Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2. Land Use Review Requirements■ C� iii o(Rosemount PHONE (612) 423.4411 2875 - 145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota MAYOR FAX (612) 423-5203 Mailing Address: Edward B. McMenomy P.O. Box 510, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068-0510 COUNCILMEMBERS Sheila Klassen TO Mayor McMenomy ,lames (Red) Staats Councilmembers: Klassen,. Staats, Willcox, Wippermann HarrywOlcox Dennis Wippermann TOR Port Authority Board Members: Anderson, Dunn, aoMIWS StephannJilkilk Edwards, Mawe, McMenomy, Sinnwell, Wippermann Planning Commissioners: Hathaway, Meyer, Busho, Gundacker, Baago Utilities Commissioners: Walsh, Oxborough, Mulhern FROM: Lisa J. Freese, Director of Planning -g DATE: May 8, 1992 RE: Special City Council Meeting Airport RelocationProcess On Tuesday, May 12th at 7:00 p.m. a Special Council Meeting is scheduled to discuss the airport relocation/site selection process and the impact that the process will have on the City. Representatives from the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission and Dakota County have been askedtomake presentations and be available for your questions. I hope all of you can attend because this will be an excellent { opportunity to have the people discuss this process as it relates specifically to the City of Rosemount. Attached are some background materials for your review. If you would like any additional information or have questions in advance of the meeting, don't hesitate to call me. ATTACHMENTS: Metropolitan Council Guidelines Metropolitan Council Search Area Designation Report Summary of the 1989 Planning Law 1991 Metropolitan Council Report to the Legislation Technical Committee Minutes & Handouts Dual Track Airport Planning Process Flow Chart LF/lj 6verylkings (Poming ( p RosemounlY 0 rftvc d WON w. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Cenrrr. 1.30 East Fifth Street, St. Paul. MA' 55101-1634 612 191-6359 FAX 612 291-6550 TTY 612 291-0904 January 7, 1992 Lisa Freese Community Dev. Dir. City of Rosemount 2975 145th St. W. Rosemount, MN 5508 RE: Merropoluan Council Guidelines for Reviewing Land Use Changes and New Public Buildings or Facilities in rhe New Airport Final Search Area Dear Ms. Freese: I am writing to you because all or part of your community is in the new airport final search area. On December 19, 1991, the Metropolitan Council selected the "Dakota" candidate search area as the final new airport search area. As a result of this action, the Council's guidelines for the protection of land in the final search area are now in effect. A copy of the guidelines is enclosed. The guidelines include the forms to be filled out and describe other materials to send to the Council These guidelines will affect your community when it reviews applications for land use changes (changes in the local zoning ordinance, zoning variances and conditional use permits) and plans for the new construction of public buildings or facilities. In addition to your own local review, the Council must also review these changes. The city cannot approve land use changes without the Council's approval. The Council has authority only to comment on plans for the construction of new public buildings or facilities. The Council's review of land use changes for the final search area will consider the consistency of proposed chances with the city comprehensive plan. The Council will also determine the consistency of the proposed change with the Council's plans for metropolitan systems (airports, highways, parks, sewers and transit), and once a site is selected in the search area, with the development and operation of a new major airport. The Council's review of new public buildings and facilities will focus only on these latter two factors. Robert Overby is the Council staff person assigned to work with communities in the final search area. Mr. Overby is available to meet with you and your city council board to discuss the guidelines further and answer any questions you may have; his phone number is 291-6381. He will be contacting you to arrange a meeting and discuss your questions about the guidelines. Sincerely, 1.4ary 1~frson, Chair Enclosures E. Craig Morris, Metropolitan Council District 16 Margaret Schreiner, Metropolitan Council District 15 Bonnie Featherstone, Metropolitan Council District 14 Robert Overby, Metropolitan Council Staff ity o} CcJ�osemousli PHONE (612) 4234411 2875 • 145th Stmt Wast. RoaamouM, Mmnsota FAX (612) 4235203 me" AWraas: P.O. Box 510, Rowmount. Minnesota 55068-0510 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lisa J. Freese, Director of Planning DATE: January 13, 1992 SUBJ: January 14, 1992 Regular Meeting Directorls Announcements ATTACHMENTS: LETTER FROM MARY ANDERSON METROPOLITAN COUNCIL GUIDELINES 1. NEW AIRPORT FINAL SEARCH AREA DESIGNATION MAYOR Eowwd B. MtMenomy cOUNaLmEMBERS Shaka Ktassan Jams {Ralf Staatc Harty Wft= Dan= Wippennann ADMINISTRATOR Stephen J8k On December 19, 1991 the Metropolitan Council selected the "Dakota" search area as the final search area site. As you are aware, approximately 1/3 of the City is within this search area. The Metropolitan Council has guidelines for land protection and land use changes in this search area (see attached letter and guidelines). The Metropolitan Council has assigned a staff person to work with communities in the final search area and he is available to meet with the Dakota County and/or City Council to discuss the guidelines and review requirements. At Tuesday's meeting I would like to discuss a possible date for meeting on these guidelines. 1.1(Up osemoulzt JI (Sver�i>ng s e0y niszg -. r 8.01.90 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWING LAND USE CHANGES IN NEW AIRPORT FINAL SEARCH AREA 1. L INTRODUCTION A. Purpose and Authority This guide defines the procedures the Metropolitan Council will use in its review of applications for changes in zoning, zoning variances, or conditional uses, including planned unit developments, within the final search area for a new major airport. Minnesota Statutes Section 473.1551 requires local governmental units within this area to submit applications for such changes to the Council for review and approval The guide further defines the procedures the Council will use in its review and comment on new public buildings or facilities, including transportation, sewer, and' park facilities, within the final search area. A governmental agency or unit may not construct such buildings or facilities until it has submitted the plan for the building or facility to the Council. The guide also contains the forms for submission to the'CounciL B. Types of Review The guidelines establish separate procedures for the submission and review of land use changes and new public buildings or facilities within the final search area. C. Duration of Procedures The final search area procedures apply until one year after the report to the legislature on long-range airport development required by Minnesota Statutes Section 473.618. D. Search Area Zoning All land within the final search area not zoned for other use is zoned for use exclusively for agricultural purposes, except that a prior nonconforming use established with reference to any lot or parcel of land may be continued. E. Scope of Review All applications for changes in zoning, zoning variances, or conditional uses, including planned unit developments, will be subject to a maximum 90 -day review by the Council, unless the local governmental unit and the Council mutually agree to an extension of the 90 -day period. The Council will review an application in the final search area to determine whether or not it is consistent with the comprehensive plan for the local governmental unit adopted in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 473.175 and 473.851 to 473.871, metropolitan system plans, or the development and operation of a new major airport in the search area. The local. unit may not approve an application that the Council has disapproved. F. Concurrent Review with Plan Amendment If the local governmental unit submits a plan amendment covering the same area as covered in an application, the Council will review the two changes concurrently. II. DEFINITIONS A Application a written request or other proposal to a local governmental unit for a change in zoning, a zoning variance, or a conditional use (as defined by Minnesota Statutes Section 4623595 for cities and Minnesota Statutes Section 394.301 for counties), including planned unit developments. B. Chair - the chair of the Metropolitan CounciL C. Commission - the Metropolitan Airports Commission. D. Comprehensive Plan - the comprehensive plan, or its replacement, of a local governmental snit as required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minnesota Statutes Sections 473.351-473.871) or any other authority. F— Comprehensive Plan Amendment - modification of a map, text, graphic or table of a comprehensive plan required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act or any other authority. F. Construction of a Public Building or Facility - all new construction of public buildings or facilities, including substantial additions to existing buildings, sewer extensions and the upgrading of existing roadways, but excluding maintenance of such buildings or facilities. G. Council the Metropolitan Council. H. Final Search Area - the single area selected from the candidate search areas by the Metropolitan Council for a new major airport under Minnesota Statutes Section 473.155, subdivision 3. I. Local Governmental Unit - any county, city, town, school district, special district or other political subdivisions or public corporation, -other than the council or a metropolitan agency, lying in whole or pan within the metropolitan arca. 2 -.. t J. Metropolitan Agency • the metropolitan parks and open space commission, regional transit board, metropolitan transit commission, metropolitan waste control commission. metropolitan airport commission and metropolitan sports facilities commission. K Metropolitan Area the area over which the Metropolitan Council has jurisdiction, including only the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota excluding the city of Northfield. Hennepin excluding the city of Hanover, Ramsey, Scott excluding the city of New Prague, and Washington. L Metropolitan Development Guide • the comprehensive development guide prepared by the Council to achieve the orderly and economic development of the. Metropolitan Area. M. Metropolitan System Plans • the aviation and transportation chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide, and the policy plans, implementation plans and capital budgets for metropolitan wastewater handling and treatment, transportation and regional recreation open space. N. Substantial - "substantial" is a relative term. It import a considerable amount or value in opposition to that which is inconsequential or small, something serious as opposed to trivial, something essential, material, or fundamental. O. Usual and Customary • found in ordinary practice; commonly