The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About15. Comprehensive Guide Plan: Implementation Plan; PUD StandardsCity of Rosemount Executive Summary for Action Planning Commission Meeting Date: September 8. 1992 Agenda Item: Comprehensive Guide Plan: Implementation Plan; Agenda Section: PUD Standards NEW BUSINESS Prepared By: Lina J. Freese Agenda No. Director of Planning ITEM # 15 Attachments: Implementation Plan; Commercial PUD; dB ApproveJV Residential PUD. At the meeting I would like to discuss with the Planning Commission the draft Implementation Plan. If time permits, I would like to also cover the Commercial PUD. Originally, I had wanted to discuss the Residential PUD (Kelley property), but Commissioner Gundacker asked that I delay discussion until he could attend the September 22, 1992 Meeting. I would like to consider having a Special Work Session with the Planning Commission on the Comprehensive Guide Plan and other topics in September. Bring your calendars and let's see if we can find a date. Recommended Action: None. Planning Commission Action: IMPLEMENTATION a OUTLINE ZONINGAN -VISION ORDINANCES At a minim m, the following amendments should be made to bring the ordinances into conformance with the Comprehensive Plan: 1. Establishment of a PUD district. 2. Establishment of CUP provisions. U N 3. Establishment of multi -family locational criteria for R-3. 4. Establishment of performance standards for multi -family (may include a performance based scoring system). 5. Change intent statement for R-3 District. 6. Change density of R-3 to 12 units per acre base density. 7. Combine C-1 and C-3 Districts? 8. Eliminate Section 6.6 C. (R-2)/require manufactured home parks and cluster ' by PUD. 9. Add to list of permitted uses under R-1 attached single-family by PUD. 10. Eliminate RL District. 11. Change Ag District to 1/20 acres east of Akron. 12. Clarify Waste Management District purpose re: public/private. 13. Rezone Broback Industrial Park. 14. Amendzoning map. 15. Identify non -conforming uses. 16. Update' Shoreland Ordinance to conform to 1989 rules. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Identify and prioritize needs, determine funding sources and ability to pay and budget for major public improvements over five years. 1. Police 2. Fire 3. Public Works 4. Parks and Recreation 5. Public Utilities 6. Streets' 7. City Hall CBD/REDEVELOPMENT 1. Identify, procedures (plans, feasibility, etc.). 2. Identify, tools (TIF, others). HOUSING 1. Housing assistance (low and mod). 2. Housing maintenance. 3. Housing rehabilitation. 4. Home ownership. 5. New housing (low and mod). 6. Creative multi -family housing approaches. 7. Multi -family limitation (to 20%). 2 URBAN EXRANSION 1. Industrial (east) 2. Residential (west) BLIC U1,1LITIES 1 L 1. Inflow and infiltration reduction. 2. Replacement of rural water system. 3. On-site', septic inspection program. f 4. Interconnection of water systems/conservation program. 5. Creation of new MUSA (east Rosemount). 6. Storm ''water utility. 7. Treatment plant expansion timing relative to need. '�7TTIAITI f�'11TT � T T1 T1 !\TTIATTAIT 1.4 1. Tree replacement ordinance. 2. WetlanO mitigation. 3.Erosion control. Water ',Management Plan. U ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1. Plans and procedures. 2. Tools to be employed. INTERGOYERN jFNTAL COOPERATION 3 Planned Unit Development Areas Areas designated) Planned Unit Development (PUD) warrant extraordinary environmental tural consideration. They are characterized either by unique r the offeropportunities(woodlands, carefully and topographic relief) warranting sensitive treatment o y P controlled mixed, use development at prominent locations in the City. These will require an extraordinary amount of careful evaluation by the City. PUD is intended to be mandatory within areas so designated. PUD - Planned Residential. Predominantly residential, this area is intended to have an urban/rural character with a mixture of housing types, but a relatively low overall density to reflect the need to protect its unique stands of upland hardwoods and variable topography. It is an area that is intended to have urban landscaped streets with curb and gutter, sidewalks, and all public utilities. One small convenience retail center may also be considered near the intersection of Dodd Boulevard and Connemara Trail, if market conditions warrant. Part of this area already has public sanitary sewer and water services available. It is in single ial natural ownership which will readily allow it to be planned as a unit.a Areas of and the dense resource concern are the hilly areas along the northern edge of the property woodlands with cleared openings lying westerly of Dodd Boulevard. Densities in these areas are intended to be low enough to allow for the creation of open space which correlates with natural feature', preservation. PUD plans must demonstrate their sensitivity to natural land form and vegetation protection. The Planned Residential PUD is primarily intended to accommodate single-family housing (attached and detached) at an overall gross density of up to units per acre or total units. Park lands outside the requisite PUD, but in the same ownership, may be given density creditlwithin the PUD to the extent the amount of park land designated exceeds park to dedication requirements. To the extent that higher densities and clustering ma �b on anted dered preserve natural features or to attain the overall gross density, townhouses y by the City. ' ,Generally, lands along the northern edge of the PUD should be lower than the average PUD, density and those near Dodd Boulevard should be clustered or sufficiently low in density to protect the maximum amount of woodland. The site is intended to be planned as a single unit and developed in phases as market conditions warrant. Clustering is intended to be employed as a means to protect/integrate development'', with the natural environment. Performance standards are also intended to be sidential policies of formulated to minimize the loss of unique natural resources. And, the re this plan apply to the planned residential FUD. PUD - Nixed Use. Mixed Use areas clearly have commercial potential, but there is concern that they may compete with downtown Rosemount for uses that will compromise its future viability. They are not only prominently located in the City immediately adjacent to Y arterial streets, they are in areas that might be classified as sensitive because until now, they have been planned for residential, not commercial development. They are also located near existing and future residential land uses. Land uses intended to be accommodated in these areas include residential (high and low density), commercial, and office uses. They are intended to be planned as a unit wherever possible and are proposed to adhere to general transitional development concepts which call for a gradient in land use from higher to lower density. Residential densities should conform to those of Urban Residential areas. Commercial 'development within these areas is intended to be allowed only when and where traffic can be accommodated via existing cross streets, a viable plan is submitted, a market study is presented which establishes market absorption capabilities and the proposed development] is acceptably preleased in accordance with prevailing financial standards. The respective commercial and residential policies of this plan shall apply within mixed use areas. Designated PUDs are not intended to be eligible for use of TIF. Because they are vacant, they need no public assistance. Uses considered to be generally acceptable within mixed use areas are those that would not be appropriate in the town center. These include such as: highway service, fast food and convenience, retail uses, and larger scale projects such as home improvement, building supplies, harder are and garden supply stores, and home furnishing stores of a freestanding nature. Day Care Centers, offices, and institutional uses are also acceptable within mixed use areas: li City of Rosemount u Executive Summary for Action Planning Commission Meeting Date: August 11, 1992 Agenda Item: Residential PUD Performance Standards Agenda Section: NEW BUSINESS Prepared By: Lisa J. Freese Agenda No. Director of Planning ITEM #9. Attachments: Comprehensive Guide Plan Update Excerpt Approved By: Below is a fust draft of the performance standards for the Residential PUD in the Comprehensive Guide Plan Update. Mr. Fred Hoisington will be present at your meeting on Tuesday to discuss the performance criteria and the implications such criteria will have for development in this area. RESIDENTMAL PUD PERFoRmANCE CFUTERu The following criteria are intended to apply: 1. Steep slopes of 20% or greater over a vertical elevation difference of 30 feet are not to be altered.' 2. Grading which changes, rather than simply adopts to, the landscape is to be avoided. 3. Streets are',to be designed to follow the natural contour and, thus, not disrupt natural landforms. 4. Lands having the characteristics of a wetland (hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and intermittent saturation) are not to be altered. 5. The loss of significant trees (12 -inch or larger deciduous and 8 -inch or larger coniferous) is to be minimized. Where loss is unavoidable, such trees are to be replaced in accordance with accepted standards which create incentives for tree preservation. 6. Building envelopes are not to be drawn into steep slope areas (20% or greater slopes). Recommended 'Action: Provide further direction to staff and consultants on Performance Standards for Residential PUD. Planning Commission Action: 08/11/92.009 V Planned Unit Development Areas Areas design ted Planned Unit Development (PUD) warrant extraordinary environmental consideration They are characterized either by unique natural features (woodlands, water, and topographic relief) warranting sensitive treatment or they offer opportunities for carefully controlled m. ed use development at prominent locations in the City. These will require an extraordin amount of careful evaluation by the City. PUD is intended to be mandatory within areas so designated. PUD - Planned Residential. Predominantly residential, this area is intended to have an urban/rural character with a mixture of housing types, but a relatively low overall density to reflect the, need to protect its unique stands of upland hardwoods and variable topography. It is an area that is intended to have urban landscaped streets with curb and gutter, sidewalks, and all public utilities. One small convenience retail center may also be considered, near the intersection of Dodd Boulevard and Connemara Trail, if market conditions warrant. Part of this area already has public sanitary sewer and water services available. It is in single ownership which will readily allow it to be planned as a unit. Areas of special natural resource concern are the hilly areas along the northern edge of the property and the dense woodlands with cleared openings lying westerly of Dodd Boulevard. Densities in these areas are intended to be low enough to, allow for the creation of open space which correlates with natural feature preservation. PUD plans must demonstrate their sensitivity to natural land form and vegetation protection. The Planned Residential PUD is primarily intended to accommodate single-family housing (attached and detached) at an overall gross density of up to units per acre or total units. Park lands outside the requisite PUD, but in the same ownership, may be given density credit within the PUD to the extent the amount of park land designated exceeds park dedication requirements. To the extent that higher densities and clustering are warranted to preserve natural features or to attain the overall gross density, townhouses may be considered by the City; Generally, lands along the northern edge of the PUD should be lower than the average PUD density and those near Dodd Boulevard should be clustered or sufficiently low in density to protect the maximum amount of woodland. The site is intended to be planned as a single unit and developed in phases as market conditions 'Warrant. Clustering is intended to be employed as a means to protect/integrate development with the natural environment. Performance standards are also intended to be formulated to minimize the loss of unique natural resources. And, the residential policies of this plan apply to the planned residential PUD. PUD - Tgixed Use Mixed Use areas clearly have commercial potential, but there is concern that they may compete with downtown Rosemount for uses that will compromise its future viability. They are not only prominently located in the City immediately adjacent to ri