HomeMy WebLinkAbout2. Residential and Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (PUD)eity of (Rosemount
PHONE (612) 423.4411 2875 - 145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota
FAX (612) 423.5203 Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 510, Rosemount, Minnesota 550680510
TO: Mayor & City Council
Planning Commission
Port Authority
Parks and Recreation Committee
Utilities Commission
FROM: Lisa Freese, Director of Planning
DATE: December 11, 1992
SUBJ: Comprehensive Guide Plan Special Council Meeting 12/
Rosemount Fire Hall
This memo is intended to brief you on the issues which the Planning sta
decisions are made on at this Special Meeting on Monday. It is quite c)
made, so that we can make final maps,`finish land use calculations, sew
transportation projections. (Several of these items are omitted or are in
your draft of the Plan) .
Therefore, I would ask that you consider making formal recommendatic
each of the agenda items. 'If I might also suggest, since the Planning CI
recommending authority on Coml
taken by the Commission and the,
and be included in the plan as prt
vote. If the policy does not pass,
direction.
RESIDENTIAL PUD — KELLEY TRUST
MAYOR
Edward S. McMenomy
COUNCILMEMBERS
Sheila Klassen
James (Red) Steals
Harry Willcox
Dennis Wippermann
ADMINISTRATOR
Stephan Jilk
- 7:00 p.m. -
need to have
cal that decisions are
flows, and
eliminary format in
and take votes on
mission has
lation vote should be
City Council should vote on the issues. In order to pass
d, the City Council must approve the motion by a 4/5
:ouncil must offer an alternative motion to give staff
After considerable work on the performance standards, the Planning Commission has finally
developed a recommendation for the Residential PUD concept encompassing the Kelley Trust
property (Binger and Daly farms). The major components of this PUD clude: 1) the property
must be planned for development as a single unit; 2) the density permitted is 2.5 units per acre
as in the Urban ResidentialDevelopment Standards; however, the developer will not be able to
include the wetlands, steep slopes, and park dedication into the densitycalculations; 3) a buffer
area must be maintained, privately, along the Rural Residential area on The northern edge; 4)
significant trees are to be protected, maintained, or replaced via a Tree Preservation Ordinance.
In order to implement this policy element, the Zoning Ordinance will n to be amended to
include a Residential PUD District/Standards and the City should adopt a Tree Preservation
Ordinance either as an overlay, or if deemed appropriate, it may be applied to the entire City.
6verylkings (Pouring (Ub RosemounlY
iJ lftvcw Pane.
Special City Council Meeting: 12/14/92
Comprehensive Guide Plan Update
Page 2
Fred Hoisington will be present at this meeting to discuss the concept
speak more extensively about the various implementation issues.
he will be able to
If the Council approves this concept, we will also need to make a decisi n regarding the Interim
MUSA for this property because of the pending assessments. Planning staff is recommending
that the two western sewer subdistricts currently served by that trunk line be included within the
Interim MUSA. (Interim MUSA is the MUSA area that we will develop within the Year 2000
MUSA prior to the treatment plant expansion in 1996-97).
If the Concept PUD Standards are approved, it will also enable staff to eet with the Kelley
Trust attorney to discuss their desire for sewer capacity and the timing c f their need for sewer
capacity. Depending on their interest in development of this property, ft may be possible to work
out an arrangement to allocate that capacity intended' for the Kelley proy erty to some other land.
That would only be possible if they do not desire to develop or sell to a developer the property
before 1997
Minn USE PUD
At the Council's request, the Planning Commission has revisited the concept of the PUD - Mixed
Use. This is intended for the property located between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway, south of County Road 42. The rationale behind this concepti that since this area was
originally planned for residential and the area to the south is developed as residential, special
attention needs to be made as to what kinds of commercial development and what kinds of traffic
patterns are allowed to impact the neighborhood. Commercial development in this area would
only be allowed if traffic can be adequately accommodated. In addition consideration would be
given on approval of a development as to whether or not the market will be able to absorb a
commercial project. Any commercial development occurring in this area would not be eligible
for tax increment financing or any other type of subsidy.
The Planning Commission made some minor wording changes to this text, however, they felt that
there was not a need to develop detailed standards as with the Residential PUD.
REVIEW OF POLICY ELEMENTS
Last year extensive discussion occurred on the various policy elements t at are in this plan. At
this point the Planning staff would like to briefly review these policy elements and determine
whether there are any outstanding issues. All of these policy elements are in chapter 4 of the
Comprehensive Plan. Please take the time to review them for the meet' ig and come with
questions.
PENDING COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENTS
As I am sure you are all aware, as a result of the Metropolitan Council's interaction with us,
staff has been recommending that all Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendments submitted since
June be held and included as part of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Update. At the current time
we have four Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendments pending and one proposal that is in
conflict with our current proposed Land Use Map. On Monday night it is essential that the
Special City Council Meeting: 12/14/92
Comprehensive Guide Plan Update
Page 3
Council make a decision as to whether or not you wish to approve each
amendments. I will try to briefly summarize what I perceive to be the c
proposal.
A. CMC Heartland Partners
of these
tndin issues on each
This Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment would change our Land Use Designation from
Industrial to Residential for this 103 -acre parcel located on the C1AC property situated north
of CSAH 42, west of Biscayne Avenue, and south of 145th Street West. The development
would consist of small lot single family, townhouses, and a comm rcial component on
approximately 10 acres in the southwest corner of the site. This proposal has been initially
reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council and, based upon previous
discussions, it is the Planning staff's impression that this concept is acceptable. At this
time Planning staff is recommending that this area be included in Interim MUSA area
so that development can proceed here, prior to the treatment plant7ur
expansion.
B. Chicago Northwestern Property
This proposal consists of a 226 -acre parcel in which the CMC Heatland Partners desires to
build a mixed use residential development with approximately 660 housing units. At the
current time the Metropolitan Council has this area included in the: MUSA as an industrial
land use with the equivalent of six single family homes. The City Council, however, never
adopted that amendment after the Metropolitan Council gave its approval. Planning staff
has brought this proposal before both the Planning Commission ar d the City Council. At
those informal reviews, this project was given general support. P anning staff has
recommended that if this amendment is approved, that this area bc included in the Year
2000 MUSA, but not within the Interim MUSA developable befor 1996.
C. Islamic Community Cemetery Proposal
Earlier this summer the Islamic Community brought before the PI
City Council a proposal for a cemetery on a piece of property loc
Biscayne Avenue, just west of the Rosemount Woods mobile horn
Comprehensive Guide Plan discussions this area was to be design
This parcel is a critical parcel because it is the approximate aligm
and the likely location for the Brockway draw interceptor. In the
configurations this would be included within the Year 2000 MUS.
Interim MUSA. Planning staff s opinion is that one of the major
is how the infrastructure surrounding this piece of property will 1
that may or may not have on the development potential of this pi(
D. Mosquito Control Commission Facility
The Mosquito Control Commission has optioned a piece of proy
the 40 -acre parcel at the northwest corner at Biscayne Avenue a
Mosquito Control Commission desires to move their existing fw
University of Minnesota Rosemount Campus to this site. It w
work and storage area for their mosquito abatement activities in
ming Commission and
ed on the east side of
park. Based upon our
�d as Urban Residential.
mt of Connemara Trail
urrent MUSA
, but not within the
)ncerns with this request
up and what impact
of property.
y on western ten acres of
160th Street. The
y located on the
d be primarily used as a
s region. At the current
Special City Council Meeting: 12/14/92
Comprehensive Guide Plan Update
Page 4
time we do not have any building plans for this proposal, but do
Commission's architect indicate that there may be several buildi
prefabricated metal on this site.
ptions provided by the
made out of
There are two primary issues that need to be dealt with in cons' ' g this request. First,
whether or not the Mosquito Control Commission should be consk ered a Public or
Institutional use, since they are governmental in nature. This use J s not unlike the Dakota
County Maintenance facility which is located on Biscayne Avenue, north of 145th Street
West. That property is zoned PUB Public.
The second issue with this particular request concerns the fact that a corner of this property
has been included in the MUSA as a result of the Empire Sewer Diversion Amendment. At
issue is whether or not we should allow unsewered development as the Mosquito Control
Commission desires, within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area.
D. National Guard Armory Maintenance Facility
The City of Rosemount has received word that the National Guard has made a purchase
offer for property in the University Addition at the northeast comer of Biscayne Avenue
and CSAH 42. This property is presently zoned IP Industrial Park which is our planned
industrial district. At our last Comprehensive Guide Plan meeting this particular property
was discussed in context of whether or not it should be industrial r urban residential. At
that particular time, the consensus of those present was that this ar a should be designated
urban residential in order to provide continuity and an adequate mass of residential
development to make the CMC and the Chicago Northwestern properties linked. The City
has not received anything formal, but previous discussions with th National Guard Armory
have indicated that they intend to build a quality building with materials of brick or a
similar nature and that they would be willing to landscape and bu er the outdoor storage
area for the trucks and guard related vehicles. This property is attractive to the Guard
because it has sewer and water available and this is one of the requirements that must be
met for this maintenance facility site. The other thing that should be noted is that there are
some constraints to the development of this property because of aipeline that runs along
the eastern edge of the property and the frontage on two sides of CSAH 42.
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
At the meeting Monday I would like to go over the various implements on items that have been
identified to date as a result of these discussions. There is a 3-4 page listing (Chapter 5) that I
would encourage you to read through and consider any issues or concerns that you may have with
these items.
REMAINING GUIDE PLAN PROCESS
If conclusions are made regarding all of the issues on this agenda, Planning staff will be able to
pull together the final document. It is anticipated that the document can be substantially complete
so that the Planning Commission can review it and make recommendation on January 12, 1993.
We would suggest that the City Council could accept the document at thJanuary 19, 1993
Special City Council Meeting: 12/14/92
Comprehensive Guide Plan Update
Page 5
meeting and set a public hearing at that time if the document is accep
that the City Council hold a Special Meeting for thita
s public hearing.
a public hearing may be February 3, 1993. At the conclusion of the h
required, the Council can direct staff to complete those.
possible to adopt the If those char
Comprehensive Guide Plan at your February 9, 1
As a note of caution, however, this schedule is dependent upon decisio
on Monday night's agenda. If these items are left unresolved, the sche
I know that all of you are quite anxious to get the Plan complete so, I
productive work session on Monday night.
Thank you for your cooperation.
ble. It is recommended
he date most attainable for
acing, if changes are
es are minor, it may be
193 City Council Meeting.
s regarding these issues
(ule could be moved back.
ust we will have a very
A
ROSEM�OTJNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL MEETING
DECEMBER 14, 1992
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a special meeting of the City
Council of the City of Rosemount was duly held on Monday, December 141
1992, at 7:00 p.m. at the Rosemount Fire Hall at 1442$1 Brazil Avenue.
Mayor McMenomy called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with Councilmembers
Willcox, Klassen, Staats and Wippermann present. Also present were City
Administrator Stephan Jilk, Economic Development Coordinator John Miller,
Planning Director Lisa Freese, Planning Assistant Rick Pearson, Port
Authority members: Bill Mawe, Joan Anderson, and Ed Dunn; Planning
Commissioners: Al Meyer, Jay Baago, and Cathy Busho; and Parks and
Recreation Committee member Jerry Puciaty. City Consultant Fred Hoisington
and City Attorney Shawn Moynihan assisted in presenting the Comprehensive
Guide Plan. Several other residents and interested people attended the
meeting.
I
Mayor.McMenomy lead the group with the Pledge of Allegiance.
Planning Director Lisa Freese noted that the purpose f the special meeting
was to discussthe final draft of the Comprehensive G ide Plan and obtain
recommendations from City Council.
Director Freese reviewed the Residential PUD for the Kelley Trust property.
Fred Hoisington explained many of the details and answered questions.
MOTION by McMenomy to approve the Residential Planned Unit Development with
noted changes for inclusion to the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Second by
Staats. Ayes: Klassen, Staats, Willcox, Wippermann,iMcMenomy. Nays: 0.
Attorney Moynihan noted that a Public Hearing would be necessary prior to
formal adoption of the Guide Plan.
Fred Hoisington reviewed the "Mixed Use Planned Unit Development" concept.
MOTION by McMenomy to approve the PUD - Mixed Use in the Comprehensive
Guide Plan but to remove the last two sentences in paragraph three
referring to TIF eligibility. Second by Wippermann. Ayes: Staats,
Willcox, Wippermann,- McMenomy, Klassen. Na,ys: 0.
Director Freese reviewed the policies section of Chap er 4 of the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
MOTION by McMenomy to approve the Agriculture Area portion of the
Comprehensive Guide Plan with a 1/10 density. Second by Willcox. Ayes:
Willcox, Wippermann, McMenomy, Klassen, Staats. Nays� 0.
MOTION by McMenomy to approve the Conservancy Areas portion of the
Comprehensive Guide Plan. Second by Klassen. Ayes: Wippermann, McMenomy,
Klassen, Staats, Willcox. Nays: 0.
ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL MEETING
DECEMBER 14, 1992
MOTION by McMenomy to approve the Housing and Neighborhoods portion of the
Comprehensive Guide Plan with the table of Residential Density Summary for
Year 2010 showing the percentage of Single Family at 800, Multi -Family at
17o and Mobile Homes/Other at 3o. Second by Klassen. Ayes: McMenomy,
Klassen, Staats, Willcox, Wippermann. Nays: 0.
MOTION by McMenomy to approve the Public and Institutional Plan portion of
the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Second by Klassen. Ayes: Klassen, Staats,
Willcox, Wippermann, McMenomy. Nays: 0.
MOTION by Klassen to approve the Commercial Area portion of the
Comprehensive Guide Plan removing the last two sentences from the first
paragraph under the sub -title Plan Elements and under the sub -title
Policies, number seven, change the word "provide" to "insure" regarding
parking. Second by Willcox. Ayes: Staats, Willcox, Wippermann, McMenomy,
Klassen. Nays: 0.
MOTION by McMenomy to approve the Industrial Areas portion of the
Comprehensive Guide Plan clarifying the description of the "Pine Bend" area
and removing the phrase following the word "fashion" in item three of the
sub -title Objectives. Second by Willcox. Ayes: Willcox, Wippermann,
McMenomy, Klassen, Staats. Nays: 0.
MOTION by McMenomy to approve the Waste Management portion of the
Comprehensive Guide Plan. Second by Wippermann. Ayes: Wippermann,
McMenomy, Klassen, Staats, Willcox. Nays: 0.
Director Freese and Planning Commissioner Baago reviewed the Islamic
Community Cemetery proposal. A representative from the Islamic Community
said the northern portion would be available to the city for easement at no
cost and development of the lower portion would be in phases not being
totally developed until the year 2035.
MOTION by Willcox to re -zone the parcel considered by the Islamic Community
from Urban Residential to Public within the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
Second by Staats. Ayes: Klassen, Staats, Willcox, Wippermann. Nays: 0.
Abstain: McMenomy. Motion carried.
Public Works Director Ron Wasmund reviewed the Mosquito Control Commission
Facility proposal. Richard Gager, consulting engineer working in the seven
county area, noted how other cities have dealt with similar facilities.
Gager said the closing for the land is planned for March of 1993 and
Mosquito Control Commission would agree to hook up to sewer when it is made
available.
MOTION by Willcox to have the Comprehensive Guide Plan public hearing by
February 15, 1993 and go ahead with a Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment. Second by Staats. Discussion followed.
ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL MEETING
7 DECEMBER 14, 1992
Motion was withdrawn by Willcox and second withdrawn by Staats.
MOTION by Wippermann to approve the Mosquito Control Commission Facility
zoned Industrial conditional on connecting with sewer when it is available.
Second by Willcox. Ayes: Klassen, Staats, Willcox, ippermann, McMenomy.
Nays: 0. W
MOTION by McMenomy to recommend to have staff proceed with a Minor
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment relating to the parcel requested by the
Mosquito Control Commission. Second by Staats. Ayes: Staats, Willcox,
Wippermann, McMenomy, Klassen. Nays: 0.
Councilmembers Willcox and Staats left the meeting at
Director Freese said the land use designation for CMC
proposal would change from Industrial to Residential I
parcel which,lis included in the present MUSA estimati(
this point in time.
Heartland Partners
or the 103 acre
ns.
