Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.a. Dakota County CDA Simple Plat and Final PUD Plan for Prestwick Place TownhomesEXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: Case 17-13-PUD and 17-14-FP Request by Dakota County Community Development Agency for a Simple Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan for Prestwick Place Townhomes AGENDA SECTION: New Business PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 9.a. ATTACHMENTS: Site Location Map; Final Site and Building Plan Approval Resolution, Simple Plat Resolution, Final Plat, Preliminary Plat (2 Sheets); Project Information Sheet; Site Survey, CDA Response Letter, City Attorney Memorandum, April 12, 2017 Traffic Analysis, Public Correspondence (3 letter and 2 emails), Public Comment Map, Planning Commission Minutes and Packet 3/17/2017, Existing Conditions, Cover Sheet, Final Site Plan, Final Grading Plan; Erosion Control Plan, Utility Plan, Storm Water Management Plan, Landscape Plan; Building Floor Plans, Architectural Plans; Carbury Hills Photo, Prestwick Area Zoning Map, Prestwick Preliminary Development Plan, City Engineer’s Memorandum dated March 16, 2017, Parks Directors Memo dated March 15, 2017 APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the following motions: 1. Motion to adopt resolution approving a Final Site and Building Plan for Prestwick Place Townhomes, a 40-unit townhome project 2. Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Simple Plat for Prestwick Place Townhomes 2 SUMMARY Applicant: Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) Location: Oultot M of Prestwick Place - East of Akron Avenue about ½ mile north of County Road 42 and ½ mile south of Bonaire Path (The southeast quadrant of Akron Avenue and 141st Street East). Gross Acres: 5.87 Acres – not including remainder of CDA parcel Net Acres: 5.63 Acres Proposed Units: 40 Dwelling Units Gross Density: 6.8 Units/Acre Net Density: 7.1 Units/Acre Comprehensive Plan Designation: MDR – Medium Density Residential Zoning: R3/PUD – Medium Density Residential Planned Unit Development The City is being asked to consider a request from the Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) for a Simple Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Site and Building Plan approval for a 40-unit townhouse development called Prestwick Place Townhomes. The City of Rosemount previously approved a PUD Concept Plan and PUD Master Development Plan and Rezoning for the subject property and surrounding area, with the PUD approval occurring on October 2, 2007. As specified in the City’s Zoning Ordinance, final site and building plan shall signify approval of all plans necessary prior to application for a building permit subject to other necessary approvals by the city including, but not limited to platting. Because it has been over one year since the preliminary plat for Prestwick was approved by the City, the applicant has requested a concurrent approval of an updated preliminary plat and final plat consistent with the City’s simple plat process. As the Commission and Council is aware, an approved Master Development Plan functions as the zoning for the property and therefore review of this project should be based upon the 2007 approval with conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission reviewed this item at their March 20, 2017 regular meeting. After the presentation, the Commission asked questions concerning the timing of the initial Prestwick PUD as it related to development of the surrounding neighborhoods. It was noted that Greystone was platted after 2007, with Greystone 1st Addition being approved in May 2012. The Commission also discussed extension of Addison Street to the south property line and asked for additional information relating to neighborhood concerns about the impact of the project on property values. Staff indicated that there is no evidence that values will be impacted by the project. There is some information on this topic in a study conducted by Maxfield Research in 2014. The existing Carbury Hills Townhouse project located in Rosemount also owned and operated by the CDA is a part of that study. The link to the study is here: http://www.mnhousing.gov/idc/groups/secure/documents/admin/mhfa_010263.pdf Staff also reviewed the police call information provided by the Police Department. Commissioner Henrie noted that the neighborhood has changed since 2007 as many of the Prestwick projects have been reguided to a low density use. Staff noted that changes were prompted due to a change in market and all reguiding thus far has occurred on the west side of the Akron Avenue. Kari Gill, CDA Deputy Executive Director explained why the site was chosen, how tenants are chosen and how the rents work. She clarified that all tenants must have a job to qualify to live at the development. She 3 indicated they are requesting approval now, but the development would not be built until the spring or summer of 2018. She clarified that only two people per bedroom are allowed. During the public hearing portion of the meeting nine different residents spoke against the project. (A map showing the addresses of the speakers as well as anyone who sent an email or letter is included.) There were numerous concerns expressed, relating to traffic, safety, and impact on property values. It was questioned why this location was chosen since it was at the edge of development and there wasn’t transit or jobs in the area. Several indicated that if they had known that workforce housing was proposed they would not have moved into the neighborhood. Several noted they were aware that townhomes would be built on the site but they didn’t know they would be low income or rental. There was also a question about payment in lieu of park dedication and also questions about eviction from the project. Staff clarified that the City doesn’t differentiate between rental units or home ownership for residential developments and also cannot consider price in land use deliberations. The City Attorney has provided a memorandum regarding this issue which was written after the Planning Commission meeting. Staff also explained the future road system in the area and noted that the 2007 staff report indicated that 200 units would be allowed in the east side of the Prestwick neighborhood before a second access to the area would be required. Since the Planning Commission meeting, staff has requested additional traffic review by the City Engineer. The Study itemizes traffic generation for this particular subdivision using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation numbers for the built and proposed housing products. The Study notes the three neighborhood or minor collector streets anticipated to accommodate growth in the area north of County Road 42 and east of Akron Avenue. The main street for this discussion is 141st Street which is an east/west minor collector that parallels the future Connemara Trail and County Road 42. 141st Street is projected to have approximately 3,000 average daily trips with full neighborhood build out. The traffic study finds that in the interim, traffic at 141st may be high since all of Greystone and anything in Prestwick, east of Akron Avenue would all utilize 141st until Connemara or access to Bonaire is created. However, from a timing standpoint, the CDA project is not proposed for construction until 2018. By that time the access to Bonaire Path through Greystone will be constructed providing another access option for that neighborhood, reducing the use of 141st Street. In either event, under the interim or final development plans, 141st Street was created as a neighborhood collector and is built to accommodate the current, future, and projected traffic. Ultimately construction of Connemara Trail and paving of Bonaire Path will pull traffic away from 141st Street. Bonaire Path is listed in the City’s 5-year CIP for future paving and construction of Connemara Trail is dependent upon future development. After the public hearing, the Commission discussed the issues raised. It was clarified that the CDA owned the property for some time and the PUD approval occurred prior to development in the adjoining neighborhoods and that information was available to the public. How park dedication fees work was also explained, along with clarification that the second access to Greystone, from Bonaire Path would be constructed later this summer. From a process standpoint, the PUD Master Plan functions as the zoning for the site and therefore the review is more consistent with a site plan approval, (i.e. does the development proposal comply with the previously approved PUD). The Commission also explained opportunities for the public to be involved in the new Comprehensive Plan update process. Regarding the police call information, staff explained that the City police pulled calls from 50 homes in Greystone to compare to 40 townhome units in Carbury, so the number of units was relatively similar. Based on the feedback from the meeting, Staff further investigated the breakdown of police calls that were identified and noted that the number of homes within Greystone is somewhat higher than initially discussed (closer to 80). According to police files in 2016, there were 17 calls for service in the Greystone neighborhood and 24 calls in the Carbury neighborhood. In 2015 there were 25 calls in Greystone 4 (approximately 50 homes) and 40 calls in Carbury. Ultimately, it is difficult to draw a firm conclusion from the data because the general nature and location of police calls varies considerably throughout the City. There is also variation month to month. One house with numerous calls can skew the results for any given neighborhood. In general, police calls in throughout Rosemount are low compared to some other cities. In this case, neither neighborhood sees enough activity that the police department would consider them problematic areas. In discussions with the Police Chief he indicated that “the Carbury neighborhood does not cause us any more concern than any other neighborhood in our community”. He will be available at the meeting if there are more questions. After additional discussion the Planning Commission voted to approve the simple plat and final site and building plan for the CDA townhouse project on a 4 to 1 vote. Those in support noted the plans complied with the 2007 master plan approval and noted they cannot deny because of the type of medium density housing proposed. The dissenting vote was based upon the desire to have a traffic study conducted prior to final action being taken on the project. As mentioned above, since the Planning Commission meeting, staff has obtained more traffic and police call information. Additionally, the City Attorney has provided a letter regarding the charge of the city in review of this request. Staff also met with the CDA representatives and discussed some of the issues highlighted in the staff report. In response to the City Engineer’s review comments, the CDA is proposing some additional storm water ponding on the site, and due to the existing grades in the area, may need to extend one of the ponds into Outlot A. The CDA owns sufficient land to accommodate the ponding, but must either dedicate additional easements over the pond or could expand the townhome lot to cover all ponding areas. Staff has drafted an additional condition of approval to address the need for additional ponding. The Dakota County Plat Commission reviewed the subdivision request at its March 20, 2017 meeting and requested additional right-of-way for Akron Avenue over Outlot A. The applicant has since updated the plat to address the Plat Commission’s comment, and the updated plat is included with the Council memorandum. BACKGROUND The subject property is part of a larger 290 acre mixed use development approved by the City in 2007 on the northwest and northeast corners of County Road 42 and Akron Avenue. The approved PUD Master Development and Rezoning includes approximately 50 acres of commercial, 90 acres of residential, and 130 acres platted as outlots for future development (the remainder of the 290 acres includes roads and parks; please note that some of areas labeled for future development have since been subdivided in the intervening years). Most of the approved development areas west of Akron Avenue received final plan approval over the past decade and have since been developed, while none of the planned development east of Akron Avenue has reached this stage. The Dakota County CDA owns 19.75 acres east of Akron, and at this time the CDA is asking for approvals associated with the northwest portion (5.87 acres) of the site. As depicted on the approved Master Development Plan, it is anticipated a higher density project will be developed on the southern portion of the site in the future. Prior to approval of the Prestwick Place mixed use development, the City completed an environmental review of the entire project area and land further north (the CSAH 42/Akron AUAR). The AUAR examined three possible development scenarios for the entire area, and included an evaluation of the potential impacts from development, including traffic, storm water, water supply, and other environmental concerns. The approved plans for Prestwick Place adhere to the first development scenario, which was the lowest density alternative at 6.21 dwelling units per acre. Since approval of the PUD, the City has approved 5 plan modifications west of Akron Avenue that have reduced the overall project density by eliminating many of the planned townhouse units. This means that future developments consistent with the Prestwick preliminary plans will fall well within the project scope and impacts expected when the development was reviewed and first approved by the City. The CDA has owned Outlot M of Prestwick Place since shortly after the subdivision was approved by the City, and was involved in preparing the preliminary development plan for the site. The 2007 staff reports to the Planning Commission and Council included the following summary of the plans for this property: The Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) is acquiring 18.53 acres on the east side of Akron Avenue and the north side of Connemara Trail for the development of work force housing. The northern 7.17 acres is proposed for a 42 unit townhouse complex and the southern 11.36 acres is proposed for 200 apartment units within five (5) apartment buildings. The 42 unit townhouse complex is intended to be similar to the Rosemount Family Housing 32 unit townhouse development recently approved for the CDA on the northwest corner of South Robert Trail and Connemara Trail. The intent is to have the complex be owned and maintained by the CDA and rented to working families that would currently have an average income of $30,000. The CDA has a proposed central playground area as a private recreational amenity for the complex. The only deviations from the City Code are to allow for a one car garage per unit and the 20 foot parking setback, the same as the other townhouse development within the Prestwick Place development. The CDA parcels contain sufficient detail to receive rezoning and Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan, but additional information such as landscaping, internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation, ingress and egress, and stormwater management will need to be clarified during Planned Unit Development Final Development Plan approval. The 2007 review included additional information concerning the 200-unit apartment complex; however, the apartments are not part of the current application nor does the CDA have plans to develop the apartment potion of the project in the near future. The preliminary plan review noted that the CDA would have the option to sell the apartment site to a private developer that would then need to bring a final development plan forward. These apartments may or may not have an affordable component if the property is sold by the CDA. The Dakota County CDA has now submitted its request for Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan approval with the application currently in front of the Planning Commission. As the Commission is aware, the adopted Master Development Plan functions as the zoning for the site and the final site and building plans should be reviewed based upon that approved Master Plan. The current application includes all of the required detailed information for a final plan review, including a final site plan, grading, drainage, and erosion control plans, stormwater plan, landscaping plan, and related information. The overall configuration of units follows the approved master development plan very closely, but with two fewer units then was originally planned. This reduction falls within the 5% variation allowed before it would be considered a major change to the preliminary development plans. Access into the project via a new extension of Addison Street and the location of the internal access road is consistent with the preliminary approval. Overall, the project includes 40 residential units within nine townhouse structures with either four or five units in each building. The main entrance is planned off of Addison Street roughly 400 feet south of 141st Street East. All units will front onto an internal private street with a small area of common open space in the middle portion of the site. The plans also show a series of sidewalks providing pedestrian connections 6 across the site, with a small playground area in the center of the neighborhood. All of the buildings will be two stories in height, with one garage stall and one driveway stall to accommodate parking for each unit. As part of the preliminary approval, the City approved a standard to require two parking stalls per unit with one of those in a garage. Overall, the site plan provides for the minimum number of parking stalls required for each unit (two) in as well as the guest/overflow parking of one stall for every two units. Dakota County now is requiring additional right-of-way dedication along Akron Avenue, which is a change since the 2007 approval. In 2013, the County adopted a new Plat Needs Map for its roadway network, and the required right-of-way for Akron Avenue increased to 150 feet in width, or 75 feet from the centerline of the road. When the preliminary plat and plans for Prestwick Place were previously approved by the City, the plans included 110-foot right-of-way with 55 feet from the center line on the applicant’s side of the road. Over time, the County has been asking for the additional dedication with new projects, and the CDA is expected to dedicate an additional 20 feet within the final plat and plans. The final plans have been updated to reflect the additional right-of-way required by the County and while providing for required structure setbacks that meet the minimum PUD zoning requirements for townhouses within Prestwick Place. The additional right-of-way dedication has also been provided over Outlot A as part of the final plat. The CDA will be developing Prestwick Place Townhomes under its workforce housing program. As noted on the CDA’s website, the workforce housing program is designed for moderate income families with children under the age of 18. The program sets minimum income limits in order to qualify, and also includes income thresholds for all participants. As an example, a household with three members seeking a two-bedroom unit would need to have a minimum income of $19,176 with a maximum income allowed of $46,800. The preference income for this situation would be $39,000. The program is intended to help cities throughout Dakota County accommodate their affordable housing goals and to provide units at a price point that are not being met by the private market. There is one other workforce housing project in Rosemount, the Carbury Hills Townhouses at the South Robert Trail and Connemara interaction, which was constructed roughly 10 years ago. Issue Analysis Legal Authority. Subdivision and planned unit development requests are considered quasi-judicial actions. In such cases, the City is acting as a judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed. Generally, if the application meets these requirements it must be approved. Because the subject property is located within Prestwick Place, the City has established zoning for the area of R3-PUD. This means that the PUD master development plan functions as the zoning for the property and the more specific requirements within the PUD are the standards that must be used to evaluate development proposals rather than the R3 ordinance criteria. The applicable PUD standards, along with staff findings related to each are provided below. Similar to a site plan review process, if the Commission finds that the application is consistent with the ordinance criteria (the master development plan in this instance) the project should be approved. General Subdivision Design The applicant presently owns Outlot M of Prestwick Place, which is a 19.75 acre parcel located east of Akron Avenue and south of 141st Street East. In order to facilitate the construction of the planned townhouses, the applicant is proposing to split Outlot M into two parcels. One of the new parcels would be a 5.63 acre lot that would contain the townhouse units, private road, and other site improvements, with the 7 remainder of the CDA property platted as a larger 13.47 acre outlot. The plat also includes an additional 20 feet of right-of-way for Akron Avenue, which would bring the overall width of this right-of-way to 75 feet from the centerline consistent with the updated County Plat Needs Map. All areas outside of the individual townhouse units, driveways, and play area improvement will be covered by a drainage and utility easement since they include a storm water retention pond, the swales/pipes leading to this pond, and the public sewer and water lines serving the development. Because the townhouses are rental units, there will be no individual lots created for each of the structures. The roads providing access to each unit are private streets and will be under common ownership. In this case, the Dakota County CDA will retain ownership of the property and will therefore be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all private improvements on the site. The plat includes an extension of Addison Street south of 141st Street East, and dedicates this right-of-way over all property owned by the CDA. Because the centerline of Addison Street was planned to follow the boundary between Outlot M and Outlot N in Prestwick Place, the applicant will need to either dedicate an additional 30 feet for this road over Outlot N or will need to secure easements from the adjoining property owner so the road can be constructed in its planned location. The dedication/easement must be obtained before the road can be constructed and is listed as a condition of approval. The proposed subdivision may be considered through a simple plat process, which combines the preliminary and final plat review into one step. The overall boundaries of Outlot M relative to the other parcels within Prestwick Place are not changing due to the plat, and the plat only creates a buildable lot for the townhouse project while leaving the remainder of the parcel intact for development at a later date. Land Use and Zoning The site under consideration is guided for medium density residential in the City’s Comprehensive Plan, which guides land for residential development at a density of 6-12 units per acre. The proposed project falls within the low end of this range at 7.1 units per acres. Consistent with the future land use designation, the property is zoned R-3 Medium Density Residential/Planned Unit Development. Single- family attached residential units are a permitted use in this district in accordance with the minimum lot requirements and setbacks specified in the Zoning Ordinance. With the PUD designation, the development also needs to adhere to the standards, requirements, and any flexibility allowed under the approved master development plan. The Rosemount Comprehensive Plan includes specific goals and policies concerning housing that apply to this development. In particular, three of these goals indicate that the City should 1) provide a mixture of rental and home ownership opportunities to provide life cycle housing, 2) locate different housing styles within the appropriate areas, which includes a policy of dispersing medium and high density housing throughout the community to avoid entire neighborhoods of medium or high density residential, and 3) provide workforce and affordable housing opportunities through cooperative efforts with other agencies (with the Dakota County CDA listed as a principal partner). Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan The 2007 Prestwick Place PUD Master Development Plan established that development within the PUD area will follow the underlying zoning requirements with the exceptions listed in the approved PUD Agreement. These exceptions include the following:  The townhouse buildings within Outlot G, Outlot L, and that part of Outlot M zoned R3 PUD, 8 Prestwick Place, are permitted to have a maximum of 12 units per building.  The townhomes within that part of Outlot M zoned R3 PUD, Prestwick Place, are permitted to have a single stall garage provided that there is total off street parking provided for an average of 2.5 stalls per unit.  The townhouse buildings within Outlot G, Outlot L, and that part of Outlot M zoned R3 PUD, Prestwick Place, have a setback from the public street of 25 feet, a setback from property lines of 30 feet, a minimum building separation of 20 feet, and a minimum parking setback of 20 feet. The final development plans comply with all of these requirements as summarized in the following chart: Standard Requirement Proposed Total Residential Units 42 (Preliminary PUD) 40 Max Units Per Building 12 5 Total Parking 2.5 stalls per unit/1 garage stall 40 garage stalls (1 per unit); 40 driveway stalls, 20 guest stalls (100 total/2.5 per unit) Street Setback 25 ft. 30 ft. Akron Ave. 56 ft. 141st St. E. 103 ft. Addison St. Property Line Setback 30 ft. East, North, and West – see above street setbacks South – 52 ft. Building Separation 20 ft. 20 ft. Parking Setback 20 ft. 38 ft. In addition to the standards specified in the PUD agreement, the Zoning Ordinance includes a section specific to single family attached housing. The final development meets or exceeds these requirements; however one standard warrants further explanation. The ordinance requires a minimum separation of at least 60 feet when the rear of a row of townhome dwelling units faces the rear of an adjoining row of townhome dwelling units. In considering the applicant’s site plan, none of the structures directly face the rear of another structure since all of the middle units are at an angle to other nearby buildings. Staff has found that this standard is met since the rear of Building 9 is technically facing the side of Building 4 (and therefore subject to a 40 foot setback instead of 60 foot setback). The appropriate rear separation is provided for all other buildings on the site plan. The site meets or exceeds all other applicable standards of the City’s R3 zoning and single family attached dwelling ordinances and is constituent with preliminary master development plan for Prestwick Place. Home Designs The proposed townhome structures will look similar but with slight variations in each building both in terms of the number of units in each building (either four or five) and allocation of various dwelling unit configurations within the buildings. The applicant is proposing seven unique floor plans, some of which are located entirely on one level, with most having living and sleeping space on two levels. Each unit will have a single car garage stall and main entrance along the front of the building adjacent to the garage. There are no openings or doorways on the rear or sides of the structures, and no shared space inside of 9 the buildings. The floor area of each unit ranges from the smallest one bedroom unit at 675 square feet to the largest three bedroom unit at 1,285 square feet. There are seven different types of units proposed for the development, with a mixture of one, two, and three bedroom units as follows: Unit Type Number Percent One Bedroom 6 15% Two Bedroom 21 52% Three Bedroom 13 33% A typical building elevation has been submitted for “Building 5”; all of the other structures will adhere to the same design and construction elements, which includes the following:  A single-garage stall for each dwelling unit with four or five total garage doors depending on the allocation of units in each building.  Articulation of the front and rear facades to help break up the apparent massing of each building, which are between 100 and 125 feet in length.  Face brick around each of the garage doors and along a portion of the rear building elevations. The brick portions of the buildings are located on walls that extend out from the main structure and will wrap around the building extension to provide some variety to the side elevations.  Dormers above each garage unit providing living space on the second level of each building. The gable end of each dormer will be finished with shake siding for additional variation in materials.  Fiber cement board lap siding over the majority of the remaining building elevations. The overall building design either meets or exceeds the architectural requirements elsewhere within Prestwick Place, and will provide for a unified site design throughout the project area. Because the overall design exceeds the City’s requirements for residential structures and any approved standards within Prestwick Place, staff is not recommending any specific PUD conditions related to building design for the CDA project. The attached typical elevation will be referenced in the PUD agreement, and all buildings must be consistent with these plans. The design of the townhomes is very similar to those in the Carbury Hills development in Rosemount. The CDA has numerous photos and a virtual tour of this development on its website at the following address: http://www.dakotacda.org/housing-resources/workforce-housing/workforce-housing- developments/ (scroll to the bottom of the page to find the Rosemount project). Access and Parking Although the subject parcel currently abuts both Akron Avenue and 141st Street East, no new access to these streets from Outlot M is included with the Prestwick Plans. Instead, the sole access into the townhouse site will be from an extension of Addison Street south of 141st Street. Eventually, Addison will connect into a new north/south road at the border with Outlot L, and this future north/south road will provide a connection to Connemara Trail (which has yet to be extended east of Akron Avenue). The overall trip generation from the project is expected to be approximately 266 trips per day (6.65 average vehicle trips per day per apartment unit), which is well within the design capacity of the local street system and adjacent County Road. As additional development occurs east of Akron Avenue, the future connection to Connemara will help divert traffic (especially southbound) away from 141st Street East. 10 Internally, the development will be served by a looped private street system designed to meet the City’s minimum width requirement of 28 feet. This width allows for the passing of two vehicles even in a situation where a car is parked or stopped on the street. Each of the garage units will access directly onto the private road, and throughout the project area the applicant is maintaining a minimum separation of at least 20 feet from the front face of the garage to the street. This distance will ensure that the parking stalls in front of the garage can count toward the overall parking requirements of the development while also making sure that no vehicles will block traffic on the adjacent street. The proposed plan accommodates the required guest parking in a series of four smaller parking areas spaced throughout the project site. Each of these overflow areas is either directly connected or located very close to sidewalks providing internal connections throughout the site. Counting each of the garage stalls, the driveway stalls in front of the garages, and overflow parking areas, there are 100 parking stalls on the site, or 2.5 stalls per dwelling unit. This ratio is consistent with the City’s residential parking standards as well as the PUD requirements for Prestwick Place. Landscaping The applicant has prepared a landscape plan that includes the installation of 164 trees and 369 foundation plantings in addition to a series of perennials to be planted around the site. There are no existing trees on the property (nor were there any present at the time of preliminary plan approval), so the applicant will not need to provide any replacement trees on the property. In terms of the City’s landscaping requirements, the application exceeds all City standards based on the zoning and number of dwelling units proposed. Landscaping Required Provided Trees 40 (1 tree per dwelling unit) 105 Deciduous 40 Evergreen 19 Ornamental Foundation Plantings 333 (1 shrub per 10 lineal feet of building) 369 The landscape plan provides a good mix of deciduous and evergreen trees meeting the City’s requirement of at least 75% deciduous trees. The plan also includes spacing of trees with the required separation of 50 feet along the Addison Street boulevard, with an enhanced planting program along the Akron Avenue boulevard to provide additional screening and buffering between the residential units and the collector street. Given the storm water needs of the site, and in particular the need to drain water away from each of the units along Akron Avenue, the applicant is not proposing any berming along the adjacent streets. Staff is recommending that some of the trees located within the central part of the northeast infiltration pond be moved to the northern property line to provide additional screening to the north. Parks and Pedestrian Features The City’s Parks Master Plan does not identify a new park in this area, and staff is recommending the City collect a cash dedication in lieu of land dedication for the project. The primary neighborhood park for this area is Ailesbury Park, which is located roughly one quarter of a mile west of Akron Avenue along Connemara Trail. In addition to the neighborhood park, the development plans for the Prestwick Place Townhomes include a central common play area with privately owned and maintained play structures. The size and location of the common area is consistent with the preliminary development plans for the site. 11 For pedestrian access, the plans include an extension of an existing 8 foot bituminous trail along 141st Street East along the eastern border of the CDA property. With this extension, there will be a trail along the east, north, and western boundaries of the site with future connections planned to the south as well. In his comments, the Assistant City Engineer notes that the plans should be updated to include a sidewalk along the eastern side of Addison Avenue in order to match the sidewalk configuration in the Greystone neighborhood to the north. Installing either trails or sidewalks on both sides of streets serving higher density neighborhoods is something that has been supported by the Planning Commission and Council in previous projects. Additionally, the preliminary plans for all Prestwick streets east of Akron and south of 141st Street East depict either a trail or sidewalk on both sides of these streets. All of this area is planned for townhouse or multi-family development. Internal to the site, the plans include a series of sidewalks that will cross the common recreation space in the middle of the development and provide a connection to the existing trail along Akron Avenue. There are no such connections shown to the planned trail along Addison Street, and staff is recommending that the final plans be updated to include a sidewalk connection to this trail. Lighting Under the City’s zoning regulations, the townhouse project does not require a specific photometric lighting plan. Instead, the applicant has been advised that they will need to follow the City street lighting policy for Addison Street and the internal private road system. The City’s policy specifies the type and spacing of fixtures to be used. The final plan set does not include any information about street lights, and the final plans should be updated to include a specific lighting plan. Trash Enclosures Each individual townhouse unit will be responsible for trash enclosures similar to any other single family development. All trash must be stored in an approved container and within an enclosed building before and after the scheduled pickup. Signage The final site plan depicts a monument sign near the Addison Street entrance in the southern portion of the site. The applicant will need to secure a sign permit for this sign prior to installation and the sign must comply with all applicable requirements of the sign ordinance concerning size, location, and other regulations. Engineering Comments The Assistant City Engineer has reviewed the Prestwick Place Townhomes plans and his review comments are attached for consideration by the City Council. The review is broken down into two sections with both general comments and review comments specific to the proposed storm water management plan. Please note that there are several areas in which the plans must be revised to conform to the City storm water ordinance. The applicant may need to consider additional ponding areas in order to address these concerns, and ultimately there is another storm water basin planned for the applicant’s property immediately south of the site on Outlot A. The recommended extension of Addison Street to the south will also require additional storm water runoff mitigation that may be difficult to accommodate within the planned system. The applicant will either need to provide an easement over Outlot A if the additional ponding is located on this lot, or as an alternative, the applicant may extend the property boundary of the townhome development to include this area. The revisions needed and some recommended considerations are included in the City Engineer’s Memorandum attached to this Executive Summary. Compliance with the memorandum is included as a 12 condition of approval for the simple plat and PUD approvals. Phasing The applicant has indicated that they are planning to begin construction in the spring of 2018, with a potential later start date based on the availability of funding for the project. The site will be developed as one project with all units being built over a relatively short time frame. All roads and public infrastructure will be installed at one time, with individual unit construction occurring when services are in place. General Workforce Housing Questions In advance of the Planning Commission public hearing, Staff received calls from resident in the nearby neighborhoods asking questions or expressing concerns about the development. Two issues that were raised in several conversations are addressed below.  Impact on property values. Staff has received two calls in advance of the meeting from residents expressing concern that the CDA’s project will lower property values of homes in the surrounding neighborhood. Staff is not aware of any studies that definitively find that affordable housing projects cause a reduction in surrounding property values; particularly single family homes. Most studies are either inconclusive or indicate that these types of projects have no measurable impact on property values. A 2014 study performed by Maxfield Research titled An Update Analysis of the Relationship Between Affordable Family Rental Housing and Home Values in the Twin Cities is an example of such a document. One of the projects studied in this report included the CDA’s Carbury Hills project in Rosemount, in addition to several other similar projects in Minnesota. The general conclusion of this study was that “This report documents little or no evidence to support the claim that tax‐credit rental housing for families has a negative impact on the market for owner‐occupied housing in the surrounding area. The homes that were sold in the subject areas around the eight tax‐credit developments in our study, in general, displayed similar or stronger performance in the period after the tax‐credit properties were built, as well as similar or stronger performance to comparable homes sales from a control group”.  Police calls. Staff has asked the police department to compare police calls in the area surrounding the Carbury Hills development and a typical residential subdivision. The numbers indicate that the workforce housing project does not generate an excessive number of calls as compared to a similar number of single family homes. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission and Staff find that the Prestwick Place Townhomes Simple Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan are consistent with the Prestwick Place PUD Master Development Plan approval. The Planning Commission and Staff are recommending approval of the Prestwick Place Townhomes Simple Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan with the conditions listed in the attached resolutions of approval. Prestwick Townhomes Property Information March 2, 2017 0 875 1,750437.5 ft 0 270 540135 m 1:9,600 Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2017 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANN ED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLAN FOR PRESTWICK PLACE TOWNHOMES WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from the Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA), 1228 Town Centre Drive, Eagan, MN (Applicant) requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Site and Building Plan concerning property legally described as: Outlot M, PRESTWICK PLACE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota WHEREAS, on March 20, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a public hearing and reviewed the PUD Final Site and Building Plan; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the PUD Final Site and Building Plan, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on April 18, 2017, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission’s recommendations and the PUD Final Site and Building Plan for Prestwick Place Townhomes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Site and Building Plan for Prestwick Place Townhomes, subject to the following conditions: 1.Execution of a Subdivision Agreement. 2.Compliance with terms and conditions of 2007 Prestwick Place Master PUD Development Agreement 3.Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum dated March 16, 2017. 4.Conformance with all requirements of the Parks and Recreation Director as detailed in the attached memorandum dated March 15, 2017. 5.The final construction plans shall be revised to include the construction of Addison Street to the eastern property boundary with Outlot L. 6.Dedication of 30-foot of right-of-way or a roadway easement over Outlot N to accommodate the construction of Addison Street. 7.Park dedication in the form of cash in lieu of land for 40 residential units to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit, in the amount in effect at the time based upon the Council adopted fee schedule 8.The applicant modify the landscape plan to provide additional screening along the northern site border 9.Obtain a sign permit for the entrance monument sign that complies with the Sign Ordinance. ADOPTED this 18th day of April, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. RESOLUTION 2017- __________________________________________ William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Clarissa Hadler, City Clerk 2 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2017- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SIMPLE PLAT FOR PRESTWICK PLACE TOWNHOMES WHEREAS, Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA), 1228 Town Centre Drive, Eagan, MN (Applicant) has submitted an application to the City of Rosemount (City) for a Simple Plat concerning property legally described as follows: Outlot M, PRESTWICK PLACE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota WHEREAS, on March 20, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Simple Plat for Prestwick Place Townhomes; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2017, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Simple Plat for Prestwick Place Townhomes, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on April 18, 2017, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission’s recommendations and the Final Plat for Preswtick Place Townhouses; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the revised Simple Plat for Prestwick Place Townhomes, subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of a Subdivision Agreement. 2. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum dated March 16, 2017. 3. The final plat shall be revised to include a drainage and utility easement over all storm water retention areas required to comply with the City Engineer’s review memorandum. As an alternative, Lot 1, Block 1 may be expanded to include all required storm water retention areas. 4. Conformance with all requirements of the Parks and Recreation Director as detailed in the attached memorandum dated March 15, 2017. 5. Park dedication in the form of cash in lieu of land for 40 residential units to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit in an amount consistent with the Council adopted fee schedule. 6. The final plat shall incorporate all easements as required by City. ADOPTED this 18th day of April 2017, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. __________________________________________ William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Clarissa Hadler, City Clerk BUILDING & UNIT DATAA (end)BUILDING NUMBERBUILDING AREA***-INC. GARAGE (GSF)TOTAL UNITS PER BUILDINGA2CNO. OF UNIT TYPES PER BUILDING2345455541BUILDING DATAUNIT TYPE1ST FL. GSF (EXCL. GARAGE)TOTAL NO. OF TYPE2232A int.A2BC69434132DWELLING UNIT DATA7056941,023NO. BEDROOMSNO. BATHROOMSACCESSIBILITYTYPE---TYPE A1.51.511.57,060 TOTAL BA (int.)12 22A end69412-1.52ND FL. GSF487488TOTAL GSF(GARAGE GSF)1181 (264)1182 (264)4961201(271)7631457 (264)DE131.5131NOTE: ALL UNITS HAVE A ONE STALL GARAGE-36789TOTAL4+OFFICE4 4012413 21,023 (352)-964 (271)25570922DE1 5,665 TOTAL 5 17,837 TOTAL 26,366 TOTAL * INCLUDES GROUND FLOOR AREA (EXCLUDING GARAGE SF) SECTION 7.11 OF MN OVERLAY OF GREEN COMMUNITIES GUIDELINES REQUIRES 1 RADON SYSTEM/3,000 SF OF BLDG. FOOTPRINT**ASSUMES 9' CEILING AT FIRST FLOOR AND 8' CEILING AT SECOND FLOOR. SOFFITED VOLUMES HAVE NOT BEEN SUBTRACTED FROM NUMBER.***INCLUDES WATER ROOM AREAS 3 3922922 (264)-OFFICE324324-1-1ACCESSIBLE60,470 TOTAL RADON AREA*3,434SF (2) 3,270SF (2) 2,776SF (1) 3,481SF (2) -VOLUME**(EXCL. GARAGE)10,142CuFt.10,150CuFt.10,313CuFt.12,350CuFt.9,207CuFt.7,967CuFt.8,298CuFt.1 1 11 111 11111 14 1 12222227,060 TOTAL 3,270SF (2) 7,060 TOTAL 3,270SF (2) 6,690 TOTAL 3,100SF (2) 6,366 TOTAL 2,776SF (1) 6,366 TOTAL 2,776SF (1) UPDATED 2/17/17UPDATED 2/17/17GENERALG0.00TITLE SHEETSURVEYOVERALL SITE (9/26/2016)SURVEYTOWNHOME SITE (9/26/2016)CIVILC0.00COVER SHEETC2.1SITE PLANC3.1 OVERALL GRADING PLANC3.2ENLARGED GRADING PLAN - NORTHC3.3ENLARGED GRADING PLAN - SOUTHC3.4SWPPP PLANC3.5EROSION CONTROL PLANC4.1 SANITARY & WATER PLANC4.2STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANC5.1DETAILSC5.2DETAILSC5.3DETAILSC5.4DETAILSLANDSCAPEL2.1LANDSCAPE PLANL2.2LANDSCAPE DETAILSARCHITECTURALA1.00 BUILDING 1 FLOOR PLANSA1.10BUILDING 2 FLOOR PLANSA1.20BUILDING 3,4 FLOOR PLANSA1.30 BUILDING 5,8,9 FLOOR PLANSA1.40BUILDING 6 FLOOR PLANSA1.50 BUILDING 7 FLOOR PLANSA2.10BUILDING 5 ELEVATIONSFILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS CLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACELOCATION: SE QUADRANT OF INTERSECTION AT AKRON AVE. AND 141ST ST. E.ROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.2029 2/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALC:\Revit Local Files\160489_Prestwick Townhomes R17 Central_admadso.rvt3/15/2017 8:34:36 AMG0.00-KDB160489TITLE SHEET2/21/17PRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNPROJECT TEAMOWNERROSEMOUNT II LIMITED PARTNERSHIPC/O DAKOTA COUNTY CDA1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123ARCHITECTLHB701 WASHINGTON AVENUE N., SUITE 200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTELAN DESIGN LAB901 N. 3rd Street, Suite 120Minneapolis, MN 55401STRUCTURAL ENGINEERMATTSON MACDONALD YOUNGBASSETT CREEK BUSINESS CENTER901 NORTH 3RD ST., SUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CIVIL ENGINEERELAN DESIGN LAB901 N. 3rd Street, Suite 120Minneapolis, MN 55401MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERDESIGN - BUILDCODE INFORMATIONVICINITY MAPBUILDING LOCATIONPROJECT RENDERINGCITY OF ROSEMOUNTPUD SUBMITTAL - SHEET INDEXAPPLICABLE BUILDING CODES1. 2015 MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE2. 2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (WITH 2015 MINNESOTA STATE AMENDMENTS)OTHER PROJECT REQUIREMENTS1. DAKOTA COUNTY CDA DESIGN STANDARDSOCCUPANCY GROUP1. R-2 DWELLING UNITSCONSTRUCTION TYPE1. V-BOCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS1. SECTION 406.3.4 R2 TO U2. IBC 420 1-HR BETWEEN DWELLING UNITS3. ALL BUILDINGS 'NON-SEPARATED' (IBC 508.3) BUT WITH CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY 406.3.4 AND 420ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT & AREA1. R2 - DWELLING UNITTABLE 503 2 STORIES (40FT)2. ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA R2 TYPE VBTABLE 503 = 7,000 SQ. FT. (PER FLOOR)3. ACTUAL AREA & HEIGHT (TAKEN FROM PROJECT'S LARGEST BUILDING - BLDG. 6)ACTUAL 1ST FLR. AREA = 4,808 GSF ACTUAL HEIGHT = 23' - 5 3/4"STORIES = 2FIRE WALLS (706)1. NOT REQUIREDFIRE BARRIERS (707)1. NOT REQUIREDFIRE PARTITION & CONTINUITY (708)1. FIRE PARTITIONS REQUIRED BETWEEN DWELLING UNITS (1 HOUR)2. CONTINUITY - SPACE BETWEEN CEILING AND DECK SHALL BE FIRE BLOCKED OR DRAFT STOPPED (708.4)HORIZONTAL SEPARATION (711)1. REQUIRED AT SEPARATION BETWEEN STACKING UNITS D & E AT BUILDINGS 2,3 & 4FIREBLOCKING (718.2)1. BATTS OR BLANKETS ARE ALLOWED AS FIREBLOCKING IN WALLS WITH PARALLEL STUDS @ 10' INTERVALS IN CONCEALED WALLS(718.2.1.1)DRAFTSTOPPING IN ATTICS (718.4)1. REQUIRED IN LINE WITH DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION - PROVIDE BETWEEN ALL UNITSSPRINKLERS (903.2.8)1. MN 1305-903.2.8 - REQUIRED, NONE OF THE BUILDINGS HAVE A FIRE AREA LESS THAN 4,500SQ. FT.2. SPRINKLER TYPE - NFPA 13RFIRE ALARMS/DETECTION (907.2.9)1. ALARMS NOT REQUIREDSMOKE ALARMS (907.2.11.2)1. UP HIGH ON WALL OUTSIDE EACH SLEEPING AREA2. IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM 3. ON EACH FLOOR WITHIN DWELLING4. INTERCONNECTED - WIRED TO SOUND SIMULTANEOUSLY (907.2.11.3)CO DETECTORS1. MN1305-908.7 - UNIT REQUIRED WITHIN 10'- 0" OF ANY SLEEPING ROOM2. ON EACH FLOOR WITHIN DWELLING (PROVIDE NEAR DOOR BETWEEN UNIT AND ATTACHED GARAGE)RECYCLING AREA (MN 1303-1500)1. EACH UNIT WILL HAVE ITS OWN RECYCLING AREA. SEE ENLARGED UNIT PLANS FOR REQUIRED LOCATIONS (UNIT SF x .0025 = REQUIRED SF)2. TRASH AND RECYCLING WILL BE PICKED UP AT CURBSIDE AT EACH UNIT.RADON (MN 1303-2400)1.ALL SLAB ON GRADE TOWNHOMES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A PASSIVE RADON SYSTEM INSTALLED2. INSTALL PASSIVE SYSTEM PER DETAIL ON SHEET A5.013. PASSIVE SYSTEMS SHALL BE MADE ACTIVE SYSTEMS IF TESTING FINDS THAT RADON LEVELS ARE 4 pC/l OR GREATERACCESSIBLE UNITS:1. 1107.6.2.1.1 REQUIRES 2% OF UNITS ON SITE TO BE TYPE 'A' ACCESSIBLE (40x.02)= 1 UNIT2. IF MHFA FINANCED- REQUIRES 5% OF UNITS ON SITE TO BE TYPE 'A' ACCESSIBLE (40x.05) = 2 UNITS3. ALL GROUND FLOOR SPACES ARE ON AN ACCESSIBLE PATH AND VISITABLE PERMHFA REQUIREMENTS. MULTISTORY UNITS ARE EXEMPT FROM TYPE 'B' STANDARDS BY 1107.6.2.1.2 & 1107.7.24. IF MHFA FINANCED- IN ADDITION TO, AND SEPARATE FROM THE 5% TYPE 'A' UNITS, INSTALL 2% OF UNITS WITH ACCESSIBLE COMMUNICATION FEATURES. THESE UNITS ARE TO BE IDENTIFIED BY OWNER (40x.02)= 1 UNITUPDATENO DATE REVISION     MEMO April 13, 2017 To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director, City of Rosemount From: Kari Gill, Deputy Executive Director Anna Judge, Director of Property Management Re: Additional information related to Property Management of Prestwick Townhomes The Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) will be the Property Manager for Prestwick Townhomes. The CDA has a record of constructing affordable rental housing throughout Dakota County that fits in with neighboring communities. Beyond that, we apply a high standard to property management principles for all of our properties. Our in-house property management team is responsive and accessible should problems arise in a particular unit or development. As requested, the following is more specific information about our rules for eviction and background checks, including basis for denial. Evictions/Lease Terminations If there are issues regarding tenant behavior (ie. disrupting the peaceful enjoyment of neighbors, criminal activity or unauthorized household member), the CDA investigates and determines a response on a case-by-case basis. If there are concerns that have not been addressed as requested or a pattern of unresolved concerns, the CDA generally tries to terminate the lease with the tenant rather than going through court action for an eviction. The CDA terminates the lease by issuing the tenant a termination of residency letter. The tenants usually leave voluntarily; however, there are instances where the CDA has to file an Unlawful Detainer with Dakota County Court and has to wait for a decision from the presiding judge before the eviction can formally occur. If there is a major issue, the CDA will pursue immediate eviction action through Dakota County Court. Background Checks The CDA verifies applicant income and conducts rental history, credit, and criminal background checks prior to offering a unit for lease. On the criminal background report, we look for patterns or convictions that we feel could put the safety of the residents or our property at risk. Our third-party screening reports provide us information that goes back several years. Applicants are denied for landlord or criminal concerns. When looking at landlord history (obtained from the current and past landlords for at least the previous five years), the CDA reviews applicants for:  late rent payments  utility payments  damages to the unit or common areas  housekeeping - how the applicant/family keeps or has kept up the unit  disturbances  fires  police calls  criminal/drug activity with family members or guests allowed in the unit  permitting others to stay in the unit that were not on lease Each applicant is reviewed individually to determine suitability for tenancy. The number of applicants denied varies over time, but it is not unusual for us to go through two to three applicants to fill each unit with denials being for income, credit, rental history and/or criminal history.   Kennedy Mary D. Tietjen 470 US Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 & Graven (612) 337-9277 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax mtietjen@kennedy-graven.com http://www.kennedy-graven.com C H A R T E R E D MEMORANDUM To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director From: Mary Tietjen, City Attorney Re: Dakota County Community Development Agency Plat and PUD Plan Date: April 11, 2017 On April 18, 2017, the City Council will be taking action on the request by the Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) for a simple plat and planned unit development (final site and building plan) for the Prestwick Place Townhomes project. The Planning Commission considered this item at its meeting on March 20, 2017. The CDA is developing the townhouse project under its workforce housing program. The program includes minimum income limits in order to qualify and would assist the city in meeting its affordable housing goals. You asked me to comment on the City’s ability to consider the “affordability” aspect of the project in taking action on the land use approvals. As the staff’s memo to the Planning Commission explained, decisions on subdivision and PUD applications are considered “quasi-judicial” decisions. For these types of decisions, the City Council reviews the applicable ordinances to determine if the applicant has met the criteria. If an applicant has met the standards in the ordinances, then the Council has very little discretion to deny the applications. Staff’s memo to the Planning Commission indicates that the applicant has met the applicable criteria. The Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve the CDA plat and PUD subject to certain conditions. During the public hearing, some residents in nearby neighborhoods stated objections to the CDA project, claiming that the project will lower property values and generate excessive police calls. Some residents also objected based on possible traffic congestion. General statements of public opposition should not be a basis for denying an application, unless those statements can be supported with factual and verifiable evidence and are related to the public’s best interest. In other words, in order to rely on public opposition to deny a land-use application, the public opposition should be corroborated by studies or expert testimony on the 1 subject. In this case, it appears that the residents’ statements are general statements of opinion only and that staff has presented information directly rebutting those opinions. In addition, the Council should not rely on the “affordability” aspect of the project as a basis for possible denial of the project. Neither the income of prospective tenants or residents, nor the amount of rent that an individual will pay, is one of the criteria for approval of the land use applications. These factors are unrelated to the legitimate land use issues that the Council can consider, such as density, setbacks, parking, traffic, building designs, impacts on public facilities and open spaces, and a whole host of other issues. Although the density of a project is often considered in the context of what type of use is permitted in the applicable zoning district (single-family vs. multi-family residential uses), land-use regulations do not differentiate between the types of occupants of those units (owner-occupied vs. renter). Therefore, this factor alone would not be an appropriate basis for the denial of a land-use application. 2 Infrastructure  Engineering  Planning  Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541-4800 Fax: 763 541-1700 Memorandum To: Mitch Hatcher, P.E., Project Engineer City of Rosemount From: Chuck Rickart, P.E., P.T.O.E., Traffic Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: April 12, 2017 Re: Traffic Review 141st Street East City of Rosemount, MN WSB Project No.: 1005-99 Concerns have been identified with the amount of traffic on 141st Street east of Akron Avenue today and in the future. The purpose of this traffic review is to document the amount of traffic on 141st Street today; in the interim prior to completion of area collector road system and the Connemara Trail extension, and; in the future with full build of the area. In 2012 a Collector Road analysis was completed documenting the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes on the minor collector roadway east of Akron Avenue (CR 73) to Blaine Avenue (CSAH 71) and south of Bonaire Path to CSAH 42. The attached figure shows the ADT volumes determined at that time. These traffic volumes represented the anticipated full development of land in the area and not on actual platted lots. Based on this analysis 141st Street would have and ADT ranging from 3,000 vehicles per day (vpd) at Akron Avenue (CR 73) to 2,500 vpd at the intersection with Connemara Trail. Existing Condition Approximately 500 feet of 141st Street was constructed with the Greystone Phase I development. There are currently 120 single family lots built with the first two phases of the Greystone development. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition traffic generation rates, these lots would generate approximately 1,140 vpd. 100% of these trips will use 141st Street until such time as a connection to Bonaire Path is constructed with phase III of the development, which is scheduled to be completed in the fall of 2017. Interim Condition There is a planned future development, Prestwick Place, between 141st Street and the future Connemara Trail east of Akron Avenue (CR 73). As part of the development approval up to 200 units could be developed prior to the extension of and a connection to Connemara Trail. 141st Street Traffic Review April 12, 2017 Page 2 It is assumed for the interim condition that the additional traffic from the 200 units would only have access through the 141st Street to Akron Avenue. Based on the ITE traffic generation rates, these units would generate approximately 1,170 vpd. 100% of these trips will use 141st Street until such time as a connection to Connemara Trail is constructed. The total trips on 141st Street in the interim condition, including the existing lots from the Greystone development, would be 2,310 vpd. Future Condition The future conditions assume the completion of the Greystone Phase III development, the completion of the remainder of the Prestwick Place development and future residential development in the area east to Blaine Avenue (CSAH 71). The assumptions for each of these development areas are discussed below: Greystone Phase III: This phase of the development includes an additional 169 single family lots with a roadway connection to Bonaire Path. The additional residential units will generate 1,610 vpd. A total of 2,750 vpd would be generated from the entire Greystone development. Based on the location of the existing and proposed lots and the connection to Bonaire Path, approximately 60% of the traffic would use 141st Street or 1,650 vpd. Prestwick Place: The remaining development of Prestwick Place includes 146 townhome units with a roadway connection to the Connemara Trail extension. The additional residential units will generate 850 vpd. A total of 2,020 vpd would be generated with the completion of the Prestwick Place development. Assuming the extension of Connemara Trail and the connection from the proposed development approximately 20% of the traffic would use 141st Street or 400 vpd. Future Development Area: The future development area east of the Greystone and Prestwick Place developments to Blaine Avenue (CSAH 71) is anticipated to be residential, however ownership of this property may affect the development type and schedule in the future. Based on the Akron Area AUAR and the City’s Comprehensive plan, an estimated additional 10,000 vpd would be generated from the developable area. Based on the anticipated roadway network and multiple connections to the collector and arterial roadways system it is anticipated that approximately 10% of this traffic or 1000 vpd would use the 141st Street connection to Akron Avenue (CR 73). Based on the above assumptions 141st Street at Akron Avenue would have approximately 3,050 vpd at full build of the area, compared to 3000 vpd originally assumed shown on the attached map. It should be noted that the estimated trips for the undeveloped area east of the current developments are based on assumed density. An updated traffic review should be completed at the time the area is planned for development to document the anticipated traffic conditions. If you have any question concerning these comments please feel free to contact me by email crickart@wsbeng.com or phone (612)360-1283. AKRON AVE (CR 73)145TH ST W (CSAH 42)BLAINE AVE (CSAH 71)BONAIRE PATH E AUDREY AVE145TH ST E (CSAH 42)145TH ST E (CSAH 42) 140TH ST E BONAIRE PATH E 3,000 2,2503 , 5 0 0 8,000 31,000 2,000 1,5002,500 Document Path: K:\01005-99\GIS\Maps\ADT.mxd Date Saved: 3/27/2012 9:08:53 AMProposed RoadsTraffic Counts (ADT)City of Rosemount MN 0 1,000500Feet Legend Major Collector (Future Roadway) Minor Collector (Future Roadway) Major Collector Minor Arteria Principal Arterial8,000 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1156 140th Street East Rosemount, MN 55068 March 23, 2017 Mayor Bill Drost Rosemount City Council Members Rosemount City Administrator Logan Martin Rosemount City Hall 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068-4997 RE: Dakota County Community Development Agency Plan – Prestwick Place Townhomes Mayor Drost and City Council Members: On Monday, March 20, 2017, I attended the City of Rosemount Planning Commission Meeting Public Hearing in regards to the proposed Prestwick Place Townhomes planned by the Dakota County Community Development Agency. Unfortunately, it appears that the Public Hearing came 10 years too late for those of us now residing in the Greystone Development who have moved in to the area over the past three to four years. The commission was only able to vote to confirm that the development met the criteria set forth from planning back in 2007. Please keep in mind that none of us in this area now were here back in 2007. While I am not opposed to workforce housing, there are concerns from my neighbors and myself about this development: • Rosemount Schools are already full and additional building(s) are either in work or need to be discussed. With Greystone adding another 150+ homes as well as other area neighborhoods, where will these children go to school? • 141st Street West is the only entrance for the Greystone Development as it stands today. The town homes will add another project using the same entrance with additional vehicle traffic at the entrance. We were told that there will be another outlet from Greystone sometime in 2017 yet not sure that will help traffic patterns in our area. • Prestwick Place Townhomes is a great concept however, also not near any businesses or any public transportation routes which makes me question why this location would be ideal for those with low incomes to live and have to find a way to work. Why would the CDA want to place a community like this in a location like this? • The City Planning staff took police calls from 2016 for both a similar development (Cadbury) and Greystone. Of course that is not “apples to apples” given the fact that Greystone had very few homes sold compared to the more mature Carbury Hills development. Ms. Kim Lindquist even noted at the hearing that sometimes things and plans change as it relates to the purchase of the Greystone Development by then Ryland now Cal-Atlantic Homes. After all of the comments were made by my fellow neighbors, it was again disappointing to learn that this meeting was only a formality and that the Planning Commission was not able to do anything about this. Of course the audience was told to participate in future planning meetings that will shape the next 10 years of Rosemount. Why can’t the City or Planning Commission revisit if this is a good idea for the community now? Why would something that was part of the plans 10 years ago have to stand today? As you are aware things do change over the course of 10 years. I am opposed to the Prestwick Place Townhomes as the plan stands today and would ask you to vote against this planned development. I hope that I can count on your support at the next City Council meeting where we’re told that this will be voted upon. Sincerely, Jonathan A. Fox 1 Klatt, Kyle From:Martin, Logan Sent:Monday, March 27, 2017 10:24 AM To:Lindquist, Kim Subject:FW: Seeking Support     Logan Martin  City Administrator  City of Rosemount  www.ci.rosemount.mn.us  City Hall: 651‐423‐4411  Direct: 651‐322‐2006        From: David Marcotte [mailto:dpmarcotte017@hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 10:39 PM To: Martin, Logan Subject: Seeking Support Logan ‐     Good evening! First, I want to congratulate you on your new position with the City of Rosemount as the new  City Administrator. Welcome to Rosemount!    I was referred to reach out to you by Heidi Freske as I spoke to her last week and wanted to reach out to you  with some concerns on the new Dakota County CDA development currently slated for the corner of 141st  Street and Akron Avenue to open in spring of 2018 which the Planning Commission currently approved to go  before the city council in April.     My wife and I have been living in Rosemount since 2008 and have watched this city grow. We love the small  town feel and the schools and have integrated ourselves in to this community. In 2015, we decided to move  however refused to look anywhere outside of Rosemount due to the great things that Rosemount has to offer.  We decided to purchase a home in the Greystone community just east of Akron Avenue. During the  negotiations of our home, we asked our Sales person about the parcel of land to the south of our  development and all that we were told was that owned town homes would be built sometime however no  plan was offered at this time.     After moving in, meeting great neighbors, the topic came up as to what would be developed on this land.  Many of our neighbors did much more homework than we, even contacting the city to find out what would be  developed. Each of them were told the same. After attending the planning meeting on Monday, March 20 at  City Hall, we discovered that the land was purchased by the Dakota County CDA back in 2007, however the  CDA claimed they had no intentions of ever developing the land, that they wanted the land ore for an  investment, however when our neighbors checked in with the city and others, at no time did anyone instruct  2 them that government town homes would be built adjacent to our development. Many of which stated that  had they known this government town home was going to be built, many of them would not have decided to  build or move into this development. Many of us feel duped and I speak to friends who are looking to  purchase homes in Rosemount and many of them are not interested in even looking in our development due  to the proposed Dakota County CDA development being built. Many indicating immediate decrease in home  values amongst other factors. I remember moving to Rosemount in 2008 and from the Bloomfield  development east, was nothing but farmland, open land. Once the economy turned for the better,  development increased in single family homes however the planning commission approved new development  after new development knowing that the Dakota County CDA owned a small parcel of this land, although at  the meeting, they cited that over time, things do change and zoning changes as well. The city planners did not  revisit this land or even work with the CDA knowing that the city was growing towards this land. I also do not  see the sense it makes to build high density homes within or in very close proximity to these new  developments that were approved and have not been built up and continue to expand.     What I am reaching out to you on is other factors for building this CDA development. I realize and understand  that as our city is growing, it cannot however only grow with single family homes and low income, high density  homes must also be part of the growth of the city. My concern is with the placement of this development in  the current proposed location off 141st Street and Akron Avenue. The reason for my concern is the proximity  to not just the Greystone development but also the Prestwick development across the busy street of Akron  Avenue. The Dakota County CDA claims they purchased this land due to the proximity of Dakota County  Technical College which however the land they purchased run from Connemara and runs north to 141st Street  all along Akron Avenue. Would it not make more sense to move this development south to the corner of  Connemara and Akron?     A couple of reasons for the proposed movement south a bit, both Connemara and Akron are busy streets and I  would guess that as the city continues to grow that Connemara will grow and become more of a bus route.  Moving this development south a bit would be a safer place for this high density development to take place  and to catch public transportation without having to go far. Another idea is to work with the CDA about  purchasing this land back, working with current developers to build twin homes, town homes or expand their  footprint and move the propose high density to nearby other high density land that is open within the city.     Another concern (and one that is of greater concern) I have is our development currently has 1 entrance in  and out. I realize that another entrance is scheduled to be built and open especially once the 2nd phase of our  development opening, however that entrance hardly services the current residents and will not limit the  current traffic we have in to and out of our development. By adding a 40 unit town home community adjacent  to the Greystone development without an additional entrance, this increases the already overcrowded  entrance/exit to our development, just increases this traffic which makes it severely more unsafe for all  residents both in Greystone and the proposed town homes residents.     Akron Avenue is a very busy street which some already use as a drag strip at times. Akron Avenue only had 2  Stop Signs, 1 at Bonaire and 1 leading on to Highway 42 with no lighting whatsoever on the road, no cross  walks. By building this development and expect the same entrance that is currently in place, is simply unsafe  for all that utilize it, however when you look at similar development nearby such as Prestwick and Falmoor  Glen, they have multiple entrances and exits which severely reduce congestion.     I hope that you can understand my concerns for the safety of all residents within Greystone. Simply asking to  move the CDA development to the south of their owned land with their own entrance/exit would clear up the  3 congestion and also providing a buffer to the CDA town homes and the Greystone development. By adding  lighting, cross‐walks to Akron also makes this road much safer.     I hope that you will please share these concerns with the city council, mayor and other city officials. I would  also like to request a meeting with city council members including yourself, even a town hall meeting so I/we  can voice some concerns over the placement of this development with our city leaders and hope that they are  able to hear and listen to our concerns before acting in April.     I appreciate your time in reading this and would love the opportunity to discuss further. I also appreciate you  passing this on.     Thank you!    ‐ Dave Marcotte  651‐260‐4283  1 Klatt, Kyle From:Martin, Logan Sent:Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:04 PM To:Lindquist, Kim Subject:FW: Seeking Your Support - CDA Planned Dev - Akron FYI from Mark…    Logan Martin  City Administrator  City of Rosemount  www.ci.rosemount.mn.us  City Hall: 651‐423‐4411  Direct: 651‐322‐2006        From: Mark (Home) [mailto:markdebett@charter.net] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 1:15 PM To: Martin, Logan Cc: Debettignies, Mark Subject: FW: Seeking Your Support - CDA Planned Dev - Akron Logan, Received the below email from a resident that I thought you should have copy on. Thanks Mark DeBettignies Phone: (612) 240-3350 markdebett@charter.net From: Nicholas Goers [mailto:ngoers@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:23 AM To: Mark.DeBettignies@ci.rosemount.mn.us; mayor@ci.rosemount.mn.us; heidi.freske@ci.rosemount.mn.us; shaun.nelson@ci.rosemount.mn.us; Jeff.Weisensel@ci.rosemount.mn.us Subject: Seeking Your Support Good morning, I am reaching out to the Mayor and Council today seeking your support in helping the Greystone Development that was built by CalAtlantic Homes (Formerly Ryland Homes) and a property that is slated to begin construction in the Spring of 2018. That project is owned by the Dakota County CDA for low income/transitional housing. After sitting through the public hearing on Monday evening with the planning commission, I, along with another 20 or sow neighbors have some serious concerns regarding this project and fell that we were not heard at this meeting nor was the correct information provided to us homeowners and possibly the builder as well. When we looked at moving to Rosemount, we did our due diligence in researching everything we could about the city and this was included. We called the city to discuss the zoning of the land adjacent to the CalAtlantic/Ryland Homes development to get a better understanding and make an educated decision on where 2 to start a family. What we were told, as well as our neighbors, was that it was zoned for medium density housing for town-home development in the future. What we were told by our developer (sales representative, Mitch) was that a retirement community was slated to be built in the future. What we heard at the meeting on Monday evening was that this land had been approved back in 2007 and the city was well aware that low income housing was eventually going to be added. They also made it perfectly clear that it was our fault for not doing our due diligence, even though we absolutely did so. So, either the city is lying, CalAtlantic is lying or is it possible both of you are lying and "sleeping together?". However you look at it - we were duped and not provided with a full disclosure which is illegal. Here are some additional concerns of ours and other neighbors; The added traffic to the area is a very big concern with only one way in to our development. CalAtlantic has advised us that a new entrance was to be added, but it really does none of us any good to go out Bonaire Path in the first place. We have far too many children in our close knit community and the added traffic with just one entrance is a little frustrating and disturbing. The value of our homes are about to change significantly. We have done research with the support of our realtor and while the actually county assessors office would say the Value of our home may go down a couple of percentage points, we have to look at this in the bigger picture of the word Value. 1. Had we know the correct information about this CDA development, we would have not purchased with CalAtlantic/Ryland Homes. That is a loss to the organization, because every single one of our neighbors said the same thing at the Monday night meeting. 2. Neighbors are starting to already consider moving (we certainly are, even if that means to another city and community) and it will be more difficult to sell or get full ask for our homes. That's a loss in value not only to us as homeowners, but to the city as well. Sure, there are those seeking to be homeowners that do not mind having low income housing next to them, but had they disclosed this information to buyers, I am certain they wouldn't be expanding as quickly as they have. Because of this approach and our feelings on this - the commission painted a picture that we were basically all poor people haters which was never spoken. In fact we encouraged the build, but provided alternative locations, my next concern. I wrote a letter to the commission which the letter we received explained to do to express our concerns. I provided some alternative locations, and locations that made more sense. We asked the the city to work with the Dakota County CDA and land owners in the area to see if something could be looked at, but never once was it mentioned. Here are some alternative land locations I proved; - Property in Harmony village at the intersection of Connemera Trail and Brockway Ave. - Property located off Biscayne Ave adjacent to the National Guard Post. - Property on the other side of the tracts from our development at the intersection of Bonaire Path and Akron Ave. - Property adjacent to the Public Storage Facility of Chippendale Ave. - Consider another city like Farmington/Empire. Will Akron eventually become a bus route and adding even MORE congestion? We were under the impression that we would by a small community tucked back off of County Road 42 and Akron Ave., not on a congested, busy road. The biggest concern for us I think, is the fact that someone isn't telling us the truth about what information was actually known and yet the city is making us all feel like we're the idiots for not knowing. That's unacceptable! We've spoken to some legal teams and they have some serious concern as well and the negligence that is present. We are asking that the Rosemount City Council and Mayor reconsider the zoning for this land and zone it for low density/single family homes immediately and halting the Dakota County CDA project or, work with them to have the development moved elsewhere. 3 We thoroughly appreciate all of our neighbors and our little community. We've all gotten to know each other, look after one another and our children and now, we're about to get a revolving door of uncertainty directly next to all of us. The CDA can't guarantee who lives in these developments and have seen this first hand from a relative that lives one. A revolving door of residents by the day, week, month and extensive police activity (mostly domestic related). As a Criminal Justice educated person, it's one of the most difficult things to deal with as an officer and now it's moving right next door! I hope that you will seriously take all of this information into consideration and assist the Greystone community. I personally look forward to hearing back from you all and hope you have a wonderful day, rest of the week and weekend. Respectfully, Nicholas S. Goers President & Founder  P: 651.755.4480 | W: DSGchallenge.org | E: dsgchallenge@gmail.com  #CHALLENGEyourself    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 141ST STADDISON AVE140TH ST ADDISONCT141ST ST ADRIAN CT139TH STADELLE AVE Tom Raiolo 13869 Addison Ave Shena Johnson 1199 140th St E Don Jach 14084 Adrian Ct Joe Musolf 14054 Adrian Ct Evan Ellis 14099 Addison Ave Kelly Estepp 1019 140th St E Raphel Rauer 14064 Adrian Ct Jonathan Fox 1156 140th St E Jeff Jones 13999 Addison Ave Nick Goers 14094 Adrian Ct Dave Marcotte 1176 140th St E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 141ST STADDISON AVE140TH ST ADDISONCT141ST ST ADRIAN CT139TH STADELLE AVE Tom Raiolo 13869 Addison Ave Shena Johnson 1199 140th St E Don Jach 14084 Adrian Ct Joe Musolf 14054 Adrian Ct Evan Ellis 14099 Addison Ave Kelly Estepp 1019 140th St E Raphel Rauer 14064 Adrian Ct Jonathan Fox 1156 140th St E Jeff Jones 13999 Addison Ave Nick Goers 14094 Adrian Ct Dave Marcotte 1176 140th St E Prestwick TownhomesPublic Hearing 4/11/2017 MXD: T:\GIS\Project\CommDev\Development\CDA\PublicHearingComments11x17.mxd PDF: I:\GIS\Map_Library\CommDev\Development\CDA\PublicHearingComments8x11.pdf 0 200100 Feet !Letter Received !Spoke at Public Hearing PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 20, 2017 PAGE 1 I. Regular Meeting Call to Order: Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was held on Monday, March 20, 2017. Chair Kenninger called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. with Commissioners Freeman, VanderWiel, Clement, and Henrie. Commissioners Forster and Mele were absent. Also in attendance were Community Development Director Lindquist, Senior Planner Klatt, Planner Nemcek, Project Engineer Hatcher, and Recording Secretary Bodsberg. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. Additions to Agenda: None Audience Input: None Consent Agenda: a. Approval of the February 28, 2017 Regular Meeting Minutes. b. Approval of the February 28, 2017 Work Session Meeting Minutes. MOTION by Henrie. Second by Freeman. Ayes: 5. Nays: 0. Public Hearing: 5.a. Request by Dakota County Community Development Agency for a Simple Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan for Prestwick Place Townhomes. (17-13-PUD and 17-14-FP) Senior Planner Klatt gave a brief summary of the staff report. Commissioner Clements questioned when the CDA purchased this property. Klatt confirmed that it was purchased in 2007. Clements inquired when were the Greystone & Prestwick developments approved. Klatt confirmed that it was after 2007 when Greystone was platted. Community Development Director Lindquist stated that the 2007 Master PUD Development Plan had laid out the entire Prestwick area. Commissioner Clements inquired why staff is requesting to have Addison Street extended to the end of the property line vs ending at the edge of the development. Klatt explained that when future development does happen then the road will be ready and there will not be a gap in the road. Commissioner Henrie inquired if the staff could address the residents’ concerns about property values near CDA properties and potential police calls to the property. Klatt explained that staff has referenced a report done in 2014 that stated that there is no evidence showing that this kind of development would impact the property values near the CDA property. Klatt also stated that the Rosemount Police Department compared the Carbury Hills Townhomes vs a single- family development and there were generally the same amount of police calls when removing vehicle calls relating to the adjoining roadways. Commissioner Henrie questioned that with the changes in the surrounding developments, would this kind of property development still fit with the current developments. Klatt stated that the development still does fit into the plan because the City has been planning for this project all along. Community Development Director Lindquist stated that the market had prompted the original land use to change but that the comprehensive plan on the East side has not been modified. Commissioner VanderWiel asked for clarification from staff as to what the Planning Commission should take into consideration when they listen to residential comments. Klatt stated that the decision should be about the focus on the site plan and zoning. VanderWiel inquired if the Commission has any dictation as to whether the property is high or medium density. Klatt clarified that has already been decided and set within the Master PUD Development Plan. VanderWiel asked if the Commission has any authority over whether the property is used for affordable housing or not. Klatt stated that the Planning Commission cannot dictate if a development is used for certain types of housing. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 20, 2017 PAGE 2 The public hearing opened at 7:33 pm. Public Comments: Kari Gill, CDA Deputy Executive Director of Housing Development, stated that the CDA believes that this is a good site for this development because of its proximity to Dakota County Technical College and that there is a plan to have Commercial properties along 42. There are usually multi-family properties used as a buffer between single family homes and the commercial properties. It is expected that the development would start either in the Spring or Summer of 2018, and would last for about a year. The entire development would be constructed at one time. Ms. Gill explained the process of obtaining tenants and how the rent is configured. Chair Kenninger inquired as to what the lease terms are. Ms. Gill stated that the lease is for a one-year time. Kenninger inquired if the occupancy at Carbury Hills Townhomes is full. Ms. Gill confirmed that is correct. Commissioner Clement inquired what the background check consisted of. Ms. Gill stated that a criminal background check is completed on all applicants 18 years and older and that they accept or deny an applicant based on those reports. Clement inquired how many applicants are denied. Ms. Gill stated that she was uncertain but was able to find that out and provide that information for the Commission. Commissioner Henrie inquired if there was a maximum to how many people can occupy a unit. Ms. Gill stated that they cannot occupy more than two people per bedroom. Tom Raiolo, 13869 Addison Avenue, stated that people were not aware that this project was on the books when they built their homes. Mr. Raiolo stated that Akron goes to gravel just north of 141st and he is concerned about the increased amount of traffic. He thinks that the property values would be affected. Mr. Raiolo stated that the CDA property in Eagan near the post office does not have an onsite manager. Mr. Raiolo would like to see more trees added to site plan. He would like to know if there is any documentation on the police calls for Carbury Hills Townhomes. He thinks that the congestion is going to be too great getting in and out of the development. Shena Johnson, 1199 140th Street East, stated that she has concerns about the safety of her family. Don Jach, 14084 Adrian Court, questioned if work force housing means that the CDA helps the family move them up to the next step. He understands that people start in apartments and then move to purchase their first home. He would also like clarification on if the property will be non-smoking. Joe Musolf, 14054 Adrian Court, stated that the information given to them when he moved into their property was that it was going to be medium density not that it was going to be work force housing. Mr. Musolf stated that if he would have known the exact plan then he wouldn’t have purchased his home in Greystone. He questioned as to why the CDA is choosing this spot for their development with all the single family homes surrounding the property. He feels that along highway 3 or near a main bus route would be a better fit for this type of property. Evan Ellis, 14099 Addison Avenue, inquired when there would be another entrance into this development. He stated that the corner of 141st Street West and Akron Ave is already very populated. Kelly Estepp, 1019 140th Street East, stated that there is one entrance into her development and she is concerned as to the traffic that will occur. Nicholas Goers, 14094 Adrian Court, questioned if this is the right location for this type of property. Mr. Goers stated that he thinks a property near a bus route would be better. Had he known that this development was in the plan he would not have moved here. Mr. Goers stated that he did do his due diligence before buying his property. Raphel Rauer, 14064 Adrian Court, stated that a lot has happened in 10 years and changes have been made to the area. Mr. Rauer feels like exceptions have been made for other developments and questions why can’t they be made for this development. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 20, 2017 PAGE 3 Katie Welch, 1219 140th Street East, stated that when she called the city she was told that it was going to be townhomes. She would like to know why she wasn’t told about the fact that they would be rentals or low income. Ms. Welch is also concerned about the fact that there are no jobs in that area of town and no bus route nearby. Tom Raiolo, 13869 Addison Avenue, questioned why this development is paying cash in-lieu of having a park. Mr. Raiolo also stated his concern for the high traffic on 141st Street West going in and out of the Greystone development. Chair Kenninger requested that Ms. Gill explain what work force housing is. Ms. Gill stated that the residents that live in this type of residence already have jobs. She also stated that the resident usually has a car and that the CDA has other properties that are on a bus route. If the applicant didn’t have a vehicle they would apply for a property near a bus route. Ms. Gill stated that this development will not be restricted to non-smoking. Commissioner Clement inquired if the other developments are work force. Ms. Gill confirmed that they are work force. Clement questioned the differences between the Eagan property to the Rosemount property. Ms. Gill stated that the Eagan property is not restricted to just single mothers and anyone that joins the property are required to be added to the lease and a background check will be completed. Clement questioned why the CDA purchased the land for the potential apartments with no intentions on developing it. Ms. Gill stated that they purchased the land because of the proximity to Dakota County Technical College and future commercial developments. At the time of the purchase they were unable to subdivide the property because the easements are very limiting that run through that site. Clement inquired if the property was already zoned for apartments when they purchased the property. Ms. Gill confirmed that it was already zoned. She stated that the property was not purchased with the intent to be an investment property. Don Jach, 14084 Adrian Court, inquired what the cost is for the project and what are the rules for eviction. Ms. Gill stated that the cost will be about $160,000 per unit. An eviction will happen if they are not lease compliant. MOTION by Clement to close the public hearing. Second by Freeman. Ayes: 5. Nays: 0. Motion Passes. The public hearing closed at 8:16 pm. Additional Comments: Senior Planner Klatt stated that according to the environmental study that was completed and the changes to the original plan of this areas development; the level of traffic has actually gone down. Klatt stated that there will be two connections when the development is finished. With the second phase of Greystone starting this year there will be a second connection out to Bonaire Path to the north of the development. Klatt shared maps of different buffer proximities from similar developments around Rosemount. Klatt stated that there is no evidence showing that housing values have gone down in existing neighborhoods near similar developments. Commissioner Freeman stated that she lives near the Carbury Hills Townhome development. She drives past and walks with her family past the development and has never seen any issues with maintenance or crime. Klatt stated that the developer proposed this project in this specific site because that is what the site was planned for. The City has to plan for high-medium dense housing. The City is mandated by the Met Council to update the land use plan every 10 years. The overall plan is the guiding plan and was last updated in 2007. The Land Use Plan maps are available for anyone to see what the plan is for a specific area. The CDA has owned the property for a long time and would have been the owners when Prestwick and Greystone were developed. The only thing that wasn’t advertised is who owned the property, but that information is public knowledge and is available on the Dakota County website. Klatt stated in response to the question about the requirement for a cash payment in-lieu of park land. The City has a master park plan and if a park was not a part of that original plan then the City will request a cash payment in-lieu of park land. That payment gets put into a park use fund for future park maintenance. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 20, 2017 PAGE 4 Chair Kenninger questioned if the apartment property is sold what could come of that. Klatt stated that the city could go through the process to update the plan and make that property be single family homes. But at the same time we need to keep in mind on where we are placing high density homes. Kenninger inquired if the application meets the landscape plan. Klatt stated that it does meet the requirements and what kind of trees are planted. Staff does request that there are additional trees placed in the north of the property for additional buffering. Commissioner VanderWiel inquired what kind of options the residents have to state their opinion on the Comprehensive Plan and what the future plan will be for the apartment site. Klatt stated that there will be neighborhood meetings and meetings with a public hearing so that the residents can voice their opinions. Residents can also write into the Commission at any time. Community Development Director Lindquist stated that this also falls under the Master Development Plan for this specific area that has been in place since 2007. We should be taking a look at the details of this project and not the zoning and land use. This project is further in the process compared to projects proposed to the Planning Commission in the past. Commissioner VanderWiel inquired about when should people be looking for notices for the improvements on the Comprehensive Plan. Lindquist stated that the larger community meeting has already taken place but the City will have upcoming meetings throughout the process. Residents can go to the Comprehensive Guide Plan page on the City’s website and there will be a list of meetings and the packet agenda items that the Planning Commission has been working on. Chair Kenninger questioned if the data on what the police department gathered was available. Klatt stated that he requested the call activity from the police station from Carbury and the Greystone neighborhood. Lindquist stated that the comparison was 50 homes from Greystone to the 40 units in Carbury. They didn’t want to compare a large neighborhood to a small neighborhood. Commissioner Henrie stated that the access points into this development are potentially years away. There could be major safety issues with this much traffic through a residential area. Lindquist stated that the other access out of Greystone will be complete by the end of the Summer 2017. Henrie stated that he is still concerned about the aspect of the travel patterns and the access point in and out of this development. He requested that an additional traffic study be performed near this area. Commissioner Clements inquired about any current commercial development in this area. Lindquist stated that there is too much undeveloped land in that area to start developing commercial properties at this time. Clements inquired about any inquiries on Industrial development. Lindquist stated that there have been several current inquiries but that nothing is official as of yet. Commissioner Henrie stated that he does not plan to support this plan until a traffic study has been completed. He is concerned for the safety of the neighborhoods near this property. Commissioner Clements stated that he thinks his hands are tied, he cannot not support the plan just because it is for low income residents. He stated that he used to be low income and he is a good person. He didn’t find out until tonight that Carbury was owned by the CDA. He stated that this property has been owned by the CDA since 2007, and it has been zoned this way since 2007. The commission cannot tell a land owner how they can or cannot improve their property. If they are meeting the current zoning requirements they cannot deny the application. Chair Kenninger stated that the Planning Commission needs to enforce the rules and they cannot discriminate against how the land owner would like to use their land. Commissioner Freeman stated that she agrees with Commissioner Clements comments. The land has been owned by the CDA since 2007 and it shouldn’t come as a surprise as to who owns the property or what the land has been zoned for. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 20, 2017 PAGE 5 Commissioner VanderWiel stated that the Commissioners have a statutory obligation to follow the Land Use Plan and zoning. Throughout this meeting the residents have been provided with options for the future and how future development is completed. Motion by Clements to recommend the City Council approve the Simple Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan for Prestwick Place Townhomes, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with terms and conditions of 2007 Prestwick Place Master PUD Development Agreement. 2. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum dated March 16, 2017. 3. Conformance with all requirements of the Park and Recreation Director as detailed in the attached memorandum dated March 15, 2017. 4. The final construction plans shall be revised to include the construction of Addison Street to the eastern property boundary with Outlot L. 5. Dedication of 30 –foot of right-of-way or a roadway easement over Outlot N to accommodate the construction of Addison Street. 6. The final plat shall incorporate all easements as required by City. 7. If required by Dakota County Plat Commission, the final plat shall dedicate an additional 20 feet for the Akron Avenue right-of-way over Outlot A. 8. Park dedication in the form of cash in lieu of land for 40 residential units to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit, in the amount in effect at the time based upon the Council adopted fee schedule. 9. The applicant modify the landscape plan to provide additional screening along the northern site border. 10. Obtain a sign permit for the entrance monument sign that complies with the Sign Ordinance. Second by Freeman. Ayes: 4. Nays: 1, Henrie. Motion Passes. Old Business: None. New Business: Community Development Director Lindquist stated that electronic packets would like to be an option for the Commissioners. Planning Commission was in agreement that they liked that idea. Commissioner Henrie questioned if there will be new commission members at the April meeting. Lindquist stated that the City Council have been conducting interviews. Klatt stated that there will be a Work Session on Tuesday, April 11th, 2017. The Land Use Plan will be the topic for the Work Session. Reports: None Adjournment: There being no further business to come before this Commission, Chair Kenninger adjourned the meeting at 8:59 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Stacy Bodsberg, Recording Secretary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning Commission Meeting Date: March 20, 2017 Tentative City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: Case 17-13-PUD and 17-14-FP Request by Dakota County Community Development Agency for a Simple Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan for Prestwick Place Townhomes AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 5.a ATTACHMENTS: Site Location Map; Final Plat, Preliminary Plat (2 Sheets); Project Information Sheet; Site Survey, Existing Conditions, Cover Sheet, Final Site Plan, Final Grading Plan; Erosion Control Plan, Utility Plan, Storm Water Management Plan, Landscape Plan; Building Floor Plans, Architectural Plans; Carbury Hills Photo, Prestwick Area Zoning Map, Prestwick Preliminary Development Plan, City Engineer’s Memorandum dated March 16, 2017, Parks Directors Memo dated March 15, 2017 APPROVED BY: KL RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to recommend the City Council approve the Simple Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan for Prestwick Place Townhomes, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with terms and conditions of 2007 Prestwick Place Master PUD Development Agreement 2. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum dated March 16, 2017. 3. Conformance with all requirements of the Parks and Recreation Director as detailed in the attached memorandum dated March 15, 2017. 4. The final construction plans shall be revised to include the construction of Addison Street to the eastern property boundary with Outlot L. 5. Dedication of 30-foot of right-of-way or a roadway easement over Outlot N to accommodate the construction of Addison Street. 6. The final plat shall incorporate all easements as required by City. 7. If required by Dakota County Plat Commission, the final plat shall dedicate an additional 20 feet for the Akron Avenue right-of-way over Outlot A. 8. Park dedication in the form of cash in lieu of land for 40 residential units to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit, in the amount in effect at the time based upon the Council adopted fee schedule 9. The applicant modify the landscape plan to provide additional screening along the northern site border 10. Obtain a sign permit for the entrance monument sign that complies with the Sign Ordinance. SUMMARY Applicant: Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) Location: Oultot M of Prestwick Place - East of Akron Avenue about ½ mile north of County Road 42 and ½ mile south of Bonaire Path (The southeast quadrant of Akron Avenue and 141st Street East). Gross Acres: 5.87 Acres – not including remainder of CDA parcel Net Acres: 5.63 Acres Proposed Units: 40 Dwelling Units Gross Density: 6.8 Units/Acre Net Density: 7.1 Units/Acre Comprehensive Plan Designation: MDR – Medium Density Residential Zoning: R3/PUD – Medium Density Residential Planned Unit Development The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a request from the Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) for a Simple Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Site and Building Plan approval for a 40-unit townhouse development to be called Prestwick Place Townhomes. The City of Rosemount previously approved a PUD Concept Plan and PUD Master Development Plan and Rezoning for the subject property and surrounding area, with the latter approval occurring on October 2, 2007. As specified in the City’s Zoning Ordinance, final site and building plan shall signify approval of all plans necessary prior to application for a building permit subject to other necessary approvals by the city including, but not limited to platting. Because it has been over one year since the preliminary plat for Prestwick was approved by the City, the applicant has requested a concurrent approval of an updated preliminary plat and final plat consistent with the City’s simple plat process. As the Commission and Council is aware, an approved Master Development Plan functions as the zoning for the property and therefore review of this project should be compared to the 2007 approval with conditions. BACKGROUND The subject property is part of a larger 290 acre mixed use development approved by the City in 2007 on the northwest and northeast corners of County Road 42 and Akron Avenue. The approved PUD Master Development and Rezoning includes approximately 50 acres of commercial, 90 acres of residential, and 130 acres platted as outlots for future development (the remainder of the 290 acres includes roads and parks; please note that some of areas labeled for future development have since been subdivided in the intervening years). Most of the approved development areas west of Akron Avenue received final plan approval over the past decade and have since been developed, while none of the planned development east of Akron Avenue has reached this stage. The Dakota County CDA owns 19.75 acres east of Akron, and at this time the CDA is asking for approvals associated with the northwest portion (5.87 acres) of the site. As depicted on the approved Master Development Plan, it is anticipated a higher density project will be developed on the southern portion of the site in the future. 2 Prior to approval of the Prestwick Place mixed use development, the City completed an environmental review of the entire project area and land further north (the CSAH 42/Akron AUAR). The AUAR examined three possible development scenarios for the entire area, and included an evaluation of the potential impacts from development, including traffic, storm water, water supply, and other environmental concerns. The approved plans for Prestwick Place adhere to the first development scenario, which was the lowest density alternative at 6.21 dwelling units per acre. Since approval of the PUD, the City has approved plan modifications west of Akron Avenue that have reduced the overall project density by eliminating many of the planned townhouse units. This means that future developments consistent with the Prestwick preliminary plans will fall well within the project scope and impacts expected when the development was reviewed and first approved by the City. The CDA has owned Outlot M of Prestwick Place since shortly after the subdivision was approved by the City, and was involved in preparing the preliminary development plan for the site. The 2007 staff reports to the Planning Commission and Council included the following summary of the plans for this property: The Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) is acquiring 18.53 acres on the east side of Akron Avenue and the north side of Connemara Trail for the development of work force housing. The northern 7.17 acres is proposed for a 42 unit townhouse complex and the southern 11.36 acres is proposed for 200 apartment units within five (5) apartment buildings. The 42 unit townhouse complex is intended to be similar to the Rosemount Family Housing 32 unit townhouse development recently approved for the CDA on the northwest corner of South Robert Trail and Connemara Trail. The intent is to have the complex be owned and maintained by the CDA and rented to working families that would currently have an average income of $30,000. The CDA has a proposed central playground area as a private recreational amenity for the complex. The only deviations from the City Code are to allow for a one car garage per unit and the 20 foot parking setback, the same as the other townhouse development within the Prestwick Place development. The CDA parcels contain sufficient detail to receive rezoning and Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan, but additional information such as landscaping, internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation, ingress and egress, and stormwater management will need to be clarified during Planned Unit Development Final Development Plan approval. The 2007 review included additional information concerning the 200-unit apartment complex; however, the apartments are not part of the current application nor does the CDA have plans to develop the apartment potion of the project in the near future. The preliminary plan review noted that the CDA would have the option to sell the apartment site to a private developer that would then need to bring a final development plan forward. These apartments may or may not have an affordable component if the property is sold by the CDA. The Dakota County CDA has now submitted its request for Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan approval with the application currently in front of the Planning Commission. As the Commission is aware, the adopted Master Development Plan functions as the zoning for the site and the final site and building plans should be reviewed based upon that approved Master Plan. The current application includes all of the required detailed information for a final plan review, including a final site plan, grading, drainage, and erosion control plans, stormwater plan, landscaping plan, and related information. The overall configuration of units follows the approved master development plan very closely, but with two fewer units then was originally planned. This reduction falls within the 5% variation allowed before it would be considered a major change to the preliminary development plans. Access into the project via a new 3 extension of Addison Street and the location of the internal access road is consistent with the preliminary approval. Overall, the project includes 40 residential units within nine townhouse structures with either four or five units in each building. The main entrance is planned off of Addison Street roughly 400 feet south of 141st Street East. All units will front onto an internal private street with a small area of common open space in the middle portion of the site. The plans also show a series of sidewalks providing pedestrian connections across the site, with a small playground area in the center of the neighborhood. All of the buildings will be two stories in height, with one garage stall and one driveway stall to accommodate parking for each unit. As part of the preliminary approval, the City approved a standard to require two parking stalls per unit with one of those in a garage. Overall, the site plan provides for the minimum number of parking stalls required for each unit (two) in as well as the guest/overflow parking of one stall for every two units. One of the previous site conditions that has changed since the preliminary plan was approved by the City is Dakota County now is requiring additional right-of-way dedication along Akron Avenue. In 2013, the County adopted a new Plat Needs Map for its roadway network, and the required right-of-way for Akron Avenue increased to 150 feet in width, or 75 feet from the centerline of the road. When the preliminary plat and plans for Prestwick Place were previously approved by the City, the plans included 110-foot right-of- way with 55 feet from the center line on the applicant’s side of the road. Over time, the County has been asking for the additional dedication with new projects, and the CDA is expected to dedicate an additional 20 feet within the final plat and plans. The final plans have been updated to reflect the additional right-of-way required by the County and while providing for required structure setbacks that meet the minimum PUD zoning requirements for townhouses within Prestwick Place. The CDA will be developing Prestwick Place Townhomes under its workforce housing program. As noted on the CDA’s website, the workforce housing program is designed for moderate income families with children under the age of 18. The program sets minimum income limits in order to qualify, and also includes income thresholds for all participants. As an example, a household with three members seeking a two-bedroom unit would need to have a minimum income of $19,176 with a maximum income allowed of $46,800. The preference income for this situation would be $39,000. The program is intended to help cities throughout Dakota County accommodate their affordable housing goals and to provide units at a price point that are not being met by the private market. There is one other workforce housing project in Rosemount, the Carbury Hills Townhouses at the South Robert Trail and Connemara interaction, which was constructed roughly 10 years ago. Issue Analysis Legal Authority. Subdivision and planned unit development requests are considered quasi-judicial actions. In such cases, the City is acting as a judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed. Generally, if the application meets these requirements it must be approved. Because the subject property is located within Prestwick Place, the City has established zoning for the area of R3-PUD. This means that the PUD master development plan functions as the zoning for the property and the more specific requirements within the PUD are the standards that must be used to evaluate development proposals rather than the R3 ordinance criteria. The applicable PUD standards, along with 4 staff findings related to each are provided below. Similar to a site plan review process, if the Commission finds that the application is consistent with the ordinance criteria (the master development plan in this instance) the project should be approved. General Subdivision Design The applicant presently owns Outlot M of Prestwick Place, which is a 19.75 acre parcel located east of Akron Avenue and south of 141st Street East. In order to facilitate the construction of the planned townhouses, the applicant is proposing to split Outlot M into two parcels. One of the new parcels would be a 5.63 acre lot that would contain the townhouse units, private road, and other site improvements, with the remainder of the CDA property platted as a larger 13.47 acre outlot. The plat also includes an additional 20 feet of right-of-way for Akron Avenue, which would bring the overall width of this right-of-way to 75 feet from the centerline consistent with the updated County Plat Needs Map. All areas outside of the individual townhouse units, driveways, and play area improvement will be covered by a drainage and utility easement since they include a storm water retention pond, the swales/pipes leading to this pond, and the public sewer and water lines serving the development. Because the townhouses are rental units, there will be no individual lots created for each of the structures. The roads providing access to each unit are private streets and will be under common ownership. In this case, the Dakota County CDA will retain ownership of the property and will therefore be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all private improvements on the site. The plat includes an extension of Addison Street south of 141st Street East, and dedicates this right-of-way over all property owned by the CDA. Because the centerline of Addison Street was planned to follow the boundary between Outlot M and Outlot N in Prestwick Place, the applicant will need to either dedicate an additional 30 feet for this road over Outlot N or will need to secure easements from the adjoining property owner so the road can be constructed in its planned location. The dedication/easement must be obtained before the road can be constructed and is listed as a condition of approval. The proposed subdivision may be considered through a simple plat process, which combines the preliminary and final plat review into one step. The overall boundaries of Outlot M relative to the other parcels within Prestwick Place are not changing due to the plat, and the plat only creates a buildable lot for the townhouse project while leaving the remainder of the parcel intact for development at a later date. Land Use and Zoning The site under consideration is guided for medium density residential in the City’s Comprehensive Plan, which guides land for residential development at a density of 6-12 units per acre. The proposed project falls within the low end of this range at 7.1 units per acres. Consistent with the future land use designation, the property is zoned R-3 Medium Density Residential/Planned Unit Development. Single- family attached residential units are a permitted use in this district in accordance with the minimum lot requirements and setbacks specified in the Zoning Ordinance. With the PUD designation, the development also needs to adhere to the standards, requirements, and any flexibility allowed under the approved master development plan. The Rosemount Comprehensive Plan includes specific goals and policies concerning housing that apply to this development. In particular, three of these goals indicate that the City should 1) provide a mixture of rental and home ownership opportunities to provide life cycle housing, 2) locate different housing styles within the appropriate areas, which includes a policy of dispersing medium and high density housing throughout the community to avoid entire neighborhoods of medium or high density residential, and 3) 5 provide workforce and affordable housing opportunities through cooperative efforts with other agencies (with the Dakota County CDA listed as a principal partner). Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan The 2007 Prestwick Place PUD Master Development Plan established that development within the PUD area will follow the underlying zoning requirements with the exceptions listed in the approved PUD Agreement. These exceptions include the following: • The townhouse buildings within Outlot G, Outlot L, and that part of Outlot M zoned R3 PUD, Prestwick Place, are permitted to have a maximum of 12 units per building. • The townhomes within that part of Outlot M zoned R3 PUD, Prestwick Place, are permitted to have a single stall garage provided that there is total off street parking provided for an average of 2.5 stalls per unit. • The townhouse buildings within Outlot G, Outlot L, and that part of Outlot M zoned R3 PUD, Prestwick Place, have a setback from the public street of 25 feet, a setback from property lines of 30 feet, a minimum building separation of 20 feet, and a minimum parking setback of 20 feet. The final development plans comply with all of these requirements as summarized in the following chart: Standard Requirement Proposed Total Residential Units 42 (Preliminary PUD) 40 Max Units Per Building 12 5 Total Parking 2.5 stalls per unit/1 garage stall 40 garage stalls (1 per unit); 40 driveway stalls, 20 guest stalls (100 total/2.5 per unit) Street Setback 25 ft. 30 ft. Akron Ave. 56 ft. 141st St. E. 103 ft. Addison St. Property Line Setback 30 ft. East, North, and West – see above street setbacks South – 52 ft. Building Separation 20 ft. 20 ft. Parking Setback 20 ft. 38 ft. In addition to the standards specified in the PUD agreement, the Zoning Ordinance includes a section specific to single family attached housing. The final development meets or exceeds these requirements; however one standard warrants further explanation. The ordinance requires a minimum separation of at least 60 feet when the rear of a row of townhome dwelling units faces the rear of an adjoining row of townhome dwelling units. In considering the applicant’s site plan, none of the structures directly face the rear of another structure since all of the middle units are at an angle to other nearby buildings. Staff has found that this standard is met since the rear of Building 9 is technically facing the side of Building 4 (and therefore subject to a 40 foot setback instead of 60 foot setback). The appropriate rear separation is provided for all other buildings on the site plan. 6 The site meets or exceeds all other applicable standards of the City’s R3 zoning and single family attached dwelling ordinances and is constituent with preliminary master development plan for Prestwick Place. Home Designs The proposed townhome structures will look similar but with slight variations in each building both in terms of the number of units in each building (either four or five) and allocation of various dwelling unit configurations within the buildings. The applicant is proposing seven unique floor plans, some of which are located entirely on one level, with most having living and sleeping space on two levels. Each unit will have a single car garage stall and main entrance along the front of the building adjacent to the garage. There are no openings or doorways on the rear or sides of the structures, and no shared space inside of the buildings. The floor area of each unit ranges from the smallest one bedroom unit at 675 square feet to the largest three bedroom unit at 1,285 square feet. There are seven different types of units proposed for the development, with a mixture of one, two, and three bedroom units as follows: Unit Type Number Percent One Bedroom 6 15% Two Bedroom 21 52% Three Bedroom 13 33% A typical building elevation has been submitted for “Building 5”; all of the other structures will adhere to the same design and construction elements, which includes the following: • A single-garage stall for each dwelling unit with four or five total garage doors depending on the allocation of units in each building. • Articulation of the front and rear facades to help break up the apparent massing of each building, which are between 100 and 125 feet in length. • Face brick around each of the garage doors and along a portion of the rear building elevations. The brick portions of the buildings are located on walls that extend out from the main structure and will wrap around the building extension to provide some variety to the side elevations. • Dormers above each garage unit providing living space on the second level of each building. The gable end of each dormer will be finished with shake siding for additional variation in materials. • Fiber cement board lap siding over the majority of the remaining building elevations. The overall building design either meets or exceeds the architectural requirements elsewhere within Prestwick Place, and will provide for a unified site design throughout the project area. Because the overall design exceeds the City’s requirements for residential structures and any approved standards within Prestwick Place, staff is not recommending any specific PUD conditions related to building design for the CDA project. The attached typical elevation will be referenced in the PUD agreement, and all buildings must be consistent with these plans. The design of the townhomes is very similar to those in the Carbury Hills development in Rosemount. The CDA has numerous photos and a virtual tour of this development on its website at the following address: http://www.dakotacda.org/housing-resources/workforce-housing/workforce-housing- developments/ (scroll to the bottom of the page to find the Rosemount project). 7 Access and Parking Although the subject parcel currently abuts both Akron Avenue and 141st Street East, no new access to these streets from Outlot M is included with the Prestwick Plans. Instead, the sole access into the townhouse site will be from an extension of Addison Street south of 141st Street. Eventually, Addison will connect into a new north/south road at the border with Outlot L, and this future north/south road will provide a connection to Connemara Trail (which has yet to be extended east of Akron Avenue). The overall trip generation from the project is expected to be approximately 266 trips per day (6.65 average vehicle trips per day per apartment unit), which is well within the design capacity of the local street system and adjacent County Road. As additional development occurs east of Akron Avenue, the future connection to Connemara will help divert traffic (especially southbound) away from 141st Street East. Internally, the development will be served by a looped private street system designed to meet the City’s minimum width requirement of 28 feet. This width allows for the passing of two vehicles even in a situation where a car is parked or stopped on the street. Each of the garage units will access directly onto the private road, and throughout the project area the applicant is maintaining a minimum separation of at least 20 feet from the front face of the garage to the street. This distance will ensure that the parking stalls in front of the garage can count toward the overall parking requirements of the development while also making sure that no vehicles will block traffic on the adjacent street. The proposed plan accommodates the required guest parking in a series of four smaller parking areas spaced throughout the project site. Each of these overflow areas is either directly connected or located very close to sidewalks providing internal connections throughout the site. Counting each of the garage stalls, the driveway stalls in front of the garages, and overflow parking areas, there are 100 parking stalls on the site, or 2.5 stalls per dwelling unit. This ratio is consistent with the City’s residential parking standards as well as the PUD requirements for Prestwick Place. Landscaping The applicant has prepared a landscape plan that includes the installation of 164 trees and 369 foundation plantings in addition to a series of perennials to be planted around the site. There are no existing trees on the property (nor were there any present at the time of preliminary plan approval), so the applicant will not need to provide any replacement trees on the property. In terms of the City’s landscaping requirements, the application exceeds all City standards based on the zoning and number of dwelling units proposed. Landscaping Required Provided Trees 40 (1 tree per dwelling unit) 105 Deciduous 40 Evergreen 19 Ornamental Foundation Plantings 333 (1 shrub per 10 lineal feet of building) 369 The landscape plan provides a good mix of deciduous and evergreen trees meeting the City’s requirement of at least 75% deciduous trees. The plan also includes spacing of trees with the required separation of 50 feet along the Addison Street boulevard, with an enhanced planting program along the Akron Avenue boulevard to provide additional screening and buffering between the residential units and the collector street. Given the storm water needs of the site, and in particular the need to drain water away from each of the units along Akron Avenue, the applicant is not proposing any berming along the adjacent streets. Staff is recommending that some of the trees located within the central part of the northeast infiltration 8 pond be moved to the northern property line to provide additional screening to the north. Parks and Pedestrian Features The City’s Parks Master Plan does not identify a new park in this area, and staff is recommending the City collect a cash dedication in lieu of land dedication for the project. The primary neighborhood park for this area is Ailesbury Park, which is located roughly one quarter of a mile west of Akron Avenue along Connemara Trail. In addition to the neighborhood park, the development plans for the Prestwick Place Townhomes include a central common play area with privately owned and maintained play structures. The size and location of the common area is consistent with the preliminary development plans for the site. For pedestrian access, the plans include an extension of an existing 8 foot bituminous trail along 141st Street East along the eastern border of the CDA property. With this extension, there will be a trail along the east, north, and western boundaries of the site with future connections planned to the south as well. In his comments, the Assistant City Engineer notes that the plans should be updated to include a sidewalk along the eastern side of Addison Avenue in order to match the sidewalk configuration in the Greystone neighborhood to the north. Installing either trails or sidewalks on both sides of streets serving higher density neighborhoods is something that has been supported by the Planning Commission and Council in previous projects. Additionally, the preliminary plans for all Prestwick streets east of Akron and south of 141st Street East depict either a trail or sidewalk on both sides of these streets. All of this area is planned for townhouse or multi-family development. Internal to the site, the plans include a series of sidewalks that will cross the common recreation space in the middle of the development and provide a connection to the existing trail along Akron Avenue. There are no such connections shown to the planned trail along Addison Street, and staff is recommending that the final plans be updated to include a sidewalk connection to this trail. Lighting Under the City’s zoning regulations, the townhouse project does not require a specific photometric lighting plan. Instead, the applicant has been advised that they will need to follow the City street lighting policy for Addison Street and the internal private road system. The City’s policy specifies the type and spacing of fixtures to be used. The final plan set does not include any information about street lights, and the final plans should be updated to include a specific lighting plan. Trash Enclosures Each individual townhouse unit will be responsible for trash enclosures similar to any other single family development. All trash must be stored in an approved container and within an enclosed building before and after the scheduled pickup. Signage The final site plan depicts a monument sign near the Addison Street entrance in the southern portion of the site. The applicant will need to secure a sign permit for this sign prior to installation and the sign must comply with all applicable requirements of the sign ordinance concerning size, location, and other regulations. 9 Engineering Comments The Assistant City Engineer has reviewed the Prestwick Place Townhomes plans and his review comments are attached for consideration by the Planning Commission. The review is broken down into two sections with both general comments and review comments specific to the proposed storm water management plan. Please note that there are several areas in which the plans must be revised to conform to the City storm water ordinance. The applicant may need to consider additional ponding areas in order to address these concerns, and ultimately there is another storm water basin planned for the applicant’s property immediately south of the site on Outlot A. The recommended extension of Addison Street to the south will also require additional storm water runoff mitigation that may be difficult to accommodate within the planned system. The revisions needed and some recommended considerations are included in the City Engineer’s Memorandum attached to this Executive Summary. Compliance with the memorandum is included as a condition of approval for the simple plat and PUD approvals. Phasing The applicant has indicated that they are planning to begin construction in the spring of 2018, with a potential later start date based on the availability of funding for the project. The site will be developed as one project with all units being built over a relatively short time frame. All roads and public infrastructure will be installed at one time, with individual unit construction occurring when services are in place. General Workforce Housing Questions In advance of the Planning Commission public hearing, Staff has received calls from resident in the nearby neighborhoods asking questions or expressing concerns about the development. Two issues that were raised in several conversations are addressed below. • Impact on property values. Staff has received two calls in advance of the meeting from residents expressing concern that the CDA’s project will lower property values of homes in the surrounding neighborhood. Staff is not aware of any studies that definitively find that affordable housing projects cause a reduction in surrounding property values; particularly single family homes. Most studies are either inconclusive or indicate that these types of projects have no measurable impact on property values. A 2014 study performed by Maxfield Research titled An Update Analysis of the Relationship Between Affordable Family Rental Housing and Home Values in the Twin Cities is an example of such a document. One of the projects studied in this report included the CDA’s Carbury Hills project in Rosemount, in addition to several other similar projects in Minnesota. The general conclusion of this study was that “This report documents little or no evidence to support the claim that tax‐credit rental housing for families has a negative impact on the market for owner‐occupied housing in the surrounding area. The homes that were sold in the subject areas around the eight tax‐credit developments in our study, in general, displayed similar or stronger performance in the period after the tax‐credit properties were built, as well as similar or stronger performance to comparable homes sales from a control group”. • Police calls. Staff has asked the police department to compare police calls in the area surrounding the Carbury Hills development and a typical residential subdivision. The numbers indicate that the workforce housing project does not generate an excessive number of calls as compared to a similar number of single family homes. 10 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the Prestwick Place Townhomes Simple Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan are consistent with the Prestwick Place PUD Master Development Plan approval. Staff recommends approval of the Prestwick Place Townhomes Simple Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building Plan with the conditions listed. 11 141ST STREET ENO PARKINGNO P A R K I N G AKRON AVENUECONNEMARA TRAIL W140TH STREET EABBEYFIELD AVENUE ADDISIONAVENUEADDISONSTREETLOCATION MAPPROJECT CONTACTSNOT TO SCALESHEET INDEXPRESTWICKPLACEROSEMOUNT - MINNESOTAPUD RESUBMITTALMARCH 15, 2017NOT TO SCALEVICINITY MAPC0.0 COVER SHEETC2.1 SITE PLANC3.1 GRADING PLANC3.2 ENLARGED GRADING PLAN - NORTHC3.3 ENLARGED GRADING PLAN - SOUTHC3.4 SWPPPC3.5 EROSION CONTROL PLANC4.1 SANITARY & WATER PLANC4.2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANC5.1 DETAILSC5.2 DETAILSC5.3 DETAILSC5.4 DETAILSL2.1 LANDSCAPE PLANL2.4 LANDSCAPE DETAILSSITECIVIL ENGINEERSTEVE JOHNSTON, PET (612) 260-7982F (612) 260-7990ELAN DESIGN LAB, INC.901 N 3rd STREETSUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401LANDSCAPEARCHITECTPILAR SARAITHONG, RLAT (612) 260-7980F (612) 260-7990LAND SURVEYORTHOMAS O'MEARA, LST (952) 895-9212F (952) 895-9259BOHLEN SURVEYING & ASSOCIATES1682 CLIFF ROAD EBURNSVILLE, MN 55337ELAN DESIGN LAB, INC.901 N 3rd STREETSUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CITY PLANNINGKYLE KLATTT (651) 322-2052CITY ENGINEERMITCH HATCHERT (651)-322-2015CITY OF ROSEMOUNT2875 145TH STREET WROSEMOUNT, MN 55068CITY OF ROSEMOUNT2875 145TH STREET WROSEMOUNT, MN 55068OWNERANDY MADSON, AIAT (612) 752-6925LHB CORPORATION701 WASHINGTON AVENUESUITE 200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401DAKOTA COUNTY CDA1228 TOWN CENTRE DRVIEEGAN, MN 5512335255145TH STREET WAKRON AVENUE BONAIRE PATH WBLAINE AVENUE E150TH STREET W145TH STREET WCONNEMARA TRAIL W160TH STREET WMcANDREWS ROADBISCAYNE AVENUECHIPPENDALE AVENUE WSHANNON PKWY DIAMOND PATH W PILOT KNOB ROADJOHNNY CAKE RIDGE ROAD FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZESHEETSCLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.20291 02/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALMJW16048902/21 /17NO DATE REVISIONI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Landscape Architect under the lawsof the state of MINNESOTA.Pilarsinee Saraithong45059LHB16006PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891402/15/17NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET CERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATECivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990D E S I G NARCHITECTCONTRACTOR TBDC0.00COVER SHEETLHB06-C000.DWGPS 7C5.1ACCESSIBILITYSIGNAGE (TYP)MONUMENTSIGNSEE ARCHO F F I C E NO PARKINGBUILDING 6BUILDING 7BUILDING 8BUILDING 9BUILDING 5BUILDING 1BUILDING 3N O P A R K I N G ADDISON STREETBUILDING 4BUILDING 2INFILTRATIONBASINTOTLOT376428'F-F8' 8' 8. 5 ' T Y P 10'2 7 'R15'R15'2 8 ' F- F 2 2 ' T Y P R15'R15'19'R3.5'R36'R64'R3.5'R3.5'R21'R49'R3.5'R3.5'R16'R44'R3.5'R3.5'R26'R54'25'20'15'30' BUILDING SETBACK30' BUILDING SETBACK20'20'30'40'28'22'22'23'TYPF-F28'19'8.5'8'8'15'19'28' 28'10'25'5'10'22'28'10'2 0 ' 5'25.1'5'30.1'2 0 ' 5' 20'5'43'25'5'5'3 4 . 1 '76'SHELTERSEE ARCH1C5.1B612 CURB & GUTTER(TYP)43' 4 3 ' 12.5'5'12.5'12.5'8.5'TYP43'17'5'10C5.1CONCRETE WALKWAYPAVEMENT SECTION (TYP)8C5.1BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSECTION (TYP)3C5.1ACCESSIBILITYCURB RAMP (TYP)5C5.1DEPRESSEDCURB (TYP)11C5.1TYPICAL STREETSECTION (TYP)PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY30'30'60'F-F7C5.1SIDEWALK JOINT(TYP)2C5.1CONCRETEDRIVEWAYAPRON (TYP)O U T L O T NO U T L O T M141ST STREET EASTCOUNTY ROAD NO. 73 (AKRON AVENUE)6C5.1SIDEWALKJOINT (TYP)4C5.1PERMANENTBARRICADE(TYP)DEPRESSEDCURB (TYP)RETAINING WALLDEPRESSEDCURB(TYP)R5'TYPR 5 ' T Y PDEPRESSEDCURB (TYP)DEPRESSEDCURB (TYP)DEPRESSEDCURB (TYP)DEPRESSEDCURB (TYP)DEPRESSEDCURB (TYP)DEPRESSEDCURB (TYP)11.67'DEPRESSEDCURB (TYP)30.35'8.5'19'28'TYPEXISTING 8' BITUMINOUSTRAILEXISTING 8'BITUMINOUSTRAILACCESSIBILITYCURB RAMP(TYP)ACCESSIBILITYSIGNAGE (TYP)ACCESSIBILITYCURB RAMP(TYP)ACCESSIBILITYCURB RAMP(TYP)ACCESSIBILITYCURB RAMP(TYP)R3.5'55' BUILDING SETBACK30.24'9C5.1BITUMINOUSDRIVEWAYPAVEMENT SECTION(TYP)8' BITUMINOUSTRAIL22.7'R99.33'R100.67'32' 2 5 . 7 '10.67'23'TYP 10.67'10.67'R10'R5'11.67'56.05'DEPRESSEDCURB (TYP)52.33'33.28'5'8'R483'FREESTANDINGMAILBOXSEE ARCH1C5.1B618 CURB& GUTTER(TYP)10.67'23'TYPTYP 10'10'5'PLAYGROUNDCURB30'75'1SITE PLAN1" = 40'SITE PLAN NOTES1. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE TO FACE OF CURB AND EXTERIORFACE OF BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.2. MEET AND MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS. PROVIDE TRANSITION ASNECESSARY.3. ON-SITE CURB TO BE D412 AND B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, UNLESSNOTED.4. ALL CURBS TO HAVE 3/4" EXPANSION JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 100'-0" ANDCONTROL JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 10'-0".5. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE STRIPING.ACCESSIBLE SYMBOLS TO BE PAINTED IN WHITE AND ACCESSIBLE ACCESSAISLES TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPE 18 INCHES ONCENTER AND AT 45 DEGREE ANGLES TO STALL, WITH 'NO PARKING' MARKED.REFLECTORIZED PAINT SHALL COMPLY WITH MNDOT 3592.LEGENDPERVIOUS AREACONCRETE PAVEMENTEXISTING ZONING : AG - AGRICULTURALPROPOSED ZONING : R3 - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIALSITE AREA 245,266 SF. (5.63 AC.)BUILDINGS 42,800 SF. (17%)PLAY/ WALK/ PARKING/ DRIVE/ STREET 65,381 SF. (27%)TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 108,181 SF. (44%)PERVIOUS 137,085 SF. (56%)TOTAL 40 UNITSDENSITY 7.1 UNITS/ AC.REQUIRED PARKING 2.5 STALLS/ UNIT (8.5'X19') 100 STALLSPROPOSED PARKING100 STALLS40 GARAGE STALLS40 DRIVEWAY STALLS20 GUEST STALLS2 - 8'X19' ACCESSIBLE STALLS18 - 8.5'X19' STALLSPROJECT SUMMARYFILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZESHEETSCLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.20291 02/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALMJW16048902/21 /17NO DATE REVISIONLHB16006PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891402/15/17NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET CERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATECivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990D E S I G NPLAY SURFACE8040SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RC2.1SITE PLANLHB06-C201.DWGPS INFILTRATION BASINBOTTOM 922.02 YEAR 927.110 YEAR 929.0100 YEAR 932.5O F F I C E NO PARKINGBUILDING 6BUILDING 7BUILDING 8BUILDING 9BUILDING 5BUILDING 1BUILDING 3>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>N O P A R K I N G ADDISON STREETFFE 948.11FFE 947.44FFE 948.78FFE 952.07FFE 951.40FFE 952.07FFE 952.11FFE 952.11BUILDING 4FFE 951.94FFE 951.94BUILDING 2FFE 952.35FFE 951.68FFE 951.68FFE 951.27FFE 948.40FFE 949.07FFE 947.74FFE 944.31FFE 943.64 FFE 944.28FFE 944.95>> > > > >FFE 945.87FFE 945.20>>>>>>F F E 9 4 3 . 6 4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>10C5.1CONCRETE WALKWAYPAVEMENT SECTION (TYP)8C5.1BITUMINOUSPAVEMENTSECTION (TYP)MEET & MATCHEXISTING CURB &GUTTERMEET & MATCHEXISTINGBITUMINOUS TRAIL9C5.1BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYPAVEMENT SECTION(TYP)MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C3.2MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C3.3M A T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T C 3 . 2 M A T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T C 3 . 3O U T L O T NDRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>951 951951950949949951 951 950950 950 949 949 948947946945944943942941940939 938 937936935 93 4 933932 931 93 0 929 934935936937938939940 933941942943944945946947949950951952 950950948 947946945944943942941940939938937141ST STREET EASTCOUNTY ROAD NO. 73 (AKRON AVENUE)922924926928930940944946944947949950948946950952 950950950950951950948 950948946944946947945944948 943943944942 9499489479429 4 8 9 5 0 9 4 6 9 4 4 940938936942940942932934922924926928930932933935943 942951951951951 947 951951944946944943950949948946944944944943943951 932934936948946944942950941951949 948 9469449449449429409389369349409389 3 6 951947BOULDERRETAINING WALLMEET & MATCHEXISTINGBITUMINOUS TRAIL1GRADING PLAN1" = 40'FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZESHEETSCLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.20291 02/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALMJW16048902/21 /17NO DATE REVISIONLHB16006PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891402/15/17NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET CERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATECivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990D E S I G NGRADING NOTES1. VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUNDTHAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED.2. ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSNOTED.3. ALL UNDOCUMENTED FILL, AND TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM WITHIN THE PROPOSED BUILDING PAD. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNATEDREPRESENTATIVE SHALL OBSERVE THE PROJECT EXCAVATIONS TO VERIFY THAT UNSUITABLE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY REMOVED FROM PROPOSEDSTRUCTURAL AREAS, THAT ADEQUATE BEARING SUPPORT IS PROVIDED BY THE EXPOSED SOILS AND THAT STRUCTURAL FILL IS PLACED APPROPRIATELY. THEEXPOSED SOIL AT THE BASE OF FOOTINGS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 98 PERCENT PROCTOR DRY DENSITY (ASTM D698). IF SOIL CORRECTION IS REQUIRED ITSHALL EXTEND 3 FEET OUTSIDE OF THE PAVEMENT OR BUILDING LIMITS PLUS ONE FOOT HORIZONTAL FOR EVERY VERTICAL FOOT OF CORRECTION.4. ON-SITE NON-ORGANIC NON-SILT SOIL IS GENERALLY SUITABLE FOR STRUCTURAL FILL. SILTY OR ORGANIC SOILS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR STRUCTURAL FILL.PLACEMENT OF STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE OBSERVED AND TESTED BY AN EXPERIENCED TECHNICIAN OR ENGINEER TO VERIFY THAT PROPER COMPACTIONHAS BEEN ACHIEVED. STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE MOISTURE CONDITIONED (DRIED OR WETTED) AS APPROPRIATE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. MOISTURECONDITIONED ENGINEERED FILL SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED IN LOOSE LIFTS OF 8 INCHES OR LESS. EACH LIFT OF FILL SHOULD BE COMPACTED BYLARGE VIBRATORY EQUIPMENT UNTIL THE IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE FOLLOWINGTABULATION.TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION COMPACTION CRITERIA MOISTURE CONTENT (% RESPECTIVE PROCTOR) VARIANCE FROM OPTIMUMNON-ENGINEERED FILL (GREEN SPACE) 90 ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FOUNDATIONS 98 ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FLOOR SLABS 95 ENGINEERED FILL PLACED AS PAVEMENT100 AGGREGATE BASEENGINEERED FILL PLACED MORE THAN 3 FEET 95BELOW PAVEMENT AGGREGATE BASE ENGINEERED FILL PLACED IN UPPER 3 FEET 100BELOW PAVEMENT AGGREGATE BASEUTILITY TRENCHES95 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT THE SUBGRADE FROM INCLEMENT WEATHER TO MAINTAIN STABILITY. FOLLOWING REMOVAL OF TOPSOIL, PAVEMENT, ANDANY UNSUITABLE SOILS, THE RESULTING SUBGRADE SHOULD BE SCARIFIED AND RE-COMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 12 INCHES. A PROOFROLL TEST SHOULD THENBE PERFORMED TO DETERMINE SOFT OR UNSTABLE SUBGRADE AREAS. IF RUTTING OR LOCALIZED UNSTABLE SUBGRADE AREAS ARE OBSERVED, THOSE AREASSHOULD BE SUBCUT, MOISTURE-CONDITIONED, AND RE-COMPACTED OR REMOVED TO A STABLE DEPTH. THE PROOF ROLL SHOULD BE PERFORMED WITH ATANDEM AXLE DUMP TRUCK LOADED TO GROSS CAPACITY (AT LEAST 20 TONS). ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OF THE PROOF ROLL SHALL BE LIMITED TO RUTFORMATION NO MORE THAN ONE INCH (1”) DEPTH (FRONT OR REAR AXLES) AND NO PUMPING (ROLLING) OBSERVED DURING THE VISUAL INSPECTION. PROOFROLL TESTS SHOULD BE OBSERVED BY AN EXPERIENCED TECHNICIAN OR ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TO VERIFY THESUBGRADE WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE PAVEMENT SUPPORT.6. PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT1.5" BITUMINOUS WEAR (MNDOT 2360)WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) SPWEA240E)TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357)1.5" BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR (MNDOT 2360 TYPE 12.5NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) SPNWA230E)8" AGGREGATE BASE (MNDOT 3138 CL5 OR CL7)COMPACTED SUBGRADEBITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYS2.0" WEAR (MNDOT 2360)WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) SPWEA240E)6.0" CL 5 (MNDOT 3138 CL5)CONCRETE WALKWAY4.0" CONCRETE (SEE BELOW FOR MIX DESIGNATION)6.0" AGGREGATE BASE (MNDOT 3138 CL5 OR CL7)COMPACTED SUBGRADE-3 TO +3%-3 TO +3%-3 TO +3%-2 TO +2%-2 TO +2%-2 TO +2%-3 TO +3%IMPERVIOUSPERVIOUSTOTAL0 ACRES5.631 ACRES5.631 ACRESEXISTINGPROPOSEDBUILDING0 ACRESPAVEMENT0 ACRESTOTAL IMPVNPDES AREA SUMMARY2.484 ACRES3.147 ACRES5.631 ACRES0.983 ACRES1.501 ACRES7. CONCRETE MIX NO. 3A32 (MNDOT2461) SHALL BE USED FOR HAND PLACED FORMED CURBAND GUTTER, MEDIANS, DRIVEWAYS, CROSS GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, PEDESTRIAN RAMPSAND MEDIANS. CONCRETE MIX NO. 3A22, MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2461) SHALL BE USED FORAN EXTRUSION MACHINE PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE. IN THE PRODUCTION OF CONCRETE,AN AIR ENTRAINING AGENT SHALL BE ADDED TO THE MIX ACCORDING TO MNDOT 2461.4.8. FORM COATING MATERIAL SHALL MEET MNDOT 3902. CONCRETE INSTALLATION SHALLCONFORM WITH MNDOT 2531.9. SITE CONCRETE FINISHING - CONCRETE SHALL BE STRUCK TRUE TO CROSS SECTION ASSHOWN ON THE PLANS. NO ADDITIONAL WATER MAY BE ADDED TO AID IN THE FINISHINGPROCESS. A LIGHT BROOM FINISH WILL BE REQUIRED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTERLINE ON ALL CONCRETE WORK UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. ALL EXPOSED EDGES ANDJOINTS IN CURB,GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND STEPS SHALL BE ROUNDED WITH A SUITABLEEDGING TOOL. BEFORE FINAL FINISHING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK THE CONCRETEWITH A TEN (10) FOOT STEEL STRAIGHT EDGE TO ENSURE THERE IS NO VARIATION GREATERTHAN 3/16”FROM THE STRAIGHT EDGE ON TANGENT LINES OR GRADES. IF DEVIATIONSGREATER THAN 3/16” ARE FOUND THE WORK WILL BE CONSIDERED AS UNACCEPTABLE ANDWILL BE REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER.10. CONCRETE CURING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY APPLYING A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND(TYPE 2, WHITE PIGMENTED, MNDOT 3754) TO THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE CONCRETEWITHIN ONE (1)HOUR AFTER FINISHING THE CONCRETE SURFACES. WHEN THE FORMS AREREMOVED IN LESS THAN 72 HOURS AFTER PLACING THE CONCRETE, THE CURINGCOMPOUND SHALL BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY TO THE EXPOSED SURFACES, OR THETRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY WITH SUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL. THERATE OF APPLICATION OF CURING COMPOUND SHALL BE 150 SQUARE FEET PER GALLON.THE COMPOUND SHALL APPEAR AS WHITE AS A SHEET OF PAPER AFTER APPLICATION ONTHE CONCRETE SURFACE.11. PREFORMED EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL MEET MNDOT 3702, AND SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THEFOLLOWING LOCATIONS: AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF ALL CURB AND GUTTER RADII.WHERE NEW CONCRETE SURROUNDS, ADJOINS, OR ABUTS ANY EXISTING FIXED OBJECTSSUCH AS FIRE HYDRANTS, BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS,AND OTHER RIGID STRUCTURES. AFTER EACH LOAD OF CONCRETE WHEN PLACING CURBAND EVERY 100 FEET WHEN PLACING SIDEWALK. CONTRACTION JOINTS WILL NOT BESEALED BUT WILL BE REQUIRED AT A SPACING OF 10 FEET ON CURB AND GUTTER AND ONSIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. CONTRACTION JOINTS WILL BE CUT TOA DEPTH 1/3 THE THICKNESS OF THE CONCRETE, SURFACE AND BACK OF ALL CURBS.CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT NO SLAB IS LARGER THAN 100 SQUAREFEET IN AREA. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTING CONTRACTIONJOINTS THAT PREVENT CONCRETE FROM CRACKING AT OTHER LOCATIONS.12. CONCRETE TESTING INCLUDING SLUMP, AIR ENTRAINMENT, TEMPERATURE ANDCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE PERFORMED ON THE FIRST LOAD OF THE DAY FOR ALLCONCRETE POURS OF AT LEAST 4 CUBIC YARDS. AN ADDITIONAL TEST SHALL BEPERFORMED FOR EACH 100 CUBIC YARDS OR PORTION THEREOF.13. AGGREGATE BASE FINAL SHAPING AND COMPACTION OF THE AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BEDONE JUST PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE. THEFINISHED SURFACE OF THE BASE SHALL SHOW NO VARIATION GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHFROM A TEN (10) FOOT STRAIGHT EDGE.14. PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUS MIXTURE SHALL BE SPREAD WITHOUT SEGREGATION, AT THESPECIFIED RATE TO THE CROSS SECTION SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND PER MNDOT 3151.15. THE THICKNESS OF EACH BITUMINOUS COURSE SHALL BE WITHIN 1/4 INCH OF THETHICKNESS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE TOTAL THICKNESS OF ALL BITUMINOUSCOURSES SHALL BE WITHIN 1/2 INCH.16. ADJUST ALL SURFACE COURSES TO NOT GREATER THAN ” ABOVE ADJACENT CURB FRONTEDGES WHERE WATER FLOWS TO CURB, AND FLUSH WHERE WATER FLOWS AWAY FROMCURB, OR ” ABOVE MANHOLE FRAMES, VALVE BOXES OR OTHER FIXED STRUCTURES.17. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING THE BITUMINOUS BINDER AND/OR WEARING COURSES, THECONTRACTOR SHALL SWEEP THE PARKING LOT. THE SWEEPER SHALL BE ASELF-PROPELLED PICK-UP (WITH WATER) SWEEPER. A SIDE-THROW SWEEPER WILL NOT BEALLOWED.18. TACK COAT SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT 2357.2.A.19. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 92% OF THE MAXIMUM THEORETICALDENSITY. THE OWNER MAY AT THEIR OPTION PERFORM AGGREGATE AND BITUMINOUSTESTING. THE COST OF ALL FAILING TESTS MAY BE BACK-CHARGED TO THE CONTRACTOR.8040SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RC3.1OVERALLGRADING PLANLHB06-C301.DWGCONCRETE PAVEMENTLEGENDSMJ NO PARKINGBUILDING 7BUILDING 8BUILDING 9BUILDING 1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>ADDISON STREETBUILDING 4FFE 951.94FFE 951.94BUILDING 2FFE 952.35FFE 951.68FFE 951.68FFE 951.27FFE 948.40FFE 949.07FFE 947.74FFE 944.31FFE 943.64 FFE 944.28FFE 944.95> > > > > > > > > > > > > >FFE 945.87FFE 945.20>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > M A T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T C 3 . 3MATCHLINESEE SHEET C3.3>>>>>>>>934935936937938939940 9 3 39419429439449459469479499509519521.6%1.6%1.6%1.6%1.6%5%1.6%3.86%1.6%1.6%1.6%1.6%1.6%1.6%5.0%1.6%48.8248.1548.1547.4948.825.0%2.9%3.5%5.5%2.9%4.2%48.7248.0548.0547.4947.3947.8747.6948.8249.0748.5348.5348.5348.5348.5347.8647.8647.92 EOF49.0347.3348.0348.5349.549.547.402%2%46.522%48.5347.8647.8647.7047.8647.8647.2047.2047.8644.8447.4547.1046.9446.6847.50EOF46.99EOF48.1548.4048.4048.2548.4047.2047.2047.2047.2047.2047.7447.2047.491.4%1.3%48.1547.862.3%50.5150.7951.0351.3851.0250.6852.0052.1052.353.6%51.3351.4351.684.0%51.3351.432.0%51.6852.0052.1052.355.6%3.5%51.3351.4351.6851.433.3%5.6%52.1052.2051.5351.4351.6851.1451.1451.1451.1451.1451.1451.1451.1451.1451.1451.1451.1451.1451.1451.1451.6851.4351.0751.42.0%52.3552.3550.751.6%51.436.2%52.1051.8151.8151.8151.8150.6450.6450.6449.0649.5650.641.7%5.1%51.0251.3550.6851.0350.8050.5151.0751.402.0%51.9451.9451.9451.9451.2751.5951.5951.5951.5950.923.2%1.3%3.2%1.2%3.5%5.5%2.0%51.0251.0251.0251.2750.7351.942.6%50.25EOF51.6951.6951.6951.6951.6951.6951.6951.6951.9451.4051.4051.4051.4051.4051.4051.4051.4051.4051.4051.4050.7350.7350.7350.7350.7350.7344.152. 9 %44.6543.8143.3543.0143.0043.3343.7944.1344.654. 9 % 3. 7 %43.9843.985. 7 %45.0045.0045.0045.0044.3344.3344.3344.0844.0844.0844.0844.7544.7544.7544.7543.7943.7943.7943.7943.7943.7943.7943.7944.4644.4644.4644.4644.4644.4644.4643.7943.411.8%5. 7 %43.9343.933. 7 % 5. 0 %44.6044.603. 0 %44.2844.2844.2844.9544.9544.9544.7044.7044.7044.7044.0344.0344.0344.0343.742.1%43.3843.7443.7443.7443.7443.7443.7443.7443.7444.4144.4144.4144.4144.4144.4144.4143.049.0350.53FLATTEN CROSS SLOPE TO 2%50.248.4550.75.0%4:1 48.9542.242.8142.5543.2443.3143.52. 0 % 2. 0 % 2. 0 %5%47.8547.2047.7547.702.0%5.0%47.6047.502.0%47.2247.1347.5847.4847.8648.4248.3348.6947.5847.6847.1347.0847.5847.2947.2947.6348.1347.047.045.946.044.7545.1145.1145.2745.8143.044.2043.9643.2643.522.0%2.0%2. 0 %43.046.95.0%3:1 43.33: 1 44.502.0%3.4%46.3446.3446.4446.4446.4446.4446.3447.3748.00.0%46.440. 7 5 %46.3846.440. 7 5 %46.3846.4446.250.75%46.4446.3450.951.11.9%2.0%50.2950.250.9050.9050.233:145.6546.048.048.12.0%5.0%46.2547.049.047.548.549.548.65.0%41.5043.8943.951.7%43.2743.7743.143.143.14.5%42.6443.2442.048.546.045.044.433. 9 %44.05.0%49.649.049.048.047.046.043.9149.0848.9850.9350.7150.8951.2951.8151.6951.5350.9249.8849.2737.502+0036.7335.9535.1834.401+0033.6933.1132.9132.850+0048.2347.8347.4347.0346.6346.2345.8345.4345.0344.6344.2343.8343.4343.0343.4343.8344.2344.4344.2343.8343.4343.0342.6341.6651.542.4922924926928930940944946944947947950948946950952 95095095095094894 6 944 94494394394494 3 949948947942950949951948948948951943945947948950949950951951951951951951951 951945 9 4 3 94 3 9 4 2 9439449429439439449449449439469449 4 3943 9449449449449449469449 4 4 9 4 5 946945939940942949 93893293493693793693593493395195145.046.545.49491ENLARGED GRADING PLAN - NORTH1" = 20'FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZESHEETSCLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.20291 02/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALMJW16048902/21 /17NO DATE REVISIONLHB16006PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891402/15/17NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET CERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATECivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990D E S I G NGRADING NOTES1. SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES AND LEGEND.6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RC3.2ENLARGEDGRADING PLAN - NORTHLHB06-C302.DWGSMJ O F F I C EBUILDING 6BUILDING 7BUILDING 8BUILDING 5BUILDING 3>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>N O P A R K I N G ADDISON STREETFFE 948.11FFE 947.44FFE 948.78FFE 952.07FFE 951.40FFE 952.07FFE 952.11FFE 952.11BUILDING 4FFE 951.94FFE 951.94BUILDING 2FFE 952.35FFE 951.68FFE 951.68FFE 951.27FFE 949.07FFE 944.31FFE 943.64 FFE 944.28FFE 944.95> >FFE 945.20>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>F F E 9 4 3 . 6 4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> S E E S H E E T C 3 . 2 M A T C H L I N ESEE SHEET C3.2MATCHLINE9509505.0%1. 3 % 5. 0 %1.6%1.6%1.6%1.6%1.6%1.6%1.6%1.6%5%1.0%3.86%3.86%1.6%1.6%1.6%1.6%3. 0 % 1. 3 % 5.0%1.6%50.6851.0251.7251.8252.074.1%51.7251.826.1%52.0752.0751.8251.8250.742.0%51.2250.8751.7251.8252.075.1%51.7251.823.1%52.0751.9251.8250.6452.0751.8251.2751.4251.5351.9250.4851.1551.1551.0551.1551.4050.862.4%3.5%51.072.0%51.1951.0550.9050.756.3%1.9%52.1152.1152.1152.1152.1152.1151.5751.8651.8651.8651.8651.8651.8651.8651.8651.7651.7651.7651.7651.5751.5751.5751.5751.5751.5751.5751.5751.5751.5751.5751.5751.5751.574.3%3.7%5.6%43.4343.0942.6342.293. 0 %43.9643.965. 0 % 3. 7 %43.2943.295. 7 %2.2%42.6843.1044.0644.0644.0644.0644.3144.3144.3143.7743.7743.7743.7743.7743.7743.7743.7743.1043.1043.1043.1043.1043.1043.1043.6443.1043.1043.6443.6443.6443.3943.3943.3943.3946.7647.1047.5647.9046.5146.0548.435.0%48.433.0% 3.7% 5.9% 3.8% 6.2%47.7647.7647.0947.1947.1947.1947.4447.4446.9046.9046.9046.9046.9046.9047.8647.8647.8647.8648.1148.1148.1146.9047.5747.5747.5747.5747.5747.5748.2448.2448.2448.2448.2448.2448.2448.7848.5348.5348.5348.5348.7848.7841.9942.3542.0941.7341.8741.5142.3542.0642.0642.0742.0742.1142.1142.2042.7042.4542.0643.6443.1043.1043.5443.5449.3448.3947.4247.9248.9848.2048.3048.3048.3048.2548.7548.3348.3347.9747.9148.4148.4647.52.0%5.0%47.446.4547.470.9%2.0%51.0751.0751.0747.547.447.547.447.54:15.0%47.442.1642.1641.4442.6047.05. 0 % 5. 