'' � 12 � 2,� � �. � �'� 'Cq �`� -,�
,
�_<_::f�:,,►- �)�a. :� '� .�-_ - - -- — — a-, �'-,� ,9 �
3�, �� � �'��� � - -, � �.
� . -
:� �r�� _� ��d�j � �� � �� �
— �
. . .
�p `
�' t r-,. •i � ' �j '
d� z'�� __;�- �,� � � �� ��1 � _
_ .
a' , � � � � :�.�
.
,��'!!'' ;� \ �
�. � : . ,
��r�.a i ii1 �� �=` ;,'.u�. , . . � ��____ ---.'_„� -�
�„�,�.v.�: -
�����,� , � , '' ,� '1 �
�(M�l���� i\ �, � ( �'� 1 � i r ' �_'�'�
Sf11'�� y� � . � ' •
}:�I) 1 �
���.� ���.,.Y=aia'�"_..�-�;h r{I� �, � �� 2 7 i rth �E r"'' ?•�� z C�; 2 9 �.
�'f'�+.�.""1 ��c�L-i}-�I�LG ' ...E.`•�� 'YI- 111 � t� ��� � �'� _ , 'l9
a _.. _. '
r r q170����� 5i am z a 3:i� ��!�(� � �
�,�'�I'�r�i���l �!1Pl��ll�i�i-=^�� ����7�Y� ��� ��� , � .
�' ` ,��9��,''r� � ,�r�;���►/�%�' +id// 2 8 ��;
i;��,��,L��'�i��` -�ail,�..-�,��t� � � ,--- �
., � �� ��� �
���y�.,��N'i1i�,��� F�,�rt�a s_���� ' �� � , ...�t�.�.
��►; 7i�:�� l f� �, ;� �
_^��;�.�d ,,,��'��.' /� i: __ �-�� il
f.�i#1� ats�'!sF^..::::.°—:.-� � I
� '.
_ i •
F � � , .
���i�'�'^''� r; ;� , �? ;;�_ J z�.^�-- - �.a:�� t;C -- s, -, .. z z
� 't�� � 1 . �l; � � ,., � , � ?� V�.,
�,. , � ,- _ —
A, �������� �� I �� I I
-�-- .1 , '� ,
rt •' I _
�s'`� �.3nT�s,�,Jfj' —— — I � � : �
1 �, � .
_ ,
.. p;
r "'':.: � �
i
��''� .i��,:�� *;'
� „ �I' i s .
�
� e�i . : IIII��
...,,.:},., __ �. _ .L �--- -- ___.
�
� � 1 ( �
��� �� � , �
�1�1� , i � �
��� �: Q`� G .
c� t' � �s � • � � � � � ' . i
.-+
� •� . , �: : • � �, �. � � � . I11
�U,V E'��
.
�
- • • � • t� • • - • �
- • • • � � � • � • � � �
,
City of Rosemount N°:
C4MPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
Date: /o�/�.�9L
APplicant: RCf.� �F� � ,EsTs�r� p��rivF.�SHi,d Phone• �/3�- G�3 Z
Address: / 70�8 T",��z_ c2 Qia T�.� f�n� �,v �.n,,., /�W � S 0 � �'
STATUS OF APPLICANT:
�' Owner Buyer _________ Lessee OTHER:
LOCATION: Lot , Block , Addition
_-- StreetJ�ddress: .
-------------- -_ .
Metes & Bounds Description Attached:
-_ .�_
�' � Survey or P1 ot P1 an Attached: l�� --
Presently Designated: _ � � ,��> ; u ` ��t2,�� . -
Proposed Designation: _ L � �, �,-r L��,�{T-,z,r��
REASON FOR REQUEST.
1. � �,��T r�.�,� ;�o..� D r r��3 i� c r�.� �� ,... � _
ry /-"�� � ,� 1T7
�"G�Z TN e /��F Tr-L_ �% /�'f � 5 G2 �--t r T U � c. n.. , /Z � G-
^._ -
2.
3.
_ ` - �t' �r�"�
� Signature af App icant
FOR OFFICE USE OIJLY
Application received "by: flate:
Fee: $ How Paid: Date:
Planning Commission Action:
Date:
, .
