HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.a. South Rose Park 3rd Addition Final Plat0
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 5, 1991
The proposed South Rose Park 3rd Addition is a 3.8 acre
subdivision which would cause replatting of Lot 3, Block 2, South
Rose Addition Replat; property which is situated at the
intersection of Carousel Way and Chippendale Avenue. Attached
with this executive summary is staff memorandum which outlines in
detail the issues relating to this plat.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: MOTION to adopt A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
SOUTH ROSE PARK 3RD ADDITION FINAL PLAT; and,
to approve the Subdivision Development Contract.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Adopted resolution.
AGENDA SECTION:
Old Business
AGENDA ITEM: South Rose Park 3rd Addition
Final Plat
PREPARED BY:
Michael Wozniak, AICP,
City Planner
AGENDAr MA1'"
..
ATTACHMENTS:
Dev. Contract,
Staff Memorandum, Final Plat,
Drainage Report, Resolution.
APPROVED BY:
The proposed South Rose Park 3rd Addition is a 3.8 acre
subdivision which would cause replatting of Lot 3, Block 2, South
Rose Addition Replat; property which is situated at the
intersection of Carousel Way and Chippendale Avenue. Attached
with this executive summary is staff memorandum which outlines in
detail the issues relating to this plat.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: MOTION to adopt A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
SOUTH ROSE PARK 3RD ADDITION FINAL PLAT; and,
to approve the Subdivision Development Contract.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Adopted resolution.
P.O. BOX 510
2875 -145TH ST. W
y ofROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
(��Ivacems/®o /nt 612-423-4411
TO: MAYOR NAPPER, COUNCIL MEMBERS: RLASSEN, OXBOROUGH, WILLCOX,
& WIPPERMAN; & CITY ADMINISTRATOR JILR
FROM: MICHAEL WOZNIAK, AICP, CITY PLANNER
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 1991
SUBJ: FEBRUARY 5, 1991 - REGULAR MEETING REVIEWS
South Rose Park Third Addition - Final Plat
Mr. Ron Carlson of Carlson Farms, Inc., has submitted a final plat
for South Rose Park 3rd Addition for consideration by the City.
The Planning Commission has considered this preliminary plat and
at its January 12, 1991, meeting, recommended approval to City
Council subject to an executed subdivision development contract.
This subdivision involves replat.ing of Lot 2, Block 3, South Rose
Park Addition Replat to divide the 3.8 acre lot into three smaller
lots for future commercial development. This property is situated
at the intersection of Chippendale Avenue and Carousel Way.
Attached with this review are the following:
1. South Rose Park 3rd Addition Preliminary Plat;
2. South Rose Park 3rd Addition Final Plat;
3. Resolution Approving South Rose Park 3rd Addition
Preliminary Plat subject to conditions;
4. Barr Engineering Storm Water Report.
At its August 14, 1990, meeting the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the South Rose Park 3rd Addition Preliminary Plat to
City Council subject to the following:
a. rezoning to C-4 General Commercial;
b. payment of $4,180.00 cash in lieu of land park dedication
prior to City release of the Final Plat.
City Council approved the South Rose Park 3rd Addition Preliminary
Plat at its September 4, 1990, meeting (see attached Resolution
1990-82).
A principle issue of concern in respect to this plat was the impact
of increased storm water runoff upon full commercial development
of the proposed subdivision. Part of this concern was based on the
fact the City's Comprehensive Drainage Study (1989) has indicated
significant storm water capacity concerns in the general area of
the site. To address this concern the developer funded a special
storm water report to indicate what type of site improvements would
be necessary to avoid the potential for flooding problems upon
complete site development.
The final plat as submitted is in conformance with all zoning and
subdivision ordinance requirements. Council Resolution 1990-82
established six requirements for final approval. Below I will
indicate how each of these requirements will be met.
A requirement for removal of the existing home situated on the
property within three years of final plat approval will be included
within the Subdivision Development Contract.
A provision will be included in the Subdivision Development
Contract which allows a maximum of one driveway access from
Chippendale Avenue to be situated a minimum of 150' from the
intersection of Chippendale Avenue and Carousel Way.
Any modification to City Utilities required will be referenced in
the Subdivision Development Contract.
The plat has been prepared to include the required drainage and
utility easements to meet standard City requirements for easements
along lot boundaries. Further, adequate drainage and utility
easement has been indicated on the plat to provide the necessary
on site storm water detention area as referenced in the Storm Water
Report prepared by Barr Engineering.
Drainage improvements including grading to create a storm water
detention swale which must be constructed by the developer will be
referenced in the Subdivision Development Contract.
City Council will be requested to approve rezoning of the property
from R-3 Multiple Residential to C-4 General Commercial concurrent
with final plat approval.
Payment of $4,180.00 cash in lieu of land to meet park dedication
requirements prior to release of final plat will be referenced in
the Subdivision Development Contract.
Prelim-irliArY 1)1-1
SOUTH ROSE PARK 3RD ADDITION
-5E19'22'31"E s 523-00—
... 270-0,
1 1- 252.99
j:
11-1 11 Ldis 10
471.1
LOT 1
Ii r"� I � r't
at
Ilk,
v � i r'n i^ My _�`�0
LOT 2 1
'Ism
4 69122'31"W
•
LOT 3
0
A 1 0
mp�
Ch �,A I,—c. rU 276 00 A 50.
Z
..c
�dARRQUSEL—
r.r lF rr=,
0),
a!
00
I I I I �I J
1 C
LEGEND
Denotes Iron Monument Set
Denotes Existing Spot Elevation
M.M. 0 .:otes Manhole
C.B. D:j otes Storm Sew- Catch Basin
Hyd. Denotes Hydrant
T.C. Denotes Top of Curb
G.
Denotes Gutter
INV. Denotes Pipe Invert
P.P. Denotes Power Pole
Sewer and Water Services Shown per Plan
50 .60 200 AP
F
LP('—'mYDESCPIL1-1M1
Lot 3 BIOC�� 2, Sotili ROSE P0): ADDITION REPLAT
according
cc . r;Inq to the r, -carded Plat thereof Davota
County. t1lin.00ta.
LpflPlITY AREAS
Lo*Z 1 7
Ft. 0 . IP2
57 acr-S)
Lot 3 -----37.906 !0- Ft. (G.P697 acres)
Intal plat ----165.941 !,q. It. (3.8005 acres)
SOUTH ROSE PARK 3RD ADDITION
523-00--
--SB9'22'31*E
2-252 99
-0
LOT 2
7
C,I.
91 ;n
§1 ' °L. —.— — N 8T 22'31" W 218 46
q
LOT 1 .0
LOT 3
A
1A
3000
6 CFO- .'9-T95
N69*46'41"W 320.00
VICINITY MAP
:-d
p . ..... .
wawulox SUN aA.
CAftS- I—S W
STAN 0 —WSO"
WIll W PA1011 r of r nil here I. .... .
M.11 W DWIA Inl ..... ...... —z—,
nn
er
IV
I Ih, 1-1 I'll ... .
------------
S III( 01 .(SOIA
s"
trod Sura yon, Y�nr•rfeM Nr
ApIl-11 .1 1. PI.—I.. c",
—Illy '191o.
rent tee l+IY IMr rM •. f for IM rr•r Ir90 rnr lam crier Pea n n�f v •. •f SW In 603( vAHn )AO AIXIIIIM Mv< teen Ps o en tors__._ a,r .
.11990.
ref roil .19W
Il K ...... R— ere v........
I ..... ...... .... .
SIGMA
SURVEYING
SERVICES INC -
3077
Development Contract
South Rose Park 3rd Addition
AGREEMENT dated , 1991, by and
between the CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota municipal
corporation, ("City"), and Carlson Farms of Rosemount, a
Minnesota limited partnership, (the "Developer").
1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked
the City to approve a plat of land to be known as SOUTH ROSE
PARK 3RD ADDITION, (also referred to in this Contract as the
"plat"). The land is legally described as follows:
Lot 3, Block 2, South Park Addition Replat,
Dakota County, MN.
2. Condition of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves
the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this
Contract.
4. Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in
accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be
attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plan A, the
plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after
entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in
this plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this
Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are:
Plan A --Plat
Plan B--Grading/Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
5. Grading/Erosion Control and Drainage Plan. The
Developer shall submit to the City prior to issuance of any
building permits within the plat a site grading/erosion
control and sediment control plan.
6. Private Improvements. The Developer shall install
prior to issuance of building permits for Lots 1 and 3, Block
1, of the plat, in accordance with City ordinances and
standards and pay for the following:
A. Site Grading within drainage and utility easements
designated on the plat, necessary to provide storm water
detention of 0.5 acre feet of storage volume, where flows
would leave the site through an existing 18 inch RCP storm
sewer in Carousel Way.
7. Storm Water Management. Prior to issuance of
building permits on Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, of the plat the
Developer shall install all necessary erosion and sediment
control facilities according to the Grading/Erosion Control
and Sediment Control Plan. Further, the Developer shall agree
to jointly fund on an equal basis with the City, stormwater
control improvements which may be necessary to avoid erosion
which may be caused by runoff from the 18 inch RCP storm sewer
which passes through Carousel Way near the southwest corner
of Lot 3 and discharges above -ground upstream of Wachter Pond.
8. Removal of Non -conforming use. The Developer shall
remove the existing house situated on Lot 1, Block 1, of the
plat by February 5, 1994, or before issuance of a building
permit for development of Lot 1.
6
9. Restriction of Site Access. The Developer hereby
agrees to limit site access to the plat from Chippendale
Avenue to single access point situated a minimum of one
hundred fifty feet (1501) from the north right-of-way boundary
of Carousel Way at the point it intersects with Chippendale
Avenue.
10.License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its
agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter
the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed
appropriate by the City during the installation of public
improvements by the City. The license shall expire after the
plat has been developed.
11. Clean up. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris
from streets that has resulted from construction work by the
Developer, its agents or assigns, within 24 hours after notice
by the City.
12. Responsibility for Costs.
A. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs
incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including
engineering and attorney's fees.
B. The Developer shall pay in full all bills
submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under
this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the
bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat development
work and construction including, but not limited to, the
issuance of building permits, until the bills are paid in
3
full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue
interest at the rate of 8% per year.
C. The Developer shall make a cash contribution to
the City of Four Thousand One Hundred Eighty and 00/100
($4,180.00) Dollars for park dedication before the City
releases hardshell copies of the plat.
13. Miscellaneous.
A. The Developer represents to the City that the plat
complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state and
federal laws and regulations including, but not limited to:
subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and environmental
regulations. If the City determines that the plat does not
comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow
construction or development work in the plat until the
Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer
shall cease work until there is compliance.
B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the
City under this Contract.
C. Breach of the ,terms of this Contract by the
Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits,
including lots sold to third parties.
D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence,
clause, paragraph or phrase of this Contract is for any reason
held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portion of this Contract.
4
E. The action or inaction of the City shall not
constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this
Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in
writing, signed by the parties and approved by written
resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to
promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not
be a waiver or release.
F. This Contract shall run with the land and may be
recorded against the title to the property. After the
Developer has completed the work required of it under this
Contract, at the Developer's request, the City will execute
and deliver to the Developer a release.
G. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon
the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right,
power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising,
available to the City, at law or in equity, or under any other
agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein
set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time
to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient
by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise
at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy.
H. The Developer may not assign this Contract without
the written permission of the City Council.
14. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be
in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the
Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer
5
by registered mail at the following address: Carlson Farms
of Rosemount, 15125 South Robert Trail, Rosemount, MN, 55068.
Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either
hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the
City by registered mail in care of the City Administrator at
the following address: Rosemount City Hall, 2875 145th Street
West, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068, Attention: Administrator.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
BY:
Vernon J. Napper, Mayor
BY:
Stephan Jilk, City Administrator
CARLSON FARMS OF ROSEMOUNT
BY:
Its Partner
BY:
Its Partner
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of , 1991,
by Vernon J. Napper, Mayor, and Stephan Jilk, City
Administrator, of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota municipal
corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the
authority granted by its City Council.
Notary Public
0
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SS
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of , 1991,
by , Partner and
Partner; Carlson Farms of Rosemount.
Notary Public
7
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1990-82
A RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL
TO THE SOUTH ROSE PARR THIRD ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT
AND SETTING OUT CONDITIONS FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has received a Preliminary Plat
for the following legally described property: Lot 3, Block 2,
South Park Addition Replat.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount has
reviewed said Preliminary Plat and submitted its recommendation to
the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the required public hearing and notifications have been
completed.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rosemount approves the South Rose Park Third Addition Preliminary
Plat, subject to the following:
1. A executed Subdivision Development Contract which addresses the
following issues: removal of existing house, installation of
utilities to serve Lot 1 prior to reconstruction of Chippendale
Avenue, and restriction of access to Chippendale Avenue.
2. Modification of preliminary plat to include ten foot wide
drainage and utility easements along all lot boundaries;
4. Detailed Engineering recommendations regarding impact of stone
water runoff;
5. Rezoning to C-4 General Commercial District;
6. Payment of $4,180.00 cash in lieu of land park dedication prior
to City release of Final Plat.
ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 1990
ATTEST:
Susan M. Johns -6n, City Clerk
Motion by: Napper
N -N -09M'`
Seconded by: Klassen
voted in favor: Willcox, Wippermann, Napper, Oxborough Klassen
Voted against:
None
1
Barr
Engineering Company
7803 Glenroy Road
Minneapolis, MN 55439-3123
6121830-0555
6121835-0186 (Facsimile)
September 26, 1990
Mr. Richard Hefti
Director of Public Works
City of Rosemount
P.O. Box 510
Rosemount, MN 55068
Re: South Rose Park Third Addition
Dear Mr. Hefti:
REV1EVv ED BY
9�'zs qfl
RN
This letter summarizes our review of drainage options for this plat. As
a formal grading plan has not been developed we looked at three possible
options for site drainage and stormwater management. The following indented
paragraphs describe each option.
Option 1
Under this option all of the runoff from Lots 1, 2, and 3 would be
directed to the south west corner of Lot 3, where flows would leave the
site through the existing 18 inch RCP storm sewer in Carrousel Way.
Option 2
Under this option runoff from Lot 1 would be directed to the southwest
corner of Lot 1 where it could flow through an intake (to be
constructed) and then into the .Chippendale Avenue storm sewer system.
Runoff from Lots 2 and 3 would be directed to the southwest corner of
Lot 3 where it would leave the site through the existing 18 inch RCP
storm sewer in Carrousal Way.
Option 3
Under this option, runoff from Lots 1, 2 and 3 would be directed to the
southwest corner of Lot 1 where it could flow through an intake (co be
constructed) and then into the Chippendale Avenue storm sewer.
For each of these options, we analyzed the 100 -year storm events ranging
from one-half hour duration through a four day duration storm. Our analysis
Mr. Richard Hefti September 26, 1990 Page 2
of each option revealed that the short duration storms (J -hour, 1 -hour or 2 -
hour) storm would be most critical. For each option we find storm water
detention will be necessary upstream of each of the outflow pipes to prevent
Chippendale Avenue or Carrousel Way from flooding.
Options 2 and 3 involve constructing a connection to the Chippendale
Avenue system. For these two options we found that a storm water detention
basin would be required upstream of this connection to detain virtually all
of the runoff from the 100 -year storm event. This is because the Chippendale
Avenue storm sewer would be flowing at full capacity and under pressurized
flow. Therefore, runoff from this development could not flow into the system
until the system was relieved. Also, the pressurized flow in the Chippendale
system could cause water to flow from the Chippendale system into Lot 1 and
result in more flooding. Therefore, if Options 2 or 3 are implemented, the
connection to the Chippendale system must be provided with a special flap
gate facility. This flap gate would allow flow from Lot 1 to pass into the
Chippendale system after it relieved but would prevent flow from passing
from the Chippendale system into Lot 1.
Table 1 presents the preliminary storm water detention volumes and
discharge requirements for each of the above described options.
TABLE 1
Option
Lot 1
Lot 3
Storage
Volume
(AC -FT)
Discharge
(CFS)
Storage
Volume
(AC -FT)
Discharge
(CFS)
1
NA
NA
0.5
11
' 2
0.5
( 0*
0.3
2
3
1.0
0*
NA
NA
Flap Gate Control Device
Another consideration for this plat is that of erosion and sediment
control both during and after construction. The developer should prepare an
erosion and sediment control plan for the site. The plan should be layed out
so that all runoff leaving the site is routed through erosion and sediment
control facilities. Also, it is my understanding that the 18 inch RCP storm
sewer which passes through Carrousel Way near the southwest corner of Lot 3
Mr. Richard Hefti September 26, 1990 Page 3
discharges above -ground upstream of Wachter Pond. As the terrain leading
down to Wachter Pond is quite steep it is likely that the increased flows
will cause erosion in the drainage way leading to Wachter Pond and the eroded
material will be deposited in Wachter Pond. Therefore, we recommend that
until this system is extended to the normal level of Wachter Pond, that a
designed swale be constructed with a protective material that would prevent
on-going erosion from occurring. The finished Swale (with installed
protective material) should be at least 15 feet wide and 1 foot deep.
Material that could be used as a protective material could include (1) a
designed riprap rock placed over a filter cloth or granular filter material,
or (2) enkamat material with seed or sod designed to grow in the material.
If you have any questions concerning this review, please let me know.
cerely,
S /en M. Klein
SMK\kah
Attachment
2319125\RHO921.LTR
f
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1991-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
SOUTH ROSE PARK 3RD ADDITION FINAL PLAT
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has approved the South Rose Park 3rd
Addition preliminary plat/Planned Unit Development Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount has
recommended approval of the South Rose Park 3rd Addition final
plat.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of
Rosemount hereby approves the South Rose Park 3rd Addition final
plat, subject to an executed Subdivision Development Agreement.
ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 1991.
ATTEST:
Susan M. Johnson, City Clerk
Motion by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Vernon J. Napper, Mayor
Seconded by: