HomeMy WebLinkAbout2. Diamond Path / 145th Street Project�} Z—
z- Co i s r•
4s s:. �4Lr s.
is r, �
Es r o / /J
,,j PAtl-T':
/d T/ v AJ /Co rv►i'Ll EN TS
C.o 7"S
(Nrt1 Sc14
4 `f-
Q <Q A,4 y l
►� m4Y
SZ W �4
� SiRiP� �dk Z 7Rf}GF/GSD
- clFoa [--
S
F-
L�+�ES Nd�
CN F L4 'L, t2 41i:'�— _ Jt—1 Iki 11,4 7 4E�
IOAAKeN G r"le 0' E Fob
4-/a/l G. L a4 /lig
7A, LR NF S
.�"" S� GC
/3 /Q MA- Y
A) p /d,4,e !( IAJG.
d�
T2, L�NEs
�S
— 1 A,4&K/NG- ""J&
— s c %/o o L
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1992 - 37
A RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF
145TH STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
FROM SHANNON PARKWAY TO DIAMOND PATH
CITY PROJECT #206
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount by a unanimous vote ordered
a feasibility report for 145th Street Improvements, City Project #206 and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and accepted the feasibility report on April
3, 1990 on City Project #206; and
WHEREAS, the City Council ordered and held a public hearing to receive input on the
project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount
hereby orders the improvements of 145th Street Reconstruction from Shannon
Parkway to Diamond Path, City Project #206.
ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1992.
E. B. McMenomy, Mayor
A TTCCT.
Motion by: Wiggermann Seconded by: Klassen
Voted in favor: Staats Klassen Willcox Wil2permann
Voted against: McMemony
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1992 - 38
A RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF
DIAMOND PATH STREET IMPROVEMENTS
(145TH STREET TO CONNEMARA TRAIL)
CITY PROJECT #212
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount by a unanimous vote ordered
a feasibility report for Diamond Path Street Improvements, City Projects #212; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and accepted the feasibility reports on
September 4, 1990 on City Project #212; and
WHEREAS, the City Council ordered and held a public hearing to receive input on the
project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount
hereby orders the improvements of Diamond Path Street Improvements, City Project
#212.
ADOPTED this 16h day of April, 1992.
/3 • Inc -
E. B. McMenomy, Mayor
A rTre+T_
Motion by: Willcox Seconded by: McMenomy
Voted in favor: Willcox Wippermann McMenomy, Staats
Voted against: Klassen
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1992 - 39
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS
DIAMOND PATH RECONSTRUCTION
CITY PROJECT #'212
DAKOTA COUNTY PROJECT #33-03
WHEREAS, the Consulting Engineers for the City and Dakota County have
prepared final plans and specifications for Diamond Path Reconstruction, Project
#212, Dakota County Project #33-03, and such plans and specifications have
been presented to this Council for approval:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Rosemount, Minnesota:
1. Such plans and specifications are hereby approved and ordered placed on
file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City and Dakota County Department of Highways are entering into an
agreement to jointly construct the improvements described as City Project
No. 212 and Dakota County Project No. 33-03.
ns 3. Dakota County is acting as the Administrative Agency for the project, and
said County Staff shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the Official City
Newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon
the making of such improvements under such approved plans and
specifications for City Project No. 212.
4. City Project No. 206 and Dakota County Project No. 33-03 (City Project
No. 212) are "tied" together for bid opening, award and contracting
purposes.
5. The advertisement shall be published in each of said publications at least
once not less than three (3) weeks before the date set for opening bids,
shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly
opened on May 15, 1992 at 10:30 o'clock a. m. at the Dakota County
Auditor's office at 1590 West Highway 55, Hastings, Minnesota and that
no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City and County
representatives and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid
bond or certified check payable to the City of Rosemount and Dakota
County for five (5%) percent of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1992.
E. B. McMenomy, Mayor
A -rrrn^r.
Motion by: McMenomy Second by: Willcox
Voted in favor: Wippermann. McMenomy, Staats, Willcox
Voted against: Klassen
4
It
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1992 -
A RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF
DIAMOND PATH STREET IMPROVEMENTS
(145TH STREET TO CONNEMARA TRAIL)
CITY PROJECT #212
AND 145TH STREET FROM SHANNON PARKWAY
TO DIAMOND PATH
CITY PROJECT #206
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount by a unanimous vote ordered
a feasibility report for Diamond Path Street Improvements from 145th Street to
Connemara Trail, City Project No. 212, and 145th Street West Street and Utility
Improvements from Shannon Parkway to Diamond Path, City Project No. 206; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and accepted the feasibility reports on
September 4, 1990 on City Project #212 and April 3, 1990 on City Project #206;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council ordered and held a public hearing to receive input on the
project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount
hereby orders the improvements of Diamond Path Street Improvements/145th Street
from Shannon Parkway to Diamond Path Improvements, City Project #212/206.
ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1992.
E. B. McMenomy, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk
Motion by: Seconded by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
E
ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1992.
ATTEST:
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
2
E. B. McMenomy, Mayor
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1992 -
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS
145th STREET RECONSTRUCTION BETWEEN SHANNON PARKWAY
AND DIAMOND PATH
CITY PROJECT #206
M.S.A.P. 208-103-06
WHEREAS, the Consulting Engineers for the City have prepared final plans and
specifications for 145th Street Reconstruction between Shannon Parkway and
Diamond Path, Project #206, and such plans and specifications have been
presented to this Council for approval•
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Rosemount, Minnesota:
1. Such plans and specifications are hereby approved and ordered placed on
file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official City
newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon
the making of such improvements under such approved plans and
specifications for City Project #206.
3. City Project No. 206 and Dakota County Project No. 33-03 (City Project
No. 212) are "tied" together for bid opening, award and contracting
purposes.
4. The advertisement shall be published in each of said publications at least
once not less than three (3) weeks before the date set for opening bids,
shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly
opened on May 15, 1992 at 10:30 o'clock a. m. at Dakota County
Auditor's office at 1590 West Highway 55, Hastings, Minnesota and that
no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with City and County
representatives and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid
bond or certified check payable to the City of Rosemount and Dakota
County for five (5%) percent of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1992.
ATTEST:
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk
Motion by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Second by:
c enomy, Mayor
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1992 -
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS
DIAMOND PATH RECONSTRUCTION
CITY PROJECT #212
DAKOTA COUNTY PROJECT #33-03
WHEREAS, the Consulting Engineers for the City and Dakota County have
prepared final plans and specifications for Diamond Path Reconstruction, Project
#212, Dakota County Project #33-03, and such plans and specifications have
been presented to this Council for approval:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Rosemount, Minnesota:
1. Such plans and specifications are hereby approved and ordered placed on
file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City and Dakota County Department of Highways are entering into an
agreement to jointly construct the improvements described as City Project
No. 212 and Dakota County Project No. 33-03.
3. Dakota County is acting as the Administrative Agency for the project, and
said County Staff shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the Official City
Newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon
the making of such improvements under such approved plans and
specifications for City Project No. 212.
4. City Project No. 206 and Dakota County Project No. 33-03 (City Project
No. 212) are "tied" together for bid opening, award and contracting
purposes.
5. The advertisement shall be published in each of said publications at least
once not less than three (3) weeks before the date set for opening bids,
shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly
opened on May 15, 1992 at 10:30 o'clock a. m. at the Dakota County
Auditor's office at 1590 West Highway 55, Hastings, Minnesota and that
no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City and County
representatives and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid
bond or certified check payable to the City of Rosemount and Dakota
County for five (5%) percent of the amount of such bid.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 7, 1992
AGENDA ITEM:
Approve Cooperative Agreement
AGENDA SECTION:
with Dakota
County for Diamond Path
Consent
PREPARED BY: Ron Wasmund
Director/Building Official
AGENDAHM
5
Public Works
ATTACHMENTS:
Cooperative Agreement
-
Y:/)
;*I4A4
V
The attached agreement formally outlines the conditions,
responsibilities and participation limits between Dakota County, City
of Apple Valley and the City of Rosemount.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: MOTION TO APPROVE THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR
COUNTY PROJECT 33-03,DIAMOND PATH BETWEEN DAKOTA COUNTY, CITY OF
APPLE VALLEY AND THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT.
COUNCIL ACTION:
DAKOTA COUNTY
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT -
eorA nal AYIF AVENUE. 3RD FLOOR
April 1, 1991
Mr. Ron Wasmund
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Dear Mr. Wasmund:
DAVID L EVERDS, P.E.