� � �, , � �\ r � i t i ' j '�' '1'�t, i i �, �� � ! � -- �4�" �'�.y-o- "� �4
� o// f� \ t i i / � � �j,\ � l �� / 4 � �- ` I
/ / / 1 I � a. - �-
� � g � ��f' �\ � �\ � . I 1 I � � � � � �i� 1 1 , ' � � �_` � , \ � S j-[" j
`1 � � \ � � � � ' �, �� � �r �/ \
� it � �'� � i ��o `r_�� ! � � �� �� 1 � � � �Pi i � � �� � �� i � � �
_i � l � 1� � i 9 �,L!1 , \� � � /�i � � � ! '' �� � ��� ^y i���� � ` �
� , -----�---�-�- --- -�-- ��
�►� � ���- � r / . , � `-. _ ' � ���r'/ � �� . � ,��� •'�-�
�i� � � � i . \ ,� �-� ,i � �\ i � � � ,��- �
'�� � �,) �t �� / � ` *o` �� � .� � �`` ` \ ` �` ��\-�, ��' �� r� i���
/ � � � � �� ► � �
� i y�;�� , , , � ,. � � . L � , .
., � i � •�, � �� , i 1� . �
� � � � � � i ' � s � � ; i i ' �'g �. � �`_� �•� � ._'� �
-./��.�� � / f i � � � '� i � i s� `� ` , i r �I
/ �� l �t.,'` �!!i / 1 � �� � l� � � ! I V
.� ^� � 1 i � �\ 1 '� I y'` (� .
1Y-s" " .'`C=� �- � ,_. �� � ( \ ) � ! �� \ \ � 1 \ 1 I ' / �
�i C ��� ii//� �._ � I ) � � i \1 ���
��-�:-�--=��.../��i J \ \� ! I � � �l \ • i �` \ � � i / � � t
���--'012'S5 ~or ���-'`��'� � -'�� �`,�l`�+ ~ / I j � l � � �� �� � f I /i ( , ���
� � � � y 5 o,.r' / "�-.\� �\ ° ,� _� � �' � ��
� � � � � ��,/ r .�� ;` " �- /_s� �! � _ �, �\ i � ���J�� /.' Ir
I � �'/ � � ► I� ��o`��'\,� -'"�" -__�� -� ` � � � � �I�I
.�
��_i,�� � ,�� �! � � 1l �='_ ---'��----� �s o , ��\� i � �`��:�,� � ��
� �� �1 , i �. ..� �-_. 95� "-\/i _ (�� � � 1\\ � 1� �
I �
� /, � � '� PAM7 OF _ .� '� �..�5-�5.� � ., ��.i CULTIVF.yED F��LO�r,Ri oF �� � E�
� � :�- 1 1 � � GI4-85 4,�� �\ / � � � 0��85 � �� ��
� \ ;' � � I 1 I �� � s / � \ � �
,��dOSQJiTCj � � � ` �t�
._�._�—_��; � ,� \ �, �
� � i i � � � � ; cotar�ai. � � `�i'.� k� Scale:
� r 1 � � t I SITE , . ♦ � \ �I� 1 inch =
� �; � � 1 � . I i�\ w m � � �� 200 feet
i I �I 1 � � � � ` ( u � � � �
� { � � ( \ ? � � �- � � � � ��
i / ��! � � f I �� \ / \ � � \ �� \ � 1��
; � I -=-,� ��-� i 1( i � �� � 1 �_ � x
� � �" ; � � � i t \ � � �
�-- __ �Rov-- � , ; 1 ! i , � t �-.\ . �` i � �
- i � �
oi3-as, i;.::rl � ._...� ...._- — — '-i\,---- '."' , ► � �� \ � � � ,
'�.:.,
_�'�--. i ,' � I 1 1 � �'� � ��
,�}�� i� � i� �� -.. , � 1 -\ �� � � �t
�. �i-�I��r _ � � . � . . � . . / 9S� . � ` �� � . � � \ . � �.\� �"'� � •�. . . .
.:�1�- �_�� � - / \\ l' 1 ' , `g _1� '/ y
_ � .,_ �__ ��, � � � /`+"� ' � ` V � Sp \ ♦
� PARKTNG`1-' �o � � , \ � \� ,� s � �� `� ~� ���, ��
�1 s � \ � �
�, � f�•. �--- 0 J , � ` \ f� o o � �` � \ ��
t �� � 1 1 � 11 � � 1 �.. � -�..=....�..� _[._ ..�.i. .� M� � �—=s� �
. .._-—�'-1-=��?'--f.?-- ��(.�. y���.� -�- - -�-I GriHfi i���.......��1.. .���. �..c�^�.-��..•.�.-�.1.+.�F e--I�'�•-f-•—-./->.� .
Topography map from City of Rosemount . .
This print Dated 10-09-92
,
i,
�
;
. . . . . i . . . . .
.. . . . ,. . ' . . . . . ... . . . .
. � . � . � � . . I. . . . � � � . � .� . .
. . �� . . . . . . �� / . .. �� . . � . � .
. . . . �•i �, r� . .�- . � . ' .. . BLPEs���E?WC.1C_:.. � ._� .
t-°—, � a ' � , � � f I �'_ -1
. � ."�"ir � ?. Y � r� x � � : . . . . ` viww�sE ' _ I_. --- -- - .. ._
'� ^\
��*. ��{ ~ w� .� . �' r�--`_.. . � �. � �� � 'I i
t e ' �� {
� �/�' �� ,` it ? , ��� �..r � i ,`1 1�?^$* �� ., . �TFMiN� ' 1 � . ! � / . " � ! .
,� �.:i �::. ., .�, . '� . . .. �.._._—_� . , •�: . .
.t � •�# ' : � I�O �-r+
`'_" p �_ `'' ' �*�:r . .�..'�s:''w:. ` 5�we % \ .
� ��.� -• { �� ..� ` 'I_�},, . y M .�.'r ..t I�, ch- . . y�8ar.[ . — � ��.� . . '(�, . � • � 5"TTtEE-j'.V./:
+. �fa
.• :s-. fAWM �,� �1 g cti�/ �` �'� � i' �I � . % . � I
� � ,� � � .tk�4 �y �. % . � • �x �1. . . � i . .
. r , �.},K Y�° ,Y ' tua. � y �' � .
�C �.. � :+�'' � / i+ j .��g�� • ' � -
� . � - �'' .` oFf� . .
. aRLfN�1�8.` �. . �' �� ,a .: ,.JtA � i
:�fbt^I17 = . o ' . . .
w.q4s - . , �' �
f . �
% .. ..�:��� ._.. . � _ � ' • �' , ' ----
. ' .� . ' � `�b. . .. — - . . o. . . . , . � .
� .. . �' �� �1�� � ' � ' � � �
/'
('�'� , . _.. t� r��; Y+" . .. .. -_ � .... •. ' '� . / � _� .. _. . .
, . ,. , . , ,q:: _. . .., . . , . , _ . � . . _ . . . . � � ' .
` . . .. _.... � . . ... . 1:`.. .. . .• .. � � _ 5 � � . , . . .
� � . . � . �ii...� �'�... . .
.r. . . . . . .. . �µ.Y .. . � . � .
. ' . �. � � ' �� �I � � �
. , •.Nletrop�olitan Mosquito _ "� 5c�"-�� s ,,�N H°•Architects
. , �� . A � . , �� �
, ~.0011t�0I DIStf jCt:. . N ' AIQL�-� q�� . CORDING•NATWIGK•t!lLBERT ARCHITECTS, 1�IC.
: � Dakota,County.Division. .-`-.��--� •. ���.,.��,��.��.
• Rosemount,Minnesota' - � ST.°"�.,.�""�°t"u," .
n�r.a�.,aa
• . . . .. � ..�5:'*' � . . . � ' ... ' . � OGOWRO�ABIOOi1L1U-eWM['M-rIBFNiMp(IGGi{ �
. .. .. .�. . , ' . . .
� . .. . . .. • .
�. . ` . . ' . .f . . , . .
�.
� .. ...
. . •'
. � . .. + . . . .
.;. . . wr
. . . . •- .
,. .
. . .. . . -. • . _ . �, .
:-
:
. . w . .: ,, , y � . . . .
e =
• _ ._ _. ..... .. . _.. . • . . , . �.._ ,?ri!' • . . .. ._. ' , ..