HomeMy WebLinkAbout7. Shannon Pond Final Plat i �
,
City of Rosemount
� Executive Summary for Aetion
Planning Commissian Meeting Date: Mav 2S. 1993
Agenda Item: Shannon Pond Final Plat Agenda Section:
NEW BUSINF.SS
Prepared By: Rick Pearson Agenda No.:
Assistant Planner ITEM NO. 7
Attachments: Final Plat. APProved By:
- SEE ATTACHED -
Recominended Action: A MOTION to recommend approval of Shannon Pond First Addition
subject to:
1) Park dedicatian in the amount of$21,840. cash contribution as well as sidewalk and trail
installation as specified by the Park and Recreation Cammission ineluding sidewaiks in
the northerly boulevard of 156th Street West, westeriy boulevard of Crocus Avenue, and
the sautherly boulevard of Crocus Avenue;
2) Detailed plans and specificatians including a revised grading plan to be approved by the
City Engineer; �
3) Committing to house designs that conform to ordinance standards for lot 5, block 5, and
lot 1, blaek 4;
4) An executed Subdivision Development Agreement; and
5) An approved and recorded lot split / combination for property recently acquired by the
developer for the revised first phase.
Planning Commission Action:
OS-25-93.007
• y
. . . . . . � . . � � . � .
z�� o osemouvi�
PHONE (612)4234411 2875-145th Street West,Rosemount,Minnesota MAYOR
FAX (612)423-5203 Mailing Address: Edward B.McMerwmy
P.O.Box 510,Rosemount,Mirtn6sota 55068-0510 COUNCILMEMBERS
, Sheiia Kfassan
TQ: PIdI1T11I1� COIT1II11SStOT1 ' James(RedJ Staats
Harry Wiilcax
Dennis Wippermann
FROM: Richard Pearson, Assistant Planner noM�r,�sr�aroa
Stephan Ji1k
DATE: May 20, 1993
SUBJ: May 25, 1993 Regular Meeting Reviews Agenda Item 7
ATTACHIVV�NTS: F�nal Plat
7. SHANNON POND FINAL PLAT
HAMPTON DEVELOPMENT CORF. - SHANNON POND PI�D PHASE ONE FINAL PLAT
(South of Jaycee Park, West of Shannon Parkway)
PROPOSAL ` -
1VIr. James Allen, President of Hampton Development Corporation, developers of Shannon
Pond Planned Unit Development is requesting fmal plat approval of the first phase containing
42 lots of the 89 lot subdivision.
On April 20, 1993, the City Council approved the Preliminary Plat, Planned Unit
Development and Rezoning for the averall 89 iot development.
FINAL PLAT
Phase I of the PUD containing almost half of the praposed lots will not be contiguous with any
adjacent subdivisions. Generally, future phases of Shannan Pond PLTD abat or will be across
Danville and Danbury Avenues from future phases of the West Ridge PUD developed by
Rosemount Development, Inc.
ACCESS AND STREETS
Entry into the plat wiil occur at Shannon Parkway via 156th Street West south of Jaycee Fark:
Two north-south streets will be eonstructed and will terminate at a �ourth street generally
parallel and south of 156th Street West. The streets have been renamed in canformance with
the County street designation system.
There will be no connections to Danbury or Danville avenues until future phases are
developecl.
LOTS
40 out of the 42 iots meet or exceed minimum lot standards as specified in the Zoning
Ordinance. The two exceptions are lot 5, block 5 and lot 1, bloek 4 on either side of the
outlot that will provide drainage to the pond area and a possible park trail. The two lots both
scale approxunately 73 feet wide at the building setback line (80 feet required by ordinance).
�ver���ing�s �oming �UL� C'�l�,osemoun��l
. . . A � � . . . . . .
� .
May 25, 1993 Regular Meeting Reviews
Fage 2
The two lots exceed all other standards; Lot 5, block 5 is about 90 feet longer than the 124 '
foot standard; Lot 1, black 4 exceeds the lot depth standard by 25 feet. Lot 5, block 5
exceeds lot area. standards by 2,294 sq. ft. and lat l, block 4 exceeds area sta.ndards by 173
sq. ft. The outlot between the two lots is twenty feet wide. Given the standard ten foot side
yard setback for houses, they will be separated by forty feet. The developer will be prepared
to demonstrate specific house designs that will conform to the setbacks.
DEVELOPMENT ISSLTES
The first phase will be a private project with developer installed irnprovements. The
developer's agreement will be structured similar to the Country Hills developer's agreements
which was also a private project.
The City Engineer has reviewed the grading plan and found identif'ied areas that will require
modif'ication. Primariiy, street grades are toa level and the grading extends beyond property
owned by the developer. Easements for the grading must be acquired or the plan mod�ed to
match existing grades at the property boundaries. Erosion control management practices will
be incorporated into the agreement as the grading for the entire PUD will be accomplished .
with the first phase.
PARK DEDICA'TION AND SIDEWALKS
The required park dedication will be $21,840 for the first phase. This arnount is based upon
the formula four percent of the land (or it's cash equivalent) times the number of dwelling
units times the current value of land per acre established by resoiution. In addition, sidewalks
will be installed on the southerly houlevard of Crocus Way, the northerly boulevard of 156th
Street West and the westerly boulevard of Cracus Avenue. The Craeus Avenue sidewalk will
align with a bituminous bike path to be constructed on the outlot connecting to the pond area.
OTHER ISSUFS
A lot split was approved in February, 1993 for the first phase o�the development. Since that
time, the first phase has shifted east onto property optioned but nat owned by the developer.
Another lot split/combination must be accomplished so that the land can be recorded by the
developer and platted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATTON
A MOTT�N to recommend approval of Shannon Pond First Addition subject to:
1) Park dedication in the amount of$21,840, cash contribution as well as sidewalk and trail
installation as specified by the Park and Recreation Commissian including sidewalks in the
northerly boulevard of 156th Street West, westerly boulevard of Crocus Avenue, and the
southerly baulevard of Crocus Avenue;
2) Detailed plans and specifications including a revised grading plan to be approveci by the
City Engineer;
3) Committing xo house designs that conform to ordinance standards for lot 5, btock 5, and lot
1, block 4;
4) An executed Subdivision Development Agreement; and
5) An approved and recorded lot split / eombination for property recently acquired by the
developer for the revised first phase.
� �
Shannon Pond Final Plat
May 25, 1993 Planning Commission Agenda Item No. 7
Page Two
' The principal meter statian building will be setback approximateIy 144 ft. from the frontage
along Rich Valley Blvd. The small accessory building will be setback 75 ft. from the
frontage. The front yard setback standard for buildings in the General 7ndustrial District is 75
ft. The side and rear yard setback standards are both 50 ft. The site plan is nat drawn to
scale, and no side yard dimension can be determined. Setback criteria only applies to the
front yard in this site plan because the fence lines aze not property boundaries except along
Ca. Rd. 71.
The meter building will be canstructed of a combination of rockface concrete block and
prefuushed metal panels and a metal roof. The building exceeds the required 50 percent
aesthetic matejrial standard for the west elevation. which fronts Rieh Valley Blvd. by 30
percent. The building also exceeds the material standard for all of the ather walls (25 percent
standard) by eight to fifteen percent.
The metal surfaces will be painted "stormy blue."
The 27Q sq. ft. electrical equipment sub station is indicated as. having a smoath exterior. This
buildinb is required to conform to the same standards as�the larger meter building with regard
to exterior materials. A variance would be required if the standard cannot be met.
LANDSCAPING
No landscape improvements are indicated on the plans.
The Ordinance standard for the General Industrial District specif`ies 21 foundation plantings
along with the Planning Commission recommendation. Given the exposure of the site and the
use, Planning Staff would recommend screening plantings of large draught tolerant shrubs,
bouleuard trees or evergreens as an alternative to foundation plantings. If a tree for shrub
trade off is preferred, Planning Staff would substitute five 2 inch diameter boulevard trees or 6
foot spruce trees for the 21 shrubs.
RECONIMENDATION
A MOTION tQ approve the site plan for the pipeline meter station subject to.
1) conformance with the aesthetic materiai standards for the electrical equipment substation
as specified in Section 7.2 A(4j of the Zoning Ordinance;
2) provision of either 21 shrubs for screening or 5 trees as the Planning Commission deems
appropriate and providing a security in the amount of $65Q. per Sectian 8.3G af the
Zoning Ordinance; and
3) conformance with all applicable building and fire codes.
--------- - � . '� F
�,w,- �^I,'
'� ` 1
. . . . ,��� .� � . .
. . . . . ���.�� � . . . .
S H A N N .��.,.,.,, ,� . �w. Y. .
SNu
�r'/�� f
O � iMt�~1f{^���E /'r.Np�M��� . . . �
58�6�� ' �::.+•.N . . �
i .
� POND �l ���
, ., -. �
� Q _ � �
.� :, '
; �,
EXHIBIT B :- `
. W�• !�mq . � . �
.�O F �+ �
. . .J� . � o ,,N . .
�p�
, . O A ,� .. . .
z'• h �� - ; �,o� 'r'�.
m�`w E • pc •�- .. .�"'w, i .
O .� ,,..s�''�i3• -s���s •,'^�( ••;;"'�sy¢ �'`
. . x� s,.5�7,2 b����; '8 ' g'\'Q'$154�66•• • ._•-'_- . . . .
� . � . . l•127.92rmot. ��� :�� ,,,��t��l\f « � 2 4'\'M }•� � ��N'�•,M . . .
. . .� � � L•f2J!6 deey • . . �
as i F g q�A•• „�.,-firi!" •. � 1 � .
a•n•s9•u'.,k.a �:a � .,�t � �/'�oo � � �. 3 n\�� ��\ . v1y-;.+, �.,» ' _
�a•2?'S9'SBeNee � ei x°f �. \t /� t\ N. • . . � . . � .
utH�tv 1 ON�N��G[[Aa.xlM/5.�MC S�uwH TMIS R..�801 � ��i��l� 1. �1` • w� 'T �� �,� '( �' 9"� y���M I . .
. �p �i ��8 ..'`8 `a �:ou ,�REE. .� E� �,S i � �`
�xD Bsac nnr� £ : '�+ �i ,s'c 9 �q �J F�'�. l�"� ,d.'S �r � P �
GH BRGN!/•�O,SJ£ne�o i � 7{' .:� w "'\Y, ��` �r%� �°�p~ .�� .S"�T� f"M \`� ;�tt • .
� • s a
. . � � I . . . . . �t`sisi o�I.. ``.(� .(�i�iy Jt�L,ei°p'ort���g�es ``�. eT'. �".� •°�°�t,� ' �`S6°� A� �$'Sl�`a �� `, �0 .
I. �.. . . . . e �A�/ '�6 A �� �� �. t r �f�4- : � ` 5�A� ` .
` ��\ cAc '09y Jbd �.fw! �t f���s°O yr� 4 � A �7
. . :�' � � . � �,� E.P,�� n:l• $ i;,�''a . l. � j58SN..�� � u° 4, � �Ql. �yy�,�`�ss*'�w. . . .. � .
� . ��n � �59��9 0 .a i.t7 fs �rn4�,�^,T � . ��' S....• �1 �o e�`'� 3 '2\.�� '��- ai�
�t . •a n�+ ����T '''`�v �n�±!'+�' -"� .naa eN•' ����
` 7� c '� t� \s.E 2 "���, �'�..�
..� ��.ro . � �� � �n�._.._. . /, � . �. R.S7l�fd.. PC . i.�` � �.b j. • � y111 n 11 p�)� f: . . � . .
� �� �t�` 1 a<. \^•'A \` , t�.�t�♦
. . .. . � k,, . �0 �h Si� tF �Sllf��J•�''��.� . ��10�.9E� M�{ . � .
nrnw w ner w�w u+AUU IWY<M1NiG S!M((1 ANYIIMMIO� . � .
�Mj!M�0!!L(�M{�Oflr AIIO AWOM�MA6 SIOC lJT INKl � �1 1l1� �♦ �1' , J . . .
v«es�w��m.�s�MlwtAfeO tM�A.t vanr � t w : �i��p „R'^ 1..� ��R;¢2 g'I= ' �i it i i ; �:. 'b � ,
� � � . ;\ ��'.'• �. � � ��' _�azi�.� £ f!: '¢ �� r. ` \'1,{�iie��a$1� 1 a'8�.�� . � � . � � .
. , . ,:1 � . . . .�� �O � N�t 0.NM� t -�� ��+ `'�a8 . :g'_. . . . . � �d . .
t �.�' . uo: e�bq r 4}�•�.COI � � 'Rt�7.u',' §� OtA . `�g+.TJi
. . � � �x. U � .�naai ba� i ( .i��—�-� s�i � �Z �41e a pAX S $ .n.e � .
� � . . .��� ••�t ' � 2 � '. �99 1 s.��oa1 �) � L� .1 ,��C � j.�,p' .'�GOUR � � � �M`,�,.� �� � . .
