HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.h. County Road 42 Principal Arterial Update . , CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SIIMMARY FOR ACTTON
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JULY 6, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: COUNTY ROAD 42 AGENDA SECTION:
PRINCSP,AL AR:TERIAL STATUS UPDATE OLD BUSINESS
PREPARED BY; STEPHA.N JILK, CITY ADMINISTRATOR AG�T��� �
ATTACIiMENTS: PRESENTATIOIV MATERIAL APP VED Y.
COUNTY PROPOSED AGREEMENT
On Tuesday, June 22, the Dakota County Physical Development Committee of
the Dakota County Board considered the recommendations of County staff to
put into place interim guidelines for spacing requirements of accesses on
CR 42 as if it were to be a principal arterial.
At that meeting the Physical Develapment Cammittee voted 3 to 2 in favor of
allowing the development of the two proposed plats, the business park and
CMC, under current guidelines. This recommendation was passed on to the
full County Board on Tuesday June 29th.
At that full board meeting Iengthy discussion was held on this matter with
the result being that the full County Board voted 5-2 in favor of the
follawing;
1) That the two developments would be allowed a full access at a quarter
mile spacing from the railroad crossing. This will require that the
existing entrance on to CR 42 be moved about 200 feet east of where it is
currently located. This may cause a problem with grading because of the
lower areas of the proper�ies, especially on the north side. This will
probably not be a insurmountable problem.
2) That both plats be redrawn to provide a more direct, seeond access, to
Biscayne ave. This is being requested to provide a access to Biscayne if
the full access to CR#42 is ever closed.
3� That the property owners of the property north and sauth of CR#42 be
required to sign an agreement with the County whieh would eliminate the
County' s financial �iability for closing the fu11 intersection on CR#42 if
that does occur. This requirement is not acceptable and I believe should
be discus.sed further.
The County is offering alternatives to this final requirement and that is
to place a 3/4 intersection at one quarter mile spacing which would allaw
all turning movements except a "left out" turn from both developments.
Th.is option should be considered further.
I will be pleased to discuss this matter further but at this time I believe
the City should continue to work with CMC and on its own business park plan
to decide on which option will work best.
RECOl�lENDED ACTION: None.
COUNCTL ACTIONs
i�� o osevycou�c�
PH4NE (&12)4234411 2875-ta5th Strest West,Rosemount,Minnesota MAYQR
FAX (672j 4Y35203 MailiAg Addreu:
Edward 8.McMenomy
P.O.Box 510,Hosemount.Minnesota 5506&0510 COUNCiLMEMBERS
Sheila Kiessen
James(Red)Staats
June 21, 19 9 3 . HB�ry wincox
Dennis Wippermann
ADMlNlSTRATd�i
Stephan Jilk
Dcar_ Maher, Chaix
Dakota County Physical De�relapment Committee
Western Service Center
7.4955 Galaxie Avenu�
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
Dear Mr. Maher:
On June 22nd the Physical Development Committee af the Dakota
County Commissianers will consider recommendations from County
s�aff regardir�g the designation of CR 42 as a principal arteriai
and tYie adoption of interim guidelines for spacing of aceesses on
highways with this designation.
The City af Rosemount has reviewed the alternatives, as
recommended by County staff, and requests that the County
consider only one possible action in this ma�ter,
The position that the City of Ros�mount is requesting that the
County takes is two fold:
1. That the County reconsiders its request to desigr�ate CR 42
as a principal arterial; and
2 . That the two preliminary plats that the Plat Commission has
reviewed, the CMC xesidential development and the City' s
Business Park, be allowed accesses under the current spacing
guidelines which would allow a full intersection between
Biscayne Avenue and the railroad crossing on Highway 3 and
right-infright-out accesses at one-eighth m�le spacing.
The.. �ity- Port Authority and Planning Com�-nissian have taken action
in support of this position.
The reasons the Cit� has taken this position and is ma.king this
request are the follawing:
1. The City has been planning for and working with Dakota
County for several years on the development of CR 46 (160th
St. ) as the majar cross county roadway. This planning was
at the direction of Dakota County and with the intention
that CR 46 (160th St. } would relieve traffic off of CR 42 as
it was being develaped as a minor arterial and as a
collectar street.
�ver•�;t�iveg's �omis�g �� C�'11,osemouhl��
�
CR 42 Principal Arterial
June 21, 1993
Decisions reflected in the City� s Comprehensive Guide Plan,
recently completed and sent on to the Metropolitan Council
for approval, were based on 160th Street being the major
east-west county corridor through Rosemount and CR 42 being
allowed to develop as it has with current county road access
guidelines.
