Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7. County Road 42 (52-55 Improvements, Project #1987-903TO: .` teen � /u•6/�'c. �c�a���n� r' 13c)Y,'M) • ill o "I, 14,111 ST W ROSEM01 IN r. r 11NNP o i A SS060 ?Olsewount fit') 4?1-.1411 Mayor, Council, City Administrator FROM: Dean Johnson, Director of Community Development DATE: December 11, 1987 SUBJ: CSAR 42 Public Improvement Hearing You have previously received copies of an updated feasibility study, prepared by Short Elliott Hendrickson. The numbers included in the report are updated estimates of costs originally prepared by Dakota County Highway Department. It is important to note that these numbers represent the gross cost to the City of Rosemount. They are not an accurate reflection of the costs proposed to be assessed. The proposed assessable costs are much lower. Let me explain. As you are aware, we have had three public improvement hearings for county road projects over the past two years (CR 38; CSAH 42, west of TH 52; and CSAH 42, east of TH 52). A presentation of the design and costs have always been made by the county, followed by a discussion of the proposed assessments by the City. In each of the county road projects, the amount to be assessed was limited to a percentage of the construction costs and a percentage of the expanded right-of-way costs. In other words, we have not previously listed engineering costs or excess right-of-way (new alignment) costs as part of the assessable portion of any of the county projects. (Previous engineer's estimates and assessment estimates for each of the projects are attached). This public improvement hearing is being repeated, because there has been a design change and because one year will have lapsed since the City approved the project. Projects to be assessed under Chapter 429 of the statutes require that a contract be awarded within one year of approving the plans. One year will have run out on December 11. The revised costs that arc proposed to be assessed are illustrated on the attached outline. I will use this in my presentation to the property owners. The assessable cost is estimated at $166,000. This breaks down into $136,000 in construction and $30,000 in right-of-way cost. Last year's assessment was based on $148,500 total costs. Because of this design change, some of the original parcels that received benefit have been deleted. The estimated number of assessment units has been reduced from 100 to 90. Our policy ii' to assess one-half mile either side of the roadway. Because CR 38 lies only one-half mile to the north, the assessment district on this side of CSAH 42 is cut in half. The assessment unit size is 10 acres, which reflects the maximum density of lots or dwellings in the Agriculture District: This is the same criteria used in the CSAH 42 assessment project, west of TH 52. The resulting estimated assessment rate is $1,844.44 per ten acres within the assessment district. CSAR 42 Public Improvement Hearing December 9, 1987 Page Two Is 0 There is a situation, regarding our area -based assessment policy, which is unique to this project. This particular assessment district is virtually all commercial agricultural property. We have a policy in the Comprehensive Guide Plan which discourages new road construction in commercial agricultural areas (this regards constructing new roads, not upgrading existing roads). While our area -based assessment policy is defendable on a cost/benefit basis, there is a conflict of sorts with this policy. We require 300 feet of frontage for metes and bounds divisions of property in the non-sewered areas of the City. An 80 -acre parcel with one quarter mile of frontage and one-half mile of depth, would technically be allowed only four lots, unless new roadways were to be constructed for access. In other words, the "back 40" does not receive comparable benefit to the "front 40" unless a cul-de-sac or roadway were to be constructed. This situation does not jeopardize the road policy; however, it is not consistent with our intent to limit housing and new roadways in the commercial agriculture areas. If there were amenities, such as lakes, ponds and wooded areas, an exception to our new road limitation might be appropriate. This was the exact situation evaluated with Stonebridge Addition. The "back 80 of this project was entirely wooded and loaded with small ponds. The property was never utilized as farmland. The City approved a rather lengthy cul-de-sac to provide access for a higher and better use of the property. The area surrounding Stonebridge is still agricultural land. The CSAH 42 area is devoid of such amenities and is not conducive to residential development that requires additional investments in roadways and corresponding costs of services and maintenance. A division of property is permitted, however, for every 300 feet of frontage along CSAR 42. This provides for additional housing options for farm family members or for the outright saleto offset the costs of assessments. To be consistent with our own policies, I don't believe we want to encourage additional divisions of property that require new road improvements. Therefore, I am recommending that the City Council embrace the concept of deferred assessments for all of the "back 40's", south of CSAH 42. This would not jeopardize the area -based assessment policy which we have used, and it would be consistent with our agricultural land use policies. It would result in a comparable assessment on both sides of the roadway; that is, only the 10 -acre, units with existing frontage would be immediately assessed. The deferment would allow for reimbursement in the future, if either the use changed or dimensional standards were reduced. This concept would result in the additional participation by the City of approximately $45,000. I believe this option is fair to the general taxpaying public and is certainly fair to the property owners. Our land use policies promote the distinction between urban, rural and agricultural uses by establishing orderly growth patterns. We clearly identify this area as commercial agriculture and attempt to promote agriculture by protecting farm investments. At the same time, reasonable participation by all landowners for road improvements that benefit property must be adhered to. Assessments on CR 38, CSAH 42 west and those proposed on CSAR 42 east are comparable in unit rates. In spite of comments received at all of the public improvement hearings and the assessment hearings, the final attitude of those assessed has been favorable, if not satisfactory. The City Council previously approved this project on December 11, 1986. I would recommend the same action at this time. Because this project involves assessments and there was no petition for the improvements, a four-fifths vote of the City Council is required. • CSAH 42 Public Improvement Hearing December 9, 1987 • Page Three FOOTNOTE: I have not discussed residential equivalents in this memo. Because of the priority the county has placed on this project, and due to concerns the City expressed on our own ability to fund a third county project in a two-year time frame, the county elected to utilize additional federal aid on this project. This decision by the county has resulted in a significant reduction in the total cost to the City. The net assessments to property owners are significantly less than the costs of the residential equivalents. We recognized this several years ago and worked with the county to reach a compromise. The bottom line is that the proposed assessments for this project have become equitable with those of other county projects and the City has not had to jeopardize its policies or burden the general public with excessive City participation. *REQ Residential Equivalent l December 11, 1987 CSAH 42 EAST COSTS/FUNDING (East of TH 52) 12,582 feet Total length of project 100 feet ROW width 24 feet 2 -lane pavement section 10 feet Pave shoulders $ 1,442,000.00 Total estimated cost $ 262,400.00 Estimated Rosemount share $ 166,000.00 Estimated assessable share $ 114.61/lineal foot Total per foot cost of CSAH 42 $ 42.00/lineal foot Residential equivalent cost $ 42.00 l.f. @ 12,582 $ 528,444 - Maximum assessment by REQ* 10 acre Proposed assessment unit size 90 units Estimated number of assessment units $ 166,000 = 90 $ 1,844 - maximum assessment rate $ 528,444 — 90 $ 5,872 - maximum assessment rate $ 5,872 x 75% $ 4,404 2 -lane county road rate $ 1,844/unit Proposed rate per unit *REQ Residential Equivalent S • F [ t t r Luall limb ot. f JJ � s /. /... i s 1 • x t v. i s i z 7 _ s ..too A, r. ' 12/5/86 CSAH 42 EAST COSTSf FUNDiN6 ( T" OV- T14 5Z) 13,229 feet Total length of project 100 feet ROW width 24 feet 2 -lane pavement section 10 feet Paved shoulders $ 1,320,000.00 Total estimated cost $ 148,500.00 Estimated Rosemount share $ 99.78/lineal foot Total per foot cost of CSAN 42 $ 42/lineal foot Residential equivalent cost $ 42 l.f. @ 13,229 feet $ 5550618 - Maximum assessment 10 acre Proposed assessment unit size 100 units Estimated number of assessment units $ 148,500 t 100 $ 1,485 - minimum assessment rate $ 555,618 f 100 $ 5,556 - maximum assessment rate $ 5,556 x 75% $ 4,167,2 -lane county road rate $ 1,485/unit Proposed rate per unit w -- - OUNTY9PROJECT 41-t0 (T.H.51 - T.H.35) --- _- - TOTAL LENGTH OF SWING - 13229 FT. X40 *5:� ZZ (:)(!Db_ - 1.45000► - ITEM NO. ITEM ESTIMATED PARTICIPATING TOTAL LOCAL (.35000) ROSEMOUNT UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL COST FAS FUNDS (731) FUNDS COUNTY COST COST - = 2031.503 FIELD LABORATORY, -TYPE -9--- EACH- 1:00--2500.00---2500. 