� �i'--' � a��: �e' 's'ailZ �' I� .,�iG��•J. `�� �w?'I%- _. 4 •' ++$(� . .
. � .� ,� ' '4 wsr.DaO w�. �� .sr ros��'[ � w�eroin'C.� j� � � •�',:'� � �•�n Q., .
�;k g p p,
� . . .. `n�'°` "�� �inb=; ^y� �� �r`3' .1�. ��w`,`��L ��'��� � L1�.. .n3ii .�i "�IY;. .� i� ky :-..�:r�a . .. .
• +���A' � ��YI�y ,t� -(S_�.r»_..y� �' ':a rs se J rerrr.�i� �. .'� r" ,� ` i�•. . O .
n„N 8a �`rrerer•..'�1 �_"f)67'os"F� g �3� �i AR y y'e �' r'
fa .� ^: �A �7 (� S l� k �[�j � 1$ �• 'EJ a: 3 i.::y:;. � .
� � � �� 10 ;sl �. ,,.:_s_J z�: i � �;a .....� Z .
E"..__�•.,. �`� .s�� ,�4 � (� �( ,�� __ i
� � � � � . '� � � �� .N�1�'i��fYy� +1;�.a �.9. t��...�� �p_NSI•hril W� Q� : 1 Mf7'f�00 M����•� . �` � .
J i'Y �
, � i' iS 5� �3 ��' F�a ib't3 F" 13� � _� l� Z �
�� � .� �h , � , 3
W tif�s°�Y e v ti as• i� :?!�.J. Q.. +L' � �
((j j�b r NY�J�w �'� q L�,r�t.ps� '"= ;,;�w� �� � t___ �vor 1 ;3 �' �
v n v' � a � .--i Nn• �LN r H�!•lJI�M ^fi
� � /d � 'S.As+'' q ' �1C`' �inr� ��' g.�;.. I � �� "o C� .
• W ''\
� � � � . , ;3 r q .~ . .� s es �' �t'' $�?�9'�.. 1�g,8 •_��« � �,.. 1y � j� f �,� ^b . � \ . . �$� . .
��� ♦ } .1A pwcy N� �M!! f i �� !� � '�� \
. . .. . � /2 1��� ; O� �XfO•M 48��{ �rr.� {SR v %'�w Z'�+ •��l�� �� ' ' ,���MJe•i . .� ��� `
. . ., � V` /Gr 1 i 1�7�1J��� q��o'�, ', Op�,."'���L�. : � � ��`�7y�til . . � . � .��J pC 1 . �
��, J �x 7 �� � :.. ,
. l � , �. ,
� .„•a., t � ��.� ut� ---�c:; �
� .t r7etl � '��4�L �i1 � �' DRIVt' + � 'bq,p{ . .�.
� —�,,''�;t�$` p0r+a � ,�,� O ,
1�� �,.... .�
�noe Aiwu ' '�`yS�JN.� "4i3 s�t x':�,:oar�� av,w�'3'
� �Q .�^ . Q � .w�rw 'Y"; . �s����`a3��,, r �.a�'q � Y�_p1��/:�,�. +'ys+ � .. � � �. . � � � .
. . . . .. o.i . � � �..�n... „ �+,p�.'8"� �aq. sr2..��L �; le tiwi/lt�, � � . . .` .
� , ,� A ^K �,�° 2 i,�" - �� 4� �;� x^� �=aR: » '
; 8 � 7�� �, i $-,, � •�"' �t �
� so ky � 'p-' s1g ~, ..b Z �,,�"1 t ila ,�� , r ,i
� . p � � a�.�� ?DO .ry � . e.+� �a�a��o�o� ��e�c.�,I� i,�L.. 1 ��A �.�` i `'. . . . Ktg .
u�1� .�.J F!{,J .� . 1
SCaLf � w�� fEE7�. � . 1 '- l� � l I00 SB . . '`S— ."���ilrLOT g . � ��
� � O(kfa�n t/Yw[pi N��rOn . ... '.,J• ..�1Vt DO -. • � �� ��O•21•11'f1' d�' `•�6fM._. . � ;'� . �a • .
. �enw�tMu��wdmeMMLr /w �'t�pd•W..,�A•ldsBrM��.�i . . R•5Z4.E3 � h N6J.�s.�,� �` .�� . . . .. . A ��\
c�.�..e N. iaa� -. $8 t rt�aes.s+ t r }�'� �. '0'�no .
-;"�' �.';, ;>� g{ $` b`p �,y?.+,r �
fM SweA bnrelMt SWI/ief. ryA �� . Q"+ryq . . . ^g . .NQj ; Y, . .�y„���� �� � � �
. . �f.11S•�{9 na�6ffh/k��M� � �` � �� . . . � t� Q �'g,�. . .�J• .. � . . . ��C•�
. . . . e aanM,N EaST � . . � . . •� o � � . '�" . .
��:ix z N �'3 � , 'e.cc
.
1�1AY G_t4 '�3 1�3�53 CITY C SEM�•IT . P.2
� Date Re�eived:
Cx�y of��semor��xt .
p.0. Box 510 .
. • Zs�s ias�x sTs�EY wEsr
RosEMovN'c, MN S5ofi8-O510 • �
(6l2)423-4�411
. . . _��. : a•..o%f..."9. iyeo�;••� 'M::"rti4�::x.f/�..... ..i- ..:�..� �.F;.'�".J�:°'r'ix�ix�� �r fn:i`y`;°;�:xro7x'.'•:i.%A.:i:o�i.n°��eoK%i�t'.fi'.��vX, `'�,a�xxsan'h'ak.�:��a`:'�4,'w�%:i•a
,*,.5:46��f.x1'�xvl:o:xg:�e���y;3vx..%°�.c.w7„a°F».fwser(�r.�t6'3�•Y:«t�.xc.,�fc�.�C+�.{��H„ar�x",�,�'y•�rf• 'ff...�{; a.cyy,.; x�.�ti.�w '1 > .a�cv.��; ^hi�:..x.,n•x.:.. �.v..�.:... �`.<?;:n ...� a'+t. .
.s s:.>..y,e�.�,;t�x3:. 4•�ian 4 # �a ..A.�.t; 1'l.+x�.r,:a •r `$ ^ot.wc>.: w.•:.. .�':��.'�w.'x "g'w M Y r�.%ex. �Ks.r'i"x a�'r ...s.
�a e., � .e�ew:f.�.. b`wwg.:�?xx:�di,� xro�r . zt .rg� x,;.' ��p p +�T��'�} x '.4c�a:y ..e:y!3 k� ��h'�:v%:.,?�4 ...
w �.S � �.'l��.x tS..hrnSwcn+{ R �+S �'� <o�.tx.Fn���?� ��Y�AH�����LAV��v`J�s bf.,� . `%'RRa.;ra •o rv.o�` � X•�..
,rt x � y, k.. 4 y. ix S � m . .4. �3'r x a ! 's i o„ ...:..,?;°.. w.j-0:�'�. .s....n�w..K �'. aw.:.,....�. ��,...,...�w.. .6.�Y...:�.
� r a y'S. r 4 re K qf �A 4 .'�.a:x�..r.�_.. c.�.........i..�.... r :. -.:
...:Y�1 .k�«..?;,.f 8.`�?�...>.'�k .�..:.?4 ........ ��x....,...s�..e..K....ev...... .�.c.�.J. . . . �
j, Hampton Develo�ment Carnora�ion 1am � F A'I 9 P�, $A4-1 R�� — _
Name of.9pplicant (to be used on legal docume�tts) Telephone No.
2. i2433 Princeton Ave � Sava�e MN 55378 94-454�
Address ojApplicant Fax No.
3, Bob Smith • � ' 8bi-6940
lVarne of Consulrant . Tetept�nr�e No.
,4. 3009 West 702 Street Richfield MN 55423 861-$084
Adciress of Cortsu�rant _ Fax No.
5 Ha�agton Development Corporation
Narne af Properry Oxner
, b. 12433 Princeton Ave Sava�e , .MN 55378 894-18$8
Address of Properry Owner Telepl:c�rte �vo.
7. R_1 ----
Current Zanirig . Pr'opaced Z.urting (if apPlicable)
g. Agriculture - . --�'---
Prese,ar U,re �'r•opvseci Use (If�PPIicaUle)
9. � '� 300 :00 ..
..... , ... _:
Fiiuzl Plat Fee: .a300.00 Received J8y
10. Location Map of Property(ies) Involved. Attaciied? , I n C i t v �'i l e
. Current Description(s) and Survey Attachezi? �I n C i t y F��e
Revisecl Description(s} and Sisrvey Attached? I n C i t y F i�e
� 6. PrOj2Ct D�SCtipti0n' � Forty Two(�4Z) Sin�ie Fa�mily� Lots ---
�
. � . . � . . � . . . . ' . . t*!t at T!O[,
, ,
J h1�lY 04 '93 10�54 C I TY OF RO�EMOUrIT � P.3
12, Planning Commission �ction; 1?ate.• __-__ _--
13. City Council Action: Date:
14. eondidons or Requirements: �
7'fcis applica#ion must be c�cco»ipartied hy a list v,f rcames and addresses o,f property owriers witliin a 350
foot ractius of t3�e subject property. Also to be included are two sets of uddress labels af ilie prvperty
ofvraers. 77aese musi accompmay the c�pplication ai tlae tirne of st��i�nittat.
All applicalions musf iriclude a copy of ihe p�vperiy ozUner's DupTicaie CeJtc;ficule of 'liile if t1:e property
is recorded under the Torrens systeni. .
?�T(�TE: A.PPLICATI�NS ARE NOT COMPL'�TE LJNTIL ,�LI, 1:t�C,�UIREv SUBA•f1SSTONS HAVE S��N �LECEIYED.
ACKh'OWLEDGENlENT AND SIGNATilIRE:
7�t1E UNDE'XtSICIVBD APPLICANT HER�'B3' REPRESENTS'UPON ALL �F THE t'�NALTIES OF Tfl� ;t.rt 1i; THE
PURPOSL QF JNDI/C/h'C THE CITY 0� ROS�MOU�'�'T TU Y'rlri',� ACT10N HER�Ih' R��UEST�D, THAP �1LL
STATE�IENTS HEREIN AR,� ?'RUE AND TI�'AT ALL W4RK HEREtfi' ;Sl�NTIONEL► K'JLL �E I30J�'E IN ACCOR.UA��CE
WITH THE QRUINANCE :OF 'lf3'� C17'Y QF 1�'OS�MDUi'VT, A1'�'D "fH� LAWS OF THE .S'TA7'B Of ML1'h'ESfl1'A, Alti!)
!'f�'Rl' 7HE UNDEItSIGNED APf�ICAt4'T W1LL P�Y AJ.L F�ES A�\'1? Gt1ARGES !h'eUI:RED BY 'f�E CITY FUR !'HE
B.YAMtNA7'ION AND REV1E1�' OF.�H1S.PE�rTT14N. .. . ..... . . .: , .. .
� nature of Applicai�t J a m e s E. A l l e n i ature of Property Owner ,T a m e s E. A l l e n
M a_v 2 0 t h . i 9�3 ____�a-y O r h , t c�q� _
Date I�ate
FNLPL7AP.93-2
, .
MEMO
TO: RICK PEARSON, ASStSTANT PLANNER
FROM: BUD OSMUNDS011[, CITY ENGlNEER
DATE: MAY 21, 1993
RE: SHAf�t'�ION POND GRADING PLAN
CITY PROJECT #231
We reviewed the grading plan for the Shannon Pond PUD. I have a number o#
concerns listed below:
i. The app(icant shows grading beyond its ownership boundaries on the west and
northwest sides adjace�t to Danviile Avenue and Danbury Avenue. This
grading is permissible if the appiicant has a grading easement from the adjacent
property owners and if the proposed grade matches the previously submitted
plan for the West Ridge area. The appficant also shows grading in the
southeast corner of the site off its property and into the City ponding area. It
appears that this grading is done at a 4;1 slope which is acceptable and is of
a minor concem. -
Z The applicant shows grading adjacent to the Well Site No. 8 in the nartheast
corner of the property. The grading appears to be rather steep where the City
has an existing dnveway into the welt site and adjacent Jaycee Pa�k. This itern
can be addressed with the developer.
3. On the grading pfan the applicant shows a future storm drain inlet in the center
south area of Block 6. This wil! not be allowed and therefore the applicant
should modify his grading plan to accommodate the runoff down lot lines.
4. On Page 5 of the grading plan, which is the street grade for 156th Street West,
the app(icant shows two t2? grades that are under 1 %. This does not meet
City Standards nor acceptable engineering practices and is not acceptable.
Street �rades under 1 °!o are aiso shown on Page ?,, Page 9 and Page 10. None
of these are acceptable and the applicant shouid modify the grading ptan
accordingly.
The applicant appears to have submitted a good grad'rng ptan and design except as
noted above. We ask that the grading plan be redesigned to accommodate those
items listed above.