practiced. III. PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING LAND USE CHANGES A. Submission. Before making a final decision to approve an application for a -change w in zoning, zoning variance or conditional use, including planned unit developments, the local governmental unit must submit it to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. (The local governmental unit may deny an application without review by the Council.) To expedite the review process, the local unit may submit the application prior to any official local review. B. Method of Submission. All applications must be accompanied by an "Information Submission," attached hereto, and a map. C Initial Determination of Completeness of Submission. Within 15 working days of receipt by the Council of an application and an "Information Submission" form, Council staff will determine whether the "information Submission" form is complete and whether,the application contains adequate information for the Council to conduct it review. The chair will notify the governmental unit of staff's determination. Failure of the chair to do so within 15 working days of receipt of the proposed application will constitute a finding of completeness. In notifying the governmental unit that the T .' I "Information Submission" is incomplete, the chair will note what additional information is needed. Incomplete Applications. After 90 days, the Council will return all incomplete applications to local units of government for which the needed information has not been received. A local unit of government may resubmit the application for Council review. D. Initial Determination of Level of Review to be Conducted. Within 15 working days of receipt by the Council of an application, the chair, on behalf of the Council and with input from staff, will notify the governmental unit whether the Council will invoke the 90 -day review period Failure of the chair to do so within 15 working days will constitute a waiver of review. If the chair determines that the application is consistent with the local government's comprehensive plan, metropolitan system plans, and the development and operation of a new major airport in the search area, the Council may waive review of the application. E. Commencement of Council Review. If the application is found to be complete upon first submission, the 90 -day review period will commence on the day the application was received. If the application is found to be incomplete, the review period will commence at such time as a complete application is submitted to the Council. F. Criteria for Determining Consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Metropolitan System. Plans and the Development and Operation of a New Major Airport The chair will utilize the following criteria in determining whether an application is consistent with the local unit's comprehensive plan, metropolitan system plans and the development and operation of a new major airport. 1. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. a. Whether the proposed change has the same use and service characteristics (for example, height limitations, severing needs. transportation access) as defined for the area in the comprehensive plan. b. When the use and service characteristics are not clearly defined in the comprehensive plan, the Council will use a definition that is usual and customary for the affected comprehensive plan designation. 2 Consistency with Metropolitan System Plans. The -criteria are the same as those used for major plan amendments and are listed in Appendix A �- Consistency with the Development and Operation of a New Major Airport. The criteria for determining consistency with the development and operation of a new major airport will apply when the approximate location of the airport site and the configuration of the runways, terminal and other structures for im the new airport are reasonably known. An application must be consistent with the requirements of the following: a. Aircraft operational areas, including runways, taxiways, parking aprons and future expansion areas. b. Airport facilities, including terminals, support facilities, service facilities, environmental buffer areas and future expansion areas- G Airport Zoning Act (Minnesota Statutes Sections 360.061-360.074 and applicable rules or regulations) d. Regulation of Structure Heights (Minnesota Statutes Sections 360.81- 360.93 and applicable rules or regulations) e. Airport Development Act (Minnesota Statutes Sections 473.636- 473.639) f. Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace (Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 77) g. Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Aircraft Noise (see Appendix B) and the principles of Airport Noise Compatibility Planning (Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 150) G. Extension of Review Period. Any extension of the review period will be mutually agreed to by the Council and the local governmental unit submitting'the application. The aereement will include a specific time period for the extension. H. Simultaneous Review by Metropolitan Airports Commission. The local governmental unit will send a copy of any application to the Metropolitan Airports Commission for comment. After a preliminary determination that a waiver of review is warranted, the Council will forward this determination to the Commission. ne Commission will have five working days to indicate whether it concurs with this determination. Failure to notify the Council that a 90 -day review is warranted will constitute concurrence with the Council's determination. If the Council invokes the 94 -day review period, the Council will notify the Commission of this determination. The Commission has 45 days after Council notification to comment. I. Inconsistent Application. If the Council finds an application to be inconsistent with the local comprehensive plan, the local governmental unit may submit a plan amendment for Council review under the "Metropolitan Council Guidelines for Reviewing Local Comprehensive Plan Amendments." 