HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.e. Airport Planning ProcessCITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:- SEPTEMBER 3, 1991
AGENDA ITEM: AIRPORT PLANNING PROCESS
AGENDA SECTION:
OLD BUSINESS
PREPARED BY: STEPHAN JILK, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
AGENDA MAR
IMM 5E
ATTACHMENTS: RESOLUTION, LETTER TO CITIES,
APP B .
NEWS ARTICLES, PUBLIC NOTICE
On Thursday, September 5, 1991, the Metropolitan Council will conduct a
public hearing at Rosemount High School to gather input on the proposed
selection of the Dakota Search Area for airport planning purposes.
I have added this back on the agenda for discussion purposes so that we may
formulate a statement for presentation at the public hearing on Thursday.
I believe that outlining those concerns we have addressed in our
resolutions regarding the lack of credibility the process has provided, the
conflicts with metropolitan development framework, the need to determine
the need of a new airport and the need to speed up the decision making
process,should all be brought out.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Formulate a position for presentation at the September 5th hearing.
COUNCIL ACTION:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1991-47
A RESOLUTION SETTING A POSITION REGARDING THE SELECTION
OF THE ''DAKOTA SEARCH AREA" AND THE TWO TRACK PROCESS
FOR AIRPORT PLANNING IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council was directed to proceed on a
two track approach, by the Minnesota Legislature, in 1987 for
airport planning purposes. Track "A" called for the planning for
continued expansion of the existing airport, and Track "B" called
for the selection of a site for a potential new airport; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council, through its New Major Search
Area Advisory Task Force, determined criteria for the selection
of a search area, determined the process to follow in the
selection of the search area and determined how those criteria
would be applied; and
WHEREAS, the same agency responsible for reviewing criteria and
environmental performance adequacy on projects such as this has
been allowed to "establish their own rules" and process, acting
as both enforcement agency and developer; and
WHEREAS, without public hearings and established methods of
taking public comment which would effect the search area
selection, this Advisory Task Force has "advised" the regional
communities of their process and decision; and
WHEREAS, the selection of Dakota Search Area as the "final"
search area for the location of a potential new airport violates
several goals established in the Metropolitan Development and
Investment Framework, the Metropolitan Council's own "Guide Plan"
for managing development in the region; and
WHEREAS, the criteria established and followed by the Advisory
Task Force eliminated the possibility of considering the existing
airport as the final location choice by the advisory task force;
and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Task Force did not engage the region's
communities in this planning process, but only advised them of
their work; and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Task Force members were not truly
confronted with the regional communities' sentiment on the
potential relocation of the existing airport; and
WHEREAS, at a time when the State of Minnesota, through its
legislature has recognized the need to develop a more stable and
stronger relationship between the rural and urban areas of the
state, and this selection process has been viewed by most rural
residents as an effort by,he urbanized areas to push off the
negatives of having an airport located near them to the rural
areas and still retain the positive economic benefits related to
projects of this nature; and
WHEREAS, the final search area selected contains approximately
one third of the land mass of the City of Rosemount and on two
occasions the City of Rosemount have adopted resolutions
indicating their support to: stop the two track process and to
leave Rosemount out of any search area with no recognition of
these concerns other than recognizing the city has adopted those
resolutions; and
WHEREAS, as the selection process continues and a final airport
site is chosen, the City of Rosemount must continue to insure
that its interests are best represented; and
WHEREAS, the city's position is still firm that the existing
airport should be expanded and maintained in its present
position; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount recognizes the
complexity of the issues relating to the location of a major
airport and how its location effects the economic, political and
sound structure of its neighboring communities; and
WHEREAS, the cities, townships and county government of Dakota
County may have divergent views on the planning and lobbying
efforts which now must be carried out on this project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Rosemount declares its strong opposition to the continuation
of the "two track" process established by the Minnesota
Legislature and that the Metropolitan Airport Commission, the
Metropolitan Council and the State Legislature should continue to
plan for the expansion and maintenance of the Minneapolis -St.
Paul Airport at its current location, determine its site adequacy
and until it is determined that the existing site is not capable
in providing the expansion and operational needs for the next
twenty years, and that this process be completed in the next 24
months, that the search area selection process be stopped and the
Dakota Search Area be released out from under all development
regulations as established under the airport siting act; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Rosemount finds it
necessary to take a leading role to establish the scope of and
the process for planning along with the Metropolitan Airports
Commission and the Metropolitan Council, the final location for
the airport site and all the land use regulations, environmental
and socio-economic issues which will need to be addressed in
order to protect the City of Rosemount and the other townships
and cities in and abutting the Dakota Search Area. The City
encourages other cities aNd,,township in and abutting the Dakota
Search Area to join in with the City in this effort.
ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 1991.
Vernon J. Napber4 Ayor
ATTEST:
ael
Stephan Jilk, CityAdministrator
Motion by: Willcox Seconded by: Napper
Voted in favor: Willcox Wippermann Napper. oxborough Klassen
Voted against: None
AUG 2i1991
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'S er,y of WS&M Nr
NEW -AIRPORT SEARCH AREA ADVISORY TASK FORCE
PUBLIC MEETINGS
on the Task Force's draft report
Selecting a Search Area for a New Major Airport
Part 3: Recommended Search Area
The New -Airport Search Area Advisory Task Force will hold two public meetings to receive
comments on it's draft report, Selecruzg a Search Area for a New MajorAirport, Part 3. Recommended
Search Area. This report recommends designating the Dakota Search Area, a 115 square mile area
in east -central Dakota County, as the general location for a possible replacement airport for
Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport
You are invited to attend these meetings and offer comments. Copies of the report (Pub. No. 559-
91-108) are available from the Council's Data Center by calling 291-8140. The task force is expected
to take final action on the report on Friday, Sept. 20, 1991. This meeting will be held at 10 a.m. at
the Metropolitan Council offices.
PUBLIC MEETING INFORMATION:
When/Where: Thurs., Sept. 5, 1991, 7 p.m.
Rosemount High School Student Center
3335 142nd St W.
Rosemount
When/Where: Fri., Sept 6, 1991, 9 a.m. *
Metropolitan Council Chambers
230 E. Fifth St_
St. Paul
* This meeting will also be cablecast live on regional cable television channel
6 (Metro Cable MCN), and recablecast in part on Sat., Sept. 7, at 8 p.m.
How To 1. You may attend one or both of the meetings and offer
Participate: comments. To register in advance to speak, please call Donna
Mattson at 291-6493.
2. You may send a letter with comments, which must be received
no later than Sept. 6, to: John Kari, Metropolitan Council, 230
E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN 55101.
Questions: Call Donna Mattson of the Council staff at 291-6493.
(Pity of (Rosemount
PHONE (612) 423-4411 2875 - 145th Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota MAYOR
FAX (612) 423.5203 Mailing Address: Vernon Napper
P. 0. Box 510, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068-0510 COUNCILMEM8ERS
'Sheila Klassen
John Oxborough
Harry WiilCox
Dennis Wippermann
ADMINISTRATOR
Stephan Jilk
August 23, 1991
RE: AIRPORT SELECTION PROCESS
Dear
The announcement last week by the Metropolitan Council Airport
Advisory Task Force served to reaffirm our previous beliefs that
the Dakota search area would be the search area selected as the
future site of a new metropolitan airport if this site selection
process continues.
Attached is a copy of a resolution passed by the Rosemount City
Council on August 20, 1991, further opposing the continuation of
the two -track process and affirming that directly affected cities
should take a leading role in the planning process.
The Rosemount City Council believes that it is imperative we begin
to combine our efforts to preserve the integrity and use of the
land within the Dakota search area. Therefore, we must begin to
meet to develop and plan this effort.
I would ask that those communities who are interested in being
involved in such an effort and wish to meet to discuss our common
interests to please contact me no later than Friday, September 6,
1991. After such time, a meeting will be scheduled.
Please do not hesitate to contact myself or Assistant City
Administrator, Sue VanderHeyden, with any questions. I look
forward to working with you.
Sincerely,
Stephen Jilk
City Administrator
SJ/SV
wef-ylliing7 �omtnq `-)l /11 ;_4J osemoun��l
Proposal adds new, terminal
62 �' Y F i - , Nk1i2 i
4North-South� Alignment
'f Concourses A task force plan to
..
;' expand 'the airport:`
I Remote
TlnllN171 '.. Pa,t,,,` T recommends taking
Y, ,�,,yy,�,,,,,,� much of two` Richfield
neigh"oods and''
. the'Rneer
�
e e� U '
, cel '
noteis in a�oomingtonr
Q Existing n+ c
=J
ljraltce and am a _
pow Proposed r temnai would'm.l
ove
Underground train
1 TIM VAN NESS/ PIONEER PRESS
ort ex anslonproposal
p
wo l
u. d affect 11,000 homes
DON AHERN STAFF WRITER
Three
major
Bloomington hotels
if
and 11,000 homes
Minneapolis -St.
in Minneapolis and
Paul
international
Richfield would be
removed if Minne-
Airport is ever
apolis-St. Paul In-
moved, the
ternational Airport
replacement
ration a likely
to at
is expanded, an ad-
group to the
in Dakota
Metro
Metropolitan Air-
County between
ports Commission
Hastings and
recommended
Rosemount.
Pago1B.
Wednesday.
The $4.5 billion expansion option rec-
ommended Wednesday by the Airport
Planning Task Force calls for adding a
new north -south runway and relocating
the main terminal to the west side of the
airport.
That would create a new main en-
trance to the airport in the vicinity of
Crosstown Highway 63 and Cedar Avenue
— now the landing field's back yard.
But before any ground is broken, the
Legislature first must decide whether to
expand the airport or build a larger one
in a suburban location. A Metropolitan
Council task force, working independent-
ly of the airport commission, is expected
on Friday to choose a tentative suburban
site for a bigger airport..
The Legislature is not expected to
make a decision on expanding or relocat-
ing until the 1996 session.
The Airport Planning Task Force —
made up of 24 representatives of nearby
communities and counties, state and met -
AIRPORT CONTNUED ON 13A it.
1 .1.......,u "b- ".moo, LU111111CI LAdJ
groups, and airport users — will
forward its recommendation to
the Metropolitan Airports Com
The commission is sched-
uled to choose among three run
-
Fli". way 'options and two terminal
location alterfiativej on Aug. 27..
Wednesday's action was the first
spec4ic. indication of how. expan-
sion may occur.
The $4.5 billion price tag for the
propoied expansion. includes $1.5
billion for actual construction. The
remaining $3 billion would'pay for
razing - and , rel6cating..1;-11,000',
homes in Richfield and §okh Mid-!
neapolis near the airport; the Reg-�
istry - Sheraton and Excel inn ho-:
tels along Interstate 414, and for
sound -proofing ' another :e..�Jj 000
houses in the area.l. -
If the plan is approved by'.'both
the airports commission' and,
Legislature, the existing terminal
eventually w aid
0 be eliminated; .
In .its place would be two long
boarding concourses, each totally
encircled by parked airplanes. The
replacement hangar would be be-
=t "e- two existing parallel
way on the west side of the
- field,-- approximately where" the
control tower and National Weath-
er Service are now. It would have
several levels of parking on top of
t A remote parking, raim'lp'would
be near the existing airport main,
entrance on the east side.) That
ramp, the concourses, and We new
terminal all would be connected'
by an underground train.
The north -south runway would.
be on the west side of the airport,
with the end of the glide path di-
rectly over Interstate 494 and the
location of the three existing'.ho-
Leis. ME runway would be used
almost exclusively for takeoffs to
the south
or landings from the
south so it could be used at the
same time the other existing run-
ways are in use.
The other two options include
adding a third parallel landing
.I- strip either to the north or south of
the existing northwest -southeast
runways. Each of the three run-
way options also can be paired
with locating the terminal on ei7
ther the east or west sides.
The task force was virtually
unanimous in its choice of the
north -south runway, although the
Ramsey County delegate ab-
stained from voting because the
county board has not indicated a
preference.
But there was - far less agree-
ment on moving the terminal and
relocating the entrance near Ce-
dar Avenue and the Crosstown,
both already heavily traveled
roads during - rush hours. An air- i
port entrance there may require
extensive highway improvements.
Task_ force cliairnian Tim Lo-
vaasen expressed , the' group's
choice of a west terminal as "con-"
sensus, . with strong reservations
about access to Cedar, and the
Crosstown."
But several memberilsaid that
they want to recommend what
they think would be the best air-
port layout, leaving problems like
access to the region's highway sys-
tem to be worked out later by
experts.
"If we can't make it work on if
the west, we are already on the
east" and can fall back to that as
an alternative, Lovaasen argued.
.;TIIURSi)AY. AUGUST 15, 1991
SAINT PAUL PIONEER PRESS
Additional runway proposals
V North Parallel - Runway and glide path would
require.rebuilding military bases and buying about 75
1 apartment units in South Minneapolis.
17
V South Parallel Would take most or all of Rich Acres
and New Fold Town residential areas of Richfield.
5
1 Existing
='P
Grass roots opposition to new
airport being organized quickly
by Erik Christianson
The grass roots opposition -to a
new airpon t being -located in
Dakota County is starting to grow. -
Several elected officials, citizens
and municipalities in Dakota
County are seeking people who are
' opposed tb a nevvkiipoit bding
built in their backyard.-
"What we are really talking
about is getting names and starting
a group that will take a grass roots
approach that will prevail in this
issue," said Rep. Dennis,Ozment,
IR -Rosemount.
Ozment, along with Sen. Pat
Pariseau, IR -Farmington, and
Dakota County Commissioner
Joseph Harris, are leading the
charge to oppose an airport being
built in Dakota County.
Last Friday, a 115 -square mile
portion of land in east -central
Dakota County was recommended
as the best site to build a new
airport, should one be built. The -
cities of Coates and Vermillion, the
townships of Nininger, Marshan
and Vermillion, and part of the city
of Rosemount are included in the
area.
Ozment .said Tuesday that the
opposition to a new airport started_:
before last Friday, however.
A booth was set up the Dakota' -
County Fair and over. 1,250. names:
and addresses of people opposed to
a new .airport were collected, The .
cities of Coites, .Hastings;
Lakeville and Vermillion each
staffed the booth for one. day.
"We need to show opposition to
the whole process," said Ozment.
"We need to show that the present
airport is completely useless before
we throw it away.",
Once the grass roots group gets
organized, elects officers and starts
having meetings, the elected
officials will step aside.
"As elected officials, we will
then drop out of the picture and
work on their behalf," he said.
. Something the group is already
vehemently opposed to is "land
banking," the putting aside of land
for a new airport for the future.
That was one of the additional
recommendations of the
Group See page 3
GROUP �=..
Continued from paged
Metropolitan Council planning
staff.
The New Airport Search Area
Advisory Task Force will vote on
the recommendafion Sept. 20. In
addition, two public meetings will
be held in early September.
Ozment calls land banking a
"cloud" over Dakota County.
"That's what we are really fearful
of," he said. "I think we need to
protest that point more than
anything."
Those wishing more information
can write "Stop the Airport", P.O.
Boz 312, Hastings, MN, 55033.
Ozment said those that sign up by
the end of September will be
contacted of the organizational
meeting to be held in October.
".People really need to take over
this effort," Ozment said.
Lakeville city administrator
questions ethics of task force
by Erik Christianson
The New Airport Search Area
Advisory Task Force will be in
violation of Metropolitan Council
bylaws when it votes next month
to recommend a search area for a
new airport, according to Lakeville
City Administrator Robert
Erickson.
"We believe there is a conflict of
interest," Erickson told reporters
after the task force's meeting last
Friday. The task force accepted a
recommendation to designate the
Dakota Search Area as the best site
for a new major airport.
Erickson asked the task force if
the bylaws of the Metro Council
relating to advisory committees
apply to the Sept. 20 vote.
"We have mason to believe [that
for many members] it is not
possible to vote," he said. He feels`
that number could be as high as
ETHICS
Continued from page 1
issue with" what Erickson said. He
represents Dakota County and a
small portion of Washington
County.
"How do you get around that?"
Morris asked Erickson. "That's a
no-win situation. You either have
too much or not enough."
Of the 41 -member task force,
only seven even live in Dakota
County. It is not known the exact
employment status of most of the
task force other than elected
officials.
Morris, who said he is a pilot,
told Erickson he asked to be on the
task force.
"I support the area of ethics,"
Morris said, but as far as specs
he couldn't "spell [them] out right
now."
"The Metropolitan Council
worked on ethics some time ago,"
Morris said.
Erickson said he doesn't view his
question as a move of desperation.
H added the city of Lakeville has
contacted legal advisers about this
issue.
"We raised the issue," he said.
two-thirds of the 41 -member task
force.
The bylaws relating to advisory
committees state in part that if a
member has a material or financial
interest in the issue, is employed
with an institution directly
involved in the issue or is related
by blood or marriage to someone
directly affected, they have a
conflict of interest:
Erickson said some examples of
conflicts of interest include living
in the search area or working for
an airlines.
"How can they vote? They have
a vested interest," Erickson said.
"I think it needs to be resolved."
Metro Council member E. Craig
Morris approached Erickson after
the meeting, saying that he "took
Ethics see page 3
"They will have to respond."
The task force took no action on
Erickson's question.
Airport would s impact county's quality of life
n y q y
To the editor:
Good morning, Dakota County.
The range war is on and the day
when heavy aircraft are
overhead is getting closer. Soon
the Metropolitan Council will
most likely recommend land
banking for a new major interna-
tional airport to replace the pre-
sent Minneapolis/St. Paul Inter-
national Airport. The designated
area (115 square miles) to be
land -banked is in central Dakota
County and includes parts of
Rosemount, all of Coates and all
of Vermillion and borders on
Farmington, Lakeville, Apple
Valley and Hastings. Prevailing
northwesterly winds could very
likely result in alignment of the
most frequently used flight path
to be over Rosemount and Apple
Valley (including the zoo). If this
happens and a world-class inter-
national airport is built in Rose-
mount, the quality of life for
thousands of Dakota County
K
residents will be diminished
significantly. Also, thousands of
acres of rich farmland will be
paved over forever. There must
be a better solution to whatever
might be the perceived problem.
The most disturbing part about
the present process of the
Metropolitan Council as man-
dated by the Minnesota
Legislature is that it runs suspect
of being a land -grab operation by
special interest groups in the core
of the metropolitan area. These
special interest groups appear to
be dedicated to moving the noise
out of Minneapolis and St. Paul
while preserving access to the
future airport by using bullet -
trains or whatever. Special inter-
est groups interested in the mass
joined the noise mover groups. So
far, the agenda to do it appears to
have. been executed with the
precision of a ballet perfor-
mance. It's time to drop the cur-
tain.
Why haven't more people been*
concerned about their property
values dropping as soon as land
banking begins (within weeks)?
Why haven't more people recog-
nized the change in quality of life
that will affect them when there
is the constant roar of heavy air-
craft taking off over Rosemount
and Apple Valley? I suspect that
it's human nature for us to act
only when we are convinced there
is a problem, I think there's a
problem and everyone in Dakota
County who owns residential
blasting the roars of takeoffs of
heavy aircraft that will become
standard soundq if the new air-
port is built here; then, maybe
then, we'd begin to realize a small
portion of the impact that the new
airport would have on our com-
munity and how this problem
dwarfs other current community
Problems.
One local public hearing is left
before the Metropolitan Council's
task force concludes its report.
This is scheduled for Sept. 5 at 7
p.m. at Rosemount High School.
For information on the New -
Major Airport Search Area Ad-
visory Task Force, call John Kari
at 281-6548 or Donna Mattson at
291-6493. I'd also recommend con-
tacting your elected officials.
movement of an infinite number property and/or lives here best
of people into the metro area recognize the problem. Maybe if RONJACOBSON
within a short period of time in Chuck Doyle could be hired to fly Rosemount
order to fill several domed his double -winged plane over
stadiums for unimaginable con- Rosemount, Apple Valley and
ventions and opportunities have Lakeville with loud speakers ( .
August 1991
Metropolitan Airports Commission!
containing information on the
ng T rm%Comp l o'r thy"
;}. Lo a rehensive an
21
nneapolls-3t Paul international Airport_
w30',4(
Number Fizr
MSP Airport Planning Task Force Recommends Nopth-South
Runway, West Terminal as Preferred Expansion Option
The MSP Airport Planning Task Force,
at its Aug. 14 meeting, selected a north -
south runway and a replacement west
terminal (Concept 6) as the preferred
expansion option for Minneapolis -St.
Paul International Airport.
The recommendation is being
forwarded to the Metropolitan Airports
Commission, which is scheduled to
choose among three runway options and
two terminal alternatives at a special
Aug. 27 meeting.
The Task Force, a broadly based
24 -member group composed of local,
state and metropolitan officials, has
provided a sounding board for work in
progress on the Long Term
Comprehensive Plan for MSP. Chaired
by MAC Commissioner Tim Lovaasen,
the group reviewed a report on off-site
impacts developed by the MSP Airport
Interactive Planning Group, as well as
an on -sire development concepts report.
According to Lovaasen, the Task
Force was unanimous in its choice of the
north -south runway. Some members
voiced reservations in selecting the west
terminal, primarily because of ground
access considerations. "The Task Force
felt the replacement west terminal was a
better long-term option than an
expanded east terminal," Lovaasen says.
"In addition, it provides a better
international terminal and construction
can be phased in while operations
continue from the existing terminal.
However, an airport entrance near Cedar
Avenue and the Crosstown may require
extensive highway improvements."
The north -south runway would be
on the west side of the airport and would
be used for takeoffs to the south or
landings from the south. This option
would mean removal of the Registry,
Sheraton and Excel Inn hotels along
Interstate 494.
The facilities cost for this option is
$1.5 billion; additional costs have been
developed by the Interactive Planning
Group for off-site mitigation, including
relocating and soundproofing residential
areas.
"The facilities costs are harder
numbers than the mitigation costs,"
Lovaasen says. "The mitigation costs
certainly include some assumptions from
the cities bur essentially, these costs did
not really help differentiate between one
alternative or another."
Concept 6 — North -south rtmual and replacement west terminal.
Public Meetings Scheduled in September to Present Information on Preliminary
Selection of Airport Development Concept for MSP
A series of public meetings will be held
in September to provide information on
the preliminary selection of an airport
development concept for the Long Term
Comprehensive Plan for Minneapolis -St.
Paul International Airport.
The concept, which will be
selected by the Metropolitan Airports
Commission at its Aug. 27 meeting,
will be described by MAC
representatives. The public meetings
will be held in the cities adjacent to the
airport, including Eagan, Bloomington,
St.. Paul, Mendota Heights, Minneapolis,
Richfield and Burnsville.
According to Nigel Finney, MAC
Deputy Executive Director, Planning
and Environment, the presentation will
focus on the option selected by the
Commission. "We also plan to provide a
framework and context for this
preliminary selection," Finney says, "and
to explain how this current step firs into
the dual -track planning process."
The schedule includes:
Sept. 10 - Eagan at City Hall,
7:00 p.m.
Sept. 12 - Bloomington at City
Council chambers, 5:30 p.m.
Sept. 16 - St. Paul at City Council
"Airport Development Concepts" Publication Presents
Runway/Tepminal AltepnaRves to Meet MSP's 2020 Needs
A newly published report, Airport
Development Concepts, presents the
identification, evolution and selection of
alternatives for airfield, terminal, ground
access and other facility development to
meet 2020 needs for Minneapolis -St.
Paul International Airport (MSP).
The publication, prepared by
Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff
in association with other consultants, is
the fifth in a series of reports detailing
the Long Term Comprehensive Plan for
MSP for the 1990-2020 timeframe. The
Volume 5 report is being used by the
Metropolitan Airports Commission
(MAC) to review on -.site and off --site
characteristics of the six consolidated
airport development concepts.
The report contains a discussion of
runway and terminal development
alternatives, a detailed evaluation of
consolidated airport development
concepts, and a recommended
comprehensive plan. Cost estimates and
an evaluation summary are also
provided.
Metropolitan Airports Commission
"? 6040 28th Avenue South
+ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450
(D
Printed on Recycled Paper
chambers, 7:00 p.m.
Sept. 17 - Mendota Heights at
City Hall, 7:00 p.m.
Sept. 23 - Minneapolis at
7:00 p.m.
Sept. 25 - Richfield at the High
School, 7:00P m.
Sept. 26 - Burnsville at City Hall,
7:00 p.m.
In addition to the presentation, an
informational brochure will be available.
Anyone needing further information or
directions to these meetings can call
Jenn Unruh at 726-8189.
Update is published monthly by the
Metropolitan Airports Commission in an
effort to provide information on the Long
Term Comprehensive Plan for the
Minneapolis -St Paul International Airport.
To request copies of brochures or reports
on the airport development concepts or
for information on upcoming meetings,
please call Jenn Unruh at 726-8189.
STEPHEN JILK 36626
2875 145TH ST W
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4941
;:_, !
STEPHEN JILK 36626
2875 145TH ST W
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4941