Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.a. Ed Dunn Metes & Bounds Lot DivisionEXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 3, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Ed Dunn/Sowles Metes & Bounds AGENDA SECTION: Lot Division Old Business PREPARED BY: AGENDA N # 5 A Lisa Freese, Director of Planning,•, ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, P.C. Memo; Lot AP VED BY: Division Application; Survey of Lot Division /�&_ Mr. Ed Dunn is requesting a metes and bounds lot division of a 55 acre parcel in order to split off a 10 acre tract of land in Eastern Rosemount. The original 55 acre parcel abuts State Trunk Highway 52 between County Road 38 and County Highway 42. The 10 acre tract is located in the northwest corner of the 55 acre parcel. The 10 acre parcel is to be accessed off of County Road 38 via the 60' road easement shown along the eastern portion of the 10 acre parcel. The attached survey also shows the road easement continuing through the remnant parcel to County Highway 42. If the remnant parcel is further subdivided, the frontage road should be developed in the general location shown on the Plat, but staff would prefer that the easement south of the 10 acre parcel not be shown on the survey at this time and requests that Council make this a condition of the approval. It should be noted that at some future date when the frontage road is developed in this manner, the property owner will need to acquire an additional 160' of railroad right- of-way to accommodate an acceptable curve radius entering onto County Road 42. The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the lot division subject to four conditions at the August 27 Regular Meeting. 1) Cash park dedication in lieu of land for the 10 acre parcel. 2) Access to the ten acre parcel be provided through theroad easement. 3) The road easement must be graded and a gravel surface must be installed the length of the 10 acre parcel by the property.' 4) No other parcels may be divided from the remnant parcel without going through a Plat and/or Planned Unit Development. After review of the revised survey submitted by Mr. Dunn on August 29, staff recommends one additonal condition. 5) The easement shown on the survey should be revised according to staff specifications. RECOMMENDED ACTION: A motion to adopt A RESOLUTION FOR A METES AND BOUND LOT DIVISION subject to a revised survey. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 1991- A RESOLUTION FOR A METES AND BOUNDS LUT DIVISION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount has reviewed and recommended approval of a metes and bounds parcel division as legally described in the hereto attached Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves and authorizes a division of property located in Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota, as legally described in Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 1) Cash park dedication in lieu of land for the ten -acre parcel; 2) Access to the ten -acre parcel be provided through the road easement; 3) The road easement must be graded and a gravel surface must be installed the length of the ten -acre parcel by the property; 4) No other parcels may be divided from the remnant parcel without going through a Plat and/or Planned Unit Development; and 5) The easement shown on the survey should be revised according to staff specifications. ADOPTED this 3rd day of September, 1991. Vernon J. Napper, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor• Voted against• 1 Exhibit A East Half of Northeast Quarter (Eh of NE;) except 2.53 acres RR except 4 acres west of RR except point in highway except commencing 549.1 feet west of southeast corner west 336.95 feet right 90 degrees 112.6 feet right 57 degrees 31 minutes 20 seconds 409.8 feet right 42 degrees 28 minutes 40 sections 97.4 feet right 107 degrees 46 minutes 20 seconds 348.05 feet to beginning except parcel 34-02500-010-06 except 2.86 acres additional to highway. Resulting Parcels: PARCEL A: The north 871.00 feet of the west 534.00 feet of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter (E, of NE;) of Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota. Subject to a road easement over the north 55.00 feet thereof. Together with an easement for road purposes over the east 60.00 feet of the west 594.00 feet of the north 871.00 feet of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter (Eh of NE;), Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota. PARCEL B: That part of the East One Half of the Northeast Quarter (Ek of NE;) of Section 25, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the easterly right-of-way line of a railroad and except the following described tracts: a) That part of said East One Half of the Northeast Quarter taken for State Highway purposes; and except b) That part of the East One Half of the Northeast Quarter described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said East One Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence south 89 degrees 46 minutes 39 sections west along the south line thereof a distance of 549.10 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing south 89 degrees 46 minutes 39 seconds west along said south line a distance of 336.95 feet; thence north 00 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds west a distance of 112.60 feet; thence north 57 degrees 18 minutes east a distance of 409.82 feet; thence north 89 degrees 46 minutes 39 seconds east a distance of 97.43 feet; thence southwesterly to the point of beginning; and except c) That part of the East One Half of the Northeast Quarter described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner 2 of said East One Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 14 minutes 41 seconds west along the centerline of County Road 42 — State Highway 52 a distance of 195.70 feet; thence north 00 degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds east a distance of 940.55 feet to the angle point in