Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3.b. SOAR - Dual Track Airport Planning Process Update CITY OF ROSSMOIINT SX}3CUTIVE SU�+IARY FOR ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 4, 1993 AGENDA ITEbi: SO.AR / Dual Track Airport AGENDA SECTION; Planning Pracess Update , Department Heads Reports PREPARED BY:Stephan Jilk AGSNDA � �� ATTACffi�iENTS: None APP O B : r.c_.� / This is the monthly report from representatives of SOAR and City staff on the Dual Track Airport Planning Frocess. REC01�2ENDED ACTION: None COUNCIL ACTION: � � a , . . . � � � � � � � . . . �� . . . . MEMORANDUM TO: Sheila Klassen FROM: Kevin Carroll, SOAR Vice-President RE: SOAR Report for 5-4-93 City Council Meeting As I mentioned during our last telephone conversation, I will not be able to present a SOAR report at the 5-4-93 City Council Meeting, due to the illness and recent hospitalization of a family member. I would therefore appreciate your assistance in distributing copies of the attached re�olution, which was unanimously adopted by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners on April 20, 1993. As you may recall, three potential sites for a new airport are still under consideration, and one of those sites (Site 6) is quite close to downtown Rosemount. A map or diagram of Site 6 has been attached for reference. As the attached resolution indicates, the °airport development area" may potentially include any property located within three to five miles of the boundaries of the proposed airport site that is eventually selected. It is my understanding that the Metropolitan Council has taken the position that under the provisions of the Airport Development Act, the Metropolitan Council can begin --` regulating the "use and development" of the "airport develapment area" within 120 days after the Metropolitan Council gives final approval to the site that is selected by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) . Under the current timetable, the MAC will select the final proposed site on or by January 17, 1994. Accordingly, if the Metropolitan Council has its way, it could conceivably begin implementing restrictions regarding zoning ordinances, building codes, subdivision regulatians and other aspects of land use and development for a sianificant�ortion of Rosemount on or about May 17, 1995, even though a final decision on the airport relocation issue will probably not be made by the Legislature until 1996. In short, unless the Metropolitan Council can be persuaded or forced to adopt a different position with respect to this issue, the Metropolitan Council could conceivably restrict or even prohibit certain types of development in parts of Rosemount far nearly an entire year in order to prepare for a new airport that may never be built. I was fairly certain that you and the other members of the City Council would be interested in this issue, and I will keep you advised regarding future developments (no pun intended) . : . , _ ,, � �oa�.b o� cc�vrr�x Co�M�ssroNERs : � . DAKQTA GOUNTY. MINNESUTA DATE��. 20,� 199� RESbLUT1L7N NO. 93'-3F3� Motion by Comrr�3asfo�ner Iiarxi� Secanded by Commiaa3oner Jen�sen ,. �F WxERE1�S, th� A1.rpart Dave�:apment Ac�, p�,�r��d f.n �hs +aar�.y 1�970�a r�s Mf.nrt�s�ata �5tatut�s 473.636-473,641, direct� that t�ith�,n �,�;Q d+�iy� a�ter the M��ropol.it�n Counc,�l appx�oves a new m�t�or t�irport �ite atel6�etad by th� M�txopolita» Airpert� Commis�ion, tha Counc�l mu�t adopt cr�,�s►r�a aztd guide�.inet� Y'Q� the regul�fifan af u�� snd development o� the+ +�airpart dev��apment ar�a"S �rid WHE�tfiAS, ths ��a�.rpozt development area" isa def3.r�ed as a�.l ox a portian of property in th� m�tropozitan ared Qxtend�,ng out �ra� m�.l�ee� fx�cm th� propc►sed bou�dari�s of 'th• $ite or Qut �3�ve. m3.lea fxpm tha bdundarie� a� the a�,�e� �o px�vtect the► »atu��l r+�saurces o� �hs metrapolitart �rea; and wH�RFAs, the ��aa.rpor� developm+ant arear� criterfa and guideZ�.r�e� mr�y r�rlat� to var�ous lanci use and developme�nt cozttro�, me�tsures, inGluding � zaning axdi»anc�s, buf�.ding ao�e�, aubdiv�ax'on regul�tions, and af�iai�Z• �t�ps; $nd WHEREAs, �ollowing Mc�tropol�.tan Gc�unc�.�, apprcv�2 0� l.and use and d�ve�.opment oontral measures, no publio or priv�t�� u�� cantrary tQ i�Gs provfsfans may be made af thr� praperty to wh3.Gh i� applies ar no gpeci�al us�e pe�mzt or v�r�.�nce maY be gra��ed �.h�� suthariz��t a us� o£ d�ve3.ogment cont�rar� �o the Cou»�il�s airpart dav��.apment area" criter�.a at�d guid�liz�es; and . t�HEREA�, the A3rgart Devela�ment Aat requires the M�tro,pol�tan Caunc�.1, to es�ablish a�rcr��t floise aone� and thos� aft�cted loc�1 gavernments �o adopt the necessary contral mea�ure� �o prev�nt the use, can��ruc�iaz�, or imp,�ovem�r�t of pxcpexty �nd bui:3.ding� sula�eat ta n 1ev�►l af noise in exce�� ' o� the aac�ptab�,e level estt�bl�.shed bY tihe Coun�il �or that 1$i�d use, and XES NQ N�rrls � Narris Meher � .. Maher ' 8�►taglis 3' Batsglla Richard6 � Richards 7u ra�e r X Turnar Jonsen X Jencen loeding _ � , Loeding State a►f Minnesota County oi llakota 1,Jos� L. Kandati,C1ork w tho Daard of Li►� Guunt,y of 1Jskota, utxte af Mfnne�cst�, do��cr�b,y certify that�� have camparpd the fore,gaing copy�of a�re�aiution witl�th�original rninutes of the�,roceedings of tl�e 8oard of Gcunry Gommissioner�,bako�t►County, Mirsnesota, at their aRssion held on thc-- �C1'�}'1 day�f �I'�".�,�,,,_ 1�3�r►uw on'file ir, the Cotu�ty Administrution Uepart�r�ent, und hav� found the eame C�t�a true nnd correct eop,y Lltereot. , � Wftaers Tr�y Ifund aRd offiCial�ea1 4f Uakots Cpunty this .......��_;__„�ny�f ,��.�! --- G�__ .r�� ' (:iPrk tn th< T?nF.a r s'r► ;.r-'----r — � "«"""'""" — � ...,�+�:;..' - . .:. ,. ., . .�. , ,�, _� .,v.;�,..�,.�.,�..�.�.o-..: ..:... . ....�,.,.,, _ �...�, . ..e ,:�«- ' t � `"' ,i...�&K,.. ' »,. `• `FY� '�F�+nws ..--k �"v v .L �1 �- :'�''- - .� � �. a � .�t +«'k k . ; �. '� ''�i^"'r: �...e.M4T^'�.. ..: f ., � � ' .. smrt.�'� � � .: ,a�rv�� l - _ �w�E' � #�'. se +9f'iY"^Y-#'Y�.t iM�@b,5^i'�4rs "'�wrs�t ,.'S£ . �+n ' dF9�'+'�`�" 1 'nm:� �^�rartz �,-F"-�%=.�h.r^% Z✓ A �+m� �c"*. ,.w.i' u�"'yy-e� a v..r r e. � -.. . ia. ': -3 � _ �� Aue►1�Traok� �1 < �� -� � � � u � , � _ , �_- .e ,. �,�.� . . ..�. _w.., � �. �� .� . � u. �a. _ �. � . � � _ _ � �4 M�.nna otn n T�s ialature ,. to r ex� Plannin+� Frooe�a w�s man8ata�d l�y th� 198A � � ino � �p�ions� `�� ta� ; (L� �� i�her �� rebuild�ng �� _. ': Minnea►pol�,s�-St.�� P+au1 - tnterr�ationnl Air�ort�� (MSP3�. aR the ma�ar metropoiitat� �- .airpar��;ar�.(��.,�,,r�loc��ing �a a� new me�or �regl�,aemant �irpox�` in . the � metropal�;�an xegian�r�-and=�� W ;� { � �"� �` �'� �`� ,�� ,��, �� :�,� �� -�� «;.�.aKx'r,�r�'� , '� x � s ...,�- ,.,t ti .H�N aw.-c- ' _� „�z��...«» `_ - .., ..�: .. .. .a ,_ ..-.>._ �.:,. .,'WH�REAS,�,,tihe��followinqg�y�Ar,_, .�h� �.99a� Minne��ot�t`.��g�.aXdtu�re enact�d � 199pN �„Mi�ne�sota�°��ws,��Chaptar : 44Q,- now codifie�d ag �,M3.nneso�a - Sta�ute 473 15g1,` ::which'�.� nllowed��-fo�c�°aearch :�� are+a -" pro��ct�.cn �_�b '��rastric�.�.ng-.-. �ev�lopment� �� ianconsist�nt�with da�✓e�o in �t ��,� � F St n�w major �irpor� w thir� �hat �r�a� and � ��:=�.�.�, � �,, � �� ~�":�� ~ �- : �'� a�.��-:.�, , ;� ,, �..� �� .�°�� ; «� .�-�< .�:: ,�.e�:�� . � �. �WHEREAs�; ths�M3:nnnabta�L+�gls�.stu�eru wi�.l'�na�`¢:.T�elect - az�e� of =�the� Duu1 M Traak x' Airport Flan�ing; �lterne�ivsg unti��,995,� � ;� � � F _� � _, � .� � }s��'� �,..�.� ,�.. : _-� .�:�. �F�., �*�� :� e ��._.�,�.:� � ..,,�: � . ,t „ � �._ . e. , -�.� � < � �� - �. � 1.� � L �. , � � .M.,t.� ,__,: �r ... , _ ,_. > ,�_: v - _ . ,. .� r � �- y ... � _�,x... � _ :�_ m�..�;.�. �, ��,x � � NoW; fitiEREFOR�� BE IT RESflLVED,� That th� Dakvte�� Caun�x �oard Qf Com�a►iss�.�oners ' main�e�f,n�� hat the Airpart : D�velopment�'`Aat ; doas not . �t'�d chauld »o� �taka affect;��until after ` the Minnesota L�g�gl�eture decide� s� p�rt ` of ' the Dual : Track. Ai7rport Pienz��g: procsas whetl��r to rebu3ld MSP or ralocate to a � new _ma�or �reglacement a3rport; �nd � � x�� ` 8�YAZT Ft�RTHER 1�SOLVED, That the Dakota County Hoax�d ct. Catt►m3.�s�.on� � . .' .�.� � rs dfrects sta�f w to. prepar� a ].et�e�r tc b� lorwarded to bath the M�tropoI.itan Council and the Matropolitan Airport� Catttm3.ss�,an �ta�3.ng �.t� po��tion and assertions witih r�garc� ta any pat�n�ia2 i.mp].�men�ation of tha A�.rport DeveZopment Act; and-� � �. • � , � � � :��-�- � . �. x .. .: � „,�, yyie_ d"�. ., m,. ��. �.;. , . ; �: _,x � F . -. .. � . .. -... , .-.,. ,�. �_ .. .�., - .:p��' r.c>...<a: .. ., , . . ..�., . . . �E �-:Sm-:, FURTFiER- .RESOLVED� , Th$� the ' Da�o�a � Cattnty Baard af Cammf.rc�.r►ners `autharizes �t� Chai]r, Cammiasiaries gteven G.: Lced3�g, to r�v3ew and ��gn the afar�menti.oned l+�ttc�re, , ;� � 1� 11�wJ I�w+�1 1w►+a+� O�r�r{ � �wwr� ar�.d �..rl �r�i�1 '�rr�iJ �..�1 �.r.rr.j '�t.J 1.r.r.� 1...r.�J 1....�.1 L._...J, t `��a� 'l � �� a i��'�d �t� � � a�� ' „ �� , z �.i;.� � . � - .. . . . � � �,' � . i �. ,: . . . . . ; } , {`��` t i � Y �A I(t ) F'�rC'�"��95.� � 3 �� •',. j�q � }4 -. . t t� � - �,, r .,� `:,�� w y�;. ��„�, n . � � ,��Ft�.�t��'��' `��,�� 1 .i�, r�� c / . + • • � • • • • , • • � � •' � . A .1 . �� _ , f \ � � � , � a �zS:Sz�f . �\ � V . � r : � tive T ( . � ��T�Pi K� �RQSEMOUNT �' ; � � �, h A . ; -- --- - -- .- _ �� Gj ; . . . : __ ��` . �Eg?ERt� PI EF�N Y.:.: J ` ,�•NaRt� 11 �1�1� � i�• �� y5 r . __ �.,. .. ' � ' 'I�A�O � 1J►- .% ��t�it�I t��1 ( --------- � �2SJ ----- -- —-�H • 1��'t��I t��t ------ � ��- `� � . . 2 J y,2 -,f� � Nin � nger � � � ,,,� �_�_ F , , � . C A ES �� ASTING� � A � B � � 48 j � _� _.1._ 're=" -- l-- -- L._.�_._ ------'T � r' � I�'� �"""�" � A 1 � � •'1t1'/rJA� TA I , �'..1 i �,v 4/ H 3!G � �:' �� sp v � ,�,, f .� i k`: W ��..h i �;L'�° � T� � � � ' �y 'r� I Q •Q,? a ; �� r,�� "#' �- V e r :i J ` � — f ► �h ' � -�- - __. Marsh n —— '� � ' e A I � ' , - , � , � � ; �o Empire ' �� ,� = i � - , � i .� '. z � �� ' r'• � �, ' �>� � : + , � .•1' ' `. -' l : �. � 3, � � -- __-- ------- --- o. o �� ' --�-- --- - ----�-- -_--- ct I j ' � � , . 0 � ( Y'".�:� e,�:.m,ilttiQ"�'� � j � � �VI�LI� I �� 1 � - I � _ '_� _ �-! ----- , . � � �E� ' 1 ' ' >, � { ; � I � r+ ' ( �, - � � d :�r � � � � A A/ 4 � ; � r ' ' ` � F!'t �R��'t!�'�'!t'f'�'ti-!t �� t,�t�...__'_ --.,_ : tt�-M1� ae�t I � . �,;� � ; �1LL,�a�.�'" � r _ AMPTON � 3: ve.� � _ � � � '� MIESVILLE V. —� --, , r-, r — 1 t�,�or,f,�� t �,, :, � ; 0 � 2 tr�ie �� .� t � � � .��. � � y , � �,� F ., ; i a � ,y �z', � �� w �� "�x :,;HMvl� 5 ��`t;��:,h��' w't„.d�.W�'�"�t ro�}#.«�1P,f,i�hp�k°'s,�,� '�a, .y�.. � � � o �� N . , , . x .,, _ a M � - `� + ��' Potential Site 6 �'�,rro��i r r � . . . . . . . . . � .