'Ibe Council will reconsider the application concurrently with its review of the plan amendment. 5 N. PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING NEW PUBLIC BUILDINGS OR FACILITIES A. Informal Comments Prior to Formal Submission. Local governmental units may submit plans for public buildings or facilities, including transportation, sewer and park facilities (e.g. roads, sewer lines, lift stations, ballfields) to the Council for informal review prior to formal submission. The purpose of informal review is to advise local governments as early in the development process as possible on the consistency of their plans with Council system plans and the development and operation of a new major airport. Informal reviews will be conducted exclusively by Council staff upon the request of the local governmental unit preparing the plans, and will be advisory in nature. B. Submission. All plans for public buildings or facilities, including transportation, sewer and park facilities, must be submitted by the local governmental unit to the Metropolitan Council All plans must be submitted prior to the start of construction. C. Method of Submission. All plans must be accompanied by an "information Submission," attached hereto and a map. D. Initial Determination of Level of Review to be Conducted. Within 10 working days of receipt by the Council of a plan for a public buflding or facility, the chair, on behalf of the Council and with input from staff, will notify the governmental unit whether the Council will review and comment on the plan. Failure of the chair to do so within 10 working days will constitute a waiver of review. If the chair determines that a review is warranted, the Council will complete its review and forward any comments to the local governmental uni: within 45 days. E. Simultaneous Review by Metropolitan Airports Commission. Upon receipt of a plan for a public building or faciiiry, the Council will transmit a copy to the Metropolitan Airports Commission for comment. The Commission has 30 days after Council notification to comment and may comment to the Council or' directly to the governmental unit that submitted the plan. APPENDIX A CRITERIA'FOR DETERMINING POTENTIAL METROPOLITAN SYSTEM IMPACT 1. Whether the proposed amendment may result in a substantial change in the timing, staging and capacity or service area of local facilities in a council -approved local sewer policy plan or comprehensive sewer pian. 2. Whether the proposed amendment may result in a wastewater flow that substantially exceeds the flow projection for the local governmental unit as indicated in the Water Resources Management Development Guide PoUcy/Plan, Part L Sewage Treatment and Handling. �. Whether the proposed amendment may require a new national pollution discharge elimination system permit or state disposal system permit, or a substantial change to an existing permit, or results in the premature expansion or extension of metropolitan service, upgrading of treatment levels at the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant, or expansion of treatment capacity. 4. Whether the proposed amendment may result in substantially less restrictive standards and conditions to be adopted for the installation or management of private, on-site sewer facilities, or the installation or expansion of private treatment plants than those described in the comprehensive plan. - 5. Whether the proposed amendment may have a substantial impact on the use of regional recreation and open space facilities or natural resources within the regional recreation open space system. Impacts on the use of recreation and open space facilities include, but are not limited to. traffic, safety, noise, visual obstructions (for example, to scenic overlooks), impaired use of the facilities, or interference with the operation or maintenance of the facilities. Impacts on natural resources include, but are not limited to, the impact on the level, flow, or quality of a facility's water resources (lakes, streams, wetlands, groundwater) and impact on a facility's wildlife populations or habitats (migration routes, breeding sites, plant communities). 6. Whether the proposed amendment may preclude or substantially limit the future acquisition of land in an area identified in the capital improvement program of the Council's Recreation Open Space Development Guide/Policy Plan. 7. Whether the proposed amendment may substantially affect either the function of a metropolitan airport identified in the Council's Aviation Development GuideRolicy Plan or the land use within an airport search area. 8. Whether the proposed amendment is substantially inconsistent with the "Guidelines for Land Use Compatibility with Aircraft Noise" contained in the Aviation Development Guide/Policy Plan. 7 9• Whether the proposed amendment may result in a substantial change to existingor proposed metropolitan highways, highway interchanges, or intersections with metropolitahi ihwa to local roadways that have interchanges with metropolitan highways. Substantial changes r the mainline, interchanges, and intersections include an increase in volume that will overload oad the facility, or a difference in timing, design or location from that indicated in the Transporta- tion Guide/Policy Plan. Changes to local roadways include changes in timing, staging,volume, capacity, design, location or functional classificatioa. met 10. Whether the proposed amendment may result in a substantial chap e facilities inconsistent with the Transportation Guide/Poticy plan. >; transit service or 11. Whether the proposed amendment may have a substantial impact on the use of solid w facilities identified in the Solid Waste Management Development Guide/Poli Plan. aue on the use of these facilities include, but are not limited to, disruption of plannedfacility �pacu staging, facility access, or other interference with the operation and maintenance of he facilities. a APPENDIX B LAND USE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR AIRCRAFT NOISE The four aircraft noise exposure zones for major and intermediate airports can be classified as severe, serious significant and moderate, respectively. They are described below. NOISE EXPOSURE ZONE I Zone 1 is immediately adjacent to the airport property and can be generally described as having a severe noise problem. It is subjected to aircraft noise greater than 80 LEQ (equivalent sound level) during the busiest hours of operation at MSP and 70 Ldn (level -day -night) at St, Paul Downtown. It is an area frequently affected by both takeoff and landing operations. In addition, the proximity of the airport operating area, particularly the runway thresholds, reduces the probability of relief resulting from future changes in the operating characteristics of either the aircraft or the airport. Both the existing and expected noise intensity in the area are severe and permanent. No new development other than that dedicated to nonnoise-sensitive land uses should be considered. In. addition to preventing future noise problems, the severely noise -impacted areas surrounding MSP should be fully evaluated to determine alternative land use strategies including eventual changes in existing land uses. NOISE EXPOSURE ZONE II The noise impact in zone II are generally sustained, especially close to the runway ends. Zone II is exposed to aircraft noise of 75 to 80 LEQ for takeoffs and 70 LEQ for landings during the busiest hours at MSP and between 65 and 70 Ldn at St. Paul Downtown. Based on the proximity of the affected area to the airport, the seriousness of the noise exposure is such that sleep and speech interference can be routinely expected. In addition, given that aircraft operations, particularly departures, are still relatively close to the runway centerlines (extended), created noise exposure can be expected. The noise intensity in this area is generally serious and oftentimes continuing. New development should be limited to uses that have been constructed to achieve certain interior to exterior noise attenuation and that discourage certain outdoor uses. NOISE EXPOSURE ZONE III Aircraft noise impact in zone III can also be categorized as sustaining. However, the intensity is such that it should be considered significant, or somewhat less than serious. Zone III is exposed to aircraft noise of 70 to 75 LEQ for takeoffs and 65 to 70 LEQ for landings during the busiest hours at MSP and 60 to 65 Ldn at St. Paul Downtown. In addition to the intensity of the noise, the location of buildings receiving the noise must also be 'fully considered. Operational changes can provide some relief for certain uses in this area. If residential development is located outside areas that are exposed to frequent arrivals and departures, is constructed to achieve certain interior to exterior noise attenuation and is restrictive 0 as to outdoor use, it may be acceptable. Certain medical and educational facilities that involve permanent lodging and outdoor use should be discouraged. NOISE EXPOSURE ZONE IV Zone IV is best described as a "gray" area where aircraft noise exposure might be considered moderate. It is exposed to aircraft noise 65 to 74 LEQ during the busiest hours. Noise exposure is predominantly related to takeoffs. Land uses are likely to receive the most benefit from changes in operations. The area is considered transitional because potential changes in airport and aircraft operating procedures could lower noise levels. Another factor to be considered is the ambient or background noise environment. Development in this area may be generally free from land use restrictions as such, but can benefit from insulation levels above typical new construction standards in Minnesota. While such measures may abate the level of interior noise, insulation cannot eliminate outdoor noise problems. Building locations and site planning can help mitigate both interior and exterior noise in some cases and must be encouraged. NEW DEVELOPMENT AND MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT "New development" means a relatively large, undeveloped track of land proposed for development (for example, a residential subdivision, industrial park or shopping center). "Major redevelopment" means a relatively large parcel of land with old structures proposed for extensive -rehabilitation or demolition and different uses (for example, demolition of a square block of old office and hotel buildings for new housing, office, commercial uses; conversion of warehouse to office and commercial uses). Guidelines for land use compatibility with aircraft noise are summarized in Tables B-2 and B-3. The g:idelines apply to noise exposure zones I through IV as previously defined. An explanation of the four ratings of land uses in the tables --consistent, provisional, conditional and inconsistent land uses-- folio% s: Consistent: Land uses that are acceptable. Provisional: Land uses that must comply with certain land use provisions to be acceptable. These provisions are descnbed in the following section entitled "Provisional Lund Use Requirements." Conditional: Land uses that may be identified as -conditionally acceptable in local comprehensive plans. The Metropolitan Council will review and authorize conditional uses incorporated in local comprehensive plan amendments for compliance with the factors set forth in the following section entitled "Conditional Land Use Review Factors." Inconsistent: Land uses that are not acceptable even if acoustical treatment were incorporated in the structure and outside uses were restricted. in PROVISIONAL LAND USE REQUIREMENTS Land uses that meet the following requirements are acceptable: Structures built after December 1483 shall be acoustically constructed so as to achieve the interior sound levels described in Table B-1. Table B-1 STRUCTURE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS' Land Use Residential Educational/Medical CulturaVEntertainment/Recreational Office/Commercial/Retail Services Industrial/CommunicationJU tility Agricultural Land/Water/Arca/ Resource Extraction Interior Sound Level' 45 dBA 45 dBA 50 dBA 50 dBA 60 dBA 65 dBA ' These performance standards do not apply to buildings, accessory buildings or portions of buildings that are not normally occupied by people (Sec Table B-6 for listing of standard land use coding.) ' The noise descriptors used to delineate the noise policy zones are: MSP, one-hour LEQ, and St. Paul Downtown, combination of annualized Ldn for Zones L II, and III and L10 in Zona IV. ' Special attention is required for certain noise sensitive uses (for example, concert halls). Each local unit of government that has land within the airport noise Zone will be responsible for implementing and enforcing the structure performance standards (Table B-1) within its jurisdiction. The Metropolitan Council will review the adequacy of these standards as part of its review of amendments to each community's comprehensive plan. CONDMONAL LAND USE REVIEW FACTORS When a local government submits a land use plan amendment proposing the potential authorization of uses identified as conditional in these guidelines, the Metropolitan Council will use the following factors in determining whether to approve the provisions relating to proposed conditional uses: 1. Specific nature of the proposed use, including extent of associated outdoor activities. '? Relationship of proposed use to other planning considerations, including adjacent land use activities, consistency. with overall comprehensive planning and relation to other metropolitan systems. 3. Frequency of exposure of proposed uses to aircraft overflight 11 4. Location of proposed use relative to aircraft flight tracks and aircraft on -ground operating and maintenance areas. 5• Location, site design and construction restrictions to be imposed by the community of the proposed • use with respect to reduction of exterior to interior noise transmissions and shielding of outdoor activities. 6. Method community will use to inform future occupants of proposed building of potential noise from aircraft operations. 7. Extent to which community restricts the building from having facilities for outdoor activities associated with the use. 8. Distance of proposed use from existing or proposed runways, parallel taxiways or engine run- up areas. Table B-2 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR MAJOR AND INTERMEDIATE AIRPORTS, NEW DEVELOPMENT AND MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT NOtSE•EXPOSURE ZONES Land Use Type t t II III IV Residential Single/Multiplex with Individual Entrance INCO= INCO INCO CONI)' Multiplex/Apartment with Shared Entrance INCO INCO INCO GOND Mobile Home INCO INCO INCO COND Education and Medical Schools, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes INCO INCO INCO PROW Cultural, Entertainment, Recreational Indoor COND CONI) COND PROV Outdoor COND COND COND CNSV Office, Commercial, Retail CON"D PROV PROV CNST Services Transportation -Passenger Facilities COND PROV PROV CNST Transient Lodging INCO PROV PROV PROV Other Medical, Health and Educational Service COND PROV PROV CNST Other Semites COND PROV PROV CNST Industrial, Communication, Utility PROV CNST CNST CNST Agricultural Land, Water Ar+ess, Resource CNST CNST CNST CNST Extraction Note: For iriM recaostr is ice and additions, even though certain tend uses are generally ascostsisteat is a given zone, extenuating circumstances could justify the project and the community should address this m its plan amendment, as appropnate. ' Applicable for off -airport use only. INCO means incoissistent- CONI means conditional. ' PROV meats provisional ' CNST mesas coasistcat. 13 Table B-3 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR MAJOR AND INTERMEDIATE AIRPORTS, INF'ILI, DEVELOPMENT AND RECONSTRUCTION OR ADDITIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES NOISE EXPOSURE ZONES Land Use Typet I II III IV Residential SiVe/Multiplez with Individual Entrance CONDI COND COND COND MultiplWApartment with Shared Entrance COND PROVE PROV PROV Mobile Home COND COND COND COND Education and Medical Schools, Cburehes, Hospitals, Nursing Hames COND COND COND PROV Cultural, Entertainment, Recreational Indoor COED PROV PROV PROV Outdoor COND COND COND CNST' OMce, Commercial, Retail PROV PROV PROV CNST Services Transportation-Passenger Facilities COND PROV PROV CNST Transient Lodging COND PROV PROV PROV Other Medical, Health and Educational Services COND PROV PROV CNST Other Se.Nlccs COND PROV PROV CNST Industrial, Communication, Utility PROV CNST CNST CNST Agricultural Land. Water Areas,, Resource Extraction CNST CNST CNST CNST Note: For infill. rr, 0=,ruction and additions, even though certain land uses areenera g Iiy inconsistent in a =cnuating m=mstaaces could given mac, Protea and the cattununiry should address this in its appraprtatc. plan amendment, as Applicable for off-airport use only. ' COND means conditional. PROV means provisional CNST means conststent. Table B-6 TYPICAL LAND USE BY STANDARD LAND USE CODING MANUAL CODES Type of Land Use Code Numbers and Specific Uses Residential: 72.1 - SinglefMultipl= with Ind. Entrance 11 Household units Recreauonal activities (inti gold courses, riding 11.11 Single units - detached stables, water recreation) 11.12 Single units - semidetached Resorts and group camps 11.13 Single units - attached row Parks 11.21 Two units - side-by-side Retail trade -building materials, hardware and farm equipment 11.22 Two units - one above the other • MultiplWApartment with Shared 1131 Apartments • walk up Entrance 55 Retail trade - automotive, marine craft, aircraft and accessories 1132 Apartments - elevator Retail trade • apparel and aaxssones 12 Group quarters Retail trade - furniture, home furnishings and equipment 13 Residential hotels - Mobile Home 14 Mobile home parks or courts Educational and Medical 65.1 Hospital. nursing homes Schools, Churches, Nursing 68 Educational services Homes 69.1 Religious activities ' Services 71 Cultural activities (including churches) Cultural. Entertainment, Recreational - Indoor 72 Public assembly 72.1 Auditoriums. Concert halls - Outdoor 74 Recreauonal activities (inti gold courses, riding stables, water recreation) 75 Resorts and group camps 76 Parks Office, Commercial, Retail Services 52 Retail trade -building materials, hardware and farm equipment 53 Retail trade - general merchandise 54 Retail trade - food 55 Retail trade - automotive, marine craft, aircraft and accessories 56 Retail trade • apparel and aaxssones 57 Retail trade - furniture, home furnishings and equipment 58 Retail trade - eating and drinking establishments 59 Other retail trade - Transportation-Passcager facilities 40 Transportation, communication and utilities - Transient Lodging 15 Transient lodging - Other Medical, Health and 60 Services Educational Services 61 Finance, insurance and real estate services 62 Personal services 63 Business services 64 Repair services 65 Professional services Other Services 35 Professional, scaearifie and contrO iag instruments; photographic and optxal goods; watches and clocks manufacturing 15 INTORMAITON SLBMISSION FOR LAND USE CILANGES LN THE FINAL AIRPORT SEARCH AREA, This summary worksheet mist be filled out and submitted to the Metropolitan Council with a copy of each proposed application for a change in zoning, zoning variances or conditional uses, including planned unit developments, within the final search area. Please be as specific as possible; attach additional explanatory materials if necessary well. . If a staff report was prepared for the Planning Commission or City CounciYrown Board, please attach it as Send applications to : Referrals Coordinator Metropolitan Council Z30 E. Fifth St. St- Pact, MN SS101.1634 I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Sponsoring governmental unit Name of local contact person Address Telephone Name of preparer (if different from contact person) Date of preparation B. Application Name DescriptionlSummary C. Please attach the following: 1. Three copies of the application. 2. A ciryhownship-wide map showing the location of the proposed change. 3. The current land use plan map(s), indicating the area(s) affected by the proposed change. 4. The proposed coning map(s), indicating the area(s) affected by the proposed change. - • r r D. What is the official local status of the proposed application? (Check one or more as appropriate.) Acted upon by planning commission on Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review. Considered, but not approved by governing body on Other II. LAND USE A. Describe the following, as appropriate: 1. Size of affected area in acres 2. Existing land use plan designation 3. Proposed zoning, zoning variance or conditional use, including planned unit developments M. METROPOLITAN SYSTEM PLANS A. Wastewater Treatment 1. Will the proposed application result in a change in the projected sewer Bows for the community? No/Not Applicable. Yes. Indicate the expected change. Total Year 2000/2010 flow for community mfllion gallons/day based on existing pian Total 2000/2010 flow for community million gallons/day based on application - 3 B. Transportation 1. Will the proposed application result in an increase in trip generation for the affected area? _ No/Not applicable. Yes. Describe effect. 2. Does the proposed application contain any changes to the functional classification of roadways? No. Yes. Describe which roadways. C. Aviation Will the proposed application affect the function of a metropolitan airport or the compatibility of land uses with aircraft noise?- No/Not applicable. Yes. Describe effect. D. Recreation Open Space Will the proposed application have an impact on existing or future federal, state or regional recreational factgities? No/Not applicable. _,___ Yes. De3rnbe effect INFORMATION SUBMISSION FOR PUBLIC BUILDING/FACILITY PLANS IN THE FINAL AIRPORT SEARCH AREA This summary worksheet must be filled out and submitted to the Metropolitan Council with a copy of the proposed public building or facility, including transportation, sewer and park facilities, within the final airport search area. Please be as specific as possible; attach additional explanatory materials if necessary. If a staff report was prepared for the Planning Commission or City CouncUrown Board, please attach it as well. Send plans to : Referrals Coordinator Metropolitan Council 230 E. Fifth St. St. Paul, MN SS101.1634 I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Sponsoring governmental unit Name of local contact person Address Telephone Name of preparer (if different from contact person) Date of preparation B. Project Name Description/Summary C. Please attach the following: 1• Three copies of the plans. 2. A city/township-wide map showing the location of the proposed buildinVfacility. D. What is the official local status of the proposed building/facility? (Check one or more as appropriate.) _ _____Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review. Considered, but not approved by governing body on _Other II. CONSTRUC71ON SCHEDULE Indicate the current construction schedule below, including bid letting and ground breaking. aadcr%3 L&W - (Umv4ary Df C`CGt(GCe�iLt S H. Land Use Chances in the NEW AIRPORT FINAL SEARCH AREA A. Contents of Information Submittal: o a completed "Information Submission for Land Use Changes in the Final Airport .Search Area" worksheet; o three copies of a written request (application) for a change in land use; o a city/township-wide map showing the location of the proposed change; o a current land use plan map(s) indicating the area(s) affected by the proposed change; o the proposed zoning map(s) indicating the area(s) affected by the proposed change; o any additional explanatory materials, if necessary. B. Completeness of Submission (initial determination by Council within 15 working days): 1. Incomplete ARplications Local government unit is notified by letter from Council Chair of incomplete submittal and the additional information needed. If the requested information is not received within 90 days, the Council will return the application. 2. Complete Applications (a) Consistent with Local Comprehensive Plan: refer to # e below. OR Inconsistent: Local government unit may submit an amendment to its comprehensive plan. The Council will review it and at the same time reconsider the application for change in land use. Local unit of government may not approve land use change, if found inconsistent with the local comprehensive plan. (b) Consistent with Metropolitan System Plans OR Inconsistent (c) Consistent with the Development and Operation of a New Major Airport (criteria are in review guidelines) OR Inconsistent C. Level of Review: 1. Waiver of Further Review. If the Council Chair determines that the application is consistent with the local comprehensive plan, metropolitan system plans, and the development and operation of a new major airport in the search area. 2. 90-dav Review. Starts on the day the application was received. The Metropolitan Airports Commission may comment within 45 days. D. Extension of Review Period: Local government unit and the Council must mutually agree to an extension of the review period beyond 90 days. New PublicBuildingsor Facilities in the NEW AIRPORT FINAL SEARCH AREA A. Informal Comments Prior to Formal Submission Local governmental units may submit plans to the Council for informal review by Council staff. The review will provide advisory comments on the consistency of local plans with Council system plans and the development and operation of a new major airport. B. Formal Information Submittal: 1. Timing - All plans must be submitted prior to the start of construction. 2. Contents - o a completed "Information Submission for Public Building/Facility Plans in the Final Airport Search Area" worksheet; o three copies of the plans; o a city/township-wide map showing the location of the proposed building/facility; and o additional explanatory materials, if necessary. 3. Completeness of Submittal: Initial determination within 10 working days. (a) Incomplete Plans(Submittals Local government unit is notified by letter from Council Chair of the incomplete submittal and the additional information that is needed. If the requested information is not received within 90 days, the Council will return the plan/submittal. (b) Complete Plans/Submittals Consistent with Local Comprehensive Plan: refer to # 4 below. OR Inconsistent: Local government unit may submit an amendment to its comprehenisve plan. The Council will review it, and the same time, reconsider the application for a new public building or facility. Local unit of government may not approve the plan for the public building/facility, if it is found inconsistent with the local comprehensive plan. 4. Level of Review: (a) Waiver of Review The Council Chair sends a letter to the local governmental unit notifying it of the Council's determination. (b) 45-Dav Review Council Chair notifies local governmental unit that the Council will conduct a review of the plan and forward its comments within 45 days. Council also transmits a copy of the plan to the Metropolitan Airports Commission for its review and comment (to the Council or directly to the local unit of government) within 30 days after notification by the Council. 5. Extension of Review Period: Not provided for in the review guidelines.