HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.d. O'Leary's Hills Additions EAW DistributionE;R. " (filled in by EQB) _ _ 5/1/84
F�xjs 19
_ $T °its
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
MARK APPROPRIATE BOX:
CX] REGULAR EAW _ ❑ SCOPING EAW
NOTE TO REVIEWERS: For regular EAWs, written comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the EAW
Information, potential impacts that may warrant investigation and/or the need for an EIS. For scoping EAWs, written com-
ments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest issues for investigation in the EiS. Such
comments must be submitted to lite Responsible Government Unit (RGU) during the 30 -day period following notice of the
EAW's availability in the EQB Monitor. Contact the EQB (metro: 612/296-8253; non -metro: 1-800-652.9747, ask for envi-
ronmental review program) or the RGU to find out when the 30 -day comment period ends.
1e Project Name O'Leary's Hills Residential P.U.D.
2e Proposer Parkview, Inc. 3, RGU City of Rosemount
Contact Person Steve Broback
Address 15021 Oakland Avenue
Burnsville, MN 55337
Phone (612) 423-1660
Contact Person Dean Johnson
and Title Director of Community Development
Address 2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Phone (612) 423-4411
4. Project Location: SiNE V. Section 31 Township 115 Range 19
a. County Name Dakota City/Township Name Rosemount
b. Attach copies of each of the following to the EAW:
1, a county map showing the general area of the project. Figure 1
2. a copy(ies) of USGS 71/2 minute, 1:24,000 scale map. Figure 2
3. a site plan showing the location of significant features such as proposed structures, roads, extent of flood plain,
wetlands, wells, etc. (Figure 3 )
4. an existing land use map and a zoning map of the immediate area, if available. (Figures 4-8)
5e Describe the proposed project completely (attach additional sheets as necessary).
The project consists of a 158 unit single family detached housing development. This
project has been expanded to include 7 phases, with phases 1 and 2 already completed.
Utility service to this area was identified in an earlier EAW (published 5/19/86),
prepared by the MnPCA on the trunk sewer system in Section 31, Township 115, Range 19,
Dakota County, Minnesota. The EAW described the phases of trunk sewer construction
and the ultimate development of (1,920 housing units) of Section 31. O'Leary's Hills
Additions will be served ultimately by the trunk sewer system identified. All
phases of O'Leary's Hills will be served through the in-place temporary lift station
and force main to the Rosemount WWTP.
6.
CLM's
Reason for FAW preparation: Mngl a Fami l v Detached FILE y 8
List all mandatory category
rule #'s which apply: , 6 MCAR S 3,038 R 1- b
7.
Estimated construction cost
$15,`800,000 public improvements and strttc _ures
8•
Total project area (acres)
59 or length (miles)
7 •
Number of residential units
158 or commercial, industrial, or institutional square footage
10*
Number of proposed parking spaces 316
He
List all known local, state and federal permits/approvals/funding required:
Level of Government
Type of Application Status
Federal: HUD
Mortgages Pending
State: MDH
Water Extension Permit Not applied for
' MPCA
Sewer Extension Permit Not applied for
MWCC
Sewer Extension Permit Not applied for
Local: City
Subdivision/Rezoning Pending
12. Is the proposed project inconsistent with the local adopted comprehensive land use
plan or any other adopted plans? 0 No ❑ Yes
If yes, explain:
13. Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site.
Section 31 is in transition from agricultural uses to planned urbanization,
primarily residential. There are approximately 145 acres of platted
residential acreage, containing 230 existing housing units. This property
has previously been under cultivation.
14. Approximately how many acres of the site are in each of the following categories?
(Acreages should add up to total project area before and after construction.)
Before After Before After
Forest/Wooded _0_ 0 Wetland (types 3-8) 0 �—
Cropland 54 -0 Impervious Surface Q_ 8.5
Brush/grassland S _0 _ Other (specify)
15. Describe the soils on the site, giving the SCS soil classification types, if known.
See Figures 9-11.
The predominant soils are Waukegan and Wadena, which are well suited
for development.
16. Does the site contain peat soils, highly erodible soils, steep slopes, sinkholes, shallow
limestone formations, abandoned wells, or any geologic hazards? If yes, show on site
map and explain: ❑ No ® Yes
See Attachment A.
17. What is the approximate depth (in feet) to:
a. groundwater -5--ruin. 40 avg. It. bedrock 145 min..3Qavg.
13
. CLERKS�
190' Does any part of the project area iae: FILE 9f "`7
a. shoreland zoning district? No Yes
b. delineated 100 -year flood plain? No - Yes
c. state or federally designated river land use district? No Yes
If yes, identify water body and applicable state classification(s), and describe measures
to protect water and related land resources:
19. Describe any physical alteration (e.g., dikes, excavation, fill, stream diversion) of any
drainage system, lake, stream, and/or wetland. Describe measures to minimize im-
pairment of the water -related resources. Estimate quantity of material to be dredged
and indicate where spoils will be deposited.
The project includes 31.5 acres of permanent ponding, requiring no
dredging and little site alteration.
20. a.Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water? If yes, explain
(indicate quantity and source): � No ❑ Yes
b.Will the project affect groundwater levels in any wells (on or off the site)? If yes, ex-
plain: ❑ No
❑ Yes
21. Describe the erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after
construction of the project.
Erosion and sedimentation potential does exist due to the nature of
construction. The necessity for temporary silt fence or straw bale
traps and.diversions or netting and mulching during reseeding will be
determined by the City Engineer, as each phase of the project
progresses.
22. a. Will the project, generate: MV
1. surface and stormwater runoff? No LAI Yes
2. sanitary wastewater? No Yes
3. industrial wastewater? No Yes
4. cooling water (contact and noncontact)? No n Yes
If yes, identify sources, volumes, quality (if other than normal domestic sewage),
and treatment methods. Give the basis or methodology of estimates.
See Attachment A
b. Identify receiving waters, including groundwater, and evaluate the impacts of the
discharges listed above. if discharges to groundwater are anticipated, provide per-
colation/permeability and other hydrogeological test data, if available.
Discharge is limited to domestic sanitary wastewater, treated at the
Rosemount WWTP.
23. Will the project generate (either during or after construction):
a. air pollution? No Yes
b. dust? No Yes
c. noise? No Yes
d. odors? No Yes
If yes, explain, including as appropriate: distances to sensitive land uses; expected lev-
els and duration of noise; types and quantities of air pollutants from stacks, mobile
sources, and fugitive emissions (dust); odor sources; and mitigative measures for any
Impacts. Give the basis or methodology of estimates.
See Attachment A
13
KI
c"mrs 19 87 1
24. Describe the type and amount olod and/or hazardous waste including sludges jo FILE
ashes that will be generated and the method and location of disposal:
The project will generate solid waste: 158 homes @ 8.5 lbs/home/day = 943 lbs/day
25. Will the project affect:
a. fish or wildlife habitat, or movement of animals? ® No ❑ Yes
b. any native species that are officially listed as state endangered, threatened, or of
special concern (animals and/or plants)? 0 No ❑ Yes
If yes, explain (identify species and describe impact):
269 Do any historical, archaeological or architectural resources exist on or near the project
site? If yes, explain (show resources on a site map and describe impact): ® No ❑ Yes
Mr. Ted Lostrum, Minnesota Historical Society, indicated there are
no known sites of historical or archeological significance in
27Section 31, in a phone conversation on April 24, 1986.
0 Will the project cause the impairment or destruction of:
a. designated park or recreation areas? IL No Yes
b, prime or unique farmlands? No Yes
c. ecologically sensitive areas? No Yes
d. scenic views and vistas? No Yes
e. other unique resources (specify)? No Yes
If yes, explain:
28. For each affected road indicate the current average daily traffic (ADT), increase in ADT
contributed by the project and the directional distributions of traffic.
See Figure 12.
See Attachment A.
29. Are adequate utilities and public services now available to service the project? if not,
what additional utilities and/or services will be required? ❑ No Pq Yes
Summary of Issues
For regular EAWs, list the issues as identified by "yes" answers above. Discuss alternatives and mitigative measures for these
issues. For scoping EAWs, list known issues, alternatives, and mitigative measures to be addressed in EIS.
See Attachment A.
CERTIFICATION BY RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT
I hereby certify that the information contained in this document is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and that
copies of the completed £AW have been made avoilableAo all points on the official EQB distribution list.
Sz
Signature D/8/fate
Title t t',C CX7? C _1XD
CLERKS
19,9?
�
ATTACHMENT A
16. Storm water detention ponds proposed are sited within basins which are
the surface expressions of buried Karst. Elevated concentrations of
nitrates have been reported in bedrock wells in the vicinity. However, a
minimum of 145 feet of unconsolidated material is covering the bedrock
and these sinks are not active. Present drainage to these basins is from
agricultural land which tends to carry a higher nitrate load than does
residential runoff. Therefore, the development of this section may result
in a reduction of nitrate infiltration to the bedrock aquifer.
22. a.l This project will utilize 31.5 acre feet of permanent ponding for
surface and storm water runoff. The quality of runoff should improve
due to the reduction in concentrations of pesticides, herbicides and
fertilizer as land is removed from agricultural production.
a.2 158 homes @ 3 persons/ household and a maximum of 300
gallons/ household equals 47,400 gallons/day.
23. b. & c. Dust and noise will be limited to levels normally associated with
subdivision construction. Both conditions are temporary; and, because of
phasing, are expected to be short in duration (one to three months) in
any given phase. Dust may be suppressed by watering, by limiting the
amount of exposed soil and use of the erosion control measures
described in Item 21. Noise can be limited by use of properly muffled
equipment and limiting construction to daytime hours.
27. Construction of this subdivision and contiguous acreage in Section 31
will result in the loss of prime farmland. Section 31 is in an area well
suited for planned extensions of urban development, both locally and
regionally. Efforts to protect other areas with prime farmlands are
being implemented by the City.
28. At ultimate development (1,920 homes), Section 31 could generate 19,000
ADT. Vehicle trips will be well distributed to existing and planned
collector streets and minor arterial highways. It is estimated that the
ADT on CSAH 42, west of Section 31, will be 5,100. The ADT on CSAR
42, east of Section 31, will be 4,900. The ADT on TH 3 (east of Section
31), north of CSAH 42, will be 2,800. Maximum ADT on 160th Street, in
either direction, will be 2,000. Maximum ADT on Chippendale Avenue, at
any point, will be 6,000. ADT on either Chippendale Avenue or Shannon
Parkway (north -south collectors proposed at center section), north of
CSAH 42, is 2,400.
•a•w Aaaw •aaW Mtw 11lOW
f t Mt■
pkmm
Dakota
County T
x
x�?;/�LH"Ttil�iq. .',., MINNESOTA
ww •�–•�I�JVDUT f �. �� �E .»w r_+1w
T j-� /-f � - _ •rn.�mum+t��rwwwrn p
•t OOxfNO TO .!. ..`� o ! `^\�it Nf "O i _ � ! I •..w.�r..•w�.+�+..��
[� �• �`� p MIX1-7
�,- �.........
x 1'>GA1` /f
C1a �7- ai
;P'-�'- oro •-� o p
�i a ) '� ■ .- 9'•-ES'���6�: e 1 Fc��l ' F. �,t. ` T` I �. �i i Y � � .�....:
I_
'M■ I w ROaS�,EM0�1(il-T, ii r ! �-i mEsoorrr ^• lie
`. 6 z:
'° ' "N1NfNGER HP S.
//% !- • 3•• fA { ! I COAT
i o AK Vi L r IZr ° • n ,EMPIRE « • • n • « • n • e r�1 • T
xYfA tll 1� ' V M
I,e 77 H X e " ) N )o a, N M if TTA }f t• QFI. f /� W
lo. ypq(al �itfER' 10
n As " r •�k7., r ,o
Is
f >2
Y. - i I
•
0S 7{ ! nz F a v
��E r • ROC ,Arca ' • • I "r Yntt ' o L—
fUREIf • a r� --��1-� r)
1'13
iE �I'fI _« )rO « _ 2NjT�E • F�' __n}JI(((lLL �J•EI• I .L PIff Q•HAMST.JJJJJII o • n// _'
.»nNs
N AS o� i• 7tt t) F. OIt tt(O
It
�! 10 " x I ! f t• ! xp� ffi
A t1 -_–
ii•� � 1! t
yx CAS E.ut " » r >s _ x p x • i —w I « -x '—x ft •w
f T f Q. ) i j A DO N ~Q ooz,uE co. i=
ENV • !
Iia .,» i ;- -, _ „ •�.._3;= �- — `FAU lit
Mi 1
l(. Til I "r
m 8._ov
___--
At low ■a■w ■law Al■w ■1Fw thew
F l GU RE
s 4�e v 1 <
i �47ilk
( ,� J
.. -" �•. air ' .- ..i it 94
° L Carr
vo
"r
c 1!.
i V
•; .f SL ohn yc'121
$ns Cert 2�
- . t Job \ (�'
_ Q
929
9t - --- -
9�2 � ,. nFo:.
/
ti �!N£ �High Sto ephh ` m Q
R
��
St Joseph) hrIG
Cem /' t54P.. /
_}Gp Radio Tower
s
R0SEM0t1NT �• ;_�'., c, ."0S_ E T
G 6 /
Diamond Path /._., 70 .. Q� ��
l ichp 145TH 9 ST t _ _ —
1 .
Pk •
-,25 5 � y' -.... ..... ....... .. ....� . � � - - 969. .. — ---
�, � U
t ' 9 e.145
` — 29 s 1: / T 2
G•
_
z• -•
- , pJj.
.. y
lz Park -
�" - - I,
_ r� w
�! •, t �` Pk QUO¢
Pk
-. • i, • - -- 954 _
9.2 1507[9 ! /'„•• STREET *Water Tank ---
,t - UNDER _ 9":• CONSTRUCTION
t► J.
� / z _ ' � ••n r•r•a s www r•' / _
Rest Area / a
r sa 1 ` 902 32 32
f ! �
Gravel Pit I /� W
Gravol
!
! Pit
9E' .160TH '' '• 9.,
„_ ._a._ _ .._.,. • STREET CORiURATF.. {t.. RU1'NDARl' •5 / 954 945;�.ROSEMOUNT�.
...b� ( 931 �O ,,p, r \l ." 160 \.
� 949
I. n
:. rwP I pit
.YY
� fi
.,Gj -_.`. 1 ;� r. - 852947
,
- 1914 0
94/ r STREET 957l
--.
91 r1 / i _ 430 - 94211
• I (q V 1 Rest Area Gravei Pit
lam :' C.
s 1�
CLERK'S
FILE.
1987..i 3 =
i r
, N
•MI•Ab tu
{ t .... zol-
02
goal
'. • 111 I � i F •+
W 1 n•°°
• _ ? t/ gah W1� fifQ
• ; } •, {• 1 : ' f__ � �— � � —.rim � I I / Y
M6 n
I LI-
{ 2 d
M>
■
,
.. 4
t '=i
:/� t i�D �•... ^- ,, W
Y
� I `tn I � lC�vmbotY =i�gb 3
LLS
.•. r � /� � i � z
D�gwn�o�} 1•
3 Set
(Lf
l ^ _
q J s s r♦ . [J s lJ
.moi it: !/ ♦ IY
0
ii
u i r 9
FIG. 12 i LECD
-- 1990 URBAN SERV. AREA RH HIGH RESIDENTIAL 0
19
90 LAND USE LAAP.,, PUBLIC & INSTITUTIONAL RR RURAL RESIDENT AL
POS PRESERVATION OPEN AG AGRICULTURAL �f
SPACE ones MISSISSIPPI RIVER CRITICAL
R O S E M O U N T 7
GI GENERA IINDUSTRIAL AREA
IP INDUSTRIAL PARK
MINNESOTA
' � � c � O�A l � CC COMMUNITY (CBD) '�'� MAJOR STREETS tai
G COMMERCIAL
HC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL UNDESIGNATED: MEDIUM
GC GENERAL COMMERCIAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
CNC CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL �O
Cb
W
LJJ
L—.
Nigh I
va
m
�-c
lob
m
VAL13--y TKO$41< SEWep_ CLERK'S 1
aoR FILE 987
id
%
CA# slow cf. AM -1.
CORWtj Cf ties by
it
4•f NUR.
—1WAV r
V
I —i
10" ovtx .
-4 M Lq
FI G UR
W g
J �p
:_ CLERK'S 1987 3
FILE \
,� ►= z
v,�^a
`c z a
}�3
v
Y
•,,
U
aeQu
N
3lM3ddlH:
tiiN
-.
.. •�.pi n'�Mti L,L � .. ��:. •�..�i r ��nf�il r r �,1
N � t
O
Q
i
N
.1
�t11 d
p 7
9 ExCAvATIDN REWRED
..................................... Mw .................... E�
CO. R D.; 42
O/96.3
ACRES 27" O
30" ............,�.. INFL:CE 48'
uA ,
a
sa' .
42"
24' •._
SCALE
wd
J
i
t �V(4�HT32
R
� 1 ,
a
r T
Wae" RAISACRES 34
OAD
ACRES IAC. Ft
9 09 AG FT- _
AC FT ..... .. 27" Z '
12" V
2a�
•..'
F, AC
15.9 I
�V
W =
_ AC FT
9 ExCAvATIDN REWRED
..................................... Mw .................... E�
CO. R D.; 42
O/96.3
ACRES 27" O
30" ............,�.. INFL:CE 48'
uA ,
a
sa' .
42"
24' •._
SCALE
wd
J
i
t �V(4�HT32
R
� 1 ,
a
r T
Wae" RAISACRES 34
OAD
ACRES IAC. Ft
9 09 AG FT- _
AC FT ..... .. 27" Z '
12" V
AlL
r..
15.9 I
_ AC FT
��
Z4 ARES
.y
GiF
PREPARED BY
CITY OF
ROSEMONT
E %G
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON. INC. (
SECTION
31 STUDY
_
St PAUL. WOON OSA • CwrP*W4 IALL& %"X !
STORM
DRAINAGE
pP:w.•.0 NO
3
W
SEs 1987 13
OZ do laed0005 ••••• i Z 000£ 0004 0009
N
aIfw t O si5 9i
a
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
.SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
DAKOTA CO
SOIL LEGEND CLEWS
198?
Map symbWe consist at numbers a a combination of numbers and a Who. Tho initial numbers sepresenf the kind of sail. A ape oft blowing
these numbers indicates the class d aose. Symbols without a slope letter are Is newly lewd wads or miscellaneous areL A Anal aumbee of 2
oteowing the Mope Mt indicates that the and is waded.
SYMBOL NAME
28
2C
7A
7B
7C
70
aA
8B
12C
27A
278
39A
39B
3981
39C
39C2
390
41A
418
4,
498
816
sic
Bit
94C
98
IOOA
1008
100C
1068
106C
106C2
10602
109
113
114
12%
1508
151C
1510
1558
155C
155E
173F
176
177A
1776
177C
189
2038
208
2138
226
239
250
251D
251E
252
253
25S
2798
219C
283A
2836
2830
285A
2858
285C
299A
2998
299C
3018
313
317
318
3208
SYMBOL NAME
Ostrander bum, 1 to 6 percent slopes
320C2
Taftuka sift WnL 6 to 12 paced dopes, erode
Ostrander bum, 6 to 12 percent dares
3428
Ktngskey sandy own, 3 to 8 patent dopes
Hubbard 10" Died, 0 to 1 Percent soyas
3420
Kingsley sandy nam, 8 to 15percent dopes
Hubbard loamy sand, I to 6 percent dopes
342E
Kingsley sandy Warn, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Hobbmd Wmny send, 6 to 12 percent stapes
342E
Kingsley sandy, him, 25 to 40 percent stapes
Hubbard loamy sand, 12 to 18 percent shims
344
Quam UR bum
Spall loamy line lead, 0 to I percent dopes
3728
kwon sift lam, I to 6 paced dopes
Sparta loamy line sand, I to 6 percent slopes
378
Mu utill sdy day lure
Emmert way parody sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent Iwo
3828
Blooming sal loam,. t to 6 percent dow
Dickinson sandy tum, 0 to 2 percent dopes
408
Faxen silty day loam
Dictnson sandy tam, 2 to 6 percent dopes
4098
Elle fine Bundy Wm, 2 to 6. percent slope
' Warfare barn, 0 to 2 percent dopes
4090
Etter fie sandy tam, 6 to 12 Percent Muses
Wartime tam, 210 6 percent dopes
411A
Waukegan silt tam, 0 to I Percent slopes
Wa kora lam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, mode
4116
Waukegan silt loam, I to 6 percent dopes
Wadena Wad, 6 to 12 percent dope
411C
Wmmkegan sift him, 6 to 12 pmcant slopes
Warless lam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, traded
414
Mimi sift lam
Waded loam. 12 to 18 percent slopes
415A
K"MW tam, 0 to 2 Percent Moped
Estherville sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent dopes
4158
Kgwnati tam. 2 to 6 Decent supe:
Estherville so" loam, 2 too percent slopes
4150
Kenaradi tram, 6 to 12 percent reopens
Salida gravelly cause sandy tam, 2 to 12 percent dopes
4498
Crystal Late sift lam. I to 8 percent slopes
Anligo dal learn, 1 to 8 percent slopes
4548
Malin moo loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes
Booe loamy line sae, 2 to 6 percent dopes
454C
Mantamedi loamy no, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Boone loamy fine sand, 6 to 12 percent dopes
454E
Mobtome li loamy sand, 15 to 25 Forced slopes
Boone loamy Box sand, 12 to 40 percent slopes
463
Minmuske tem, occasionally Hooded
Tewil loam, 4 to 12 percent dopes
465
Kalnervdk sandy nam, frequently flooded -
COB wU bum, occasionally Room
495
hartam floe sandy loam
Co"Mon Hem, 0 to 2 percent slopes
512
Bods muck
Copasom loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
539
Palms mull
Coniston loam, 6 to 12 Percent dopes
540
Seeyedlu muck
Leder loam, 2 to 6 pemers slaps
545
Bandeau muck
Lester bare, 6 to 12 percent dopes
61IC
Hawick coarse sandy lam. 6 to 12 pend delays
Lest tam, 6 to 12 percent Mopes, eroded
6110
Howick course sandy loam, 12 to 18 Paled lees
Lest tam, 12 to 18 paced sheds, eroded
611E
Hawick Wary woad, 18 to 25 Percent dopes
Codom sift' clay Wm
611F
Hawick Wmy sand. 25 to 50 percent slopes
Webster clay Wm
857A
Urban tad -Waukegan complex, 0 to I Percent dopes
Glencoe silty clay Wm
8576
(Alan end-Waukefoea complex. I to 0 percent slopes
Cylinder Wm
858C
Urban lend4ludek complex, I to 15 Forced dope
Speocer silt Win. 2 to 6 Paulo slopes
8600
Urban land -Lester com rox, 3 to 15 percent dopes
BuAhaidt sandy Wm, 6 to 12 percent dopes
861C
Urban Mud -Kingsley complex, 3 to 15 Iced slopes
BurkAarnt sandy Wm, 12 to 18 percent slopes
861E
Urban Tend-Kingsles complex, 15 to 25 Docent Mope
Chetek sandy Ham, 3 to 6 percent dopes
8658
Urban lend -Hubbard complex, 0 to 6 paced slopes
Chatek sandy Mann, 8 to 15 percent slopes
880E
Brodal►Rock outcrop complex. U to 45 Fervent dopes
Chatek Bondy team, 15 to 25 percent dopes
8988
Kingdaylest ample, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Froatew Wm, 25 to 40 percent slopes
8880
Klgs"ster complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Buwm silty clay loam
8880
Kingsley -Loser complex, 12 to IS percent dopes
Gotham loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent dopes
8898
Wacee4Mwthk ample, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Gotham loamy fie sorb, 2 to 6 percent slopes
989C
Wadena-Hawick complex, 6 to 12 paced slopes
Gotham loamy fine sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes
8890
WadenadMwick complex, 12 to 13 percent slopes
Aubumdate sill Won
8958
KingabPMdhtanadi,Spenta complex, 3 to 8 Paced slopes
joy sift loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes
8950
KingsoydAahtoaerASpemser complex, 6 to 15 percent dopes
Kate silty clay lam
896E
Kingsley-tahto mei complex, 15 to 25 pent dopes
Klinger silt loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes
8%F
Kingsley-Mahlamedi complex, 25 to 46 percent :Mies
Lawson sift them
%302
Ti mule -Bold sift loom, 6 to 12 percent dopes, eroded
to Sneer Mars
96302
TimuM-Bold ser tams, 12 to 18 paced sofas, aade
Kennebec sift Ham
963E2
Timul"ohl s8t pea, Is to 25 percent slpes, eroded
Muleen Wm, 12 to 18 percent slopes
1013
Pits, quarry
Modena bare, 18 to 25 percent dope
1021
Udartheds, wet
Marden silty day bum
1029
Pits, pmol
Mmcreek ally clay. Wm
1039
Umbar MM
Maya all loam
1055
Aquolla and IAdomM, panded
Otthote sig Wm, 1 to 6 Percent slopes
1072
Udothefft modern* shallow
OttheK site Wm, 6 to 15 percent dopes
IBIS
Zambia loamy fine sand
Plainfield loamy sae, 0 to 2 paced slopes
1816
Kennebec Variant to lam
Plainfield loamy send. 2 to 6 percent slopes
1821
Algansa wady oma, occasionally flooded
Plaiafiel Wmy seat 6.o 18 paced. slopes
1824
Queen A Mom, palled
Part Byron Site Wm, 0 to 2 percent dopes
18150
SeelyedlM muck, sl*q
Pat Byron ate Wm, 2 to 6 percent stripes
1927A
Waukegan sift loam, bedreck substratum, Oto 2 Paced slope
Pod Byron am Wm, 6 to 12 percent dapas
18278
Waukegan all Wm, bedrock DA*Atum, 2 to 6 Pant dopes
Recksoo Wm, 0 to 2 Farad slopes
1827C
Waukegan sift Wm, bedrock au6sAatum, 6 to 12 paced slopes
Rockier Wm, 2 to 6 percent dopes
19488
Sports Wmy sand. Bedrock substratum, 2 to 0 Paced Mopes
Rocklen lam, 6 to 12 percent dopes
18948.
Wurebage Wm; 2 to 6 percent slopes
Lindstrom aft lam, I to 4 percent slopes
I895B
Come lam, 2 to 8 paced dopes
Spillade Wm, occasionally flooded
18968
OdroaderGrod tams, 2 to 6 percent des
Oshawa silty clay lam
1898F
Etta-Brodale complex, 25 to 60 percent dopes
Mayer beret swap
19026
Jewell sift Wm, t to 6 percent Mopes
Tateula silt Wm, 2 to 6 percent dope
�lup
10
UWY, MINNESOTA MINNEO AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
CLERK'S 19 8+?
FILE 3
CONVENTIONAL AND SPECIAL
SYMBOLS LEGEND
CULTURAL FEATURES
WATER FEATURES
SPECIAL SYMBOLS FOR
SOIL SURVEY
BOUNDARIES
DRAINAGE
National, state or province
— —
Perennial, double line
SOIL DELINEATIONS AND SYMBOLS
129 4�IA
County or parish
—
Perennial, single line
/"
ESCARPMENTS
f
Reservation (national Bor park,
Intermittent
� "�
Bedrock
rrrerrrron nwrvrrw
state forest or park, and large airport)
-�
(points down slope)
I
Drainage end
`
Other than bedrock
(points down slope)
Field sheet matchline 3 neatline
Canals or ditches.
SHORT STEEP SLOPE
...
AD HOC BOUNDARY (label)
Drainage and/or irrigation
--►— - i--
GULLY.
Small airport, airfield, park, oilfield,
'D-- Amtnp a �--
LAKES, PONDS AND RESERVOIRS
DEPRESSION OR SINK
0
cemetery, or flood pool
-- ----� T-N� '
Perennial
MISCELLANEOUS
STATE COORDINATE TICK
MISCELLANEOUS WATER FEATURES
Clay spot
IB
LAND DIVISION CORNERS
L _j_ 1�
Marsh or swamp
4
Gravelly spot
o°a
(sections and land grants)
T
ROADS
Spring
0-
Rock outcrop
r
(includes sandstone and shale)
Divided (median shown
Wet spot
*
Sandy spot
it scale permits)
County, farm or ranch
Severely eroded spot
rs
ROAD EMBLEMS & DESIGNATIONS
Stony spot, very stony spot
0 (D
Interstate
as
Organic soil(
Federal
52
High lime spot
State
County
�r
PROPOSED INTERSTATE
Or UNDER CONSTRUCTION
RAILROAD
a ---►---a
LEVEES
Without road
With road���
DAMS
Large (to scale)
Medium or small
rrrr,
PITS
Gravel pit X
Mine or quarry jr
FIGURE II
Ltuew Fut1Cuonm Glassmatm
TRANSPORTATION PLAN MINORPRINCIPAL
ARTER ALRAL
COLLECTOR
PARKWAY
RO S E M O U N T UNDESIGNATED: LOCAL ROADS
MINNESOTA
�I (� M5
m n
W