� ' . . . . . .. .. � .. � . . . .. .. . . � �. . .. . . . ... � . � SC�IEDULE FOR SITE SELECTION; The tentative schedule of activities for site selection is: . � : Scoping DocumendDraft Scoping Decision Document (SDD) and Beginning of Comment Period) Mazch 1, 1993 � Public Scoping Meeting Mazch I8, 1993 � End of Comment Period - March 31, 1993 EQB Review/Comment on SDD May 20, 1993 � M1�C Adoption of SDD and � - Determination of Adequacy - June 21, 1993 Draf�Atternative Environmental Document (AED) :� � -:and Beginning of Comment Period August 30, 1993 Public Hearing(s) . . _.�::..�_: __ September, 1993 � - n f omment Period October 29, 1993 E ct o C � EQB Review/Comment on Final AED , ,, December 16, 1993 ... .. , ,. � , : .� �� -� , . . _ . ,.� ._ MAC Adoption of Final AED, Determination ' � , .�Y,.°�` T��Y �1>';� � of Adequacy, and Seiection of Sit� _ _ t,, ., _. . . . . , . .: :•-� . - ; � � � � u. � - � �� . .,�:��` °�� t "��,.;.�� .,� � ��; � '�� ,� - .� },�� ..�� x �� , � s .�� .� a�� , `� � �o �`" ��,t :s -�� -s- t.�� -,� <: -�• � ---- � - - � .- � . �sa.�.... '.+�`fs €-$��'e z�D") t «e � �;"*,rof 3Y°wa+r� px`A'st� �k#� �i,�s E �P«,��.r,�x,��-4.. i `�*�:Y`�.��' ��:��&�+� ^'�,ac,i �` � '- '- r r � _�� y�. . . , ,. . , � y�� x " T��i� �_� ��+ti.4=. �' '�..� � se��-w'x w ti' �"°� �r�5 tt '�."��;A�k�,�ra � c ''�..�.��. � �tce�ix � -`�t�s�, '*w .. � , � K�..sd n'W ';. �.v .�:> �� 5} k "^ , .. . ` '4 'at 3 � �'tL. � R; ¢rm*��e'.��'� t�-jt��+� �.�.�mw$ d�... .m- u ""s1. a„ � ^� �� 4?�� r� 3{§_ '�„ ,y�.:. �4�ty; �„ �i�' ,. �''` . �" �w...�'a}, �" �- ._ �.s,..�(-.,-r, __ �;�'":S'n:"�.,.� a ,w.t a.g.� �. r. .�.».,..a..�,_ _ ., rs - ., �H T. w, v�uar.�._., . . . _. ,-.t . . v . ., .. -� . ., .� `>":�', - - ��:�::� eus.�:,a} a�serms w¢e �t ,� �-a�A`t+i�ir'.�4`F�.s'ti:-��'� �3�..� ^t"�'L'�"+��k'.�T'��k�' . � ._- �� . . _ ' . � xk�. '� � s�.... : ;' a ";„c` 'rYS� st.-�». '"' o.s. :v. +1" z ...,,3, ��- .; ` ,.......d.qF.. s,.. iZ*r� „`t8.�:.- n ., .a� � � e.�. -. _ . .. ... ..,. .. , � ; : 4 .'�-_ � "�.. , .. . � ,� ; . ..: . -. .. , - - - � � �,aa��"� u- � +�s p. - xr �� - ` ,:. i,;.y� � �� .. . . � '� yra �"� .�, � X n �.� .s'.a.�'«x � i"�-,�.'r�c'��-�� t,_ «s�� v rs. .,,"r.� ,o.=.s" �'«- .�i. -�� ^�c.' ..Lk�a- �a. . . . : - . : ,, „ , :s+_ ,.- - ;� _ �,�- °, .. " �� . -. „ °" ^� . � �� _ .. __ .�. ' � � . . .. wa r r-�.c y�s�.e x ra u.�. � .,.w_�.. �+ .�x �:= wa ,r�y� s'� �"Sa.;:yy b,s„Fx,t y s a J. I-,T ..�'.��'€+a.i�' 'f& #nW!#f.�e' '4A'� �'A� t, vr c��43Gw 'P4 h'*�-: _�+`P'" �, . � � � i � »*--r° 's�^ �r �:� `. .��.�- . . . . ..: . . .: . � � �� e.,.._._..«, ., � ........:W.. .. . .. �.. � ,. .. ,_��... 4„ .,..� . .,.__ ,_, . . ... .. t TIiE AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT AGT, Minn. Stat §§ 473.636 - 473.641 �Within 120 days after the Metropolitan CQuncil approves a new major airport site selected by the MAC, the Council must adopt criteria and guidelines for the regulation af use and development�f the "airport development area." •The "airport developmeat area" is defined as all or a portion of the property in the metropolitan area extending out three miles from the proposed boundaries of the site or out ve mil from the boundaries of the site to protect the natural resources of the metropolitan area. •The criteria and guidetines may relate to various land use and development control measures, including zoning ordinances, building codes, su6division regulaEions, and official maps. The criteria aad guidelines must encourage controls for the use and development of property and the pianning of pubIic facilities to protect inhabitants of the airport development area from aircraft noise and to preserve natural underground water r�ervoirs and other natural resources of the metropolitan area. �The criteria and guidelines must be sent to each government unit with the authority to adc�pt land use and