HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.c. Minutes of June 30, 1992 Special Council MeetingROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
— MEETING
SPECI
JUNE 30, 1992
Special Meeting of the City
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a Sp held with the Planning
Council of the City of Rosemount was jointly
Commission, Port Authority, Parks and Recreation Committee and Utilities
Co m. in the Council Chambers
Commission on Tuesday, June 30, 1992, at 6:40 p.
at City Hall.
Actinmay
or Wippermann called the meeting to ordeRiCktPearson, all uMarieembers
Ac g Y e Lisa Freese,
present. Staff members present wer
Darling and Susan Walsh. Various commission and committee members we
re
also in attendance.
Acting Mayor Wippermann led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor McMenomy joined the meeting at 6:55 p.m-
An
addition to the agenda was Item 2(d)(3) Trunk Highway 3.
comprehensive Thepp
ur ose of the meeting was to receive nput and
dPdirection on several
remaining issues regarding the Com p
an update.
Director of Planning
Lisa Freese reviewed the development process of the
comprehensive Guide Plan update and reviewed the agenda for the meeting.
ntial
P
Fred Hoisington from Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. presented a reside
F pro
erty. Under this
planned unit development (PUD) for theKelly the
Trustger Farm and Daley Farm
concept the o be cre plannedeasoonesting development unit. if the property is
would need to be p will be afforded more opportunities to use
planned as one unit, the city Protect or reduce the impact of
clustering and density transfers to p provide i some
development on important environmental features andthapro overall density
flexibility to the developer. It was sung
should be considered and performance standards could be developed to ensure
further protection.
scenarios. Based. on the existing
Director Freese reviewed various density a s. imately 850 to 920
zoning of R-1 (229 acres) and AG (220 acres),ro proposed urban residential
units could be built on the site. proximateth the ly 1300 units could boximate
density of 2.5 units, a total of app
accommodated in the total development.
Discussioper n ensued on app
density caps ranging from 2
er
the
Staff included the concept of a small convenieiCetypetllnwouldabea °f
Highway 3 and Connemara as an option. Any rovided services would be
discouraged and any duplication of already p neighborhood
discouraged. Assistant Planner Rick Pearson noted that any
convenience center is only to serve those living within one-half mile
en e site; and if kept small in size, it would not "compete"
radiusof the stor
with downtown shops. Tschida, 3138 -
Residents Bernard McGarri- Garrofalo,13960 - 137th37th Court eStreet rWest, commented
131st Street West and Sam green ac
on preserving the land and staff's consideration of
educational needs and city services.
_,-
ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL MEETING
JUNE 30, 1992
Director Freese reported that upon meeting with the school district that
existing school sites can accommodate this growth through the year 2010.
Director Freese commented on a tax capacity analysis prepared by Planning
Intern Marie Darling. Freese noted the analysis provides insight on the
tax burden of residential uses relative to nonresidential uses within the
city and compared to other cities in Dakota County. Councilmember
Wippermann noted that in a fiscal impact study done by another community in
the metropolitan area that it would be necessary to have a home valued at
least $225,000 in order to pay for the required public services.
Director Freese explained that the PUD could have performance standards
setting parameters for protection of environmentally sensitive areas and
natural features. The consensus of the participants was to further define
the performance standards and to review at a later meeting.
By unanimous consent, Mayor McMenomy called for a ten minutes break at 8:05
p.m.
Discussion followed on commercial zoning. The consensus was not to develop
east of Highway 3 and County Road 42, noting that it is not proposed to be
included in the MUSA area for the year 2000 and because of the daily
railroad traffic. It is was agreed a positive message should be given to
potential commercial developers regarding the City of Rosemount's desire
for commercial development. This could be done by allowing commercial
development between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon Parkway on County Road
42 through a PUD process. The area between Shannon and Diamond Path should
not be considered commercial and would be appropriate to develop as
residential. The property owners expressed a preference to have the land
not be designated residential. The participants decided that then it
should remain zoned agricultural and designated agricultural in the comp
plan until after 2010. This area would not be included in the MUSA.
Due to
would
staff
at the
MOTIO
Nthe late hour, a consensus was reached by the participants that this
be an appropriate', time in the agenda to adjourn the meeting. City
and the participants agreed the next four items should be discussed
earliest date available.
by Klassen to adjourn. SECOND
by McMenomy. Ayes: 5. Nays: 0.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda Jentink
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Susan M. Walsh
Administrative Assistant
2