HomeMy WebLinkAbout2. Goal Setting Session with Council and Department HeadsTo:Mayor McMenomy
Councilmembers:Klassen
Staats
Willcox
Wippermann
FROM:Stephan Jilk
Re: 1992 Goal Setting Session
June 15, 1992
4:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M.
Dakota County Technical College
Rainbow Room
The City Council/Department Head Goal Setting session is set for
this Monday. Please note the above time and location.
In order to assist us all to prepare for the evening I am providing
the following general outline of process for the evening. Also,
attached are; 1) a summary of the goals established in 1990, 2) a
copy of the minutes of the meeting between department heads and the
council and, 3) the minutes of the special meeting between the city
council and the city commission members. This information has been
passed on to Dori Bargen, our facilitator for the evening, to assist
him in preparing for working with us. Please take a few moments to
review the information as I believe it will help us in working
together at our worksession.
General Outline for work session
Presentation of list of items for discussion from the City Council -
department heads and the City Council -Commission Members meeting.
Addition of any items as selected by the group.
Discussion, in small groups, of the listed items to prioritize the
items and discuss them.
Full group discussion on the final list of items to establish a
list of "Goals" and to discuss methods of reaching these "Goals"
and time lines to complete.
A report will be written by Don Bargen as a summary of the
evenings' for presentation to the Council for adoption at a later
council meeting.
We will have liquid refreshments available all evening and we will
be bringing in a Pizza - Sub Sandwich supper about 5:30 to eat
while we work.
I know that department heads are looking forward to the evening and
working together with you to establish these extremely important
and valuable goals for the City in 1992.
June 10, 1992
GOAL SETTING MEETING SCHEDULE
for 1992 and 1993
1992
City Council/Dept. Heads
City Council/Commissions
City Council/Dept. Heads
Goal Setting
City Council/Administrator Mtg.
Town Meeting
1993
City Council/Dept. Heads
City Council/Commissions
City Council/Dept. Heads
Goal Setting
City Council/Administrator Mtg.
City Council/Administrator Mtg.
Town Meeting
April 28, 1992
May 13, 1992
June 15, 1992
August 10, 1992
November 19, 1992
January 27, 1993
February 10, 1993
February 24, 1993
March 15, 1993
October 25, 1993
November 18, 1993
Tues.
Wed.
Mon.
Mon.
Thurs.
Wed.
Wed.
Wed.
Mon.
Mon.
Thurs.
Decision
■� Resources Ltd.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 1990 GOALS SESSION
January 30, 1990
Decision Resources, Ltd., was retained by the City of -Rosemount
to facilitate a goals setting session with the City Council and
-City Staff . Diane Traxler acted as- session facilitator;
Bill Morris and Linda Winter served as session recorders. The
entire process was completed in six hours; the results provided a
framework for action during the coming year:. This overview is
based upon the written record compiled during he session.
Determination of City Goals:
The rules for a nominal group brainstorms- g'and prioritization
"exercise were distributed:
1. Silent generation of ideas in writing. Working silently and
independently, Participants jot down their responses to the
question.
2. Round-robin recording of ideas. When called upon, each
participant contributes a single idea that is recorded on a large
is
flip -chart. Discussion of the ideas ishe notsoermitted atey
nhbe
time. Conpleted sheets are taped to
seen by the group. The group facilitator continues to call upon
the participants until all ideas have been recorded, or the group
determines that they have produced a sufficient number of ideas.
3. Serial discussion of the list of ideas. The participants
discuss each idea on the list so that they are clear about the
meaning of the "ideas.
4. voting. The participants identify what each of them believes
is the most important ideas, they rank order their preferences on
a slip of paper,
the votes are recorded on the flip -chart, and
the voting pattern is discussed.
When similar ideas were grouped, a list of thirty was compiled.
..Questions of clarification were then pp,itarticipantsd to insure
that
wereasked
participants understood each it P
to rank order each of the thirty issues. Council and Staff
preferences were tallied separately. The results of this
exercise are shown below. It is noteworthy that both groups
agreed on the two major issues facing the City; however, after
those top ranked items, the lists were very dissimilar.
�»o nr»,� l`n, art • �,tiilnPaYlnliC N i1 "lima ((712) 92n -n -V1
ISSUE
COUNCIL STAFF
RANK RANK
Waste -to -Energy Plant 1 1
Industrial Development on Eastside 8
Land Use Policy Consensus.
3 *
'.� Taxes versus Service Needs 6
Southside Business Development
Impact of 1990 Legislative Session
Non -Hazardous Waste Disposal
City Input/Involvement Process
7
Westside Business. Development
Update COMP GLIDE PLAN
2
Balance Small Town Rural Ambience
with Growth
4
Street Reconstruction
Koch Refinery Expansion
City Facilities Expansion/Construction
Staffing on Special Projects
U of M Lands
New Commercial Development outside of
Downtown/Different Business Types
Implement Sidewalk Plan
Promote Additional. Senior Housing
Identify/Recruit Retail & Industrial
Businesses that work for Rosemount
9
Armory Design
Tax Base Growth
Size and Type of Growth in City
Need of and Relationship with School
District
E
ISSUE COUNCIL STAFF
RANK RANK
City Attractions
Aesthetic/Architect Guidelines for
Downtown
Unified Community in Appearance and -
nFeel"
City Staffing
Maintaining Open/Rural Areas 5
Town Green Plan
There was a strong consensus by a majority of the Council on the
nine, top ranked issues;. similarly,. a strong Staff consensus.
developed around their eight top ranked topics.- But, an intense.
minority listed several policy. issues. These items are marked
with a * and, because the intensity,_. were included for further
discussion.
Action Plans:
Each ofthe top ranked issues were fully discussed. Then,
specific actions to be undertaken during the coming year were
proposed. When a consensus had developed within the group, ..the
action step was recorded and a definite time frame for completion
assigned. r _
I. Waste to Energy Plant _
1. Push for acquisition of the University of Minnesota lands,
subject to not assuming liabilities. (Timeline: 0-2 months)
2. Publicize city strategy: rationale for position and actions..
Develop communications plan, including timing and message
content. (3-6 months)
3 Develop host... community relationship with Dakota_ County.
Identify.bargaining points. _.(3-6 months)
4. Acknowledge receipt of EIS (Environmental .Impact:: Study)
Expect County to; live up to the letter of the EIS and employ- any,
new technologies as they emerge.,. (0-2 months)
II. Update COMP Guide Plan
1. Define process. Summarize available data and update.
(Timeline: 0-2 months)
2. By July 1, 1990, hire consultant and define work program.
(3-6 months)
3. Implement process.- (7-12 months)
4. Completion/Adoption of plan by June, 1991."
111. Land Use Policy Consensus
1. Staff recommendations will be guided by current policy:
2. Guiding Principal: Land use decision making process will be
open and complete.
IV. Balance Small Town Rural Ambience with Growth
1. Recognize the importance of,this -issue.
2 Agree on the meaning of this issue. Select process for
reaching agreement. (Timeline: 3-6 months)
3. . Complete process by the beginning of the Comprehensive Plan
Update, July 1, 1990.
V. Maintaining open/Rural Areas
1. Identify the means to maintaining open/rural areas.
(Timeline: 3-6 months)
VI. Taxes versus Service Needs
1. Use budgeting and development review process.to:
(a) Determine the proper balance to define and protect
basic services;
(b) Consider upgrades.
VII. City Input/Involvement Process
1. Establish a: -policy to continue citizen involvement -
communications whenever feasible. (Timeline: 3-6'months)
VIII. Industrial Development on Eastside
I. Evaluate need/feasibility of providing public services to
existing industries and promoting additional development.
(Timeline: 0-6 months)
Ig. Identify/Recruit Retail & Industrial Businesses that work
for Rosemount
1. Complete,"Star City" process by July, 1990 (Timeline: 0-6
months)
2. Determine process for identifying business suitable for
Rosemount. (3-6 months)
3. Determine process for recruiting businesses. (3-6 months)
X.. Impact of 1990 Legislative Session
1. Maintain contact with area legislators.
%I. New. Commercial Development Outside of Downtown/Different.-
Business Types
1. Define "Downtown Area. (Timeline; 3-6 months)
2. Assess businesses and services not currently available in
Downtown Rosemount. (3-6 months)
3. Discussion of businesses which might.. relocate out of
Downtown. (3-6 months)
%II. City Facilities Expansion
1. Determine a process to prioritize and meet the city's special
needs to the year 2000. (Timeline: 3-6 months)
%I2I. Non -Hazardous Waste Disposal
1. Examine consolidating waste management industry locations:
(Timeline:.. 0-2 months)
2: Assess terms -of permit approval .(7-12 months)
The record just reviewed provides a systematic workplan for
action on the major priorities suggested by both Council and
Staff. Much of the emphasis is on the determination of processes
.for decision-making, but several of the tasks call for the
implementation of specific policies and plans.
Work Schedule:
Placing the action steps on a timeline indicates that Staff will
be required to undertake quite a number of activities during the
intermediate 3-6 month future time period.
0-6 Month Activities
I-1._ Push for acquisition of the University of Minnesota lands,
subject to not assuming liabilities.
I-4. Acknowledge receipt of EIS (Environmental Impact Study).
Expect County to live up to the letter of the EIS and employ any
new technologies as they emerge.
II -1. Define process. Summarize available data and update.
VIII -1. Evaluate need/feasibility of providing public services
to existing industries and promoting additional development.
IX -1. Complete_"Star.-City" process by July, 1990.
XIII -1. Examine consolidating waste management industry
locations.
3-6 Month Activities
' I-2. Publicize: city strategy: rationale for position and
actions. Develop communications plan, including timing and
message content.
I-3. Develop host community relationship with Dakota County.
Identify bargaining points.
II -2. By July 1, 1990, hire consultant and define work program.
IV -2. Agree on the meaning of this issue. Select process for
reaching agreement.
IV -3. Complete process by the beginning of the Comprehensive
Plan Update, July 1, 1990.
-V-1. Identify the means to maintaining open/rural areas.
VII -l. Establish a policy to continue citizen involvement -
communications whenever feasible.
IX -2. Determine process for identifying business suitable for
Rosemount.
IX -3.- Determine process for recruiting businesses.
6
3-6 Months (cont,)
XI -1. Define "Downtown Area."
XI -2. Assess businesses and services not currently available in
Downtown Rosemount.
XI -3. Discussion of businesses which might- relocate out of
Downtown.
XII -1. Determinea process to prioritize and meet the city's
special needs to the year 2000.
7.-12 Month Activities
II -3. Implement process.
XIII -2. Assess terms of permit approval
1991 Activities
II -4. Completion/Adoption of plan by June, 1991.
While staffing on special projects and city staffing, in general,
were not priority issues for this session, the numbers of tasks
to be accomplished in the 3-6 month time period would suggest
some discussion is needed.
Summary and Conclusions:
The goals session achieved its two broad purposes: first, an
issues prioritization was determined; and, second, a workplan for
1990 was agreed upon. However, like any strategic planning
document, these results should not be considered permanent. They
should be evaluated periodically and re -appraised, particularly
at the end of six months. The session indicated another very
important fact: a solid accord of both City Council and Staff on
the major issues facing Rosemount and a surprisingly high level
-of consensus on the approaches to be used in examining the issues
of the day.
7
GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/LAND USE ISSUES
Ouality of Life
A. Parks / Open Space
B. General Recreational
C. Quality / Diverse Housing
D. Services
E. Taxes
F. Balance of Small Town with Growth
Economic Development
A. Downtown
B. Industrial
C. Retail
D. Commercial
E. Land Use
F. University of Minnesota
Communication (City involvement Process)
A. On issues before Council
B. General Public Information (i.e. newspaper)
C. Between Commissions / Council
D. Between Staff and Council
City Infrastructure
A. City Facilities
B. City Streets, Sewer, Water, Stormwater
Environmental
A. Management of Waste Programs
B. Working with Industries, existing and new
C. Interacting with outside agencies (i.e. County, MPGA,
U of M)
ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL MEETING
APRIL 28, 1992
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a Special Meeting of the City
Council of the City of Rosemount was duly held on Tuesday, April 28, 1992,
at 6:40 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Mayor McMenomy called the meeting to order with Councilmembers Klassen,
McMenomy, Staats, and Wippermann present. Councilmember Willcox arrived at
6:55 p.m.. Staff present were: Aker, Bechtold, Freese, Jilk, Knutsen,
May, and Wasmund.
City Administrator Jilk advised the purpose of the meeting was to have the
City Council and City Department Heads discuss mutual concerns regarding
communication, cooperation and decision making.
Klassen recruested to set a Special Council meeting for airport discussion.
MOTION by Klassen to set a Special Council Meeting for May 12, 1992 at 7:00
p.m. for the purpose of hearing a presentation by Metropolitan Council and
Metropolitan. Airport Commission on the airport planning process. Second by
McMenomy. Ayes: 4. Nays: 0.
Council and Department Heads then_ discussed the following issues:
1. Positive reinforcement of committees/commissions
2. Budget process and Council involvement
3. Administrations role in budget/operations
4. Communication between Council and staff on decisions and the
need for strong recommendations from staff.
5. Improving the substance of reports to Council from staff.
6. The need for Council preparation for Council meetings.
7. Staff suvzort of the Council and the Councils support of
s t a f f .
8. The importance of staff presenting "pros" and "cons" on
recommendations to Council.
9. The need to communicate and involve Council in certain
processes.
MOTION by McMenomy to adjourn.
ATTEST:
E.B. McMenomy, Mayor
Second by Klassen. Ayes: S. Nays: 0.
Respectfully submitted,
Stephan Jilk,-
City Administrator
ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL MEETING
MAY 13, 1992
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a Special Meeting of the
City Council of the City of Rosemount was duly held on Wednesday,
May 13, 1992, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers for the
purpose to provide City Council with input on goals for the City
in 1992 in preparation for the June 15, 1992 Special City
Council/Department Head Goal Setting Session.
Mayor McMenomy called the meeting to order with Councilmembers
Klassen, Staats and Wippermann present. Commissioners present
were Planning: Baago, Busho; Parks & Recreation: John Howard,
Jerry Puciaty; Port Authority: Anderson, Dunn, Edwards, Mawe
(McMenomy, Wippermann). Staff present: Attorney Mike Miles,
City Administrator Stephan Jilk, Planning Director Lisa Freese.
Mayor McMenomy led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor McMenomy advised those present that the City Council called
this Special Council Meeting for the purpose of taking input from
commission members to assist the City Council in establishing
goals for 1992.
The City Council then entertained suggestions for issues and
ideas to address in the goal setting. These issues and ideas
presented were grouped into generally defined areas as follows:
INFRASTRUCTURE
1) Public Safety; support continued upgrading of public
safety departments to maintain services.
2) Police Services; community awareness/visibility
3) Match level of service to growth
4) Look at alternatives to meeting these service levels
5) Focus on service needs:
a. Sewer and Water, support expansion of sewer treatment
facilities.
b. Support sewer and water extension to light industrial
development areas.
c. Sufficient staffing to support building programs and
expansion
6) Transportation; public transportation to serve community
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1) Accessible downtown parking
2) Complete downtown development plan
3) Establish retail zoning on CR42
4) Support Retail/Service businesses
5) Highway 3 (downtown) status planning
6) Establish industrial park; zoning and utilities
7) Economic development promotion/recruitment
ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL MEETING
MAY 13, 1992
8) Infrastructure to support economic growth
9) Employment opportunities
10) Complete ice arena - now
11) Highway 52 Corridor utilities for development
12) Develop public/private partnerships for development
13) Complete Strese Oil project soon
14) Balance economic/residential growth
15) Select site for industrial park
16) Utilize Comprehensive guide plan for downtown development
17) Determine what "downtown" really is.
PLANNING
1) Complete Comprehensive Guide Plan
2) Support no greater than 500-. increase in population over
life of Comprehensive Guide Plan
3) Support park development per Parks Master Plan
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
1) Council/commission - communicate purpose and direction to
commissioners
2) Friendly meeting place for all ages
3)_ Utilize cable channel for public information
4) Public information network (i.e. sc.00ls, organizations,
city)
5) Continue "Town Meeting" process
6) Encourage cable system expansion
7) Staff, Council, Commissions communications
QUALITY OF LIFE
1) Def ine
2) Continue to support "Family Friendly Factors".
MOTION by McMenomy to adjourn the meeting. Second by Klassen.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m..
ATTEST:
E.B. McMenomy, Mayor
2
Respectfully submitted,
Stephan Jilk
City Administrator
AGENDA:
4:00 REVIEW OUTCOMES/AGENDA
REVIEW AREAS & ISSUES, May 13, 1992
4:45 CRITICAL PROBLEMS
- Impact: refers to positive effect that addressing problem
has on mission
- Urgent: refers to timing
- Feasible: refers to practicality and probability
5:30 REVIEW CRITICAL PROBLEMS
- Understandable
- Manageable
6:00 DINNER & DESIRED OUTCOMES
7:00 FORCES FOR/BARRIERS TO ACHIEVING OUTCOMES
8:15 DEVELOPING WORK PROGRAMS
- Part 1
- Part 2
9:30 FULL REVIEW
10:00 ADJOURN
Strategic Visioning* Executive Development oConference Facilitation
•
•
P.O. Box 9975
Donald E Bargen
St- Paul, MN 55109
—�
•—
612/481-9335
Organizational Consultant
FAX: 612/486-9861
•�
/•
•
Deerwood. MN
218/534-3067
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
June 15, 1992
OUTCOMES:
-
+ TO IDENTIFY
CRITICAL ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED BY CITY ADMINISTRATION
IN 1992
- 1994
+ TO DEVELOP
SPECIFIC 90 -DAY WORK PROGRAMS TOWARD EFFECTING
OUR
DESIRED
OUTCOMES
-
AGENDA:
4:00 REVIEW OUTCOMES/AGENDA
REVIEW AREAS & ISSUES, May 13, 1992
4:45 CRITICAL PROBLEMS
- Impact: refers to positive effect that addressing problem
has on mission
- Urgent: refers to timing
- Feasible: refers to practicality and probability
5:30 REVIEW CRITICAL PROBLEMS
- Understandable
- Manageable
6:00 DINNER & DESIRED OUTCOMES
7:00 FORCES FOR/BARRIERS TO ACHIEVING OUTCOMES
8:15 DEVELOPING WORK PROGRAMS
- Part 1
- Part 2
9:30 FULL REVIEW
10:00 ADJOURN
Strategic Visioning* Executive Development oConference Facilitation
THE WAY WE WANT THINGS TO BE:
DESIRED OUTCOME
ONCE WE HAVE ADDRESSED OUR PROBLEM, HOW WILL THINGS BE
DIFFERENT? DESCRIBE THE DESIRED OUTCOME.
WHAT WOULD EXIST THAT DOESN'T EXIST NOW?
WHAT WOULD BE HAPPENING THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN NOW?
WHAT PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOR THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN PLACE
WOULD BE ELIMINATED OR CHANGED?
WHAT WOULD THERE BE MORE OF?
WHAT WOULD THERE BE LESS OF?
WHO WOULD BENEFIT IN WHAT WAYS?
IN A SENTENCE, OUR DESIRED OUTCOME IS:
Page 5
(Pity ofCRosemount
PhVK (ett) 4234411 2676 -145th a" WW, po4amo^ Mhr4WU
FAX (612) 423-5203 Maiinp Addnas
PA. t3oz StO, Rnaamaumt, AAinnaot4 S SQ68L516
JUNE 14, 1992
4:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m.
AREAS AND ISSUES
Rosemount City Proceedings
Special Meeting
May 13, 1992
INFRASTRUCTURE
MAYOR
Id L MOMCQ*my
In Klaum
M4Q) snare
y wilco
wwo.fi1W"I
1. Public Safety; support continued upgrading of public
safety departments to maintain services
2. Police Services; community awareness/visibility
3. Match level of service to growth
4. Look at alternatives to meeting these services levels
5. Focus on service needs:
- Sewer & Water, support expansion of sewer treatment
facilities;
- Support sewer and water extension to light industrial
development areas
- Sufficient staffing to support building programs and
expansion
6. Transportation; public transportation to serve community
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1. Accessible downtown parting
2. Complete downtown development plan
3. Establish retail zoning on CR42
4. Support Retail/Service businesses
5. Highway 3 (downtown) status planning
6. Establish industrial park; zoning and utilities
7. Economic development - promotion/recruitment
G. Infrastructure to support economic growth
jok
9. Employment opportunities
10. Complete ice arena - no
11. Highway 52 Corridor utilities for development
12. Develop public/private partnerships for development
13. Complete Strese Oil project soon
14. Balance economic/residential growth
15. Select Site for industrial park
16._ Utilize Comprehensive Guide Plan for downtown development
17. Determine what "downtown" really is
PLANNING
1. Complete Comprehensive Guide Plan
2. Support no greater than 50% increase in population over life
of Comprehensive Guide Plan
3. Support park development per Parks Master Plan
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
1. Council/commission - communicate purpose and direction to
commissioners
2. Friendly meeting place for all ages
3. Utilize cable channel for public information
4. Public information network (i.e. schools, organizations,
city)
5. Continue "Town Meeting" progress
6. Encourage cable system expansion
7. Staff, Council, Commissions communications.
QUALITY OF LIFE
1. Define
2. Continue to support "Family Friendly Factors"
Page 2
THE CRITICAL PROBLEM
A. IN OUR AREA, WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WE NEED TO WORK ON?
B. WHY IS IT A PROBLEM? WHAT IS IT ABOUT THIS
SITUATION THAT KEEPS US FROM BEING A HEALTHY
COMMUNITY? WHAT COMMUNITY VALUES DOES THIS
SITUATION "VIOLATE"?
C.
WHAT ARE KEY FACTORS
CAUSING THIS PROBLEM
Page 3
WHAT ARE THE IMPORTANT
CONSEQUENCES OF PROBLEM
D. WHO'S INVOLVED
WHO ELSE SEES THIS AS A PROBLEM (GROUP OR INDIVIDUAL)
WHO IS MOST AFFECTED BY THE PROBLEM
E. DEFINE THE PROBLEM IN ONE SENTENCE:
Page 4
THE WAY WE WANT THINGS TO BE:
DESIRED OUTCOME
ONCE WE HAVE ADDRESSED OUR PROBLEM, HOW WILL THINGS BE
DIFFERENT? DESCRIBE THE DESIRED OUTCOME.
WHAT WOULD EXIST THAT DOESN'T EXIST NOW?
WHAT WOULD BE HAPPENING THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN NOW?
WHAT PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOR THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN PLACE
WOULD BE ELIMINATED OR CHANGED?
WHAT WOULD THERE BE MORE OF?
WHAT WOULD THERE BE LESS OF?
WHO WOULD BENEFIT IN WHAT WAYS?
IN A SENTENCE, OUR DESIRED OUTCOME IS:
Page 5
OUR DESIRED OUTCOME;
--------------------------------------------------
Page 6
ORGANIZING OUR PROJECT
PART 1: OVERALL PROJECT PROCESS
A. IDENTIFY CRITICAL MILESTONES FOR THE PROJECT TO
ACHIEVE. THESE SHOULD BE THE MAJOR ACTIVITIES OR
BENCHMARKS YOU WILL BE WORKING TOWARD DCURING THE LIFE OF
THE PROJECT.
B. FOR EACH MILESTONE, IDENTIFY THE FOLLOWING:
1. ESTIMATED DATE OF COMPLETION
2. WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ACHIEVING THIS
MILESTONE
3. STAKEHOLDERS WE NEED TO INVOLVE IN ACHIEVING
THIS MILESTONE
Page 7
PART 2: SHORT-TERM OR WORK PROGRAM
After reviewing the milestones you have identified for
the entire project, focus now on those specific work
tasks which must be initiated and/or completed within the
next 90 days in order for you to achieve the milestone
objectives. After identifying the tasks, identify the
date by which the task needs to be completed and the name
of the person who whill be responsible for that task.
Being responsible doesn't have to mean doing all the
work! It only means that you will make sure the work is
done. Finally, identify other persons or groups from the
community to be involved in each task.
A. TASK
1
2
3
4
5
COMPLETION DATE RESPONSIBLE OTHERS
B. TASK 30 DAYS 60 DAYS 90 DAYS OTHERS
1 r
2 rw►s�y
3 _ PquL
4 J EM ,
1
5 A6YSSA
C. PERSON TASK STARTED BY COMPLETE BY OTHERS
1
2
3
4
5
Page 8
Strategic Visioning
\' •� Executive Development
—• •— Conference Facilitation
Donald F. Bargen
Organizational Consultant
P.O. Box 9975
St. Paul, MN 551 Q9
612/481-9335 Deerwood, MN
Far- Al WARAARR1 91 R /FRd.RnA7
,P,at&-ovw