development controi measur�es applicable to the airport development azea Within 120 days after the receipt of the Council's criteria and guidelines, the affected government unit must submit to the Council whatever changes in its existing land use and development control measures the affected government deems necessary to make them consistent with the Council's eriteria and guidelines. The Council must review and approve each control measure within 120 days with whatever changes the Councii deems necessary to make it consistent with the criteria and guidelines. The tocal government then has 60 days to put the nece.ssary control measures into effec� •Following Councii approval o£land use and development control measures,no public or private use contrary to its provisions made be made of the property to which it applies. No special use permit or variance may be granted that authorizes a use or development contrary to the Council's criteria and guidelines. •The Council must also establish aircraft noise wnes and affected local governments must adopt the necessary control measures to prevent the use, construction, or improvement of property and buildings subject to a level of noise in excess of the acceptable level established by the Council for that tand use. �The MAC would be required, if funds are available, to pay any damages to property owners resulting frocn the.application of the development control measures. •The criteria, guidelines, land use, and development control measures must be consistent with the requirements of the Airport Hazard Zoning Act. •Government units located wholly or partly in the airport development area shall jointly study and decide upon a plan For the sharing oE property tax revenues derived from property located in the airport development area. ; , , i ;r f ; i , � ; i � � � � � � � . . . . . . . . . . � . ... � � . .i NEW AIRPORT SITE SELECTION STUDY ' � ; � � ; � SITE SELECTION ANALYSIS i � f I I ; 1 SITES 2, 3 AND 6 I � , • UPDATED SITE SELECTION C�tITERIA I • REFINED SITE LAYOUTS ' i � � , j ,, � , ; I � ; ', I �, � ; � , � ; �, ; , � � ; , ;, ; ; � April 13 and 14, 1993 . '� . �,, i ; , I � � , � , � ; � , - �.� ''� . I��, _=-1 �'• ,.-,` , ; +'�` -+.: - = - � - - ' . . _ - . - .� ..�. _- � Page i . Revised: 12—Apr-93 � DUAL TRACK AtRPORT PLANNING PROCESS NEW AIRPORT SITE SELECTION STUDY �� SITE SELEC710N ANALYSIS F/�E C T�:R:�� t�t T.E'.::E�1 A::: I, , A1i�ORT CHARACTERISTICS I' a'ERATIONAL EFF1CIEt�Y * Main nanways usage with max.aliowabie crosswind of 13 kna�s(%): * Main rurnvays usage with max.aliowabie crosswrc�d of 20 knots(%): ', * Average taxi distartce and associated annual c�st: ', * Average airsp�e vavei distance&associated average annuai cost: ,� --Arrival fixes to tem�inal airsp�e: ' �—Terminal airsp�e�o n,nway end: ', . --Departure snd aF runvvay to edge of terminai airsp�e: ' --Terminal airspace to departure fi�ces: * Mnual cost at high t�ific volume: * Loca!meieorobgicai c�nditlons that may negatively affect aUport operations I �4tR.SPAt�INTERACTION � * Degree of airsp�;e interaction with surraanding airports/airspsece('inciuding ' other ai�orts and�route swcwre): ' Si'TE EXi'ANDABIUTY * Ru�way expandabitiiy��al: � * Terminai are3 expand�ility poten�al: ' * Cargo&other facitility expanda#aility potential: ' * Site cons�traints due to su�nding features: SITE ACCESSIBILITY * Differentiai t�avel time ro airportfrom -- ' Minneapolis Ciiy HaIL• , Saint Paul City Hall: ' Anoka: I Chaska: �, Haspngs � Shakopee: Stiilwater: ' ' Differantial travel time ta airport(ln minutes)from major ac�vity centers �I in region (weighted average): * Effect on intra—county travei times(for non—airport users): ! * Effect�inter—county travei times(for non—airport users): * Total lane—milas of roads requiring reloca�on,bY�YPe: * To�i lane—miles of roads requiring improvement,bY type: I * Generai off—site impact�s of airport access road&differential roadway , improvements due ro airport devebpment � COMMUNITY/SOCIAL IMPACTS I' Aii�'ORT DEVELOPMENT AREA IMPACTS ! * Affect of site on c:ommunity expansion plans: ', * No.of acres of future residential 8�commercial/industrial land within ADA: ', ,j Other cdteria wiU be identified to es�timate differential impacfs within 3—5 miles of ' e�h site boundary� ' �, Source: HMBIStudy Team Analysis Metropoiitan Airports Cammission ' • � ' ' .Pa$e 2" Revised: 12—Apr-93 ' DUAI.TRACK AIRPORT PLANNiNG PROCESS NEW AIRPORT SITE SELECTION STUDY SITE SELEC'f1ON ANALYSIS FI�:GT H:SI :FIETERIA:: DISPLACED COMMUNITIES/PEOPLE * Exls�ng municipalities dispiaced due to airport development: * Number of peopie within site boundary relocaied due to airport d�velopment: * Number o�households within site boundary relocated due io airport development * Numbe�of people dispiaced due to roads and u�lity c�nstruction/relocation. � Ak�mber of hous�eholds displaced due to roads and utility consiruction/relocation: tAND USE PLANS * A�cres of residential&canmercialJindustrial dsveb�xnent in site boundary�rcxn tocai c�omprehensive pians): * l�cras of residential land within Ldn 60 and Zonas A&B(from locai c�nprehensive pians): - COMMUNITY SEf�NICES/INFRASTRUCTURE * Number of hospitais withi�site bound�y: * Number of s�choois within site b�ndary: * Number of pi�of wor:�ip within site boundary: * Number of cemeteries within site boundary: * Perc.eniage of 1990 assessed schc�oi district tax base elim�ated: ' Percentage of 199Q assessed tavm�tip tax bage eiiminated: PK?ISE IN�'ACTS * t 990 po�lation resid'mg within�dn 65 in Search Area: * 1990 populat�n re�dfng with�Ldn 65 outside Search Area: * 1990 population resticling within Ldn 60(inci.Ldn f�: * 2000 papulati�ragiding within Ldn 65 in Search Area: * 2000 populatiort residing within l.c�65�t�side Search Area: * 2000 population residing witliin Ldn 60{incl.ldn 65j: * Population within L10 c�ntours for ail rurnnray�ds: * Number aF noise—sensi�ve land uses within Ldn 65: * Numbe�of noise—s�sitive land uses within Ldn 60: � * Average daily number aF arrival and departure overflights on princ�p�e n�gntracks ( bebw 5,000 feet: STATE SAFETY ZONES A&B * Number of peopie within state safeiy zones A&B fi 8earch Area: * Number of peopie within s�te safety zones A&8 outside Search Area * Number of househoitis within state sefety z�es A&B in Search Area * Number of households wilhln state safery zones A&B outside Seartx+�rea * Number of employees within state safety zones A&B in Search Area * Number of employees within staie safety zones A&B outside Searcn�►rse * Number of displ�ed businesses withln state safeiy zones A&B in Searcn araa * Number of displ�ed businessss within state safety zanes A&B oucs�w S Area �rce: HNTB/Study Team Malysis Metropolitan Airports Commission ` Page 3 . Revised`. 12—Apr-93 . DUAL TRACK AIRPORT PLANNING PROCESS NEW AIRPORT SITE SELECTION STUDY SITE SELECTION ANALYSIS F h;> T < ::'� .C::R.�T E::_E�1 AE:> TfffAL POPULATION IIU�'ACTS SUMMAftY * Totai�—airport po{�lat�n within site boundary: * Tc�tal off—airport po{�lat�m within state safety z�es A&8 and l.dn 60 in S.Area: * Total aff—airport populat�n within state safeiy zones A&B and Ldn 60 outside Search Area: HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAt.RESOURCES * No.of Native Americ�arcttaeoiogicai�tes pot�tially sligibie for NRHP: * !