HomeMy WebLinkAbout6. Master Transmission Rezoningt c
S
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 21, 1992
AGENDA ITEM:
AGENDA SECTION:
Master Transmission Rezoning
Public Hearing
PREPARED BY:
AGEND MM 6
Lisa Freese, Director of Planning
G
ATTACHMENTS; Ordinance, PC Packet, Mailing
APP BY�s
List, Hearing Notice
�_ ell -1,
v �1/
On December 3, 1991, the City Council initiated a rezoning petition for
Master Transmission located at 14805 South Robert Trail. Originally
Mr. McKinley, the owner of Master Transmission, petitioned the City to
rezone his property from C-2, Community Commercial to C-3, Highway Service
Commercial to enable him to expand his auto repair business which is non-
conforming in the C-2 zoning district. The Council decided that .0-4,
General Commercial, may be a more appropriate zoning district. After
tabling action on Mr. McKinley's petition, the Council initiated a rezoning
petition for C-4 zoning.
A summary of current project status and an analysis of the rezoning request
are provided in the attached Planning Commission review: dated
January 12, 1992. At the January 14 regular meeting of the Planning
Commission, the commission recommended unanimously (4-0) approval of the
rezoning of this property from C-2 to C-4 because: 1) it is consistent
with the existing uses; 2) it provides more opportunities for reuse than
the C-3 zoning district; 3) it serves as a logical transition area between
the Community Commercial District and the General Commercial district in
the Comprehensive Plan; and 4) it is consistent with the function plan_
delineated in the McComb Commercial Study completed in 1990.
1
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
A motion to adopt Ordinance No. B-17, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B,
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE.
COUNCIL ACTION:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
ORDINANCE NO. B-17
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled "City of Rosemount
Zoning Ordinance," is hereby amended to rezone from C-2 Community Commercial to C-4
General Commercial the following described property located within the City of Rosemount,
Minnesota to -wit:
Lot 2, Block 1- Evenson First Addition
SECTION 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount referred to and described in said
Ordinance No. B as that certain map entitled, "Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount," shall not
be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the said
zoning map on file in the Clerk's office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove
provided for in this Ordinance and all of the notation references and other information shown
thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication
according to law.
Enacted and ordained into an Ordinance this 4th day of February, 1992.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
E.B. McMenomy, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk
Published in the Farmineton Independent this day of . 1992.
�iiy of (Rosemount
PHONE (612) 423.4411 2675 - 145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota
FAX (612) 423.5203 Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 510, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068-0510
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lisa J. Freese, Director of Planning
DATE: January 12, 1992
SUBJ: January 14, 1992 Regular Meeting RevieVS
ATTACHMENTS: CC REVIEWS & MINUTES
BACKGROUND MATERIALS
HEARING NOTICE AND MAILING LIST
LOCATION MAP
MAYOR
Edward B. McMenomy
COUNCILMEMBERS
Shelia Wasson
James (Red) Staats
Harry Willcox
Dennis Wippermarm
ADMINISTRATOR
Stephan Jilk
S. MASTER TRANSMISSION REZONING PETITION
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Motion to recommend approval of the rezoning
from C-2, Community Commercial to C-4, General Commercial.
NATURE OF REQUEST:
Dave McKinley, owner of Master Transmission located at 14805
South Robert Trail, proposes to expand his Auto Service related
business by adding a two bay service area on the site. The
property is presently zoned C-2 Community Commercial and auto
service businesses are not permitted in that Zoning District.
Mr. McKinley's business is considered a legal nonconforming use
because it was legally established prior to 1989 when the Zoning
Ordinance was changed. Legal nonconforming uses are permitted to
continue in the C-2 district, but the Ordinance prohibits them
from expanding.
Mr. McKinley originally requested that the property be rezoned to
C-3 (Highway Service Commercial), a district which permits auto
service business so that he could add a new building to his site.
The Planning Commission reviewed this request at the November 24,
1991 Regular meeting and recommended that the City Council delay
action on the rezoning petition until after the Downtown Plan is
complete. The Planning Commission also recommended that if the
City Council were to consider the rezoning prior to the
completion of the Downtown Plan, that C-4, General Commercial be
considered instead. It was the consensus of the Planning
Commission that C-4 zoning was more consistent with thegverall
land use pattern south of Lower 147th Street.
At the December 3, 1991 City Council meeting, the City C(
tabled action on the original C-3 petition and initiated
rezoning to C-4 for this property. The City Council fell
needed to be taken on Mr. McKinley's request prior to th(
completion of the downtown plan.
6verylhtng���i
's omtng �osemouni��
`� e<rcMtl Darier
1
a
action
MASTER TRANSMISSION
PAGE 2
SURROUNDING CONDITIONS:
The property in question is located in a commercial area. The
area to the north and on the west side of Trunk Highway 3 is
zoned C-2, Community Commercial and designated as Community
Commercial in the Comprehensive Plan. The types of busine ses
located in this area include a snowmobile sales and servide shop,
an autobody shop and a heating and plumbing contractor. These
businesses are all legal non conforming in the C-2 zoning
district.
The vacant property to the immediate south along TH 3 and the
intersection of County Road 42 is zoned residential. It s,
however, designated as general Commercial in the Comprehe sive
Plan. C mmercial development has been proposed for this roperty
and previous Planning Commission decisions have been favo ably
disposed to those projects. To date, however, no project for
this vacant property has received final approval.
On the east side of Trunk Highway 3 is Strese Oil. This property
is zoned C-3, Highway Service Commercial. The property to the
north of Strese oil is zoned C-2. All of this area is deignated
as Community Commercial in the Comprehensive Plan.
This com
auto ori
Group di
adopted
or City
A fully
west.
The sit
square
of the
for the
lot. A
portion
ercial area was typified as "destination commerc al,
nted" in the Retail Area Function Plan that the McComb
for the EDA in 1990. This study, however, was mever
s a plan or official policy by the Planning Commission
ouncil.
eveloped residential area abuts this property tolthe
is an triangular shaped parcel of approximately
et. The current structure is located on the nor
reel towards the rear of the lot. The existing
usiness is located along TH 3 on the north end o
umber of vehicles appear to be stored on the rem
f the lot.
PROJECT UPDATE AND BACKGROUND:
At the December 3 discussion at the City Council, it was
recommended that the Economic Development Authority shoul
examine the feasibility of assisting Mr. McKinley through
Increment Financing. If feasible, the City Council thoug
this assistance may provide an incentive for him to const
addition to his existing building rather than build a sep
building. Mr. McKinley as you will recall had decided to
second building in order to avoid the fire suppression
requireents on both the new and existing building and to
2,670
h end
the
ining
Tax
it that.
-uct an
irate
build a
limit
MASTER TRANSMISSION
PAGE 3
the building materials requirement to only the new struc
Mr. McKinley has indicated that he does not want to expl
possibility of EDA assistance at this time.
City staff met with Mr. McKinley on January 6, 1992 to di
his current constructions plans. At that meeting it was
determined that if the total square footage of the existi
building and the addition were under 5,000 square feet, t
suppression system would not be required under city fire
This classification rating assumes that no welding or for
will be used in the structure. Mr. McKinley indicated th
would probably be able to keep the floor area under 5,000
feet.
Mr. McKinley would be required to bring the entire buildi
(existing portion and new addition) up to the building ma
requirements in the current zoning ordinance. In commerc
zoning districts, commercial buildings that have exterior
or curtain wall panels of finished steel, aluminum or fib
are required to be faced with brick decorative block, woo
stone, architectural concrete cast in place or precast co
panels on 100 percent of the wall surfaces abutting a pub
right-of-way or residential uses. Therefore, Mr. McKinle
need to meet this requirement on the entire building.
In the C-4 district, Mr. McKinley would also need to obta
variance from the Planning Commission for the rear yard s
for this addition. A 30' minimum setback is required whe
abutting a residential zoning district. If the rezoning
approved, the Planning Commission would also need to appr
site plan prior to the issuance of a building permit by t
As discussed in previous reviews, a Planned Unit Developm
(PUD) would be required only if Mr. McKinley pursues the
construction of a separate building rather than an additi
the existing building.
DISCUSSION•
The proposed zoning district C-4 is consistent with the e
use on this property and the surrounding commercial uses.
in that area of transition between the downtown and the g
commercial area. Historically, the policy direction has
maintain this area as part of the downtown. Recent studi
however, indicate that this historical policy direction i
shifting and that this area is more suited for General Co
uses. While it would provide a greater level of comfort
Planning Commission and City Council to have a completed
the
e fire
ode.
hes
t he
square
g
erials
al
f inish
xglass
crete
is
would
n a
.tback
s
ive a
.e City.
i;r-.
sting
It is
eral
en to
rcial
the
MASTER TRANSMISSION
PAGE 4
plan supporting this rezoning, it seems likely that the dwntown
plan will confirm that this area is outside the central b siness
district area and that general commercial usesareapprop iate at
this location.
Therefore, Planning Staff recommends approval of the rezo ing of
this property from C-2 to C-4 because: 1) it is consiste t with
the existing uses; 2) it provides more opportunities for euse
than the C-3 zoning district; 3) it serves as a logical
transition area between the Community Commercial District and the
General Commercial district in the Comprehensive Plan; an 4) it
is consistent with the function plan in the McComb Commer ial
Study completed in 1990.
Council was of the consensus that C-4 zoning would be t
appropriate zoning for the Master Transmission property and that
the Economic Development Authority should exam the feasibility of
assisting Mr. McKinley with public improvements required to meet
the building and zoning code requirements for his proposal. Mr.
McKinley advised he would be willing to meet with city 4taff.
MOTION by Klassen to postpone action on C-3 rezoning petition and
to initiate a zoning change to C-4 by the Planning Commission.
SECOND by Napper. Ayes: Napper, Oxborough, Klassen, Willcox,
Wippermann. Nays: 0.
MOTION by Napper to request the Economic Development Aul
work with Mr. Mckinley with regards to possible economic
development assistance. SECOND by Oxborough. Ayes: 03
Klassen, Willcox, Wippermann, Napper. Nays: 0.
3
rity to
rough,
ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 3, 1991
Carey Perket, for USPCI, reiterated Mr. Jackson's request
to
continue the public hearing advising the company needs to
further
review permitting requirements by Dakota Countyt Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency and the City.
MOTION to recess the public hearing to January 7, 1992.
SECOND by
Klassen. Ayes: 'Klassen, Willcox, Wippermann, Napper, Ocborough.
Nays: 0.
MOTION by Napper to postpone action until completion of
:he public
hearing. SECOND by Oxborough. Ayes: Willcox, Wippermainj
Napper, Oxborough, Klassen. Nays: 0.
Mayor Napper opened the public hearing to consider a reqaest
to
rezone property located at 14805 South Robert Trail from
C-2
Community Commercial to C-3 Highway Service Commercial.
Director of Planning Lisa Freese advised petitioner Dave
McKinley,
owner of Master Transmission, requested a rezoning to allow
him to
expand his auto service related business by adding a two
bay
service area in a separate building on the site. Director
Freese
reported on the Planning Commission unanimously recommending
the
petition for C-3 zoning be denied. The Planning commissLon
further recommended that the City Council not consider a
rezonings in this area until after the downtown developmant
plan
is complete; however, if a decision to rezone is made by
the City
Council, that C-4 General Commercial be considered as a
nore
appropriate zoning district. See Clerk's File 1991-40.
Dave McKinley stated he has been trying to reach an agreement
with
the City on his expansion project for approximately two
years, and
that he should have been advised when the new Zoning Ordinance
was
adopted in 1989.
NOTION by Napper to close the public hearing. SECOND b
Willcox.
Ayes:
l:
Wippermann, Napper, Oxborough, Klassen, Oxborough. Nay
0.
Council was of the consensus that C-4 zoning would be t
appropriate zoning for the Master Transmission property and that
the Economic Development Authority should exam the feasibility of
assisting Mr. McKinley with public improvements required to meet
the building and zoning code requirements for his proposal. Mr.
McKinley advised he would be willing to meet with city 4taff.
MOTION by Klassen to postpone action on C-3 rezoning petition and
to initiate a zoning change to C-4 by the Planning Commission.
SECOND by Napper. Ayes: Napper, Oxborough, Klassen, Willcox,
Wippermann. Nays: 0.
MOTION by Napper to request the Economic Development Aul
work with Mr. Mckinley with regards to possible economic
development assistance. SECOND by Oxborough. Ayes: 03
Klassen, Willcox, Wippermann, Napper. Nays: 0.
3
rity to
rough,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 3, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: Master Transmission
AGENDA SECTION:
mission to rezone the property at 14805 South Robert Trail from
Rezoning Petition
PUBLIC HEART
G
PREPARED BY:
AGENDAM
Lisa Freese, Director of Planning
ITE
ATTACHMENTS: PC Review; Petition; Hearing
APPROVED BY:
Notice; Mailing List
A 2_0!7
Dave McKinley, owner of Master Transmission located at 14805 S
Trail, proposes to expand his Auto Service related business by
bay service area in a separate building on the site. The prop
presently zoned C-2 Community Commercial and auto service busi
not permitted in that zoning district. Mr. McKinley's busines
considered a legal nonconforming use because it was legally es
prior to 1989 when the Zoning Ordinance was changed. Legal no
uses are permitted to continue in the C-2 district, but the Or
prohibits them from expanding. Therefore, Mr. McKinley is req
the property be rezoned to C-3 (Highway Service Commercial), a
which permits auto service business so that he can add the bui
site.
The Planning Commission reviewed this petition at their Regu1,
November 19, 1991. The Commission discussed the issues in th,
Planning Commission Review. There was considerable concern a:
impact that this decision may have on the Downtown Plan proce
presented to the Commission a copy of the "Retail Area Functi
the McComb Group which supports destination commercial auto o
development in this general area of downtown. This study, ho,
never adopted as a plan or official policy by the Planning Co
City Council. The Planning Commission also expressed concern
appropriateness of the C-3 zoning district which only allows
sales and service uses. The Planning Commission unanimously
that the rezoning petition for C-3 zoning be denied. In addi
Commission recommended that the City Council not consider any
this area until after the downtown development plan is comple
if a decision to rezone is made by the City Council that C-4,
Commercial, be considered as a more appropriate zoning distri
If the City Council wishes to consider C-4 zoning for this p
would.be necessary to hold a new hearing and republish the n
iuth Robert
adding a two
:rty is
iesses are
is
:ablished
iconforming
esting that
district
ding to his
Meeting on
attached
ut the
Staff
Plan" by
er, was
ssion or
out the
o repair,
ommended
n, the
zonings in
However,
erty it
fication.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: A motion to deny the petition by Master
Trans-
mission to rezone the property at 14805 South Robert Trail from
C-2, Community Commercial, to C-3, Highway service commercial.
COUNCIL ACTION:
PHONE (612) 423-4411
FAX (612) 423-5203
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Gii� (Rosemount
osemouni
2875 • 145th Street West, Rosemount. Minnesota
Mailing Address:
P. O. Box 510. Rosemount, Minnesota 5506&0510
Planning Commission
Lisa J. Freese, Director of Planning
November 24, 1991
November 26, 1991 Regular Meeting Reviews
ATTACHMENTS: REZONING PETITION
BACKGROUND MATERIALS
LOCATION MAP
5b. MASTER TRANSMISSION REZONING PETITION
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
delay action on the
completed.
MAYOR
Vernon Napper
COUNCILMEMBERS
Sheila Klassen
John Oxborough
Harry Willcox
Dennis Wippermann
ADMINISTRATOR
Stephan Jilk
Motion to recommend that the City C uncil
rezoning petition until the Downtown Plan is
N&TURE OF REQUEST:
Dave McKinley, owner of Master Transmission located at 1 805
South Robert Trail, proposes to expand his Auto Service related
business by adding a two bay service area on the site. rhe
property is presently zoned C-2 Community Commercial and auto
service businesses are not permitted in that Zoning District.
Mr. Mckinley's business is considered a legal nonconforming use
because it was legally established prior to 1989 when the Zoning
Ordinance was changed. Legal nonconforming uses are permitted to
continue in the C-2 district, but the Ordinance prohibits them
from expanding. Therefore, Mr. Mckinley is requesting that the
property be rezoned to C-3 (Highway Service Commercial), a
district which permits auto service business so that he can add a
new building to his site.
BACKGROUND:
Based on discussion with previous Planning staff and an analysis
of the previous zoning ordinance; prior to 1989, the C zoning
district did not specifically regulate auto related use (repair
shops and sales facilities). When the present zoning ordinance
was adopted, there was an effort to clarify the ordinance by
modifying the language of the C-2 district to prohibit uto
related types of uses. A new zoning district, C-3 Highway
Service Commercial, was also added at that time. The C-3
district is designed as a highly specialized district that
provides auto related services to passing motorists. T is
district is located in highly visible areas. Existing -3 zones
are scattered along Trunk Highway
�n3/%and in South Rose Park. Uses
(Svery1111-ngs (Pominq `UJ6 gosemouvilY
MASTER TRANSMISSION
PAGE 2
that are permitted in the C-3 district include car repair and
sales, eating establishments, hotels and motels, car wash s,
service gas stations and commercial outdoor recreation.
Based on my research and according to Dean Johnson's
recollection, there was knowledge of the effect that the
would have on a number of existing businesses in the dow
area, such as Master Transmission. It was also intended
Housing and Redevelopment Authority would undertake a mo
detailed development study of the downtown and within th
these issues were to be examined more closely. That stu
never done.
Discussion held on the Comprehensive Guide Plan update h
addressed where commercial land uses are appropriate but
specifically addressed what type of commercial is approp
the downtown. In part, Planning Staff and Consultants r
from that level of detail because the Economic Developme
Authority had indicated they planned to initiate a Downt
That plan is now underway with the first workshop being
November 23.
Meanwhile, Mr. McKinley has been caught in a rather unfo:
circumstance. Approximately three years ago, he began to
the feasibility of adding onto his existing business. H:
original plans were to construct a two bay addition onto
existing building. After discussion with Building Inspe,
staff about fire suppression requirements, Mr. Mckinley
to add a second building to his site rather that add on
existing building. This would allow him to avoid the fi
suppression requirements. In addition, he would not be
to bring the existing building up to the building materi
requirements in the Zoning Ordinance. only the new buil
would need to meet this requirement. Both of these excl
result in considerable upfront savings on the project an
have made it feasible for Mr. McKinley to proceed with h
construction plans.
Basically in order for the project to proceed, a rezoni
required. If approved, Mr. McKinley will need to do a
Unit Development (because there will be multiple build'i
site) and have a site plan approved prior to obtaining
permit.
DISCUSSION:
Master Transmission is within the area generally considf
downtown and currently there is no plan in place to guic
development decisions for the downtown, Since there is
full
t the
study
was
s not
to in
ained
Plan.
d on
tunate
examine
s
his
.tion
Decided
:o the
equired
is
ing
.s ions
thus
s
will be
.anned
fs on a
building
-ed the
i plan
MASTER TRANSMISSION
PAGE 3
process underway both the city and the property owner would be at
risk if any premature decisions are made regarding this rezoning
petition. The historical policies that affect this property
appear to be in conflict. If a decision were made to rezone the
property and later through the planning process the city decided
to take an alternative policy direction, any investment vade by
the owner based on this decision would be jeopardized.
Planning staff recommends that action on the petition be delayed
until the Downtown Plan is complete and encourages the C'ty
Council to proceed with the Plan as soon as possible.
�Tty of (Rosemount
PHONE (612) 423-4411 2875 -145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota
FAX (612) 423-5203 Mailing Address:
P. O. Box 510, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068-0510
J
TO: LISA FREESE, PLANNING DIRECTOR
FROM: TRACIE PECHONICK, E.D. SPECIALIST
DATE: JANUARY 31 1992
SUBJ: MASTER TRANSMISSION - Dave McKinley
MAYOR
Vernon Napper
COUNCILMEMBERS
Sheila Klassen
John Oxborough
Harry, Willcox
Dennis Wippermann
ADMINISTRATOR
Stephan Jilk
As directed by the Rosemount Planning Commission, EDA .staff
contacted Mr. Dave McKinley in regard to the proposed expansion of
his business called Master Transmission. The EDA staff was.
requested to contact Mr. McKinley to determine if there might not
be some form of financial assistance available to help Mr.' McKinley
with the expansion of said business.
I contacted Mr. McKinley by telephone approximately two weeks ago.
I explained my purpose for calling him and asked for information
that would allow EDA staff to determine the feasibility, of using
tax increment financing funds to assist the proposed Master
Transmission expansion, He informed meat that time thathe would
prefer that I talk to his wife Sue who is also involved in said
business. She was not available to talk to me at that time so he
recommended that I allow him to provide her with a message to
contact me at her convenience as Master Transmission has been very
busy as of late.
Not having been contacted by Mrs. McKinley, I again called Master
Transmission yesterday. Mrs. McKinley was not in, but I!dd talk
to Mr. McKinley. I once again explained my purpose for contacting
him. This time he informed me that while he is still interested
in going through with the proposed expansion, he is not interested
in any assistance from the EDA/City. I inquired as to why he felt
this way and he simply repeated that he didn't want to get involved
in any projects with the local government. I told him to think
about it before making a hurried decision and assured him that
simply providing us with some numbers would not lock him into doing
an entire project with us. He agreed to think it over and said he
would contact me if he comes up with any questions and/or if he
decides to provide us with the numbers we requested.
cc: Stephan Jilk, City Administrator
Project File
(Sverylhivcgs (90vntnq (Up gosemounlY
90,00x..
ecwea aur
City of Rosemount NO:
REZONING PETITION
Date: 9/210/91
Applicant: MASTER TRANSMISSION, INC. Phone: 612/423-4221
Address: 14805 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL
STATUS OF APPLICANT:
Xx Owner Buyer Lessee OTHER:
LOCATION: Lot 23Q Block 01 , Addition EVENSON 1ST ADDITION
Street Address: 14805 South Robert Trail
Metes & Bounds Description Attached:
Survey or Plot Plan Attached:
Presently Zoned: C2
Proposed Zoning: Q
REASON FOR REQUEST:
1. After being aoproved for the building expansion, we notified the city of a go-
ahead. and then were told the zoning had been change) without us of them bein
2, aware of it. This is the second building project we have proposed and being
a,t.);)roved for. Due to the fire suppression laws changing, conforming to the size
3. of the 'ouilding, we had to propose a second building. This also was; approved.
After being ii business for 10 years in this location, we feel the need to
expand to serve the community.
Signature of Applicant
Application reeeived by:
?4W -W -f-
Date:
Fee: $ - 50
How Paid: G
Date:
Planning Commission Action:
Date:
s ,,, G'i sf t ,,, h C, w. rG h G h Sti v G
Etter ip . r o , J P
COMMERCIAL LAND USE PLAN
Objectives
1. To meet the convenience shopping needs of Rosemount residents.
2. To facilitate growth, expansion. redevelopment and rehabiil-
tation of downtown Rosemount as the community shopping center.
3. To maintain and build upon downtown Rosemount as the shopping,
cultural and historical focus of the community.
Plan Elements (Centers)
Five types of commercial developments will be required to serve
Rosemount residents based on projected population growth, popula-
tion characteristics and existing and future development patterns.
Four of them are termed "centers" reflecting an integrated design
concept. Each of these relates to a different geographic consti-
tuency and a different level of service based on convenience and
shopping goods and services needs. The fifth commercial type,
General Commercial. is one that accommodates retail shops that
normally do not lend themselves to a collective design. The cri-
teria found in Table I should be carefully adhered to in all deci-
sions regarding commercial rezonings.
Community Center
As growthcontinues in Rosemount, the retail function of downtown
will need to change or business will be lost in ever greater
amounts to centers beyond the City. It cannot compete with or
become a regional shopping center due to existing physical and
market limitations. _It's function, then, is to satisfy the retail
goods and services needs of the entire Rosemount community.
Downtown is intended to continue to be the center for civic actt-
vity in Rosemount while serving as the dominant retail center of
the community. More titan any other center type, it is intended
that the downtown be planned and designed in -a manner which empha-
sizes pedestrian circulation and coordinated parking. An open or
enclosed pedestrian environment is desirable as a means to knit
the retail center into a unified whole. Downtown is intended to
12
"PIC, vk
be a relatively more diversified center catering to governmental
services, medical and dental clinics, general and professional
offices, public service facilities, financial institutions. high-
density residential developments, cultural and entertainment faci-
lities and a full range of retail shops including general
merchandise, clothing, hardware, variety stores, shoe stores,
restaurants and commercial recreation facilities.
Because it is an existing center, parking improvements, redevelop-
ment and rehabilitation efforts are intended to be a public/
private effort.
Nelghborhood Center
Neighborhood centers are highly specialized retail centers which
provide a sub -area of the community (one or two neighborhoods)
with day-to-day convenience retail shopping goods and services
within easy walking and biking distance of neighborhood
residences. These contain smaller shops that do not compete with
the downtown but instead serve a unique and distinctive neigh-
borhood function. When confronted with a request, and undecided
about whether such use is of neighborhood or larger magnitude, the
first test is how large a geographic area it serves; the second is
whether it or something similar is listed in the toning ordinance
as a permitted neighborhood commercial use. Typical uses include
a small food market (12,000 sq. ft. maximum) drug store, barber
shop, beauty shop, appliance shop, small laundry and/or a dry
cleaning shop. Typical adjacent uses include small medical, den-
tal andprofessionaloffices. churches and day care and nursery
facilities. With the exception of the grocery store, individual
shops do not exceed 6,000 square feet in area.
Convenience Centers
Convenience centers are very small and provide a very small area of
the community with convenience shopping needs. They are generally
free-standing centers but might also be expected to be located in
transitional areas adjacent to other centers. Typical uses
include a superette and gas station with self service.
1 00 Y Y
t e O Y
w C 22 Cp1
Y
Q w
r H W ••
C
r w B
r
4
r Y
A r > c
C
r Y OL
W V r V
060 ••
r r
✓ Y Y r
1p r r m
IV
C .2 Y S
A U W r
S O i C
7 Y w V
r c ✓ •
■ O le
w 41 41 0
r O 1 Y C
w O Y > q
V Y V
w
C
i
•
r
s Ye •rro m
>.
Ymm
e
M.
w
w
V
r .. r r Y Y✓ 7
Y 5 C w
V. •
4 W
L
.•i
1
C
C
• Y
•+w 'O C.V. O m C a+
a.
V
Vb.w
Y. t
Y w
Y w
O • C W Y D Y 0•
V V
Y•
4
O !
V V
q V W O ■ V
a >
w r
Y
r
Y
Q Y V U • Y• O 1+
Y IV*
V 7
4 r•
Qma
✓
r r
'C • W w • f Y Y� r
r f
✓ .'i
a
•y
C Y
✓
C S
C•
w
Sca
• Y O r q. r > w
O O✓■! O r✓ O t
Y Y r.
C O
�•
Cc
7 Y
6tl w C Q e e V
W w A
i O
Q
u
W r
. V
. .
a C
C 7 r V■ w! VV@ S .R.
r O. w
W O
•.
Y
G Y C Vgg ! V q Y 8 t C
e so
w
Y• O Y O. r 0 0 0 Y a
r 4 7
C O
w e s
O qr
! O
i1
w > ! V q U✓ v
Y• f
O
✓ p
o C i C
C e Y
'J V
Af OY •.0 Yw wsw
ww r
y
w:'�9
i^.44e
•Y.W
; .Oii W
A..
C✓
O.i6
60
V r r w w CY
V A• 01 O `+
> Y
4 r •
w
�_ {
'w O
C w—
'O
Z> L Y .+ ✓
• O O. •
V
S V
w✓� Y
•. ✓ Y
V r_S
r
.+ w
✓✓.0 .r. 7 r ..I C
• w 0 !'• A w i S SI C Y ir
w
�
A e •pi Y
Y
S w
q i; V
W
r O
u• W.
Q
,v aq
Y w •' Y Y u w> Y V
f. i
7
Y
Y C
A Y
iw V
r V
r
t r .+
w 0.
O: z
Coe
O
r C r. a•! w i r O
= w Y Y✓ w V 'O Y g8
Y
A v
A
✓
r 6 C
V■ ✓ Y
V Yy rO
Y %. D C• V w O. O
✓.
..•..
�" w V V
w
✓ C 7
C 0.7
Y• 'D
Q. a.>
! 0 .0-0 O ® V V
C
4 .r do r
r
. V O
✓ V Y
L, .0 C
w
r
y r C r r j. . 'p r y
Y
> '7
Q
0.
w 9 a
w
r
!j
•
O.
V c r
r V
q o0
•
G w • i•! W . V e q
V
r m r �.
Y
+. O•
•
0 r
C 4.
w Y••
w
C Y
V
• V• A •p L .+. C V +• V qp
W.
Y
D
V
mC
r
w r r w 0 rp..O •r
V
rww
l
V YiL
. G.
%
41
9 Ye i w O .. V
•�
V> •
w
i>
.a
• m Y
06 •
Y
C
C3
•q■
W..r�r
8
O
4Vr W 6i•rV�O
S C
M
Y
YS 4.O
m! w
O
O Y O
•
A4 >
> Y
u
O Y Y f V O
C O ++ • V r r 0. V C
V!
Y 7✓
-.0Y✓
Y r
Q O p
O ++ •
p O - s Y C V • .
r S •
f .+
C
> tl 60
Y
�+ r
O. 6.
V �+ U
!
.+
V p r w V■ .+ V
q✓> v • 6 r w r•
•
. r✓
m r !
V
w
�'1
•
w Y
V S O
'Q
O
4 Q Y
U
'a C a
C
O O
C
Y
Y
Yr CV r- C Y r Y> • V Y S
Y 4 r S V V
1
S
Y C V
. ""' Y
V
w
S
•.
<✓
N ri 0
W w w
U w
C
V 6 C 60 61 C w 41 a C
Y
S Y Y l Y r w. C g Y i
S♦ !•'+
O
w
V 1� 'O w j. ✓ 60 q U ! Y G7 3
F S t+ •r
0. /�
N
/'�.
V
nla. t
1990 LAND USE PLAN
EM UNT
MINNESOTA
7.................N.. ..N / •
GI
LEGEND
•� 1990 URBAN SERV. AREA RH HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
...P/1 PUBLIC & 'INSTITUTIONAL RR RURAL AG AGRICULTURAL
TIAL
POS PRESERVATION OPEN
SPACE ■man MISSISSIPPI RIVER CRITICAL
GI GENERAL INDUSTRIAL AREA
IP INDUSTRIAL PARK MAJOR STREETS
CC COMMUNITY (CBD) --
COMMERCIAL
HC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL UNDESIGNATED: MEDIUM
GC GENERAL COMMERCIAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
CNC CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL
SECTION 6.10 C-2 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
A. Purpose And Intent This District correlates only with Downtown Rosemount which is
intended to serve the entire cite. The downtown area is intended to be a diversified
commercial center which offers the full range of comparison goods, sales and services,
cultural and civic, entertainment, financial and offices and public uses. Because the
downtown is an area of relatively higher intensity development and consists of buildings
and uses which pre -date zoning regulations, the City is intended to play a role in the
provision of parking and related public improvements. Thus, normal yard, parking and
lot requirements do not apply within this District.
B. Uses Permitted By Right
1. Accessory ARartments.
2. Professional and Business Offices.
3. All Retail Goods and Service Establishments conducted within structures but excluding
automobile and equipment sales, services and repair establishments; truckstops; drive-
thru restaurants; gasoline and fuel sales; car washes; and commercial outdoor
recreational uses.
4. Custom Manufacturing not to exceed a gross floor area of 2,000 square feet with at
least 1/13 of said space to be used for retail sales and display purposes.
5. Outdoor Disglav of Merchandise for direct sale, rental or lease provided said
merchandise consists only of finished products and not disassembled merchandise parts
or junk; except that new products which are customarily sold unassembled and are
intended for consumer purchase and assembly are permitted to be displayed.
6. Video Arcades subject to the following restrictions:
a. Any arcade with fifteen (15) or more machines shall have an adult supervisor on
duty during all hours of operation.
b. No arcade shall be operated within 500 feet of a school, church or residence unless
it is an integral part of a shopping center and does not have an entrance except
from within the shopping center.
C. Uses Permitted By PUD Commercial developments involving multiple parcels, structuresor uses shall be required to use the PUD procedure. Refer to Section 12 for PUD'
requirements.
SECTION 6.11 C-3 HIGHWAY SERVICE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT'
A. Purpose And Intent This is a highly specialized district which is located in high vehicular
traffic zones with high visibility. It is primarily intended to satisfy the needs of passing
motorists.
B. Uses Permitted By RL -ht
1. Automobile Eouivment Sales and Repair Shotes including transmission, body, paint,!
muffler, engine, glass, battery and tire sales and services.
2. Easing Establishments including truck -stops and drive -ups.
3. Hotels and Motels and accessory uses.
4. Car «'ashes including drive-thru and conveyor types subject to the special restrictions
established for Self -Service Gasoline Stations in the C-1 District. Refer to Section 6.9'
B1.
20
Full-Ser-6ce Gasoline and Fuel Stations subject to the special restriictions established
for Self -Service Stations in the C-1 District. Refer to Section 6.9 Bl.
6. Outdoor Disl2lav of Merchandise subject to the special restrictions established for the
I) C-2 District. Refer to Section 6.10 B5.
7. Recreation. Commercial -Outdoor provided all improvements conform to setback
requirements for principal buildings in the district and no facilities are closer than fifty
(50) feet to an "R" District boundary.
C. uses Permitted By PUD Commercial developments involving multiple parcels, structures
or uses shall be required to use the PUD procedure. Refer to Seaion 12 for PUD
requirements.
SECTION 6.1-1 C.4 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
A. Purpose And Intent This district is intended to accommodate a broad range of retail
goods and services which serve the entire community. Though not exclusively, businesses
in this district are relatively freestanding and tend to occupy independent building sites.
They depend on good accessibility, high visibility and relatively large .volumes of traffic
and are therefore found along major streets.
B. Uses Permitted By Right
1. Accessory Anartments.
2. Agricultural ImWement Sales and Services.
3. Automobile Eauinment Sales Ind ReRa_ir Shons.
4. Automobile and RV Sales Service and Rental.
S. Business Schools.
6. Business Services and Repairs including office supplies and equipment.
7. Clubs and Lodges -Private.
8. Commercial Recreation -Indoor: bowling alleys, pool halls, racquetball and tennis
courts and roller rinks.
9. Communications Services including radio and TV broadcasting stations and studios
but excluding towers.
10. Construction Materials Sales includine lumber yards and building supply stores.
11. Dav Care Centers Nursery and Montessori Schools.
12. Eatine and Drinking Establishments including drive -ups and taverns.
13. Entertainment Facilities: night clubs, theaters, movie theaters.
14. Financial Institutions and Banks.
15. Food and Beverage Retail Sales.
16. Funeral Homes and Mortuaries.
17. Health Care Facilities: hospitals, nursing homes and extended care facilities.
18. Health Spas and Reducing, Salons.
19. Home Furnishings Stores.
20. Hotels and Motels.
21. Laundry Establishments.
22. Offices Business and Professional.
23. Printing and DunlicatinS€ hoes.
24. Repair Services including bicycles, furniture, appliances, shoes, etk.
21
25. Wholesale Businesses and Su,l!21y Centers.
26. Animal Sales and Services including pet hospitals, pet shops, kennels and veterinary
clinics provided they have no outdoor runs.
27. Gasoline Stations and Car Washes including drive-thru and conveyor types, subject
to the special restrictions established for the C-1 District. Refer to Section 6.9 Bl.
28. Commercial Recreation -Outdoor subject to the special restrictions for the C-3 District.
Refer to Section 6.11 B7.
29. Outdoor Dis2lav of Merchandise subject to the following restrictions:
a. The sale is conducted by the owner or lessee of the premises or with his or her
written permission,
b. The sale is no longer in duration than two (2) days,
c. The goods are those customarily sold within that structure in the C-4 District, and
d. The merchandise and vehicle do not occupy the required parking area of the
principal use.
30. Video Arcades subject to the following;
a. Any arcade with fifteen (15) or more machines shall have an adult supervisor on,
the premises during all hours of operation.
b. No arcade shall be operated within 500 feet of a school, church or residence.
C. Uses Permitted by PUD Commercial developments involving multiple parcels, structures;
or uses shall be required to use the PUD procedure. Refer to Section 12 for PUD
requirements.
SECTION 6.13 IP INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT
A. Purpose And Intent This district is intended to accommodate new, modern, high t
performance, light industrial uses which are planned as a unit and include an internal;
circulation system. This district is located within the MUSA and is intended to be served;
- —" by the public utility systems. Uses shall be conducted completely within structures:
excepted as provided for herein.
B. Uses Permitted By Right
1. Business and Professional Offices.
2. Manufacturing.. Custom.
3. Manufacturing Warehousing Wholesaling Distribution Processing Packaging
Assemble Compounding and Accessory Uses.
4. Machine and Repair Shops.
5. Television and Radio Studios.
6. Testin€ and Research Laboratories.
Outdoor Storage of materials, supplies and finished or semi -finished products provided!
such storage shall be completely screened from view from public streets and adjacent)
properties by a wall or fence.
S. Support Commercial Uses provided they are located within the same structure as the'
principal use, and are incidental to the principal use, and do not have an entrance
except from within the principal building.
C. Lases Permitted By PUD Industrial Developments involing multiple parcels, structures
or uses shall be required to use the PUD procedure.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City of Rosemount
FROM: McComb Group, Ltd.
RE: RETAIL AREA FUNCTIONAL PLAN
DATE: November 12, 1990
This memorandum recommends a functional plan for Rosemount's
downtown area that is consistent with previous analysis than deter-
mined:
1. The trade area for retail and service establishments
located in downtown Rosemount, and
2. The amount of additional retail space that !can be
supported by households within those areas over the next
ten years.
This phase of the analysis examines the relationships between
retail and service businesses in Rosemount and recommends a
functional plan for these activities that is consistent with Rose -
mount's current development patterns and the locational criteria
of the various types of businesses.
Functional Retail Plan
Rosemount is a freestanding community that is changing tola suburb
by virtue of expanding metropolitan development. This change
presents both opportunities and special problems that are unique
to Rosemount. As has been indicated by the previous analysis,
Rosemount's retail and commercial potential is limited; by the
existing MUSA line, heavy industrial development to the east, and
the University of Minnesota Research Center. As a result,
population growth will occur in the western part of the city and
will limit the demand for retail and commercial space.
By 1995, supportable additional retail space in Rosemount is
estimated at about 35,000 square feet, with an additional 34,000
square feet by the year 2000. This presents the City. with an
opportunity to strengthen retailing in downtown Rosemount and
provide locations that are consistent with the locationalcriteria
for these types of businesses and reinforce the traditional role
of downtown.
The traditional Rosemount downtown area is centered along;Highway
3 and focuses on the intersection with 145th Street. This is the
"100 percent" corner in downtown Rosemount. Current uses in this
area are generally reflective of central business district activity
and it serves as the central location for convenience retail,
service, financial and government activities in Rosemount.
Automobile -oriented and strip -type development has generally
located in peripheral locations along Highway 3 south of Lower
147th Street and County Road 42. Past activities of both the
private and public sectors have, for the most part, created this
logical separation of uses. Proper location of these commercial
activities can reinforce and enhance the retailing activities in
downtown Rosemount. On the other hand, an inconsistent development
pattern of these types of uses can weaken the destination character
of Rosemount and hinder its retail growth.
The recommended functional plan for downtown Rosemount is shown on
Map 1 and contains three primary retail and service land use
designations:
1. CBD Core includes uses such as convenience retail, shopping
goods retail, and sit-down restaurants, as well as business
services, professional services, personal services, financial
institutions and other traditional downtown activities.
Examples of types of stores are shown below:
Food
Drug
Liquor
Hardware
Variety Store
Clothing, Accessories
Furniture
Appliances
Music
Barber/Beauty Salon
Dry Cleaner
Flower Shop
Sporting Goods
Video
Gifts
Pet Store
Restaurants
Film Processing
Specialty Retail
Financial
Post Office
Office Uses
Other Services
Shoe Repair
Key Shop
Government
Churches
Education
2. Professional/Business -Services, including many of the
services indicated above but expanded to include service
businesses that have locational criteria that do not require
high visibility, and other types of businesses that provide
their services off -premise. These uses include:
2
Map 1
Retail Area Functional Plan
Naw some-
jC
VomaJ .Iso
BD CBD G
N
N
pCBD a
• s
CBD N.1. {l•Is- NSI •
N
� N m
v IM a
CL
Co. Rd. 42
DC
DC A
KEY
CBD CBD Care
PBS Profess,ionai/Business
Services
DC Destination Commercial
Auto Oriented
G Government
—,.I
Bank/Savings &
Financial
Real Estate
Accountants
Medical/Dental
Legal
Insurance
Loan Office Uses
Barber/Beauty Salon'
Veterinarian
Travel Agent
Other Services
Optometrists
Print Shop
3.. Auto -Oriented Destination Commercial includes
benefit from drive-by traffic and are businesses
to be unrelated to other shopping trips. -These
benefit from arterial access and visibility.
typical of this group include:
Fast Food
Auto Supplies
Auto Repair
Auto Dealers
Used Cars
Equipment Rental
Heating &Plumbing
uses that
that tend
businesses
Businesses
Ag Services
Service Station
Convenience Store
Day Care
Building Materials
Other Destination and
Auto Oriented Uses
The functional plan contained in Map 1 focuses the traditional
central business district activities around the 100 percent corner.
Professional and business services are concentrated south of 145th
Street along Burma Avenue and west of the railroad tracks. Auto -
oriented destination commercial flanks both sides of Highway 3
south of Lower 147th Street. These land use patterns are consis-
tent with locational critera for these types of uses.
Physical Plan
Many of the buildings' locations and uses in downtown Riosemount
support the functional retail plan, while some others do not. This
section contains suggestions for development and redevelopment to
accomodate the various uses in downtown Rosemount that are
consistent with the functional plan. The objective is to reinforce
downtown uses by emphasizing corner buildings, and to also provide
store and business locations that are attractive to retailers and
other businesses. These suggestions are shown on Map 2 and
described below:
o 100 Percent Corner
The intersection of State Highway 3 and West 145th Street
should be reinforced as the 100 percent corner of ',downtown
Rosemount. The existing buildings on three corners of this
intersection (northwest, southwest and southeast) reinforce
this concept.
4
Map 2
Suggested Development Concepts
uo
tea
u
Toch" / (�
DAKOTA COUNTY RD. NO. 42
A
N
The service station on the northeast corner is a convenience
use and serves a necessary purpose. However, in the future
there may be an opportunity to develop a building that is
more consistent with 100 percent corner concepts, framing the
intersection by providing parking to the side and rear
similar to South Robert Square.
The Geraghty building on the south aet corner gives character
to the downtown and reinforces the traditional character of
Rosemount. However, to adequately utilize this building, it
may be necessary to expand the ground floor portion to
provide more usable area, and to create more convenient
parking to support the building.
o Rosemount Mall Block
Rosemount Mall provides the most significant challenge to
downtown in terms of accommodating retail use. This block
is the logical location for many convenience shopping uses
that can be accommodated in downtown Rosemount. Tom's Super
Value and the hardware store reinforce this use.
However, the mix of structures on this block creates chaotic
land use and poor visibility for retail spaces. The
buildings occupied by Shenanigan's and Crown Auto block
visibility for the Rosemount Mall.
Rosemount Mall is a split-level building with ground floor
portions at the north and south ends and a split-level
portion in the middle. Retail space at the north end of the
building is blocked by Crown Auto and the split-level portion
of the building is not functional in today's marketienviron-
ment.
The service station at the south end of this block could
remain until such time as a more consistent use for that site
occurs.
Suggested changes that will improve the retail potential of
this area include the following:
1. The split-level portion of the Rosemount Mall could be
demolished and reconstructed with a ground floor retail
tenant area.
2. The area between Tom's Super Value and Rosemount Mall
should be filled with a retail building and a new
facade erected along the full length of the building
to give it a unified look with a design that is
characteristic of Rosemount architecture.
a
3. The buildings housing Shenanigan's, Crown Auto, and
possibly the dentist should bedemolishedand,,the
tenants relocated. Shenanigan's could be a restaurant
tenant in a redeveloped mall. This would also, provide
an opportunity for Shenanigan's to separate its on sale
and off sale operations. Crown Auto could be relocated
to the south along Highway 3. This would create a
contiguous retail mall anchored by a grocery store and
hardware store, and provide additional space for other
retail tenants.
This solution would create a shopping center building that
fits the criteria of retailers in terms of having good
visibility and parking in front of the stores and would
provide convenient parking for the Geraghty building. As an
alternative, the Rosemount Mall could be demolishedInd a new
building with these characteristics developed on the site.
o Block A
This area should be redeveloped to provide buildings close
to the street with parking between or behind the buildings
to reinforce the downtown character of Rosemount.
o Blocks B and C
The best use for these blocks is freestanding destination -
type businesses as described above. However, the' shallow
depth of these parcels dictates that parking will be provided
to some degree in front but in most cases to the :sides of
these buildings.
o Block D
This corner parcel enjoys high visibility from both Highway
3 and County Road 42. However, development potentiat of this
parcel is limited by access constraints. There is a'need for
an additional entrance/exit on County Road 42 to provide
adequate ingress and egress to this parcel. Uses on this
site should be those consistent with the high visibility and
automobile orientation of the property.
These concepts for physical development of the downtown area
provide Rosemount with a conceptual framework for use in evaluating
the location, type of buildings, and uses to be developed in the
future within the downtown area. These concepts support the
functional plan and are consistent with contemporary retail
locational criteria.
7
These concepts, if implemented, will require some businesses to
move and provide the opportunity for others to expand and capital
ize on the growing retail demand that will exist in the future.
Many of the businesses in Rosemount could benefit from new and/or
better locations and facilities. This plan provides the. -.oppor-
tunity to begin discussions with building owners and businesses to
create a downtown area that works .better for both. public and
private interests.
8
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
Public Notice
Master Transmission 14805 South Robert Trail
Rezoning Petition
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, the City Council of the City of
Rosemount will hold a public hearing on Tuesday,
January 21, 1992 in the Council Chambers of the City
Hall, 2875 145th Street West, beginning at 8:00 p.m, or
as soon thereafter as possible.
The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request to
rezone property located at 14805 South Robert Trail and
legally described as Lot 1, Block 3, Evenson First
Addition, from C-2 Community Commercial to C-4 General
Commercial, to permit construction of a structure that
would expand a current legal non -conforming property
use. A rezoning from C-2 to C-4 would cause the
current auto service related use of property to be in
conformance with the ordinance and an expansion of that
business could be permitted, subject to the other
requirements of the Ordinance.
Persons wishing to speak on this issue are invited to
attend this meeting on Tuesday, January 21, 1992 at
8:00 .P.m.
Dated this 7th day of January, 1992.
Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk!
City of Rosemount
Dakota County, Minnesota
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILED & POSTED HEARING NOTICE
MASTER TRANSMISSION - 14805 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL
REZONING PETITION
STATE OF MINNESOTA j
COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) ss
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
Susan M. Walsh, being first duly sworn, deposes and ';says:
I am a United States citizen and the duly qualified'Clerk of
the City of Rosemount, Minnesota.
On January 9, 1992 acting on behalf of the said City, I
posted at the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, and
deposited in the United States Post Office, Rosemount,
Minnesota, a copy of the attached notice of a publics hearing
for consideration of a petition to rezone the property
located at 14805 South Robert Trail from C-2 Community
Commercial to C-4 General Commercial, enclosed in sealed
envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to
the persons listed on the attached listings at the addresses
listed with their names.
Susan M. Walsh
City Clerk
City of Rosemount
Dakota County, Minnesota
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of
1992.
Notary Public
MASTER TRANSMISSION - REZONING
PETITION
MAILING LIST
EVENSON
FIRST ADDITION
1.
John F. & Margie M. Ryan
34-24850-010-01
3465 143rd Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068-4090
2.
David Lawson
3424850-020-01
14785 South Robert Trail
Rosemount, Mn 55068-3127
3.
David McKinley
34-24850-030-01
14805 South Robert Trail
Rosemount, Mn 55068-3108
MARIAN TERRACES
4.
Leo Lund
34-47450-660-00
Gary Thorson
8900 Penn Avenue South #101
Bloomington, MN 55431-2099
MARIAN TERRACE REPLAT
S.
Wayne H. & Helen Lucking
34-47400-050-00
14755 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, Mn 55068-4429
6.
Francis J. & Madonna Goggin
34-47400-060-00
14765 Cambrian Avenue
P.O. Box 243
Rosemount, Mn 55068-0243
7.
Ervin & Donna Hanks
34-47400-070-00
14775 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, Mn 55068-4429
8.
Thomas & Maralyn Buckley
34-47400-080-00
14785 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, Mn 55068-4429
9.
Wayne H. & Bernice E. Claussen
34-47400-090-00
14795 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, Mn 55068-4429
10.
Donald & Doreen Thull
34-47400-100-00
14805 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, Mn 55068-4445
11.
John & Lorraine Degiovanni
34.47400-110-00
14815 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068-4445
12.
Leroy & Ruby Getting
34-47400-120-00
14825 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068-4445
13.
Joseph J. & Dorothy A. Akin
34-47400-130-00
14835 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068-4445
14.
Jerome Fluegel
34-47400-140-00
14830 Cambrian Avenue
34-47400-150-00
Rosemount, MN 55068-4446
15.
Virgil D. & Gladys Hestness
34-47400-160-00
14820 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068-4446
16.
Ronald J. & Margery Pankratz
34-47400-170-00
14810 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068-4446
17.
Ronald J. & Deborah A. Russell
34-47400-180-00
14800 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068-4446
18.
Bernard F. & Alice C. Murphy
34-47400-190-00
14790 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068-4404
19.
Mary A. Fleming
34-47400-200-00
14780 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, MN 550684404
20.
Richard W. & Anna T. Klatt
34-47400-210-00
14770 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068-4404
21.
Kevin I. & Julie A. Kuzma
34-47400-220-00
14760 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068-4404
22.
William M. Matuska
34-47400-230-00
14750 Cambrian Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068-4404
MARIAN TERRACE REPLAT 2ND ADDITION
23.
Donald L & Josephine Lewis
34-47401-030-02
14770 Camera Lane
Rosemount, MN 55068-4406
24.
Wayne E. & Roxanne Swanson
34-47401-040-02
14780 Camero Lane
Rosemount, MN 55068-4406
25.
Donna D. Smith
34-47401-050-02
14790 Camero Lane
Rosemount, MN 55068-4406
26.
Julia M. Kelly
34-474014060-02
14800 Camero Lane
Rosemount, MN 55068.4440
27.
Ouincy D. & Sarah M. Moore
34-47401-070-02
14810 Camero Lane
Rosemount, MN 55068-4440
28.
James M. & Quanah Bonrud
34-47401-080-02
14820 Camero Lane
Rosemount, MN 55068-4440
29.
David W. & Susan L Lloyd
34-47401-090-02
14830 Camero Lane
Rosemount, MN 55068-4440
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 27
30. Marquette National Bank
Box 520 D Nelson
Minneapolis, MN 55480
31. Walter W. & Olga A. Strese
14810 South Robert Trail
Rosemount, MN 55068-3109
32. Milwaukee Land Co.
547 Jackson Blvd W - Suite 1510
c/o CMC Real Est Corp. - Box 6205
Chicago, IL 6068046205
AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 27
33. Chicago Rock Island & Pacific RR
74520 La Salle Station
Chicago, ILL 60606
34-03700-020-62
34-03700-030-62
34-03700-010-65
34-03800-010-15
JOHN F & MARGIE M RYAN DAVID LAWSON
3465 143RD ST W 14785 S ROBERT TR
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4090 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-3127
LEO LUND WAYNE H & HELEN LUCKING
GARY THORSON 14755 CAMBRIAN AV
8900 PENN AV S #101 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4429
BLOOMINGTON MN 55431-2099
ERVIN & DONNA HANKS THOMAS & MARALYN BUCKLEY
14775 CAMBRIAN AV 14785 CAMBRIAN AV
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4429 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4429
DONALD & DOREEN THULL JOHN & LORRAINE DEGIOVANNI
14805 CAMBRIAN AV 14815 CAMBRIAN AV
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4445 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4445
JOSEPH J & DOROTHY A AKIN JEROME FLUEGEL
14835 CAMBRIAN AV 14830 CAMBRIAN AV
ROSEMOUNT MN 55066-4445 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4446
RONALD J & MARGERY PANKRATZ RONALD J & DEBORAH A RUSSELL
14810 CAMBRIAN AV 14800 CAMBRIAN AV
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4446 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4446
MARY A FLEMING RICHARD W & ANNA T KLATT
1780 CAMBRIAN AV 14770 CAMBRIAN AV
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4404 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4404
WILLIAM M MATUSKA DONALD L & JOSEPHINE LEWIS
14750 CAMBRIAN AV 14770 CAMERO LN
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068.4404 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4406
DONNA D SMITH JULIA M KELLY
14790 CAMERO LN 14800 CAMERO LN
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4406 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4440
JAMES M & QUANAH BONRUD DAVID W & SUSAN L LLOYD
14820 CAMERO LN 14830 CAMERO LN
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4440 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4440
OLGA A STRESE CMC REAL EST CORP
14810 S ROBERT TR 547 JACKSON BLVD W STE 1510
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-3109 CHICAGO IL 60680-6205
DAVID MCKINLEY
14805 S ROBERT TR
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-3108
FRANCIS J & MADONNA GOGGIN
14765 CAMBRIAN AV
P 0 BOX 243
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-0243
WAYNE & BERNICE CLAUSSEN
14795 CAMBRIAN AV
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4429
LEROY & RUBY GETTING
14825 CAMBRIAN AV
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4445
VIRGIL & GLADYS HESTNESS
14820 CAMBRIAN AV
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4446
BERNARD R & ALICE C MURPHY
14790 CAMBRIAN AV
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4404
KEVIN I & JULIE A KUZNIA
14760 CAMBRIAN AV
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4404
WAYNE E & ROXANNE SWANSON
14780 CAMERO LN
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4406
QUINCY D & SARAH M MOORE
14810 CAMERO LN
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4440
MARQUETTE NATIONAL BANK
BOX 520 Di NELSON
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55480
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068
CHICAGO ROCK IS & PACIFIC RR
74520 LA SIALLE STATION
CHICAGO IL 60606
4=00
'MIF
t
N
Y
1,'
/ 1r
All
VACATED 14 /
4Q 4%6
(� 47 46fo
/ !
56 =� S 58 58
u TREE?
,,A .I
RRk EPARK
4 f r
I �