0 %42.7042.8042.041.9042.5042.6051.5351.5351.5351.5351.5351.5351.5351.5351.5351.5350.8650.8650.8650.8650.8651.4050.8650.6950.9351.3351.7351.33x50.9350.7150.8951.2951.8151.6951.5350.9249.8849.2750.5350.1349.7349.3348.9348.5348.1347.7347.3346.8245.6844.4343.2342.7842.3842.0641.7341.4141.0840.7640.4340.2940.8540.463+0039.8239.0538.2837.502+0036.7335.9540.9648.2343.4343.8344.2344.4344.2343.8343.4343.0342.6341.6640.70950950950951950947 95094894 6 944 94694794594494894394394494 3 9499489479429 4 8 9 5 0 9 4 6 9 4 4 950949951948948948950949950951951951951951951951951951 945 948949 951 949951950 9 4 8 9 4 7 933934935944943946 945 9449459469439439 4 3 94 3 9 4 2 9439449 4 2 942 941 941942943 9439439449449449439469449 4 3943 94494693994094294952.1152.1148.7844.3195095093894 0 94 0 9409399389379369511ENLARGED GRADING PLAN - SOUTH1" = 20'FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZESHEETSCLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.20291 02/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALMJW16048902/21 /17NO DATE REVISIONLHB16006PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891402/15/17NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET CERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATECivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990D E S I G NGRADING NOTES1. SEE SHEET C3.1 FOR GRADING NOTES AND LEGEND.6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RC3.3ENLARGEDGRADING PLAN - SOUTHLHB06-C303.DWGSMJ FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZESHEETSCLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.20291 02/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALMJW16048902/21 /17NO DATE REVISIONLHB16006PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891402/15/17NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET CERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATECivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990D E S I G NC3.4SWPPPLHB06-C304.DWGMJW >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>ADDISON STREETFFE 948.11FFE 947.44FFE 948.78FFE 952.07FFE 951.40FFE 952.07FFE 952.11FFE 952.11FFE 951.94FFE 951.94FFE 952.35FFE 951.68FFE 951.68FFE 951.27FFE 948.40FFE 949.07FFE 947.74FFE 944.31FFE 943.64 FFE 944.28FFE 944.95> > > > > >FFE 945.87FFE 945.20>>>>>>F F E 9 4 3 . 6 4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2C5.2INLET PROTECTION(TYP)5C5.2SILT FENCE(TYP)1C5.2ROCK CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE4C5.2CONCRETEWASHOUT AREA6C5.2BIO ROLL SEDIMENTCONTROL (TYP)O U T L O T NO U T L O T M>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>951 951951951950949949948948947947951 951 950950 950 949 949 948947946945944943942941940939 938 937936 935 9 34 933932 931 93 0 929 934935936937938939940 93 3941942943944945946947949950951952950950949949950 948 947946945944943942941940939938937936141ST STREET EASTCOUNTY ROAD NO. 73 (AKRON AVENUE)922924926928930940944946944947949950948946950952 950950950950951950948 950948946 944 94694794594494894394394494 2 9499489479429 4 8 9 5 0 9 4 6 9 4 4 940938936942940942932934922924926928930932933935943 942951951951951 947 951951944946944943950949948946944944944 943943951932934936948946944942950941951949 948 9469449449449429409389369349409 3 8 9 3 6 9519473C5.2EROSION CONTROLBLANKET (TYP)EROSION CONTROLBLANKET (TYP)SILT FENCE(TYP)1EROSION CONTROL PLAN1" = 40'FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZESHEETSCLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.20291 02/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALMJW16048902/21 /17NO DATE REVISIONLHB16006PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891402/15/17NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET CERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATECivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990D E S I G NLEGENDSTORM STRUCTURE PROTECTIONSILT FENCEBIO ROLL SEDIMENT CONTROLSOD & LANDSCAPE PLANTINGMNDOT MIXTURE 35-221 DRY PRAIRIE GENERALBROADCAST SEEDINGTEMPORARY - MIXTURE 21-111 OATS COVER CROPSEEDING RATE PLS 36.5 LBS/AC.FIBER BLANKET (ALL SEEDED SLOPE >3:1)MNDOT MIXTURE 33-261 STORMWATER SOUTH & WESTBROADCAST SEEDINGTEMPORARY - MIXTURE 21-111 OATS COVER CROPSEEDING RATE PLS 35 LBS/AC.RESTORE ALL DISTURBED NON-PAVED AREAS WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOILAND SEED OR SOD AS INDICATED ON PLAN WITHIN 72 HOURS OFCOMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITY IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA.8040SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RC3.5EROSION CONTROLPLANLHB06-C305.DWGPSMNDOT MIXTURE 35-241 MESIC PRAIRIE GENERALBROADCAST SEEDINGTEMPORARY - MIXTURE 21-111 OATS COVER CROPSEEDING RATE PLS 36.5 LBS/AC. INFILTRATION BASINBOTTOM 922.02 YEAR 927.110 YEAR 929.0100 YEAR 932.5O F F I C EBUILDING 6BUILDING 7BUILDING 8BUILDING 9BUILDING 5BUILDING 1BUILDING 3>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>ADDISON STREETFFE 948.11FFE 947.44FFE 948.78FFE 952.07FFE 951.40FFE 952.07FFE 952.11FFE 952.11BUILDING 4FFE 951.94FFE 951.94BUILDING 2FFE 952.35FFE 951.68FFE 951.68FFE 951.27FFE 948.40FFE 949.07FFE 947.74FFE 944.31FFE 943.64 FFE 944.28FFE 944.95> > > > > >FFE 945.87FFE 945.20>>>>>>F F E 9 4 3 . 6 4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1C5.3PLASTIC PIPEBEDDING(TYP)7C5.3SANITARY SERVICECONNECTION (TYP)5C5.3WATER SERVICE(TYP)4C5.3GATE VALVE &BOX (TYP)|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASOHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPSAN MHRE=945.2IE=914.6SAN MHRE=938.1IE=915.1SAN MHRE=932.7IE=915.7O U T L O T NO U T L O T MTNH=954.11 TNH=951.08 TNH=935.97 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SAN MHRE=951.3IE=912.624" PVC SANITARY SEWER12" DIP WATERMAIN >>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||8" PVC SANITARY SEWER8" DIP WATERMAIN>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ELECELECELECELEC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>141ST STREET EASTCOUNTY ROAD NO. 73 (AKRON AVENUE) >> ||||SAN MHRE=933.55IE=916.55>>CBMH 1CBMH 17STMH 2CBMH 3CB 4CBMH 5CB 6CB 10CB 9CBMH 7CB 8CBMH 11CB 12CBMH 14CBMH 15CB 16CB 24CBMH 23CBMH 22CBMH 20CB 21CB 19CBMH 18CBMH 25CBMH 27CBMH 28CBMH 29CB 30CB 13FESHYDRANT WITH6" LEAD ANDGATE VALVE (TYP)HYDRANT WITH6" LEAD ANDGATE VALVE (TYP)HYDRANT WITH6" LEAD ANDGATE VALVE (TYP)EX SAN MHRE 933.55N IE 916.55S IE 916.65SAN MH 1RE 935.8N IE 917.15S IE 917.25SAN MH 3RE 940.88NW IE 918.09SW IE 920.09SAN MH 8RE 943.90SE IE 932.90SAN MH 4RE 941.0NW IE 929.93SW IE 929.93NE IE 927.93SAN MH 5RE 945.25W IE 933.37NE IE 933.27SAN MH 6RE 950.50N IE 934.77E IE 934.67SAN MH 7RE 947.70S IE 936.70SAN MH 2RE 939.4NW IE 917.73SE IE 917.83387'-8"PVC@0.5%384'-8"PVC@0.77%259'-8"PVC@0.5%16 7 ' - 8 " P V C @ 2 . 0 % 10 6 ' - 8 " P V C @ 7 . 4 %65'-8"PVC@0.4%120'-8"PVC@0.4%126'-8"PVC@0.4%8"-DIP8"-DIP 8"-DIP 8"-DIP8"-DIP8"-DIP8"-DIP8" - D I P 8" - D I P 8"-DIP8"-DIPREMOVE PLUG AND CONNECTTO 8" WATER STUB WITH 8"GATE VALVE8"X8" TEEWITH GATEVALVESEXTEND 8" DIP TO 10'BEYOND PAVEMENTAND PLUG.EXTEND 8" PVC TO 20'BEYOND PAVEMENTAND PLUG.8"X8" TEEWITH GATEVALVE8" 45d BEND8" 45d BENDEXTEND 8" DIP TOPROPERTY LINEAND PLUG.8"X8" TEEWITH GATEVALVES8" 45d BEND8" 11-1/4dBEND8" 11-1/4dBEND8" 11-1/4dBEND4"- D I P 6" - P V C 4" - D I P 6" - P V C 4" - D I P 6" - P V C4"-DIP6"-PVC4"-DIP6"-PVC4"-DIP6"-PVC4"-DIP6"-PVC4"-DIP6"-PVC4"-DIP6"-PVC3C5.3HYDRANT(TYP)8C5.3SANITARYMANHOLE(TYP)48'-8"PVC@0.4%CBMH 26CBMH 31CBMH 321SANITARY & WATER PLAN1" = 40'FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZESHEETSCLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.20291 02/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALMJW16048902/21 /17NO DATE REVISIONLHB16006PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891402/15/17NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET CERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATECivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990D E S I G NUTILITY NOTES1. VERIFY ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANYDISCREPANCIES BETWEEN LOCATED UTILITIES AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SHOULD BE NOTEDAND FORWARDED TO THE ENGINEER.4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE MEANS AND METHODS TO ASSURE ADJACENT PROPERTY IS NOTDAMAGED DURING UTILITY INSTALLATION.5. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE.6. PIPE MATERIALS: (TO BE VERIFIED)WATERMAINDIP 6&8"CLASS 52 SAN SEWER PVC SDR 35 (8-18' DEEP), SDR 26 (18-26' DEEP)STORM SEWER HDPE (GREEN SPACE) OR RCP (UNDER STREETS) OR PVC FOR AREA DRAINSSANITARY SERVICE PVC SDR 26WATER SERVICE 4" DIP (CLASS 53)7. ALL UTILITY CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM WITH STATE, CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA(CEAM), AND CITY OF ROSEMOUNT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.8. ADJUST ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED. COMPLYWITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS TO MEETOWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.9. MAINTAIN 7.5' COVER ON ALL NEW WATERMAIN.LEGEND>>>>STORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERWATERMAIN8040SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RC4.1SANITARY &WATER PLANLHB06-C401.DWGSMJ O F F I C EBUILDING 6BUILDING 7BUILDING 8BUILDING 9BUILDING 5BUILDING 1BUILDING 3>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>ADDISON STREETFFE 948.11FFE 947.44FFE 948.78FFE 952.07FFE 951.40FFE 952.07FFE 952.11FFE 952.11BUILDING 4FFE 951.94FFE 951.94BUILDING 2FFE 952.35FFE 951.68FFE 951.68FFE 951.27FFE 948.40FFE 949.07FFE 947.74FFE 944.31FFE 943.64 FFE 944.28FFE 944.95> > > > > >FFE 945.87FFE 945.20>>>>>>F F E 9 4 3 . 6 4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2C5.3CLASS BPIPE BEDDING(TYP)1C5.43'X4' CATCH BASIN(TYP)3C5.4CATCHBASINMANHOLE(TYP)2C5.4STORM MANHOLE(TYP)4C5.427" CATCHBASIN(TYP)5C5.4RIPRAP ATOUTLETS|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||CATCHBASINRE=931.7IE=921.4CATCHBASINRE=932.5S IE=927.9E W IE=925.8CATCHBASINRE=932.5IE=928.7RE=931.9IE=922.6CATCHBASINRE=936.4S IE=931.8E IE=927.5N IE=927.5CATCHBASINRE=936.4IE=933.0CATCHBASINRE=945.6IE=941.7CATCHBASINRE=945.9IE=942.4CATCHBASINRE=945.4IE=941.8RE=946.1CATCHBASINRE=948.0IE=943.5CATCHBASINRE=948.3IE=943.9CATCHBASINRE=948.3IE=943.9CATCHBASINRE=948.1IE=944.0CATCHBASINRE=948.9IE=944.8CATCHBASINRE=950.3IE=945.9CATCHBASINRE=950.3IE=945.6CATCHBASINRE=950.0IE=946.2CATCHBASINRE=949.5IE=945.0CATCHBASINRE=949.1IE=945.3CATCHBASINRE=949.1IE=944.6CATCHBASINRE=949.6IE=944.8SAN MHRE=947.1IE=913.2CATCHBASINRE=932.4IE=928.6CATCHBASINRE=932.3IE=929.0GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASOHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPSTMHRE=932.8IE=922.8O U T L O T NO U T L O T MTNH=954.11 TNH=951.08 TNH=935.97 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>12" DIP WATERMAIN >>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 8" DIP WATERMAIN>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>STMHRE=946.4IE=941.2ELECELECELECELEC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>141ST STREET EASTCOUNTY ROAD NO. 73 (AKRON AVENUE) >> ||||>>72" CBMH 1RE 942.64IE 922.08 NEIE 928.53 SEIE 937.98 SW4' SUMP AND GRAVITY SEPARATORCBMH 17RE 942.64SW IE 938.12NE IE 938.124' SUMP AND GRAVITYSEPARATORSTMH 2RE 943.93IE 930.15 NWIE 930.35 SWIE 933.35 SE4' SUMP & GRAVITY SEPARATORCBMH 3RE 940.32IE 934.39 NWIE 934.39 EIE 936.75 WCB 4RE 940.32IE 936.82CBMH 5RE 939.79IE 934.73 WIE 936.22CB 6RE 939.79IE 936.29CB 10RE 941.44IE 938.94CB 9RE 942.0IE 939.5CBMH 7RE 941.50IE 931.97 NEIE 937.97 WIE 939.42 NWIE 939.33 SWIE 938.51 SECB 8RE 942.0IE 939.5CBMH 11RE 948.1IE 943.17 EIE 943.17 WIE 943.17 SCB 12RE 947.42IE 943.71 NIE 944.52 SCBMH 14RE 950.12IE 944.91 WIE 944.91 ECBMH 15RE 950.12IE 945.19 EIE 945.66 WCB 16RE 949.08IE 946.57CB 24RE 949.56IE 945.05CBMH 23RE 947.33IE 945.18CBMH 22RE 949.29IE 944.64 EIE 945.11 WCBMH 20RE 949.29IE 944.59 EIE 944.59 WIE 945.80 SCB 21RE 950.25IE 947.75CB 19RE 945.65IE 943.05CBMH 18RE 942.2IE 938.34 EIE 938.54 WIE 939.45 SWIE 938.54 NWCBMH 25RE 943.0IE 939.01 NIE 939.01 SCBMH 27RE 943.00IE 939.43 NIE 939.43 SCBMH 28RE 944.58IE 939.49 NIE 939.49 SCBMH 29RE 945.37IE 940.07 NWIE 939.60 SCB 30RE 942.40IE 940.30CB 13RE 948.26IE 944.76FESINV 922.0EX SAN MHSAN MH 1SAN MH 3SAN MH 8SAN MH 4SAN MH 5SAN MH 6SAN MH 7SAN MH 2108'-15"HDPE@0.5%104' -15 "HDPE@5 .0% 47'-15"RCP@0.5%83'-8" PVC@1.1%87'-15"HDPE@2.0%59'-8"PVC@0.4%46'-15"RCP@0.25%52'-15"HDPE@0.8%31'-15"HDPE@0.2%59'-15"HDPE@0.8%75'-8"PVC@2.5%39'-8" PVC@2.5%45'-8"PVC@8.0%110'-15"HDPE@5.5%71' - 1 8 " H D P E @ 0 . 3 %28'-18"RCP@0.5%84 ' - 3 6 " R C P @ 0 . 1 %108'-8"PVC@0.4%28'-15 RCP@0.25%28'-15"RCP@0.25%56' -15 "RCP@0.6%28'-15"RCP@1.0%28'-15"RCP@0.2%20'-8"PVC@0.4%108'-18"RCP@1.5%173'-15"RCP@0.6%108 ' - 1 5 " R C P @ 1 . 5 %26'-8"PVC@0.65%17'-8" PVC@0.4%CBMH 31RE 932.3IE 922.23 WIE 928.70 E4' SUMP & GRAVITYSEPARATORCB 32RE 932.4IE 940.3041'-15"RCP@0.5%65'-15"RCP@0.5%DRAINAGE ANDUTILITY EASEMENT(TYP.)DRAINAGE ANDUTILITY EASEMENT(TYP.)CB 26RE 945.0IE 942.520'-8"PVC@15%1STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN1" = 40'FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZESHEETSCLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.20291 02/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALMJW16048902/21 /17NO DATE REVISIONLHB16006PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891402/15/17NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET CERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATECivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990D E S I G NUTILITY NOTES1. SEE SHEET C4.1 FOR UTILITY NOTES AND LEGEND.8040SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RC4.2STORMWATERMANAGEMENTPLANLHB06-C402.DWGSMJ O F F I C E NO PARKINGBUILDING 6BUILDING 7BUILDING 8BUILDING 9BUILDING 5BUILDING 1BUILDING 3N O P A R K I N G ADDISON STREETBUILDING 4BUILDING 2O U T L O T N141ST STREET EASTCOUNTY ROAD NO. 73 (AKRON AVENUE)INFILTRATIONBASINTOTLOTSHELTERSEE ARCHRETAINING WALLPLAY EQUIPMENTS& SURFACESEE ARCHMONUMENT SIGNSEE ARCH1L2.2DECIDUOUS TREEPLANTING (TYP)2L2.2CONIFEROUS TREEPLANTING (TYP)3L2.2SHRUB PLANTING(TYP)4L2.2PERENNIALPLANTING(TYP)5L2.2EDGE AT PLANTINGBED (TYP)6L2.2SOD ATHARDSCAPE(TYP)16" MAINTENANCESTRIP (TYP)16" MAINTENANCESTRIP (TYP)7L2.2TREE GUARDS(TYP)1LANDSCAPE PLAN1" = 40'FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZESHEETSCLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.20291 02/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALMJW16048902/21 /17NO DATE REVISIONI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Landscape Architect under the lawsof the state of MINNESOTA.Pilarsinee Saraithong45059LHB16006PROJECT NO.02/15/17NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET CERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATECivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990D E S I G NLEGENDSOD 77,735 SF.LANDSCAPE SUMMARYR-3 ZONING DISTRICTREQUIRED TREES1 OVERSTORY TREE/ OPEN SPACE UNIT EXPOSURE = 40 TREESSPACING INCLUDE BOULEVARD TREE/ 50' INTERVALPROPOSED40 - 2.5" OVERSTORY TREES FOR 40 UNITS2.5" OVERSTORY BOULEVARD TREES AT MAX. 50' INTERVAL2.5" OVERSTORY TREES, 6' HT. CONIFEROUS TREES, AND1.5" ORNAMENTAL TREES FOR SCREENINGREQUIRED FOUNDATION1 SHRUB FOUNDATION PLANTING/ 10 LF. OF BUILDING PERIMETERBUILDING 1 403 LF. REQUIRED FOUNDATION 40 SHRUBSPROPOSED43 SHRUBSBUILDING 2 391 LF. REQUIRED FOUNDATION 39 SHRUBSPROPOSED41 SHRUBSBUILDING 3 391 LF. REQUIRED FOUNDATION 39 SHRUBSPROPOSED41 SHRUBSBUILDING 4 391 LF. REQUIRED FOUNDATION 39 SHRUBSPROPOSED41 SHRUBSBUILDING 5 334 LF. REQUIRED FOUNDATION 33 SHRUBSPROPOSED38 SHRUBSBUILDING 6 413 LF. REQUIRED FOUNDATION 41 SHRUBSPROPOSED47 SHRUBSBUILDING 7 362 LF. REQUIRED FOUNDATION 36 SHRUBSPROPOSED42 SHRUBSBUILDING 8 333 LF. REQUIRED FOUNDATION 33 SHRUBSPROPOSED38 SHRUBSBUILDING 9 333 LF. REQUIRED FOUNDATION 33 SHRUBSPROPOSED38 SHRUBSSUBSTITUTIONS: IF ANY SUBSTITUTIONS ARE REQUIRED, SUBMIT WRITTENDOCUMENTS AND PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS TOLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL 5 DAYS PRIOR TOPURCHASE AND/OR INSTALLATION.LANDSCAPE NOTES1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINISHED GRADING AND POSITIVE SURFACEDRAINAGE IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT THE FINALGRADES ARE MET AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND,IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION.2. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM WITH STATE & LOCAL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS ANDTHE CURRENT ADDITION OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS. ALLPLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE HEALTHY, HARDY STOCK, AND FREE FROM ANY DISEASES,DAMAGE, AND DISFIGURATION.3. QUANTITIES OF PLANTS LISTED ON THE PLAN ARE TO GOVERN ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEQUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN. PLACE PLANTS IN PROPER SPACINGFOLLOWING LAYOUT FIGURES.4. APPLY FOUR (4) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN FOUR (4) FOOTDIAMETER RING AROUND ALL TREES IN TURF AREA. NO EDGING IS REQUIRED.5. EDGE ALL SHRUB BEDS WITH 3/ 16" X 4" MILL FINISHED ALUMINUM EDGING WITH STAKES.6. APPLY THREE (3) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN ALL SHRUB AREAS.7. APPLY TWO (2) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN ALL PERENNIAL AREAS.APPLY PELLET WEED PREVENTER UNDER MULCH BED IN ALL PERENNIAL AREAS.8. SOD SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE INSTALLED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. SOD SHALLCONFORM WITH MNDOT 3878.2A, BE DENSE, AND OF UNIFORM TEXTURE, FREE OF WEEDS ANDDISEASE. APPLY MINIMUM SIX (6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL (MNDOT 3877) AND THOROUGHLY APPLYSLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER TO TOP TWO (2) INCHES BEFORE LAYING SOD.9. PLANTING SOIL FOR LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE AT MINIMUM SIX (6) INCHES IN DEPTH AND ASANDY LOAM, SILT LOAM, LOAM, OR SANDY CLAY CONSISTING OF NO MORE THAN 65% SAND,1.5-10% ORGANIC MATTER, A PH OF 4.5-6.8, SOLUBLE SALTS LESS THAN 2 MMHOS/CM, FREE OFCHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS, AND NOT COMPACTED BEYOND 80% OF STANDARD PROCTOR OR 200PSI. SUBSOIL SHALL BE SCARIFIED BEFORE TOPSOIL IS SPREAD. SOIL SHALL BE GENERALLYFREE OF DEBRIS SUCH AS LARGE ROCKS AND FRAGMENTS OF WOOD.10. SPREAD PLANTING SOIL AT MINIMUM EIGHTEEN (18) INCH DEEP IN ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TOPLANTING.11. PLANTING AND TURF AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM.NO WATER IS ALLOWED ON ANY PAVEMENT, PARKING, WALKWAY, AND BUILDING. IRRIGATIONWATER SHUTOFF AND METERS IS LOCATED IN THE OFFICE CLOSET. COORDINATE WITHARCHITECT FOR FINAL LOCATION. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN AND ENSURETHAT IRRIGATION DESIGN MEETS ALL CITY PLUMBING CODES AND REQUIREMENTS.12. FOLLOW LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ALL INSTALLATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PLANTS AND SOD IN HEALTHY CONDITION THROUGHOUTTWO YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. THE WARRANTY PERIOD SHALL BEGIN UPON INSPECTION ANDACCEPTANCE BY CITY STAFF.SEEDED AREA 86,416 SF.SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SEEDING MIXQUANT.KEYCOMMON NAMESCIENTIFIC NAMESIZEROOTCOND.DECIDUOUS TREESEVERGREEN TREESMATURESIZEPLANT SCHEDULE10' CLUMP B&B 40'H X 30'WBETULA NIGRARIVER BIRCH6' HT. B&B 50'H X 25'WPINUS RESINOSANORWAY PNIE19B&B 50'H X 40'WQUERCUSBICOLOR2.5" CAL.SWAMP WHITEOAKB&B 50'H X 35'W2.5" CAL.10261112ACER X FREEMANII'SIENNA'SIENNA GLENMAPLEB&B 60'H X 40'WCELTIS OCCIDENTALIS 2.5" CAL.COMMONHACKBERRY18DECIDUOUS SHRUBSEVERGREEN SHRUBS5 GAL.POT2'H X 4'WMICROBIIOTA DECUSSATA'PRIDES'CELTIC PRIDERUSSIAN CYPRESS81ARCTIC FIREDOGWOODCORNUS STOLONIFERA'FARROW'5 GAL.3'H X 4'WPOTPERENNIALS1 GAL. POT 1.5'H X 2'WHEMEROCALLIS'ROSY RETURNS'ROSY RETURNSDAYLILY5 GAL.2'H X 3'WPOTSPIREA JAPONICA'GOLDMOUND'GOLDMOUNDSPIREA50172ORNAMENTAL TREESMALUS'PRAIRIEFIRE'1.5" CAL. B&B 20'H X 20'WCORNUSALTERNIFOLIA1.5" CAL. B&B 20'H X 15'WPRAIRIEFIREFLOWERING CRAB9PAGODA DOGWOOD(TREE FORM)106' HT. B&B 35'H X 20'WPICEA GLAUCADENSATABLACK HILLS SPRUCE10B&B 50'H X 35'W2.5" CAL.TILIA CORDATA'GREENSPIRE'GREENSPIRELINDENB&B 25'H X 15'WSYRINGA RETICULATA'BAILNCE'2.5" CAL.FIRST EDITIONSSNOW DANCEJAPANESE TREE LILAC176' HT.PINUS STROBUSEASTERN WHITEPINEB&B 70'H X 30'W5 GAL.3'H X 4'WPOTILEX VERTICILLATA'RED SPRITE'RED SPRITEWINTERBERRY7929522MULCH8040SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RL2.1LANDSCAPEPLANLHB06-C201.DWGPS FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZESHEETSCLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACEROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.20291 02/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALMJW16048902/21 /17NO DATE REVISIONI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Landscape Architect under the lawsof the state of MINNESOTA.Pilarsinee Saraithong45059LHB16006PROJECT NO.02/15/17NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET CERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATECivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990D E S I G NMOUND SUBGRADESCARIFY BOTTOM ANDSIDES OF PIT PRIORTO PLANTINGCUT AND REMOVE TOP 1/3 BURLAP (MIN.),WIRE BASKET, AND ALL NYLON CORD16" POLY PROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE,40 ML, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAPPLANTING PIT 2-3 X DIA. OF SOIL BALLDUG & TILLED PIT 3-5 X DIA. OF SOIL BALLMULCH DISHMULCH, EDGING, & DISH RING(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)ROOT FLARE AT SOIL LINE ORFIRST MAJOR BRANCHING ROOTAT 1 INCH BELOW SOIL LINEDOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE3' @ 120 DEGREE INTERVALSINDIGENOUS SOIL BACKFILLWATER & TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETSNOTESMAINTAIN TREE IN PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE GUARANTY PERIOD(SEE SPECIFICATIONS).TREE STAKING AND ITS METHOD ARE OPTIONALTO CONTRACTORS. TWO ALTERNATIVES ARESHOWN.2CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGNO SCALE8' STEEL STAKE INSTALL ON THE SIDEOF PREVAILING WIND1DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTINGNO SCALETREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCHMOUND SUBGRADESCARIFY BOTTOM ANDSIDES OF PIT PRIORTO PLANTINGCUT AND REMOVE TOP 1/3 BURLAP (MIN.),WIRE BASKET, AND ALL NYLON CORD16" POLY PROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE,40 ML, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAPPLANTING PIT 2-3 X DIA. OF SOIL BALLDUG & TILLED PIT 3-5 X DIA. OF SOIL BALLMULCH DISHMULCH, EDGING, & DISH RING(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)ROOT FLARE AT FINISHED GRADE ORFIRST MAJOR BRANCHING ROOTAT 1 INCH BELOW SOIL LINEDOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE3' @ 120 DEGREE INTERVALSNOTESMAINTAIN TREE IN PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE GUARANTY PERIOD(SEE SPECIFICATIONS).TREE STAKING AND ITS METHOD ARE OPTIONALTO CONTRACTORS. TWO ALTERNATIVES ARESHOWN.ONE FLAG PER WIREPLANTING SOILTOP SOILINDIGENOUS SOIL BACKFILLWATER & TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS8' STEEL STAKE INSTALL ON THE SIDEOF PREVAILING WINDPLANTING SOIL(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)MOUND SUBGRADESCARIFY BOTTOM ANDSIDES OF PIT PRIORTO PLANTINGMULCH(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)TOP OF ROOT ATFINISHED GRADEEDGING(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)REMOVE ALL POT AND ALL PLASTIC3SHRUB PLANTINGNO SCALEPLANTING SOIL(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)MULCH(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)3" MAX. BELOW PAVING SURFACEEDGING(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)6" MIN.INSTALL PLANTING BED 6" MIN.BEYOND ROOT STRUCTURE6" MIN.3"5EDGING AT PLANTING BEDNO SCALEPLANTING SOIL(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)SCARIFY BOTTOM ANDSIDES OF PIT PRIORTO PLANTINGMULCH(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)MAKE SAUCER AROUND PLANTSEDGING(SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES)SEE PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPACING12" MIN.6" MIN.INSTALL PLANTING BED 12" MIN. AROUND PLANTSPERENNIAL PLANTINGNO SCALE54SODDED AREA 1" MIN.BELOW PAVING SURFACE1"6SOD AT HARDSCAPE EDGENO SCALEL2.2LANDSCAPEDETAILSLHB06-C201.DWGUV INHIBITOR-TREATED WHITE EXTERIORWITH BLACK INNER SURFACE7TREE GUARDSNO SCALE3" MIN.- 8" DIAMETER2-PLY CORRUGATED HDPE GUARDS36" MIN. OR TO FIRST BRANCH SET BOTTOM FIRMLY IN SOILPS UPUPDNDN1-41-31-21-D1-C21-B1-A1-11-5AiCCLR. AREAAiCCLR. AREA8" STEP8" STEPCLR. AREACLR. AREAWATER1-C1FFE 99'-4"FFE 100'-0"FFE 99'-4"FFE 98'-8"120'-8"35'-4"25'-0"25'-0"35'-4"43'-0"4'-0"33'-0"1'-4"4'-8"GAS METERS10'-2 7/8"25'-8"11'-1 1/8"26'-8"11'-1 1/8"25'-8"10'-2 7/8"1-41-31-21-D1-C21-B1-A1-11-5AiAi1-C135'-4"25'-0"25'-0"35'-4"4'-0"33'-0"1'-4"4'-8"120'-8"43'-0"11'-8" 5 1/2"25'-9"5 1/2" 11'-8"ATTICATTICFFE 109'-3 1/8" FFE 109'-3 1/8"FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS CLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACELOCATION: SE QUADRANT OF INTERSECTION AT AKRON AVE. AND 141ST ST. E.ROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NODATEISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.2029 2/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALC:\Revit Local Files\160489_Prestwick Townhomes R17 Central_admadso.rvt3/15/2017 8:34:11 AMA1.00-KDB160489BUILDING 1 FLOORPLANS2/21/17N 1/8" = 1'-0"1BUILDING 1 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"2Building 1 - Second Floor PlanNO DATE REVISION UPUPUPUPDNDNDNDN2-62-42-32-22-12-D2-C22-B2-A2-7CLR. AREAAe BDEA22-5WATERCLR. AREACLR. AREACLR. AREA2-C18" STEP8" STEPFFE 100'-0"FFE 99'-4"FFE 99'-4"FFE 100'-0"FFE 99'-4"119'-8"25'-0"25'-0"7'-5 1/2"12'-10 1/2"24'-0"25'-4"43'-0"4'-0"33'-0"1'-4"4'-8"11'-8"26'-8"18'-8"26'-8"10'-2 1/2"14'-0"11'-9 1/2"2-62-42-32-22-12-D2-C22-B2-A2-7Ae BA2D2-5CLR. AREA2-C125'-0"25'-0"7'-5 1/2"12'-10 1/2"24'-0"25'-4"119'-8"4'-0"33'-0"1'-4"4'-8"43'-0"11'-8" 5 1/2"25'-9"5 1/2"18'-8"5 1/2"25'-9"5 1/2" 10'-2 1/2" 5 1/2" 13'-1" 5 1/2" 11'-9 1/2"ATTICATTICATTICATTICFFE 109'-3 1/8" FFE 109'-3 1/8"FFE 109'-11 1/8"FFE 109'-3 1/8"FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS CLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACELOCATION: SE QUADRANT OF INTERSECTION AT AKRON AVE. AND 141ST ST. E.ROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.2029 2/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALC:\Revit Local Files\160489_Prestwick Townhomes R17 Central_admadso.rvt3/15/2017 8:34:15 AMA1.10-KDB160489BUILDING 2 FLOORPLANS2/21/17 1/8" = 1'-0"1BUILDING 2 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"2Building 2 - Second Floor PlanNNO DATE REVISION UPUPUPUPDNDNDNDN3-23-33-53-63-73-A3-B3-C23-D3-1A2EDB Ae3-48" STEPCLR. AREA3-C1WATERFFE 100'-0"FFE 100'-0"FFE 99'-4"FFE 100'-0"FFE 100'-0"CLR. AREACLR. AREACLR. AREA119'-8"25'-4"24'-0"12'-10 1/2"32'-5 1/2"25'-0"43'-0"4'-8" 1'-4"33'-0"4'-0"11'-9 1/2"14'-0"10'-2 1/2"26'-8"18'-8"26'-8"11'-8"GAS METERS3-23-33-53-63-73-A3-B3-C23-D3-1DBAe3-43-C125'-4"24'-0"12'-10 1/2"7'-5 1/2"25'-0"25'-0"119'-8"4'-8" 1'-4"33'-0"4'-0"43'-0"11'-9 1/2" 5 1/2" 13'-1"10'-8" 5 1/2"25'-9"5 1/2"18'-8"5 1/2"25'-9"5 1/2" 11'-8"ATTICATTICATTICATTICA2FFE 109'-3 1/8"FFE 109'-11 1/8"FFE 109'-11 1/8" FFE 109'-11 1/8"FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS CLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACELOCATION: SE QUADRANT OF INTERSECTION AT AKRON AVE. AND 141ST ST. E.ROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.2029 2/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALC:\Revit Local Files\160489_Prestwick Townhomes R17 Central_admadso.rvt3/15/2017 8:34:19 AMA1.20-KDB160489BUILDING 3,4 FLOORPLANS2/21/17 1/8" = 1'-0"1BUILDING 3,4 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"2Building 3,4 - Second Floor PlanNO DATE REVISION UPUPUPUPDNDNDNDN5.55.45.35.25.1DC2BAGAS METERS Ae BB AeCLR. AREAC1FFE 100'-0"FFE 100'-0" FFE 100'-0"FFE 100'-0"100'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"43'-0"4'-0"33'-0"1'-4"4'-8"CLR. AREACLR. AREACLR. AREAGAS METERS WATER11'-8"26'-8"23'-4"26'-8"11'-8"5.55.45.35.25.1DC2BAROOF LINE ABOVE DASHEDAe BB AeC1F.O. BRICK BELOW25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"100'-0"4'-0"33'-0"1'-4"4'-8"43'-0"11'-8" 5 1/2"25'-9"5 1/2"23'-4"5 1/2"25'-9"5 1/2" 11'-8"ATTICATTICATTICATTICFFE 109'-11 1/8" FFE 109'-11 1/8"FFE 109'-11 1/8" FFE 109'-11 1/8"FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS CLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACELOCATION: SE QUADRANT OF INTERSECTION AT AKRON AVE. AND 141ST ST. E.ROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.2029 2/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALC:\Revit Local Files\160489_Prestwick Townhomes R17 Central_admadso.rvt3/15/2017 8:34:23 AMA1.30-KDB160489BUILDING 5,8,9 FLOORPLANS2/21/17 1/8" = 1'-0"1BUILDING 5 (8&9 SIM.) - FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"2Building 5 (8&9 SIM.)