�.of 191h c�tury Euro—Amer.archaeologka!�ites potentially eligible for NRHP * f�mber of indivich�a!star�ding structures pot�riaaily eligible for NRHP: * Number of siariding structure districts pot�tiaily eligible for NRi-1P: * i�.of rurai histioric land�cape.s pot�tially eligibie far NRHP. * No.of NRHP standing structiures impacted by potentlal aff—airport roadway fia�ic and hi�way improvements: FARM AND NON—FARM BUSI(�SSES �" Number of non—farm empioyees relocated due�o airpon development * (�mber of non—farm businesses within�te baandary rek�cated due to airport deyelopm�� * i�mber of fam�atsads within�te boundary relocated due to airport development ' t�ambet of dairy famt8 with�site boundary: FARAALAND * T�mbe�'af acres of prime farmlaTtd within site bamdary('�ncluding undra�ed land): * Totai number of acres of agr�ul�ral/pasture land within site boundary: * Number af acres of agriculiural preserve land within site boundary: * Number of'century farms"within site boundary: * Wefghted average crop equival�cy ratings: PUBUC PARKS/RECI�ATION LAND * Number of{wbl�pairks az�d rec,land within site boundary: * Number of acres of public parks and rec.land within�te boundary: * Number of�blic parks and rec.land impacted by Ldn 65: * Number of�res of public parks and rec.land impacted by Ldn 65: OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS WILD AND SCENIC RNERS * IWumber of arrivaUdeparture overflights below 2,000 feer WETLANDS * Number of acres of weUands within srte boundary: * Number o#�res of wetlands imp�ted by airport develapment areas. WASTE QISPOS/�.SITES * Number artd type of known i�dfiils within airport boundary: * Number of known contaminated waste sites within airport boundary: Source: HNTB/Study Team Malysis Metropolitan Airports C�m�+�ssion ; Page 4 • Revised: 12—Apr-93 � DUAL TRACK AIRPORT PLANNING PROCESS NEW AIRPORT SiTE SELECTION STUDY SITE SELECTION ANALYSIS F!� T i�;R: l 'R E T.E::t�I.AF:.> WATER C�UALITY * l�mberof�res of Prairie Du Chi�i,�rdan Aquiferwithin airport boundary ciassified as: Very Highy Sensitive: Highly Sensitivve: * D�feren�al runoff(pre—proje�t vs.post—pro)ect): * Estimmated storage volume displ�ed as a resuft of t�nsstruuc�on within flood fringe and wedands: * Esstimmated drainage area upstream from�te: * Oifferen�al{pre—project vs,post—project)stoRn water n�noff load for chemicai �Y9en dem�d,�otai phosphorus and totai suspended solids: AfR(XIALITY * inctease in annuai CO�nmissions from v�icle Vips to/from airport: * CO conc�tratia�s relative�o state and federai air qualiry siandards: BI�STRII+�ISSUES * Undrained wetl�ds CI'Ypes 3,4,&�within 10,000 ft.of runvva�r�ds:� * Condi�c3ns t:onc�ucive to birdstrikes within 5 miles af runway ends: ENDANGE(�DITHREATENED&SPECtAL CONCERN SPECIES * Federally proteeted�ecies{Loggefiead Shrike is candidate �d is bund�each sfte boundary): * Known communities of state rare species(flora 8�fauna�within within�te bamdary: * Number of�gnificant naturai areas in site boundary: * No.oF knovm loca�ons of bald eagie nesGs and night roostlng areas within 10,000 feet of runways. LlGHT EMISSIONS * Sensitive land u�s potentially impacted by light�nissions from site: ENEf�'aY SUPPLY AND NATURAL RESOIJRCES , * Yehicie fuel consumption (gallons): * Loss of mi�eral or energy resources: * Can each s�ite's energy r�uir�nents be met by existing/planned source facilities? FLOODPLAINS * Pb.of ac�ss of floodway within site boundary: * No.of acres of fioodway ftinge likely impacted by airpoR development areas * Ability to mitigate flood fringe impacts on site: ' �rce: HMBIStudy Team Analysis Metropoiitan Airports Commission y .Page 1• Revised: 12—Apr-93 DUAL TRACK AIRPORT PLANNING PROCESS NEW AIRPORT SITE SELECTION STUDY SITE SELECTION ANALYSIS F A G T ;E� I:R t.T.E:R 1 A:<: �tFFEf�ENT1AL DEVELOPMENT COSTS ' * Differentlai land�qui�ition costs: * Di�`ererrtial site preparation cos�arising from-- Road imprw�n�ts(re�c.,airport access): U�lity hookupJrelocatio�: TQpo9�aphY��oiU9eo�gyltloodway sut�ctures: * Communiiy rebca#ion costs: Note: Approxirnate�e of airport boundary is 10,000 acres. Source: HMBIStudy Team Malysis Metropolitan Airports Commission ' Dual Track Airport Planning Pracess New Airport Site Selection Study ��.s;,�� ,- � , ,�,�; T`` -�::�.:•- w, . . �r� /i`��?� � �' �__ � ,,, �:` �: ,�1 . " � �� ■� �� e�- � �� ` .a/� �� "�'�1 • �I��•1 . � � ' ',. �� n'�,-=� � �;• � �, • :e � \ � � � �� '„�, -J �_�l�' "� I■ii,MM�l�1��'�• �� ' i�- ^.''.: �.��,��;' �,-�."� �" � �� ' ��. :�i's�EE:�:�..��i��'. \ � �-• � . • s ' :e, �r '� � =�I�.rN �; � m � - -�� =�3:1°0ii�3i~� ` �.:� .� � :..� �� r.. �, �i��7_��_-��` �ai^��:9..... , � � � ;�Csiki�!��t]�r�,�l�� ! � ��1��13_..�i{' 3! ♦ � , , � �, � L_ -�::(��►•.-� ��,J °� E' � '�_ 1��7�!., � �� . � �. � � � .� �� A �� /�r�� 1� � ! � � � :,��r�, 0 - � � flllllllllll �� ,,,,,.;�'� . � ' -�`�� . � �"�� . �� 1 : 1 �.1�►..�.. _ . '` . c � � ' ' �•IJ1� , � � r..�� ., /� �� = y ' _ , , � - . ,, � � ' �..._ -:-= i�� •i; .� ; _ m � �,�, -� m , � i�.��..�► ,�� , ,r�� , � :� �:._� . � .�...., .. � �.,::�::::� •. � ��J_l�I.Y��/ , �� ' ��IIIC1� ;'��i li ic� ' �� ;�-,�� , . � r ' e �ill �� - - _' il"r �!/ ' �� r�� ' 1 - �� MAC HNTB Figure 1 . � . . Dual Track Airport Planning Process New Airport Site Selection Study �� ` � `�`,- �� `�t� ■ lit�+� � ��' �'* _ ` .�, �� \� � _ ;. , ,, M. ` 1/�: T -� . �� :. .�� . � _ � .. �� r � _� :'�' �, ,�� j,- ,�•;; _ '. ," ��►.' ` s�,'�'"^��.,. '`�•:;: : .� ��' �,,; r�. _ --� �� u�► � �r=:�>>��.-�—��:.., J �; �� ,�,�� , I m ��[Ti�: Bc43i,:i�1�� — �� ,:��,,, „ „ � ��-c+�;:3aii �-�� ►�o �Ih dl��• .• ,J � C:i�.7�� y � ��, r�►` r -,� �` / �� .l��.r '�� ,. � �Iv' � �� ,'"�3_,!_�_,_..��' !i � -�C=�'��oi �.-.-�4� � � ,.= - _��l�� -- � �� i— rr'��;u � i �� I! f „� 'S"��^��I�)��'" c ' T�� ! �� . � � �� _ '�. = --� �� .;!_� � �!� � � � m �<<�,� o - ' * � ►f'iiniiiiiii ■. � ' . � "''�,"IIII� '' - �� ' � � ��: 1` , �� .� ' � / 1 �� , , i � ��i� ,, � � .� •�, . �� , , y► .. � , �� ,:.;,,,A�� , � , ��__ � � � ..�:::::� y �rr�uu� - ,r/r ��JJ�I.I�f��/ ■R��1 �:��'' � � � � �.Ir'Y . ■ � ..��el��.l� �■iiir�' �� !� , y�!�� • � / � y �,r • � — , ,_ �+''' �I1 � , �^�� . � - : .�.� MAC HNTB �: Figure 2 .. � . . Duai Track Airport Planning Process New Airport Site Selection Study �t�� ,. , �.,�,Z;� �:;�,:�:_-.- .■ �� , �� /i'��+� � �' ''�►.. _ , , �:��,� � ,. , �:� fi:� ��, � � �:� � �� ' -- i �� • .r� � � ,� t �`'�,f ,.�- : ,��i°i s Iw. � ' ��,.� !� � i � �' � � �, �� '"�� _ ''�� r �� 0• _ ��: • �� .-� ��''�� . ._� ��/ �w� I ��.�� .`. ��=i�i:F�S�,r:�..•� �� !!� � � ��'r`�'�� us�� :=ii�ii��►�t�,. \` � � �1 __e�..�+ "�� r. ��"�=:1�'' � �l��ii;•�i: � �"'�.,,� ,�.�r,�� •�r ,F �� i,�'.,,3.�_ ':'' � . �� ,�. ��,r� ��,. � � �� _ � `� ��►�� t�.� ��i�� a �, � � ii;"),y■ / i ►., �� '�' � �""' � � ��1�„e��i,,�N'�-� ^ � �� (�� e ►✓"'.�:-. , ,��— � ..�A •� �►r. �� .�: � , :� -�� r� ��, �� ,r�� ,, 0 ' - ►� ' � ��illl�lll?� � �■ • � . � � �"�I�� ► 1 �� ..� � ,.. , ��- . ,` ` ' • �; � ,, 1 �� t,:��i ' _ , - � / m .. • � � - . , _ � � r �..—r �.,�.. .I�� .,� . ; �, , �► m , � ////��■ ::.:�� ► ■- .:�:::.� � ar ...., � ��.�:;:;::::; � ��1� �' , ......., �� ,m:i, t�:l�i�1� �iiiiiiYi� �� ,�!F �_y�� . � /' � , ,�., �, . . � .. , "� . ' �r �. . '� -� � �� 1 . �� HNTe MAC Figure 3 . . .