The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6. West Ridge Addition PUD / Preliminary Plat / Rezonng Hearing - 8:00 p.m.CLERK'S FILE 1� O 44 �)?Olsemount PUBLIC NOTICE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: 1987 0 5 2875 -145TH ST. W. ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4491 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota will hold a series of Public .Hearings beginning at 8:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 3, 1987, at the Rosemount City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, and continuing until all items have been heard. The purpose of these hearings will be to consider the following items: ITEM #1: The Concept Planned Unit Development and preliminary plat for West Ridge Additions, a proposed 280 -unit single family development, located in the Southwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 115, ;Range 19 Dakota County, Minnesota. ITEM #2: The ,proposed rezoning from AG Agriculture to R-1 Single Family Residential, land legally described as the Southwest Quarter of Section 31, Township <115, :Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above hearing items will be heard at this meeting. Dated this 13th day of February, 1987. ,• Steph Jilk Admin strator/ erk City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota QN rs 19 8 7 0 5 SoX ,w (o `s 7P`cl�s � aPc� �-- o-sa l aw'FIN I987 05 as /iiiV J�S?1� I��►�.t� ��/ X550( 8 �` �iN SSvb g /7, rid 1UTIO � -� 1 IVO RT4 «,mss �c� 19 8.1 0 5 Vit% A! 41 4 m (V\ L.,j o T�, 41c i� Dz9-� CLER OS TO: Planning Commission & City Council K 9 T � S FROM: Dean Johnson, Director of Community Development FRI DATE: February 27, 1987 SUBJ: March 3, 1987, Regular Meeting Reviews 4a West Ridge Addition - Concept PUD/Preliminary Plat/Rezoning West Ridge Addition is located in the southwest quarter of Section 31, in the very southwest corner of the City. Approximately one year ago, the City reviewed a concept for the development of the entire Gergen farm, approximately 189 acres. While the concept was approved, no final action was taken. Issues regarding sewer access to the Empire waste water treatment plant (WWTP) prevented the City and developer from pursuing the overall proposal. Revised plans included a preliminary plat for 110 lots. A final plat for only 56 lots was approved, which reflected the level of public improvements that were proposed. Hence, West Ridge First Addition was approved and improvements were installed. We are now reviewing the concept for development on approximately 105 acres in the southwest quarter of Section 31. This area can be served by gravity sewer to the Empire WWTP, and has been approved for sewer service by the Metropolitan Council. The development consists of five phases, containing 280 lots. The concept PUD illustrates the phasing plan, trunk utility corridor, permanent storm water ponding area and future park dedication. The trunk water main has been installed and approximately one-half of the trunk sewer is in place. The street layout is consistent with future utility needs. Some modifications in the street layout should be included in the final PUD. Provisions should be made in Phase 4 to allow for the transition in the alignment of proposed Diamond Path to the north. Diamond Path would be wholly located in Rosemount in the north half of Section 31 and mostly located in Apple Valley for the south half. The very northwestern corner of the development should allow for this transition. There should also be a street access to Diamond Path, near the boundary of Phase 2 and Phase 3. The two northerly blocks in Phase 4 exceed a quarter mile in length. The ordinance allows for pedestrian access (trails) in the middle of such blocks. My preference would be full street access to break up the length. The two openings do not necessarily require the same alignment. I would prefer to be vague, rather than to choose an alignment now, in order to maintain maximum flexibility for future development in the area. The concept plan identifies the typical lot to include a minimum area of 10,200 square feet and a:minumum width of 75 feet. The lot area is consistent with existing and proposed ordinance requirements. The lot width is less than the existing 85 feet minimum or proposed 80 feet minimum. .. CLERKS X981 45 Under the PUD process, we have the authority to vary lot dimensions. In the past, we have allowed variations due to topographic and other site conditions, and we have allowed them due to economic considerations. Based upon the amount of planning and engineering in the first two phases, I would recommend we approve Phase 2 as presented. The remaining phases should be redesigned to meet minimum standards. We, the City, need to determine whether the proposed ordinance minimum at 80 feet or existing minimum of 85 feet will be established. The concept PUD also serves as a preliminary plat. Subject to the comments noted on the PUD, I would recommend approval of the preliminary plat for the entire area. Final plats for each phase will have to reflect these comments. We have already received a final plat for the second addition. Two remaining issues include the EAW, which has been distributed, and the rezoning. The comment period on the EAW does not expire until March 11, 1987. We have a public hearing set for March 3, 1987 at which time the concept PUD, preliminary plat and rezoning will be reviewed. Any approvals at this time must be conditioned on the negative declaration of the EAW. Based upon the information submitted and comments noted, I would recommend approval of the West Ridge Additions concept PUD subject to the following: 1. EAW approval 2. Preliminary plat approval 3 Diamond Path right-of-way and additional street access locations 4. Lot dimension conformance (Phases 3-5) 5. PUD Agreement I would also recommend approval of the West Ridge Additions preliminary plat, subject to the following 1. EAW approval 2. Concept PUD approval 3. Rezoning of individual phases concurrent with final plat approval 4. Right-of-way additions and adjustments in Phases 3 and 4 5. Temporary cul de sacs as determined by the City 6. Park land dedication and cash dedication as determined by the City 7. Developement agreements with each final plat Finally, I would recommend approval of the rezoning of West Ridge Second Addition from AG Agriculture to R-1 Single Family Residential. 1987 05 4b Shannon Park 1st Addition - Final Plat Enclosed are copies of the Shannon Park 1st Addition final plat. The preliminary plat and site plan for the eight -building, 64 -unit multiple- family ultiple- family development were approved last fall. The property is zoned RM Multiple Residential. Bill Jacobson, architect and developer, is proposing to construct the first four buildings on Lots 1 and 2, as soon as the plat has been recorded. If the project is well received, he may start construction on the balance of the development in the fall. The City has designed the utilities to serve the project. The City Council has approved the concept of installing the utilities and assessing the property. The water service will be part of the trunk water system. One change that I wish to recommend regards access to 145th Street. A permanent driveway was approved in the alignment of the utility easement. This was logical given the absence of any commitment on the timing of Shannon Parkway. The City Engineer and I have re-evaluated the situation and feel that the permanent access to the site should be off Shannon Parkway. Because of the timing of the first phase, we will allow temporary access to 145th Street as originally proposed. Permanent access will be located between lots 2 and 3. Mr. Jacobson has graciously agreed with this change. This will -require an adjustment to the common lot line between lots 3 and 4. The site plan will also be modified to show and increase in the spacing between the units on Lot 2 and Lot 3. In essence, the open area in the southerly end of Lot 4 will shift to the north. I would recommend approval of the Shannon Park 1st Addition Final Plat subject to the following: 1. Adjustment in the common lot line of Lots 3 and 4 2. Revision to the overall site plan 3. Subdivision development agreement -3- 5a Les Drentlaw Metes and Bounds Land Division Fitts 19 87 +� Enclosed is a copy of a legal description and locational map for a metes and bounds division of property in the southwest quarter of Section 16, Township 115, Range 19. This is contiguous with an identical division of property lying to the north. All ordinance- requirements are met, albeit the resulting parcels are odd -shaped. I recommend approval of the division as requested. _4_ FILE� 19 $ 7 6 (Dam Q A75-145TH ST.-W. ?01semount ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4411 AFFIDAVIT OF NAILING AND POSTED HEARING NOTICE STATE OF NINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF DAKOTA )ss CITY OF ROSENOUNT ) Stephan Jilk, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: o'I Subscribed and sworn to before me this 18th day of February, 1987. Not 'ry Publ i SUSM M. warapY puBLIe=11a DAKOTA C"TY My COMM. EXPIRES JUNE 11, 1982 w v V v�nr.ri+v+nNvwfvvvv�ivsnne+n,w+� ■ 1121,61 -le- 11<549•v6 - A,�Es7- GoNccPr 16v011eEZ41 AW6- Qws 19 8? 0 5 /, Yer�ron �rtdP1�'or1 3s�. �.'111� - a �1-02 kl d,&7`��c��Ei`, O 4mani F. 1 -501761- 7o?i - :(-eek nu `,,� �so� ,3.:1SQ1-tare �1. C7Qr � 35� 0 3/10 - 0/1- ,r e3 o?lk& &da., C�h -W 35 2. ISWVIZAt�d�d&m `&7 / � /5 / , /7/ moo, 3A6 ; /i tree 7` rl • /, 2, 023 � i p2.3! a2�, 027 o, mvu rz, ; lW 5S46 8 3/, 3a) 3-