HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.a. Proposed State Aid CutsCITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MARCH 17, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: PROPOSED STATE AID CUTS
AGENDA SECTION:
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
PREPARED BY: STEPHAN JILK, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
AGENDA I 'EM # 1 "t A
ATTACMUMTS: LETTER FROM AMM,
APP VE BY
NEWS ARTICLE
The Governor has proposed a budget for the next biennium which includes
massive cuts in State Aid to cities. The governor has stated that these
cuts would only amount to it of municipal budgets. In fact, when the
proposed cuts are actually applied it amounts to 8% of cities' budgets.
(Please see attached letter from the AMM.)
This is only proposed and the word is that it will not likely pass in its
proposed form. But, it is likely that some cuts will be made in our State
Aid both in 1992 and 1993.
I hesitate to even discuss this because it is so early in the process that
many changes will likely be made before anything is adopted.
We will maintain involvement in the process and keep you informed as we
move along.
I and department heads are beginning discussion on how to respond to
potential cuts.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
None.
I COUNCIL ACTION:
J• d ' n � dig, ..0
.. ,. ... .; Y• ` _f + �'.>F p+Mnp R+',in./r�Qfi W^��;M. f "I''• n.,�
JOE ODEN/PIONEER PRESS
their heels on Monday in the crusty snow covering a hilly pasture at Wagon Wheel Stables near Lakeville.
rta Monday forcing school closings and causing traffic accidents. Story, 2B. Weather page, 12D.
Chad Zeien, 19,
above, told
Investigators he
drank 14 beers
and smoked
marijuana before
he and Timm
Mathiowetz
began playing
Russian roulette
Friday night.
"They took turns
Bad nevus gets w
11M RAGSDALE STAFF WRITER
At St. Paul City Hall and in other city offices
around the state, officials who cringed when the
governor said he would cut state aid to cities
last week are making an unpleasant discovery:
It's worse than they thought.
Nothing has been cut yet, but Gov. Arne Carl-
son,' as part of his budget -balancing message on
Thursday, proposed reducing the amount of aid
sent from the state to the cities to help pay for
to
f"0. c - '
R
Cr
DAVID ESPO ASSOCIATED PRESS '
For the first time, a poll shows that
President Bush is no better than even
money against the two leading Demo-
W�s
cratic presidential contenders, ArkansasGov. Bill Clinton and former Massachu-
setts Sen. Paul Tsongas, who were barn-
41
storming through Florida on Monday in a
final, hurried hunt for Super Tuesday
votes.
TODAY: 11
Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin folded his un-
states will
compromisingly liberal campaign a day
have
before the 11 -state 'Democratic show-
primaries
down with a parting shot at Bush and a
and caucuses
pledge to "bear any burden" to help un-
with 421
seat him in the fall.
Republican
The nationwide ABC -Washington Post
and 783
poll of 1,030 Americans between March 4
Democratic
and March 8 showed Bush in a dead heat,
delegates at
44-44, when hypothetically paired against
stake.
Tsongas. Against Clinton, Bush was pre-
INSIDE:
ferred by a scant 45 percent to 43 per-
Is Tom
cent edge - again, too close to call,
Harkin's
given the poll's statistical margin of er-
departure
ror of plus or minus 3.5 percentage
opens
Minnesota to
points.
When the poll was limited to just regis-
other
tered voters, Bush ran a few points be-
candidates.
8A
SUPER CONTINUED ON SA ►
orse:. St. Paul to
police and fire protection, library and health
services ,and Other -city functions.
Last Friday, relying on preliminary estimates,
St. Paul officials tallied up their share of the loss
at $3 million. They said Monday that "figure was
way off, and that the actual total the city would
lose under Carlson's proposed budgetary fix is
between $9 million and $10 million.
Stacy Becker, the city's budget director, said
all. city services would be vulnerable to signifi-
cant reductions, if St. Paul were to lose that
Surgeon general says
FROM WIRE SERVICE
lose $10 million
much in -the middle of the year, without anyway
of making it up in increased taxes. By way of
comparison, she noted that ;10 million repre-
sents about two-thirds of the salaries for police
patrol, and is far more than the entire budgets of
such large departments as libraries and health.
"We're to the point where it means big cuts in
services," she said. To spare police and fire from
such cuts, she noted, "you would have to wipe .
out entire departments."
CUTS CONTINUED ON SA ►
'Old.Joe' has got to go
Novello said the ads target young children and
infinone-n fhn nhnirne fhY.o M�11 + . Iq^n • ^w$..
tings.
Zeien's parents were not at home when
the shooting took place. His mother, Lin-
da, was at the hospital for the birth of
Zeien's son, William Kyle. Zeien's 17 -
year -old girTf0-Pd gave birth 0 the boy
im:UTS
V CONTINUED FROM IA
several of them left the building when
Zeien placed a live shell Into the revolv-
er, according to Backstrom.
"They didn't want anything else to do
with the games that were being played,"
Backstrom said.
time We gaine was playeu wuu u „Vt;
round and that he did not see any signal
from Mathiowetz, Backstrom said. That
witness said Zeien reacted in horror
when the gun discharged and Mathiowetz
fell to the floor shortly before 9 p.m.
anv� a w t.latp/ twv t✓■.�■ � n ■ ,■a.■w ..■ w +sq
Mayor Jim Scheibel said he would begin meeting with Becker r
and other department heads today to come up with contingency trtltiiort shofafl:r
I
glans. Scheibel, who was in Washington, D.C., on Monday for
meetings of the National League of Cities, also said he will be fggyilt' std GioK C,arison's
meeting with state legislators to argue that this proposed cut Cly 4 f
ki<i'Ct, state proposed cuts .. %'Fut
falls unfairly on the neediest cities and should be rejected. 43g $346,439 100096
In his budget balancing message last Thursday night, Carlson, Apie Va11er,f" q$46,.
faced with an $569 million shortfall during the current bienni- Blaine 1,084,851 486,634 44.9 '
um, proposed a $66 million reduction in aid to local govern- iloomiltigtbii' ; € f 0. 0 0 0
menta this year. While the governor has not released the specif-, gCenter 1,647,162 595,570 36 2
Wm
ics of his package, city lobbyists have computed the amount }
each city would lose. t3rooktyn Pairk 1,4t21t389 916,537 '63 5
For St. Paul, the figure cited by the Association of Metropole- Burnsville 317,566 317,566 100.0
tan Municipalities, which lobbies for metro -area cities, is $9.8 066h Rapitl. IRA:91,272 745,155 34 .0,
million. For Minneapolis, the cut would be $14.6 million. Duluth puluth . ,16,332,490 2,296,244 141
would take a $2.3 million cut, the association said.genq y* 0 0 0 0
But the proposed cut would not fall equally on all communi-
ties, because not all are equally dependent on the category of In
wa Eden Prairie 0 0 0 0
state assistance proposed to be cut. 3, Edtne�`�'fi.< 0 0 0.0
Roger Peterson, director of legislative affairs for the Associa- Fddiey 1,478,960 509,387 34.4
tion of Metropolitan Municipalities, said those cities with higher i'Mert>tg{psn
4a521,107 891,558 "19 7
property values tend to be less dependent on local government <: Maple Grove '` x:5.22,916 122,916 100.0
aid from the state. Some wealthier communities, such as Edina, M14pletod x y , 655,683 621,523 94.8
Eagan and Arden Hills, receive none of the state aid proposed
to be cut, according to the association's study. } Minneapolis 59,926,160 14,611,936 24.4
Other categories of state assistance that., these communities; ; Mlnnetgnitaf 0 0
do depend on, such as state -paid property tax ,relief for home- # Moorhead � 3,966,384 533,600 13 5
owners and farmers, were spared b Carlson in his budget -bat- Y '
ancing plan. Nor were schools, county governments or town- ' P �t£ "0 0 0
lRtchfleld I 3,015,710 775,256 25 7
ships hit by reductions,'eity officials note. R 30 4
"It's a disproportionately large hammer that we're being `
Roseville
h. " .76,647 , .1,632,599 "
Rochester 5 3
clubbed with," said Rip Rapson, deputy to Minneapolis Mayor 0 0 0 0
Don Fraser.}St: Claud �f;447,35t31`1297:946':1...,ft'..
Officials in the governor's office have said these cuts make u"
g P St, bouts Park 1,805,307 1,035,9� 57
a small amount of the cities' total budgets, and should be;r$t: Pau[g` a°'3$ 890'871 • 9,788$'i! 25.
manageable
Alanhout WelleiDFL-Willmarf the Hous or se Majority Lead-af urce Ceague°ntNinl►eanta'"cities j ,,x s}�" t
er, said Monday that the Legislature will probably look fora
way to soften the $66 million cut to cities. In the meantime PIONEER PRESS GRAPHIC
cities are facing a lot of financial uncertainty. the state reduces 'aid� ".1:''
Stillwater City Manager Nile Kriesel said he understands the That means he may talk to the City Council about not filling
city would lose about. $350,000 out -of a,.budget,,of,,pbout ,.$5,r1„two.vacancies in�he� p!(►li.. departments tie, ell, said. And he
million. He said at a time the city should 1>'e” adding servicesAd r . addedi he couldn f�iihe $ the warm i e .g4ven oto Carl
keep up with population growth, it is forced to cwt back when ,J son's speech last week.
live at home if he were able to make
bail.