00. -- 1875.00- - 2101.301 CLEARING ACRE 1.128 5000.00 5640.00 4230.00 1410.00 775.50 634.50 2101.:02 CLEARING TREE 74.00 60.00 4440.00 3330.00 1110.00 610.30 499.50 ---2101.346 6RUSBiNG ----- ACRE - _.:__1:128 5000.00 - - --5640.00_ .._._ - 4230.00 ---t410.00 ----775.50 ____ -634.50 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 88.00 60.00 5280.00 3960.00 1320.00 726.00 594.00 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS LIN.FT. 428.00 5.00 2140.00 1603.00 535.00 294.25 240.75 ----2104.301 REMOVE FENCE - -- -------LIW.FT. 2011.00- -- 2.00 - - - 4022.00 - 3016.50 -- 1005.50 - ---- 553.03 - - - - 452.48- 2101-1401 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CU.YD. 111251.00 1.10 122376.10 91782.08 30594.02 16826.71 13767.31 2105.30/ SU86RAOE EXCAVATION (P) CU.YD. 26213.00 1.10 29834.30 21625.73 7208.37 3964.71 3243.86 --2105.521 9RA)A"a BORROW (C.V.) ON-31TE- CU.YD.- 50000.00- _ 3.00 - 150000.00 1`12500.00 -- 37500.00 - 20673.00 --16875.00 2105.315 TOPSOIL BORROW (L.V.) OFF 511E CU.YD. 10000.00 3.00 30000.00 22500.00 7500.00 4125.00 3375.00 2118.501 A86REGATE SURFACING CLASS 1 TOM 325.00 4.25 1381.23 1035.94 343.31 189.92 - ---2211.541 ANRE64TE BASE CLASS - TOM- --- 54281.00 ---4:70 --155!20.70 - 191340-53- 155.39 2221.501 A66RE64TE SHOULDERING CLASS 1 TON 619.00 3.00 3093.00 2321.25 773.75 425.56 348.19 w31.504 9I1 MATERIAL FOR MATURE TON 286.00 200.00 57200.00 42900.00 14300.00 7865.00 6433.00 -- 233!.514 BASE COURSE MIXTURE - _TOW___ -- 6362.00. ---9:50-- -- -60439.00- 45329.25 15109:75 8310.36 - 6199.34 - - - - -- -- - - 1341.308 4EARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 7182.00 10.30 73974.60 55480.95 18493.65 10171.31 8321.14 2341.504 91T MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE TON 399.00 200.00 119800.00 89850.00 29950.00 16472.50 13477.50 -2341.310 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE - -TON---- 4001:00- -10.34 42034:30- 31525.73- _ .---10309.57 -5779.71 - - 4728.86 - - ----- -_ 2337.502 91T MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT SAL. 3783.00 1.10 4161.30 3110.98 1040.32 572.18 468.14 2541.511 18' C.S. PIPE CULVERT LIN.FT. 616.00 15.00 9240.00 6930.00 2310.00 1270.30 1039.50 --2501.311 24' R.C. PIPE CULVERT CL. 2-- LIN.FT: -433.00--20.00 9680.00 ----6495.00 -2165:00---1190.75- - 2301.311 30' R.C. PIPE CULVERT LIN.FT. 148.00 26.00 3848.00 2996.00 962.00 529.10 432.90 2301.313 18' B.S. PIPE APRONS EACH 24.00 100.00 2400.00 1800.00 600.00 330.00 270.00 2501.315--24' R:C. PIPE APRONS- -EACH-10-.00- -300. * 3000.00----2250.00-- -150:00- -4!2.34--- -337.30-' 2901.315 60' R.C. PIPE APRONS EACH 4.00 500.00 2000.00 1300.00 300.00 275.00 225.00 2501.321 21' SPAN G.S.P.-A CULVERT 2341.521-44• SPAN- R:C.P.-A- CULVERT- CL. 2A--LIN.FF.--71.00----10.00 LIN.FT. 114.00 22.00 2508.00 1881.00 627.00 344.35 282.15 2501.525 21' SPAN G.S.P.-A APRONS EACH ---4970.00-----3721.50 ---t242.50-- 683.38 ----359:13 `-- - -- - 150t.525 44' SPAN R.C.P.-A APRONS EACH 6.00 2.00 150.00 300.00 900.00 1000.00 675.00 225.00 123.75 101.25 575.301ROAD51DE SEEDING (P) ACRE 16.04-110.00-06+- 00 750.00 - !324.04 - 250.00 137.30 - 440.00---- 242.00 - 112.50 --148.00 - - - - 1513.502 SEED MIXTURE 3 L8. 900.00 2.40 1920.00 1440.00 480.00 164.00 216.00 :575.503 SODDING SQ.YD. 642.00 1.40 898.50 674.10 224.70 123.58 101.11 -2375.311 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE -1--- TON - -32.00- -120.00 ---3840.00--2880.00---960.00- 29.00----43100 2575.319 DISC ANCHORING (P) ACRE 16.00 50.00 800.00 600.00 100.00 110.00 90.00 357.603 INSTALL FENCE, PERMANENT LIN.FT. 1947.00 2.00 3894.00 2920.50 913.50 333.43 438.08 1029711.35 772288.04 257429.31 141586.12 115843.21 -------- w- - -_-RIGHT-OF WAY- COSTS-__ - --- 10000.00-- -- 38500.00 ----29841.35 _- -- ---__.Adak - TOTAL COST 10991117.35 772288.04 257429.31 180086.12 _145684.36 t7j._ Nj 17 s 1 • 4/10/86 CSAH 42 COSTS/FUNDING (WE—sr OF T f -i G-2-) 4,300 feet Total length of project 170-210 feet ROW width 4 -lane divided Typical road section $ 900,000.00 Total estimated cost $ 405,000.00 Estimated City share $ 209.30/lineal foot Total per foot cost of CSAH 42 $ 42/lineal foot Residential equivalent cost $ 42/l.f. @ 4,300 feet $180,600 - Maximum assessment 10 acre Proposed assessment unit 49 units Maximum estimated assessment units $ 180,600 = 49 $ 3,685 - Minimum unit assessment rate Assessment options that some cities have used in conjunction with county road projects 2 -lane county roads 75% of REQ* 4 -lane divided 50% of REQ 75% of REQ on CR 38 - $ 281,925 or $ 2,170/unit 50% of REQ on CSAH 42 - $ 90,300 or $ 1,845/unit u CR 38 - $ 143,075 MSA & other funds CSAH 42 - $ 314,700 MSA & other funds *REQ - Residential Equivalent . VY.w._.. 