the westerly right-of-way line of said State Highway and the point of beginning; thence continuing north 00 degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds east along said westerly right-of-way a distance of 166.45 feet; thence north 89 degrees 44 minutes 08 seconds west a distance of 100.00 feet; thence south 00 degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds west a distance of 285.00 feet; thence south 89 degrees 44 minutes 08 seconds east a distance of 29.32 feet, more or less, to a point 33.0 feet, as measured at right angles to the westerly right-of-way line of said Highway; thence, at right angles to the westerly line of said State Highway, a distance of 804.41 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the Highway right-of-way line; thence South 89 degrees 14 minutes 41 seconds east along said right-of- way line a distance of 34.41 feet to the angle point in said State Highway; thence north 17 degrees 14 minutes 04 seconds east along said westerly right-of-way line to the point of beginning; and except d) the north 871.00 feet of the west 534.00 feet of said East Half of the Northeast Quarter. 3 �tiiy of Rosemount PHONE (612) 423-4411 2875 - 145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota FAX (612) 423-5203 Mailing Address: P. O. Box 510, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068-0510 TO: Planning commission FROM: Lisa J. Freese, Director of Planning DATE: August 25, 1991 SUW: August 27, 1991 Regular Meeting Reviews ATTACHMENTS: REZONING PETITION LOT DIVISION APPLICATION SURVEY OF LOT DIVISION LOCATION MAP MAYOR Vernon Napper COUNCILMEMBERS Sheila Klassen John Oxborough Harry Willcox Dennis Wippermann ADMINISTRATOR Stephan Jilk 6. L.H. SOWLES REZONING PETITION ED DUNN METES & BOUNDS LOT DIVISION RECOMMENDED MOTION: A motion to recommend approval of the lot division subject to the corrected survey and legal description for both lots and the three conditions enumerated in the staff review. A motion to recommend approval of the rezoning petition from Agricultural to General Industrial. BACKGROUND: The present request is two -fold: 1) a metes and bounds lot division to split off a ten acre tract of land from a larger 55 acre parcel in eastern Rosemount and 2) to rezone the ten acre tract of land from Agricultural to General Industrial to be used as a storage yard. The original 55 acre parcel abuts State Trunk Highway 52, between County Road 38 and County Highway 42. The ten acre tract is located in the northwest corner of the 55 acre parcel. Attached with this summary is a site location map and a copy of the survey submitted by the current property owner Mr. Ed Dunn (only in Planning Commission Packets). Staff has informed Mr. Dunn of several concerns regarding the survey as submitted: 1) A legal description should be provided for both the parcel being created and the remnant of the 55 acre parcel; 2) The frontage road easement should be limited to the length of the 10 acre parcel and should be attached to the description of the remnant parcel; 3) The radius shown for the frontage road connection to County Road 42 is too severe. Either additional land should be acquired from the Railroad or the intersection should be moved to the east. Until additional subdivision of the 55 acre property occurs the City does not desire to maintain the road easement or improve it in any way. That would be the responsibility of the property owner. Pending resolution of these issues prior to the veryl�InYs �om1ng;(a'b gosemounlP R� �0�%.ecrc�op.nr� DUNN\L.H. SOWELES PAGE 2 Council meeting on September 3, staff recommends approval of the metes and bounds lot division subject to the following conditions: 1) Cash park dedication in lieu of land for the 10 acre parcel. 2) Access to the ten acre parcel be provided through the road easement. 3) Public Works requests that the road easement be graded by the property owner and a gravel surface be installed the length of 10 acre parcel. 4) No other parcels may be divided from the remnant parcel with going through a platting and/or Planned Unit Development process. Mr. Dunn has a purchase agreement with L.H. Sowles for the property. L.H. Sowles has petitioned the City to rezone the 10 acre parcel to General Industrial in order to use the property as a storage yard for tower cranes. No utilities would be required for this use of the property. Previously the Planning Commission and City Council reviewed and approved a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment request to designate this 10 acre parcel as industrial. In that review it was determined that an industrial use of this nature was appropriate for this property and it would be a logical extension of the industrially zoned land to the north. The Metropolitan Council approved the Guide Plan Amendment so a rezoning at this time would be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 016 g6lyof semount W APPLICATION FOR LAND SUBDIVISION P.O. BOX 510 2875 -145TH ST. W. ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4411 Applicant: \rC Gr/LCA--s �'�-l%f'%/� �C?'T"/ 1�s 4v7.01phone:g7Z. �S'L Address: Zi p: Project Name: Location: �,'T >/ —s- ---- ,S' M �--- Status of Ownership: Project Description:f�G,e. ,�jl//5 �.ex/ /--/-z Fee: $25.00 + $2.00 per unit: No. Units Total Deposit: $7 Total Due: 16utt y undeutand that the Appt i,cat i.on Fee and Depoz t may not tenneaejLt the total Jeea which may be bitted agaivt6t the project, and am pnepaned to ne,imbu,u,e the City o f Rosemount Jo)L Zegat, engi.neen..ulg, planning and admini- atic live expenz ea ineuhned by it in exceaa o { the aepozit . I tepte-6ent that I am the app e i cant on an agent o J the app.e i cant- a.uthoA i.Z to d ubm<i t th.i 6 app.P.i.cat.i.o n . �l,Q A p p 1 i c a n t Date: Status of Appl i cant: Phone:2� Fees received by: Date: 30.00 AU- requited in6onmat,i,on mutt be teceived at teazt 20 dayb pr�i.on to Ptanni.ng Comm,izz i.on on. City Council meet-i,n.6 to ensure adequate teview and pt aceme Lt on the red pec t i.ve ag enda6 .