The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6. White Lake Acres Assessment Hearing6 v r Ily o 287s-�45,,,si w n0SUMOUNt. MINNEsc)tA 55M osem ou n t �,� 921-441 f PUBL IC N OTIC E Notice of Hearing on Proposed Assessment TO WHOM IT MAY:CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Rosemount City Council will meet at 7:00 p.m. on September 8, 1987, at the Rosemount City Hall, . 2875 145th Stret West in Rosemount to pass upon the proposed assessment for the street improvement of County Road 38 (135th St) between the Apple Valley city limits and Trunk Highway 3. The following is the area proposed to be assessed. All real property one-half (1/2) mile north and south of County Road 38 (135th St) between the Apple Valley corporate limits and Trunk Highway 3. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the city clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $281,925.00. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The city will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the city has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the city's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be taped -recorded. Randy E Schwartzhoff 3650 125th St W Rosemount,MN 55068 Charles H & Kathleen Strese 3794 125th St W Rosemount,MN 55068 Terry D & Bette A Noble 4297 138th Ct W Rosemount,MN 55068 Charles J & Mary L Ullery 12513 Danbury Way Rosemount,MN 55068 Donald C & Bernice Grunter 12517 Danbury Way Rosemount,MN 55068 �osernount AFFIDAVIT OF NAILED HEARING NOTICE 2875 -145TH ST W ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA _ SO TA 55068 612--423-4411 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF DAKOTA )SS. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT Stephan Jilk, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: I am a United States Citizen and the duly qualified Clerk of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota. . On September 15, 1987, acting on behalf of the said City, I deposited in the United States Post Office of Rosemount, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of public hearing regarding proposed assessment on White Lake Acres street improvements, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the attached listings at the addresses listed with their names. There is delivery service by United States Mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed. S'te phVf J i I k Administrator/Cler City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota Subscribed and sworn to before me this,--�;OLAay of September, 1987. y Public 1 14 3 'i! 1J c) 2A75 -W,111 Si w A �O�SC'rl� U FIOSEMOUNi. MINNESOTA 651611 612 421-4411 TO: White Lake Acres Property Owners You previously received mailed notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment for public streets within White Lake Acres. While all legal requirements for publication, posting and mailings of the notice have been met, an error in the amount of the individual assessments has been detected. The total assessable cost of the project remains at $232,021; however, the number of assessable units was incorrectly listed at 21. There are only 19 buildable lots in White Lake Acres. Two ponding outlets, incorrectly listed in the ownership of Lyol and Bernice Netteburg, had originally been assessed as benefiting property. The total assessable cost, spread among 19 parcels, results in the increased assessment amount of $12,211.68 per lot. Attached is the revised assessment roll. The final assessment remains less than the value of the pending assessment. The public hearing scheduled for September 15 will be continued for public comment at a Special City Council Meeting at 8:00 p.m., September 29, 1987. We apologize for the error involved and any inconvenience or misunderstandings that may have resulted. Dated this 15th day of September, 1987. StcphaVKJilk Administrator, Page No. 1 09/15/87 White Lake Acres Assessment Roll Parcel No.- Name' 34-04000-010-02 Richfield Sk & Trust: n Co. 34-84000-010-01 Joseph A & Borash i Marilyn A 34-84000-040-02 Douglas & Chilton Rate Cher D 1 34-84000-010-03 Leon L Cook 34-84000-040-03 Catherine M Desautels 34-84000-070-03 Daniel & Helwig 4 Rebecca 1 34-84000-060-02 Philip R & Holmes 3 Janet L 12211.68 34-84000-080-02 Robert Jante 34-84000-050-02 Jens C & Jensen 7 Viola 1. 1 34-84000-020-03 Hallmore Land Co. 34-84000-030-03 Lee & Joyce Lunde 34-84000-040-01 Patrick J & Neisius 1 Diane 12211.68 34-84000-010-00 Lyol H & Netteburg 12211.68 Vernice 2 34-84000-020-00 Lyol H & Netteburg 12211.69 Vernice 3 34-84000-030-01 L 11 Netteburg 34-84000-050-03 L 11 Netteburg 34-84000-020-02 Mark Nolan 34-64000-030-02 Joseph E Romain 34-84000-070-02 David & C Schmitz 0 Robin 0.00 34-64000-020-01 Albert H & Schwab 12.211 .68 Mary E 5 34-64000-060-03 Karlan R Zahorka «+► Total 2 2 U n i Lot Blk t Rate Amount 1 2 1 12211.60 12211.68 1 1 1 12211.68 12.211.68 4 2 1 12211.60 12211.68 1 3 1 12211.68 12211.68 4 3 1 12.211.68 1.2211.68 7 3 1 12211.68 12211.68 6 2 1 12211.68 12211.68 8 2 1 12211..68 12211.68 5 2 1 12211.68 12211.68 2 3 1 12.211.6a 12211.69 3 3 1 122.11 .68 12.211 .68 4 1 1 12211.68 12211.68 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 3 1 1 12.211 .68 12211 .68 5 3 1 122.11.68 12.211.68 2 2 1 127..11.68 1.2211.68 3 2. 1 12211.68 122.11.68 7 2 1 12211.66 12211.68 2 1 1 12211.66 12211.68 6 3 1 12211.68 12211.68 19 232021.92 '