HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.b. Armory Support Resolution . ,I . . . . . . .
� ��� P O. ROX 510
/Z�� 0 28T5-145TN ST. W. �
O�Q/I'l.OVL�� ROSEMOUNT, MINNESQTA 5506$
612-a23-44 t 1
ITEM # �g
March 12, 1990
T0: Mayor Napper
Council Members: K].assen
Oxborough
Willcox
Wippermann
FROM: Stephan Jilk, City Administrator
RE; Minnesota Armq Reserve National Guard
Division Headquarter Armory Proposal
On Monday, Februarp 26, Ma�or General John Cox called our offices
and spoke to Dean Johnson. General Cox indi.cated that the Guard -
had been working with the City of N�w Brighton for some two years
in placing a 400 person armory there. This Armorp was to b� the
r�home" for:
1) The 47th Viking Division Headquarters
2) The 47th Viking Divisian Band Heat�quarters
3) The 47th' Viking Division Military Palice (MP)
Headquarters
It would have 37 or more fu11 time employees and the division
headquarters would be commanded by a two- star general, Division
Commander General Dave Lueck.
The City of New Brighton studied the opportunity , in depth, that
this would provide to sugport their efforts to bnild a communitq
center which would include a theatre, a swi,mming pool, a running
track, a gymnasium, a fitness center and a senior center,
In the end design considerations, land acquisitian costs and
costs for building in con�unc�ion with the Guard caused the city
to decide not to work with the Guard and on Februarp 20th the
City of New Brighton advised the Guard it did not want the armory
built there. This was a�ter a twa year procesa involving the
city and the Guard.
In his ca11, General Cox indicated that he wished to know if the
City o£ Rosemount would consider the locating of the larger
Armory here at the alreadq chosen Armorp site.
�
. .
Armory - Division Headquarters
Page 2
A meeting was set up for Tuesday, February 27th between General
Cox, Mayar Napper , Dean Johnson and I to discusa this concept.
General Cox presented cost information, unit makeup information
and informafiion regarding desi n and construction time frame for
the 400 person armory to us. �Informatian an coet/aq. footage �s
attached. ) Design funda have been allocated already and the
architect already chosen ; unless Federal funding would be heXd
up, this facility wouia be built in 1992.
Mayor Napper, Dean and I indicated the city' s interest in this
larger unit as we saw the advantages for the citq in the larger
complex.
General Cox indicated that a decision would be made on Thursdaq
March 1st by the Guard management as to whether to pursue this
project and where it should be considered for placement.
On Friday, March 1st , General Cox was contacted and he indicated
that General Andretti, Minnesota National Guard Adjutant General
and other members of his staff who decide these matters had
decided to proceed with Rosemaunt as the primary site for this
facility.
A meeting was set up for Tuesday, March 13th to discuss with
General Cox more information an the epecific facilitp size, its
physical makeup, the options for city/state cost sharing and
design/construction time-lines.
The Tuesday meeting was attended by General Cox, Tom Vesely -
Design/Construction Coordinator for the Guard , Craig
Project Manager, Terry Palmer - Minnesota Building Commission
�xecutive Director, Don Darling , Dave Grannis, Dean Johnson and
myself.
To summarize the meeting I would relate the following ;
1) The Guard is prepared to move ahead with this praject here,
if the citq is ;
2) Design of the pro�ect coul.d begin right away and the City
and the Guard need ta begin making decisions on what is
wanted and how it can be placed on the site. (The Guard
presented two "footprints" of the building for the site �ust
to get an idea of the size. A ane story building would be
11 times as l�ig as City Ha11 . )
3) This would be the largest armorp in the state, outside Camp
Riplep, at 91 ,000 square feet.
Armory - Division Headquarters
J
Armorp - Division Headquarters
Page 3
4) With the increased size and overall cost of this facilitp
compaxed to Che previously proposed unit the local share
would potentially increase from $387 , 500 to $837,500.
General Cox indicted that the state share may be able to be
increased thue reducing the local share. We ind3cated that
the City would be unable to bear the entire $837,500.
5) Because this would be a "Diviaion Headquarters" ,Armor� there
would be some increase in siz�/number of components which
would provide the community more use without requiring
additional expend�tures by the City which we would hav�
considered otherwise such ass
a. larger gymnasium
b. larger parking area
c. triple the locker area
d. larger kitchen faci�.ities
e. theater "t�rpe" facilitq for 250 persons - this map
require some local �tinding to make it useable as a
real theater
6) A portion of the de�ign must be completed by October of this
year With bidding in October of 1991 and construction in
spring of 1992.
7) Locatin� this larger facility t�n ` the site wi11 nat preclude
the addition of anq "multi-purpose" facilitp for the cit�r.
It is staff' s feeling that because the Gu�rd was "dropped" in New
Brighton after two years and is under a ti.meline ta proceed with
this facility they are in a very cooperative mode.
It is our recommendation that we proceed with this concept. We
have placed an item on the agpnda to adopt a resolution of
support for this pro�ect. This resalution is a repetition of one
adopted in late 1988 for the initial proposed pro�ect.
Though there are potential increases in costs to the citp, it is
felt that this facility , with all the manpower involved, both
fu11 time and part time, and the facilitp componente available to
the community for use� cannot be overestimated as to the positive
effects it wi11 have on the communitq.
I request your considerati.on c�f the "Resalution of Support" and
ask your direction to proceed with haste, working with the Guard
to bring this pro�ect to reality .
l �
�
March 15, 1990
COST AND SQUARE FOOTAGE COMPARISONS OF:
Proposed Rosemount (8ngineering aattalion) Armory and
New Brighton (Di�isian Headquartexs) Armorp
�ngineexing Division
COST Battalion Headquarters
,
Total Cost $ 3, 100,000 $ 6,700,Q00
Federal 2, 325,000 5,025,Q00
Local/S�ate 775,000 1 ,675,OOQ
SQUARE FOOTAGE
Tota]. Square Footage 35, 200 Sq. Ft. 91 , 400 Sq. Ft.
Classroom 2,63Q Sq. Ft, 6,550 Sq. Ft.
Assembly Ha11 5,800 Sq . Ft. 7 ,500 Sq. Ft.
Kitchen 590 Sq . Ft. 910 Sq . Ft.
Lockers 3, 134 Sq . Ft. 11 ,300 Sq. Ft.
1�
,
, " «
I `
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA GOUNTY, MINNESOTA
;,,,�„ RESOLUTION 1990-
A RESOLUTION PLEDGING SUPPORT TQ THE MINNESOTA ARMY
NATIONAL GUARD IN ESTABLISHING AN ARMY NATIONAL
GUARD ARMORY IN THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Army National Guard has expressed interest
in establishing an armory �n the City of Rosemount ; and
WHEREAS, officials of the Minnesota Army National Guard have met
with city officials to discuss the general planning and funding '',
requirements for an armory; and �
i
WHEREAS, the Rosemount Independent School District ��196 has also I
indicated strong interest in having an armory located in the City
of Rosemount ; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount and Independent School
District ��196 feel it would be extremely beneficial ta �toseznount
citizens in many ways for the Minnesota National Guard ta
continue its planning to lacate an armory in the city�
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESQLVED, the City Council of the City of
Rosemount unanimously continues its encouragement to the
,� Minnesota Army Nationa]. Guard to select the City of Rasemount as
the location of the armory and pledges its support and
cooperation in the subsequent planning and siting effort .
ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1990.
�
Vernon J. Napper, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M Johnson, City Clerk
Motion by: Seconded by:
Voted in favor :
--,- Voted agains� :