HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.h. Cancel October 22, 1992 Public HearingCITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING ATE: OCTOBER 6, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: CANCEL
OCTOBER 22, 1992 SPECIAL
AGENDA SECTION:
COUNCIL MEETING ,
CONSENT
PREPARED BY: SUSAN
ADMINISTRATIVE
M. WALSH
ASSISTANT
AGENDM#
"�'
ATTACiIIUMS: LETTER
FROM BRIGGS AND MORGAN,
APPROVED BY:
RESOLUTION
At`>a Special Council Meeting on September 21, 1992, Council set a special
meeting to hold a public hearing on October 22, 1992 to consider an
amendment to the Rosemount Redevelopment Plan
Please refer to the a tached letter from Mary Dyrseth from Briggs and
Morgan who states this
, public hearing is not necessary.
Since this public hearing was set by a resolution, the appropriate action
would be to adopt the attached resolution.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1992-101
MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION
COUNCIL ACTION:
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
(612) 223-6625
Mr. Stephan Jilk
City Administr,-
Mr. John Miller
Economic Dew
City of Rosemou
2875 145th Stree
Rosemount, MN
LAW OFFICES
BRIGGS AND MORGAN
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
West
55068
TELEPHONE (612) 223 - 6600
FACSIMILE (612) 223-6950
September 23, 1992
t Director
ML'%^_TEAPOLIS OFFICE
2400 IDS CENTER
MINN-EAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE 1012) 334-8400
FACSIMILE 1612) 334-8650
Re: Port Authority of the City of Rosemount - $3,500,000 General Obligation
Bonds, Series 1992 (Ice Arena Project)
Dear Steve andJohn:
Enclosed re copies of the letters that were sent to the County and School
Districts informing them that the public hearing scheduled for October 22, 1992,
has been canceled.
As I mentioned in our telephone conversation, I remembered, after
returning to the office, that the above referenced bonds are being issued under
the port authority law (Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.060), which authorizes the
issuance of general obligation bonds by a port authority, secured by the full -faith
and credit of the city, without an election.
The amen
ments were necessary to enlarge the Rosemount Redevelopment
District to include
the ice arena site and to authorize the use of tax increments
from both the Rosemount
Redevelopment District and Tax Increment District
No. 1-1 for the ice
arena project. Since we have independent authority for
issuing the bonds
under the port authority law, it was not necessary that the Tax
Increment Financing
Plan authorize the issuance of $3,500,000 in tax increment
bonds. The amendments
were needed only to allow the use of tax increments to
pay debt service
Dn the bonds in the event the revenues of the ice arena were not
sufficient.
BRIGGS AND MORGAN
Mr. Stephan Jilk
Mr. John Miller
September 23, 1992
Page Two
Notwithstanding the fact the costs of the ice arena exceeded the amount
set forth in the amendments to the plans, the City does not need to hold a new
public hearing to increase the costs unless tax increments are going to pay debt
service on more than $2,500,000 of the $3,500,000 bond issue. Since this is highly
unlikely, if not impossible, I have concluded that a new public hearing is not
needed. I hope this clarifies why a new public hearing is not necessary. I am
sorry for the confusion on this matter.
I also want to mention that the following resolutions or ordinances, as the
case may be, will be necessary in connection with the issuance of the port
authority bonds:
1. A Port Authority resolution calling for the sale of the bonds.
2. An ordinance adopted by the City Council consenting to the pledge
of its full faith and credit to the bonds. The ordinance must be
published once in the official newspaper of the City.
3. A Port Authority resolution accepting the bid on the sale of the
above referenced bonds.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
MMD:mw
Enc.
cc: Mr. Dan O'Neill
Mr. Vince Thomas
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
(612) 223-6625
Dr. R. J. Rehwal
Superintendent
Independent Sch
14445 Diamond 1
Rosemount, MN
Re: City of Rosf
Rosemount
Developmer
Financing I
District No.
Dear Superinte
Board M
The purpc
Rosemount, that
scheduled for O(
MMD:mw
cc: Mr. Step]
Mr. John
LAW OFFICES
I?IGGS AND M013GAN
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDINO
SAINT PAUL, 241-NNESOTA 55101
TELEPHONE (612) 223-6600
FACSIMILE (612) 223-6450
September 23, 1992
District No. 196
9W
MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE
2400 IDS CEN -TER
MINCKEAPOLIS, MDNESOTA 55-402
TELEPHONE 4012) 334'8400
FACSIMILE (812) 334-8850
nount - CancelIation of Public Hearing on Modification to
tedevelopment Plan and the Development Program for
District No. 1 and the Amendment of Tax Increment
an for Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development)
1-1
t Rehwaldt and
:rs of the School Board:
of this letter is to inform you, on behalf of the City of
e public hearing for the above referenced matter, which was
ber 22, 1992, has been canceled and will not be rescheduled.
Jilk
Very truly yours,
Mary M. seth
k'RITER'S DIRECT DIAL NL-MBEER
(612) 223-6625
LAW OFFICES
BRIGGS AND MORGANT
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SALNT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
TELEPHONE (612) 223-6600
FACSIMILE (612) 223-6450
September 23, 1992
Dakota County Board of Commissioners
Dakota County Judicial Center
1560 Highway 55
Hastings, MN 55033
Attention: Ms. Norma Marsh
County Auditor
MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE
2400 IDS CENTER
MIN-.N-EAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE (012) 334-8400
FACSIMILE 1612) 334-8650
Re: City of Rosemount - Cancellation of Public Hearing on Modification to
Rosemount Redevelopment Plan and the Development Program for
Development District No. 1 and the Amendment of Tax Increment
Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development)
District No. 1-1
Dear Ms. Marsh and Members of the County Board:
The purpose of this letter is to inform you, on behalf of the City of
Rosemount, that the public hearing for the above referenced matter, which was
scheduled for October 22, 1992, has been canceled and will not be rescheduled.
Very tr ly yours,
Mary M. Dyrseth
MMD:mw
cc: Mr. Stephan Jilk
Mr. John Miller
WRITER -S DIRECT DIAS. NUMBER
(612) 223-6625
Mr. Roger Norst,
Superintendent
Dakota County T
Intermediate Sch
1300 East 145th
Rosemount, MN
LAW OFFICES
RIGGS AND MORGAN
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
TELEPHONE (612) 223 - 6600
FACSIMILE (612) 223-6450
September 23, 1992
fl
:chnical College
,ol District 917
treet
55068
MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE
2400 IDS CENTER
ML\-A'EAPOIIS, XIN ESOTA 55402
TELEPRONE (012) 334-8400
FACSIMILE 1912) 334-8850
Re: City of Rosemount
- Cancellation of Public Hearing on Modification to
Rosemount
Redevelopment Plan and the Development Program for
Development
District No. 1 and the Amendment of Tax Increment -
Financing
Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development)
District N
. 1-1
Dear Superintendent Norstad and
Board Members of the School Board:
The purpo
Rosemount, that
scheduled for Oc
of this letter is to inform you, on behalf of the City of
e public hearing for the above referenced matter, which was
Ser 22, 1992, has been canceled and will not be rescheduled.
Very truly yours,_
)Mary M. Dyrseth
MMD:mw
cc: Mr. Stephn Jilk
Mr. John Miller
A
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
RESOLUTION 1992-
SOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 1992-101
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount deems it
unnecessary to hold a public hearing on October 22, 1992 which
was set for the purpose of considering a modification to the
Rosemount Development Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Rosemount rescinds Resolution 1992-101, A RESOLUTION CALLING
FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE ROSEMOUNT
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO. 1 AND A PROPOSED SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT)DISTRICT NO. 1-1; and
BE IT FURTHERESOLVED, that the City Council cancels the special
council meet'ng set for October 22, 1992.
ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
6th day of October, 1992.
Susan M. Walsh, City Cler
Motion by:
For:
Against:_
E. B. McMenomy, Mayor
Seconded by: