Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.b. Penalty Abatement Request1987` aws 02 Ci ly O 2875 -145TH ST. W oSe �u ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4411 January 26, 1987 .Mr. Seymour B. Olson, County Assessor Dakota County Government Center 1560 West Highway 55 Hastings, MN 55033 Re': Application for Abate of David Lawson #34=24850-020-01 Dear Sir: The Rosemount City Council at their meeting on January 20, 1987 unanimously approved that the assessed value of the above referenced property be reduced from $47,816 to $37,410. Enclosed please find the executed Local Government Abatement Recommendation. *Steaenl'Jlilk rely, A Administrator/Clerk smj Enclosure F C rs 987 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT ABATEMENT RECOMMENDATION This is to certify that we the I iJt�c/� of the wma.[r have caref y considered the attached application and trOstatements contained therein. Name Parcel � S/�'S7} C%�Q–Q/ _ Market Value $ Address (As presently Assessed) Based upon our knowledge of the property referred to and the values allocated to surrounding properties and all other facts at hand, we hereby recommend that this application be: 1. Granted 2. Rejected 3. Allowed at the following market valuer Land . 60Z9 Structures iAtt.'Mach. Total ®dam Assessed Value be reduced to and fixed at the sum of:: Homestead Non -Homestead', Chairman, e .deM,�.— X amm 1987 02 FIM ABATEMENTS- January 2, 1987 Real Estate: Approved David Lawson Upon review it was found that when #34-24850-020-01 the property was divided it was Rosemount, City of done incorrectly.' Therefore, the estimated market value should be reduced from $111,200 to $87,000 in 1986 and the assessed value should be reduced from $47,816 to $37,410 in 1986. r s i t L i Applicant's Nims David Lawson ant Form 3 lRay. 3/74) 's 198? ,v 2 FILE APPLICATION FOR REDUCTION IN ASSESSED VALUATION OF REAL ESTATE I For Taxes Assessed in Year 986 e and Payable in Year 1987 Complete in triplicate if tax reduction exceeds $500; v otherwise complete in duplicate. Please print or type. Applicant's Mailing Address — -- 14785 Robert Tr. S. Rosemount, MN 55068 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Street Addteq lif different then above), city or Township SGhool olstrict No. Rosemount 196 APPLICANT'S REQUEST Applicant affirms no proceedings of any kind for correction of the assessment against said property are now pending in any court. Applicant believes that this property is assessed higher than property in the same class and of the same value in this assessment district and therefore requests that the assessed valuation be reduced and that the market value of said property for said year be reduced and that the market value Of said property for said year be reduced to and fixed at $ NOTE: -Minnesota Statutes 1971, Section 609.41 "whoever in making any statement, oral or written, which is required or authorized by law to be made as a basis of; imposing, reducing, or abating any tax or assessment. intentionally makes anv statement as to any material matter which he knows is false may be 34-24850-020-01 ASSESSMENT, DATA (on Jan. 2 of year of assessment) ' 1. Market Value Exclusive of Structures and Improvements $ 41,800 2. Market Value of All Structures and improvements $ 69,400 3. Total Market Value (line 1 + line 2) 5111,200 4. Assessed Value $ 47,816 OWNER'S DATA (on Jan. 2 of year of assessments 1. (>Nnet'sEstimated Market Value $ 2. Total Fife insurance Carried on Said Property $ 3. Date Property Acquired , 19 Purchase price $ 4. Cost of Additions and Improvements since purchase $ S. Is this property applicant's homestead? ❑ Yes 6. ` Type of instrument used to convey title: 7. In applicant's opinion the excessive assessment was due to: 8. Applicant did not secure a correction of said excessive assessment before it had been finally equalized because: Just became aware of incorrect assessment. APPLICANT'S REQUEST Applicant affirms no proceedings of any kind for correction of the assessment against said property are now pending in any court. Applicant believes that this property is assessed higher than property in the same class and of the same value in this assessment district and therefore requests that the assessed valuation be reduced and that the market value of said property for said year be reduced and that the market value Of said property for said year be reduced to and fixed at $ NOTE: -Minnesota Statutes 1971, Section 609.41 "whoever in making any statement, oral or written, which is required or authorized by law to be made as a basis of; imposing, reducing, or abating any tax or assessment. intentionally makes anv statement as to any material matter which he knows is false may be REPORT OF COUNTY ASSESSOR (or City Assessor in certain cities) Prior Year Assessment Total $ 111,200 1. Report of Investigation: Upon review it was found that when the property was divided it was done incorrectly. $ 2. Estimated market value on Jan. 2, 19 86. 111,200 Recommended lassification: Cottmteerci0010 3. Assessor's Recommended Market Value: Land $ 2,000 ; Structures $ s0 ; Total $ — 4. Assessor's Recommended Limited Value: Land $ ; Structures $ ; Total $ 5. Recommended Assessed Value: Homestead $ Non -Homestead $ 37.410 c 6. Recommendation of Assessor: In Approved ❑ Denied Date Assessor's Signature CERTIFICATE OF RECOMMENDATION BY COUNTY BOARD AND COUNTY AUDITOR 1. 1, the undersigned, County Auditor of the within named county, hereby certify that the market value, limited value, and the assessed value of the real estate described in this application for said year as fixed and equalized in the assessment are as shown below (original values). A careful investigation has been made by the county board of said county and by me as to the aalue of said real estate and of all the allegations set forth in this application. Based upon said investigation and from our own knowledge of the facts we believe that the market value and assessed value of said real estate should have been as shown below (corrected values). ORIGINAL VALUES CORRECTED VALUES Market Value Limited Value Market Value Limited Value Land $ $ $ Structures $ $ $ $ Total $ $ $ Assessed Value $ $ $ is 2. 1 further certify that at a meeting held 19 _ _ said county board,•by official action upon motion duly adopted and entered upon the minutes of its proceedings as a public record, showing the names of the taxpayers and other persons concerned and the amounts involved, made the following recommendation, wherein i hereby concur, upon said application: I hereby, certify that the result of said recommendation is as follows and that if the taxes have been paid that proportional refundment be aiithnri7gd Reduction of Penalty Tax Rate: Reduction of Interest Total Reduction or Refundment Q Tax is Paid: Date 19 Tax is Not Paid Signature of County Auditor Date ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - STATE OF MINNESOTA- . 19 REJECTION ACCEPTANCE Upon due consideration of the within application it is upon due consideration of the within application it is ordered that: ordered that the same be and it is hereby rejected. 0 the recommendation of the County Board and County Auditor be granted., (] the assessed valuation for the real estate and the year described therein be reduced to and fixed at S+ Commissioner of Revenue The auditor and treasurer of said county are hereby authorized and directed to make such changes in the records and books of their respective offices as maybe necessary to carry out this order. By w Reason for Rejection: Commissioner of Revenue By 2 _ Assessed Values Tax 1 Tax Less Hstd. Credi Special Total Assessments Payable Original New Reduction Reduction of Penalty Tax Rate: Reduction of Interest Total Reduction or Refundment Q Tax is Paid: Date 19 Tax is Not Paid Signature of County Auditor Date ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - STATE OF MINNESOTA- . 19 REJECTION ACCEPTANCE Upon due consideration of the within application it is upon due consideration of the within application it is ordered that: ordered that the same be and it is hereby rejected. 0 the recommendation of the County Board and County Auditor be granted., (] the assessed valuation for the real estate and the year described therein be reduced to and fixed at S+ Commissioner of Revenue The auditor and treasurer of said county are hereby authorized and directed to make such changes in the records and books of their respective offices as maybe necessary to carry out this order. By w Reason for Rejection: Commissioner of Revenue By 2 _