4. .. ...At _�.Y�a T!l 'F 7RAOINa - 4992.15 FT 2:'3/86 1.450061) !.55000) ROSEMOUNT EMin j cw N T tiA Tf N ... TOi41 r ;4 t COSI c 7 n 2071 4. t0 ,,i r, �nnl '; y�P, t , },)rTYPE 5 sru ".,. _L_....'N3. ,....3 ..34 .0-...'A0 t.T..:'.6.1. a ;�;5,010 .51`.:0 . f hEil6 ..'0 ...0+1 ._•}:.:!) _452.00 ..5..p: t'11 + G3 161''x5.40 7, 14 4' _.18..,,. _...r,_L2dNfz ...00 30... _._C... .,.6.)0 l!)461 / zxacf 51111 4✓k,44ko�� 1.,.50! -EMOTE ..E.. Lv_ T. .I).... �.�30 ..c0 61_..00 :698.75 S_.''I r7- 01 REMOVE ENC: 14. 1i""r4 , r q fn. v 11.35 275-75.65 � © t I ilw6^,huG vriiuN 5 i" 1.10 Ia a8 20 3.51 1557 69 ur Et' _..5.52! SRANULAR .0.,...7{ C ,t2. 5..3.00 4.00 60000.00 3.1;_0.00 2.0610.+)0 + ,4 nGYl E r ur') a06�}o e ti, o to n�. 11 01 i&7+ >a" h Ya " 45S 1/1N ) 00 3.25 3Li Etc ;t c r t '_ IuN 0 4.10 E9 5 4Ea -.3b 40i,­7. 74 r rix) A PZ. L' 46 CLASS ! TrON .0 5 10 ar 1 64.,'5 a' 25 "Z1.304 8 r "A E3R wri �.:c T0h 733 '0 '9..,0 44840 00 Boat."610 2017a.-.)o 1...4BASEE CCURSE "t1 RE :0N 4 10 9.!0 45791 •O379.00 2:41 .!Ca WEARIN6 _IURSE MLITURE TEN 3?45.:.0 10.30 40633.50 22349.43 18285.07 2341.504 BIT MATERIAL =OR MIXTURE TON 407.00 !90.00 77330.00 42531.50 34792.50 3I)40ER MIXTUM 304 3403.6'0 10.30357178.50 !9239.33 157x2.!7 23.`"1.:02 BIT MATE9FAL =4R TACK COAT SAL. 3049.00 1.!0 ;333.90 1844.65 1509.25 2501.5!1 115' G.S. PIPE CULVERTT LF!i.F'. 453.0E 16.00 7264.00 3995.271 3268,94 01.511 18' C.S. FIRE CULVERT LFN.F?. 220.00 21.00 4620.00 2541.00 2079.00 no'.5!1 :.'z58' R.C.P.-A CULVERT CL.2 LI'l.FT. 400.00 10.00 26000.00 85400.00 12500.00 112'."' 6 ' .-A CULVERT CL._ LIN. FT. 37!.00 32.00 !A'771.;)0 5349.60 4622.40 25)1.511 !:. R._...._ CULVERT CL. LIN.... 61. a0 22. n0. 834^.00 M. 1') 603.?n 250!.51! !9" t... PFFE 4: L` CL 49 Z4. 111 j2. i0 ! _ '!" 11 U 'VERT .2 FN. 8.00 )0 44 .60 t. ..4 2501.511 24' R.C. FIFE CULVERT CL.2 LF"N.FT. 402.00 29.':3 10452.00 5748.60 4703.40 :501,511 309 R.:...._.ULVERT C.L.2 LFN.FT. !60.00 , 26.00 4I6O.00 250!.3..:5' 9..3. :.-1?- APPONS EAC4 23.00 1)0.00 2800.:70 1540.00 8260.00 250'..515 !a" B.S. PFFE APRONS E.4C! l4. U0 !20.0') 1680.00 924.00 156.00 :508.:!. 24' R.C. PIPE AFR *iS EACH 112."0 390.00 54;10.00 2670.00 24'0.00 :`0!.5:5 'c' ...C..., c eP=Oils EACH 2.00 WOn,a0 29+0.00 !!00.00 ?00.00 25'?1.52! 17' SPAN C.....-.A CLILVER'. LM FT. 130.00 MO'960.00 151:.00 8297.00 _50!..:5 1. ., A.4 3. ., .-A nFRO45 EACH 8.00 :.0.M. !200.-0 660.00 544).')0 25.18.3:5 12' 3F "! ,,.C...-A AP-C'lS EACs 4.'610 10.00 .8`61.00 154.00 j. P0 g c `O1 iWnSll,�E 2 E E ' 'ix P) ACRE 9.85 ,n 10 996.50 49.-)S 403.42 ""S.5 ED ".Ir._ E 5 .2. 4 } )L5Q 6+N" 60 .'a0 r'0 2 T 10 57..504 au061!Na S9 70. 1 ,,n 00 .40 1 M10.)0 !00!0.00 Me". 14 VIC 2��1,v✓� Sj5 S18 pllL�H MA. RAL T`tF_ 8 TO 6.161 1'4.0 2;7,.15 1552.5! 1:70.14 14.64L_ 335 19 0 yNCr hiNa :?' ACRE 9. l5 15. 00 611.25. 3s6.89 S.:bY Y `( 257!.5'41 t` nF ILyE ?Le.S r NETTINE 39O J 00 n. 0 0 610 0.00 00 1t 54. 0 '�STAL_ cE r .cion64RY 'l.F 0717 i0 .00 „000..8950.00 ''NEETALL rE4CE FE MANENT L:!:% 703.00 3.00 5579.00 s2.R9.45 .94.54 N J_REU anR .E...PR0 PA1L L`N.FT.354e ;,0 0 0n 84@00..4 .1}0.00 _:0a4.0V REMOVE 11 ELLANUMS STRUCTURES LUMP _-'UM�1. 0 1 i ''6' 'T SU DCD !!000.)10 5000.`.1 1 6337 3u ,',75.06 61036 ,, R! h! nE _0 rf.,ctc j1i1 '+.AL CCST 77:-7-7. 34) t035T'3.'16 330897. 4 .Z x'172 K45% 41c, i �R� w 1/29/86 COUNTY ROAD 38 COSTS/FUNDING 11,581 feet Total length CSA31-TH3 8,950 feet Total length Rosemount segment 4,850 feet Total length MSA designation 100 feet ROW width 24 feet 2 -lane pavement section 10 feet Paved shoulders $ 1,215,150.40 Total cost CSAH 31 - TH3 $ 939,034.00 Total cost Rosemount segment $ 422,550.30 Total Rosemount Share $ 104.92/lineal foot Total per foot cost of CR 38 $ 47.64/lineal foot O'Leary's Hills REQ* assessed $ 42.12/lineal foot White Lake Acres REQ proposed $ 45.00/lineal foot 130th Street REQ estimated $ 47/L.F. @ 8,950 feet $ 420,650 - Maximum CR 38 Assessment $ 42/L.F. @ 8,950 feet $ 375,900 - Proposed CR 38 Assessment 5 acre Proposed assessment unit 130 units Estimated units in assessment district $ 375,900 =130 Estimated unit assessment rate w r-1 L --A 1.9 Q0 cr �r fl UA In I�'' .? to � • n q• m '} `'•: T It C> t ] D N- •U+f7 I'+ M •_ M � b• U') NT -n rr' • ♦ .- !D f J R• �• r•- • i 1. Vim-• U7 Q [T O . ! H •-Y ) -p i d.-♦ W] ry U7 47 a N. t[f <1- V) µ'r fp J ['•! Ih '> o ai +r 117 [af r� b �Jl N. Vf �) m •q F- V> Y) O -1 [M. Vl CY 1>~ m C! 17 �y R7 Cl 1.-n tl' .O RC O t7 ty) G -p 4 V) Vf •t J D Il .1- (! O -!] U'> .• Y M F. s%> M YY M S-! 's •- • > s, SCJ U-> rn Is Ka �• Is 11 <C J.f U-) eY Cf• F• !}- [.} ..-' R• •-• •'f fY Ci Q. m + M- f7 P. m S F. p- •t> b7 M V> f>- •t• I') p Ca « 47 F. N' m V> h. r-. `-. ')..n rJ -.) .•! � •-• nl .1• Vf F• rn hl -• Kf p1 fl [>^ � R• Iff m Ct) - [+1 nl ] hl m <f- r7 r7 `! N U'1 1-. .� ..JR •Y' N, t-! "T []- M Q C`A • 4 -O V) -0 W ^• ,.p C> d M • C•! K) • m F. N CF • M •.b-) []- Q fe C'i f7 V) ) V] Sn • t-- C! I-. h• [V <Y SF V) w K! [4 Us V) F. '4' rN 47 ',! p• V) fF K) •tl- 4'i to f•. 47 fr.. n1 w- [>• ry-! C M b• P /ff V> •n +o- •••• U. • , •a' 4 f`I O *Y Cl CV! N f7 JO b', O CMJ -[f m V) - P F- V, 1 - l)! (rf .N 1 a A •p t [ ; y. 4,+ p. ..• t� .- CV - .e 1'> n Ill d' Is I s] c: C, 1 Q - r3 r `a Cn 4 V) m if) r7 I U7 r O V, O G> !> � d Q C. O� Q Cl O Q O a .-. a •-< > a �-> > 7 :+ t•l l CJ :9s 1,�`. F• p) r /9 R) ifs •n 1 I -R 11 r . do O m b _ �) a � r+ F. •^r G> m > ff) [ i M U) ,q ] n) �) ri O NY f-1 G a n ^ • rt •iy-• C> M a vi i� m .h l o t1 CJ Its a,, c i-? f4i m Co %' i' Ir' F•- M -O Is ff• b• KI V) •• Kf h- r�- �-♦ f•- m N} N tT t>' U'J h- m' w o r� m 'V• - G> a `� Y? D r S! _.,> p1 U: : .- +•. <.< •Y C`! f) r'•. i•i r:i tV _. .Y N... Va N IJsp{-'•L'}/. Ui ..• >• CfV�JSI >- O O ?'� O �.> O 4 '� O •3 �) CT Q Q G O 4 0 Q Q O a p <d] 4 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 c) GGs g b /n Q V) • • •• . v 4 Q Ys [.l T fes'} rn h. m D r [,) .p CI V) a 4 < O O d 4 a O O t Q •3 •.� p J 19 [•• na f �-• Q n N .3 V) C> a O �' G )? 1ff U7 Q V1 �j ) r .Y r• t) W K) - F. CJ R•? •- C 1 1 Jf! r .J, f) On �a •! •- � 9 p "' b> U] h � +'S >> 1 m sY m D t } b m m Y> Ci V• ..! _q Ir) .. .7 a F. • M -• r'} •-. M Ir>. J'�l J -• [tl Rf 1' o <C !-> eQi O O •_ _ sj a +� -J G+ 1[l. O V '� 4 Q O 4 •� Cf> i=> 4 �> ^_'. O O Q +-_s O 4 O O .�> .^J> •is � t7 1 �: f > U) C-! »� 1 i !'Y •Y f/ Gs .-< ..a ') U') •!' •J. �D b7 ` r.. J d a <> [ 1 • • Ca <•� Gr C. >? I')� t!1 :: • ti • f '1 7 i ? <3> V Vf f1 N Vf 2 r• R fD ! ! Y CIs J [t It -n J I C.! to f cn t _ s C•! [ 1 m t C, h1 •7 a) - W to �'�• rL V• p R> O JJ C•! eY /S n S)- Ca r -n f - - <Y �-• JY,• _ �. �•fw CJ R. Is K] In mm .. m _.♦ ... f) m J w w i !'iw�'�• . w x. a T) Wy cry .-]- a- .:r,��• x MI' a=� •�' 4`l T �" ) _) ). ] '•) U rll) GM j T T. �' T l IL la/ I.al 1. X '� J Q J (-IJ � S .> lsi zC t Y k-• ! _J 4..1 V <. C_) 1- !.i C.) eC J N 1•- c1C .'V) LL, 3 r• u1 m ci lL rrn +.r Cn Ul YY [Y: p: IFM'. I)' [n Uf V! n ) 1 4. P Y. CJl la!s ! 2' 9 tb [1f 4 p. w U, LL! UT It -Ili 2 'X. .T. .T. x S, _) Y ll! 1i1 O a 2: 1:: [J J 2: n) x Y'Y n y,� aa p ...! _.l 1 J SY n: a' p. T. <C Q ) a" R A h• i.) ..1 Cp •- ) 7 ) > a. h CL L 1 1 1 1 a rl ) W :• f) • \- s :i - ! +1) u. 1°tJ Ib J p a. n_ a. c Ja• s [.l F♦) A-• f 114 'Q 'C/ W J t lU LL! Ul UI JJI UI lU t • • Ul - > \ J T J 1.. l I wN ) w- .�+ Uo a. !) CJ UI ♦]] C> R U. 1> � U! n 1 ! f Y I In !. -C In U,11. 1L III G a Cn +�Z I= Ca ! ! .] r xt ! .... e] fL�' J rr .L' :}: . • . u. i!. q. a. zn C ♦Y Y ii C�JY C.! <X 9j C�•J v) w J:J .tom c) P] c1 i i [_) [.i JY rx m It; .Z u: a: fn u] n u) f)'. [r. r ;C Lo J CI al C9 —w �<�'. R: Q iii 4 7 [n -t. a-1 +r i•. 11 I•! If). sr F. 11 t•, in e-. m m s: ra - N N v> ra ro M -• f] •.. /r) - .. `>.. '') / -n .. V> ..• .'< ,J ..a N .-• ..< .-1 ... .-• 1!') Vi UM If, V, b -a VI ..a 1J7 r•) M_ M ) 1f, If) U7 4ff K} f, V ff K) J ) If) f) t) V) fl If) If) U) if) W,If If) !S] 11) lf} Vf if) fl Ir) If/ f) I2 V) f1l Jtl ti H fl 17 f) !ff r �• _.� < ..� • w .� ..a f� .-• 1) V) M �) Vf i ] b') 1 It, . ") Ifl (f> Y) Jb07 IY11 ri M Jb0-) Y7 tr1�7J irrb, Y"I. b> ibf)1 vi ! 1. 1 C'J f•1 J -! S•1 •1 Y K I I Sti -1 N f'-1 •J IJ S•i SJ -! C! •! f•l J "•l 1 rJ J K•! N �� v�� L �"r-r w/mm :� p�np�rN+�i 4�ra••}. v} {i .�-+n vs h y[� `• - �(� u'> C S [.if arm M d• y sY v r> � � �O m � � �o � ,•�',� . 4,) [.• V [J m N N t'J M b t7 m C! 17 ; .1' N �� • (/ .Y Qi :> .[) [[} • O• .[• •O m M m C1 e y Gi •'.) ny �.�/ 1'1 4n [[- d 4« w Ow- N d YY b. ^� h ■' ' WS� 10 n©J In a r� ai o. c� tv ao t.t o . � lr; H [v •� °• ci\ iM0•.gmm.w m �I-ind o• M �� �•/ 1 O' ar• s'. '�" tOt ri Op N �OtT Cd} N i - b � p j. Y '> � "•' 4 d Ifl V• M b M e•> d G M hl j.r n )wia .t`! %- t'• .pMm NO -m � 4.. w0•4 b'} N ['� �:n N r i .+Z} .y -}• to rvy [n 4.r d [)� n O 4 .•� b) M-- O U 4') . . Cf Ca O G •5 Ca d }-. :,Y ry �!' /•- +r et• CQ c') 1•. : Ul 2. .'»} )f- t•1 O w v7 X t-- b) fr uj leCJ x r i_f m r[cn } r'•c r `� 11 [ait�m. X j w " C1 aY: t7 W r�'J-' _) W Ul T J. Via! , 4) 5[ C) f.w1>rl m ! t..m h t1 T �J J st ..1 LLl J � 4� J � C U! CII l!S [tf r cnr ui W tii W. z to ri n z. iz cf u - 2iz. u �) Li l:) } U P W C'.} l) tit u f• [ [Y S U) faf to -f { [n i-• a: [[) a ¢ %-�. [cif v} Ir} rn fr} r� [-> 17 4w- 4'T M M .!• aY .f N P W .• •� ` 14 . ['/ I) I'� - r. ') N> hM I.n� 4) N) C4 F• M I j C•1 r1 PUBLIC NOTICE CRY OF ROSEMOUHT PUSUC HEARM(i TO WHOM IT. MAY CONCER$I:' N(?TILE iS HEREBY GIVEN, that the (!I- ty Council of the City of RAeeritnntl will con- duct a Public Nearing ort'Tuesday. I)ecemher 15, 1997, wi le Cn*tc l Chambers of the ('fly Hall, MS 1451h:$treet West. at A:00 p.m. ._ The purpose of 1t* IW*rb* is to receive connnents on proposed tilmendinenis to the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Itoose- ino llof Hlydinmxe No. XVII.41. The follow- ing subsections of Subdivision 5.7 of the Suit - division Ordinance .r-hatl be ante nded to read as follows: It. Dedleati". in all new residential sub- divisions, the City shall require that a suf- ficient portion of such land be aside and dedicated to file public for parks, play- grounds or other public use exclusive of propi-ly dedicated for streets and other public ways. 1t shall be p•eswned that a sufficient atmamt of landihas been dedicated for parks and playgrounds few 1 he present and future residents of Ifie suit - division if the sttlalivider dctlicales at least lour pereeni 14%) of the land in the sub. division for each dwelling unit proposed to be subdivided (o.o4 x number of units). The City upon consideration of the par- ticular type el development timp0:ed in the subdivision may require large) or lesser amount~ of land to fie dedicated if Ilse city deternunes (hat lite preseiet and future residents of lite subdivision would revlune greater or lesser anwunis of land fol such purposes The Cily shall deter- mine whetleer a cash in lieu of land dedica- I ion is uppropriale. The value of the cash dedicalion is determined by )nupiplying 1 he nundter of acres dedicaled by a value of land set by resolution of file City.Coun- cil. In all new conunecial and industrial sub- divisions, it shall he presumed that a suffi- cient anunuat of land has leen dedicaled to serve the'tweds o the resident and work- ing pfnelafion if lite subdivider dedicales all astfivepercenta5%1oflitelandinthe subdivision for parks. recreation and usable often space. The City upon con- sideralion of the particular type of development proposed in flit- subdivision may require target- br lesser amounts of Ln nod it) be dedicated if i1 de�lerinines that I ie present and future residents of life suh- division would require greater or lesser amounts of land for such purposes. The Ci- t y shall determine whether a cash in lieu It land dedication is appropriate. The value of cash rkdicalient is determined by oulliplyingthenagtlhei fit acres dedicated Ire a value of land o el by resolution it( Ilie ('ity Council. to all developinels, where a subdivision of land has not Occurred. or where a dedication has nol leen made in lite past, a (101111-ibution shall ire made of the lime el budding p(h•neil issuance, according to a fo•rnular esldbfished by eeseluliom of lite Cly C'ontcil. d. Pedemion wars and Trails The City shall define a meaningful pedestrian circulation system fill, each de•velo pincol, which con- nects h) file major Irail system, parks, schools and shopping areas. Subdividers shall be required to install such sidewalks and hails as deterniaed fly the City and according to City' standards. Pedeslriart impovenients required fly the City are in addition lit flit, land dedication in subsee- Idem G. Such persons as dewire to be heard with relerence to the alcove it a nis will ter heard al this needing Paled Ibis :nth day of Noveniher, 11017. /si sTEI'HAN MIX AdministraloriClerk City Of ftnsetoouil Dakota Count%-, Minnesota 7s2 N) 41 9 • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS County of Dakota NANCY J. GUSTAFSON, being duly sworn, on doth says that she is an outhorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as Dakota County Tribune, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: ' (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02,331 A.07 and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed --- which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week, for 4600 successive weeks; if was first published on Thursday, the day of \1 1 Q.C. e'rn, 19 and was thereafter printed and published on every Thursday to and Including Thursday, the _ day of �- C''t^� �.`r. (.� ,19 g; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both taclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice' abedefghi jklmnopgrstuvwxyz BY: 60 TITLE: Secretary Subscribed and sworn to before me this, day of \` n No" Public ��CC CAROL J. HAVE,,9LAND XI gl NOTARY PUBLIC — tAINNESOTA /tee i DAKOTA COUNTY tty CcmmissiIm Cxpirou Dec. 3. 1909 asww�so+,cwss�as s edr CITY OF ROSEMOUNT RESOLUTION 1987- I A RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF COUNTY ROAD 42 (U.S. 52-TH 55) IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT 1987-903 i WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount has, on their own initiative and by a unanimous vote ordered a feasibility report for County Road 42 (US 52-TH 55) Improvements, Project 1987-903; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received and accepted the feasibility report on City Project 1987-903; and I WHEREAS, the City Council ordered and held a public hearing to receive input on the project. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of j Rosemount hereby orders County Road 42 (US 52-TH 55) Improvements, Project 1987-903. ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 1987. I i I I i Leland S. Knutson, Mayor ATTEST: Stephan Jilk, Administrator/Clerk E 1 1 \\ f f 2875-145TH ST. W. �SeI rl �u ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4411 P U B L I C N O T I C E NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota, will meet at 8:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 15, 1987, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of the City of Rosemount, 2875 145th Street -West, to consider the following 'improvements: Reconstruction of Dakota CountyRoad 42 between U. S. Highway 52 and State Trunk Highway 55. The total estimated cost of said improvement is $1,442,000. The amount to be assessed is estimated to not exceed $275,000. The area proposed to be assessedfor the foregoing improvements would generally be all that area in Sections 28, 29, and 30, Township 115, Range 18, one-half mile either side of the 'east- west 'center line of said sections between U. S. Highway 52 and Minnesota Highway 55, whether abutting thereon or not, based on benefits received and without regard to cash valuation. Such person as desires to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements will be heard at this meeting. Written or oral opinions will be considered. Dated this lst day of December, 1987, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Ste an Jilk Ad nistrator/ erk _City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota PUBLIC NOTICE CITY OF ROSEMOWT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARNG ON IMPROVEMENTS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS REREBY GIVEN, that the Ci- ty Council of the City of Rosemount, Min- nesota, will meet at 8:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 15, 1987, in the CouncitChambers of the City. flail of the City of'Rosemamt, 2875145th Street West, to consider the follow- ing improvements: Reconstruction of Dakota County Road 42 between U.S. Highway 52 and State Trunk Ilighway 55. The total estimated cost of said improve- ment is $1,442,000. The amount to be assessed is estimated to not exceed $275,000. The area proposed to be assessed for the foregoing improvements would generally be all that area in Sections 28, 29, and 30, Town- ship 115, Range 18, ane -half mile either side of the east -west center line of said sections between U. S. Highway 52 and Minnesota Highway 14 whether abutting therm or not, based on benefits received and without regard to cash valuation. j Such person as desires to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements will be heard at this meetingg. Written or oral opi- nions will he considered. Dated (bis Ist day of December, 1997. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL. STEPRAN JILK Administrator/Clerk City of Rosemount Dakota Coan(y; Minnesota 761 4n-41 i • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02,331 A.07 and other oppii (B) The printed � � ��,,: �...... `�--�-•-' n as o legal s amended. which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed i and published once each week for ._ successive weeks; if was first published on Thursday, the cd day ofC-"�` 14� and was thereafter printed and published on every Thursday to and Including Thursday, the U . day Of Oc' C and printed below is o copy of the lower can alphabet from A to Z, bath inclusive,'', which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: a bedefghi jklm nopgrstuvwxyz Subscribed and sworn to before nle. \ nof "� E'-'t�� ,4 / this day 1 Notary lrabiie N►eNssws rvn+sNH ' CAROL J. HAVEnLANQ NOTARY PUBLIC —MINNESOTA t��! DAKOTA COUNTY �:�rt�' my Commission Expires Dec. 9, 1�B tINM STATE 4F MINNESOTA ) SS County of Dakota ) NANCY J. GUSTAFSON, being duly sworn, on Doth says that she is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as Dakota County Tribune, and has 0 ily of OSeYNOZf )2t 1,iox "to .1475 145 111 ST W. ROSEMOUNT. MINNIM)IA 550611 (' 1112 173 -AA 1 1 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILED AND POSTED HEARING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF DAKOTA )ss. visa yr icvaZr1VU"L ) t Stephan Jilk, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: I am a United States Citizen and the duly qualified Clerk of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota, On December 3, 1987, acting on behalf of the said City, I posted at the City Hall, 2875 145th Street West, and deposited in the United States Post Office of Rosemount, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of public hearing regarding reconstruction of Dakota County Road 42 between U. S. Trunk Highway 52 and State Trunk Highway 55, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the attached listings at the addresses listed with their names. These is delivery service by United States Mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed. Administrator/Clerk City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15- day of December, 1987. ' Notary Publ c e. CNN Dams" "MW AJ#Lr YMIIE9(1fA CAM M MWIT MY COW 910 - a AM M f&!R OSernUUnI o ?Ai5-14-ij11 S1 W nOSEMO UN 1 MINNESO t A 5r,068 612 -1; 423-4411 P U B L I C N 0 T I C E NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota, will meet at 8:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 15,_1987, in the Council Chambers of the City stall of the City of Rosemount, 2875 145th Street West, to consider the following improvements: Reconstruction of Dakota County Road 42 between U. S. Highway 52 and State Trunk Highway 55. The total estimated cost of said improvement is $1,442,000. The amount to be assessed is estimated to not exceed $275,000. The area proposed to be assessed for the foregoing improvements would generally be all that area in Sections 28, 29, and 30, Township 115, Range 18, one-half mile either side of the east - west center line of said sections between U. S. Highway 52 and Minnesota Highway 55, whether abutting thereon or not, based on benefits received and without regard to cash valuation. Such person as desires to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements will be heard at this meeting. Written or oral opinions will be considered. Dated this 1st day of December, 1987. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Z��Jr Ste an Jilk" Ad nistratort erk City of Rosemount Dakota County, Minnesota Reconstruction of County Od 42 between TH 52 & TH 55 Mailing List - [elvin G. Astleford Melvin G. Astleford Melvin G. Astleford 200 Highway 13 West 1200 Highway 13 West 1200 Highway 13 West 'urnsville MN 55337 Burnsville MN 55337 Burnsville MN 55337 4 02800 010 15 { 34 02800 010 25 34 02800 010 30 ,elvin G. Astleford Melvin G. Astleford Melvin G. Astleford 200 Highway 13 West 1200 Highway 13 West 1200 Highway 13 West urnsville MN 55337 Burnsville MN 55337 Burnsville MN 5337 4 02800 010 36 34 02800 010 50 34 02900 010 20 lelvin G. Astleford Melvin G. Astleford Melvin G. Astleford 200 Highway 13 West 1200 Highway 13 West 1200 Highway 15 West urnsville MN 55337 Burnsville MN 55337 Burnsville MN 515337 4 02900 010 25 34 02900,010 35 34 02900 010 75 Kelvin G. Astleford Rich T. Burger Adolph & Otto Ped 200 Highway 13 West 1200 Highway 13 West 4992 145th Street East urnsville MN 55337 Burnsville MN '55337 Rosemount MN 55068 f 4 03000 010 19 34 02900 010 10 34 02900 010 50 ichard C. & Ramona A. Cordes John Reese John Reese 594 145th Street East 4230 '145th Street East 4230 145th Street East osemount MN 5506$ Rosemount MN 55068 Rosemount MN 5$068 4 02900 010 060 34 02900 010 69 34 03000 011 75 aymond A. & Rosella Rahn Raymond A.'& Rosella Rahn Marlin & Joann'Rechtzigel 2125 Albatross Circle 22125 Albatross Circle 3540 140th Street East 'armington MN 55024 Farmington MN 55024 Rosemount MN 55068 4 03000 010 09 34 03000 010 30 34 03000 013 35 olberg Construction Co. Hans J. Abrahamsen Frank A. Jr. &'',Betty J Knoll 3245 Clayton Avenue 1700 Bellows 4322 145th Street East .osemount MN 55068 West St. Paul MN 55118 Rosemount MN 55068 4 03000 010 40 34 03000 010 50 34 03000 012 7$ [arlin W. & Joann Rechtzigel 4727 Clayton Avenue, East :osemount MN 55068 ,4 03000 010 90 I,