MOTION by McMenomy to approve the land use designatio for the CMC
Heartland Partners proposal as Residential. Second b Wippermann. Ayes:
Wippermann, McMenomy, Klassen. Nays: 0. motion ca ried.
MOTION by McMenomy to approve a Mixed Use Residentiallland designation for
the Chicago Northwestern Property residential development proposal. Second
by Klassen. Second by Klassen. Ayes: Wippermann, MeMenomy, Klassen.
Nays: 0.
MOTION by McMenomy to zone the northeast corner of Biscayne Avenue and CSAR
42 Urban Residential rather than Industrial Park. Se and by Wippermann.
Ayes: McMenomy, Klassen, Wippermann, Nays: 0. MMon Carried.
MOTION by McMenomy to adjourn. Second by Klassen. A 1 in favor. The
meeting was adjourned at 11:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda Jentink, Re
ATTEST:
Stephan Jilk, City Administrator
The City Council Agenda Packet is Clerk's File 1992-5
3
)rding Secretary
2
X r
Figure 11
MAJOR EMPLOYERS
PRODUCTS/SERVICES
EMPL
YEES
TOTAL EMPLOYMENT
3,348
KOCH REFINERY
CRUDE OIL
900 PERMANENT
300-5CO
DAILY
CONTRACTORS
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
DIST. 196
EDUCATION
715
DAKOTA CO. TECH.
COLLEGE
EDUCATION
475
GREIF BROS.
MULTIWALL BAGS
150
SPECTRO ALLOYS
ALUMINUM ALLOYS MFG.
95
KNUTSON SERV., INC.
REFUSE/RECYCLING
95
GENZ & RYAN PLUMBING
& HEATING
PLUMBING & HEATING
85
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
GOVERNMENT
60
DAKOTA COUNTY HRA
GOVERNMENT
45
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS
NATURAL GAS
36
CONTINENTAL NITROGEN
CHEMICALS
35
CARLSON TRACTOR
INDUSTRIAL & FARM
EQUIPMENT
30
The Metropolitan Council has projected employment
to continue increasing in the City of Rosemount
until the year 2010, and then predicts it to remain
constant over the next 10 years. (See Figure 12) As
the graph shows, employment in Rosemount has not
increased at a constant rate. In 1985, the Brockway
Glass Plant closed and partially explains the
decrease in employment between 1980 and 1990.
Not until after the year 2000 is Rosemount expected
to make up for the loss in employment that occurred
in that year.
However, Rosemount residents are not dependent on
jobs in Rosemount. 85 percent of the residents of
Rosemount commute to other parts of the metro area
to work. About 18 percent work in either
Minneapolis or Saint Paul, 25 percent work in
another part of Dakota County and the others are
C.T
3
scattered through the other parts of the area.' (See
Figure 13)
Retail Sector
Rosemount has a ve limited retail sector, as the
community is adjace at to several other larger
communities with st ong existing retail markets.
Property for comme cial purposes in Rosemount has
a total 1992 value o only $18.9 million, compared
with the Apple Valley total of $98.2 million.'
However, Rosemount does offer a variety of
neighborhood shops and services. Neighborhood
convenience centers are in fact, the prime
recruitment target for the retail sector. In addition,
Rosemount has a number of successful auto -related
businesses, including repair shops, salvage yards
and body shops. (See Figure 14)
00
r
Rosemount Retail
Eating and Drinking Establishments . 12
Convenience Shops .............
5
Specialty Retail Shop ............
15
Automotive ...............16
Services (Professional) ...........
24
Entertainment ................
5
Services (Personal) , ............
9
Total ................
86
Industrial Sector
Rosemount has tremendous investments in industrial
property. In 1992, the total property value for land
used for industrial purposes was $59.6 million,
compared with Apple Valley's less that $8 million.'
The majority of the Northeast section of the city is
completely used for industrial purposes. This area
has access to no city utilities at the present time,
except for the USPCI site in the Pine Bend
Industrial Area. City staff recognizes that the
potential to recruit new industry into the area will
severely hampered by the lack of utilities. Therefore
they have asked the Metropolitan Council's
permission to slowly extend services to the entire
area beginning with the USPCI site and careful
expansion over the next 20 years.
Property Valuation
The total market value for property in Rosemount in
1992 was $335,880,800.6 69 percent of the totalis
residential ($229.6 million), 18 percent industrial
($59.6 million) and 6 percent commercial ($18.9
million). (See Figure 15) ****Figure 15 is
planned as a table of total market value by land
use from 1980 to 1992 Perhaps a pie chart of
1992 market value would be more
appropriate.**** An historical analysis of property
values shows that over time, residential land uses
have had an increasing amount of the total property
value. (See Figure 16) ***Figure 16 is planned as
a line or ribbon graph showing historical trends.
I planned to put the year on the X-axis and the
Dollar amounts on the Y-axis, with my series
OF
4
being land uses.***(This is a direct correlation to
the change in the city's labor force as the
community moved from a free standing growth
center to a third -tier uburban center.
Tax Capacity
Often in city goverm
that the residents of
big a share of the cit
tax burden for a city
amount of tax that c,
property in a city be
added. This is also c
Figure 17 shows, th(
burden in Rosemoun
the tax year 1990, w
by the Dakota Count
Figure 17
gent staff hears the complaint
city are responsible for too
is total tax burden. The total
nay be described as the total
i be levied from all the
)re special assessments are
fled the tax capacity. As
resident's share of the tax
has remained constant since
en tax capacity was first used
tax assesor.
s
r i
1.Decisions Resources Survey.
2.1990 Community Profile.
3. Decisions, Resources Survey.
4.Courtesy of the Dakota County Tax Assesor's Offi
5.Ibid.
6.Ibid.
M
5
Pln
GROWTH PROJECTIONS
HISTORIC LAND USE PATTERNS
Rosemount's history as a rural agricultural
community is still evident in its land use patterns.
Although residential and industrial development
continues to consume farmland, large portions of the
City still remain in agricultural use. Over 1,800
acres of agricultural land in the City is protected
under the Metropolitan Agriculture Preserves Act,
with that acreage remaining fairly stable over the
life of the program.
Most of the City's remaining prime agriculture land
is located in the southeastern portion of the City,
with heavy industrial uses concentrated in the
northeast and urban residential and commercial
development focused on the western one third of the
City.
The large amount of land used for agriculture,
combined with the large tracts of open space held by
public entities within the City, makes a significant
contribution to the rural character of Rosemount.
Rosemount has an unusually large percentage of
public land, due in large part to the University of
Minnesota's Agriculture Experiment Station and
Rosemount Research Center. These facilities
comprise nearly 3,200 acres of agricultural land in
south central Rosemount.
Although all of this
institutional land us,
actually zoned as su
the present balance
property. While mu
in appearance, a po
for traditional instit
Separating out this
used for a variety
industrial purposes
of the balance of 1,
Existing Land Use 1970-1
10
9-
1970
01 19$0
7 1990
's
6
5-
4-
3 3
2
1
0
OF ROSEMOUN
Residential Commercial Industrial Public
(Unk%v- y not
1
-operty is designated as an
only a small portion is
.. This is in part a reflection of
land uses existing on the
of the property is agricultural
on of the property is not used
onal or agricultural purposes.
rge public holding that is being
institutional, agricultural, and
ay give a more accurate picture
I use within the City.
P/1
11
LAND UsE
1970 % OF
ACRES TOTAL
1980 % OF 1970,80
ACRES TOTAL CHANGE
1990
AcREs
% OF
TOTAL
1980-90
CHANGE
RESIDENTIAL
375
1.7%
1,115
4.9%
197.3%
2,163
9.6%
94.0%
PUBUCANSTITMONAL
3,495
15.5%
4,060
18.0%
16.2%
4,083
18.1%
0.6%
COMMERCIAL
20
0.1%
43
0.2%
115.0%
I 280
1.2%
551.2%
INDUSTRIAL
620
2.7%
1,215
5.4%
96.0%
1,376
6.1%
13.3 %
AG. VACANT & OTHER
18,050
80.0%
16,127
71.5%
-10.7%
14.658
65.0%1
-9.1%
[Table of Land Use Calculations]
11 j 3,4951 4,0601 4,083 II
Land use changes have occurred at various rates
depending on the type of use.
Today Rosemount devotes a far larger portion of its
land to commercial development than at any time in
the past. This is not the case for other types of land
uses, however, which exhibited a slower rate of
physical expansion over the last decade than what
occurred during the decade 1970-80.
Although the amount of land used for residential
development nearly doubled during the decade, this
is a far slower rate of growth than previously
_.experienced. Along with this, the City has seen a
slowing in the physical expansion of public land
uses. Industrial development also showed a slightly
slower rate of physical expansion than was seen
during the previous decade as the City's larger
industries focused on maintenance of current
facilities rather than expansion.
OF
2
PIE CHARTS
OVER TIME
[what sort of balanc
is considered a heal
this compare with
capacity???]
G CHANGES IN USE
do other City's have and what
by balance... how does all of
guation info and tax
P 12
( e
I
^
September 30, 1992
City of Rosemount
Major Residential Developments in
Country Hills Additions (PUD approved .981)
U.S. Home Corporation
8421 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 300
Golden valley, MN 55426
Sdd-7333 I
Addition
Lots
Platted
Bldg Pmts
Issued
Vacant Lots
Country Hills First Addition (9/86)
80
80
0
Country Hills Second Addition (6/87)
160
156
4
Country Hills Third Addition (11/88)
140
124{
16
Country Hills Fourth Addition (7/91)
31
29
2
Country Hills Fifth Addition (10/91)
37
21i
16
Country Hills Sixth Addition (Pending)
77
77
Totals
525
416
115
Carrollton Additions (PUD approved 1988 -
Thomas O'Leary
Rosemount Properties of Minneapolis
2415 Annapolis Lane, Suite 109
Plymouth, MN 55441
557-1557
126 Lots)
Addition
Lots
Platted
Bldg Pints
Issued
Vacant
. Lots
Carrollton 2nd Addition (1/88)
47
41
0
Carrollton 3rd Addition (10/89)
40
40
0
Carrollton 4th Addition (8/92)
39
38
IF-- Totals
7126
8
38
a
O'Leary's Hills Additions (PUD approved 1987
Steve Broback
Parkview, Inc.
15021 Oakland Avenue
Burnsville, MN 55337
454-3172
- 213 Lots)
Addition
Lots
Platted
Bldg mts
Issued
Vacant
Lots
O'Leary's Hills First Addition (8/83)
30
30
0
O'Leary's Hills Second Addition (6/86)
25
36
0
O'Leary's Hills Third Addition (7/87)
23
3
0
O'Leary's Hills Fourth Addition (4/89)
31
7�9
2
O'Leary's Hills Fifth Addition (Pending)
37
0
37
O'Leary's Hills Sixth Addition (9/92)
2
10
2
Totals
14
41
Shannon Hills Additions (PUD approved 1989' - 190 Lots)
Steven Fiterman, President
Ground Development Corp.
1550 Utica Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55416
546-2625
Addition
Lots
Platted
Bldg Pats
lssue4
Vacant
Lots
Shannon Hills lst Addition (10/89)
30
R
0
Shannon Hills 2nd Addition (10/90)
40
36
4
Shannon Hills 3rd Addition (2/92)
26
1
14
Shannon Hills 4th Addition (Pending)IL
30
(
11
30
IF-- Totals
IF 126
7z
48
2
p x
Wensmann Additions (PUD approved 1987 - 206 Lots)
• Herb Wensmann
Wensmann. Realty
14340 Pilot Knob Road
Apple Valley, MN 55124
423-1179
Addition
Lots
Platted
Bldg Pmts
Issued
Vacant
Lots
Wensmann First Addition (9/87)
40
40
0
Wensmann Second Addition (5/88)
65
64
1
Wensmann Third Addition (4/89)
34
34
0
Wensmann Fourth Addition (9/89)
31
30
1
Wensmann Fifth Addition (7/90)
38
36
2
Totals
208
204
West Ridge Additions (PUD approved 1987 -
Timothy Broback
Rosemount Development Company
3480 Upper 149th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
423-1660
280 Lots)
Addition
Lots
Platted
Bldg Pits
Issued
Vacant
Lots
West Ridge First Addition (2/87)
56
56'
0
West Ridge Second Addition (6/87)
54
51
0
West Ridge Third Addition (4/89)
41
41,
0
West Ridge Fourth Addition (2/92)
32 11
151
17
Totals
183
166
17
Cimarron Village Townhouses (36
Michael Conlin
Nichols/Conlan Financial Company
431 South 7th Street, Suite 2540
Minneapolis, MN 55415
612133317321
Building Permit Issued 8/92 for 36
3 ', n
MAJOR NEW DEVELOPMEN
� G°W V G,11N III
- r�_ T-- .= ..p IN- �t��EMOUNT—
P no •
_ ;�• o Y � . � " � -• _amu iC, ; ,• /� I �-
Amberwood Estates y -
1 _I
i i
` I I
1120 it.
3.
1 4P
•-J!//�.�i� -- /C,w-• .` - - _
i ' ��irs !=•yam • ti- - - - 1� -/ - Ilr..
r� Y Shannon.•
a i••-• •-•trig►*, !
Shannon Park!'--
TQwphomes E All,
LA
A -z
&0 ®
Limrat
AGRICULTURAL
IFI- 1,
• a r
Hills
• • — -�-r • 32�' sl EXPERIMENT_
1 _ ::. s,.r ! rte-^.: •/
z • •�#!.� '=� '�a•'.'�-; �."s� t . i � - I I,I I,_ it S!
28000-
26000-
24000-
22000-
20000-
18000-
16000-
14000-
12000-
10000.
8000-
26040-
24040-
22000-
20000-
18000-
16000-
14000-
1200010040.
8040
6000
im
Year
Forcasted Growth
1990.2070
Population -City
Households -City
2010
F
Y;
COMMUNITY GOALS
1. Preserve and foster the small town ambience of
such develop men
will produce a net benefit in
the community by striving to respect
property tax reve
ues over servicing demands.
Rosemount's unique historical and physical assets
14.
Protect existing and
future heavy industrial and
and encouraging the continuation of strong
waste management/processing
land uses from
interpersonal relationships among residents
non -compatible use
encroachments.
(CAC #1).
15.
Generally promote
new industrial and
2. Balance industrial, commercial, and residential
commercial enterprises
for the purpose of
development with small town ambience (CAC
creating new em
loyment opportunities and a
#VI).
more diversified
tax base.
3. A balanced and diverse community that provides
16.
Protect and improve
the social and physical
opportunities for living, working, shopping,
integrity of existing
neighborhoods from
playing, learning, and socializing.
potentially adver
a external influences.
4. Maintain the rural appearance and character of
17.
High quality residential
environments which are
Rosemount.
healthy, safe, economical,
are well maintained
5. Conserve unique natural/physical/historical
and are convenient
to work, shopping, and
resources including landscapes of scenic and
schools.
ecological significance.
18.
The continuation
of long-term agricultural use for
6. A generally compact urban form within urban
as long as possible.
service areas with orderly and sequential growth
19.
Development of
a park and open space system
that is capable of being efficiently and
that serves the n
s of all residents while
economically served by public services.
providing opporl
unities for the conservation of
7. A mix of housing opportunities for people of all
natural resourc
.
age, income, and ethnic backgrounds.
20.
An enhanced sense
of community togetherness by
8. Preservation and enhancement of the downtown's
creating, mainta
ning, and preserving areas and
identity as a place of orientation, social
facilities for boti
active and passive leisure time
interaction, cultural expression, and commercial
experiences (CAC
#IV).
exchange (CAC #II).
21.
A balanced and
efficient transportation system
9. Continuing redevelopment and growth of the
which provides
sense of connectedness, good
Rosemount CBD as the predominant center for
local and regional
accessibility and consists of
retail, office, dining, entertainment, institutional,
public transit, streets
and highways, bicycle paths
and public uses.
and sidewalks.
10. Attraction of new retail establishments to
22.
Increased econo
is development efforts to
downtown and the support of existing viable
balance property
taxes with public services and
businesses in their efforts to expand or maintain
attract higher paying
employment opportunities.
current operations for the purpose of retaining
23.
The provision of
additional waste treatment
- existing employment and enhancing a stable tax
capacity to service
areas within Metropolitan
base.
Urban Service
Areas.
11. Minimize environmental impacts attributable to
24. Maximize contr
l over external entities in a
development while creating opportunities for tax
manner that ensures
consistency with the City's
base enhancement.
character and goals
(CAC #V).
12. If major projects/industries capable of adversely
25.
An informed citizenry
which fosters unity,
affecting Rosemount are to be considered,
encourages a sense
of identity, allows
concentrate them in a single area of the City
put/feedback, and
encourages openness (CAC
where uniform and efficient environmental
#III).
controls and monitoring can be applied.
13. Promote the east end of Rosemount as an area
that is uniquely suited for heavy industrial
development and other compatible uses provided
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
1
DECEMBER, 199
0 10
HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS
OBJECTIVES
1. Provide housing in appropriate proportions,
based on need, for people of all income, age
and life style.
2. Create and maintain quality living
environments that are in tune with the natural
environment and the rural character of
Rosemount.
3. Upgrade and maintain the existing housing
stock.
4. Strengthen neighborhoods and protect them
from adverse influences (excessive traffic,
junk cars, nuisances).
PLAN ELEMENTS
The plan establishes three categories of residential
land use termed High Density Residential (HR),
Urban Residential (UR), and Rural Residential
(RR). Each is intended to offer a distinctly different
lifestyle to satisfy the needs and desires of a diverse
population. Each is intended to be planned to create
neighborhood cohesiveness and identity, to promote
neighborhood conservation and long term residency,
and to protect the natural environment and
incorporate it as an element of human habitation.
High Density Residential (HR)
High Density Residential development is intended to
be permitted only within MUSA. It has a maximum
density of 18 units per acre (except within the CBD)
and will include the full range of attached multi-
family rental and owner occupied housing ranging
from townhouses to apartments. While the City has
a rather substantial amount of land already used
and/or zoned for multi -family housing, some of
which is designated on the land use plan, it is the
City's intent to be circumspect about where and
under what circumstances it will approve additional
higher density housing.
The City currently has 12.7% or 364 units of its
housing stock in multi -family housing exceeding a
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
density of six (6) units per acre. Saturation use of
currently zoned but vacant R-3 land (29 acres) at
eighteen (18) units per acre would produce a multi-
family ratio of18 % r 885 units by year 2000.
It is the City's intent to limit high density housing to
20 % of its future hot sing stock. This will require
the rezoning of apprc ximately 60 to 70 acres of land
by year 2010 for up to 715 additional units. Areas
for these units are not designated on the land use
plan. Their location will be based on the degree to
which individual projects meet adopted locational
criteria.
It is the City's intent to discourage large multi-
family concentrations and to encourage projects that
are unique, properly located, fill market niches,
entail a higher level of amenity and/or satisfy a need
for affordable housing.
Multi -family housing exceeding a density of six
units per acre will be considered with a density not
to exceed 12 units per gross acre only if it meets all
of the following locational criteria:
1. Located withi MUSA;
2. Does not requ re the use of existing local
residential streets for access;
3. Is compatiblewith adjoining uses; and
4. Represents a 1 gical transition from higher to
lower intensity land uses or provides sufficient
on-site opens ace to effectively buffer
dissimilar uses or is adjacent to a permanent
open space th t buffers dissimilar uses or is
adjacent to the CBD or represents a logical
extension of existing multi -family zoning.
Density bonuses for up to 18 units per gross acre
are intended to be considered for projects outside of
the CBD if there is a provision of extraordinary
landscaping, outdoor group open space, indoor and
outdoor recreational amenities, high quality design
standards, energy conservation and/or it satisfies
unique and special market niches and needs for
affordable housing. Within the CBD densities up to
dart (40) units per are may be considered for
seniors housing providing such amenities.
3 DECEMBER, 199'
P 7-1
Urban Residential (UR) Rural Residential (RR)
Urban Residential is located entirely within MUSA
and is serviced by public sewer and water utilities.
This designation correlates with the already
established urban neighborhoods of western
Rosemount plus lands that are currently vacant but
are easily served by public utilities. The full range
of single-family housing is intended to be
accommodated at modest densities (two to six units
per gross acre). Housing types intended to be
accommodated include single-family detached
(traditional and zero -lot line), single-family attached
(townhouses and duplexes) and manufactured
housing. Multi -family housing is also intended to be
accommodated but only upon satisfying the
qualifying locational criteria described above (HR).
Clustering and density transfers are encouraged
where steep slopes (12% and up), undevelopable
soils, surface water and wetlands and quality
vegetation can be avoided and protected. Clustering
is encouraged where it is desirable to avoid such
potentially adverse influences as major streets,
railroad lines and nonresidential uses and as a means
to reduce land development costs (grading and
utilities). Permanent usable open space and natural
resource preservation are intended to be the
products of clustering.
The clustering of single-family housing is intended
to be permitted only by Planned Unit Development
(PUD). Densities of up to six units per gross acre
will be considered, provided the overall PUD
density is no greater than three units per gross acre.
Density bonuses will be considered for a PUD to a
maximum overall density of four units per gross
acre where the PUD offers such things as
extraordinary landscaping, outdoor group open
space, indoor and outdoor recreational amenities,
high quality design standards, energy conservation
or satisfies unique and special market niches and the
need for affordable housing.
Attached single-family projects in UR are intended
to be relatively small (not exceeding a size of 80
units). It is intended that a range of housing styles
and designs be employed ranging from
contemporary to traditional and that maximum
consideration be given to the creation of
neighborhoods that are safe, healthful and enjoyable
places to live.
OF
4
Rural Residential are
distinctive rural char
family detached h=
and gutter or sidewa
with the natural land
lawn, and the minim
Residential areas are
features which are w
rolling topography a
hardwoods, features
family estate lifestyle
residential developm
In Rural Residential
already established
acres with a minimu
to encourage infill v
residential areas, thi
acre minimum lot si
current densities ext
residential developn
metropolitan Counc.
pre-existing and bec
interest in preservin
Rosemount from ru.
pressure, the City v
conforming density
Rural Residential ar
Trunk Highway (ST
developed with utm,
preservation of natu
of this unique Rosel
STH 3 are intended
re-evaluation in the
in the future.
HR High Densi
UR Urban Resi
RR Rural Resic
` To 18 units per
bonuses and sei
x Overall density
with bonuses.
s are intended to have a
-ter with large lot single-
ag, rural streets without curb
:s, the integration of housing
;ape, small areas of manicured
m of public services. Rural
:haracterized by natural
.que in Rosemount. They have
I excellent stands of upland
iat are supportive of a single
and without which rural
at is not viable or sustainable.
►reqs the development pattern is
a density of one unit per five
i lot size of 2.5 acres. In order
thin these existing rural
City intends to maintain 2.5
es. The City acknowledges that
;ed the recently adopted rural
:nt standards of the
. This development pattern is
use the City has a strong
agricultural lands elsewhere in
ll residential development
ends to maintain this non -
lying westerly of State
3 are intended to be
attention given to the
features and the continuation
tnt lifestyle. Those easterly of
be the subject of continuing
;nt public utilities are needed
Table
Residential 16 to 12 units per
acre
2 to 6 units per acre?
I units per 5 acres
with bonuses and 40 units per acre with
housing in the CBD.
rage 3 units per acre; to 4 units per acre
P '7?
GENERAL HOUSING POLICIES
appropriate WE
AG 'ICUL R vRAL
opportunities.
The following are the City's Housing and
14. To require the
proposing to uti
Neighborhood Policies as they apply to all housing
15. To encourage tl
in Rosemount:
protect/enhance
1. To eliminate code violations that threaten life
and provide nei
and safety and nuisance conditions that
16. To maintain a t
adversely affect neighborhoods.
densities in con
2. To monitor the housing stock to determine the
objectives.
need for a mandatory housing maintenance
the
program.
5.
with other housing
of PUD for all developments
;e density transfers.
use of PUD to
itural features, open space,
borhood transitions.
ince of housing types and
.-mance with community
3.
To participate in programs to meet the City's
AG 'ICUL R vRAL
low and moderate income housing needs.
RESIDENTIAL POLICIES
4.
To cooperate with Federal, State and County
agencies to make affordable housing available
and to redevelop and rehabilitate older homes in
In order to protect tie rural character of Rosemount,
the City.
the
following policies shall apply:
5.
To disperse affordable housing, multi -family
1.
To discourage a placement of structures in
housing and group homes throughout the City
open fields and on the top of exposed ridge
rather than concentrate them in large projects or
lines.
6.
in close proximity to one another.
To encourage clustering and/or extraordinary
2.
To locate house adjacent to tree lines and
setbacks at neighborhood edges to minimize the
3
wooded field edges.
To utilize clus ring where open space and
impact of major streets and conflicting land
active agriculture can be retained.
7.
uses.
To require residences to back or side to major
4.
To preserve anincorporate stone rows, tree
streets.
lines, existing agricultural structures and usable
8.
To facilitate neighborhood planning for
farm roads withsite plans, wherever possible.
improvements which create/reinforce
5.
To require that roads follow existing contours
neighborhood unity, safety and identity and
to minimize graling, where practicable.
increase home ownership potential on a cost-
6.
To maximize th retention of vegetation and
sharing basis with neighborhoods. Improvements
maintain natural landforms.
may include landscaping, parks, and local street
7.
To maintain vegetation along ridge lines.
modifications to reduce traffic impacts.
8.
To discourage excessive lawn areas in general
9.
To formulate an ongoing policy and funding
and maintain natural habitat areas.
program for the reconstruction of local
9.
To define, duri g the platting process, building
residential streets and sidewalks/trails.
envelopes whic i avoid the location of structures
10.
To reconstruct local neighborhood streets (not
in areas needin to be preserved.
MSA streets) to a standard that corresponds with
10.
To give consideration, at the time of subdivision
neighborhood scale and character with emphases
approval, to the resubdivision of lots, including.
on preserving healthy significant street trees.
ghost -plats., should public utilities become a
11.
To formulate a funding policy and conduct an
necessity ata later date.
ongoing residential street tree maintenance and
11 .
To protect open space or conservation areas
replacement program.
with conservation easements, deed restrictions
12.
To encourage flexibly designed housing
and scenic easements. These tools are intended
developments which are targeted at filling
to be used for environmental and scenic
market ruches.
resource pro tec ion, not public access.
13.
To allow manufactured homes and clustering
12.
To encourage infill of existing rural residential
only by PUD in numbers that represent an
areas to prese a agricultural land elsewhere in
Rosemount.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
5
DECEMBER, 19979
P 7,3
Table
REfiIll�1'I'IAI' DENSITY �UMIARY
Housing Type 11
Number
°k Units
Add'1 I Average
Units Density
Acres
Needed
Single Family`
77.01 6,4281
2,639 1,0561
1,163
Multi -Family
20.0 1,6601
600 55
752
Mobile
Homes/Other
3.0 211
0 0
106
ToTnL
8,299
1,110
1744
' Includes single-family detached; two-family and single-
family attached having densities of less than six units per
acre.
2 29 vacant acres are already zoned R-3.
OF
DECEMBER,
P ?-4
PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL P
OBJECTIVES
1. To establish appropriate, compatible locations
for public and institutional uses and public
services.
2. To locate public owned facilities that are
required by the resident and working population
in a manner which maximizes the public health,
safety, and welfare.
PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL PLAN
ELEMENT'
The public and institutional land use plan is intended
to identify -appropriate areas for governmental,
educational, cultural, recreational, public service,
and health care facilities. Government offices,
public and private schools, churches, public parks,
museums, libraries, and hospitals are specific
examples of public and institutional uses.
Public services are also part of the public and
institutional plan and include police and fire
protection, street maintenance, utility maintenance,
public property maintenance, recycling and waste
management. Police and fire stations, public works
facilities, public MSW processing facilities, public
recycling facilities, and public wastewater treatment
facilities are specific examples of public services.
Expansion of City facilities and services are
intended to be reviewed annually as part of the
capital improvements planning and budget process.
Special studies may be necessary to carefully
examine major improvements, such as new or
expanded public buildings.
The City will continue working with Independent
School District 196 in locating future public
educational facilities. The City and school district
should continue to examine possibilities for joint
development and usage of facilities.
The University of Minnesota owns a considerable
amount of property within the City of Rosemount. It
identifies its properties as the Agricultural
OF
7
Experiment Station
md the Rosemount Research
Center. The majority
of the property is utilized for
agricultural research
or commercial agriculture. This
plan identifies the I
niversity's property as public
and institutional. U
es on the property should be
limited to publican
I institutional uses.
PUBLIC AND
POLICIES
It shall be the polic,
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Annually asses
services.
Locate publicl}
and institution,
Protect public
incompatible IE
Locate public
compatible wit
Permit only ed
and public and
University of l
Locate and op(
manner in whi
welfare is Prot
INSTITUTIONAL
of the City to
the needs and delivery of public
owned facilities within public
districts.
ad institutional uses from
id uses.
id institutional uses in areas
existing uses.
cational research, agricultural,
.nstitutional uses on the
innesota property.
-ate publicly owned facilities in a
h the public health, safety, and
n7I-
COMMERCIAL AREA
OBJECTIVES
1 Satisfy the weekly convenience retail and
service needs of market area residents.
2. Maintain the Town' Center as the historical
retail/governmental center of Rosemount and the
remainder of the CBD for highway service and
support commercial activity.
3. Provide for revitalization of the CBD as a
means to maintain its viability and
competitiveness in the market place.
4. Build on the historical values of the Town
Center by maintaining its main street vs
shopping center) character.
5. Maximize the efficiency and synergy of
retail/service developments within the CBD.
PLAN ELEMEVTS
The Rosemount Central Business District (CBD)
consists of two rather distinctly different sub -
elements: the Town Center which generally lies
north of Lower 147th Street and the remainder
which extends south along South Robert Trail to the
intersection of County Road 42 and west to
Chippendale. The CBD as a whole has a sufficient
supply of vacant land and redevelopment capacity to
satisfy the needs of its retail market area until at
least year 2000. It is for this reason that the City
intends to concentrate all commercial development
in this single contiguous area.
The Town Center exemplifies the City's small town
character and serves as the center for civic
interaction. It is intended that the Town Center
continue to accommodate a mixture of non -auto
oriented retail, office, governmental, religious and
educational facilities and function in an historical or
traditional fashion with buildings oriented to the
street, sidewalks, on -street parking, parking lots
behind or between buildings and small vestpocket
park or pedestrian scale open spaces. It is intended
that the Town Center be redeveloped with buildings
of an appropriate massing, scale and size to create a
pedestrian friendly environment.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
The remainder. of thD CBD is intended to
accommodate freestanding destination -type retail and
service establishments including auto -oriented uses
that may be of more contemporary design. These
uses generally benefit from arterial access and high
visibility. They incl ide auto service, fast food,
convenience retail and other uses of a one-stop
nature.
POLICIES
The following are the City's policies for
Commercial areas:
1. To consider commercial development beyond
the CBD only hen contiguous, the site is five
acres or larger n size, a viable plan is
submitted, a m ket study is presented which
establishes mar et absorption compatibilities and
the proposed development is acceptably pre-
leased in accordance with prevailing financial
standards.
2. To facilitate th rehabilitation of sound
structures and the redevelopment of unsafe,
blighted or obsolete structures where consistent
with the City's Redevelopment and
Comprehensive Plans.
3. To facilitate CBD planning and redevelopment
and the implerr entation of parking and
landscaping im rovements.
4. To assume res onsibility for the development of
all Town Center parking and streetscape
improvements and assess landowners for
improvements ased on benefits received.
5. To assist with a relocation of inappropriate
businesses away from the CBD as part of the
City's redevelopment program.
6. To encourage land use arrangements which
improve retail mix and maximize land
use/parking efficiencies in the Town Center.
7. To provide convenient parking in appropriate
locations and in sufficient amounts to satisfy
parking dem ds.
8. To encourage Shared parking, wherever
practicable, to minimize excessive hard surface
land coverage.
8 DECEMBER, l9
P -1
F1
PLAN ELEMENTS
Rosemount presently has a significant amount of
heavy industrial development in the Pine Bend area
and only limited light industrial development near
the old Village. Koch refinery is one of only two
such facilities in the entire State of Minnesota.
These factors suggest that more heavy industrial
development may be forthcoming, that alternative
uses will be increasingly unlikely in this area and
that public utilities will be needed to service this
collection of regional and larger scale land uses.
In the western portion of the City, earlier plans for
industrial development have been scaled back and
redirected. The 1980 comprehensive plan designated
a significant amount of land north of County Road
42 and State Trunk Highway 3. Much of that land
remains undeveloped and the landowners have
expressed a desire to develop the land residentially.
After extensive evaluation, the City has decided to
redesignate those areas for residential, in part
because of the limited land for residential
development. To insure adequate land supply, the
City has identified a new area in western Rosemount
to focus business park development. Generally, this
area is south of County Road 42 and to the east of
State Trunk Highway 3.
Two types of industrial development are proposed as
follows:
Business Park (B -P)
Business park areas are intended to serve light
industrial uses as well as general office development
and supporting commercial service uses. Generally,
business parks are developed under one single
ownership, but, in any event, development must
occur in a coordinated fashion that demonstrates
future phasing capability (if applicable); an internal
circulation system with limited access to collectors
and streets); high standards of planning,
architectural and landscaping design which remain
consistent throughout the park; adequate buffering
(through the use of extra -ordinary setbacks and/or
effective screening) from adjacent residential uses;
and limited well -obscured outdoor storage. Typical
business park uses include warehousing,
distribution, light assembly, and wholesaling as well
as office uses and commercial uses that clearly
support, are incid(
business park (e.g
restaurants that se:
are intended to be
Service Area, adji
street.
General
OF ROSEMOUNT 10
General industrial at
exclusively for indu:
exterior storage. Th
located so as to min
land uses and to be
as well as barge and
Typical general indc
and heavy manufact
and distribution cent
mining. Offices and
permitted only whet
general industrial ac
POLICIES
[ to, or complement the
Tice supplies and services or
employees). Business parks
eloped within the Urban
t to an arterial or collector
(G -D
;as are those reserved
xies requiring large sites and/or
general industrial areas are
nize adverse effects on adjacent
tell -served by arterial roadways
rail transportation systems.
;trial uses include processing
ring, large-scale transhipment
;rs, outdoor storage yards and
general commercial uses are
clearly accessory to the
The following are e City's policies for Industrial
areas:
1. To create an Urban Service Area for east
Rosemount to s rvice regional -scale industrial
and waste mana ement/processing land uses.
2. To allow forthexpansion of industrial
development in the Pine Bend area where land
is undesirable f r other uses or could be
adversely influenced by adjoining uses
(incinerator) provided such development is
within the Urban Service Area, will not
adversely impact long-term agricultural
activities, is serviceable by public utilities in
sequential fashion (is contiguous to already
served areas where services can be readily
extended) and i able to be accessed via public
streets without public assistance.
3. To require that all industrial developments
comply with U.S. EPA and MPCA standards
for effluent emissions per NPDES permit and
SDS permit procedures.
4. To require that all on-site industrial waste
water treatment systems be maintained and
inspected according to the requirements of the
n 7 1A
M a
City's Subdivision Ordinance, Building Code
and Chapter 70-80, MPCA Rules.
5. To require that all industrial uses within Urban
Service Areas be connected to public sewer
and water services as such services become
available.
6. To require that planning for industrial
developments minimize environmental
impacts, land use conflicts and visual
accessibility from surrounding properties and
public streets and highways.
7. To initiate the development of a business park
for low impact light industries in western
Rosemount and consider the use of economic
incentives as means to stimulate tax base
enhancement and job creation.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
OBJECTIVES
1. To promote effective regulation of private waste
management activities.
2. To supplement and enhance environmental
protection policies.
3. To establish appropriate, compatible locations
for waste managment activities.
PLAN ELEMENTS
Public attitudes and technology involving waste
management continue to evolve. Singular
approaches to waste managment have given way to
integrated systems including waste reduction, reuse,
recycling, resource recovery, and disposal.
Environmental awareness creates increasing
demands for responsible waste management.
A waste management land use element serves
several functions. It allows for the proper
identification of a special use district. It allows the
City to proactively determine where private waste
related activities may be compatible with other uses
and should be located. It allows the City to protect
private waste management activities from
infringement by incompatible uses. It also allows the
City the vehicle to establish proper regulations and
responsible managmeent for private waste related
activities.
OF
8. To maximize la
requiring extrac
buffering, scree
edges of industi
and highways.
9. To encourage d
spaces and trail
by employees a
City's trail syst
opportunities ai
10. To require fire
industrial build
Chapter 38, Sty
11
d use compatibility by
unary standards for setbacks,
ing and landscaping at the
i1 areas and along major streets
provision of small green
within industrial areas for use
d to tie industrial areas into the
n to provide recreation
I commuting alternatives.
uppression systems in all
cgs in accordance with Appendix
Building Code.
Policy review and analysis
is an on-going
requirement in any
growth management plan. The
need for continual policy
analysis in waste
management planni
g is particularly vital due to the
rapid changes in waste
management technology,
regulatory directio
, and public sentiment.
WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICIES
It shall be the poli c
of the City to:
1.
Permit private
aste related activities only when
the public healt
i, safety, and welfare is ensured.
2.
Require that pr
vate waste related activities
occur in locations
that minimize or eliminate
conflicts with other
uses.
3.
Locate private
waste related activities in areas in
which long term
land use compatibility and
protection from.
other conflicting uses may be
maximized.
4.
Permit private
waste related activities only when
any potential or
known conflicts or impacts are
eliminated or properly
mitigated.
5.
Require that any
private waste related facility
employ the best
available technology in any
aspect of the facility
regarding environmental
protection controls.
6.
Ensure that the
design, construction, and
operation of private
waste related facilities
minimize any
negative environmental impacts
and mitigate them
to fullest extent possible.
0 7Q
7. Allow private waste disposal to occur only when
efforts to reuse and recycle wastes have been
exhausted.
8. Consider private waste related facilities only
when the economic benefits, incentives, and
other advantages to the City and community
clearly outweigh any known or potential
negative aspects of a facility.
9. Permit private waste related facilities only when
the proper infrastructure exists to serve facilities
or when proper improvements can be made
without expense or burden on the City.
OF
12
0 -) e,
4
PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT AREAS
Areas designated Planned Unit Development (PUD) warrant a lfeatu�es
are characterized either by unique natural features
consideration. Tom' offer o orlon
cations in the City- They will rel
topographic relief) warranting sensitive treatment or they pP
mixed use development at prominent
amount of careful evaluation by the City. pUD is intended to be mandc
designated.
PUD - PLANNED RESMENTIAL
This area is intended �oe ave an urban/rural
of housing types but a
character with a nix
relatively low overall density to reflect the need to
protect its unique stands of upland hardwoods and
variable topography. It is an area that is intended to
have urban landscaped streets with curb and gutter,
sidewalks, and all public utilities.
part of this area already has public sanitary sewer
and water services available. It is in single
ownership which will readily allow it to be planned
as a unit. Areas of special e northern edge of thnatural resource e are the hilly areas along
property, the dense woodlands with cleared
openings lying westerly of Dodd Boulevard and
numerous wetland areas. Densities in these areas are
intended to be low enough to allow for the creation
of open space which correlates with natural feature
preservation. PUD plans must demonstrate their
sensitivity to natural land form, wetland, and
vegetation protection.
The planned Residential PUD is intended to
accommodate single-family housing (attached and
detached). To the extent that higher natural features
clustering are warranted to preserve
or attain the overall gross density, townhouses may
be considered by the City. Generally, lands along
the northern edge of the PUD should be lower than
the average PUD density so as to respect existing
rural residential development. Those near Dodd
Boulevard should accommodate
clustering
the maximum
sufficiently low in density to protect
amount of woodland.
The site is intended to be planned as a single unit
and developed in phases as market conditions
warrant. Clustering is intended to be employed as
OF
appropriate to
environment.
environmental
oodlands, water, and
s for carefully controlled
re an extraordinary
ry within areas so
development with the natural
pUD _ Reserve protection Objectives
1. Adaption of development to natural landforms
rather than significantly altering them*
2. Protection and/or replacementation with the overall
resources and their incorporation
development plan.
le of adjacent rural
3. Protection of th rural lifesty
residential areas.
PUD - Po rCIES
In addition to applicable residential policies, the
following are the City's policies for natural resource
protection with planned Residential PUDs:
arterials)
1. To have majo streets (c alslectOrs ams ugh
constructed, i as much possible,
clearings ra er than through stands of significant
trees.
2. To have str is designed to follow the natural
contour.
3. To establish a trail connection from Burger Pon
to Schwarz and/Carrolls Woods via Shannon
Elementary School.
4. To require landscaped buffer yards or setbacks dth a
minimum o one hundred feet (100')
adjacent to mral residential areas which are free
of structures. As adjacent densities increase
tho e of R-1, buffer yards should be
beyond
increased in size proportionately.
5. To require tree replacement with similar species
so as to rreate approximately the original
vegetative mix.
P -2,1
Residential PUD Performance Criteria
In the interest of protecting natural resources and
the rural lifestyle, the following performance criteria
are intended to apply:
1. Percentage of twenty percent (20%) or steeper
slopes (with a vertical elevation difference of
- twenty (20) or more feet to be protected: ninety
percent (90%).
2. Percentage of lands having the characteristics of
a wetland (hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
and intermittent saturation) to be protected and/or
value replaced in accordance with the
requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act of
1991: one hundred percent (100%).
3. Percentage of existing significant trees (a 12 -inch
or larger deciduous tree excluding elm, willow,
boxelder, and aspen, or an 8 -inch caliper or
larger coniferous tree) to be protected,
maintained and/or replaced for the overall site
(see tree replacement ordinance): eighty percent
(80%). '
4. Percentage of existing vegetation to be protected
and/or replaced within designated buffer yards:
one hundred percent (100%).
5. Percentage of an established buffer yard to be
privately maintained in permanent open space:
one hundred percent (100%).
6. Permitted overall PUD density excluding park
land dedication, wetlands and slopes (twenty
percent (20%) or greater): 2.5 units/acre.
7. Percentage of site to be maintained as soft cover
(maximum forty percent [40%] hard surface
coverage): sixty percent (60%).
Caliper Inches
IMPLEMENTATION
While these objectives, policies, and performance
criteria apply specifically to residential PUDs, tree
preservation/replacement is intended to be applied to
the entire City. In order to implement this tree
preservation/replacement policy, an amendment to
Section 8.3.E. Woodland Preservation, should be
adopted which includes the following:
E. Woodland Preservation and Replacement
1. Purpose and Intent.
C.T
2
2. Definitions (caliper inches, drip line,
significant tree, etc.).
3. Permit/Applicat on/Procedures/Requi
4. Exemptions.
5. Tree Replacement including:
a. Calculation
f tree replacement
b. Location of
-eplacement
c. Sizes and types
of trees
d. Sources of
ees .
e. Guarantees
Utter of Credit/Bond
There are numerous ays to calculate tree
replacement depending on the City's objectives. For
the sake of simplicity the City could establish a flat
percentage of tree preservation and/or replacement
at say eighty percent 80%). Or, it could create
incentives to preserve the maximum amount of
existing vegetation utilizing a sliding scale approach
which, at some point, actually requires more
vegetation to be repla ed than is lost Mm
The formula for calculating replacement per Figure
_ is:
(A/B x C) x A = D
Where: A = Total diameter inches or significant
trees lost
B = Total diameter inches of significant
trees o the site
C = Tree rc placement constant
D = Replacement trees in caliper inches
This concept is patte ned after the Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, model which was designed to maximize
preservation while minimizing staff review time.
Such an ordinance would necessitate an inventory of
significant trees by e developer/owner, thus
adding to his costs. I would not require additional
staffing but may infrequently require the services of
a consultant forester whose responsibilities may be
to assess the accurac of the tree inventory, when in
question, and make j idgements as to the health of
trees. These costs should be able to be passed on to
the developer. This approach to tree preservation
requires qualified sta , which the City has, and the
resolve on the part o policy makers to preserve
significant vegetatior in the interest of
environmental protection.
A -A-7
-
PUD - MIXED USE
Mixed Use areas clearly have commercial potential,
but there is concern that they may compete with
downtown Rosemount for uses that will compromise
its future viability. They are not only prominently
located in the City immediately adjacent to arterial
streets, they are in areas that might be classified as
sensitive because until now, they have been planned
for residential, not commercial development. They
are also located in close proximity to existing and
future residential land uses.
Land uses intended to be accommodated in these
areas include residential (high and low density),
commercial, and office uses. The area is intended to
be planned as a unit wherever possible and must
adhere to general transitional development concepts
which call for a gradient in land use from higher to
lower density. Residential densities should conform
to those of Urban"Residential areas.
Commercial development within these areas is
intended to be allowed only when and where traffic
can be accommodated via existing cross streets, a
viable plan is submitted, a market study is
presented which establishes market absorption
capabilities and the proposed development is
acceptably pre -leased in accordance with prevailing
financial standards. The respective commercial and
residential policies of this plan shall apply within
mixed use areas. Designed Mixed Use PUDs are not
intended to be eligible for use of TIF, or any other
type of public subsidy. Because the land is vacant
and without environmental or physical constraints,
no public assistance is needed.
Uses considered to be generally acceptable within
mixed use areas are those that would be compatible
with uses in the town center. These may include
such as: highway service, fast food and convenience
retail uses, and larger scale projects such as home
improvement, building supplies, hardware and
garden supply stores, and home furnishing stores of
a freestanding nature. Day Care Centers, offices,
and institutional uses are also acceptable within
mixed use areas. Industrial uses are not considered
appropriate in this area. Higher intensity uses must
be buffered via good design from residential uses.
OF
3
P12-2,
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEVfENT
WATER
Water is provided via seven deep underground
wells, only three of which are currently used, w�l
(numbers 3,6 and 7.) (See Figure ***). The three .
I ocaUon :.: .... r
active wells pull water from the Prairie du Chien- 1 Old city Hall Drift
Jordan aquifer located in Jordan Sandstone. 2 Old City Hall Jordan
Sandstone
Water is treated at each well site with various
chemicals to protect the residents. Rosemount City
water is treated with chemicals which bond with
metallic ions, like iron and manganese, as is
necessary to avoid ingestion of harmful metals. The
water also receives chlorine and fluoride as required
by the State Health Department requirements for
public water supplies.'
Please refer to the 1988 Comprehensive Water
System Plan for more details on the water system.
,STORM SEWER AND STORM
WATER UTILITY
A 1989 report entitled "Drainage Plan, West
Drainage Area provides the basic framework for
development of the ponding system throughout the
western drainage. This drainage area incorporates
the urban density development within the City. This
plan is designed to give 100 -year flood protection
within the 19 subdistricts. Virtually all of these
basins are landlocked.
In 1992, the City created a storm water utility as a
financing mechanism to upgrade and enhance
maintenance of the City's storm water system. The
revenue generated by the utility is intended to be
used for the following purposes:
1. Finance construction projects (which will
ultimately be paid by connection charges);
2. Fund construction projects that are not repaid
by connection charges;
OF
1
3
Brazil Avenue
Jordan
412
Sandstone
4
Chippendale Park
Jordan
520
Sandstone
5
Chippendale Park
Jordan
482
Sandstone
6
Dallara Park
Jordan
Sandstone
7
Chippendale
Jordan
Avenue
Sandstone
Figure ***. Existing
3. Fund the develop
Comprehensive S
4. Fund water qualm
5. Fund facility rep]
facilities deterion
redevelops;
6. Fund legal and e,
7. Cover costs of ac
8. fund system oper
Wells
ant of the City's
rm Water Management Plan;
improvement projects;
ement projects when
or when the City
t costs;
Bring the fund; and
and maintenance.
D -a
1901
Abandoned
412
Abandoned
471
500
520
Abandoned
490
Abandoned
482
550
4901
1,000
Wells
ant of the City's
rm Water Management Plan;
improvement projects;
ement projects when
or when the City
t costs;
Bring the fund; and
and maintenance.
D -a
S Y
SANITARY SEWER
More than any other element of the plan, sanitary
sewer service functions as the primary means of
guiding growth in the community. Because of the
expense involved with providing sanitary sewer
services, expansion of the service must be
concurrent with growth. However, growth must be
guided to occur in only those areas that can be
economically served by sewers. To this end, the
City has delineated sewer districts and sub -districts
to guide growth based on service feasibility.
Rosemount, like every other City in the
Metropolitan Area, is required to prepare and adopt
a local comprehensive sewer plans and to secure the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's (MWCC)
approval prior to undertaking any sewer
construction, alteration or improvements. In
addition, the MWCC is also responsible for
construction and operation of all wastewater
treatment plants. It is therefore the responsibility of
the MWCC and the Metropolitan Council to expand
sewer services as necessity warrants.
The City of Rosemount currently uses both the
Rosemount and Empire Wastewater Treatment
Plants for treatment of waste.' Empire WWTP
currently serves just the Southwest corner of the
City (767 acres) and Rosemount WWTP serves the
rest of the Municipal Urban Services Area.
ROSEMOUNT WWTP
Empire WWTP has
mgd. In 1991, the
which leaves a 2.7
is projecting a 2000
this facility.
a current design capacity is 9
ierage flow was just 6.3 mgd,
agd growth cushion. Rosemount
estimate of .475 mgd to flow to
Design capacity of I
ie Rosemount WWTP is
currently .71 mgd.
owever, the MWCC has
indicated that the pl
uit is running at less than
optimal capacity, pr
obably closer to .60 mgd. The
1991 average flow
as .605 mgd. Therefore it was
imperative that the
ity divert the Southeastern
corner to Empire
. In addition, the MWCC
has begun exploring
alternatives for the expansion
of the Rosemount N
fWTP capacity. The expansion
is ideally scheduled
for completion in 1996 and will
ensure that the plant
will be able to meet the
demands that the City's
growing community will
place on it until at least
2010.
Consistent with this framework, the City has
established the following projections for annual
sewer connections from 1992-1996 and a more
generalized figure r 1997-2000. In addition, a
second figure shows the projected annual sewer
connections by sewer subdistrict.
EMPIRE WWTP I I TOTAL
'This figure was calculated using the 1991 post diversion flow figure (0. 57) as a base.
3This figure was calculated using a 1991 post diversion flow figure of 0.174 as a base.
OF
2
-2117
Additional
Cumulative
Additional
Cumulative
Add'
' nal
Cumulative
YEAR
Flow (MGD)
Flow (MGD)
Flow (MGD)
Flow (MGD)
Flow
GD)
Flow (MGD)
1992
0.107
0.5652
0.009
0.183'
0.116
0.747
1993
0.078
0.643
0.026
0.209
0.104
0.852
1994
0.050
0.693
0.030
0.238
0.080
0.931
1995
0.051
0.744
0.032
0.270
0.083
1.014
1996
0.032
0.776
0.041
0.311
0.073
1.087
1997-2000
0.192
0.968
0.164
0.475
0.356
1.443
2010
'This figure was calculated using the 1991 post diversion flow figure (0. 57) as a base.
3This figure was calculated using a 1991 post diversion flow figure of 0.174 as a base.
OF
2
-2117
3
.......SrIITRX sEWkR<TIAWS ..:2000 URA . PRIVATE WA TE 2' ZEATMENT
sa�Kxv>ccE tom► SYSTEMS
Served by Rosemount WWTP
Sub
District
Area
(Acres)
Avg. Flow I
Added (mgd)
Cum. Avg.
Flow (mgd)
Peak Design
Flow (mgd)
101
332
0.498
0.498
1.694
103
59
0.089
0.089
0.354
105
26
0.026
0.026
0.104
12
291
0.291
0.291
1.077
13
284
0.284
0.568
1.931
14
208
0.208
0.208
0.790
16
117
0.117
1.510
4.379
17
115
0.162
0.162
0.632
18
531
0.053
1.563
4.533
19
53
0.061
0.061
0.244
20
267
0.267
2.498
6.745
21
576
0.576
6.853
15.077
Served by Empire WWTP
Sub-
District
Area
(Acres)
Avg. Flow
Added (mgd)
Cum. Avg.
Flow (mgd)
Peak Design
Flow (mgd)
102
261
0.337
0.626
2.218
104
289
0.289
0.289
4.069
106
217
0.217
0.843
2.698
The minimum design standards for
inflow/infiltration on the construction of new
sanitary sewer facilities are 100 gallons/day/inch
diameter/mile. All facilities are air tested to insure
compliance. The specifications for pipes, joints and
manholes are as follows:
Description
Specification
Joint Types
Reinforced
ASTM C76
ASTM C361
Concrete Pipe
PVC Pipe
ASTM D3034
Elastomeric
Gasket
Cast Iron Soil
ASTM E-8
ASTM C564
Pipe
ASTM A-438
Rubber Gasket
ASTM A-126
Manhole
ASTM C-478
Gasket
OF
3
All non-agricultural uses within the Urban Service
Area must utilize public sewer facilities. Therefore,
private waste treatment systems can only be used
when public sewer s stems are not available. Each
system must conforni to published standards for the
design, location, installation, use and maintenance
of the City's Subdivision Ordinance; the County
regulations published in ordinance 113; the state
plumbing code, Charter 4715 and the state's
Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Standards,
Chapter 7080.
At present, two indu trial firms operate their own
waste treatment plants, Koch Refinery and
Continental Nitrogen. Both of these firms operate
under the National P llutant Discharge Elimination
System and State Diposal Systems permit
programs.
t s
PUBLIC FACILMES PLAN
Objectives
1. To provide public utility services within the
Urban Services Area in order to maintain the
health, welfare and safety of the public.
2. To ensure that additional waste treatment
capacity is provided in a timely fashion so that
development within the Urban Services Area is
not restricted as a result of insufficient capacity.
3. To provide limited urban services to Rural
Service Areas.
4. To explore service sharing with surrounding
communities and develop alternative methods of
providing public services which will maintain
levels without substantial cost increases.
5. To minimize service failures by monitoring and
maintaining the public infrastructure.
6. To extend public utility systems in a logical,
sequential fashion concurrent with develop, not
in advance.
7. To define and protect potential public utility
rights-of-way which may eventually be needed
to extend service to rural residential areas.
8. To recognize the value of water as a natural
resource and adopt policy that encourages water
conservation wherever possible, both by the
private sector and the public.
9. To provide safeguards to insure against the
disruption of essential public services.
Water Policies
1. To provide and maintain facilities for the
transportation, storage and distribution of water
within the Urban Services Area.
2. To provide adequate distribution and storage
facilities,to cover peak consumptive demands,
fire fighting, and other events in where
additional water will be needed in excess of that
which can be directly supplied by the available
wells.
3. To provide for any increases in the amount of
water demanded by new developments and
industrial uses within the Urban Services Area.
4. To research potential benefits which may accrue
to interconnecting public water supply systems
in conjunction with appropriate conservation
measures to insure a minimum level of service
in case of service disruption.
OF
4
5. To evaluate the eed and feasibility of providing
public water service to Northwest Rosemount
only if the public health is at risk.
Storm Sewer Policies
1. To reduce the ne ative impacts of increased
runoff and sedim nts from expanding
development.
2. To provide adeqt iate facilities for storage and
transportation of runoff to protect against
flooding.
3. To require that the release of stormwater from a
developed site comply with the City's
stormwater management plans or be retained to
the extent that its release rate is no greater than
the pre-developnient ten-year peak discharge.
4. To require the termination of the pumping of
storm water from basement sumps directly into
the sanitary sewer system.
Sanitary Sewer Policies
1. To cooperate wit.1 the MWCC in providing
sufficient waste t,eatment capacity to meet
Rosemount's projected sanitary sewer needs.
Including the expansion of the Rosemount Waste
Water Treatment Facility to satisfy the growing
need for capacity throughout the City.
2. To provide publi sewer service to East
Rosemount to service regional -scale industrial
and waste management/processing land uses.
3. To support the expansion of the waste water
treatment faciliti s to satisfy the growing need
for capacity throughout the City.
4. To reduce the in ow and infiltration to the
sanitary sewers stem and thereby increase
wastewater treat ent plant capacity by
continuing to upgrade the present system and
reducing precipitation induced inflow.
5. To provide public sewer service to and replace
the existing rura water system in East
Rosemount to se ice regional -scale industrial
and waste ma= ement/processing land uses.
Private Wastereatment Systems
Policies
1. To prohibit the evelopment and use of new
private waste water treatment plants in the City
and the expansion of existing systems.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
To require soil testing for all on-site waste
treatment systems.
To maintain an inventory and support Dakota
County's routine annual inspection program for
on-site septic systems.
To require replacement of non -conforming on-
site systems.
To revise the City ordinance to meet county
ordinance 113; Minnesota Individual Sewage
Treatment Systems Standards, Chapter 7080
and the Clean Water Act.
To require that the system be designed to
receive all sewage from the dwelling, building,
or other establishment served.
7. To prohibit the i
se of a private waste treatment
system for the d'sposal
of all products
containing hazar,
ous materials.
8. To prohibit the use
of private systems inside
the Urban Services
Area and require all
residents, private
and commercial to use public
facilities as they
become available.
9. To require in the
subdivision platting process a
study to dete '
e the site's compatibility with
septic system co
istruction and operation.
10. To require that
1 industrial dischargers satisfy
the U.S. Enviro
ental Protection Agency
standards for m*
ustrial wastes discharged into
surface waters.
PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT
Public services can be categorized as being either emergency or non-eiriergency oriented. On the
basis of this categorization, different locational criteria emerge. Police andfire services must be
located such that travel time to developed areas are minimized, but other City facilities may be
located in any central site. The Municipal Facilities, Space Needs Analysis repared by Boarman and
Associates in 1990 is used as the basis for City office and service space needs.
POLICE
At the present time the Police Department is located
in City Hall. Currently the department occupies
3,116 square feet and employs 10 officers with 10
volunteer reservists. The national average for police
space is 350 square feet per staff member.
Rosemount has 312 square feet per staff member.'
The smaller the space reserved for each staff
member the greater the confidentiality problems and
lack of work space. Therefore, an expansion of
facilities is planned before 2000. The current
location will be expanded to allow, among other
things, for increased staff as the population of
Rosemount grows, more work space and a secure
storage area for large evidence. Additional
expansions are planned as the need presents itself
and are more fully outlined in the Municipal
Facilities, Space Needs Analysis, 1990.
OF
5
FIRE
The fire department 's currently located to the North
of the City Hall and staffed by volunteers. This
location houses both the administrative part of the
department and the lire station. However, a
referendum process o build a new fire station is
being undertaken. In 1988, Hoisington Group Inc.
completed a Fire Lo ation Study which explored the
City's alternatives. I was the recommendation of
this study and later iscussion by the City Council
that the City should begin acquisition and
development of a pr perty on 145th Street between
Shannon Parkway and Chippendale Avenue. The
decision on when to hold a referendum is likely to
be made during the first quarter of 1993.
CITY Go
Rosemount is a statutory city with a mayor -council
form of government. The City Council consists of
four council members and the mayor, who acts as
the chairperson, with all five votes carrying equal
P �9
y
weight. Administrative authority in the City is held PUBLIC SERVICES PLAN
by the City Administrator.
The City Council receives recommendations from Objective
the Planning Commission, the Utilities/Cable 1. To locate public facilities and provide public
Commission, the Port Authority and the Parks and services in a mariner that assures the continued
Recreation Committee. health, welfare, and safety of the public.
All elected officials are selected at large, with Police Policies
municipal elections held in odd -number years.
Council members serve staggered four-year terms 1. To provide polic and rescue services for the
with the mayor serving a two-year term. There are City of Rosemount.
four precincts in the City. 2 To continue to u grade emergency equipment to
maintain present levels of service and improve
The current City Hall is located on 145th Street at insurance ratings.
Burma Ave, and was built in 1987. The Public 3. To continue to promote cooperative
Works maintenance facilities is also located at this arrangements be een the Dakota County
site. Expansion of the City Hall along with several Sheriff and all oher law enforcement agencies
other alternatives are being proposed and are to improve servi es and optimize costs.
discussed in -more detail in the City of Rosemount 4. To serve warran s and subpoenas as assigned.
Municipal Facilities Space Needs Analysis, 1990. 5. To investigate n isance-type complaints and
issue citations as the situation demands.
6. To transport prisoners as may be required.
SCHOOLS 7. To direct traffic to relieve congestion problems
as needed.
Rosemount is currently served by 3 independent
school districts, ISD 196 -Rosemount, ISD 199 -Inver Fire Service Policies
Grove Heights and ISD 200 -Hastings. The greatest
share of Rosemount students are in ISD 196. ISD 1. To provide fire d rescue services to all areas
of the Western Urban Service Area within a six
196 has greatly expanded since its creation in 1952,
and now includes portions of Burnsville, Eagan, to seven minute response time.
2
Apple Valley, Inver Grove Heights, Coates, . To site fire stations in locations that offer the
best potential accessibility by volunteer fire
Lakeville, Empire and Vermillion making ISD 196
the largest and fastest growing school district in the fighters and especially to recruit daytime
state. The district serves 22,500 students at 3 high volunteers ns. a two minute turnout time
schools, 5 middle schools and 17 elementary from stations.
3
schools. Four of these schools, Rosemount . To continue to cooperate with Koch Refinery
Elementary, Middle and High Schools and Shannon and the University of Minnesota to improve fire
Pprotection servi es to the more remote areas of
Park Elementary, are located within the City of
the City.
Rosemount. 4. To consider the need and feasibility of providing
public water service to northwest Rosemount
PARKS only if the public health is at risk.
5. To continue to upgrade fire fighting and
emergency rescue equipment and water service
as needed to maintain present levels of service
and improve insurance ratings.
6. To continue to explore cooperative cost-sharing
arrangements with mutual aid fire departments
to increase efficiency and improve fire service
and training.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 6 DECEMBER, 1997
� �Q
t ;
City Government Policies
1. To maintain all public administration functions
in a single centrally located City Administration
Center which meets accepted "workspace
standards.
2. To evaluate/explore service sharing
opportunities with other jurisdictions and service
organizations" ranging from cost-sharing to
consolidation.
School Policy
1. To cooperate with the staff of the school
districts in order to provide for the educational
needs of the community.
2. To encourage the school to develop future
facilities in conformance with City land use plan
policies.
OF
7 DECEMBER, 199
0 An
t
ROSEMOUNT'S NATURAL ENVIRO MENT
LAND FORMATrONS
Rosemount's physical geography has been impacted Assuming a standar
by glaciers more than any other geologic event. The the areas of extrem
glacial imprint has divided the city into two have serious erosio
generalized areas based on the location of the glacier does not pose a ser
and the alteration of the land as the glacier receded. soil for residential
does not pose a ser
Rosemount is almost entirely situated on the
Mississippi Valley Outwash Plain. The outwash
plain was created by recurrent flooding of an early
river system as it carried deposits of sand and gravel
away from the melting ice of a glacier. This area
includes most of the Southern half of the city and all
of the Eastern portion. However, the lowest areas of
the river valley in the Northeast corner are heavily
influenced by the more recent activity of the
Mississippi River and are composed of floodplain
alluvium deposited by flooding.
The Northwestern third of the city is within the
Eastern St. Croix Moraine. Moraines also are
created by glacial activity. They are an accumulation
of rock debris carried or deposited by a glacier.
Generally the debris is not sorted by size or content,
but is a mixture of cobbles, boulders, sand and
gravel. Moraines are also characterized by scattered
small lakes, rolling hills and generally high water
tables, as are noted in this portion of Rosemount.
Soils
The majority of soils within the city of Rosemount
fall into two groups. The first group, the Waukegan-
Wadena-Hawick, dominates in the Northeast and the
South half of the city, (the part of the city situated
on the outwash plain.) (See Soil Map) The slopes
of this group vary from the nearly level Waukegan
to the sometimes very steep Hawick. These soils are
made up of silt and loam sediment and are generally
black, dark brown or dark grayish brown and about
8-12 inches thick.' Although irrigation may be
necessary, this soil group is well suited to
agriculture, especially for corn, soybeans and small
grains. The group is also noted for its reserves of
sand and gravel.
caution must be tat
absorption fields he
characteristics of tl
contamination.'
level of management, except in
slope, the soil group does not
difficulties. Since construction
us erosion threat, it is a good
ructures, since construction
us erosion threat. Special
a to protect septic tank
Lever, because the
soil increase the risk of
The second soil gr o p . the Kingsley-Mahtomedi,
dominates in the Nc rthwest and the North central
portion of the city, the part situated on the
moraine.) Unlike die first group, this group is
rarely level, and is enerally gently sloping to steep.
Like the first group these soils are also dark,
usually black or dark grayish brown, but they are
generally loamy ins ead of silty and are only 5-8
inches thick.
This soil group is also noted for its reserves of sand
and gravel, but the are not suited for cultivated
crops as their steep slopes have a tendency to erode.
In addition, the risk of erosion also call for certain
precautions to be taken when constructing either
buildings or septicsystems.'
Refer to the Soil SL rvev of Dakota Cour
Minnesota (publish4 d by the United States
Department of Agriculture's Soil Conservation
Service) for more s ecific information about soil
types and drainage capacities.
WATER RESOURCES
Surface Waters
There are more th
30 lakes and ponds within the
Rosemount city lini
its, with the majority in the
Northwest corner.
4owever, the most significant of
Rosemount's water
is the Mississippi River and its
500 acre spring-f
backwater, Spring Lake, located
in the Northeastern
tip of the city. Because of its
OF ROSEMOUNT 1 1
importance, both to the State of Minnesota and to
other states further downstream, all development on
the river and its shores are strictly regulated not
only by the City's zoning and shoreland overlay
regulations, but also by several state and federal
agencies, such as the US Fish and Wildlife agency,
the Army Corp of Engineers, the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, etc.
Another protected surface water source is the City's
numerous wetlands. Wetlands are areas where land
and water meet. They may be covered with surface
water or saturated with ground water long enough
during the growing season for vegetation to adapt to
growing in these situations.'
While there are many types of wetlands, all have
three basic characteristics in common. First, even
though wetlands may be dry periodically, all
wetlands must have water saturation present for at
least two weeks. Second, a wetland must have
hydrophytic vegetation, (meaning plants which can
live in wet conditions.) Finally, a wetland must
have hydric soils. Hydric soils are soils that are
saturated, flooded or ponded long enough during the
growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in
the upper layers.'
Wetlands have an important impact on the natural
environment. They perform many valuable services
for a community including water recharge,
floodwater storage and retention, provide wildlife
habitat, control erosion, and trap sediment from
rapidly flowing water.'
Most all of the 30 lakes and ponds, as well as many
smaller wetland areas, are designated as protected
waters and wetlands by the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources. The Wetland Conservation
Act of 1991, by the Minnesota Legislature goes
beyond the DNR protected wetland by seeking to
increase the quantity, quality, and biological
diversity of the state's wetlands by restoring or
enhancing diminished or drained wetlands, avoiding
direct or indirect impacts from activities that destroy
or diminish wetlands; and replacing wetlands were
destroying the wetland can not be avoided.
Ground Waters
The Prairie du Chien -Jordan Aquifer underlies most
of Dakota County. Rosemount, as well as many
other communities, relies heavily on this aquifer for
the majority of thew ter used in the city.
Rosemount is also located over various gravel
aquifers. However, these aquifers are used primarily
for agricultural uses.
Most of Rosemount i
situated on soils and
substratum that are hi
Yhly porus and thus
particularly conducive
to groundwater
contamination. In some
areas, surface contamination
can reach the aquifer
within a matter of weeks or
years. The level of sensitivity
is linked to the soil
type. The areas of the
city where the Waukegan-
Wadena-Hawick soils
dominate have low to
moderate sensitivity and
the areas where the
Kingsley-Mahtomedi
dominate are highly sensitive
to groundwater contamination.
OF ROSEMOUNT 2
Vegetation
Three native plant co nmunities once dominated the
area: oak -savanna, s iort grass prairie, and the
Mississippi River upland and bottomland
environments. Oak -savanna was the dominant
vegetation of the Northwestern portion of the City.
Savannas are open, densely grassed areas with
deciduous tree cover. In Rosemount, oaks are the
most numerous trees in the savanna areas.
Short -grass prairie characterizes the majority of the
area that today makes up most of Rosemount's
farmland and industrial areas. This type of
vegetation is well suited for the driest parts of the
prairie and is hometwo different grass species,
buffalo and grama.
The last native vegetation
group is influenced by the
Mississippi River. Tae
river valley supports two
distinctly differently
types of vegetation. The
floodplain is home to
cottonwood, willow, elm,
aspen and basswood
trees and supports a substantial
water -related wildlif
population. The river bluffs
have a mixture of oak,
maple and elm which protect
the steep slopes from
erosion.
Wildlife Habitat
j T 0 BE ADDED ]
0 A-7
Historic Preservation
To date, Rosemount has no buildings or landmarks
on the State Historical Records Directory. However,
15 sites are currently being considered. The
following is an inventory put together from a recent
survey of.Rosemount by the State Historic
Preservation Office.
OF
3505 145th St. W.
Rosemount House
14520 South Robert Trail
Catholic Temperance League
Hail
145th St. & So Robert Trail
Commercial Buildings (razed)
145th St. & So. Robert Trail
Commercial Building
14375 So. Robert Trail
St. Joseph Catholic Chu
ch
145th St. & Biscayne Way
Houses
146 Cameo Avenue
Old Baptist Church
140th & Blaine Avenue
School
Highway 38 & 55
House
12101 Dodd Boulevard
Kamps Farm
125th St & Canada Court
House & Rosemount High
School
13575 Dodd Boulevard
Old Rectory
Mendota -Big Sioux Rd
odd Rd)
Pine Bend
3 DECEMBER, lyy.�
ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION P.
OBJECTIVES FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE NATUR
5. To protect areas susc
1. Conservation of unique and essential natural encroachments whicl
resources. damage or impede d
2. Integration of urban development with the water body in accorc
4;> = natural environmentin an environmentally floodway standards.
rmanner. 6. To reduce nonpoint
3. ' Protection of people and property from natural adoption of the Metr
and manmade hazards. Stormwater Ordinann
4. Conservation of energy resources.
5. Protection and preservation of scenic and Ground Water PC
histnrical resources_
Soils and steep slope Policies
1.
2
3.
4
To require site plan review and strict erosion
control measures for any development of slopes
in excess of 12% and prohibit any development
of slopes in excess of 18% except as allowed by
the Mississippi River Corridor Ordinance.
To promote agriculture in designated areas which
contain prime agricultural soils.
To prohibit the construction of on-site sewer
systems in areas having severe or very severe
soil limitations for such systems except where
alternative systems can be designed and
maintained.
To prohibit the construction of on site sewer
systems in wetlands or flood plains.
Surface Water Policies
1
2.
3.
4.
To prohibit the alteration of all wetlands which
are identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Natural Wetlands Inventory unless
replacement/mitigation is provided in the ration
of two acres of mitigated wetlands for each acre
of drained or filled wetland.
To require that any wetland mitigation comply
with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Criteria for
wetland quantity, character, and diversity.
To prohibit the use of Type 3, 4, or 5 wetland
(open water) as a primary sediment trap during
or after construction.
To protect designated Recreational Development,
General Development, and Natural Environment
Waters per the City's Shoreland Overlay
Regulations.
OF
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
4
lL ENVIRONMENT
:ptible to flooding from
could result in property
hydraulic efficiency of the
mce with State and Federal
pollution per the
n Council Model
To prohibit the use f groundwater for once -
through heating and oling.
To promote water nervation programs to
diminish the public d private use of water for
nonessential purposes.
To investigate methods and programs which will
minimize the use of applied chemicals for lawn
care, agriculture, and public street maintenance.
To require land alte ation and erosion control
plans for all developments during construction.
To require the main enance of natural vegetation,
shorelines, and wed and fringes of and require
minimum setbacks om protected waters as a
means to protect water quality and wildlife
habitat.
To encourage a dual pond concept per U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service guidelines to buffer
protected waters from sediment and chemical
incursions.
To continue to work with the MPCA and the
University of Minnesota to remedy all waste
contamination.
To protect groundwaters by insuring that water
wells are capped in accordance with State
regulations.
To establish a City-wide water quality
management plan to protect surface and ground
waters.
To assist the Metropolitan Council as directed to
achieve interagency cooperation among federal,
state, regional and i,ocal water management
agencies, and to co rdinate and facilitate water -
related programs.
Q A4
Vegetation Policies
1. To minimize the loss of significant trees on
public and private property. Where loss is
unavoidable, require replacement with acceptable
substitute plant materials in the subdivision
development process.
2. To preserve remnants of the three major natural
plant communities (oak/savannah, short grass
prairie and upland hardwoods/bottomland shrubs
and brush,) on public and private lands where
possible and require appropriate replacement
when loss in unavoidable.
3. To require, as an element of site plan review,
the identification of significant trees and tree
stands and proposals for tree preservation and
replacement with species native to Minnesota and
the region.
4. To require screening, landscaping, and tree
replacement as an element of development plans.
5. To require that protected trees be marked and
fenced prior to the start of construction to
minimize damage and future loss.
Energy Conservation Policies
1. To consider energy conservation during site plan
review including solar access protection and the
use of vegetation to facilitate summer shading
and winter solar gain.
2. To prohibit developments from shading
residential structures during the winter heating
season (from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.)
3. To use available grant and loan programs to
provide for the increase energy efficiency of the
City's housing stock.
4. To promote alternative means of commuting,
such as the increased use of public, (including
park-and-ride facilities,) and non -motorized
transit and ride -sharing as a means to reduce
energy consumption.
Wildlife Habitat
otection Policies
1. To protect the existing
wildlife habitat in the
Mississippi River VaIley
and the northwest area
of the City and City-
ide through protective
easements or open sr
ace protection.
2. To support the prese
ation and management of
rare, unique, endang
red and threatened plants
and animals and prohibit
any action that would
reduce or degrade the
habitat supporting such
species.
3. To protect natural habitat
corridors which link
major habitat areas.
4. To encourage the use
of yard plantings which
also serve as wildlife
habitat.
OF ROSEMOUNT 5
Historical, Scenic and Landmark
Policies.
1.
0
C
To protect historic, scenic, and landmark
features, wherever practicable.
To incorporate known historical, scenic, and
landmark resources, as identified by the City or
other agencies which proposed development and
redevelopment prof is and, where loss is
unavoidable, to mitigate losses.
To cooperate with a id assist the State Historical
Society in locating, valuating, and, where
appropriate, preserving historical sites and
structures having significant historical or
architectural values.)
1> A
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
Major Thoroughfares
The City is traversed by only one Metropolitan
System Highway, State Trunk Highway 52, located
in eastern Rosemount. This is a four -lane principle
arterial with at -grade intersections (except at County
Road 42) that carries approximately 23,300 and
16,000 vehicles per average day north and south of
Highway 55 respectively (1991). According to the
Metropolitan Council's Transportation Development
Guide, no improvements are scheduled for Trunk
Highway 52 prior to 2410. It will become an
extremely important roadway necessitating
substantial improvements if MSP International
Airport is relocated to the search area.
Recent accidents involving tanker trucks near Koch
Refining and ongoing traffic increases have resulted
in a study initiated at the request of Koch Refining.
The Cities of Rosemount and Inver Grove Heights,
Dakota County, and MnDOT are jointly
participating in a corridor study that is intended to
identify the future functional classification of
Highway 52 and develop integrated design concepts
jointly between the two communities along the
TH52 corridor. The intent of the City of Rosemount
is to develop a frontage road system to alleviate
these conflicts.
Other existing arterial streets include County Road
42 and State Trunk Highways 3 and 55. The entire
system of State, County, and Municipal State Aid
(MSA) streets is operating at a favorable traffic
volume to physical. capacity ratio except for State
Trunk Highway 3, where current capacity is
deficient. Trunk Highway 3 is a two-lane street,
currently carrying approximately 8,500 ADT
(average daily traffic), which bisects downtown
Rosemount. Any efforts to increase its capacity
would be in direct conflict with the redevelopment
of this center as the City's primary shopping
district.
Public Transit
OF
The City of Rosemount along with Apple Valley,
Burnsville, Eagan, Prior Lake and Savage, is a
member of the Minnes Valley Transit Authority.
This opt out authority provides a work commute
express bus service to and from downtown St. Paul
and Minneapolis. The City has one park and ride lot
located near the inters tion of 143rd Street West
and South Robert Trail (TH 3) from which the
Green Line Shuttle currently provides a feeder route
through Rosemount, east Apple Valley and Eagan
connecting with express bus service to Minneapolis
and St. Paul. The MVTA, which is overseen by the
Regional Transit Board (RTB), is also responsible
for monitoring and meeting transit needs throughout
the six city member region. In addition, Rosemount
is also served by DARTS (Seniors), Metro Mobility
(handicapped), and the Community Action Council
Transportation System low income).
Aviation
The City currently has no public airport or any
heliport facilities within its jurisdiction. It is,
however, within a Critical Airspace Policy Area
which must be protected from the encroachment of
obstructions .to air navigation (structures over 500
feet tall). Southern and eastern Rosemount are also
included within the Dakota Search Area for a new
hub or major airport, should MSP be relocated. If
the decision is made to relocate MSP, actual
construction will not occur until after the turn of the
century. The nearest reliever airports are South St.
Paul and Air Lake, both of which are six or more
miles from Rosemount. There is a small private
airport on the University of Minnesota campus, just
south of the Technical College.
Rail Service
Rosemount is served y both the Soo Line and the
Chicago Northwestern Transportation Companies.
Large areas of the City can be served by rail, and
P4h
s
freight hauling, switching, and piggy -back services
are available to local industries.
Barge Facilities
The Pine Bend area of Rosemount is accessible by
barge and existing barge facilities serve several
industries within the City.
STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN
Objectives
suggests, may be warranted because of high
projected traffic volumes in 2010. However, the
1. Development of a safe and efficient hierarchy of
designation would be i consistent with the City's
public streets and highways that provides for the
plans for growth and development.
movement of large volumes of long distance
traffic on major streets and minimizes traffic on
The designation of Hig iway 3 as a principle arterial
local streets within neighborhoods.
would be inconsistent because the City intends to
2. Optimum accessibility throughout the City and
redevelop its historic downtown. Intrinsic in this
to major regional activity centers via systems
plan is a town center atmosphere, including on -
that are coordinated with neighboring
street parking, direct access from businesses to the
communities, the County, and the State.
street and pedestrian tr ffic. If Highway 3 is
3. Reduction in single occupant automobile travel
changed to a principal erial, no town center
to diminish the growing demand for street
atmosphere could exist because of safety issues.
capacity.
Therefore such high traffic volumes as proposed on
4. Provision of greater transit choice and improved
Highway 3 by the Cou ty must be diverted away
mobility for all City residents, especially the
from the Highway or the Highway relocated.
transit dependent.
5. Continuing improvements to public streets to
The City prefers that the excess traffic be diverted
protect the public's investment in infrastructure.
away from the downtown area rather than
6. Protection of airspace throughout the City from
relocation. Excess traffic can be assigned by design
vertical obstructions to aviation.
to Diamond Path, (if is road is redesignated as a
minor arterial,) or to Pilot Knob Road.
Major Thoroughfares
The only scenario where the City would encourage
Until substantial increases in the cost of commuting
the relocation of the h' hway, would be in the event
occur or stronger efforts are made to promote public
of the movement of the MSP Airport South of
transit, the automobile will be the primary mode of
Rosemount. Public safety in this case would
transportation for City residents until well into the
necessitate its relocation because of the high
next century. For this reason, major thoroughfares
predicted traffic volu es the airport would cause on
will dominate Rosemount's transportation system.
all roads through the region.
The proposed Major Thoroughfare Functional
The designation of Co my Road 42 as a principal
Classification System 0000M correlates
arterial would be inconsistent for two reasons.
with the transportation plan of Dakota County, with
Residential uses to the North of County Road 42 are
the exception of Trunk Highway 3 north of County
not adequately buffered from the ensuing noise and
Road 42 and County Road 42, both are classified as
traffic such an upgrad ng would cause. Second,
principal arterials (freeways) by the County. The
planned commercial lands to the South of 42 would
principal arterial classification that the county
not longer have even 1 he limited access that they
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 2 DECEMBER, 199:
P41
now depend on for customers. The resulting loss of
business would be an economic hardship not only
for the business owners, but for the entire City as
well.
Policies
1. To require the elimination or reduction in the
number of direct driveway accesses to the
arterial street system as redevelopment occurs
and prohibit any new direct accesses to Trunk
Highway 52.
2. To require expanded setbacks for land uses
adjacent to major streets between major
intersections where accessibility is not available
or desirable but consider reduced setbacks along
frontage roads and at intersections to
accommodate public transit accessibility.
3. To require the protection of sight lines at street
intersections. ..
4. To cooperate with the Minnesota Valley Transit
Authority, Dakota County, MnDOT, RTB, and
neighboring communities in the planning and
-implementation of principle and minor arterials,
highway and transit improvements.
5. To require that accepted standards (ITE) for
sight distances based on speed are met at
intersections and driveway entrances to major
streets.
6. To require residences to back or side to major
streets.
7. To build sidewalks and, where practicable,
bikeways/trails as integral parts of the
upgrading of major streets and coordinate
pedestrian and non -motorized systems with the
Parks Master Plan.
Collector and Local Streets
All streets not shown as major thoroughfares fall
under City jurisdiction. These include collector
streets and local streets. Collector streets generally
accommodate traffic movements within rather than
between neighborhoods and industrial and
commercial areas. Their primary purpose is to
collect traffic from local streets and distribute it to,
or between, arterial streets. They move moderate to
low volumes of traffic at relatively low speeds, (35
to 45 mph) over relatively short distances, usually
one to four miles.
ON
Local streets move low volumes of local traffic at
low speeds (maximum 30 mph) over relatively short
distances (less than 1/3mile) within neighborhoods.
Their primary purpose s to provide direct access to
and from individual abutting properties.
The transportation plan is primarily in place in
Western Rosemount. H wever, a series of collector
streets are planned which will service the proposed
industrial areas at Pine Bend. Providing access to .
adjacent properties via local streets will allow for
the eventual upgrading f Trunk Highway 52 to
meet freeway standards.
Policies
1. To require the ded cation of all rights-of-way
for collector and Ic cal streets. In addition, to
protect rights -of -w ty for future collector and
arterial streets fro land use encroachments.
2. To require adequataly spaced driveways and
street intersections along major streets to
maintain maximum efficiency and capacity and
minimize vehicular,conflicts.
3. To establish and a force.minimum setback
distances between ntersections and driveways to
accommodate quet ing and avoid traffic conflicts
at street intersectic ns.
4. To use signage, tr is diverters, and other
appropriate measures to minimize traffic
volumes and through traffic on local residential
streets (not MSAstreets) but avoid the use of
stop signs for such purposes unless warranted
by cross traffic vo umes.
5. To require the protection of sight lines at street
intersections.
6. To require that ac epted standards (ITE) for
sight distances based on speed are met at
intersections and driveway entrances to major
streets.
7. To require residences to back or side to major
streets.
8. To build sidewalks and, where practicable,
bikeways/trails as integral parts of the
upgrading of major streets and coordinate
pedestrian and non -motorized systems with the
Parks Master Plan.
9. To permit the use of cul-de-sacs only as means
to avoid street ext ns' ns that would be
detrimental to the natural environment or
P49
where, due to topographic change, such
extensions cannot feasibility be made.
10. To approve streets only where every effort has
been made to fit the natural contour and avoid
landform disruption.
11. To require traffic impact studies for larger
residential, commercial or industrial
developments or where projects are unable to
meet the minimum standards set forth in this
Plan.
Design Element
Principal
Arterial
Minor
Arterial
ollector
Street
Local
Street
Number of traffic lanes
4-6
2-4
2-4
2
Traffic lane width (ft)
12-14
12-14
12
10-12
Curb parking or shoulder width (ft)
No parking
No parking
8-10
8
Minimum pavement width (ft)
52
44-52
36
28
Minimum R -O -W width (ft)
300
100-120
80
50
Design speed (mph)
55
45
30-40
30
OF
4
P49
Principal
Arterial
Spacing 3-6 miles
On edges of development
Minor
Arterial
1-2 miles
On edges of development
and neighborhoods
Collector
Street
0.5-1 mile
On edges or within
neighborhoods.
Traffic signals and cross
Location
and neighborhoods.
signals.
Intersection
Local street stops.
1,000 - 10,000
Characteristics
Grade separated.
35-45
Volumes Carried
5,000 - 50,000
Posted Speed
Legal limit.
preferential treatment for
Parking
None
Access control
To interstate freeways,
Ramp metering with
other arterials and
collectors.
Management Tools
preferential treatment for
transit.
Rosemount, Dakota
To interstate freeways,
County,MNDOT
System Access
other arterials.
TH 3
Jurisdiction
Metropolitan Highway
Short trips (1-4 miles at
miles) at moderate speeds.
System, MNDOT Federa
Local transit trips.
Examples in
Highway 52
Rosemount
Trip -making Service
Performed
Trips greater than 8 miles
at moderately high speed.
Express transit trips.
Source: Metrovolitan Council
Minor
Arterial
1-2 miles
On edges of development
and neighborhoods
Collector
Street
0.5-1 mile
On edges or within
neighborhoods.
Traffic signals and cross
4 -way stops and some
street stops.
signals.
Local street stops.
1,000 - 10,000
250-2,500
50
35-45
Restricted as necessary
Restricted as necessary
Signal timing with
Number of lanes.
preferential treatment for
Signal timing.
transit.
Access control
To interstate freeways,
To minor arterials, other
other arterials and
collectors.
collectors.
Rosemount, Dakota
Rosemount
County,MNDOT
County Roads 42 and 46,
145th, Shannon Parkway,
TH 3
Dodd Blvd.
Medium to short trips (2-6
Short trips (1-4 miles at
miles) at moderate speeds.
low speeds.
Local transit trips.
Local transit trips.
5
O .
Local
Street'
I block - urban
I mile - rural
Within neighborhoods and
other homogeneous land
use areas.
As required
Less than 1,000
Maximum 30
Restricted if MSA.
Intersection control.
Cul-de-sacs.
Diverters.
To collectors and other
locals.
Rosemount
Danbury Ave., Cameo
Ave, 144th
Short trips at low speeds.
4 -
City of Rosemount
Street 5 Year CIP
Source: Rosemount CIP, Dakota County CL
SCHEDULE
IMPROVEMENT
JURISDICTION
FROM - TO
145th Street
Rosemount
Cameo to Shannon Parkway
1993
Chili -Chippendale
Rosemount
146th to end
1993
Cameo
Rosemount
143rd to 145th
1993
143rd Street
Rosemount
TH 3 to School
1993
CR 38
Dakota Co.
Past Billings Row Acquisition
1993
Lower 147th
Rosemount
TH 3 to Canada
1993
Cameo
Rosemount
145th to Lower 147th
1994
Cambrian Ave.
Rosemount
Lower 147th to TH 3
1994
Camero
Rosemount
Cambrian to End
1994
CR 46
Dakota Co.
Apple Valley to Highway
52
1994
CR 73
Dakota Co.
Inver Grove Heights to C
42
1995
Chippendale
Rosemount
151st to 160th
1995
145th
Rosemount
Brazil to CR 42
1995
Biscayne
Rosemount
CR 42 to Railroad Tracks
1995
Connemara Trail
Rosemount
Shannon Parkway to Highway
3
1996
Dodd Blvd
Rosemount
Chippendale to Delft
1997
Source: Rosemount CIP, Dakota County CL
WA
Principal
Minor
Collector
Local
Arterial
Arterial
Street
Street
RURAL
Minimum
Limited access carefully planned
Access. carefully planned
Entrances combined where possible
Entrances
Desirable
Access only at Principal and Minor
Access only at Pr, Min & Coll
Access carefully planned
combined
General type of
URBAN
Minimum
Access only at Principal and Minor
Some access at major generators
Access carefully planned
where
access control
Desirable
No access between Interchanges
No access between public streets
No access between public streets
possible
Principal
6 miles
---
Minor
3 miles
3 miles
Desirable spacing
RURAL
Collector
1 mile
2 miles
2 miles
of intersections of
Local
None
1 mile
1 mile
Carefully planned
crossing public
Principal
3 miles
---
---
`
roadways
URBAN
Minor
1 mile
1 mile
---
—`
Collector
None
.5 mile
.5 mile
—
Local
None
None
.25 mile
Carefully planned
RURAL
Minimum
1,250 feet
500 feet
300 feet
100 feet
Non-public
Desirable
None
1,250 feet
1,000 feet
300 feet
entrance spacing
URBAN
Minimum
1 mile
200 feet
100 feet
50 feet
Desirable
None
500 feet
300 feet
100 feet
Corner clearance
RURAL
Minimum
300 feet, if any
50 feet
50 feet
50 feet
to non-public
Desirable
No access permitted
100 feet
100 feet
100 feet
entrance
URBAN
Minimum
No access permitted
50 feet
30 feet
30 feet
Desirable
No access permitted
100 feet
100 feet
100 feet
WA
(Major Thoroughfare Plan)
(with 2010 volumes)
W
1
PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN
For reasons primarily related to the lack of financing public usage, transit service to Rosemount is very
limited, consisting of a feeder bus service connecting with express buses to downtown St. Paul and
Minneapolis from a park and ride lot located just north of downtown Rosemount. According to the
Community Survey (1989) only 17% of Rosemount's residents are employed in J dinneapolis and St. Paul while
a substantial percent (34%) are employed in Eagan, Burnsville, Apple Valley Bloomington/South
Hennepin County to which no service is available. According to the March, 1996 Transit Service needs
Assessment prepared by the RTU, transit dependency is low in Rosemount with primary work trip attractions
being Bloomington, Eagan and Apple Valley. Public transit is and will continue to be a very minor need for
Rosemount, except for the truly dependent rider, until congestion increases, pa 'ng fees are initiated or
spaces taxed and fuel costs increase dramatically. It is the City's intent to.expl re with the Minnesota Valley
Transit Authority (MVTA), as opportunities arise, para -transit, jlexroute circulator service, park and pool
service and to continually monitor and meet the transit needs of the City. Also available is service to seniors
through DARTS, service to the handicapped through Metro Mobility, and servi a to those with low income
through the Community Action Council Transit System.
Another facet of public transit is the possible implementation of Light Rail Tran it (LRT). This possibility is
currently being studied by several agencies. Rosemount's participation is through the Southern Dakota
County Light Rail Committee. As the planning of LRT progresses and as the need for public transit becomes
more apparent it will be necessary for the marry agencies involved in transportation issues to coordinate their
efforts and finances.
6. As the need arises for moving or increasing the
PUBLIC TRANSIT POLICIES
number of park an I ride lots, the location of such
should be in the C D or near other
1. To encourage state and federal transportation
retail/commercial and higher density residential
dollars to be used more toward public transit and
areas, or in high traffic volume areas such as
less toward freeway construction to increase
State Highway 52 md State Highway 55.
patronage of transit and decrease traffic
7. To exercise local development controls and
congestion.
financing mechani ms to protect needed park and
2. To encourage larger employers to participate in
ride sites from urban development.
Minnesota Rideshare.
8. To establish appro riate and supportive land uses
3. To promote and encourage the increased use of
in the vicinity of park and ride lots to maximize
public transit and ride -sharing as means to reduce
compatibility and shared parking.
single occupant automobile travel demand.
9. To locate higher d nsity developments
4. Through participation in the MVTA, to work
appropriately to tace into account the future
with the RTB to ensure Rosemount's bus service
availability of pub is transit services.
needs are met and appropriate dollars made
10. To encourage developers with transit corridors to
available.
design for public t ansit including the orientation
5. Through participation in the MVTA, to work
of building entrances to streets, reductions in
with the other opt -out authorities and the RTB to
setbacks, provision of transit stops and walkways
change policies regulating transit tax dollars and
and the provision of preferential parking
bus ownership in order to create a more favorable
opportunities to those who car and van pool.
market for competition among transit operators.
9 P54
11. To participate with MVTA, RTB, Met Council,
and MnDOT to ensure that transit facility needs
are coordinated with highway planning.
12. Through participation in the Southern Dakota
County Light Rail Committee, to ensure
Rosemount's interests are represented.
13. To encourage coordination of bus service and
LRT service by working with all involved
transportation agencies, such as MnDOT, Met
Council, RTB, LRT committees, and other opt -
outs.
10
P 5s
AVIATION PLAN ELEMENT5
It is the City's intent to continue to participate in the process of selecting a
replacement airport for Minneapolis St. Paul International.
AVIATION POLICIES
1. To require that tall towers having a height of 200
feet or more above ground level be subject to
variance, planned unit development, or interim
use permit (IUP) requirements and procedures.
Also, to include notification of MnDOT and the
FAA in said procedure.
2. To require that heliports comply with the
licensing requirements of MnDOT, the approach
and altitude standards of the FAA and the noise
standards of the MPCA as requirements of CUP
approval.
3. To prohibit the use of seaplanes in the City.
4. In the event a new international airport is
approved by the Minnesota Legislature near
Rosemount to protect all airspace zones from
vertical intrusions and prohibit general
obstructions to air navigation per Minnesota
Department of Transportation Rule 14 MCAR
1.3015, Subdivisions C and D.
5. In the event a new airport is developed near
Rosemount, the MAC should acquire land within
the 60 Ldn Contours and the preferred take-
off/landing approaches should be clearly directed
away from urban concentrations.
11
area for a new major
6. In the event a new airport is developed near
Rosemount, MAC shall implement new
transportation imp vements that do not change
the character of existing roadways or disrupt the
character of the communities in which the
roadways exist.
7. In the event a new airport is developed near
Rosemount, local jurisdictions should retain
taxation and development jurisdiction of non
airport development. MAC shall not acquire
additional property beyond the area needed for
safe/environmental operation of an airport.
8. In the event a new airport is developed near
Rosemount, LRT and other transit policies should
be re-evaluated.
9. In the event a new airport is developed near
Rosemount, Dakota County and Metropolitan
Council highway plans need to be updated.
P5(40
Economic Development
Objectives
1. Provide opportunities for the attraction of new business
business as means to expand employment opportunities
City's tax base.
2. Stimulate the redevelopment of underutilized, blighted, or
3. Insure that publicly assisted economic development
that guarantee public benefit.
4. Coordinate economic development activities/programs
Economic Development Policies
The following are the City's policies for Economic Development as 1
and Industrial areas:
the retention of existing
increase/diversify the
land uses.
meet established criteria
other public agencies.
apply to Commercial
1. To promote public financial assistance/incentives for projects that eliminate blight,
increase or retain predominantly full-time professional, technical and managerial
employment or retain existing viable businesses.
2. To avoid public financial assistance for any business reloll,ating or expanding where
the assistance alone makes the business viable.
3. To make public financial assistance available for econom c development only when
it can be demonstrated that the project would not be feasible without public
assistance.
4. To make public assistance available only when a project can be proven to be -
fmancially feasible and will produce long-term tax base nefits which exceed public
costs.
5. To require developer financial guarantees as part of red elopment agreements as
the first line of defence against project failure. In other words, the developer should
guarantee that payments in lieu of tax increments will be made by the developer in
the event of a shortfall.
6. To actively identify redevelopment needs and initiate
City's qualifying criteria.
7
which meet the
P61
PUBLIC UTILITIES
1. Inflow and infiltration reduction
2. Replacement of rural water system.
3. On-site septic inspection program
4. Interconnection of water systems / conservation program
5. Creation of new MUSA (east Rosemount)
6. Storm water utility
7. Treatment plant expansion timing relative to need.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
------------------------------------------------------------
1. Tree replacement ordinance
2. Wetland mitigation
3. Erosion control
4. Water Management Plan
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
1. Plans and procedures
2. Tools to be employed
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION
OF
3
ity aRosemount nin .:
•T
------
A r.
_ -- AG
AG �_ --- - m —" �i� ......._...._ •.... _ _ \ Q s' ®rte~ "' ``:.
4
]RR
i
AG ____
--- -- • \� �
_�� •I.. • G AGP -- — I O a u
A
r _
W
IG
ttt
�, � � �+. t a �• [ '�' •, -,,
i RR ti — l % • AG I AGr•'c• +t? s
r
s
i
i}:y.,�.;., .. :•i-i<ai � 'fin_. IS _- � --.• • _. _. _ •-- — -_�. _ .. ... !G
=i•af`,v 1 V3{,+n:.?E'•+,'?Y.'+T.:C"y{r+''�+,'„: I '� 1�
iF9
Ica
3 PB �p{'J•tti vi'rJ. i}ti Fv. ••:• i
a v;:-3'�'•>ati; 4�'•,t kik^?~ as '! _ f_.. PS
IG
.:.� ...IY..
_ `x}''�3i.�c->�r.?,:..ai�:,r;}h •.. =�•.� _f '�.. !Ij war � (
9 y Jry AG I I .... M \, t
AGP ,.... WM
'AG
4 r
1jjjj.
- xf}S }'}r'uf4igha,•?6+q - , •Y } ! : .... 1 I i.
'Nk
AG
L. t Ifll NfNNfN ... AG ra
- ►• I Ao � Itlll � f `I f11 }ff�'';:f':fi:,a 7 `' S,
/' A• l�l'Y'i711Ifi`,{}��..ff-T17Ff1 t,. tltII��i� ,�•. �..3$ i,� ~ 1• �..�.II I..-,) I� �,.,� h4`t !/''.�J !`
:1� llls J as t.. � �tllllltlllililtfr>�ali �-Uvi y:'��^{��''k II i. `- _ , � ;'� •- .— •-
i 1
/• tiff a.a �' � If /
PB
AG
!A _ •� , FT71nT117T1� d 3: �� �'. ::fi - ; '
1�1!!!1! i ,3 f 3•:.,
J'• �F i 11!� t`J}I!!R�IIz st r� AG
�illlfill— as 111111
- ...- ... ^ •:-.•si.•••},:}tee; .._ - - ... - - --
AG / JAG
if;
f3, Y"fna lv c ( i I f AGP i
b.HIltt " ,.ij�it , 33f t: ; + AGP
'`: i........ 3 �F . I s ” f � I, AGP —
FF
AG
AO
I Au AGP
T1 . EEL I I
_: -.--- _
ZONING MAP DRAFT (11/92) ZONING MAP.
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN UPDATE
LEGEND 'LAND TO BE REZONED AS PART OF THE
,_. R-1 Single Family Residential C-3 Highway Service Commercial — ° '`-COMP :GUIDE 'PLAN .UPDATE
R-1 A Single Family Residential C-4 General Commercial IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
R-2 Single Family Attached PB Public / Quasi -Public •
R-3 Multiple Family Residential IG General Industrial `
. ` R-4 Multiple family Residential IP Industrial Park
RR Rural Residential AG Agriculture
RL Residential Low Density AGP Agriculture Preserve
C-1 Convenience Commercial FW Floodway
fC-2 Community Commercial WM Waste Management
all
m
mn
C
�•,�' �
��ji�
"o coo 000000000a oco o00o
� 0 00o0o0ou c o0o co Opo°c O�Ooc�o°c o O O�`'Opo°<
�.•
r'.'
n Ff
2i
:...
000000 00000006000000 O O �0000p000000 000000
0000000000000000000000 00
0000
00 00
000000
/
..'i'.L`
L: �Nw`..
0000OyyO0�++0000000 00 000000000000
.
t N -f.- '.
�+ ;�, <: -
'�
r: 0 000y0000 000000 O 00 000000000 000
...:•.' � O O 0"00000,0.Q0�000000000 000 0000 00000
x• 000 00 0 000 0000 000 00 00000 00 0
/ 1
v
x v',iC• :
�
p,F
Vri
v�'i f �Sv 'A vyy� U
- :f �. iL�
ti�--`' W O O O 000 O 000 O D 000 O O 000
%G O O 0000��00000JO 00 00000000 O 000 O 0000
�s ..� 00 000R�0��0�00000A000000000p000
•-. 0 0 O 00 000000
0000000000
J :llY��ffO_yyO
.' fi /nu
3:
K
4r
.rr .�
.i{avr O O 0000
0000000 00000
rr/C Sv':p 0000000 00 00000000 0000000000000000 O
�++/��
LvF;f'•v r�v:e
•
J+S %
riyL:
v 3�'`w+r.. v:�itf O 000 00d0'C000 O O 00 0 00000
LL O 00000000000000 000 00000
? 00
b
./' f1L •: 000�OQ0000000000 �dCg00;,,0000000 Y�
• .: /�' .L: ;. .q . Ni.. • :::. .'a . ..::t4:`•:..
: •:: 4-.:' ' ,,.,,:i. ;::: L• -:?moi;':.'. r i :M.
EXISTING M U S A
J
INTERIM M U S A
�`� 2000 M U S A
�� TO BE
WITHDRAWN FROM M U S A
M U A BOUNDARY MAP
UNTIL AFTER 1996
12/92-
-
12/96,
r■� ■ ■�. -2010 M U S A
" J
.1•, _ x .'1, ra \, . x, -•�: x, d. '-1 , ';;, ' - r•,,; �I r., i' r•ta. .,r ,Pak, ,`.�
_ - :":i • / ' fix I },,• t d
•,y ,tp• l:� ,
yr !G' r • 1
r\C:
V'
, ►tel%'-''• i''
1
`\t;!If
''J �•Y r„'' •sr'
t•
'y4 • ,In, r' i+
2
1 J'
„
'1
4
( /
.1 yr, f• i
{ \a
s' E •' l .
-!
J<
7
t•
t! S I C ADDITION
•rr+>l - A„ �,ASr ",Ir, .-,ZI•n ' ';i' IrxMa -,,rp ' S~,;,, I ,
`- ,____ h, r// i Via`,` , 1'rxt„ \ I�l%'r i p i•
yx' p r '1.' • s
'R
•'r ,Ila % ,•' ':
f• ` 1 1
1 -
"\`� of t
r�
1 S
r
i + '�=' • 'r }�, _
-
1 t ` c ut• J' ` --- ---- - ---
" a
I it
Y ~' 1' win {{
i
er
�.. r• - as aad, I' - �`\''�.�''a SkQ.' f,
t\`
Y� „\„ 0'• M
rl •
/
1 i
,r,\a
i", r •i
..;�::, • .3. 't /,� is iii `
r
LJ r
If
` _J •- I r -
sC '
h' _i` S
_
a5•'a
- - k
SR
,c< t _
•. 1, ;.=//,� _"/ , �.. - ---
•=.-J-`, _•moi 'I x
r\. • iGrn,r ;, t'`� `"�+, Aa e•. - --*��� �,^.-"z�s _ _ .`i"�\' �fc;� a l� , , r
J�? ��, /-� - a7J, - is .lr \ ,�,�,.:.' •J-, ,.4: __ , , /. i•--•
„\fl .� ,. > ;111 - J' - t,l r .1 J�, ;�•' k._
If,``,ttN'ti'f'I rl i,'•P„
-,sa ` , '1, r , .�� - z} ' / Y 1, l` fM1•' r;„ •'/., i �\ I • ,pl�•r�{ i �!
11 f
I'
•:f;r
f,
ry-^h.
i I
1.
pi
•, , .'Srll
If
,V
L 1Q.
-
/�h/i
n'
a'
D'r
a' l
•r� - •l
[t
- i
d' i •� '
,
r. J._
'•v >'••`
b�
or
a 1' �•s
t ♦ i In
\
I °1
Y a
T'r ,
v.
I -
�� .II' S ':+in,'If Ih til :\` �,, •, ./ ___ -�,c -
{4, ( ';•� .'.li . � is >f \, � - 1
'A
f'f\
ta`A "N a 1 '
I �5• _
F
. k
_
>f
- rl
1~' V
A
't
r;
t
�1
-
-_
1
,1
1'
y p
/
•1
}
LEGEND:
.p�•• 'vh)' til „uLJ ,
f - -
I -
_ ,I
If ,
.ate \ ',' II I � \.
Woodland A '3
teas `--�;` .,,
y,
7+ i'i" _
>2096 Slopes Over j'; ,rt'�n •/„ `I' r 4 ` r 'I;.' - ;v- 'f •`�.' I, .•• /
P i7._
n
,
-- - -- - -------- --- -- \ ::�} � '"� Wit, "';ii" + _,`�.,• .l '':,,':'/'" - / � v' YS ,;:7•'-�, `*'r
�r/yr,"
20' Elevation
,1 t,
D
Wetlands 5 Buffer Zone
` L,•a
r,y
1,
- r
ai
:r" W, gg 1 •T
3 ..
Buffer Yard ''>« 'Y •
Bu
d
,�•` IIS„ {.. ',4 i,,- _ lL,
_ • {.., k : Vii.. 7 b
t
R•a
fl`
I
t /
% ` it ` n�, i • , T,�'. ,
'�\ 'i,' • t.•` \ .,\` ` 'rot � '." 1 \ t
Trail Connection >~ :P,;<
.+r•. _ -Ir r"T.r? a� _ 'a`-,, ;'s', //7,'r:`` .a. 115'- ,-mss, Iv, . �"` \
`
/.��. : n fi c •'yd a. ` „`., \ ', , ir" ..r7Nf..ra` ,v. :'.�'.:�. 11„ : T^ -
psi•.'\, : , \ , .ti , gid; ' F:•: n,'k-<: At`.,rA'.
� Road Connection %/i� '+'::'s. -.r ;;t \:. 'i - r .v. _+_ II „�- - - .yc-,r•,a.w„ �. y '-%` ,> v �,Q.� �-,.3.'�s ' '-•-•!
r
;;/\` .,\ � arJ` „"�R''"i '-n'rr' i• -ice ,s; •` li-P �:� %'i.'; .{"'�-' P
X",
, \•' `.�',\ 'trx "J al,','r%b"� `a@, •`d.'' 4,I'lr''' NS nl",rJ.\ ` v. _:_�., ',1 ,A, p�
• i' �` ui.�f I_ '•7�'` ,`k;" ' r/ �•�11,a ""an'`li' , �:' - _ w: .yAli
� 'Ind-. TT�•
r"pa^Irl•. - l ''t.,'-�'_'_� , "5 : 'f
t II
IIS �I I
�.,• f, (`� ��'�.'1" o�i,�.`f�«,�i r[+jJ/'� '� "+// - `:`,: rS"`'',per' r•,'y-?��:,'�1' - =v�'� .�- `.ai^,a�t,i,�. t, ,�. .ic_'•...�_ '. .fN'ai/�-.,.-:i`:�_ �t ,y, '�: ��.."yp}
f. I �. , � �:`„a, f ; r l� ` '^F - : `- h�' 4�' �r�iy � 1'ir •,- • �IpO„`,` .. ,F;,; _ � -. `„ . ,..y ; !.,/`.w•. _ - -' lip,,, , t k Y / �:%� +�
�./••, >.'.,. � .r i.i�',R„',•:' .u. +,fhA,a r ,/�::a`t, .. Il,flr,.
• �, A k',� � : �i ,•-_' F -/„ nY. *,. illi l' r �.\� -rat!ya�,: , x,Nr" ' it 1 � 'a `'r 1;1, 1�� �7�1
"4t'/- � _ - 'irx a•'�.•in'n.r "j ,,io,,,n` �i`',`�r�-h�.i. / - i•.. 1, '�:5 `,' ryl.,l�/', `\` fi
1 �,.4 r •M, t', ,�� --. Y. `',' ' /,,, •/'•� • /'xP' �; '1"''r'' In f1`f'� ';//,,,: a`\.`' a\,L•'It•' :I�', `, `kx"' ';; ' ft,' t _'I':;.:t -Y, n A
•.J
, j, l ; tIf - %� Ir i`',a•
y+` '•\,,.� Il�•. :,a•.�'/,''_ - iL' --•tjaa_ /✓''/ 'I^h`, ,'ql,f„R,,p;i\`, .;'=_ I;'l,l`flf q ii; I ;'�il.`•> �%'` r:� ..d ql' l�
�'rlr.b '<, .i •'Q,1 4 r•i. a..N •Ifl.>, /I P i,•,5r t,.7.. .na'. Ji: i\�aa\at \.. 1 ,, J," `"' f;,lr,1y,fl '��,1, , �``a I 1 -,i'• /
I,hi" �`iJ� • t J'' , /„ 1,• ��``�� y" ' M„ , I,f li'"( r•,Y.� _ �//r„1 i; l' '1A' j7{1�
,:I'1 i •i+•.,,,4 -,If IPltrrx Af, fat`, G', L'J
:;� :A,� I a ' _ '^ '' ;.i/ �r: � •�x•..'.', ya... ;q" f ya., na,f ti} �ryI,� 1 .;• .r,; ,n,n
• ; i•IN a,l , j -Marl, ,,\'i _ i�" 't•.�f� a -/Ir r;,. 11r1,� ' �. •"h. F�',jr _ 'I' ' /, iIM
i�-.l _,'/'. .0 �•.:1 l , -'k• _ --/ _ `, �• ,'yx, '„Il`:, `�4 i1.` ,;11,,, - •I,,tii ✓..x �I a\ ,r/-.INI' ,l'r�,/r •Ip
;V ,S+S7 � �� _ - j„', .. yr'�'d • i,:.f ,,'.. \P,
':'', f -'s''• l ••?t"'-'::.?. -w - '''ia' - - -__ k,.J+' `,r _ "�,Nf`:.ti,�i x �„<;,'u-• •. � x t' � ,! �s' ,.k Gc
' \ � r /< _.i4•+ _''i' / y fid"- ,1, •/ `, pl yi: -a . .t.,r, `'„/Mi'in'\ e t W�. .Waw ', rp r ` 'x' A _ f�
i1, 4r - :\\-: a+ - ty,•1.' ,�;',`v, r .•'� - i\�•"•'t; �,; •.,•.. - _ 'yYy��{,'$%
- --/ - _ 1- trl' «?p - ":•+,r„ ,f1piJ ,ai• ., y+ f'„ ..,,,r, »,x�� :, t,•, ,"11 • ",'ifllii i��iQa
Y vx,t �Y t(:; ,/ .'Y -- ,,,, /, i•`a"tf' �y 'iA„ , '„/. 'xir ' !•,. i•' , /, 1, "i, ' ,rV ' •�
� -'�� f,,(� taa/ •f a`':a:.. !�-._^- ¢�:a<'-. / � 1 S - ly a"`�f 1�,1 ,
'A �,``a \. i'/. ,l1,lY`:3� '�/ �. i'l ,fi�,y'M • '/rf 11,. /,+�� ,;;, �` ,y l
f `.J -•rax' i\r �.r',f , 1,.__' 1 •.J,\'< ,'1'f�'', ,. k �liL,_.i'' C., 1 ` Nf f1 afe 1 •'I ,`'ll .i ,r
�: ;,\.,- ..••.�; A`a7Pa,-•\�oTtJ' � `2 '�' f �Jr„'1 , is .fll ,,.f.`, ' .....
�� , _ ' < 'lf' i iS `, ✓ %;M ,� •��:.,:"wk`��J< a'I , �•,'• t %ii f'/ •,, , ,
1`. { '. A.`t. «J /. ,.P .�.: ) - 'rC`• ,11rr•'• .+�•K ' �Y A
.l1 r.. - '.IH l \ ::M .1,� rIr S.: , f . _ a!• •t �' r � . ,f, ,N"," a,- `f' , LA,f � `-»i lii 'e 1. �� .xl;�. 1 :,n/ • r � I /•%' �I' 1' -J .
5' '•..,. �1la'rlk....•,vy,, i'„ ,',.,{ ,L.,t:' xl�;,�-_, i `lf`�•�;-� ::;� � -� • ; �;:�'/'' ''I♦ v.� <g; .,_p
,.1 ` %<; - _ �fl'•,I. - ':""� , :.':,; , r n, :r;' "�',%_; ` ,tw+, ; /i ,a,y ,/ . ha `, :•\�, ,� ,,r q
'„r.'C' .�*+ ;� � uf; '../, r,>,; '�S - :c. •-\1fJ,, :'',''"4'la;`'+-''` ;tr1 f\ t,lr < I_ '•!r,/•/, if • .'J „'a;,. f`T;8 4
'�•�/- `/' ( %,'•, .•..dr.' ,d - .at"`'' -V •p`ri 5s h,r \.; ...�•if' ..1��� .(
®mon 0 2OW 40W SOW v 11,.7f 1:F---
`,�.'`, _: , j ..:'3.-"r' ; ///�, a- , ,'a, , �:.. • - - I,! A 1.•..;� f r I , s;� : 1 I ,;Y x'�,,t :� I r I' •^'\ / ,.: 'i, 1;'" •1,17
_.�'. .i`'. k, r7' /P �,\. , - t;i, \_./._ - ,;`•.C, '\'i" ' 5,,,.��yyff •'w'.I: F:+c_ )%%����,'iii/,l .bs71„'`/� -� /�•
�. '4`'i �S .1.;, .-y +_�?£r�tF.X_• ,r �_ ' .. �iJ i••:� %� f.?�I' .�/��a,. -'` r'. "1:_ ��
lM5! IW PREPA I:O n MCCO Nf rF1AR11 ROM ASSOCL4"S. W_ '
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc
73M bkko Mw4. Soft M5
-Mhu+eapoWI,71`1 SSt99•(6t2)696A9Q0 - - - :_.
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAP