HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.d. Approve Reimbursement to Carrollton 2nd Addition for Core Water Improvements A j � •
1T�M � �. �
*******�********�*******************AiEMO**�r********�r****�*****�****,t**********�t*
DATE: JULY 13, 1989
T0: MAYOR & G�UNCILP1EriBERS
G/0 CITY ADMINISTRATOR JILK
FROM: CITY ENGINEER/PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR HEFT
R�: ITEPt FOR THE 3ULY 18, 1989 COUNCIL rtEETING
CONSENT AGENDA
Approue Reimbursement to Carrollton 2nd Addition for Core Water Improvements
The IJtility Commission is r.ecommentlinp, to reimbuxse the devc�l.opers of the
Carrc�llton 2nd Addi.tion, Rc�semount Pro�erties of AtinneApnli9, f�r thF
J.11:1LE11L.�Lion undcr Clieir. pri.vt�t.r. cc�ntract oE lE�" core w€�term�in acrc�ss l.hr.i.r
elevelopment. This reiml�t�rsement am�unts to $47,563. Attached is documentation
the Utility Cammission based their recommendation on.
Recommended action for Council to consider is ta approve the reimbursement to
Rosemount Yroperties of Minneapolis.
� . ; , ! . . � . . .
x � •
**********,t***��s�*****,t*************riFP1n***************�**************�*******�*
DATE: JULY 6, 1989
T0: UTILITY COl'1�1ISSION
FROr1: CITY ENGINEERIPUBLIC WQRKS DIRECTOR HEFTI `�
RI;: (�
ITEPt FOR Ti1E JULY 10, 19II9 U'fII.ITY kiEETING ��
� P
�� ��
NEW BUSINESS
Approve Reimbursemenk to Carrollton 2nd Addition for Core Watermain
Installat�on
The developer of the Carrollt�n 2nd Addition constructed a 16" watermain through
his development at tiis own expense. �n accordance with aur poliey the developer
is eligible for reimbursement for the cost in excess of constructing a 6" lateral
watermain insYead of the 16" watQrmain our tiaster Waker Plan requires. The Water
Core Fund is responsible for the oversizing cost that are outlined in the
attached letter sent to the developer.
The cost figures used for determining the Citys share were based on actual bids
we received for 6" and I6" watermain construction. I would be happy to discuss
this matter in further detail if the Commission so desires.
Recommended action for the Commission to consider is to approve reimbursement to
the Carrollton 2nd Addition developer subject to their paying their ovtstanding
bi11s to the City and submittal of the "Waiver of Hearing" for the additional
storm sewer improvements installed under the 1987 Shannon Parkway project.
� ♦
. �yt��S+. • .. � !• • . I�r� �1��. •.���
'�'1' � � ���� �� '!; . 1 1'.I 1� .I l'.
� '���'' !.'! Itt�'.1 1,1��I�111 1�111111! '.��I A �.'.rn.��
�'� .`� ���,��������c�t.�t�il ,,, . , ., „„
July 5, 1989
Thomas 0'Leary
EnCry �ne I�C.
2415 Annapolis Lane
Si�ile 109
Plymouth� MN 55441
Ite: Reimbursement for. Core WAtermAin instellr�tion in Carrollton 2nd Additi�n
Dear Mr. 0'Leary:
I reviewed the cost thaC you sabmitted from Imperial Developers Lor tiie
dif£erence between instal.ling a 6" lateral watermain and the 16° cor.e wakprmain
facility that you did install. In reviewin� these co�t, Z have the fol�.owin�
commenCs:
1. Item 1; I Eeel the �t5.25 cost difference bPtwPelt 6" and 16�� �iPQ �Q
more than I cAn ,�ustify. Other than the Shannon parkway pco3eet th�t
was built by Arkon, I h�d a smali pro3ect built by S. M. Nentges end
Sona uith a cost difference of $14.20 per foot and the larger pro,ject
buil.t by Austin P. Keller. with a cost difference Was $13.00 per Foot.
Giving the hpnefit of tF1Q do��bt 8I1�] AVeCA$�.I1� tlleSe tWo �vrn�l�i rPs��lt in
a tmit price of $t3.6Q ciifEerence between the 16" wstermAin end the g"
watermain. Assuming the larger project bidn could h�ve been
tm helancecl, t Would he willing ta go to $14.00 per lineAl f.�ot ns A
realistic and j»9tiEi�ble cost between 16" and 6" wAtermain
installation, ThAt would amount to $28,840.
2. Item 2; 6" gate valve boxes are cvnsidered lAterAl expenses. Tf��y
will not be included i.n the core facility cost calculntion.
3• Item 3 & 4; I wovld coml�ine Item 3 6 G together. I also Eeel yoi�r
price difference �f $1, 190 per velve is a little ateep, Fxi,sting
contracts we have reveal c�st difference of around $1,000 per valvP.
i{owever, I wotild t�e willing to go $I ,p$p per vAly.e, xhis wotalc� r�mrni�tt
to $5,25Q.
4• Item 5; Your numbers here are within a covple hvndred dnitars of our
average pricing sv I woulci agree with your total £or fittings of
$5,546,
5. I would aiso justi.Cy an averAp,e nVP.CIIP_At� n� 20� makinp the t�t.�l �redi(:
or reimUvrsFment ['�r. the insta)l.�tion of the 16" watetmain at $47�5(i3,
. . • •
Page 2 u ,, ��., , . � . . . . � . . .
Reimbursement-Watermain Installation
� will be hringinp, this ko the Utility Commiseion et thei.r� at�iy i�, 1:9A9 m��tin�;
and rec�mmending that they approve a $47�563 ceimbursement. florvever, I wi11 m�ke
this contingent upon you clearing up the tinpaid bill� ancl 3Uh1tI1tCA}, of A 31�;I1P.(�
"1�iaiver of NeAring" for the actciitionel starm aewer We huilt For your cievel��meni;.
5i erely�
. /�, . yF4��� �. , ". .
6 � L
Richard At. Hefti, P.
City Engineer/Public c�rks I)irector
�,