"I would rather see him go Into treat-
ment," Ron Zeien told the judge. "I'm
just not sure myself if he should come
HEALTH
♦ CM MUED FROM 1A
practice in which doctors refer patients
to costly treatments using machines that
the doctors own and benefit from finan-
cially.
i
The plan also would begin the process
i
of eliminating what some feel are dis-
criminatory practices in the insurance
f
industry that result in unaffordable rates
1
for many people. The first step would
1.
prohibit insurers from setting rates based
on gender in certain markets.
it
House Tax Committee Chairman Paul
v
Ogren, DFL-Aitkin, praised, the agree-
ti
ment as a worthy compromise between
DFLers and IRs who, for five years, have
c
disagreed vehemently on how to ap-
e
proach the problem.
u
"What this will guarantee is that the
h
state of Minnesota will have more effec-
tive cost control in our health care sys-
a,
tem than any other governmental entity
ti.
anywhere in America," Ogren said. "This
w
guarantees that there is more affordable
m
access to health care than in any other
of
state in America. This guarantees that
the level of discrimination in health in-
in
surance practices, while not entirely
Bt
eliminated, is eliminated to an extraordi-
nary degree.".:.;,
to
The agreement still must be approved
is
by the Legislature, but members of both
If
parties seem eager to deliver an election-
11
year plan to voters, who they believe are
let
yearning for a solution to rising health
care costs. = r a �r . • «
$- . ,.
"This is the politics of an election.
er.,
tht
year," said Luanne Nyberg, a lobbyist for
an.
the Children's Defense Fund, advocacy
ize
gr
rIn fact, the .only visible opposition to
thL
orc
'
the measure is from the hospitals and
doctors who provide health care. That's
sill
because they, will be*forced to Ta a new
Iev
Eairto raise the �2�0 �fslrii+�n"'Esl!rit+�+e�'��'
ed to operate the nrnnra.n
Legislative
as ociation of
metroolitan
• ..Contact
municipalities
Alert
March 9, 1992
TO: Mayors, Legislative Contacts and Managers/Administrators
FROM: Roger Peterson, Director of Legislative Affairs
Vern Peterson, Executive Director
RE: GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL AND STATUS OF MAJOR METROPOLITAN
AREA PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE BILIS
I GOVERNORS BUDGET HAMMERS CITIES!
COTS TO CITIES OUTRAGEOUS!
The Governor's overall budget proposal uses accounting gimmicks for
savings of $178 million for schools, reduces `rainy day fund' by
$140 million, cuts state agencies and higher education by $164
million, and cities LGA by $71.6 million.
City aid cut of $71.6 million is 23% of LGA, equalization aid, and
city disparity reduction aid. For cities receiving these aids, this
equals an 8% -plus cut of Revenue base (i.e. aids plus levy).
Schools, Counties, Towns, Special Districts, get ZERO cuts. They
are held harmless! Not all cities are cut. Those receiving only
HACA have no cut. Is this divide and conquer?
Enclosed is a preliminary run showing the impact on AMM cities. The
AMM position at this point is that cuts to cities are unnecessary.
Additional use of the rainy day fund may cause small short term
state borrowing but that would have no impact on the state's bond
rating and would certainly be preferable to the major impact the
nuts would have on the general public health and safety if cities
are forced to make large cuts.
Cities should contact their legislators and relate how this may
-1-
183 university avenue east, st paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008
impact locally. The AMM absolutely does not want to get into a
battle among cities but pointing out that schools, counties, and
towns are held harmless is appropriate.
POINTS TO STRESS:
1. Cities have already done their part. Local government, through
aid cuts and support of sales tax increase, solved 41% of the
state's $1.2 billion problem in 1991 while accounting for only
10% of the state budget. Likewise, we solved over 35% of the
problem in 1990. For the past 3 years, cities have taken cuts,
held levies down, spent tax dollars wisely, reduced employees,
and this is our reward.
2. The administration says this is a 1.1% cut of base. This is
very misleading. The cut is 1.1% of all County, City, Town, and
Special District Revenue but only cities are cut. The cut
becomes 3.5% of all city revenue but 7% of operating budgets
when non-cuttable special assessment revenue is eliminated.
Finally, the cut becomes about 8% after non -LGA cities are
removed. When one gets beyond smoke and mirrors, this is a 23%
cut of all city LGA and an 8% cut of city revenue base.
3. Cities need to communicate the impact of these cuts to their
legislators. Remind them of the cutbacks already taken.
Register indignation. Think about use of city newsletters and
local media to get the unfairness story out. It is about time
the state stops solving its problems on the back of cities.
Minnesota cities spend at about the national average, but when
all Minnesota state and local governments are added together,
spending is much greater than the national average. We aren't
the problem and shouldn't be the solution.
NOTE 1: THE ATTACHED RUNISBASED ON ALL $71.6 MILLION AID COT
COMING FROM CITIES AID NOT INCLUDING HACA. THE REVENUE BASE
USED WAS 1991 WHICH SHOULD BE SIMILAR TO 1992. THE ACTUAL
CUTS MAY VARY BY A FEW DOLLARS.
NOTE 2: THE AMM HAS JUST LEARNED THAT THE ADMINISTRATION HAS
DELAYED RELEASING THE ACTUAL PLAN AND BILI,, THUS THEY MAY BE
WORKING ON CHANGES TO THEIR PROPOSAL?
II. STATUS OF KEY METRO BILLS:
A. HF 1778 (REP. ORFIELD)-SF 1656 (SEN. MONDALE) WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FINANCING:
The AMM opposes this bill as noted in the AMM Legislative
Contact Alert, dated February 27th. The bill was heard in
the House Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs
Committee on Thursday, March 5th. and was held over. it
-2-
was scheduled for a continuation hearing for Tuesday,
March 10th. and to meet the Legislative deadline, it must
pass out of this committee by March 14th. No hearing has
been scheduled in the Senate as yet but if HF 1778 passes
out of Committee by the deadline, SF 1656 will be heard
in a Senate Committee sometime the week of March 16-21.
AGAIN, THE MAIN REASONS FOR AMM OPPOSITION TO THIS BILL:
1. Does not provide solution to the problems that do need
to be addressed in the older developed portion of the
Metropolitan Area.
2. Weakens the regional approach to waste water treatment
and financing of the metro sewer system on an
equitable basis.
3. Raises legal questions because of the vast amount of
money already collected through SAC fees for system
expansion, current and future.
4. It is premature at this point in time, since
Minnesota Laws 1991, Chapter 183 also authored by
Rep. Orfield directs the Metropolitan Council to
study the concerns and problems of the older
developed communities and report back and make
recommendations to the Legislature in January 1994.
ACTION SUGGESTED:
Please continue to discuss your concerns with this
bill with your Legislators particularly your
Representatives. If HF 1778 passes out of the House
Committee by the weekend deadline, please sign up to
testify on SF 1656 when it is heard. We will do our
best to let you know if a hearing gets scheduled in
the Senate.
B. PROPOSED EXPANSION OF MET COUNCIL AUTHORITY OVER LOCAL
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING. (no bill number as yet)
As noted in the Legislative Contact Alert dated February
27th. a proposed.bill has been developed by a
subcommittee of the House Local Government and
Metropolitan Affairs Committee which makes some changes
to the Met Council's authority vis a vis comprehensive
planning and the other Metro Agencies (RTB, MWCC, etc.)
The bill moved out of the subcommittee and will likely be
heard in full committee on Wednesday, March 11th. or
Thursday, March 12th. Attached is the section of the
bill which expands the Council's authority with respect
to being able to require modifications to local
comprehensive plans.
me
To our knowledge, this bill has not been introduced as
yet in the Senate but if it passes the House Local
Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee this week
it will likely get a 'hearing' in the Senate Metropolitan
Affairs Committee sometime the week of March 16 to 21.
ACTION SUGGESTED:
If you share our concerns with the proposed expansion of
the Council's authority, please discuss it with your
local legislators as soon as possible.
C. HF 1977 (Rep. Trimble) - SF 1958 (Sen. Price) LOCAL WATER
SUPPLY PLANS.
Both HF 1977 and SF 1958 have been heard in the
respective Environment Committees and have been passed by
the committees. Both bills are consistent with AMM
legislative Policy IV -I. Water supply plans would not
become a 15th. System' nor would the Met Council have
approval authority over the local plans. Cities would,
however, be required, to prepare local water supply plans
by 1995 and these plans would be subject to Met Council
"review and comment".
The bills are consistent -with ANN policy as previously
noted but there are some parts which are of concern.
Parts which trouble us are:
1. Existing municipal water appropriation permits would
all be reviewed by January 1, 1998, by DNR. The
permits would be subject to modification if the DNR
Commissioner determines that the local contingency
plan is not feasible.
2. Local Water Supply Plans for cities that use
ground water for all or part of their water supply
would have to be submitted to the county in which
the cities are located for review and comment if that
county has adopted a ground water plan under
M.S. 103B-255.
3. Increased reporting and administrative records
keeping required by cities in terms of the amount of
water used by the city.
ACTION SUGGESTED:
You may want to review the provisions of these companion
bills and discuss with your local legislators if they
are of concern to you.
