HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.a. Comprehensive Guide Plan ProcessCITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 21, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Comprehensive Guide Plan
AGENDA SECTION:
Proposed Schedule & Staffing Recommendation
OLD BUSINESS
PREPARED BY:
Lisa Freese, Director Planning
AGENDA lffEM
of
ATTACM1ENTS: Memo; Proposed Schedule; List of
APP 9YEBY:
Tasks; Guide 'Plan Contents; Staff Summary.
/ U
At the April 14th Planning Commission meeting, the Comprehensive Guide Plan
update was discussed. The Planning Commission discussed at length the
proposed schedule for completion and the required staffing. The attached
memo summarizes the issues presented to the Planning Commission and the
rationale for their recommendations on the schedule timeline and staffing.
The proposed schedule would include the scheduling of two special City
Council meetings, one each in May and June. The schedule also includes an
informal staff review of the City's Guide Plan by the Metropolitan Council.
If this schedule is adhered to by the City Council, the public hearing for
the final draft would be held before or at the first meeting in August.
The approved plan would be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for their
review and approval in August.
The proposed staffing includes retaining Mr. Fred Hoisington to complete
the items agreed upon in the original staffing plan and hiring a summer
intern to assist with research and document compilation. The remaining
tasks would be handled by the Planning staff with technical support from
other City Departments as required.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1) A motion to support the proposed schedule.
2) A motion to authorize staff to develop a contract with the
planning consultant and commence hiring a planning intern.
COUNCIL ACTION:
�iiy of (Rosemount
PHONE (612) 423.4411 2875 • 145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota
FAX (612) 4235203 Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 510, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068-0510
T0: Mayos McMenomy
Councilmembers: Klassen
Staats
Willcox
Wippermann
FR: Lisa J. Freese, Director of Planning X -:f"
MAYOR
Edward B. McMenomy
COUNCILMEMBERS
Sheila Wasson
James (Red) Steals
Harry Willcox
Dennis Wippennann
ADMINISTRATOR
Stephan Jilk
RE: Comprehensive Guide Plan
Proposed Schedule and Staffing Recommendation
At the last City Council meeting, Mayor McMenomy indicated that he
would like to complete the update of the Comprehensive Guide Plan as
soon as possible. With your support and direction at Tuesday
night's meeting, I would like to set the process back in motion.
Last year the City put considerable effort into the completion of
the Guide Plan update. Unfortunately, due to the complexity of the
planning issues being discussed and the staffing changes in the
City, the Plan did not get completed as scheduled in 1991. It was
necessary to secure additional funding to complete the plan. In
January, a Planning Assistance Loan was approved by the Metropolitan
Council to help fund the completion of the Guide Plan. Due to the
timing of my maternity leave in early February, it has not been
possible to proceed with the Plan update process until now.
Completing the Plan update is the Planning Department's highest
priority and with your support all available staff resources will be
allocated to this project during the next four months.
REMAINING TASKS AND SCHEDULE:
Attached to this memo is a listing of the tasks involved in the
guide plan process and the status of those tasks at this time. At
the present time staff is working to compile a complete draft of the
actual guide plan document (see attached outline). There are still
some outstanding issues that staff needs further policy direction.
During the month of May it is anticipated that the Planning
Commission will be reviewing a set of alternatives for each one
these issues and then making recommendations to be discussed at a
special Council meeting to be scheduled in late May. Staff is
recommending that this meeting be a joint meeting including the City
Council, Port Authority, Planning Commission, Utility Commission and
Parks and Recreation Committee.
Also, City staff are presently meeting with Metropolitan Council
staff to identify the potential regional issues resulting from the
policies that are emerging in the draft guide plan. It is hoped
that the Metropolitan Council staff will be able to complete an
6verythings �ovning (UP gosemouvdY
t1 re wWd Dane.
7
4/10/92
Proposed Schedule for Completion of
the Comprehensive Guide Plan Update
4/14
Planning Commission: Discussion of 1) Process Schedule and 2) Staffing
recommendations.
Week of
Staff meets with Planning Consultant regarding proposed work program, budget and]]
4/20
schedule.
4/21
Port Authority: Presentation regarding economic development element of the plan.
Discuss and provide policy direction to staff.
4/21
City Council: Presentation regarding process schedule and proposed staffing.