- Second Floor PlanNO DATE REVISION UPUPUPUPUPDNDNDNDNDN6-56-46-36-26-16-D6-C26-B6-A6-6Ae BB AiA2WATERCLR. AREACLR. AREACLR. AREACLR. AREACLR. AREA6-C18" STEP8" STEPFFE 99'-4"FFE 100'-0"FFE 100'-0"FFE 99'-4"FFE 98'-8"125'-4"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-4"43'-0"4'-0"33'-0"1'-4"4'-8"11'-8"26'-8"23'-4"26'-8"11'-2 1/2"14'-0"11'-9 1/2"6-56-46-36-26-16-D6-C26-B6-A6-6Ae BB AiA26-C125'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-4"125'-4"4'-0"33'-0"1'-4"4'-8"43'-0"11'-8" 5 1/2"25'-9"5 1/2"23'-4"5 1/2"25'-9"5 1/2" 11'-2 1/2" 5 1/2" 13'-1"12'-3"ATTICATTICATTICATTICATTICFFE 109'-11 1/8" FFE 109'-11 1/8"FFE 109'-3 1/8" FFE 109'-3 1/8"FFE 108'-7 1/8"ATTICFILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS CLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACELOCATION: SE QUADRANT OF INTERSECTION AT AKRON AVE. AND 141ST ST. E.ROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.2029 2/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALC:\Revit Local Files\160489_Prestwick Townhomes R17 Central_admadso.rvt3/15/2017 8:34:28 AMA1.40-KDB160489BUILDING 6 FLOORPLANS2/21/17 1/8" = 1'-0"1BUILDING 6 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"2Building 6 - Second Floor PlanNNO DATE REVISION UPUPUPUPDNDNDNDNBA(end)BA(end)7.27.37.47.57.67.A7.B7.C27.DGAS METER LOCATION BATH7.1Ae BB AeWATER7.C18" STEPFFE 99'-4"FFE 100'-0" FFE 100'-0"FFE 99'-4"CLR. AREACLR. AREACLR. AREACLR. AREA113'-4"13'-4"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"43'-0"4'-8" 1'-4"33'-0"4'-0"61'-8"26'-8"11'-8"STORAGEOFFICE7.27.37.47.57.67.A7.B7.C27.DFFE=109'-3 1/8"ROOF LINE ABOVE DASHEDCOLUMN LOCATIONS BELOWF.O. BRICK BELOW7.1Ae BB Ae7.C1ROOF LINE ABOVE DASHED13'-4"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"113'-4"4'-8" 1'-4"33'-0"4'-0"43'-0"61'-8"5 1/2"25'-9"5 1/2" 11'-8"ATTICATTICATTICATTICFFE=109'-3 1/8"FFE=109'-11 1/8" FFE=109'-11 1/8"FILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS CLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACELOCATION: SE QUADRANT OF INTERSECTION AT AKRON AVE. AND 141ST ST. E.ROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.2029 2/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALC:\Revit Local Files\160489_Prestwick Townhomes R17 Central_admadso.rvt3/15/2017 8:34:32 AMA1.50AuthorChecker160489BUILDING 7 FLOORPLANS2/21/17 1/8" = 1'-0"1BUILDING 7 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"2Building 7 - Second Floor PlanNNO DATE REVISION ELEVATION KEY:AC AIR CONDITIONING UNIT AD LIGHT W/ ADDRESS (SEE )AS ASPHALT SHINGLESB BRICK (MODULAR SIZE, RUNNING BOND PATTERN)BB BACKER BOARD (SEE )BS BRICK SOLDIER COURSE (SEE )CF CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLCJ CONTROL JOINTCO FCB INSIDE/OUTSIDE CORNER TRIM (SEE )CT4 1"x 3-1/2" CEDAR BASE TRIM (SEE )EC ENGINEERED COLUMN W/ CEDAR BASE AND CAPITAL TRIM, PTD.EM ELECTRIC METERSFL4 FCB (FIBER CEMENT BOARD) LAP SIDING, 4" EXPOSUREFR FCB RAKE (SEE )FS FCB FASCIA & SOFFITFS6 FCB SHAKE SIDING, 6" EXPOSUREFT4 1"x 3-1/2" FCB TRIMFT6 1"x 5-1/2" FCB TRIMFT8 1" x 7-1/4" FCB TRIMFT12 1"x 11-1/4" FCBGD GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTGM GAS METERSKF KICKOUT FLASHING SHOP FABRICATED W/ WATERPROOF SEAMS LV 14" W X 27" H LOUVERS, W/ 1"X3 1/2" FCB TRIM @ SILL & JAMB, 1"X5-1/2" FCB TRIM HEADOH PREFINISHED OVERHEAD GARAGE DOORRA RADON VENTRV RIDGE VENT (SEE ROOF PLANS, )SD PTD. STEEL ENTRY DOORSH VINYL SINGLE HUNG WINDOWSS CUT STONE SILL1st Floor Slab (high)100' - 0"2nd Floor T.O.Subfloor (high)109' - 11 1/8"Truss Bearing (high)118' - 0 1/4"T.O. Footing (high)96' - 8"5.55.45.35.25.1EMBSBGDCOCFFSFL4FT4RVFT6SHFRASFS6CT4LVFT8ACRVGDCOFT4FT4ECSDOHAD1st Floor Slab (high)100' - 0"2nd Floor T.O.Subfloor (high)109' - 11 1/8"Truss Bearing (high)118' - 0 1/4"T.O. Footing (high)96' - 8"5.55.45.35.25.1SSBGDCOCFFSFL4FT4RVFT6SHFRASFS6CT4LVFT8ACRVGD1st Floor Slab (high)100' - 0"2nd Floor T.O.Subfloor (high)109' - 11 1/8"Truss Bearing (high)118' - 0 1/4"T.O. Footing (high)96' - 8"DC2BAC1ECSSBGDCOFSFL4FT4RVFT6SHFRASFS6KFFT6LVFT8AC1st Floor Slab (high)100' - 0"2nd Floor T.O.Subfloor (high)109' - 11 1/8"Truss Bearing (high)118' - 0 1/4"T.O. Footing (high)96' - 8"DC2BAC1BBEMGMECSSBGDCOFSFL4FT4RVFT6SHFRASFS6KFFT6LVFT8ACFILE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJ. NO:DRAWING NO:DRAWING TITLE:PROJECT NAME:THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS CLIENT:1228 TOWN CENTRE DRIVEEAGAN, MN 55123DAKOTA COUNTY CDAPRESTWICK PLACELOCATION: SE QUADRANT OF INTERSECTION AT AKRON AVE. AND 141ST ST. E.ROSEMOUNT, MNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYCOPYRIGHT 2013 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.NO DATE ISSUED FOR701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612.338.2029 2/21/17 PUD SUBMITTALC:\Revit Local Files\160489_Prestwick Townhomes R17 Central_admadso.rvt3/15/2017 8:34:36 AMA2.10-KDB160489BUILDING 5 ELEVATIONS2/21/17 1/8" = 1'-0"1BUILDING 5 - FRONT ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"3BUILDING 5 - BACK ELEVATIONREPRESENTATIVE OF TYPICAL BUILDING ELEVATIONSNO DATE REVISION 1/8" = 1'-0"5BUILDING 5 - RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2BUILDING 5 - LEFT SIDE ELEVATION Front Elevation Photo—Carbury Hills Development (Similar Design) AKRON AVE (CR 73)A VANTIAVE BONAIRE PATH W AKRON AVE (CR 73)AT R I U M A V E 140T H ST W ATWOODCIR139TH ST W WAYST W 142ND C O N N EMARATRL 145TH ST E (CSAH 42)AKRON AVE (CR 73) ATWOOD CT AUBURN AVEATHENA WAY ATHE N A CT ABBEYFI E L D CT ABBEYFIELD AVEAILESBURY CTAI L E S B U R Y A V E 141ST ST AD D I S O N A V EADDISONCTADE L L E A V E AILESBURY AVE 140TH ST 139TH ST 138TH ST A B E R C O R N A V E ADAIR AVEADAIR AVE 141ST ST ADELAIDE AVEALDBOROUGH AVEALBANY AVEA L M A C I R AKRON AVE (CR 73)A VANTIAVE BONAIRE PATH W AKRON AVE (CR 73)AT R I U M A V E 140T H ST W ATWOODCIR139TH ST W WAYST W 142ND C O N N EMARATRL 145TH ST E (CSAH 42)AKRON AVE (CR 73) ATWOOD CT AUBURN AVEATHENA WAY ATHE N A CT ABBEYFI E L D CT ABBEYFIELD AVEAILESBURY CTAI L E S B U R Y A V E 141ST ST AD D I S O N A V EADDISONCTADE L L E A V E AILESBURY AVE 140TH ST 139TH ST 138TH ST A B E R C O R N A V E ADAIR AVEADAIR AVE 141ST ST ADELAIDE AVEALDBOROUGH AVEALBANY AVEA L M A C I R Date: 3/16/2017 1 in = 850 ft Document Path: T:\GIS\City\Maps\Departmental Maps\CommunityDevelopment\Arcon8x11.mxd R1 - Low Density Residential R1A - Low Density Residential R2 - Moderate Density Residential R3 - Medium Density Residential R4 - High Density Residential C4 - General Commercial AGP - Agricultural Preserve AG - Agricultural PI - Public/Institutional MEMORANDUM DATE: March 20, 2017 TO: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Stacy Bodsberg, Planning & Personnel Secretary John Morast, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: Mitch Hatcher, Project Engineer RE: Prestwick CDA Townhomes Engineering Review SUBMITTAL: The plans for Prestwick Place Townhomes have been prepared by Elan Design Lab dated February 21, 2017. Engineering review comments were generated from the following documents included in the submittal:  PUD Submittal ▫ Existing Conditions ▫ Site Plan ▫ Preliminary Plat ▫ Erosion Control Plan ▫ Grading and Drainage Plan ▫ Utility Plan ▫ Landscape Plan ▫ Details  Stormwater Management Report GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. Development fees are required based on the current Schedule of Rates and Fees. For 2017, the estimated development fees are listed below:  Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $ 6,865 / acre  Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $ 1,075 / acre  Watermain Trunk Charge: $ 6,500 / acre 2. As outlined in the existing Joint Development and Cost Sharing Agreement, the developer is responsible for the costs of adjacent roadways. 3. A subdivision agreement will be required for the installation of public infrastructure. 4. Street and utility construction shall be installed in accordance with the 2015 City of Rosemount General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates and the Engineering Guidelines. 5. Final construction plans for grading, street, and utilities should be submitted to the City for review. 6. City inspection of public street and utility installation is required during construction. 7.60’ of ROW is needed for Addison Avenue, 30’ from centerline on each side. ROW or Easement is required for the 30’ on the east side of Addison Ave. If easement is dedicated, ROW will be required in the future when Outlot N is platted. 8. All work occurring within the Great River Energy easement shall be by agreement or permit with the easement owner. 9.Drainage and utility easements are required encompassing all public utilities including sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer. The width of drainage and utility easements shall be verified during final design. 10.Sidewalk should be installed along the east side of Addison Avenue to match existing Greystone neighborhood to the north. 11.A sidewalk connection should be made from the internal sidewalk to the trail along Addison Avenue. 12.Roadway typical section for Addison Avenue shall be 2” bituminous wear, 2” bituminous non-wear, 6” aggregate base, 24” select granular. Bituminous trail section along Addison Avenue shall be 2” bituminous wear, 6” aggregate base, 12” select granular. Concrete sidewalk section along Addison Avenue shall be 6” concrete, 12” select granular. 13.Maximum allowable slope is 4:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) and minimum slopes of 2% are allowed. Maximum slopes of 3:1 are only allowed below the 10:1 maintenance bench for NURP basins. 14.Retaining wall should have top of wall and bottom of wall spot elevations. Retaining walls exceeding 4 feet in height shall require a plan prepared by a licensed engineer submitted for review and approval by the Building Official prior to permit issuance. 15.Retaining walls and fences are required to be installed by the developer with the mass grading of the site. Retaining walls and fences are required to be owned and maintained by the developer or individual property owners. 16.Hydrant spacing and locations should be approved by the City Fire Marshal. Typical maximum spacing for multi-family areas is 300’. 17.A street light plan should be submitted for review. 18.Rock construction entrances should be shown on the erosion control plan. 19.The developer is required to obtain a grading permit from the City prior to construction grading activity. The developer is required to obtain a NPDES construction Stormwater Permit and provide a copy of the approved SWPPP to the City prior to the start of any construction activity. 20.Upon completion of the street, sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer construction, the City requires record drawings. See Engineering Guidelines for submittal and formatting requirements. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 21.The City’s standards requires storm sewer to be RCP and a minimum of 15” diameter. 22. Some EOFs were missing labels on the grading plan - Show all emergency overflow routes from all low points with spot elevations. See Engineering Guidelines for additional details (Section I.3). a. FFE of building 1 looks close to the EOF of CBMH 23. b. FFE of building 2 looks close to the EOF of CBMH 15. 23. Velocity through CB 26 to CBMH 25 is greater than 12 fps. Verify the grade is correct in the storm sewer spreadsheet. Storm sewer should be designed for a minimum velocity of 3 fps and a max velocity of 10 fps. 24. CBMH 31 includes a gravity separator. Further detail should be provided. 25. Upon validation of storm sewer capacity, the existing 2 CBs and the North end of Addison may be directly routed to the regional basin in Greystone. 26. CSWMP Background: The proposed CDA site has been planned to be routed to the Northeast to regional basin WRV-1710 which was constructed as part of Greystone 2nd Addition. Per the Prestwick PUD the CDA need to meet regional basin requirement on site. c. Site needs to be modified to provide live pool storage volume for the 100-yr 24 hour runoff event for the entire drainage area. Any area not directed to a region basin will need to be approved by the City Engineer and will be subject to additional ponding fee charges. d. For newly developing areas, no discharge or infiltration can be assumed for purposes of establishing the 100-year, 24-hour storm event high water elevation. i. Remove exfiltration from the HydroCAD model and recalculate the high water levels for the 2, 10, and 100 year events. ii. Verify freeboard requirements are still met with Addison Avenue. 27. City maximum infiltration rate for HSG type A soils is 0.3 in/hr. Different infiltration rates will be considered (up to a maximum of 3.0 in/hour) by the City Engineer on a site-by-site basis based on percolation tests or other pertinent information conducted by a professional soil scientist or Professional Engineer. No infiltration recommendations were observed in the Geotech report. a. Double ring infiltration testing must be completed after the infiltration system is constructed to confirm infiltration rates meet or exceed 0.8 inches/hour. 28. In order to take credit for the regional ponding volume an infiltration surface needs to be provided either above the NWL or in an adjacent infiltration basin. Infiltration surface area needs to be greater than or equal to the area as calculated below: This will meet the City’s 1/12 ac-ft/acre/day infiltration area requirement. 29. All regional basins should have outlet pipes with outlet control structures containing a weir wall set at the 100-yr, 24-hr rainfall event and an orifice with a sluice gate set at the NWL. Orifice should be sized to allow 0.05 cfs/acre of drainage area when the basin is at its HWL. See City Standard Outlet Control Structure detail. This site should be routed to the Greystone 30. HWLs on the plan set should be called out for both the 100-yr, 24-hr rainfall event and the 10-day snow melt event. 31. Lining of NURP ponding areas is not required by the City; however, the developer may want to consider this as ponding areas will likely not maintain vegetation below the NWL. 32. All low floor elevations appear to be greater than 1 ft above the HWL and all Low building openings appear to greater that 3 ft above the HWL. These elevations should be confirmed after pond design is adjusted. 33. Subcatchments Site-Post and Addison need permanent pool volumes greater than or equal to the runoff from a 2.5 inch storm event. 34. Each NURP basin Permanent pool average depth shall be > 4ft with a maximum depth of < 10ft. North Ponding areas need to be revised. 35. Outlet pipes shall either be submerged or have a skimmer structure meeting the requirements outlined in City Engineering Guidelines (section II.3.f.) Should you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above, please contact me at 651-322-2015. MEMORANDUM To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner Anthony Nemcek, Planner John Morast, Interim City Engineer Mitch Hatcher, Project Engineer From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Date: March 15, 2017 Subject: Prestwick Townhomes The Parks and Recreation Department recently reviewed the development plans for the Prestwick Townhouse project. After reviewing the plans, the Parks and Recreation Department staff has the following comments: PARKS DEDICATION The City’s Parks Master Plan does not have a public park identified in this area and staff is recommending the City collect a cash dedication in-lieu of land for this project. Because the City is in the process of reviewing our parks dedication collection methods and parks dedication fees, staff is recommending that the City delay collection the parks dedication until a decision is made regarding the park dedication. SIDEWALKS and TRAILS Staff is recommending that a sidewalk be added that connects the office to Addison Avenue. The Parks and Recreation Commission will be reviewing this item at their meeting on Monday, March 20, 2017. Please let me know if you have any questions about this memo. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting: April 18, 2017 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Two Principal Structures at 2665 145th Street, until December 2018 AGENDA SECTION: New Business PREPARED BY: Anthony Nemcek, Planner AGENDA NO. 9.b. ATTACHMENTS: Rendering, Site Plan, Project Narrative APPROVED BY: LJM RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation construction phasing plan to allow two principal structures on a single lot during the period of construction ending by December 2018. SUMMARY Applicant: Ryan Companies for Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation Location: 2665 145th Street West; northwest of the intersection of 145th Street West and Blanca Avenue Area: 4.51 Acres Zoning and Guide Plan Business Park Staff has received an application for a site plan approval from Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation (MERC) and their contractor, Ryan Companies, to construct a new 23,300 square foot building at MERC’s site, located approximately 1,000 feet east of City Hall. If a plan meets all Business Park ordinance criteria, which this application does, an application can be approved administratively. Staff is bringing this item to the City Council because the applicant wishes to continue utilizing the existing building until construction of the new building is complete. This means at one point there will be two principal structures on the property. Typically, staff does not support allowing two principal structures on the site, even temporarily because it is difficult to remove the second use, should the property owner be uncooperative. Staff is not concerned in this instance, as the site of the existing building is the location for additional parking, therefore the existing building must be removed to provide ample parking for the new building. As the new building is larger than the existing, this parking is essential. New employees will also be coming to the site; in addition to relocating existing MERC staff to the new building. MERC’s leadership team will be relocated from a site that it currently leases in Eagan to the new building Rosemount. Construction will begin on the new building in spring of 2017, with an expected completion in late 2017. At that time, staff and operations will be moved into the new building. It is anticipated that the existing building will be razed in early 2018, and construction of the new parking area and landscaping will begin as soon as weather allows. Allowing two principal structures until December 2018 should permit any modifications in the construction timing if needed. As mentioned above, this is an unusual situation and not one often requested or granted. SITE PLAN The building will feature an exterior of brick accented with decorative stone. Inside, the building contains an area for tech training, a fitness center and shower rooms, and a flexible-use conference room. All this is in addition to workstations for field ops and corporate offices. The rear portion of the building contains 2 the warehouse area. The site plan indicates a storm water detention pond located in front of the building and a parking lot on the eastern portion of the site where the existing building is currently located The landscape plan meets Code requirements for the number of trees required as well as landscaping within the parking lot. Sixty-two trees are included in the landscape plan. Foundation plantings will be located along the east, west, and south sides of the building. Construction equipment will be staged toward the rear of the building on an open area of land near the railroad. RECOMMENDATION Based on information provided by the applicant and reviewed in this report, staff is recommending approval of Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation’s construction phasing plan to allow two principal structures on a single lot for the duration of construction ending in 2018. “6) FFE=974.0 PROPOSED BUILDING R:\Projects\700\400\700-400 MERC - 20,000 S.F. Office Building\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C103 - PHASING PLAN.dwgR:\Projects\700\400\700-400 MERC - 20,000 S.F. Office Building\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C103 - PHASING PLAN.dwgPHASING NOTES: REGISTRATION NO.DATE Name ----3/28/2017 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota © 2017 RYAN A+E, INC. DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NO.DATE MBC CHL 700-400 ---- C103 3/28/2017 PHASING PLAN ---- N ISSUE RECORD ISSUE #DATE DESCRIPTION 01 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 3/28/2017 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- SITE PLAN REVIEW ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- LEGEND WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax CONSULTANTS OWNER 2665 145TH ST WEST ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 MINNESOTA ENERGY RESOURCES FACILITY PROJECT INFORMATION OFF-STREET PARKING MINIMUM PARKING REQUIRED BY CITY CODE OFFICE:1 PER 200 SF GFA @ 16,260 SF = 82 SPACES WAREHOUSING:1 PER 2,000 SF GFA @ 7,100 SF = 4 SPACES PARKING REQUIRED = 86 SPACES PARKING PROPOSED = 100 SPACES PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N - FOR SITE LAYOUT REFER TO L200 - FOR PLANTING PLAN REFER TO L400 - FOR PLANTING DETAILS REFER TO L500 - FOR GRADES AND EROSION CONTROL REFER TO CIVIL NOTES MINIMUM NUMBER OF PLANTINGS OVERSTORY TREES ONE (1) TREE PER 3,000 SQUARE FEET LAND AREA. WHICHEVER IS GREATER - SPACING MUST INCLUDE TREES AT THE BOULEVARD AT 50 FOOT MINIMUM INTERVALS. - 75% OF THE TOTAL SHALL BE DECIDUOUS TREES. ALL BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BE OF SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE TYPES. - CREDIT FOR THE RETENTION OF EXISTING TREES WHICH ARE OF ACCEPTABLE SPECIES, SIZE AND LOCATION MAY BE GIVEN TO SATISFY THE MINIMUM NUMBER 145,646 SF = 49 REQUIRED TREES FOUNDATION PLANTINGS 1 FOUNDATION PLANTING PER 10 LINEAR FEET OF BUILDING PERIMETER. 678 LN = 68 REQUIRED SHRUBS SCREENING LANDSCAPING AND BERMING SHALL BE THE PRIMARY SOURCE FOR SCREENING PARKING. - PARKING AREA SCREENING SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM FIFTY PERCENT (50%) OPACITY SCREEN TO A HEIGHT OF AT LEAST FOUR FEET (4'). PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING A MINIMUM OF FIVE PERCENT (5%) OF THE PARKING AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED. - THIS LANDSCAPING SHALL BE LOCATED ON ISLANDS, PENINSULAS OR THE LIKE WITHIN THE PERIMETER OF THE PARKING AREA. - A MINIMUM OF ONE TREE SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH TWO HUNDRED FIFTY (250) SQUARE FEET OF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA. - THE REMAINING AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH SHRUBS OR GROUND COVER (NOT TO INCLUDE ROCKS OR GRAVEL EXCEPT AS A MULCH AROUND SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER) NOT TO EXCEED TWO FEET (2') IN HEIGHT. 13 REQUIRED TREES GENERAL LANDSCAPING - ALL AREAS OF LAND OTHER THAN THOSE OCCUPIED BY BUILDING OR HARDCOVER SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH A COMBINATION OF SOD AND PLANTINGS. - ROCK OR MULCH MAY ONLY BE USED AS AN ACCENT MATERIAL AROUND SOD OR PLANTINGS. - TREES, SHRUBS, FLOWERS AND GROUND COVER NEEDED IN THESE AREAS SHALL BE IN ADDITION TO THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF TREES AND FOUNDATION PLANTINGS REQUIRED. - ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. 62 TREES REQUIRED = 62 TREE PROPOSED CITY REQUIREMENTS HH W V W V W V W V W V W V 23,300± SF FFE=974.0 PROPOSED BUILDING 0 30 60 FT ISSUE RECORD ISSUE #DATE DESCRIPTION 1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL3/28/17 LOCATION RESOURCES FACILITY ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 REGISTRATION NO. CHECKED BY 46100 KWP DRAWN BY DATE 700.400 3/28/2017 CLR L100 --- LANDSCAPE I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. KEVIN PFEIFFER SITE PLAN 2665 145TH ST WEST MN ENERGY WWW.RYANCOMPANIES.COM RYAN A+E, INC. 50 South Tenth Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2012 612-492-4000 tel 612-492-3000 fax CONSULTANTS OWNER © 2017 RYAN A+E, INC. DRAWN BY JOB NO.DATE PROJECT INFORMATION ISSUE SET 3/28/2017 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION