HomeMy WebLinkAbout2. Rosehaven Addition Preliminary Plat / Concept PUDTO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
ITEM 2.
0 '__71% 6_3 ly of
(k_Kosemount
CITY COUNCIL
MICHAEL WOZNIAK, CITY PLANNER
JULY 13, 1988
P0 Ro x 610
2875 -145TH S1 W.
ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068
612--423-4411
JULY 19, 1988 SPECIAL MEETING REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING
ROSEHAVEN ADDITION PRELIMINARY FLAT/CONCEPT PUD
As the City Council is aware, Haven Enterprises of Minnetonka, has submitted a
preliminary plat/concept planned unit development plan for Rosehaven addition
which will be situated on 8.94 acres presently part of the South Rose Park Addition
Replat - Commercial Subdivision. The main component of this project is a 63,000
square foot retail mall to be located on a 7.74 -acre lot. In addition the project will
create a 1.19 -acre lot fronting on County Highway 42 which has been identified as a
future building lot.
Included with this review are copies of the following drawings:
1. Site Plan;
2. Preliminary Plat with Grading and Utility Concept;
3. Elevation Sketches of Mall Structure;
4. Landscaping Plan.
Community Development Staff has been working with the Developer for
approximately 3 months to modify earlier designs for the project to meet City
Ordinance requirements while achieving an aesthetically pleasing appearance. The
current status of the proposal is that it received recommendation of approval
(without right -in access off of County Highway 42) by the Planning Commission on
June 21st.
The key component of the project the 63,000 square foot mall represents a very
significant commercial development in Rosemount with an estimated project cost
exceeding $5,000,000.00. The proposed structure will have a central interior hallway
with anchor -type tenants (presumably occupying the largest square footage) at each
end of the structure. This proposed mall is not of a size which would suggest a
large department store or supermarket as tenants, but rather, more likely tenants
would be a discount drug store, a hardware store, a liquor store, a family style
restaurant or comparable type uses. The Developer has not indicated commitments
from any specific tenants at this point.
Because of its excellent visibility from County Highway 42 the proposed future
building lot would lend itself to many potential uses especially a restaurant which
would depend on high visibility. No indication has been given of what use or when
the tot would be developed.
`kosehaven Addition PriWinary Plat/Concept PUD
July 19, 1988 Special CWhcil Meeting
Page Two
It is the opinion of Community Development Staff that excluding the right -in access
drive off of Highway 42, the proposed plan meets City zoning and subdivision
ordinance requirements while providing a safe, aesthetically pleasing design. It is
the feeling of Staff that the following issues should be of major concern in
evaluating the Rosehaven Addition Preliminary Plan/Concept PUD:
1. Site Design and Building Aesthetics;
2. Right -in Access Drive off of County Highway 42
In the remainder of this review I will summarize these issues and present a Staff
recommendation for action to be taken regarding this proposal.
SITE DESIGN AND BUILDING AESTHETICS
A key component regarding the appearance of the proposed mall is the landscaping
and grading which the developer proposes in conjunction with the project (see
landscape plan). The Developer has proposed a landscaping plan which includes 50
deciduous shade trees, 11 evergreen trees, 15 ornamental (medium sized) deciduous
trees, and over 100 evergreen and deciduous shrubs. As the trees mature they
should help considerably in giving the site some identity and providing shade to
portions of the parking area. A look at the elevation sketches of the building will
give an indication of the effect landscaping along the building will have in
improving the appearance of exterior walls. Proposed berms along Highway 42 and
151st Street will also help to provide identity to the site while also helping to
screen views of parking and service activities from off the site. Although the
current zoning ordinance has establishes no landscaping standards the quantities of
plant material proposed in the plan do exceed standards which are being proposed in
the Comprehensive Update of the Zoning Ordinance which Staff is working on.
After many meeting with the Project Architect and two reviews by the Planning
Commission, Staff is satisfied that the selection of materials and color scheme for
the exterior of the mall structure are appropriate. As is illustrated on the
elevation sketches of the building, the exterior wall surfaces will be constructed of
a combination of four materials: rock faced block, dryvet (a stucco -type material),
a metal signage band, and decorative tiles. The rock faced block will be a dark
brown and will make up the lower 2* 1/2' of the structure. Above the block will be
7'-8' of the dryvet material in a tan color with a fairly smooth texture. This lower
wall section of dryvet will be broken up by rectangular panels spaced evenly with
tile accents located above to provide a three dimensional element to longer wall
spaces. A recessed, three foot metal signage band (green) in segments separated
periodically with arches above the tan dryvet wall. Another three feet of the
dryvet material colored beige with a rougher texture will make up the remainder of
the wall above the sign band.
Staff has proceeded to obtain samples of the dryvet material and product
information which describes the types of uses for which the product is suitable.
Also, included with this review is a list of Minnesota projects in which "dryvet" has
been utilized. Staff is convinced that the dryvet material in the proposed colors and
texture will provide an acceptable appearance for the major wall areas of the Mall.
At the meeting the Developer will have on display a three dimensional model of the
building rendered in color which should help give Council Members a clear
indication of the appearance and shape of the structure.
Rosehaven Addition Pre' nary Plat/Concept PUD
July 19, 1988 Special Coil Meeting
Page Three
RIGHT -IN ACCESS OFF OF COUNTY HIGHWAY 42
From initial discussions regarding this project a major concern of Community
Development Staff has been the proposed access off of Highway 42. Despite
recommendations of Staff and the Planning Commission the Developer has opted to
pursue approval of a right -in access drive off of Highway 42. Staff sees the
proposed access a representing a safety concern, but more importantly from a
planning perspective it would establish a precedent which would promote 1/8 mile
spacing of intersections which could create a significant traffic problem along 42.
Although, discussions the Developer has had with County Engineering Staff led the
Developer to believe that the access may be possible; a recent conversation
between Dean Johnson and Gary Erickson, Director of the Physical Development
Division of Dakota County has confirmed that approval of a right -in access would
be very unlikely. Indicated on the South Rose Park Addition Replat is a symbol
which signifies no access being allowed to Highway 42 between Chippendale and
Canada Ave. Mr. Erickson has suggested that it would take a significant change in
policy to allow a private access drive in the location proposed by the Developer.
Staff has argued that the logical place to improve access to the site would be with
the addition of a right turn lane at Canada Avenue. Improvement at this
intersection would better serve the needs Qf users of South Rose Park rather than
strictly benefitting the one site. A final argument is that the site plan illustrates
four excellent access points excluding the right, in off of 42, these four other
entrances will more than adequately accommodate traffic flow in and out of the
development. It is important to remember that the Rosehaven Mall will be the most
significant Commercial Project to be built in Rosemount in many years. I cannot
believe that residents of this area will not utilize the mall because it does not have
a right in access off of Highway 42.
Included with this review is a memo from Director of Community Development, Dean
Johnson which also addresses this issue of access from Highway 42.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Community Development Staff recommends that the City Council approve the
Rosehaven Mall Preliminary Plat/Concept PUD without the right in access off of
County Highway 42, subject to the following conditions:
1. Engineering recommendations;
2. Detailed plans and specifications;
3. Trail location recommendations;
4. Park dedication recommendations;
5. PUD Agreement/Subdivision Development Contract.
Included with this review is a copy of the require Resolution which includes these provisions.
0
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC HEARR46
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Ci-
ty Council of the City of Rosemount will con-
duct a Public Hearing, Tuesday, July 19,
1988, at the Rosemount City Halt, 2875 145th
Street West, beginning at 7:80 p.m. or soon
thereafter. The City Council will consider the
Rosehaven Addition Preliminary Plat/Con-
cept Planned Unit Development plan. The
proposed Rosehaven Mall is a component of
t his proposed subdivision. The property to be
included within the Rosehaven Addition is
legally described as follows:
South Rose Park Addition Replat: Lot 1,
Block 1, except beginning at the Northwest
corner east along the north line 225.21 feet
south 0 Degrees 13 Minutes 19 Seconds
west 217.98 feet north 89 Degrees 46
Minutes 41 Seconds west 225 feet to the
west line north along west 208.33 feet to
beginning; and
South Rose Park 2nd Addition: Lot 3,
Block 1.
Such \person as desire to be heard with
reference to this item will be head at this
meeting.
Dated this 5th day of July, 1988.
STEPHAN JILK,
Administralor/Clerk
City of Rosemount
Dakota County, Minnesota
975 19-20
C�
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA )SS
County of Dakota
NANCY J. GUSTAFSON, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is on authorized agent and
employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as Dakota County Tribune, and hos full knowledge
of the facts which are stated below:
(A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a legal
newspoper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02,331 A.07 and other applicable lows, as amended.
(9) The printed C
which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once
each -week; for
>s
succes4ve-weeks; it was
first published on Thursday, the
1, 9 _ , and was thereafter printed and published on every Thursday to and including
Thursday, the ____ day of
,19
and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is Hereby
acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice:
a lx•(Ief phijkbn nnlxlrst a vwx y 7.
TITLE: Secretary td4fie tolisher i, v
Subscribed and sworn to before me n this day, of i° , 19
-.— 4' t- uu C, �.
/) ``\~•
Notary Public ( i
[It
tiERL.AND
, fiCTAliRllt, tigff,MI.SOfA
t'i )tlt4T'IFay Conal [xuR Nl4c r•.w:RSn...^.::4'LVA 3'141
Aft AdIL
6ily
osemount
P n t3()X 510
2875 145111 ST W
ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068
612--423-4411
Affidavit of Mailed and Posted Hearing Notice
Rosehaven Addition - Preliminary Plat/Concept PUD
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )ss
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT )
Stephan Jilk, being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
I am a United States citizen and the duly qualified Clerk of the
City of Rosemount, Minnesota.
On July 5, 1988, acting on behalf of the said City, I posted at
the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, and deposited in the
United States Post Office, Rosemount, Minnesota, a copy of the
attached notice of a public hearing for Rosehaven Addition
Preliminary Plat/Concept PUD, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with
postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on
the attached listings at the addresses listed with their names.
There is delivery service by United States Mail between the place
of mailing and the places'so addressed.
f
S1lk
Administrator/04 k
City of Rosemount
Dakota County, Minnesota
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5th day of July, 1988.
i
Notaly Public ,•''
aannf• ,�,r
.'_.��,.• SUSPA M. J01'19S0?.1
K NOTARY PUBLIC—ro11Tli1ESOTR
4
OAK01I, C1iiJIV i Y
MY COF„M ta+=lKS
R y`d1'd'/�!'sM'1MPJdV�NSr`,IW'd�s1Mh Vr1%`,� v' O
I I
Clifford 14. G-irlson
151.25 S. Robert Trail
Rosemount, MN 55068
James C. & Gloria Boerner
4385 Orion
Cagan, MN 55122
Midway National Bank
1578 University Avenue W.
St. Paul, MN 55104
1i
Pizza HULs of Northwest, Inc.
9111 Douglas E.
Box 428
Wichita, KS 67201
James Tutewohl
3300 Lower 150th St. W.
Rosemount, MN 55068
Timothy Broback
3340 Upper 149th St. W.
Rosemount, MN 55068
Chippendale 42 Partnership
14605 ,Johnny Cake Ridge Road
Apple Valley, NN 55124
0
Lyndal.e 'terminal Co.
Box 1224
Minneapolis, HN 55440
Dexterity Dental Arts, Inc.
3438 151st Street- West
Rosemount, MN 55068
McDonald Corp.
Box 66207
AME 011ARE
Chicago, IL 60666
Fairfax Construction Co.
3480 Upper 149th St. W.
Rosemount, MN 55068
Jameso J. & Kathleen Sorrano
3310 Lower 150th St. W.
Rosemount, MN 55068
Jeff Scislow
15744 111ghview Dr.
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Rosemount National Bank
15055 Chippendale Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068
l arry Ilile
357 Maple island Road
Burnsville, MN 55337
William Berg
4363 Upper 135th Street W.
Rosemount, MN 55068
Patrick & Zelda Fahey
2609 52nd Street W.
Minneapolis, MN 55410
Robert A. Newman
3290 Lower 150th W.
Rosemount, MN 55068
David & ,Joyce Sandstrom
15001 Charlston Avenue
Rosemount, MN 55068
Donald & Myra L. Goble
22250 Panama Avenue
Prior Lake, MN 55372
TO: Mayor, City Council, Clerk/ Administrator
FROM: Dean Johnson, Director of Community Development
DATE: July 14, 1988
SUBJ: Rosehaven Mail - PUD/Preliminary Plat
You have received, under separate letter from Mike Wozniak, information
regarding the PUD/plat for the proposed shopping center. I wish to highlight
only one aspect of that proposal, direct access from CSAH 42. Attached are
my original comments on this matter to the Planning Commission and a letter
from the County.
In the recommendation by the Planning Commission, the project was approved,
without access to CSAH 42. This issue is not dead, however, and I feel
compelled to comment on any debate that may come from the developer. Staff
has been consistent from the start on this issue. We informed the developer
in our first meeting we would not support any recommendations for access on
CSAH 42.
There are only two relevant issues at this time: 1) County policy allows
access at quarter -mile spacing, which is the distance between Chippendale
Avenue and Canada Avenue; the only exception is for access to "non -
continuous, low volume"up blic streets; and 2) we can not condone or
recommend a precedent for eighth -mile spacing along four -lane divided
highways (even public streets).
The proposal in hand is for eighth -mile spacing access to the site and as a
private access point. This is in itself inconsistent with County policy; and,
County staff indicated they would be adamantly opposed to a "city
recommendation" for a variance. They made it clear that the eighth -mile
exceptions were made under extreme political pressure in the past.
If the County were to allow this as a variance, City staff would still argue
against it on the basis of the precedent it sets. A good example of this
concern regards the "McNamara" parcel, immediately west of Chippendale. This
property has a half -mile frontage on CSAH 42 between Shannon Parkway and
Chippendale Avenue. If the "Rosehaven access" were permitted, it would set
the stage for five accesses on CSAH 42, including Shannon and Chippendale.
Can you envision nine access points along CSAH 42, if this precedent were
carried all the way to Diamond Path? That's nine accesses in one mile. At
full development, we'd like to see only two more access along CSAH 42 -- one
right -in right -out west of Shannon and one right -in right -out east of Shannon.
We have also gone on record indicating that a right turn lane at Canada would
better serve the needs of the shopping center, as well as the entire
commercial neighborhood. This is not an immediate requirement, based on
existing traffic on CSAH 42. Under current County policy, this would be a
County project and done at County expense.
TO: Planning Commis
FROM: Dean Johnson, DCD
DATE: June 17, 1988
RE: Rosehaven Mall - CSAH 42 Access
The developers have not reduced their interests in an entrance to the site from
CSAH 42. City staff have not changed their position that the access, should not
be considered. We hold this position for two reasons:
1) A right turning lane in this location does not safely or appropriately serve
the needs of the entire commercial district; and 2) it sets on unacceptable
precedents for future demands on similar access provisions along CSAH 42.
The developers have met with the County Highway Department and hold the
opinion that the access in consistent with County policy and they are legally
entitled to it. A letter from the County Surveyor may seem to agree with this;
but, in reality, it does not.
The Surveyor's letter indicates there is no provision for a commercial driveway
- that is correct. The letter makes reference to an exception for "1/8th mile
spacing for low volume, non -continuous streets". This would be the case for a
Canada Avenue, which already exists, but not a commercial driveway, which is
proposed. Whatever assumptions the Surveyor made in suggesting that this
proposal is acceptable to the County are unfortunately incorrect.
I have spoken with Gary Erickson, Director of Physical Development (in charge
of highways and planning). He confirmed that the 1/8th mile spacing provision
is allowed by the County for city streets, not driveways. He was also not aware
that the County's "access restriction symbol" is already recorded on the South
Rose Park Addition Replat all along CSAH 42, from Chippendale to Canada
Avenue. He very firmly indicated he would not favor an acception to this
existing restriction for a public street, let alone for a private driveway. We
have informed the developer of our position all along. We have also protected
their right to go through the motions in requesting the access. In spite of what
the Surveyor's letter seems to suggest, the County will not entertain the request
unless the city formally makes the request - and then they have no obligation to
approve it.
We believe the access represents only the ultimate in convenience to the
developer. The absence of the access does not jeopardize the project. We do
believe that a right turning lane on Canada Avenue will not only enhance the
mall, it will benefit the entire commercial district. According to Mr. Erickson
the county pays for such improvements when an intersection, such as Canada
Avenue, already exists. The City is not exposed to the cost.
Another more practical problem exists if the access were to be considered. An
additional 15 feet of right-of-way along CSAH 42 will be required (actually it is
being requested with or without the access). The site plan that staff has
essentially approved does not reflect this additional right-of-way. If the right-
of-way is required, the entire north row of parking will have to be eliminated.
Gary Erickson indicated that the right-of-way would have to be dedicated if the
access were approved; however, they would wave the additional right-of-way
requirement without the access. To me, the parking is far more critical than
the access.
Planning Commission
Rosehaven Mall
Page Two
I believe the developer is prepared to accept the refusal of the access. The
other issues regarding the mall have been resolved satisfactorily. In keeping
with Mike's comments the proposal can be approved, without the access, not
subject to it. The developer is not interested in any delays at this time. The
developer would rather appeal to the City Council for the access, rather than
have any additional delays in Planning Commission actions.
I would recommend the Rosehaven Mall preliminary plat and Concept PUD be
approved, but without access to CSAH 42.
0 i
DAKOTA CGARY H. STEVENSON, R.L.S.
COUNTY SURVEYOR
SURVEY DEPARTMENT _ (612) 431-1153
City of Rosemount
1367 - 145th St. E.
Rosemount, MN 55068
tai iv nn aimLt:i, auiit Asw
Att: Stephan Jilk, City Administrator
RE: ROSEH"EN MALL
Dear_ Mr. Jilk:
/irrLC VMLLCT, IVfIfVIVLJ\llil JJ;,fq
June 14, 1988
The Dakota County Plat Commission met on June 13, 1988, to
consider the preliminary plat of ROSEHAVEN MALL. Said plat is
adjacent to C.S.A.H. No. 42 and is, therefore, subject to the
Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance.
County guidelines for C.S.A.H. NO. 42 call for 75 feet of half
right of way. The plan as submitted shows an additional 15 feet
of R/W which meets the guidelines. The guidelines also call for
no access for commercial driveways. However, the right in only
shown on the plan does meet the guideline of 1/8th mile spacing
for low volume, non -continuous streets. This access is
acceptable to the Plat Commission provided that the remainder of
the frontage on C.S.A.H. NO. 42 be dedicated as restricted access
on the final plat and that internal access to Outlot A is
provided for.
The Ordinance requires resubmittal of the final plat before
recommendation of approval is made to the County Board.
No work shall commence in the County right of
is obtained from the County Highway Department.
Sincerely,
Gary H. Stevenson
Dakota County Surveyor
Secretary, Dakota County Plat Commission
cc: Ron Krueger & Associates
David Everds, County Highway Engineer
Tom Swanson, Permits Technician
GHS:vf
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
way until. a permit
City of Rosemount
Resolution 1988-
A Resolution Giving Approval to
the Rosehaven Addition Concept PUD and
Preliminary Plat and Setting Out the Conditions for
Final Approval
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has received a PUD Concept Plan
and Preliminary Plat for that part of Lot 1, Block 1, SOUTH ROSE
PARK ADDITION REPLAT lying east of a line lying 225.00 feet east of
and parallel with the West line of said Lot 1, as measured at right
angles to the West line thereof; and, Lot 3, Block 1, SOUTH ROSE
PARK 2ND ADDITION; to be known as ROSEHAVEN ADDITION; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount has
reviewed said Concept PUD and preliminary plat and submitted its
recommendation to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the required public hearing and notifications have been
completed.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Rosemount approves the Rosehaven Addition PUD Concept Plan and
Preliminary Plat, subject to the following:
1. Engineering recommendations;
2. Detailed plans and specifications;
3. Trail location recommendations;
4. Park dedication recommendations;
5. PUD Agreement/Subdivision Development Contract.
Adopted this 19th day of July, 1988.
Rollan Hoke, Mayor
ATTEST:
Stephan Jilk, Administrator/Clerk
TME LUTZ COMPANY
EXCLUSIVE DRYVIT® DISTRIBUTOR
SPRING 1988
COMPLETED DRYVIT PROJECTS
MINNESOTA/WESTERN WISCONSIN
6311 Cambridge Street
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
(612) 929-4309
. ° 0
HUBBARD MILLING
TURA MN
8800 SQ FT
1987
BARRON CO' REST AREA
# 33 & # 34
BARRON COUNTY WI
600 SQ FT
1987
OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH
9185 LEXINGTON AVE'
BLAINE MN
2600 SQ FT
1986
.RESIDENCE - BLOOMINGTON
EMERSON CIRCLE
BLOOMINGTON MN
3000 SQ FT
1987
RESIDENCE, COUNSELFORM HOMES
281 NORMAN RIDGE DR
BLOOMINGTON MN
2720 SQ FT
1987
BLOOMINGTON COMMUNITY STATE BANK
9633 LYNDALE AVE' SO'
BLOOMINGTON MN
16800 SQ FT _
1986
OXBORO MEDICAL CLINIC
98TH STREET & 35W
BLOOMINGTON MN
2500 SQ FT
1987
MAINSTREET-BROOKDALE
BROOKDALE
BROOKLYN CENTER MN
27500 SQ FT
1988
BURNSVILLE 4 THEATRES
BURNSVILLE CENTER
BURNSVILLE MN
1600 SQ FT
1983
CLOQUET COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HUSPITA
SKYLINE BLVD'
CLOQUET MN
15000 SQ FT
| 1987
MEDICAL CL
PIPESTONE
PIPESTONE MIAJ
1700 SQ FT
1988
NORTH HEIGHTS CHURCH
SE CORNER OF STATE HWY 96& HWY 10
ARDEN HILLS MN
6000 SQ FT
1986
ST' TIMOTHY'S CHURCH (OFFICES)
707 89TH AVENUE NE
BLAINE MN
3400 SQ FT
1984
SOUTHTOWN MALL
76TH AND PENN
BLOOMINGTON MN
6500 SQ FT
1983
BLOOMINGTON SCHOOLS�
BLOOMINGTON MN
12000 SQ FT
1987
OLD PEORIA CO' OFFICES Q WAREHOUSE
7900 CHICAGO AVE'
BLOOMINGTON MN
4700 SQ FT
1983
'-
COMMUNITY STATE BANK
9613 LYNDALE AVE' SOUTH
BLOOMINGTON MN
15000 SQ FT
1986
HONEYWELL
BOONE AV' N' (WEST OF BOONE AT 75TH
BROOKLYN CENTER MN
30000 SQ FT
1985
RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER
BURNSVILLE MN
23000 SQ FT
1987 '
CARLTON NURSING HOME
STATE HWY' 45 NORTH
CARLTON MN '
9000 SQ FT
1982
COON RAPIDS LIBRARY
114400 CROOKED LAKE BLVD'
COON RAPIDS MN
1800 SQ FT
1986
AN0KA COUNTY LIBRARY
��^
111440 CROOKED LAKE BLV���
COON RAPIDS MN �-
1100 SQ F[
1986
AT&T
COON VALLEY
COON VALLEY WI
3100 SQ FT
1987
THORSON COMMUNITY CENTER
58TH AND NEVADA
CRYSTAL MN
3000 SQ FT
1983
BLUE RIDGE FLEX OFFICE BLDG
HY 55 & DODD RD
EAGAN MN
1600 SQ FT
1988
YANKEE SQUARE INN
3540 WASHINGTON DR'
EAGAN MN
24500 SQ FT
1983
CROSSTOWN II OFFICE BLDG'
SHADY OAK RD' AND 169
EDEN PRAIRIE MN
6000 SQ FT
1982
GRACE CHURCH OF EDINA
5300 FRANCE AVENUE SO'
EDINA MN
2500 SQ FT
1983
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ELK RIVER
729 MAIN ST'
ELK RIVER MN
700 SQ FT '
1981
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH
FAIRMONT MN
1680 SQ FT
1983
FREDERIC APT' BLDG'
107 E' OAK ST'
FREDERIC WI
13000 SO FT
1987
GLEN LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
4881 WOODRIDGE RD'
GLEN LAKE MN
5100 SQ FT
1984
COON RAPID -ENTERPRISE BLDG I
890 SPRINNORJOK DRIVE'
COON RAPIDS MN
8200 SQ FT
1987
FIRE STATION
8641 80TH ST' SO'
COTTAGE GROVE MN
7000 SQ FT
1985
DAWSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DAWSON MN
2500 SQ FT
1986
BLUE RIDGE FLEX OFFICE BUILDING
HWY 55 & DODD ROAD
EAGAN MN
16000 SQ FT
1988
CAR WASH
EAU CLAIRE WI
1400 SQ FT
1987
NSP, NORMANDALE SERVICE CENTER
5309 W. 70TH ST'
EDINA MN
6800 SQ FT
1981
FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL
FRANCE AVE' AT HWY 62
EDINA MN
700 SQ FT
1986
ELK RIVER CONGREGATE HOUSING
ELK RIVER MN
13500 SQ FT
1980
DRVRY FURNITURE STORE'
100 MAIN STREET
FOUNTAIN MN
1200 SQ FT
1987
J. C. HOIBY TECHNICAL CENTER
1400 73RD AVE' NO'
��
FRIm-EY MN '
2700 SQ FT
1982
GRAND RAPIDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
mRHy1Q RAPIDS MN
9000 SQ FT
1985
MINNESOTA VETERAN'S HO
ALICE S lTf( EMENTARY SCHOOL
ADHASTINGS MN
9TH AVENUEMINNETOmKA MILLS RD
2900 SQ FT
HOPKINS MN
1987
6900 SQ FT '
1984
HOPKINS COMMUNITY CENTER
HOPKINS EISENHOWER COMMUNITY CENTE
1001 HIGHWAY 7
1001 HWY' 7
HOPKINS MN
HOPKINS MN
22000 SQ FT
23060 SQ FT
1986
1986
DOW TOWERS
LACROSSE COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION
HOPKINS MN
LACROSSE WI
13000 SQ FT
13000 SQ FT
1987
1987
HAPPY CHEF OFFICE BLDG'
MANKATO MN
4000 SQ FT
1987
CRICKET INN
194 AND CENTURY
MAPLEWOOD MN
27000 SQ FT
1982
ATQT
MEDFORD
MEDFORD MN
2500 SQ FT
1987
CITIZENS STATE BANK OF MILACA
2ND STREET AND HIGHWAY 169
MILACA MN
5100 SQ FT
1982
LAKEWOOD PUBLICATIONS
50 SOUTH 9TH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS MN
17500 SQ FT ,
1987
801 NICOLLET BUILDING
801 NICOLLET MALL
MINNEAPOLIS MN
6000 SQ FT
1986
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE
900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS MN
10000 GQ FT
1984
RIVERSIDE CENTER STAIRTOWER
606 24TH AVE' SO'
MINNEAPOLIS MN
4280 SQ FT
1983
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN
MANKATO MN
1987
MAINSTREET/MAPLEWOOD
MAPLEWOOD MALL
MAPLEWOOD MN
8500 SQ FT
1988
CONVENT OF THE VISITATION SCHOOL
2475 DODD RD' '
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN
1200 SQ FT
1983
CALHOUN PLAZA APARTMENTS
3129-41 EXCELSIOR BLVD.
MINNEAPOLIS MN
40000 SQ FT
1986
PLAZA VII
7TH ST' AT NICOLLET
MINNEAPOLIS MN
20000 SQ FT
1986
HENNEPIN COUNTY PARKING RAMP
600 PARK AVENUE
MINNEAPOLIS MN
3500 SQ FT '
1986
WHITE CASTLE
4H AND CENTRAL AVE' NE'
MINNEAPOLIS MN '
2500 SQ FT
1983
SUPER COMPUTER CENTER
1201 2ND AV' S' (35W WASH- AVE-)
MINNEAPOLIS MN
22000 SQ FT
1985
WAS iH URN MCREAVY FUNERAL HOME
R
MARSHALL'S/HUB SHOPPING CENTER
HE :NNE' P I N AVE- �
66TH AND N L_LE:.i
Iii I NNL��aF�OL I S MN
MINNEAPOLIS 14
198/
I J,_
801 I'd I COLLE'T' BUILDING
B R--GON TOWERS EAST
.v U 1 N I Ol _LET MALI—
2910 EAST FRANKLIN AVE-
VE_MiNNEA
MINNEAPOLIS
OLIS MN
MINNEAPOLIS Mitt
5utoii SO E=T
40000 SO Fr
1986
1984
i:AiEII_!LIC ELDERCARE CENTER
CRICKET INN UNIVERSITY
8308302ND2NDAVE'_ NI'--..::.
^ I�'� r
2407 UNIVERSITY AVE.AVE.E_
MINNEAPOLIS MN
MINNEAPOLIS MN
24000 GO FT
25000 GO FT
198:2
1983
WESTERN RN UNION E;..i A i RTOWE:: R
CHAMBER BER OF COMMERCE E SKYWAY
31.7 SECOND AVENUE �_; _
T
51_H ��s'1" Et EE.1_
MINNEAPOLIS MN
MINNEAPOLIS MN
2000 bQ Fl
1000 SO FT
198:3
1986
ALL NATIONS INDIAN t Eit:JFt:C H
RESIDENCE — F I T'ERMAN
7:39 17 TH AVE: SO
'KWY-
4637 E. LAKE HARRIET PKWY -
MINNEAPOLIS
MINNE.AE''t.: LIr MN
MINNEAPOLIS MN
1000 Gw FT
6000 GO FT
1987
1987
CAL_.E-iO IN PLAZA APTS-
RICK'S CAFE AMERICANA
3129--41 EXCELSIOR AVE. SO..
1727 LYNDALE AVE_ NO-
O-MINNl-:
APt::J1 _IS MN
MINNEAPOLIS
MINNEAPOLIS MN
4U200 SO NT
4:300 SO FT
1V86
1983
RES I D E -:NC E — FAi..l-I H
RESIDENCE — Yilt._IN6
341 RAM? EY RD.
28U5 MAPLEWOOD CIRCLE E
M I NNE'I ONKA MN
M I NNE:Tt iNKA MN
198"/
1987
EsEGIDE:NCE KILSTOFTF..:
RESIDENCE -- WE STt='ORT CO.
"iii I- IUHL._AND RD_
MINNETONKA MN
M I NNE T'i iNKA MN
48UO O GO F...L.
25OU SO F)
1981
198'/
RIDGE.: HILL PROFESSIONAL OFFICE: BLD
MONTIt: ELLO PUBLIC LIBRARY
=i_ uu PL.Yt1t:;tl._iTH RD-
WALNUT STREET AND 4TH STREET
M I NNE::Ti iNKA MN
MtM NT I C EL.LLO MN
12000 SO FT
3500 SO FT
1984
1981
STATE BANK t_1F MOUND
MEDTRONIC. INC-
NC-MO
MOUND
iND MN
:3055 OLD HIGHWAY E
198-7
NEW BRIGHTON MN
:;00 SO FT
19811
BIRCH H MaD CONDOMINIUMS MS
HYPR i BUILDING
IU WINDSOR CO1_iE~ T
375 FIFTH AVEN! IE NORTHWEST
NEW BRIGHTON MN
NEW BRIGHTON MN
MINNESOTA FEDERAL •`_iiiVTNi:S
I[- W
1.1L 11 HN •
4600 60 Ff
1901
Nf-4RT HF I ELD CITY T1' HAL_L.
IWUR I HF= t E:::L..D Mi`J
1000 so III
198i
RESIDENCE — GERBER
4600 80 F1'
IV8"/
HONEYWELL
12001 HIGHWAY ` ti
3800 So F''f
198
CTS CENTER OFFICE Bi.._DU_
RICHFIELD MIN
wouo so Fr
1983
3
C►FaKDAL...E MED. OFFICE BLDG,, PHASE T
3366 OAKDALE AVE_ G i_
Ir?.`iBBIN` DAL._E_ MIN
4500 So I::: _i_
1986
_!IFFY MAR r
IhcOCHE:S ..I..ER MIN
lbOO 60 FT'
1983
C,_I..Y RD C R SNEI._LING AV. N.
ROSEVILLE MN
14000 Ll0 F._I.
1981,
DELUXE CHE i :KPI: I N..I..E:: RS
2941 sr. (: Fc:►: i I
ROSEV I L.L_E MN
30oub So F1'
1981
SALIK CENTRE ARMORY
SAS;_ K CENTRE MIN
30110 SO F:._I..
198/
CANTERBURY RY INN f:'ES TF11.J1='A N l'
GO. HWY. 8 (NE . 1.. TO CANTE.Ec1. RY DOWN
SHA ► u EE MIN
198611000 So FT
NEW SWEDEN MUTUAL INSURANCE l L.DU ..
NI►►►IL_EI
1983
RESIDENCE — LUNDQUIST
OAK GROVE TOWNSHIP MIN
500 GIe
ITT
1987
CARVER RESIDENCE
1:05 DANE RD.
OWATONNA MN
1800 SO FT
1983
RIVERSIDE ARMS, RICE. LK. FhOUS, A►._IT
RICE LAKE WI
20000 60 FT
198;'
OAKDALE ME::.DICAL OF=FIE.E BLDG,PHA4=;1:
J366 OAKDALE AVE. SO.
F OBB I NSDAL.E. MN
23000 SO FT
19 8t
TRADE MART
ROCHESTER MN
1000 SO FT
19 8.1. t
BUENA VISTA C ONDOMINILIMA;
127 14TH ST. NE
ROCHESTER MN
16000 SO FT
1982
HOFFMANN ELECTRIC/NU COMP OFF. BLD
36 FULHAM :c,T
R►. SEV I LLE MN
32000 So F-r
1983
FIRST BANK SA►._iF• CENTRE
SA►. K CENTRE MN
3500 SO F1'
1981
CANTERBURY INN RESTAURANT'
HIGHWAY 83
SHAKOPEE:. MN
13000 SO FY
19815
MICRO -COMPONENT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
3850 VICTORIA ST'..
SHOREV I EW MN
9000 SO FT
1983
DELUXE CHECK PRINTER.--..-,
�1080 W COihNTY R0 F
S|iOREVIEW MN 0
b000 SQ Fl
1V87
RIV"TnWN COMMONS STWTR' ELD' HOUS
212 N. 2ND ST'
STlLLWATRR MN
20000 RQ Fr
1986
HOLIDAY INN ST' LOUIS PARK
9970 WAYZATA BLVD'
S[' LOUIS PARK MN
62000 SQ FT
1986
HENNEPIN COUNTY PARKING RAMP
600 PARK AVENUE
ST' PAUL MN
3000
1986
SUBURBAN SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER
I.H. 94 & WHITE BEAR AVENUE
ST' PAUL MN
5000 SQ F[
1987
LAN -U -SHEEN BUILDING
1 WEST WATER ST'
ST' PAUL MN
9850 SQ FT
1986
SKYLINE TOWERS
1247 S[' ANlHONY(i94 AND LEX' AVE'
S[' PAUL MN
175080 SQFT
1986
STATE FAIR MODEL HOME
STATE FAIR GROUNDS
ST' PAUL MN
1200 SQ FT
1982
MIDWAY MEDICAL PARKING RAMP
17V0 UNIVERSITY AVE' W'
ST' PAUL MN
1100 SQ FT
1983
NEW MECH
1633 EUSTIS ST'
ST' PAUL MN
3900 SQ FT
' 1983
CHPP TOWERS
77 E. 91 ST'
ST' PAUL MN
14580 SQ FT
1982
COLOR TILE SUPERMART
8347 UNIVqgbI1Y AVE' NE'
SPRING MN
800 SQ FT
1983
U.S. SWIM AND FITNESS
4900 EXCELSIOR BLVD'
ST' LOUIS PARK MN
2200 SQ FT
1983
WEST SIDE HEALTH CENTER
153 CONCORD ST'
ST' PAUL MN
2500 SQ FT
1985
MIDWAY FORD
2777 SNELLING AVE' NO'
ST' PAUL MN
1000 SQ FT
1983
MINNESOTA MUTUAL
400 NO. ROBERT
ST' PAUL MN
35000 SQ FT
1982
RAMADA INN
194
ST' PAUL MN
20&Q0 SQ FT
1979
CITY 11 CNTY EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION
10TH & ROBERT STREETS
ST' PAUL MN
9500 SQ FT
1986
KREBSBACH HYUNDAI
1190 UNIVERSITY AVE' W'
ST' PAUL MN
2100 SQ FT
1988
BISHOP'S CAFETERIA .
1469 S' ROBERT ST.
ST' PAUL MN
2500 FT
1985 '
'
CHEROKEE STATE BANK
GRAND AVE' AND CHATSWORTH
ST' PAUL MN
1300 SQ FT
1986
CITY AND CNTY' EMPLOY' CREDIT UNIO
144 E. 11TH ST'
ST' PAUL MN
6500 SQ FT
\/*N WMTERS AND Ru6ERS
^ 345 TURRACE COURT
ST' PAUL MN
���
2600 SQ FT
1981
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTUR
90 W. PLATO BLVD'
ST' PAUL MN
27000 SA FT
1978
WHITE CASTLE
N. LEXINGTON PKWY' AND
UNIV. AVE'
ST' PAUL MN
1000 SQ FT
1983
.
AH GWAH CHING WATER TREATMENT
PLAN
WALKER MN
2o00 Sg FT
1986
WHYZA[A SHOPPES
WAYZAlA MN
1200 SQ FT
1987
MODEL CIT HEAL[H CLU8
DALE � F
ST' PAUL Mo
5000 SQ FT
1J87
`
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BLDG -
505 PARK AVENUE
ST_ PAUL MN
32000 SQ FT
1979
COSMOPOLITAN BLDG
6 TH ST R WACOUTA
ST- PAU; MN
20000 SQ FT
1987
WATERVILLE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
WATERVILLE MN
2300 SQ FT
1987
WESTVIEW VALUE MALL
MENDOTA HD' AND SO' ROBERT
WEST ST' PAUL MN
11000 SQ FT
1084