The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6. Daniel Huntington - Site Plan ReviewCity of Rosemount Executive Summary for Action Planning Commission Meeting Date: September 8. 1992 Agenda Item: Daniel Huntington - Site Plan Review Agenda Section: MEW BUSINESS Prepared By: Rick Pearson Agenda No. Assistant Planner ITEM # 6 Attachments: Memo; Application; Location Map; Building Approved By: Elevations; Site Plan. - SEE ATTACHED MEMO - Recommended Action: A MOTION to approve the site plan for the office/warehouse building project subject to: 1) a grading/erosion control and sediment control/drainage plan for South Rose Park 3rd Addition must be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer; 2) modification of the landscape plan regarding plant materials, spacing, and to include three additional trees, in accordance with Section 8.3 of the Zoning Ordinance; 3) providing a landscape performance security, as required in Section 8.3(G) of the Zoning Ordinance; 4) conformance with applicable building and fire codes, as well as ADA requirements for handicapped access; and 5) modification of the west elevations of the building to conform to building materials standards as specified in Section 7.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. Planning Commission Action: (Pity of (Rosemount PHONE (612) 423-4411 2675 - 145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota FAX (612) 4235203 Mailing Address: P.O. Sox 510, Rosemount, Minnesota 550680510 TO: Chairperson Meyer Commissioners: Baago, Busho, Gundacker, Hathaway FROM: Richard Pearson, Assistant Planner DATE: September 2, 1992 MAYOR Edward S. McMenomy COUNCII.MEMSERS Sheila Klass" James (Red) Stasis Harry Willcox Dennis Wippermann ADMINISTRATOR Stephan Jiik RE: September 8, 1992 Meeting Review Agenda Item '6 ATTACHMENTS: Application Location Map Building Elevations Site Plan Item 6 Site Plan Review Daniel E. Huntington 15185 Carrousel Way RECOMI\1ENDEDMOTION: Motion to approve the site plan review for the office - warehouse building subject to: 1) a grading/erosion control and sediment control/drainage plan for South Rose Park 3rd Addition must be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer; 2) modifying the landscape plan regarding plant materials, spacing and to include three additional trees in accordance with section 8.3 of the Zoning Ordinance; 3) providing a landscape performance security as required in section 8.3(G) of the Zoning Ordinance; C ° 4) conformance with applicable building and fire codes xl�p T!�ffo access - 5) modification of the west ele ations of the buil ing to co o' o building materials standards as specified in section 7.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Daniel Huntington is requesting site plan approval of a 7940 sq. ft. office and warehouse building located on lot 2, in South Rose Park Third Addition, south of the existing Matthew -Daniels building at 15185 Carrousel Way. The land is zoned C-4, General Commercial. Offices, business and professional, construction materials sales including building supply stores, wholesale businesses and supply centers are uses permitted by right in the district. The facility will house his plumbing contracting and supply business. Preliminary discussions with the applicant raised questions as to whether the use was permitted in the General Commercial district. Given that the warehouse is accessory to the office and wholesale aspect of the use, Planning staff has determined that the use is permitted in the General Commercial district. � // 6vertylhingsr (Poming `UJ6 gosemounlY as Regular Planning Commission Meeting Reviews September 8, 1992 ACCESS/SITE CHARACTERISTICS The site is 0.75 acres in size and has one access to Carrousel Way on the east side of the parcel. The site is has 140 ft. of frontage with a depth varying from 218 to 252 feet deep. Currently the site is undeveloped, but the site contains a large amount of stockpiled excavated material. The site plan indicates proposed spot elevations that indicate generally, how the site is to be graded. The building and paved -surfaces combined equal 74.2 % lot coverage, which is 0.8 % below the maximum. In other words, the proposed use is maximizing the existing site with little flexibility left for future expansion or modification. The South Rose Park Third Addition development contract required that a grading plan be submitted for the entire addition before any building permits are to be issued. To date, no grading plan has been submitted to the City. The Developer of South Rose Park Third Addition is responsible for the grading plan. The ordinance standards for office, "shop" and warehouse uses require 11 parking spaces which have been provided for on the site. If any of the uses - especially office - are expanded, additionalparking would have to be provided in the fenced area. labeled "bituminous. drive and parking". BUILDING CONSIDERATIONS The east elevation fronting on Carrousel Way is composed of gray face brick veneer with a maroon vinyl canopy above the windows and doors. On the north elevation a combination of grey' decorative masonry block and a grey standing seam metal wall is specified. The west warehouse elevation will be a standing seam metal wall. The west office and south warehouse elevation building materials are not specified. A combination of grey brick and grey standing seam metal will be used for the south office wall. Appropriate treatments must be applied to the west and south elevations to meet ordinance building material standards. LANDSCAPING Five shade trees are indicated for the east frontage adjacent to the parking area; four upright junipers are indicated in the ten foot side yard north of the warehouse. Additionally, a foundation planting of globe evergreens are indicated for the east office frontage. The landscape standards specify eight trees or 1 tree per 3,000 square feet of land area. The landscape plan is deficient by three trees from the minimum standards of section 8.3 (Landscaping Requirements) of the Zoning Ordinance. 2 aiuw awvw City of Rosemount Name of Applicant (to bt used on legal documents) Telephone No. 2. /S/SS 6✓O( , /?5'L—u.f -, 6 Ff L/25-301-7 3. C 6� 4. N-7SO /Zo b, - Taj �r(( qZ3 - 22S 4.1-+. Pax 5. Street Address of Property(ies) Involved: ��/ X �av �u�L� W 12 ej Current Description(s) and Survey Attached? Revised Description(s) and Survey Attached? 6. Property described is by: 1� Abstract Torrens Name of Property Owner $. Address of Property Owner 9. Current Zoning 10. Uacamk- Present Use 11. $ 150.00 0+ a than 1 acre) Site Plan Review Fee ollecte� L12 -3,-3 7 Proposed Zoning (if applicable) 12. Development Review Committee Recommendations: Date Reviewed: ?/�s�9�-- W04MARMWWl A ► % W / a NOTE: Applications are not complete until all required submissions have been received. DevRevApp 08.5 /■■■��11��1■11■1■ film- ■111lmwomomi, clo, 111 ■IIIIt11��1 !1111111 iit� ■ �� ■it■ ��►IIII�� _ ,� ■■ � � iII111111fIIINI(IIIIIIIII. � � •• io:i i ® Big 111111111111111 ■■■111 iii11uuea1isuiiiiui��--MW ■ r /� ---.. ■,,,/„■ 11111111llll{IIIIIIltlilll� ■� ■� •••�• • F� l� sommoommossm 1115■■11115■ sommommoss F�■ tit/■ [: � Im MJim 1111 M■_ ■ 1011111.2.1111