Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.c. Minutes of June 30, 1992 Special Council MeetingROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS — MEETING SPECI JUNE 30, 1992 Special Meeting of the City Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a Sp held with the Planning Council of the City of Rosemount was jointly Commission, Port Authority, Parks and Recreation Committee and Utilities Co m. in the Council Chambers Commission on Tuesday, June 30, 1992, at 6:40 p. at City Hall. Actinmay or Wippermann called the meeting to ordeRiCktPearson, all uMarieembers Ac g Y e Lisa Freese, present. Staff members present wer Darling and Susan Walsh. Various commission and committee members we re also in attendance. Acting Mayor Wippermann led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor McMenomy joined the meeting at 6:55 p.m- An addition to the agenda was Item 2(d)(3) Trunk Highway 3. comprehensive Thepp ur ose of the meeting was to receive nput and dPdirection on several remaining issues regarding the Com p an update. Director of Planning Lisa Freese reviewed the development process of the comprehensive Guide Plan update and reviewed the agenda for the meeting. ntial P Fred Hoisington from Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. presented a reside F pro erty. Under this planned unit development (PUD) for theKelly the Trustger Farm and Daley Farm concept the o be cre plannedeasoonesting development unit. if the property is would need to be p will be afforded more opportunities to use planned as one unit, the city Protect or reduce the impact of clustering and density transfers to p provide i some development on important environmental features andthapro overall density flexibility to the developer. It was sung should be considered and performance standards could be developed to ensure further protection. scenarios. Based. on the existing Director Freese reviewed various density a s. imately 850 to 920 zoning of R-1 (229 acres) and AG (220 acres),ro proposed urban residential units could be built on the site. proximateth the ly 1300 units could boximate density of 2.5 units, a total of app accommodated in the total development. Discussioper n ensued on app density caps ranging from 2 er the Staff included the concept of a small convenieiCetypetllnwouldabea °f Highway 3 and Connemara as an option. Any rovided services would be discouraged and any duplication of already p neighborhood discouraged. Assistant Planner Rick Pearson noted that any convenience center is only to serve those living within one-half mile en e site; and if kept small in size, it would not "compete" radiusof the stor with downtown shops. Tschida, 3138 - Residents Bernard McGarri- Garrofalo,13960 - 137th37th Court eStreet rWest, commented 131st Street West and Sam green ac on preserving the land and staff's consideration of educational needs and city services. _,- ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL MEETING JUNE 30, 1992 Director Freese reported that upon meeting with the school district that existing school sites can accommodate this growth through the year 2010. Director Freese commented on a tax capacity analysis prepared by Planning Intern Marie Darling. Freese noted the analysis provides insight on the tax burden of residential uses relative to nonresidential uses within the city and compared to other cities in Dakota County. Councilmember Wippermann noted that in a fiscal impact study done by another community in the metropolitan area that it would be necessary to have a home valued at least $225,000 in order to pay for the required public services. Director Freese explained that the PUD could have performance standards setting parameters for protection of environmentally sensitive areas and natural features. The consensus of the participants was to further define the performance standards and to review at a later meeting. By unanimous consent, Mayor McMenomy called for a ten minutes break at 8:05 p.m. Discussion followed on commercial zoning. The consensus was not to develop east of Highway 3 and County Road 42, noting that it is not proposed to be included in the MUSA area for the year 2000 and because of the daily railroad traffic. It is was agreed a positive message should be given to potential commercial developers regarding the City of Rosemount's desire for commercial development. This could be done by allowing commercial development between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon Parkway on County Road 42 through a PUD process. The area between Shannon and Diamond Path should not be considered commercial and would be appropriate to develop as residential. The property owners expressed a preference to have the land not be designated residential. The participants decided that then it should remain zoned agricultural and designated agricultural in the comp plan until after 2010. This area would not be included in the MUSA. Due to would staff at the MOTIO Nthe late hour, a consensus was reached by the participants that this be an appropriate', time in the agenda to adjourn the meeting. City and the participants agreed the next four items should be discussed earliest date available. by Klassen to adjourn. SECOND by McMenomy. Ayes: 5. Nays: 0. Respectfully submitted, Linda Jentink Recording Secretary ATTEST: Susan M. Walsh Administrative Assistant 2