HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.n. Approve Change Order #1, West Ridge 3rd Addition ` � f�'EM # �+ N
***********************************MEMO***********************************�
DATE: AUGUST 1� 1990
TO: MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS & CITY ADMINISTRATOR JIL
FROM: CITY ENGINEER/PUBLIC WORRS DIRECTOR HEFTI
RE: ITEMS FOR THE AUGIIST 7, 1990 COUNCIL MEETING
CONSENT AGENDA
Approv� Change Order #1, West Ridge 3rd Addition
City Contract 1989-2
This item consist of approving the Change Order #1 for West Ridge 3rd
Addition project. This memo includes some background on the need for this
change order and recommended action for Council to take.
Change Order #1 includes payment to the Contractor for items that were non-
contract work related. Items #1, 2 and 4 are related to extra work resulting
from actual conditions being slightly different from the construction plans.
Item #3 was added as an interim clean-out to allow the City access to flush
this sanitary sewer line until the next phase is constructed then we have
access to the next upstream manhole. Item #5 was necessary to improve the
stability of the turnaround at the end of Diamond Path. The Public Works
Department request turnarounds at all temporary dead-end streets to allow
emergency vehicles and our Public Works snowplowing vehicles to turnaround
rather than having to backup. Finally, Item #6 is an item that we added to
mitigate the erosian from the boulevards on unbuilt property adjacent to the
street. In the past we have not required boulevard restoration because the
builder wi11 eventually end up sodding the entire front yard once the house
is built. However, we have experienced erosion from the boulevard during the
period between the final construction and when the subdivision is filled out.
Therefore I feel that it is a necessary item to add to help mitigate the
erosion of the boulevard topsoil onto the street and eventually into the
storm sewers. The cost for restoration is very comparable to the cost that
may have been received had this item been included on the original plans and
specifications. A portion of the cost for Item #3, that is yet to be
determined, will come from the sanitary sewer core facility fund because of
the oversizing to a 10" pipe. The remaining cost will be assessed to the 41
lots in the West Ridge 3rd Addition.
Recommended action for Council to consider is to approve Change Order #1 to
Contract 1989-2, West Ridge 3rd Addition, and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to sign the change order.
� CHANGE ORDER
-
-
ENG(NEERS�ARCH/TECTS/PtANNERS 3535 UADNAIS CENTER DRIVE,ST.PAUL,MINNESOTR 55110 672 49p-2000
City of Rosemount 7-9-90
OWNER DATE
195 1
OWNERS PROJECT NO. CHANGE ORDER N0:
tiiest Ridge 3rd Addition 89137
PRQJECT DESCR�PTION SEH FILE NO.
The following changes sha11 be made to the contract documents
oescriprion: � Add the following �tork items to the Contract.
(See Attached Summary�)
PurposeofChangeorder. payment for boulevard restoration and miscellaneous
utility work, which was added to the proj ect.
8asisofCost: �Actual ❑fstimaCed
Attachmentsitistsupportingdocumentsl 1 - Summary of Non-Contract Ulork Items
6 - Daily Records of Non-Contract Trlork
1 - Claim for Extension of Contract Tir_Ze
CONTRACT STATUS Tme Cost
origina�contract 65 Days/75 Days $ 316 , 025. 00
Ner Change Prior�O:s to - - -
ChangerhisC.O. 17 Days/17 Days 10,994.81
Revised Conrract 82 Days/9?_ Days $ 327,019..81
Recommended for Approval: SHORT-ElLtOTT-HENDRICKSON,INC. By
Steven D. Campbell
Ag to by Co ractor. Approved for Owner.
er eY
-�V G� �
T� ey
D1srrlbuNon Cont2ctor 2 Owner t Project Represenrarive 1 SEH Office 1
SHORT EWOTT ST.PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALlS,
NENDRICKSON WC. MINNESOTA WISCONSIN
SUNIlKARY OF NON-CONTRACT WORK ITEMS
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
WEST RIDGE 3RD ADDITION
CITY PROJECT NO. 195, CITY CONTRACT NO. 1989-2
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
SEH FILE NO. 89137
ITEM DESCRIPTION COST
1• Realigning the existing sanitary sewer $ 1,377.OQ
stub at Manhole No. l to match the pro-
posed sewer alignment.
2. Lawering the existing drop section on 904.00
the north side of Manhole No. 1 to
match the new sanitary sewer grade.
3• Installing a 10" DIP clean-out on T, 220.29
Darling Path.
4. Extra excavation on the storm sewer 1, 545.50
from Manhole No. 124 to the stub an
Darling Path.
5• Furnishing and installing 10�� crush- 338.02
ed limestone for the turnaround at
the end of Darling Path.
6• Boulevard restoration, which was add- 5, 610.00
ed to the plan.
TOTAL: $10,994.81
DAILY RECORD OF NON-CONTRACT. WORK'
Owner City of Rosemount Pro�ect No. 195
Pro�ect Westridqe 3rd Addition SEH �File 89137
Contractor Nodland Construction Date 8/30/89
Description of Work Realigning sanitary sewer stub from NII�i # 1 to match
up to plans.
Direct
.� LABOR Time Labor
Name Classification Start S,to Hour Rate Cost �
Labor 4.5 w33.00 $14�.50
L�-�bor 4.5 �33.00 �148.50
Total direct labor $297.00
MATERI�LS Payroll costs @ � Included
Total labor � $297.00
Item Quantit Unit Unit cost Cost
EQUIPMENT Subtotal NA
( Include Operator Time Under Labor) Sales tax
Total materials NA
Time
Unit Start Sto Hours Rate Cost
u�„a+-Gt, p� annr.� h��-khna���_ 4_5 $110_00 �495.00 I
-�.1C}�U�1�,1.'l,u-]S._W f Fnraman 4_5 �50_00 J�225_00
_Tr�r7r�r f_ irv�ratnr 4_S �HO_OO $360_00
Total equipment $1080.00 �
SUN�SARY Approved:
Total labor $2q�_pp
Total materials NA �i , �.t,� ' ��,�,r��w�_ �;/g`/ ��
Total equipment ��1 Of�O_00 Contractor Date
Overhead & ��
Profit @ $ -rncl„d� 7�i���'�— 9/8/89
R sident � Project Date
Representative
Total Cost _.�1377.00
DAILY RECORD OF NON-CONTRACT. WORK`
Owner Citv of Rosemount Pro�ect No. 195
Pro�ect Westridae 3rd SEH File 89137
Contractor _N�land Construction Date 9/13/89
Description of Work I,o�,,,erina e�isting drop section on north side of MH # 1
to matrh new �ani tar�,v w r crrade on p�an
. Direct
•i LABOR Time ' Labor
Name Classification Start S:to Hour Rate Cost
I'ab°r 4.� 33.00 132.00
_ Lab°r 4.0�= 33.00 132.00
Total direct labor
MATERI�LS Payroll costs @ $
Total labor � ��h4_nn
Item Quantit Unit Unit cost Cost
EQUIPMENT SubtotaZ Q
(Include Operator Time Under Labor) Sales tax
Total materials �
Time
Unit Start Sto Hours Rate Cost
Foreman w/ uickun 4.0' ; 50.00 2QQ.00
-�aek� wf ox�ator 4.0 110.00 440.00
Total equipment $640.00 �
SUNINiARY Approved:
Total labor $264.00
Total materials p /���
Total equipment $6gp,00 Contractor Date
Overhead &
Profit @ � _Included in quotes . ., �/ .,.r=�� g�28�gg
Re dent �� Pro�ect Date
Representative
Total Cost �904.00
DAILY RECORD OF NON-CONTRACT. WORK'
Owner City�:of Rosemount Pro�ect No. 195
Project Westric,�cLe 3rd SEH File 89137
Contractor N�land nst�n� tion Date 9/11 /89
Description of Work Tn al 1;nc� a 10" DTp clean ot�t on Darlina Path whi_ch
s�ac ar�clar� i-n r�l an
�
Direct
� •,R LABOR Time Labor
Name Classification Start S.to Hour Rate Cost
Labor , 82.50
Labor 2.5 33.00 $2.50
Total direct labor 165_00
MATERIALS Payroll costs @ $
Total labor �1ti5_n�
Item Quantit Unit Unit cost Cost
�n�� T�TP "�� T.F �n �� ��R ��
111"—L1IP 1�8 l�.nd� 2 �,.- 97 4A ��a.$!1_
10" L�P-�.un 1 --EA.- �12 �� �2 21
s. • �a�_
EQUIPMENT Su otal ���
( Include Operator Time Under Laborj Sales tax -
Total materials �655.29
Time
Unit Start Sto Hours Rate Cost
FQreman w/ picku�p 2,5 50.00 125.00
Ba.ckhoe wi operator 2.5 110.00 275.00
Total equipment ��00.00 �
SUI�SARY Appro ed:
Tota1 labor $165.00 '
Total materials $655.29 .�i�,�yv�
Total equipment $400.00 Contractor Date
Overhead & - ��
��
Profit $ Included in / -� �` ,...--��— 9/28/89
@ quotes ,i'!�^ � __
R ident �� ro�ect Date
Representative
Total Cost �1220.29
llHILY RECORD Or NON-CONTRACT WORK
Owner City of Rosemount Pro�ect No. 195
Project Westrid�e 3rd SEH File 89137
Contractor Nodland Construction Date 9/25189
Description of Work Extra excavation on storm sewer svstem
from manhole ��124 to stub on Dar�in� Path due to revision from
ori�inal plans .
