The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment - Armory MUSA AdditionCITY OF; ROSEM[OUNT EXECUTIVE SUIWIARY FOR ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 4, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Armory�Project -'Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment No. 23 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARING PREPARED BY: AGENDA E I' m .j� '"� Tj" Lisa Freese, Director of Planning ATTACHMENTS: Resolution; Metropolitan Council APPR D Ys Amendment Application;' Zoning Map; MUSA Map; Public Hearing Notice & Mailing List. The Armory site is designated Public & Institutional in the 166mprehensive Guide Plan and ,is zoned Public (PUB) The site, however, is not within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) In order to extend urban services (water, storm and sanitary sewer) it is necessary to bring this area into the MUSA. This is considered a minor amendment under the Metropolitan Council's guidelines. The Metropolitan Council review is concerned with the facility's metropolitan systems impacts. In this case, we presume that they will be most concerned with the impact on sanitary sewers and transportation. The attached application and information supplement addresses these issues. On Tuesday, July 28, 1992 the Planning Commission reviewed this MinorGuide Plan Amendment and recommended approval to the City Council In twootherrelated actions, the Planning Commission approved a variance from the parking standards and approved the site plan. Both of these actions do not require City Council approval. The parking variance was necessary because the Armory/Community Center site could not accommodate the amount of parking that would have been required by the Zoning Ordinance. In granting this variance the Planning Commission acknowledged that the multi -use nature of this facility did not lend itself to parking requirements. In this instance, they felt that the shared parking concept was acceptable and the frequency of maximum parking need would be limited to a few times a year. If the Armory facility coordinator employed a contingency parking plan overflow situations could be dealt with by using other city -owned parking facilities. The site plan was approved subject to: 1) approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment;,2) obtaining necessary access and drainage permits from MnDOT to STH 3; 3) storm water runoff and retention plan approved by the City Engineer; 4);a variance granted for Zoning Ordinance parking standards; and 5) prior to issuance of a'Building Permit,a revised site plan, conforming to all setback requirements and a revised landscape plan must be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION., MOTION to adopt A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPRE- HENSIVE GUIDE PLAN OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT TO INCLUDE THE .12 -.ACRE NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY/COMMUNITY CENTER SITE WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICE AREAI(MUSA) BOUNDARY. COUNCIL ACTION: 8-4-92.005 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 1992- A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT TO INCLUDE THE 12 -ACRE NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY / COMMUNITY CENTER SITE WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICE AREA (MUSA) BOUNDARY WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has entered into an agreement with the National Guard to develop a facility that combines an armory and community center; and WHEREAS, urban services must be provided to the Armory/Community Center as part of the development of the facility; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount considered the proposed MUSA boundary addition at a regularly scheduled meeting on the 28th of July, 1992 and recommended approval of the amendment to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council scheduled a Public Hearing, according to law, to consider the plan amendment and the hearing was held on the 4th of August, 1992 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount forwards Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment No. 23 to the Metropolitan Council for their review of this amendment to the 1980 Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan MUSA boundary; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount approves Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment No. 23 as an amendment to the Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan contingent on upon the Metropolitan Council action. ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1992. E.B. McMenomy, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted against: INFORMATION SUBMISSION FOR MINOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS This summary worksheet must be filled out and submitted to the Metropolitan Council with a copy of each proposed minor comprehensive plan amendment. Minor amendments include, but are not limited to: 1. Changes to the future land use plan where the affected area is small or where the proposed future land use will result in minor changes in metropolitan service demand. 2. Changes (land trades or additions) in the urban service area involving less than 40 acres. 3. Minor changes to plan goals and policies that do not change the overall thrust of the comprehensive plan. Please be as specific as possible; attach additional explanatory materials if necessary. If a staff report was prepared for the Planning Commission or City Council, please attach it as well. Communities submitting regular plan amendments may wish to enter this form or a reasonable facsimile into their word processing menu for ease in preparation of the form. Send plan amendments to: John Rutford, Referrals Coordinator Metropolitan Council, Mears Park Centre 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN 55101-1634 I. GENERAL INFORMMATION T A Sponsoring governmental unit CITY OF ROSEMOUNT Name of local contact person LISA J. FREESE, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Address 2875 145TH STREET WEST, ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 Telephone (612) 322-2050 Name of Preparer (if different from contact person) RICHARD PEARSON, ASSISTANT PLANNER/LISA FREESE. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Date of Preparation JULY 17, 1992 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN MIENDMENT NO. 23 B. Name of Amendment NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY & ROSEMOUNT CO1*1UNITY CENTER Description/Summary To extend the Metropolitan Urban Service Area to a 12 -acre site that will be developed as a National Guard Armory and a Community Center. An Ice Arena may be included in the development. C. Please attach the following: 1. Five copies of the proposed amendment. 2. A city-wide map showing the location of the proposed change. 3. The current plan map(s), indicating area(s) affected by amendment. 4. The proposed plan map(s), indicating area(s) affected by amendment. i D. What is the official local status of the proposed amendment? (Check one or more as appropriate.) X_ Acted upon by planning commission (if applicable) on JULY 28 1992 X Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review, AUGUST 4, 1992 Considered, but not approved by governing body on Other E. Indicate what adjacent local governmental units and other jurisdictions (school districts, watershed districts, etc.) affected by the change have been sent copies of the plan amendment, if any, and the date(s) copies were sent to them. Independent School District 126, August 5 1992 II. 1AIN D USE A Describe the following, as appropriate: 1. Size of affected area in acres 12 ACRES . __ _. 2 Existing land use(s) PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL 3. Proposed land use(s) PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL 4. Number and type of residential dwelling units involved NONE 5• Proposed density N_ON APPLICABLE 6. Proposed square footage of commercial, industrial or public buildings ARMORY: 62.235 sct ft._• COL211 LAITY rFATm�A. ICE ARENA. 32,154 s r 13.. tom' III. METROPOLITANMETROPOLITANDEVELOPMENT GUIDE TOTAL: 108,280 sqftft A. Population, Household and Employment Forecasts Will the proposed amendment affect the city's population, household or employment forecasts for 2000, or any additional local staging contained in the original plan? X No/Not Applicable Yes. Describe effect. ii B. Changes to Urban Service Area Boundary Will the proposed amendment require a change to the boundary of the community's urban service area? No/Not applicable. x Yes. Under I. C., a map should be attached to show the proposed change. C. Changes to Timing and Staging of Urban Service Area Will the proposed amendment require a change to the timing and staging of development within the urban service area? X No/Not Applicable. Yes. Under I. C., a map should be attached to show the proposed change. D. Wastewater Treatment 1. Will the proposed amendment result in a change in the projected sewer flows for the community? No/'Not Applicable. x Yes. Indicate the expected change. Total Year 20002010 flow for community based on existing plan _029 million gallons/day 2000/2010 Total 20002010 flow for community based 'on plan amendment 1.443 million gallonsiday 2000 2.406 2010 2. If your community discharges to more than one metropolitan interceptor, indicate which interceptor will be affected by the amendment. ROSEMOUNT WASTE 14ATER TREATMENT PLANT INTERCEPTOR 3. Will flows be diverted from one interceptor service area to another? X No/Not applicable. Yes. Indicate the change and volumes (mgd.) involved. E. Transportation 1. Will the proposed amendment result in an increase in trip generation for the affected area? No/Not applicable. x Yes. Describe effect. - SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION SUPPLEMENT - iii 2. Does the proposed amendment contain any changes to the functional classification of roadways? X No. Yes. Describe which roadways F. A%Iation Will the proposed amendment affect the function of a metropolitan airport or the compatibility of land uses with aircraft noise? _x No/Not applicable. Yes. Describe effect. G. Recreation Open Space Will the proposed amendment have an impact on existing or future federal, state or regional recreational facilities? X No/,Not Applicable. Yes. Describe effect. H. Housing Will the proposed amendment affect the community's ability or intent to achieve the long-term goals for low- and moderate -income and modest -cost housing opportunities contained in the existing plan? No/Not Applicable. Yes. Describe effect. I Water Resources 1. Does the plan amendment affect a Minnesota Department of Natural Resources or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers protected wetland? If yes, describe type of wetland affected and show location on a map. Yes. X No. 2. Will the wetland be protected? Yes. Describe how. No. Describe why not. iv 3. Will the plan amendment result in runoff which affects the quality of any surface water body? If yes, identify which ones. X Yes. - SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION SUPPLEMENT No. 4. Will the water body be protected? X Yes. Describe how. - No. Explain why not. IV. IMPLEMENTATION PR0GRAJi1 A. Official Controls Will the proposed amendment require a change to zoning, subdi%ision, on-site sewer ordinances or other official controls? x No/Not Applicable. Yes. Describe effect. v JUL 24 '92 11:26 OSM MPLS, MN P.2 Minor Comprehensive plan Amendment ITx (E) - Transportation I � N A traffic generation analysis was conducted for the proposed Armory/Civic Center. Four generation periods were looked at: 1, weekday average daily traffic (ADT) 2. weekday peak hour 3, weekend peak hour 4. special event peak hour The traffic generation rates were based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Traffic Generation Manual, as well as data provided by the developer. The followin assumptions were made, to assure a worse case analysis, in calculating the anticipated g traffic generation: All activities (i.e., Armory event, Ice Arena event, banquet\Auditorium event) would occur at the same time. Vehicle occupancy of 3.0 persons per car for events. All events and services would generate at their maximum level. For the weekend and special event peak hour traffic, all vehicles would arrive during the same hour. Table 1 illustrates the traffic generation for the proposed development. Table No.1 Traffic Generation Armory Site Generator Weekday Weekend Event ADT Peak Peak Peak Armory 135 45 160 160 Ice Arena 50 10 340 440 Banquet Hall/ N/A N/A 220 220 Auditorium Office 25 5 N/A N/A Total 210 60 720 820 JUL 24 '92 11:27 OSM MPLS, MN P.1 As a result of the traffic generations discussed above, potential impacts to the existing roadway system in the area would occur. The following is a list of potential impacts: • Traffic delays on State Trunk Highway 3 (S.T.H. 3) due to right and left turning vehicles into the proposed site. • Safety concerns associated with stopping traffic and the change of speed in this area. The type on conflicts mentioned above currently exist on S.T.H. 3 for the access of Dodd Road and the Rosemount High School driveway. III. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Based on the potential impacts discussed above and discussions with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) two alternatives were developed and are being evaluated. These improvements will improve the operation and safety of S.T.H. 3, and address the traffic impacts mentioned earlier. 1. A continuous by-pass lane from the existing School Drive through the proposed site accesses including Dodd Road. Z. A continuous center left turn lane from the existing School Drive past Dodd Road. Both alternatives discussed above would include right turn lanes at the Armory Site driveways_ One of the alternatives discussed above will be implemented, They are both currently being studied. The City of Rosemount is currently evaluating the operational characteristics, as well as the financial feasibility including the possibility of a cooperative agreement between Mn/DOT and the City. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission t\ Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1633 612 222-8423 June 22, 1992 Ms. Lisa Freese Rosemount Planning Dept. 2875 - 145th Street W. Rosemount, MN 55068 RE: Estimation of SAC for the National Guard Armory/Community .Center and Ice Arena Dear Ms. Freese: Per your request the following is an estimation of SAC charges that will be assessed on the above referenced projects. The estimation is based on plan review of documents dated April 10, i992, dild from information from the project Architect, Steve Belmont of Arthur Dickey Architects, Inc. This estimate breaks down SAC charges according to possible bid alternatives. The Commission requests that after bids have been reviewed for the project and a decision is made as to the extent of the project, final construction documents be resubmitted for review so that a final SAC determination can be made. SAC DETERMINATIONS National Guard Armory and Community Center 1. Alternative 1 (minimum build) Armory: Personnel 29.79 417 enlistants @ 14 people/SAC Unit Vehicle Washing 22 vehicles C 5001 wash/day @ 3.5 gal/mn 2 81 @ 20 mn/vehicle @ 274 gallons/SAC Unit Community Center: Assemble Area 7,626 sq ft @ 15 sq ft/person @ 14 people/SAC 36.31 Park & Recreation Offices Office 0.84 2017 sq. ft. @,2400 sq. ft./SAC Unit Conference Room 0.10 168 sq. ft. @ 1650 sq. ft./SAC Unit Total Charge: 69.85 or 70 2. Alternative 2 (includes Bid Item 12 only) Alt. #1 Minimum Bid minus Assemble Area (69.85-36.31) 33.54 Expanded Assemble Area 9266 sq. ft. @ 15 sq. ft./person @ 14 people/SAC 44.12— Total Charge: 77.66 or 78 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 3. Alternative 3 (includes Bid item 14 only) Alt. #1 Minimum Bid 69.85 Auditorium 343 seats @ 110 seats/SAC 3.12 Banquet 6006 sq. ft. @ 590 sq. ft./SAC 10.18 Office 134 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft./SAC 0.06 Total Charge: 83.21 or 83 4. Alternative 4 (includes Bid items 12 and 14) Alt #2 (Minimum Bid w/bid item 12) 77.66 Auditorium 343 seats @ 110 seats/SAC 3.12 Banquet 6006 sq. ft. @ 590 sq. ft./SAC 10.18 Office 134 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft./SAC 0.06 Total Charge: 91.02 or 91 5. Ice Arena Team Rooms 4 teams rooms @ 1 room/SAC Unit 4.00 Zamboni Pit 1 Pit @ 4 SAC Units/Pit 4.00 Bleachers 1015 seats @ 110 seats/SAC Unit 9.23 Total Charge: 17.23 or 17 If you have any questions regarding the above SAC estimations or require additional information please don't hesitate to call. 9nald rely, AS. Bluhm Municipal Services Manager DSB:KLC:jle 92062253 CC: Sandy Selby, MWCC Ronald Wasmund, City of Rosemount T. ARMORY ZONING LOCATION MAP •• . �•-- ` �'- AG RR IG - PUB AG f I- P B -,., G-2 PUB PUB :Tf i AGRICULTURAL PUB 1 i�1 - - --- AG 1 1 C— L} AG TR i3 EXPERIMENT 32 EX PUB P Uri - IG sTATI+ 0 PHONE (612) 423.4411 FAX (612) 423.5203 �iiy of Rosemount 2875 - 145th Street West. Rosemount, Minnesota Mailing Address: P.O. Box 510, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068.0510 Public Notice Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment No. 23 Rosemount Armory Site - NWSA Designation 139XX South Robert Trail (West of TH 3 at Dodd Boulevard) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: MAYOR Edward B. McMenomy COUNCILMEMBERS Sheila Klassen James (Red) Staats Harry Willcox Dennis Wipperrnann ADMINISTRATOR Stephan Jilk NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, the City Council of the City of Rosemount will hold a public hearing nn Tuesday, August 4, 1992 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, beginning at 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of this hearing is to receive comments on a proposed amendment to the Rosemount Comprehensive Guide Plan which would include the Rosemount Armory site within the City's Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The Public Hearing pertains to property located west of State Trunk Highway 3 (South Robert Trail) at Dodd Boulevard, legally described as P.I.D. No. 34-02010-013-55. . Persons wishing to speak on this issue are invited to attend this meeting on Tuesday, August 4, 1992 at 8:00 p.m. Dated this 21st day of July, 1992. i 5u M. Wal , City Clerk City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota (Sverything s (90m.ing (UP g osemounl�.I :SD 196 _4445 DIAMOND PATH :OSEMOUNT MN 55068 3LBERT MONK 1-3975 S ROBERT TR 20SEMOUNT MN 55068 )ENNIS P O'LEARY JR _5291 CHIPPENDALE AV ?OSEMOUNT MN 55068 MICHAEL & EILEEN MCDONOUGH 14555 DANVILLE AV W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 EARL & KAREN TOURDOT 2965 BRUCE CT INVER GROVE HTS MN 55077 DEAN C & BERNICE V FALLS 13936 S ROBERT TR ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 ST JOHNS AM LUTH CHRCH 3285 144TH ST W ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 RICHARD L BATTAGLIA P 0 BOX K ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 MARTIN & RITHA LUCKING 13830 S ROBERT TR ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 jOUIS GRAMSEY TODD HENRY FRANZ NHD RSMNT WOODS ASSOC 325 CRYSTAL LAKE RD 13940 5 ROBERT TR 3010 PLAZA VII TOWER 3URNSVILLE MN 55337 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 45 7TH ST S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 eity of (Rosemount PHONE (612) 423.4411 2875 - 145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota MAYOR FAX (612) 423.5203 Mailing Address: Edward B. McMenomy P.O. Box 510, Rosemount, Minnesota 5506&0510 COUNCILMEMBERS Sheila Klassen AFFIDAVIT OF MAILED AND POSTED HEARING NOTICE James (Red) Staats O'LEARY'S HILLS 5TH ADDITION STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS HarryWillcox PROJECT 232 Dennis Wippermann ADMINISTRATOR Stephan Jilk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF DAKOTA )ss. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ) Susan M. Walsh, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: I am a United States Citizen and the duly qualified Clerk of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota. On July 22, 1992, acting on behalf of the said City, I posted at the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, and deposited in the United States Post Office of Rosemount, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of public hearing regarding O'Leary's Hills 5th Addition Street and Utility Improvements, Project #232, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the attached listings at the addresses listed with their names. There is delivery service by United States Mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed. A usan M. W h City Clerk City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota Subscribed and sworn to before me this 0' iA,4 day of July, 1992. Nott rub )lPdDY DGRP:iDtN tiR r NOTARY PUBLIC—MINNESOTA l ??` COUNTY.5, .- va�ru�AAMAMM44 My Conn. EEJ Aug.OTA IM � . 6verylkings coming (Yb RosemounlP eity of (Rosemount PHONE (612) 4234411 2875 . 145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota FAX (612) 4235203 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 510. Rosemount, Minnesota 55068-0510 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS O'LEARY'S HILLS 5TH ADDITION STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 232 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: MAYOR Edward B. McMenomy COUNCILMEMBERS Sheila Klassen James (Red) Staats Harry Willcox Dennis Wippennann ADMINISTRATOR Stephan Jilk NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota will , meet at 8:00 o'clock p.m. or as soom thereafter as possible, Tuesday, August 4, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, to consider the following improvements: Project #232 - O'Leary's Hills5thAddition Street & Utility Improvements The nature of improvements shall include the construction of street construction, sidewalk, watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, curb and gutter. The total estimated cost of said improvements is $672,000. The total assessment cost of said improvement is $672,000. The area proposed to be assessed for the foregoing improvements would generally be all that area generally described as PID Number 34-03110-014-17 of the north half of Section 31, Township 115, Range 19 in the City of Rosemount recorded in the office of Dakota County, Minnesota. Such person(s) as desires to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements will be heard at this meeting. Written or oral opinion will be considered. Dated this 21st day of July, 1992. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL. City Clerk City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota 6ver1y11ltngs �oming (UP gosemounF.11 I MAILING LIST O'LEARY'S HILLS 5TH ADDITION STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 232 PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 4, 1992 8:00 P.M. Parkview, Incorporated 34-03110-014-17 3480 Upper 149th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 Farmington Independent AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Diane Berge, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper, known as The Farmington Independent , and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statues 331A.02, 331A.07 and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed /(/ 0+W which is attached, was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and .published once each week for successive weeks- it was first published on Thursday, the -�Jfd day of 19 9 ;)- and was thereafter printed and published on every Thursday, to and including Thursday, the _day of , 19 , and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: abc&fgbiJU=op<;:7= v.xyz By: F3gm (4— Title: Administrator for LhJ Vublier Subsc ' ed ad sWorn to before me on this day of ' 19 j of Public AFFIDAVIT AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA LISA M. SHERVHEIM NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA DAKOTA COUNTY My Commission Expires Nov. 19, 1992 City of Rtisemoant Public Notice Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment No. 23 Rosemount Armory Site - MUSA Designation 139XX South Robert TrA (West of TH 3 at Dodd Boulevard) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, the City Council of the City of Rosemount will hold a pOblic hearing on Tuesday, August 4, 1992 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, beginning at 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible., The purpose of this hearing is to receive comments on a proposed amendment to the Rosemount Comprehensive Guide. Plan which would include the Rosemount Armory site within the City's Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The Public Hearing pertains to property located west of State Trunk Highway 3 (South RobeR Trail) at Dodd Boulevard, legally described as P.I.D. No. 34-02010-013-55. Persons wishing to speak on tfiis issue are invited to attend this meeting on Tuesday, August 4, 1992 at 8:00 p.m Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota 7/23 i