Designation of CR 42 as a principal arterial with access '
restricted to those ��proposed guidelines° for principal
arterials, will severely affect the City� s Guide Plan and
development of plats already being reviewed such as the CMC
Heartland and City of Rosemount Business Park.
It is the City�s understanding that CR 46 was to be a
principal arterial under the work that was approved for the
Highway 35W and CR 46 interchange and that the Metropolitan
Council understood this to be the plan for this xoad and
might not otherwise have approved this interchange,
2 . The County has requested that CR 42 be designated as a
principal arterial and this classification was adopted by
the Minnesota Department of Transportation. But, the
Metropolitan Council is only now reviewing the proposed
additions �o �he Principal Arterial System to see if these
highways, as currently developed, eould meet the criteria of
such designation. The Caunty proposes to regulate the City
by a "proposed - interim - potentially - yet to be approv�ed
designation. °
It is not fair for the City of Rosemount to be caught up in
this process and held hostage by regulations that are not
yet determined or to be held hostage on potentially
valuable, well planned out development, until this
designation process is fully complete.
3 . Dakota County has not amended its own transportation plan to
reflec.t either. the designation of County Road 42 as a
principal arterial or proposed access spacing guidelines.
The County is suggesting that even if the guidelines; as
proposed by County staff, are adopted now, they would be
temparary until the Dakota Caunty Transportation Plan is
updated.
The City believes that current spacing requirements should
be followed and �that the County should be working more
closely with all cities affected by potential revisions to
these guidelines.
2
CR 42 Principal Arterial
June 21, 1993
To cause the City to follow °gotential and temgorary«
guidelines could be less than effective, in the I.ong �term
and may be devastating to proposed develapment now under
consideration.
4. On March 1, 1993 the Dakota County Plat Commission took
under consideration two pre2iminary plats in Rosemount wzth
accesses to CR 42 . On June 21 the P1at Commission
considered a third.
On Ma.rch lst the Dakota Cvunty Plat Commission provided
written comment to the City indicating that those two plats,
CMC Heartland and the City' s Business Park wauld be allowed
access to CR 42 under current county spacing guidelines.
This would have been acceptable to the City.
On May 24th the County provided additional comments '
indicat.ing that CR 42 had been designated a principal
arterial and .these two plats artd future plats requiring
access to CR 42 may be subject to proposed spacing
guidelines for principal arterials.
The City finds the seeond response unacceptable and more
over unreasonable since these two projects are in the final
stages of planning and received the review and appropriate
comments on access spacing on Ma.rch 1, 1993 .
5 . The report �o the commissioners, f-rom County staff,
indicates that the desa.gnation o� CR 42 would provide a
consistency in spacing of prineipal arterials within the
Twin Cities Metropolitan Area.
The City believes that, following a review of the principal
arterial system, existing and proposed, for the Metropolitan
Area, that the designatian of specific roadways as principal
arteri�l �and minor arterial is much more a facet of good
transportation planning than it is a function of spacing.
Designation of CR 46 would seem to make much more sense,
from a land use and transportation planning development
aspect, though it is a mile south of CR 42 . This is why the
City of Rosemount has canta.nued its support of CR 46 as the
cross county roadway and not CR 42 .
3
• CR 42 Principal Arterial
June 21, 1993
Because of these reasons and so that the City of Rosemount may
continue to work with Dakota County to develop a strong program
for City and County transportation elements, the City asks that
the County consider our two request.
The City stands ready to discuss this and other planning issues
with you and asks your consideration of our requests.
Sincerely,
.
Step n Jilk
City Administrator
cc: Dakota County Commissioners
Dave Everds, Dakota County Physical Pianning . .
Mayor McMenomy and Rosemount City Cauncilmembers
Cathy Busho, Planning Commission Chairperson
Ed Dunn, Port Authority Chairperson
Lisa Freese, Planning Director
Bud Osmundson, City Engineer
John Miller, Economic Development Coordinator
_ _ �.
4
CITY OF ROSEMODNT
DAKOT3L Ct3tTNTY, MINNESOTA
RESQLIITION 1993- 67
A RESOLUTION TNDYCATING A POSITIDN AGAINST
DESTGNATION OF COUNTY ROAD 42 ,
AS A PRSNCIPAL ARTERIAL
WHEREAS, Dakota County has requested, through the Transportation
Advisary Board, the designation of certain highways in Dakota County
as Principal Arterials; and
WSEREAS, this designation will be placed on roads in the City of
Rosemount including CSAH 42 from Diamond Path to TH 55 and TH 55 from
CR 42 to Hastings; and
WHEREAS, the guidelines for access to these raadways designated as
_ principal arterials are more restrictive than other county roads, and
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has been working with Dakota County for
several years in planning CR 46 (160th Street) as the major "cross
county" roadway to reduce traffic on CR 42 with existing and plainned
development; and
� WHE�EAS, the City of Rosemount has been developing its Comprehensive
Guide Plan Update for over two years and has provided copies to
"Dakota County for comments which plan includes a "Transportation
Element -Streets and Highway Plan" ; and
�++THEREAS, Dakota County has not provided comments on the plan which
designated CR 42 as a minor arterial and based many other development
assumptions on the "minor'� designation; and
WHEREAS, the City o€ Rosemount submitted two preiiminary plats to the
County' s P7.at Review Committee in March of 1993 which provided access
to CR 42 under existing access guidelines; and
WBEREAS, the Caunty' s Plat Commission indicated that access would be
allowed under current spacing guidelines; and
WHEREAS, two months later the County indicated that the "Principal
Axterial" spacing guidelines would apply restricting access to these
deveiopments; and
WHEREAS, the process to designate CR 42 as a "Prineipal Arterial" did
not provide for the County and cities to work together on this
decision; and
WHEREAS, cities throughout Dakota County, not just Rosemount may be
severely effected by this designation and the planning that these
cities have done assuming a minor arteriai status; and
' RESOLUTION 1993 -
WHEREAS, Dakota County has a policy on having cities pay 45% of
improvements to caunty raads and should have opportunity to have an
effect on deciding matters of this nature,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT' RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City af
Rosemount does hereby request that Dakota County reverse its position
on this designation of CR 42 as a principal arterial; and
BE IT FURTBER RESOLVED, that Dakota County allow a complete fully
controlled intersectian on CR 42 between Biscayne Avenue and Highway 3
and the existing �spacing guidelines for the two proposed developments
in Rosemount.
BE IT FORTBER RESOLVED, that if Dakota County continues with this
designation, and if modifications to CR 42 and adjacent properties a�e
required, the City will be made whole financially by Dakota County for
any costs.
ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 1993 . ,
�� /C7•
E. B. McMenomy, Mayar
ATTEST:
.
us M. wals , City Clerk
Motion by: W� � Icox Secanded by• Kiassen
Voted in favor• McMenomy, Staats, Klassen, Willcox, Wippermann
Voted against: None�.
2
�
j
�
GARY N.S7EVENSON,R.1..S. ;
�� /'\ ���..{ ���1 \J �� LANO�N ORMA iON ti1flECT4R
LJ 1 \�J 7 / � �.1�,.% i r + (6i2)891-7087
SURVEY d�LAND lNFORMAT�t?N DEPARTMENT FAX 1612)89t-703t
. ' 1d955 GALAXIE AVENUE APPLE VALLEY,MINNES07A 55t24-8579
.���p � . . . . . .
"''7N�''`::...�•il
�4: ,�'.i"`
' March 1, 1993
City of Rosemount �
: 1167 - 145th St. E.
Roseniount, MN 55068
ATT: Stephan Jilk, Administrator
ROSEMOUNT BUSINESS PARK
Dear Mr. Jilk:
The Dakota County Plat Commission met an March 1, 1993, to
� consider the Concept Plan for the ROSEMOUNT BUSINESS PARK.
Said plan is adjaeent to C.S.A.H. NO. 42 and FROPOSED CO.
RD. 46 and is, therefore, subject to the Dakota County
Contiguous Plat Ordinance.
County guidelines require the following:
C.S.A.H. N0. 42 - Access is limited to one opening between
Biscayne Ave. and the railroad. This �ccess must be loca�ed
1/4 mile east of the railroad. The guidelines require 75
feet of half right of way.
Proposed Co. Rd. 46 - The existing acCess to 160th St.
should be consolidated to meet the County guidelines of 1/4 •
mile spacing. The guidelines require 60 feet of half right
of way.
The Ordinance reauires resubmittal of the preliminary and
final plats before a recommendation is made to the County
Board. �
No work shall commence in the County right of way until a
permit is obtained fram the County Highway Department.
Sineerely,
�• '
t .
Gar X� Stevenson
Y
Dakota County Surveyor & Land Information Director
Secretary, P1at Commission
GHS/vf
cc: Short Elliot & Hendricksann .
n .- - - - •--• � ~ AN EQUAI OPPORTUNITY EMPIOYER
- . . - .- %�:�f."I l?n�!'t1+o enittr,rnt�
D� K�Tf� � GARY H.STEVEN50N,R.L.S.
Q UN T Y �NQGN O�M T OM OIRECTQR
{612)891-7087
SURYEY& LAND INFORMATION DEPARTMEMT FAX{612}89t-703t
• ' • 14955 GALAXIE AVENUE APPtE VAILEY,MINNES07A 55124-8579
,��„�>.,,�
. �'• • , :
� .a`'
'Y,t,��'.'¢�a,
i�
�t�� .'-
t�$.,�1�
+
� .
May 24, 1993
City of Rosemount
1167 - 145th St, E.
Rosemount, MN 55068
ATT: 8tephan Jilk, Administrator
ROSEMOUNT BUSINESS PARK
GMC HEARTLAND PARTNERS
Dear Mr. Ji3k:
The Dakota County Plat Commission met on May 24, 1993 , to
cansider the preliminary plats of ROSEMOUNT BUSINESS PARK
and CMC HEARTLAND PARTNERS. Said plats are adjacent to �
C.S.A.H. NO. 42 and are, therefore, subject to the Dakota
County �ontiguous Plat Ordinance.
In April, the Met Council approved the designation of
C.S.A.H. 42 as a principal arterial. In addition, the
Commissioner of MN/DOT recently designated C.S.A.H. 42 as a
route on the National Highway System. These actions will
have impacts on the access to C.S.A.H. NO. 42 . The
implications of these actions have not been fully addressed,
but will be presented to the Caunty Board at their June 22nd
Physical Development Board Committee (PDBC) meeting. Since
it is likely that the County's current guidelines may be
changed, the Plat Commission tabled review of these plats
until after the PDBC meeting. The Plat Commission
recommends that no further action be taken on these
developments at this time.
. No work shall commence in the County right of way until a
permit is obtained from the Caunty Highway Department.
Sincerely,
%�
'� �. � f
F
Gary . Stevenson
Dakota County Surveyor & Land Information Director
Secretary, Plat Commission
GH�Jvf
cc: Bob Beyers, Short Elliot & Hendricksonn
Bud Osmundson, City Engineer
Printed on Recycled Paper ��y�
f`•`��s ��UtC$O�/ AN EQUAI OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
. � �o/i7/y3 00:39 liAKOTA COUNTY-WESTERN SERV. CTR. ��1
' P S Y B I C A L � D E Y S L O P M $ � T 8 O � A n C � M M I T T $ S
' AEQIIlSBT �'I'OR C4MMITTLS RS'V'I3�iP
D29IBIObIs PHYBTCAL DSVBLOPMSJ�iT k�*$TIitG DATSt JLUi• Z2� 3993
DE�.'ARTMSNTZ $YAH'WAY E�PENDITITRE
Contaat F�rsoAz DRVZD L. EQERDS Btidgg'�aQ
��1*ph�n• �b�r: B91-7�02 Lion-�+•+�
Pr�par�a Byt PSTB 80R$NSQDT - . �
. ' p�671 M ot 4�0°'
. . taa�m�m Y.c�°^
W brandtaxtre�ngm f*�"�` � `
ZTEMt GONTI�I7�US PTsAT �RDINANCE t Pagt'1t. �o, ,�.,,..
� PRxNCIPAL ARTSRIAL Ti�GHWAY9 �� '"�"'� p,,oro«. �r' l�
Refarrad b�: l�tanaqa�mant T�am � F8"� �
--� o•p►.
� �
ax� Z'}� �
HACICOROU�2D t ; - �
Tha Dakota County �oard of Comntiss3.oners in 19s7 appraved a functianal.
classification �cy.stem (see Attachment A) updating the system which was part
of the z9sa Dakota �ounty Transportation P�.an. The syste�t basad on the
1982 plan included such raadways r►s TH 55 and csAH 42 ag minor arterial
highways. The--�previoue system includ�d CSAH 32 b�tween TFi 13 dnd TH 52 as
a Prin�ipal :Arterial xfghway.. �
The Metrapo2itan Council is aurrent2y updating their Transportatian
D�ve2op�nent Guide/Policy Plan: including revi�ions to the Principal Arteria3
systam. T�.t the request of the Bottrd, stafF was involved with the
development of the revisions ta the Principal Art�rial Syst�m. The
Metrapo�.itan coux�cil this spririg adopt�d a fur�ctional clr�ssiP�catian system
which it�cludes segments oP three Dakota County roads, as �eII t�s the TH 55
segments, as �rincipal Arterial xighwaye. The segmenta adapted were those
zecp�uq��id8d },aY Dakat$ County. This functional classification system was
also adop��d by the Minnesota Department of Tr�nspar�ation this �pring (see
Attachm�nt B) .
I'n Dslcata CQun�y, the ro�dwsys �dded to the ,Pr�nc.ip�2 Arter.fal ii.fghway
sys�em .inc�ude:
1. CSAH 42 �rom the Scott Coutl�y Xine to TH 55 in Rasemount
2. 7�H 5S from cSAH 42 3n Rosemount to TX 63 jn Iias�ings
3 . CSAH 23 tram CSAH 42 'Cfi TN 77 .i13 App1e VBZZey
�4 . TH 55 from th� Mendote Brjdge in M�ndota to TH 1�3/52 (La�ayette
Freeway) �Ln .tnver Grov� Ne.iqhte �
5. TH 55 Prom TH 52 �o CSAH 42
The�se zoute� provide spacing and roadway cantinu�ty to o�her Principal
Arterial Highwmys and are consi�atent with route ��stems throuqhout ti�e Twin
Cities me�rapolita� area. As the development of Dakota Caunty continues,
ths trafPfa demands on these roadwAys and the rer�iar�al eigni�ica»cg of
these roadway� continues to graw nt a very rapid pace.
The Conunissioner af Transportat�on also approvecl a pdrtion of the PrincipAl
Arterial Hiqhways �s roadways on the National Highway System (raadways of
na�ional signi.fi.cance) . The roadways submitted for inclusion in th�
National Highway system incivae section� o� CSAH 23, CSAH 32, and CSAH 42
whieh werQ bppx�vad as roadways tc� be inciuded in the Principal Arterial
Highway system (see A��achmenta c and D) .
� ��� b6i17i93 �8:40 : DAKOTA COUNTY-WESTERN SERV. CTR. 002
I�BUL'`8�CUb�CERNB r
Moe� o� the �rs�adways �classifi�d a� Principa3 Art�rials in �Ghe metro�area
�re �tate rae►ds. Hflwever, in nakota cdunty, develapmsnt ha►s oocurr�d very
re►pid�.y, resulting in � road network supporting regional transportation
which `iac under the �juriadiction af Da}cota County.
Tha curr�nt D�kota Caunty Transpor'�ation PZan v7as approved in 19e2 and
includ�s guidel.ines for regulat3,ng access and rir�ht-af-way based upon the
2o year $nt3.aipated trn��ic valuxpeg and an Dakata Caunty road neads. This
�Y���m doe� not take into acaount the functional clar>sification o�c futur�
�urie�dictional neeris.
The Metropo].itan Counail's revisio» oP the Trarisportation Developmant
Guide/Palicy Plan is unflarway. The couneil�s draft guicl�linas ihaicat�
that the roadways which are classi�iea as principai arterials must be
pratected from c1Q�e spacing of access ta acA�acent d�velopment by more
restrfctiv� m�aasures than are provided in the Dakata County guidelines.
The draft �ransportatfon DeveZopman� Gujde .ind�.cates th�t median crossjngs
are to be 1��t.ited to �nterssct.fon spac.�ng of one/half zu.i.Ze. Th� current
mc�st restrictiv� spacing in �he Dakata County guidelines is one-quarter
��-1� gP���-ng• Aa improvaraents ar� made to the roadway and as »ew
developxn�nt occuz� adja�ent to the raadway, Dakata county will need to
��p1Y the more re8trictive guidelirtes {r�ssuming their adoptian by the `�
Council) i� th� raadway ia �o remain on th� Principal Az�terial Systam.
Staff involvement at Metropolitan Council cam�nittees indicats that
tentative accass spacir►g guidelines are in tha proce�s of b�ing devaloped.
, It is ]. that u � 1 elo ad which r roadways
classifiad as Pr ncipal Arterial Highways rom dr veways to privata � '
developmen�s And will �prxca �ull intersectians with publia street� at one-
haif mi1.a distances. Tha access a3.lawed anto Principai Arterial Highways
wiZ1 b� viewed in two ma�or categorfes: 1) �reeway standards; a►nd 2)
Expressway standards. csAH 23, csAH 32, and CSAH 42 sagmants clase#.ffed as
Prfncipal Ar�eria�.s would fall under the Expregsway standards c�tegory.
z� �g��sx ���cted �hat partial accees to public streets wou2d he allowed at
one-e qh� th and at one--quarter mi].e �pacing. The partia�. accec�g could
cans3st of right-injright-out a� one-eighth mfle spacing tznd t-igh�-in/left-
in/xigh�-r�ut r�� one-quarter mfle spacing. This �ype af accegs would provide
directfon t� cit�.es reviewing undeveloped nreas to no� Pocus pr�.mary access
an�o the Principa�. Arterial Highway ar�d pravide �or traffic cir�ulatir�n
z�way from the highway as muoh as pa.:;si.ble. .
Tha b�►kota Cau�x�y Trr��nsportAtion p�.an is curr�ntl bein u dated and is
��peG � o b� rou o�e e Board at the end of 993 . This plan must
�M�i••�•= ,�aa�u=�� �o Ar�.ng �G s roa waya c nss e� �,g Principal Arterial,
which are unde�r the iuriadiction of Dakota Countiy, ta the gtz�ndards af �►
Prin�ipal Arterial roadway. Some of• the problems which have baen caused by
the rapfd development in Appla Vall�y and Burnr:vilie cou.�d be aastly and
disrup�ive ta change �ince th�t devalopment focused sa heAvily on GSAH 42.
RdSEMOU1+tT BUSINESS PAR,I{ � CMC HEARTLAND FARTNERS
Tne Plat Ccamtpission reviawed preliminazy p3at� for Rosemount Businassc park
{�sea Attachm�nt� E, F, �, and H} a�nd for CMC Heart�.�nd PartnerQ (gee
Attachmant x) at their meeting or� May 24, 1993. The Commi�eion de�.ayed
� . 6o�17iy3 @2:40 . DHKOTA COUNTY-WESTERN SERV. CTR. �b3
action a� �hese pla�s �ue �a the impendi�g ahange� far regulating �ccesa
alang rou��� cl�ssitied as principai art�rials. �heae two sevelopm�nts
h�ve focu�ed thair main acc�as onto esAH 42 to an .in�ergect�on
. approxim�tely .110o� ea�t oP the railroad track� near TH 3 i� Rasempun�.
Thia in��rg�Ction is pZOpO�Ad as the m��or �cGess to t�e devalopments and
the city�s consultant expect� the fntersection ta b� sign�lixed at some
time when tra��ic builds to the required lev�ls.
2ha plat com�n�s�ion did review a concapt plan Zor �ha Kosemount Bu�in�ss
Park nt thair meeting on MarCh 1, 2993. At th�� me�ting the Plat
commissian r�sponded that the current �uidellne� would parmit an
intersaction ane/quarter mil8 east of the railroad tracks (sea Attachment
�} . The praposed design ineludsg a �ull intarsection with CSAH 42 which is
240' clos�r to th� raiiraad tracks than the current quidelines would per�it
and ov�r a quarter m�l� olaser than what will be �e�mit�ed under the new
guidelines beinq congid�re� by the Metropolitan Council. . This location
could ba cr�tical when future traffic conditions require a grade separa�ion
structure at the railroad crogsing.
The March i, 1993 Plat Com�ission meeting accurred prior to the develop�ent
of preZimi»ary guidelineg by the M�tropoli�an. Council for the Principal
Artari�l Sygtem and prior to the Transportation D�p�rtment adopting the .
Nat�onal Highway Syst��. Followin� the March 1, 2993 Pl�t Commission
meeting, praliminazy guidelinse regulating access �o Principal Axtiarial
roadways have b�en developed by the stiate fo� inclusion in the
Transportation IIevelapm�nt Guide �nd the st�ff does not feel that i� ia
appropriate to apply the old guide�ines ala»g thege roadw�ys.
Staf� �ttanded the�Rosgmount Port Authority mea4ing on June 1, 1993 to
explain the actione of the Plat Comsnission. The City has warked �ith the
CMC xeartlarid �artnars and h�s devsloped an industrfal park concep� at
great length under the thought that thiB access wou3d be approved (sea
Attachment K) .
W�iilcs the RQsamount plat reqttests raise the issue af haw to hand3e aCCess
issues in the interim between the draft Metropolitar� Council .guid..lines far
Principnl Arterfala an8 the. revfsion of the caunty gufdelinea (astiivated to
be about a six-mon�h period) , simi2ar is�ues aould em�rga in Apg1e Valley,
BurnsviZle and Ettgan.
Fall:ow�.�g� �re possible Actions by the Courtty:
1. Approve the� requ�sts fflY" �HGCB88 as submitted; or
2• . Apprave a►n ' interaeatic�n accordi.ng to current County guidelines (a ft121
int�r�$�t�,�n wauld be �12owed ona-quart�r mila eagt aP the railroad
crossing 2�0� eaet oP the location requestad� ; or
3 . Adapt temporary acce�s spacing gu,ide2i»e� which would parm�:t pl�ttting
o� property with �uZl �.ntersection spaaing of one-ha3�' miZe. These
cluidelines would perxpit partial aecess at closer spacing (right�
in/right-out a� or,e-eighth mil.e spacing ar�d l+aft-in/right-in/righ'��out
at one 4uarter mile apacing�� otr" .
4• pltace a �tix month mar�tar�.uut on approvinq a2.1 plats along these routes
unti� r�ew guideiinas are $dopted (aix manths) .
-E
� • � �bil?i93 �2:41 DAKOTA COUNTY-WESTERN SERU. CTR.
�aa
stAf� recozara$nds tha� the Coun� tr�ka a .
Rr��ssmou�� taking rz�,�, pogsible measuz�aa tofldevelopWthes� pra�er��.as� in
Puture ra�dwexy �.,��u�� on Cs2�H 42 �w�.l� nat ba sevarelyr oompromtsed. Tha
developments ahauld focu� �he�.� �avices�s onto CBAH 42 att His � �o '�2�t�t
�?'Rf ��rv�as.mtnnt� cttyne Ava�nua.
� ii.iiYY�7LL7L7�7a�AilvitS/StJRCZR6M�Tt c�inn 7 '1TTfl * . ` . . . �
It iac s�ugggsted thati th� Physical DeveXopment Board Committee e
thAt the Cou»ty g�ard adopt the fallowing. regolution, r aomzttend
w�r�R�s; Dak�ta eounty h�zg suppar�ad the xunctlonai cias�aifiaati�n g
which inc2ud�g ��r��in se ygt�q
gments oP CSAH 23., CSAH 32 and CSAH� 42 ae
Pr�nci�nl Arter,ial, Highways� �nd
WH�REAs, the� ��a�a Of M!nnesata hac� approved thes+a se �nt�
Arteria� H,��hW�ys in their �unctionaz classific�tion system and
Minnesota bepartmant o� Tranapor�a�ion has iriclude 5�► a$ principaZ
h3.ghways in th� Naticnal Highw�y� system� nnd �h$
d tha�a �egm� :�ts o�
z�'xE��s, tha M�tropQlitarr �ouncf 1 is in the
Trt�nspartatian Development Guidc�/PolScy P1anPwhich�includestgu�c��fn�s Yo
pratectirtg �ew principal arterial highwayg from high nwmbers a� . r
iht�r8eotian� and access pa�nts� and
���3, bakotr� County is in ths rocess of updt►ti�g thg Dakota
xrans��rtation Plan, �z,�� Count
�+'HERF..Ag, the segznants aP CSAH 23� CSAH 32, A»d CSAH 42 ro as
Principa7. Ar�srial Highway connect vi.ta�. P P ed aa
pravide continuity and spacing t� other Principal ArterialtH &nd reqio� and
is cons�,gtent with the ras o t s Twin C t es Me ropo tan r�xe� an
i hwa* � which
WHEREAs, orflerly davelapmant ad�acent to these roa , �
provide transpo=tation systems which w��.1 su dwa�rg is important to
grawth and will provide for the �ransportation�nsed�ofmpakotagCountinuec�
adoqixa��ly 3�nti�, the� tuture. y
N�W, �HF.RLFORE, 8E ZT RESOLVED, That the Dakota Count Plati
direated ta r�visa the acc�ss s ac�.n Y Commis�ion be
subm�.tted which are cont�guQus to the o�.�,Qwinggroadways?i������ t° P�ats
�S� �3 from CSAH� 42 to TH 77� anQ ,� - • _�
CSAH 32 �rom TH 33 t� 2-33E; and
CSAH 42 from Scatt County to TH 55. .
23E IT FVRTHF•R $E�OLyED� Th�t the �eV�.��d
street interssctian spacit�g a� fallows; �idel.inas provide for �ub�fc
�u12 intersection spacing ot one-halt mile; �Tid
le�t-in/riqht-i�/r'ghti--aut intergaation �pacing of o�e..
m33e, �nd quarter
right-injright-aut intersectian spacl�ng ot one-ei hth
. g mi1e.
� � � 00/17/9s �8:42 DAKOTA COUNTY-WESTERN SERU. CTR. 0@5
E IT FURTHER RESOLV That the revi�ed idslines are temparA �nd Wi1�
be rev�ewed ag par� of the up�ated Da bta County Transpar a on Flan.
Louis J. Breimhurst, DTRECTOR David L. Everds, P.E.
PHYSICAI� DEVET.UPM�INT bIVISIflN HIGHWAY ENGINEER
Brandt Richardson
COUNT'St ADMINISTRA,�I`dR
DLEJPLS/mjl
Attar.hments: A-K
Juna22-1 � � .
,
I
- � ,
. I
, _ .
- _ .` . _ I .. ,
� .
1
�
�
�
,
_ �
�
�
. �6i29i93 14:56 DAK�TA COUNTY-WESTERN SERU. CTR. �02
]IBMOR � �TDIII�
. DA�oTA C+�IIbI*�7t ATTOIt�BY'8 OFFSCB
JAMLB C. BACS.ST�f3l�
Q4V�1'Y'Y ATTCRNEY
ctv=r, aTqrsxox
Dakcta Couaty Jud3cial Csnt�r � ���/�`�+�!.
Haatf,nq�, �iansac►ta 55033-Z392 ' S
�elepl�aae: (sZaa ��g-{4�e
AATE: June 29, 1993
s0: Commis�ioner. Aonald Maher
FRqMs Mike Ring, A�sirtant County AtitOrney���
BtT�JEC�: Propased Draft pf �Cov�nants tar Pre3iminary Pl.ats in thc�
City bf Rosem�unt
oux� Ff1e Na.
covE�
�E�A3. the c#.ty af Rosemaun�, a Minnesota Municipa7. Corparatian, is
�he awner in fee simp�,� cf a pa.�cel o� real prapext� iaaated in r�akc►ta
�cun�y, State o�' Mir►nesota, described, as (leg�i to govern, property
located �.n N� i/4 of Section 32, Township 115 North, Range �.9 Wes�} ;
and
WH�tFAs, the said City is� propasing ta pl,a� said property �or
deve�.opmerit purpo�es; and
wHEREAs, th� � south side o�E the subject proper�y Pronts on Da3�ota
County State Aid Highway No. a2, which is des�gna�ed as a pr�.nc�,pal
ar�erf.al highway by the State o�' Minnesv�a; �nd
�E�A$, th� ca.ty is propo�ing const�uction ot a �ull in�ersection
].acated apprvx�.mately ane-�our�h mile east of the raiiraad track
�.ocated �n �he east side of Minne�ota Trunk Highway No. 3 in the City
af � Ra��ntour�t, which �.nterC�ectian 3�s of concern ta �ha Dakota County
Board o� Commfss��nera in triat said inters�ation may be 'incansis�en�
With gu3deli.nes ta b� �dopted for develvpments alcsng princip��.
�rt�rial h�.ghways andjor maybe come a matter oF cancern to public
safety �or vehicles u�ing County stat� Aid xighway 4z; and
��REAS, the Dakota CQunt Board ot Commissioner� must approve and sign
a31 pla�a for real esta�e d�v�lopments af propert�.es lying w�.thin the
baundari�s o� Dakot� County.:
�
N�W, THEI�EFORE, the Gity of Rcssemount, for itselt, i�s heirsr
�uccessors and as�i.g�as for a11 properti�s located wi.thin �he
bourMa�ri�s o� a plat identi.�ied as daes her�by
. , , 06i29i93 14:57 DAKOTA C�UtJTY—WESTERN SERU. CTR. 0�3
� �
covtnr�nt and ag���, tha� in �f'i� ev�nt the AA}CO�a Cou�l'�� Bo3rd of
Commis�fvn�srs �dete.�ma.n�s that elo�ur� of �he med�an ta be con�tr�ucted
�n �ounty st�te Aid H�,ghway �2 �Pprox�.mat�ly Qne-�ourth mile �ast of
the railraad �ra�k lying r►ri the s��i� �id� of minn��sota Truz�k Hiqhway 3
ir� the Gity a� Rosemaunt sha�ld be closeci to z�
Caunty state, Highway 4Z or as a matter of public�sag tiy forev�hicles
using �ca�.d roadway, s�s determined by t2�e sole discx��lori ag �he� Dakota
County Bc►ard o� commissioners, said med�.an may be closed by order o�
the Daka'�� County Board o� Commissfaners withc►u� paymen� og
Campensation ta any prapertis�s lacat�d withiri said plat.
CTTY 4F R4SEMUUNT
A�y:
. ICs:
�ulascrib�d and sworn to b��Qxe ma
thfe day �g
, 2993.
Not�ry Pub c
M/Mahcr
i