-4-
ti_s DID V -I-_ • efolfAai-I •- c • --• ••
The attached printout lists the estimated impact of Governor
Carlson's budget proposal upon selected Minnesota cities. The 1992
revenue base (certified levy + LGA) for all cities is not currently
available; thus, in the printout the 1991 revenue base is used.
(For most cities the 1992 revenue base should not be dramatically
different from the 1991 revenue base.) The following is a
description of each of the columns in the printout.
Column 1: Payable 1991 revenue base.
Column 2: The estimated reduction in state aids that would result
from the Governor's proposal.
Column 3: The estimated reduction as a percentage of the payable
1991 revenue base. For most cities this should be about 8.2
Percent unless the sum of the 1992 LGA, equalization, and disparity
reduction aid for the city is less than 8.2% of its 1991 revenue
base.
C01-�4: The new revenue base after subtracting the aid cut.
Column 5: The sum of LGA, equalization aid, and disparity reduction
aid that was certified for 1992. (Disparity reduction aid is
estimated.)
912mnn 6: The estimated aid reduction as a percentage of the total
1992 LGA, equalization aid, and disparity reduction aid.
Col--�:7: Amount of LGA, equalization aid, and disparity reduction
aid after the cut.
*444*4 ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES
ESTIMATED
IMPACT OF
THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET
PROPOSAL
PRELIMINARY -- SEE ATTACHED MEMO FOR DETAILS
'
Revenue
Est.
Percent
Rev. Base 1
Aid (LGA
Percent
Aid After
Base
Cut
Cut
After Cut 1
DRA, EA)
Cut
Cut
ANOKA
{
3787642
309072
8.21
3478570
1044511
29.61
735439
APPLE VALLEY
,
8268095
346439
4.21
7921656
346439
100.01
0
ARDEN HILLS
;
1508952
0
0.01
1508952 1
0
0.01
0
BAYPORT
;
847897
21567
2.51
826330
21567
100.01
0
486630
1084850
40.01
598210
BLOOMINGTON
22329287
0.05
22529287 ;
BROOKLYN CENTER
7298651
595570
8.21
6703081 1
1647162
36.21
1051592
BROOKLYN PARK
11232077
916537
8.21
10315540 ,
1442889
63.51
526352
BURNSVILLE
=
11941835
317566
2.71
11624269
317566
100.01
0
CHAMPLIN
,
2981583
243297
8.21
2738286 =
431653
56.41
188356
CHANHASSEN
=
3012098
0
O.OS
3012098 1
0
0.01
0
1464520
119505
8.21
1345015 1
280680
42.61
161175
CIRCLE PINES
1
895180
73047
8.21
822133 '
240586
30.41
167539
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
'
5029738
410427
8.21
4619311
1923545
21.31
1513118
55
2906464
47.9:
1472039
COTTAGEPGROVE
5323839
434425
8.21
4889414 1
CRYSTAL
5405523
441091
8.21
4964432 1
1687778
26.1.
1246687
DAYTON
711578
32578
4.61
678700 It
32878
100.01
0
DEEPHAVEN
'
916060
0
0.01
916060 '
0
0.01
0
EAGAN
;
9807752
0
0.01
9807752 ;
0
0.01
0
EDEN PRAIRIE
0
D.01
0
10369526
0
0.01
10369526 ;
FALCON HEIGHTS
780728
63707
8.21
717021 '
171127
. 37.2Z
107420
FRIDIEY
624241:6
509387
5.21
5733099
1478960
34.41
969573
GOLDEN VALLEY
1
7021431
18589
0.31
7002842 ;
18589
100.01
0
HASTINGS
1
4580512
373770
8.21
4206742 1
1154055
32.41
780285
'
5294749
432052
8.21
4862697 '
1
762287
56.71
330235
INVER�GROVE HEIGHTS
1
4740254
3868805
5.21
4353449
407471
94.91
20666
MANTOMEDI
1
1168027
95311
8.21
1072716 1
130200
73.21
34889
MAPLE GROVE
1
7645602
122916
1.61
7525656 1
122916
100.01
0
MAPLEWOOD
'
7616701
621523
8.25
6995178
655883
90.0
34360
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
;
2252077
0
0.01
2282077 ,
MINNFAPOLIS
'
179067845
14611936
8.21
164455909 1
59926160
24.4:
45314224
MINNETONKA
12695379
0
r
0.0.
12695379
0
D.DS
D
MOUND
'
1905059
155453
8.21
1749606 1
276184
56.31
-120731
MOUNDS VIEW
;
1983229
161831
8.21
1521398 1
561182
28.81
399351
BRIGHTON
49373
9629
21
1
7
530315
NEW
4856392
396252
5.21
44601105
926659744
42.5/
NORTH ST PAUL
i
1741034
142065
8.21
1598966 i
657516
21.61
515448
'
3393597
276918
5.2
3116679 1
570195
45.61
293280
ORONLE
O
'
1711328
0
0.01
1711328 '
0
0.01
0
OSSEO
;
477257
35944
5.21
438313
52511
74.21
13567
PLYMOUTH
0.01
1
2636690
2704837 3
/.Oz
2609647 1
21043
1
0
RAMSEYLAKE
'
1695340
138340
8.21
1557000 '
275897
50.11
137557
RICHFIELD
=
9500655
775256
8.21
8725429 1
3015710
25.71_
2240454
ROSEMOUNALE
1
1444054
61.61
3459
1142211
ROSEMOUNT
,
279820
228340
8.21
2569949 1
370551
ROSEVILLE
1
6641658
0
0.05
66416580 1
0.0.
0
SAINT ANTHONY
1
1705430
127316
7.51
1578114 1
127316
100.01
0
SAINT FRANCIS
1
485976
25136
5.11
463840 1
25136
100.01
0
SAINT LOUIS PARK
1
12695604
1035961
5.21
11659643 1
1805307
57.41
769346
SAINT PAUL
'
111072846
8787544
110965302 1
35416669
20.9:
29101990
SAINT PAUL PARIS
�
8.25
1
SAVAGE
1
2115614
50231
2. 4,v,
20653'3 1
50231
100.0:
0
SHAKOPFE
1
2605060
142925
5.51
2462135 1
142925
100.01
0
SHOEEVIEW
1
4119334
0
0.01
4119334 1
0
0.0:
0
SHOREWAAD
1
1790051
0
0.01
1790051 1
0
0.01
0
SOUTH ST PAUl
1
6162900
502893
8.2:
5660007 1
22792-7
22.1:
1776344
SPRING LAKE PARK
106930
87260
8.21
952107 1
204964
42.61
117704
SPRING PARK
7
STTLLWATER
TILLW
I
4180453
341615
5.21
380*6 44538 =
71151990
48.05
369902
WAY7ATA
1
1538357
0
0.01
1538357 1
0
0.0:
0
WFST ST PAUL
1
4206451
392206
8.21
4414245 1
1038748
37.8:'
646542
W(0DFll•':Y
1
4725741
0
0.0
47257911
0
0.01
0
WOODLAND
1
135697
0
0.06,
135697 1
0
0.01
0
MET COUNCIL AUTHORITY EXPANSION
� 02/28/92 16:12 (RESDEPT J RE DD353
1 improvement programs with other adopted chapters of the
2 metropolitan development guide. The council may require a local
3 governmental unit to modify any comprehensive plan or part
4 thereof which may have a substantial impact on or contain a
5 substantial departure from metropolitan system plans. By
6 ............ (date), the council shall establish criteria, after
7 soliciting comments and suggestions from potentially affected
8 local government units, for determining when a comprehensive
9 local plan or plan amendment will have a substantial impact on
10 or substantially depart from metropolitan system plans. The
11 criteria may not be limited to a metropolitan facility's
12 capacity, but must also address whether a proposed plan or plan
13 amendment will have a substantial impact on or substantially
14 depart from metropolitan system plans, as that phrase is used in
15 section 473.852, subdivision S.
16 Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 473.865,
17 subdivision 1, is amended to read:
is Subdivision 1. Each.local governmental unit shall adopt
19 official controls as described in its adopted comprehensive plan
20 and shall submit copies of the official controls to the council
21 within 30 days following adoption thereof, for information
22 purposes only. The official controls adopted shall implement
23 the purpose, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive
24 plan. Zoning ordinances and subdivision regulations must not
25 allow land use and development that will effectively prevent the
26 planned land use as designated within specific areas of the
27 comprehensive plan. The determination of the timing of the
28 implementation of the comprehensive plan shall be at the sole
29 discretion of the governing body:
30 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 473.858,
31 subdivision 1, is amended to read:
32 Subdivision 1. Within three years following the receipt of
33 the metropolitan system statement, every local governmental unit
34 shall have prepared a comprehensive plan in accordance with
35 sections 462.355, subdivision 4, 473.175, and 473.851 to 473.871'
36 and the applicable planning statute and shall have submitted the
League of Minnesota Cities
cit y Views
Number for Minnesota Legislators March 10, 1992
CITIES
1
GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL
A. THE PROPOSAL DESTROYS THE INTEGRITY OF THE DEDICATED LOCAL
GOVERNMENT TRUST FUND LESS THAN ONE YEAR AFTER IT WAS CREATED.
x Raids the local government trust fund by $198 million over three years.
x Takes money from the 1/2 -cent local option sales tax adopted in 1991 by local
governments.