Direct
LABOR Time Labor
Name Classification Start Sto Hour Rate Cost
Total direct labor
MATERIALS Payroll costs @ $
Total labor
Item Quantit Unit Unit cost Cost
MH ,��129 to MH �r131 t. eeper
MH ��131 to MH ��132 �5 ft. eeper �— � ��-
MH ��132 to stub (7. 5 ft dee er� �— L. F. �'�Z.,' S�j-
EQUIPMENT Subtotal
( Include Operator Time Under Labor) Sa1es tax
Total materials 1 , 545 . 50
Time
Unit Start Sto Hours Rate Cost
Total equipment —�-
St3I�IARY Approve : /i
Total labor NC v"v;� �,�d C�nS��v, .ti� L�il�� /
Total materials -�.i� �!�x�rn � �Y�/q o
Total equipment NC Contractor Date
, Overhead & f
Profit @ $ �'�y �'� �'��.�
Res"ident Project Date
Representative
Total Cost $1 , 545 . 50
DAILY RECORll OF NON-CONTRACT WORK
Owner City of Rosemount Project No. 195
Project Westridge 3rd SEH File 89137
Contractor Nodland Construction Date 11/21/89
Description of Work Furnishing and installin� 100% crushed
limestone for turn aroun d on Darlin� Path as requested bv Citv.
Direct
LAHOR Time Labor
Name Classification Start Sto Hour Rate Cost
Total direct labar
MATERIALS Payroll costs @ �
Total labor
Item Quantit Unit Unit cost Cost
Class ��5 100tr/, Crushed 35 . S Ton 6. 50 $228. 02
EQUIPMENT Subtotal
(Include Operator Time Under Labor) Sales tax _
Total materials 228. 02
Time
Unit Start Sto Hours Rate Cost
S i oa er w operator • •
Total equipment ���—
SUMMARY A rove •
Total labor NC PP ����u � ����s(�' ���y J
Total materials 228. 02 �,t,r ..�s-✓'�!
Total equipment 110. 00 Contractor Date
Overhead & j /��' �r �
Profit @ � �<��_f i ���--- /��>>
R sident Project Date
Representative
Total Cost 338. Q2
%�Price as quoted by Contractor
DAILY RECORD OF NON-CONTRACT WORK
Ownar �; t� �f RoSPmni�nt PrO�ACt No. 195
Pro�ect WP�tr; ��P 3rd A��; t; �n SEH File 89137
Contractor Nodland Construction Date 7-9-90
Description of Work
Boulevard restoration which was added to the plan
Direct
LABOR Time Labor
Name Classification Start Sto Hour Rate Cost
Total direct labor
MATERIALS Payroll Costs @ $
Total labor
Item Quantit Unit Unit cost Cost
Salvaaed Topsoil 966 .Y. 2 . 50 $2, 415 . 00
Roadside Seedina 1. 8 cre 750 . 00 1,350 . 00
Seed, Mixture 700 77 . 5 lbs 2 . 00 155 . 00
_Mulch Material, Tvpe 1 3 . 5 ton 260 . 00 910 . 00
_Disc Anchoring 1. 8 cre 100 . 00 180 . 00
TnpSnil RnrrncT $Q ,Y, 7..50 ���.��
EQUIPMENT Subtotal
( Include Operator Time Under Labor) Sales tax •
Total materialsY5, 610. 00 �
Time
Unit Start Sto Hours Rate Cost
Total equipment ,
SUNIIKARY APProp�ed:( /'�
Total labor d/ori wwd t-7�nb�-�
Total materials � ����o.� �`Q- Qfl
Total equipment Contractor Date
Overhead & �'"
Profit @ $ /r/^C�;�=. C�a�fc�e' {A.r'c� �- � ���
Resident Pro�ect Date
Representative
Total COst _� 5 , 610. 00
�'Sr37 - .
CLAIM FOR ERTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME
PR(3JECT OWNER: City of Rosemount, MN DATE: January 29,199�
PROJECT: Westridge 3rd Addn; Sts & Utility Constr
PROJECT NO. 195 CONTRACT N0. SEH FILE NO: 89137
CONTRACTOR: NODLAND CONSTRUCTION �OMP�TY,INC.: Alexandria, MN 56308
* * * * * * * * * * * * � *
AN EXTENSION OF THE CONTRACT TIME IS HEREBY REQUESTED FOR:
( x ) SUBSTANTIAL ( X ) FINAL COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT.
SUBSTANTIAL FINAL
PRESENT CONTRACT TIME:
WORKING DAYS 65 75
FIXED DATE
EXTENSION REQUESTED:
WORKING DAYS 7-7 17
CALENDAR DAYS
REASON(S) FOR CLAIM: Changes in Sa.nitary & Storm Sewer Construct?on
THIS CLAIM REPRESENTS THE ENTIRE ADJUSTMENT TO WHICH THE CONTRACTOR
IS ENTITLED BASED ON THE STATED REASON(S) AND OCCURRENCES TO DATE.