Week of
Planning staff meets with Metropolitan Council staff regarding potential metro
4/27
systems issues.
4/28 & 5/12
Planning Commission: Discussion of 1) Organization of Plan Document; and 2)
Remaining Issues.
5/5
City Council: Finalize consultant staff arrangement and set Special Joint Meetings
with Planning Commission and Port Authority (1 -May, 1 -June)
Week of
Draft document distributed to City Council, Planning Commission, Port Authority,
5/11
Utilities Commission, Parks & Recreation Committee and Met Council staff for
review.
Between
Special City Council Meeting with Planning Commission and Port Authority held
5/18 & 5/29
to discuss plan and make recommendations to staff on remaining issues.
6/15-6/30
Special City Council Meeting with Plannin LCommission and Port Authority to
review overall document.
6/23 or 7/14
Planning Commission review of final document and forward to City Council to set
Public Hearing.
7/7 or 7/21
City Council accepts final document and sets Public Hearing.
7/21 or 8/4
City Council holds Public Hearing. Makes final recommendations and requests
appropriate staff revisions.
8/4 or 8/18
City Council accepts final document and forwards it to the Metropolitan Council for
review.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STATUS REPORT 0
Work Task ResponslbWty status
1. Base Mapping
1 Data Mapping
3. Inventory
4. Analysis
a. Summarize Census Data
b. Graphics
c. Analysis/Narratives
5. Assumptions/Forecasting
6. Community Goals
a. Assembly
b. Goals Statements
7. Policy/Concept Plan
8. Comprehensive Plan
a. Introduction
b. Inventory/Analysis
c. Land Use Plan
1) Text
2) Graphics
d. Transportation Plan
1) Text
2) Graphics
e. Public Facilities Plan
1) Utilities
a) Plans
b) Narrative
2) Parks
3) Other Facilities
f. Environmental Protection
g. Implementation Plan
9. Mappine Background Graphics
10. Preliminary Plan Graphics
11. Final Plan Graphics
12. Working Drafts
a. Land Use
b. Transportation
c. Public Facilities
d. Environmental Protection
e. Economic Development
13. Final Plan Draft
14. Meetings (PC/CC)
15. Meetings (Staff)
City
Complete
City
Complete
City
Complete
City Complete
City Partially Complete
Consultant Incomplete
Shared Partially Complete
City Complete
Consultant Complete
Consultant Complete
Consultant Incomplete
Shared Partially Complete
Consultant Partially Complete
City Incomplete
Consultant Complete
City Incomplete
City
Incomplete
Consultant
Incomplete
Brauer & Assoc.
Draft Complete
City
Incomplete
City
Incomplete
City
Incomplete
City
Incomplete
Consultant
Complete"
City
Incomplete
Consultant
Partially Complete
Consultant
Complete
Shared
Partially Complete
City
Partially Complete
City
Partially Complete
City
Partially Complete
Consultant
I of 12 Remain
Consultant
0 of 8 Remain
Following Contract Outline
Except for differentiation between 2000 and 2010 11/04/91
City of Rosemount
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN UPDATE
Remaining Tasks
1) Completion of Draft & Review
- See attached task; list (C) S 7,800
- Meetings: Two with City Council
One with Metro Council
Three with City staff (S) 5.000
$ 12,840
11/04/91
2) SuRRIemental Studies:
- Pine Bend Utility Feasibility Study
(C) $ 50,000
- TH 52 Corridor Study
(C)
3,000
- Airport Impact Study
(C)
7,500
- Downtown Plan
(C)
12,000
- Staff Coordination & Review of
Supplemental Studies
(S)
5.000
$ 77,500
3) Preparation of Final Guide Plan Document
- Desk -top Publishing
(S)
S 1,000
- Graphics/Maps
(S)
2,500
- Implementation Plan
(S)
1,000
(C)
1,500
- Printing of Document (Final)
(P)
3.000
$ 9,000
4) Final Adoption of Plan
(S)
$ 800
' 5) Implementation
- Subdivision Ordinance
(S)
S3,500
(A)
500
- Zoning Ordinance
(S)
1,500
(A)
500
- Other Implementation Tasks
(S)
3,000
$ 9,000
PREVIOUS EXTENDITURES:
Consultant (Plan)
S 15,930
Consultant (Sewers)
S2,500
Intern (Cindy Carlsson)
S 6,400
Staff
(undetermined)
KEY
S = staff C = Consultant
A = Attorney P = Punter
11/04/91 .
Comprehensive Guide Plan
Completion of Draft & Review
Consultant's Estimate of $ 7,800 includes:
1)
Two more City Council Meetings ............................
4 hours/each
2)
Three Staff/Consultant Meetings ............................
3 hours/each
3)
One Metropolitan Council Staff Meeting .... .......... .....
3 hours/each.
4)
Analysis Section - provide narrative ........ ... . ... ..
12 hours
5)
Assumtions/Forecasting Section - complete .....................
6 hours
6)
Comprehensive Guide Plan - Introduction .. ................ .
2 hours
7)
Comprehensive Guide Plan - Inventory .......................
12 hours
8)
Comprehensive Guide Plan - Land Use Plan ...................
6 hours
9)
Comprehensive Guide Plan - Public Facilities Plan ...............
6 hours
10)
Required Support Services - Secretarial/Graphics ........ ... ..
Variable
D
Rosemount Minnesota
Year 2000-2010
Comprehensive Guide Plan
I. INTRODUCTION
1. Purpose
2. Process
D -a � I 1 / g2
II. REGIONAL/HISTORICAL SETTING
1. Historic Context
[MAP)
2. Regional Growth and the Metropolitan Council
3. Rosemount's Regional Position
III. DEMOGRAPHICS/CITY PROFILE
A. Population Characteristics
1. Age
2. Household Size
3. Education
B. Employment Opportunities and Economic Activity
IV. PROPERTY VALUATION AND TAB CAPACITY
V. ASSUMPTIONS.AND PROJECTIONS/LAND DEMAND
VI. COMMUNITY GOALS AND ISSUES
VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
A. Land Use Element
1. General Existing Land Use
vtXISTING LAND USE MAP
EXISTING ZONING MAP
`/a. Historic Land Use Patterns and Calculations
b. MUSA
MUSA MAP FOR YEAR 2000 and 2010
2. Agricultural Areas
a. Objectives and Policies for Plan
3. Residential Land Use
a. Residential Construction and Housing
1.) Physical Development Patterns
2.) Rural Residential Development
3.) Urban Single Family Development
4.) Multiple Family Housing
5.) Housing Affordability
6.) Housing Assistance
b. Housing and Neighborhood Plan
1.) Objectives and Policies for Plan
rk
11"
mi
Wr_J
4. Public and Institutional Land Uses
)PUBLIC LAND USE MAP
a. Parks and Open Space
b. University of Minnesota
C. Objectives and Polices for Plan
5. Conservancy Areas
a. objectives and Policies
6. Commercial Land Use
a. Existing
b. Objectives and Policies for Plan
8. Industrial Land Use
a. Existing Land Use
1.) Light industry and industrial parks
2.) Industry in Pine Bend
b. Industrial MUSA district
b. objectives and Policies for Plan
9. Waste Management Plan
B. Transportation Element
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION MAP
1. Existing Transportation
a. Streets and Highways
b. Public Transit
C. Aviation, Railroads, & Barge Facilities
2. Transportation Plan
a. Streets and Highways
b. Public Transit
C. Aviation
C. Community Facilities and Services
1. Public Utilities
a. Existing Conditions for sewer, water, & storm
sewer (public and Private systems)
ING CRUTfrwav CV-WV.'P STORM SEWER, and WATER
.M.A.LQ.L I
SERVICE MAPS
b. Projections and flows
C. Public Utilities Plan
2. -Public Services
a. Police
b. Fire
C. Street Maintenance
3. City Government
4. Schools
D. Environmental Protection
1. Rosemount's Natural Environment
a. soils
/SOILS MAP
b. Water Resources
1.) Surface Waters
2.) Ground Water
C. Vegetation
2. Environmental Protection Plan
E. Economic Development
1. Current Conditions
2. Economic Development Plan
VII. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
A. Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances
1. Design and performance standards
2. Wetland protection
B. Capital Improvements Program
C. Central Business District Plan
Redevelopment?
D. Housing (should these be under A?)
1. Density Transfers for environmentally sensitive
development?
2. Techniques to encourage creative multifamily
development
3. Housing maintenance code and rehabilitation program
E. Public Utilities
Sewer Inspection Program
F. Transportation