B. THE PROPOSAL CREATES DRASTIC EFFECTS ON CITY BUDGETS THIS YEAR.
x Cuts 8% of city revenue bases for calendar year 1992.
x With the budget year partly gone, these cuts would be about 12% for the balance of the year.
x These cuts are on top of cuts of 4% of city revenue bases enacted in the 1991 session for the
1992 budget year.
X These cuts are on top of frozen city levy limits in 1992.
X Examples of Governor's proposed cuts:
Minneapolis --$1 S million, St. Paul --$10 million, Duluth --$2.2 million.
C. THE PROPOSAL CREATES EXTREME UNFAIRNESS BETWEEN LOCAL
GOVERNMENT UNITS.
x City aid cuts are 29% of the total state budget cuts proposed by the Governor, while city aid is
only 6.6% of the state budget.
x No cuts for counties and townships, which provide many of the same services as cities.
x Many cities receive no aid cuts (those getting HACA but no LGA), making the aid cuts to other
cities higher.
DON'T BLIST THE TRUST
For more information, contact John Tomlinson at 227.5600
III IE
League of Minnesota Cities
183 University Avenue East
St. Paul, MN 55101
March 11, 1992 Contact: John Tomlinson (612) 227-5600
TO: Mayors, Managers, and Clerks
FROM: Donald A. Slater, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Governor's Proposal for Drastic Cuts in City LGA
Governor Carlson has proposed city LGA cuts of $71.6 million for -this city budget
year, calendar year 1992. The cuts are limited to city aid other than HACA and are
8.0% of city revenue base (levy plus aid). There are NO cuts to the aids of
counties, townships, and special districts.
Attached are these materials:
* My Views giving the facts on the proposal and arguments against it.
* A listing of the aid cuts for all cities.
Considering that the proposed cuts apply to THIS BUDGET YEAR, the aid cuts already
made for this year in the 1990 and 1991 sessions, and the frozen levy limits for
this year, this is one of the most damaging proposals ever made regarding city
aid.
It is urgent that you take these steps THIS WEEK expressing your outrage regarding
this proposal:
1. Call or write to the Governor.
2. Call or write to both your State Senator and State Representative.
3. Discuss the proposal with news media personnel in your area.
4. Inform your city employees about this proposal.
The League of Minnesota Cities has issued a press release expressing our opposition
to the Governor's proposal. The League will conduct a followup press conference on
this subject featuring a representative panel of leading city officials on
Thursday, March 12 at 1:30 pm. Dont assume that someone else will communicate
with your legislators or the Governor on this subject. Every city official must
personally write and/or call if we are to be effective. Remember, we cannot expect
any help from the counties, townships, or schools, since the Governor specifically
exempted them from proposed cuts In his budget balancing proposal.
Since we are on our own, we must all make a maximum personal effort. Please send
copies of any letters on this subject to the League offices.
ESTIMATED IMPACT OF THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL
ON CITY AID FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992
117
1
;GOV'
PERCENT
BERTHA CITY OF
pROpQS...q..OF
OF
NAME
CUT AT
:REVENUE i
...................................
8.02%
BASE
117
1
BENSON CITY OF
GOV'S
PERCENT
BERTHA CITY OF
PROPOSED:;
OF
NAME' :; .
CUT>AT
REVENUE
...................................
8.02%
BASE:
BENSON CITY OF
80,802
8.020%
BERTHA CITY OF
12,291
8.020%
BETHEL ITY
8 684
"8.020%
BIG FALLS CITY OF
5,277
8.020%
BIG
8:020%
BIGELOW CITY OF
2,424
8.020%
BI RK I F
10,293
8.020%
BINGHAM LAKE CITY OF
3,638
8.020%
BIRCHWOOD CITY OP:0
0.000°/0
BIRD ISLAND CITY OF
33,252
8.020%
BISCAY CI FY::OF
956
8.020%
BIWABIK CITY OF
55,181
8.020%
BLACKDUCKCITI;<OF.
;.:15;589
8.020%
B91NE CITY OF
528,683
8.020%
BLOMKE TCITY OF.
2,838
8.020%
BLOOMING PRAIRIE CITY OF
47,172
8.020%
BLOOMINGTON'CITY.OF
0
0.0000/
BLUE EARTH CITY OF
109,083
8.020%
BLUFFTON CITY OF:: i
11154
8.020%
BOCK CITY OF
429
8.020%
BORUP CITY OF
948
" 8.020%
BOVEY CITY OF
39,433
8.020%
BOWCUS CITY OF:2,430
8.020%
BOY RIVER CITY OF
305
8.020%
BOYD :CIT:Y :OF
9,826
8.020%
BRAHAM CITY OF
32,035
8.020°k
BRAINERD`CITY OF>:
291,211
8.020%
BRANCH CITY OF
13,897
3.899%
BRANDON CITY OF: -:::::
7,642
8.020%
BRECKENRIDGE CITY OF
102,211
8.020%
BREEZY POW CITY:OF' -
0
0.0000/0
BREW TER CITY OF
8,955
8.020°k
BRICELYN CITY OF
12,338
8.020%
BROOK PARK CITY OF
1,747
8.020%
BROOKLYN CENTER.CITY OF
623,534
8.020%
BROOKLYN PARK CITY OF
931,821
8.020%
BROOKS CITY OF -
1,707
8.020%
BROOKSTON CITY OF
723
8.020%
BROOTEN-CITY OF
13,905
5.020%
BROWERVILLE CITY OF
13,197
8.020%
BROWNS VALLEY CITY OF
26,978
8.020%
BROWNSDALE CITY OF
9,123
8.020%
BROWNSVILLE CITY OF -
6,329
5.020%
BROWNTON CITY OF
24,737
8.020%
BRUNO CITY OF -
1,958
8.020%
BUCKMAN CITY OF
1,876
8.020%
BUFFALO CITY OF -'
102,060
8.020%
BUFFALO LAKE CITY OF
24,476
8.020%
BUHL CITY OF
53,192
8.020%
BURNSVILLE CITY OF
317,566
2.589%
BURTRUM CITY OF
1,708
8.020%
BUTTERFIELD CITY OF
13,711
8.020%
BYR N ITY.
51,297
8.020%
CALEDONIA CITY OF
55,777
8.020%
CALLAWAY:CITY OF:>
3,722
-: 8.020%
CALUMET CITY OF
19,659
8.020%
CAMBRIDGE CITY OF:
98,557
5.020%
CAMPBELL CITY OF
4,394
8.020%
CANBY>CITY OF
58,167
8.020%
CANNON FALLS CITY OF
98,5 01
8.020%
ESTIMATED IMPACT OF THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL
ON CITY AID FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992
CANTON CITY OF
GOV'S'
PERCENT
CARLOS CITY OF
PROPOSED
OF
NAME
CUT AT
REVENUE '
CARVER CITY OF
8.02%
BASE
CANTON CITY OF
74737
8:020%:
CARLOS CITY OF
3,920
8.020%
CARLTON ITY:OF
21 6
..0
CARVER CITY OF
18,824
7.943%
CASS LAKE 'CITY OF
30 53
8l0
CEDAR MILLS CITY OF
123
8.02096
CENTER CITY CITY OF
6,777
8.0
CENTERVILLE CITY OF
6,462
1.905%
CEYLON CITY.OF
14,560.
8.020%
CHAMPLIN CITY OF
247,524
8.020%
CHANDLER CITY OF
5,295
8.020%
CHANHASSEN CITY OF
0
0.000%
CHASKA CITY OF
118,063
8.020%
CHATFIELD CITY OF
61,221
8.020%
CHICKAMAW BEACH CITY OF
0
0.000%
CHISAGO CITY CITY OF
46,985
8.020%
HISHOLM CITY OF
245,157 >
8.020%'
CHOKIO CITY OF
11,435
8.020%
CIRCLE PINESCITY . F ' `
72,892
8:020%`
CLARA CITY CITY OF
34,157
8.020%
CLAREMONT CITY OFr .
13519 rl8.020%
8.020%
CLARISSA CITY OF
16,706
8.020%
CLARKFIELD CITY OF
37;906 -
.8.020%
CLARKS GROVE CITY OF
8,285
8.020%
CLEAR LAKE CITY OF_-
5 942
8.020%
CLEARBROOK CITY OF
10,375
8.020%
CLEARWATER CITY OF>
- 13,752
8:020%
CLEMENTS CITY OF
3,977
8.020%
CLEVELAND CITY OF
12,423
8.020%
CLIMAX CITY OF
6,870
8.020%
CLINTON CITY OF
16,255
8.020%:
CLITHERALL CITY OF
1,085
8.020%
CLONTARF CITY OF
678
8.0200'
CLOQUET CITY OF
356,858
8.020%
COATES CITY OF
0
0.000%
COBDEN CITY F
213
8.020%
COKATO CITY OF
42,279
8.020%
COLD SPRING CITY OF
54,882
8.020%
COLERAINE CITY OF
54,523
8.020%
COLOGNE CITY OF
13,334
8.020%
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY OF
419,632
8.020%
1 COMFREY CITY OF
17,332
8.020%
COMSTOCK CITY OF '
1,001
8.020%
CONGER CITY OF
3,065
8.020%
COOK CITY OF
13,383
.8.020%
COON RAPIDS CITY OF
763,524
8.0200/9
CORCORAN CITY OF
16,203
2.231%'
CORRELL CITY OF
464
8.020%
COSMOS CITY OF
14,023
8.020%
COTTAGE GROVE CITY OF
453,107
8.020%
COTTONWOOD CITY OF _
24,772 _
8.020%
COURTLAND CITY OF
CROMWELL CITY OF
7,528
4,258
8.020%
8.020%
CROOKSTON CITY OF
CRO BY CITY OF
242,269
63,478
8.020%
8.020%
CROSSLAKE CITY OF
0
0.000%
CRYSTAL CITY OF
458,244
8.020%
CURRIE CITY OF
5,422
8.020%
CUYUNA CITY OF
3,060
8.020%
CYR;JS CITY OF
5,679
8.020%
DAKOTA CITY
GOV'S
PERCENT
DALTON CITY OF
PROPOSED
OF : ....
NAME
CUT AT
REVENUE:::'
DANVERS CITY OF
8.0296
BASE .. .
DAKOTA CITY
3,540
1:8.020%
DALTON CITY OF
3,604
8.020%'
DANUBE CITY
16 7868.020%'
DANVERS CITY OF
2,114
8.020%
DARFUR CITY
1'74
:::8.0200'
DARWIN CITY OF
683
8.020%
D EL ITY. F'::.:...
33;857.
8.020%
DAWSON CITY OF
55,880
8.020%
DAYTON CITY OF r32431
4:320"/
DEEPHAVEN CITY OF
0
0.0000/0
DEER CREEK CITYI:OF
5;271
8.020%
DEER RIVER CITY OF
DEERWOCITY Cr "
27.8
17;615
I20V-
8.020%
RAFOD;
F ► f OF
735
8.020%
DELANO,CITY OF
51;119
8.020%
DELAVAN CITY OF
9,409
8.0200/9
DELHI CITY::OF
:5.020%
DELLWOOD CITY OF
0
0.000%
DENHAWCITY OF
0
0.000°k:
DENNISON CITY OF
2,113
8.020%
DENT CITY>OF
T,459
8.020%`
DETROIT LAKES CITY OF
165,794
8.020%
DEXTER CITY OF.,
8.020%
DILWORTH CITY OF
53,577
8.020%
DODGE>CENTT=R CLTY OF <
54>377
..
8.020%:
DONALDSON CITY OF
751
8.020%
DONNELLY CITY OF ..3;793
8.020%'
DORAN CITY OF
809
8.020%
DOVER CITY OF::'6;662
8.020%
DOVRAY CITY OF
1,002
8.020%
DULUTH CITY OFrr
2,244,748
8.020%
DUMONT CITY OF
3,056
8.020%
DUNDAS CITY OF ;..
7,775
8.020%.
DUNDEE CITY OF
871
8.020%
DUNNELL:CITY OF;::.
5,233
EAGAN CITY OF
0
0:000%
EAGLE BEND CITY: OF
>;,15,792
8.020%0.
EAGLE LAKE CITY OF
19,745
8.020%
EAST BETHEL CITY OF
65;642
8.020%a
EAST GRAND FORKS CITY OF
232,985
8.020%
EAST GULL LAIC CITY OF
0
0.0000/0
EASTON CITY OF
7,791
8.020%
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY OF
0
0.000%
EDEN VALLEY CITY OF
18,734
8:020%
EDGERTON CITY OF
23,869
8.020%
EDINA CITY'OF
EFFIE CITY OF
761
8.020%
EnEN CITY OF.
51092
<>8.020%
ELBA'CITY OF
552
8.0209'0
ELBOW LAKE CITYL OF
--a9941
8.t7zow//0
ELGIN CITY OF
16,051
8.020%
ELIZABETH CITY:QF ..
2;453
i:8.020°x`
ELK RIVER CITY OF
185,186
8.020%
ELKO CITY OF
1;733
2.512%
ELKTON CITY OF
2,349
8.020%
Et,LENDALE CITY OF
8,684
8.020%
ELLS �, TH CITY OF
12,755
8.0200 11
ELMDALE CITY ::
1.;071
8.0200/
ELMORE CITY OF
21,657
8.020%
ESTIMATED IMPACT OF THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL
ON CITY AID FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992
ELROSA CITY 017
GOV S > ..:
,PERCENT I:
ELY CITY OF
PROPOSED.:,.
8.020%
NAMECUT
AT
REVENUE
EMILY CITY OF
8.02%
BASE
ELROSA CITY 017
:3,005 '
8:020%
ELY CITY OF
141,665
8.020%
ELYSIAN CITY;: F
y5 7 8
8.020%
EMILY CITY OF
4;901
3.149°x6
EMM.' N CITY!0
7200 ';.
" :8!020%:
ERHARD CITY OF
1,457
8.0200/o
ERSKLNE CITY; F
; :12;143
8:020%
EVAN CITY OF
824
8.020%
EVANSVILLE :CITY. Of.
10.1:80 ;:..:
8.020%
EVELETH CITY OF
178,912
8.020%
EXCELSIOR CITY OF
-62,440 >"
8.020%
EYOTA CITY OF
22,644
8.020%
FAIRFAX CITY<OF
35,563
8.020%
FAIRMONT CITY OF
296,620
8.020%
FALCON.HEIGHTS CITY OF
64;980 ;
: - 8.020°x6'
FARIBAULT CITY OF
422,440
8.020%
FARMI : GTON::CITY OF:
1'39,278; :
8:020%'
FARWELL CITY OF
1,558
8.020%
FEDERAL. DAMCITY;OF
537.
8:020%
FELTON CITY OF
3,492
8.020%
FERGUS FALLS CITY: OF..:*.
337.,680` >
8.020%f
FERTILE CITY OF
18,8981
8.020°x6
FIFTYLAKES:CITY OF _ .
0 :
0.000%
FINLAYSON CITY OF
2,854
8.020°x6
FISHER CITY OF.. -.
4,702:
8,020%
FLENSBURG CITY OF
2,286
8.020%
FLOODWOOD:::CITY OF " .
21,242
8.020%
FLORENCE CITY OF
9231
8.020%
FOLEY CITY OF
41,640 ';
8.020%!
FORADA CITY OF
884
7.789%
FOREST: LAKE CITY -OF..
r .122 300: r
8-020%
FORESTON CITY OF
4,165
8.020%
FOR RIPLEY .CITY OF
:: ,160
-: 3.671%,
FORT SNELLING
0
0.0000/0
FOSSTON CITY OF :
36,184,
8.020%
FOUNTAIN CITY OF
8,118
8.020%
FOXHOME CITY. OF:..
1``392
8:020°%
.FRANKLIN CITY OF
15,541
8.020%
FRANKLIN CITY OF
1,489
8.020%
FRAZEE CITY OF
17,281
8.020%
FREEBORN CITY OF.:
-' 5,045
8.020%
FREEPORT CITY OF
13,853
8.020%
FRO LEY CITY>OF r.
1499,703.
.8.020%
FROST CITY OF
8,645 -
8.020%
FULDA'CITYOF.
34,315
8.0200/9
FUNKLEY CITY OF
4
8.020%
GARFIELD C".OF:::*
''..1;850
8.020%
GARRISON CITY OF
2,447
8.020%
GARVIN CITYOF4,683
936
.8.020%
GARY CITY OF
6,377
8.020%
GAYLORD CITY OF
56,750
8.020%
GEM LAKE CITY OF
0
0.000%
GENEVA CITY OF
7,264
8.020%
GENOLA CITY OF
0
0.000%
GEORGETOWN CITY OF .
1,884
8.020%
GHENT CITY OF
5,510
8.020%
GIBBON CITY<<;OF
24,069
:8.020%
GILBERT CITY OF
85,962
8.020%
GILMAN CITY;OF
358
8,020%
GLENCOE CITY OF
T18,108
8.020%
GLENVILLE:CITY OF< :.
GOV'S
PERCENT
GLENWOOD CITY OF
PROPOSED'
OF
I'A E4.CUT
AT
REVENUE " ;
GOLDEN VALLEY CITY OF
8.02%
BASE
GLENVILLE:CITY OF< :.
< . 12,438
8.020%`
GLENWOOD CITY OF
88,431
8.020%
GLYNDON'CITY OF >
18969
8.020%
GOLDEN VALLEY CITY OF
18,589
0.257%
GONVICKCITY OF;;
8,926
8.020%
GOOD THUNDER CITY OF
16,288
8.020%
OODHUE CITY OF :]...
16,369
-8.020%
GOODRIDGE CITY OF
2,139
8.020%
GOODVIEW.CITY>OF..
-' 63,291
8.020%
RACEVILLE CITY OF
17,086
8.020%
GRANADA CITY OF,
6,037
8.020%
GRAND MARAIS CITY OF
53,094
8.0209'0
GRAND MEADOW CITY OF
17,529
8.020%
GRAND RAPIDS CITY OF
251,289
8.020% .
GRANITE: FALLS C OF.
62,1.19 '
8.020%
GRASSTON CITY OF
1,786
8.020
GREEN `ISLECITY:
11;488
8.020°x6
GREENBUSH CITY OF
20,001
8.020%
GREENFIELDCITY OF
0
0.0000/0
GREENWALD CITY OF
1,953
8.020%
GREENWOOD CITY OF
0
0.000%
GREY EAGLE CITY OF
8,440
8.020%
GROVE CITY.CITY OF
14,597
8.020%
GRYGLA CITY OF
4,886
8.020%
GULLY CITY OF
803 r
8.020%
HACKENSACK CITY OF
5,392
8.020%
HADLEY ITY F :
464
8.020%
HALLOCK CITY OF
30,873
8.020%
HALMA.CITY OF
- 983,8.020%
HALSTAD CITY OF
16,152
8.020%
HAM LAKE CITY<OF
77;897
8.020%
HAMBURG CITY OF
13,133
8.020%
HAMMOND CITY OF
1,609
8.020%
HAMPTON CITY OF
5,094
8.020%
HANCOCK CITY OF :
15,698
8.020%
HANLEY FALLS CITY OF
9,046
8.020%
HANOVER CITY OF
11,504
8.020%
HANSKA CITY OF
10,929
8.020%
HARDING CITY OF-
165
8.020%
HARDWICK CITY OF
3,294
8.020%
HARMONY CITY OF
34,051
8.020%
HARRIS CITY OF
10,080
8.020%
HARTLAND CITY:OF
51987
.8.020%
HASTINGS CITY OF
379;008
8.020%
HATFIELD CITY OF - '
672
7.983%
HAWLEY CITY OF
22,126
8.020%
HAYFIELD rCITY OF
41,032
8.0200/0
HAYWARD CITY OF
4,570
8.020%
HAZEL RUN CITY OF
936
8.020%
HECTOR CITY OF
HEIDELBERG CITY OF
45,256
293
8.020%
8.020%°
HENDERSON CITY OF
22,303
8.020°x6
HENDRICKS CITY OF
15,863
8.020%
HENDRUM CITY OF
6,518
8.020%
HENNING CITY OF.
20,400
8.020%
HENRIETTE CITY OF
306
8.020%
HERMAN Ul-T-YOF-L
14,055
8.020%
HERMANTOWN CITY OF
111,178
8.020%
HERON LAKE CITY OF '
18,735
8.020%
HEWITT CITY OF
4,379
8-020%
ESTIMATED IMPACT OF THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL
ON CITY AID FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992
HIBBING CITY OF.
GOV'S;!
PERCENT ;>
HILL CITY CITY OF
PROPOSED
OF
NAME
CUT AT
REVENUE
HILLS CITY OF
8.02%
BASE
HIBBING CITY OF.
681,0711:
8:020%'
HILL CITY CITY OF
16,625
8.020%
HILLMAN CITY195
=209'
8.0,
HILLS CITY OF
10,736
8.020%
HILLTOP CITY:OF
16,920 s
8:0209:
HINCKLEY CITY OF
26,401
8.020%
HITTERDAL-CITY F
5A26
8:02096.
HOFFMAN CITY OF
10,458
8.020%
HOKAH CITY OF
19 096
8.020%'
HOLDINGFORD CITY OF
21,016
8.020%
HOLLAND CITY OF
4,703
8.020%
HOLLANDALE CITY OF
5,718
8.020°/9
HOLLOWAY CITY OF
3,891
8.020%
HOLT CITY OF
757
8.020%
HOPKINS CITY OF
434,846
8.020%
HOUSTON CITY OF
21,423
8.020%
HOWARD LAKE CITY OF
29,864.
-8.020%'
HOYT LAKES CITY OF
119,865
8.020°/9
HUGO CITY, OF
24,252
2.651!Yo
HUMBOLDT CITY OF
855
8.020%
HUTCNINSON CITY OF<
320,367 ,:
8.020%:
IHLEN CITY OF
1,412
8.020%
INDEPENDENCE CITY -OF,
0
0.000%
INTL FALLS CITY OF
301,185
8.020%
INVER GROVE HT CITY
394 700
8.020%.
IONA CITY OF
4,182
8.020%
IRON;JUNCTION CITY OF
598
8.020%
IRONTON CITY OF
19,946
8.020%
ISANTI CITY OF
35,775
8.020%
ISLAND VIEW CITY OF
0
0.000%
ISLECITY OF
13,390'
IVANHOE CITY OF
15,664
8.020°/9
JACKSON CITY OF
112,670
8.020%
JANESVI LLE CITY OF
38,882
8.020%
JASPER CITY OF
12,420
8.020%
JEFFERS CITY OF
8,652
8.020%
JENKINS CITY OF
2,680
8.020%
JOHNSON CITY OF
468
8.020%
JORDAN CITY OF
62,571
8.020%
KANDIYOHI CITY OF
7,765
8.020%
KARLSTAD CITY OF
24,332
8.020%
KASOTA CITY OF
6,270
8.020%
KASSON CITY OF
74,461
8.020%
KEEWATIN CITY OF
54,462
8.020%
KELLIHER CITY OF
2,948
8.020%
KELLOGG CITY OF
6,325
8.020%
I KENNEDY CITY OF
- 9,104
8.020°
KENNETH CITY OF
1,2061
8.020%
I KENSINGTON CITY OF
5,294.
8.020°/0.
KENT CITY OF
1,730
8.020°/9
KENYON CITY OF
55,052
8.020%
KERKHOVEN CITY OF
13,444
8.020%
KERRICK CITY OF
521:
8.020°/9
KETTLE RIVER CITY OF
4,461
8.020%
KIESTER CITY OF
16,289 `
8.020%
KILKENNY CITY OF
2,893
8.020%
KIMBALL CITY OF
15,360
8.020%
KINBRAE CITY OF
KINGSTON CITY OF
3371
652.
8.020%
8.020%.
KINNEY CITY OF
14,6991
8.020%
LAKE 5HUHE CITY OF 0 0.000%
LAKE ST CROIX BEACH CITY 7,000 3.988%
I i e= Wu _cnN t'lTV (W T ROOF
1,
I LESUEUR CITY OF 1 86,1381 8.020%1
LILYDALE CITY OF ;:::
GOV'S
PERCENT
LINDSTROM CITY OF
PROPOSED
OF
NAME
CUT AT
REVENUE
LISMORE CITY OF
8.02%
BASE
LAKE 5HUHE CITY OF 0 0.000%
LAKE ST CROIX BEACH CITY 7,000 3.988%
I i e= Wu _cnN t'lTV (W T ROOF
1,
I LESUEUR CITY OF 1 86,1381 8.020%1
LILYDALE CITY OF ;:::
0 1...::
0.000%
LINDSTROM CITY OF
47,133
8.020°/9
LINO LAKES CITY OF
<'' 137,030
7.017%
LISMORE CITY OF
5,977
8.020%
LITCHFIELD CITY OF
137,074
8.020%
LITTLE CANADA CITY OF
64.140
3.471%
LITTLE. FALLS CITY OF
:194,019
.:8:020%
LITTLEFORK CITY OF
12,370
8.020%
LONG BEACH CITY>.OF
I 1 0
.0.000%
LONG LAKE CITY OF
48,244
6.834%
LONG PRAIRIE CITY OF
'55,183
8.020%'
LONGVILLE CITY OF
4,127
8.020%
LONSDALE CITY OF
21,6381.;.:,:w:8.0
LORETTO CITY OF
8,1281
8.020%
L r7t 11SRl1RG CITY ()F. _
_ 7131
8.020%
ESTIMATED IMPACT OF THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL
ON CITY AID FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992
MAGNOLIA CITY OF ..%
OV'
PERCENT
MAHN OMEN CITY OF
pROPWEP
;OF, :>
NAM ......,:
CUT AT
REVENUE.....
MANCHESTER CITY OF
8.02%"BASE
.
MAGNOLIA CITY OF ..%
2,096:::..:
8Q20%
MAHN OMEN CITY OF
31,892
8.020%
AHTOME L:,' 1TY 0
MAW:,
8:0
MANCHESTER CITY OF
588
8.020%
;MANNA
17 112
8.020%
MANKATO CITY OF
872,428
8.020%
MANTO I LLE ITY F .
19,389; ..
&02096
MAPLE GROVE CITY OF
122,916
1.483%
:MAPLE:LAKE<CITY OF;<:
30 841;
8.;020%:
MAPLE PLAIN CITY OF
39,320
6.666%
MAPLETON CITY OF. ; !
31;094::::...:81020%'
6.605%
MAPLEVIEW CITY OF
5,8181
8.020%
MAP:LEWOODICITY::OF
627,214
8.020%
MARBLE CITY OF
32,819
8.020%
MARIETTA CITY OF: -..6,090
4,404
8.020%
MARINE -ON-STCROIX CITY
0
0.000%
MARSHALL.CITY OF ;:241
070
8.020%
MAYER CITY OF
7,313
8.020%
MAYNARD CITY OF
16.;969,
8.020%
MAZEPPA CITY OF
11,601
8.020%
MCGRATH CITY OF ..
18t<
8;020%`'
MCGREGOR CITY OF
9,662
8.020%
MCINTOSH:CITY.OF
;.14,431;
8:020%
MCKINLEY CITY OF
8,662
8.020%
MEADOWLANDS CITY iOF
2 951
8.020%''
MEDFORD CITY OF
18,343
8.020%
MEDICINE LAKE CITY OF
345,939.
MEDINA CITY OF
0
0.000%
MEIRE GROVE CITY';OF
1,524
8.020%
MELROSE CITY OF
59,932
8.020%
MENAHGA CITY OF
27,939
8;020'/0
MENDOTA CITY OF
5,462
7.457%
MENDOTA.HEIGHTS CITY -OF :
00.000%:4
-> 8.020%
MENTOR CITY OF
1,832
8.020%
MIDDLE RIVER CITY OF
31<19
8.020%
MIESVILLE CITY OF
0
0.000°k
MILACA CITY OF
50j993
8.020%
MILAN CITY OF
11,346
8.0200/.
MILLERVILLE CITY OF
80
8.020%
MILLVILLE CITY OF
804
8.020%
MILROY CITY OF :
8,232
8.020%
MILTONA CITY OF
3,807
8.020%
MINN CITY;CITY OF
3;393
8.:020%.
MINN LAKE CITY OF
23,237
8.020%
MINNEAPOLIS CITY OF
14;659065
8.020%
MINNEISKA CITY OF
1,2148.020%
8.020°/0
MINNEOTA' ITY OF >'
31;902.
::8.020%`
MINNETONKA BEACH CITY OF
0
0.000%
MINNETONKA CITY:OF
> 0
6 0.000%'
MINNETRISTA CITY OF
0
0.000%
MIZRAH CITY OF
348
8.020%
MONTEVIDEO CITY OF
157,552
8.020%
MONTGOMERY CITY OF
77;289
8.020%
MONTICELLO CITY OF
0
0.0000/0
MONTROSEICITY OF,
16181:7
8.020%
MOORHEAD CITY OF
552,018
8.020%
MOOSE LAKE CITY OF
r26,330
8.020%
MORA CITY OF
54,482
8.020°�
MORGAN CITY OP:..35;052
8.020%
MORRIS CITY OF
137,082
8.020%
> ....
GQV'
PERCENT`
MORTON CITY OF
PROPOSED
OF
NAME
CUT AT
REVENUE
MOUND CITY OF
8.02%
BASE:::: -
MORRI TOWN CITY:.OF
__ _
15;122
8.020%'
MORTON CITY OF
14,761
8.020%
MC ::
7 10277
:'^8.020%.
MOUND CITY OF
158,120
8.020%
M : "' N
17 112
8.020%
MSP INTERNATIONAL AIRPOR
0
0.0000/0
MTI N : ° ITY
119;382
8.020%
MT LAKE CITY OF
61,155
8.020%
MURDOCK:CITY OF:`
6,655
8.020%
MYRTLE CITY OF
687
8.020%
NASHUA CITY OF ::...
392
6.605%
NASHWAUK CITY OF
61,344
8.020%
NASSAU CITY OF :
1,085
8.020%
NELSON CITY OF
962
8.020%
NER TRAND CITY:
4,404
8.020°6
NEVIS CITY OF
6,534
8.020%
NEW AUBURN CITY OF r.r
41319
8.020%
NEW BRIGHTON CITY OF
302,900
8.020%
NEW ER Y ITY OF ,
5,742
8.020%
NEW HOPE CITY OF
421,527
8.020%
NEW LONDON CITY.:OF
1.21,473
8.020%
NEW MARKET CITY F
5,795
8.020°/0
NEW<MUNICH CITY OF
3,809
8.020%
NEW PRAGUE CITY OF
103,512
8.020%
NEW RICHLAND'CITY. OF.
26,070
8.020°/
NEW TRIER CITY OF
413
8.020%
NEW ULM'CITY
345,939.
8.020%
NEW YORK MILLS CITY OF
27,328
8.020%
'NEWFOLDEN CIiY OF
7,105
8.020%
NEWPORT CITY OF
84,643
8.020°/
NICOLLET CITY
12,371
8,020%
NIELSVILLE CITY OF
2,457
8.020%
NIMROD VILLAGEI OF.
465
-> 8.020%
NISSWA CITY OF
0
0.000%
NORCROSS CITY OF
3,123
8:020%
NORTH BRANCH CITY OF
NORTH MANKATO CITY OF
38,741
258,994
8.020%
_ 8.020%
NORTH OAKS CITY OF _
NORTH REDWOOD CITY OF
0
2,769
0.000%
8.020%
NORTH ST PAUL CITY OF
146,875
8.020%
NORTHFIELD CITYOr
286,624
8.020%
NORTHOME CITY OF
5,781
8.020%
NORTHROP UITY'OF
4,257
8.020%
NORWOOD CITY OF
25,495
8.020%
OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY OF
0
- 0.000°/0
OAKDALE CITY OF
303,367
8.020%
ODESSA CITY OF '
4,369 `
8.020%
ODIN CITY OF
2,138
8.020°/0
OGEMA CITY OF
3,059
8.020%
OGILVIE CITY OF
9,945
8.020%
OKABENA CITY OF
6,574
8.020%
OKLEE CITY OF
11,738
8.020%
OLNIA CITY OF
73,152
8.020%
ONAMIA CITY OF
9,247
8.020%
ORM BY CITY OF
2,248
8,020%°
ORONO CITY OF
0
0.000%
ORONOCO CITY OF -
8,678
8.020%
ORR CITY OF
5,704
8.020%
ORTONVILLE CITY OF
88,551
8.020%
OSAKIS CITY OF 1
34,660
8.0200%
ESTIMATED IMPACT OF THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL
ON CITY AID FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992
OSLO CITY OF
GOV'S
PE ENT .
OSSEO CITY OF
PROPOSED
OF
NAME:CUT
AT
REVENUE:.
OTSEGO CITY OF
8.02%
BASE '
OSLO CITY OF
12,220
8.020%
OSSEO CITY OF
40,302
8.020%
OSTRANDER CITY OF
6' 139
8020%
OTSEGO CITY OF
32,529
7.117%
OTTERTAIL CITY OF
0
0,
OWATONNA CITY OF
482,655
8.020%
PALISADE CITY OF
1,039
_ 8.020%
PARK RAPIDS CITY OF
56,802
8.020%
PARKERS PRAIRIE CITY OF "
17336
8.020%
PAYNESVILLE CITY OF
68,113
8.020%
PEASE CITY OF
910
8.020%
PELICAN RAPIDS CITY OF
37.1781
8.020%
PEMBERTON CITY OF `4,230
30,320
8.020%
PENNOCK CITY OF
6,846
8.020%
PE UOT LAKES CITY OF
- 21,486
8.020%
PERHAM CITY OF
40,050
8.020%
PERLEY CITY. OF
1,4461
8.020%
PETERSON CITY OF
3,132
8.020%
PIERZ;CITY OF
12,487
8.020%
PILLAGER CITY OF
9,361
8.020%
PINE CITY CITY:OF
:53 840 >
8.020%
PINE ISLAND CITY OF
73,371
8.020%
PINE RIVER CITY OF
21,137 >I
8:020%
PINE SPRINGS ITY OF
0
0.000°
PIPESTONE CITY OF 77"....':_103,5321
,79;607
8.020%'
PLAINVIEW CITY OF
69,259
8.020°/0
PLATO CITY OF.
9,056
8.020%
PLEASANT LAKE CITY OF
0
0.000°/0
PLUMMER CITY OF
10,239
8.020%
i PLYMOUTH CITY OF
0
0.000%
PORTER CITY OF
4,334
8.0200%
PRESTON CITY OF
48,377
8.020%
PRINCETON CITY OF
- 87,449
8.020%
PRINSBURG CITB OF
11,665
8.020%
PRIOR LAKE CITY OF -
26,989
- > 0.953%'
PROCTOR CITY OF
70,276
8.020%
WAWA CITYOF
;f52
$.020°/0.
RACINE CITY OF
3,334
8.020%
RAMSEY CITY OF
141,055
8.020%
RANDALL CITY N7-7,444
83,778
8.020%
RANDOLPH CITY OF
2,679
8.020%
RANIER CITY OF
1,938
8.020%
RAYMOND CITY OF
14,365
8.020%
RED LAKE FALLS CITY OF
52,620
8.020%
RED WING CITY OF -
38,442
0.427%
REDWOOD FALLS CITY OF
153,517
8.020%
REGAL CITY OF
297
8,020%
REMER CITY OF
7,385
8.020°,6
RENVI LLE CITY OF
f
45,014
8.020%
REVERE CITY OF
RICE CIN OF
3,058
10,728
8.020%
8.020%
RICHFIELD CITY OF
791,139
8.020%
l RICHMOND CITY OF _ -_--
RICHVILIE CITY OF
18,219
782
8.020%
8.020°/0
RIVERTON CITY OF
1,965 ^
8.020%
ROBBINSDALE CITY OF
316,884
8.020%
ROCHESTER CITY OF
1,672,659
8.020%
ROCK CREEK CITY OF
7,192
8.020%
ROCKFORD CITY OF
53,343
8.020%
ROCKVILLE CITY OF
7,672
8.020°/0
ROGERS'CITY OF
Gov$
PERCENT::::
ROLLINGSTONE CITY OF
PROPOSEp
8.020%
NAME
CUT AT.:REVENUE
8.020°0
ROOSEVELT CITY OF
8.02%
BASE
ROGERS'CITY OF
0
0.000%`
ROLLINGSTONE CITY OF
1028
8.020%
RONNEBY: CITY.OF. i..:.
289
8.020°0
ROOSEVELT CITY OF
378
8.020%
FIOSCOE CITY
ROSE CREEK CITY OF
6,464
8.020%
ROSEAU :CITY OF
58;320
020%
ROSEMOUNT CITY OF
243,496
8.020%
ROSEVILLEE CITY OF:.
0 :
0:000%
ROTHSAY CITY OF
8,275
8.020%
ROUND LAKE CITY>OF
8',683
,:8.020°!0'
ROYALTON CITY OF
10,310
8.020%
RUSH CITY CITY OF: r
30,320
8.020%
RUSHFORD CITY OF
36,434
8.020%
RUSHFORD VILLAGE CITY OF
11;109
8.020%
RUSHMORE CITY OF
8,862
8.020%
RUSSELLCITY OF
11,892
`'8.020%'
RUTHTON CITY OF
5,518
8.020%
RUTLEDGEITY OF:
-$27
6.934%
SABIN CITY OF
7,395
8.020%
SACRED HEART CITY:OF
SANBORN CITY OF
11,774
8.020%
SANDSTONE CITY>OF
30,870
8.020%:
SAR EANT CITY OF
1,040
8.020%
SARTELL'CITY OF. ,::..
,79;607
8.020%
SAUK CENTRE CITY OF
105,986
8.020%
AUK RAPIDSCITY
146;150 -
8:020%'
SAVAGE CITY OF
50,231
2.154%
SCANLON CITY OF >
2.5,315
8.020%
_
SEAFORTH CITY OF
- 1,699
8.020%
SEBEKA CITY OF :
- :18;563
:8.020°/0
SEDAN CITY OF
217
8.020%
SHAF R:CITY OF
5;129
8.020%'
SHAK PEE CITY OF
142,925
5.182%
SHELLY CITY OF...,5,343
8.020%
SHERBURN CITY OF
41,217
8.020%
SHEVLIN CITY -.OF .
. 1 090.
.;:8.020%
SHOREVIEW CITY OF
0
0.000°/0
SH REWOOD CITY OF
0
0:000°/0"
SILVER BAY CITY OF
83,778
8.020%
SILVER LAKE CITY OF
19,642
8.020°/0
S t LINE CITY OF
2,585
8.020%
SUs ON CITY OF >
65,462
`8.020°oi
S EPY EYE CITY OF
88,345
8.020%
SOBIESKI CITY OF
690
r. 8:020%'
SOLWAY CITY OF
810
8.020%
SCI: _ H HAVEN CITY OF
2,599
8.020%'
S TH' ST PAUL CITY OF
507,522
8.020%
SPITER CITY OF .
28;299
8.020%
SPRING GROVE CITY OF
36,814
8.020%
SPRING HILL CITY OF
887
8.020%
SPRING LAKE PARK CITY OF
93,115
8.020%
SPRING PARK CITY OF
0
0.000%
SPRING VALLEY CITY OF
74,377
8.020%
SPRINGFIELD CITY OF
64,589
8.020%
SQUAW LAKE CITY OF
636
8.020%
ST ANTHONY CITY OF
127,316.
7.376%
ST ANTHONY CITY OF
444
8.020%
ST BONIFACIUS CITY OF
4,254
x1.525%
ST CHARLES CITY OF
56,096
8.020%
ESTIMATED IMPACT OF THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL
ON CITY AID FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992
iF , 2;376
2,342
0 -
---- -- 5,638
19,140
1
TONKA BAY CITY OF >
0
0.000%
TOWER CITY OF
PROP.(
,OF
NAME
CU7 AT
REVENUE
TRAIL CITY OF
8.02%
8.020%
iF , 2;376
2,342
0 -
---- -- 5,638
19,140
1
TONKA BAY CITY OF >
0
0.000%
TOWER CITY OF
16,150
8.020%
TRACY CITY OF
70,245
8.020%
TRAIL CITY OF
600
8.020%
TRIMONT CITY OF
25,760
8.020%
TROMMALD CITY OF
1,425
8.020°%
TROSKY CITY OF
;392
8.020%
TRUMAN CITY OF
31,570
8.020%
TURTLE RIVER CITY OF
- 7
1.400%
TWIN LAKES CITY OF
3,718
8.020%
TWIN VALLEY CITY OF
"18;957
8.020%
TWO HARBORS CITY OF
117,218
8.0201%
TYLER CITY OF..
26.587
8.020%
IUNULHWUUU%GITY>OF ::I '6.8651 8.020%)
URBANK CITY OF
GOV'S
PERCENT
UTICA CITY OF
PROPOSED
OF
NAME
CUT AT
REVENUE
VERGAS CITY OF
8.0246
BASE
URBANK CITY OF
419
8.020%
UTICA CITY OF
3,336
8.020%
VADNAIS,HEIGHT CITY OF
0
.0.000%
VERGAS CITY OF
2,018
8.020%
VERMILLION CITYO
a` :810
0.965%
VERNDALE CITY OF
9,085
8.020%
VERNON CENTERCIrY:OF
8,386
8.020%
VESTA CITY OF
8,011
8.02046
VICT RIA. `CITY. OF `' :
0
0.000%
VIKING CITY OF
2,019
8.020%
VILLARD CITY OF
5,139
8.020°%
VINING CITY OF
1,127
8.020%
VIRGINIA CITY: OF
490,587
8.020%
WABASHA CITY OF
76,689
8.020%
WABASSO CITY OF'
16;933
8.020°%
WACONIA CITY OF
86,716
8.020%
WADENA CITY OF:::::
76,408
8.020°%
WAHKON CITY OF
3,203
8.020°%
WAITE:PARK CITY OF
119,014
8.020%
WALDORF CITY OF
6,680
8.020%
WALKER .CITY OF::;
37,851
8.020%
WALNUT GROVE CITY OF
17,361
8.020%
WALTERS CITY OF':`
2,600
8.020%
WALTHAM CITY OF
3,504
8.020%
WANAMINGO CITY OF "
21,845
8.020%
WANDA CITY OF
1,777
8.020%
WARBA CITY OF -:
1,493
8.020%
WARREN CITY OF
28,619
8.020%
WARROAD CITY. OF
28,696
8.020%
WASECA CITY OF
189,732
8.020%
WATERTOWN ITYiOF :,
32,221
8.020%
WATERVILLE CITY
41,421
8.0200%
WATKINS CITY OF
WATSON CITY OF
20,896
7,590
8.020%
8.029%
WAUBUN CITY OF
5,729
8.020°%
WAVERLY CITY OF
22,072
8.020%
WAYZATA CITY OF:
0
0.000°%
WELCOME CITY OF
19,714
8.020%
WELLS CITY OF
65,190
8.020°%
WENDELL CITY OF
4,9011
8.020°%
WEST CONCORD CITY OF.
18,042
8.020%
WEST ST PAUL CITY OF
396,677
8.020%
WEST UNION CITY OF
395
8.020%
WESTBROOK CITY OF
23,262
8.020°%
WESTPORT CITY OF
214
8.020°%
WHALAN CITY OF
1,405
8.020°%
WHEATON CITY OF
52,281
8.020%
WHITE BEAR LK CITY OF
312,922
8.020°%
WILDER CITY OF
1,175
8.020%
WILLERNIE CITY OF
10,613
8.020%
WILLIAMS CITY OF
3,320
8.020°%
WILLMAR CITY OF
362,252
8:0200/o
WILLOW RIVER CITY OF
2,969
8.020%
WILMONT CITY OF
6,012
8.020%
WILTON CITY OF
0
0;00010/0
WINDOM CITY OF
118,098
8.020°%
WINGER CITY OF
5,436
8.020%
WINNEBAGO CITY OF
42,701
8.020%
WINONA CITY OF
WINSTED CITY OF
693,275
43,8721
8:0200%,
8.0200
ESTIMATED IMPACT OF THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL
ON CITY AID FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1992
WINTHRORCITY OF
GOV'S .
PERCENT
(NAME
PROPOSED
OF
WOLF LAKE ITY OF , :
GUT AT::
REVENUE
WOLVERTON CITY OF
>8.02%
BASE
WINTHRORCITY OF
35,807
8.020%
WI ON CITY—OF
2870
8.020%
WOLF LAKE ITY OF , :
78 :.
WOLVERTON CITY OF
3,181
8.020%
WOOD..LAPm—cl—Ty—iv-
10;730
8.0
WOODBURY CITY OF
0
0.000%
W ODLAND I TY OF ::
0
0.
WOODSTOCK CITY OF
3,234
8.020%
WORTHI1VGi N CIIY OF
295,263 777UW
TOTALS1 $7.1;600,0001 6.68796
prepared by: The League of Minnesota Cities
10—Mar-92
GOV'S
PERCENT
PROPOSED
OF
NAME:.,CUT
AT
REVENUE
8.02%
BASE
TOTALS1 $7.1;600,0001 6.68796
prepared by: The League of Minnesota Cities
10—Mar-92