S IGNATURE: `�k.�•� .�is%✓t'`1�rt%
TITLE: Treasurer
COMPANY: Nodland Construction Co,Inc.
., i
��1 P.O. BOX 510
Zl� � 2875-145TH ST. W.
Q�e'I�l.�u�2 ROSEMQUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
t 6 Y2-423-4411
August 7, 1990
TO: Mayor Napper
Council Members: Klassen
Oxborough
Willcox
Wippermann
FROM: Stephan Jilk, City Administrator
RE: Carroll ' s Woods - Future Use Plannin
For several months there has taken place much discussion on the
existing and future use of Carroll 's Woods. There is concern, as
raised by a committee representing 'the neighborhood abutting
Carrall 's Woods, that no "Master Plan" or "Mission Statement"
exists for the "Woods" .
There is consensus among many staff and P & R Committee members
that in a liberal sense this ,process had its start in 1975 and
has continued ever since through ongoing planning, development
and maintenance of the Woods. There is also consensus that
Carroll 's Waods today is a result of that process.
There are concerns, however, voiced by several citizens that this
process needs to be better defined and clarified. It should
guarantee that the planning and development process would insure
community input, staff input and the use of an unbiased "expert" !
opinion on creating the long term use of the Woods, enhance the
habitat of the Woods and to protect the Woods from any
degradation or departing from what the community wants. There is
concern that the original "plan" for the Woods has not been
followed and that the existing use is not the best use.
The neighborhood group has had several discussions with the Park
and Recreation Committee regarding these issues. The Parks and
Recreation Board has already utilized several other sources of
input in discussing these issues, including the neighborhood
committee, two naturalists who were hired and representatives
from the state agency which provided grant funds to the City to
acquire the property.
The Parks & Recreation Committee had discussed the possibility of
utilizing a consultant, po�sibly the same one hired to do the
Parks & Open Space planning to work with the Parks & Recreation
Committee in inventorying Carroll ' s Woods for environmental and
natural assets such as �� �x-e�s-, woodland and floral
habitat. �
��/`�+'►'1r� s
f �
Carroll ' s Woods Planning
Page 2
It was intended that the consultant would assist in determining
what habitat and wildlife were there and how the Woods should be
developed to best enhance, protect and allow enjoyment of these
assets and still allow the best accessibility to the community
for this enjoyment.
As parks are one system of a City's total service infrastructure
it is important to provide such an overall Master Plan for the
entire system. Though many components now exist for such a
Master Plan, as developed by in-house staff, there does not exist
such a completed Master Plan for the entire system.
It might be well to consider the completion of such a plan at
this time. As the community continues to grow and the Parks &
Recreation Department brings on line additional parks and further
develop existing parks and trail systems it will be �.xtremely
important to be able to rely upon a Master Plan and a Mission
Statement for all city parks for direction on future development
planning and budge�ing as well as program development for
recreational programs.
Funding for major park acquisition and development will be
essential in the upcoming years. Funding for ongoing programs
will also be essential as priorities need to be set for the types
and quantities of certain programs. The P & R system/program may
not be all things to all people.
Making decisions for future P & R boards and staff to utilize in
the development maintenance and programming for recreational
facilities is important now so that a direction can be set and
followed as we continue to grow.
Nothing is static. Developments change, ideas change, funding
changes, elected officials change. What cities want now, may not
be what they want 20 years from now. Master Plans are not
documents which are set once and forever stay the same. They
should be living documents. Being able to, if you would, take
their life from the community they serve. But we must have a
beginning. A point at which the first over all plan is
conceived. This seems to be an appropriate time to do this.
There will be many dollars spent over the next several years on
our parks system. it is important to have that "living" plan in
place now. It is also appropriate to be completing this at the
time the Comprehensive Guide Plan is being updated.
I would recommend that staff take the next month to draft an RFP
for this Master Parks Planning Process; and then offer it for P
& R approval and City Council approval.
•. 4
Carroll 's Woods Planning
Page 3
At that point we could either negotiate with the Parks & Open
Space planning consultant or go out for receipt of proposals
depending on our success with the negotiations.
This Master Plan development process would include the input from
all areas of the community including, neighborhoods, general
public, business sector, city staff, P & R committee and all
necessary "experts" as would be determined necessary such as a
naturalist in the case of Carroll 's Woods.
Further "development" of Carroll 's Woods would not take place
until this "Master Plan" is completed as this would be one
specific component to be reviewed in the over all plan.
Your approval to proceed with this concept and the drafting of
the RFP for the Parks Master Plan is requested.
lj