COUNTY ENGINEER
(612)891-7100
Fax (612) 891-7031
VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124-8579
RECEFM
1991
APR
C:?Y OF ROSEMOUNT
I have enclosed two draft agreements for your review. One
agreement is for the CP 33-03 project and the other is for the
145th Street realignment. Please return your comments, and those
of any other officials, regarding these agreements as soon as
possible so the final agreement can be presented to the city
council for signature.
If you have any questions contact me.
Sincerely,
Mitchell J. Rasmussen, P.E.
Assistant Design/Construction Engineer
MJR/mj1
Encls.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
DG3�%ti
DAKOTA COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
AGREEMENT FOR HIGHWAY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF DAKOTA,
THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
AND
THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
FOR
State Aid Project No. 19-633-05
Dakota County Project No. 33-03
Reconstruct County State Aid Highway 33 (Diamond Path) between
approximately 700' south of 145th Street and approximately 1000'
north of 140th Street in accordance with the plans and
specifications for the above referenced project in Apple Valley
and Rosemount, Dakota County.
County Project No. 33-03
March 29, 1991
Design engineering costs for the storm sewer items shall be
shared by the County, Apple Valley and Rosemount and shall be
proportioned according to their respective storm sewer
construction costs.
2. Roadway Construction Items. The construction costs of
the following items for those items shall be shared in the amount
of fifty five percent ( 55%) by the County and forty five percent
(45%) by the Cities with the Cities share being split 50/50:
a.) Mobilization;
b.) Clearing and grubbing;
c.) Removal and salvage items;
d.) Grading items;
e.) Aggregate base;
f.) Concrete curb and gutter;
g.) Bituminous paving;
h.) Fencing;
i.) Turf establishment;
j.) Catch basins and leads for surface water drainage;
k.) Centerline culverts which are open on both ends and not
connected to any storm sewer structure; and
1.) Modification of the• following existing items:
sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermains and
appurtenances due to relocation or grade adjustment as
part of this project.
3
County Project No. 33-03
March 29, 1991
6. Plans and Specifications. The County shall prepare
complete grading and paving plans and specifications consistent
with State design standards and the Dakota County Transportation
Plan. Apple Valley and Rosemount shall cooperatively provide to
the County the necessary plan sheets and specifications to be
incorporated in the construction plan. Apple Valley and
Rosemount approval of the plans is necessary prior to awarding
the contract.
7. Right -of -Way. The County shall acquire all required
permanent and temporary highway easements for this project. The
cost of these easements shall be shared in the amount of fifty
five percent (55%) by the County and forty five percent (45%) by
the Cities. Apple Valley and Rosemount shall participate only in
those easements located within their respective Cities.
8. Payment. The County shall act as the paying agent for
costs of acquiring new right of way, adjusting private utilities
and for all payments to the contractor. Payments to the
Contractor shall be made as the Project work progresses and when
certified by the County Engineer. Upon presentation of an
itemized claim by one agency to the other, the receiving agency
will reimburse the invoicing agency for its share of the costs
incurred under this agreement within thirty (30) days from the
presentation of the claim.
5
v
County Project No. 33-03
March 29, 1991
12. Traffic Control. This project willentailboth partial
and total road closures with detours; however, the county will
keep the road open for access in at least one direction at all
times to local traffic and emergency vehicles. The County will
notify Apple Valley and Rosemount prior to a scheduled complete
road closure. The County will strive to reopen the closed
roadway as soon as construction allows.
13. Indemnification. The County agrees to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless Apple Valley and Rosemount against
any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense arising
under the provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting
from its negligent act or omissions and/or those of its employees
or agents. Apple Valley and Rosemount agree to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the County against any and all
claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense arising under the
provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting from
their negligent act or omissions and/or those of their employees
or agents.
14. Waiver. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid
work to be performed by the County shall not be considered
employees of Apple Valley or Rosemount and any and all claims
that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of
this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any
7
County Project No. 33-03
March 29, 1991
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be executed by their duly authorized officials.
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
Director of Public Works
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
Director of Public Works
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
By
Mayor
(SEAL)
By
City Clerk
Date
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
By
Mayor
(SEAL)
By
City Clerk
Date
0
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
County Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
County Attorney
COUNTY BOARD RESOLUTION
No. Date
County Project No. 33-03
March 29, 1991
DAKOTA COUNTY
By
Chairman of the Board
(SEAL)
By
County Auditor
Date
10
s
2021 East Hennepin Avenue Engineers
Orr Minneapolis, MN 55413 Architects
Schelen
Mayeron& 612-331-8660 PlannersCM%5A MemorandumAssociates, Inc. FAX 331-3806 Surveyors
TO: Mr. Bud Osmundson, P.E.
Rosemount City Engineer
FROM: Chuck Rickart
Traffic Operations Engineer
CC: Brian Bourassa OSM
DATE: April 16, 1992
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
145TH STREET - CSAH 33 TO STH 3
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
L INTRODUCTION
The City of Rosemount is in the planning stages of improving 145th Street between CSAR
33 and STH 3. Concerns have been raised on what cross section should be provided for the
most efficient movement of traffic through the corridor. Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates,
Inca (OSM) was requested to provide a preliminary traffic analysis of the existing and
proposed traffic conditions in the area. The purpose of this memorandum is to document
the findings of the preliminary traffic analysis.
II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The reconstruction of 145th Street to a two lane or four section is a issue the City Council
has been addressing over the past few weeks. In order to determine exactly what
improvements are necessary the City requested OSM to conduct a preliminary traffic
analysis.
The analysis, which looks at traffic volumes (peak hour and average daily traffic) and traffic
patterns along the corridor, yielded the following conclusions:
1. The existing facility operates at a satisfactory level of service as a two lane
roadway with the current traffic volumes.
2. The future (20 year) analysis indicated that the facility would operate at an
unacceptable condition. This analysis is dependent on assumptions made
based on limited, available data.
3. To evaluate the "true" impact of the future traffic on this and other city
facilities, a detailed city transportation plan is needed.
4. Based on our preliminary analysis, a four lane roadway is recommended to
accommodate future travel needs for the city of Rosemount. See the
Mr. Bud Osmundson
April 16, 1992
Page 2
alternatives offered as solutions in the body of this memo for further
information.
III. DATA COLLECTION
Existing traffic volume data was collected from the City of Rosemount, Dakota County
Highway Department and Mn/DOT. The data was in most cases, in the form of 48 hour,
two-way counts. Some directional and turning movements counts were also collected. This
data is illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. To supplement this data a video tape license plate
study was undertaken. Cameras were set up on 145th Street at CSAH 33 and STH 3.
License plates were recorded at each location and then sorted to find matches. This
information was used to determine the number of vehicles traveling on 145th Street with
origins or destinations between CSAH 33 (Diamond Path) and STH 3.
IV. PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
A capacity and level of service analysis was performed using the Transportation Research
Board (TRB) 1985 Highway Capacity Manual and Highway Capacity Software (HCS)
version 1.5 ±. Two sections of 145th street were analyzed.
CSAH 33 to Shannon Parkway; and
Chili Avenue to STH 3.
These sections represent the worst case traffic volumes within the corridor. Each section
was analyzed for existing (1992) and projected (2012) a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes,
assuming a two lane facility. Each section was also analyzed for projected (2012) p.m. peak
hour traffic (worst case) with a four lane section. The projected 2012 volumes were based
on multiplying the existing volumes by a 2.1 growth factor for a 20 year period. The 2.1
growth factor is an established factor for the Dakota County Area.
The results of the capacity and level of service analysis are shown in the table 1. The
capacity analysis work sheets can be found in the attached Appendix. The level of service
is measured on a scale from A to F, with A representing the best or free flow operations
and F representing forced traffic movements or failure.
LEVEL OF SERVICE SCALE
A 0, �_
.
Failure' e
Mr. Bud Osmundson
April 16, 1992
Page 3
TABLE 1
II ROADWAY SECTION I L.O.S.* I V/C RATIO** I
CASH 33 TO SHANNON PARKWAY
1992 P.M. PEAK - 2 LANES
C
.28
1992 A.M. PEAK - 2 LANES
C
.30
2012 P.M. PEAK - 2 LANES
E
.63
2012 A.M. PEAK - 2 LANES
E
.63
2012 P.M. PEAK - 4 LANES
B
.34
CHILI AVENUE TO STH 3
1992 P.M. PEAK - 2 LANES
C
31
1992 A.M. PEAK - 2 LANES
C
..19
2012 P.M. PEAK - 2 LANES
E
.64
2012 A.M. PEAK - 2 LANES
D
.40
2012 P.M. PEAK - 4 LANES
B
.35
* * V/C = Traffic volume to road capacity ratio
* LOS = Level of Service
The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the existing two lane facility operates at
satisfactory levels of service (i.e., C or better). However, by the year 2012, should the
current projections be realized, the facility would require improvement. It should be noted
that these are border line conditions. That is, if the projections are high it would appear
no improvements (Le, roadway widening) would be required, however, if the projections are
low the improvements may be required sooner.
The video tape license plate survey concluded that, the majority (90 - 95%) of the traffic on
145th Street have origins or destinations within the area. This indicates that traffic patterns
are unlikely to change as a result other roadway/corridor improvements.
Mr. Bud Osmundson
April 16, 1992
Page 4
V. ALTERNATIVES
Based on the results of the capacity and level service analysis, the video tape study and
visual observations of the corridor, it can be concluded that no capacity improvements are
required to address today's traffic needs. However, the future 2012 operations of the facility
are unclear. With this in mind a variety of alternative solutions were considered.
Alternative 1:
Construct turn lanes at critical intersections maintaining one through lane in
each direction (a two lane roadway).
Alternative 2•
Construct a three lane section with one lane in each direction and a
continuous left turn lane.
Alternative 3•
Construct a four lane section and provide striping for two lanes which would
providing parking on both sides of the roadway. Parking could be eliminated
if the need for four lanes is realized in the future.
Alternative 4•
Construct four lanes now providing capacity for future needs.
VI. CONCLUSION
The results of the Preliminary Traffic Analysis identifies the need for a city wide
transportation plan. A transportation plan would provide a solid basis for determining what
transportation improvements are truly required on the 145th Streetcorridor as well as other
city roadways. The plan would look at the City's transportation system in conjunction with
Mn/DOT, Dakota County and Metropolitan Councils plans. It would analyze future land
use plans and population projections which would provide the basis for proposed future
traffic patterns.
Roadways are generally designed for a level of service C for a twenty year period. However,
practical experience has shown that when roadways are generally reconstructed in a 50 - 60
year time period. Our analysis indicated that the reconstruction to a two lane facility may
operate sufficiently (average to poor) for the majority of the twenty year period. However,
since this investment is realistically for a longer time period than twenty years, we
recommend that serious consideration be given to alternative 3 and 4.
LEGEND
XX 1991/1992
(XX) 2012
x
i—
Q
V)
o
>
tl
0
O
J
tYi
In
O
O0
co
Z
Z
Q
Z
Q
ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL
00
0co
'�
co
V)
J
7950
U
7690
(16720)
145TH STREET
(16150)
7240
(15200)
i—
w
_
o`
_
w
0o CC
oN N
00
V CO
Z
W
in
I--
v
ti7
�LJO
J
O
Q
~
OQQ
0 0
O LO
V
tf) —
Iv -I
CSAH 42 z
z
W
o0
.. om
P O�
00
,J
�-
CnQ
t!) in
J
Q
0
.�
Z
W
d
D_
U
Drown By:
Drowing Title
Comm. No.
LAM
Orr
443840
Mayer n &
Associates, Inc.
ROSEMOUNT
AVERAGE
TRAFFIC STUDY
DAILY TRAFFIC
Figure No.
Dote:
4/16/92
Engineers ■ Architects . Planners ■ surveyors
1
2021 Eut Hennepin Avenue 0 Minneapolis, illi 55413 ■ 672-337-8660
LEGEND
XX 1991/1992
(XX) 2012
A AM PEAK HOUR
P PM PEAK HOUR
771 A (1620 A
776 P (1630 P
a a-
00
v�
to �o
M L..�
M
0 Q n-cr J�
�
O in OQ�
U NN
ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL
0
co
z
0
z
z
Q
N 285 A
(600 A)
376
558 A (1170 A) v (790PP)
687 P (1440 P)
145TH STREET 442 A (930 A)
712 P (1500 P)
a o_ w
Cr
0 w cc
0 to =3 F-
1`0 1;7 w
> z
Q �
Q.... to
CL J
N
� U 227 A
(480 A)
604 A (1270 A) 318 P
533 P (1120 P) (670 P)
CSAH 42
z oQ
w do
0
CL 11)CIV
d
x
U
Drown By: Drawing Title Comm. No.
LAM Schelen ROSEMOUNT TRAFFIC STUDY 443840
Mayeron & PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
Dote'C%s)k Associates, Inc. Figure No.
4/16/92 Engineers ■ Architects ■ Planners ■ Surveyors
12021 East Hennepin Avenue ■ Minneapolis, WN 55413 ■ 812-331-6680 2
APPENDIX
1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzszzzzzzzzzzzztzzztzzzzzzzzszzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FACILITY LOCATION.... 145TH ST. - CSAH 33 TO SHANNON PKWY
ANALYST .............. CTR
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 1992 PM PEAK HR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 04-15-1992
OTHER INFORMATION....
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES.. ....................... 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50
PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 60 / 40
LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12
USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 9
PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 100
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
LEVEL TERRAIN
E E E f f f
LOS T B R a d HV
A 2 1.8 2.2 1 .94 .98
B 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
C 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
D 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
E 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS
-------------------------------------------------------------
INPUT VOLUME(vph): 776
ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 116
SERVICE
LOS FLOW RATE V/C
------------ -----
A 103 .04
B 411 .16
C 822 .32
D 1471 .57
E 2580 1
LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: C
1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS
#tt###tttt#ttttt#tttttt#t#t#t#ttttt##tttttttttt#tttt##ttt#t#tt#t
FACILITY LOCATION.... 145TH ST. - CSAH 33 TO SHANNON PKWY
ANALYST .............. CTR
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 1992 AM PEAK HR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 04-15-1992
OTHER INFORMATION....
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50
PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................. 1
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 60 / 40
LANEWIDTH(FT)............................. 12
USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 8
PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 100
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
LEVEL TERRAIN
E E E f f f
LOS T B R w d HV
A 2 1.8 2.2 1 .94 .98
B 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
C 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
D 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
E 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS
-------------------------------------------------------------
INPUT VOLUME(vph): 771
ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 771
SERVICE
LOS FLOW RATE V/C
A 103 .04
B 411 .16
C 822 .32
D 1471 .57
E 2580 1
LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: C
1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HI6HWAYS
FACILITY LOCATION.... 145TH ST. - CSAH 33 TO SHANNON PKWY
ANALYST .............. GTR
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 2012 PM PEAK HR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 04-15-1992
OTHER INFORMATION....
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGEOF TRUCKS... ..................... 2
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH)..... ..................... 50
PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 60 / 40
LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12
USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 8
PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 100
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
LEVEL TERRAIN
E E E f f f
LOS T B R w d HV
A 2 1.8 2.2 1 .94 .98
B 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .9B
C 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
D 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
E 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS
-------------------------------------------------------------
INPUT VOLUME(vph): 1630
ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1630
SERVICE
LOS FLOW RATE V/C
A 103 .04
B 411 .16
C 822 .32
D 1471 .57
E 2580 1
LOS FOR 6IVEN CONDITIONS: E
1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS
tt##t#X#t#ttt##X##tXtX#XXtt#tttt#t###tt#t#t#tXtt#tttt#XtttXX#Xtt
FACILITY LOCATION.... 145TH ST. - CSAH 33 TO SHANNON PKWY
ANALYST .............. CTR
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 2012 AM PEAK HOUR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 04-15-1992
OTHER INFORMATION....
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50
PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 60 1 40
LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12
USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 8
PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 100
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
LEVEL TERRAIN
E E E f f f
LOS T B R w d HV
A 2 1.8 2.2 1 .94 .98
B 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
C 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
D 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
E 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS
-------------------------------------------------------------
INPUT VOLUME(vph): 1619
ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1619
SERVICE
LOS FLOW RATE V/C
A 103 .04
B 411 .16
C 822 .32
D 1471 .57
E 2580 1
LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: E
1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS
###fff####f##f##f###f###f#######f#f#f#ff#f###f####f###ff#ffff#f#
FACILITY LOCATION.... 145TH ST. - CHILLE AVE. TO TH 3
ANALYST .............. CTR
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 1992 PM PEAK HR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 04-16-1992
OTHER INFORMATION....
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0
DESI6H SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50
PEAK HOUR FACTOR........... ................. 1
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 60 / 40
LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12
USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 8
PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 100
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
LEVEL TERRAIN
E E E f f f
LOS T B R w d HV
A 2 1.8 2.2 1 .94 .98
B 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
C 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
D 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
E 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS
-------------------------------------------------------------
INPUT VOLUME(vph): 786
ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 786
SERVICE
LOS FLOW RATE V/C
A 103 .04
B 411 .16
C 822 .32
D 1471 .57
E 2580 1
LOS FOR 6IVEN CONDITIONS: C
1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS
t#ttt#tttttt###tt###ttt#tit##tt##ttt###t#t#tt######tt#t#t#t####t
FACILITY LOCATION.... 145TH ST. - CHILLE AVE. TO TH 3
ANALYST.............. CTR
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 1992 AM PEAK HR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 04-16-1992
OTHER INFORMATION....
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGEOF TRUCKS ........................ 2
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0
DESIGNSPEED (MPH) .......................... 50
PEAK HOUR FACTOR ......... :.................. 1
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 60 / 40
LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12
USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 8
PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 100
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
LEVEL TERRAIN
E E E f f f
LOS T B R a d HV
A 2 1.8 2.2 1 .94 .98
B 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
C 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 98
D 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98 `
E 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS
-------------------------------------------------------------
INPUT VOLUME(vph): 488
ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 488
SERVICE
LOS FLOW RATE V/C
A 103 .04
B 411 .16
C 822 .32
D 1411 .51
E 2580 1
LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: C
1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS
t#t#tt###t######t#tt##ttttt##ttttt##tt#t##t#tt##t#t#!#t#t##t###t
FACILITY LOCATION.... 145TH ST. - CHILLE AVE. TO TH 3
ANALYST .............. CTR
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 2012 PM PEAK HR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 04-16-1992
OTHER INFORMATION....
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS. ....................... 2
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50
PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 60 / 40
LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12
USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 8
PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.................... 100
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
LEVEL TERRAIN
E E E f f f
LOS T B R w d HV
--- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
A 2 1.8 2.2 1 .94 .98
B 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
C 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
D 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
E 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS
-------------------------------------------------------------
INPUT VOLUME(Yph): 1651
ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1651
SERVICE
LOS FLOW RATE VIC
------------ -----
A 103 .04
B 411 .16
C 822 .32
D 1471 .57
E 2590 1
LOS FOR 6IVEN CONDITIONS: E
1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS
t#ttttt#tt##tt#tttttt#ttttt#ttt#t##tt##t###ttt#tttttt#t#ttt###tt
FACILITY LOCATION.... 145TH ST. - CHILLE AVE. TO TH 3
ANALYST .............. CTR
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 2012 AM PEAK HR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 04-16-1992
OTHER INFORMATION....
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGEOF TRUCKS........ ................ 2
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50
PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 60 / 40
LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12
USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 8
PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 100
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
LEVEL TERRAIN
E E E f f f
LOS T B R w d HV
A 2 1.8 2.2 1 .94 .98
B 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
C 2.2 2 2.5 1 .94 .98
D 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98 '
E 2 1.6 1.6 1 .94 .98
C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS
-------------------------------------------------------------
INPUT VOLUME(Yph): 1025
ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1025
SERVICE
LOS FLOW RATE V/C
A 103 .04
B 411 .16
C 822 .32
D 1471 .57
E 2580 1
LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: D
1985 HCM:MULTILANE HIGHWAYS
FACILITY SECTION..... 145TH ST. - CSAH 33 TO SHANNON PKWY
ANALYST .............. CTR
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 2012 PM PEAK HOUR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 04-16-1992
OTHER INFORMATION.... EASTBOUND 4 -LANE SECTION
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ................. 2 (TYPICAL - 200 #/HP)
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES .................. 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES.. 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) ................... 50
PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1
DRIVER POPULATION FACTOR ............. 1 (WEEKDAY/COMMUTER)
LANE WIDTH (FT) ...................... 12
OBSTRUCTIONS ......................... BOTH SIDES
DISTANCE (FT) FROM ROADWAY EDGE...... 2
TYPE OF MULTILANE HI6HWAY............ SUBURBAN, UNDIVIDED
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
E E E f f f f
TERRAIN TYPE T B R HV M p E
LEVEL 1.7 1.5 1.6 0.99 0.94 1.00 0.80
C) OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
tti###tt#t#t##tit##t##ttt#t#t##t
NO. OF LANES ..................... 2
INPUT VOLUME ..................... 972
V/C RATIO ........................ .34
LEVEL OF SERVICE.................B
MAX. SERVICE FLOW RATE (pcphpl).. 655
SPEED (®ph) ...................... 43
DENSITY (pcpapl)................. 16
1985 HCM:MULTILANE HIGHWAYS
t####t#########tttt###t####t#t####t##t#tt####tt###t##t#tt##tt###
FACILITY SECTION..... 45TH ST. - CHILLE AVE TO TH 3
ANALYST .............. CTR
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 2012 PM PEAK HOUR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 04-16-1992
OTHER INFORMATION.... EASTBOUND 4 -LANE SECTION
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
-------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ................. 2 (TYPICAL - 200 #/HP)
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES .................. 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES.. 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) ................... 50
PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1
DRIVER POPULATION FACTOR ............. 1 (WEEKDAY/COMMUTER)
LANE WIDTH (FT) ...................... 12
OBSTRUCTIONS ......................... BOTH SIDES
DISTANCE (FT) FROM ROADWAY EDGE...... 2
TYPE OF MULTILANE HIGHWAY............ SUBURBAN, UNDIVIDED
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
E E E f f f f
TERRAIN TYPE T B R HV w p E
------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- -----
LEVEL 1.7 1.5 1.6 0.99 0.94 1.00 0.80
C) OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
#tttt###ttttt#t###tttttttttt#ttt
NO. OF LANES..................... 2
INPUT VOLUME ..................... 990
V/C RATIO ........................ .35
LEVEL OF SERVICE.................B
MAX. SERVICE FLOW RATE (pcphpl).. 667
SPEED (mph) ...................... 43
DENSITY (pcpapl)................. 17
Urgent Memo
From: Rosemount Business Owners Date: Rpril 18, 1992
To: Rosemount City Officials
Subject: 145th Street reconstruction
For the past several years Rosemount business and community leaders have been
discussing the impending growth, the future of the community, and the preservation
of a downtown business district. These are not easy issues to face and they often
involve the balance of preserving the past while accommodating the future.
One thing is certain in our fast paced society.... transportation corridors are the vital
link between residential neighborhoods and business centers.
We, the undersigned Rosemount business owners, want to strongly encourage
Rosemount City officials to make a stronger commitment to planning for future growth
by providing ample transportation corridors that feed the downtown business area.
We are concerned that we not duplicate the poor planning that went into the
construction of Canada Avenue south of County Road 42.
More to the point, we are alarmed over plans to divert traffic off 145th Street to
County Road 42 and a future Conomara Trail. We are deeply concerned over plans to
reconstruct 145th street from its current 45 mph major collector to a 30 mph
residential street. We believe 145th street to be the major feeder to downtown
business and we believe it should be reconstructed to invite people to shop downtown.
Urgent Memo
From: Rosemount Business Owners Date: Rpril 10, 1992
To: Rosemount City Officials
Subject: 145th Street reconstruction
For the past several years Rosemount business and community leaders have been
discussing the impending growth, the future of the community, and the preservation
of a downtown business district. These are not easy issues to face and they often
involve the balance of preserving the past while accommodating the future.
One thing is certain in our fast paced society.... transportation corridors are the vital
link between residential neighborhoods and business centers.
We, the undersigned Rosemount business owners, want to strongly encourage
Rosemount City officials to make a stronger commitment to planning for future growth
by providing ample transportation corridors that feed the downtown business area.
We are concerned that we not duplicate the poor planning that went into the
construction of Canada Avenue south of County Road 42.
More to the point, we are alarmed over plans to divert traffic off 145th Street to
County Road 42 and a future Conomara Trail. We are deeply concerned over plans to
reconstruct 145th street from its current 45 mph major collector to a 30 mph
residential street. We believe 145th street to be the major feeder to downtown
business and we believe it should be reconstructed to invite people to shop downtown.
E�4 /n L m
April 14, 1992
City of Rosemount
Council Members
Regarding: Diamond Path and West 145th Street Improvements
The road improvements for Diamond Path and 145th Street will be a long over
due welcomed site. My husband and I share in your concerns to update this
area. We agree that the curve has always been a hazard and several accidents
have occurred on this curve ..... and to mention in our yard and the replacement
of our mail box many times due to reckless driving. The stop signs should
help reduce such incidents. You may find it necessary to put a four -lane on
Diamond Path for some future use but God forbid if 145th Street becomes a
four -lane. We feel this would not be an "improvement".
I'm sorry Sheila Klassen took such unnecessary badgering at the Council
Meeting and I'm sorry I didn't voice my opinion at that time. She agrees with
the improvements except for the four -lane so why continue making this such an
issue. Maybe the road improvements have been delayed and should have been
completed two years ago but in my opinion there shouldn't be so much pressure
put on one Council Person who happens to be voicing an opinion. Why would a
four -lane be such an important issue when a "new two-lane", removal of the
dangerous curve and all the other needed improvements are more important. You
have made the "four -lane" the issue (and the one person who is against it).
I feel that your approval should be made for the road construction to begin.
Sincerely,
Judy and David Bezenek
4275 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068